| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
Church Of Rome vs. City Of Rome
[Some say] … Rome no longer holds the Faith. This directly contradicts the indefectibility of the Church that our Lord promised us in Matthew 16:18…
F G
MHFM
It is not contrary to indefectibility to say that the city of Rome has lost the faith. Various theologians before Vatican II correctly distinguished between the Church or Ecclesia of the city of Rome (under a true pope) and the city itself. The Church of the city of Rome (and the Apostolic See) cannot fall away, but the city can fall into apostasy if the true pope is absent. An assembly in Rome under a notoriously heretical antipope is not actually the Church or Ecclesia of the city of Rome. Various theologians also recognized that the prophecies about Babylon in the Apocalypse refer to the city of Rome (not the Church of Rome) returning to paganism in the last days. That has occurred. The fact that Rome under the Vatican II antipopes is in apostasy is an absolute and irrefutable fact, as our material proves.
Compelling
Leo XIV Mocks The Priesthood With Anglican Laywoman “Archbishop”
This is By FAR the most insightful, compelling, uncompromising and convincing coverage of the latest effrontery by Prevost. The AP praying with the heretic Anglican woman is definitely a mockery!...
TheJet
Pope St. Innocent I’s Declaration That No One Is Saved Without Baptism
Thank you so much…! That’s 2 canonized popes, Pope St. Leo the great and Pope St Innocent, as well as Pope Clement V and others all consistently teaching one baptism for the remission of sins.
Dom Gazy
Among others, there is also the authoritative teaching of Pope St. Zosimus and Pope St. Siricius. Those popes specifically contradicted the idea that anyone can be saved without the Sacrament of Baptism in some of the most important papal acts from the period of the early Church:
https://endtimes.video/ancient-pope-water-baptism-de-fide/
https://vaticancatholic.com/latin-text-oldest-surviving-papal-decree-rejects-baptism-desire/
There are many other definitive arguments, which are covered in our playlist on the matter:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzssJHrA8L1PjrxWW-S15pnEQ
This is one of the quotes that’s included in our recent video (Sam Shamoun: Ecumenical Fake Christian Exposed). It further contradicts those people who think that it’s not really a big deal for Protestants and the Eastern “Orthodox” to deny the Papacy.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 1, Chap. 10: “For it is in truth not a simple error, but a pernicious heresy to deny the primacy of Blessed Peter instituted by Christ.”
Sam Shamoun: Ecumenical Fake Christian Exposed
Sincere Question: How is your position that Heretics lose office instantaneously not Donatism?
Dershogun
In charity, your incorrect understanding of Donatism has led you to conflate distinct issues. Donatism was the false belief that wicked or unholy ministers could not validly perform sacraments. That’s false. It’s not the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church because a wicked person or someone outside the Church can validly perform a sacrament (e.g. baptism) if he observes the requisite matter, form, etc. Donatists also held that the Church only consisted of the morally pure. That’s also false because not every grave sin (but only schism, heresy or apostasy) severs a man from the Church.
Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis Christi (#23), June 29, 1943: “For not every offense, although it may be a grave evil, is such as by its very own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy.”
So, the Catholic Church rejects the position of the Donatists that unholy people cannot perform sacraments or be part of the Church. But the Catholic Church teaches that if someone denies the faith (and is a heretic) he automatically loses membership in the Church and therefore cannot rule it. The position that heretics automatically lose membership and authority in the Church is not only found in authoritative papal teaching but was articulated by the very doctors of the Church who condemned Donatism. So, our position is Catholic and has nothing to do with Donatism.
Pope St. Celestine, To The Clergy And People Of Constantinople: “Nevertheless, lest the sentence of him who had already called down a divine sentence upon himself should appear to have force even for a time, the authority of Our Apostolic See has openly ordained that no bishop, cleric, or Christian of any profession, who were deposed from their position or from communion by Nestorius and those of his ilk from the time [ex quo] they began to preach heresy, is to be seen as either deposed or excommunicated. But all these have been and until now remain in Our communion, because he who stumbled in preaching such things was not able to depose or remove anyone.”
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Bull Cantate Domino, 1441: “It [the Holy Roman Church] condemns, rejects and anathematizes all who think opposed and contrary things, and declares them to be aliens from the Body of Christ, which is the Church.”
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 2, Chap. 30: “For when those Fathers say that heretics lose jurisdiction, they do not adduce any human laws, none of which perhaps even existed at that time on this matter, but they argue from the nature of heresy. The Council of Constance, on the other hand, does not speak except concerning the excommunicated; that is, concerning those who through a sentence of the Church have lost jurisdiction. Heretics, however, even before an excommunication are outside the Church and deprived of all jurisdiction, for they are condemned by their own judgment, as the Apostle teaches in Titus 3. In other words, they have been cut off from the body of the Church without excommunication, as Jerome explains.”
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 2, Chap. 30: “... a manifestly heretical Pope automatically ceases to be the Pope and the head just as he automatically ceases to be a Christian and a member of the body of the Church, and that for this reason he may be judged and punished by the Church. This is the judgment of all the ancient Fathers, who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction...”
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Ecclesia Militante, Chap. 10: “For that reason [Popes] Celestine and Nicholas, in the passages cited, say that a heretical bishop, from the time he began to preach heresies, was not able to loose or bind anyone…”
Vatican II, Heretics & Ignorance Objection
Vatican II’s Protestant Heresy
What if a defender of the Vatican II sect says that the statements about Protestants and schismatics being in the Body of Christ in Unitatis Redintegratio #3 only refer to members of Protestant and schismatic sects who are invincibly ignorant?
