| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party. This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments. Section containing some important recent posts.
New Video Posted
No One Can Be Forgiven Without This – Catholic Teaching
In our recent video, Novus Ordo Supporter Demolished On Loss Of Office & Heresy, we refuted the grave misuse and mistranslations of St. Robert Bellarmine that are widespread among defenders of the Vatican II Sect. Below are some additional quotes from St. Robert Bellarmine. They make it extremely clear that, in his view, neither a council nor all the cardinals gathered together nor anyone else can judge a pope while he’s still considered the pope. These passages further prove that Bellarmine believed that a manifest heretic would lose authority and cease to be pope prior to any such judgment or intervention. When Bellarmine refers to a manifest heretic being judged, he’s referring to someone who has already ceased to be the pope.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Conciliis, Book 1, Chap. 10: “For on account of suspicions concerning the doctrine and life of the pontiffs, there were never convened any councils except provincial or national. Neither does it seem at all necessary for a major council [to be gathered for this reason]; for as long as [dum] he is truly Pontiff, he cannot be judged by any council, unless perhaps he himself grants power to the council for examining his own case, and of passing a discretionary sentence, not nevertheless a coercive sentence.”
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 2, Chap. 26: “… the Roman Pontiff is able to be judged by no one on Earth… even if he had no temporal power, he cannot in any manner be judged on Earth by any Christian princes, whether secular or ecclesiastical [i.e. bishops] nor by all simultaneously gathered in council (neque ab omnibus simul in Concilio congregatis).”
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Conciliis, On Councils, Book 1, Chap. 9: “... General Councils should become acquainted with controversies that have sprung up around the Roman Pontiff, but not audaciously to pass sentence against him.”
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 2, Chap. 30: “Second, to be deposed from the Pontificate unwillingly is without doubt a punishment; therefore the Church deposing the Pontiff against his will without doubt punishes him. But to punish is of a superior and judge… Therefore the fifth opinion is true. A manifestly heretical pope automatically ceases to be pope and head, just as through himself he ceases to be a Christian and a member of the Body of the Church; wherefore he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the position of all the ancient fathers, who teach that manifest heretics immediately (mox) lose all jurisdiction.”
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 2, Chap. 29: “It is lawful, I say, to resist him by not doing what he commands and by preventing him from accomplishing his will; nevertheless it is not lawful to judge, punish or depose him; because this is only [the role] of a superior.”
The final passage is another one that’s abused by Vatican II Sect heretics.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Conciliis, Book 1, Chap. 21: “In addition to this is the fact that the Pontiff at a Council is not only the Judge, but has many colleagues, that is, all the Bishops, who, if they could convict him of heresy, would also be able to judge and depose him, even against his will.”
Some cite this passage to argue that Bellarmine held that a Roman Pontiff could be judged and deposed against his will! In the process they grossly misunderstand Bellarmine and accuse him of the heresy of Conciliarism; for if a council could depose a valid pope against his will, then it is superior to a pope. Indeed, Bellarmine explicitly teaches (e.g. De Romano Pontifice, Book 2, Chap. 30) that to depose another unwillingly is to inflict a punishment and involves the role of a “superior”. That’s why he adopts the position that a manifest heretic automatically ceases to be pope. In passage cited above from De Conciliis in Book 1, Chap. 21 (which the Vatican II Sect members misuse), Bellarmine is not dealing with loss of office. He’s responding to an objection that Protestants make to Roman Pontiffs presiding at general councils. In responding to that objection, Bellarmine simply states that in the context of such a council there would be many judges who, if they could convict someone of heresy, could then judge and depose him “even against his will”. He was not teaching, as the neo-conciliarists of the Vatican II Sect contend, that the person who might thus be convicted, judged, and deposed even against his will remained a valid pope until the conviction and judgment. On the contrary, he held that “so long as” the man is truly pontiff “he cannot be judged by any council” (De Conciliis, Book 1, Chap. 10).
In fact, since Bellarmine teaches that to convict someone of heresy enables that person to be judged and deposed even against his will (De Conciliis, Book 1, Chap. 21), and he repeatedly teaches that a valid Roman Pontiff cannot possibly be judged and deposed against his will by any council (for then the Roman Pontiff would be inferior to the council), that means that Bellarmine did not believe that a Roman Pontiff (while he is considered the Roman Pontiff) could be convicted of heresy. Only someone who has already automatically (ipso facto) ceased to be pope in the sight of the Church for manifest heresy can be thus convicted and deposed against his will.
