|Recent Featured Videos and Articles||Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted||How To Avoid Sin||The Antichrist Identified!||What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians||Why So Many Can't Believe||“Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists||Amazing Evidence For God||News Links|
|Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed||Steps To Convert||Outside The Church There Is No Salvation||E-Exchanges||The Holy Rosary||Padre Pio||Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups||Help Save Souls: Donate|
The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II
You can order the 658-page book here for only $20.00
This book has 200 color photographs and over 1,700 references; it also reads like a manual so that even those just flipping through it will learn a lot
The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II Audio Program, Part 1, Part 2 (Audios)
Detailed Table of Contents
PART I – OUTLINING THE PRESENT SITUATION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE POST-VATICAN II APOSTASY IN TREMENDOUS FACTUAL DETAIL
* note: While this Table of Contents is extremely detailed (in order to make it as easy as possible to find particular sections a reader may be looking for), it does not cover even all of the subjects that are addressed in this 600-plus page book; and it does not do justice to the depth and specificity into which each section of this book goes. We hope that reading the Table of Contents does not substitute for reading in full the sections of this book.*
Glossary of Terms and Principles
1. The Great Apostasy and a counterfeit Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy – Page 1
► Jesus Christ predicts that there will hardly be any faith on Earth when He returns (Lk. 18:8). – Page 1
► The New Testament teaches that the Great Apostasy will happen “in the Temple of God” (2 Thess. 2) and “in the holy place,” (Mt. 24:15) which clearly indicates a takeover of Catholic buildings in a religious deception. – Page 1
► The Great Apostasy will be worse than the Arian Crisis (4th cent.), in which 97% of the bishops became Arian and the true Catholic Church was reduced to a remnant who were considered the outsiders at the time. – Page 2
► Our Lady of La Salette appeared in 1846 and prophesied that Rome will lose the Faith and become the Seat of the Antichrist – a prophecy which has been fulfilled before our eyes. – Page 3
2. Pope Leo XIII’s Original Prayer to St. Michael - a prophecy about the Future Apostasy in Rome – Page 6
3. The Message of Fatima: a heavenly sign marking the beginning of the end times and a prediction of apostasy from the Church – Page 10
► Fatima, the sign of Apoc. 12:1, and the great red dragon (Communism), the sign of Apoc. 12:3, both come on the seen in 1917…– Page 14
4. A complete list of the Antipopes in History – Page 19
► Jesus Christ founded His Church upon St. Peter (Mt. 16) and made him the first pope.
► It’s a fact that there have been many antipopes in Church history: a full list of the 41 antipopes in Church history.
5. The Great Western Schism (1378-1417) and what it teaches us about the post-Vatican II apostasy – Page 21
6. The Catholic Church teaches that a heretic would cease to be the pope, and that a heretic couldn’t be validly elected pope – Page 31
7. The Church’s enemies, Communists and Freemasons, made an organized effort to infiltrate the Catholic Church – Page 37
8. The Vatican II Revolution (1962-1965) – Page 40
THE MOST SPECIFIC HERESY IN VATICAN II – Page 41
THE OTHER PRINCIPAL HERESIES OF VATICAN II IN THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS: – Page 43
Unitatis Redintegratio – Vatican II’s Decree on Ecumenism – Page 43
Orientalium ecclesiarum – Decree on Eastern Catholic Churches – Page 49
Lumen Gentium – “dogmatic” Constitution on the Church – Page 52
Dignitatis Humanae – Declaration on Religious Liberty – Page 56
►An explanation of Catholic teaching against religious liberty… – Pages 56-57
►Detailed refutations of the attempted defenses of Vatican II’s teaching on this issue: refuting the “coercion” subterfuge, the “within due limits” subterfuge, “the issue is not dogmatic” objection, etc. – Pages 59-62
Ad Gentes – Decree on Missionary Activity – Page 65
Nostra Aetate – Decree on Non-Christian Religions – Page 66
Gaudium et Spes – Constitution on the Church in the Modern World – Page 70
Sacrosanctum Concilium – Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy – Page 72
9. The Liturgical Revolution – A New Mass – Page 82
►The traditional Roman Rite of Mass was codified by Pope St. Pius V, who declared that it cannot be changed. – Page 82
►The Ottaviani Intervention, authored by cardinals, says the New Mass represents a striking departure from the theology of the Council of Trent. – Page 92
PROOF THAT THE NEW MASS IS NOT VALID – THE ESSENTIAL WORDS OF CONSECRATION HAVE BEEN CHANGED – Page 105
► An explanation of what is needed for a valid sacrament based on Catholic teaching…
► The Catholic Church’s teaching on the form of consecration, from Pope Eugene IV and Pope St. Pius V…
► Pope St. Pius V teaches that changing the meaning of the form renders the Mass invalid.
► The Catechism of the Council of Trent teaches that “all” cannot be used in the form of consecration in place of “many.”
