| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
MHFM: In 1 Chronicles 21 we find another example of how angels are intimately involved in events on Earth. God was very displeased with King David for having ordered a census of the people. It was a sin of pride. David repented, but God gave him a choice of three punishments.
1 Chronicles 21:10-13- “‘Thus says the Lord, three things I offer you; choose one of them, that I may do it to you.’ So Gad came to David and said to him, ‘Thus says the Lord, ‘Choose what you will: either three years of famine, or three months of devastation by your foes while the sword of your enemies overtakes you, or else three days of the sword of the Lord, pestilence on the land, with the angel of the Lord destroying throughout all the territory of Israel. Now decide what answer I shall return to him who sent me.’ Then David said to Gad, ‘I am in great distress. Let me fall into the hand of the Lord, for his mercy is very great, but do not let me fall into the hand of man.”
David chose his punishment, and 70,000 men of Israel fell. We also read that God sent an angel that would have destroyed Jerusalem. However, God stopped the angel from destroying Jerusalem because David repented and sacrificed to the Lord in obedience. This reminds us that angels are active in events on Earth. This is true of good and bad angels.
1 Chronicles 21:14-27- “So the Lord sent a pestilence on Israel, and 70,000 men of Israel fell. And God sent the angel to Jerusalem to destroy it, but as he was about to destroy it, the Lord saw, and he relented from the calamity. And he said to the angel who was working destruction, ‘It is enough; now stay your hand.’ And the angel of the Lord was standing by the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite. And David lifted his eyes and saw the angel of the Lord standing between earth and heaven, and in his hand a drawn sword stretched out over Jerusalem. Then David and the elders, clothed in sackcloth, fell upon their faces. And David said to God, ‘Was it not I who gave command to number the people? It is I who have sinned and done great evil. But these sheep, what have they done? Please let your hand, O Lord my God, be against me and against my father’s house. But do not let the plague be on your people.’ Now the angel of the Lord had commanded Gad to say to David that David should go up and raise an altar to the Lord on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite… And David built there an altar to the Lord and presented burnt offerings and peace offerings and called on the Lord, and the Lord answered him with fire from heaven upon the altar of burnt offering. Then the Lord commanded the angel, and he put his sword back into its sheath.”
MHFM: In a striking confirmation of what we covered in the video we posted a few days ago (Francis Comes Out In Support Of “Pride Month” Defender), today (June 12) Antipope Francis met with the notorious ‘Fr.’ James Martin again. He ‘blessed’ Martin. Martin also says that Francis once again confirmed his ‘ministry’. This is more proof of what our video stated. Don’t be distracted by the gaslighters and liars who focus on whether Francis used a ‘slur’ in private. It’s irrelevant.
MHFM: In Matthew 7:7, Jesus says: “Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you.” Multitudes today lack faith or struggle to believe. If they sincerely prayed for the true faith in humility (without seeking the approval of others), God would give them the grace to move toward traditional Catholicism and recognize that it’s true. Further, note that this verse indicates that everyone who sincerely desires baptism will receive it. Jesus says: “Knock, and it will be opened.” What opens? Doors and gates open. The Church teaches that baptism is the door or gateway (ianua) of the spiritual life. It’s how one enters the faith of Christ. That door will be opened (and not remain shut) to those who sincerely seek it.
Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439: “Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life (vitae spiritualis ianua), holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church. And since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5]. The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water.”
These videos are also relevant to the matter of why so many lack faith:
MHFM: When the prophet Jeremiah told King Zedekiah and the people of Judah that the Chaldeans would capture Jerusalem and burn it with fire (as a result of their sins), they would not listen. Instead of hearkening to the true message, they beat him, accused him of defecting to the enemy, and threw him into a dungeon. That’s another example of how throughout history people generally resisted God’s word and those who preached it.
Jeremiah 37:8-17- “They shall capture it and burn it with fire. Thus says the LORD, do not deceive yourselves, saying, ‘The Chaldeans will surely go away from us,’ for they will not go away… When he was at the Benjamin Gate, a sentry there named Irijah the son of Shelemiah, son of Hananiah, seized Jeremiah the prophet, saying, ‘You are deserting to the Chaldeans.’ And Jeremiah said, ‘It is a lie; I am not deserting to the Chaldeans.’ But Irijah would not listen to him, and seized Jeremiah and brought him to the officials. And the officials were enraged at Jeremiah, and they beat him and imprisoned him in the house of Jonathan the secretary, for it had been made a prison. When Jeremiah had come to the dungeon cells and remained there many days, King Zedekiah sent for him and received him.”
