| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party. This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments. Section containing some important recent posts. E-Exchange Archives.
On Oct. 28, 2025, Antipope Leo XIV held an interreligious event “in the Spirit of Assisi” at the Roman Colosseum. This ecumenical/interfaith “Prayer For Peace” was organized by the Community of Sant’Egidio. It featured “Christian”, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, and other religious representatives, including a “gay” female “priest.” During his address Antipope Leo XIV urged people to “keep this spirit alive, even going against the tide”. He also encouraged all religions to “offer the immense treasures of ancient spiritualities to contemporary humanity.” (Vatican News, Oct. 28, 2025)
Leo XIV also directly linked this (outrageous) event with the teaching of Vatican II and Nostra Aetate. Oct. 28 was the 60th anniversary of Nostra Aetate. Leo XIV stated: “For the Catholic Church, prayer in the spirit of Assisi is based on the solid foundation of Nostra Aetate.” Citing the Council’s words, he added: “We cannot truly pray to God as Father of all if we treat any people as other than sisters and brothers, for all are created in God’s image.”
This event is a bold manifestation of heresy and apostasy. It’s more clear proof that Leo XIV is a notorious heretic who does not profess the true Catholic faith. He promotes a notoriously false religion, and if you cannot recognize that in light of these facts you are simply not a Catholic. Leo XIV is not the pope, but an antipope of the end-times Counter Church, the Vatican II Sect (as our material explains). See our video: Vatican II Is A New Religion for the Catholic Church’s total condemnation of such evil activity.
Oct. 26 is the feast of Christ the King. In his 1925 encyclical Quas Primas Pope Pius XI established the feast. In that encyclical to the universal Church the pope also affirmed the Church’s true teaching on baptism. He taught that no one can enter the Kingdom of God without faith and baptism (identifying baptism as “an external rite” – i.e. the Sacrament). That’s another example of how the true position on baptism – that no one can be inside the Church or saved without the Sacrament of Baptism (John 3:5, etc.) – continued to be affirmed in the official teaching of the popes and the Magisterium in the decades before Vatican II.
Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas (#15), Dec. 11, 1925, addressed to the universal Church, concerning entrance into the Kingdom of God: “Which Kingdom indeed is set forth in the Gospels as one into which men prepare to enter by doing penance but are unable to enter except through faith and baptism, which, although it is an external rite, nevertheless signifies and effects an interior regeneration.”
In Quas Primas Pope Pius XI also affirmed the Acts 4:12 dogma, which teaches that no one can be saved without faith in Jesus Christ.
Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas (#18), Dec. 11, 1925: “In him is the salvation of the individual, in him is the salvation of society. ‘Neither is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given to men whereby we must be saved’ (Acts 4:12).”
The act of faith “in the name of Jesus Christ” that is absolutely necessary for every person’s salvation is baptism, as we’ve covered before: https://endtimes.video/acts-4-12-salvation-name-of-jesus/
Baruch & Jeremiah
It’s important to note that in the early Church the Book of Baruch was often cited under the name of Jeremiah. Failure to recognize this has led some into error.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Verbo Dei, Book 1, Chap. 8: “Finally, the ancients frequently cite this book [Baruch] under the name of Jeremiah, because Baruch was the secretary and a disciple of Jeremiah, as is evident from the Book of Jeremiah (36:4). This is why the ancient councils and fathers did not place Baruch by name in the canon, because they undoubtedly considered this book to be part of the prophecies of Jeremiah.”
Display
EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo Deceived By John Paul II
What a powerful display of human respect and grotesque irreverence for God. Thank you MHFM for this powerful video.
Kristine
Blindness
EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo Deceived By John Paul II
I was so astonished when several months ago I watched one of his programs how he (Raymond Arroyo) described his encounter with JP2 and mother Angelica. He described it as "supernatural". The guy has a deep devotion for these apostate individuals. These were the same who participated in and supported pagan worship, which is condemned by the Catholic Church. Raymond's blindness is a very thick one. This video further exposes the depth of that blindness. He is leading many astray with false conclusions on his programs.
