| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party. This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments. Section containing some important recent posts. E-Exchange Archives.
Commit Apostasy
Lies About Catholic Tradition & Islam
To say you worship Allah with the Muslims is committing apostasy. You cannot serve two masters.
Kenny
New Church Is Not Catholic
Lies About Catholic Tradition & Islam
Absolutely - the Vatican 2 new church is not the Catholic Church.
Ian Ward
It’s remarkable and outrageous to see defenders of Vatican II trying to convince people that the Catholic Church traditionally taught that Muslims and Christians worship the same God. Their claim is false, and they misrepresent many things. No, Christians and Muslims do not worship the same God, and that fact is clear from traditional Catholic teaching. There are some powerful additional points that we hope to share on this topic. They will further refute the heretical distortions and lies that are being put forward by adversaries of the true Catholic faith – i.e. defenders of the Vatican II apostasy who lead people into heresy and blasphemy.
More Evidence Against
John Of St. Thomas On How Certain Words Exclude All Exceptions
Even more evidence against the John 3:5 mockers, who sadly believe the words of our Lord dont mean what they say. Many that I've encountered believe that BOD & BOB can entirely suffice in only EXTRAORDINARY circumstances, not exceptions. They fail to realize that those words are synonymous in this context as there are no exceptions to water baptism being necessary for salvation. God bless.
Ethan Brown
Beyond Horrific
Man Shot & Saw Hell – Shocking Must-See Video
The fire in hell is beyond horrific. The stench and pain are indescribable. The fear is next level terror. The demons torture without mercy and the worm of regret turns forever. But the worst part of hell is what we take for granted every day: the presence of God all around us here on earth. In hell… there is no hope. You are utterly abandoned with the eternal realization that no one is coming to save you. Even if you were in hell and didn't experience any pain, no fire, no demons, no fear - the worst torture is the utter abandonment without the hope of God.
Lorddeliverus
John of St. Thomas (a prominent 17th century theologian) made an interesting statement about how certain words in dogmatic pronouncements necessarily exclude all exceptions. In the passage below he’s referring to the absolute requirement of supernatural faith. However, the point he makes also applies to the absolute requirement of the Catholic faith and baptism for salvation, since similar language is used in dogmatic texts about baptism and the Catholic faith. John of St. Thomas says that general statements, such as we see in the Athanasian Creed, and words like nulli (to no one) and nunquam (never) exclude all exceptions.
John of St. Thomas, Cursus Theologi In Secundam Secundae D. Thomas, 1663, p. 50: “Supernatural faith is so necessary for salvation that in no case can it be supplied by something else. The conclusion is understood concerning habitual faith in children, which is infused simultaneously with grace, but concerning actual faith in adults… certainly the passages cited in the first proposition [about the necessity of supernatural faith] are so general [e.g. Athanasian Creed, Heb. 11:6, ita generalia sunt] that they admit of no exception, especially that of Trent there cited, to which can be added what the same council says, Sess. 6, Chap. 7: without faith justification never comes to anyone. It excludes all persons in that word nulli, and all times and places in that word nunquam.”
As an example of how such language is used for the absolute necessity of water baptism for salvation, see this video/article: No One Can Be Forgiven Without This
Excellent Content
To Understand Catholic Dogma You Need To Know This
Excellent content and well-articulated. Thanks for all your hard work.
Richard McMahon
Dispensationalist Heretics
Bellarmine: Christians Are Now The People Of God
This is unfortunately rejected by those Dispensationalist heretics, who believe that the temporal Israel is the true Israel of God and that the Jews are the chosen people who must be constantly supported by the government.
Aurea
Correcting My Thinking
To Understand Catholic Dogma You Need To Know This
Thank you for correcting my thinking on this…. Every professing Catholic needs to understand this precept.
AM Wilson
Was Not Aware Of That Pronouncement
To Understand Catholic Dogma You Need To Know This
Thank you, very interesting. I wasn't aware of that Vatican I pronouncement.
SonnyJim
Comment
To Understand Catholic Dogma You Need To Know This
So many powerful insights in this video…
J. Balderston
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 4, Chap. 16: “For just as the Judean people was at that time [in the Old Testament] the People of God, thus now it is the Christian People.”
Helpful Video
The “Strongest” Argument Against The Papacy (Pope Vigilius) – Refuted
Thank you for this video! It's so complex. I've had to watch this three times to comprehend it. The time stamps, book references, and the Greek Orthodox clips were very helpful.
