| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party. This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments. Section containing some important recent posts. E-Exchange Archives.
This is a very important video. We recommend that people watch it all the way through.
Catholic Theology On The Trinity
Not only is this video a masterpiece in its refutation on Eastern "Orthodoxy", but it is a masterclass in the Catholic Theology of the Trinity.
Kittyword
A Clear Display
A clear display of why most people are damned...
Antonio Eligius
Comment
A Prophet Explains The Vatican II Apostasy From Catholicism
Thank you so much for your amazing work. This really made me think…
Chrissy
Insights
The Dark Meaning of John Paul I’s “Beatification”
Wow. Very impressive and profound insights. You have taken the time to research many things in many of your videos and I am grateful to you brothers for helping me to become a better Catholic and to better know the faith, and this research ties together a lot of what your previous videos commented on…
Paul
Attacking Baptism
Thank you Brothers for defending the teaching on baptism once more! Our Holy God will always provide His people with what's truly necessary to enter heaven… I know the satanic mouthpieces will not stop the attack on baptism until that day of judgement puts them in fire for eternity.
Christina Kalix
Church Of Rome vs. City Of Rome
[Some say] … Rome no longer holds the Faith. This directly contradicts the indefectibility of the Church that our Lord promised us in Matthew 16:18…
F G
MHFM
It is not contrary to indefectibility to say that the city of Rome has lost the faith. Various theologians before Vatican II correctly distinguished between the Church or Ecclesia of the city of Rome (under a true pope) and the city itself. The Church of the city of Rome (and the Apostolic See) cannot fall away, but the city can fall into apostasy if the true pope is absent. An assembly in Rome under a notoriously heretical antipope is not actually the Church or Ecclesia of the city of Rome. Various theologians also recognized that the prophecies about Babylon in the Apocalypse refer to the city of Rome (not the Church of Rome) returning to paganism in the last days. That has occurred. The fact that Rome under the Vatican II antipopes is in apostasy is an absolute and irrefutable fact, as our material proves.
Compelling
Leo XIV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
This is By FAR the most insightful, compelling, uncompromising and convincing coverage of the latest effrontery by Prevost. The AP praying with the heretic Anglican woman is definitely a mockery!...
TheJet
In the Old Testament God repeatedly chose a monarchic form of government to rule His people. He conferred upon His representative (e.g. Moses, Joshua) supreme authority over the rest of the people, which they exercised under God who was the ultimate king. It thus makes sense that in the New Testament God would establish His Church with one person (St. Peter, the first pope) serving as Christ’s primary representative and holding supreme authority over the rest.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 1, Chap. 2: “But setting these things aside, what form of rule God wished to confirm by His own authority can also be gathered — and especially from this source — from that Republic which He established among the Hebrew people. For the government of the Hebrews was not, as Calvin claims (but does not prove), aristocratic and close to a polity [rule by many, elders and nobles], but plainly a monarchy. The princes among the Hebrews were first patriarchs, such as Abraham, Jacob, Judah, and the rest; then leaders (generals), such as Moses and Joshua; next judges, such as Samuel, Samson, and others; afterwards kings, such as Saul, David, and Solomon; and finally again leaders, such as Zerubbabel and the Maccabees.”
Question for Feeneyites: Suppose your baptism was invalid due to a defect of form, matter or intention. You had no idea and continue to live a Catholic life, receiving the sacraments and die in what you believe to be a state of grace. Do you go to Hell because you were never validly baptized?
C J
First, the term you employ (i.e. “Feeneyite”) to describe those who adhere to Catholic teaching on baptism is inaccurate. Second, in the early Church Pope St. Siricius and Pope St. Leo the Great addressed situations that are similar to what you have described. In their responses/acts they taught that even unbaptized catechumens who wanted water baptism will not be saved if they die without it (thereby contradicting the very idea of “baptism of desire”).
In Letter 167 Leo the Great addresses the issue of people who are unsure if they were baptized as infants. He responds by stating that they must be regenerated “lest they evidently perish” (ne pereant evidenter). He thus clearly teaches that baptism is absolutely required for salvation, even for those who want baptism and are unsure if they received it.
Pope St. Leo the Great, Letter 167, 5th Century: “Question 16. Concerning those who have been left as infants by Christian parents, if no proof of their baptism can be found whether they ought to be baptized? If no proof exists among their kinsfolk and relations, nor among the clergy or neighbors whereby those, about whom the question is raised, may be proved to have been baptized, steps must be taken for their regeneration: lest they evidently perish…”
Likewise, in Letter 166 he refers to people who “seek the saving waters of baptism, but in the ignorance of infancy cannot remember whether they have received the mystery and rites of baptism”. He says that they must be baptized because they remain outside “the gate of salvation, which he is shown never before to have entered.” He again thereby teaches that such people will not be saved without actually receiving baptism. Pope St. Siricius also taught that unbaptized catechumens “in any necessity” who desired baptism must be baptized right away lest every single one of them (unusquisque) perish for not having received what they desired. See our articles on Siricius and Leo the Great for more. For instance: https://vaticancatholic.com/pope-leo-the-great-sacrament-of-baptism-salvation/
Second, God’s providence will make sure that all of His elect are baptized.