TCE
Comment
EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo Deceived By John Paul II
Demonic. Evidently served hell. Wake up, world, especially novus ordo pew warmers…
2Hearts
Analysis
EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo Deceived By John Paul II
It must be supernatural the way in which he is deceived, because a cold analysis of the facts about JP2 shows he was anything but Catholic.
Stephanus
On Thursday, Oct. 23, 2025, Antipope Leo XIV will host an ecumenical service in the Sistine Chapel. He will pray with the notorious heretic King Charles III, who claims to be the “Head” of the “Church of England” (i.e. the Anglican Sect). Such joint prayer with the representatives of non-Catholic religions has always been forbidden by the Catholic Church under pain of mortal sin. Even though this service will take place in a chapel that has historically belonged to the Catholic Church, the event still constitutes participation in non-Catholic worship. When a notorious heretic who represents a false religion (such as King Charles) worships, that person is of course engaging in non-Catholic worship. To join in prayer with such a person when he conducts his (non-Catholic) worship is to participate in (or join yourself to) that person’s non-Catholic worship. Not that any further proof is required, but this act will further demonstrate that Leo XIV is a manifest heretic and an antipope. He professes and manifests a false faith. For a detailed discussion of the Church’s teaching against participation in non-Catholic worship and “ecumenical events”, as well as Vatican II’s false teaching on it, see this video/article: Vatican II Is A New Religion
Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 10), Jan. 6, 1928: “So, Venerable Brethren, it is clear why this Apostolic See has never allowed its subjects to take part in the meetings of non-Catholics…”
“In the Acts of the Sacred Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith of 1769 is also found an exhortation which called upon the bishops to prohibit their priests and the faithful from communicating with schismatics in their prayers. The exhortation stated that this prohibition had been decreed by all the Sacred Councils.” (Fr. Ignatius Szal, The Communication Of Catholics With Schismatics, Imprimatur 1948, p. 137)
In our video Eastern “Orthodox” Deception About The Papacy Exposed – Early Pope Proves Catholicism, we also showed that Pope St. Gelasius taught that people who hold communion with a notorious heretic are implicated in his crime. This Catholic principle is violated by the Vatican II Sect (the end-times Counter Church) on a regular basis.
Pope St. Gelasius, Epistle 10 (#4), AD 493: “Acacius was certainly not the inventor of a novel or peculiar error of his own, requiring new decrees to proceed against him, but he implicated himself in another man’s crime through his communion with him.”
Why Mother Teresa Was Not A Saint
Mother Teresa was a nun. She was not a priest as only males can be Roman Catholic priests. It might be possible for women to be theologians but she never claimed to be a theologian and the Roman Catholic Church never considered her a theologian. Complex theological debates are not the forte of nuns or even necessarily of saints.
Tina
Mother Teresa denied basic truths that every adult Catholic is bound to know. What she believed is incompatible with a basic faith in Jesus Christ and Catholicism. In fact, it’s not possible to be a Catholic and believe what she did. She embraced religious indifferentism and endorsed false religions, as the video documents. She was sadly a horrible and demonic apostate. (By the way, the false canonization of Mother Teresa by itself proves that Francis was not a valid pope.)
Headed To True Catholicism
Thank you for what you do… almost joined the quote Eastern Orthodox church, was not convinced… True Catholicism is where I'm headed now, thanks again.
Matthew T.
Employment Possibilities
A married couple is looking for a traditional Catholic who might be able to work as a household manager (who would take care of chores, meals, etc.) near Beaumont, Texas. Another married couple near Charlotte, NC, is looking for a traditional Catholic who could work as a nanny. If you are interested, please e-mail us.
