This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party. This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments. Section containing some important recent posts.
New Video Posted
This story is actually really sad because it shows how stupid the general public is. We have seen crisis actors laugh and botch their lines in the past but this emotionless woman has basically put in no effort to memorizing basic facts about "the daughter" who is supposed to have been killed. The people running these psyops and false flags know they can do a lousy job and most people will be convinced regardless of the facts since they're of bad will and don't love the truth.
The reporter... had to say the girl was in third grade; NBC News and Independent also reported that this girl Annabell is in the third grade. But when you go on the Uvalde website and look up Arnulfo Reyes, who this woman said is the daughter's teacher, it has him listed as a fourth grade teacher.
It's also noteworthy that the woman says: "We don't know the grade". So, she knows that neither one of the "parents" knows the current grade of their "daughter". She then rattles off the name of the "teacher", which you would not expect her to know considering that she didn't even know the girl's grade. One can only conclude that she memorized certain things about the story but failed to memorize others.
Other than fuel for a gun grab, do you think there are other reasons for these various shooting hoaxes? I'm wondering if part of the plan is to keep people in a constant state of brainwashing through lies. A con man knows that if he can get a mark to believe a small lie then that same mark will more easily accept a bigger lie.
I'm wondering if by feeding the populace constant lies, the hoax pushers hope to make them swallow bigger and bigger lies. Come to think of it, the counterfeit church is like that too. By getting people to accept small lies, they can more easily push the bigger lies of an invalid new mass and their antipopes.
The move to outlaw most or all guns is obviously at the top of their agenda. However, they also intend to use such hoaxes to completely abolish the first amendment: e.g. by pressuring companies to remove from social media (and even from basic services such as banking, etc.) those who spread a conservative message. Hence, they often claim that the perpetrator was influenced by what he saw or read on social media. They are very dedicated to take over America - i.e. to transform it into a helpless tool of the globalists - by these means.
I saw a bulletin posted in my local coffee shop which was asking if members of the public had experienced unexplained paranormal activity in their homes. I went to the coffee shop this morning and almost all the info cards were taken. For context, I was there about a day or two ago and only two info cards were taken but in a matter of days, almost all of the info cards were taken.
There seems to be a dramatic increase in paranormal activity.
Excellent video… I wanted to share a very interesting tweet regarding this situation. Someone tweeted about this story saying they would be Catholic if the church showed this much strength. This tweet received hundreds of likes. It made me sad to think how many people are put off due to the V2 sect weakness and indecisiveness.
Former atheist here. I returned to Catholicism and your videos strengthen my learning and desire to expand knowledge and understanding. Thank you.
… you hit the nail on the head with your analysis…
… the fruits of Vatican ll…
MHFM: Concerning the girl who is supposedly their own daughter, they say: “We don’t know the grade, but we know the age…” What a hoax.
Wilton Gregory, DC
There is no unity of faith or discipline in the Vatican 2 sect. If you don't like what's being served in one place, you can get something completely different somewhere else. This story reminds me of the schismatic eastern "orthodox" who heretically believe all the bishops in the world are equal. If there were a true pope, Pelosi would have been excommunicated a long time ago but the Whore of Babylon, led by the layman Wilton Gregory in Washington DC, allows evil to flourish…
… Your material has helped me learn about Catholic religion and history far better than the Vatican II Catechism I grew up with... the Vatican II sect is false.
Great video. It should humble the V2 apologists who thought this proved something in favor of their sect.
This is an excellent video brothers. Sadly here in northern Ireland fake priests continually remain silent ove the mass of politicians here advocating the exact wicked practices of Pelosi.
Thank you for what you do to show and defend the one true faith! So many more would be lost without you in these evil times.
Amazing Video – “Magicians”
Amazing video! If anything, people are underestimating how many people are demonized - have demons attached to them that are heavily influencing them and circumstances in their lives and making them attracted to others who are demonized as well, especially performers, but even certain tiktokkers, youtubers and instagrammers. And of course, politicians and elite leaders.