Bellarmine: The First Principles Are Self-Evident
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Iustificatione, Book 3, Chap. 2: “… the first principles of things, which, with the words themselves explained, without any other reasoning are believed by all to be true, such as: the same thing cannot both exist and not exist; the whole is greater than the part, etc.”
Comment
No One Can Be Forgiven Without This – Catholic Teaching
Deep diving your videos recently and amazing work…
Luke S
Left The Novus Ordo
Five Popes Named Gregory Said Don’t Pray For These People
Brothers, I want you to know you've helped me over these many years. Your materials aided me in leaving the Novus Ordo and to holding the Sedevacantist position. Thank you.
Yossarian
Video
No One Can Be Forgiven Without This – Catholic Teaching
Excellent video!...
Christoffer
Spirituality
This is one of the greatest videos on spirituality. Thanks for everything!
Angelo
No One Can Be Forgiven Without This – Catholic Teaching
It seems that today is the feast of Pope Saint Zosimus, great coincidence!
Ignacio
Wow, we didn’t even realize that. That’s very interesting. Many indeed date the end of his reign to Dec. 26 (today). We just happened to post this video today. Frankly, there have been a number of cases where a similar thing has occurred with videos we’ve posted.
Watching In Rome
No One Can Be Forgiven Without This – Catholic Teaching
I’m in Rome watching this video, and I love your great work!
Af
Vital Information
No One Can Be Forgiven Without This – Catholic Teaching
Can't thank the Brothers of MHFM enough for this vital information.
Al
Proofs Of Christ’s Divinity At His Birth
St. Francis De Sales: “At His Birth we have very clear proofs of Our Lord’s Divinity. Angels descend from Heaven and announce to the shepherds that a Savior is born [Luke 2:8-14] to them. Magi come to adore Him [Mt. 2:1-11]. This clearly shows us that He was more than man, just as, on the contrary, His moaning as He lies in His manger shivering from the cold shows us that He was truly man.” (Sermon for Christmas Midnight Mass, Dec. 25, 1622)
Disgraceful Menorah Lighting
Positively disgraceful.
Helen
Is it true that Karol Wojtyla and Joseph Ratzinger were born to Jewish Mothers and so then are Jews?
Elain M Gardens
Evidence supports that Antipope John Paul II was Jewish. See: John Paul II was Jewish, says Historian.
Ratzinger (i.e. Antipope Benedict XVI) also wore a Star of David mitre.
Anacletus II was an antipope who was elected in 1130, after Pope Innocent II had been canonically chosen by a commission of eight cardinals that was entrusted with the papal election. Antipope Anacletus II reigned in Rome for eight years. His reign in Rome did not end until his death in 1138. At one point, Anacletus was supported unanimously by the clergy and people of Rome.
John Doran and Damian J. Smith, Pope Innocent II (1130-1143), p. 9: “Central to the Anacletan claim was the marvellous and astonishing concord of the clergy and people of Rome who had unanimously elected him.”
The reign of Antipope Anacletus II in Rome, with the full support of the clergy and people of Rome, provides an instructive historical precedent for what we’ve seen during the post-Vatican II apostasy: i.e. antipopes reigning in Rome for years.
From The Pit Of Hell
It is impossible for the one true catholic Church to lead the faithful into error or teach heresy. This is catholic doctrine. The novus ordo church and religion are out of the pit of hell, and for them to condone and promote sodomy is demonic.
Alby
The Vatican II Sect is the end-times Counter Church.
Day Of Fast
Today (Friday, Dec. 20) and tomorrow (Saturday, Dec. 21) are Ember Days of fast in the Traditional Catholic Calendar. Dec. 24 (the Vigil of the Nativity) is also a day of fast: https://vaticancatholic.com/catholic-calendar/
Opening To The Truth
Christ Born In Bethlehem, Which Means “House Of Bread”
Thank you… MHFM you are all blessings to us from God, for opening my mind to what’s truth... I’m eternally grateful.
