| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party. This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments. Section containing some important recent posts. E-Exchange Archives.
Came Across Our Videos “In An Unexplained Manner” After Praying
Faustina & The Divine Mercy Deception
Is this a sign? I’m praying to St. Paul and St. Peter to intercede to me and ask our Lord Jesus Christ to give me knowledge with his church. I also pray to our Lord Jesus Christ to guide me. I’m thinking from the past days and supposed to do DIVINE MERCY tomorrow which is Sunday to us but in an unexplained manner I ended up here watching your videos. It’s all connecting now that our Church has been intercepted by Satan and his minions. God, our Lord and Savior Jesus and Holy Spirit Guide us to truth.
Joseph
God definitely want you to see our material. It contains the truth and explains what's happening. In addition to watching more of our videos, you should pray 15 decades of the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. Also see our video: A Prophet Explains The Vatican II Apostasy From Catholicism, among others. It's crucial to distinguish between the Vatican II Sect, which is not the Catholic Church, and the true Catholic Church (as our material explains)
Eyes Opened
It is Divine Mercy Sunday and I refuse to participate. I am so grateful I found this channel but now I at a loss at what to do. In the chapel where they have a tlm, there is a giant picture of the fake Jesus next to the cross and I am mortified… you have opened my eyes to the v2 sect.
A C
We're glad that you came across the material. You should not go to that church. As you watch more of the videos, we think that your questions will be answered. You can also call us here and someone can help you.
John of St. Thomas was a famous Thomistic theologian who died in 1644. Like many other theologians of the period, he acknowledged that St. Thomas and St. Augustine taught that explicit faith in Christ is required by a necessity of means. A necessity of means is something that’s so necessary that salvation cannot be attained without it even when one is invincibly or inculpably ignorant of the obligation. The fact that faith in Christ is absolutely required for salvation (and that faith is given in baptism) is dogmatically established. However, since so many false traditionalists deny this truth, it’s often useful to cite theologians on this point to further demonstrate that the aforementioned individuals have departed from Catholic Tradition.
Here’s what John of St. Thomas says about St. Thomas’ position.
John of St. Thomas, Cursus Theologi In Secundam Secundae D. Thomas, Disputation 4, A. 1., ed. 1663, p. 52: “Finally, St. Thomas agrees, who clearly seems to hold this position [that explicit faith in Christ is absolutely required]. For in Sentences Book 3, distinction 25, question 2, article 2, Quaestiuncula 2, he says: ‘That after the coming of Christ, all—both the greater (the learned) and the lesser (the simple)—are bound to believe explicitly, and if someone were not to have instruction, God would reveal it to him, unless he remained without it through his own fault.’ Therefore, St. Thomas thinks that this explicit faith is necessary by a necessity of means; for otherwise, if someone were not to have an instructor, he would be excused from such a precept—which St. Thomas does not admit. Instead, he has recourse to an extraordinary manner of instruction, which in the present case ought to be supplied.
And in Secunda Secundae, question 2, article 7, speaking at the beginning of the body of the article about what is necessary to believe by a necessity of means, he concludes that faith in Christ the Lord was required to be believed in some way at all times: ‘But after the time of the law of grace, all—both the greater (the learned) and the lesser (the simple)—are bound to have explicit faith in Christ.’ Therefore he is speaking about a necessity of means; otherwise he would not be speaking consistently.”
A covenant means “I am yours and you are mine”. In Exodus 19 the covenant meant that the people would be “a holy nation” and a “treasured possession”.
Exodus 19:5-6: “Now if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, you will be My treasured possession out of all the nations—for the whole earth is Mine. And unto Me you shall be a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.”
Here we see that through the covenant (which was based on faith and basic obedience at the time) the people could be pleasing to God through the inferior form of sanctification/justification that was available prior to Christ's coming. It meant that they were God's people through faith and obedience to Him.
Thus, if the Jews have a valid covenant now (as John Paul II and the other Vatican II antipopes repeatedly taught), that signifies that they can be pleasing to God and saved in their religion - which is heresy (see the Council of Florence, etc.).