Disgusting behavior, it turns my stomach to think how selfish these people are. Novus Ordo is made up of weak worldly [people] who care not for God's law, nor the sanctity of life. I thank God I was given the opportunity to convert. Crisp video, excellent.
The fact that the V2 "hierarchy" refuses to publicly excommunicate any of these horrible public figures makes them complicit in their promotion of evils such as abortion. It's a horrible situation throughout the whole world that countless apostates are allowed to call themselves "Catholic" and by their scandalous actions they bring dishonour upon the name of Christ's most holy Church which is without blemish, and which they are aliens to.
This degrading V2 sect [is] not remotely Catholic, and so obvious in light of Catholic Tradition! Thanks again, and again MHFM for bringing to light the abominable inconsistencies of the Vatican II sect!
Thanks for this wonderful new video. The saint is right it's a crime, a mortal sin… against Almighty God to deny the Faith. God bless MHFM and please pray for us and thank you all very much.
Ah, nothing says 'democracy' like signing away your national sovereignty to an unaccountable international globalist organization. The Serpent continues to tighten his hold over the nations. God help us.
S N I
Just what I needed to help dig my family out of the V2 sect. Thanks, I'd forgotten about the Catholic Rite and what it actually means. Great stuff Bro keep it coming, we need all we can get… you are changing things!! God bless you.
Just like they did nothing during the BLM riots or the takeover of Portland and Seattle.
Thank you so much for how thoroughly you explained the reflections in her eye. I've been fascinated by that detail for years, but haven't seen it illustrated this well.
Great work brothers. Thank you for the concise explanation…
Baptism “in the name of Jesus Christ”
Awesome stuff… ! I appreciate your videos. One question According to the book of acts, every water baptism was performed in the “Name of Jesus Christ” and not “Father, Son, Holy Spirit”. Can you explain why the Catholic Church doesn’t baptize in Jesus Name ? Thanks
“Baptism in the name of Jesus Christ” does not mean that it's not according to the Trinitarian form. “Baptism in the name of Jesus” refers to the baptism instituted by Jesus Christ, which is performed in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. This is indicated in Acts 19, as the video below covers.
Acts 19:2-5- “And they said, ‘No, we have not even heard that there is a Holy Spirit.’ And he said, ‘Into what then were you baptized?’ And Paul said, ‘John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one who was to come after him, that is, Jesus.’ On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.”
This passage indicates that the baptism “in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ” was according to the Trinitarian form, which mentioned the Holy Spirit (as well as the Father and the Son). By being baptized in the name “of the Son” and according to the Trinitarian baptismal form, one is baptized in the name of Jesus Christ (for He is the Son). This is the act that people must receive to be justified, as we cover in this video/article:
Food Shortages, Philippines
Our Department of Agriculture reported the same here in the Philippines. They urged people to do urban gardening.
A very good video! ... how wicked and faithless false traditionalists are... they defend a disunited sect where one is able to hold every anti-Catholic position imaginable...
This demonstrates two things that people of good will and of faith comprehend without much thought: 1) Most people… are weak-willed and easily intimidated into silence or, in this case, of recanting their position; and 2) The Left and the "LBGTQ" cabal know this and use it to their advantage.
… A headline today reminded me of this: "New Research Shows “Harvesting Blood & Body Parts of the Young” Could Help Achieve Immortality”. It shows us how truly pathetic (and possessed) is the geriatric crowd of "globalists" who are holding their breath, as they hope against hope that "science" will find the key to immortality while they are still alive. Recall how (in the Australia video) Bill Gates gulped and swallowed nervously when he was asked a question regarding what he thinks he will see accomplished by "science" before he dies. He did not want to admit that he is hoping that he will not die, but will live forever. "No, you shall not die the death." (Gen. 3:4) Same old trick. Same old lie…
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles, Book I, Chap. 10: “Now, in God… it is pre-eminently the case that His existence is His essence, so that to the question what is He? and to the question is He? the answer is one and the same.”