Maya
Has Me Wondering
https://endtimes.video/catholic-charismatic-movement-exposed/
This presentation has me wondering if John Paul ll was the False Prophet written of in the Apocalypse? He was the most traveled Pope in the history of the Catholic Church, right?
Elaine M Gardens
Actually, he was the Antichrist. See these videos, among others:
https://endtimes.video/apocalypse-now-in-the-vatican/
https://endtimes.video/temple-of-god-vatican-prophecy-antichrist/
https://endtimes.video/antichrist-distinguishing-mark/
Also, it's crucial that recognize that he was not a valid pope but an antipope, as our material explains.
https://endtimes.video/sedevacantism-debate/
It was fitting for Christ to be born in Bethlehem for a number of reasons. St. Thomas Aquinas states:
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Pt. 3, Q. 35, A. 7: “It is written (Micah 5:2): ‘And thou, Bethlehem, Ephrata . . . out of thee shall He come forth unto Me, that is to be the ruler in Israel.’… Therefore He willed to be born at Bethlehem, where David was born, in order that by the very birthplace the promise made to David might be shown to be fulfilled. The Evangelist points this out by saying: ‘Because He was of the house and of the family of David.’ Secondly, because, as Gregory says (Hom. viii in Evang.): ‘Bethlehem is interpreted 'the house of bread.’ It is Christ Himself who said, ‘I am the living Bread which came down from heaven.’”
Angelic Encounter
A Soldier Encounters An Angel!
This is really beautiful. Thank God for His infinity mercy!
Angelo
Comment
Merry Christmas... thanks for all the souls you lead to the truth...
Charles C
St. Cyprian’s erroneous position that heretics could not receive or confer baptism validly is of course well known. We’ve mentioned it repeatedly as an example of how individual Church fathers and theologians can be wrong. But it’s worth noting that, in arguing for his incorrect position, Cyprian pointed out that it was “no new or sudden thing”. He believed that his position was very ancient and represented the Apostolic Tradition. He claimed that “very many bishops” agreed and that “thousands of heretics” were reconciled to the Church by baptizing them unconditionally because they considered it impossible for those heretics to have been validly baptized. This is a prime example of how individual Church fathers can be quite wrong and how an extremely ancient practice or position endorsed by Church fathers can be wrong. Hence, we must always ultimately base our conclusions on the teaching of the Magisterium and the Chair of St. Peter.
St. Cyprian, Epistle 72, To Jubaianus: “… concerning the baptism of heretics; who, placed without, and established outside the Church, arrogate to themselves a matter neither within their right nor their power. This baptism we cannot consider as valid or legitimate, since it is manifestly unlawful among them… But among us it is no new or sudden thing for us to judge that those are to be baptized who come to the Church from among the heretics, since it is now many years and a long time ago, that, under Agrippinus— a man of worthy memory — very many bishops assembling together have decided this; and thenceforward until the present day, so many thousands of heretics in our provinces have been converted to the Church, and have neither despised nor delayed, nay, they have both reasonably and gladly embraced, the opportunity to attain the grace of the life-giving layer and of saving baptism.”
St. Robert Bellarmine also noted that the local council which endorsed the false view on the validity of baptism received among heretics was attended by 85 bishops.
St. Robert Bellarmine, On Councils, Book II, Chap. 10: “That [local] councils of this kind could err, there is the witness of the Council of Carthage under Cyprian, which was national, most famous, legitimate and of 85 bishops, of which many were martyrs or confessors, as is clear from the letter of Cyprian to Jubaianus, and still it erred.”
St. Ephrem, Commentary On Tatian’s Diatessaron, Part 6, #19: “‘To the one who has, it will be given, and from him who has not, even what he has will be taken from him’ [Luke 8:18]. This is for those who have spiritual ears within the bodily ears… How can one who is not worthy of what he possesses hope to receive what he does not possess? For there will be given to him who is worthy of what he possesses that which he does not possess. But, if he is not worthy, even that which he actually possesses will be taken away from him.”
The Appearance Of Evil
Antipope Francis’ official approval of “blessing” same-sex “couples” (and others living in grave sin) is problematic on so many levels. It’s also a violation of 1 Thess. 5:22.
1 Thessalonians 5:22- “Abstain from every appearance of evil.”
Galatians Bible Study
Did St. Paul Really Rebuke St. Peter In Galatians 2?
