E-Exchanges Archive, Summer 2012




Subject: your website


Every time I see your ad I picture Martin Luther….He was upset because of lots of things, among which was selling indulgences….. it appears to me that you are the ones capitalizing on what you perceive to be error in the Church. It took me a couple of seconds to recognize that you do not speak for THE Catholic Church, and as a very serious, practicing Catholic….seeking to come closer to our Lord, I am saddened that you find it necessary to attempt to divide again! I don’t know how successful you’ve been in seducing disillusioned Catholics. I can’t imagine anyone being attracted with positive interest in your very disturbing ads, but not much surprises me these days. I was taught as a child that what brings us closer to God is of God….if it takes us away, it comes from some other source.


I assure you, you are in my prayers.




MHFM: You obviously don’t understand the Catholic faith at all.  In your failure to recognize what constitutes Catholic truth and Catholic authority, you actually are the person who accuses the Catholic Church of error.  Are you aware that Benedict XVI praises Luther, and that he has agreed with Luther on the heresy of justification by faith alone?  Are you aware that Benedict XVI teaches that Protestants (e.g., the followers of Luther) are inside the Church of Christ, and that such a position is heretical?  Are you aware that Benedict XVI engages in condemned interfaith worship with the followers of Luther, and that such an activity has always been forbidden by Catholic teaching?  Are you aware that there have been antipopes in Church history, even some who reigned in Rome?  Are you aware that it’s a Catholic teaching that heretics cease to be members of the Church, and they consequently cannot hold the papal office even if they claim to?


Do you even know what the Papacy is, or what fidelity to the Magisterium means?  It doesn’t mean just following or defending any new teaching that a man in Rome promotes.  It means adhering to the authoritative teaching of the popes throughout history.  Are you aware that a Great Apostasy is foretold in Scripture and Catholic prophecy, and a massive falling away from the faith is not ipso facto incompatible with the promises of Christ to His Church?  You need to look at the facts and educate yourself on these matters, rather than just dismissing them; for you are definitely wrong.  A good example of how you depart from Catholic teaching is the fact that you believe in salvation outside the Church.  Are you aware that it’s a binding Catholic teaching that there is no salvation outside the Church, and the dogma really means that all those who die without the Catholic faith are not saved?  You clearly reject that Catholic teaching, and that is heresy.  You are not on the side of the Church in taking the positions you take.  You are deceived, and you need to look at the information to see the truth of the real Catholic faith.  For starters, we recommend these files:


The Glossary of Terms and Principles [PDF]


Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [section]


Benedict XVI prays with female Lutheran "bishop"! [video]




… I needed some time for little basic :) reading of Your Vast Traditional Catholic Encyclopaedia.


After many years of drinking poisons of heresies and eating rotten venom of modernism I was starving and my faith was dead. But our LORD Jesus Christ Who Himself by His own Divine Power rose from the Dead 1979 years ago gave me life…






Subject: …"The Apocalypse Explained"


… Thank you for sending your thoughtful books and DVD. I watched "The Apocalypse Explained" and "The Third Secret of Fatima".  My name is Robert, I'm an Orthodox Christian. In the first millennium, the Orthodox and Catholic were one apostolic church.

The assertions and proof of your research and presentation is very clear and speaks the truth. It all makes a lot of sense and is very thought provoking. It is obvious that there was an imposter Sister Lucia and a radical takeover of the Papacy which started ushering in a new era for a one world religion.

In "The Apocalypse Explained", your explanation of the 'beast with seven heads and ten horns' seems right on, especially how the EU has become a re institution of the Roman empire that Daniel spoke of…. The explanation about the 7 official Popes is engaging and plausible… To me, it does seem that these anti-popes will be in league with him because they are obviously ushering in the era of one world religion, by combining all the world's faiths
to join together, and changing all the church doctrine to heresy…



MHFM: We’re glad that you have some interest.  It’s critical, however, that you look at the material on the biblical proof for the Papacy and the sections proving the recognition of papal primacy and authority in the ancient Church.  “Orthodoxy” is not true Christianity.  It rejects what Christ established in St. Peter and what was recognized by the ancient Church.  The material on the apocalypse concerns a Counter Church and antipopes – not true popes.  Satan’s primary deception in the last days centers around Rome and previous centers of Catholic authority because the Catholic Church is the one true Church.


