E-Exchanges
on the Catholic Church and other issues *This section of our website will contain some
less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may
be of value to our readers. We will
include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable.
We often add bolding and underlining which are not
necessarily that of the other party.
This section also frequently includes, not
only e-exchanges we have, but notes, updates and comments by us.* Typical Subject: Bad-willed
heretic Dear
Brothers, Bad
will … I really do understand what you guys are trying to do, but our Lord said Himself that there will always be tares along with the wheat in the Church (Matt 13:30). Even today's Mass reading about Paul's final announcement to the Church at Ephesus where he said to the congregation there that "savage wolves will come in not sparing the flock", "and men coming forward perveting the truth to draw disciples after them". But he never said to set up your own church (a la Luther et al). The popes have said and done extremely foolish and hideous things--no doubt. But like St. Paul said in 1 Thess. 5:21 I will "test everything and hold fast to what is good", what, in essence, you guys do. I have even left religious orders because of the ridiculousness I found in them (even one's that offer the latin mass!!!!!). The Lord Jesus knows my heart and by His power (and ONLY that ) He is holding His only true Church together…. Peace MHFM: You are unfortunately a
heretic. If you had any faith, which
you don't, you would realize that Benedict XVI has set up his own Church and
that he doesn't even believe in the Papacy.
He has also agreed with the Lutherans on Justification. It’s an outrage that you presume to quote
the Lord Jesus Christ, as you simultaneously defend heretics who teach that
Christ is unnecessary. You obviously
reject the Catholic dogma that heretics are automatically expelled from the
Church. You are deceived. You cannot recognize the Catholic Church in
our day – and that the Vatican II Church does not represent it – simply
because you don’t believe in the traditional teaching of the Church. Cause Dear
Most Holy Family Monastery, To
be possessed can mean that Satan has gained mastery over the will so
devastatingly that sinfulness passes beyond ordinary depravity in the world,
and its cause must be sought in a power above the order of nature. To be
possessed can mean that Satan has beclouded the intellect, so that the light
of faith cannot illuminate it. To be possessed can mean that Satan has
befuddled a person’s reason. What can properly describe the prerequisite
condition in a man that decides to sell the organs of infants after their
infanticide? What is even more madness, is that experimentation on slain
infants is not only unnecessary, but it doesn’t help alleviate any condition
whatsoever anyways (not that it would make it moral, but it just goes to show
there is a darkness enveloping and underlying this abomination)… I
remember seeing a presentation by a former abortionist that committed more
than 75,000 infanticides; of a real time ultra sound video showing a 12 week
old baby girl in 1978, who was getting aborted. Before the infanticide
occurred, the former abortionist began explaining the ultra sound footage,
and the baby girl was actually sucking her thumb and moving in the womb, and
when the abortionist’s suction tube tried getting the baby, the baby girl
began moving violently and tried dodging the suction tube. Her heart raced
from 140 beats per minute, to 200. Her mouth was actually open crying, and
finally when the baby girl’s limbs were grabbed she let out a silent scream
and the mouth could be seen wide open in agony, while she was ripped. Then
the infanticide practitioner crushed the baby girls’ head with forceps. To
further dehumanize the baby, instead of the head of the baby being called a
head, it is instead called “number 1” -”the abortionist crushes number 1.”
Infanticides and their accompaniment markets and experimentations are Satanic
Rituals, there to venerate and pay homage to Satan. These rituals are
unspeakable and unimaginable abominations… HB Heretical
priest I
am soooooooo unexplainably disgusted right now. In
fact, I don't even know if I can eat. …
St. Cyril and Methodius Ukrainian Catholic church in St. Catharines,
Ontario. This is the church where I had an unfriendly conversation with this
priest a few weeks back. He relayed a personal opinion that denounced
Brother Peter and Brother Michael Dimond to be
OUTSIDE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. … this Father Bohdan Choly … began discussing the conversation we had a few
weeks back (one week?). He asserted that he had discussed this Baptism of
Desire refutation with a few elder priests and that he needs to know how
obstinate I am in denying the Catholic Faith. (cant'
remember his exact wording). Next, he begins slandering all views in
opposition to Baptism of Desire, claiming that Baptism of Desire has always
been taught by the Catholic Church. …
Next, he just continued uttering filth Next,
he began ridiculing that I'm ............ unto like a Protestant Next,
he began glorifying himself ....., chirping that
he's studies theology for 7 years (?) Next,
he spat that 'the Brothers' are most likely guilty of misquoting. I
then asked him to state something specific that he found fault with. His response? THE ENTIRE BOOK IS A MISTAKE !!!! (referring to
'Outside the Catholic Church .....')… Next, he SPEWED THAT SOMEONE CAN BE
BAPTIZED BY SAND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wow !!!!!!!!!...
Next, being quite aghast, I asked him to repeat this contention. He repeated it. Next, I told him that I would be quoting
him. His eyes kinda shifted and he added that the
Catholic church ......... in the 17th Century .......... allowed people to be
baptized by SAND .......... in exceptional circumstances
!!!!!! I was completely
appalled and, after rebuking him .... nearly fainted in disgust… Shawna MHFM: There are many horrible heretics
out there. The heretic you mention
(who should be avoided) does not understand or believe in the dogma Outside
the Church There is No Salvation, and what he said about baptism in sand is
heretical. Thoughts
Subject: Thoughts I watched your video on "death and
the journey into hell". Based on the video it almost seems like one
little false move by whomever and you will be damned. We'll never be perfect.
We are all sinners until death. Based on how this world is now, I can see the
thought of more going to hell then heaven. I've broken every commandment. I'm
trying to stay away from sin but I still find myself suffering with the same
sins. I pray to Jesus and Mary all the time. I pray the rosary and many other
prayers. I try to make a point of doing goods acts in the name of Jesus
whether great or small. This video made me feel as though no matter what I do
I will be damned. Jesus be with you and your family. Ace… MHFM:
You say that it’s as if one false move will send you to Hell. A mortal sin is not a false move; it’s a
willful commission of an act that’s gravely offensive to God. You clearly have a desire to justify
mortally sinful activity, and your problem is that you won’t exercise your
will and resist sin. You claim that
you pray; yet you persist in grave sins.
There are two reasons for this: 1) you don’t pray with true faith and
sincerity; and 2) you don’t have the first degree of humility: a fear of God
that compels one to avoid mortal sin.
Hence, your problem is pride.
You think God’s law is a joke – not serious enough to warrant a change
in your lifestyle – and you are mistaken. St. Benedict
(c. 520): “The first degree of humility, then, is that a man always have the
fear of God before his eyes, shunning all forgetfulness and that he be ever
mindful of all that God hath commanded, that he always considereth
in his mind how those who despise God will burn in hell for their sins, and
that life everlasting is prepared for those who fear God.” Islam Subject: Islam Dear Brothers, I was just looking at your recent article
you linked to about Islamic persecution of "Christians" and the one
about the Imam talking about Muslim men allowed to have up to 4 wives and as
many concubines as they want. I had studied Islam a lot and hear about all
these stories going on. Sadly, this is what that evil religion actually
teaches. It actually teaches violence against non-Muslims. The true popes
were right to call it an "abominable sect". Yet, Benedict XVI has
the audacity to say that this is a great religion. How can anyone doubt that
Benedict XVI is an antipope? He praises one of the most evil false religions
in the world. Granted, all false religions are evil. But none have expressed
their evil quite so much as Islam. How can this be a religion of peace? Or
how can it be a noble or good religion, as Benedict XVI thinks? This just
proves, beyond a doubt, that Benedict XVI is definitely an antichrist and a
total apostate antipope. God bless, Wesley Brittain Comment Subject: Doug with the bad-willed cousins Dear MHFM: Doug with the bad-willed cousins mentioned this in his
e-mail: "I actually had not recommended to my cousins that
they pray the Lord's Prayer or the Hail Mary every night, so I tried to do
that today at school. He responded with hostility and annoyance." A significant reason that atheists are so angry, hateful
and spewing is that they are internally conflicted. Their mind is trying to rationalize that God does not exist in direct opposition
to what they actually know in their heart (soul) that indeed He does. If Doug's cousin "truly" believed that God did
not exist then he would not have reacted with hostility or annoyance, but
rather he should have been amused at the idea of praying and willingly
consented, since he "knows for sure" that they are just a bunch of
"meaningless" words. Doug should point out to his cousin that his
refusal and resistance to recite a bunch of "meaningless" words
indicates that in his heart (soul) he actually knows/fears that God actually
does exist. Hopefully, if Doug can prevail here by goading his cousin
to put his money where his mouth is, by saying these prayers (just
"meaningless words" after all), the Lord will open his eyes and
mind to the truth. It probably won't be an instantaneous change but saying
these prayers (even just once) will weigh heavy on his soul and mind and
"torment" him. It may also be just enough to allow his guardian
angel to start more actively prodding him to wake up. Prove Brothers,
… This
will hopefully be my last email about my cousins, there's just one more thing
I have to resolve before I stop spending my time on them for good. I
actually had not recommended to my cousins that they pray the Lord's Prayer
or the Hail Mary every night, so I tried to do that today at school. He
responded with hostility and annoyance. He then asked me to prove to him that
he is not GOD. I asked him what he meant by this, and he said that I can’t
disprove or prove to him that he is God, and therefore trying to prove God is
trying to prove a negative. I tried to rebuttals with some common
philosophical and theological arguments, but he then said my logic was
"ridiculous." There was no point in bring up Catholic dogma or
miracles like Our Lady of Guadalupe, I had already
tried to use these. Now of course the only man who was God was Jesus Christ,
but is there any way to prove to him that he is not God? Sincerely
in Our Lady, Doug MHFM: You could ask your cousin to
tell you, off the top of his head, how much rainfall Brazil gets in a year,
and how many deer there are in North Dakota.
When he is unable to do so, explain to him that he just proved he is
not God; for God is omniscient (all-knowing) and your cousin is not. The existence of God can be proven;
but after you say a few final words to your cousin, you shouldn’t spend more
time with him. He is of extreme bad
will. Creation and Miracles, Past and Present (full length) Information
Proves God [video] Stand Hi I esteem your fight for the truth. Can
you tell me where I stand if I attend the Novus Ordo
mass, but totally see where you're coming from? Thanks …John… MHFM:
You will not be saved if you continue to go to the Novus Ordo. Comment Dear MHFM, your… helpful video on King Solomon and his fall from grace…
some wisdom I gleaned from the Solomon video is how he was originally a very
good man and one of the best that ever lived and was taken down by his
addiction to lust. His kingdom which once was a perfect model and tribute to
Our Lord's infinite reign became a total bastardization of its original
purpose and became the center of the worship of man. Incredible how he was
getting 666 talents of gold every day I think it was. It makes me compare to
the counterfeit demonic bride that everyone thinks is the
"Catholic" church today. The big difference is that Benny is like
an anti-solomon from the bowels of Hell that was
rotten to the core from the beginning and never had a period of goodness like
Solomon. It’s amazing how everything in the OT mirrors and prophetically
foreshadows this awful time. He's bathed in custom cologne, has thousand
dollar shoes, He's a spiritual business man from Hell who was born for one
mission and one mission only, to destroy as many souls in the last battle as
possible…. I mean it just makes me sick how by now anyone can consider this
negative mirror image to be the Immaculate Bride of Christ. Does anyone even
care? The Vatican, once the wise governing body of Christ's one true church is
nothing but an unbelievably giant money laundering and soul killing
operation. We True Catholics should all spend a little time meditating on the
horror of the level of wrath Our Lord must perpetually be having for these
minions... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CbxHKSJ5rM Problems Dear MHFM, MHFM:
Those who have mental problems have spiritual problems. If they convert to the true faith and pray
the full Rosary each day, their problems should be solved. Atheist Subject: Atheist friend Dear
Brothers, I
have an acquaintance who is currently an atheist, at least that's what he claims.