The ending of the video is beautifully put…
H
The apostate Novus Ordo “bishops” in the U.S. have partnered with the American Jewish Committee to release a document called “Translate Hate: The Catholic Edition” that attacks the Bible and other traditional Catholic teachings.
LifeSiteNews points out that the “63-page document contains a list of phrases, memes, and other digital symbols that the AJC claims are used to indicate hatred for Jews. What is unique to this version compared to previous iterations of the AJC’s report is the inclusion of short Catholic ‘commentaries’ on several of the index’s entries. Some of the entries argue that terms like Illuminati, globalism, New World Order, gaslighting, and even Satan can be used in antisemitic ways. It also claims that previous Church teaching on the Jews was due to a ‘misguided interpretation’ of Scripture. The document praises John XXIII, John Paul II, and the Second Vatican Council for having altered those teachings, which Traditional Catholics argue represent a break with Catholic doctrine.” (Stephen Kokx, “USCCB endorses Jewish group’s ‘anti-hate’ document that claims past Church teachings are antisemitic”, LifeSiteNews, Dec. 13, 2024)
They are disgraceful apostates and antichrists.
Today is the anniversary of the miracle of Guadalupe. This video is about that matter: The Amazing And Miraculous Image Of Our Lady Of Guadalupe
This video covers some of the history of the period: Cortes’ Amazing Conquest Of The Aztec Empire
Young Earth Biblical Proof
"Destroying Every Argument About Millions Of Years" - must-see video
Thanks for posting this.
Richard McMahon
We're currently working on some new videos, including an important one that we think sheds further light on the current situation of the remnant Catholic Church during the Vatican II apostasy.
In a letter dated Nov. 21, 2024, Antipope Francis directly contradicted Catholic teaching about the Church’s preservation from mistakes and “wrinkles”.
Antipope Francis, Letter on the Renewal of the Study of Church History, Nov. 21, 2024: “According to an oral tradition whose written source I cannot confirm, a great French theologian used to tell his students that the study of history protects us from ‘ecclesiological monophysitism’, that is, from an overly angelic conception of the Church, presenting a Church that is unreal because she lacks spots and wrinkles. Indeed the Church, like our own mothers, must be loved as she is; otherwise we do not love her at all, or what we love is only a figment of our imagination. Church history helps us to see the real Church and to love the Church as she truly exists, and love what she has learnt and continues to learn from her mistakes and failures. A Church that even in her darkest moments is conscious of her deepest identity can be capable of understanding the imperfect and wounded world in which she lives. In her efforts to bring healing and renewal to the world, she will use the same means by which she strives to heal and renew herself, even if she at times does not succeed.”
Notice that the valid popes taught exactly the opposite.
Pope Pius XI, Divini Illius Magistri (#18), Dec. 31, 1929: “… God Himself made the Church a sharer in the divine magisterium and by His divine benefit unable to be mistaken.”
Pope Hadrian I, Second Council of Nicaea, 787: “… Christ our God, when He took for His Bride His Holy Catholic Church, having no blemish or wrinkle, promised he would guard her and assured his holy disciples saying, I am with you every day until the consummation of the world.”
For more on the matter of the Church’s protection from error, see this article: https://vaticancatholic.com/the-magisterium/
Exposing A Horrible Movement
Charismatic “Christianity” Exposed
… this was a great video that you made and thank you so much for making this. We need people to know more about this horrible movement.
K F
Pushing A Hoax
Here we go again! There Is No Virus! It’s all a scam and a hoax! People realise that it’s about fear mongering to try to force people to get “vaccinated- poisoned”!... Listen to the brilliant video put out by MHFM where Dr. Andrew Kaufman explains in great detail the Virus hoax…
Mary Wrenne
Anderson
“Pastor” Steven Anderson Exposed – Documentary
Such a great video.
Dynamic G
Comment
The Key To Changing Your Life - Short Video
You make an incredible difference to so many lives around the world.
Richard
This video provides biblical support for the Immaculate Conception and it shows how the truth taught in Ephesians 1 is connected to it.
Explicit Faith Dogmatic Proof?
