| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party. This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments. Section containing some important recent posts. E-Exchange Archives.
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Pt. II-II, Q. 140, A. 1, Reply to Obj. 1: “The Old Testament contained temporal promises, while the promises of the New Testament are spiritual and eternal, according to Augustine (Contra Faust. 4). Hence in the Old Law there was need for the people to be taught how to fight, even in a bodily contest, in order to obtain an earthly possession. But in the New Testament men were to be taught how to come to the possession of eternal life by fighting spiritually, according to Matthew 11:12: The Kingdom of Heaven suffers violence, and the violent bear it away. Hence Peter commands: Your adversary, the devil, as a roaring lion goes about seeking whom he may devour. Resist him, strong in faith. Also James 4:7: Resist the devil, and he will fly from you. Since, however, men while tending to spiritual goods may be withdrawn from them by corporal dangers, precepts of fortitude had to be given even in the New Law, that they might bravely endure temporal evils, according to Matthew 10:28: For not them who kill the body.”
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Pt. II-II, Q. 169, A. 2: “But those women who have no husband nor wish to have one, or who are in a state of life inconsistent with marriage, cannot without sin desire to give lustful pleasure to those men who see them, because this is to incite them to sin. And if indeed they adorn themselves with this intention of provoking others to lust, they sin mortally; whereas if they do so from frivolity, or from vanity for the sake of ostentation, it is not always mortal, but sometimes venial. And the same applies to men in this respect… [Reply to Obj. 1]… whence we are given to understand that women are not forbidden to adorn themselves soberly and moderately but [are forbidden] to do so excessively, shamelessly, and immodestly.”
… I'm a huge fan of your work. I have discovered your content during the course of my graduate theology studies at a "Catholic" university, when I started to notice something was up with the Vatican II church and began seeking answers. Your material has proved invaluable to my journey towards the truth…
Tim F.
“St. Vincent De Paul” And Albany “LGBT Catholic Churches” Exposed
… awesome exposé series.
Jeffery
“St. Vincent De Paul” And Albany “LGBT Catholic Churches” Exposed
These are the Days of Noah again.
G
“St. Vincent De Paul” And Albany “LGBT Catholic Churches” Exposed
What an abomination, and they didn't even have a tabernacle anywhere near their altar. Man is God in their eyes.
Antonio Eligius
“St. Vincent De Paul” And Albany “LGBT Catholic Churches” Exposed
This is the end result of Francis' "who am I to judge" heresy.
Kristian
“St. Vincent De Paul” And Albany “LGBT Catholic Churches” Exposed
It's unbelievable how many of these "LGBTQ Churches" there are in just your home State alone! So many that it requires a whole series to expose! And people will still look the other way and call this the Catholic Church. Insane!!
General
Many people cite Jesus’ words in Matthew 25 about the Last Judgment to argue that people can be saved without the Catholic faith, if they practice corporal works of mercy.
Matthew 25:31-42: “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. And he will place the sheep on his right, but the goats on the left. Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink? And when did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you? And when did we see you sick or in prison and visit you?’ And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’ Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink’…”
Their interpretation is false, of course, since no one can be saved without the true faith. In commenting on this passage, St. Robert Bellarmine teaches that Mt. 25 only describes the judgment of those who are in the Church, and that it’s not about unbelievers (who are necessarily lost without the true faith). The fact that Mt. 25 is perfectly consistently with the truth that no one is saved without the Catholic faith is dogmatically established by the Council of Florence, which references the passage in the very paragraph in which it declares that all who die outside the Church are not saved.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Amissione Gratiae et Statu Peccati, Book 6, Chap. 5: “… but in the Gospel of Matthew (Chap. 25) there is only described the form by which those who are in the Church will be judged... For infidels are customarily compared to wolves and dogs in the Scriptures rather than goats. Also, that reason for their eternal punishment: ‘I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat…’ etc. quite clearly indicates that this form of judgment should be referred to the faithful alone, seeing that they are not denounced because they lacked the proper faith, but because they did not exhibit the works of the faith. Finally, since the Gospel pertains to the faithful alone, and since none has faith in the Gospel except the faithful, there was no need in the Gospel to describe the form in which infidels will be judged, but it was sufficient to make the general statement: He who does not believe, will be condemned (Mark 16); and: He who believes not in the Son will not see life (John 3); and with regard to children: The fault of one man resulted in condemnation for all men (Rom. 5).”
