You say nobody without canonical stays or authority can war pope Francis. Ridiculous. You do not need authority to warn someone. You need authority to judge them. Your smart enough to know there is a debate among credible theologians on whether a pope can be judged or not. But a pope certainly can be warned or corrected.
No, you didn’t listen carefully and you don’t understand the point. We said that if he were the pope (he’s not, but for the sake of argument, suppose he were), no one would have the authority to give him a CANONICAL warning (i.e. a warning that, if unheeded, would result in specific or additional canonical penalties against the pope). That’s because no one has authority over the pope. But we never said that no one could give him rebukes, admonitions or warnings by pointing him to the divine law or to the Catholic teaching which he is contradicting. But those would be merely fraternal (not canonical) corrections, and the fraternal correction of a cardinal or a bishop would be no more canonically authoritative vis-à-vis a pope than one given by a layman on the street. That's because no one has any jurisdiction over a pope. Got it? Well, Francis has received many such fraternal corrections/warnings, and he has even acknowledged them. He has also ignored/rejected them. He’s also pertinacious against known Catholic teaching. He’s a notorious heretic.
Sign up for our free e-mail list to see future vaticancatholic.com videos and articles.