But I've shown him your video on Creation and miracles, as well as the Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas and he said that his
eyes are a lot more open than before and he liked your video. I even
suggested that he pray the rosary, and from what he told me, he said he did
pray it and it made him feel better. Now, he's still not converted yet. But
it seems like he has an open heart to the truth. I'm emailing you to ask if
you and all the members of your monastery can keep him in your prayers, for his
conversion. His name is Anthony. Thank you. :-) God
bless, Wesley
Brittain Italy BBC News - Italian earthquake: Centuries of history destroyed My father's family Tomasi came
from a tiny town called Minti outside
Torino------so while this grieves me deeply I also see how the hand of GOD
acts in every place on earth to show that HE is in control of all and since
virtually every single person not only in Italy but throughout the entire
earth has rejected, abandoned and betrayed HIM in these times....well, it is
most certainly within HIS mighty capability to let something like this
occur...human "pride" is crushed. Ethiopian MHFM: This is a somewhat interesting
quote about Philip’s conversion of the Ethiopian eunuch, recorded in Acts
8:26-40. “The stress in the eunuch story is
on God leading Philip to the eunuch and providentially arranging for the
eunuch to be reading a text of Isaiah conducive to evangelism about Jesus –
Isaiah 53. The emphasis on the man
being an Ethiopian makes it very likely that he was black. Indeed, Ethiopians in antiquity were
proverbially thought to be the darkest people on earth. We should stress that there is no evidence
from antiquity of widespread prejudice against a particular group of people
simply because of their skin color, or a combination of their skin color and
distinctive ethnic features (e.g., hair, facial features). On that score, Luke lived in a different
world from ours.” (Ben Witherington, New Testament History, p. 193.) Food Subject: Organic Food Co-op Dear MHFM, MHFM:
No, it’s not. However, if you have not
done so, we recommend that you give them a copy of the book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the
Catholic Church. Impression Subject: Correct me if I'm wrong? I was under the impression that: 1) The Fatima requirement
was for Russia to be consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary IN UNION WITH
(ALL) THE BISHOPS (don't think this was ever attempted).....I wonder if John
XXIII was supposed to accomplish this and his Masonic doctrine of Man had
taken precedence instead and he had VATII?... MHFM:
Your question is addressed in detail in the article. That’s why people interested in this issue
need to put out some effort and READ
THE ARTICLE. The Whole Truth about the Consecration and Conversion of
Russia and the Impostor Sr. Lucy We
will quote a short paragraph from the article which answers your question;
but to see all of the facts that support and fill out this position, one has
to read the whole article. But didn’t Our Lady
promise that Russia would be consecrated in union with all the Bishops of the
world? No! This is a key point. Our Lady requested
that After Subject: death Brother Michael and Brother Peter, MHFM:
It’s sad to have a family member die outside the faith. Unfortunately, it’s a reality that
basically every Catholic must face.
When pondering this sobering reality, the overriding consideration
should be that each person ultimately chooses his or her own fate. Each person ultimately searches out and
follows after what he or she really wants and really values. Thus, those
who die outside the Church did so because they didn’t want God and they
didn’t want the truth. They wanted to
go their own way, and that’s what they did.
A
Catholic should not fulfill any kind of funeral requests made by a
non-Catholic family member. A Catholic
must not be involved with a non-Catholic funeral. The only thing one may do with a deceased
non-Catholic family member is have that person buried. However, it must not be a
Catholic/religious burial. Australia,
Anglicans Subject: Anglicans Dear Brothers, Comment New Jersey Man Has $20k Stolen From Him by Tennessee Police - YouTube When
I listen to this man (whose job it is to uphold the law) justifying
the practice of stealing money from people, I am reminded of one of the
little episodes which is described in MHFM's book on Padre Pio. It's
where Satan goes into Padre Pio's confessional
disguised as a man, confesses every disgusting sin imaginable, and then justifies
those sins. And the ability and skill of the devil in justifying these
sins was enough to take even a man like Padre Pio
aback. Makes one wonder if the devil wasn't giving Padre Pio
a sneak preview of things to come. Once upon a time, evil things had
to be hidden, but no more. Now, everything evil is openly called good. It's
like the world is possessed. Also
wanted to add that Bill Mulligan brought out an interesting point about
efforts being made by many in Russia to oppose abortion. I doubt you will
find much about that in the Gruner or SSPX
propaganda on Fatima. Lee
Ann V-2 Dear MHFM, Isn't it somewhat ironic that
the twelve apostles of Jesus Christ were jewish and
converted to Christendom, and millions of willing jews
throughout salvation history converted, as well as other races converting
throughout the world, and the second vatican
council 1962-65 condemns Catholics from evangelizing jews
to convert, or any other religion? Calling Catholics who do so, anti-semitic and proselytizers in the negative. That's
nearly two millenia fighting for Catholicism in its
true form. What's wrong with this VII production? -Dea- Russia Subject:
Russian Facts In
response to the writer (Paul) who seemed to be questioning your well
documented position that the Fatima promises concerning Russia have been
fulfilled (Russia has undergone a kind of "conversion"), a couple
of facts: 1) Paul points to the income tax as a Russian "error".
The income tax system in the US was established under Woodrow Wilson in 1913,
four years before Fatima and the Russian Revolution. So this point seems to
be just wrong factually, as well as of questionable relevance. 2) While Russia
(after the communist takeover) was the first modern country legalize abortion
(1920), modern day Russia has passed many anti-abortion laws in the last
couple of years and the Russian President's wife is actually a pro-life
activist. Seems like a sort of "conversion" to me... In
the last couple of decades (since the fall of the Eastern Block) it seems
hard to argue that the US isn't the nation most responsible for spreading
error throughout the world on behalf of zionism and
its proxies. Bill
Mulligan King
David Subject:
another archaeological dig in support of Biblical accounts Dear MHFM, You may have already seen this but in
case you hadn’t – I thought you would be interested in it… http://americanvisionnews.com/3472/new-archaeology-gives-new-support-to-biblical-king-david … May our Most Blessed Mother protect you
all always!! Pax Christi, Melanie O’Keefe Papacy Subject: Print
version of Papacy audio presentation Dear Brother Peter Dimond, I am most impressed with your talk on defending
the efficacy of the Papacy as supported in Scriptures. This is a very
powerful and convincing presentation that must be made accessible in all
media formats, including print and video. I would be most appreciative if you
made the transcript available as a link or included in some book that is for
sale or provided among what donations may help cost-defray. The item is
titled this: The Bible Teaches that Jesus made St. Peter the First Pope (http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/audio/papacy.mp3), from your
website: http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/papacy_mainpage.php MHFM:
Thanks for the e-mail. In our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the
Catholic Church, you will find a section called “The Bible Teaches that
Jesus Made St. Peter the First Pope.”
It deals in print with the biblical proof for the Papacy. Consecration,
B-16 Subject:
Consecration of Russia About
the consecration of Russia: Let
me first say that I wish to ask this question for clarification. When Our
lady of Fatima said, "“Russia will spread its errors throughout the world."
We can still see Russia spreading its errors such as abortion and income tax.
Two ideas that originated in Russia and unfortunately are still being spread
today. Can it be that when Pius XII consecrated the russian
people, he failed to specifically consecrate Russia as a nation rather than
its people. Also, I do not know if he had all of the
other bishops consecrate Russia with him? Benedict is not the Pope, I can
clearly understand this, but unfortunately many people fail to recognize or
even begin to question this. Would it be possible the Blessed Virgin manifest
herself to him. Turns his heart good, say Alphonse Ratisbonne style, and then proceeds to consecrate Russia
properly. In a comparison to the likes of Darth Vader, who was truly evil
(V2) but then ultimately destroys the "Empire" and Mary's
Immaculate heart triumphs. If anything at all please respond about the Pius XII consecration. Sincerely, Paul MHFM:
First, the consecration of Russia matter – and the precise question you ask –
is addressed in detail in this article: The Whole Truth about the
Consecration and Conversion of Russia and the Impostor Sr. Lucy By the way, with each day that goes by, the position
we expressed on this issue years ago is proving itself true. Does it look like a consecration of Russia
is in our future? No, that’s because
it was accomplished in the past. (Our
article was also the first and only explanation of how the consecration of
Russia was performed before Vatican II, and how all the relevant information
is consistent with that conclusion). Second, you ask about Antipope Benedict
XVI converting. We’re always puzzled
when people focus on the possible conversion of the most
wicked men in the world. You
are talking about one of the most evil men in all of history, who was placed in the current position because
he’s a reprobate and he’s fulfilling a precise role for Satan at the end of
time. People should not be focusing on whether
there is any ounce of goodness in devilish men who are trying to smash Our
Lord’s Church to pieces. They are not
only trying to destroy the Church; they are doing it in the most insidious
way: under the guise of protecting and leading her. Antipope Benedict XVI’s conversion is FAR
LESS LIKELY than Planned Parenthood’s entire company shutting down tomorrow
and going exclusively into pro-life causes.
People should be focused combatting, rejecting and exposing these
antichrists for what they are: men who are wicked to the core. Pope Gregory XVI (1840):
“This is surely the time when the Christian battle line should smash the
devil as he rages all over the world…” (Probe
Nostis #15) Comment In your Judas quote which is inspiring
towards God's truth, I'm sure Luther, Montini, Wojtyla, and Ratzinger had/have identical expressions of
deception. Those expressions never change, much like the saying, "Birds
of a feather, flock together." Antichrists to the core! Judas MHFM: Mark 14:44- “And he that betrayed him, had given them a
sign, saying: Whomsoever I shall kiss, that is he; lay hold on him, and lead
him away carefully.” This is a somewhat interesting quote
about the incomprehensible insincerity and phoniness exhibited by Judas when
betraying the Lord of all creation. “A
kiss was a normal form of greeting between disciple and teacher, a token of
real friendship. Judas says, ‘The one
I kiss should be grabbed and led away securely.’ The
intensive verb used in v. 45 [Mark 14], kataphileo, means ‘to kiss with
every show of affection,’ thus making the betrayal even worse. It is striking that after the betrayal by
the kiss, Judas completely disappears into the night, never to appear again
in Mark’s narrative.” (Ben Witherington, New Testament History, p. 167.) We mention this aspect of the betrayal in
the second half of this video: The
Agony of Jesus in the Garden [video]. Exhibit http://www.maltzmuseum.org/media-releases/maltz-museum-hosts-exhibition-on-pope-john-paul-ii/ Kathryn Discussion Subject:
“Imposter” Sr. Lucia Thanks
for the very interesting discussion on Sr. Lucy. It's not so hard to believe
that Sr. Lucy lived to be 98 years old. I know several people that have done
so, but more importantly it may be that she was really told that she would
live to see the triumph of the Immaculate Heart, or the chastisement that
would follow if The Blessed Virgins commands were not heeded. To say she
would stay "a short time longer", could
imply that it was possible for the commands to be met in a timely manner
(they were not) so Sr. Lucy stayed, but under house arrest…. Karl MHFM: The fact that few people live that
long is not the reason one must conclude there was an impostor. The evidence is overwhelming in a variety of areas: 1) the changes
in appearance; 2) her blatant contradictions to the real Sr. Lucia and the
message of Fatima; 3) her blatant heresies; 4) how a traditional view of
Fatima, the true Third Secret and Fatima’s fulfillment cannot be maintained
without rejecting the post-Vatican II “Lucia” (for she clearly and without any doubt confirmed the phony Third
Secret and the Vatican’s interpretation of it); 5) the clear need to
silence and in fact eliminate the real Sr. Lucia before 1960 and after the
Fuentes interview; and more. Only a
dishonest person would reject all of the proof and still believe that the
post-Vatican II “Sr. Lucia” was the real one.