Kristian
That doesn’t work at all because the paragraph (Unitatis Redintegratio #3) refers to “dissensions” (which includes people who reject Catholic teaching), and it speaks of all the members of these communities without limiting it to the supposedly ignorant. It also says this is true in spite of these differences. It also refers to the differences in doctrine as “obstacles”, rather than merely claiming that the individuals do not know Catholic doctrine. Further, it speaks of those who are separated from full communion, and a baptized person only separates himself from full communion through the offense of heresy, schism or apostasy (which involves a willful rejection or separation). Moreover, Lumen Gentium #15 says the same thing about those who “do not preserve communion under the successor of St. Peter”, which of course applies to people who dissent from or reject Church teaching. Hence, Vatican II clearly teaches that people who dissent from the Papacy and other dogmas are in the Body of Christ, which is the opposite of defined Catholic teaching. It also teaches that they are justified in baptism, as covered here. That’s also directly contrary to Catholic teaching.
Makes Sense
Protestants Misunderstand The Pharisee & The Tax Collector (Luke 18)
Amazing. I never heard it explained that way and it makes perfectly good sense...
Enrico
Eye-Opening
A Prophet Explains The Vatican II Apostasy From Catholicism
Very eye-opening and relevant. Thank you.
Lou
Hello Brothers,
Praise be Christ the King! I read Quas Primas today to my children and was struck by an additional quote from it which is significant for our times. "The empire of Christ over all nations was rejected... Then gradually the religion of Christ came to be likened to false religions and to be placed ignominiously on the same level with them... Some men went further, and wished to set up in the place of God's religion a natural religion consisting in some instinctive affection of the heart."
It struck me because of the ecumenism of the Vatican II sect. They are constantly placing themselves among the "pantheon" of false religions by "praying" with them and showing mutual respect for their falsity. Their syncretism is diabolical.
I also have a question about rebuking people who specifically use the name of Jesus in vain. At work we have meetings where we all gather together. Sometimes people are using the name of Jesus in vain. When they have used the name of Jesus I would eventually text them your website info and told them its crucial. I have given the info to almost everyone at work and am unsure whether I sin or not if I don't rebuke the blasphemy. No one seems to care about the faith.
Thank you
Sincerely,
C.
If people are taking the name of Jesus in vain right in front of you, you should defend the name of Jesus. You could say something like: "In charity you shouldn't say that... it's taking the Lord's name in vain." If necessary, you could add: "It's very offensive to me and God".
If the same person says it again in the future, after you have mentioned to them what's written above, you could simply say something like: "You shouldn't say that."
Matthew 10:33: "But whosoever shall deny Me before men, him will I also deny before My Father who is in Heaven."
The Meaning Of Nostra Aetate
Leo XIV Holds Outrageous Interfaith Prayer Event In The Roman Colosseum
Another smashing humiliation against the obstinate adherents of the Vatican II sect! It’s really quite laughable at what types of mental gymnastics they do to absurdly interpret Nostra Aetate to hold that it's orthodox, when their own antipopes (John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis and now Leo XIV), by their actions, clearly hold the document to its heretical meaning.
Daniel Frankel
In The Colosseum
Leo XIV Holds Outrageous Interfaith Prayer Event In The Roman Colosseum
Thanks for the information. Many traditionalists think that all will be good if only Anti-Pope Leo allows the traditional Latin Mass. What most of these people don't care about is the faith. They don't care if the church engages in these ecumenical events. That it's in the Colosseum itself where saints and martyrs spilled their blood is to further celebrate the wickedness of the Vatican II religion.
John
President Over All The Churches
St. Gregory Nazianzen Refutes “Orthodoxy” On The Papacy
As an inquirer into traditional Catholicism - Do you know if St. Gregory is referring to Rome being President over all the West, (noting he mentions Rome leads the entire West just before this) or President over all Churches? Trying to understand here, please pray for me also. Thank you!
CalvaryandChristendom
As the video covers, Gregory directly says that the See of Rome is “president over all”, not just the West. He says that Rome is binding together the West because heresies were flourishing more in the East than in the West. But the presidency of Rome is “over all”. That’s also the teaching of the ecumenical councils. We have also posted this in article form at the link above. See this playlist for other videos that totally refute Eastern “Orthodoxy”: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzss4weDvPDa-2SANNmPrxaqD It’s crucial that you embrace the traditional Catholic faith. Our material also explains what’s happening in Rome now.
Compassion
Man Rescues Baby Swan Caught In Fence - video
I appreciate these stories MHFM, they demonstrate kindness and compassion in people which is sometimes hard to find.
Jsn
Lives In California, Terrified
AB 495: Parental Rights On The Chopping Block In California
Dear brothers, I live in California and I am terrified of this bill. It shows how secular the state has become I will vote against this evil. Pray for us California.
JP
Only Way To Enter Communion
John 3:5 Mockers Have A Demonic Opposition To Catholic Truth On Baptism/Salvation
That video clip is a classic. There is no salvation outside the Catholic Church, and water baptism is the only way to enter into Communion with Her.
Francis
Comment
“Priests” Possessed After Rodney Howard-Browne “Charismatic Anointing”
… videos are so very well put together…
Damien
Oz Is Evil
Former Satanist Says Demons Appeared In Front Of Him
Even the unassuming worldly TV show hosts are sensing an evil presence around Oz. Like at an intuitive or instinctive level.
Mf
Saw The Magician
Former Satanist Says Demons Appeared In Front Of Him
Once I went to a circus and saw the magician doing supernatural things like pulling whole animals out of empty, narrow, and small bottles.
