Canonical vs. Fraternal Corrections

No, you didn’t listen carefully and you don’t understand the point.  We said that if he were the pope (he’s not, but for the sake of argument, suppose he were), no one would have the authority to give him a CANONICAL warning (i.e. a warning that, if unheeded, would result in specific or additional canonical penalties against the pope).  That’s because no one has authority over the pope.  But we never said that no one could give him rebukes, admonitions or warnings by pointing him to the divine law or to the Catholic teaching which he is contradicting.  But those would be merely fraternal (not canonical) corrections, and the fraternal correction of a cardinal or a bishop would be no more canonically authoritative vis-à-vis a pope than one given by a layman on the street.  That's because no one has any jurisdiction over a pope.  Got it?  Well, Francis has received many such fraternal corrections/warnings, and he has even acknowledged them.  He has also ignored/rejected them.  He’s also pertinacious against known Catholic teaching.  He’s a notorious heretic.