Melynn
Rotten Fruit
The New Mass Lacks The “Mystery Of Faith” (Novus Ordo Modernists Refuted)
The New Mass, judging by its rotten fruit, is evil.
Robert E
Female Altar Servers
Leo XIV’s First Appointments Prove That He Isn’t Remotely Catholic
I've noticed, at least from the ones I've seen, including before I was a sede and went to no masses, 100% of the females, regardless of age, that are female lectures / altar servers etc in the Vatican 2 sect... 100% of them do not wear veils. Not surprising really.
Eleanor
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 4, Chap. 15: “‘And whosoever will force you to go one mile, go with him another two.’ ‘And if someone should take away your coat, give him your cloak also.’ [Mt. 5:40-41] The meaning is not that we should always do this but that we should be prepared to do this whenever that will be necessary for the glory of God.”
Eye-Opening
Leo XIV’s First Appointments Prove That He Isn’t Remotely Catholic
Thank you MHFM for yet another mind-blowing eye-opening video exposing the false Vatican II sect, the end times counter false fake church posing as the true Church! Thank you for your incredibly important information and your beautiful devotion to helping SAVE SOULS! God bless you!
Daniel Woods
One Year After
"Catholic and Buddhist delegations To Hold 8th Colloquium In Cambodia"
While this was happening, on 5/28/25, Cambodia had a border skirmish with Thailand, another Buddhist-majority country, over a parcel of land involving a pagan temple; with one Cambodian soldier killed. 5/28 was also the date in 2024 when Francis had that infamous prayer with Buddhist "monks" in a Catholic basilica.
Is God punishing those 2 pagan nations for their paganism, and their promotion of involvement with the V2 Sect? Also: the irony. So much for a colloquium for "working together for peace". In any case, goes to show that false religions, even those that claim to be "peaceful" do not bear peace as their fruit, but confusion and spiritual death.
Najmat
Powerful Video
Leo XIV’s First Appointments Prove That He Isn’t Remotely Catholic
Powerful video and an incontrovertible condemnation of Leo and the irredeemable Vatican II sect…
G.P.
Glettler Shocked Me
Leo XIV’s First Appointments Prove That He Isn’t Remotely Catholic
The Glettler segment shocked me. That art is terrifying and demented, another level of wicked.
David Valdez
Comment
Leo XIV’s First Appointments Prove That He Isn’t Remotely Catholic
Thanks for continuing to do this blessed work of exposing these abominations to the world.
Andrew
The Infidelity Is So Clear
Leo XIV’s First Appointments Prove That He Isn’t Remotely Catholic
… the infidelity of the Vatican II sect is so clear, that none may say "I did not know they were heretics!" when they see their leader do such disgusting things and confirm such disgusting people!
NorwegianSedevacantist
Out Of The Charismatic Movement
The “Catholic” Charismatic Movement Exposed
Thank God and our Blessed Mother Mary brought me out of this demonic heretical movement!
Donna
The L.A. Riots: it's interesting (as we've mentioned before) how the major eruptions of lawlessness so frequently occur in June – a month now dedicated to sin in the name of "pride."
1 John 3:4- "Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness; sin is lawlessness."
In Acts 2, St. Peter connected Joel’s prophecy about the Spirit being poured out with what happened on Pentecost.
Joel 2:28-29: “And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, and your young men shall see visions. Even on the male and female servants in those days I will pour out my Spirit.”
Acts 2:16-21: “[St. Peter said:] But this is what was uttered through the prophet Joel: ‘And in the last days it shall be, God declares, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh, and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams; 18 even on my male servants and female servants in those days I will pour out my Spirit, and they shall prophesy. 19 And I will show wonders in the heavens above and signs on the earth below, blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke; 20 the sun shall be turned to darkness and the moon to blood, before the day of the Lord comes, the great and magnificent day. 21 And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.’”
Some also think that St. Peter might have been connecting (on some level) Joel’s prophecy about the sun being darkened and the moon having turned to blood with what happened on Good Friday and in the first century.
Joel 2:31: “The sun shall be turned to darkness and the moon to blood, before the great and awesome day of the Lord comes.”