Ryan Franca
The Beast & 42 Months
Revelation says a number of times about 3 and 1/2 years. Where is this in your videos you don't address that why.
Ilovecats
It's addressed in this very video. See the discussion of 42 months and Nero. The Beast (i.e. pagan Rome) persecuted the Church under Nero (the sixth king) for 42 months or 3.5 years. Then the Beast was replaced by Christian Europe, as prophesied. Then the Beast returned in the last days under the appearance of the Church (i.e. by means of a Counter Church), again during the reign of the sixth king. The 42 months or 3.5 years simply refers to when the Beast acted the first time (i.e. under Nero).
New Religion
Vatican II Is A New Religion (Visual Proof)
Brilliant!! Thank you
Celtic
This is what Pope St. Gelasius wrote about bishops in the East who were negligent in rejecting communion with heretics who opposed the Council of Chalcedon.
Pope St. Gelasius, Letter 27 To The Bishops Of The East (AD 492-496): “Nor is there any doubt that, just as in each and every heresy (a fact that needs to be repeated without ceasing, because no Christian doubts that it is unwavering) all accomplices, followers, and those in communion with a crookedness that has been condemned once and for all, are adjudged to a matching fate… let nobody offer the excuse that he did not hold communion with someone or other who is perhaps more obviously heretical, or he will be regarded as being in communion with a heretic. For what help is it to him if he does not hold communion with him and is nevertheless joined in communion with those who are not hostile to communion with him? But if he was in communion with none of them or is not in any sort of communion [with such heretics], he will be of the sincere, Catholic, and apostolic communion and faith. Otherwise, there is no way that he could avoid the compound infection of that indiscriminate involvement… But this involvement [in communion with heretics] is thought by the Greeks, among whom there is no distinction between true and false, to be an easy matter and without blame, and because they want to be in communion with all reprobates they are shown not to stand firm in any rectitude.”
Extreme Contrast
Aztec Pagan Ritual In “Catholic Church” During “Mass”
The extreme contrast between the main pagan dancer and the crucifix in the background of the first part was scary. Showing the devilish smile of the possessed Antipope John Paul II was the perfect way to sum up the entire video.
Jim
Image Converted Millions
The Amazing And Miraculous Image Of Our Lady Of Guadalupe
This is the image that converted 9 million… when Europe was fading in their belief.
Drx
Truly Frightening
Aztec Pagan Ritual In “Catholic Church” During “Mass”
Thats truly frightening.
John Jeevan
Explicit Faith Dogmatic Proof?
Fr. Ripperger, SSPX, FSSP, CMRI, Etc. Promote Grave Errors – Refuted By Cistercian Theologian
Are there any dogmatic statements that say that explicit faith is necessary for salvation? De Lorca's and Aquinas' commentaries are not dogmatic.
Charles J
Did you even watch the video? The video references (and De Lorca cites) various dogmatic statements which prove that explicit faith in Christ is required. In fact, we recently posted a translation of another papal bull (from Gregory XIII) in which that truth is taught: https://vaticancatholic.com/pope-gregory-xiii-confess-christ-to-be-saved/ It’s also certain from the Acts 4:12 dogma repeated by many popes (among other things), as this video covers: https://endtimes.video/acts-4-12-salvation-name-of-jesus/
Here's another statement on the matter from Pope Paul III:
Pope Paul III, Sublimus Dei, May 29, 1537: “The sublime God so loved the human race that He created man in such wise that he might participate, not only in the good that other creatures enjoy, but endowed him with capacity to attain to the inaccessible and invisible Supreme Good and behold it face to face; and since man, according to the testimony of the sacred scriptures, has been created to enjoy eternal life and happiness, which none may obtain save through faith in Our Lord Jesus Christ, it is necessary that he should possess the nature and faculties enabling him to receive that faith...”
You really need to stop resisting Catholic truth.
Needed To See This
The Key To Changing Your Life - Short Video
Thanks… I really needed to see this.
Buck
Comment
The Key To Changing Your Life - Short Video How To Avoid Sin
I play this video and others of yours to my teens so often that they quote back lines from them to me by heart!!!! Thank you so much for these videos which are treasures of wisdom and truth.
Carrie
Timing
The Key To Changing Your Life - Short Video
The timing of this video is incredible.
Sud
Actual vs. Habitual Grace
Grace is frequently distinguished between actual and habitual. Actual grace is a gift or assistance that enables a person to perform good acts. This grace disappears with the performance of the act. Habitual grace is an enduring state or quality that makes a person pleasing to God and disposes that person to perform supernatural, good and meritorious acts.
Family Dog, Powerful Story
Sins Sending People To Hell
"Majority of practicing Christians admit to viewing porn, many comfortable with habit: study"
“The sins which cause most souls to go to hell are the sins of the flesh.” - Jacinta
Joseph
If The Gospel Be Hidden
Fr. Ripperger, SSPX, FSSP, CMRI, Etc. Promote Grave Errors – Refuted By Cistercian Theologian
"And if our gospel be also hidden, it is hidden to them that are lost" - 2 Corinthians 4: 3-4
Ryan King
On Heretics Being Baptized
The Catholic Church – Trent Horn Misleads Calvinist “Redeemed Zoomer”
Please clarify: near the end of the video the Vatican II statement that those who are baptized are justified is criticized as wrong and heretical, but in another video on the Protestant idea of justification, you said we are justified in baptism. Is the difference only their status in a Protestant sect? I don’t understand.