ANOTHER ANGLE TO THIS ISSUE ABSOLUTELY PROVES THAT THE NEW MASS IS INVALID – Page 107
► Pope Leo XIII teaches that sacraments must signify the grace which they effect and effect the grace which they signify.
► The grace which must be signified in the Eucharistic form is the union of the faithful with Christ (Pope Eugene IV).
► The words “for you and for many unto the remission of sins” signify this grace; the words “for you and for all” do not.
► All approved consecration formulas in rites of the Church signify the union of the faithful with Christ in the consecration, while the New Mass formula does not.
10. The New Rite of Ordination – Page 112
► Pope Leo XIII declared the Anglican Rite of Ordination invalid because of its removal of all references to the true sacrificing priesthood.
►The New Rite is invalid, and the consequences for “priests” ordained in it and confessions made to “priests” ordained in it…
11. The New Rite of Consecration of Bishops – Page 120
► A comparison of the traditional form of consecration of bishops with Paul VI’s radically different form for the New Rite of Consecration of Bishops…
►The New Rite cannot be considered valid: an explanation of the consequences for “bishops” consecrated in it and “ordinations” of “priests” by such “bishops”…
12. New Sacraments: the Changes to the Other Sacraments – Page 122
► A look at the changes made by Paul VI to the rites of baptism, confirmation, confession, extreme unction, and marriage…
13. The Scandals and Heresies of John XXIII – Page 126
-The Man who called Vatican II and claimed to be pope from 1958-1963 –
14. The Amazing Heresies of Paul VI (1963-1978), the man who gave the world the New Mass and the Teachings of Vatican II – Page 140
PAUL VI ON NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS – Page 141
PAUL VI ON BUDDHISM – Page 143
► A brief explanation of the false, pagan Buddhist religion in light of Catholic teaching…
PAUL VI ON ISLAM – Page 144
► A brief explanation of the false religion of Islam in light of Catholic teaching…
PAUL VI ON RELIGIOUS LIBERTY – Page 146
PAUL VI ON THE “ORTHODOX” – Page 146
PAUL VI ON OTHER PROTESTANT SECTS – Page 149
PAUL VI ON BIRTH CONTROL – Page 150
PAUL VI ON THE UNITED NATIONS – Page 151
► A brief explanation of why the United Nations is evil…– Page 151
PAUL VI PROMOTING THE NEW WORLD ORDER – Page 151
PAUL VI ON THE WORSHIP OF MAN – Page 152
OTHER CHANGES MADE BY PAUL VI – Page 154
PAUL VI ON “MAGIC” – Page 158
PAUL VI BASICALLY ADMITTED THAT HIS CHURCH IS THE WHORE OF BABYLON – Page 159
ANOTHER PICTURE OF ANTIPOPE PAUL VI WEARING THE RATIONAL OF A JEWISH HIGH PRIEST [PHOTO] – Page 160
ANTIPOPE PAUL VI’S SIGNATURE CONTAINING THREE 6’S – Page 161
15. The Scandals and Heresies of John Paul I (1978-1978) – Page 164
16. The Heresies of John Paul II, the most traveled man in history and perhaps the most heretical (1978-2005) – Page 169
JOHN PAUL II REPEATEDLY TAUGHT UNIVERSAL SALVATION, THAT ALL MEN WILL BE SAVED – Page 170
JOHN PAUL II TAUGHT THAT THE HOLY GHOST IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS – Page 172
JOHN PAUL II TAUGHT AND PRACTICED COMPLETE RELIGIOUS INDIFFERENTISM – Page 173
JOHN PAUL II AT THE BUDDHIST TEMPLE – Page 174
JOHN PAUL II RECEIVED THE MARK OF THE ADORERS OF SHIVA – Page 176
JOHN PAUL II VENERATED THE HINDU GANDHI – Page 176
JOHN PAUL II’S APOSTASY IN ASSISI – Page 178
JOHN PAUL II’S OTHER ECUMENICAL MEETINGS – Page 180
JOHN PAUL II PRAYED WITH AFRICAN ANIMISTS – Page 181
THE “PAN-CHRISTIAN” ENCOUNTER: JOHN PAUL II’S APOSTATE PRAYER MEETING IN 1999 – Page 183
JOHN PAUL II’S ASSISI II PRAYER-MEETING WITH FALSE RELIGIONS – Page 184
JOHN PAUL II’S APOSTASY WITH THE MUSLIMS – Page 186
JOHN PAUL II’S APOSTASY IN THE MOSQUE – Page 187
