“Discretionary Judgment” False Argument - Defenders of Antipope Francis distort things

“Discretionary Judgment” False Argument

MHFM: Defenders of Antipope Francis distort things, make many mistakes, and promote false arguments. Some of those false arguments involve misrepresentations of the teaching of St. Robert Bellarmine and the Church on the matter of manifest heretics being unable to hold office in the Church. For example, they twist and misuse a statement St. Robert Bellarmine made about a “discretionary judgment” and what it means. We cover the matter (and refute their gross misrepresentation) in the Bellarmine section of this video:

Taylor Marshall’s Publicity Stunts & False Theology – Exposed

Extreme Dishonesty

The level of dishonesty that the Vatican II's antipope-splainers have is just nauseating. Now you can even see a bunch of them trying to explain how this "blessing" is good, instead of just recognizing the simple fact that Francis is a manifest heretic. Just imagine trying to defend sodomites blessing! But that's a simple conclusion of their obstinately considering Francis as a pope. Truly, heresy begets heresy.

Najmat