Peter the Venerable, A Summary Of The Entire Heresy Of The Saracens, 1142, #16: “… he [the Devil] used that most wretched man Mohammed (and as it is reported by many, one who is possessed by an evil spirit and by epilepsy) as an instrument and implement, as it were, most suited to him; alas, he plunged into eternal damnation, along with himself, a very large race and one which at present can be reckoned as nearly a half part of the world.”
Eye-Opening
Leo XIQV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
I'm new to this depth of Catholicism, and it's really eye-opening…
Aidan Chaytor
“Called” To Heresy & Invalidity
Leo XIV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
Thank you for this irrefutable video that demonstrates that Leo XIV is a manifest heretic. The fact that he explicitly stated in his message to the women that she had been "called" forces Vatican II sect members to either recognize women "ordinations", or that God would call someone into being a fake bishop (which is insanity)…
Daniel
In Poland
Leo XIV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
It is absolutely scandalous! The Vatican II sect and the Anglican sect both were formed on evil deeds - the first one with the help of the devil's servants… who removed the validly chosen pope in 1958 and 1963, and the other on the sin of adultery and murder by Henry VIII. We in Poland know the truth.
Gwido
Apostate Vatican II Religion
Leo XIV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
This is another example of how Leo XIV is just like antipope Francis, following the same apostate Vatican II religion.
Christoffer
Filippo Maroto, Institutiones Iuris Canonici Ad Normam Novi Codicis, 1919, Vol. 2, p. 172: “Indeed heretics and schismatics are barred from the Supreme Pontificate by the divine law itself, because, although by divine law they are not said to be incapable of participating in certain types of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, nevertheless they must certainly be regarded as excluded from occupying the throne of the Apostolic See, which is the infallible teacher of the true faith and the center of ecclesiastical unity.”
Pope St. Innocent I’s Declaration That No One Is Saved Without Baptism
Thank you so much…! That’s 2 canonized popes, Pope St. Leo the great and Pope St Innocent, as well as Pope Clement V and others all consistently teaching one baptism for the remission of sins.
Dom Gazy
Among others, there is also the authoritative teaching of Pope St. Zosimus and Pope St. Siricius. Those popes specifically contradicted the idea that anyone can be saved without the Sacrament of Baptism in some of the most important papal acts from the period of the early Church:
https://endtimes.video/ancient-pope-water-baptism-de-fide/
https://vaticancatholic.com/latin-text-oldest-surviving-papal-decree-rejects-baptism-desire/
There are many other definitive arguments, which are covered in our playlist on the matter:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzssJHrA8L1PjrxWW-S15pnEQ
Pope St. Innocent I’s Declaration That No One Is Saved Without Baptism
… I have a question how can i get baptized because my family is muslim and I became v2 catholic in 2024 now a traditional Catholic so I don't have any trusted man who can baptize me what should I do?
Aleyad
Please call us. However, in necessity anyone you know who would observe the matter, form, etc. and have the basic intention could baptize you (provided you are ready, convinced on all the issues, etc.).
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” 1439: “In case of necessity, however, not only a priest or a deacon, but even a layman or woman, yes even a pagan and a heretic can baptize, so long as he preserves the form of the Church and has the intention of doing what the Church does.” (Denz. 696)
This file explains how a baptism is to be performed: https://vaticancatholic.com/how-to-perform-a-baptism/ We also recommend that people, if they can, pray 15 decades of the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently.
Best
“Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists – The Last Version
These videos on demonic magicians are the very best I've ever seen. I've seen the original version that you made several years ago.
TheyLive
In his letter Inter Ceteras of Jan. 27, 417, Pope St. Innocent I confirmed the Council of Mileve and condemned the heresy of the Pelagians. His letter was considered an authoritative response of the Apostolic See. It’s also referenced as such by St. Augustine and St. Robert Bellarmine.[1] In the document Pope St. Innocent teaches that eternal life is only conferred by baptism. He also says that those who believe eternal life is granted without baptism should confess or admit that in their view the baptismal streams are of no benefit.