Kimber
People are justified in baptism when they don't place an obstacle in the way. Heretics who are validly baptized are not justified (and they don't become members of the Church, even though the baptism is valid) because their heresy is an impediment to the reception of grace and union with Christ. Vatican II falsely teaches that all baptized heretics are incorporated into the Body of Christ and are justified in baptism, which contradicts Catholic teaching. For more on this particular issue and the Catholic teaching that Vatican II contradicts, see this video/article:
https://endtimes.video/trent-horn-refuted-on-catholic-church/
Died Of Drug Overdose
The Most Misunderstood Catholic Decree – Council Of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4
Hello, Brothers. This video was excellent, as always, thank you. I have recently heard of an old former friend of mine that passed away. They had overdosed on a drug. This was a lifelong problem for them. Finding this out about them caused our friendship to drift apart. However, upon hearing this news, my heart is saddened. Is it okay to pray for them and to ask for God's mercy regarding their life and death? I've searched around for a clear answer, but I can't seem to find anyone I can trust. Can you give me the correct answer regarding true Catholic theology? Thank you, brothers. God bless you all.
Jack G
What you describe is sad. However, a Catholic is not permitted to pray for the person you described because he died in a clear state of grave sin. Catholics are not permitted to pray for those who die outside the Church or in a state of grave sin. For Catholic teaching on that matter, see this: https://endtimes.video/five-popes-gregory/
Video Posted
Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis
MHFM: This is an important video that contains many new points. We hope that people watch the entire video, for there are important points throughout.
Questions Answered
Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis
Big thanks. I had unanswered questions which are now answered in this video. May God bless and protect you.
Nsiimire Josephat
Comment
Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis
Another fantastic video…
Deus Vult
Why Do Some Insist?
Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis
This video does a great job supporting your point, but why is the title "Co Redemptrix" being used so often these days? What's their objective? Simply to reduce Jesus' importance?
R F
Hello. The answer is that throughout history multitudes have exhibited the tendency to worship idols/created things. Consider, for example, how many times members of Old Testament Israel fell into idolatry. The obstinate insistence that Our Lady is ‘Co-Redemptrix’ (in the face of dogmatic statements that contradict it) is a manifestation of that tendency in our day. There are many accurate and appropriate titles that signify Our Lady’s crucial role and her unique holiness (as the greatest of all humans ever created). But, as the video shows, she is not the female Redeemer (which is what 'Co-Redemptrix' means).
Hello, I sorry if this is a idiotic thing to ask but I don't understand why it would be heretical to try to interpret and in doing so understand how God works. Especially the God of the bible that we believe in that is Triune, infinite, all knowing, and all powerful would that not be beyond our comprehension. The idea of infinite and all powerful are so impossible to understand that the idea that the Orthodox put forward is an attempt to explain how God works through their observations and them interpreting the energies of God or the way that God works in the world. And when you say that they are making the energies of God a separate God would it not also be valid to say that that energy is a part of the Triune God in the sense that it's the energy of the Triune God. And them separating the two is just for semantics trying to separate how God does and God so they're not confused. And isn't it perfectly possible for a part of God to change because of an infinite God exists then even if one part changes he is still infinite meaning that nothing has truly changed because you cannot truly change an infinite being by just changing apart or is my interpretation of the subject matter completely wrong…
Noah
Hello. God reveals certain things about Himself, and those truths must be accepted without compromise. The Bible and the Christian Church teach that God is immutable (i.e. He does not change) and that He is absolutely simple (i.e. He is not composed of parts). The Eastern 'Orthodox' Palamite position advances a view that contradicts those truths. Thus, it's opposed to the truth about God that's revealed in Scripture and Tradition and taught by the Church. We recommend that you see this for more on that matter: God's Eternity & Immutability - Denied By Eastern "Orthodox" Speakers
This playlist of videos refutes Eastern 'Orthodoxy': https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzss4weDvPDa-2SANNmPrxaqD It's crucial that you become a traditional Catholic. We also recommend that Catholics, if they can, pray 15 decades of the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. This is an important spiritual video: https://endtimes.video/how-to-avoid-sin/
Knowledge Comes Through The Senses & Avoiding Sin
I have a huge problem [with repeated and habitual sins of impurity]…
First, in addition to prayer, you need to radically cut off the occasion of the sin. If it's your computer or phone or whatever, get rid of it. Knowledge comes through the senses. When you remove things from your eyes and your sight, you will begin to forget about them. If you cut off the occasion of the sin, avoiding the sin will become easier for you. But you need to radically cut off the occasion. That’s what Jesus taught in Mt. 5:30. Also, you need to exercise your will and be resolved to resist the Devil. It's your eternity at stake.
St. Alphonsus (1760): “If you neglect God’s call on this occasion, he may perhaps abandon you forever. Resolve, then, resolve! ‘The devil,’ says St. Theresa, ‘is afraid of resolute souls.’ St. Bernard teaches that many souls are lost through want of fortitude.”
Ecclesiasticus 5:8-9: “Delay not to be converted to the Lord, and defer it not from day to day. For His wrath shall come on a sudden, and in the time of vengeance he will destroy thee.”
Second, you have a big problem with pride. If you had the first degree of humility, you wouldn't be committing the mortal sins you are committing. You don’t have the proper fear of the Lord, which is the beginning of wisdom (Proverbs 9:10). That’s a result of pride.
St. Benedict (c. 520): “The first degree of humility, then, is that a man always have the fear of God before his eyes, shunning all forgetfulness and that he be ever mindful of all that God has commanded, that he always considers in his mind how those who despise God will burn in hell for their sins, and that life everlasting is prepared for those who fear God.”
Third, you should be praying 15 decades of the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. We also recommend that you pray the St. Michael Prayer daily. We also recommend these videos:
Judgment Came Swiftly
No one escapes the judgement.
Theodosius
Judgment came swiftly in this instance.