John Paul II, Meeting on the Roots of Anti-Semitism, 1997: “This people [the Jewish people] has been called and led by God, Creator of Heaven and Earth. Their existence then is not a mere natural or cultural happening… It is a supernatural one. This people continues in spite of everything to be the people of the covenant…”
That statement is blatantly heretical. There are in fact many similar statements of John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Francis which teach, contrary to true papal teaching, that Jews have a valid covenant and that they can be holy, pleasing to God, etc. through the practice of their religion.
In the Islamic Republic of Iran it’s not only illegal to preach the Gospel, but “marriages” with girls age 10 or younger are often permitted. It’s a country in almost total darkness founded on the imposed veneration of the pedophile Mohammed, who “married” a six-year-old.
In fact, in the 1960s, the man who would found the Islamic Republic of Iran, “Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini”, wrote a work of Islamic jurisprudence that endorsed sexualized acts with infants as long as it was not intercourse! What an outrage. A great number people have rightly been appalled by the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Yet many of those same people seem, on some level, to legitimize or defend the Islamic Republic of Iran, which is far worse. In fact, the Epstein scandal would only be comparable to the Republic of Iran if an entire country was founded on a religion that venerated Epstein and outlawed preaching the Gospel.
Mt. 27:52- “The tombs also were opened. And many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised…”
Based on Mt. 27:52 and Tradition, various fathers of the Church (e.g. St. Ignatius of Antioch, etc.) taught that when Jesus rose again – after He finished the Harrowing of Hell – He also raised Old Testament just men from the dead.
St. Ignatius of Antioch, Epistle To the Magnesians, Chap. 9: “And therefore He whom they [the prophets] rightly waited for, having come, raised them from the dead.”
Some fathers, such as St. Cyril of Jerusalem, specifically applied the prophecy of Hosea 6:2 to that Resurrection. Hosea 6:2 appears to be the Old Testament verse St. Paul has in mind when he writes about the Resurrection in 1 Cor. 15:4.
Hosea 6:2- “After two days he will revive us; on the third day he will raise us up, that we may live before him.”
St. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lecture XIV (4th cent.): “… the Savior, who not only rose from the dead, but also raised the dead with Himself. And in the person of these the Prophet Hosea [Osee] says plainly: After two days He will revive us, and on the third day we shall rise again, and shall live in His sight.”
Our video called Jesus’ Descent Into Hell & The Baptism Of The Good Thief discusses ancient Church writers who believed that the Old Testament just men were baptized. The Resurrection of Old Testament just men at the time of Our Lord’s Resurrection is consistent with the idea that they were baptized; for if Jesus told His Apostles to preach the Gospel to every creature and baptize them (Mt. 28:19), it makes sense that they also would have been baptized after He preached the Gospel to them in Hades and raised them from the dead. For more, see our video:
On this Holy Thursday it’s useful to recall that when Our Lord established the Eucharist He included the words “mystery of faith” (mysterium fidei) in the form of consecration. Even though those words were not recorded in the Gospels, they were preserved by Apostolic Tradition. Papal teaching and the canon of the Mass confirmed that those words were part of the original consecration.
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Pt. III, Q. 78, A. 3, Reply to Obj. 9: “The words added, namely, ‘eternal’ and ‘mystery of faith’, were handed down to the Church by the Apostles, who received them from our Lord...”
Pope Innocent III, Cum Marthae Circa, Nov. 29: “In the Canon of the Mass that expression, ‘mysterium fidei,’ is found interposed among His words... Surely we find many such things omitted from the words as well as from the deeds of the Lord by the Evangelists, which the Apostles are read to have supplied by word or to have expressed by deed... Therefore, we believe that the form of words, as they are found in the Canon, the Apostles received from Christ, and their successors from them.”