The Bible teaches that Jesus made St. Peter the first pope [link to section] – also contains audios on the primacy of the Bishop of Rome in the early Church




Playing dumb works very well in society. It is the number one defense used, and the easiest to use. One reason it is so effective is because it makes the other person feel superior, and even seems to trigger emotions of empathy, as we have all made mistakes in life.  Letting a person off because they say that they "didn't see the stop sign" is much more probable for a policeman, than letting a person off who says that they "chose not to stop." This is regardless of the fact that the policeman probably knows the truth: The person chose not to stop.
Sometimes I wonder if people realize that playing dumb with God is not going to work.

Romans 1:20- "For the invisible things of him, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made; his eternal power also, and divinity: so that they are inexcusable."

Chapter 7:7- "Ask, and it shall be given you: seek, and you shall find: knock, and it shall be opened to you. For every one that asketh, receiveth: and he that seeketh, findeth: and to him that knocketh, it shall be opened. Or what man is there among you, of whom if his son shall ask bread, will he reach him a stone? Or if he shall ask him a fish, will he reach him a serpent? If you then being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children: how much more will your Father who is in heaven, give good things to them that ask him?"

God does not leave men in the error of false religions if they seek the truth.






… I have listened to almost all of your online debates etc. I have always believed that outside the Church there is no salvation as I learned in the 1940s. I was an altar boy in the 40s. I was away from the Church in the late 60s and when I came back was shocked. I have attended the SSPX, SSPV and Bishop Sanborn Masses but did not agree with the BOD/BOB and I believed that you must be Catholic to be saved. They will not give Communion to someone who does not agree with them. I found an old Priest that was ordained in the early 60s but in the NO, he agreed with me but said he had to stay in the NO for medical coverage and retirement benefits even though he knew he would lose his soul.




MHFM: That’s an interesting story about the Novus Ordo priest who claims to agree but stays in the Novus Ordo for benefits.  He’s clearly a heretic but he would probably be an option for confession (for a Catholic convinced on all issues) provided he says the words of absolution. 




… on where I Can attend a non vatican 2 church,,in my area... I Go to your website frequently and have been blessed by your teachings, I had gotten away from my catholic roots at one point and tried protestant churches ,,but find them to teach falsely and they use church as a form of entertainment..not to mention their grace n faith only doctrine and how they dont include the so called apocrypa,, so I want to go back to my Catholic roots but am aware of the corrupt vatican 2 churches you speak of,,,, Please Help.. my name Is Mike.


MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  Protestantism is definitely false, as our section and book refuting Protestantism show.  We can help you with where to receive traditional sacraments, but first one must be convinced on all issues of the faith.  We hear from many people who just want a church, but aren’t yet convinced on the issues of faith. 


The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts


For instance, before receiving sacraments, one must reach the point where one is committed never to attend the New Mass again, believes in Outside the Church There is No Salvation without exception (no “baptism of desire”), rejects NFP, won’t support any heretical priests, etc.  That’s explained in this file: Where to go to Mass or confession today?  People should also make the traditional profession of faith from the Council of Trent, which can be accessed from the aforementioned file.  Once a person is convinced on all relevant matters, we can help that person with possible locations for receiving sacraments.  We also recommend people to pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible.




Dear MHFM,

I am aware that witchcraft is diabolical. My mother watches this TV show that is based on fairy tales and has magic in it. I tried to tell her that she shouldn't watch it, just like Harry Potter, because it contains something that is diabolical and against the faith… I am wondering if it is sinful to watch shows that contain magic in them, i.e. fairy tales, wizard of oz, etc.? (Although, she doesn't take the shows seriously.)  A reply would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you


MHFM: A program based on witchcraft or magic obviously should not be watched (unless the program is an exposé of witchcraft and magic).  In that case the theme of the show entails witchcraft.  However, if a program has a very different theme and only makes a passing reference to someone who became a witch (or something like that) then it would not necessarily be wrong to view it.  It sounds like your mother watches the former kind of program and that is sinful.  Reading Harry Potter, for instance, unless someone is doing specialized work to expose the evil behind it, is sinful.




