Heresy of the Week, Week of 12/17/04
By Bro. Peter Dimond
For more see: Heresies of the Week Relating to “Traditional” Issues and Persons
Nicholas Gruner spews his vomit again
In the recently published Autumn 2004 issue of The Fatima Crusader, “Fr.” Nicholas Gruner states the following (bolding, underlining and italicization are my own):
“Fr.” Nicholas Gruner, The Fatima Crusader, Autumn, 2004, p. 14: “But we are told in Sacred Scripture that one third of those stars, at a future time, will be swept down, by the great red dragon at the service of the devil. And Pope John Paul II is telling us that time is now. He warns you to not follow the one third of the Catholic clergy, Cardinals and bishops and priests, who will lead you to hell. That is why they do not release the Third Secret to you.”
This is truly sickening. This is disgusting spiritual vomit from a dark soul who has compromised his way into profound spiritual blindness, whereby he doesn’t tell us that John Paul II is the most destructive apostate in the world who is leading the whole apostasy, but rather that John Paul II is warning us about the apostasy! Notice also the incredible intellectual dishonesty of Gruner, whereby he says that “they” don’t release the Third Secret to you! It is Antipope John Paul II who is responsible for withholding the Third Secret, not the bishops and priests under him. This is truly outrageous!
Tom Droleskey reveals the dark compromise at the heart of the acceptance of Antipope John Paul II and the Vatican II sect
In a recent issue of The Remnant, “traditionalist” Tom Droleskey made the following revealing admission (bolding and underlining are my own):
Dr. Thomas Droleskey, The Remnant, Nov. 30, 2004, p. 5: “One of the worst things I have ever done is to have written an editorial for The Wanderer in 1993 criticizing an article written by Edwin Faust in The Remnant about the state of the pontificate of Pope John Paul II at the fifteen year mark. I did not really disagree with Mr. Faust’s article. Truth be told, I agreed with it. I wrote my weak and indefensible rebuttal to ‘keep my place’ on the pages of The Wanderer and to maintain my ‘access’ to the Holy See. Hey, I had interviewed the Pope’s spokesman, Dr. Joaquin Navarro-Valls, just a few months before. Then Monsignor Stanislaw Dziwisz tapped me on the shoulder to serve as the lector for the Holy Father’s private Mass in his chapel on Wednesday, May 27, 1993. I was hot stuff, folks, or so I had convinced myself in vainglorious pride and stupidity. I was thus predisposed to violate my conscience and to write an article I knew I should not have written.”
What a dishonest man and what a horrible sin. He agreed with the article criticizing John Paul II, but wrote against it anyway and attempted to refute it simply because of human respect. This is disgusting. If Tom Droleskey were not still a heretic who is still misleading people, we would praise him for the acknowledgement of his past dishonesty and sin. But because he is still a heretic and because he still attacks the truth, this quote must be pointed out to show the impure motives at the heart of the compromise. Don’t doubt for a second that if these writers (not just Tom Droleskey, but the whole lot of them) were really for the truth and the salvation of souls, they would be calling John Paul II the total apostate and formal heretic that he is, and pointing out the teaching that a manifest heretic cannot be the Pope.
Sign up for our free e-mail list to see future vaticancatholic.com videos and articles.