St. Thomas: Some Sinners Are Manifest Without A Declaration

The following statement of St. Thomas is interesting.  He recognizes that some sinners are manifest by mere evidence of the fact, even if they have not been declared by a tribunal or judge.  The same principle is recognized in papal teaching and canon law, as we’ve pointed out repeatedly.  Such facts contradict the false arguments of many defenders of the Vatican II Sect.  Many of them deny that someone can be recognized as a public sinner by notoriety of the fact itself without any declaration.  They simply do not understand or adhere to Catholic teaching and principles.

Settles The Question

Did St. Paul Really Rebuke St. Peter In Galatians 2?

Excellent video. 100% proof that Cephas in Galatians 2:9 is not St Peter. The connection with Galatians 2:1-10 and acts 11:26-30 settles the question.

Augustinus

Appreciate

How To Avoid Sin

… I greatly appreciate your posts that help me to follow God's will and become holy as he commands.

D Guzman

His Former Diocese

Syracuse “LGBT Churches” Prove Leo XIV’s Sect Isn’t Catholic

This is my former diocese…

Kyle

Leo XIV Takes Part In Another Ecumenical Prayer Service At The Site Of Nicaea

On Nov. 28 (the second day of his trip to Turkey), Antipope Leo XIV participated in another ecumenical prayer service with approximately 27 others.  It took place at the historic site of the Council of Nicaea. He prayed with “Orthodox” Patriarch Bartholomew and many other non-Catholic leaders.  They even prayed the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed together.  That’s another public mortal sin.  The action also means that, according to Leo XIV, the leaders of heretical sects have faith and belong to the Church of Christ.  But the Catholic Church teaches that they do not.  The false ecumenism of Antipope Leo XIV is a public profession of heresy.  It’s more proof that he doesn’t profess the Catholic faith but rather the false religion of Vatican II.  See our video: Vatican II Is A New Religion for the Catholic Church’s total condemnation of such ecumenical activity.

Also, see our recent article: Leo XIV’s New “Apostolic Letter” In Unitate Fidei: An Ecumenical Abomination

Bone Chilling; Novus Ordo "Apologists"; "Traditionalist-sedevacantists"

Revealing

Leo XIV’s New “Apostolic Letter” In Unitate Fidei: An Ecumenical Abomination

Very interesting and revealing article. Thank You very much.

Tommaso

Information

Leo XIV’s New “Apostolic Letter” In Unitate Fidei: An Ecumenical Abomination

Excellent information…

John

Bone Chilling

Man Shot & Saw Hell – Shocking Must-See Video

… bone chilling.

VW

Lampert

“Exorcist Priest” Vincent Lampert – Demonic Activity And His Heretical Beliefs

… this is a very insightful video.

OL

Novus Ordo “Apologists”

Voice Of Reason Scandal: It’s More Revealing Than You Think

Re: his public praise for professional anti - Catholic James White - all Novus Ordo apologists are obsequious in this manner.

Ansel

True Catholic Teaching

Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis

I would like to take the time to thank you brothers for saving me a great deal of time in sorting out true Catholic teaching on this subject matter. I am surprised and appalled, during this controversial time where we have the nope [i.e. non-pope] Leo 14th proclaiming coredemptrix false and the many false traditionalist in almost knee-jerk fashion opposing him as if his opinion matters at all. "Traditionalist-sedevacantists" are defending this title imposed upon our Lady in the most embarrassing ways. They appear to have lost their minds and are making things up. Thank you so much for your work…

Douglas

Leo XIV’s New “Apostolic Letter” In Unitate Fidei: An Ecumenical Abomination

On Nov. 23, 2025, Antipope Leo XIV released a new document called In Unitate Fidei, to commemorate the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea of 325.  Although the document is not very long, since it was written by the apostate Antipope Leo XIV it’s no surprise that it contains a number of ecumenical heresies.  He speaks of all the baptized, including all the Protestants and the Eastern “Orthodox”, as “disciples of Christ” (#9), as “brothers and sisters in Christ” (#12), and as part of the “one universal community of Christ’s disciples” (#12). 

LEO XIV TEACHES THAT THEY ARE PART OF THE CHURCH OF CHRIST

That is to clearly convey that all of those baptized heretics and schismatics belong to the Church of Christ, which is directly contrary to the dogmatic teaching of the Church.

Notice that according to actual Catholic teaching those who depart from even one dogma of the Church or the Papacy (e.g. the “Orthodox” and the Protestants) have “no part of Catholic communion” (Leo XIII) and are “aliens from the Body of Christ” (Eugene IV).

