| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
MHFM: This quote from St. Robert Bellarmine is another example of why Jesus told people that cutting off occasions of sin is the key to avoiding sin.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Gratia Et Libero Arbitrio, Book 4, Chap. 10: “… in every matter the mode of desiring corresponds to the mode of knowing; for desire follows knowledge, nor is it possible that someone desires an unknown thing.”
Another way to put it is: “Out of sight, out of mind.”
MHFM: This is another clear and a powerful example of a pope judging/condemning a false religion and an unbeliever.
Pope Callixtus III (1455): “Ego Calixtus Papa Tertius, promitto & voveo sanctissimae Trinitati, Patri & filio & spiritui sancto, Dei genitrici semper virgini, sanctis Apostolis Petro et Paulo, totique Curiae coelesti, quod etiam ad effusionem sanguinis proprii, si opus fuerit, dabo operam, & adhibebo omnimodam diligentiam, quantum potero, iuxta consilium venerabilium fratrum meorum, pro recuperatione civitatis Constantinopolitanae, quae heu peccatis hominum exigentibus, nostris temporibus occupata & eversa est, per Iesu Christi Crucifixi Salvatoris nostri inimicum, filium Diaboli, Machometum & Turcarum Dominum. Pro liberatione deinde captivorum Christianorum, necnon ad exaltationem fidei Orthodoxae, ad exterminationem Diabolicae sectae reprobi perfidique Machometi, in partibus Orientalibus, ubi maxime lumen fidei occubuit.”
Pope Callixtus III (1455): “I, Pope Calixtus III, promise and vow to the Most Holy Trinity, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, to the Ever-Virgin Mother of God, to Saints Peter and Paul, and to the whole heavenly court: that even to the shedding of my own blood, if it should be necessary, I will give effort and employ every kind of diligence, as far as I shall be able, according to the counsel of my venerable brethren, for the recovery of the city of Constantinople, which (alas) in punishment for the sins of men, in our times has been occupied and overthrown by the enemy of Jesus Christ our Crucified Savior, Mahomet [II], the son of the Devil and leader of the Turks. Next, [I promise to give effort] for the liberation of the captive Christians, and also for the exaltation of the orthodox faith and for the extermination of the diabolical sect of the reprobate and faithless Mahomet [Islam] in the Eastern regions, where especially the light of the faith has gone out.”
MHFM: It’s interesting that Gregory Palamas, who became one of the most important theological writers for the Eastern ‘Orthodox’ sects, was condemned even in schismatic Constantinople from the years 1341 to 1347. The opposition to Palamas’ revolutionary and heretical doctrine even among the Greek schismatic leadership led to his imprisonment for a number of years. However, after the political situation changed and a new ‘patriarch’ was installed Palamas was ‘elevated’ to bishop. We refute Palamas’ heretical doctrine of God here: https://vaticancatholic.com/eastern-orthodoxy/
St. Augustine Contra Calvinism On Free Will
MHFM: Some Calvinists think they have a kind of historical link with St. Augustine. But St. Augustine, of course, was not a Calvinist. Here’s a passage in which St. Augustine clearly affirms free will (contrary to Calvinism).
St. Augustine, Against Julian, Book 1, Chap. 9, AD 422: “For if you say that the root of evil arose from the free will of a good nature created by God (which the Catholic truth teaches), he [i.e. a Manichaean] will very easily overcome you with those words of your own in which you say: ‘The root of evil cannot be located in a gift of God,’ since free will is without doubt a gift of God.”
Excluding From Communion
MHFM: This is just one of many examples in which a real pope excluded grave sinners from Holy Communion (something that the Vatican II antipopes don’t do).
Pope St. Gregory VII, To Bishop Isembert II, Sept. 10: 1074: “But as for those through whom you have performed so great an offense, whether laymen or clerics, we exclude them by apostolic authority from the Body and Blood of Christ and from every sacred ministration, until you yourself come to make satisfaction…”
Clear Presentation On Justification
Documentary: Protestantism’s Big Justification Lie
Excellent presentation. The best, most thorough and clearest I have ever seen. Thank you.
Mike
New Video Posted
Francis Got Angry That People Converted To Catholicism
St. Irenaeus On Heretics Using Ambiguity and Catholic Terms
MHFM: This is another interesting quote from a saint concerning how heretics (in this case the Gnostics) employed ambiguity and Catholic terms when they insinuated and taught their heresies.
