| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
In his commentary on Luke 5:16, St. Gregory the Theologian stated that Our Lord’s withdrawal to the wilderness in order to pray, after performing His works among the people, intended to teach us that there is a time for action and a time for prayer, contemplation and retirement.
St. Gregory Nazianzen, on Luke 5:16- “And His works He indeed performed among the people, but He prayed for the most part in the wilderness, sanctioning the liberty of resting a while from labor to hold converse with God with a pure heart. For He needed no change or retirement, since there was nothing which could be relaxed in Him, nor any place in which He might confine Himself, for He was God, but it was that we might clearly know that there is a time for action, a time for each higher occupation.”
Luke 5:15-16- “But now even more the report about him went abroad, and great crowds gathered to hear him and to be healed of their infirmities. But he would withdraw to the wilderness and pray.”
Not The Same God
Ex Muslim woman who identifies as a Christian in UK.
Interesting just after the 1:20 mark, the journalist says, "Then she learned about a very different God than the one of Islam..."
Yet novus ordo/false trads/VII say that we worship the same God as Muslims.
A.
While it’s true that the Sacrament of Baptism (since it confers an indelible mark) can only be received one time, it’s important to note that the “one baptism” in Ephesians 4:5 refers to a unity in the sacramental baptism received by all Christians (i.e. the same kind of baptism), not to the number of times that baptism can be received. That’s proven by the fact that in the passage St. Paul refers to “one Lord” and “one faith”, yet a person who has fallen away from the one Lord and the one faith could repent and receive the Lord and the faith for a second time. Hence, in Ephesians 4:5 the “one Lord” and the “one faith” do not refer to the number of times the Lord or the faith can be received, but to the fact that all in the Body of Christ have the very same Lord and the same faith. Likewise, the statement that all in the Church have one baptism means that all in the Church have the same sacramental baptism (which is celebrated in water – Ephesians 5:26), which contradicts the idea that people can be in the Church without the Sacrament of Baptism. The many references to Ephesians 4:5 in magisterial documents that deal with the unity of the Church also prove that the “one baptism” in Ephesians 4:5 refers to a unity in the kind of baptism received. For example:
Pope Pius VI, Inscrutabile (# 8), Dec. 25, 1775: “… We exhort and advise you to be all of one mind and in harmony as you strive for the same object, just as the Church has one faith, one baptism, and one spirit.”
Pope Leo XII, Ubi Primum (# 14), May 5, 1824: “It is impossible for the most true God, who is Truth itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and the Rewarder of good men, to approve all sects which profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their members... by divine faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and that no other name under heaven is given to men except the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth in which we must be saved. This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church.”
Documentary About The Redeemer
Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis
Thank you very much for sharing this Brilliant Documentary. God bless.
Darren Carrie
Truth About John Paul II
The Temple Of God & The Antichrist Located!
Thank you for giving me the truth about John Paul ll being an anti-pope and anti-christ…
Mome
The Traditional Faith
“Bishop” Strickland Removed By Francis – What You Need To Know
I agree with everything you have presented here. I have never heard you say anything regarding the Faith that I do not 100% agree with. That is the Faith as it was taught to me as a child in the 1950s. My teachers were older, unmarried women who had been teaching in Catholic School since my father went to school there. Many were born before 1900. They said the same things that you say. My first grade teacher said that unless you were Baptized a Catholic, you could not enter heaven. This was after Father Feeney's [“excommunication”]; but apparently, she supported Father Feeney in his stand, which was the traditional teaching, on the necessity for water Baptism for salvation, although many were led astray at that point. I appreciate that you are so well informed… and that you consistently tell the Truths of the Faith.
Mheile
Typical Argument
Typical argument with a John 3:5 mocker goes (essentially) like this: they demand that you answer, in precise detail, 15 objections for ‘BOD’. You do. (See this: Playlist On Salvation & Baptism.) You then ask them one question. They refuse to answer or ignore it and demand that you answer 10 more objections.
