| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party. This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments. Section containing some important recent posts. E-Exchange Archives.
Truth
Congratulations on all the good work you’re doing in service to God and the truth.
Flaviu Irimie [Romania]
Comment
Wes Huff denied Jesus Christ on Joe Rogan
Your ministry has been a guiding light. Please pray for us followers to grow ever closer to Jesus through the genuine… Catholic faith.
A H R
Widespread
Wes Huff denied Jesus Christ on Joe Rogan
Unfortunately this behavior is widespread like a plague...
AV
Shocking
Wes Huff denied Jesus Christ on Joe Rogan
Shocking!
Joan
The Holy Name
Wes Huff denied Jesus Christ on Joe Rogan
Thank you for standing up for the Holy Name of Our Lord…
semper
Buddhism and Shintoism are, of course, false pagan religions. Shintoism is a blatantly idolatrous and polytheistic religion in which its followers worship many spirits and false deities. John Paul II explicitly expressed esteem for the false religions themselves. He was an apostate.
John Paul II, To A Group Of Buddhists And Shintoists, Feb. 20, 1980: “Venerable friends, representatives of Buddhism and Shinto in Japan, I am very happy to welcome you today… The Catholic Church expresses her esteem for your religions and for your high spiritual values, such as purity, detachment of heart, love for the beauty of nature, and benevolence and compassion for everything that lives.”
Yves Congar (a liberal and heretical theologian who played a significant role at Vatican II) acknowledges that a new understanding of “ecumenism” and the Church was being pushed at Vatican II.
Yves Congar: “I see that there is a profound ambiguity underlying the same word ‘ecumenism,’ between those who see only reunion with the Church (favored by charity) and those who see something quite new ahead of all of us, that calls for a profound reform.” (My Journal Of The Council [Nov. 21, 1963], Liturgical Press, 2012, p. 445).
The new ecclesiology clashed with the Church’s traditional teaching.
Yves Congar: “We are observing a confrontation between two ecclesiologies. The after-effects of the pontificate of Pius XII are being challenged. And, beyond them, the regime that has prevailed since the Gregorian Reform, on the basis of the identification of the Roman Church with the universal Catholic Church. The Churches are alive, they are there, represented and gathered together in Council, they are asking for an ecclesiology of Church and Churches, and not just of the papal monarchy…” (My Journal Of The Council [Nov. 6, 1963], Liturgical Press, 2012, p. 415).
Yves Congar: “For this hard work is based on the following idea, formally accepted by Athenagoras [“Orthodox”], and, basically, by Paul VI – that is to say: the Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church are the same Church…” (My Journal Of The Council [June 2, 1964], Liturgical Press, 2012, p. 535).
We know from the documents of Vatican II and from many statements of the Vatican II antipopes that they indeed accepted and formally taught a new and heretical ecclesiology. This is abundantly documented in our material. For example: What Vatican II Said About Protestants & “Orthodox” – Heresy Refuted In 5 Minutes.
Psalm 15 (which is Psalm 14 in the Vulgate) contradicts the false doctrine of faith alone. It’s about who will dwell in the heavenly Jerusalem. It teaches that people must walk in a certain way and do what is right to dwell there. (Faith is also of course required.)
Psalm 15: “O Lord, who shall sojourn in your tent? Who shall dwell on your holy hill? 2 He who walks blamelessly and does what is right and speaks truth in his heart; 3 who does not slander with his tongue and does no evil to his neighbor, nor takes up a reproach against his friend; 4 in whose eyes a vile person is despised, but who honors those who fear the Lord; who keeps an oath even when it hurts, and does not change their mind; 5 who does not put out his money at interest and does not take a bribe against the innocent. He who does these things shall never be moved.”
Fascinating Connections
Did The Bible Predict 70 Years Without A Pope?
Very fascinating connections, thank you for working on this video….
JusticeTaylor
Horrifying
“LGBT Catholic Churches” Across America Exposed – New Series
Absolutely horrifying.
PJC
Lacks The Marks Of The Church
“LGBT Catholic Churches” Across America Exposed – New Series
MHFM: The next time someone tells you that the Vatican II Sect has the four marks of the Church, show him this video.
