WHO conducts a 2-day pandemic simulation called "Exercise Polaris"

In a world still reeling from the aftermath of the COVID-19 scandal and a barrage of unlawful mandates, the World Health Organization (WHO) has once again taken center stage with a two-day pandemic simulation, Exercise Polaris. This latest drill, involving over 15 countries and 20 regional health agencies, has reignited debates about the true intentions behind such exercises. Health freedom advocates point out that these simulations are not merely about preparedness but are part of a broader agenda to exert control over global health narratives and policies. The same planning took place in 2019, right before the release of COVID-19.

Exercise Polaris, held last week, was designed to test the WHO’s Global Health Emergency Corps (GHEC), a framework aimed at strengthening countries’ emergency workforce, coordinating the deployment of surge teams and experts, and enhancing collaboration between nations. According to the WHO, the exercise involved more than 350 health emergency groups connected worldwide, simulating an outbreak of a fictional virus that spread across the globe.

Participating countries included Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Denmark, Ethiopia, Germany, Iraq, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mozambique, Nepal, Pakistan, Qatar, Somalia, Uganda, and Ukraine. Participating regional and international health agencies included the Africa CDC, European CDC, IFRC, IOM, UNICEF, the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, the Emergency Medical Teams initiative, Stand-by partners, and the International Association of National Public Health Institutes.

Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, emphasized the importance of global cooperation, stating, "Exercise Polaris shows that global cooperation is not only possible—it is essential." However, this rhetoric of unity and preparedness is met with skepticism by those who see the WHO as a global terrorist organization, particularly in light of the COVID-19 scandal. The obfuscation of the virus's origins and the push for gain-of-function research and predatory vaccine programs have raised serious ethical concerns.

The timing of Exercise Polaris is particularly noteworthy, given the history of similar simulations. In mid-October 2019, just months before the COVID-19 outbreak, Johns Hopkins University, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation organized Event 201, a pandemic exercise that eerily predicted the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. This so-called coincidence has led to widespread speculation about the role of these organizations is to create bio terror propaganda campaigns in advance and develop power structures that can coerce people to line up for new medical experiments.

These simulations are not coincidental but are part of a premeditated strategy to create the conditions for bio-surveillance and the implementation of unlawful medical mandates. The Biden's regime's focus in 2024, on preparing for a bird flu pandemic, further fuels these concerns, suggesting a pattern of orchestrated terror responses masquerading as preparedness.

Dr. Mike Ryan, Executive Director of WHO’s Health Emergencies Programme, claimed that Exercise Polaris "showed what is possible when countries operate with urgency and unity supported by well-connected partners." However, if the lessons of the COVID-19 scandal have taught us anything, it is that global "readiness" often serves as a facade for control rather than genuine protection.

The real threat, as history has shown, is not the next virus but who gets to declare it and prepare the vaccines for it. The WHO's role in declaring public health emergencies and guiding global responses has been fraught with controversy. The organization's close ties to pharmaceutical companies and the CCP, and its opaque decision-making processes have raised questions about its true motives.