Demonic Hatred
Man gets attacked inside store because he was wearing a "Palestine" shirt - video
This is horrible behavior against this young Palestinian American couple.
Bev
Demonic Hatred
Man gets attacked inside store because he was wearing a "Palestine" shirt - video
This is horrible behavior against this young Palestinian American couple.
Bev
Fired By Target For Wearing “Trust In Jesus” Nametag
Target employee fired for not following dress code - video
I'm glad I boycotted Target since May '23: the pro-LGBT/transgender line for little children…
Marianne
Pope Pius IX Implicitly Condemned “Baptism Of Desire”
In his Allocution Singulari Quadam, Dec. 9, 1854, Pope Pius IX implicitly condemned “baptism of desire” when he stated the following in the context of discussing the dogma Outside The Church There Is No Salvation.
Pope Pius IX, Allocution Singulari Quadam, Dec. 9, 1854: “For, in truth, when released from these corporeal chains ‘we shall see God as He is’ [1 John 3:2], we shall understand perfectly by how close and beautiful a bond divine mercy and justice are united; but, as long as we are on earth, weighed down by this mortal mass which blunts the soul, let us hold most firmly that, in accordance with Catholic teaching, there is ‘one God, one faith, one baptism’ [Eph. 4:5]; it is unlawful [nefas] to proceed further in inquiry.”
The word “nefas” means “unlawful, criminal or wicked”.
In regard to questions about whether someone can be saved outside the Church, Pope Pius IX teaches that it’s “unlawful, criminal or wicked” (nefas) to profess anything other than the one Lord, the one faith and the one baptism of divine revelation. That “one baptism” is celebrated in water, as the Council of Vienne dogmatically declared.
Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, 1311-1312- “Moreover, one sole baptism regenerating all baptized in Christ – just as ‘one God and one faith’ – is to be faithfully confessed by all, which, celebrated in water in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, we believe to be the perfect remedy for salvation for both adults and children.”
They Continue To Misquote Trent
It’s remarkable how many John 3:5 mockers continue to use the false “except through” mistranslation of the Council of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4. They commit mortal sin by doing so after they’ve been informed that it’s a false translation. They also deny what the Council of Trent declares in that very passage, namely, that no one gets to Heaven without being born again of “water and the Holy Spirit”. This video covers the matter: The Most Misunderstood Catholic Decree – Council Of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4
Comment
Marvellous work!
Diene
The statement below was posted by a member of the Vatican II Sect, lamenting the loss of the “Traditional Latin Mass” in Tyler, Texas. (We put “Traditional Latin Mass” in quotation marks because the new rite of ordination is not valid.) The “Latin Mass” has been banned by their fake bishop, with celebrations officially ending on Nov. 30, 2024.
“Last TLM [Traditional Latin Mass] at the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Tyler, TX. We have no bishop and... the TLM is taken from us. They won’t even allow us to celebrate the TLM at the Cathedral’s Chapel. So much hate from the hierarchy!” – JMJ777
Frankly, it’s what they deserve for obstinately clinging to a false hierarchy and apostate antipopes. It’s futile to attempt to be Catholic within a fake Church (i.e. the Vatican II Sect). With regard to Tyler, Texas, this video is relevant: “Bishop” Strickland Removed By Francis – What You Need To Know.
Many people who deny the necessity of faith in Jesus Christ and Catholicism for salvation attempt to justify their heretical opinion by appealing to certain liberal pre-Vatican II theologians – some from hundreds of years ago – whose writings or persons were not specifically condemned. They think that adherence to such writings is justified since those writings or persons were not condemned. However, by clinging to such writings in the face of the dogmatic teaching that establishes the absolute necessity of faith in Jesus Christ and Catholicism, they fall into the following condemned error.