When the horrible Novus Ordo Missae (the New Mass) was introduced by Antipope Paul VI as part of his attempt to destroy the Catholic Church, among its many other changes and novelties, the words “mystery of faith” were removed from the form of consecration. In the form of consecration in the Traditional Mass, the words “mystery of faith” specifically signified the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. However, in the New Mass the words “mystery of faith” were moved to a place after the consecration and given a different signification. Besides the many other problems with the New Mass, that change alone means that the New Mass cannot be considered valid, according to the teaching of Pope St. Pius V. The New Mass must be completely avoided. We discuss this matter and more in this video: The New Mass Lacks The “Mystery Of Faith” (Novus Ordo Modernists Refuted).
The removal of “mystery of faith” was very symbolic because those words have a special connection to St. Peter and the Roman Church. Of course, the most obvious change to the form of consecration that occurred after Vatican II was the change of the words “for you and for many” to “for you and for all”. Jesus did not say “for you and for all” when instituting the Eucharist. Hence, the inclusion of “for all” in the consecration form of countless New Masses for decades was an outrageous, heretical and blasphemous falsification of what Our Lord actually said when instituting the Eucharist. It means that those “Masses” were certainly invalid. That’s also covered in the aforementioned video.
Fr. Cornelius Lapide, Commentary on John 4:22- “Ver. 22. You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, because salvation is from the Judeans. Here Christ responds directly to the woman’s question and settles the dispute concerning the adoration of God in favor of the Judeans, condemning the Samaritans as schismatics. He says: O Samaritans, you worship what do you not know, because you worship the God of the Judeans with your Assyrian idols; and making God as it were an associate of idols, you therefore worship a false and fictitious God. Again, you worship a God different from the God of the Judeans, that is one who is the Lord of your land alone, who therefore is false and has been invented by you... In the same manner the Turks and Jews worship a God whom they do not know, because they deny Him to be a Trinity of Persons. Thus also Calvin with his followers, denying the omnipotence of God, and making Him cruel in condemning certain men to hell without any demerit on their part, worship not a true, but a false God. For the true God is Almighty, and most kind.”
His comment also contradicts the false understanding of John 4:22 that was put forward by various Novus Ordo heretics, as we showed here: Novus Ordo “Thomists” Fall Into The Pit Defending Islam’s False God.
Antipope Leo XIV recently stated that God does not hear the prayers of people who engage in war. Since he made no distinction between a just and an unjust war, his statement contradicts Catholic and biblical teaching. That’s not a surprise since he teaches heresy on a regular basis. Here’s an interesting quote from St. Robert Bellarmine that refutes Leo XIV’s false statement.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Laicis, Book 3, Chap. 16: “Finally, it is well established that the ancient pontiffs such as Urban II, Paschal II, Eugene III, and many others—as well as the general councils, such as the Lateran, Lyons, Vienne, and others, proclaimed a general war against the Mahometans...”
Preserved From Eastern “Orthodoxy”
Playlist That Refutes Eastern “Orthodoxy”
Your apologetics work against Eastern Orthodoxy is one of the major reasons that I ultimately did not become EO – your excellent work kept me from leaving Catholicism and converting to Eastern Orthodoxy which, in hindsight, would have been a great scandal and regret for me. Thank you so much!
In a 1966 General Audience entitled Voi Forse Sapete, Antipope Paul VI admitted that Vatican II taught that all the baptized, including those who reject Catholic teaching, are in the Church of Christ. That is of course a blatant heresy. Paul VI’s admission further confirms exactly what we’ve said about the false teaching of Vatican II.
Paul VI, General Audience, Voi Forse Sapete, June 1, 1966: “Think it over carefully. You are the Church, which means that you belong to the Church, to the holy Church of God, to the great assembly called together by Christ, to the living community of His word and His grace, to His Mystical Body… For the present, let Us rather ask another question. Are all those who have been baptized, even those who are separated from Catholic unity, in the Church? In the true Church? In the one Church? Yes. This is one of the great truths of Catholic tradition, and the Council has repeatedly confirmed it.”