JOHN PAUL II TEACHES THAT MUSLIMS AND CATHOLICS HAVE THE SAME GOD – Page 189
JOHN PAUL II’S APOSTASY WITH THE JEWS – Page 190
► The Catholic Church teaches that the Old Law has ceased and cannot be observed without the loss of salvation. – Pages 191-192
JOHN PAUL II PRAYING AT THE WAILING WALL – Page 198
JOHN PAUL II’S INCREDIBLE HERESIES REGARDING BAPTIZED NON-CATHOLICS (I.E. HERETICS AND SCHISMATICS) – Page 199
JOHN PAUL II REPEATEDLY TAUGHT THAT HERETICS AND SCHISMATICS DON’T NEED TO BE CONVERTED – Pages 200-201
CATHOLICS WHO WERE TORTURED AND MARTYRED BECAUSE THEY REFUSED TO BECOME EASTERN “ORTHODOX” SCHISMATICS – Page 201
THE VATICAN’S BALAMAND STATEMENT WITH THE “ORTHODOX,” APPROVED BY JOHN PAUL II, REJECTS CONVERTING SCHISMATICS AS “OUTDATED ECCLESIOLOGY” – Pages 202-203
MORE OF JOHN PAUL II’S INCREDIBLE HERESIES WITH THE EASTERN “ORTHODOX” SCHISMATICS– Page 203
OTHER ACTIONS OF JOHN PAUL II
17. The Vatican II Sect’s Protestant Revolution: the 1999 Joint Declaration with the Lutherans on the Doctrine of Justification – Page 227
18. The Vatican II Sect vs. the Catholic Church on partaking in non-Catholic worship – Page 234
THE INCREDIBLE DIRECTORY FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES AND NORMS OF ECUMENISM – Page 236
19. The Vatican II Sect vs. the Catholic Church on non-Catholics receiving Holy Communion – Page 239
20. The Heresies of Benedict XVI (2005-2013) – Page 243
► The heresies of Benedict XVI documented in this section come from a study of 24 books written by him, as well as his speeches.
BENEDICT XVI’S HERESIES ON THE JEWS – Page 245
► It is a truth of Christian revelation and Catholic dogma that Jews must be converted to Jesus Christ and the Catholic Faith for salvation, and that the Old Law (the Jewish religion) cannot be observed without the loss of salvation. – Page 245
BENEDICT XVI TEACHES THAT JESUS DOESN’T HAVE TO BE SEEN AS THE MESSIAH – Page 246
BENEDICT XVI’S PUBLIC ACT OF APOSTASY AT THE GERMAN SYNAGOGUE – Page 248
BENEDICT XVI TEACHES THAT PROTESTANTS AND SCHISMATICS DON’T NEED TO BE CONVERTED TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH – Page 252
BENEDICT XVI AND “CARDINAL” KASPER BOLDLY REJECT THE ECUMENISM OF THE RETURN, THAT NON-CATHOLICS NEED TO CONVERT – Page 256
BENEDICT XVI PRAYS ECUMENICAL VESPERS WITH SCHISMATICS AND PROTESTANTS AND SAYS HE HAS COME “TO LOVE” THE ORTHODOX CHURCH! – Page 258
BENEDICT XVI’S WORST HERESY? HE PRAYS WITH THE LEADER OF THE WORLD’S “ORTHODOX” SCHISMATICS AND SIGNS A JOINT DECLARATION WITH HIM TELLING HIM HE’S IN THE CHURCH OF CHRIST – Page 259
BENEDICT XVI’S INCREDIBLE HERESY ON THE SCHISMATIC “ARCHBISHOP” OF ATHENS – Page 261
MORE HERESIES OF THE PROTESTANTS FROM BENEDICT XVI – Page 261
BENEDICT XVI’S PUBLIC ACT OF HERESY IN THE LUTHERAN CHURCH: HE POWERS AHEAD WITH MAJOR ECUMENICAL HERESY – Page 262
MORE HERESIES WITH THE PROTESTANTS FROM BENEDICT XVI– Pages 263-267
BENEDICT XVI’S HERESIES AGAINST THE SACRAMENTS – Page 268
BENEDICT XVI’S HERESIES AGAINST SACRED SCRIPTURE – Page 270
BENEDICT XVI’S HERESIES AND APOSTASY WITH ISLAM – Page 272
► Islam rejects the Divinity of Jesus Christ and the Trinity. The Catholic Church officially teaches that Islam is a false religion, an abomination, a “diabolical sect” from which people need to be converted and saved. – Page 272
BENEDICT XVI GOES INTO A MOSQUE AND PRAYS TOWARD MECCA LIKE THE MUSLIMS – Page 275
BENEDICT XVI’S HERESIES WITH PAGANISM – Page 277
► The Catholic Church teaches that the gods of the pagans are devils (Psalm 95:5; 1 Cor. 10:20).
BENEDICT XVI DENYING OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION – Page 280
► The Catholic Church has repeatedly defined as a dogma that no one at all is saved outside the Catholic Church or without the Catholic Faith.