Subject: Heile




It's always pleasing to the ears to hear the true faith being protected against the bad-willed (Mike Heile) in these times. Mike and the others that always come to their prideful "Perry Mason Moment" thinking they are on some spiritual ride upward into greatness are sadly mistaken. These moments of false spirituality are the defining moments in their lives as heretics and hypocrites that close the gates of heaven and become the gates of hell for others as they spread "their" interpretations. These hypocrites try to get into heaven via ways other than the truth, similar to the days of old when getting to heaven was attempted by building the tower of Babel that was never allowed by God to be completed.

Matthew 23:13. But woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you shut the kingdom of heaven against men, for you yourselves do not enter in; and those that are going in, you suffer not to enter.


Also, here's the rebel hypocrite anti-pope calling the "rebel traditionalists" back into the counter-church. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/30/us-pope-traditionalists-idUSBRE88T08S20120930


God Bless,


Tom Miles




Subject: Telling Ryder Cup Interview Moment


Dear Brothers,


Here is more proof that so called "Christian" athletes are clueless. During a post-match interview a reporter asked the American team, or 13 golfers including a coach, the following question; "Did any of you at any time during the round ask for guidance from your Creator?" Now the American team has three so called vocal "Christians" on their team. Not only did none of them respond but the question was ignored and another question was quickly gone to. This goes to show the lack of conviction of false Christians and the lack of status that our God holds in society. Anything having to do with God is quickly swept under the carpet. The team had lost despite being in the driver’s seat heading into Sunday. Something tells me it they had won their attitude towards God would not have been much different. The Masonic connections at the Medinah Golf Club where the matches were held probably contributed to the question being ignored by the media and the players...


Bob Bohr


Vatican II


Where can I find a list of what DOCTRINES--as opposed to PRACTICES--were changed in the Catholic Church after Vatican 2? Thank you!




MHFM: The doctrines of the Catholic Church have not changed and cannot change.  Rather, the Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church.  Its leaders were invalidly elected heretics who falsely posed as Catholic popes.  The Catholic teachings denied by Vatican II and by the antipopes who imposed Vatican II are discussed in detail in the material on our website, in the book, in audios, and in videos.  We have a file on Vatican II’s heresies and files on the antipopes’ heresies.  We also have numerous videos that deal specifically with those topics.  If you look at the website and the videos, you will find those materials.


The Heresies in Vatican II [PDF File]





Thank you Dimond brothers for all of your material and you tube videos! You have converted me! I desire the conversion of many!


God Bless,

Esther Rodriguez




Dear Brother Dimond,


Thank you for answering me… I found [articles] regarding Vatican II's new thoughts about Wiccan's (witches) where they state "Wiccans are on a genuine spiritual quest." I was greatly disturbed yet not shocked.






Subject: Golf, Freemasonry, and Islam


Watching the 2012 Ryder Cup golf matches, I was struck by the appearance of the clubhouse of the course holding the event. First of all, the course is called Medinah, in Illinois. It appears as a shrine to freemasonry. The clubhouse has domes topped by scimitars, an Arab style sword, better known as a shriner symbol. Further, the clubhouse includes a structure which clearly looks like a minaret. Obviously, there's some connection between Islam and freemasonry. What I find most amazing is that through all of the coverage, none of this was never mentioned. Another aspect of professional golf I find troubling is the preponderance of tournament sponsorships by the big "too big to fail banks", such as RBS, Deutchebank, and Barclays....