St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book III, Chap. 17: “… not only do they hold opinions which are different, but absolutely contrary, and in all points full of blasphemies, by which they destroy those persons who, by reason of the resemblance of the words, imbibe a poison which disagrees with their constitution, just as if one, giving lime mixed with water for milk, should mislead by the similitude of the color; as a man superior to me has said, concerning all that in any way corrupt the things of God and adulterate the truth: ‘Lime is wickedly mixed with the milk of God.’”
His reference to heretics using a “resemblance of words” corresponds to how Francis, as mentioned in the recent video (Francis Got Angry That People Converted To Catholicism), sometimes speaks positively of “evangelism” or “preaching the Gospel” as he condemns the Church’s teaching on evangelism, converting others, convincing people, etc.
Junipero Serra
Charges dropped against vandals who tore down a statue of Junípero Serra - 34 second video
It's always Catholicism that is consistently and vehemently attacked by the world, and its the devil who rules the world (John 12:31). The adversary of mankind is making it clear, Catholicism is the way!
Daniel Frenkel
Ted Cruz Condemns The Bible
"Christian" Ted Cruz says: "Any law criminalizing homosexuality is grotesque and an abomination"
MHFM: He's condemning the law God gave to Israel in the Old Testament as grotesque and an abomination.
Insightful
How Many Serious Sins Do Protestants Think A “True Believer” Can Commit?
Insightful video…
Ryecroft
MHFM: It’s interesting that certain modernist defenders of the Whore of Babylon (i.e. the Vatican II Sect) are citing the pseudo-Holy Office letter, called Suprema Haec Sacra (dated Aug. 8, 1949), written against Fr. Feeney, in an attempt to justify Francis’ blatantly heretical act of recognizing Coptic ‘Orthodox’ heretics and schismatics as true martyrs and saints.
Their attempt completely fails because 1) nothing can justify Francis’ blatant act of heresy and 2) the letter they are citing was not an act of the Magisterium or even an official common form act of the Holy Office. It was never published in the AAS (i.e. the Acta Apostolicae Sedis) and was therefore technically private. It was authored by a modernist named “Cardinal” Marchetti-Selvaggianni. We cover that here: The Holy Office - Is It Infallible? (Geocentrism & Fr. Feeney).
Suprema Haec Sacra (which is accepted by some heretics who claim to be sedevacantist) was an unofficial and heretical document that reflected the growing rejection of EENS at the time. The modernists’ recourse to it, in order to justify Francis’ blatant denial of the dogma Outside The Church There Is No Salvation, demonstrates again that the rejection of the true position on salvation and baptism was foundational to the Vatican II apostasy.
It's also quite interesting that Pope Eugene IV's bull Cantate Domino (published at the Council of Florence), which so clearly contradicts Francis' act of heresy, was a bull of union with the Copts (i.e. the Coptic delegation)! So, the true Catholic Church under Pope Eugene IV got the Copts to sign a bull declaring that no one, even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, can be saved unless he's in the Catholic Church and in unity with the Roman Pontiff. But the Vatican II Counter Church does exactly the opposite. It tells the schismatic Coptic 'Orthodox' who reject the Papacy and more that they can be saved and be martyrs outside the Catholic Church, and it even gives some of their members a feast day. It's a striking example of how the end-times Counter Church does the opposite of the true Catholic Church.
Our video, Faustina & The Divine Mercy Deception, is back on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quQb-vyM9Cw
After receiving over 27,000 views in the first nine days and making a big impact, the video was removed from YouTube for over two weeks as a result of a bogus copyright claim by the ‘Marian Fathers’. They can’t refute what’s covered in the video, so they wanted to try to stop people from seeing the truth in it, as we explained here: https://vaticancatholic.com/divine-mercy-deception-video-update/
But now it’s back on YouTube. Please spread this video far and wide. Even when it was down from YouTube, the video was available on our website here: https://endtimes.video/divine-mercy-faustina-deception/ (All of our videos are available on our website, even if they are not available on certain platforms.)
Bellarmine: Not All Are Sons of God
MHFM: This is an interesting quote from St. Robert Bellarmine about how grave sinners and unbelievers are not sons of God.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Iustificatione, Book 3, Chap. 9: “For not only many sinners among Catholics, but also heretics, say to God: ‘Our Father who art in Heaven’. Nevertheless, they are not truly sons of God. And to the Jews saying [in John 8]: ‘We have one Father, God’, Christ said: ‘You are of your father, the Devil.’”