Video
“LGBT Catholic Churches” Across America Exposed – New Series
Great video brothers!!...
Hayden
Days Of Noah
“LGBT Catholic Churches” Across America Exposed – New Series
These are the Days of Noah again. Read the Signs of the Times.
M U
End Times Abominations
“LGBT Catholic Churches” Across America Exposed – New Series
This video is proof we are in the end times..... very close to the end.
Tony
Comment
“LGBT Catholic Churches” Across America Exposed – New Series
That is beyond words…
John
Lost Souls
“LGBT Catholic Churches” Across America Exposed – New Series
It is so diabolical... So many lost souls!
Alessandra
Monsignor Joseph Clifford Fenton was a somewhat well-known American theologian who also attended Vatican II. Even though he was not truly conservative (as we’ve shown in our refutations of his false salvation views), he did care about some Catholic principles. The things being promoted in the discussions and drafts at Vatican II were so heretical that even Fenton was accusing “everyone of heresy”.
“Fenton was so hateful, so obstinately negative, so aggressive, so utterly senseless, that Mgr Philips got up and said, with emotion, but forcefully and calmly: it is impossible to work in these conditions and I am leaving. Because (turning to Fenton) you accuse everyone of heresy. It is impossible to work unless one respects others and their points of view…” (Yves Congar, My Journal Of The Council [March 8, 1962], Liturgical Press, 2012, p. 77)
Comment
Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis
An excellent and helpful explanation of this delicate subject. Thank you for your hard work!
Mcgoodle
People are commenting on the face made by Ronald Hicks (the Vatican II Sect “Archbishop” of NYC). It does remind one of Isaiah 3:9: “The look on their countenance witnesses against them, and they declare their sin as Sodom…”
Even if he’s not a sodomite himself, he is guilty of that sin for allowing it to be endorsed, promoted and celebrated at many Vatican II Sect (Novus Ordo) churches in NYC. We have videos coming out, God willing, that will document the shocking things that are promoted at churches under Antipope Leo XIV in NYC and in many other places.
Fr. Charles Balić was a Franciscan theologian and a consultor to the Holy Office under Pope Pius XII. He was also President of the International Marian Academy. Later on he was appointed (by the Vatican II “Church”) to be a theological expert at Vatican II. According to Yves Congar (who was a significant figure at Vatican II), “Balić told us that [Pope] Pius XII had deleted the word Co-Redemptrix in all the documents bearing this title and had replaced it by ‘Socia Christi Redemptoris’ (Associate of Christ the Redeemer).” (Yves Congar, My Journal Of The Council, Liturgical Press, 2012, p. 72)
Pius XII never used the term “Co-Redemptrix” as pope. He probably recognized that the term is indeed inaccurate and problematic, and that’s why he deleted it from drafts. For a full treatment of this matter, see our video called: Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis.
Infallible Statements
2,000 Years Of Infallible Papal Teaching On Baptism’s Absolute Necessity
This is amazing work, it’s great that all of the relevant infallible statements of popes on the subject is now in one video.
Benedict
Clear Doctrine
2,000 Years Of Infallible Papal Teaching On Baptism’s Absolute Necessity
Thank you for passing on so completely this clear doctrine which they diabolically tried to hide from us. I never heard it in my fifty years being in the Vatican II sect!...
Carrie
Magisterium
Thank you… this is really wonderful. I hope some false traditionalists will really listen with an open heart and be convinced by the teachings of the Infallible Magisterium in this very important matter.
Philothea
Roger Schutz was a non-Catholic who founded the ecumenical, non-denominational “monastery” of Taize. Yves Congar (a liberal theologian who played a significant role at Vatican II) reports what Schutz told him about John XXIII.