The Catholic Church of course teaches that baptized people who deny the Papacy or any other dogma are outside the Church. See this: What Vatican II Said About Protestants & “Orthodox” – Heresy Refuted In 5 Minutes
Irrefutable
Leo XIV Worshipped A Pagan Goddess – What It Means
… this is really irrefutable, no mental gymnastics can explain this away…
Marko
Connections
Leo XIV Worshipped A Pagan Goddess – What It Means
Only after rewatching some segments here I realize how insightful those videos were. Hearing the Antichrist declaring the divinity of man three times in his first sermon as antipope to the crowds, along with many Providential temporal connections, and many other things, should be enough for a good willed mind to accept the reality of his role in history. It's like some reject or avoid the truth because they don't want it to be true, which is weak.
Josip
Video
Leo XIV Worshipped A Pagan Goddess – What It Means
Great video…
Wesley
Comment
Leo XIV Worshipped A Pagan Goddess – What It Means
Actually irrefutable.
M V
St. Margaret Mary vs. Faustina
Faustina & The Divine Mercy Deception
Excellent point brother, on St. Margaret Mary and Our Lord's Sacred Heart, as well as pointing out the errors of Vatican 2, Thank you!
Dom
Papacy Should Be Obvious To People
… It is astounding to me that so many people cannot comprehend why Christ gave the world the Catholic Church and the Papacy which He protects from error. Heretics do not want to be united to Christ; but they are willing to be united to Satan by lies (which, at root, is always the hatred of Christ and His one true Church). False religions are like chain-gangs to which people voluntarily enslave themselves and voluntarily remain. Very sad.
Lee Ann
Informative & Well-Documented
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Thank you for this very informative, well-documented video.
Archie
Comment
Amazing Evidence For God – Scientific Evidence For God
What a wonderful, wonderful presentation. It makes me weep to think that any seeing it would not immediately understand that God must certainly exist and must have created all.
Wendy
“Some months before he departed this life, Benedict forewarned his disciples on what day he was to die; and he ordered his grave to be opened six days before he was carried to it. On the sixth day, he would be carried into the Church, where he received the Eucharist, and then… with his eyes lifted up to heaven, and absorbed in prayer, he gave up the ghost. Two monks saw his soul rising to heaven, clothed in a most precious garment and surrounded with lights, and one of a most glorious and awe-inspiring aspect standing above, whom they heard saying: This is the way whereby Benedict, the beloved of the Lord, goes up to heaven.” (The Divine Office, March 21, Lectio 6, On The Death of St. Benedict)
In his work called Moralia (or Morals on the Book of Job), Pope St. Gregory the Great repeatedly teaches that no one is saved without the Sacrament of Baptism.
Pope St. Gregory the Great, Morals on the Book of Job (Moralia), Book 4, #3: “For every man that is not absolved by the water of regeneration, is tied and bound by the guilt of the original bond… And that he who is not washed in the water of salvation, does not lose the punishment of original sin, the Truth plainly declares by Itself in these words: Unless a man is born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God [John 3:5].”
In the passage below he cites Our Lord’s words in John 3:5 specifically to affirm that no infant whatsoever can be saved without the Sacrament.
Pope St. Gregory the Great, Morals on the Book of Job (Moralia), Book 9, #32: “For there be some that are withdrawn from the present light, before they attain to show forth the good or evil deserts of an active life. And whereas the Sacraments of salvation do not free them from the sin of their birth, at the same time that here they never did aright by their own act; there they are brought to torment. And these have one wound, viz. to be born in corruption, and another, to die in the flesh. But forasmuch as after death there also follows, death eternal, by a secret and righteous judgment ‘wounds are multiplied to them without cause.’ For they even receive everlasting torments, who never sinned by their own will. And hence it is written, Even the infant of a single day is not pure in His sight upon earth. Hence ‘Truth’ says by His own lips, Unless a man is born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God [John 3:5]. Hence Paul says, We were by nature the children of wrath even as others. [Eph. 2, 3] Therefore, he who adds nothing of his own is bound by the guilt of birth alone, how does such a one stand at the final judgment, from a merely human point of view, except as one 'wounded without cause'? And yet in the strict account of God it is but just that the stock of mortality, like an unfruitful tree, should preserve in the branches that bitterness which it drew from the root. Therefore he says, For He shall break me with a tempest, and multiply my wounds without cause. As if reviewing the woes of mankind he said in plain words; ‘With what sort of visitation does the strict Judge mercilessly slay those, whom the guilt of their own deeds condemns, if He smites for all eternity even those, whom the guilt of deliberate choice does not impeach?’”