LEO XIV TEACHES THAT THEY HAVE THE SAME FAITH

In #12 of the same document, Leo XIV teaches that all the baptized (including the various Protestants and Eastern “Orthodox”) share the same faith in the one and only God.

That’s actually a heresy, one that’s often overlooked.  It’s often not recognized because 1) few understand Catholic teaching about “faith” and 2) Leo XIV’s statement (that non-Catholics share faith with Catholics) is so frequently expressed by the Vatican II antipopes that people have become desensitized to it.  The truth is that heretics do not have any faith in God.  To reject one dogma is to reject all faith.

Even though it’s directly contrary to Catholic teaching to assert that a heretic has any faith, the Vatican II antipopes have taught the false doctrine that heretics and schismatics, as well as Muslims and Jews, have “faith” on hundreds of occasions.

LEO XIV FULLY ENDORSES JOHN PAUL II’S ECUMENICAL ABOMINATION, UT UNUM SINT

In his new document Antipope Leo XIV fully endorses Antipope John Paul II’s encyclical Ut Unum Sint, which is filled with heresies and contradictions of Catholic teaching.

John Paul II’s abominable document Ut Unum Sint teaches the heresies that 1) Catholics and non-Catholics are in communion with each other; 2) that non-Catholics have the faith; 3) that there are non-Catholic saints and martyrs; and 4) that participation in non-Catholic worship is not only permitted but recommended.  It explicitly endorses the outrageous Directory For The Application Of Principles And Norms On Ecumenism, promulgated in 1993 by John Paul II and the Council for “Promoting Christian Unity”.  It’s essentially a manual for how to commit sins against the faith.  It recommends the very actions that were specifically condemned by the Church, such as taking part in non-Catholic worship in non-Catholic churches.

The Church has always condemned the very activity that is endorsed by Antipopes John Paul II, Leo XIV, and the other Vatican II antipopes.

LEO XIV TEACHES THE NON-CATHOLIC “SAINTS” AND “MARTYRS” HERESY

As alluded to above, in his new document Leo XIV also quotes John Paul II to teach the blatant heresy that all the non-Catholic sects have saints and martyrs.

That is a bold rejection of the dogma Outside The Church There Is No Salvation.  In particular, it directly contradicts the dogmatic statement of Pope Eugene IV.

John Paul II taught the “ecumenical saints and martyrs” heresy many times, but in Ut Unum Sint he expressed it in a particularly blasphemous manner.  He wrote:

As we’ve mentioned before, John Paul II used the particular word “reseraverunt”, which means “they unlocked”.  Thus, he not only taught the heresy that people can be saints outside the Church but he expressed that the non-Catholic sects themselves unlocked Heaven for them.  That is to imply that those sects, and not just the Catholic Church which was founded upon St. Peter, have the keys to the Kingdom.  It’s an astounding statement.  We believe that John Paul II deliberately used the word “unlocked” to increase the blasphemy, for his modus operandi was to subtly mock God and the Catholic Church on a regular basis.

Leo XIV’s document is another clear expression of the false religion of Vatican II.  It’s not the Catholic faith.  He’s not a Catholic, and those who obstinately profess communion with him deny the faith.  On Nov. 28, Leo XIV will participate in another ecumenical prayer service, which will be another public mortal sin against the faith and a further expression of heresy.  He’s a non-Catholic antipope.  The Vatican II Sect is not the Catholic Church, but the end-times Counter Church, as our material explains.

St. Clement, Roman Primacy & Miraculous Water

Nov. 23 is the feast of Pope St. Clement.  According to the oldest list of the popes (which is found in St. Irenaeus’ work Against Heresies), he was the fourth pope (the third successor to St. Peter).  His reign is dated by some to have been from AD 92 to AD 101.  Irenaeus also says that Clement heard both St. Peter and St. Paul in person. 

Clement’s famous Epistle to the Corinthians is “the earliest piece of Christian literature outside the New Testament for which the name, position and date of the author are historically attested” [Johannes Quasten, Patrology, Vol. I, 1950, p. 43].  It was considered to be part of Scripture by many in the ancient Church and thus included in several canonical lists of the New Testament.  It’s often cited as an early example of papal primacy.  In the epistle Pope St. Clement (writing on behalf of the Church of Rome) admonishes the Church of Corinth, an Eastern church that was located almost 1000 miles away by sea.  The tone of the letter indicates that the Church of Corinth is subject to the Church of Rome:

His epistle also provides early support for the importance of confession.

