| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
Gregory XIV Threatened Excommunication For Supporting Calvinist
In January 1591 Pope Gregory XIV “renewed all former decrees against [then Calvinist] Henry of Navarre as a relapsed heretic, who because of that status had lost his right of succession to the French throne, and told the French bishops they must withdraw all support from Henry within fifteen days or be excommunicated and lose their dioceses.” (Warren H. Carroll, The Cleaving Of Christendom, p. 443)
Recently Left
I recently left the counter church of the V2 sect…
S P
Capitalizing on the hype surrounding Antipope Francis’ current health status, false traditionalist Taylor Marshall (who posts some truth but has misled many people with disastrously false conclusions) recently published a click-bait video in which he scandalously calls the notorious heretic Francis “Pope Francis”, and he doesn’t even mention that Francis needs to convert to the Catholic faith in order to be saved. Marshall’s act was outrageous because the notorious heretic (and promoter of sodomy) Antipope Francis is obviously not the pope, and he is guilty of countless public mortal sins against the faith (as our material documents). As just one example of many that could be cited:
Antipope Francis, Sep 13, 2024: "Every religion is a way to arrive at God... There is only one God, and each of us is a language, so to speak, in order to arrive at God. Sikh, Muslim, Hindu, Christian, they are different paths."
Thus, Francis must not be called “Pope”. Further, Marshall himself said this in 2022 (when he was trying to appeal to a more conservative audience that was fed up with Francis’ constant heresies, such as his participation in a demonic prayer to the “sacred circle of spirits”): “I do not see how Francis Bergoglio can be the Vicar of Christ.” (July 29, 2022) So much for that statement.
Marshall, who wants to please men more than God, knows that calling him “Pope Francis” at this time (and praying for his supposedly “holy death”) – without specifically mentioning that Francis needs to convert to the faith and repent of his abominations in order to be forgiven – is more palatable to people and will be a popular message. Yet, it compromises the truth that Francis is not the pope and cannot possibly have a holy death unless he repents and converts to the Catholic faith. Marshall is going to be shocked when, barring a conversion (for which we hope), he is condemned by God and discovers that such compromises and misrepresentations of the truth aren’t tolerated by God (especially in one who wants to be a teacher (James 3:1). These matters are extremely serious, and people must tell the full truth without compromise. His public act of praying specifically for the “holy death” of “Pope Francis” (without the aforementioned clarifications) may seem to be charitable to those who don’t care about the Catholic faith. But it’s not. It’s phoniness. It’s false charity that compromises the faith. Yes, one may pray for any person who is still alive. But in the case of the notorious heretic Antipope Francis (whose public mortal sins and heresies are numerous and the damage he’s done incalculable), it’s scandalous to call him pope. Further, any public prayer conducted for him in particular would have to include the clarification that it’s for his conversion to the Catholic faith which he has publicly denied and does not profess.
We’ve posted in article form some of the key quotes from this video: Fr. Ripperger, SSPX, FSSP, CMRI, Etc. Promote Grave Errors – Refuted By Cistercian Theologian. Those quotes include interesting passages from a Cistercian theologian named Pedro De Lorca who died in the 17th century. Based on Scripture and Catholic dogma (such as the Council of Florence), he correctly taught that no Catholic will dare to hold that any non-Christian can be saved without faith in Christ. This truth of the Church is rejected by almost all so-called traditionalist priests today during the Great Apostasy.
Pedro De Lorca, Commentaria, et disputationes in Secundam secundae Divi Thomae, edition 1614, p. 122: “Let the second reason [that explicit faith in Christ is necessary] be the fact that, by my reckoning, no Catholic will dare to concede at this time that any non-Christian can be saved. But no one is a Christian except by explicit faith, for in this the Christian differs from the Jew. Otherwise, a Jew could be called a Christian if indeed he professes implicit faith in Christ.”
When time permits, we also plan (God willing) to bring out even more evidence to refute the dishonest attempts made by some to evade this truth and confuse people about the Church’s teaching on this matter.
Enlightening Video
Novus Ordo Supporter Demolished On Loss Of Office & Heresy
Very enlightening video. It boggles the mind how anyone could sincerely believe that Francis is anything other than a pernicious heresiarch and destroyer of souls.
Justin
Comment
Did The Bible Predict 70 Years Without A Pope?
Remarkable presentation…
Zach
It’s What Scripture Teaches
The Bible Teaches That Few Are Saved
This is such a terrifying prospect, but it is the way that I have understood the scriptures also… Combine this video with the MHFM… videos about hell, and it brings one to a very straightforward idea of what life needs to be about… Thank you for this video.