Fr. Ripperger, SSPX, FSSP, CMRI, Etc. Promote Grave Errors – Refuted By Cistercian Theologian
Are there any dogmatic statements that say that explicit faith is necessary for salvation? De Lorca's and Aquinas' commentaries are not dogmatic.
Charles J
Did you even watch the video? The video references (and De Lorca cites) various dogmatic statements which prove that explicit faith in Christ is required. In fact, we recently posted a translation of another papal bull (from Gregory XIII) in which that truth is taught: https://vaticancatholic.com/pope-gregory-xiii-confess-christ-to-be-saved/ It’s also certain from the Acts 4:12 dogma repeated by many popes (among other things), as this video covers: https://endtimes.video/acts-4-12-salvation-name-of-jesus/
Here's another statement on the matter from Pope Paul III:
Pope Paul III, Sublimus Dei, May 29, 1537: “The sublime God so loved the human race that He created man in such wise that he might participate, not only in the good that other creatures enjoy, but endowed him with capacity to attain to the inaccessible and invisible Supreme Good and behold it face to face; and since man, according to the testimony of the sacred scriptures, has been created to enjoy eternal life and happiness, which none may obtain save through faith in Our Lord Jesus Christ, it is necessary that he should possess the nature and faculties enabling him to receive that faith...”
You really need to stop resisting Catholic truth.
Needed To See This
The Key To Changing Your Life - Short Video
Thanks… I really needed to see this.
Buck
Comment
The Key To Changing Your Life - Short Video How To Avoid Sin
I play this video and others of yours to my teens so often that they quote back lines from them to me by heart!!!! Thank you so much for these videos which are treasures of wisdom and truth.
Carrie
Timing
The Key To Changing Your Life - Short Video
The timing of this video is incredible.
Sud
St. Ephrem, Commentary On Tatian’s Diatessaron, Section 4, #8: “Therefore he [Satan] said to him, Fall down from here, for it is written, They will guard you lest you stumble [Luke 4:9-11]. O tempter, if it is concerning him that the psalm is fulfilled, is it not also written there, With his wings, that he may deliver you [Psalm 91:12]. It is not possible for a bird to fall, for the air beneath its wings is like the earth. Is it not also written, You will tread on the serpent and the basilisk [Psalm 91:13]. But Satan only studied those passages from Scripture which were convenient to him and omitted those which were harmful to him. The heretics are like this too. They appropriate from Scripture those passages which suit their stumbling-blocks, and omit those that refute their errors, thereby demonstrating that they are disciples of their master.”
This is particularly applicable to Protestants who ignore dozens of passages that refute their position on justification and focus on abusing a few that are more difficult for people to understand (2 Peter 3:15-16).
In the 8th century Pope Paul I (who died in 767) described heretical members of the Eastern or Greek Empire who opposed the true faith and the rights of the Roman Pontiff as “the most wicked Greeks” and “enemies of God’s holy Church”. During this period many in the Eastern Empire had fallen into the heresy of iconoclasm (which opposed the veneration of holy images). In fact, in 754 the Council of Hieria (near Chalcedon), which was attended by 338 bishops, approved the iconoclast heresy. This council was rejected by the Catholic Church at the Second Council of Nicaea in 787.
Pope Paul I, To Pippin (With Chapters), (Codex Epistolaris Carolinus 34), AD 761 or 766: “… there came to us an envoy sent by the faithful of God’s Holy Church your spiritual mother, who always tell us the truth, to inform us that the most wicked Greeks, as enemies of God’s Holy Church and opponents of the orthodox faith (against God’s will), intend to attack both our region and that of Ravenna and mount a military expedition.”
Protestant Decided To Convert
… I have grown up as a baptized... Protestant for most of my life. I have however decided to convert after watching many of your videos. This also includes rejecting the Vatican II sect and its heresies…
Charlie
Comment
I have watched many videos from your website and youtube channel. I thank you all for the knowledge you have shared…
Michael
Important Papal Decree On Baptism
The Latin Text of the Oldest Surviving Papal Decree Rejects “Baptism of Desire” - Pope St. Siricius
Excellent truth of the Catholic Faith. Thank Thee God. St. Francis Xavier pray for the MHFM.
Allan
In his commentary on Luke 5:16, St. Gregory the Theologian stated that Our Lord’s withdrawal to the wilderness in order to pray, after performing His works among the people, intended to teach us that there is a time for action and a time for prayer, contemplation and retirement.