Philippians 2:6-7 “… who, although he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men.”
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Christo, Book 1, Chap. 6: “But the common exposition of all the other ancients and more recent ones is that the form of God [in Phil. 2:6] signifies the essence of God.”
St. Thomas Aquinas, Commentary On Philippians 2: “He says, therefore: who, namely, Christ, though he was in the form of God. For it is through its form that a thing is said to be in a specific or generic nature; hence the form is called the nature of a thing. Consequently, to be in the form of God is to be in the nature of God. By this is understood that He is true God: [‘That we may be in his true Son, Jesus Christ’ (1 Jn. 5:20)]. However, it should not be supposed that the form of God is one thing and God himself another, because in simple and immaterial things, and especially in God, the form is the same as that whose form it is.”
Fr. Ripperger: Ecumenist And Deceiver Exposed – And Why He Was “Silenced”
Another outstanding exposition by MHFM of the false Vatican II deceiver Chad Ripperger.
Francis
Awesome video, well done.
Bruno
In John 3, Jesus proclaimed that everyone must be reborn of water and the Spirit to be saved. The Catholic Church teaches that these words are a dogma without exception.
Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439: “Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church. And since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5]. The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water.”
Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Sess. 5, Can. 4, On Original Sin: “By one man sin entered into the world, and by sin death... so that in them there may be washed away by regeneration, what they have contracted by generation, ‘For unless a man is born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God’ [John 3:5].”
Some people, including certain non-Catholics, object that this proclamation of Jesus does not exclude babies who die in the womb of their mother from salvation because Jesus' statement about “rebirth” only applies to people who have been born the first time, and children in the womb have not yet been born. However, that objection is refuted by recognizing that, in the New Testament, the Greek verb γεννάω (gennaō) – which carries the meanings of “to beget”, “to bring forth” and “to be born” – is used to refer both to children in the womb and to children who have come forth from the womb. This is proven by Matthew 1:20, which uses the word γεννηθὲν (a passive participle of the verb γεννάω) to refer to Our Lord who was still in the womb of Our Lady.
Matthew 1:20 “But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, ‘Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is born [conceived/ γεννηθὲν] in her is from the Holy Spirit.’”
Yet, the same verb is used in various places of the New Testament to refer to children who have come forth from the wombs of their mothers (e.g Matthew 2:1; Acts 7:20; etc.). So, according to the New Testament, every child conceived and vivified by a soul, whether inside or outside the womb, has been “born” in that sense and will not be saved unless it is reborn of water and the Spirit. However, baptism is not to be performed until a child comes forth from the womb of the mother.
Fr. Ripperger: Ecumenist And Deceiver Exposed – And Why He Was “Silenced”
Thank you so much for the truth this video was essential.
Elizabeth Mckinnon
Fr. Ripperger: Ecumenist And Deceiver Exposed – And Why He Was “Silenced”
This one was needed. For a long time, Ripperger was the end-all-be-all of Catholicism/tradition for me. But the video speaks for itself.
Materdolorosa
Fr. Ripperger: Ecumenist And Deceiver Exposed – And Why He Was “Silenced”
… Outstanding…
Daniel
Fr. Ripperger: Ecumenist And Deceiver Exposed – And Why He Was “Silenced”
Excellent video!!...
Robert Pina
Fr. Ripperger: Ecumenist And Deceiver Exposed – And Why He Was “Silenced”
The clip of Wojtyla drinking the witch's potion always gets me. He looks like he really enjoys it too. Classic!
Roc
MHFM: That's just the tip of the iceberg on John Paul II's apostasy and complete religious indifferentism. For much more, see our recent video on Assisi and our other videos. So, when Ripperger considers him to be a "saint" and a "powerful intercessor", he's revealing that he's extremely diabolically deluded, heretical, and really just clueless about the current situation (the blind leading the blind).