Decree of the Holy Office under Pope Alexander VII, Sept. 24, 1665, Condemning Errors: “27. If a book is published by a younger or modern person, its opinion ought to be considered probable, as long as it is not established that it has been rejected by the Apostolic See as improbable.” – Condemned
As we can see, just because some opinion or writing has not been specifically condemned, one cannot necessarily hold it as “probable” (i.e. as a plausible opinion), if the Church’s magisterial teaching clearly contradicts it. Many John 3:5 mockers and heretics fall into this condemned proposition when they ignore the teaching of the Magisterium on salvation and obstinately cling to the false teaching of certain theologians who, for example, heretically taught that souls can be saved in non-Christian religions.
Biden, Dominated By Evil, Gives Award To Planned Parenthood President
Joe Biden proves again that he’s dominated by evil. He actually gave an award to the notorious supporter of abortion (and former Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards). His choice of words was also noteworthy. Planned Parenthood butchers and in essence “carves up” babies. Hence, the Devil in Biden praised Richards for having “carved an inspiring legacy”. What an outrage. Richards has an aggressive form of brain cancer. That suggests that soon she will die and, barring an extraordinary conversion, she will be in Hell forever receiving a just and mind-boggling punishment for her unspeakable evils.
Would Be Spiritually Lost Without MHFM’s Preaching
… thank you so much for so courageously speaking the truth. I would literally and spiritually be lost without the preaching of the gospel MHFM does. I'll be forever grateful. I came across your material in Dec 2022 with the debate with Jeff Cassman. I had been in Novus Ordo, Charismatic and NO, then SSPX.
Susan
As mentioned in our video, Did St. Paul Really Rebuke St. Peter In Galatians 2?, the Catholic Church’s teaching on the authority of the Latin Vulgate version of the Bible does not prohibit the use of original biblical languages and an examination of textual variants. Pope Pius XII states:
Pope Pius XII, Divino Afflante Spiritu (#22), Sept. 30, 1943: “Wherefore this authority of the Vulgate in matters of doctrine by no means prevents - nay rather today it almost demands - either the corroboration and confirmation of this same doctrine by the original texts or the having recourse on any and every occasion to the aid of these same texts, by which the correct meaning of the Sacred Letters is everywhere daily made more clear and evident. Nor is it forbidden by the decree of the Council of Trent to make translations into the vulgar tongue, even directly from the original texts themselves, for the use and benefit of the faithful and for the better understanding of the divine word…”
During the negotiations between Napoleon and Pope Pius VII concerning the re-normalization of the Church in France after the French Revolution, Napoleon threatened a cardinal in this way:
“So, Monsieur Cardinal, you want a breach! I have no need of Rome. I will act alone. I have no need of the pope. If Henry VIII who barely had an eighth of my power could change the religion of his country and succeed in this endeavor, well I know how, and will be able to do the same. In changing the religion of France, I will change it in almost all of Europe, wherever the influence of my power extends. Rome will realize its loss, it will shed tears, but there will be no remedy.” (Ambrogio A. Caiani, To Kidnap A Pope, Napoleon and Pius VII, p. 93)
The arrogance of that man of dust (who was quite wicked at the time) is remarkable.
St. Peter’s message that faith is more precious than gold, but that it is tested, is especially applicable today during the Great Apostasy, when true faith is rare and there are so many heretics and apostates.
1 Peter 1:6-7 “In this you rejoice, though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been grieved by various trials, so that the tested genuineness of your faith—more precious than gold that perishes though it is tested by fire—may be found to result in praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ.”
In his document Tam Multa of Aug. 15, 1801, Pope Pius VII called upon all the bishops in France at the time to resign in order to finalize an agreement with Napoleon to normalize the Church in the aftermath of the French Revolution. Some refused to do so. Pius VII then suppressed all the existing dioceses of France and removed jurisdiction from the disobedient bishops. By the Bull Qui Christi Domini (November 29, 1801), “Pius VII suppressed all the ancient dioceses throughout the French Republic, and erected sixty new dioceses…” (Gabriel Van den Gheyn, The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 6, “Ghent”, 1909)
A Heretical Novelty
Anyone with a shred of honesty and basic knowledge of Catholic history cannot deny that the false ecumenism that characterizes the Vatican II sect is truly a unheard heretical novelty.