After healing the crippled man who had been an invalid for 38 years, Jesus tells him: “Sin no more, lest something worse happen to you”. This is a reference to eternal damnation for sins. Hence, John 5:14 is another verse that contradicts the Protestant idea of salvation, according to which your salvation is not based on your actions or sins. Jesus’ words also reveal that being damned is a horror that far exceeds any plight in this life.
John 5:5-14- “One man was there who had been an invalid for thirty-eight years. When Jesus saw him lying there and knew that he had already been there a long time, he said to him, ‘Do you want to be healed?’ The sick man answered him, ‘Sir, I have no one to put me into the pool when the water is stirred up, and while I am going another steps down before me.’ Jesus said to him, ‘Get up, take up your bed, and walk.’ And at once the man was healed, and he took up his bed and walked… Afterward Jesus found him in the temple and said to him, ‘See, you are well! Sin no more, lest something worse happen to you.”
Enlightening
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
This was quite enlightening…
Robin Sullivan
Learning
Most Holy Family Monastery Grounds, Buildings & Eucharistic Miracle?
… Thanks for all the help in learning Catholic doctrine!
CatholicHolyWar
Comment
Man Shot & Saw Hell – Shocking Must-See Video
One of the best videos for instilling the fear of God in one’s soul.
Rosco
It’s interesting that the following statement of St. Ephrem (which was written in the 4th century) perfectly describes what diabolical Charismatics do in their services, as covered in these videos: Charismatic “Christianity” Exposed; “Priests” Possessed After Rodney Howard-Browne “Charismatic Anointing”; The “Catholic” Charismatic Movement Exposed
St. Ephrem, Commentary On Tatian’s Diatessaron, Section 6, #10: “It happens at times that Satan casts an evil deed on a person by means of one of his members and knocks him over.”
Scripture
Jesus’ Words In John 4:22 Allude To Deuteronomy 13
Thank you for sharing these connections in Scripture.
JR
Pope Gregory IX Called Same-Sex Activity “Most Abominable”
In his 1233 document Vox in Rama Pope Gregory IX described the dark and depraved practices of certain heretics in the Rhineland. These included same-sex activity, which the pope condemned as “most abominable sins”.
Pope Gregory IX, Vox in Rama, 1233: “… if perhaps those of the male sex exceed the number of women, surrendering to their disgraceful passions, burning toward one another in their desires, men engage in depravity with men. In a similar way, women change their natural function, which is against nature, making this itself worthy of condemnation among themselves. After these most abominable sins have been completed…”
Comment
Saints & Theologians On The End Times – Shedding Light On The Current Catholic Crisis
Please keep up the great work.
Eugene McMahon
In our previous post, we quoted St. Robert Bellarmine who explained how the Protestant definition of justifying faith as “trust” in God’s mercy is distinct from the Catholic definition of faith. An example of how the Bible contradicts the Protestant definition of faith as “trust” is found in Hebrews 11:7.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Justificatione, Book 1, Chap. V: “By faith Noe, fearing, prepared the Ark (Heb. 11:7). In whom the act of faith cannot be trust, because trust does not beget fear but expels it. Therefore the act of faith in Noe was to believe with certainty that there would be a flood; for from that act of believing a fear arose which was the reason the Ark was built.”
St. Robert Bellarmine points out that one of the key differences between Catholics and Protestants in regard to the identity of justifying faith is that Protestants believe that justifying faith is a special trust in God’s mercy while Catholics believe it’s an assent to those things revealed by God on the authority of God the revealer. As a consequence, Protestants confuse faith with hope.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Iustificatione, Book 1, Chap. 4: “Therefore [in regard to what justifying faith is] Catholics differ from heretics in three matters. First, in the object of justifying faith, which heretics restrict to the promise alone of special mercy, while Catholics hold that it extends as widely as the word of God extends; nay they [Catholics] contend that a certain promise of special mercy pertains not so much to faith as to presumption. Next [they differ] on the faculty or power of the soul which is the seat of faith. For heretics locate faith in the will when they define it to be trust, and thereby confuse it with hope. For trust is nothing other than a strengthened hope, as St. Thomas teaches in Summa Theologiae, II-II, q. 129, art. 6. But Catholics teach that faith has its seat in the intellect. Finally, [they differ] in the very act of the intellect. For the heretics define faith in terms of knowledge, but we in terms of assent. For we assent to God, although He proposes things to us to believe which we do not understand.”