F.F. Bruce, The Book of Acts, p. 69: “The wonders and signs to be revealed in the world of nature, as described in vv. 19 and 20 [by St. Peter], may have more relevance in the present context than is sometimes realized: it was little more than seven weeks since the people in Jerusalem had indeed seen the sun turned into darkness, during the early afternoon of the day of our Lord’s crucifixion. And on the same afternoon the paschal full moon may well have appeared blood-red in the sky in consequence of that preternatural gloom. These were to be understood as tokens of the advent of the day of the Lord…”
St. John Chrysostom, Homily 88 on Matthew: “This is the sign which before He had promised to give them when they asked it, saying, An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign, and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas (Matthew 12:39), meaning His cross, and His death, His burial, and His resurrection… For after the crucifixion, the city was destroyed, and the Jewish state came to an end, they fell away from their political society and their freedom, the gospel flourished, the word was spread abroad to the ends of the world; both sea and land, both the inhabited earth and the desert perpetually proclaim its power. These things then He means, and those which took place at the very time of the crucifixion. For indeed it was much more marvelous that these things should be done, when He was nailed to the cross, than when He was walking on earth.”
It’s interesting to note that Pope St. Siricius’ 385 Decree to Himerius, which explicitly denies that unbaptized catechumens in any necessity can be saved by desiring baptism, was intended for the whole Church and found in important collections of the earliest papal decretals.
“Not only is all of Spain supposed to be informed of the ‘statuta apostolicae sedis’; Siricius intended it for the whole Church.” (Detlev Jasper and Horst Fuhrmann, Papal Letters in The Early Middle Ages, p. 21)
“Siricius’ decretal to Himerius of Tarragona… was present in almost all of the systematic collections [of the early papal decretals].” (Detlev Jasper and Horst Fuhrmann, Papal Letters in The Early Middle Ages, p. 40)
For a discussion of this important decree and its relevance to the absolute necessity of water baptism for salvation, see this article: The Latin Text of the Oldest Surviving Papal Decree Rejects “Baptism of Desire” - Pope St. Siricius. It’s a powerful spiritual weapon against John 3:5 mockers.
Spiritual Ammo Against The “Orthodox”
Eastern “Orthodox” Deception About The Papacy Exposed – Early Pope Proves Catholicism
Amazing video... Thank you for doing all this research. As a relatively new Catholic this is amazing ammunition to use against detractors.
Fett
Video On The Papacy
The best video I've ever seen on the Papacy, any person who claims to be Christian should be convinced after viewing it.
Onlyfaithsurvives
Hegseth Orders Harvey Milk’s Name To Be Removed
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ordered the Navy to rename the ship that had been named after “gay rights” activist Harvey Milk. That’s a good move.
1 Cor. 5:11 vs. Antipope Leo
Antipope Leo XIV’s statement (which we covered in a recent video) that he is welcoming to people of whatever lifestyle choice, moral views, etc. contradicts the Church’s teaching and specifically 1 Cor. 5:11.
1 Corinthians 5:11- “But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler—not even to eat with such a one.”
Juan de Torquemada On The Creed
Leo XIV’s Huge Error Condemned By Famous Catholic Figure
Fantastic video with amazing quotes from Juan de Torquemada! It is ironic that some heretics object that we need to "interpret" Catholic dogmatic statements "according to the theologians", when this prominent 15th century Florentine theologian "interpreted" the Athanasian creed (which was stated as dogma by the Council of Florence), to mean that all who die as non-Christians are damned. Torquemada simply understood the dogmatic text as it is written, as the Church had once declared it, like Vatican I teaches we are to do.
Christoffer
The Inquisitor Tomás de Torquemada
Leo XIV’s Huge Error Condemned By Famous Catholic Figure
Wasn't he [Juan de Torquemada] a major figure in the Inquisition?
Charles
Actually, no, that was his nephew Tomás de Torquemada.
Solid
Leo XIV’s Huge Error Condemned By Famous Catholic Figure
God bless you and Amen . Thank you for your solid Catholic teaching and for exposing and naming the modern heretics and non-Catholics.
Suzy
Video
Leo XIV’s Huge Error Condemned By Famous Catholic Figure
… excellent video…
J. Balderston
Newfound Faith
Leo XIV’s Huge Error Condemned By Famous Catholic Figure
Your videos led me out of the Novus Ordo sect and into the true Catholic Church via the sedevacantist conclusion. Following your instruction, I pray the 15 mysteries each evening, a devotion vital to keeping my newfound faith. Forever grateful.
dr.parakletos
Clarity
Leo XIV’s Huge Error Condemned By Famous Catholic Figure
Thank you Brothers for clarity and helping us…
Allan
Video
Leo XIV’s Huge Error Condemned By Famous Catholic Figure
Thank you for this wonderful video…
Anna
The Ascension & The Kingdom
It’s interesting that just prior to the Ascension of Our Lord, the Apostles asked Him about the restoration of the Kingdom of Israel.