The point about Our Lady saying to the girl Lucia, “you will remain a
little longer,” is just one more small piece of
evidence that fits well with the true and proper conclusion: there is no way
the post-Vatican II “Lucia” was the real Sr. Lucia. The Impostor Sr.
Lucia - 1/3 - When and Why The Impostor Sr.
Lucia - 2/3 - The Proof and Her Contradictions The Impostor Sr.
Lucia - 3/3 - Her Heresies Comment Subject: Pacquiao Dear Brothers, Impostor
Sr. Lucia Subject: The Impostor Sr. Lucia Dear MHFM: Around the 1:49 mark of your video
"The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World " (as found on YouTube), you make the strong
case for the statistical improbability against Sister Lucia (born 1907)
living to the age of 98 years old (dying in 2005). I refer your attention to EWTN's
website about Fatima, specifically this link: http://www.ewtn.com/fatima/apparitions/June.htm At
the June 13, 1917 apparition, the following
conversation takes place between Our Lady and Lucia: Lucia: "Will you take us to heaven?" Our Lady: "Yes, I shall take Jacinta and Francisco soon, but you will remain a little longer, since Jesus wishes you to make me known and loved on earth. He wishes also for you to establish devotion in the world to my Immaculate Heart." I
find Our Lady's choice of words here extremely interesting. It would seem
unimaginable that Our Lady meant by the phrase "a little longer" as
a period of 88 years (1917-2007). Even by today's standards, 88 years is
considered a very long life. …
I would say that this very well might be Our Lady's way of indicating that Lucia
would definitely not live a full life (e.g. 70 years), and certainly not an
extraordinary long life (i.e. 98 years). If so, then it would also seem that
this was mentioned as a prophecy/warning against the impostor
Sister Lucia and against all those who vouch for her. Furthermore, the
fact that the impostor Sister Lucia was allowed to live to the year 2005, may
have been an act of Divine intervention to make it clear that her apparent
longevity was completely irreconcilable with Our Lady's words to Lucia that
she would "remain (living) a little longer." Joe Comment "To teach in order to lead
others to faith is the task of every preacher and of each believer."
—Thomas Aquinas Co… Creation Dear Brothers,
Outrage Subject: Externals and Slogans Dear Brothers: As Kevin points out, anyone should be able to
recognize that there is something apocalyptically wrong with the Vatican II
church (because there is simply too much evidence). In fact, any person
claiming to be Catholic (or even Protestant) if he were of good will, would
be willing to examine the claims of sedevacantism,
especially when he is reminded that there have been anti-popes before in
history. The Vatican II sect is silent on the promotion of gay marriage, just
as it is silent on all the public pro-abortion politicians claiming to be
Catholic. ( In fact, it often praises them.) If the
anti-popes can tolerate Pelosi, why wouldn't they tolerate Obama? And it
doesn't take a theologian to question what "conservative" and
"traditional" rags like The Wanderer have been reporting for
decades. One example: the story about Fran Ferder
and her male associate (a nun & priest combo) traveling throughout the
dioceses promoting homosexuality among religious. According to the
Wanderer, did the Vatican investigate them? Sure, and it only took the
Vatican eight years to conduct their study and tell them to stop --
but allowed the program to continue anyway. And the people writing for,
selling, and reading these rags don't see a problem in this? Where is the outrage? Why do these supposed Catholics feel
no compelling need to try to get to the bottom of this -- or be determined to
die trying? Most people have no faith at all and couldn't care less,
and the punishment seems to be that over time their blindness gets worse and
worse. And as for those who might be inclined to stop and wonder what
is going on and why, well, Satan has people like Corapi,
Salza, Fellay and all the
other Anti-Missionaries to assure them that all is well and
that they can all go back to sleep… these double-talkers, as Vladimir and
MHFM have pointed out, will just keep those mind-deadening slogans
going -- because false Christianity is all about externals and slogans..
For the individual as well as for the nation, it's either Christ and His true
Catholic Church or it's Satan --and mankind has
opted for Satan. Lee Ann People It is nearly official. Some people, do not support you,
not because you they do not think that you follow The Truth, but simply
because you are not "nice." Never mind the years of reading
documents and creating presentations to expose the antipopes... never mind
the fact that your material is their reason for getting away from the invalid
New Mass, and rejecting the complete antichrists in Rome... thanks for all of
this, but you are not "nice." What a joke. Let me tell you about
"nice" people (not that you need me too). Nanci
Pelosi is "nice," Obama is "nice," I am sure that the
politicians in China and Europe are also very "nice." We then have
a dividing line, as in, all of these MASS MURDERERS
of the innocent unborn are "nice people." Niceness has become the
ultimate, Cardinal, and ONLY "virtue" necessary in today's
antichrist world. "Niceness" is one reason for this apostasy in the
first place, as in, that is the only "virtue" on display in the
Vatican II sect.
Recently Dear Brothers, I was recently debating a woman on sola scriptura. I
showed her all of the facts on how the Canon of Scripture was given to us by
the Catholic Church, why the bible proves the Church's teachings on Our Lady,
the Eucharist, confession to a priest, etc...but she
still believes "Romanism" is a "false gospel." It just
goes to show what bad will these Protestants show. Sincerely in Our Lady, Doug MHFM: Yes, you
really see it in encounters with them. State Subject: Revolt Dear Brothers, The state of the present world situation as discussed by Mark V and
the other responder will never be a "Democracy of truth" as we know
it. We're living in a time as never seen in history where the great revolt
has occurred and the "man of sin" sits in the house of both the
secular and the visible counter-church. There is no visible good in the world
that is standing up for the truth (except MHFM) as we watch this game between
the V-II, the SSPX and other false Christians battle it out in what would
appear to be a boxing match between rivaling gang members. This great deception and web of lies is becoming so obvious as seen by the current events in the world.
Lost souls are buying into this garbage of the Vatican II, and these phony
politicians because it all fits "so nicely" in this evil world as
if they were trying on custom tailored clothing. Its
as if the insane asylums have closed their doors and are not allowing anymore
crazies in, as seen with the e-exchanges from Dr..
(Not) and (Deceived and bad willed). 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4; Let no man deceive you by any means, for
unless there come a revolt first, and the man of
sin be revealed, the son of perdition, Who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God,
or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the
temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God. God Bless Your Works, Tom Miles Ring of Fire Solar Eclipse 2012: 'Ring Of Fire' Set To Appear May 20 Dear Brothers: It has been said that the story of Creation and the real
history of the world is also taught through the phenomena of nature. I don't
doubt that that's true, even if modern man has become too carnal to see it. What a story Heaven told to the Aztecs via the garments
which Our Lady wore in her miraculous image of Guadalupe! Can't help but wonder: Does the phenomenon of the
"ring of fire" in the eclipse of the sun reflect the Faithful
Remnant in these endtimes when the true Catholic
Church, which brings the Son's light to the world, is in eclipse? And is it
the ring of fire which all of us (who wish to be a part of that
Remnant) must be in the darkness of this Great Apostasy? God Bless
Most Holy Family Monastery for showing us the way. Lee Ann Today Today 2 LatterDay/Mormon
young men came to my door. I told them that I was a Traditional Catholic. One
man said 'how is that working for you?' So I told him That Christ founded my
church and all Protestants 'protested' against the Catholic church He founded.
I tried to give them your book, "The Bible Proves the Teachings of the
Catholic Church" and he said he didn't want it. (That happened before
with the Mormons, they will never accept other literature) I said that his
'church?' was founded by a man- he said Smith was a prophet. I told him he
was a Freemason. I asked him if he knew about Freemasons and he said no. So I
told him to look it up because they worship the devil. I think that kind of
scared him, I hope, because then they left in a hurry. It is so sad they are
so blinded by the devil. God bless you
in your wonderful work! MHFM: One should also tell them that they cannot be saved
as Mormons, but only as Catholics. Silence Subject: Silence of Vatican on Obama Gay Marriage
Announcement Just wanted to
pass this along. I was reading news story on Obama recent Gay
"marriage" announcement and it stated Vatican is silent on issue. It suddenly
occurred to me that this all by itself - absent of everything else - is a
simple yet absolute condemnation of the Vatican II sect. The “President” of
the United States – “leader” of free world – makes a public announcement such
as this and the vatican is silent? What a scandal. A
true Pontiff would be all over this… Kevin MHFM: That’s a good point. Wrote Dear Brothers in Christ,
MHFM: Yes, and the meaning of the principle, “No one can judge the
First See or the Pope,” is that a pope (who is the supreme judge in the
Church) cannot be subjected to a canonical trial. It also means that his authoritative acts
(official decrees) cannot be judged.
It does not mean that a true pope cannot be criticized, in regard
things he does in a non-magisterial capacity; and of course the Vatican II
impostors aren’t true popes at all but non-Catholic heretics and antipopes. On this matter
it’s very interesting to reconsider how this principle, “No one can judge the
First See,” is ironically crucial to proving the position that heretical
“popes” lose their offices (ipso facto) without
any declaration or judgment by a man.
Some defenders of the Vatican II antipopes, who reluctantly
acknowledge a few problems with the antipopes’ volumes of heretical teaching
(it’s amazing, isn’t it?), assert that a trial or formal decree would have to
precede the rejection of a heretical “pope”; for the average person cannot
“judge,” they say. This is not only
completely wrong; but ironically, in wrongly asserting that the principle “No
one can judge the pope” requires that a trial or decree (from a council or
bishops or cardinals) precede the rejection of a heretical “pope,” they are
violating the very principle they cite.
They are calling for a judgment
of “the pope” while simultaneously arguing that he cannot be judged. In the process
they are demonstrating the truth that heretical “popes” MUST lose their
offices automatically, without any declaration, trial or formal judgment
(which is Catholic teaching); for no one could render the judgment or subject
the pope to a trial. This was covered
in detail in our article, John Salza Has No Idea What He's
Talking About [article]. It shows how one heretic, in advancing false
arguments in a futile attempt to defend the antipope, fell into a complete and embarrassing denial of
the principle: “No one can judge the First See.” The article shows that defenders of
Antipope Benedict XVI are not only wrong, but they have no idea what they are
talking about. Each principle they
cite points us directly back to the falsity of their position. They throw out arguments and quotes that
sound good and successfully deceive the typical reader, but serve to destroy
their own conclusions when carefully scrutinized. Here’s one important section of the
article. We cite this because it shows
how defenders of the antipope misuse Catholic principles, and how the proper
understanding of every Catholic principle is ALWAYS consistent with the true
position: that a heretic such as Benedict XVI CANNOT be considered a true
pope, and must be considered an antipope.
-- … we have
three layers of contradictions laid by Salza’s
erroneous writing on the sedevacantist issue: 1) contradictions within the
first article; 2) contradictions within the second article; and 3)
contradictions between what he said in the first article and what he said in
the second article. Let’s consider #3 right now: contradictions between his
first article and his second article. SALZA’S FIRST ARTICLE DECLARED THAT CATHOLICS NEED A
DECLARATION TO CONSIDER ANY PROFESSING “CATHOLIC” OR CLERIC A HERETIC HIS SECOND ARTICLE REJECTS THAT POSITION (AFTER I REFUTED IT),
AND NOW HE APPLIES HIS FALSE PRINCIPLE ONLY TO A “POPE”! In Salza’s
first article, he argued that the key error of the sedevacantists
is failing to recognize a distinction. He distinguished between 1) the fact
that a heretic ceases to be a member of the Church and vacates his office
without declaration; and 2) the fact that Catholics supposedly cannot know who is a heretic “until
the Church tells us.” The left column reflects his first article, and the
right column his second. Notice (in the left column) that he applied his
false argument, that we need the Church’s judgment to consider someone a
heretic, to all professing Catholics and to clerics in general, not
only to a pope. Then notice (in the right column)
how he changes his position and even lies about having ever taught it.