In this clip a CMRI supporter blatantly denies the Catholic Church’s defined dogma on salvation. He explicitly states that they’re not saying that all Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus are damned and that “we don’t know” if such people are saved. Well, the Church has already settled this issue. It has dogmatically defined that all who die as Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus (i.e. as pagans) are lost (Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino”) and that the Catholic faith is required for salvation. People like him are simply not Catholic, even though they purport to be staunch traditionalists when they aren’t. This is also why such heretical groups (and the heretical rogue priests who lead them into heresy) have such an animosity toward true Catholics who actually believe in the Church’s teaching on salvation and baptism.
“The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.” (Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino”, 1441)
Fr. Juan de Maldonado was a Spanish Jesuit theologian who died in 1583. He admitted that Pope St. Siricius and important Church father St. Gregory Nazianzen (who is named the Theologian) rejected “baptism of desire”. The fact that they rejected “baptism of desire” is obvious to any honest person who reads what Pope St. Siricius and St. Gregory actually wrote on the matter. However, many John 3:5 mockers are so dishonest that they won’t even admit that Pope St. Siricius and St. Gregory the Theologian denied “baptism of desire”. Hence, a statement from a theologian who acknowledged this is noteworthy. Note that Maldonado presumes that the aforementioned individuals believed that martyrdom could replace baptism, but there’s no proof for his assertion and his statement on this point can be disregarded. The Church’s teaching demonstrates that all the martyrs in Heaven received the Sacrament of Baptism (see Pope Benedict XII, Benedictus Deus) and that no one is saved without rebirth of water and the Spirit. See this video: 2,000 Years Of Infallible Papal Teaching On Baptism’s Absolute Necessity.
Fr. Juan Maldonado, Opera varia theologica, Vol. 1, 1677 (De Baptismo, Q. 4), p. 59: “Among the ancients there were some who insisted on baptism itself so strictly that they thought everyone perished who died either unbaptized or not by a martyr’s death. Of this opinion was the author of the book On Ecclesiastical Doctrines, chapter 74: ‘We do not believe that a catechumen has life, even if he died in good works.’ So also Pope [Siricius] in his letter to the bishop of Tarragona, and Gregory of Nazianzus in the oration on holy baptism [Oration 40].”
Also, it wasn’t just Pope St. Siricius (in his decree to Himerius) and St. Gregory the Theologian who rejected “baptism of desire”. The early Church itself did, as we showed in the aforementioned video by citing Pope St. Leo the Great, Pope St. Zosimus, and more.
Joe Heschmeyer (“Shameless Popery”) Confronted By Bro. Peter Dimond About Vatican II
This video is absolutely fantastic, so well documented and should be passed on the many nonCatholics across the world!...
Daniel Woods
Joe Heschmeyer (“Shameless Popery”) Confronted By Bro. Peter Dimond About Vatican II
This was an excellent refutation of Joe and the Vatican II position. God bless MHFM!
Evan Gallion
Joe Heschmeyer (“Shameless Popery”) Confronted By Bro. Peter Dimond About Vatican II
… This was much needed…
Watrew
Joe Heschmeyer (“Shameless Popery”) Confronted By Bro. Peter Dimond About Vatican II
Thank you! You just answered something I always wondered about. When I was a baptized protestant I continued to live in mortal sin of all kinds. Then when I entered the catholic church I felt a grace so strong I abandoned my former bad lifestyle. Next I started feeling that vatican 2 was terribly wrong and here I am listening to and agreeing with you. I always wondered so much about this and I am so glad to have an answer now.
Jodi
In his papal bull, Ubi Primum, Pope Clement XI proclaimed a universal Jubilee against the Turks (i.e. the Muslims).
Pope Clement XI, Ubi Primum, May 31, 1715, Proclaiming a universal Jubilee against the Turks (i.e. the Muslims): “… first we have not ceased to cry out to God with our whole heart in our private sacrifices that He might pour out His wrath against the nations which have not known Him and against the Kingdoms which have not invoked His name [Psalm 79:6]…”
The psalm that he cites [Psalm 79] is about nations that do not have the Lord as their God. The pope applies it to the Muslims. That further demonstrates (from papal teaching) that Muslims do not worship the true God.
