Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |
Thinking Logically about the Antichrist
Bro. Peter Dimond
As a reaction to Antipope Francis' recent massive and astounding apostasy, we noticed that one person speculated that Antipope Francis is the Antichrist. No, he’s not. John Paul II was the Antichrist.
For those who don’t hold our view on this issue, consider these facts:
Basically all commentators agree that the Antichrist is the first beast of Revelation 13. That’s the beast who is 1) wounded, 2) whose image is honored, and 3) who is a king of Rome. Francis doesn't fit with any of the three.
But with whom do #'s 1, 2 and 3 fit? They fit precisely with John Paul II, of course (see the video below). John Paul II fits with all three and much more, in addition to proclaiming the signature doctrine of Antichrist: that he and everyone else is Christ. John Paul II was the Antichrist.
In fact, the reason the floodgates of Francis’ apostasy have fully opened in the past few weeks is that the worship of the Antichrist (John Paul II), which was instituted under Benedict XVI, is moving to its final stages with the upcoming and now announced ‘canonization.’
By the way, in Antipope Francis’ most recent interview, he makes it quite clear (once again) that he’s not one of the seven kings. He does so by condemning the ‘papal court’ and rejecting ‘courtiers.’ For the information on how the 'seven kings' play a key role in the Apocalypse, see the video above.
Moreover, it’s quite obvious to anyone with any conservatism that we are living through the apocalyptic Great Apostasy. (Indeed, in 1957 Sr. Lucia told Fr. Fuentes that we are in the end times.) Francis’ recent actions should have made that quite obvious to anyone who is even somewhat spiritually awake. So, think about this logically.
If you don't believe that John Paul II was the Antichrist, then your position amounts to this: there will be another great deception very soon (since it's clear to anyone who's even slightly awake that we are already in the Apocalypse), in which another king of Rome will deceive the world, be wounded, have his image honored/worshipped, and more. Is that plausible? No, it's not. Is it more plausible that John Paul II (who fits with all of those descriptions and so much more, as the video covers concerning the EU, its formation, etc.) was the Antichrist? It's obviously more plausible that John Paul II was the Antichrist. That's because he was.
Here’s a quick flashback of just a few statements from John Paul II, in which he proclaimed the signature doctrine of Antichrist: that he and everyone else is Jesus Christ, the incarnate Son of God (and therefore God).
JOHN PAUL II’S VERY FIRST HOMILY: THE ‘TRUTH ABOUT MAN’ IS THAT HE IS THE CHRIST OF MATTHEW 16
JOHN PAUL II’S FIRST ENCYCLICAL: CHRISTIANITY/THE GOSPEL IS THE AMAZEMENT AT MAN
JOHN PAUL II’S FIRST CHRISTMAS ADDRESS: CHRISTMAS, WHICH IS THE FEAST OF CHRIST, IS ACTUALLY THE FEAST OF MAN (BECAUSE, ACCORDING TO HIM, MAN IS CHRIST)
Here are a few other noteworthy quotes.
WHEN GOD REVEALED HIMSELF ON MT. SINAI, HE REVEALED MAN
MAN IS THE EUCHARIST
There’s much more in our article and video on the topic.
https://vaticancatholic.com/john-paul-ii-antichrist/
Sign up for our free e-mail list to see future vaticancatholic.com videos and articles.
Recent Content
^