Comment
Amazing Evidence For God – Scientific Evidence For God
Amazing video…
Nimu
Bellarmine On The Cessation Of The Mosaic Law
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 4, Chap. 18: “Christ wanted us to be free from the ceremonies and judicial precepts of Moses because those ceremonies were figures of the New Testament; and therefore, with the reality present, they should cease. Likewise, the judicial precepts pertained to the government of the people of God according to that state. Therefore, with that state having changed, it was also necessary for the precepts themselves to change. For with the translation of the priesthood, the Apostle says in Hebrews 7, it is necessary that there is a translation of the law. But it does not follow that we should not have any political or ecclesiastical laws, if we should not have those of Moses.”
Comment
Antipope Leo XIV "Blesses" A Block Of Ice At Vatican - video
… I love your content. I have seen more and more Catholics coming back to tradition because they watch your videos…
MexicanTradCath
Had A Profound Impact
My name is Joseph G… I am 25 years old, unmarried, and without children. I recently came across your channel and website, and it has had a profound impact on me. Your teachings have challenged and reshaped my understanding of the Church, and I am deeply grateful for the clarity you provide… may God bless you in your work.
Sincerely,
Joseph G.
Pagan Rome Returned
Antipope Leo XIV "Blesses" A Block Of Ice At Vatican - video
This is another example of how the Vatican II Sect is not the Catholic Church but rather pagan Rome returned under the appearance of the Church (as prophesied).
Comment
Documentary: Protestantism’s Big Justification Lie
Great video!
Allister Smith
In one of our recent videos called, Novus Ordo “Thomists” Fall Into The Pit Defending Islam’s False God, we showed that the true meaning of John 4:22 (where Jesus tells the Samaritan woman, “you worship what you do not know”) is that the Samaritans did not worship the true God but a false god. As St. Thomas said about John 4:22, “you do not adore God because you do not know Him”. Worship of a false god is described as worship of what one “does not know”. Well, the point we made in our video (against the defenders of Vatican II) is further powerfully confirmed by Deuteronomy 13, where God repeatedly describes false gods as those whom Israel did not know.
Deuteronomy 13:2: “… if he says, ‘Let us go after other gods,’ which you have not known, ‘and let us serve them,’ you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams.”
Deuteronomy 13:6-8: “If your brother, the son of your mother, or your son or your daughter or the wife you embrace or your friend who is as your own soul entices you secretly, saying, ‘Let us go and serve other gods,’ which neither you nor your fathers have known, some of the gods of the peoples who are around you, whether near you or far off from you, from the one end of the earth to the other, you shall not yield to him or listen to him, nor shall your eye pity him, nor shall you spare him, nor shall you conceal him.”
Deuteronomy 13:13: “… certain worthless fellows have gone out among you and have drawn away the inhabitants of their city, saying, ‘Let us go and serve other gods,’ which you have not known…”
This sheds light on the reason Our Lord (in John 4:22) described the Samaritans’ false worship as worship of “what you do not know” (i.e. it was the worship of a false god).
Proverbs 1:25-30- “… because you have ignored all my counsel and would have none of my reproof, I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when terror strikes you, when terror strikes you like a storm and your calamity comes like a whirlwind, when distress and anguish come upon you. Then they will call upon me, but I will not answer; they will seek me diligently but will not find me. Because they hated knowledge and did not choose the fear of the Lord, would have none of my counsel and despised all my reproof…”
Comment
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Wonderful video…
Rustie
Dangerous & Deceptive Times
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Thank you for this video and teaching the TRUTH. We are living in very dangerous and deceptive times, many false teaching on YouTube by these so called traditional Catholics…
Kwaga
Look Forward
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
There's few who have shaken me to the core, and you are one of them... I look forward to spending the night watching a couple more of your videos.