This video covers striking parallels between the current Vatican II apostasy and what happened to the People of God and the holy city in the Old Testament.
It was recently reported that Antipope Francis insulted homosexuals during a private conversation. Antipope Francis lamented all the “faggotry” in Italian seminaries. Deluded defenders of Antipope Francis (who claim to be conservative) were celebrating Francis’ comment, as if it proved that he’s good or Catholic. Of course, their attempt to portray Francis as Catholic based on this comment was absurd. Antipope Francis is a total apostate and religious indifferentist who teaches an array of heresies. Those heresies include his public approval of sodomy. In fact, even if Antipope Francis excommunicated every single supporter of homosexuality in the Vatican II Sect, he would still be a notorious heretic on many issues. While the duped supporters of the Vatican II Sect were celebrating his comment, we discussed this among ourselves. We thought that probably within one week Francis would apologize or utter another major heresy. It only took a few days. Antipope Francis has apologized for the “faggotry” comment, making his defenders look foolish once again. Antipope Francis’ apology was published by the Vatican Press Office on May 28. It stated:
"Pope Francis is aware of the recent articles regarding a closed-door conversation with the bishops of the CEI [Italian Bishops' Conference]. As he has stated on many occasions, 'There is room for everyone in the Church, for everyone! No one is useless; no one is superfluous; there is room for everyone. Just as we are, everyone.' The Pope never intended to offend or express himself in homophobic terms, and he apologizes to those who felt offended by the use of a term, as reported by others." (Vatican News, May 28, 2024)
Since the Vatican II Sect is heretical and lacks grace, it’s unable to stand against the world.
MHFM: Early Church father St. Optatus of Milevis was an opponent of Donatism in 4th-century Africa prior to St. Augustine. He acknowledges that St. Peter received the keys of the Kingdom in a unique way, and that the Bishops of Rome inherited this unique authority. This is more evidence for the Papacy in the ancient Church.
St. Optatus of Milevis, Against the Donatists, Book 7, Chap. 3, AD 384: “… blessed Peter (for whom it would have been enough if after his denial he had obtained pardon only) both deserved to be placed over all the Apostles, and alone received the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, which he was to communicate to the rest.”
St. Optatus of Milevis, Against the Donatists, Book 1, Chap. 10, AD 384: “Therefore none of the heretics possess either the Keys, which Peter alone received, or the Ring, with which we read that the Fountain has been sealed; nor is any heretic one of those to whom that Garden belongs in which God plants His young trees.”
St. Optatus of Milevis, Against the Donatists, Book 2, Chaps. 2-3, AD 384: “You cannot then deny that you do know that upon Peter first in the City of Rome was bestowed the Episcopal Chair, on which sat Peter, the Head of all the Apostles… that, in this one Chair, unity should be preserved by all, lest the other Apostles might claim----each for himself----separate Chairs, so that he who should set up a second Chair against the unique Chair would already be a schismatic and a sinner. To Peter succeeded Linus, to Linus succeeded Clement…”
St. Optatus of Milevis, Against the Donatists, Book 2, Chap. 4, AD 384: “… we read that Peter received the saving Keys – Peter, that is to say, the first of our line, to whom it was said by Christ: 'To thee will I give the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven,' and these keys 'the gates of Hell shall not overcome.' How is it, then, that you strive to usurp for yourselves the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, you who, with your arguments, and audacious sacrilege, war against the Chair of Peter?”
MHFM: This is another interesting quote from a pope about how heretics typically contradict themselves and use ambiguity. The Church teaches that such individuals must be held to (and condemned for) their heretical statements, regardless of the contradictions and ambiguity in which those statements are concealed. The fact that heretics typically contradict themselves – and the Church's teaching that they are to be condemned regardless – is a principle that many defenders of the Vatican II antipopes are simply unable (or refuse) to grasp.