Sick Society
"Navy Confirms Using Drag Queen Influencer As A 'Digital Ambassador' To Attract Recruits"
Sick society.
Holly
Man Said He’s Antichrist
Man who says he's antichrist with the word Hell on his shirt
What a stupid way to die...
Lex orandi
Ireland’s Fall
Of all the former Catholic nations, we are the absolute worst.
Ian
The Apostle John And Avoiding Heretics
This is an interesting story about how the Apostle St. John is said to have acted, according to a tradition that came down to St. Irenaeus. The attitude of the Church and the saints is obviously very different from the heretical false ecumenism of the Vatican II Counter Church: Vatican II Is A New Religion (Visual Proof).
St. Ireneaus, Against Heresies, Book 3, Chap. 3, c. AD 180: “There are those who heard from him [i.e. St. Polycarp] that John, the disciple of the Lord, going to bathe at Ephesus, and perceiving [the heretic] Cerinthus within, rushed out of the place without bathing, exclaiming: ‘Let us depart, lest even this place crash, because Cerinthus, the enemy of truth, is within.’ And when the heretic Marcion met Polycarp on one occasion and said, ‘Do you know me?’, Polycarp replied by saying: ‘I know you as the first-born of Satan.’ Such was the horror which the Apostles and their disciples had against holding even verbal communication with any corrupters of the truth. As Paul also says: ‘A man that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid, knowing that he is corrupted and that he sins, being condemned by himself.’”
Nasa
Nasa / nasha is the Hebrew verb 'to deceive'.
Ian
Lampert
“Exorcist Priest” Vincent Lampert – Demonic Activity And His Heretical Beliefs
Great Insight.
Tony Kirby
The Grace Of Baptism
Playlist Of Videos On The Salvation And Baptism Issues
Dear Brothers,
I just listened to your video "The Best Argument Against BOD," and agreed with it all… Thanks for your help.
Nancy
St. Irenaeus Contra Faith Alone
MHFM: St. Irenaeus, an important early Church father, wrote about AD 180. His writings are filled with statements that contradict the false gospel of faith alone and once saved always saved. Below is just one example. After quoting Galatians 5 and 1 Corinthians 6, he states:
St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book V, Chap. 10: “He [St. Paul] shows in the clearest manner through what things it is that man goes to destruction, if he has continued to live after the flesh…”
It’s astounding that so many people embrace the heresies of faith alone and Protestantism when those ideas are not only patently opposed to the clear teaching of Scripture but also the obvious witness of the early Christian fathers.
Trinity
My mind is blown. I really respect your work…
AW
No Conviction
Cameron Bertuzzi Proves Bro. Peter Dimond Correct
Yes, this proves you correct. There is no real fear of God in these people and also no strong conviction about the inerrancy of Scripture and the magisterial teaching of the Church. They need to go to your website and learn, learn, learn, and become Catholic. As you say the root of the problem is the denial of the authentic salvation doctrine of the Church by almost all "traditionalists" and by those they continue to call their pope and hierarchy.
Tony
Post-Trent Catechism By St. Peter Canisius Contradicts “Baptism Of Desire”
MHFM: Today is the feast of St. Peter Canisius, a doctor of the Church who attended the Council of Trent as a theologian. We have a very important video/article on St. Peter Canisius’ catechism. His catechism was published after key sessions of the Council of Trent. This is a must-see video/article. https://endtimes.video/council-of-trent-catechism-st-peter-canisius/ This video/article is extremely significant because it constitutes further powerful support for our position on baptism and it debunks common arguments made by John 3:5 mockers. John 3:5 mockers typically misrepresent the Church's teaching and the Tradition on the salvation and baptism issues. St. Peter Canisius’ catechism was the first major catechism in Church history, and it was approved by various popes. His catechism contradicts the idea of ‘baptism of desire’ by citing passages from early Church fathers which specifically taught that unbaptized catechumens (no matter how much progress they make) cannot be forgiven or saved without water baptism. In the same section on baptism, he specifically cites key passages of Trent, including the passage that John 3:5 mockers misunderstand (i.e. Sess. 6, Chap. 4), to teach that no adult is saved without baptism! His work was a providential defense and expression of the true faith. His catechism also contradicts the heresy that people who die ignorant of the faith or in false religions can be saved.