Catholicism and the Vatican II sect are truly two different religions.
Daniel Frenkel
Trump’s nominations, such as Big Pharma opponent RFK Jr. (to oversee Health) and Matt Gaetz (Attorney General), are further proof of our analysis about Trump – i.e. that despite some significant problems (e.g. Israel) he’s not a globalist conspirator, and he is a huge obstacle to the Deep State and the complete takeover of America by communists. We were exactly right. See our videos on him:
Also see the video: Why The Left Rages Against Trump & For Lawlessness.
Despite some major problems, Trump is vastly different from the radical left and much better for the country in so many ways. Many people, including some who claim to be traditional Catholics, became basically unhinged in their analysis of Trump. They failed to evaluate his overall impact and policies (as distinct from his personal problems) in a fair, honest and accurate way. We especially like the selection of Matt Gaetz. Hopefully, if God wills, he will be able to assume the position.
Fr. Martin Becanus was a Dutch theologian who died in 1624. He correctly taught that no adult could be saved without explicit faith in Christ, and that God ordained this to be the requirement.
Fr. Martin Becanus, Summa Theologiae Scholasticae, edition 1683, p. 467: “From these testimonies thus I conclude: No adult is able to be justified or attain the remission of sins without explicit faith in Christ. But faith in Christ consists chiefly in this, that you believe Christ to be true God and true man, who died for our salvation and rose again. This is the foundation of the whole Christian faith, without which in the New Testament no man can be justified. Not that it is necessary from the nature of the thing itself, but because God ordained it this way.”
Gregory The Great: Apostolic See Is “Set Above” All The Churches
Pope St. Gregory the Great, Book 3, Letter 30: “Inasmuch as it is manifest that the Apostolic See is, by the ordering of God, set over all Churches, there is, among our manifold cares, special demand for our attention when our decision is awaited with a view to the consecration of a bishop.” (J.P. Migne, Patrologia Latina 77:645)
The Eastern ‘Orthodox’ recognize Gregory the Great as a saint, yet reject the truth that the Apostolic See has authority over the entire Church.
Appalled By This Man
“Cardinal” Dolan & The Counter Church In New York City (NYC)
I've always been appalled by this man.
Annie Thompson
This is an interesting quote about the shocking effects of the French Revolution not long after 1789.
“For five weeks [in 1800] Spina travelled through the French countryside. For this Italian prelate the situation was shocking, the effects of the [French] Revolution plain. Priests were nowhere to be seen. Clergy were required to dress in normal clothes, which made them indistinguishable from the rest of the population. Many churches remained shut, with nobody to minister to local congregations. Several Catholic chapels and shrines had been rededicated to the republican cults of youth, womanhood, prosperity and old age. The republican calendar had abolished Sundays and the ten-day week seemed to take France away from Catholic rhythms of life. The archbishop felt as if he had entered a heathen land.” (Ambrogio A. Caiani, To Kidnap A Pope, Napoleon and Pius VII, pp. 70-71)
This statement from Pope Pius XI perfectly explains why the Middle East is always at war.
Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas (#1), Dec. 11, 1925: “… these manifold evils in the world were due to the fact that the majority of men had thrust Jesus Christ and his holy law out of their lives; that these had no place either in private affairs or in politics: and we said further, that as long as individuals and states refused to submit to the rule of our Savior, there would be no really hopeful prospect of a lasting peace among nations.”
Kamala Harris’ Antichrist Rally
At Kamala Harris’ rally last week two students yelled “Christ is King” and “Jesus is Lord”. To those statements Kamala Harris replied: “You are at the wrong rally.” The students were then mocked and yelled at by others, before being kicked out. That’s another striking sign that Kamala Harris’ movement (and that of the Radical Left) is antichrist and belongs to the Devil. Christianity is not compatible with an America run by the Radical Left.