Pope Vigilius, Second Constitutum, Feb. 23, 554: “… it is the custom of heretics to hide their poisons with counterfeit speech and to utter words that have a semblance of agreeing with orthodox professions, and through being tolerated to maintain that malign access through which the pestilence of their error can infiltrate, as the prophet testifies about them: ‘They made their speeches smooth above oil, and they are darts’ [Ps. 54:22]…”
MHFM: In our recent video on Pope Vigilius (The “Strongest” Argument Against The Papacy (Pope Vigilius) – Refuted), we cited this passage from Sess. 3 of the Second Council of Constantinople in 553.
Second Council Of Constantinople, Sess. 3, AD 553: “… the holy, catholic and apostolic church of God, if anyone separates himself from its communion by holding contrary opinions, such a person, since he alienates himself from the orthodox faith and numbers himself with the heretics, is justly condemned and anathematized by the holy Church of God.”
The Council clearly teaches that people are separated from the Church “by holding contrary opinions”. The same was taught by the Council of Florence, Leo XIII, etc. This passage from Constantinople II refutes the defenders of the Vatican II Sect who claim that merely holding beliefs contrary to Catholic teaching doesn’t separate one from the Church, but that a further declaration from a Church authority is required. They are once again contradicted by the Church’s teaching.
Understanding of the Magisterium
MHFM: The facts covered in the recent video on Pope Vigilius also refute the false understanding of the Magisterium held by John 3:5 mockers and some others. These facts further confirm that our understanding of the Magisterium and papal infallibility is correct. Without properly distinguishing between solemn declarations of a pope and what a pope might have taught outside of a solemn declaration, one cannot defend the Papacy or papal infallibility in this instance.
The “Strongest” Argument Against The Papacy (Pope Vigilius) – Refuted
The Three Chapters
The “Strongest” Argument Against The Papacy (Pope Vigilius) – Refuted
This was a brilliant, scholarly video thoroughly refuting anti-papacy arguments regarding the "Three Chapters" controversy, and it contains a wealth of information and provides powerful quotes to confirm papal supremacy in the early Church. One thing I also found interesting is how the Catholic principle, rooted in Galatians 1, that manifest heretics automatically lose Church office and membership, sheds light on why the attendees of the Constantinople II assembly decided to break communion with Pope Vigilius and declare him outside the Church, while simultaneously claim to still have communion with the Roman see: they used the Galatians 1 principle to conclude that Vigilius no longer occupied the Roman See due to manifest heresy. True, they misapplied the principle, but they recognized it. It explains their thinking and actions on this point. Vatican II sect people who claim to be Catholic but deny the Catholic principle that manifest heretics ipso facto lose office, or that the early Church recognized this principle, could not adequately assess and explain what happened. This shows how true Catholics who embrace and utilize the full truth, are better equipped to defend true doctrines than some heretics who attempt to defend those same true doctrines.
Christoffer
Degradation Of Society
Dear Brothers,
As many have noted, we witness daily the degradation and destruction of every aspect of a rightly-ordered society. Though sad, for us it's not surprising -- because we know that this has all been brought to us by heresy, fake Christianity and apostasy. What is interesting, though, is how all the world seems to be Gnostic (boldly daring to harmonize opposites, especially evil and good). Fake Christians complain about communism, but then openly support Zionism; the antipope tells 'priests' to give God's 'blessing' to that which God condemns and abominates; men think they can be women, and women, men. In whatever direction we look, we see a total inversion of truth and right reason. No doubt, this is Satanism at its 'best' and perhaps an intimation of the arrogant pride (and fall) of Lucifer when he attempted to set his throne above God... Maybe, too, it is why God allowed Satan to visit Padre Pio in the confessional (while pretending to be a man) - and attempt to skillfully justify the most hideous of sins (pg. 38 of your Padre Pio book). It seems that God was giving Padre Pio (and us) a preview of just how dark the hour of darkness would be.
Lee Ann
God Knows The Secrets Of The Heart
St. Polycarp, Letter To The Philippians, Chap. 4, AD 110: “… all sacrifices are carefully inspected and nothing escapes [God], whether thoughts or intentions or secrets of the heart. Knowing, therefore, that God is not mocked, we ought to live in a manner that is worthy of His commandment and glory.”
Interesting Story
MHFM: This is interesting.