Tucker out at Fox News
MHFM: Tucker Carlson’s exit from Fox News is another alarming sign for the state of the country and the world. He was the most prominent – and perhaps the only – figure on mainstream television powerfully exposing the facts about the communization of America. The globalists and those in the Deep State also surely want him out at Fox in advance of the upcoming election and the probable false flag events they will stage or carry out and then blame on conservatives.
America’s Fall To Communism – Documentary
History
The Real History Of “Orthodoxy”
Wonderful history I’ve long sought but no one could tell me! Thank you, brothers!
Ochem
Been Watching
I have been watching your material and slowly making my way through your videos and your position resonates with me. I live in New Zealand and was baptized a catholic as a baby… I am convinced of your case that the current leadership in Rome is in apostasy…
God Bless
Matthew Brook
Our recent video, Faustina & The Divine Mercy Deception, which had over 27,000 views in the first nine days and (by the grace of God) was having a big impact, was temporarily removed from YouTube due to a copyright claim by the ‘Marian Fathers’. You can still view the video on our website: https://endtimes.video/divine-mercy-faustina-deception/
The claim made by the ‘Marian Fathers’ is without merit, and we have filed a counter-notification. We hope to have the video restored to YouTube, but the process might take a few weeks or longer. The ‘Marian Fathers’ are upset that the irrefutable facts covered in OUR VIDEO expose the truth about Faustina and the Divine Mercy deception. We hope that we don’t need to go to court over this matter, but we will do so if that’s what’s necessary. Clearly, the Devil doesn’t want the truth about Faustina and the Divine Mercy Devotion known.
This is another interesting quote from St. John Chrysostom, in which he again teaches the position that no one can be saved without baptism. He comments on Ephesians 4:4-7, where St. Paul declares that there is “one Lord, one faith, one baptism”. Based on this text, Chrysostom concludes that just as everyone in the Church has the same God, everyone in the Church has received the remission of sins in baptism. According to Chrysostom, to posit that someone who has not received the remission of sins in baptism can be in the unity of the Church is equivalent to asserting that some people in the Church can confess “a greater God” while others in the Church confess “a lesser God” (which is of course unthinkable).
St. John Chrysostom, Homily 11 on Ephesians [4:4-7]: “There is one Lord, one faith, one baptism [Eph. 4:5]. Behold the hope of your calling. One God and Father of all, who is over all, and through all, and in all [Eph. 4:6]. For can it be, that you are called by the name of a greater God, another, of a lesser God? That you are saved by faith, and another by works? That you have received remission in baptism, while another has not… The chief and principal points of all, he says — Baptism, the being saved by faith, the having God for our Father, our all partaking of the same Spirit — these are common to all.”
Our Phone Lines
MHFM: For some strange reason, from approximately Friday until Monday we were not able to receive or make long distance calls. If you tried to call here during that period, you would have gotten a busy signal. The problem has been fixed now.
Decided Against Eastern ‘Orthodoxy’ After Watching
I decided against Eastern Orthodoxy after watching your videos. Thank you. I want to be Catholic.
Julie
Pope Paul IV, Cum Secundum, Dec. 16, 1558: “Since, according to the Apostle, no man ought to assume honor for himself, but he who, as Aaron was, is called by God [Heb. 5:4], it can easily be recognized by all how gravely they overstep, sin, and err who presume to usurp both superior and inferior ecclesiastical dignities…”
This statement of Paul IV is applicable to countless independent heretics in our day, who presume to function as priests and even as bishops while they deny Catholic dogma (such as Outside The Church There Is No Salvation). Such men have not been called by God to act as priests or bishops; and they are not permitted to function as priests or bishops, since they don't even believe in Catholic teaching.
This playlist of videos covers the salvation and baptism issues in detail: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzssJHrA8L1PjrxWW-S15pnEQ
Trump Indicted
MHFM: The recent indictment of Trump, while countless criminals are not charged, is more evidence of what we covered in America’s Fall To Communism – Documentary.
America’s Fall To Communism – Documentary
They are wrong
Francis Contradicts God And St. Pius V On Homosexuality Laws
Those fake traditionalists are also still whining about their "pope emeritus Benedict XVI" who according to them was the righteous pope and they are wrong about that as he was one of the biggest pushers of Vatican II alongside the Antichrist John Paul II who among many heresies is also responsible for the abominations of Assisi…
Anne Rosler
Wolf
Francis Contradicts God And St. Pius V On Homosexuality Laws
St Francis de Sales: "The declared enemies of God and His church, heretics and schismatics, must be criticized as much as possible, as long as truth is not denied. It is a work of charity to shout: "Here is the wolf! when it enters the flock or anywhere else."