Ed Dodge




Dear Brothers,

Thank you for exposing the proud liar and heretic, Mike Heile. He lacks the true charity and honesty that should characterize a Catholic. He is clearly not a Christian, since he obviously rejects the Papacy given that he holds to Antipope John Paul II the Antichrist, and can't distinguish between the authority of a Council and the lack of authority of a Catechism. He appears to be a false traditionalist who claims to believe in the salvation dogma, but in reality denies it by his opposition to basic Catholic truths. The Devil uses such individuals to try to weaken our resolve and to induce us to compromise the faith, since by their diabolical aggression and blatant inversion of the truth, they hope and attempt to have us be as faithless and cowardly as themselves. However, such faithlessness is impossible for true Catholics who persevere in living the life of grace (unless we sin mortally), since God never tempts us beyond what we can bear, and gives us the wisdom to confound the proud and arrogant (Matt. 23:12). Your replies were right on the point, which is always great to see...

2 Timothy 3:1-5 - "Know also this, that, in the last days, shall come dangerous times. Men shall be lovers of themselves, covetous, haughty, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, wicked, Without affection, without peace, slanderers, incontinent, unmerciful, without kindness, Traitors, stubborn, puffed up, and lovers of pleasures more than of God: Having an appearance indeed of godliness, but denying the power thereof. Now these avoid."

God Bless,

Chris White




Subject: Very troubled Soul


Hi. I'm looking for some spiritual guidance. I live near Philadelphia, PA. I am currently reading many of the articles and watching many of the videos I see on your site. I want to become a true Catholic. I want to make sure I am Baptized. Where can I find help around here… I am desperate. Please do not hesitate. I'm in agony every second I am awake.


– Tony


MHFM: Tony, God is definitely giving you the grace to see what’s most important and to act upon it.  The easy steps to convert are in the link below.  It shouldn’t take long for you to be convinced, follow the steps, and be ready for a conditional baptism.  That’s explained in the file.  You should also pray the Rosary each day, if you are not doing so already.


The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts


How to Pray the Rosary [pdf]


When you feel like you know the basics (which again, shouldn’t take much time), and you are convinced on all the other core issues of faith, we can help you with where to receive traditional sacraments or with someone to perform a conditional baptism.  That’s explained in the file, but anyone can baptize as long as the person adheres to proper matter and form (and has the minimal intention).  The key is to pray and to continue to look at the information.  These videos are very important in regard to acquiring a good understanding of what has transpired since Vatican II, and how the post-Vatican II Church is not the Catholic Church.


The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World

Why the New Mass and New Rite of Ordination are Invalid (full length)




Subject: Converting to Catholicism


Hi, my name is Zak Valle. I am in the Navy, currently serving.  I've watched a lot of the YouTube videos that Brother Peter Diamond has put up and I must say that I am mind blown at some of the movies that he's produced. I love them! Anyways, that's not what I am e-mailing MHFM about.

I was hoping to hear back from either Brother Peter or someone about converting to Catholicism. I am looking to convert to Catholicism as I have discovered that I have found peace in practicing the customs and participating in the traditions of the faith to the extent that I am allowed, amongst other things. I am curious to know more about how I would go about converting to Catholicism as well as how to become a traditional Catholic vice a "Vatican 2" catholic, of which even I am not certain the main differences between the two. I would love to discuss more with him about converting and accepting the faith and how different the process would be to convert if I have already been baptized.

Thank you for your time and keep up the good work. You guys are a light in this ever darkening world.




MHFM: That’s tremendous to hear, Zak.  You should follow these steps to convert:


The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

How to Pray the Rosary [pdf]


Also, you should pray the Rosary each day.  When one has taken the steps above, we can help that person with where to receive valid sacraments. 


New Video Posted


MHFM: This is a new video.  He also talks about his experience with a Novus Ordo “priest” and the conviction that comes with the true faith.