As we covered in our important video, John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation, John Paul II specifically stated that the Assisi World Day Of Prayer – which featured pagans, idolaters and representatives from all the major false religions of the world – was a visible illustration of the teaching of Vatican II.
John Paul II, To the Roman Curia, Dec. 22, 1986, #7: “The event of Assisi can thus be considered as a visible illustration, a concrete example, a catechesis, intelligible to all, of what is presupposed and signified by the commitment to ecumenism and to the interreligious dialogue which was recommended and promoted by the Second Vatican Council.”
John Paul II, To the Roman Curia, Dec. 22, 1986, #9: “The day of prayer at Assisi, showing the Catholic Church holding the hands of brother Christians, and showing us all joining hands with the brothers of other religions, was a visible expression of these statements of the Second Vatican Council [Lumen Gentium 16; Nostra Aetate 2].”
This is one of the worst Vatican II Sect churches in the country.
“St. Paul The Apostle” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed
How appalling it is to see so much sodomy in these latter times. Thank you, MHFM, for exposing these heretics. You were instrumental in my conversion to the true faith. God bless you.
Tradred
“St. Paul The Apostle” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed
Thanks for teaching us about the faith and bringing souls like me to the true faith... May our Lord bless you and always grant you wisdom.
Jarod Valdivia
“St. Paul The Apostle” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed
Thank you! Absolutely excellent effects- in example, the demons being let loose from hell - so much so that I came away with fear in my heart for these people. I mean a palpable sense of how satanically influenced this group of “ individuals “ are. I understood so much from this video and i could write paragraphs about it all, but suffice it to say that PRIDE is of Lucifer.
TheJet
Importance
“St. Paul The Apostle” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed
Another video of grave importance for the Vatican II Sect adherents who stubbornly persist in their wayward belief that such desecrated churches hold the Apostolic Faith. Deo Gratias! And thank you, brothers!
Jackson
Shocking
“St. Paul The Apostle” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed
This is shocking…
TheLoneStar
This is a very important video. We recommend that people watch it all the way through.
Clarity
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
Perfect clarity... Amen. The man always gave me the willies from day 1 of his anti‐pontificate. A plastic banana that could not be mistaken for the real thing at 100 paces. And when he was "con-anized" by another phony baloney "christian" ... well, that was my hard kick out the door of the V2 NO "church." I would rather wander around homeless praying the rosary than witness much less partake of the routine scandals and blasphemies that occur in the fake church, and others (heretical sects) like it.
Saorael
Comment
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
I am so grateful to MHFM for their teaching on the true faith and for opening our eyes to the truth about what is going on in the fake Novus Order church, may God bless your Holy work in exposing the truth about the fake church and all its Evil deeds, I would also like to thank you for [helping] my soul and the souls of all my family…
Paul S.
Trent vs. Faustina Divine Mercy
Why The “Divine Mercy” Messages Of Faustina Are Actually Protestant
Amazing quote from the Council of Trent using the words "Divine Mercy". Also, Faustina's message about an "Abyss of mercy", Abyss is not a word we use. Like a black hole. Very dark.
Evan Daniels
Denis the Carthusian was a prominent 15th century theologian and biblical commentator. He lived at the time of the Council of Florence. He emphatically taught that no one at all can be saved without faith in Jesus Christ and that all the non-Christians, such as the Muslims, will not be saved unless they convert. This is just one example of many statements he makes on the matter.
Denis the Carthusian (1452), Contra Perfidiam Mahometi, Book 4, Art. 5 (Opera Omnia, Vol. 36, p. 418):
“Know therefore, O Saracens [Muslims], that you are most certainly in a state of eternal damnation, and you cannot be saved except by believing in Christ and obeying Him.”