BENEDICT XVI INSULTING CATHOLIC DOGMA – Page 282
BENEDICT XVI ADMITTING THAT VATICAN II HAS CHANGED OR REJECTED CATHOLIC DOGMA – Page 283
BENEDICT XVI’S HERESIES AGAINST THE CHURCH – Page 284
BENEDICT XVI TOTALLY REJECTS THE UNITY OR ONENESS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH – Page 285
►The unity or oneness of the Catholic Church is one of its four marks and a defined dogma. – Page 285
OTHER HERESIES OF BENEDICT XVI – Page 286
CONCLUSION ON BENEDICT XVI – Page 290
21. Answers to the Most Common Objections Against Sedevacantism (19 Objections answered) – Page 298
■ Obj. 1) The gates of Hell cannot prevail against the Church, as Christ said (Mt. 16). He said He would be with His Church all days until the end of the world (Mt. 28). What you are saying is contrary to the promises of Christ. – Page 298
►ANSWER: Indefectibility does not mean that the Church cannot be reduced to a remnant, as happened during the Arian crisis, and as is predicted to occur at the end. It does not mean that antipopes cannot reign from Rome, as has happened, or that there cannot be a period without a pope. Heretics are defined by the popes to be the gates of Hell. It is those who assert that heretics can be popes who assert that the gates of Hell have prevailed against the Church. There is not a single dogma that can be quoted which is contrary to the situation of a counterfeit Church, headed by antipopes, opposing the true Church, which is reduced to a remnant.
■ Obj. 2) What’s your authority for making these judgments? Your use of dogmatic statements is private interpretation. – Page 299
►ANSWER: The authority is Catholic dogma (explained). To assert that using dogma is private interpretation is condemned by Pope St. Pius X. The Council of Trent teaches that dogmas are infallible rules of Faith meant for all the faithful, to distinguish truth from error and Catholics from heretics.
■ Obj. 3) You cannot know if someone is a heretic or denounce him as such without a trial and declaratory sentence. – Page 300
►ANSWER: This is answered and refuted from the teaching of Pope Pius VI, the case of Martin Luther, and the teaching of St. Robert Bellarmine, etc.
■ Obj. 4) Can’t the Vatican II popes be just “material heretics”? – Page 302
►ANSWER: No, there are three reasons why it’s absurd to assert that the Vatican II “popes” are “material heretics.” They are absolutely formal heretics. This answer includes a detailed explanation of the meaning of “material heretic.”
■ Obj. 5) The Church cannot exist without a pope – or at least 40 years without a pope. – Page 308
►ANSWER: The Church has existed hundreds of times without a pope, and for years. The answer includes a quote from a well known theologian writing after Vatican I who says the Church could exist decades without a pope.
■ Obj. 6) Vatican I’s definitions on the perpetuity of the Papal Office contradict the claims of sedevacantists. – Page 310
►ANSWER: Vatican I’s definitions don’t in any way contradict the position of those who reject the Vatican II antipopes; answers to the specific passages are given. In fact, it is only those who reject Benedict XVI who can faithfully profess the dogmas of Vatican I, since Benedict XVI utterly rejects them. It is precisely because we believe in Vatican I and its definitions on the Papal Office that we must reject the Vatican II antipopes, who hold them to be meaningless.
■ Obj. 7) No one can judge the Holy See; thus the Vatican II popes are popes. – Page 315
►ANSWER: The Holy See has told us that no heretic can occupy the Holy See. To deny that is to judge the Holy See. The original meaning of the phrase refers to subjecting a true bishop of Rome to a trial, which has nothing to do with recognizing that a manifest heretic cannot be the pope. Pope Paul IV destroys this objection by quoting this very teaching in the very Bull which declared that one must not accept a heretic as the pope!
■ Obj. 8) St. Robert Bellarmine said that no one can depose the pope, but that one may resist his bad actions. – Page 317
►ANSWER: This quotation has been completely taken out of context and misapplied. In the very next chapter, St. Robert Bellarmine says that a manifest heretic cannot be the pope. In the passage given in the objection, he is talking about a bad pope, not a manifest heretic. Further, sedevacantists don’t depose a pope. They recognize that a manifest heretic has deposed himself. The dishonest promoters of this argument almost never quote St. Robert’s teaching in the next chapter on manifest heretics who claim to be pope.
■ Obj. 9) Pope Liberius gave in to the Arian heretics and excommunicated St. Athanasius; yet he remained the pope. – Page 319
►ANSWER: It is not true that Pope Liberius gave into Arianism or excommunicated St. Athanasius. According to Pope Pius IX and Pope St. Anastasius, Liberius was falsely accused by the Arians and remained faithful to Catholic teaching.
■ Obj. 10) Pope Pius XII declared in Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis that a cardinal, no matter what excommunication he is under, can be elected pope. – Page 320
►ANSWER: It’s a dogmatic fact that a heretic cannot be the head of the Church, since it’s a dogma that a heretic is not a member. A “cardinal under excommunication” presupposes that the excommunication is not for heresy, since a heretic is no longer a cardinal. There are numerous things for which a cardinal could be excommunicated and still remain a Catholic cardinal – the distinction between major and minor excommunications. This is made clear by the fact that Pius XII is talking about “ecclesiastical penalties.” Heretics are barred from the papacy not merely by an ecclesiastical law, but by the divine law. Pius XII is talking about Catholics under ecclesiastical impediments, not heretics. Even if we grant, for the sake of argument, that Pius XII was legislating that heretics could be elected (which he wasn’t), he says that a cardinal’s excommunication is only suspended for the purpose of the election, and that it comes into force immediately afterward. This would mean, even if we granted for the sake of the argument that the objection was correct, that the heretic elected would lose his office immediately after the election.