Seventh-Day Adventist Converts [video]


In Response


Subject: In response to “Stopped”

Dear Brothers,

I hope "OH" takes your advice to heart. There was a time when I too gave in to this snare of the devil - worrying about my heretical family. The fact is, if they were of the truth, they would act in accordance with the truth. There were many times, too, when I tried convincing them of the necessity of the Catholic faith, but liars will never be convinced of the truth. That is when you need to "shake the dust off your feet," so to speak. Ignore them, and focus on God (as MHFM advises). Trust wholly in God. St. Teresa of Avila said, The most we have to strive for in the beginning is to care for oneself alone and consider that there is nothing on earth but God and oneself. She added, The safe path for the soul that practices prayer will be not to bother about anything or anyone and to pay attention to itself and to pleasing God.

One more thing, "OH" mentions that he/she is becoming impatient with God. Perhaps this is why he/she feels alone? God wants us to be patient. We must bear with what He wants. Patiently endure the distressing and painful things that befall you, for through them God in His providence is purifying you (St. Thalassios the Libyan).

I would recommend your video, Solitude: Behold Where God is found. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgDslMyevFo

Sincerely in Christ,



False Traditionalist Site


MHFM: By the way, there’s a false traditionalist website (which begins with “trad”) that consistently lies and claims to be the most visited traditional Catholic site in the world.  He continues to make this false claim despite the fact that for many years our website has been and still is ranked higher (i.e., is much more active and more visited) than his site.  This is confirmed by the very source he references.  In fact, every web traffic ranker will indicate that our website is much more visited and active than his website.  The despicable character who runs the site is not only a total liar, but he obstinately accepts the antipope (well, actually being a liar and obstinately accepting the antipope are connected).  He acknowledges the antipope while simultaneously calling the Church under him (i.e., the Vatican II sect) a non-Catholic body.  He thus believes that the Catholic Church has become a heresy-ridden non-Catholic sect (which is a heretical concept).  He also believes in salvation outside the Church, has defended membership in Freemasonry, and rejects the “canonizations” of the man he claims to be the pope.  His view on the Papacy is so heretical and blasphemous that it’s similar to what “Old Catholics” believe.   He also refers to himself in the plural (“the Fathers”), when it is our opinion (based on information we have) that he works by himself.


Also, when we were sued a few years back (in the baseless case that was recently dismissed), the aforementioned liar prominently promoted the false claims against us.  However, when the suit was dismissed he did not mention anything.   




Dear Brothers,


To listen to the former seventh day adventist, Juan, thank you for bringing to the true faith, was truly an inspiring four and a half minutes. It clearly shows that if a person is of good will then he or she can make the transition from heresy to Catholicism. All it takes is common sense and determination to do the right thing. Juan has that determination as he is already saying the 15 decade Rosary and adheres to the dogma and teachings of the Church. All his time spent in heresy is now behind him and he will save his eternal soul as long as he perseveres to the end. Calls like this have to make your day as it brings joy to all those who support you as well. Let's hope there are many more like Juan who make the choice to do the right thing and embrace the Catholic faith...


Bob Bohr


False Flag


Dear MHFM,

I watched 'A Noble Lie' the documentary about the false flag known as the Oklahoma City Bombing on the Alfred P. Murral Federal Building (killing 168 people). It was a total outrage and very revealing about the full scope of criminal conspiratorial penetration into very important government offices. The ATF (Bureau of Alchohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) which was involved in the Oklahoma City bombing and coverup, displays the undeniable signs of systemic corruption at the top. Many other agencies display these signs as well since they seemed to expect the bombing that day and had prior knowledge. After all, was not the ATF involved in Operation Fast & Furious arming the Sinaola Mexican drug cartel and others with guns and grenades - to eliminate other drug cartels not in business with the drug dealing of the criminal element controlling government? They also ran this criminal conspiracy in order to create a wave of gun violence, to call for gun sales restrictions - after arming these gangs with tens of thousands of assault rifles. These federally supported and funded criminal gangs were allowed to operate within and without the United States, freely dealing drugs and also in violence - eliminating the competition. And nobody got punished - now that's something to ponder. I find it interesting that before the Anti-Terrorism bill could be passed (written before Bush left office in the early 90s) it required the deaths of many people in a terrorist attack. It's also interesting that the New York FBI bombed the World Trade Center in 1993. Amongst the pro-government media outfits: the Oct. 28th and 31st 1993 New York Times, the Los Angelos Times, and the Dec. 15th Chicago Tribune reported that the FBI head of New York was recorded on tape ordering the bombing of the World Trade Center. Mr. Salem, a 43 year old former Egyptian Army Officer, had decided to record him. The bombing caused the death of 6 people, 1/2 a million dollars in damages, and over a thousand persons were injured. The truck with the bombs was not driven next to the columns as was ordered, and so the FBI were unable to cause the mass deaths… However in 1995 came their [i.e., the criminal element in government's] breakthrough of the Oklahoma City Bombing at approximately 9:00 AM (i.e.,9:02 am) on April 19th, the day which commences massive and tremendous Satanic blood ritual sacrifices culminating on May 1st. When the Protestant heretics reject the Catholic Church's Religion - Christianity - and its precedence over the state: these are simply the sort of things that happen…