What Is Bergoglio’s False Gospel
Vigano’s “Excommunication” By Francis Is Invalid (Catholic Teaching)
What is the false gospel that Francis teaches? (genuine question to help me understand)
James C
He teaches a false gospel because, among many other things, he condemns converting people to the Catholic faith. He also agrees with Martin Luther on justification. He teaches religious indifferentism. He teaches that the death penalty is contrary to the Gospel, to name just a few things. All of that (and much more) is documented in our videos and articles. Here are a few quotes that are relevant.
Francis, Speech to Lutherans and ‘Catholics’, Oct. 13, 2016: “It is not licit to convince them of your faith. Proselytism is the strongest venom against the ecumenical path.”
Here he defines proselytism as trying to convince people of the faith, and he rejects it.
Francis, Aug. 7, 2013: “Should you go and convince someone else that he should become Catholic? No, no, no! Go out and meet him, he is your brother. This is enough."
Here he says 'no' to the question of whether people should convince others to be Catholic.
Francis, Video Message To National Catholic Youth Conference, Nov. 21, 2019: “Go, go and take the Lord, go and fill up your environments, even the digital ones, not with convictions, not to convince, not to proselytize, but rather by bearing witness to Jesus’ tenderness and mercy.”
Here he again heretically rejects trying to convince people of the faith, and he rejects having convictions.
Francis, Address To Participants In The General Chapter of The Pontifical Institute For Foreign Missions, May 20, 2019: “And so you proclaim Jesus Christ. This is not seeking new members for this ‘Catholic society’, no. It is making Jesus visible: so he may become visible in my person, in my conduct; and to open, through my life, room for Jesus. This is evangelizing. This is what your Founders had at heart.”
Here he explicitly rejects the effort to seek new members for the Catholic society (further proving our point).
Francis, June 26, 2016: "Nowadays, Lutherans and Catholics, and all Protestants, are in agreement on the doctrine of justification: on this very important point he [Luther] was not mistaken."
Here he teaches that Luther was not wrong on justification. That is to teach a false gospel.
Bergoglio’s Poisonous Words
Vigano’s “Excommunication” By Francis Is Invalid (Catholic Teaching)
Hearing the words of Bergoglio here, they drip like slow, sweet poison from his lips.
Johnny Toronto
... you mention that adults who are baptised into Protestant or Eatsern Orthodox sects receive valid baptisms but are not united to the Mystical Body because their heresy is an impediment to the reception of sacramental grace. Notice how you mention adults though. It's because you know full well that babies who are validly baptised into false sects do receive sanctyfing grace and union with Christ and are to be considered Catholic. That's because babies are incapable of heresy, so there's no impediment on their part. But what you don't mention in ANY of your videos is the distinction between formal and material heresy and formal and material schism. How convenient of you. This is where the fatal flaw in your position lies and where many of the things you teach around baptism and ecclesiology crumble which is why you NEVER mention those distinctions. EVER. The fact that babies baptised into false sects become members of the Mystical Body despite never having stepped foot in a Catholic Church or ever having come into contact with a Catholic, proves that the Church is both visible and invisible, physical and metaphysical and is wider and larger 8n scope than just the visible institution. But you make it sound like it's impossible to be a true member of the Church unless you are formally united to it by stepping into one of the tangible brick and mortar buildings owned by the visible heirarchical Church. You also like to quote Mystici Corporus about how only those who profess the true faith are members of the Church. Well if babies or adolescents that are baptised into false sects can become members of the Chuch without professing the true faith, then so can adults. That's because a robust knowledge of Catholcism and all of its theological nuances isn't required for salvation. At a minimum you need to believe that God exists and is a rewarder of those who seek him. That's St. Paul in Hebrews and what the Church told the Jesuit missionaries who were trying to convert the Native Americans. So adults who convert to Protestantism or Eastern Orthodoxy without understanding the theological and historical differences between the different communions but believe that God exists, is a rewarder of those who seek Him, that Christ is the Messiah, that He died on the cross for our sins etc do recieve grace and union with Christ because any errors that they may hold are usually in good faith and are accidental, not something they hold on purpose with bad will and malicious intent to defy the Catholic Church, so they would only be guilty of material heresy, not formal heresy, and thus would be united to the Church since it's the formal kind that offends God and severs one from the Mystical Body. God isn't going to hold a theology quiz and prevent people from entering heaven who lack an in-depth understanding of advanced theological concepts or make honest mistakes because they don't know any better or lack the mental capacity and reading comprehension skills to understand scripture and arrive innocnetly at false conclusions which happen to be (materially) heretical. That's idiotic nonsense. God is infinite in His perfections and immutable in His divinity, so His permanent disposition towards us is one of love. He's not in the business of condemning people for making honest mistakes or transgressing Church laws that they don't even know exist. He's not like our unjust secular authorities who say that ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it and doesn't absolve you of guilt. Ignorance does absolve you in God's eyes, for you can only be guilty for doing something that you know to be wrong. Full knowledge and consent are 2 of the conditions for a sin to be mortal, and not all Protestants or Eastern Orthodox know that they are in error and many of them think they are doing the right thing and that it's Catholics who are the ones in error. Once shown the truth, many of them actually end up converting, which proves that it's not bad will on their part, just a lack of understanding. Also, Vatican II was held at a time before the whole born-again evangelical and charismatic movements took off which is when the idea of accepting Jesus into your heart and saying the sinners prayer was gkw yoi got saved became a common belief. Most Protestants at the time of Vatican II were still baptised as babies and were thus members of the Church, provided they didn't sink into formal heresy in theie adult ears.