Evelyn McEwen
Short Message
[This is part of a short message to a person in the Novus Ordo sect, who has seen a few of our videos. The person recognizes a lot of the truth in the material, but is definitely resisting the true conclusions and looking for ways to justify the antipopes – such as: “How do we know they don’t have a good intention?”. The person is also considering Eastern ‘Orthodoxy’, which is the place that many rebels against God, who cannot stand against the world, go in our day.]
It doesn't seem like you have seen many of our videos. We have a collection of videos that refute Eastern 'Orthodoxy' (a false religion). You will definitely go to Hell if you embrace that false religion. The section refuting E. 'Orthodoxy' is here: https://vaticancatholic.com/eastern-orthodoxy/
The fact that you are considering E. 'Orthodoxy' demonstrates that you don't have the Catholic faith. You need to stop going to the New Mass, start to pray 15 decades of the Rosary each day, and start to seek the approval of God rather than men. Do you pray the full rosary each day? The current situation in Rome was prophesied. You should also see this video: How To Avoid Sin (Overcome Yourself). It's obvious that you are in some sort of spiritual crisis or crisis of faith. God is giving you the opportunity to see the full truth and act upon it, but the Devil is also trying to get you to resist it, choose the world, and embrace heresy. You need to follow the true and narrow Catholic path and stop resisting the truth. Otherwise you will lose your soul. You need to stop being spiritually slothful.
With regard to intention, a person’s intention is known by his actions. When men preach a false gospel, they are considered to have a heretical intention.
Pope St. Leo the Great, Sermon 36, 5th Century: “Men's hearts are shown by the character of their works, and the fashion of their minds is betrayed by the nature of their actions.”
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, II, 30: “… for men are not bound, or able to read hearts; BUT WHEN THEY SEE THAT SOMEONE IS A HERETIC BY HIS EXTERNAL WORKS, THEY JUDGE HIM TO BE A HERETIC PURE AND SIMPLE, AND CONDEMN HIM AS A HERETIC.”
Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9), June 29, 1896: “The practice of the Church has always been the same, as is shown by the unanimous teaching of the Fathers, WHO WERE WONT TO HOLD AS OUTSIDE CATHOLIC COMMUNION, AND ALIEN TO THE CHURCH, WHOEVER WOULD RECEDE IN THE LEAST DEGREE FROM ANY POINT OF DOCTRINE PROPOSED BY HER AUTHORITATIVE MAGISTERIUM.”
Also, it's not possible to embrace false ecumenism and have a Catholic or good intention.
Gets It Now
… Having been a Lutheran, I believed EENS & submitted my intellect to it, but it bothered me. I kept praying the Rosary and listening to your videos and reading old Catholic books and I get it now. Thank you for holding the line…
God Bless,
Sonya
Joseph Strickland is considered to be "extremely conservative" among "bishops" of the Vatican II Sect. Yet, he endorses everything Benedict XVI wrote! That once again demonstrates how far even "conservative bishops" in the Vatican II Sect are from the Catholic faith. Benedict XVI was a notorious heretic and an antipope, as proven here: https://endtimes.video/benedict-xvi-death-not-a-pope/
Gregory XVI On Rebirth Of Water And The Spirit
MHFM: In this quote Pope Gregory XVI refers to the cathedral in which he was baptized. He calls it a “temple”, and he says that having been reborn to God through water and the Spirit was the “greatest benefit of all”.
Pope Gregory XVI, Quo Grati, July 6, 1831: “For it is with an especially sweet and delightful remembrance that there comes before Our mind that most eminent temple in which, reborn to God through water and the Holy Spirit, We received the greatest benefit of all from divine liberality.”
Blind Supporters of Israel
"Pastors" Say "Christians" Must Vote For Politicians Who Stand For Israel - 1 minute video
They and their followers are all blind. Israeli lawmakers just introduced a bill that would criminalize saying the name Jesus, either verbal or in print, essentially outlawing the New Testament. Offenders would get jail time. Yet these fools believe we should support that.
Mike
Intrigued
I have been watching your videos and am intrigued. What must I do to be saved?...
James Williams
Assisi And Active Participation
MHFM: In the following statement at the 1986 Assisi World Day Of Prayer For Peace, Antipope John Paul II repeatedly mentions that he invited the various religious leaders to come to Assisi in order to pray and worship. To invite people to engage in idolatry (and to host the event) constitutes active participation in the idolatrous worship. Thus, John Paul II was guilty of all the idolatry committed at Assisi.