Note that Gregory the Great’s work Moralia was not promulgated as an official papal teaching with the full authority of his office. It was, rather, his personal work and commentary that reflected his views on many topics. Some might interpret the second passage cited above to mean that infants who die without baptism are tormented by the fires of Hell. That was a common belief in the West at the time. However, we know from subsequent papal teaching that while infants who die without baptism are barred from Heaven, they are not punished by the fires of Hell. Since they die with original sin only, without having committed actual mortal sin, they go to a part of Hell where there is no fire. Nevertheless, Gregory’s statements manifest his belief (and the faith of the Church) that no one at all is saved without the Sacrament of Baptism based on John 3:5.
For another passage from the same work in which Pope St. Gregory the Great teaches that no one can be saved without the Sacrament of Baptism, see this post: St. Gregory The Great: All Unbelievers & People Outside The Sacraments Are Lost.
Responsible For The Current Crisis
Fr. Ripperger, SSPX, FSSP, CMRI, Etc. Promote Grave Errors – Refuted By Cistercian Theologian
It is so strange how much the dogma "extra ecclesiam nulla salus" is hated—even by people who would consider themselves traditional Catholics. They bend over backwards in order to be able to argue that it doesn't mean what it clearly means. MHFM is right that the gradual defection from this dogma is to a significant degree responsible for the current crisis in the Church…
Positive Christianity
Huge Help
Playlist That Refutes Eastern “Orthodoxy”
I was orthodox… these videos are a huge help.
Joah Steenberg
A very popular and widely-sold energy drink in Slovakia is called Hell.
An error promoted by certain representatives of the Vatican II Sect concerns the meaning of anathema. Vatican II Sect member Jimmy Akin made a number of false claims on this matter, including his assertion that anathema does not mean damned by God. Being under an anathema does not mean that a person cannot possibly repent and convert, but a person who is anathematized is condemned by God and will be ultimately damned unless he or she converts. Indeed, here’s an interesting quote from Pope Stephen III who correctly teaches that anathema means that a person will be damned by God (unless he or she repents).
Pope Stephen III, To Charles and Carloman (Codex Epistolaris Carolinus 45), AD c. 769: “If anyone, contrary to our wishes, presumes to act against this our solemn and earnest exhortation, may he know that by the authority of my master the blessed Peter prince of the apostles he is bound with the bond of an anathema, excluded from the kingdom of God, and consigned to eternal fire together with the devil and his cruel pomps and all the impious.”
Akin also made the false claim that anathema only refers to a ceremonial excommunication pronounced by a bishop, not an automatic penalty or condemnation that strikes those who deny dogmatic teaching. But that’s also wrong. His claim is refuted by Pope Stephen III’s statement above, which clearly refers to an automatic penalty. It’s also refuted by other papal pronouncements (including statements in the Council of Trent), as we covered here: Anathema – Jimmy Akin Gets It Wrong.
Comment
“Orthodoxy’s” False Teachers – Jay Dyer Violates Logic & Christian Creed
Wonderful video…
Joshua H
Enlightening
“Orthodoxy’s” False Teachers – Jay Dyer Violates Logic & Christian Creed
Once again a great and enlightening video from MHFM. It both refutes Jay Dyer's heretical nonsense and explains and teaches sound philosophy at the same time.
Christoffer
Video
“Orthodoxy’s” False Teachers – Jay Dyer Violates Logic & Christian Creed
Awesome video…
Gx
Comment
“Orthodoxy’s” False Teachers – Jay Dyer Violates Logic & Christian Creed
… Very grateful for your apostolate.
C E
Very Interesting
“Orthodoxy’s” False Teachers – Jay Dyer Violates Logic & Christian Creed
Very interesting video!!!... fantastic philosophical arguments. Thanks, God bless.
Tommaso
Further Evidence
“Orthodoxy’s” False Teachers – Jay Dyer Violates Logic & Christian Creed
This is just further evidence that the Palamite model of the Trinity is contrary to both reason and the faith of the fathers.