“God himself said to St. Theresa: ‘No one is lost without knowing it, and no one is deceived without wanting to be.” (The Glories of Mary, p. 557)
Pope Leo XIII, Apostolicae Curae, Sept. 13, 1896: “When anyone has rightly and seriously made use of the due form and the matter requisite for effecting or conferring the sacrament he is considered by that very fact to do what the Church does. On this principle rests the doctrine that a sacrament is truly conferred by the ministry of one who is a heretic or unbaptized, provided the Catholic rite be employed. On the other hand, if the rite be changed, with the manifest intention of introducing another rite not approved by the Church, and of rejecting what the Church does, and what by the institution of Christ belongs to the nature of the sacrament, then it is clear that not only is the necessary intention wanting to the sacrament, but that the intention is adverse to and destructive of the sacrament.”
Preaching, But Not Believing - Heresy
St. Jerome: You Cannot Be Saved Without Water Baptism
The Church cannot preach any other way to salvation than baptism and the sacraments. But God can save whomever he wills in whichever way he wills.
Michel
What you have expressed is a condemned Modernist error. You are arguing that dogmas are preceptive norms for acting, but not norms for believing. That’s condemned.
Pope Pius X, Lamentabile, The Errors of the Modernists, July 3, 1907, #26: “The dogmas of faith are to be held only according to a practical sense, that is, as preceptive norms for action, but not as norms for believing.” - Condemned
Since it’s impossible for God to lie (Heb. 6:18), He will only save people in the manner in which He has said people must be saved. Well, God has revealed that people must be saved with the Catholic faith and by an act in the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 4:12) – i.e. water baptism.
https://endtimes.video/acts-4-12-salvation-name-of-jesus/
Video Posted
Anathema - Jimmy Akin Gets It Wrong In Debate With James White
Insightful Video
Anathema – Jimmy Akin Gets It Wrong In Debate With James White
Incredibly outrageous that Akin found it appropriate to celebrate the Vatican II antichurch’s statements regarding how all Protestants aren’t actually anathematized! This also goes back to how God doesn’t give graces to those that seek approval from other men rather than God alone, as Akin shamelessly did. Thanks for another insightful video, Brothers!
Servus A
Another Protestant Sect
Anathema – Jimmy Akin Gets It Wrong In Debate With James White
Jimmy Akin thinks that he converted to Catholicism from Protestantism. He doesn't know he has joined another protestant sect which is the Vatican 2 counter church. He never was a Catholic.
Ben
Thomas Merton
Was the Catholic monk Thomas Merton in error by seeking truths in other religions whilst remaining faithful to the Catholic religion?..
Jeff K
He was not a true Catholic. He was, rather, a promoter of false ecumenism and religious indifferentism. That is incompatible with the Catholic faith. For why, see these videos (among others):
https://endtimes.video/vatican-ii-new-religion/
https://endtimes.video/why-mother-teresa-was-not-a-saint/
Born Into Pagan Family But Wants To Convert
Dear Dimond Brothers,
Thank you for your consistent work in propagating the Traditional Catholic faith. I am not a Catholic. I was born into a pagan family but my grandparents are Catholic (post V2). I am planning to convert to Catholicism due to your content. I refuse to worship pagan gods since my plan to convert. My parents are angry at me due to my behavior. Funnily enough, my grandma defended my parents and said that Catholicism is not against pagan worship. Please pray for me as well as for my family.
Best Regards,
Vito
It's great to hear that you want to convert. It's crucial that you make it a priority to do so. We recommend that you pray the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. That will give you important graces. We recommend that Catholics, if they can, pray 15 decades of the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. This is an important spiritual video: https://endtimes.video/how-to-avoid-sin/
"And Jesus said, 'Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.' And they cast lots to divide his garments." (Luke 23:34)
Did Jesus pray for all who crucified Him while He was on the Cross? The answer is no, according to St. Thomas Aquinas. Since Christ’s prayers were absolutely efficacious, being perfectly conformed to God's will, He only prayed for those in the world who would accept Him and were predestined to eternal life.
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Pt. 3, Q. 21, A. 4, Whether Christ’s Prayer Was Always Heard: “Objection 2. Further, He [Christ] prayed that the sin of those who crucified Him might be forgiven, as is related (Luke 23:34). Yet not all were pardoned this sin, since the Jews were punished on account thereof. Therefore it seems that not every prayer of His was heard… I answer that, according to the will of reason, Christ willed nothing but what He knew God to will. Wherefore every absolute will of Christ, even human, was fulfilled, because it was in conformity with God; and consequently His every prayer was fulfilled. For in this respect also is it that other men's prayers are fulfilled, in that their will is in conformity with God, according to Romans 8:27… Reply to Objection 2: Our Lord did not pray for all those who crucified Him, as neither did He for all those who would believe in Him; but for those only who were predestinated to obtain eternal life through Him. Wherefore the reply to the third objection is also manifest.”
The Errors of Peter Abelard, Condemned by Innocent II, July 16, 1140, #10: “That they have not sinned who being ignorant have crucified Christ, and that whatever is done through ignorance must not be considered sin.” - Condemned.
St. John Chrysostom, On Luke 23:34: “But He [Jesus] says, Forgive them, if they should repent. For He is gracious to the penitent, if they are willing after so great wickedness to wash away their guilt by faith.”
Devils Laughing In Hell?
Man Shot & Saw Hell – Shocking Must-See Video
How can devils laugh in Hell when there is no pleasure there?