Las Vegas teen who said he saw a UFO and nonhuman says he believes it was a demon - video
This commentary on Luke 18:8 from a 19th century Jesuit biblical scholar named Joseph Knabenbauer is interesting. He correctly taught that the words of Jesus in Luke 18:8 indicate that there will be hardly any faith before the Second Coming. That means that the Catholic Church will be reduced to a remnant. Even though the words of Scripture on this matter speak for themselves (e.g. Luke 18:8), quotes like this are important because some defenders of the Vatican II Sect have now resorted to arguing that the New Testament does not teach that the Church will be reduced to a remnant before the end of the world. Their claim is false, of course, as the teaching of Scripture and the current state of the world demonstrate.
Joseph Knabenbauer, S.J. (1896), Commentarius in quatuor S. Evangelia: Evangelium secundum Lucam, p. 498:
“The elect will of course greatly desire the Day of the Lord, and that desire will especially increase, and to its full extent, in those final and supreme tribulations which will assail them before the Day of the Lord (cf. Mt 24:22; Mk 13:20,24; Lk 21:36). But will there be many, will there be substantially more who will await and long for the coming of Christ with that same faith and desire? Some answer has already been given in Lk 17:26-28, where men are described as entirely wrapped up in worldly affairs. You have another answer here: ‘But when the Son of Man comes, do you think he will he find any faith on earth?’ St. Cyril has already warned us that this rhetorical question indicates that they [i.e. people with faith] will be extremely few. Just as Christ found few believers among His own people at His first coming – ‘it is necessary that He be rejected by this generation’ (Lk 17:25) – so will He find something similar in His second. For as Christ says, ‘False prophets will arise and present such signs and wonders that even the elect (if such is possible) will be led into error’ (Mt 24:24). This is the very apostasy and seduction that the Apostle writes about in 2 Th. 2:3 seq. (cf. 2 Pet 3:3). You can see that on this question the Apostles taught the same as Christ had foretold... From this description of the last times, as from other words and parables of Christ, it may also be concluded that in no way is the opinion of certain Chiliasts to be commended, namely that in the last times the Church will have some kind of immense splendor and triumph, and that almost everyone will possess an exceptional and blessed holiness...”
What is a source for the promises made to the Order of St. Benedict?
Another source for the promises about the Order of St. Benedict is the book: The Very Reverend Paul Of Moll, A Flemish Benedictine, Second Edition, Benedictine Convent, 1914, Imprimatur 1910, p. 338.
Promise 1 (as recorded in the book) is: “His order will continue to exist to the end of the world.”
Promise 2 is: “It will, at the end of the world in the final battle, render great services to the holy Church and confirm many in the faith.”
MHFM: Today is the feast of St. Peter Canisius. His catechism was providential and remains very important for the defense of the true faith in our day. It’s particularly relevant for the defense of the absolute necessity of water baptism. St. Peter Canisius was a doctor of the Church who attended the Council of Trent. He then published the first major catechism in Church history. In that catechism he twice teaches that no one can be saved without water baptism. He makes no exceptions. He also directly contradicts the idea of ‘baptism of desire’ while specifically referencing Sess. 6, Chap. 4 of Trent (the very passage that some wrongly claim teaches ‘baptism of desire’). St. Peter’s Catechism contradicts ‘baptism of desire’ not only by teaching that no adult can be saved without water baptism, but also by specifically referencing (in that context) passages from Church fathers about how an unbaptized catechumen, no matter how much progress he makes, cannot be forgiven until he is actually baptized (which directly contradicts the idea of ‘baptism of desire’). He also cites Can. 5 on baptism, in addition to Sess. 6, Chap. 4 of Trent. The true understanding of Sess. 6, Chap. 4 of Trent was thus providentially transmitted through St. Peter Canisius (who attended Trent) and his Catechism. His teaching about baptism and Sess. 6, Chap. 4 of Trent was much more important and authoritative than the fallible commentaries of other theologians. He also contradicts the idea that anyone can be saved in a false religion. His catechism serves as a powerful and providential refutation of John 3:5 mockers. You can read an article or watch a video about this matter here:
Post-Trent Catechism By St. Peter Canisius Contradicts “Baptism Of Desire”
MHFM: This is an interesting quote from Church historian Sozomen concerning the jurisdictional authority exercised by Pope Julius (who became pope in 337) over Eastern bishops during the time of St. Athanasius.