Pope St. Innocent I, Inter Ceteras, To The Council of Mileve, Jan. 27, 417: “But that claim which your Fraternity asserts that they [the Pelagians] preach, namely, that children can be endowed with the rewards of eternal life even without the grace of baptism, is utterly foolish… But those who claim this [eternal life] for them without regeneration seem to me to wish to nullify baptism itself, since they preach that these have what is believed to be conferred on them only by baptism. If therefore they [the Pelagians] want to claim that not being reborn is no hindrance [to eternal life], it is necessary that they should confess that the sacred streams of regeneration are of no benefit. But in order that the perverse doctrine of unnecessary men may be refuted by the swift reason of truth, the Lord proclaims in the Gospel, saying: ‘Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not; for of such is the kingdom of heaven’ (Luke 18:16).”[2]
Thus once again we see a pope authoritatively teaching that the Sacrament of Baptism is required for salvation. That’s the true position of the Church, which is so widely denied in our day.
Comment
Bellarmine On Certain Obstinate Sinners Praying The “Our Father”
Very wise and full of truth excerpt.
Miriam
Important Video
One of the best among many excellent videos. Hearing it again after many years.
EENSrds
Buddhism Is From Hell
"22 Buddhist monks arrested at airport after record drug bust"
Buddhism is a demonic, atheistic sect from Hell.
Francis
St. Robert Bellarmine, On Certain Habitual Sinners Who Pray The “Our Father”:
“But if someone does not want the grace of conversion, nor asks for it from his heart, but prays with his lips alone from habit – or what is more grave, prays in order to be seen by men – he not only gains nothing from his prayer, but it even becomes a sin, since he lies in almost all of his petitions. For how can he say ‘Our Father’, who does not want to be a son? And how can he say ‘hallowed be thy name’, by whom the name of God is regularly blasphemed? And how can he say ‘thy kingdom come’, who fears nothing more than the coming of the Lord? And how can he say ‘thy will be done’, who always does his own will and not the will of God?”
- De Bonis Operibus In Particulari, Book 1, Chap. 6 (Fifth Petition)
Leo XIV Condemns The Death Penalty Again
In another bold affirmation of the heretical teaching of the Vatican II Sect, Antipope Leo XIV has once again condemned the death penalty. He did so in a message on April 24, 2026, to people at De Paul University who were celebrating the abolition of the death penalty in Illinois.
Antipope Leo XIV, Address To Participants At De Paul University (Chicago, IL) Celebrating The 15 Anniversary Of The Abolition Of The Death Penalty In Illinois, April 24, 2026: “I am pleased to greet all of you who are gathered at DePaul University to mark the fifteenth anniversary of the decision to abolish the death penalty in the State of Illinois…
In this regard, we affirm that the dignity of the person is not lost even after very serious crimes are committed. Furthermore, effective systems of detention can be and have been developed that protect citizens while at the same time do not completely deprive those who are guilty of the possibility of redemption (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2267). This is why Pope Francis and my recent predecessors repeatedly insisted that the common good can be safeguarded and the requirements of justice can be met without recourse to capital punishment. Consequently, the Church teaches that ‘the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person’ (ibid.).
I therefore join you in celebrating the decision made by the Governor of Illinois in 2011, and I likewise offer my support to those who advocate for the abolition of the death penalty in the United States of America and around the world.” (https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2026/04/24/260424c.html)
To assert that the death penalty is inadmissible (and an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person) is of course manifest heresy. It contradicts Scripture and what the Church has always taught. See this post, for example: St. Robert Bellarmine On The Death Penalty. Leo XIV is a ridiculous antipope, and (just like Antipope Francis) he presents his false teaching against the death penalty as the official teaching of the Vatican II Sect.
So Glad I Stumbled On This Channel
“Fr.” Mike Schmitz (Ascension Presents) – False Theology Exposed
I'm glad I stumbled upon your channel! I am learning so much about my Catholic faith! Keep up the good work. keep posting new videos! I love it!
J L M
They Abandon
“Fr.” Mike Schmitz (Ascension Presents) – False Theology Exposed
People are so afraid to say something that might offend a Protestant that they completely abandon real Catholic beliefs.
Escher
Catholic Truth
“Fr.” Mike Schmitz (Ascension Presents) – False Theology Exposed
Straight up, unadulterated explanations of Catholic truth. Perfectly researched... Thank you brothers. Much, much appreciated.