On Oct. 1, 2026, Antipope Leo XIV met with members of the Lutheran World Federation in the Vatican. During the meeting he praised the notoriously heretical Vatican-Lutheran Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification.
Leo XIV, Address To The Delegation Of The Lutheran World Federation, Oct. 1, 2026: “I am pleased that the Lutheran-Catholic relations have matured both spiritually and theologically over the decades. The international dialogue, now in its sixth phase, has yielded important insights. A milestone in the ecumenical journey was certainly the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification.”
The 1999 Vatican-Lutheran Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification is a manifestly heretical document. It teaches that the Lutherans are no longer condemned for denying the Council of Trent and that Trent’s anathemas no longer apply to them. It asserts that the following Lutheran heresies (among others) are not condemned: justification by faith alone; that humans are incapable of cooperating in their salvation; and that justified persons remain “totally sinners” (Martin Luther’s idea). Simply put, it’s a denial and an abandonment of the Council of Trent and the true biblical doctrine of justification. Anyone who approves it is a manifest heretic. It was affirmed by Antipopes John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now Leo XIV. We have articles and videos about this heretical agreement, such as: The Vatican II Sect’s Protestant Revolution: The 1999 Joint Declaration With The Lutherans On Justification Exposed In Just A Few Pages.
Taken in isolation, this agreement would be apocalyptic. Yet the Vatican II Sect is now so heretical that Antipope Leo XIV can make a statement praising this notorious agreement and hardly anyone in the Vatican II Counter Church even bats an eye. It’s truly a false Church.
During his meeting with the Lutherans, Antipope Leo XIV also of course prayed with them. That’s a public mortal sin and a further manifestation of his heterodoxy.
Leo XIV, Address To The Delegation Of The Lutheran World Federation, Oct. 1, 2026: “Dear brothers and sisters, united in this shared ecumenical and missionary task, I would like to thank you once again for your visit. Let us renew our commitment to unity by praying together now as the Lord has taught us.”
2,000 Years Of Infallible Papal Teaching On Baptism’s Absolute Necessity
Dear Brothers,
Your video, "2,000 Years of Infallible Papal Teaching on Baptism's Absolute Necessity For Salvation" presents the full historical picture regarding this crucial sacrament, and totally destroys the [false doctrines] of BOD/BOB. It also reveals the malice and the artifice of obstinate heretics who - regardless of when they live, or which heresy they're pushing - all work for the destruction of the true Catholic faith, whether they realize it or not.
Many years ago when I was going to an SSPX Chapel, I sent an email to an SSPX priest I knew which included the infallible pronouncement by Pope Eugene IV that there is no salvation outside the Church - even if one outside the Church were to pour out his blood for the Name of Christ! The priest did reply to me, but made no reference to the infallible papal statement I quoted; he just ignored it… It's not surprising that the SSPX accepts the V2 Sect and accepts it's leaders as "popes". Nor is it surprising that Almighty God allows them to have this great deception. Like all protestants, they don't want to hear popes who reveal the divine truths and therefore would have to be obeyed. No, this end-times system of antipopes works well for the SSPX. While claiming to be Catholic, and even traditional, they can obey - or disobey - these antipopes whenever they please. What a scam. The Vatican 2 'religion' (held by almost everyone claiming to be "Catholic" today) is just the largest, most virulent, and last form of Protestantism which, in these lasts days, is occupying the property of the Catholic Church, as the Bible predicts it would. The Vatican 2 Sect (like all false religions which it embraces) is and has been organized and animated by its founder - the proud Satan, first heretic & first protestant - working through the agency of the Unfaithful...
Lee Ann
In 1554 Pope Julius III published a constitution against people who blaspheme in Rome. He laid down punishments that would be incurred for the sin, and he gave authority to the inquisitors to implement what he legislated.