Sozomen, Ecclesiastical History, Book 3, Chap. 8, 5th Century: “The Roman bishop, on learning the accusation against each individual, and on finding that they held the same sentiments about the Nicaean dogmas, admitted them to communion as of like orthodoxy; and as the care for all was fitting to the dignity of his see, he restored them all to their own churches. He wrote to the bishops of the East, and rebuked them for having judged these bishops unjustly, and for harassing the Churches by abandoning the Nicaean doctrines.”
Every one who has believed on Jesus the Christ is born of God. And he who loves Him who begot also loves Him who is begotten of Him. (1 John 5:1)
Freak
Actually, the Greek of 1 John 5:1 uses γεγέννηται, a perfect tense verb meaning “has been born”, signifying an action completed in the past.
1 John 5:1- “Everyone believing [Πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων – present participle] that Jesus is the Christ has been born [γεγέννηται – perfect tense verb] of God…”
This indicates that every true believer in Christ (who possesses saving faith) has already been born of God in water baptism. We discuss this in our article and video on Cornelius: https://vaticancatholic.com/speaking-in-tongues-baptism-holy-spirit/
You can’t believe with the result that you are reborn. It’s just the opposite: you must be reborn in baptism in order to possess saving faith.
As the Council of Trent declared:
Council of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 7 on Justification: “This faith, conformably to Apostolic tradition, catechumens beg of the Church before the sacrament of baptism, when they ask for the faith that gives eternal life, which without hope and charity faith cannot give.”
As St. John and the Council of Trent teach, a person does not have saving faith until he or she is born of God in the Sacrament of Baptism. That’s why the Church has always taught that only the baptized are ‘the faithful’. Pope Innocent III also solemnly declared that there is absolutely no salvation outside the Church of the faithful.
Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215: “There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful outside of which no one at all is saved…”
“Una vero est fidelium universalis ecclesia, extra quam nullus omnino salvatur…”
MHFM: Many John 3:5 mockers misrepresent the teaching of the early fathers on the necessity of baptism (and related matters). They claim that all the fathers taught that ‘baptism of blood’ could replace water baptism. But that is not true. The Chair of St. Peter gives us the true doctrine of the fathers. Here’s the official teaching of Pope St. Leo the Great, which directly contradicts ‘baptism of blood’ and ‘baptism of desire’ by declaring that for UNBAPTIZED CATECHUMENS in PERSECUTION (or any other danger) actually receiving water baptism is the ONLY WAY to be saved. That would not be true if ‘baptism of blood’ and ‘baptism of desire’ were ways for unbaptized catechumens in danger or persecution to be saved.
MHFM: We have often emphasized (e.g. see the videos below) that a primary reason God withholds true faith from people is that they seek to please men rather than God (John 5:44). This is an interesting quote from the Acts of the Second Council of Nicaea in that regard.
The Acts of the Second Council of Nicaea (AD 787), Sess. 6: “… the writer of Proverbs said: ‘There are paths that seem to a man to be straight but their ends lead to the pit of Hades’ – this they too have suffered because they were overcome with the desire to please men and spoke from their own bellies. They thought their paths were straight, but they lead those who follow them into the pit of Hades.” (Richard Price, p. 462)
Pray
MHFM: A traditional Catholic named Denise South recently passed away. Please pray for the repose of her soul.
The false traditionalist group called “The Fatima Center” (which was founded by Nicholas Gruner) has now taken the position that the woman who presented herself as “Sr. Lucia” after 1967 was an impostor. They recently stated: “The Fatima Center’s position is that it has been established with reasonable certainty that the woman presenting herself as Sister Lucia in all known public photos from 1967 onward was not the true Lucia.”
That’s the true position, and it has recently been confirmed by forensic evidence. While we certainly do not endorse their group (which has serious theological problems), we’re glad that they have finally acknowledged the truth on this point, after having promoted the impostor Sr. Lucia (and having misled people on the matter) for decades. We hope that they come around to the full truth about the Vatican II Counter Church.