The Vision of Drytheim and the experience of the man covered in our recent video report that demons laugh in Hell as they attack and torture people. Their laughing in Hell, however, is not a manifestation of actual pleasure (which they completely lack) but rather of utter hatred, mockery and disdain. In an analogous way, many people in this life laugh at good people, sound advice, and sound teaching out of mockery and contempt, even though they are actually miserable, insecure and unhappy.
Renewed Urgency
Man Shot & Saw Hell – Shocking Must-See Video
Thank you for your new video about the man that was shot and saw Hell. It has given me a renewed urgency to work for the conversion of sinners…
M
Brothers I have an extremely important question. I am 100% open to joining the Church I just have one question about the Holy See of Rome. Peter himself was rebuked by Paul during the council of acts. Paul showed Peter the error in his belief that the gentiles must be circumcised. This is covered in Galatians 2. If the pope (Peter) was incorrect in doctrine how does this lead to the belief of papal infallibility. The lesser bishop Paul rebuked the Pope, Peter in this passage. How do I reconcile this?
Deacon
Actually, the evidence is overwhelming that the 'Cephas' rebuked by St. Paul in Galatians 2 was not St. Peter. We have an in-depth video on this matter: Did St. Paul Really Rebuke St. Peter In Galatians 2? We encourage you to view it. God wants you to become a traditional Catholic. Our material explains how to do that.
Comment
John 3:5 Mockers Stumped (1917 Code, Delayed Ensoulment, “Baptism Of Desire”)
… Outstanding work.
Sebastian Moncada
Grace Of Regeneration Began With His Resurrection
John 3:5 Mockers Stumped (1917 Code, Delayed Ensoulment, “Baptism Of Desire”)
If the old testament saints are in heaven now, that would mean they were born again before going to heaven, so if they can received the Sacrament of baptism even though they are dead, without physical going to the baptism, why can't God do the same for people who died before wanting to be baptized?
Pdub
The Old Testament righteous were not born again without baptism. As Leo the Great teaches, "the grace of regeneration began with His resurrection" (citation below). Further, in this video we present the evidence that they were all baptized (even though they died before the Law of Baptism was promulgated): Jesus’ Descent Into Hell & The Baptism Of The Good Thief
Pope St. Leo the Great, Letter 16, Oct 21, 447: “... after He rose from the dead, handed on both the form and power of baptizing to His disciples, in whose person all the chiefs of the churches received their instructions with these words, ‘Go ye and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost.’ On which of course He might have instructed them even before His passion, had He not especially wished it to be understood that the grace of regeneration began with His resurrection.”
God has declared, and the Church infallibly teaches, that all need baptism for salvation. Further, no one who dies outside the Church in the New Testament period can be saved, and only the baptized are in the Church.
Providence & Baptism
John 3:5 Mockers Stumped (1917 Code, Delayed Ensoulment, “Baptism Of Desire”)
Where does the Church teach that God would NOT take a person’s life before baptism while they are being catechized? It would be a cruel god that would damn a person while they desired to be in the Church but still needed to be taught for baptism.
Jamie
To your first question, the Church teaches that everyone in Heaven from the New Testament period receives baptism (Pope Benedict XII, Benedictus Deus) and that no one can be saved without water baptism (Trent, Sess. 5, Original Sin, etc.). Further, Pope St. Leo the Great and Pope St. Siricius both teach that for unbaptized catechumens in any situation (including accidents, persecutions, etc.), the only way for them to be saved is to actually receive water baptism. They taught that in two of the most important papal decretals in the early Church:
https://vaticancatholic.com/pope-st-leo-the-great-contradicts-baptism-of-blood-desire/
https://vaticancatholic.com/latin-text-oldest-surviving-papal-decree-rejects-baptism-desire/
Ergo, God in His providence will keep all of His elect alive so that they can receive the Sacrament. St. Augustine expressed it well in his final work Against Julian.
St. Augustine, Against Julian, Book 5, Chap. 4: “Of the number of the elect and predestined, even those who have led the very worst kind of life are led to repentance through the goodness of God… Not one of them perishes, regardless of his age at death; never be it said that a man predestined to life would be permitted to end his life without the sacrament of the Mediator [Baptism]. Because of these men, our Lord says: ‘This is the will of him who sent me, the Father, that I should lose nothing of what he has given me.’”
We also see examples of this in the case of missionaries such as St. Isaac Jogues. Here are just two quotes from his life:
The Life of St. Isaac Jogues, p. 92: “Then, most of all [the heathens concluded], the Blackrobes caused people to die by pouring water on their heads; practically everyone they baptized died soon after.”
The Life of St. Isaac Jogues, p. 225: “Two of the Hurons, Jogues learned, were to be burned to death that night at Tionontoguen. He stayed with them on the platform and concentrated his appeals on them. Finally they consented. About that moment, the Mohawks threw the prisoners some raw corn that had been freshly plucked. The sheaths [of the corn] were wet from the recent rains. Father Jogues carefully gathered the precious drops of water on a leaf and poured them over the heads of the two neophytes [new converts], baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. The Mohawks understood that his [Jogues’] act meant to bring happiness to these hated victims. They raged at his audacity and beat him down, threatening to slaughter him with the Hurons… That night the two Hurons [whom he had baptized] were burned over the fire.”
Other examples can be found in these files:
https://vaticancatholic.com/st-isaac-jogues-st-francis-xavier-vs-invincible-ignorance/
St. Emerentiana, Jan. 23
MHFM: Today is the feast of St. Emerentiana. Many who don't believe in the necessity of baptism for salvation falsely claim that St. Emerentiana was not baptized. However, the truth is that Pope Benedict XII dogmatically defined that all the martyrs in Heaven from the New Testament period received baptism. Further, the Church has never taught that St. Emerentiana or any other martyr got to Heaven without the Sacrament of Baptism. This video covers the matter. We also have an article on the same topic.