Pope Julius III, Constitution “In Multis Depravatis Moribus”, Feb. 1, 1554:
“There is nothing that wounds and pierces our mind more than the horrible and impious blasphemy of the divine name, intolerable to Christian ears. When we hear that the most sacred name of God and of Jesus Christ our Lord — a name which the things of heaven venerate above every name, the things of earth adore, and the things below tremble at, and which, because of its sublimity and majesty, ought not to be taken lightly by anyone — is everywhere torn by the voices of wicked and savage men, and is likewise rent, together with the name of his most holy Mother and of the venerable saints and friends of the supreme God himself, by detestable blasphemies and curses, it is little wonder if the scourges of divine wrath are not lifted from Christian peoples set in such great calamities, since, according to the saying of the Wise Man, the plague will not depart from the house of a man who swears much…
2. Those who blaspheme, namely God the Father almighty, or his only-begotten Son, our Lord and Redeemer Jesus Christ, or the Holy Spirit, whether particularly and expressly or generally and implicitly, by attributing to the Divine Majesty things that in no way befit it, or by removing what is proper to it, if convicted for the first time, shall, if rich, be compelled to pay forty gold scudi; if poor, they shall pay ten; and if they cannot pay these sums, they shall suffer the penalty in their persons. For those convicted a second time, whether noble, rich, or poor, the pecuniary penalty shall be doubled in proportion to the first fine of this kind, and they shall moreover incur infamy and incapacity to obtain any benefices, ranks, dignities, and honors. For those of low condition who are convicted, the tongue shall be pierced. For nobles convicted a third time, whether rich or poor, the pecuniary penalty shall be tripled respectively, as above. Furthermore, they shall by the law itself be deprived of ecclesiastical benefices and of all offices whatsoever, of dignities, titles, magistracies, and honors; they shall be incapable of making or receiving a will; they shall be incapable of giving testimony; and they shall be publicly banished from the City for three years. For those of low condition, flogging or consignment to the galleys for three years shall be imposed, and they shall be exiled in perpetuity.
3. The same shall be observed against those who blaspheme the most blessed Mother of our Lord Jesus Christ himself, Mary ever Virgin. 4. Those who blaspheme the male or female saints of God shall be severely corrected, at the discretion of the lord judges, regard being had to the nature and gravity of the crime, together with the other circumstances that the law requires to be considered.”
MHFM: If there is a Catholic in the area of Brisbane, Australia, who is wiling to help with a baptism, please e-mail us at [email protected].
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
After decades of searching for the Faith, God led me to Most Holy Family and Catholicism. I am forever grateful for God's direction and protection. Thank you, brothers, for the critical work you do…
Htg
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
… hearing all the details is so shocking… but the magnitude of the blasphemy is unbelievable. All the while in the homeland of St. Francis, one of the Church’s greatest saints. This was so horrible.
E C
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
Thank you Most Holy Monastery. I was fooled by JP2 Growing up. Until we found True Catholic Faith…
Jason B
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
Great exposure of the abomination…
Michael Novak
Thank you… I was not aware of what happened.
Joan
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
Great video…
David Lopez
Cardinal Vincenzo Lodovico Gotti (1664–1742) was a Dominican theologian, prior, provincial, and inquisitor of Milan under Clement XI. He wrote an apologetic work on the Church against the Swiss Calvinist Giacomo Picenino.
Cardinal Vincenzo Lodovico Gotti, O.P., Vera ecclesia Christi signis, ac dogmatibus demonstrata, 1748, Chap. 3 (#6), pp. 78-81: “Protestants neither have martyrs nor can have them... I likewise most gladly yield to you your martyrs of France, who died not for Christ but for the faith of Calvin. Nor would I say more about them, except that you dare even to compare them with the ancient martyrs and to treat the cause of both as one and the same. Our ancient martyrs died for the unity of the Church; yours died for schism against that unity. What common cause, then, is there?... The Calvinists and the other sectarians did not suffer for justice, because they did not die in the faith. Nor in charity: if they had possessed it, they would not have torn apart the body of Christ, which is the Church. Therefore they are not martyrs.”
Fr. Celestine Oberndorffer, O.S.B., Auctoritas Ecclesiae Christi, 1760, p. 317:
“Therefore, according to Sacred Scripture, baptism is necessary in order that souls may be added, or constituted in the Church. Minor premise. But catechumens are not baptized.