Acts 1:6, just prior to the Ascension: “So when they had come together, they asked him, ‘Lord, will you at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?’”
It is evident that, at that time, they did not recognize that the promises about the Kingdom were to be fulfilled in the Church and the spiritual reign of Christ on Earth.
St. John Chrysostom, Homily 2 on the Acts of the Apostles (on Acts 1:6): “Indeed, to me it appears that they had not any clear notion of the nature of that kingdom; for the Spirit had not yet instructed them.”
This is analogous to how many today don’t recognize that the end-times deception, prophecies and apostasy primarily concern what has happened to the Church and what is happening in Rome now.
Acts 1:9- “And when he had said these things, as they were looking on, he was lifted up, and a cloud took him out of their sight.”
Came Across
As a practicing Roman Catholic of over 26+ years I have come across this channel and these videos and have been awe struck, your level of detail, research, citations of real quotes and passages should cement the validity of these times.
JH
It’s Protestant
Vatican II Is A New Religion (Visual Proof)
The Vatican 2 sect is Protestant and NOT Christian/Catholic.
Alberto
Oz Is Evil
Former Satanist Says Demons Appeared In Front Of Him
Even the unassuming worldly TV show hosts are sensing an evil presence around Oz. Like at an intuitive or instinctive level.
Mf
Saw The Magician
Former Satanist Says Demons Appeared In Front Of Him
Once I went to a circus and saw the magician doing supernatural things like pulling whole animals out of empty, narrow, and small bottles.
Ryan Franca
The Beast & 42 Months
Revelation says a number of times about 3 and 1/2 years. Where is this in your videos you don't address that why.
Ilovecats
It's addressed in this very video. See the discussion of 42 months and Nero. The Beast (i.e. pagan Rome) persecuted the Church under Nero (the sixth king) for 42 months or 3.5 years. Then the Beast was replaced by Christian Europe, as prophesied. Then the Beast returned in the last days under the appearance of the Church (i.e. by means of a Counter Church), again during the reign of the sixth king. The 42 months or 3.5 years simply refers to when the Beast acted the first time (i.e. under Nero).
New Religion
Vatican II Is A New Religion (Visual Proof)
Brilliant!! Thank you
Celtic
Video
Former Satanist Says Demons Appeared In Front Of Him
Excellent video.
McGrath
Channel
Former Satanist Says Demons Appeared In Front Of Him
This is the best channel on youtube. I'm so grateful you were able to discern the best way to bring your ministry to every neighborhood.
Ashley
Welder
Former Satanist Says Demons Appeared In Front Of Him
I was a welder so I paid attention to Doug. Saw him… There's no trickery except for that of Satan…
T C
It’s interesting that as a welder you acknowledge that his acts could only be performed with the assistance of spirits.
Oz Pearlman
Former Satanist Says Demons Appeared In Front Of Him
MHFM: Among other things, anyone who sees some of the Oz Pearlman acts and believes that it’s all natural trickery, skill or sleight-of-hand – while failing to recognize that he’s definitely assisted by evil spirits – is blind.
Has Come To See The Truth
Dear Most Holy Family Monastery
I am ever thankful to the Lord God for giving me the graces to come to the truth of our current situation, which is, the Modernist captivity of Rome and the fulfilment of the Apocalypse, through your website, videos and articles. The Day of the Lord is closer than ever. The situation here in Chile, my beautiful country which is continuously being ruined by the Left, is quite sad since we do not have the true Mass and every Catholic so-called I know believes the Whore of Babylon is the Catholic Church of all the ages, and that their "Popes" are holy...
There is no doubt in my mind that you have assistance from the Most High and are, by His Will, the last major vestige of the true Faith of Rome, outside of which there is no salvation at all.
… your material as greatly helped me in my spiritual life, and I hope those whom I've shared your material with, by the Grace of God, can see the truth… In any case, I am thankful to Our Lord that your apostolate exists. I shall include you in my prayers at the end of each daily Rosary I pray.