Chris
Catholic Analysis
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Thank you so much… for making this excellent video because it gives a concise and documented Catholic analysis based on Charlie’s own words and actions…
Magdalena
Were Saying
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Thank you so much for this video, I was expecting your reaction to Charlie's Kirk assassination. Honestly, all the [false] trad commentators are saying the same… I knew that [you'd] clarify all this. Thank you, and may God bless you!
Luis
Insightful
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Wow truly insightful…
Clouds
New Video
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Thank you for another masterpiece of a video. God Bless you.
Jason
Excellent
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Excellent!! Thank you…
Robert Pina
Subject
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Great video on a very sensitive subject for a lot of people right now.
Cody Miller
Comment
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
Amazing video.
Jan
The Amount Of “Trads”
Charlie Kirk: Was He A Real Christian?
… The amount of "trads" celebrating Kirk astonished me and this video hits the nail on the coffin.
O C
No Slight Matter When Teaching About God
Pope St. Martin I, Letter Of Pope Martin And The Synod To Constans II, AD 649: “This they have written, in no way heeding the conviction of the holy fathers that in the teaching about God and the divine that which falls slightly short is no slight matter.”
I Feel The Grace Of God Guiding Me
Hello brothers, nice to meet you I am Juan Hincapie from Colombia. I am totally appalled by the heresies and blasphemous declarations of the Vat II council… I am praying the rosary every day (15 mysteries) and I feel the grace of God guiding me… Thank you. God bless you.
Juan
Stark Contrast
St. Peter Canisius said that this abominable vice can “never be sufficiently detested.” Pope St. Pius V called it a “horrendous crime.” That’s a stark contrast between true Catholics and phony ones like Antipope Leo & James Martin.
Sergio
Reminder
"13-Year-Old Uses Slingshot to Save Sister From Kidnap Attempt" - video
Thank you for sharing this amazing story! It's a great reminder about how God is always in the background keeping an eye on His creatures, and protecting their lives.
Daniel Frenkel
The Only
Voice Of Reason Scandal: It’s More Revealing Than You Think
The only unacceptable heresy in the Vatican II Sect is true Catholicism.
Joseph Boyat
Pure Delusion
The idea that this man, who openly speaks of changing attitudes toward unnatural vice, could somehow be a "return to orthodoxy": as the Novus Ordites claim, is pure delusion.
Daniel Frankel
Proof
Leo XIV on "transgenders" and sodomites - "That doesn't mean those people are bad people" - video
… the fact that the Vatican II fake popes are obsessed with fornication, saturating the media with it… while ruining the innocence of children who hear/read it, is proof that Satan reigns in the Vatican…
Dr P
Comment
Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis
Thank you for this well-researched and documented video…
Rick
As a further confirmation that he’s an apostate and a promoter of religious indifferentism, on Sept. 14, 2025, Antipope Leo XIV sent a message to the 8th Congress Of The Leaders Of World And Traditional Religions in which he explicitly endorsed Antipope John Paul II’s abominable 1986 Assisi prayer event and Antipope Francis’ 2019 Abu Dhabi declaration. For those who don’t know, the 2019 Abu Dhabi declaration explicitly taught the blasphemy that God wills other religions. Antipope Leo XIV is a total apostate and those who obstinately adhere to him deny the Catholic faith.