■ Obj. 11) What does it matter whether Benedict XVI is the pope? The issue does not concern me. – Page 322
►ANSWER: If this issue doesn’t matter, then the New Mass doesn’t matter, the non-Catholicism of the Vatican II sect doesn’t matter, etc. Further, if you accept Benedict XVI, John Paul II, etc. as true popes you cannot even present the Catholic Faith as binding to a Protestant. This is explained in The Devastating Dilemma.
THE DEVASTATING DILEMMA PROVES THAT ONE CANNOT EVEN CONSISTENTLY TRY TO CONVERT A PROTESTANT IF ONE ACCEPTS THE VATICAN II “POPES” – Page 322
■ Obj. 12) How could all the cardinals accept an antipope, as in the case of John XXIII? – Page 325
►ANSWER: Pope Paul IV explicitly declares that one cannot accept as valid the election of a heretic as pope, even if it takes place with the consent of “all” the cardinals – proving that such is a possibility. At the beginning of the Great Western Schism, all of the cardinals rejected Pope Urban VI and accepted Antipope Clement VII.
■ Obj. 13) John XXII was a heretic who was even denounced by a cardinal; yet he remained pope. – Page 326
►ANSWER: John XXII was not a heretic, and his reign is no proof that heretics can be popes. This answer utterly refutes the perversion of this case that has been advanced by certain non-sedevacantists.
■ Obj. 14) Pope Honorius I was condemned as a heretic by a council; yet he was a true pope. – Page 328
►ANSWER: In condemning Pope Honorius, no council said that he remained the pope after his lapse. Further, the case of Honorius is very different from that of the Vatican II antipopes. The very doctors of the Church who comment on Honorius saw nothing in his case to dissuade them from their position that heretics cannot be popes.
■ Obj. 15) The Church and the hierarchy will always be visible. If the Vatican II Church is not the true Catholic Church, then the Church and the hierarchy are no longer visible. – Page 331
►ANSWER: People misunderstand in what the visibility of the Church consists. It does not exclude the possibility of the true Church being reduced to a small remnant at the end, which is precisely what is predicted by Catholic prophecy and Sacred Scripture – and what was seen in the Arian heresy. The hierarchy remains with the few clergy who remain faithful to the fullness of the Catholic Faith. The Vatican II sect cannot be the visible Church of Christ; in fact, one of its heresies is that it denies the visibility of the Church!
■ Obj. 16) The Vatican II popes haven’t taught manifest heresy because their statements are ambiguous or require commentary. – Page 334
►ANSWER: The Vatican II antipopes have taught many manifest heresies which are completely bold and unambiguous and require no commentary (examples). They also have many other heretical statements which are mixed with ambiguity. Pope Pius VI points out that heretics often do this. He further points out that some heresies need study and analysis to condemn, a point which directly refutes the objection.
■ Obj. 17) Both the 1917 and 1983 codes of Canon Law teach that a declaration is needed for one to lose his office due to heresy. – Page 343
►ANSWER: This is simply not true. Only John Paul II’s 1983 Code says this; the 1917 Code says just the opposite: public heresy deposes a cleric from office without any declaration. The one who publicly promoted this objection is completely wrong.
■ Obj. 18) The Council of Constance condemned the idea that a heretic ceases to be pope, since he is not a member of the Church…– Page 343
►ANSWER: No, the Council of Constance condemned the idea that a merely wicked man (not a heretic) ceases to be pope, since he is not a member of the Church. This is very different from the truth that a heretic ceases to be pope. See explanation...
■ Obj. 19) The Joint Declaration with the Lutherans on Justification isn’t manifest heresy because the Vatican II “popes” didn’t sign it. – Page 344
►ANSWER: The Joint Declaration with the Lutherans is absolutely manifest heresy on the part of the Vatican II antipopes. They have publicly approved of it. The fact that they didn’t sign it is irrelevant. James Smith could draw up a document denying the Immaculate Conception, and if John Doe publicly promotes it (even if he didn’t sign it) he is a manifest heretic.
START OF PART II – BY THEIR FRUITS YOU SHALL KNOW THEM: THE ROTTEN FRUITS AND INEXHAUSTIBLE SCANDAL OF THE VATICAN II SECT – Page 348
The Rotten Fruits and Inexhaustible Scandal of the Vatican II sect prove that it’s not the Catholic Church and that we are in the Great Apostasy
A teen in leotards, in an inappropriate position, performs for an applauding John Paul II – just one of a myriad of examples of the scandal, immorality and bad fruits universally exemplified by the Vatican II sect
► The Catholic Church is exceptionally holy and is characterized by its inexhaustible holiness; this is one of its marks.