John Paul II, Address To The Religious Leaders At Assisi, Oct. 27, 1986: “Let me begin by thanking you from the bottom of my heart, for the openness and good will with which you have accepted my invitation to pray at Assisi… The coming together of so many religious leaders to pray is in itself an invitation today to the world to become aware that there exists another dimension of peace and another way of promoting it which is not a result of negotiations, political compromises or economic bargainings. It is the result of prayer, which, in the diversity of religions, expresses a relationship with a supreme power that surpasses our human capacities alone… I wish to express again my gratitude to you for having come to Assisi to pray… let us dispose our hearts for prayer in true internal silence. Let us make this Day an anticipation of a peaceful world.”
We discuss more about active participation in false worship here: Vatican II Is A New Religion (Visual Proof). We discuss the apocalyptic significance of the Assisi event here: The Antichrist Conquers In This Sign.
Would Have Been An Atheist
No Latin Mass Or Prayers For Dead Non-Catholics – Papal Teaching
I would've still been a miserable and wretched atheist if it wasn't for your ministry. Thank you for introducing me to Our Lady and her Rosary…
Slick
Material
Incredible material Brothers! While I have not completed my first order of materials, reading what I have I truly desire more. I am a Traditional Catholic, I believe in Apostolic Catholicism, primitive Christianity, and I can see myself rejecting the teachings of Vatican II.
God Bless You for making these materials affordable.
Ave Maria!
Thomas
When Hus Was Burned At The Stake
MHFM: When John Hus (a terrible and pertinacious heretic) was burned at the stake during the Council of Constance, on July 6, 1415, he prayed for his enemies. This is another good example of how apparent external acts of ‘piety’ mean nothing (and amount to insincere and phony acts) when they are separated from a commitment to the true faith and the revelation of God.
Committed To Spiritual Fornication
"Bishop Wants Rome's Approval For Pagan Novus Ordo"
The Vatican II sect is committed to spiritual fornication and religious indifferentism... God willing, some will wake up in time to come out of the V2 sect in time.
Francis
Wycliffe’s Bones
MHFM: During the eighth session of the Council of Constance, on May 4, 1415, the writings of the heretic John Wycliffe were publicly condemned and ordered to be burned. His bones were also dug up from consecrated ground and burned.
Worse Than Luther
A heresiarch worse than Luther.
C C
Significant Actions
Vatican II Is A New Religion (Visual Proof)
It's unbelievable! And most people either do not know or do not realize the significance of it, but once seeing it, how can you not?
Wendy S
Comment
… you have really well researched content…
Jordan Paron
Message To Eastern ‘Orthodox’ Apostate
This was a brief message we sent to an arrogant and obstinate Eastern ‘Orthodox’ heretic.
MHFM: You are, one must say in the interest of your salvation, an apostate fool. Your religion is false. You have no faith. The only reason you have gravitated toward Eastern 'Orthodoxy' is that you are a rebel against God and you could not stand against the world. You reject the known truth, and you are headed for Hell without any doubt. Your Palamite false doctrine of God is so stupid and anti-Christian that it's about as bad as Calvinism (although in a very different way). Uncreated things don't begin to exist. Learn Christianity 101. And yes, it was definitely Palamas' position that 'uncreated energies' have a beginning. He even doubled down on that nonsense when he was corrected about it. The material we have put out thoroughly refutes Eastern 'Orthodoxy' and proves Catholicism to anyone of good will. The Papacy is also true, and you reject what Christ instituted on that matter. Your bad will is profound. You are following a mob of rebels to Hell.
Certain conservative members of the Vatican II Sect are hailing “Bishop” Thomas Paprocki (of Springfield, Illinois) for stating that it’s possible for bishops and others to excommunicate themselves automatically for heresy. Paprocki implied that “Cardinal” McElroy might have fallen into automatic condemnation because of his endorsement of the “LGBT” agenda and related heresies. Well, the truth is that while Paprocki might be mildly criticizing some of the most radical heretics in the Vatican II Counter Church on moral issues, he fully accepts false ecumenism and the heresies of the Vatican II Sect. He thus denies the Catholic faith. For example, in 2017 Paprocki was a presider during an ecumenical prayer service that included Lutherans and “Catholics” in St. Agnes Church in Springfield, Illinois. The heretical gathering was based on, among other things, the heretical joint declaration with the Lutherans on justification.