Henry
St. Thomas On “No One Can Say Jesus Is Lord Except In The Holy Spirit”
1 Cor. 12:3- “… no one can say ‘Jesus is Lord’ except in the Holy Spirit.”
St. Thomas Aquinas, Commentary On 1 Cor. 12:3: “And no one can say ‘Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit. But against this seems to be the fact that by the Holy Spirit man is introduced to the kingdom of heaven, as it says in Ps 143 (v. 10): ‘Your good spirit leads me along the right path.’ The Lord, however, says: ‘Not everyone who says, Lord, Lord, will enter the kingdom of heaven’ (Matt 7:21). Therefore, not everyone who says ‘Lord Jesus,’ says it in the Holy Spirit. The answer is that saying something in the Holy Spirit can be understood in two ways: in one way in the Holy Spirit moving but not possessed. For the Holy Spirit moves the hearts of certain men to speak, although He does not dwell in them, as it says in John (11:49) that in predicting the utility of the Lord’s death Caiaphas did not speak from himself but through the Spirit of prophecy. Balaam also predicted many true things, but moved by the Holy Spirit, as it says in Numbers (chaps. 23 & 24), although he did not possess Him. According to this, therefore, it must be understood that no one can say anything true, unless moved by the Holy Spirit, Who is the Spirit of truth, of Whom it is said in John (16:13): ‘When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth.’ Hence Ambrose says in a Gloss: ‘Every truth by whomsoever spoken is from the Holy Spirit.’ This applies especially to matters of faith, which are had by a special revelation of the Holy Spirit. Among these is the fact that Jesus is Lord of them all. Hence it says in Ac (2:36): ‘Let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.’ In another way someone speaks in the Holy Spirit moving and possessed. And according to this, what is said here can be verified, but in such a way that ‘to speak’ refers not only to the mouth but also to the heart and the deed. For something is said by the heart as in Ps 14 (v. 1): ‘The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God.’’ But something is said by deed, inasmuch as someone by an external work manifests his thought. No one, therefore, except by having the Holy Spirit can say: ‘Jesus is Lord,’ in such a way that he confesses this not only by the mouth but also with the heart reveres Him as Lord and in work obeys Him as Lord.”
When It’s Absent
St. Thomas Aquinas: “… the need for a thing is best known from its absence.” (Commentary On 1 Cor. 12)
The Truth Book
Dear Brothers,
… I am re-reading the Truth book [The Truth About What Really Happened To The Catholic Church After Vatican II]; it is an absolute gem that not only should be read by everyone, but gets better with each subsequent reading. I find it helpful now in keeping focused, while the apostate world is racing toward its end. In the Truth book, you mention (and demonstrate) that the documents of Vatican 2 appear to have been written by Satan himself. Who can doubt it! The Holy Ghost inspires and protects the infallible teachings of the papacy and the true Catholic Church. Certainly the Ape of God -- the other 'ghostwriter' - inspires his own, and would do so especially in his 'greatest' achievement, a counterfeit 'Catholic' Church which deceives the whole world. The true Church is the Ark of salvation; but the Counterfeit V2 Sect is the Ship of Fools whose adherents try to claim that the teachings of Vatican 2 were just 'weak', or 'too liberal', or 'misunderstood', or 'not binding'. They make endless excuses for defending Satan's Church which is obviously demonic and ruled by antipopes. Since Vatican 2 there has been no true pope - only Papa Satan. They love Papa Satan.
And the Truth book (like all your works) proves that Vatican 2 has 'expertly' (almost too expertly) inverted almost all of the truths revealed by God while claiming to be 'Catholic' - something no heretic or fake 'Christian' church has ever been able to pull off in 2,000 years - though such was prophesied to occur in the last days. Through his Vatican 2 Sect, Satan has spoken. But, as our Lord promised it would, Christ's one true Catholic Church continues to speak through MHFM -- and in a manner that previous ages (and probably even the popes themselves) would never have imagined possible! But it's how God does things. Blessed be God. And blessed be God in His Angels and in His Saints.
Lee Ann
Gregory Of Valencia On Explicit Faith
Gregory of Valencia was a noted scholastic theologian who died in 1603. Like many other theologians of the period, he acknowledged that St. Thomas held that explicit faith in Christ is required by a necessity of means (which means that even those who are “invincibly ignorant” of it cannot be saved without it). The fact that faith in Christ is absolutely required for salvation (and that faith is given in baptism) is dogmatically established. However, since so many false traditionalists deny this truth, it’s often useful to cite theologians on this point to further demonstrate that the aforementioned individuals have departed from Catholic Tradition.
Gregory of Valencia, S.J., Commentariorum theologicorum, Tome 3, Disputation 1, Q. 2, Punct. 4, 1595, p. 301: “[Durandus says]… if someone neither has nor in a human manner can have any knowledge of the faith of Christ – and nevertheless lives morally well insofar as he can through his natural powers and (as I think should be added) through some prevenient and exciting grace (which is lacking to no one) – then God, either through Himself or through another, whether man or angel, would inform such a man about the faith of Christ, so that first of all he can be justified through it, and indeed attain the first and second salvation [i.e. first justification and ultimate salvation]: because without doubt no one can be saved without this faith… Likewise it is our assertion based on the mind of many other theologians, who plainly seem to think that explicit faith in Christ is now necessary in every way for the faithful, in which way it was not necessary for the common faithful before the coming of Christ; and therefore [is now necessary] by a necessity both of precept and of means, inasmuch as in neither of these modes was this faith necessary to the common faithful before the coming of Christ.”