22. The Massive Sexual Scandal among the Vatican II/Novus Ordo “priests” – Page 350
23. The Seminaries of the Vatican II Sect are unspeakable cesspools of homosexuality and heresy – Page 355
AN INCREDIBLE ACCOUNT OF THE STATE OF THE SEMINARIES FROM ONE WHO SPENT TIME AT A PROMINENT NOVUS ORDO SEMINARY– Page 357
24. The idolatry of the Vatican II Sect, and the formation of “priests” for its idolatry in the seminaries, is connected with its rampant homosexuality – Page 360
25. The Vatican II Sect promotes idolatry by its general worship of man, by its particular worship of man in the New Mass, and by its acceptance of idolatrous religions – Page 364
► Pope Pius XII on the distinction between Church and Lord…– Page 369
26. The Deplorable State of “Catholic” Parochial and High Schools – Page 372
27. The Deplorable State of “Catholic” Colleges and Universities – Page 377
28. The Annulment Fiasco - The Vatican II Sect’s De Facto Acceptance of Divorce and Remarriage – Page 382
► Catholic dogma teaches that a consummated sacramental marriage is indissoluble.
► An annulment is a declaration by a valid Church authority that a marriage never existed due to a hidden or known impediment.
► Annulments were traditionally given very rarely, are difficult to prove, and the evidence that there was no marriage must be clear; when doubt exists the validity of the marriage is presumed.
► Some examples of why the Church would grant an annulment (a declaration that the marriage never existed)…
WHILE THE VATICAN II SECT DENIES THE INDISSOLUBILITY OF MARRIAGE, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE TRUE POPES HAVE DEFENDED IT AT ALL COSTS – Page 384
29. The Figures on the Post-Vatican II Decline – Page 387
30. One can be pro-abortion and part of the Vatican II sect at the same time – Page 389
► The Catholic Church condemns such a heretical position, which gives Communion to public heretics.
► Quotes from Popes Pius IX, Gregory XVI, and Pius VIII; read the quote from Pope Benedict XIV on how those opposed to just one dogma must be refused Communion.
► Catholic dogma and history teach that if a man is in favor of a dogma, but doesn’t condemn heresy opposed to it, he is a heretic.
► History shows us that bishops during the Arian crisis who signed the Council of Nicaea’s profession of Faith, but refused to condemn the Arians, such as Eusebius of Nicomedia, were considered heretics.
31. The Vatican II sect literally turns away converts at the door – Page 396
32. The Religious Orders in the Vatican II Sect: Totally Apostate – Page 397
“Trappist” priest being installed as teacher of Zen Buddhism by a “Jesuit”
33. Shocking News items provide a summary of the Apostasy of the Vatican II Sect’s dioceses, faithful, clergy, etc. – Page 412
• John Paul II's Envoy Favors Recognition of Sodomite Unions. – Page 419
• “Bishop” of San Jose Denies Historical Accuracy of the Gospels. – Page 421
CONCLUSION ON THESE SECTIONS CONCERNING THE SCANDAL OF THE VATICAN II COUNTER-CHURCH – Page 425
34. The Apostasy of the “bishops” and prominent members of the Vatican II sect - is this your hierarchy? – Page 428
THIS SECTION CONTAINS INTERESTING ITEMS AND IMPORTANT COMMENTARY ON SOME OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT AND REVEALING HERESIES FROM THE PROMINENT MEMBERS OF THE VATICAN II SECT
► St. Robert Bellarmine, Dom Prosper Guéranger, Pope St. Celestine on how even laymen must resist heretical bishops and how heretical bishops lose their offices without any declaration after defecting from the Faith…– Pages 428-429
▼ The “Bishop” of Buffalo gets vested by the Dalai Lama in a massive ecumenical service with Jews, Muslims and heretics which expresses his complete apostasy from the Catholic Faith. – Page 429 [PHOTO: page 428]
▼ The Head of Russian Bishops tells us that the Vatican II sect has no intention of converting Russian “Orthodox” Schismatics. – Page 430
▼ U.S. Novus Ordo Bishops Officially Join “Christian Churches Together in the U.S.A” – a Protestant Communion. – Page 430
> With this agreement, the Novus Ordo Church in the U.S.A. has officially repudiated any claim to be the one true Church of Jesus Christ, and has admitted that it is just one of many heretical denominations.
▼ John Paul II’s appointment as New Bishop in Jerusalem says that the Catholic Church has no intention of converting Jews to Christianity! – Page 431
▼ John Paul II’s “Cardinal Archbishop” of Washington, D.C. confirms John Paul II’s rejection of proselytism (converting others)! – Page 432
▼ The “Archbishop” of Strasbourg admits that the Vatican II sect has abandoned Catholic teaching on the Jews! – Page 433
> He says that Vatican II revised traditional teaching on the Old Covenant being revoked, and that John Paul II repeatedly taught that the Old Covenant is permanent.