Was St. Emerentiana Baptized? Unbaptized Martyrs?
… I got into an argument with some Protestant heretics and we ended up talking about the “gift of tongues” and one Protestant showed me 1 Cor 14:2. I didn’t know how to answer it…
1 Cor. 14:2- “For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God; for no one understands him, but he utters mysteries in the Spirit.”
Hello. We agree with St. Thomas’ explanation of the verse. In 1 Cor. 14:1 and following, St. Paul is teaching the Corinthians that they should not be desirous of the gift of tongues or languages just for the sake of speaking in that way, but rather insofar as it will edify others. Hence, he says in 1 Cor. 14:2: “For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God; for no one understands him, but he utters mysteries in the Spirit.” The tongue or language mentioned there, which is spoken not to men but to God, is not an unintelligible babble language. Rather, it refers to an actual human language that’s not understood by those in the audience (but only by God, who of course knows all languages). As St. Thomas says, it’s like “when one might speak German to a Frenchman without an interpreter.” St. Paul’s point is that speaking in tongues for its own sake is not beneficial. It should be understood by others and edify them.
This is also why St. Paul says:
1 Corinithians 14:10-13- “There are doubtless many different languages in the world, and none is without meaning, but if I do not know the meaning of the language, I will be a foreigner to the speaker and the speaker a foreigner to me. So with yourselves, since you are eager for manifestations of the Spirit, strive to excel in building up the church. Therefore, one who speaks in a tongue should pray that he may interpret.”
St. Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on 1 Cor. 14:1-4- “In regard to the second it should be noted that because there were few in the early Church assigned to preaching faith of Christ throughout the world, the Lord enabled them to proclaim the word to more people by giving them the gift of tongues, by which they could all preach to all. Not that they spoke in one language and were understood by all, as some say, but that they spoke the languages of different nations and, indeed, of all. Hence the Apostle says: ‘I thank God that I speak in the languages of all of you,’ and in Acts (2:4) it says: ‘They began to speak in other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.’ Furthermore, many received this gift from God in the early church. But the Corinthians, being inquisitive, were more desirous of this gift than the gift of prophecy. Therefore, when the Apostle mentions here about speaking in a tongue, he means an unknown language not interpreted; as when one might speak German to a Frenchman without an interpreter, he is speaking in a tongue. Hence, all speech not understood or explained, no matter what it is, is properly called speaking in a tongue.”
True Eastern Catholics Are Not Palamites
But aren’t Eastern Catholics Palamists? Are they heretics too?
Emil
No, true Eastern Catholics are not Palamites. You should see this video/article: Greek "Orthodox" Gregory Palamas Is Not A Saint & He Was Condemned Before Vatican II.
Awesome Miracle
The Amazing And Miraculous Image Of Our Lady Of Guadalupe
Truly awesome miracles about every aspect of this tilma. The resulting massive miracles of conversion are a testament to the Power and the Glory of God working through Our Blessed Lady the Queen of Heaven and Earth. Glory to God.
Paddy Early
Drop RCIA
…I’ve started going to a church that has a “divine mercy” “theme” to it and I started my RCIA classes there. I am now fully Aware and willing to accept that this is a false teaching and it is the Devil clever substitute church. Should I completely drop my RCIA classes and find another church to go to or should Continue to go until the end of it. I’ve never been baptized…
Deon
We’re glad that you came across the information. Yes, you should drop RCIA (and avoid the New Mass) and convert through the steps on our website. You should also start to pray the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. (We recommend that Catholics, if they can, pray 15 decades of the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently.)
Explaining
Why Francis Must Not Be Considered The Pope
Thank you, sir, for clearly and succinctly explaining the peril in which we currently reside. It is imperative that all faithful awaken to this peril, and 'with fear and trembling work out your salvation. ' (Phil. 2:13)
Jason Hurd
Heretics Always Misuse Scripture
The Acts of the Second Council of Nicaea 787, Sess. 6: “When people try to pervert the correct doctrine according to their own fancy, let no one be surprised if they employ the words of Scripture, since all originators of heresy take the starting point of their error from inspired Scripture, falsifying the orthodox utterances of the Holy Spirit with their own wicked thoughts.”
Burke, French Revolution
All this action of the antipope to remove or punish more conservative "prelates" reminds me a lot of the demonic French Revolution, where the ones who enabled and were allies of the revolution or even brought the revolution about in the first place were eventually punished themselves by the beast they helped create. These worldlings are praised and glorified one day, but the next are thrown under the bus when they become "too soft" or "too conservative" for the fast growing wickedness of the beast...
Philothea
Creation Science – Dr. Walt Brown
Did God allow the devil to place conclusive evidence to the contrary inside the earth, or was that a result of the fall? How does one properly reconcile God’s truth and non-promotion of confusion with the observable facts around us? That all secular evidence precludes a young earth isnt disputable, so there’s got to be something missing to reconcile this.
Coffee Catastrophe
Hello. Science does not support evolution or an old Earth. It destroys evolution and supports a young Earth. On that matter, we recommend the book: In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood, by Dr. Walt Brown (a scientist with a Ph.D. from MIT): https://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html
We also recommend these videos:
https://endtimes.video/amazing-evidence-for-god/
https://endtimes.video/creation-and-miracles-condensed-version/
Powerful Quote
The Earth Is Young (Acts Of Nicaea II)
Powerful quote…
Josip Gregoric
Benedict XVI, Luther
Benedict XVI was even WORSE than Luther in some ways.
Ryan Autrey
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