Therefore they are neither added nor constituted in the Church of Christ. Indeed, baptism is like a door: just as it is the way to obtain salvation, so also it is the way into the harbor of salvation, that is, the Church — according to that saying: ‘Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God’ [John 3:5]. And hence the common teaching of the Fathers was that a catechumen is indeed in the vestibule of piety, yet cannot be called one of the faithful unless he enter inside through baptism; that he is alien to the faithful, and has nothing in common with him.”
Dear Brothers,
I hope you are doing well… Your material was decisive in my complete conversion to the traditional Catholic faith, and I am very grateful for that. My future wife also converted thanks to your content.
Sincerely,
Gustavo
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
Great awesome video…
Brad
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
A brilliant video. Since my conversion I've known for a fact that the gods of other religions are demons. When Assisi went down I was horrified however not a single [‘Catholic’] I talked to thought it was a problem. I thought I was crazy. Then I read a book by JP ll and tore it to shreds. It was demonic. Most people are sheep. They are followers of the perception of the majority. There is no critical thinking and no understanding of Catholic teaching and they don't care. Yet they think a secular antichrist will come in the name of peace and then destruction. No secular man could ever cause the magnitude of lost souls more than this monster with his insidious lies. Your videos Solitude and Death are a great help to those of us who are isolated. Thank you for the wisdom you impart and for your hard work in putting together all these amazing videos.
David R
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
Very informative.
Fideidefensor
John Paul II’s Assisi Prayer Meeting – The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
Thank you so much for exposing the stark truth about this man and the reality of the Great Apostasy…
Carrie
In his second Asian journey in 1984, John Paul II visited the Buddhist temple. Before reaching the temple, he expressed how anxious he was to meet “His Holiness, the supreme Buddhist Patriarch in the temple.” A few days before going to the Buddhist temple, John Paul II also said:
John Paul II, May 6, 1984: "For the Korean people throughout history have sought, in the great ethical and religious visions of Buddhism and Confucianism, the path to renewal of self… May I address a particular greeting to the members of the Buddhist tradition as they prepare to celebrate the festivity of the Coming of the Lord Buddha? May your rejoicing be complete and your joy fulfilled."
John Paul II then went into the pagan temple and bowed his head to the Buddhist Patriarch who sat in front of a gigantic statue of Buddha. John Paul II was an apostate antipope.
Lactantius was a Church father and 4th-century apologist. He is praised by various popes and even quoted specifically by Pope Pius XI in Mortalium Animos on the matter of worship. He is therefore an authority on worship. Lactantius directly addresses whether one can worship the true God while worshipping false gods. He teaches that it’s impossible to worship God along with false gods, since the worship of the true God requires belief that He is the one and only God. He also correctly understands that worship is intimately connected to faith.
Lactantius, Institutes (4th Century), Book 1, Chap. 19: “First of all, it has never been the case that those who worshipped these [false deities] also worshipped God; nor could it be so, for if the same honor is paid to other gods, then He whose religion is that we believe that He is the one and only God is not worshipped at all.”
This passage is particularly relevant because various Vatican II heretics have argued that people can worship the true God while worshipping a false god or gods. They are of course wrong. We cited the aforementioned passage from Lactantius in this video that refuted a Novus Ordo heretic.
Why The “Divine Mercy” Messages Of Faustina Are Actually Protestant
"The greater the sinner the greater the right he has to my mercy" I've just realised… but according to this sentence ppl like… Mao, Stalin should be the greatest saints! I read her diary about 10 years ago and I loved it. Now I see how deceived I was.
Usagi
“Priests” Possessed After Rodney Howard-Browne “Charismatic Anointing”
Fabulous exposé. Alarming and scary.
Ashleigh Schneider
Indeed, it was the denial of the dogma of "Extra Ecclesiam nulla sallus" that caused the vatican 2 apostasy.