Dear Brothers,

That's great news about the Seventh Day Adventist converting to the true Catholic faith. Thank you for sharing it. It shows that in spite of the fact that the world is going to end very soon, that God is still allowing time for people to convert. It also shows that God's grace is all-powerful, and that no matter how much of a sinner a person has been in their past life, if they are of good will and sincerely seek the truth, then God will ensure that they receive instruction in the Catholic faith and get water baptized. Yet according to all the BOD/BOB/II heretics, such an individual need not convert, since according to their heresies on salvation outside the Catholic Church, it is possible for Protestants to be saved. It is outrageous blasphemy against the Sufferings and Crucifixion of the Lord Jesus Christ.  According to them, there is no need to try to convert anyone, nor for anyone to convert to the Catholic faith, since according to such apostates, Christ need not even have died… for a few moments of pleasure in sin, they pay for all eternity in hell.

Apocalypse 21:8 - "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, they shall have their portion in the pool burning with fire and brimstone, which is the second death."

God Bless,

Chris White




Dear Brother Dimond,


That was beautiful story of the convert and I hope there will be many more conversions because of the solid and truthful information on your website, and all the people passing the information to others…


God Bless and Thank you

Mary Ann Davis






I have been convinced with this information and had stopped attending Mass and supporting the priests of the church I had been attending (the same Church I had my "First Communion" and "Confirmation" at). But this has caused great grief in my life since I am the only one in my entire family that believes in, even the possibly of the facts of your research. I have investigated most of your information in detail and believe that it answers so many questions that only ignorance has kept alive in my life. My problems with my family are so terrible right now that its not even worth speaking of. I don't know where I'll settle with all of us and I have been angry a lot lately with other people's judgemental comments about my interest with this information and have been becoming impatient with God (with everything crumbling around me). I need confession and to talk to a priest and don't know where to begin. I have been wearing my Brown Scapular and praying the 15 decade Rosary everday and begging God to help me because I feel more ALONE (ouside of prayer) than I have ever in my life. What must I do for help to find a Priest for Confession, Communion, and local guidance? I have made the traditional profession of faith from the Council of Trent and want access to the Sacraments.





MHFM: We think you care too much about what your family thinks.  You definitely should not be that troubled by family members’ disagreements.  You try to help them, and move on.  Before receiving sacraments, one must be convinced on all the issues of the faith, not just about rejecting the New Mass.  For instance, one must reject BOD, NFP, I.I., V2C, B16, NJP, and not support any heretical priests.  When a person is convinced, we can help him or her with where to receive valid sacraments.  Why would you want to speak with a priest when they are all heretical?  The only reason to be approaching certain priests in our day is to receive absolution or Communion, not for advice.


Have some faith


Yeah, but its a hard decision because the priests at my church will basically deny everything your saying as grounds to the faith... I even quoted some of the things you sent me, but their response is that all the controversy is covered by the "blood of the lamb" and that even people in other religions may be saved threw the mercy of the cross. They even gave me a book that Benedict the XVI wrote… and he does make himself out to be pretty sincere about Christianity... but if you can give me any verses directly from the scriptures that would give me further awareness that would be great. I will continue to watch your videos too..