We were the first organization in the world to publicly state and make the case that there was an impostor Sr. Lucia. We first mentioned this briefly in a magazine we published around the year 2000. We also mentioned it on our website in 2004 in questions and answers. We knew that there was an impostor because it was impossible that the real Sr. Lucia would do what the post-Vatican II “Sr. Lucia” was doing. The two individuals were also different in appearance. In 2006, we published a widely-read article called: The Whole Truth about the Consecration and Conversion of Russia and the Impostor Sr. Lucy. Subsequently we put the information about the impostor Sr. Lucia on a DVD and into various YouTube videos, which were viewed well over a million times.
In our 2006 article we laid out the case that there was an impostor. We cited facts about the problematic writings and actions of the impostor. We covered how her appearance differed from the true Sr. Lucia, why she could not be the true Sr. Lucia, and we answered various objections (such as why her extended family would not have complained). When we published that 2006 article, the position that there was an impostor was very unpopular and dismissed by many as “absurd”. However, that didn’t stop us from stating that there was an impostor because it was true and people needed to know about it. Now, about twenty years later, it has been confirmed by forensic evidence. (People are really going to be shocked when they discover that we’re correct about the Antichrist and the Consecration of Russia as well.) It should also be noted that after our 2006 article came out (in which we made the case that there was an impostor, and explained how the consecration of Russia was fulfilled), another woman (named Marian) published her own article about how she believed there was an impostor. But her article came out after our big 2006 article, and well after we had mentioned this in our publications. When our 2006 article came out, many people in ‘traditionalist circles’ began to talk about the impostor Sr. Lucia issue. After that happened, the other woman (Marian) apparently got the courage to also claim that there was an impostor, but that was after people were talking about it as a result of our article. We mention this because in recent years many other groups have now taken the position that there was an impostor Sr. Lucia, but they almost never mention that we were the first organization to point this out. In fact, if we hadn’t publicly made the case that there was an impostor so many years ago (in the face of great opposition), it’s possible (if not probable) that no one would be saying it now.
Nicholas Gruner's Problems - Part 1
Nicholas Gruner's Problems - Part 2
The Impostor Sr. Lucia - Part 1
The Impostor Sr. Lucia - Part 2: Her Heresies
Videos
MHFM: We’re currently working on a few longer videos on important topics. They are moving toward completion, God willing. But there might be a shorter video in between.
MHFM: Today is the feast of Pope St. Leo the Great, one of the greatest popes in Christian history. We quote him quite a bit in our material. Among many other things, Leo the Great’s official teaching proves that no one at all is saved without the Sacrament of Baptism:
Pope Leo The Great On The Necessity Of Baptism For Salvation
His teaching also refutes the false doctrines of the Eastern ‘Orthodox’, such as their rejection of the Papacy, their rejection of the Filioque, and their false doctrine of Palamism. As an example, see:
Catholic vs. “Orthodox” On The Transfiguration Light (Leo, Maximus)
Website & Videos
… I'm so grateful you reached out to me and that you have worked so hard to create such amazing websites and videos! Thank God for you! I pray the rosary daily and have gotten my parents to stop praying the Divine Mercy and have received many blessings from your ministry…
God bless you,
Jeff Tormey
St. Bernard Against Phony Annulments
MHFM: This is a quote from St. Bernard against bishops in his day who unjustifiably granted an annulment. The pope at the time, Innocent II, supported him and excommunicated the bishops. That's quite a contrast to the Vatican II Sect, which hands out invalid annulments like hot cakes: The Annulment Fiasco – The Vatican II Sect’s De Facto acceptance of Divorce and Remarriage
St. Bernard, Letter 294 To Pope Innocent II, 1142: “It is written: ‘What God has joined together let no man put asunder.’ But shameless men have arisen who, despite the law of God, have not scrupled to separate what God has joined together. They have gone further and added one sin to another by uniting what should not be united. The sacred rites of the Church have been violated and the robes of Christ have been torn, and to make matters worse this has been done by those very persons whose business it ought to be to mend them.’”
German Wants To Convert
I watched some very well made videos... and I want to join the Catholic faith in Germany… I… left my church 25 years ago as agnostic…
May God Bless You.
Kind regards
Robert Benthien
Constantinople II: Separated For Contrary Opinions
MHFM: This passage from the Second Council of Constantinople in 553 demonstrates once again that people who hold opinions contrary to the Church’s official teaching are separated from the Church’s communion by that fact itself, before any declaration.