St. Gregory Nazianzen, on Luke 5:16- “And His works He indeed performed among the people, but He prayed for the most part in the wilderness, sanctioning the liberty of resting a while from labor to hold converse with God with a pure heart. For He needed no change or retirement, since there was nothing which could be relaxed in Him, nor any place in which He might confine Himself, for He was God, but it was that we might clearly know that there is a time for action, a time for each higher occupation.”
Luke 5:15-16- “But now even more the report about him went abroad, and great crowds gathered to hear him and to be healed of their infirmities. But he would withdraw to the wilderness and pray.”
Not The Same God
Ex Muslim woman who identifies as a Christian in UK.
Interesting just after the 1:20 mark, the journalist says, "Then she learned about a very different God than the one of Islam..."
Yet novus ordo/false trads/VII say that we worship the same God as Muslims.
A.
While it’s true that the Sacrament of Baptism (since it confers an indelible mark) can only be received one time, it’s important to note that the “one baptism” in Ephesians 4:5 refers to a unity in the sacramental baptism received by all Christians (i.e. the same kind of baptism), not to the number of times that baptism can be received. That’s proven by the fact that in the passage St. Paul refers to “one Lord” and “one faith”, yet a person who has fallen away from the one Lord and the one faith could repent and receive the Lord and the faith for a second time. Hence, in Ephesians 4:5 the “one Lord” and the “one faith” do not refer to the number of times the Lord or the faith can be received, but to the fact that all in the Body of Christ have the very same Lord and the same faith. Likewise, the statement that all in the Church have one baptism means that all in the Church have the same sacramental baptism (which is celebrated in water – Ephesians 5:26), which contradicts the idea that people can be in the Church without the Sacrament of Baptism. The many references to Ephesians 4:5 in magisterial documents that deal with the unity of the Church also prove that the “one baptism” in Ephesians 4:5 refers to a unity in the kind of baptism received. For example:
Pope Pius VI, Inscrutabile (# 8), Dec. 25, 1775: “… We exhort and advise you to be all of one mind and in harmony as you strive for the same object, just as the Church has one faith, one baptism, and one spirit.”
Pope Leo XII, Ubi Primum (# 14), May 5, 1824: “It is impossible for the most true God, who is Truth itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and the Rewarder of good men, to approve all sects which profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their members... by divine faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and that no other name under heaven is given to men except the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth in which we must be saved. This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church.”
Documentary About The Redeemer
Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis
Thank you very much for sharing this Brilliant Documentary. God bless.
Darren Carrie
Truth About John Paul II
The Temple Of God & The Antichrist Located!
Thank you for giving me the truth about John Paul ll being an anti-pope and anti-christ…
Mome
The Traditional Faith
“Bishop” Strickland Removed By Francis – What You Need To Know
I agree with everything you have presented here. I have never heard you say anything regarding the Faith that I do not 100% agree with. That is the Faith as it was taught to me as a child in the 1950s. My teachers were older, unmarried women who had been teaching in Catholic School since my father went to school there. Many were born before 1900. They said the same things that you say. My first grade teacher said that unless you were Baptized a Catholic, you could not enter heaven. This was after Father Feeney's [“excommunication”]; but apparently, she supported Father Feeney in his stand, which was the traditional teaching, on the necessity for water Baptism for salvation, although many were led astray at that point. I appreciate that you are so well informed… and that you consistently tell the Truths of the Faith.
Mheile
Typical Argument
Typical argument with a John 3:5 mocker goes (essentially) like this: they demand that you answer, in precise detail, 15 objections for ‘BOD’. You do. (See this: Playlist On Salvation & Baptism.) You then ask them one question. They refuse to answer or ignore it and demand that you answer 10 more objections.
Demonic Hatred
Man gets attacked inside store because he was wearing a "Palestine" shirt - video
This is horrible behavior against this young Palestinian American couple.
Bev
Demonic Hatred
Man gets attacked inside store because he was wearing a "Palestine" shirt - video
This is horrible behavior against this young Palestinian American couple.
