Exposing Dave Landry, A False “Catholic”

"The Dave Landry Zone" [Pdf] –

a satire of true comments by a radical schismatic (3 pages, so you need to scroll down to see all of it)

AUDIO SERIES COMPLETELY REFUTING THE FALSE AND SCHISMATIC POSITIONS OF DAVE LANDRY

MHFM: We’ve received one too many e-mails from certain radical “traditionalist” schismatics, who spread their falsehoods and perversions of Catholic teaching in small groups.  So, we’ve decided to completely and thoroughly refute and expose them once and for all.  Here’s the series you need to hear if you’ve been exposed to them or to any of their arguments.  This series refutes all of their main arguments, including their many false accusations against us.  This series focuses on three “traditionalist” schismatics in particular: R.I., Dave L., and Frank.  However, the detailed points and issues that are covered apply to a vast array of similar schismatics and their false arguments.  These audios are listed in reverse order because our general readers will probably find Part 4 to be the most interesting.

Part 1- Introduction and quick background on these radical schismatics [9 min audio.]

A quick background on the schismatic Dave Landry and more.

Part 2 - In depth refutation of their false arguments regarding the Council of Basel and the salvation dogma [50 min. audio]

This section covers a number of detailed objections, including: the Council of Basel’s decree (was it dogmatic?); Quam Singulari; when does the baptized child of a Protestant become a schismatic or a heretic; a supposed “stumper” question concerning Martin Luther; their lies about our view of the salvation dogma; and a lot more.

Part 3 - Refutation of the Argument that Canonizations are not infallible by virtue of the teaching of Vatican I [20 min. audio]

How can canonizations be infallible if divine revelation ended with the death of the last apostle?  This section answers that question and refutes the heretical position of these schismatics.  It also refutes another objection that they launch concerning Pope Pius XII.

Part 4 - Exposing the demonic and shocking statements of the schismatic RI – the source for many strains of "traditionalist" schism [16 min. audio]

This section exposes the shocking statements of R.I.  Listen to the audio clips, including: his threats to kill those who don’t agree with him; how he would have someone blow a cat’s brains out as part of her penance; how he would torture St. Thomas Aquinas if he could; how he claims to be a prophet, but admittedly falsely identified the other “witness,” and more.  Most importantly, however, this section explains how this false prophet and non-Catholic schismatic was the source for much of the radical traditionalist schism that floats around now, in various forms.  He was the source of the schism even among those who don’t fully agree with him on all points, but apply portions of his demonic thought.  This is especially true concerning the rejection of canonizations, abjurations, etc. 

His heretical teaching was also the reason that a member of our community left our community a few years ago.  A few days before he left, this member of our community read this guy’s writing on Mass attendance and suddenly came to the conclusion that he was a “heretic,” and that had been committing many mortal sins against “the faith” each week.  He abruptly left.  (We will tell the true story of that in another audio coming up.  It will refute the totally false and very injurious lies that people are spreading, as if we have done something wrong when we have not.)  This former member of our community was a total supporter for over two years, but then it was as if he was called by the demonic teaching of this false prophet and he suddenly changed his entire theological viewpoint. 

INTRODUCTION ON DAVE LANDRY

Dave Landry is a radical schismatic who spreads his schismatic and heretical views in small groups.  A little background: about 2-3 years ago, Dave Landry was a sedevacantist.  He then denied the Catholic faith completely and returned to the Vatican II sect and all of its gross apostasy.  At the same time, Dave Landry returned to defending and attending the invalid New Mass.  Dave Landry thus completely denied Christ and all of Catholic teaching after having seen the full truth of the Catholic faith.  Think of all the evidence we have against the Vatican II sect.  Think about a person seeing all that and then going back to believing that it’s Catholic.  Think about the bad will that such an act entails.  That’s what he did. 

We do not begrudge anyone the chance to convert from darkness to light.  Everyone who is baptized goes from darkness to light.  However, when one goes from darkness to light and then to darkness again and then to another form of darkness, as we will see that he did, you are dealing with a man of bad will.  You are dealing with a blind guide.

This prideful heretic now mistakenly thinks that he can guide people to the true faith.  He did become a sedevacantist again.  However, since he is of bad will and his intentions are impure, he was led to a heretical bishop named Sanborn.  We see that Dave was again attracted to error.  Sanborn believes that Jews who reject Christ can be saved.  By his willingness to join Sanborn, after having seen the evidence exposing Sanborn’s heresies, Dave Landry demonstrated that he doesn’t care about Catholic dogma at all. 