There is also a tradition that when he was exiled at Chersonesus Clement’s prayer caused a fountain to miraculously spring up for the help of Christians, and that many infidels were converted and baptized as a result of this miraculous flow of water.  Clement died as a martyr under the emperor Trajan, in approximately the year 100.  It is believed that he was thrown into the sea with an anchor tied around his neck.

James Acknowledged St. Peter’s Exegesis In Acts 15

Our video called Did St. Paul Really Rebuke St. Peter In Galatians 2? covers many important points that are relevant to the biblical proof for the Papacy.  One of those, which is explained below, is a particular term that James used about Peter’s statement at the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15.  Concerning Peter’s unique role in the incorporation of the Gentiles, Acts 15:7 says this about St. Peter’s actions at the Council of Jerusalem:

As the visible head of the Church, Peter spoke first and pronounced the definitive doctrinal decision at the Council.  Contrary to what some say, it was Peter, not James, who made the decisive doctrinal statement at the Council.  Peter proclaimed that gentile converts do not need to be burdened with the yoke of circumcision and all the requirements of the Old Law. 

When Peter ended his speech in Acts 15:11, the very next verse (Acts 15:12) says:

Scripture mentions the silence immediately after Peter’s words finish.  This indicates that the multitude recognized the authority of St. Peter’s decision and position.  As non-Catholic commentator on Acts Darrell L. Bock admitted: “The assembly became silent (ἐσίγησεν, esigēsen) as a result of Peter’s remarks (an ingressive aorist, Moulton and Turner 1963: 71).” (Darrell L. Bock, Acts, 15:12.).

The particular proposal made by James, the local bishop of Jerusalem, that Gentile converts should abstain from food that has been sacrificed to idols, from blood and from what has been strangled, which the Apostles decided to adopt, was a recommendation involving Church discipline, not dogma.  It was a disciplinary measure adopted by the Church for that particular apostolic period, in which a single Church of Christ was forming from those who had observed the Old Law and Gentiles who had not.  However, it did not bind for all of Church history, unlike Peter’s dogmatic declaration about incorporating Gentiles into the Church.  Thus, Peter proclaimed the key doctrinal truth that would stand for all of Church history, not James. 

In the first part of James’ speech, he makes reference to what Simon Peter had already said. 

Using the Hebrew form of Simon (‘Simeon’), James refers to St. Peter’s speech near the beginning of his speech; yet, when Peter began to speak, he didn’t reference any other man.  He simply mentioned how God chose him.  Further, when James says Simeon 'expounded', the verb used in Greek is ἐξηγήσατo, a form of ἐξηγέομαι.  The verb can mean to expound or relate, and it was often used in antiquity for purporting to reveal divine things.  In fact, each time the verb is used in the New Testament, it refers to those who are reporting acts or statements of God or Heaven. The term 'exegesis' (ἐξήγησις in Greek) derives from the verb ἐξηγέομαι.  Thus one could translate Acts 15:14 as: “Simeon has exegeted how God first visited to take from the Gentiles a people for his name”.

A Protestant commentator named Adolph Schlatter noted that Josephus (the ancient historian) used the verb as a “technical term for the interpretation of the law as practiced by the rabbinate”.  The New Testament uses the verb six times, including for how Cornelius made the angel’s message known, and for how Paul and Barnabas, after Peter's speech at the Council, related God’s miracles in Acts 15:12.  So, when James references Peter's speech near the beginning of his speech, he describes Peter’s statement as an exegesis of God’s revelation on the Gentile issue.  That exegesis came first at the Council after Peter stood up and it silenced the assembly.

There are also the striking parallels between St. Peter's role at the Council in Acts 15 and King David's role at an assembly in Jerusalem in 1 Chronicles 28.  They are discussed in the video mentioned above on Galatians 2 and in our video called The Bible Proves The Papacy. 

Ireland & “Transgenderism”

"The Crime Problem Coming To Your Doorstep" - video

Here in Ireland, the government took all the assets and money from the bank accounts of a young teacher because he is speaking up and will not call a boy, a girl!.. The whole system is corrupt and are punishing all the family members who are rightfully speaking up against transgenderism!...

Mary W

St. Gregory of Nyssa: Bishops Receive The Key Through Peter

Eastern father St. Gregory of Nyssa taught that St. Peter uniquely received the key of Heaven, a fact denied by many Eastern “Orthodox”.