It is amazing how sin has become so commonplace in American society that people consider acts of abortion, immodest dress, drunkeness, fornication and more to be both sane and normal, and any attempt to curtail those sins to be evil.
President of “German bishops”
Though his saying is heretical, it's in line with Lumen Gentium 8, “... the Church... always in need of being purified... and renewal”, which of course has been condemned by Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos. This just goes to show that you cannot follow Vatican II and be a Catholic.
… great video exposing the blatant evil of Tim... Dolan.
Changed his life
Your channel is the best I ever seen. When I was in the Vatican II satanic cult I was a guy who committed many sins… but your videos changed my life. Sadly i live in Israel…
Servo del Signore
Peter and Paul
Hello! I was wondering what your interpretation is of Paul opposing Peter in Galatians 2:11-14.
We have a very detailed video on that matter. It presents the evidence that the person St. Paul rebuked was not St. Peter but a different person.
St. John Eudes (17th century), on those who violate their baptismal promises and put themselves under Satan through mortal sin:
“They fall under the dominion of Satan, who is the most cruel of all tyrants, the hardest of masters, the most implacable of enemies, and the most barbarous of all persecutors. He entertains for them a mortal hatred; he seeks only their destruction and their ruin. If he promises them any good, it is only to render them miserable; if he permits them to taste of momentary pleasure, it is only to plunge them into eternal grief. He hurries them from one disorder into another, with the hope of deriving some gratification from it; but they no sooner taste of the poisoned cup of pleasure than he makes them feel its bitterness. Impieties, injustices, wrath, impurities, avarice, ambition, are the things to which Satan solicits, without ceasing, those who return to him; and, in order to obtain their desires, what pains, what uneasiness must they not undergo. Their heart is continually agitated with fears, with suspicions, with jealousies, and despair; they feel neither peace nor repose, and after he has rendered them miserable in this life, he renders them more unhappy for eternity. What a sad state!”
Great videos, well put together, strong message, not for the faint hearted.
MHFM: We have a new video. It's the last version of our video: “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists, but it will not be posted on YouTube. It's available at the link below for free right now. There are new things in this last version, including a clear refutation of those who believe that all levitating magicians have a device that enables them to levitate. This video is worth watching and we really believe that this will be the last version of this video.
This is a short video that describes our new video.
Thank you for your selfless dedication to reveal the truths about the Catholic faith, the meaning of the beast in the Book of Revelation, and the dogma that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation. I have learned a lot from your videos…
Thank you and God bless...
Those who dishonestly deny the evidence that this is præternatural magic, as it is proved to be in Brother Michael Dimond's videos, are allowing the devil to deceive them. Though those of goodwill and sincerity will accept the facts laid out in this video.
After watching this one can understand why God sends people to hell forever.
This just goes to show that they really can do something for Americans by securing our border but they don’t want to.
St. Peter Canisius, Summa Doctrinae Christianae, 16th century, De Baptismi Sacramento:
“What is Baptism, and is it necessary to all? This is the first sacrament of the New Law and the most necessary, consisting in the external washing of the body and the legitimate enunciation of the words in accordance with Christ’s institution. It is a sacrament, I say, that is necessary not only for adults but also for little ones, and is no less efficacious for them in obtaining eternal salvation. All are born children of wrath; therefore even the little ones need cleansing from sin, for they cannot be cleansed and be regenerated as children of God without this sacrament. For as a general rule our Lawmaker declared, ‘unless a man is born again of water and the Holy Spirit he cannot enter the Kingdom of God.’”
Why does St. Peter Canisius use the phrase “For as a general rule”? That suggests there are some cases where one can be saved without reception of water baptism.