▼ The Novus Ordo Bishops Bluntly Repudiate the Dogmatic Second Council of Lyons and the Council of Florence! – Page 433
> In a Joint Statement with schismatics which is carried on the official website of the American Novus Ordo “bishops,” they bluntly state that the dogmatic definition of the Second Council of Lyons, which condemns those who deny that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Son, is “no longer applicable”!
▼ Vatican Commission under John Paul II again rejects trying to convert Jews…– Page 435
▼ Hindus worship the Devil at the Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima…– Page 436
▼ The Vatican II sect commemorates Mennonite “martyrdom.” – Page 437
▼ Non-Catholic “Saints” and “Martyrs” Commemorated by the Vatican II sect, repeating John Paul II’s heresy…– Page 438
▼ The Vatican II sect praises and celebrates John Wesley, the founder of the Methodist sect. – Page 438
▼ No Words of Consecration, No Problem. With the approval of John Paul II and Benedict XVI, approves a “Mass” as valid which has no words of Consecration! – Page 439
▼ The Novus Ordo Bishop of Kansas City denies the Perpetual Virginity of Our Lady. – Page 441
▼ At the 2003 Fatima Conference, the Novus Ordo Clergy called the dogmatic definition of the Council of Florence “horrible”! – Page 442
▼ Even “conservative” Novus Ordo “bishops,” such as “Bishop” Fabian Bruskewitz and “Cardinal” George, are complete apostates. – Page 443
▼ Every year the Vatican sends a message commemorating Buddhist feast of Vesakh. – Page 444
▼ Every year the Vatican Congratulates Muslims for the end of Ramadan. – Page 444
▼ Every year the Vatican Sends a Message to Hindus on the Feast of Diwali! – Page 445
▼ The Vatican II sect teaches that Jews and Muslims are the spiritual seed of Abraham, which is a denial of Jesus Christ. – Page 446
35. EWTN: The Global “Catholic” Network and the Charismatic Movement – Page 449
► A discussion of why the Charismatic movement is diabolical…
► A discussion of Mother Angelica’s “mystical” experiences…
START OF PART III – THE TRADITIONALIST RESISTANCE – Page 456
THE TRADITIONALIST RESISTANCE – SOME ISSUES PERTAINING TO THOSE WHO HAVE FIGURED OUT, TO ONE DEGREE OR ANOTHER, THAT THE POST-VATICAN II CHURCH MUST BE RESISTED OR REJECTED
► These sections deal with refuting some of the false positions that have been adopted by those who have recognized a problem with the post-Vatican II “Church,” but still maintain that the antipopes at the head of this new Vatican II religion are true popes or that the New Mass is valid, etc.
36. The False Apparitions at Bayside, New York – Page 458
► This article exposes the lengths to which the Devil has been allowed to go to deceive people about the Vatican II apostasy, the Vatican II antipopes and the New Mass.
► Our Lord foretold (Mt. 24) that there will be false miracles and false revelations in the last days to deceive, if it were possible, even the elect. – Page 460
► The alleged appearance of the Mother of God at Bayside was one of those false revelations and miracles. This is proven by the false and heretical messages contained within the Bayside revelation.
► False apparitions accompanied by deceiving miracles like those at Bayside have recently occurred in many places. They are meant to misdirect people during the time of the Great Apostasy.
37. What does Medjugorje say? The Message of Medjugorje proves that it is also a false apparition – Page 468
38. Was Vatican II infallible? If you believe that Paul VI was a true pope, yes. – Page 469
THIS SECTION DISPROVES THE POSITION OF THOSE WHO HOLD THAT PAUL VI WAS A TRUE POPE, BUT REJECT THE HERESIES OF VATICAN II BY SAYING THAT THEY ARE NOT BOUND TO ACCEPT THEM BECAUSE VATICAN II WAS NOT INFALLIBLE EVEN IF HE WAS A TRUE POPE
► This section proves that the true position is that the man who imposed the heretical Second Vatican Council could not have been a true pope because he solemnly attempted to bind heretical Vatican II on the faithful.
■ Obj. 1) John XXIII said that Vatican II would only be a “pastoral council,” which proves it wasn’t dogmatic. – Page 472
►ANSWER: John XXIII never said that (see explanation), and it is Paul VI’s solemn confirmation that matters anyway.
■ Obj. 2) Paul VI said in 1966 that Vatican II had avoided proclaiming dogmas affected by infallibility. – Page 473
►ANSWER: Paul VI’s 1966 statement is irrelevant because Vatican II had already been solemnly closed in 1965. Paul VI made this statement after the fact to add confusion. Further, in this 1966 statement, Paul VI says that Vatican II constitutes the teaching of the Magisterium. He further declares that whoever honors Vatican II honors the Magisterium. Thus, even those who go by this statement would be bound to accept Vatican II as the teaching of the Magisterium (which is infallible and binding) – see explanation.