Yves Congar: “… [this] was confirmed by a conversation I had with Pastor Roger Schutz on 20 June 1960. Schutz told me, though with the greatest of discretion, about the audience, arranged for him by Cardinal Gerlier, that he had had with John XXIII on the evening of, or the morning after, his consecration. According to Schutz, the Pope [John XXIII] had said some very incredible, even downright heretical, things to him, such as: the Catholic Church does not possess the whole truth; we should search together… I think that the leading members of the Curia very quickly realized that, with John XXIII and his plan for a Council, they might be in for a very strange adventure…” (My Journal Of The Council [July 1960], Liturgical Press, 2012, p. 7)
Schutz’s testimony about John XXIII’s beliefs is credible because John XXIII was in fact a heretic and an antipope who oversaw revolutionary things at Vatican II. Congar was also an ally of John XXIII. John XXIII named him a consultant to the preparatory commission for Vatican II and effectively rehabilitated him. Antipope Benedict XVI also notoriously gave “Holy Communion” to the non-Catholic Roger Schutz, and he declared that he went to Heaven when he died.
Fr. Thomas Stapleton (d. 1598) was a noted English Counter-Reformation Catholic theologian and scripture scholar. He was named prothonotary Apostolic by Pope Clement VIII. He correctly taught, in accordance with traditional Catholic teaching, that the multitude of Protestants who reject Catholic teaching can “in no way” belong to the Church of Christ. That is the opposite of the teaching of Vatican II.
Fr. Thomas Stapleton (Catholic Theologian), Principiorum fidei doctrinalium demonstratio, 1578, Book 4, Chap. 7: “… let us conclude that our adversaries [the Protestants] in no way can belong to the Church; but we, by a singular benefit of God to be in that society which is the true and only Church of Christ. First we will speak concerning the prior part, and then concerning the latter part. I say therefore that the multitude and assembly of Protestants, who today call themselves Evangelicals, and who have gone out from the Roman Church, cannot be the true Church of God and of Christ.”
On June 2, 2026, Antipope Leo XIV named former president and chief operating officer of EWTN’s news division, Montse Alvarado, as Prefect of the Dicastery for Communication. This was announced just a few days after the publication of our important new video called: EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy. Leo XIV’s decision to appoint a non-religious laywoman to be the head of a Vatican dicastery is a novelty that has upset many people in the Vatican II Sect. However, Montse Alvarado’s views on non-Christian religions are even more revealing. They further confirm exactly what we’ve said about EWTN and the Vatican II Sect.
In an interview called In Our Time (Nostra Aetate): A Conversation with Montse Alvarado, on Aug. 21, 2022, Alvarado expressed blatant heresy on the Jews. She stated, among other things:
Watch her express the astounding heresy in the clip below.
• “There’s this idea that all Jews should become Christians, which obviously is wrong”! That’s an astounding heresy. Has this woman ever read the New Testament? Her statement is of course appalling and outrageous, but she’s actually just following the teaching of Vatican II and the Vatican II antipopes.
• She characterizes traditional Catholic views on Jews as “soft forms of anti-semitism”.
• She also teaches that Jews are the Chosen People.
• She defends various heresies that Antipope Francis taught on the Jews.
• She says that Jews and Christians are “walking hand in hand toward salvation” (blatant heresy and a denial of Christ).
• She also encourages people to observe the Jewish Sabbath, and she says that when Jews do so they are encountering the “Holy of Holies”. But the Catholic Church teaches that after the coming of Christ and the promulgation of the Gospel the Jewish Sabbath can no longer be observed without mortal sin and the loss of salvation (Council of Florence). Her statement is heresy and blasphemy.
• She also of course promotes Vatican II’s heresy that Jews and Muslims worship the same God.
Montse Alvarado’s appointment by Antipope Leo XIV is a striking confirmation of exactly what we have said about Antipope Leo XIV and EWTN. We also don’t think it’s just a coincidence that this occurred just a few days after our new video on EWTN came out. The timing serves as a providential confirmation of what’s covered in our video concerning the significant role EWTN has played in leading people into apostasy and the blatant heresies endorsed by the Vatican II Counter Church.