No, it doesn’t suggest that at all. He uses the word “generatim”, and you have to consider the context. St. Peter was writing in Latin, not in English. In context he’s speaking about two CLASSES of people: adults and infants. He teaches that baptism is necessary for both groups, and he emphasizes/concludes this point by stating that the Lawmaker declared “as a general rule… unless a man is born again of water and the Holy Spirit…” [Nam et generatim legislator edixit], using “generatim” to teach that the words of Jesus apply to all classes of people, not just specifically to infants or specifically to adults. They apply to the entire humanum genus (human race). It could also be translated “as a universal rule”. In his speech against the governor Verres, Cicero treats the terms “generatim” and “universe” as virtually synonymous: “... singillatim potius quam generatim atque universe loquar.” Further, as the video showed, St. Peter elsewhere in his catechism teaches that only those with faith and baptism can receive the remission of sins.
St. Peter Canisius, Summa Doctrinae Christianae, 16th century, Concerning faith and the symbol of the faith, #19: “The remission of sins, without which none can be justified and saved. This truly rich treasure did Christ obtain for us by a bitter death and His own precious blood, in order that the whole world might be freed from its sins and their perpetual punishments. Of this said treasure only those are made partakers through the grace of Christ who join themselves to Christ’s Church through faith and baptism, and persist in her unity and obedience.”
As the video also covers, when teaching that baptism is most necessary for salvation, he also gives footnotes to passages from Church fathers that specifically contradicted the idea that unbaptized catechumens can be forgiven or saved. In fact, the third passage he cites on this matter, which we did not discuss in detail in the video, comes from a letter believed at one time to have been written by Pope Clement. It is no longer considered authentic. However, that passage cited by St. Peter Canisius taught that “it is impossible” for someone to be saved without water baptism. That gives us another indication of what St. Peter was teaching in his catechism: no one is saved without water baptism based specifically on Trent, etc
In his opening remarks on Monday, Tucker Carlson described the demonic "protests" of the pro-aborts.
Carlson showed the demonstrators at certain justices' homes, the attacks on a counseling center, etc. But when he spoke about their attacks on churches, he specifically showed the pro-aborts attacking things Catholic (or what people believe to be Catholic) - such as the "Mass", the tabernacle, the "Eucharist", the Rosary, etc. And he even pointed out that the first group of people to be killed by the Soviets were the priests. Carlson concluded that these attacks are not just about Roe v. Wade, but that they are attacks against "Christianity" itself.
But did it ever occur to Carlson (or any of his viewers) that what the pro-aborts are attacking are essentially the same things the Protestants attack (and have been attacking) ever since Martin Luther began his revolt against Christ? Non-Catholics and pro-aborts are bedfellows, because (regardless of how he does it) the devil always moves his followers to hate the things he hates. And if anyone doubts this, they should read some true histories about the Protestant destruction of Catholic monasteries and churches and tabernacles. Or they could just listen to the snide remarks and venomous tirades non-Catholics of all persuasions make against the true Catholic faith. If they did so in good will, they would come to realize that the end-times world is against Christianity (and has a counterfeit "Catholic" Church in Rome) because almost all the world has rejected Christ and the only true Christian faith.
Dear Brothers in Christ,
Thank you for this newest informative video. “Religious leaders” who teach that their “lord” in a “mysterious way” leads masses of obstinately ignorant people to “heaven” by keeping them on the road of disobedience/destruction reveal their lord & master for who he is -Satan…
Lord deliver us from all self love, and fill us with holy obedience to Your Most Adorable Will for your judgments are just!
St. John Eudes (17th century): “Experience, as well as faith, teaches us that the wicked shall find no peace. But on the contrary: those who love and serve God shall enjoy peace in abundance, which shall render their lives a thousand times sweeter and more agreeable than are the lives of those who follow their own inordinate inclinations.”
St. Robert Bellarmine: “Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart (Acts 2:37)… Therefore the Gospel not only consoles but even terrifies. For compunction is born from terror.” (De Justificatione, Book 4, Chap. 2)
Was looking into Eastern “Orthodoxy”
Hello, I am Roman Catholic and was looking into Orthodoxy before seeing your video refuting it on YouTube. What does one need to do to become a traditional Catholic? Where to worship? Etc. Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you and God Bless!