Finally realizing that Sanborn was a heretic, Dave Landry abandoned him and started following an extremely radical schismatic named Frank.  Landry was once again attracted to that which is false and evil, as the audios expose.  Frank and Dave’s views now include that canonizations are not infallible (which amounts to the heresy that the Catholic Church officially errs), that pre-Vatican II popes (including Benedict XV, Pius XI, and Pius XII), were manifest heretics and not true popes, and much more.  For a short period of time, Dave Landry and Frank even concluded that Pope Leo XIII was not a true pope but a heretical antipope.  This was in the summer of 2009.  Simply put, he is a blind guide and a non-Catholic.  Dave Landry is led from deadly error to deadly error because he is not of the truth.  God resists the proud and the vain, and gives His grace to the humble (James 4:6).  Dave Landry currently embraces numerous schismatic views.  The audio series above addresses, and completely refutes, his current false, heretical and schismatic views.

Dave Landry also has an extreme problem with vanity and impurity of intention.  He only called up here and repeatedly mentioned (to Sister Ann) how “tall and good-looking” he thinks he is; but he also said that he would, for that reason, make a “big impact” when he became a priest.  He also said that he was “well built.”  Think about the vanity involved in coming out and saying that to someone.  It’s shows that he is so full of himself that he cannot contain it.  No wonder he is not filled with God.  He made these statements a few positions ago, at the very time that he agreed with one of the independent bishop Sanborn.   At that time he thought that it was “Catholic” to join that bishop to become a priest.  The file above is a satire of true comments that he made.   This is a must read for all who are familiar with this individual.  It’s very funny.

P.S. ON HIS DISHONESTY

The audios above thoroughly refute these radical schismatics, including Dave Landry.  We would like to mention one other point.  Dave Landry spreads his schismatic views while frequently mixing them with some truth on the salvation dogma and similar issues.  Most of the true information that he rehashes on such issues comes from the material that he’s seen in our books and on our website. 

He also makes many false accusations.  These stem from his pride, his bad will and his lack of understanding of Catholic issues.  He is also extremely dishonest.  I will provide just one example of this, besides those mentioned in the audios. 

Dave Landry was arguing with some salvation heretics about the early Church fathers and the necessity of water baptism.  He was quoting many passages from our book, Outside the Catholic Church There is Absolutely No Salvation.  He was citing the passages from our book to demonstrate that the early fathers held that all men must be baptized to be saved.  Not surprisingly, he did not say that the quotes he was using were taken from our book.  He didn’t want to give us any credit, of course.  He was then confronted by these baptism of desire heretics.  They claimed, as they are wont to do, that the quotes were “out of context.”  They claimed that the quotes gave a misleading view of the tradition.  This is not true.  Not knowing how to refute this complete lie, because he didn’t do the research (Bro. Peter Dimond did), he then said essentially: well, I trusted the Dimonds’ book and now I realize that they are very dishonest even on an issue about which they are correct. 

What an outrage!  This is not only false, but so evil and despicable that it’s almost beyond words.  Notice that he only mentioned that he was taking the quotes from our book when he thought he was refuted.  He felt that he could lay the blame for an error on our part.  But when he thought that the quotes proved his point and made him look good, he used them without giving us any credit.  We only got mentioned as the source when he thought that it would relieve him of an error and make us look bad.  Interesting… isn’t it?  That happens to us a lot.  It happens because so many people are of bad will and the Devil hates the truth we are putting out.  The fact of the matter is that the quotes aren’t taken out of context.  To claim otherwise is a load of nonsense.

Since Dave Landry didn’t do the actual research, he is ignorant of the issue.  He doesn’t possess the real, first-hand knowledge which comes in long periods of study, and having spent much time reading and compiling the quotes.  Instead, he was only pasting them from our book without any credit.  For that reason, he doesn’t know how to refute the common lies of the baptism of desire advocates when they come up.  So, like a heretical tower of sand, he cowered and caved immediately when he was attacked with their pathetically false argument.  With nowhere to run, he tried to blame us.  To add insult to injury, their accusation was COMPLETELY FALSE and it could have been refuted if he possessed some real honesty and knowledge of the issue.  This is amazing injustice.  It was all done to us by heretics on the left and evil, dishonest, pride-filled, blind, lying radical hell-hounds on the right… but they won’t get away with it before the Judgment Seat of Christ.