In his first article (left column),
he clearly teaches that a declaration from the Church is necessary to
consider someone a heretic; and he argues that this principle applies to “a
cleric” (not just a pope) and even to “another Catholic’s orthodoxy.” That
means that he was applying his false principle to all who professed to be
Catholics. He was arguing that you cannot consider any “Catholic” a heretic
until “the Church tells us.” In my article (John Salza’s Arguments Against Sedevacantism Crushed) I completely refuted his false
argument, and that’s why Salza abandoned it in his
second. He now argues (right column) that you can recognize a professing
“Catholic” as a heretic without a declaration from the Church, and he even
dishonestly says he never taught otherwise. Anyone can see that Salza’s statement is false and dishonest. He clearly
taught that Catholics cannot recognize another “Catholic” as a heretic “until
the Church tells us.” The fact that Salza is
changing his position (again) and lying about it should make it clear to
anyone that his position is false and indefensible. PP. 5-6- SALZA’S NEW POSITION CAUSES HIM EVEN MORE HERETICAL
PROBLEMS Salza’s new
position is that while Catholics can
recognize some people as formal heretics without the Church’s declaration, in the case of a pope a declaration is
always required. This opens up a whole new can of worms for his
position because the canons he consistently cites and misuses don’t specify
that they apply exclusively to a pope. Even more importantly, in making his
false argument that a claimant to the papal office must be declared a heretic
before anyone could consider him one, Salza violates the dogmatic principle that a pope and the
First See cannot be judged. As I will show, there are literally dozens of
errors, lies and contradictions in Salza’s second
article, but this error might be the most important. THE PRINCIPLE THAT A POPE AND THE FIRST SEE CANNOT BE JUDGED
BURIES SALZA’S ARTICLE AND HIS WHOLE NEW LINE OF ARGUMENTATION The principle that a pope and the
First See cannot be judged is bound up with Catholic teaching on the primacy.
It was articulated from the earliest days of the Church. Essentially, it
means that since the pope is the leader of the Church with universal primacy
and jurisdiction, no cleric, bishop or Catholic can depose the pope or
SUBJECT THE POPE TO A CANONICAL TRIAL. While a pope can summon a lower cleric
(such as a bishop, cardinal or priest) to a trial for heresy, no one can do the same to a pope; for
there is no authority on Earth higher than a reigning pope. Pope St.
Nicholas, epistle (8), Proposueramus quidem,
865: “… Neither by Augustus, nor by all the clergy, nor by religious, not by
the people will the judge be judged… ‘The
first seat will not be judged by anyone.’” (Denz.
330) Pope St.
Leo IX, In terra pax
hominibus, Sept. 2, 1053, Chap. 11: “By passing judgment on the great See,
concerning which it is not permitted any man to pass judgment, you have
received anathema from all the Fathers of the venerable Councils…” (Denz. 352) Pope St.
Leo IX, In terra pax
hominibus, Sept. 2, 1053, Chap. 32: “… As the hinge while remaining immoveable
opens and closes the door, so Peter and his successors have free judgment over
all the Church, since no one should remove their status because ‘the highest
See is judged by no one.’” (Denz. 353) Canon 1556, 1917 Code of Canon Law, On trials in general: “The First See is judged by no one.” Nevertheless, throughout his second
article, John Salza argues that the pope not only
can be judged to be a heretic by an official declaration, but that such a
declaration (and a preceding trial) are necessary for a Catholic to consider
the pope a heretic! John Salza, Second Article, p. 7: “Second, even if the pope were subject to
canon 2200 and thus his formal heresy were presumed (which is not true), the pope would still be entitled to
rebut the presumption in a canonical trial…” John Salza, Second
Article, p. 6: “Even if there were
evidence of malice or disregarded warnings, the pope would be entitled to rebut such evidence as a matter of
due process. That is why Dimond fixates on
a Catholic’s ability to recognize heresy without the intervention of the
Church (because he wants to personally judge the heresy) and also why he ignores or dismisses the canon law
that requires declaratory sentences for heresy (again, because he wants
to personally judge the heresy).” He teaches
that there must be a process and examination of the pope. He even says that
the pope would be entitled to rebut such evidence in a trial. All of this
reveals his flawed theology, and his heretical understanding of the issue. The pope cannot be subjected to a trial
or examination, nor can he be deposed by a declaration from any cleric,
bishop, body of bishops or even a council. In
fact, the notion that a council could judge or depose a pope is the heresy of
Conciliarism; yet many non-sedevacantists
argue that a council must handle the matter. (A non-sedevacantist on YouTube,
whose user name begins with “September,” made a similar false argument. Like Salza, he also refused our debate challenge.) That’s why
the loss of papal office, and the ability of Catholics to recognize it, must happen WITHOUT ANY DECLARATION; for no one can judge the
pope. Any Catholic, on the other hand, can recognize that a manifest heretic
is not a pope. Here are
some more quotes in which Salza promotes his
primary heresy on this matter: that a pope can be judged, subjected to a
trial, and deposed. SALZA’S FUNDAMENTAL HERESY EXPOSED – JUDGING AND DEPOSING A
POPE The sheer
number of times that Salza promotes his fundamental
heresy is alarming. His entire argument revolves around this heretical
position, which he vomits forth page after page. When reading his repeated
utterances of heresy on this matter, which serve to demonstrate that his
position is false and his understanding of canon law fatally flawed, keep the
pure Catholic truth on this matter firmly in mind: since no authority on Earth
or in the Church could officially judge a reigning pope or subject him to a
canonical trial or depose him, a claimant to the Papacy who demonstrates
manifest heresy must be considered to have lost the office WITHOUT ANY
DECLARATION, JUDGMENT OR TRIAL (BY VIRTUE OF THE DIVINE SENTENCE OF HERESY).
For that reason, one is not judging a pope when one recognizes that Benedict
XVI (an obvious heretic) isn’t a Catholic. Rather, one is simply
acknowledging that a manifest heretic, who has publicly defected from the
faith, is outside the Church and, as a result, devoid of any Catholic
authority.
We’ve
uncovered the fatal flaw of Salza’s second article.
His false theology leads him to the dead end that a declaration, preceded by
a canonical trial, would have to be rendered against the pope. He argues that
only after such a trial and declaration can Catholics remove their submission
to him. SALZA’S HERETICAL WORLD, IN WHICH A POPE COULD BE SUBJECTED TO
A TRIAL In Salza’s heretical world, we could have the following
ridiculous scenario. Evidence of heresy is produced against a claimant to the
papal office in Rome. The cardinals, some of the bishops or a council call for a trial against the pope. In response, the pope
(to use Salza’s words) tries “to rebut the presumption
in a canonical trial.” John Salza, Second Article, p. 7: “Second, even if the pope were subject to
canon 2200 and thus his formal heresy were presumed (which is not true), the pope would still be entitled to
rebut the presumption in a canonical trial…” During the
trial, the pope vigorously maintains his innocence, and he even issues a
decree on the matter. Nevertheless, the finding of the trial is that the pope
is guilty. Catholics are therefore forced to remove their obedience from the
pope, as a result of this declaration against him. Hence, the declaration
serves as a deposition. Moreover, they are forced to reject the pope’s own
authoritative decree which proclaimed his innocence. Hence, they pass
judgment on the judgment of the Apostolic See! Of course, all of this is
heretical and clearly contradicts Vatican I. Vatican I, Dogmatic Constitution on the Church of Christ,
Sess. 4, Chap. 3: “And since the Roman Pontiff is at the head of the
universal Church by the divine right of apostolic primacy, We teach and
declare also that he is the supreme judge of the faithful [cf. n.1500 ], and
that in all cases pertaining to ecclesiastical examination recourse can be had
to his judgment [cf. n. 466 ]; moreover, that the judgment of the Apostolic See, whose authority is not surpassed,
is to be disclaimed by no one, nor
is anyone permitted to pass judgment on its judgment [cf. n.330 ff.].
Therefore, they stray from the straight
path of truth who affirm that it is permitted to
appeal from the judgments of the Roman Pontiffs to an ecumenical Council, as to an authority higher than the
Roman Pontiff.” Since he’s
a proven liar, Salza will probably either change
his position on this matter (now that we’ve refuted it) or flat out deny that
he taught the heresy that a pope can be subjected to canonical trial (despite
the proof above). Denying that he taught it won’t get him anywhere, however,
for his heretical position (that a pope can and must be judged, subjected to a trial and even de facto deposed by a declaration) is
the core of his argument. It’s mentioned throughout his heretical article.
That having been established, let’s return to the beginning of his article
and consider more of his errors, lies, and contradictions. Section
completely exposing Salza Comment Subject: True Civilization Dear MHFM, System … the
political system or situation is so horrible right now in this country. We
are no longer a true democracy, we have become an oligarchy, that is where a few
elite control and rule over us. They handpick who is going to rule over
us. The American people have lost
control over their own country. A true democracy is where the people decide
who will rule over them. Thank you very much for your patience. From Mark v Creation I find your channel very interesting,
and unique, Sir. MHFM: Thanks for the interest. One of the biggest problems today is that
most modern “Catholics” do not possess faith in the biblical creation
account, and they are open to such fairy tales as evolution. This ruins supernatural belief in Christ and
His dogmas. While it’s good that you
accept the truth about the creation account, it’s necessary to become a
Catholic. Only Catholicism is true
Christianity, and there is no salvation outside of it. Please see our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church. Deceived and bad-willed We will see who the one is who is
deceived!! Sorry I don't plan on seeing you in the future. I'm reminded of
the scripture that says not all those who say Lord,
Lord will enter the kingdom of heaven but those who do the will of my father.
I can tell you it is not the will of the Father to be judging the Pope. That
will be the Lords Job. Your pride wants to judge him but it will be your
downfall! MHFM: You are so clueless as a result of bad will. The information is there for you to see
that your antipope doesn’t believe in Jesus or the Gospel, not to mention the
Council of Trent, Vatican I or the Papacy.
Yet, you ignore and despise it all.
