Pope Alexander VII Condemns Adhering To A Theological Opinion Just Because It Wasn’t Condemned

Many people who deny the necessity of faith in Jesus Christ and Catholicism for salvation attempt to justify their heretical opinion by appealing to certain liberal pre-Vatican II theologians – some from hundreds of years ago – whose writings or persons were not specifically condemned. They think that adherence to such writings is justified since those writings or persons were not condemned. However, by clinging to such writings in the face of the dogmatic teaching that establishes the absolute necessity of faith in Jesus Christ and Catholicism, they fall into the following condemned error.

As we can see, just because some opinion or writing has not been specifically condemned, one cannot necessarily hold it as “probable” (i.e. as a plausible opinion), if the Church’s magisterial teaching clearly contradicts it. Many John 3:5 mockers and heretics fall into this condemned proposition when they ignore the teaching of the Magisterium on salvation and obstinately cling to the false teaching of certain theologians who, for example, heretically taught that souls can be saved in non-Christian religions.

Biden, Dominated By Evil, Gives Award To Planned Parenthood President

Would Be Spiritually Lost Without MHFM’s Preaching

Biden gives "Medal of Freedom" to supporter of baby-killing, saying she: "carved an inspiring legacy"

… thank you so much for so courageously speaking the truth. I would literally and spiritually be lost without the preaching of the gospel MHFM does. I'll be forever grateful. I came across your material in Dec 2022 with the debate with Jeff Cassman. I had been in Novus Ordo, Charismatic and NO, then SSPX.

Susan