The Widespread Bad Will & Unbelief At The Time Of Our Lord
“We see from the context in the three Evangelists that the people’s unbelief in our Lord’s previous lessons and miracles had manifested itself in the saddest manner. According to St. Matthew and St. Mark, the leaders of the people in the case of the man with the withered hand had set a trap for Jesus ‘that they might accuse Him’ (Mt. 12:10; Mk. 3:2). They made a consultation against Him, ‘how they might destroy Him’ (Mt. 12:14; Mk. 3:6). When He healed the man who was blind and dumb and possessed with a devil, they said: ‘This man casts out devils but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils’ (Mt. 12:24; Mk. 3:22) and they also said: ‘He has an unclean spirit’ (Mk. 3:30). After He had worked countless miracles before them, they wanted a sign from Him (Mt. 12:38).
Furthermore, from our Lord’s lament over the want of faith in Israel (Luke 7:9); over the impenitence of the cities in the neighborhood of the Sea of Galilee (Mt. 11:20-24); over the wicked generation which on the day of Judgment shall be condemned by the people of Niniveh and the Queen of Sheba for their unbelief (Mt. 12:40-45) – the generation which said of the Son of Man: ‘Behold a man that is a glutton and a drinker of wine, a friend of publicans and sinners’ (Luke 7:34) – from these lamentations, we see that not only the leaders, but a great part of the people also remained unbelievers.
Even His ‘[family]… went out to lay hold of Him. For they said: He is become mad’ (Mark 3:21)… Thus it became more and more clearly manifest that the people of Israel were unworthy of their eternal destiny as God’s chosen people. They had brought upon themselves the sentence of reprobation pronounced against them by the justice of their offended God. Therefore, only to a few chosen witnesses from amongst them should the decrees of the eternal Wisdom and Love regarding the new kingdom of God amongst men be made known. Not through the people as a nation, but only by means of these chosen instruments was the realization of those eternal decrees to be accomplished.” (Leopold Fonck, S.J., The Parables Of Christ, 1918, pp. 34-35).
Struck My Heart
EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy
Thank you ever so much for doing this, I’m astonished at how well researched this is and the efforts you went to on behalf of those on the very, very narrow path! So much of it has grieved me to see the extent of the “falling away” and how their bad will and pride has lead them to such unfaithfulness. That she would speak such invectives against St. Peter, St. Paul and call the Apostles “stinky”… and say how stupid they were to listen to Jesus when he told them to not take a staff, extra clothes etc… has struck my heart to the quick…. what on earth would cause her to say such stuff about them??? She’d like to “deck” St. Paul when she gets to “the kingdom”??? The audacity!!
A shocking and important expose’. Thank you.
JMJ Barbara
Extremely Eye-Opening
EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy
… this documentary was extremely eye-opening…
Farneyman
Very Important Documentary – Shocking Moments
EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy
This is one of the most important documentaries ever produced. It may be difficult and painful for some to admit that EWTN has been a deception, but people need to finally get out of the Vatican II sect. One of the most shocking moments in this video for me was the behavior of Stan Fortuna at his own mother's funeral.
David Phillips
In-Depth
EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy
Wow, thank you brothers for going so in depth with this documentary.
Watrew
MHFM Research
EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy
Just starting this and can't get over how thorough MHFM is with their research. You'd have to be a fool to dispute the research this team does. To MHFM: Thank you for these videos, articles, and the like. It must be a constant battle and, at times, tiresome. I know I am not the only one who thinks these are so well made and documented. THANK YOU!
Rmdps
Detail
EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy
Thank you for showing the truth about the V2 Counter-Church in such exquisite detail. Anyone of good will who would see these signs would know they are wicked beyond belief.
Kevin Higgins
The Great Deception
EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy
Amazing documentary. Your videos and books expose the Great Deception brilliantly. I pray every day that Christ continues to protect you, inspire you, and give you the fortitude to continue your work for the salvation of souls.
Dave Rubin
Production
EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy
Completely epic. A high-quality production.
Daniel
Information
EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy
Truly another amazing video filled with information…
Pugmom
Matthew 11:11- “Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist. Yet the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he. “
The statement of Jesus, which is recorded Matthew 11:11, is about John being the greatest of the prophets. That's clear from the preceding context of Matthew 11 (see verse 9), as well as from the parallel passage in Luke (according to most manuscripts) which specifies that Jesus is talking about prophets.