You are a reprobate. We are not
judging a pope, but an anti-Catholic apostate. You are not defending a pope, but an
invalid non-Catholic heretic; but you don’t care about truth or facts. The Catholic Teaching
that a heretic cannot be a valid pope [PDF
file] Not I know you have heard this time and
time again. Your disobedient. You are NOT Catholic
because of your disobedience. My question to you is, if sede's
are "legit" catholics, why are you all so
insidious? Tricking proper catholics at every
venue? You know you all do this. Check yourselves and your shady ways. Dr… MHFM: No, you know nothing about obedience; you know
nothing about the Papacy; you know nothing about the Magisterium. You only understand lies and savor the cult
of man. True Catholic principles,
rooted in the office of the Papacy, are meaningless to you. http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/heresy_of_antipopes_john_paul_ii_and_benedict_xvi.php Say Mr. White is
correct on Fellay. I have heard upper SSPX clergy
speak and have heard them say; for B16, it is a doctrinal misunderstanding or
confusion of the faith that he suffers from. What was sad is everyone
listening seemed to accept it. Obviously,
Ratzinger CANNOT not know what he is doing is heretical. Also, they, the SSPX
clergy refuse to use the word heretical when speaking about Ratzinger. I
hope… a split is coming and inside this group are clergy that wish to pursue
the true Catholic Faith. Matthew Comment Subject: The
Rosary Article Dear MHFM,
Apocalypse 12-17: "And the dragon was angry against the woman: and went
to make war with the rest of her seed, who keep the commandments of God, and
have the testimony of Jesus Christ." Clearly we see who the antichrist
was, and is. The boldness of JPII, antichrist, to detract from the power of
the Mother of God, and the sheeple of satan follow along in step. The modern
church has no sense of respect for the heavenly, no longer. Sad, much
like the dry feeling Lot must have felt when he saw the salt figure of his
wife on his journey to Segor. -Dea- Search Good evening. My search for Catholic
truth always starts with my Lord, but was greatly accelerated earlier this
year by your dvds, books, and website. Shock,
anger, and sadness at what happened to my beloved church while I wasn't
paying attention. Actually I have noticed a lot of things but chose to ignore
it, or maybe suppress it. Like ignoring the check engine light as we keep driving
along. Being 67 years old I came of age before Vatican 11 so I should know
better. I wasn't smart enough to be even a "material heretic". I
just went along with the program. NO more!... I
realized by your instruction that we are not to contribute or support this novus ordo sect in anyway… Jim… Communism Dear MHFM, The communist
menace shall be extinguished by Catholic invincibility, the bane of the
communists. In a compendium of the work by Lavrentiy
Pavlovich Beria, a communist Jew and the chief of
the secret police under Stalin, the Catholic Church is called “that terrible
monster the Roman Catholic Church still dominates mental healing throughout
the Christian world and their well schooled priests
are always at work to turn the public their way.” This communist manual also
laid stress on foaming hatred against the Catholic Church through left wing
pressure groups and propaganda to bring it into a state of odium before the
masses. They also stressed ridding mental health institutions of the Priests,
and admitted the efficacy of Priests healing the insane. The communists
admitted that their control of mental health centers cannot and hasn’t helped
people at all, but in fact turns out more insane people who were otherwise
healthy going in. They admitted that they turned out massive death casualties
in these institutions and that this should be kept a secret… Comment Martha Lyles: What the Fire Spared: On Mary and Motherhood Dear Brothers: I'm really glad you included this article which
demonstrates that false signs and wonders come in all shapes and sizes. The
woman writing the article starts out by saying: "The rosary is a perfect
prayer and its mysteries are a cradle of comfort". Then she immediately
adds: " What an enduring gift from John Paul II one decade ago:
the Mysteries of Light that completed the story." Wow. Isn't
it slick how this article pretends to be giving glory to Our Lady but is
actually promoting the Antichrist. According to this
woman, the Rosary as it was given to St. Dominic by Our Lady was incomplete,
and Our Lady was obviously mistaken in calling the rosary her Angelic
Psalter. In fact, everyone got it wrong, including all of the
Catholic saints and popes who, over all these centuries, have promoted the
Rosary with its three sets of mysteries. The real point of this woman's article is that, in knowing
the complete way that the Rosary should be prayed, JP2 was greater
than Our Lady (or, at the very least greater than every other saint), as he
was the one who brought the rosary to its perfection. (Little wonder why
they are already referring to JP2 as "the Great"). This woman's
article will no doubt be a BIG hit with the rest of the sickening Novus Ordo crowd who enjoy being dupes of Satan because they
have no more love and esteem for Our Lady than they do for her Divine Son. Lee Ann Letters Dear Brothers, Think Dear Brothers, What are we to think of Maria Valtorta and her writings. It
does have a supernatural feel to it, but having made it this far I am
skeptical of much. Below I have included the information and where you can
find about 1,000 pages of free samplings of her writings…. I found it amongst
SSPX websites and affiliates. Thanks! And may the Almighty keep you standing
strong and bearing witness to the True Church! Erick Vega MHFM: Her writings are false and should
be avoided. Happened Dear Sirs: Let me introduce
myself, I am Charles Hawthorne, a 59 year old male that lives in Beaumont,
Texas. I was not raised in the confines of a church but was allowed to seek
God on any level that I saw fit. In order for me to profess that I believe in
the ways of any certain church, and therefore trust them to correctly develop
my mortal soul, I must be genuinely convinced that the teachings of that
church does accurately reflect Gods true wishes. I have attended churches of many different
denominations and yet have not found any that I would not feel hypocritical
by saying that I believe in any particular churches ways. Can you help me
establish the truth to some important religious concerns? What happened to the fourth commandment,
"Remember the Sabbath and keep it Holy" ?
Was this written in stone by the finger of God and handed to Moses on the
tablets of the Ten Commandments? Which day did he command us to remember? (It
was the only day that He blessed after He created the Heavens and Earth and
everything in them) Who changed the Holy Day of Worship from the seventh day
of the week to the first day? Why was this done? Who were they trying to
align with? Who said, "Had She not such great power, She would not have
been able to change the Holy Day of Worship from the seventh day (Saturday)
of the week to the first day (Sunday) of the week? Did Jesus say, "I
came not to change , but rather to enforce" ?
Who said , "Not one jot or tittle shall be
changed for as long as the Heavens and Earth shall continue to exist?... Who
believes that any man has the power to forgive you of sin, and once you are
forgiven, "even God in Heaven above is powerless to reverse that
forgiving"? You must have
access to vast amounts of religious knowledge, I
only know what I have found on my own. Will you tell me the truth or just
something to justify these actions? God knows the truth. I seek truth
inspired directions. Can you, or will you help me find God's word? I appreciate your
help, Charles Hawthorne MHFM: The first article you should see is
this: Is Saturday or Sunday the Holy Day according to the Bible? This
article deals with your concerns on the Sabbath. It refutes the view of Seventh-Day
Adventists and Seventh-Day Baptists who believe that the day specifically
dedicated to God, rest and worship is Saturday not Sunday. Many of your
other questions are addressed in our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church, and in our
section refuting Protestantism. We
recommend that you obtain the book. Confession is taught in the Bible. In expressing your concerns about Catholic
teaching on forgiveness, you do not accurately describe the Church’s
position. The Church does not teach
that men are able to forgive sins independently of God. You imply that the Church’s priests and God
have two independent apostolates of forgiveness, and that while one is sometimes
activated the other is not. No, God
gave power and authority to men to forgive sins on His behalf and in His name (John 20:23). Hence, if God does not deem a man worthy of
forgiveness – for example, if a man has no intention of amending his ways when
he confesses a grave sin – then the priest is also unable to forgive the
sinner in confession. That’s why St. Paul, who was made a
priest and bishop in the Church, says that the ministers of the Church are ministers of God’s reconciliation
(forgiveness). 2 Corinthians
5:18-20- “God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of
reconciliation… Now then we are
ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in
Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.” If you prayed the Hail Mary and the Our
Father, you would get the graces to see the truth of the Catholic faith. Heard MHFM: This is a somewhat interesting
quote to contradict evil skeptics, who attempt to undermine the truth of the
Gospel with myths and baseless comparisons to paganism. “A commonly heard
argument says that the story of Jesus’ birth is simply a variant of the myths
of origins told about figures in the Greco-Roman world, such as the stories
about Augustus. The truth, however, is
that none of the pagan stories are about a virginal conception, a notion that
lends itself to the accusation of the child being illegitimate. The pagan stories are usually about some
kind of act of hieros gamos – a
divine being descends to earth in the guise of a man, mating with a human
woman. But this is not at all what
Matthew or Luke suggests happened in the case of Mary, which is about
miraculous conception without any form of intercourse and without the aid of
any male figure, divine or otherwise.” (Ben Witherington,
New Testament History, p. 68.) Baptism Dear Mhfm, Happened Thank you for
helping me realize what has happened to the Catholic Church. I believe I was
guided by the Holy Ghost to your website and truthful information. Keep up
the excellent/hard work. Now, I need to speak out about it but it’s been hard
for people to believe the truth. Pray for me and I will pray for your
monastery as well. May God bless. Thanks, Kevin Comment Subject: The Notorious Apostate Dear MHFM, Luther founded the false religion of Protestantism in
Germany. Adam founded the illuminati sect in Germany. It makes sense the
Antipope hails from there, to carry on the torch of the most destructive
movements in human memory. He is a Bavarian with extensive illuministic and rabid heretical trappings. It is also
beginning to make sense that one of the biggest hoaxes in human history is
intimately tied to this place, namely, the Zionist advertised fantasy of mass
gassing campaigns allegedly carried out in WWII by the National Socialist
Party of Germany. It even imprisons deniers of the ardent beliefs of the gas
chamber cult. There has been a new religion, which professing friendship
with the world, and sowing hatred against God’s dogmas, is being steered by
the non-Catholic sect led by Antipope Benedict XVI, the apostate successor of
the rabid AntiChrist himself John Paul II the
Apostate. This new religionism emanating from the
Robber Council of Vatican II gave birth to all the bastard sacraments, bastard
priests, bastard doctrines, bastard seminaries, bastard churches, and bastard
hierarchy that is so well known to us today for its
emptiness and dedication to apotheosis – the worship of man. In the 600+ page work and expose’ that you put together on
the Vatican II post conciliar new religion, when you mentioned the
historicity of Our Lord and the Scriptures were being attacked in Vatican II
colleges, I myself must point out that this is a very big problem. In trying
to convert a member of a false religion that went to such a college, he told
me the Franciscan “monks” came to teach the “religion” class and they
attacked not only the historicity of the Scriptures, but also the historicity
of the writers of the Gospels viciously. It almost makes me think such
persons were direct infiltrators, but then again people who are aware of the
activities of the exploding apostate and continue to consider him to be a
staunch Catholic, believe in nothing and can truly be called atheists.The apostate VII sect teaches nothing of the
history of the Church, nor anything of the Church Fathers; any semblance of
this will only be found in “conservative” wing VII publications and avenues
that are connected with the invalid… Mass. On a personal note, I had never
heard of mortal sin in my life before, until I was 16; I had some interest in
the faith and was in a habit of picking up booklets left out on the table, at
a VII church. When I read the little that I found out on mortal sin, I was
horrified of having never heard or being taught such a thing in my life. I
also had never heard of the prohibition about not eating meat on Fridays…. Occurred Dear Brothers Eric Coach Subject: Nebraska Coach I hope you reach out to the Nebraska assistant coach, Ron
Brown, who was so outspoken (and whose story you linked) about homosexuality.
I understand that he is almost certainly a "protestant", and a
material heretic, but at the same time, it takes an extraordinary amount of
courage nowadays for someone with a prestigious, probably lucrative position
(Nebraska is a Big 10 school) to be so forthcoming and plain spoken nowadays.
Surely to speak against homosexuality in public, in that environment is the
ultimate heresy against the modern, false ethos. It signifies grace and
goodwill. He is probably in for a hard time in the secular world. He may be open
to the complete Truth. I hope so. Bill Mulligan MHFM: First, a Protestant who rejects the
Catholic faith is not a “material heretic.”