Gregory of Valencia, S.J., Commentariorum theologicorum, Tome 3, Disputation 1, Q. 10, Punct. 1, 1595, p. 368: “… the contrary position is to be maintained, namely that for those who have heard nothing concerning the faith infidelity per se is not a sin, although, as [Saint] Thomas rightly says in this place: they are damned on account of other sins.”
Heresies Against The Bible
“Fr.” Mike Schmitz (Ascension Presents) – False Theology Exposed
This is another amazing video dismantling Mike Schmitz' outrageous heresies. Schmitz also denied the historicity of the Genesis Creation account in his "Bible in a Year" podcast. He said Genesis 1 "doesn't have to be taken literally or historically and literally", which is completely wrong, and contradicted by, for example, the Pontifical Biblical Commission in 1909.
Christoffer
He’s Considered Conservative
“Fr.” Mike Schmitz (Ascension Presents) – False Theology Exposed
Don’t forget this individual is considered “conservative” by Novus Ordo standards.
S S R
Catholic Truth
“Fr.” Mike Schmitz (Ascension Presents) – False Theology Exposed
… fantastic video. The awesome beauty of catholic truth versus the dark smog of heretics.
Tommaso
Providential Documents
“Fr.” Mike Schmitz (Ascension Presents) – False Theology Exposed
It is incredible and providential how Jesus provided important documents like those of Vatican I, Mortalium Animos, and Satis Cognitum right before the great apostasy. They contain critical and possibly final confirmatory pieces of the puzzle, if you will, and you reference them often. It's another confirmation for true Catholics that your material is correct.
Gx
Comment
“Fr.” Mike Schmitz (Ascension Presents) – False Theology Exposed
Another great video. Thank you.
Ugo
Irrefutable
“Fr.” Mike Schmitz (Ascension Presents) – False Theology Exposed
This video is irrefutable actually.
Andres Gomez
Heresies
“Fr.” Mike Schmitz (Ascension Presents) – False Theology Exposed
Thank you for this exposure video of the heresies of "Fr." Mike Schmitz.
Daniel
Comment
Faustina & The Divine Mercy Deception
The devil fed into her pride. This video is epic!…
TheJet
Clearly Shown
You guys have clearly shown that the Vatican 2 faith isn’t the true Roman Catholic Faith established by Christ… I have also been convinced of the Traditional Catholic Faith.
True G
Without A Doubt
To Understand Catholic Dogma You Need To Know This
Trent Horn is without a doubt a Vatican II shill and false speaker of dogma. He derides the true faith and misleads souls. Which is Vatican II ‘s objective to instruct a false faith!
Chuck L
Drug Overdose
On Suicides & Catechumens (The Council of Braga – Translated)
Great . Would you consider someone that overdosed on drugs a suicide death?
Roc
Such a person died in mortal sin (and is not saved) whether one considers it a suicide or not.
Points
SSPX, CMRI & Francis vs. Powerful Papal Teaching
Great articulation of the points. Thanks.
Evan
On April 13, 2026, the clown Antipope Leo XIV visited the Great Mosque of Algiers (also known as Djamaa El-Djazair or the Grand Mosque of Algiers). He took off his shoes and prayed in the mosque – another manifestation of his indifferentism and apostasy. He also gave an address on the same day, in which he says that Algeria is “blessed” with a patrimony of faith.
Antipope Leo XIV, Address at Maquam Echahid Martyrs’ Monument, April 13, 2026: “Every people possesses a unique patrimony of history, culture and faith. Algeria, too, is blessed with this richness, which has sustained it through difficult times and continues to guide it into the future. Faith in God has a central place in your heritage.”
But Algeria is almost 100% Islamic. According to Catholic teaching Muslims do not have any faith. The patrimony of Algeria is thus one of paganism and infidelity, not faith. Leo XIV is an apostate. On the same day the antipope posted a message on social media that described Algeria as having a “shared aspiration for dignity, love, justice, and peace”, even though it’s illegal to preach the Gospel in Algeria. Leo XIV is an apostate fool, and those who obstinately promote him or profess communion with him are heretics.