Greetings from Santiago de Chile. God bless you.
Sincerely…
Maximilian Cuevas
Excellent Video On Vigilius
The “Strongest” Argument Against The Papacy (Pope Vigilius) – Refuted
Good evening, your video on Vigilius is excellent…
Sincerely,
Wesley Chambers
Learned A Lot
The “Catholic” Charismatic Movement Exposed
Your content is great and I have learned a lot. Thank you.
Michael Joseph
Praised The Wolf
Leo XIV – The Shocking Truth Almost No One Is Talking About
… the fact that he praised the previous wolf instead of condemning him says it all.
Rosemary Mckinnon
Certain people in the Vatican II Sect have made the false claim that only persons – not statements, positions or propositions – can be manifestly heretical. They are wrong. This point was covered in this video. As just one example, in the following passage Bellarmine directly describes an error that is patently opposed to the Gospel as manifest heresy.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 4, Chap. 12: “Neither can it be said that this error of Gregory [III] is manifest heresy against the Gospel. For Gregory did not teach that a wife can be divorced and another woman can be taken in marriage, which is expressly contrary to the Gospel and the law of nature.”
Neq; potest dici hunc Gregorii errorem esse manifestam haeresim contra Evangelium. Nam non docuit Gregorius, posse dimitti uxorem, & aliam duci; quod expresse contra Evangelium, & ius naturae.
Here the word errorem and the term manifestam haeresim are in the same case (the accusative case) because, in context, Bellarmine connects the word error with the term manifest heresy. He presupposes that certain errors or statements are properly termed manifest heresy. Other examples could be given as well. Although Bellarmine says that this particular error of Gregory was not manifest heresy, he teaches that some errors are properly termed manifest heresy because they are expressly contrary to the Gospel or Catholic dogma. In the very next sentence he gives an example of what is expressly contrary to the Gospel and thus manifestly heretical.
Theologian Juan de Torquemada (15th century) expressed belief in the infallibility of the Apostolic See (i.e. papal infallibility) in the 15th century.
Juan de Torquemada, Summa De Ecclesia, Book 4, Part 2, Chap. 9, AD 1453: “The judgment of the Apostolic See in those things which are of faith cannot err from the truth... Luke 22:32-33: ‘… but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers.’”
As a further confirmation of what’s covered in our most recent video, just hours after it was posted Antipope Leo XIV declared that the arch-apostate Antipope Francis is in Heaven.
“During Mass, I strongly felt the spiritual presence of Pope Francis accompanying us from heaven.” – Antipope Leo XIV, May 18, 2025
Analysis
Leo XIV – The Shocking Truth Almost No One Is Talking About
Wonderful analysis.
Barry Spurr
Video
Leo XIV – The Shocking Truth Almost No One Is Talking About
Great video…
Sebastian
About Leo XIV
Leo XIV – The Shocking Truth Almost No One Is Talking About
Excellent! Thank you!
RapidCycling
Torquemada: Those Who Deny The Filioque Are Heretics
Noted 15th century theologian Juan de Torquemada taught that Greeks who denied the Filioque after the Church’s condemnation are to be considered heretics. That’s relevant because many in the Vatican II Sect will not say that the Eastern “Orthodox” who deny the Filioque are heretics. That’s why they hold ecumenical events with them, etc.
Juan de Torquemada, Summa De Ecclesia, Book 4, Part 2, Chap. 2, AD 1453: “… before the condemnation of their assertion the Greeks denying the Holy Spirit to proceed from the Son were not considered heretics, who nevertheless after the condemnation of the same [i.e. their denial of the Filioque] are considered among the heretics.”
Undeclared Manifest Heretics
To declare someone a formal heretic there needs to be more, the church must condemn him…
Andres
Your assertion is blatantly false. Many people are known to be public and manifest heretics without any declaration (Pope Martin V, etc.). They are called 'notorious in fact'. See this video, among others: Pope Martin V On Undeclared Manifest Heretics
Wants To Convert
Francis’ Death, The Loss Of Faith & The Big Picture
I need info on the steps to become Catholic, I’ve been steeped in your videos for a while. I’d appreciate links and steps as to what I need to do to get baptized into the Catholic faith.