Lampert’s Shocking Heresy
“Exorcist Priest” Vincent Lampert – Demonic Activity And His Heretical Beliefs
This truly shocks me @17:00. Jesus Christ is the ONLY way…
H
We hope to post some new videos soon, and perhaps one in the next few days (God willing).
In the following passage St. Thomas expresses the view that there would be a period of apparent “peace and security” following the death of the Antichrist before the Second Coming of Christ and the end of the world.
St. Thomas Aquinas: “Or it can be said that all those signs that will occur around the Judgment are counted within the time of the Judgment, so that in this way the Day of Judgment comprises them all. Wherefore, although men will be terrified by the signs that appear around the Day of Judgment, yet before those signs begin to appear, wicked men will believe themselves to be in peace and security [1 Thess. 5:3], SINCE THEY DO NOT IMMEDIATELY SEE THE WORLD ENDING AFTER THE DEATH OF THE ANTICHRIST, AS THEY HAD THOUGHT.” (Summa Theologiae, Supplemental Part, Q. 73, A. 1, Reply to Objection 1)
Latin: “Vel potest dici quod omnia illa signa quae circa judicium erunt, infra tempus judicii computantur, ut sic dies judicii omnia illa contineat. Unde quamvis ex signis apparentibus circa diem judicii homines terreantur, ante tamen quam signa illa apparere incipiant, in pace et securitate se impii esse credent, post mortem Antichristi non statim videntes mundum consummari, ut existimabant.”
This is consistent with what we’ve covered on the Antichrist, which shows that the prophecies concern this post-Vatican II apostasy: the return of pagan Rome and the veneration of the deceased pagan Roman king who, while sitting in the Temple of God, officially proclaimed that every man is God. See the videos below for more on that matter:
https://endtimes.video/temple-of-god-vatican-prophecy-antichrist/
https://endtimes.video/apocalypse-now-in-the-vatican/
https://endtimes.video/antichrist-distinguishing-mark/
https://endtimes.video/the-antichrist-conquers-in-this-sign/
Today the “heartbeat law” in Georgia, which saves babies by banning abortion after six-weeks, was (after a legal challenge) reinstated by the Georgia Supreme Court. This law only initially took effect in July of 2022 when Roe v. Wade was overturned as a result of the judges Trump appointed. This is why when analyzing Trump (despite his serious problems) people must focus on the actual policies and impact (in comparison to the alternative) more than on his rhetoric.
Georgia Supreme Court Issues Order Reinstating Heartbeat Law Saving Babies From Abortions
A member of the Vatican II Sect (who believes that souls can be saved without baptism and in false religions) claimed that it’s incorrect to say that theologians are not part of the Magisterium. He’s quite wrong. Here’s the teaching of the Church on this point as expressed by Pope Pius XII in Humani Generis.
Pope Pius XII, Humani Generis (# 21), Aug. 12, 1950: “The Divine Redeemer has entrusted the authentic interpretation of this Deposit [of faith] neither to individual members of Christ’s faithful nor to theologians themselves, but to the Church’s Magisterium alone.”
Latin: “Quod quidem depositum nec singulis christifidelibus nec ipsis theologis divinus Redemptor concredidit authentice interpretandum, sed soli Ecclesiae Magisterio.”