Matthew 11:9- “What then did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I tell you, and more than a prophet.”
Luke 7:28: “For I say to you, among those born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist; but he who is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he.”
Thus, Matthew 11:11 is not addressing who is the holiest person ever created. That would be Our Lady.
St. Bruno, Bishop of Segni (AD 1045-1123): “We have heard that some of our brothers not only do not condemn those things which have been done against the Church, but even imprudently try to defend them. But everyone who defends heresy is a heretic.” (Letter Audivimus quod; Migne, Patrologia Latina, 165:1139B)
All the martyrs (as well as all the confessors, virgins, and other faithful) who are in Heaven RECEIVED SACRED BAPTISM (a term for the Sacrament of Baptism) BEFORE DEATH, the same baptism received by infants. This was infallibly defined by Pope Benedict XII. Those who teach that a martyr (or anyone else) is in Heaven without having first received sacred baptism are defying infallible Catholic teaching. Also, Pope Benedict XII made no exceptions for salvation without baptism in his dogmatic definition, even though he easily could have made exceptions if they existed. He didn't make any exceptions because none exist (see John 3:5). However, he was careful to qualify other things that he defined about people being purged in Purgatory because he made sure that his definition was precise, exact and completely accurate.
Pope Benedict XII, Benedictus Deus, 1336, ex cathedra: “By this Constitution, which will remain valid for perpetuity, We define with apostolic authority that, according to the universal ordering of God, [i.] the souls of all holy men who departed from this world before the Passion of our Lord Jesus Christ, [ii.] as also those of the holy Apostles, martyrs, confessors, virgins and other faithful who died following their reception of the sacred baptism of Christ, in whom nothing was to be purged when they departed, nor should be when they depart in the future, or if there was at that time, or should be, anything to be purged in the same, then, when they shall have been purged after their death, [iii.] and the souls of children reborn in that same baptism of Christ and of those to be baptized when they shall have been baptized, dying before the use of their free will, immediately after their death and the aforesaid purgation of those who stood in need of a purgation of this kind, even before the resumption of their bodies and the General Judgment, following the Ascension of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ into Heaven, have been, are, and will be in Heaven, in the Kingdom of Heaven and in the Celestial Paradise with Christ…”
Along the lines of our most recent video, These Latin Passages Illuminate The Truth About A Controversial Issue, this is an interesting passage from Hugh of Saint-Cher. Hugh of Saint-Cher (c. 1190–1263) was a French Dominican friar, cardinal, and an important biblical scholar of the 13th century. In his Commentary On Luke 10:27, he writes:
Commentary on Luke 10:27
Diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex totis viribus totius cordis ex totis viribus totius anime ex totis viribus totius mentis…
“You shall love the Lord your God with all the powers of your whole heart, with all the powers of your whole soul, and with all the powers of your whole mind.”
… {d} Ex tota mente id est memoria sine difficultate, vel sine oblivione. Hec non possunt impleri in via.
“With the whole mind, that is, with the memory without difficulty, or without forgetfulness. These things cannot be fulfilled on the way [i.e., in this present life / on the road of earthly existence].”
Here Hugh of Saint-Cher uses the Latin word sine, followed by a noun in the ablative case, followed by the word “or”, followed again by the word sine, and then followed by another noun in the ablative case. He does not employ that language to teach that only one of the two (i.e. the absence of difficulty or the absence of forgetfulness) is required to love God perfectly. Rather, he employs that construction to teach that, in his view, love of God with the whole mind would require the absence of both difficulty and forgetfulness, not just one without the other. Hugh of Saint-Cher thus uses the Latin word sine, followed by a noun in the ablative case, followed by the word “or”, followed again by the word sine to teach that both are necessary.
The examples covered in our video sufficiently prove our point, but this was an interesting additional example that served to directly refute another errant comment made by a ‘BOD’ supporter. He falsely claimed that one could never repeat the “without” (sine) after “or” to teach that two things are required. He doesn’t know what he’s talking about, and they really just pile one error and false claim upon another.