Indisputable refutation of… BOD…
This woman is a calculating demon. A fake Catholic, she uses the term “heaven forbid!” Yes, God himself, will forbid your entry into Heaven…
That's very interesting. The richest man in the world says he may die under "mysterious circumstances", probably meaning that someone is plotting against him "from above", from government. If the threats to his life are real, the first thing he should do is to accept the true faith, the Catholic faith. He should do it in any case, but this moment may be the last warning to him from the real "above", from God.
Firstly, I would like to thank you guys at Most Holy Family Monastery for all the help you have provided to people worldwide. If I did not find your website and youtube channel, I would certainly still be a protestant or currently in the Vatican II sect. I can not thank you enough...
MHFM: Today is the feast day of St. Gregory Nazianzen, important early Church father, doctor and theologian. St. Gregory explicitly rejected the idea of “baptism of desire” in about five different ways in his Oration On Holy Baptism, as we show in this article: St. Gregory Nazianzen Rejected "Baptism of Desire"
For example, here are some of the things St. Gregory explicitly rejects:
• that God will take the “desire of baptism instead of baptism” – ST. GREGORY REJECTS IT
• that one who is “unenlightened” (i.e. unbaptized) can be “enlightened in His sight” – ST. GREGORY REJECTS IT
• that “he is within the Kingdom of Heaven who merely desires to attain it” – ST. GREGORY REJECTS IT
• that an “unsealed” (i.e. unbaptized) person can be “glorified” or “honored” –ST. GREGORY REJECTS IT
• that one can “reckon as baptized him who desired baptism apart from the reception of baptism” – ST. GREGORY REJECTS IT
• that “desire… has equal power with actual baptism” – ST. GREGORY REJECTS IT
St. Gregory also says: “Others are not in a position to receive it [baptism], perhaps on account of infancy, or some perfectly involuntary circumstance through which they are prevented from receiving it, even if they wish.” Concerning those people who are prevented from receiving it “even if they wish”, he says that they will not be glorified. He could not have rejected the idea of “baptism of desire” more clearly. St. Gregory was also given the special title of “the theologian” by the 5th ecumenical council. This is particularly relevant to refuting and debunking arguments people attempt to make for “baptism of desire” by appealing to theologians. This father and doctor who is given the special title of “theologian” by the Church explicitly rejected the idea. St. Gregory also presided, for a period of time, over the First Council of Constantinople in 381, which declared that there is “one baptism for the remission of sins”. His homily rejecting “baptism of desire” was given in the very same year (381).
In this video we also show that St. Gregory the Theologian refutes Eastern “Orthodoxy” on the Papacy. He teaches that Rome has the presidency over all other churches.
Our video also shows that St. Gregory taught that St. Peter was “the unbreakable rock, to whom was allotted the Key.”
I don't know how you have the patience to read through so many of John Paul's writings. But I'm glad you did because I and many others would never have known these things otherwise. I will show this video to my parents later.
When Gentiles who have not the law do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that what the law requires is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or perhaps excuse them on that day when, according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Christ Jesus. (Rom 2:14-16)
That passage does not teach that unbelievers can be saved without the Christian faith. Rather, as St. Robert Bellarmine correctly explains, it teaches that unbelievers who die without the full law of God will be excused of certain things on the day of judgment (because they do some things in accord with the natural law); but they cannot observe the whole moral law, which is necessary to be saved. As Bellarmine also notes, the same epistle to the Romans clearly establishes that no one is justified without faith in Christ. We cover that in this video: Invincible Ignorance? – St. Robert Bellarmine (Powerful New Quotes)
Thank you for everything you… do for Christianity…
Where St. Peter Is
MHFM: This is an interesting statement made by the Roman legates at the 4th Council of Constantinople in 869-870, concerning the remains of the Apostle St. Peter being located at the site of St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome:
The Roman legates at the 4th Council of Constantinople, 6th session, 869-870: “For the whole of this holy ecumenical council convened in this church by the grace of God knows that the holy Roman Church in the eleventh indiction, with a gathering of western bishops in the Church of St. Peter, where he rests and abounds with miracles, suspended, anathematized and deposed the usurper Photius and his followers, while the most blessed pope Nicholas was still primate.”