He is a formal heretic, which means a true heretic. A “material heretic” is not even a heretic:
he is a member of the Catholic Church, an erring Catholic. That man is not a “material heretic.” In fact, he believes in sola fide (faith alone) and sola scriptura (scripture alone). Second, while it’s good that he has
spoken some truth about homosexuality, that’s not an indication of overall
good will. Many people of bad will
defend some truths with courage: think of the false Catholics who protest
abortion, or the false traditionalists who are outspoken about some truth of
the faith; yet those same people refuse to submit to what Christ revealed on
salvation, and refuse to reject the anti-Christ apostasy of the Vatican II
antipopes. Your conclusions are
liberal and inconsistent with Catholic teaching. We do agree with you that he should be
contacted with the information, and there’s a chance he might respond. On Subject:
on Protestantism Dear
brothers, As
I was reading your e-exchanges section as I do every day (and as I've
mentioned before in a previous message, I do that more than once a day) I
noticed the two people one named Clark and one name LeeAnn
who I have seen in this section before talking about Protestantism. As I was
reading what they had to say I felt as though I should ad in my own two cents
worth of commentary about Protestantism, I deal with them on a daily basis
after all my state is 98.5% Protestant the other 1% is ‘Catholic’ and that
last .5% is Eastern Orthodox. Firstly I have to say that anyone who deals
with a Protestant needs to bring up to them the one thing that I do, and it
usually makes them fuming flaming, cussing, spitting mad. When
it comes to their false belief concerning faith alone just ask them
"Since all you have to do is believe in Jesus and you're a
"Christian", you are "saved" and going to heaven, since
Satan himself believes in Jesus therefore he is a "Christian" also
right? And I guess at the end of time he's going to heaven since he believes
in Jesus." And when they tell you no, ask them "Well, why
not?" As
we all know Satan has counterfeited elements of Christ's church in advance in
the centuries before the rise of THE CHURCH and the religion that HE himself
established for the benefit and salvation of all mankind. He did this with
Zoroastrianism by having them have so called holy water and a priesthood and the use of bells and candles and altars
and incense, etc. Satan did this with a lot of religions he founded he even
knew enough of Christ's life story in advance to counterfeit those certain
elements and spread them out and place them into the stories of these pagan
"gods" such as Horus etc., he even went so far as to abominate the
truth with Islam that there is one true God.
Now why would he not counterfeit Christianity?... Andrew Share Dear MHFM, I had a few things I wanted to share during my encounters
in trying to convert 2 different kinds of people. I evangelized to an atheist
organization and communicated to an atheist woman working there (she is the
president of that organization). When I brought up ‘No Salvation Outside the
Catholic Church’, she immediately rejected my counsel and said the head of
the “Catholic Church” in Australia recently said even the atheists can go to
heaven (she must be referring to “Cardinal” George Pell) she even
enthusiastically said that eternal hell isn’t such a worry after all. She
then wanted evidence of the one True God and His Religion. I brought out the
miraculous characteristics of the Holy Shroud of Turin and also Padre Pio’s astounding gifts from God. I brought out so much
evidence that she couldn’t refute anything. I mentioned Gemma Di Giorgio
being born blind as a result of not having pupils, and Padre Pio restoring her sight, even without her pupils, and
that this is anatomically and scientifically impossible. I also said that
doctors since her youth have examined her and declared her condition
inexplicable. Even though this is the sort of evidence she asked for, she
told me to please stop and that I made absurd assertions… Note Note: … working on a
major video on an important topic… hope to have it finished somewhat
soon. Recall My
Greetings Brothers in Faith, I
can clearly recall the deep feeling of loss when Vat II was "explained
to me". Here as a young man who was schooled by the BVM's… Altar Boy at
12… being told "All this is going away--thank God". I knew
something was wrong, was criticized for speaking out, and felt left out. I
always looked forward to Midnight Mass at Christmas, the majesty of the
Gregorian Chants, the feeling of joy, and happiness. The last time I attended
a Midnight Mass I thought I was attending a folk music festival, how sad I
was. Today I still pray… And stand by what I believe and professed at my
confirmation using the words of the Nicene Creed. Thank You for your service
to God, and holding true to what some still hold dear. Dominus
Vobiscum, William
Witt MHFM: Thanks for the interest. We hope you see the rest of the information
which covers how one must not attend any of the New Masses, and that the
Vatican II Church is not the Catholic Church. Refuse Dear brothers, My name is Doug and I'm a sixteen year old Traditional
Catholic who holds the sedevacantist position. However, I have two cousins
who are both militant atheistic secularists, and i'm
concerned about what the fate of their souls will be. They attend
pro-abortion and pro same-sex "marriage" rallies often, hate the
Catholic faith, etc. I've tried to give them sacramentals, such as the Miraculous Medal, the Green
Scapular, and a Saint Benedict crucifix, but they refuse to accept them. I've
even showed them some of your material, such as your videos on Our Lady of
Guadalupe, the Exorcism of Emily Rose, Information Proves God, and Creation
and Miracles, but even after watching them, they still refuse to believe in
the Catholic Faith. Besides praying the Rosary for them, is there anything
else I can do to bring them to the Faith? Sincerely in Our Lady, Doug MHFM: Perhaps you tried this already, but
you could recommend that they pray the Hail Mary or the Our Father. If they say no, then you definitely should
not spend more time on them. As you
know, most people are of bad will. If
they don’t respond to the grace God is giving them, there’s nothing you can
do. You tried to help them (we assume
you told them they will go to Hell unless they convert), and now you should
move on. Fruitless Dear Brothers, Protestantism Dear Brothers: In reply to Clark's email, MHFM makes the really important
point (which we should always keep in mind) that the protestant is an anti-christ who rejects Christ and His word. As MHFM
has shown, the Bible declares that the anti-christ
is he who denies or dissolves Christ. While JP2 did this explicitly and
formally when he sat in the Temple of God, every heresy in some way destroys
the truth about Who Christ is. The "Jesus" whom protestants claim
to worship is a false Christ. Their "Christ" did not reveal a
religion. He did not found a Church or establish the Papacy. He did not
fulfill the old form of worship and provide the new. His words are not truth
and can be ignored and denied. He did not tell men what they must do to be
saved: the protestant tells men what they need to do to be
saved. In their hideous cult of pride which is, as Clark has pointed out,
nothing more than a hatred of the Catholic faith, they put man in the place
of God by insisting that everything God has done, man can do better.
Scripture has told us that there was to be one Antichrist but also many
little anti-christs over the course of history.
Likewise, although there would be only one counterfeit "Catholic"
Church and religion at the end of time, it too was to be preceded by many
false sects of perdition calling themselves "Christian churches".
The endtimes counterfeit "church" with
its heretical religion is God's punishment of the world for the sins of the
world, including the horrible, world-destroying sin of heresy. In their utter blindness, these people cannot see that heresy
was the cause of the fall of Satan: he thought he knew better than God, and
preferring his own will to God's, will get to command for all eternity those
men who will have followed his example. The "new truth", as the
Antichrist JP2 put it, is simply the old lie. Lee Ann Protestantism Subject: Critical dismantling of heretic pillars Dear MHFM, It seems that the up and coming self-appointed leaders of
the Protestant community and daily springing denominations feel the need to
establish their intellectual and “theological” bona fides of Protestant
“legitimacy” by engaging the greater part of their time in stirring their
congregations in polemics towards what they perceive to be Catholicity; after
throwing in a few straw men and many other misconceptions against the
Catholic Faith, it would almost seem that the newly springing denominations
exist and find this as their only purpose. Instead of arguing and criticizing
their parent denomination from which they broke, they align their deadly
emotions towards Catholicity.. it
would seem that basically all the denominations have an inherent
characteristic of unifying and attacking the Church through lies and
half-truths, rather than attacking their fellow Protestant parent
denomination's doctrines, because that’s where their sympathies lie. Protestantism is ever a prey of party disputes,
dissensions… rivalries… denominations… in the Protestant false religion… each
disagree with the other on the most fundamental points of doctrine. They
cannot agree and keep dividing and subdividing by the year. Their only
similarity appears to be their opposition to the Catholic Church. Today the
divisions and subdivisions of Protestantism are too well known to need
comment. Another illogicality of Protestantism lies in an absence
of a continuity of Apostolic Succession. The 16th century
Protestant outbreak was never commissioned by the Apostles. Their
self-appointed “ministers” cannot trace their lineage back to the time of the
Apostles. Protestant revolters simply sent
themselves upon whim and rebellion against Our Lord. They abandoned the
exegetic patrimony of the Church; and shunned the unanimous consent of the
Fathers. … Clark MHFM:
Yes, it’s difficult to describe the righteous indignation one has in hearing
a Protestant talk about Scripture and the idea that Catholicism contradicts
it. It’s an outrage to hear a
Protestant talk about the Bible, as if
he is on the side of the word of God and
the Catholic is lost, when he (the Protestant) is actually an anti-Christ
heretic who rejects Christ and His word. Comment Subject: Farm Worker parable This is a parable that Jesus told. It applies to the
Vatican 2 false church: Na… Asked Dear
Brothers, Last
night at work I was having lunch with an acquaintance. She is an employee who
works on another floor. She befriended me and I think she may be romantically
interested in me. She brought her food from home to share with me. She is a
Seventh Day Adventist. While eating lunch she asked me what I normally bring
to work to eat. I told her sometimes I make ham and cheese sandwiches. She
gave me such a ridiculous response. She claims the Bible says anyone who eats
pig will not go to Heaven. I replied that only Catholics will go to Heaven.
She then proceeded to criticize Catholics with the usual Protestant rhetoric,
that we worship idols (images and statues of saints and Mary), etc. I thought
of giving her a copy of your book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the
Catholic Church. However she does not read English very well. Her native
language is French and Haitian creole. I doubt if you have any of your books
available in French but is there a possibility in the future you could work
on that just like you have your website in Spanish? I'm a Haitian-American
and can communicate with her in her native tongue. It's a
shame that during this Great Apostasy so many of them have apostatized
from the true faith and have founded their own heretical sects or joined
another. I know of numerous examples. Haiti was once 95% Catholic but I read
somewhere recently that it has dropped to about 80%, if my memory serves me
well. Of course this is Novus Ordo but the point is
that many of them have rejected Catholicism altogether. Sylvestre MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. A fellow Catholic has translated some of
the materials into French. The YouTube
channel is: http://www.youtube.com/user/VaticanCatholique The website is: http://www.la-foi.fr/index.aspx Note MHFM: There is a traditional Catholic,
who is looking for a single traditional Catholic person (who is in agreement
with the positions of MHFM), who could help with some office-type work. If someone is interested in this, e-mail us
at mhfm1@aol.com with your name, state and telephone number. A person who does not have internet access
could also leave a message. E-mail is
preferable, however. Found
out Dear Brothers, I'm an 18 year old male and found out when I was about 16
about the Vatican II church and have since then abjured from it and all past
heresy. My only dilemma now is that I have social anxiety, depression and
general anxiety and it keeps me from preaching my faith and living out a true
catholic life… MHFM: Thanks for the interest. We believe that if you pray the full Rosary
each day; make a good general confession of any un-confessed mortal sins to a
valid priest; live the life of grace; and ask for special assistance to
overcome your anxiety, then it will pass. Eucharist … Jesus tells us in John 6:54,"Whoever eats my flesh and
drinks my blood has eternal life"(The New American Bible, Fireside Bible
Publishers). It seems like the Eucharist is just as important as Baptism in
order to receive eternal life or am i missing something? Thank you and God Bless Adrian MHFM:
There is a necessity to receive the Eucharist: for all who hear the command
and can fulfill it. However, it is not
absolutely necessary in the way that water baptism is absolutely necessary
for every man. This is discussed in
section 22 of our salvation book. Some writers
have tried to refute a literal interpretation of John 3:5 by appealing to the
words of Our Lord in John 6:54: “Amen, amen I say to you: Except you eat the
flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you.”