Iswhatitis
We’re glad to hear about that. The steps to convert to true Catholicism are here: https://vaticancatholic.com/catholic-baptism-steps-to-convert/ We recommend that you pray the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. That will give you important graces. We recommend that Catholics, if they can, pray 15 decades of the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. This is an important spiritual video: https://endtimes.video/how-to-avoid-sin/
Muslims Are Pagans
MHFM: There’s a new crop of pro-Vatican II heretics who are trying to defend Vatican II’s heretical teaching on Islam, which includes the false teaching that Muslims and Catholics together worship the one true God. They are wrong, of course (and we might have more to say on that matter), but it’s especially worth noting that the pro-Vatican II heretics still haven’t figured out that Muslims are “pagans” according to official Catholic teaching.
Distinguishing Mark
The Antichrist's Distinguishing Mark
Amazing work.
John Jeevan
Pledging Apostasy
In other words, on the very day he was elected antipope, he pledged to continue the non-recognition of the Church's 2000-year teaching that Jews, having rejected Jesus Christ, are condemned and need conversion. It's just so transparent when one sees the comments about him from his own brother, saying he'd be the 2nd Francis. Which is extremely revealing, because after Francis was elected antipope 03/13/2023, The Times of Israel on 03/14/23 (the very next day) said this about Francis:
- “Francis I begins tenure by sending friendly letter to Rome’s chief rabbi”.
- Francis: “I sincerely hope I can contribute to the progress there has been in relations between Jews and Catholics since the Second Vatican Council in a spirit of renewed collaboration.” - which is almost word-for-word the same as Leo XIV's letter.Second Francis indeed!
By now it's like a mandatory "rite of passage", that these antipapal pretenders kowtow to these bitter enemies of Christ.
Najmat
Antipope Leo XIV & Externals
Dear Brothers,
Although it hasn't even been a week since Antipope Leo XIV stepped onto the balcony of St. Peter's, I think there is an interesting observation to be made. Antipope Leo XIV is Francis II out of the gate, his modus operandi was made crystal clear in his first address. Still, it's interesting that unlike his predecessor, Antipope Leo XIV has chosen not to eschew the externals that Francis shunned at his "election," wearing the mozzetta, stole, and rochet. He will also reportedly reside in the Apostolic Palace instead of the Casa Santa Marta. These developments are already proving to be syrupy sweet for false traditionalists like Taylor Marshall, who are now falling head over heels for Antipope Leo XIV. It's laughable how a little dressing up, a touch of Latin, and a relocation are enough to appease these people who not a month ago were lamenting their misfortune under Francis.
In my opinion, this is what makes Antipope Leo XIV far more dangerous than Francis. With regard to Antipope Francis, his rampage was blatantly obvious. He was right in your face and there was nothing to blunt or calm the constant stream of heresy, apostasy and indifferentism, no frills or externals to soothe it. But what the false traditionalists don't see (and simply don't care about) is that Antipope Leo XIV will do the same thing as Francis, just fashionably. And as long as he throws them the occasional bone, they'll just sit back and accept everything. It's like Ratzinger all over again.
Sincerely,
Liam
Their Mockery Of The Faith
Francis’ Death, The Loss Of Faith & The Big Picture
Dear MHFM
Thank you… for your excellent and much needed video on the current situation following the death of Antipope Francis. It is understandable that the heretics in the Counter Church should pray for Francis and give him praise but it is so nauseating to witness so called Traditional Catholics do the same. It makes no sense at all. It is a mockery of the Faith and makes it meaningless that a vile and unrepentant heretic such as Francis, who did so much to attack Traditionalism and destroy the Faith, can be prayed for after his death and be considered as possibly in heaven. He persecuted even those false Traditionalist groups inside the Vatican II Church, and they complained bitterly, many even suggesting he was an Antipope, but now they urge their followers to pray for him. It suggests somebody who calls themselves the pope can do what they want, however much it is against the Faith, and still be regarded as Catholic. In which case those who pray for them are, as you rightly say, joining themselves in their heresy and effectively apostasising from the Church so grave are the sins against the Faith committed by the Vatican II antipopes. Thank you for your strong and fully Catholic position on this important matter of Faith.
… Your position on the End Times is based on careful study of scripture and factual accuracies with our current times, and is watertight in its credibility and spiritual instruction for what Catholics need to do to save their souls in these last days…
God bless you
Gerard
Freedom Of Speech Gone In UK
Freedom of Speech has gone in the UK. I’m even nervous now about posting an opinion on You Tube. Do you think maybe Trump would give us political asylum?
Christie
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