“A landmark ecumenical document issued by Catholics and Lutherans in 2015 highlighted a string of agreements between the two churches while urging deeper connections at local levels. Sunday's prayer service at St. Agnes Catholic Church in Springfield, bringing together the leaders from the Springfield Catholic Diocese and the Evangelical Church in America's Central/Southern Illinois Synod, on the heels of the commemoration of the 500th anniversary of the beginning of the Protestant Reformation, does just that. ‘(The service) is a desire to recognize progress in Catholic-Lutheran relations,’ said ELCA Bishop S. John Roth, who will join Catholic Bishop Thomas John Paprocki in leading the service… The style of Sunday's service will have a pronounced ecumenical feel to it, including prayer, hymns and music in the Taize tradition, which is meditative and reflective. In the past, several local Catholic, Lutheran (ELCA), Presbyterian (USA) and United Methodist churches have held Taize services.” (Steven Spearie, “Prayer service to bring together Catholics, Lutherans”, The State Journal Register, Nov. 17, 2017)
Paprocki’s endorsement of (and participation in) false ecumenism demonstrates once again that even the “most conservative” leaders in the Vatican II Sect are not Catholic. Our video Vatican II Is A New Religion (Visual Proof) shows why joint prayer services with non-Catholics are mortally sinful and an expression of heresy. They have always been condemned by the Catholic Church. We also have a video that documents the astounding apostasy of McElroy: “Cardinal” McElroy & The Counter Church In San Diego.
Have Become Convinced
Dear Brothers…
I have watched all your videos multiple times, read through your books, and have prayed the rosary. Thanks to you, as well as God, I have become convinced of the sedevacantist position, including rejection of “BOD” and NFP… Thank you for all the work you do.
Best,
Tony
It’s interesting that in his document Summo Iugiter Studio, Pope Gregory XVI refers to the statement of the Fourth Lateran Council (“There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which no one at all is saved”) as a “solemn act” in which dogma was proclaimed (Extant praeterea solemnes ipsius Ecclesiae actus quibus dogma item annunciatum est). Thus, the proclamation that there is no salvation at all outside the Church of the faithful is a solemn definition of the Church, according to Pope Gregory XVI.
Pope Gregory XVI, Summo Iugiter Studio (#5), May 27, 1832: “Moreover there are solemn acts [solemnes… actus] of the Church in which the same dogma has been proclaimed. Thus, in the decree on faith which Innocent III published with the synod of Lateran IV, these things are written: ‘There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which no one at all is saved.’”
Well, it’s the teaching and tradition of the Church, as shown by the testimony of the fathers, liturgies, and councils, that the unbaptized (including catechumens) are not part of “the faithful”. St. Robert Bellarmine acknowledges this fact.
St. Robert Bellarmine, On Baptism, Chap. 8: “… Acts 2:41, it is said, ‘Those who received his word were baptized, and they were added on that day about three thousand souls.’ There, we said that to be baptized is nothing other than to enter the Church. This is why the Fathers, by a common consensus, distinguish catechumens from the faithful, and teach that the former are not yet within the Church because they lack Baptism, nor can they be called faithful. See Nazianzen (Orat. in Sanctum Lavacrum), Chrysostom (Hom. 24 in Joan.), Cyril (On John 12, 50), Augustine (Tr. in Joan. 4), the Council of Florence in its Instruction to the Armenians.”
These facts constitute further proof that no one is saved without the Sacrament of Baptism – a position proven by “solemn acts” in which dogma has been proclaimed.
Vatican II’s heretical teaching on religious liberty was an attack on Christ’s kingship over peoples and nations.
Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas (#19-20), Dec. 11, 1925: “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony… Oh, what happiness would be Ours if all men, individuals, families, and nations, would but let themselves be governed by Christ!”
Here’s a quote from a true pope, St. Gregory VII, acknowledging the duty of kings to use their power in defense and support of the Church and the public reign of Christ as king.
Pope St. Gregory VII, To King Henry IV of Germany, Dec. 7, 1074: “… know that you hold royal power duly, if you bow down the height of your dominion to Christ the king of kings to bring about the restoration and the defense of His own churches, and if you think over with trembling words when He says, ‘I love those who love me’ [Proverbs 8:17], and, ‘To those who give honor to me I give honor, but those who despise me will be without a name’ [1 Sam. 2:30].”