They argue that the language in this verse is the same as in John 3:5, and
yet the Church doesn’t take Jn. 6:54 literally – for infants don’t need to
receive the Eucharist to be saved. But the argument falters because the
proponents of this argument have missed a crucial difference in the wording
of these two verses. John 6:54- “Amen, amen I say to you: EXCEPT YOU eat the flesh
of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you.” John 3:5- “Amen, amen I say to thee, UNLESS A MAN be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter
into the kingdom of God.” Our Lord Jesus
Christ, when speaking on the necessity of receiving the Eucharist in John 6:54,
does not say: “unless a man eat the flesh of the Son of man…” He
says: “Except you…” His words, therefore, are clearly intended for the
people to whom He was speaking, not every man. Since the people to whom He
was speaking could eventually receive the Eucharist, they had to in order to
be saved. This applies to all who can receive the Eucharist, that is, all who
hear that command and can fulfill it, which is what the Church teaches. But
in John 3:5, Our Lord unequivocally speaks of every man. This is why the
Catholic Church’s magisterial teaching, in every single instance
it has dealt with John 3:5, has taken it as it is written. The difference in the
wording of these two verses actually shows the supernatural inspiration of
the Bible and the absolute necessity of water baptism for every man. Dalai
Lama No surprise if the "Dalai Lama" is a mason---in
fact I think it would be a bit more of a surprise if he were NOT one! Since
"the whole world is seated in wickedness"............however, the
"Dalai Lama" is slimier than most. I remember one day I was sitting
at my desk in my college house studying when I happened to glance out the
window and there he was, the "Dalai Lama" came slithering through
our campus en route to some "talk" that day on campus...........what
a slimy critter, and he doesn't seem to age much either which is a bit odd.
He is just like a serpent, yuck. How deluded so many are! Golgotha I have been contemplating a lot about the unspeakable
scene at Golgotha, the Crucifixion of Jesus, gesmas
and Dismas, imagine the Tree of Life in the Midst
and the reprobate on the left and the elect on the right… while Jesus is in
utter pain and misery because of Dismas' sins {and
mine}, Jesus doesn't even consider His own unimaginable pain, He turns to Dismas… Jesus provided everything for Dismas,
the Grace of repentance {to acknowledge and say I'm truly sorry}, the Grace
of Penance {Dismas', death on the cross}, unto
Salvation…. Todd MHFM: We should point out that many
people wrongly bring up the Good Thief as an example against the necessity of
water baptism, when he is not, as this video covers: The Good Thief, the
Old Testament Saints, and the Necessity of Baptism
[video] Concerned I enjoy reading your writings which brings me back in time
when the nuns talked the same way regarding salvation. Mortal sin for missing
Mass on Sunday, mortal sin for eating meat on Friday's etc. Salvation is found
in the Catholic church & everyone else is a heretic. The message I am
concerned with is your position with the most recent Pope's. I find it hard
to believe, that these traveling Pope's who visit other countries, can afford
to be candid with your positions that would be very offensive to other
believer's. They are giving a message within a very delicate way to avoid hatred, that will cause many Catholics to lose their
lives, in many of these countries. You can't make friends by telling them
that they are going to HELL. I was told that the Holy Spirit works within the church
& when the conclave of cardinals reach a decision, white smoke indicates
that through the working of the Holy Spirit, a Pope is selected. Are you
concerned that you may be guilty of the most serious sin in scripture, which
is the sin against the Spirit? Thanks John Paul…. MHFM: A Catholic has an obligation to
tell the truth wherever he may be.
Martyrs shed their blood rather than deny one article of the faith;
yet you are proposing that it’s somehow justified to praise false religions
in the hope that their leaders will deal more leniently with Catholics? That’s contrary to the faith. Moreover, the notion that the Vatican II
antipopes are simply praising false religions in order to make friends or be
polite is not reality. They praise
false religions from within the comfort of the Vatican. They enshrine their heretical teaching on
non-Catholics within official documents.
They willingly take part in syncretic gatherings that have been
condemned by the Church. They believe
and promote the heretical idea that Christ and the Church are not
necessary. They are apostates. That’s simply a fact. You say that you cannot make friends by
telling people they will go to Hell.
Yes, you can. Jesus told
everyone in the world that unless they believe in Him they will go to Hell
(Mk. 16:16); and He also said that those who listened to His commands are His
friends: “You are my friends, if you do the things that I command you”
(John 15:14). A true friend tells his
neighbor the truth. He doesn’t hide it
from him. He doesn’t tell him he’s
going to Heaven if, in fact, he’s going to Hell. Finally, you are wrong about the
conclave. The Church teaches that a
heretic cannot be validly elected pope, since a heretic is not a member of
the Catholic Church. The mere fact
that an election has occurred does not mean a valid occupant of the papal
throne has been chosen, as Church history and Catholic teaching prove. That’s covered in detail on our website and
in our videos. Heresy http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/homepage/news/detail/articolo/benedetto-xvi-benedict-xvi-benedicto-xvi-14866/ Dear Brothers, I thought you may like to see this to add to your Benedict XVI's
recent heresies file. It seems as he has recently said that states have the
duty to promote their cultural heritage as well as their
"religious" heritage. Hmm, someone should tell him that the
Mohammedans are already taking his advice and have been for years in advance
and are promoting their false "god" Satan/Allah across the face of
the earth as well as their warped "culture", both of which are one
and the same and indivisible from one another. Does he not already know that
entire countries are de-baptizing themselves, turning against Christ, turning
atheist and if they do believe in a "religion" anymore or leave for
one it is nowadays usually Mohammedanism which is taking over the world that
they leave for? Is he really this stupid? "Promote your religion
people" well they are and there is a reason why Mohammed has been the #1
boys name in both France and Belgium for the last 10 years and why northern
Europe is overun with these lowlife devil
worshippers and their sick wife beating, daughter killing, child molesting,
deranged and murderous false "faith". These Mohammedans are
building mosques (temples to Satan) at an alarming rate while Catholic
churches are closing even quicker and the Mohammedans are buying up closed
down Catholic churches and converting them into temples dedicated to the
coming of the Anti-Christ where they worship their true "god"
Mohammed. It is utterly sickening that the places where in some cases for
centuries GOD almighty himself has been worshipped and adored and glorified
is now being even more defiled and abominated than ever before and this punk
is in essence promoting this agenda and these acts by these very words. I
remember reading one particular prophecy that stated every place where GOD
has been despised (worshipped falsely or where a false religion has had its
ceremonies) will be left in ruins… Andrew Comment Subject: Saint Montfort's End-Time Prophecy Dear Brothers, Across I am so confused! I came across your videos by accident a
couple of weeks ago and have been going through them. I have known something
is wrong in the church for a long time. And have been from pillar to post.
I'm an Opus Dei Catholic, the mother of 4 young children (one who's name is
Fulton, after Fulton Sheen, the video that brought me to you) and married to
a good catholic man. I don't want to go to hell, I
don't want to lead my children to hell. I have done some research… Should we
stay at the Archdiocese of Boston latin Mass
and not receive the sacraments? Or stay at home? Any advice would help,
PLEASE! Thank you and God Bless. Mary MHFM:
Thanks for the interest. As you can
see from the material, to be a true Catholic you need to completely reject
the Vatican II sect and the New Mass.
Opus Dei is a heretical group that accepts Vatican II, the New Mass
and the Vatican II Counter Church. The
Vatican II Church is not the Catholic Church.
One must have no part with it.
Also, you should not go to the Latin Mass in the Boston Archdiocese
because many of the priests who offer it are invalid and it is offered in
churches where they also have a New Mass. Before
receiving sacraments, one must reach the point where one is committed never
to attend the New Mass again, believes in Outside the Church There is No
Salvation without exception (no “baptism of desire”), rejects NFP, won’t
support any heretical priests, etc.
That’s explained in this file: Where to go to Mass or confession today? People
should also make the traditional profession of faith from the Council of
Trent, which can be accessed from the aforementioned file. Once a person is convinced on all relevant
matters, we can help that person with possible locations for receiving
sacraments. We also recommend people
to pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible. Thought Subject: vatican-2 I have e-mailed you several times in the past. I thought I had converted to the Catholic
Faith. You are saying that the church I go to is not a valid church… I do
believe in the teachings. I have spent a lot of time doing study on the
different denominations and found the catholic faith to be as close to the
bible teachings. I came into the church on april 24
2011. Then what you are saying is that I may not be catholic at all. You know
my whole desire was to be saved by christ and to
follow him… Mike Childers MHFM:
Thanks for the interest. The material
on our website and in our videos demonstrates that the post-Vatican II Church
is not the real Catholic Church. The
New Mass is not a valid Mass. Please
see our video on that issue: Why the New Mass and New Rite of Ordination are Invalid We
can help you with how to become Catholic, and where to receive sacraments,
once you are convinced on the issues. You should pray the Rosary each day, 15
decades if possible. You say that the
Catholic faith is "close" to the Bible's teaching. No, the Catholic faith is perfectly
consistent with the Bible's teaching.
It doesn't seem as if you are fully convinced of that yet. Once must be convinced to have the true
faith. You should see our book, The
Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church, and stop going to the
New Mass. Conclude Thank you so much f/
the "What Really Happened to the Catholic Church" e-mail! Dk who gave you my e-mail address, but glad they did. I'm
keeping it, and sharing it, as well, because it contains practically
everything a Catholic should know. To some, it will be a real eye-opener; to
others, like me, it's a comfort. I've been distressed
f/ years… Really, the pain is indescribable, like that of an abandoned
orphan! How
older Catholics can accept, w/o a complaint, this phony religion Vatican II dumped
on us is more than I'll ever understand! For them, I pray my Rosary daily… I wish I could see a
"light at the end of the tunnel", but things just seem to get
worse. Instead of trying to fix the problem, Benedict XVI obsesses about his
designer fragrances, shoes, clothing, etc., and doesn't seem to mind if the
media announces it to the world! Such vanity fr/
the man who's supposed to be the "Vicar of Christ on Earth"!!! I can only conclude
that God is allowing this insanity to continue because He's about to return
very soon. When it happens, I pray that those of us who've suffered through,
and fought against, this hypocrisy will hear, "Well done, good and
faithful servants!" Please
include my family and me in your prayers, and keep me on your mailing list.
God bless you! Gratefully: Mary Abbey Human
Sacrifice Subject: 'Conclusive' evidence of human sacrifice found in Mexico -
Telegraph Horrifying! We used to collect obsidian knives from Teotihuacan
when we were kids growing up in Mexico. It could be said we may have had
blood on our hands. Na… Comment Subject: Saints for our times Dear Brothers: Just a thought I found interesting and wanted to pass
along. St. Louis de Montfort was not
canonized until 1947 by Pope Pius XII. It's almost as if God was reserving
him especially for our times, inasmuch as his sanctity was certainly already
recognized in his day (he died in 1716). In the little bio on him which is
presented at the beginning of True Devotion to Mary it says: "At
the saint's beatification investigation, many witnesses testified that during
his life they had heard struggles between him and the devil, including the
sound of fist blows and the swish of whips." (The devil's retaliation
against St. Louis for all the souls the saint was bringing to Jesus through
Mary. Reminds us of Padre Pio.) In looking through the Raccolta
for a prayer to St. Louis, I didn't see one to him but something else did
catch my attention. Prayer # 500 is a Novena prayer to St. Francis Xavier,
who lived around the time the Protestant revolt was beginning. I noticed that
this prayer is a bit different from others in the Raccolta,
in that it actually indicates the point at which one should ask for
his or her specific spiritual or temporal favor. Like the others,
it too is indulgenced, and is dated 1904. Since I have decided to use this
prayer, I thought I would refresh my memory on the life of St. Francis
Xavier. It seems that Pope St. Pius X declared St. Francis Xavier to be the heavenly
patron for the Society for the Propagation of the Faith and its work.
Pope St. Pius X (amazingly) believed it was possible that the Antichrist was
already living on earth in his day, and told us how we were to recognize him.