Dictatus
Fr. Christian Lupus (1612-1681), Opera Omnia, Synodorum generalium, ac provincialium decreta, et canones, Pars Primus, Operum Tomus Primus, ed. 1724, p. 70: “For in fact the Saracens, although they worship God as Almighty, nevertheless (along with Sabellius) make Him out to be barren, and they deny that the Son and the Holy Spirit proceed from Him; and so in their profane minds they reduce Him to an idol. It is not the true God that they worship, but this idol of theirs. Hence too the Calvinists, who imagine God to be the Author of sin, fail to worship the true God, invent an idol, and perpetrate a complete idolatry.”
Fr. Christian Lupus was a Flemish scholastic theologian who died in 1681. This quote was cited in this video: Lies, Contradictions & Errors Exposed.
Fr. Willem Hessels van Est (1542-1613), Annotationes In Praecipua Ac Difficiliora Sacrae Scripturae Loca (On Acts 17), 1699, p. 598: “To the unknown god (Acts 17:23)… Here it might be asked, Why then would they not have implicit faith if they worshipped as the true God a god unknown to them? Response: Firstly, because the worship of the true God cannot coexist with the worship of idols. Next, because explicit faith in the one true God is required of all. Thirdly, because it is incompatible even with implicit faith if something is believed that is contrary to it, as it was to place this Unknown God on the same footing with the gods of the pagans, that is, with false gods and therefore demons. For unless He is acknowledged as the one and only God, He is not truly acknowledged…”
This is an interesting and important passage. Fr. Willem Hessels van Est (who is sometimes called Estius) was a noted Dutch scholastic theologian and Scripture scholar who died in 1613. Van Est correctly teaches that the pagans in Acts 17 were not worshipping the true God. He explains that the worship of the true God cannot coexist with the worship of false gods or idols. Since the pagans in Acts 17 were simultaneously worshipping idols, they did not have faith and thus God could not be the actual object of their worship. This is one of many interesting passages that are cited in our video that refutes a certain Novus Ordo heretic: Lies, Contradictions & Errors Exposed. In that video we also pointed out that in this passage Hessels van Est uses the Latin word cultus clearly to include the internal act of worship. That fact serves to refute another lie and utterly fallacious argument made by the aforementioned Novus Ordo heretic.
“Fr.” James Altman rejected Antipope Francis’ claim to the Papacy and says that Leo XIV works for Satan. Yet, oddly he still professes allegiance to the Vatican II Sect. He also remains completely deceived by John Paul II. He not only calls John Paul II a “saint”, but he thinks that he was a great person who was warning people about the apostasy! This is another example of what we covered in our video: “Fr.” James Altman Deceived By John Paul II’s False Mysticism.
The spiritual deception of our day is vast. God has allowed the Devil to raise up a wide array of false teachers who present some truth but false conclusions in order to keep conservative-minded people away from the true conclusions, the true teachers, and the pure faith. Those true conclusions are covered in our material. Altman is one of those deceivers. Taylor Marshall (who also recently called John Paul II a “saint” twice) is another one of those deceivers. In March of 2025, Altman (who purports to be a traditionalist) concelebrated a Novus Ordo “Mass” with “Bishop” Strickland (another one of the aforementioned deceivers) at Mary, Mother of the Light Church in Tequesta, Florida.
“Fr.” James Altman, Feb. 26, 2025, responding to Lifesite’s assertion that Francis and Leo XIV might be antipopes: “John-Henry, I'm of the opinion that it will fall on deaf ears because most of the Cardinals are anti-Cardinals!! Most all of them are anti-Catholic and they are serving up for us the anti-Christ. Pope St. John Paul II told us it's happening in our lifetime.”
