The Right To Film Police Affirmed By Federal Court

Noel Brinkerhoff

allgov.com

Police in New Hampshire were wrong to arrest a woman trying to film a traffic stop, which constituted a violation of her First Amendment rights, a federal appellate court has ruled.

The First Circuit Court of Appeals found in a favor of Carla Gericke, who tried to record police in the town of Weare after her friend was pulled over in March 2010.

Standing 30 feet from the officer, Gericke pointed her video camera, which was later found to be not working and failed to record events. Sergeant Joseph Kelley did not instruct Gericke to put the camera away while dealing with her friend, Tyler Hanslin, who was stopped for a traffic violation.

But a second officer at the scene, Brandon Montplaisir, arrested Gericke for unlawful interception of oral communications and seized her camera.

The charges were later dropped. Gericke, however, filed a civil rights lawsuit against the officers and the town. The police failed to convince a federal judge that they were entitled to qualified immunity, prompting an appeal to the First Circuit.

There, a panel of judges ruled that Gericke was acting within her constitutional rights to film the traffic stop.

“Under Gericke’s account, she was permissibly at the site of the police encounter with Hanslin,” Judge Kermit Lipez wrote. “It would be nonsensical to expect Gericke to refrain from filming when such filming was neither unlawful nor the subject of an officer’s order to stop. In the absence of such restrictions, a reasonable police officer necessarily would have understood that Gericke was exercising a clearly established First Amendment right.”

to read more: allgov.com