As we can see, Pope Pius XII explicitly distinguishes theologians from the Magisterium (nec ipsis theologis). Although theologians are not the Magisterium, theologians are a witness to what is taught by the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium IF they are “universal and constant” that something belongs to the faith (Pius IX, Tuas Libenter). But theologians were not “universal and constant” in teaching any false position, and certainly not the false position that people can be saved without baptism or the Catholic faith. As an example, “baptism of desire” was explicitly and repeatedly rejected by St. Gregory the Theologian (the doctor of the Church who is specifically given the title “Theologian”). That was providential. We discuss these matters in our material. See this playlist of videos for a thorough treatment of the salvation and baptism issues: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzssJHrA8L1PjrxWW-S15pnEQ
Below is a passage (translated from Latin) from pre-Vatican II theologian Fr. Christian Pesch, S.J. (1835-1925) on the issue of whether St. Thomas Aquinas contradicted the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. Fr. Pesch correctly acknowledged that St. Thomas contradicted the Immaculate Conception in the sense in which it was later defined by the Church. Pesch even calls it “desperate” to claim that St. Thomas was not wrong on this point. This issue is relevant to properly understanding the Magisterium. It reinforces the point that the teaching of saints and theologians (including a great saint such as St. Thomas) is not equivalent to the teaching of the Magisterium or the Chair of St. Peter. Here’s what Pesch wrote in a work published in 1908:
Fr. Christian Pesch (1835-1925), S. J., De Deo Creante (ed. 3., 1908), tract. 1. sect. 4, a. 4, prop. 33, #s 327 et 339 et 186: “In the school of the Dominicans Blessed Albert the Great taught that it was of the faith that the Blessed Virgin, following her contraction of original sin, was sanctified in the womb before her birth (III. Sent. Dist. 3. A. 4); but concerning the day or the hour no one knows except through revelation; except that it is more probable to expect that grace would be conferred shortly after animation rather than long after. But whether in this matter St. Thomas followed his teacher is still a disputed question… Nevertheless, I think that I should say it seems to me certain that St. Thomas denied the Immaculate Conception in that sense in which it was later defined by the Church… It cannot be denied – according to the position that St Thomas often propounds in his discourses when specifically treating of this topic – that the Blessed Virgin, in the first instant of the infusion of her soul, actually contracted Original Sin; but that shortly afterwards she was sanctified by grace.”
“The passage [of St. Thomas] is in itself so clear that the exegetical attempt to remove from this passage the acknowledgment of Original Sin in the Blessed Virgin is a desperate act!”
We have a video that discusses St. Thomas’ writing on this matter. It shows that St. Thomas was wrong on the issue: https://vaticancatholic.com/immaculate-conception-st-thomas-aquinas/ For example, St. Thomas wrote:
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae Pt. III, Q. 27, A. 2, Reply to Objection 2: “If the soul of the Blessed Virgin had never incurred the stain of original sin, this would be derogatory to the dignity of Christ, by reason of His being the universal Savior of all.”
St. Thomas’ statement was obviously incorrect, as it contradicts the dogma of the Immaculate Conception as it would be subsequently defined by Pope Pius IX in 1854. St. Thomas made other statements to the same effect. The quote from Fr. Pesch above powerfully supports what we covered in the video. This is important to acknowledge because 1) it once again highlights the distinction between the teaching of theologians and the Magisterium; and 2) there are some “traditionalist” speakers and writers who to this day stubbornly insist that St. Thomas was not even wrong on the matter! They make this desperate claim because to admit that St. Thomas erred on this matter would destroy their incorrect understanding of what constitutes magisterial teaching. However, since they make this claim after the dogma was defined in 1854, their stubborn defense of a position that contradicts the dogma actually implicates them in heresy on the matter.
The liberal ‘mayor’ of NYC, Eric Adams, has been charged with fraud and bribery by the Feds not long after he complained about the migrant crisis in NYC. We don’t think that’s just a coincidence. Even though he’s very liberal and he’s in harmony with the conspiratorial agenda in various ways, they couldn’t tolerate his complaints about the migrant invasion. His statements were a huge embarrassment to them and served to expose their nefarious agenda. Thus, he got charged. Even if he’s guilty of certain things, we don’t think he would have been charged and pursued in this way if he had not made statements on that topic. It’s another example of the corruption of the federal agencies.
They Are Evil
MHFM: Those people who see Antipope Francis’ acts of heresy and/or apostasy and still present him as ‘based’ or ‘conservative’ on those occasions when he says something true are evil. They present darkness as light.
Isaiah 5:20 “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!”
Bellarmine: St. Francis & St. Benedict Were Not Priests
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 1, Chap. 27: “St. Jerome and St. Thomas Aquinas were simple priests; Anthony [of the Desert], Benedict, and Francis were not even priests...”