It would seem that if Pope St. Pius X had such confidence in St. Francis,
then St. Francis Xavier would continue to be a powerful patron for those who
propagate the true faith today. What's ironic and disturbing about this, of course, is the
fact that St. Francis Xavier, the modern apostle to the Indies, dedicated his
life to bringing to the Japanese and others the true Catholic faith, and we can
only imagine the never-ending risks, hardships and tribulations he had to
endure. Yet, the mis-named Society of St. Pius X
promotes the heresy of "baptism of desire", as did Lefebvre, and
this heresy especially renders the work of St. Francis Xavier (like the
deaths of the martrys) unnecessary, if not
downright foolish. Lee Ann Heresy Dear Brothers, Faith Brothers Michael
and Peter, ... continue fighting for the True Faith. Thanks for
everything and I want to let you know that I have woken up so much and still
growing due to your travails. Melina. Trinidad, West
Indies Comment I ask you to please stop your website and videos. I
realize that you are doing all of this in a good mindset, but all your talk
of heresy is very clearly a brand new heresy in itself. You are taking things
out of context, you are putting words in peoples mouths, and you are exploding on tiny
things. You are denying bishops and very blatantly the holy Fathers of our
Church. And worse yet you are doing it through a very unholy way. I am so
disappointed to see this kind of thing coming from people who call themselves
brothers. Please stop. I will pray for you. Kr… MHFM:
Right, that’s why you don’t give any specific examples. If you did, it would be demonstrated that
you are wrong and that your accusation is baseless. You are just another bad-willed liar
consumed by hatred of the truth and with nothing to substantiate your
claims. Quote MHFM: This is a somewhat interesting
quote about St. Luke, the author of Luke’s Gospel and the Acts of the
Apostles. It concerns what is recorded
in Acts 26:26 (Paul’s words to Agrippa), and how it favors the historical
validity of Luke’s writing. We read
that Paul told Agrippa about Christ’s fulfillment of prophecy, His
Resurrection, etc. Luke informs us
that Paul said these things were not “done in a corner.” “One thing that
definitely distinguishes modern historiography from almost all forms of
ancient historiography is that the ancients did not hesitate to include the
divine or the supernatural in their narratives of historical events. Yet
notice that Luke, unlike some ancient writers, does not discourse about the
fabulous in a way that makes it immune to historical scrutiny. He insists that the miraculous deeds and
divine interventions recorded in his account were not ‘done in a corner’ and
that various eyewitnesses could be consulted about these matters. This contrasts
with the ancient writers who wrote about ‘supernatural’ events on remote
islands or faraway countries, locations that none of their readers could
possibly check to find out if the account was veracious.” (Ben Witherington, New
Testament History, p. 26.) Olympic
Games Subject: Nuclear attack at London 2012 Olympic games Dear mhfm, Excuses Dear Brothers, Someone … When someone uses the name of God outside of the one
true faith, it is offensive… This is the fruit of religious liberty. Of the
many names of blasphemy, surely religious liberty is of the highest degree.
Thus, lady liberty is the whore [see wikipedia,
liberty (goddess)]. Saint Timothy pray for us, Richard Spinnenweber Music
Industry Subject: Music Industry I thought your video on rock n roll sorcery was great.
This video on the same subject with newer artists was excellent! I think many
people would never let anyone they cared about listen to the radio
again...very well done. God bless MHFM, Matthew MHFM:
Thanks for the e-mail. Perhaps you are
referring to a video we carry called: Rock-N-Roll
Sorcerers of the New Age Revolution. It’s extremely
powerful. Comment Dear MHFM … I think it won’t matter who wins this election in november. all the moral evils of
this country will continue with these false naturalists on the left and
right. the unborn will continue to be killed under
the cover of law. the godlessness of our nation will
continue. the future chastisement from god will be
an thermo - nuclear exchange which will be the start of an third world war. ww 3. thank you and God bless IN
HER MOST SORROWFUL AND IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY from mark vasquez Comment Dear Most Holy Family Monastery, My name is Francisco and I first wanted to thank you for
your amazing effort in saving so many souls and showing them the truth.
Because of your faith and effort I myself found the truth through your
website... May God bless you. Francisco SSPX Subject: SSPX leading souls astray A few thoughts
just came to me with regard to the SSPX. As an
organization and for the vast majority of their members, they are heretics
and schismatics. As your excellent materials on
this website clearly prove, the SSPX are heretics for several reasons, but as
regards their specific heresies which pertain to the validity of the “popes”
since 1958, they also undermine in many souls the very concept of the Papacy
and the due respect and obedience we must have for the Popes. By picking and
choosing when to follow and when not to follow the teachings of the
(Anti)Popes and their Rome since 1958, the SSPX also (probably intentionally
and devilishly) portray a false image of what it means to be Catholic – which
is to obey the infallible magisterium without compromise… The holy Catholic
Faith is not alone based on traditional externals,
and not even on the true Mass (alone), as so many in the SSPX would have us
believe. A true Catholics first and foremost obeys the Popes and has the
utmost respect for the Papacy. Who are the SSPX
to decide when B16 is right or when B16 is wrong (or his 4 predecessors), as
long as they acknowledge these guys as (their) “Popes”? Apart from being schismatics in doing so, they also mislead countless
souls into falsely thinking that respect and obedience for the (true) Popes
and their teachings is not of the uttermost importance after all... By this false
method (of picking and choosing), why don’t the SSPX just decide for
themselves what they like or don’t like in every (true) Pope’s teachings? But alas, are they
not their own little man-made "magisterium" with regard to one of
the most important Dogmas, by denying that there is No Salvation Outside the
Catholic Church? The very thought
of these heretics and schismatics makes me vomit. Brendan… MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. We should emphasize that when one says that
the SSPX should not regard the Vatican II antipopes as “popes” yet disagree
with their teaching, it’s in reference to the authoritative teaching of the
antipopes (such as Vatican II), which would qualify as magisterial if they
were true popes (which they are not).
A Catholic could disagree with something promoted by a pope if it is
not magisterial. This is especially
true if it contradicts a previous magisterial teaching. However, the SSPX’s position involves
rejecting the authoritative teaching of the men they regard as popes;
refusing communion with the hierarchy they regard as Catholic – the very
“hierarchy” they demand others (e.g., sedevacantists)
to recognize; accepting heretics as leaders in the Church; holding that the
Catholic Church has officially erred, including in canonizations; holding
that the Catholic Church has become modernist and in fact a Counter Church;
etc. ad nauseam. Their position, as
you mention, is definitely heretical and schismatic in a number of ways; and
their obstinate inconsistency should make any Catholic sick. Who Subject: Freemason Dear Brothers, Discussing Dear MHFM, I thought I heard it all...but I was wrong. Was visiting
my sister in another state, and her daughter (my niece), was visiting as
well. My niece attended Loyola University in New Orleans...and graduated a
few years ago. We started discussing the V2 false church...which she refused
to believe is false...and then told me that I need to "get with it,
times have changed"...that if Jesus were here on earth now, He'd be
smoking a joint with her and all her friends. I don't think I ever heard
anything so disgusting come out of someone's mouth. I've learned from experience
( with my family anyhow) that because of the nature
of the human condition no one likes to be pushed into a conclusion that they
are unwilling to reach. Getting through to them is unachievable. All I can
hope for is to plant a seed and then to water it with my prayers for them.
Oh' Rarest Queen of the May..."how dark without you our journey would
be". Toni Act Subject: amazing ‘bishop’ heresy Hello Brothers “Fr.”
Beck Hello MHFM, I think this "priest", who goes by the name
"Father Edward Beck", may be gay. Take a look at this video of him
defending homosexuals in the priesthood… http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=10388669 Danny MHFM: Observing him, and listening to his
strenuous effort to justify homosexuals in the “priesthood,” causes one to
conclude that he’s probably gay.
That’s not to mention his truly
jaw-dropping apostasy. It’s not an
accident that he’s the “priest” featured on ABC. That’s the image of the “priesthood” they
don’t mind projecting and the theological content they don’t mind
promoting. Matter Subject: In the matter of the «Dalai Lama,»
etc. Brothers Michael
and Peter Dimond: Matter Where do you people live.....in a cave? I don't understand why
you bash the Freemasons so badly. Everything about the Freemasons is found in
the Bible. I know this because I am a Freemason and have been for the past 18
years. It's not safe to talk about things you know nothing about...and you
can't take the word of a "former" Freemason who was ran away from
the fraternity for violating the rules or for being less than a decent moral
person, or wherever else you're getting your information. Your church organization
has been found to harbor more "effeminate" types in the form of
child molesters than any public school system known to man, and most
especially any other religious organization in this country. So you may want
to refrain from throwing manure if you're living in the barn. Timothy Ashley, God fearing Freemason MHFM:
No, you are not correct. You should
watch this video: Abortion, Rock Music
and Freemasonry Exposed
[video] Think
Bunny Familienemsse mit dem Osterhasen - YouTube Dear Brothers: I'm not certain whether or not I ever saw a bunny or devil
speaking at the false "mass"; nevertheless these videos brought me
right back to my Novus Ordo days. How angry God
must be with our world for its mockery of Him, His Beloved Son, and
the Mass which is a mystical re-Presentation of Our Lord's Sacrifice on
Calvary. The horrors taking place in the false Vatican II church should
make us tremble from head to toe. It's true, we often focus on the sheep being led astray
by these false priests, but the Novus Ordo
"church" would not be in business were in not for the MONEY that
these indifferent people give to them week after week, month after
month. All of this money given to rob people of the faith, support
heretical and evil "priests", and continue blasphemies such as we
see in the attached. None of that money is ever used for the teaching of the
true Catholic faith, for the eternal salvation of souls, or for the glory of
God. Donal emailed to ask if there is a MHFM
representative or presence in Ireland. Like the rest of us, he will
soon come to understand that the true Church is in eclipse, just as Our Lady
of La Salette said it would be. That means that, in
order to have a "presence" in the US or anywhere else in the
world, MHFM must continually spend massive amounts of money on advertising to
keep a true Catholic presence out there. This means they need many
donations week after week, month after month to reach souls
like mine, yours, and Donal's. To answer Kathryn and Michael, yes, I know it's shocking
but the actual quote from the boys was: "Michael??? But he's the bad
one!" God help these children, and God help us. Who will reach people
with the true faith if we do not? As most of us have come to realize, it is very difficult
to reach as many individuals as we would like with the truth. (Certainly, we
can reach some but not as many as we would like.) It seems to me that the
easiest and most effective way to reach large numbers of people is by
generously and regularly supporting MHFM. And I would remind others (just as
I remind myself) that to accomplish these efforts, MHFM needs significant
amounts of money, because that's precisely what is required
to plan or commit to such advertising endeavors. Isn't it
heartbreaking (and sickening) to think of the massive amounts of money that
are given even to organizations which, while claiming to be traditional
Catholics, do not tell people the truth about the faith or the truth about
the times we are living in? It is also important for each of us to remember
that supporting the spread of Catholicism is an obligation on every
person's part, and repentance for having once supported and promoted
heretical things (even if we did so inadvertently) should prompt us to even greater
gratitude and generosity. We are most fortunate to have found MHFM who
teaches the true Catholic faith whole and inviolate, just as we are obliged
to hold it for salvation. And we must remember that to whom much is given --
much will be expected from in return. May She who is the Mother of Mercy and Our Life, Our
Sweetness and Our Hope, help us as we help MHFM in rounding up for Our Lord
and Our Lady as many souls as possible throughout the world. Lee Ann Comment
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Spring 2012 Archive) Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Fall 2011 Archive) Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Summer 2011 Archive) Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Spring 2011 Archive) Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Winter 2010-2011 Archive) Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Summer-Fall 2010 Archive) Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Winter 2010 Archive) Next Archive
for the E-Exchanges is Here (A) Next Archive for E-Exchanges is Here (B) www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com |