The place where St. Peter is located (i.e. St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican) is directly connected to end-times prophecy and the Apocalypse, as these videos cover.
How loud are the screams of demons now that they will not be able to kill their children. I have seen it in person, on social media, and on television. I have not seen them rage so loud since the election of President Trump in 2016.
Our good works can never satisfy in any way or in any way merit anything. Christ death on the cross satisfied once and for all our sin debt. This does not give us a license to sin, but it is He and He alone who is worthy.
Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. Eph 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
We are saved to do good works, not saved by good works.
You are mistaken. Works cannot merit the grace itself of justification (i.e. the transfer from the state of sin to the state of grace). But they can merit an increase in grace and eternal life for those in the state of grace who obey God. That's Catholic dogma. To deny that is heresy.
Council of Trent, Decree On Justification, Chap. 16: "... we must believe that nothing further is wanting to those justified to prevent them from being considered to have, by those very works which have been done in God, fully satisfied the divine law according to the state of this life and to have truly merited eternal life."
Council of Trent, Canon 32 on Justification: "If anyone says that the good works of the one justified are in such manner the gifts of God that they are not also the good merits of him justified; or that the one justified by the good works that he performs by the grace of God and the merit of Jesus Christ, whose living member he is, does not truly merit an increase of grace, eternal life, and in case he dies in grace, the attainment of eternal life itself and also an increase of glory, let him be anathema."
With regard to Ephesians 2, you should watch this video: https://endtimes.video/fake-christians-bible/
You say nobody without canonical stays or authority can war pope Francis. Ridiculous. You do not need authority to warn someone. You need authority to judge them. Your smart enough to know there is a debate among credible theologians on whether a pope can be judged or not. But a pope certainly can be warned or corrected.
No, you didn’t listen carefully and you don’t understand the point. We said that if he were the pope (he’s not, but for the sake of argument, suppose he were), no one would have the authority to give him a CANONICAL warning (i.e. a warning that, if unheeded, would result in specific or additional canonical penalties against the pope). That’s because no one has authority over the pope. But we never said that no one could give him rebukes, admonitions or warnings by pointing him to the divine law or to the Catholic teaching which he is contradicting. But those would be merely fraternal (not canonical) corrections, and the fraternal correction of a cardinal or a bishop would be no more canonically authoritative vis-à-vis a pope than one given by a layman on the street. That's because no one has any jurisdiction over a pope. Got it? Well, Francis has received many such fraternal corrections/warnings, and he has even acknowledged them. He has also ignored/rejected them. He’s also pertinacious against known Catholic teaching. He’s a notorious heretic.
… Wow! Who can’t see this must be willfully blind.
Come to terms
Hi, I've been a regular visitor of your website for a few weeks. I truly appreciate your apostolate. Before I watched some of your videos, I was a FSSP church goer; I tried to square the circle (so to speak) by being within the Novus Ordo "Church" but "traditional." I've since come to terms with the fact that those people are deeply compromised on the true Faith…
St. John Eudes (17th century): “If you [while in mortal sin] perform any good works, they merit no recompense in Heaven; for those whom mortal sin deprives of sanctifying grace, can merit nothing for Heaven, so long as they remain in that state. Their labors and sufferings, which might satisfy for the pain due to their past sins, and acquire for them, at the same time, new degrees of grace and merit, cannot produce these happy effects, because they lose their rewards through sin.”
St. Jerome had such “love for the Bible that he decided – like the man in the Gospel who found a treasure – to spurn ‘any emoluments that the world could provide,’ and devote himself wholly to such studies… He left home, parents, sister, and relatives; he denied himself the more delicate food he had been accustomed to, and went to the East so that he might gather from studious reading of the Bible the fuller riches of Christ and true knowledge of his Savior.” (Pope Benedict XV, Spiritus Paraclitus #2, Sept. 15, 1920)
What else can one expect from a hypocrite but projection? Pelosi, and not the halting of abortion, is the abomination.