The Radical Left Is From Hell
Dear Brothers,
It's difficult to understand how people cannot see a difference between Trump and the radical left. The conglomerate of the radical left is like seepage from Hell. It is chilling, in fact, to see how, with all the different backgrounds of individuals who compose 'the left' - they all seem to have the same demonic mindset. People who do the things they do used to be called 'the criminally insane'. Back then, the Left of the day tried to excuse such criminals by claiming that the reason they committed their crimes was because they were insane. (Of course, it's the other way around.) But I never seem to hear that phrase (criminally insane) any more. I guess it's redundant, now that there's the radical left. Nobody would be able to see the difference.
The Radical Left hates God. They hate Jesus Christ. They hate the Blessed Virgin Mary. They hate truth. They hate humanity. They even hate one another. They hate law, and merit, and excellence. They devise every means to kill infants -- and to destroy the children they weren't able to kill. They foist pornography, homosexuality, drugs, and poisons on children and people of all ages. They imprison and enslave people. They lie, and lie, and lie - about everything. They attempt to destroy everything that is orderly, beautiful or meaningful. They steal anything and everything they can get their hands on. They hate individuals, families and nations.
It's simply disingenuous for anyone to say that there is no difference between Trump and the Radical Left.
Lee Ann
On Aug. 22 the Supreme Court ruled 5 to 4 to uphold an Arizona law that requires proof of citizenship to register to vote. A few days before that the Supreme Court blocked Biden’s attempt to temporarily enforce more ‘transgender’ protections in education. Just like the repeal of Roe v. Wade (and many other rulings that are positive for the country), the Court only ruled this way because Trump was able to appoint a number of judges to the Supreme Court. These examples (and many others) just further confirm what we explained in our recent video (Why God Saved Trump – A Stunning & Alarming Biblical Sign For America). Contrary to the claims of certain people who didn’t carefully watch our video or failed to recognize the nuanced analysis it presents, our video did not say that Trump was personally good. It wasn’t even a video about Trump personally per se, but rather about the dire state of America and Trump insofar as he represents what remains of the legitimate government of America. While analyzing the current state of America (which is actually deplorable), our video explained that, even though Trump has big problems and regrettable similarities with the radical left in various areas, there are many areas of profound difference. Those who deny that are simply uninformed or dishonest.
In fact, those who correctly acknowledge that Trump is terrible in certain areas, but then conclude that he’s no different from the radical left, are similar to people in the early Church who would react to a heresy by falling into a heresy in the opposite direction. Just because Trump is terrible in some areas does not mean that he’s the same as the radical left. There are many areas in which they are significantly and substantially different. To acknowledge that is simply to be accurate and honest.
Why God Saved Trump - Stunning & Alarming Biblical Sign For America
St. Robert Bellarmine makes a good point about how the Church's solemn and official declarations must be distinguished from other acts.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Conciliis, Book 2, Chap. 12: “… in councils the greater part of the acts does not pertain to faith. For neither disputations that are prefaced, nor reasons which are added, nor those things which are brought forth to explain and illustrate pertain to faith, but only the bare decrees themselves, and not all of these, but only those which are proposed as de fide.”
MHFM: It’s remarkable to see certain blind supporters of Donald Sanborn’s pseudo-sedevacantist group denounce the ‘Recognize and Resist’ position, while they fail to realize that Sanborn’s group holds the ‘Recognize and Resist’ position. Yes, Sanborn’s group holds the Cassiciacum Thesis, according to which all the Novus Ordo ‘cardinals’ (including Jorge Bergoglio) are true Catholic cardinals! Yet they resist communion with their ‘Catholic cardinals’, they reject the ‘pope’ (i.e. Bergoglio) who is recognized by their ‘cardinals’, and they resist the special privileges that Catholic cardinals enjoy according to canon 239 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law (such as the ability to preach anywhere). Are there bigger hypocrites in the ‘traditionalist’ movement? Their obstinate supporters (who claim to be sedevacantists) are exceedingly foolish.