Came Across Our Videos “In An Unexplained Manner” After Praying
Faustina & The Divine Mercy Deception
Is this a sign? I’m praying to St. Paul and St. Peter to intercede to me and ask our Lord Jesus Christ to give me knowledge with his church. I also pray to our Lord Jesus Christ to guide me. I’m thinking from the past days and supposed to do DIVINE MERCY tomorrow which is Sunday to us but in an unexplained manner I ended up here watching your videos. It’s all connecting now that our Church has been intercepted by Satan and his minions. God, our Lord and Savior Jesus and Holy Spirit Guide us to truth.
Joseph
God definitely want you to see our material. It contains the truth and explains what's happening. In addition to watching more of our videos, you should pray 15 decades of the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. Also see our video: A Prophet Explains The Vatican II Apostasy From Catholicism, among others. It's crucial to distinguish between the Vatican II Sect, which is not the Catholic Church, and the true Catholic Church (as our material explains)
Eyes Opened
It is Divine Mercy Sunday and I refuse to participate. I am so grateful I found this channel but now I at a loss at what to do. In the chapel where they have a tlm, there is a giant picture of the fake Jesus next to the cross and I am mortified… you have opened my eyes to the v2 sect.
A C
We're glad that you came across the material. You should not go to that church. As you watch more of the videos, we think that your questions will be answered. You can also call us here and someone can help you.
John of St. Thomas was a famous Thomistic theologian who died in 1644. Like many other theologians of the period, he acknowledged that St. Thomas and St. Augustine taught that explicit faith in Christ is required by a necessity of means. A necessity of means is something that’s so necessary that salvation cannot be attained without it even when one is invincibly or inculpably ignorant of the obligation. The fact that faith in Christ is absolutely required for salvation (and that faith is given in baptism) is dogmatically established. However, since so many false traditionalists deny this truth, it’s often useful to cite theologians on this point to further demonstrate that the aforementioned individuals have departed from Catholic Tradition.
Here’s what John of St. Thomas says about St. Thomas’ position.
John of St. Thomas, Cursus Theologi In Secundam Secundae D. Thomas, Disputation 4, A. 1., ed. 1663, p. 52: “Finally, St. Thomas agrees, who clearly seems to hold this position [that explicit faith in Christ is absolutely required]. For in Sentences Book 3, distinction 25, question 2, article 2, Quaestiuncula 2, he says: ‘That after the coming of Christ, all—both the greater (the learned) and the lesser (the simple)—are bound to believe explicitly, and if someone were not to have instruction, God would reveal it to him, unless he remained without it through his own fault.’ Therefore, St. Thomas thinks that this explicit faith is necessary by a necessity of means; for otherwise, if someone were not to have an instructor, he would be excused from such a precept—which St. Thomas does not admit. Instead, he has recourse to an extraordinary manner of instruction, which in the present case ought to be supplied.
And in Secunda Secundae, question 2, article 7, speaking at the beginning of the body of the article about what is necessary to believe by a necessity of means, he concludes that faith in Christ the Lord was required to be believed in some way at all times: ‘But after the time of the law of grace, all—both the greater (the learned) and the lesser (the simple)—are bound to have explicit faith in Christ.’ Therefore he is speaking about a necessity of means; otherwise he would not be speaking consistently.”
A covenant means “I am yours and you are mine”. In Exodus 19 the covenant meant that the people would be “a holy nation” and a “treasured possession”.
Exodus 19:5-6: “Now if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, you will be My treasured possession out of all the nations—for the whole earth is Mine. And unto Me you shall be a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.”
Here we see that through the covenant (which was based on faith and basic obedience at the time) the people could be pleasing to God through the inferior form of sanctification/justification that was available prior to Christ's coming. It meant that they were God's people through faith and obedience to Him.
Thus, if the Jews have a valid covenant now (as John Paul II and the other Vatican II antipopes repeatedly taught), that signifies that they can be pleasing to God and saved in their religion - which is heresy (see the Council of Florence, etc.).
John Paul II, Meeting on the Roots of Anti-Semitism, 1997: “This people [the Jewish people] has been called and led by God, Creator of Heaven and Earth. Their existence then is not a mere natural or cultural happening… It is a supernatural one. This people continues in spite of everything to be the people of the covenant…”
That statement is blatantly heretical. There are in fact many similar statements of John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Francis which teach, contrary to true papal teaching, that Jews have a valid covenant and that they can be holy, pleasing to God, etc. through the practice of their religion.
In the Islamic Republic of Iran it’s not only illegal to preach the Gospel, but “marriages” with girls age 10 or younger are often permitted. It’s a country in almost total darkness founded on the imposed veneration of the pedophile Mohammed, who “married” a six-year-old.