Refreshing
These Latin Passages Illuminate The Truth About A Controversial Issue
An excellent video - refreshing water, clear and pure…
J. Balderston
Very Instructive
A Prophet Explains The Vatican II Apostasy From Catholicism
Thank you. This series has been very instructive…
Reader459
Great Material
These Latin Passages Illuminate The Truth About A Controversial Issue
Great material…
Iron
Great Video
These Latin Passages Illuminate The Truth About A Controversial Issue
Another great video…
Christoffer
Clear
These Latin Passages Illuminate The Truth About A Controversial Issue
Clear as day.
RA
Work
These Latin Passages Illuminate The Truth About A Controversial Issue
… Your work is highly important, valued and appreciated across the world…
Eldred
Comment
These Latin Passages Illuminate The Truth About A Controversial Issue
Fantastic…!
Susan Raciti
Taylor Marshall recently made this statement/argument against sedevacantists, but he badly misapplied Trent’s canon.
Taylor Marshall stated: If a sedevacantist tells you that every diocese on earth is vacant, that person has lost the Catholic faith:
“If anyone saith that, in the Catholic Church, there is not a hierarchy by divine ordination instituted, consisting of bishops, priests, and ministers; let him be anathema.” (The Council of Trent, On the Sacrament of Order, Canon VI.)
The canon of Trent that he cites (Canon 6 on the Sacrament of Order) is not about the hierarchy of jurisdiction or governance but rather about the hierarchy of orders instituted by Christ. It has nothing to do with whether the offices of jurisdiction can be vacant. That’s proven by the canon’s reference to “ministers”, which includes deacons (see Chap. 2 of the same decree) who typically did not have ordinary jurisdiction. Marshall cannot face real arguments (his position would be demolished), but he can circulate weak and fallacious ones. He’s a false traditionalist deceiver and a compromiser who denies the Catholic faith by holding, among other things, that the notorious false ecumenist Antipope John Paul II was a saint. For more on him, see this video: Taylor Marshall’s Publicity Stunts & False Theology – Exposed.
Catholic Theology On The Trinity
Not only is this video a masterpiece in its refutation on Eastern "Orthodoxy", but it is a masterclass in the Catholic Theology of the Trinity.
Kittyword
A Clear Display
A clear display of why most people are damned...
Antonio Eligius
Comment
A Prophet Explains The Vatican II Apostasy From Catholicism
Thank you so much for your amazing work. This really made me think…
Chrissy
Insights
The Dark Meaning of John Paul I’s “Beatification”
Wow. Very impressive and profound insights. You have taken the time to research many things in many of your videos and I am grateful to you brothers for helping me to become a better Catholic and to better know the faith, and this research ties together a lot of what your previous videos commented on…
Paul
Attacking Baptism
Thank you Brothers for defending the teaching on baptism once more! Our Holy God will always provide His people with what's truly necessary to enter heaven… I know the satanic mouthpieces will not stop the attack on baptism until that day of judgement puts them in fire for eternity.
Christina Kalix
Church Of Rome vs. City Of Rome
[Some say] … Rome no longer holds the Faith. This directly contradicts the indefectibility of the Church that our Lord promised us in Matthew 16:18…
F G
MHFM
It is not contrary to indefectibility to say that the city of Rome has lost the faith. Various theologians before Vatican II correctly distinguished between the Church or Ecclesia of the city of Rome (under a true pope) and the city itself. The Church of the city of Rome (and the Apostolic See) cannot fall away, but the city can fall into apostasy if the true pope is absent. An assembly in Rome under a notoriously heretical antipope is not actually the Church or Ecclesia of the city of Rome. Various theologians also recognized that the prophecies about Babylon in the Apocalypse refer to the city of Rome (not the Church of Rome) returning to paganism in the last days. That has occurred. The fact that Rome under the Vatican II antipopes is in apostasy is an absolute and irrefutable fact, as our material proves.