St. Jerome, Letter 69, To Oceanus: “Let me now fulfil the promise I made a little while ago and with all the skill of a rhetorician sing the praises of water and of baptism. In the beginning the earth was without form and void, there was no dazzling sun or pale moon, there were no glittering stars. There was nothing but matter inorganic and invisible, and even this was lost in abysmal depths and shrouded in a distorting gloom. The Spirit of God above moved, as a charioteer, over the face of the waters [Gen. 1:2] and produced from them the infant world, a type of the Christian child that is drawn from the laver of baptism. A firmament is constructed between heaven and earth, and to this is allotted the name heaven — in the Hebrew Shamayim or 'what comes out of the waters' — and the waters which are above the heavens are parted from the others to the praise of God. Wherefore also in the vision of the prophet Ezekiel there is seen above the cherubim a crystal stretched forth [Ezekiel 1:22], that is, the compressed and denser waters. The first living beings come out of the waters; and believers soar out of the laver with wings to heaven… To Nicodemus He secretly says: Unless a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God… Those who have received only John’s baptism and have no knowledge of the Holy Spirit are baptized again, lest any should suppose that water unsanctified thereby could suffice for the salvation of either Jew or Gentile… Time would fail me were I to try to lay before you in order all the passages in the Holy Scriptures which relate to the efficacy of baptism or to explain the mysterious doctrine of that second birth which though it is our second is yet our first in Christ.” (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 6.)
St. Bede On The End Times
Saints & Theologians On The End Times – Shedding Light On The Current Catholic Crisis
Love to hear Saint Bede being quoted, I was born in Jarrow and as a child I took it for granted having an actual Saint in my home town.
Derek
Disturbing
Leo XIV’s Latest Scandal (Altar Girls) Was Condemned By Four Popes
It is unbelievably disturbing to see this…
James
Alarming
Sam Shamoun: Ecumenical Fake Christian Exposed
What comes out of his mouth is very alarming.
Nina
On False Humility
Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis
I have watched this entire video and believe I have benefited from its content in many ways…
Robert P
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Pt. II-II, Q. 161, A. 1, Reply to Obj. 2: “… humility, insofar as it is a virtue, conveys the notion of a praiseworthy self-abasement to the lowest place. Now this is sometimes done merely according to outward signs and pretense: wherefore this is a false humility, of which Augustine says in a letter (Epistle 149) that it is great pride, since it evidently seems to tend to the excellence of glory.”
Huckabee’s Heresy
Mike Huckabee is a Protestant who is infected with heretical and Zionist views. Like many other heretics, he wrongly thinks that the modern Jewish State is biblical Israel. Tucker Carlson recently asked Huckabee if, in his view, Israel has a right to the entire Middle East. Huckabee responded by saying: “It would be fine if they took it all.”
Huckabee's position is of course false and demolished biblically. Referring to the Lord Jesus Christ, Acts 3:23 says that anyone who doesn’t listen to Him is completely cut off from the People.
Acts 3:23- “And it shall be that every soul who does not listen to that prophet shall be completely cut off from the people.”
See this article for more: The “Evangelical” Protestant Heresy On Israel Refuted Simply
Converted To Catholicism Because Of Your Channel
I converted to Catholicism because of your channel...
Kind regards from me, John, and may God bless you.
St. Robert Bellarmine, On Councils, Book 2, Chap. 16: “Finally, Scripture in various places calls Christ a king and His Church a kingdom, from which it follows that the Church itself ought to be ruled by one, not by many, just as all kingdoms are governed.”
“The possible intellect is a single faculty, but it is given different names according to its different acts. Every power is specified by its formal object… The intellect receives different names according to its different acts; it is called memory, reason, inferior reason, superior reason, speculative intellect, practical intellect. The memory is the intellect as it conserves intelligible species… The reason is the intellect as it proceeds from one known truth to another, in order to acquire new knowledge.” (Henri Grenier, Thomistic Philosophy, Vol. 1, pp. 467-468)
Helped Me Find
Leo XIV’s Latest Scandal (Altar Girls) Was Condemned By Four Popes
MHFM back at it again with a great video. Thank you so much for your work Brothers. You helped me find the true Roman Catholic religion and saved me from the evil Novus Ordo "Catholicism"…
Ocular K
Another
Leo XIV’s Latest Scandal (Altar Girls) Was Condemned By Four Popes
Another smashing humiliation against those Novus Ordites who believed Leo XIV was a "return to tradition"! Thank you MHFM! Women have important roles as wives and religious sisters/mothers, however, we must respect God's boundaries that He has left Holy Orders as a duty for men.