Antipope Leo XIV, Message To Participants In The 8th Congress Of The Leaders Of World And Traditional Religions, Sept. 14, 2025: “The historic gathering of religious leaders for prayer in Assisi in 1986, convened by Pope John Paul II, demonstrated that there can be no peace among nations without peace among religions. More recently, the Document on Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together, signed in Abu Dhabi in 2019 by my venerable predecessor Pope Francis and the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, Ahmad Al-Tayyeb, offered a clear blueprint for how religious synergy can advance global peace and coexistence. We witnessed this same spirit at the last meeting of this Congress in 2022, where leaders of diverse faiths, including Pope Francis, came together to condemn violence and extremism, advocate for the care of refugees, and call upon all leaders to work jointly for peace.”
Antipope Francis and Grand Imam Ahmad Al-Tayyib, A Document On Human Fraternity For World Peace And Living Together (Abu Dhabi Declaration), Feb. 4, 2019: “The pluralism and the diversity of religions, color, sex, race and language are willed by God, through which He created human beings.”
In his commentary on John 8:24, St. Thomas again expresses his position (which is the teaching of the Church) that faith in Christ is required for salvation. Like other saints and doctors, he correctly teaches that people cannot be freed from original sin without faith in Christ. (The act of faith through which original sin is removed is the Sacrament of Baptism.) Thus, to be excluded from salvation it’s not necessary for people to reject Christ. Rather, regardless of whether they’ve heard of Jesus, people remain in original sin and are excluded from salvation unless they come to faith in Him (through baptism, etc.).
St. Thomas Aquinas, Commentary On The Gospel of John (8:24): “‘I told you that you would die in your sins, for unless you believe that I am he you will die in your sins.’ Then, in order not to entirely exclude all hope for their salvation, he proposes the remedy, saying, ‘For if you do not believe that I am, you will die in your sin.’ He is saying in effect: You were born in original sin, from which you cannot be absolved except by my faith: because, if you do not believe that I am, you will die in your sin.”
This explanation, that people remain in original sin without faith in Christ, is also rooted in the words of John 3:36. St. Robert Bellarmine has a good passage about this, as we covered in this video/article: How Is One Saved “By The Name Of Jesus Christ”? (Acts 4:12).
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Amissione Gratiae et Statu Peccati, Book 6, Chap. 2: “He who believes in the Son has eternal life; but he who does not believe in the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him [John 3:36]… Correctly St. Augustine observed… that it was not said [in John 3:36]: ‘The wrath of God will come on them’, but ‘remains on them’, in order that we would understand faith in Christ to be necessary not only so that we would not fall into the wrath of God, but even that we might be freed from the wrath into which we have fallen through the disobedience of the first man. Concerning which it was stated by the Apostle to the Ephesians, chapter 2: For we were also by nature children of wrath…”
Some people are familiar with Anthony Cekada, an independent sedevacantist priest who died in 2020. Although he said some true things, he was sadly a heretic and a John 3:5 mocker who also aggressively promoted the sinful birth control practice of NFP. He believed that people can be saved without even faith in Jesus Christ (a blatant heresy that’s condemned by many popes). In fact, when he was still alive someone we knew called him up and asked him if he believed that Jews can be saved without the Catholic faith. Cekada responded by indicating that if a Jew is a thief then no, but yes if otherwise. He simply didn’t have the Catholic faith or even truly believe in the Gospel, just like many other independent and illicit clergy who have no authority to function as priests. Cekada misrepresented Catholic teaching about theologians in reference to the Magisterium. The false arguments advanced by heretics and John 3:5 mockers like him are thoroughly refuted in our playlist on salvation:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzssJHrA8L1PjrxWW-S15pnEQ
Recently Converted
I recently converted to Catholicism because of your justification lie video. Thank you so much…!
Ben
Comment
Thank you Vatican Catholic, God bless you and your amazing channel.
Mr. G.
Brainwashed
The Best Argument Against "Baptism of Desire"
Excellent video, very well explained, BOD supporters have been brainwashed.
Felix
Comment
The Roman Ritual, Pope Paul V, And The Necessity Of Baptism
Great scholarly work.