Bev
Fired By Target For Wearing “Trust In Jesus” Nametag
Target employee fired for not following dress code - video
I'm glad I boycotted Target since May '23: the pro-LGBT/transgender line for little children…
Marianne
Pope Pius IX Implicitly Condemned “Baptism Of Desire”
In his Allocution Singulari Quadam, Dec. 9, 1854, Pope Pius IX implicitly condemned “baptism of desire” when he stated the following in the context of discussing the dogma Outside The Church There Is No Salvation.
Pope Pius IX, Allocution Singulari Quadam, Dec. 9, 1854: “For, in truth, when released from these corporeal chains ‘we shall see God as He is’ [1 John 3:2], we shall understand perfectly by how close and beautiful a bond divine mercy and justice are united; but, as long as we are on earth, weighed down by this mortal mass which blunts the soul, let us hold most firmly that, in accordance with Catholic teaching, there is ‘one God, one faith, one baptism’ [Eph. 4:5]; it is unlawful [nefas] to proceed further in inquiry.”
The word “nefas” means “unlawful, criminal or wicked”.
In regard to questions about whether someone can be saved outside the Church, Pope Pius IX teaches that it’s “unlawful, criminal or wicked” (nefas) to profess anything other than the one Lord, the one faith and the one baptism of divine revelation. That “one baptism” is celebrated in water, as the Council of Vienne dogmatically declared.
Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, 1311-1312- “Moreover, one sole baptism regenerating all baptized in Christ – just as ‘one God and one faith’ – is to be faithfully confessed by all, which, celebrated in water in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, we believe to be the perfect remedy for salvation for both adults and children.”
They Continue To Misquote Trent
It’s remarkable how many John 3:5 mockers continue to use the false “except through” mistranslation of the Council of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4. They commit mortal sin by doing so after they’ve been informed that it’s a false translation. They also deny what the Council of Trent declares in that very passage, namely, that no one gets to Heaven without being born again of “water and the Holy Spirit”. This video covers the matter: The Most Misunderstood Catholic Decree – Council Of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4
Comment
Marvellous work!
Diene
The statement below was posted by a member of the Vatican II Sect, lamenting the loss of the “Traditional Latin Mass” in Tyler, Texas. (We put “Traditional Latin Mass” in quotation marks because the new rite of ordination is not valid.) The “Latin Mass” has been banned by their fake bishop, with celebrations officially ending on Nov. 30, 2024.
“Last TLM [Traditional Latin Mass] at the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Tyler, TX. We have no bishop and... the TLM is taken from us. They won’t even allow us to celebrate the TLM at the Cathedral’s Chapel. So much hate from the hierarchy!” – JMJ777
Frankly, it’s what they deserve for obstinately clinging to a false hierarchy and apostate antipopes. It’s futile to attempt to be Catholic within a fake Church (i.e. the Vatican II Sect). With regard to Tyler, Texas, this video is relevant: “Bishop” Strickland Removed By Francis – What You Need To Know.
St. Ephrem, Commentary On Tatian’s Diatessaron #22: “… prayer can ask all kinds of requests, and the divinity can bestow all kinds of gifts, but free will can either receive or spurn all these things.”
Convinced They Cannot Be True Popes
… I am convinced that these so called recent cannot be true popes, that they've brought judgment unto themselves by manifesting heresies… I am from… Brazil…
Thank you,
Júlio.
Dear Brothers,
… After the fall of man, every person who ever lived was still obliged to worship and obey the true God (even though they didn't always do so). When the time came for God to fulfill His promise to send mankind a Redeemer, He established the Hebrew religion to prepare them to recognize and accept the Messiah. The only object of the Hebrew religion was Jesus Christ and His one true Church. The OT faithful were well aware that their worship and religious practices were figures pointing to the Messiah who was to come, and that one day these practices would end, to be replaced by the eternal realities they pointed to. That's why, some seven hundred years after the first Passover (when the Jews had fled from Egypt and were instructed by God to sacrifice the lamb), the great OT Prophet Isaiah would cry out: "Send forth, O Lord, the lamb, the ruler of the earth from Petra of the dessert to the mount of the daughter of Sion (Isaiah 16:1-5)." Historians tell us that by the time of Christ, the lamb was being sacrificed in the Temple twice each day. Jesus is the Lamb of God, and everybody knows it.