Daniel
Comment
Leo XIV’s Latest Scandal (Altar Girls) Was Condemned By Four Popes
Amazing channel…
Foederis
Modernists
Leo XIV’s Latest Scandal (Altar Girls) Was Condemned By Four Popes
Really can’t believe that even the modernists think this is fine... thanks truly for this video…
Trueguy
JPII wasn't wounded by a sword.
Jake
You are wrong. Not only could a modern gun fit that description; but, to further confirm the point, John Paul II was also wounded by a literal sword in Fatima almost exactly one year after he was shot. The fact that it occurred in Fatima was also not a coincidence. See 6:30 and following of this video: Apocalypse Now In The Vatican. John Paul II fulfills the prophecies about the image of the Beast in so many ways. Also see these videos:
The Temple Of God & The Antichrist Located
The Antichrist's Distinguishing Mark
The Antichrist Conquers In This Sign
Many people fail to recognize that the Beast is pagan Rome returned. In pagan Rome the Roman emperors were only officially ‘deified’ after death. This is why the Antichrist, fulfilling the prophecy about the return of the Beast (or pagan Rome), is officially venerated after his death by means of a false canonization ceremony. This is explained in our videos.
Antipope Leo Names Woman To “Dicastery For Bishops”
Antipope Leo XIV has appointed a woman, Sister Simona Brambilla, as a member of the “Dicastery for Bishops”. He also reconfirmed the notorious, pro-“LGBT” apostates Blasé Cupich and Joseph William Tobin to the same Dicastery. (Vatican News, Feb. 14, 2026) He continues to expose himself as an apostate, and on the issue of feminism he might even be more liberal than Antipope Francis.
Pius IX, Holy Office, Convinced
Playlist On Salvation & Baptism
The Holy Office – Is It Infallible? (Geocentrism & Fr. Feeney)
Pope Pius IX Did Not Teach Salvation Outside The Church
I just watched some of your videos about Pius IX's stance on invincible ignorance and how the Holy Office isn't infallible. And i do have to say they are quite convincing, this coming from me who previously denounced you as heretics for it… So i guess I'd want to thank you for showing me the truth…
Jor
Colossians Refutes “Eternal Security” & “Faith Alone”
Colossians is addressed “to the sanctified and faithful brothers” (Colossians 1:2) who have been “delivered from the power of darkness and translated into the Kingdom of the Son” (1:12-13). Colossians 2:11-12 describes them as “having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through the faith”. Obviously, therefore, it’s addressed to justified Christians. Yet, in Colossians 1:23 St. Paul teaches that their salvation is not guaranteed. It’s conditioned upon their perseverance in the faith.
Colossians 1:21-23- “And you, who once were alienated and hostile in mind, doing evil deeds, he has now reconciled in his body of flesh by his death, in order to present you holy and blameless and above reproach before him, if indeed you continue in the faith, stable and steadfast, not shifting from the hope of the gospel that you heard…”
If St. Paul were teaching “eternal security” or “once saved always saved”, he would not teach (as he does above) that justified Christians might not attain salvation. In Colossians 3 he also warns them that grave sins bring the wrath of God. But upon whom or what will the wrath of God fall for such sins? Certainly he means that the wrath of God will come upon the believers if they commit such sins. This further indicates that their salvation can be lost for such acts, which contradicts both “faith alone” and “once saved always saved”.
Colossians 3:5-6- “Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. On account of these the wrath of God is coming.”
Astonishing “Coincidence”
Former Satanist Says Demons Appeared In Front Of Him
'Jibreezy' said, in this video, that at 13 years of age he was diagnosed with Crohn's disease. This is an astonishing coincidence, because the famous British magician 'Dynamo' (Stephen Frayne ) said that he was diagnosed with Crohn's disease when he was 13. Astonishing; two different famous magicians from opposite sides of the Atlantic claiming to have been diagnosed with Crohn's disease at the age of 13…
K Avilla
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