Hernan
Confession Must Be Made In Person
On June 20, 1602, the Holy Office under Pope Clement VIII “condemned and forbade the following proposition, namely: ‘that it is permitted to confess sins sacramentally to an absent confessor by letter or through messenger and to receive absolution from the same absent confessor’, as false, rash, and scandalous…”
Muslim Convinced, Wants To Be Baptized
Hello. I am a Maldivian former muslim now a Catechumen who is in agreement with all the positions of MHFM. I would like to get baptised… Although I am Maldivian, I am currently in Malaysia...
Thank you so much for all the work you do.
Sincerely
MHFM: It's very sad to hear about Charlie Kirk. We plan (God willing) to make some additional comments about it.
From LifeSiteNews:
A celebrity who regularly performs pornographically for reggaeton music videos will be singing at the upcoming Vatican concert “Grace for the World.”
Karol G, one of the most popular singers of reggaeton music, a lowbrow Latin genre known for hypersexual lyrics and videos, is slated to perform for the Vatican concert in St. Peter’s Square on September 13, a Colombian outlet reported.
“Grace for the World,” a celebratory closing of the third World Meeting on Human Fraternity, is being billed as a first of its kind concert “where icons and light unite humanity through music and hope.” The event will feature drone and light displays “inspired by the masterpieces of the Sistine Chapel,” according to the concert’s event page.
Andrea Bocelli and Pharrell Williams, a songwriter who has produced and performed a long list of sexually explicit songs, are headlining the concert lineup, which along with Karol G will include John Legend, Teddy Swims, Voices of Fire Gospel Choir, Clipse, Angélique Kidjo, Jelly Roll, and BamBam.
While several of the performers are controversial picks for a Vatican-hosted concert, Karol G’s public presentation is particularly at odds with Catholic, Christian ethics. Her performances and especially her music videos typically involve pornographic gestures and dress, which tend to be especially pronounced in her genre. Even in appearances on popular shows like The Tonight Show, she is so scantily clad that she is virtually half-nude.
Pharrell rivals Karol G as an unbecoming choice for a Vatican concert headliner. He has produced, written and performed a great deal of sexually provocative and otherwise immoral music.
How Foolish
Antipope Leo XIV Allows "LGBT" Pilgrimage
How foolish do false traditionalists like Taylor Marshall look right now, who, just a few months ago was pledging his “submission” to this heretical antipope & his phony “hierarchy”. Even more disgraceful is the fact that many of their followers will continue to support them anyways and lose their souls.
Sergio
Standard Bearers Of Vatican II
Antipope Leo XIV Allows "LGBT" Pilgrimage
Not only allowed....endorsed. They marched through the Vatican like a conquering army. The standard bearers of Vatican II.
Stall
Comment
Antipope Leo XIV Allows "LGBT" Pilgrimage
Leo is turning out to just be Francis 2.0, occasionally making the most bland statements on basic theological matters that every true Catholic above the age of reason would know for the 'popesplainers' to lose their minds over, while allowing his apostate hierarchy to run wild and being as much of a heretic as Francis was.
Ian
Antipope Leo XIV sent the Vice-President of the Italian “Bishops’” Conference to celebrate an “LGBT” “Mass” in Rome, just days after meeting with the notorious James Martin. He also allowed a rainbow “pride” cross to be processed into St. Peter’s Basilica and the Vatican. The Vatican II Sect (which is the end-times Counter Church, the Whore of Babylon, as our material explains) is a pro-“LGBT” sect. Some people are calling this the abomination of desolation, but that more properly refers to the New Mass. The quote of the day on our website, from Pope St. Gregory VII, is remarkably applicable to what Antipope Leo XIV just allowed in Rome.
Pope St. Gregory VII: “Divine scripture testifies that an equal punishment is due to those who commit an evil and to those who assent to it [Rom. 1:32].” (To The Clergy and Laity of Germany, 1075)
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