As we watch true prophecy unfolding, we are reminded that when a person rejects the true Catholic faith, he also unwittingly rejects Sacred Scripture; there is only one God and only one divinely-revealed religion. If a person accepts a false gospel, he cannot correctly understand biblical prophecy. But what's also very striking... is that only the followers of MHFM are able to understand end-time events in their true light. Thank you, St. Benedict, for your Order which, in this final battle, has indeed rendered great services to the holy Church and confirmed many in the Faith.
Lee Ann
Many people who deny the necessity of faith in Jesus Christ and Catholicism for salvation attempt to justify their heretical opinion by appealing to certain liberal pre-Vatican II theologians – some from hundreds of years ago – whose writings or persons were not specifically condemned. They think that adherence to such writings is justified since those writings or persons were not condemned. However, by clinging to such writings in the face of the dogmatic teaching that establishes the absolute necessity of faith in Jesus Christ and Catholicism, they fall into the following condemned error.
Decree of the Holy Office under Pope Alexander VII, Sept. 24, 1665, Condemning Errors: “27. If a book is published by a younger or modern person, its opinion ought to be considered probable, as long as it is not established that it has been rejected by the Apostolic See as improbable.” – Condemned
As we can see, just because some opinion or writing has not been specifically condemned, one cannot necessarily hold it as “probable” (i.e. as a plausible opinion), if the Church’s magisterial teaching clearly contradicts it. Many John 3:5 mockers and heretics fall into this condemned proposition when they ignore the teaching of the Magisterium on salvation and obstinately cling to the false teaching of certain theologians who, for example, heretically taught that souls can be saved in non-Christian religions.
Biden, Dominated By Evil, Gives Award To Planned Parenthood President
Joe Biden proves again that he’s dominated by evil. He actually gave an award to the notorious supporter of abortion (and former Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards). His choice of words was also noteworthy. Planned Parenthood butchers and in essence “carves up” babies. Hence, the Devil in Biden praised Richards for having “carved an inspiring legacy”. What an outrage. Richards has an aggressive form of brain cancer. That suggests that soon she will die and, barring an extraordinary conversion, she will be in Hell forever receiving a just and mind-boggling punishment for her unspeakable evils.
Would Be Spiritually Lost Without MHFM’s Preaching
… thank you so much for so courageously speaking the truth. I would literally and spiritually be lost without the preaching of the gospel MHFM does. I'll be forever grateful. I came across your material in Dec 2022 with the debate with Jeff Cassman. I had been in Novus Ordo, Charismatic and NO, then SSPX.
Susan
Eyes Have Been Opened
Charismatic “Christianity” Exposed
My eyes have been opened. This spirit is the kundalini spirit. God took me away from this…
Louise Kord
They Don’t Care About The Faith
Faith Is More Precious Than Gold
It’s very sobering to read this after seeing so many novus ordo lost souls drowning in their own ego, posting evermore non catholic Novus ordo opinions and nonsense. These folks care nothing for the soul saving faith but only the fruits and remaining externals…
Jordan P
As mentioned in our video, Did St. Paul Really Rebuke St. Peter In Galatians 2?, the Catholic Church’s teaching on the authority of the Latin Vulgate version of the Bible does not prohibit the use of original biblical languages and an examination of textual variants. Pope Pius XII states:
Pope Pius XII, Divino Afflante Spiritu (#22), Sept. 30, 1943: “Wherefore this authority of the Vulgate in matters of doctrine by no means prevents - nay rather today it almost demands - either the corroboration and confirmation of this same doctrine by the original texts or the having recourse on any and every occasion to the aid of these same texts, by which the correct meaning of the Sacred Letters is everywhere daily made more clear and evident. Nor is it forbidden by the decree of the Council of Trent to make translations into the vulgar tongue, even directly from the original texts themselves, for the use and benefit of the faithful and for the better understanding of the divine word…”
Great Apostasy In France
The Shocking Effects Of The French Revolution
As a French, I can relate about the demonic effect of the "revolution" organized in shadow by masonic and other groups... it was the beginning of the true faith’s abandonment, and the great apostasy in France which was before an important Catholic nation…
FBony
Excellent Spiritual Video
Amen! Excellent video! Thank you!
Rapidcycling
Devil’s Servants
Charismatic “Christianity” Exposed
... devil's servants! God bless you for exposing them.
Elpida
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