Compelling
Leo XIV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
This is By FAR the most insightful, compelling, uncompromising and convincing coverage of the latest effrontery by Prevost. The AP praying with the heretic Anglican woman is definitely a mockery!...
TheJet
In the Old Testament God repeatedly chose a monarchic form of government to rule His people. He conferred upon His representative (e.g. Moses, Joshua) supreme authority over the rest of the people, which they exercised under God who was the ultimate king. It thus makes sense that in the New Testament God would establish His Church with one person (St. Peter, the first pope) serving as Christ’s primary representative and holding supreme authority over the rest.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 1, Chap. 2: “But setting these things aside, what form of rule God wished to confirm by His own authority can also be gathered — and especially from this source — from that Republic which He established among the Hebrew people. For the government of the Hebrews was not, as Calvin claims (but does not prove), aristocratic and close to a polity [rule by many, elders and nobles], but plainly a monarchy. The princes among the Hebrews were first patriarchs, such as Abraham, Jacob, Judah, and the rest; then leaders (generals), such as Moses and Joshua; next judges, such as Samuel, Samson, and others; afterwards kings, such as Saul, David, and Solomon; and finally again leaders, such as Zerubbabel and the Maccabees.”
Question for Feeneyites: Suppose your baptism was invalid due to a defect of form, matter or intention. You had no idea and continue to live a Catholic life, receiving the sacraments and die in what you believe to be a state of grace. Do you go to Hell because you were never validly baptized?
C J
First, the term you employ (i.e. “Feeneyite”) to describe those who adhere to Catholic teaching on baptism is inaccurate. Second, in the early Church Pope St. Siricius and Pope St. Leo the Great addressed situations that are similar to what you have described. In their responses/acts they taught that even unbaptized catechumens who wanted water baptism will not be saved if they die without it (thereby contradicting the very idea of “baptism of desire”).
In Letter 167 Leo the Great addresses the issue of people who are unsure if they were baptized as infants. He responds by stating that they must be regenerated “lest they evidently perish” (ne pereant evidenter). He thus clearly teaches that baptism is absolutely required for salvation, even for those who want baptism and are unsure if they received it.
Pope St. Leo the Great, Letter 167, 5th Century: “Question 16. Concerning those who have been left as infants by Christian parents, if no proof of their baptism can be found whether they ought to be baptized? If no proof exists among their kinsfolk and relations, nor among the clergy or neighbors whereby those, about whom the question is raised, may be proved to have been baptized, steps must be taken for their regeneration: lest they evidently perish…”
Likewise, in Letter 166 he refers to people who “seek the saving waters of baptism, but in the ignorance of infancy cannot remember whether they have received the mystery and rites of baptism”. He says that they must be baptized because they remain outside “the gate of salvation, which he is shown never before to have entered.” He again thereby teaches that such people will not be saved without actually receiving baptism. Pope St. Siricius also taught that unbaptized catechumens “in any necessity” who desired baptism must be baptized right away lest every single one of them (unusquisque) perish for not having received what they desired. See our articles on Siricius and Leo the Great for more. For instance: https://vaticancatholic.com/pope-leo-the-great-sacrament-of-baptism-salvation/
Second, God’s providence will make sure that all of His elect are baptized.
Peter the Venerable, A Summary Of The Entire Heresy Of The Saracens, 1142, #16: “… he [the Devil] used that most wretched man Mohammed (and as it is reported by many, one who is possessed by an evil spirit and by epilepsy) as an instrument and implement, as it were, most suited to him; alas, he plunged into eternal damnation, along with himself, a very large race and one which at present can be reckoned as nearly a half part of the world.”
Eye-Opening
Leo XIQV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
I'm new to this depth of Catholicism, and it's really eye-opening…
Aidan Chaytor
“Called” To Heresy & Invalidity
Leo XIV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
Thank you for this irrefutable video that demonstrates that Leo XIV is a manifest heretic. The fact that he explicitly stated in his message to the women that she had been "called" forces Vatican II sect members to either recognize women "ordinations", or that God would call someone into being a fake bishop (which is insanity)…
Daniel
In Poland
Leo XIV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
It is absolutely scandalous! The Vatican II sect and the Anglican sect both were formed on evil deeds - the first one with the help of the devil's servants… who removed the validly chosen pope in 1958 and 1963, and the other on the sin of adultery and murder by Henry VIII. We in Poland know the truth.