In fact, in the 1960s, the man who would found the Islamic Republic of Iran, “Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini”, wrote a work of Islamic jurisprudence that endorsed sexualized acts with infants as long as it was not intercourse! What an outrage. A great number people have rightly been appalled by the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Yet many of those same people seem, on some level, to legitimize or defend the Islamic Republic of Iran, which is far worse. In fact, the Epstein scandal would only be comparable to the Republic of Iran if an entire country was founded on a religion that venerated Epstein and outlawed preaching the Gospel.
Mt. 27:52- “The tombs also were opened. And many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised…”
Based on Mt. 27:52 and Tradition, various fathers of the Church (e.g. St. Ignatius of Antioch, etc.) taught that when Jesus rose again – after He finished the Harrowing of Hell – He also raised Old Testament just men from the dead.
St. Ignatius of Antioch, Epistle To the Magnesians, Chap. 9: “And therefore He whom they [the prophets] rightly waited for, having come, raised them from the dead.”
Some fathers, such as St. Cyril of Jerusalem, specifically applied the prophecy of Hosea 6:2 to that Resurrection. Hosea 6:2 appears to be the Old Testament verse St. Paul has in mind when he writes about the Resurrection in 1 Cor. 15:4.
Hosea 6:2- “After two days he will revive us; on the third day he will raise us up, that we may live before him.”
St. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lecture XIV (4th cent.): “… the Savior, who not only rose from the dead, but also raised the dead with Himself. And in the person of these the Prophet Hosea [Osee] says plainly: After two days He will revive us, and on the third day we shall rise again, and shall live in His sight.”
Our video called Jesus’ Descent Into Hell & The Baptism Of The Good Thief discusses ancient Church writers who believed that the Old Testament just men were baptized. The Resurrection of Old Testament just men at the time of Our Lord’s Resurrection is consistent with the idea that they were baptized; for if Jesus told His Apostles to preach the Gospel to every creature and baptize them (Mt. 28:19), it makes sense that they also would have been baptized after He preached the Gospel to them in Hades and raised them from the dead. For more, see our video:
On this Holy Thursday it’s useful to recall that when Our Lord established the Eucharist He included the words “mystery of faith” (mysterium fidei) in the form of consecration. Even though those words were not recorded in the Gospels, they were preserved by Apostolic Tradition. Papal teaching and the canon of the Mass confirmed that those words were part of the original consecration.
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Pt. III, Q. 78, A. 3, Reply to Obj. 9: “The words added, namely, ‘eternal’ and ‘mystery of faith’, were handed down to the Church by the Apostles, who received them from our Lord...”
Pope Innocent III, Cum Marthae Circa, Nov. 29: “In the Canon of the Mass that expression, ‘mysterium fidei,’ is found interposed among His words... Surely we find many such things omitted from the words as well as from the deeds of the Lord by the Evangelists, which the Apostles are read to have supplied by word or to have expressed by deed... Therefore, we believe that the form of words, as they are found in the Canon, the Apostles received from Christ, and their successors from them.”
When the horrible Novus Ordo Missae (the New Mass) was introduced by Antipope Paul VI as part of his attempt to destroy the Catholic Church, among its many other changes and novelties, the words “mystery of faith” were removed from the form of consecration. In the form of consecration in the Traditional Mass, the words “mystery of faith” specifically signified the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. However, in the New Mass the words “mystery of faith” were moved to a place after the consecration and given a different signification. Besides the many other problems with the New Mass, that change alone means that the New Mass cannot be considered valid, according to the teaching of Pope St. Pius V. The New Mass must be completely avoided. We discuss this matter and more in this video: The New Mass Lacks The “Mystery Of Faith” (Novus Ordo Modernists Refuted).
The removal of “mystery of faith” was very symbolic because those words have a special connection to St. Peter and the Roman Church. Of course, the most obvious change to the form of consecration that occurred after Vatican II was the change of the words “for you and for many” to “for you and for all”. Jesus did not say “for you and for all” when instituting the Eucharist. Hence, the inclusion of “for all” in the consecration form of countless New Masses for decades was an outrageous, heretical and blasphemous falsification of what Our Lord actually said when instituting the Eucharist. It means that those “Masses” were certainly invalid. That’s also covered in the aforementioned video.
Fr. Cornelius Lapide, Commentary on John 4:22- “Ver. 22. You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, because salvation is from the Judeans. Here Christ responds directly to the woman’s question and settles the dispute concerning the adoration of God in favor of the Judeans, condemning the Samaritans as schismatics. He says: O Samaritans, you worship what do you not know, because you worship the God of the Judeans with your Assyrian idols; and making God as it were an associate of idols, you therefore worship a false and fictitious God. Again, you worship a God different from the God of the Judeans, that is one who is the Lord of your land alone, who therefore is false and has been invented by you... In the same manner the Turks and Jews worship a God whom they do not know, because they deny Him to be a Trinity of Persons. Thus also Calvin with his followers, denying the omnipotence of God, and making Him cruel in condemning certain men to hell without any demerit on their part, worship not a true, but a false God. For the true God is Almighty, and most kind.”