Excellent article. As a country and as a society, we are moving more and more into lawlessness, the exact opposite of Christ's words. It seems as if 99.9% or more of the world's population above the age of reason is guilty of one mortal sin or another.
Why Abortion Became ‘Legal’
There's a lot of talk about abortion going on right now. But no one (other than faithful Catholics) recalls that the Counterfeit Church - the Vatican 2 Sect - was the primary reason abortion became legal in the first place, in both Europe and the US. It was during the anti-reign of Montini (Paul VI) who was declared a "saint" by Antipope Francis.
This is an important video. His heresy was very sad. He was correct about Vatican II, and sedevacantism, and the Mass … Yet all of that was a total waste for him. The level of bad will and the obstinacy from him against the Salvation Dogma were horrible. He even openly attacked the Dimonds and all those who professed this dogma. I am so thankful for the works produced by — and the outreach of —[MHFM]. I am grateful to be a Catholic and to know the Catholic Faith.
Now he is "arguing" with demons and the Devil.
He sadly got what he wanted. "Better to argue with demons than with Dimonds" = "better the turkish turban than the Papal tiara".
He was a modernist in the salvation area. But traditional in liturgy. That's how they deceive people with externals. Dogmas and faith are more important.
Can anyone help me understand why this channel believes NFP (natural family planning) is sinful?
Natural Family Planning is sinful because it’s a scheme that deliberately subordinates the primary purpose of the marriage act (the procreation of children) to other things. That’s forbidden.
Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii (# 59), Dec. 31, 1930: “For in matrimony as well as in the use of the matrimonial right there are also secondary ends, such as mutual aid, the cultivating of mutual love, and the quieting of concupiscence which husband and wife are not forbidden to consider SO LONG AS THEY ARE SUBORDINATED TO THE PRIMARY END and so long as the intrinsic nature of the act is preserved.”
NFP is a calculated attempt to have marital relations while taking positive steps to AVOID the primary purpose. Besides the fact that it contradicts Church teaching, people who use NFP know it’s wrong. It’s a sinful birth control practice. We have a video about this matter: https://endtimes.video/nfp-a-birth-control-deception/
Heretics in Colorado Springs
Good Morning Brothers,
I was watching a livestream by a priest in the group called "Servants of the Holy Family" located in Colorado Springs. This is a group that was founded by Fr. Anthony Ward (SSPX break away) and other elder members who I believe were validly ordained.
I was watching their live stream this morning and the priest laid out the "rules" for receiving holy communion. One of them was that you cannot be a sedevacantist. I.E. that this group is imposing their heresies. They actually pride themselves on "being in full communion" with the VII sect while still recognizing and resisting. In fact, they operate outside of the Colorado Springs diocese's structure while claiming jurisdiction from a Novus Ordo bishop in Latin America.
I met Fr. Ward last year and he told me that Francis was a "masonic Pope". Also one of their priests gave my parents communion even after I told him that my parents openly support the Novus Ordo mass. The priest told me that attending the N.O. mass was a sin privately. Totally hypocritical in my honest opinion...
Because of their contradictory and imposing views, I no longer support them nor am I affiliated with them in any way. They're community is honestly rubbish because it's all about externals and not any logic nor faith. The livestream this morning was the final piece in the puzzle for me to put together...
While everyone who follows the end-times counter-church may think that the lack of "ordinations" in the "Archdiocese" of Detroit is a terrible tragedy (including the fake traditionalist mouthpieces of "Church Militant"), I am happy that no new fake "priests" have been added to the dwindling ranks of the Vatican II sect. Such charlatans are... actually harmful to one's spiritual health to the point of loss of salvation.
The presentation of what's happening by MHFM is awesome. It's clear and revealing. Thank God for your monastery.
TY for all your work to teach the Catechism and also you expose the evil…