Zach
Many John 3:5 mockers not only continue to push the false idea of “baptism of desire”, but they pertinaciously promote the demonstrably wrong explanation of the false theory of “baptism of desire” that was advanced by certain saints and theologians. That theory – which wrongly applies a concept that’s applicable to penance and the recovery of justification to first justification – is that some people can be saved by a “baptism of desire” which does not remove the temporal punishment due to sin and therefore does not confer the grace of baptism or regeneration. Consequently they hold that someone could die with a “baptism of desire” and be saved but still might have to suffer in Purgatory for past sins because the temporal punishment due to sin wasn’t taken away by the “baptism of desire”. But that explanation is demonstrably wrong because it’s dogmatically defined (and directly taught by Jesus) that no one can be saved (or initially justified) without having received the grace of regeneration, in which a person became a new creation and all temporal punishment due to sin was removed. Despite the flagrant contradiction between Catholic teaching and the aforementioned explanation of “BOD”, they still won’t abandon the aforementioned explanation/position. Since they obstinately cling to a view that is clearly opposed to dogmatic teaching, that proves that they are worshippers of man with no fidelity to or belief in Catholic teaching. God rejects such people. You can read more about that particular problem of the false theory of “baptism of desire” here: https://vaticancatholic.com/best-argument-baptism-desire/
The grace of Baptism, which completely regenerates the soul, is also called regeneration or being “born again”. The effect of this grace is the remission of every sin and all temporal punishment due to sin (de fide definita: see Florence and Trent below). Since the grace of Baptism not only remits all sin, but also all the temporal punishment due to sin, thus making the person a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17; Eph. 4:24), it’s certain that someone who would die immediately after receiving the grace of Baptism would go straight to Heaven. Someone dying in that state would not need to go to Purgatory or suffer any punishment for past sins. That was explicitly defined by the Councils of Florence and Trent.
Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439: “Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life… The effect of this sacrament is the remission of every fault, original and actual, and also of every punishment which is owed for the fault itself. Therefore to the baptized no satisfaction is to be enjoined for past sins; but dying, before they commit any fault, they immediately (statim) attain the kingdom of heaven and the vision of God.”
Latin -“… sanctum baptisma, quod vitae spiritualis ianua est… Huius sacramenti effectus est remissio omnis culpae originalis et actualis, omnis quoque poenae, quae pro ipsa culpa debetur. Propterea baptizatis nulla pro peccatis praeteritis iniungenda est satisfactio: sed morientes antequam culpam aliquam committant, statim ad regnum coelorum et Dei visionem perveniunt.”
Council of Trent, Sess. 5, Original Sin, # 5, ex cathedra: “If any one denies, that, by the grace of Our Lord Jesus Christ, which is conferred in baptism, the guilt of original sin is remitted; or even asserts that the whole of that which has the true and proper nature of sin is not taken away; but says that it is only erased, or not imputed; let him be anathema. FOR, IN THOSE WHO ARE BORN AGAIN, there is nothing that God hates; because, there is no condemnation to those who are truly buried together with Christ by baptism into death; who walk not according to the flesh, but, putting off the old man, and putting on the new who is created according to God, are made innocent, immaculate, pure, guiltless, and beloved of God, heirs indeed of God, but joint heirs with Christ; in such a manner that absolutely nothing may delay them from entry into heaven.”
Council of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 3: “But though He died for all, yet all do not receive the benefit of His death, but those only to whom the merit of His passion is communicated; because as truly as men would not be born unjust, if they were not born through propagation of the seed of Adam, since by that propagation they contract through him, when they are conceived, injustice as their own, SO UNLESS THEY WERE BORN AGAIN IN CHRIST THEY WOULD NEVER BE JUSTIFIED, since by that new birth through the merit of His passion the grace by which they become just is bestowed upon them.”
Notice, you must be born again to be saved, and that rebirth necessarily includes the removal of all temporal punishment due to sin. "Baptism of Desire" does not confer that grace. That's another proof that it's false.
For Those Who Are Sad Or Depressed
James 5:13- “Is any one of you sad? Let him pray.”
Tristatur aliquis vestrum? oret.
We are close to finishing a very important video, God willing. Some other videos are also close to completion, but will not be uploaded until after the aforementioned video is published. We hope that it will be done soon.
It’s interesting that outside of Gemelli Hospital in Rome, Italy, where Antipope Francis is currently located, there is a large statue of Antipope John Paul II where he is venerated by people.
That’s another example of the veneration of the image of the beast (the one who proclaimed that man is God in the Temple of God, was wounded, was the sixth king, had his image honored, etc.), as explained in our videos:
https://endtimes.video/apocalypse-now-in-the-vatican/
https://endtimes.video/temple-of-god-vatican-prophecy-antichrist/
Our recent short video on the declaration of Pope St. Zosimus, who authoritatively taught the universal Church that “absolutely no one” (nullus omnino) is forgiven without baptism, has been posted in article form. You can find it at this link:
No One Can Be Forgiven Without This – Catholic Teaching
This very important declaration of the Chair of St. Peter further powerfully confirms that we are correct on the absolute necessity of baptism, and that the position we defend is the teaching of the Church. It’s what’s taught in all definitive acts of the Magisterium.
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