His comment also contradicts the false understanding of John 4:22 that was put forward by various Novus Ordo heretics, as we showed here: Novus Ordo “Thomists” Fall Into The Pit Defending Islam’s False God.
Antipope Leo XIV recently stated that God does not hear the prayers of people who engage in war. Since he made no distinction between a just and an unjust war, his statement contradicts Catholic and biblical teaching. That’s not a surprise since he teaches heresy on a regular basis. Here’s an interesting quote from St. Robert Bellarmine that refutes Leo XIV’s false statement.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Laicis, Book 3, Chap. 16: “Finally, it is well established that the ancient pontiffs such as Urban II, Paschal II, Eugene III, and many others—as well as the general councils, such as the Lateran, Lyons, Vienne, and others, proclaimed a general war against the Mahometans...”
Preserved From Eastern “Orthodoxy”
Playlist That Refutes Eastern “Orthodoxy”
Your apologetics work against Eastern Orthodoxy is one of the major reasons that I ultimately did not become EO – your excellent work kept me from leaving Catholicism and converting to Eastern Orthodoxy which, in hindsight, would have been a great scandal and regret for me. Thank you so much!
In a 1966 General Audience entitled Voi Forse Sapete, Antipope Paul VI admitted that Vatican II taught that all the baptized, including those who reject Catholic teaching, are in the Church of Christ. That is of course a blatant heresy. Paul VI’s admission further confirms exactly what we’ve said about the false teaching of Vatican II.
Paul VI, General Audience, Voi Forse Sapete, June 1, 1966: “Think it over carefully. You are the Church, which means that you belong to the Church, to the holy Church of God, to the great assembly called together by Christ, to the living community of His word and His grace, to His Mystical Body… For the present, let Us rather ask another question. Are all those who have been baptized, even those who are separated from Catholic unity, in the Church? In the true Church? In the one Church? Yes. This is one of the great truths of Catholic tradition, and the Council has repeatedly confirmed it.”
The Catholic Church of course teaches that baptized people who deny the Papacy or any other dogma are outside the Church. See this: What Vatican II Said About Protestants & “Orthodox” – Heresy Refuted In 5 Minutes
Irrefutable
Leo XIV Worshipped A Pagan Goddess – What It Means
… this is really irrefutable, no mental gymnastics can explain this away…
Marko
Connections
Leo XIV Worshipped A Pagan Goddess – What It Means
Only after rewatching some segments here I realize how insightful those videos were. Hearing the Antichrist declaring the divinity of man three times in his first sermon as antipope to the crowds, along with many Providential temporal connections, and many other things, should be enough for a good willed mind to accept the reality of his role in history. It's like some reject or avoid the truth because they don't want it to be true, which is weak.
Josip
Video
Leo XIV Worshipped A Pagan Goddess – What It Means
Great video…
Wesley
Comment
Leo XIV Worshipped A Pagan Goddess – What It Means
Actually irrefutable.
M V
St. Margaret Mary vs. Faustina
Faustina & The Divine Mercy Deception
Excellent point brother, on St. Margaret Mary and Our Lord's Sacred Heart, as well as pointing out the errors of Vatican 2, Thank you!
Dom
Papacy Should Be Obvious To People
… It is astounding to me that so many people cannot comprehend why Christ gave the world the Catholic Church and the Papacy which He protects from error. Heretics do not want to be united to Christ; but they are willing to be united to Satan by lies (which, at root, is always the hatred of Christ and His one true Church). False religions are like chain-gangs to which people voluntarily enslave themselves and voluntarily remain. Very sad.
Lee Ann
Informative & Well-Documented
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Thank you for this very informative, well-documented video.
Archie
Comment
Amazing Evidence For God – Scientific Evidence For God
What a wonderful, wonderful presentation. It makes me weep to think that any seeing it would not immediately understand that God must certainly exist and must have created all.
Wendy
“Some months before he departed this life, Benedict forewarned his disciples on what day he was to die; and he ordered his grave to be opened six days before he was carried to it. On the sixth day, he would be carried into the Church, where he received the Eucharist, and then… with his eyes lifted up to heaven, and absorbed in prayer, he gave up the ghost. Two monks saw his soul rising to heaven, clothed in a most precious garment and surrounded with lights, and one of a most glorious and awe-inspiring aspect standing above, whom they heard saying: This is the way whereby Benedict, the beloved of the Lord, goes up to heaven.” (The Divine Office, March 21, Lectio 6, On The Death of St. Benedict)
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