Gwido
Apostate Vatican II Religion
Leo XIV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
This is another example of how Leo XIV is just like antipope Francis, following the same apostate Vatican II religion.
Christoffer
Filippo Maroto, Institutiones Iuris Canonici Ad Normam Novi Codicis, 1919, Vol. 2, p. 172: “Indeed heretics and schismatics are barred from the Supreme Pontificate by the divine law itself, because, although by divine law they are not said to be incapable of participating in certain types of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, nevertheless they must certainly be regarded as excluded from occupying the throne of the Apostolic See, which is the infallible teacher of the true faith and the center of ecclesiastical unity.”
Pope St. Innocent I’s Declaration That No One Is Saved Without Baptism
Thank you so much…! That’s 2 canonized popes, Pope St. Leo the great and Pope St Innocent, as well as Pope Clement V and others all consistently teaching one baptism for the remission of sins.
Dom Gazy
Among others, there is also the authoritative teaching of Pope St. Zosimus and Pope St. Siricius. Those popes specifically contradicted the idea that anyone can be saved without the Sacrament of Baptism in some of the most important papal acts from the period of the early Church:
https://endtimes.video/ancient-pope-water-baptism-de-fide/
https://vaticancatholic.com/latin-text-oldest-surviving-papal-decree-rejects-baptism-desire/
There are many other definitive arguments, which are covered in our playlist on the matter:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzssJHrA8L1PjrxWW-S15pnEQ
Pope St. Innocent I’s Declaration That No One Is Saved Without Baptism
… I have a question how can i get baptized because my family is muslim and I became v2 catholic in 2024 now a traditional Catholic so I don't have any trusted man who can baptize me what should I do?
Aleyad
Please call us. However, in necessity anyone you know who would observe the matter, form, etc. and have the basic intention could baptize you (provided you are ready, convinced on all the issues, etc.).
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” 1439: “In case of necessity, however, not only a priest or a deacon, but even a layman or woman, yes even a pagan and a heretic can baptize, so long as he preserves the form of the Church and has the intention of doing what the Church does.” (Denz. 696)
This file explains how a baptism is to be performed: https://vaticancatholic.com/how-to-perform-a-baptism/ We also recommend that people, if they can, pray 15 decades of the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently.
Best
“Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists – The Last Version
These videos on demonic magicians are the very best I've ever seen. I've seen the original version that you made several years ago.
TheyLive
In his letter Inter Ceteras of Jan. 27, 417, Pope St. Innocent I confirmed the Council of Mileve and condemned the heresy of the Pelagians. His letter was considered an authoritative response of the Apostolic See. It’s also referenced as such by St. Augustine and St. Robert Bellarmine.[1] In the document Pope St. Innocent teaches that eternal life is only conferred by baptism. He also says that those who believe eternal life is granted without baptism should confess or admit that in their view the baptismal streams are of no benefit.
Pope St. Innocent I, Inter Ceteras, To The Council of Mileve, Jan. 27, 417: “But that claim which your Fraternity asserts that they [the Pelagians] preach, namely, that children can be endowed with the rewards of eternal life even without the grace of baptism, is utterly foolish… But those who claim this [eternal life] for them without regeneration seem to me to wish to nullify baptism itself, since they preach that these have what is believed to be conferred on them only by baptism. If therefore they [the Pelagians] want to claim that not being reborn is no hindrance [to eternal life], it is necessary that they should confess that the sacred streams of regeneration are of no benefit. But in order that the perverse doctrine of unnecessary men may be refuted by the swift reason of truth, the Lord proclaims in the Gospel, saying: ‘Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not; for of such is the kingdom of heaven’ (Luke 18:16).”[2]
Thus once again we see a pope authoritatively teaching that the Sacrament of Baptism is required for salvation. That’s the true position of the Church, which is so widely denied in our day.
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