Corey Balsano


MHFM: Why do you care what the “priests” at your church think?  They are heretics.  That’s proven by their claim that followers of other religions can be saved.  Does it bother you that such a position rejects defined Catholic dogma?  Frankly, it’s obvious that you don’t have any faith.  That’s clear from the fact that you can look at Benedict XVI’s heresies and still think he is good.  We’ve researched Benedict XVI, and he doesn’t even believe in Christianity or the Bible.  Those facts are available for you on the site.  In fact, you don’t even believe in Christ, one must say.  You need to start praying the full Rosary each day for faith in Christ and Catholic dogma, for you don’t have it.  Worry about embracing the truth – not following the herd to Hell.


Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link to section]




Dear Brothers,


My name is Andrew Gericke and I live in… Northwest Indiana. I was raised in the Novus Ordos Catholic Church until like many young adults I stopped going to church and took to worldly ways. After having three children with my fiance, I found your website about six months ago. I have attended confession… after denouncing the Novus Ordos…Church. I know the basic Catechism of the true faith, hold to the Dogmas of true faith, believe in the necessity of Baptism, and made the Profession of Faith of the Council of Trent…




Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on homosexualty


What a clip from CNN. Isn't it ironic that in these last days of the Great Apostasy, the US must get a lesson on morality from a person holding the false and disgusting religion of Islam? Must be another Comedy Hour from Hell, with Satan really rubbing it into the faces of the Vatican II adherents.


Contradicting not only natural law but St. Paul's explicit teaching in the Book of Romans, Antichrist JP2 and company promoted the lie that people are born with homosexuality -- which is to blasphemously claim that God makes men sinners, when it is Satan who does everything in his power to get men to use their free will to sin. And JP2 incorporated this lie about homosexuality into his official and false "catechism", which he called a sure norm of faith but which is, in fact, a sure norm for getting to hell. Not only does this false teaching endorse homosexuality, but it discourages people from overcoming and repenting of it. (Making people imagine they are locked in sin, when they can so easily repent, is a trick that Satan is so good at.) Brings to mind what Our Lady of La Salette told us -- that the Antichrist would be the Devil Incarnate. Also brings to mind the time that Satan entered Padre Pio's confessional disguised as a man and began to defend and justify the most abominable sins in a way that was so skillful, it even gave Padre Pio a start --until he realized it was the devil.


… We can only begin to imagine how much Satan hates the Incarnation and, thus, all men.  But the real irony is this: Why would a person not want to do everything in his or her power, leaving no stone unturned, to escape now from the many deceits of Satan and from the tyranny of Hell -- where Satan will be in complete control, where the torments will be far worse than any known miseries of this world, and where prayer will not even be a possibility?


Lee Ann




Hi Brothers!


I enjoyed your series on "Is the World about to end?" I would like to get more information though. Are you working on anything else that talks specifically about the seven trumpets; is there a sort of time-line that we can follow to get an idea of the sequence of events that will follow since we are living in the age of the second beast? I am very interested to learn more, since the information that is out there is prolific and incorrect.


Best regards,

JC Jacob




Dear MHFM,


I have to say that your, "Catholic Spirituality," and "Catholic Doctrine, " segment is so invaluable. Gold nuggets of Catholic truth that is perhaps not told anywhere else in the "world wide internet." It tells us so much of the Vatican II sect occupying Rome today in these end times, and how contradictory, and so false a teaching they profusely propound to the world and how sheeple follow blindly their path to destruction eternally. Thank you!


“Catholic” hospital


… a Catholic hospital and when I did have to go for a medical issue and asked for a priest to administer the Last Rites they sent me "an inner faith minister" he could not be identified as a priest he wore rainbow vestments and refused to give me last rites or confession and wanted me to pray with him. I refused. I asked the "nun" because she knows me and my beliefs but she did tell me I am being too critical and lack charity and kindness.