MHFM: After temporarily being out of stock, these rosaries are again available. At the link below, one can obtain a high-quality rosary, with wood beads and a great feel, which is also easy to carry and walk with.
Today is the feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary into Heaven. Protestants often attack this dogma by asserting that it lacks early patristic support and therefore is not apostolic. However, the Assumption of Our Lady into Heaven, body and soul, is indicated in Scripture.
Revelation 12:1 “And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.”
This woman had a crown on her head. That indicates that she is present in Heaven in both body and soul. Her Son rules all nations with a rod of iron (Rev. 12:5). That refers to Jesus. The “woman” in Revelation 12, therefore, refers to Our Lady. This woman is also understood to refer to the Church, since images in the Apocalypse can be polyvalent (i.e. they can have more than one meaning or application). However, the “woman” of Rev. 12 certainly refers to the Blessed Virgin Mary. This demonstrates that Scripture itself teaches the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary into Heaven. Hence, there didn’t need to be much explicit early support for the Assumption of Our Lady in the writings of the fathers, since it was taught by the Apostle John in one of the books of Scripture. It’s certainly apostolic.
Pope Pius XII, Munificentissimus Deus (#27), Nov. 1, 1950: “Moreover, the scholastic Doctors have recognized the Assumption of the Virgin Mother of God as something signified, not only in various figures of the Old Testament, but also in that woman clothed with the sun whom John the Apostle contemplated on the Island of Patmos.”
Many Had Strayed From The Truth
MHFM: In the 1950 bull Munificentissimus Deus (which defined that Our Lady was assumed into Heaven), Pius XII lamented that at that time many had strayed from the truth.
Pope Pius XII, Munificentissimus Deus (#2), Nov. 1, 1950: “… our pontificate is weighed down by ever so many cares, anxieties, and troubles, by reason of very severe calamities that have taken place and by reason of the fact that many have strayed away from truth and virtue.”
MHFM: A significant number of early Church fathers wrongly taught that some or all heretics, even if they observe the Trinitarian formula, could not validly baptize. Hence, they unconditionally baptized those who were baptized by heretics. This list includes St. Cyprian and a council of African bishops, St. Cyril of Jerusalem, the so-called “Apostolic Constitutions” (4th century), St. Basil, St. Athanasius, and others. The true position is that heretics can validly baptize, if they observe the proper matter, form and have the minimal intention. The widespread error on this point among the fathers demonstrates, once again, why the Chair of St. Peter is unique. In disputes about the faith, one must focus on the teaching of the Chair of St. Peter (i.e. the authoritative teaching of the popes) to necessarily arrive at the true position.
30 People
MHFM: 30 people who received the vaccine in the same location all died within close proximity of one another.
New Zealand politician says the "Covid vaccine" is directly responsible for killing people - video
Refuting The “Orthodox” On Pope Vigilius
MHFM: The Eastern “Orthodox” continue to spread the falsehood that the case of Pope Vigilius refutes the Papacy. This video demonstrates in detail that they are wrong. The case is also very instructive about the limits of papal infallibility. The facts of this case further illustrate that our understanding of when the Church is actually teaching and when it is not is correct.
The “Strongest” Argument Against The Papacy (Pope Vigilius) – Refuted
Errors On Cornelius Are Connected To So Many False Conclusions
MHFM: One reason that so many people came to incorrect conclusions about the necessity of baptism for salvation (and continue to come to false conclusions on the matter) is that they misunderstood the case of Cornelius. They wrongly thought that he was justified before baptism, but he was not. This short video covers key points on this matter, and it quotes one of the most important early Church fathers (St. Irenaeus) who correctly taught that Cornelius was not forgiven until he was baptized.
They Are Both Wrong About Cornelius & Baptism
We also have a longer video and article on the same topic, but it doesn’t quote St. Irenaeus.
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