In our material we’ve documented that Antipope John Paul II deliberately blasphemed God and the truths of the faith. (See this video, for example: The Antichrist’s Distinguishing Mark). There’s another subtle example of his blasphemous program in his encyclical Dives In Misericordia. It concerns what God Himself legislated in Exodus 21.
Exodus 21:23-24: “But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth…”
Concerning this law of God in Exodus 21:24, John Paul II states:
John Paul II, Dives In Misericordia (#12), Nov. 13, 1980: “Not in vain did Christ challenge His listeners, faithful to the doctrine of the Old Testament, for their attitude which was manifested in the words: ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ [Ex. 21:24] This was the form of distortion of justice at that time…”
John Paul II calls God’s word and His law (adhered to by those “faithful” to the Old Testament) a “distortion of justice at that time”! That is a horrible blasphemy. Even though Our Lord Jesus Christ elevated this precept in the New Testament, there was nothing unjust in what God commanded and legislated in the Old Testament. As St. John Chrysostom states in his commentary on Matthew 5:
Matthew 5:38-39- “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.”
St. John Chrysostom, Commentary on Matthew, 5:38-39: “Do you see that it was not of an eye that He was speaking before, when He made the law to pluck out the offending eye, but of him who by his friendship is harming us, and casting us into the gulf of destruction? For He who in this place uses so great strength of expression, and who, not even when another is plucking out your eye, permits you to strike out his; how should He have made it a law to strike out one's own? But if any one accuses the ancient law, because it commands such retaliation, he seems to me very unskillful in the wisdom that becomes a legislator, and ignorant of the virtue of opportunities, and the gain of condescension. For if he considered who were the hearers of these sayings, and how they were disposed, and when they received this code of laws, he will thoroughly admit the wisdom of the Lawgiver, and will see that it is one and the same, who made both those laws and these, and who wrote each of them exceeding profitably, and in its due season. Yes, for if at the beginning He had introduced these high and most weighty commandments, men would not have received either these, or the others; but now ordaining them severally in their due time, He has by the two corrected the whole world. And besides, He commanded this, not that we might strike out one another's eyes, but that we might keep our hands to ourselves. For the threat of suffering has effectually restrained our inclination to be doing.”
Thus, John Paul II’s statement that Exodus 21:23-24 (which was given by God) was a “distortion of justice at that time” is another example of how he deliberately blasphemed God in his antichrist writings.
This is another verse in the Old Testament that’s obviously contrary to the idea of eternal security or once saved always saved. God’s blessing (and the salvation He offers) is conditioned upon obedience.
Jeremiah 18:9- “And if at any time I declare concerning a nation or a kingdom that I will build and plant it, and if it does evil in my sight, not listening to my voice, then I will relent of the good that I had intended to do to it.”
It’s interesting to hear so many heretics raise objections to the true sedevacantist position based on ‘visibility’. Those objections are false, and they have been refuted many times. But it’s noteworthy that the first and most essential aspect of what makes the Church visible is that it’s a body and it has ‘members’. Just like the members of a human body (e.g. a person’s arms) are visible, the Church is visible because those in it are ‘members’ of the mystical body. As Leo XIII taught, the Church is visible precisely because it is a body.
Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (#3), June 29, 1896: “For this reason the Church is so often called in Holy Writ a body, and even the body of Christ – ‘Now you are the body of Christ’ (I Cor. xii., 27) – and precisely because it is a body is the Church visible…”
But you cannot become a member of the body of the Church (and thus you cannot become part of the visible Church) without having received the Sacrament of Baptism, as even those who deny the necessity of baptism typically admit.
Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302: “… the one mystical body … And in this, ‘one Lord, one faith, one baptism’ (Eph. 4:5). Certainly Noe had one ark at the time of the flood, prefiguring one Church… outside which we read that all living things on the earth were destroyed… which body he called the ‘Only one’ namely, the Church, because of the unity of the spouse, the faith, the sacraments, and the charity of the Church.”
Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439: “Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church. And since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5]. The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water.”
Well, almost every person who rejects the sedevacantist position based on ‘visibility’ simultaneously holds that people can be in the visible Church without becoming a member of the Church through the Sacrament of Baptism. They thus deny a fundamental aspect of Catholic teaching on visibility while making false arguments for the Counter Church based on visibility. It’s another example of how their position and arguments are self-refuting and without merit. This playlist of important videos covers the Church’s teaching on the necessity of baptism for salvation, and it refutes objections: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzssJHrA8L1PjrxWW-S15pnEQ
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