■ Obj. 3) Vatican II was not infallible because there was a note attached to Lumen Gentium that said it was not infallible. – Page 475
►ANSWER: This note is not part of all the documents, but only Lumen Gentium. This note declares Vatican II enacts the Supreme Magisterium of the Church and that Vatican II must be accepted according to the way things are said at the council. Well, Vatican II says that its (heretical) teaching on religious liberty comes from divine revelation and is to be held sacred by Christians (see examples). Thus, even if one goes by this note, one must accept Vatican II’s heretical teaching on religious liberty as sacred and part of revelation, by virtue of the “Supreme Magisterium of the Church.” See explanation.
►All of this proves that there is no way to escape the reality Antipope Paul VI could not have been a true pope and at the same time promulgate Vatican II.
PETER VS. ANTI-PETER– Page 477
► In Quanta Cura, Pope Pius IX dogmatically condemns, proscribes (outlaws) and reprobates the idea of the civil right to religious liberty in virtue of his apostolic authority. – Page 477
► The two cannot possibly possess the same apostolic authority (the authority of the Papacy). To assert that they did (i.e. that Paul VI was a true pope) is to blaspheme the Church, reject Papal Infallibility and assert that the gates of Hell have prevailed against it. – Page 478
39. Paul VI ends a very popular and significant false traditionalist myth by declaring that Vatican II and the New Mass are binding – Page 480
► The only proper position, therefore, is one which rejects Vatican II, the New Mass and Antipope Paul VI.
40. The File on the Positions of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) – Page 482
A FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE POSITION OF THOSE TRADITIONALIST GROUPS WHO RESIST VATICAN II AND THE NEW MASS, BUT STILL ACCEPT THE POST-VATICAN II “POPES”
► THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TEACHES THAT CANONIZATIONS ARE INFALLIBLE; HERETICS SAY THE CHURCH HAS ERRED IN CANONIZATIONS. – Page 485
► Quick comments on the SSPX’s possible full reconciliation with the Vatican II sect…– Page 491
41. Sister Faustina’s Divine Mercy Devotion is something to avoid – Page 493
42. Natural Family Planning is Sinful Birth Control – Page 497
43. The Whole Truth about the Consecration and Conversion of Russia and the Impostor Sister Lucy – Page 506
THIS SECTION EXAMINES IN DETAIL THE MEANING OF OUR LADY’S WORDS AT FATIMA ON JULY 13, 1917 ABOUT THE CONSECRATION OF RUSSIA, AND EXPLAINS HOW A TRUE UNDESTANDING OF THEM DOESN’T IN ANY WAY CONTRADICT THE REALITY THAT THE POST-VATICAN II “POPES” ARE ANTIPOPES;
IT FURTHER GIVES THE EVIDENCE THAT THERE WAS AN IMPOSTOR SR. LUCY AFTER VATICAN II, INSTALLED TO GO ALONG WITH THE POST-VATICAN II AGENDA AND THE FALSE THIRD SECRET OF FATIMA
-MANY INTERESTING PHOTOS AND MAPS-
START OF PART IV – CONCLUDING SECTIONS
44. Is the Vatican II sect the Whore of Babylon prophesied in chapters 17 and 18 of the Apocalypse? – Page 559
“And the woman was clothed round about with purple and scarlet” (Apoc. 17:4)
THE ASTOUNDING EVIDENCE THAT THE VATICAN II SECT IS THE WHORE OF BABYLON
CONCLUSION ON THE WHORE OF BABYLON – Page 574
► The Vatican II sect is clearly the Whore of Babylon. God tells people in Apoc. 18 to come out of her; the Apocalypse contrasts the whore with another woman (the true Catholic Church reduced to a remnant) which has fled to the wilderness (Apoc. 12). – Page 575
45. The Antichrist Code: The Shocking truth that John Paul II was preaching that Man is God – the Doctrine of Antichrist – right in the Vatican – Page 577
Antipope John Paul II Preached:
PAUL VI AND BENEDICT XVI ALSO REPRESENTED ANTICHRIST IN THE VATICAN, IN FULFILLMENT OF LA SALETTE – Page 601
46. What Catholics can and should do in the present apostasy – Page 606
► The difficult question of where to go to Mass or Confession; Catholics cannot attend the invalid New Mass for any reason… – Page 606
► The Profession of Faith for converts from the Council of Trent, which should also be used by those leaving the New Mass and the Vatican II religion…– Pages 606-607
► The form of baptism and conditional baptism; anyone can baptize in a state of necessity…– Page 608
► Practicing true devotion to Our Lady and the Rosary…– Page 609
► A few books we recommend people to obtain…– Page 610
Sign up for our free e-mail list to see future vaticancatholic.com videos and articles.