Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |
How Protestants Falsely Defined Hope, According To Bellarmine
How Protestants Falsely Defined Hope, According To Bellarmine
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Iustificatione, Book 3, Chap. 11: “A twofold certitude in hope can be considered. One, on the part of the will; the other, on the part of the intellect. On the part of the will, the certitude of hope is a firm adhesion of the will to the thing hoped for… even if on the part of the intellect man is not certain that he will attain that thing. Indeed, it seems that hope not only does not require but also cannot bear absolute certitude on the part of the intellect. For that which we certainly know we shall have, we do not hope for, but we absolutely expect… Therefore, the heretics of our time, who require absolute certitude on the part of the intellect, leave no place for hope properly stated.
But although (as we said) hope does not require absolute certitude on the part of the intellect, it nevertheless has a twofold certitude even on the part of the intellect. The first arises primarily from the foundation of hope, which is the promise of God. For we are certain that God cannot be deceived. And if indeed nothing were required for justification or salvation except the promise of God, we would also have concerning these things absolute and infallible certitude. Nevertheless, since other things are required, concerning which we are not as certain, hope does not expel all fear… The other certitude of hope on the part of the intellect arises from charity, and for this reason it is applicable only to just men.”
Paprocki’s False Ecumenism
“Bishop” Thomas Paprocki and Joint Worship with Lutherans
What was "false" about the ecumenical dialogues?
Hawk
Participation in non-Catholic worship is condemned by the Church. You should watch this video or read this article for details on the matter: Vatican II Is A New Religion (Visual Proof).
Sign up for our free e-mail list to see future vaticancatholic.com videos and articles.
Recent Content
^