Second Council of Constantinople, Sess. 3, AD 553: “… the holy, catholic and apostolic church of God, if anyone separates himself from its communion by holding contrary opinions, such a person, since he alienates himself from the orthodox faith and numbers himself with the heretics, is justly condemned and anathematized by the holy Church of God.”
Lukewarmness
Pilate is the clearest example of the evil of "lukewarmness". The failure to take a hard line stance on important issues can be as devastating as anything.
Justin Knight
Tremendous Impact
Dear Brothers,
Even though I only found out about you little more than two months ago, your work has had a tremendous impact on my life...
Sincerely, L.
Logical Conclusion
St. Robert Bellarmine vs. Antipopes Francis And Benedict XVI On Judas’ Fate
The denial of this obvious truth perfectly illustrates the logical conclusion of the rejection of the dogma "outside the Church there is no salvation." If Judas was saved, literally anyone can be (according to the demonic Vatican II sect).
Justin Knight
"And Jesus said, 'Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.' And they cast lots to divide his garments." (Luke 23:34)
Did Jesus pray for all who crucified Him while He was on the Cross? The answer is no, according to St. Thomas Aquinas. Since Christ’s prayers were absolutely efficacious, being perfectly conformed to God's will, He only prayed for those in the world who would accept Him and were predestined to eternal life.
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Pt. 3, Q. 21, A. 4, Whether Christ’s Prayer Was Always Heard: “Objection 2. Further, He [Christ] prayed that the sin of those who crucified Him might be forgiven, as is related (Luke 23:34). Yet not all were pardoned this sin, since the Jews were punished on account thereof. Therefore it seems that not every prayer of His was heard… I answer that, according to the will of reason, Christ willed nothing but what He knew God to will. Wherefore every absolute will of Christ, even human, was fulfilled, because it was in conformity with God; and consequently His every prayer was fulfilled. For in this respect also is it that other men's prayers are fulfilled, in that their will is in conformity with God, according to Romans 8:27… Reply to Objection 2: Our Lord did not pray for all those who crucified Him, as neither did He for all those who would believe in Him; but for those only who were predestinated to obtain eternal life through Him. Wherefore the reply to the third objection is also manifest.”
The Errors of Peter Abelard, Condemned by Innocent II, July 16, 1140, #10: “That they have not sinned who being ignorant have crucified Christ, and that whatever is done through ignorance must not be considered sin.” - Condemned.
St. John Chrysostom, On Luke 23:34: “But He [Jesus] says, Forgive them, if they should repent. For He is gracious to the penitent, if they are willing after so great wickedness to wash away their guilt by faith.”
MHFM: St. Robert Bellarmine correctly taught, based on the words of Scripture, that Judas was damned.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Iustificatione, Book 3, Chap. 14: “But it is firmly established that Judas was reprobate and damned, both from the passage where he is called ‘the son of perdition’ [John 17:12] and from Matthew 26, where the Lord says concerning Judas: ‘It would be better for that man if he had not been born.’”
However, the heretics Antipope Francis and Antipope Benedict XVI taught that Judas might have been saved.
Francis, Jan. 19, 2018: “None of us can say that a person has not gone to heaven. I will tell you something that might surprise you: we cannot even say it about Judas.”
Benedict XVI, Oct. 18, 2006: “This poses two questions when it comes to explaining what happened [with Judas]. The first consists in asking ourselves how it was possible that Jesus chose this man and trusted him. In fact, though Judas is the group's administrator (cf. John 12:6b; 13:29a), in reality he is also called "thief" (John 12:6a). The mystery of the choice is even greater, as Jesus utters a very severe judgment on him: "Woe to that man by whom the son of man is betrayed!" (Matthew 26:24). This mystery is even more profound if one thinks of his eternal fate, knowing that Judas ‘repented and brought back the 30 pieces of silver to the chief priests and the elders, saying 'I have sinned in betraying innocent blood'’ (Matthew 27:3-4). Though he departed afterward to hang himself (cf. Matthew 27:5), it is not for us to judge his gesture, putting ourselves in God's place, who is infinitely merciful and just.”
MHFM: In John 7:52, we read that the Pharisees tried to undermine the credibility of Our Lord and His miracles by claiming that no prophet rises from Galilee.