Eric
John Paul II: The Koran Is Holy & Islam Is God’s Way (May 1985)
Truly a disgusting antipope…
AR
John Paul II, To Muslim and Hindu Representatives of Kenya, Aug. 18, 1985: “I am grateful for this opportunity to meet leaders and representatives of the Islamic and Hindu communities in Kenya… On my first visit to Kenya, I stated in my message to the Hindu community: ‘The purpose of life, the nature of good, the path to happiness, the meaning of death and the end of our human journey – all these truths form the object of our common service of man and his many needs…’ (May 7, 1980). I would like to reaffirm these words today: they hold true also for the Catholic Church’s relationship with the Muslim people.
Humanity has many needs… the need to respect and defend human rights without any discrimination on the basis of race, ethnic group, religion, age, social class, or sex… In the face of all these human needs – spiritual, material and social – the religions of the world cannot remain passive… our worship of God and the spiritual values we hold in esteem – motivate us to become fraternal allies in service to the human family…
We are all children of the same God, members of the great human family. Our religions have a special role to fulfill in curbing these evils and in forging bonds of trust and fellowship. God’s will is that those who worship him, even if not united in the same worship, would nevertheless be united in brotherhood and in common service for the good of all.”
In this speech to Muslims and Hindus (given on August 18, 1985), John Paul II promotes apostasy once again. Keep in mind that Hindus worship a multitude of idols and false gods. Hinduism is a religion of blatant idolatry which also teaches reincarnation. Nevertheless, John Paul II states that the service Hinduism provides to man is that it teaches “truths” about the “purpose of life” and the “path to happiness”. That’s a blatant heresy and an abominable lie, for Hinduism doesn’t lead to happiness but to damnation. It doesn’t teach the truth about life and death but countless lies and myths.
Pope Leo XIII correctly taught that Hindus are “miserably imprisoned in the darkness of superstition”.
Pope Leo XIII, Ad Extremas (#1), June 24, 1893: “Our thoughts turn first of all to the blessed Apostle Thomas who is rightly called the founder of preaching the Gospel to the Hindus. Then, there is Francis Xavier… Through his extraordinary perseverance, he converted hundreds of thousands of Hindus from the myths and vile superstitions of the Brahmans to the true religion. In the footsteps of this holy man followed numerous priests… they are continuing these noble efforts; nevertheless, in the vast reaches of the Earth, many are still deprived of the truth, miserably imprisoned in the darkness of superstition.”
John Paul II applied the same statements to Islam. John Paul II’s declarations are tantamount to an endorsement of Hinduism and Islam. They constitute apostasy. He also teaches that Hindus and Muslims are “children of the same God” and that they “worship him”. That’s also a denial of the Catholic faith, for Hindus obviously don’t worship God but idols and devils. (Muslims don’t worship the true God, either.) They are also not children of God, for only those who are in the Church of Christ can be children of God (John 1:12; 1 John 3; 1 John 5:1). John Paul II was an apostate antipope.
“Church of the Blessed Sacrament” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed
Mind blowing how conservative Novus Ordites [still] haven’t figured out their sect, that restricts Latin Masses but allows these ‘masses’ constantly, is not Catholic.
Nr
EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy
This is the great falling away spoken of in 2 Thessalonians 2:3.
Prone
Greek "Orthodox" Gregory Palamas Is Not A Saint & He Was Condemned Before Vatican II
The filioque is a heresy, it's not the doctrine of the Trinity accepted by the church through the Cappadocian fathers.
Mike P
MHFM:
You are wrong and brainwashed. This video proves that St. Gregory Nyssa taught the Filioque in substance: A Big Problem For “Orthodoxy”: St. Gregory Of Nyssa & The Filioque
“Church of the Blessed Sacrament” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed
Great work. Expose these wolves.
Brad
“Church of the Blessed Sacrament” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed
Even one of these 'alphabet' churches existing would be scandalous enough, but the fact they are so numerous that MHFM can make a whole series on them is just staggering. I just can't get my head around how these people can know what is in the Bible, completely reject it & still consider themselves Catholics who are bound for Heaven.
Farney
“Church of the Blessed Sacrament” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed
Dear MHFM, thank you very much!
Miriam
“Church of the Blessed Sacrament” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed
So glad someone is willing to document this…
V
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