John 7:52- “They replied, ‘Are you from Galilee too? Search and see that no prophet arises from Galilee.’”
Not only were they wrong about Jesus, of course, but their claim is refuted by the example of the Old Testament prophet Jonah. In 2 Kings 14:25 (4 Kings 14:25 in the Douay-Rheims), the prophet Jonah is described as from Gath-hepher, which was a town of Zebulun in Lower Galilee.
Squatters & The Planned Destruction Of America
How The "Law" Protects Squatters - Deep State strategy to kick Americans out of their homes - video
MHFM: This is truly insane. It’s connected to the planned destruction/collapse/transformation of America.
Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum (#4), May 15, 1891: “… the socialists… are striving to do away with private property, and contend that individual possessions should become the common property of all, to be administered by the State or by municipal bodies.”
Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum (#38), May 15, 1891: “… there is the duty of safeguarding private property by legal enactment and protection. Most of all it is essential, where the passion of greed is so strong, to keep the populace within the line of duty; for, if all may justly strive to better their condition, neither justice nor the common good allows any individual to seize upon that which belongs to another, or, under the futile and shallow pretext of equality, to lay violent hands on other people's possessions.”
Ezekiel 8: Miraculous Transportation & Vision
MHFM: Ezekiel chapter 8 records that the prophet experienced a miraculous transportation, similar to what happened to various Catholic saints. He was taken by his hair and brought from Babylon into Jerusalem in order to miraculously see the abominations committed there.
Ezekiel 8:2-3- “Then I looked, and behold, a form that had the appearance of a man. Below what appeared to be his waist was fire, and above his waist was something like the appearance of brightness, like gleaming metal. He put out the form of a hand and took me by a lock of my head, and the Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and brought me in visions of God to Jerusalem, to the entrance of the gateway of the inner court that faces north, where was the seat of the image of jealousy, which provokes to jealousy.”
Pope Leo XIII Contra Hinduism
MHFM: Vatican II’s praise for the false religion of Hinduism is contradicted by Pope Leo XIII:
Pope Leo XIII, Ad Extremas (#1), June 24, 1893: “Our thoughts turn first of all to the blessed Apostle Thomas who is rightly called the founder of preaching the Gospel to the Hindus. Then, there is Francis Xavier… Through his extraordinary perseverance, he converted hundreds of thousands of Hindus from the myths and vile superstitions of the Brahmans to the true religion. In the footsteps of this holy man followed numerous priests… they are continuing these noble efforts; nevertheless, in the vast reaches of the Earth, many are still deprived of the truth, miserably imprisoned in the darkness of superstition.”
Marvels Of Nature Destroy Evolution
"Evolution Can't Explain This Sea Creature" - video
Dear Brothers,
It's a pleasure to watch how the breathtaking marvels of nature refute the lie of evolution. But whenever I do, the same question always occurs to me: How is it that an individual who recognizes that Creation required a 'Master Designer' is unwilling to apply that same reasoning to Divine Revelation and to the true Christian Church? The 'Master Designer' of the Catholic Church, the Christian Church, was and always will be Almighty God.
However, the position of heretics is that "Christianity" (unlike all the rest of Creation, and for some reason they never explain) was not designed by God in any great detail, implying that spiritual details are far less important to Him than material details. But the truth is the exact opposite! The true faith is the most important thing on earth. No one can alter it, and no one can gain eternal life without it. Our Lord said that Heaven and earth will pass away, but His words shall not pass away. And He commanded all nations to hear the Church.
Heretics are totally unaware that the primary reason the lie of evolution gained currency in the first place, was because it was able to ride piggy-back on the great apostasy from Christ and the true Catholic faith.
Lee Ann
MHFM: Candace Owens, a ‘conservative’ commentator who worked for the Zionist and extremely pro-Israel organization called The Daily Wire (owned by Ben Shapiro), was fired one day after posting this:
Candace Owens, March 21, 2024: “My crime, is that I do not believe that American taxpayers should have to pay for Israel’s wars or the wars of any other country. I will not change my mind. So the question is what will you do to me next? The world is watching.”
Her firing is another example of how almost all of even the most prominent ‘conservative’ organizations in the USA are controlled by Zionists and Jews. The control that Jews and pro-Israel groups have over the media and the country is astounding.
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