MHFM: That’s an interesting story.  It’s another example of the emptiness of the Vatican II sect.  [This person, by the way, is now aware that sacraments may only be sought from priests who are validly ordained and meet certain conditions.]




Subject: how to be a proper Catholic now


Hello MHFM,

I have enjoyed watching your videos and reading your commentary. I am a 30 year old man presently undergoing the RCIA. I have been surprised by how liberal the cathedral I attend is. Today I was told by my instructor that Muslims were just as saved as Catholics.

I chose Catholicism because I wanted something strict. I came from a Protestant upbringing and was atheistic for many years until recently when I decided that strict adherence to the ritualistic Catholic life had a lot of appeal…

But you make really strong points about Vatican II being heretical and I am trying to decide what you think. Should I continue undergoing the RCIA and be baptized in the currency church? Is there any hope for salvation for me in the current situation? I was hoping for more information on your site about what I should do for mass since the new mass is invalid, and in general what I should do if the church is no longer acceptable.

As is I think I will continue to follow the church's current sacraments and continue to attend the new mass but I have been arguing a lot of your points with the Catholics I meet.



MHFM: Thanks for the interest. You definitely need to stop RCIA. You will not be saved going through with it. You must get out of the New Mass and realize that the Vatican II sect is not the true Catholic Church. Please watch these videos and consult more of the information on our website and YouTube Channel.


The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World

Why the New Mass and New Rite of Ordination are Invalid (full length)


The first video will give you a full picture of what has occurred.  The heresy that Muslims can be saved, which you were told, is an example of why that church you are attending is not truly Catholic.  You should pray the Rosary each day and look at the information.  One must believe in Catholicism because it's the only true religion, not because it's strict.  Please see our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.  We can help you with where to receive traditional sacraments, but first you would have to be convinced on all the issues.  These are the steps to convert.


The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

How to Pray the Rosary [pdf]


Witch museum


Subject: a witch museum


Hello Brother Dimond,


Recently in our parish bulletin, our region's Catholic Daughters of America ("CDA") announced they were organizing a trip to Salem, MA to visit the Witch musuem and to tour the town for the Halloween season. They invited all parishioners to join them for an entire day of visiting the witch town and it's local businesses.


Feeling uneasy about this, I brought it to the attention of the CDA my feelings on the matter, and they responded that if I didn't want to go then I didn't have to. I told them I had a problem with a Cathoic group organizing a trip to a "witch town," using CDA funds for others to attend, and supporting witch businesses… They're going for entertainment and it almost seems heretical.


Am I being unreasonable? My priest knows about this event and doesn't see anything wrong with it, so it's making me think that I could be acting unfairly and also being too judgemental.  Please share your thoughts so it will help ease my mind. Thank you.




MHFM: No, you are not being unreasonable in thinking that you should not visit the witch museum.  However, it’s clear that you still attend the New Mass.  One must not go there under pain of mortal sin.  Please watch these videos (and consult the information on our site) for the reasons why the New Mass is invalid and the Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church.


The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World

Why the New Mass and New Rite of Ordination are Invalid (full length)


You should not refer to that “priest” as your priest or his heretical church as your parish.




I wanted to make a comment on the latest post titled ‘striking.’ I read Archbishop Lefebvre’s book ‘Apologia Pro’ a few years ago. Something that was clear within the first few chapters was the Archbishop’s diplomacy with the Vatican II sect. I found he never took a solid stance on the heresy of the counter church. Many people claim that the SSPX have diverted from Lefebvre’s original campaign but the truth is that he never started on the right foot in the beginning.






Subject: Lifeless


Dear MHFM,

The evidence of the collapsing Novus Ordo is everywhere in Midwestern states. In Wisconsin for example, the Milwaukee "archdiocese" announced the closure of 103 of its 203 Novus Ordite parishes, over half of the parishes to be shut down. In Michigan the "archdiocese" of Detroit announced the closure of nearly 60 parishes with the "archbishop" Allen Vigheron there publicly admitting that less than 15% of Novus Ordites in his "archdiocese" attend "Mass" each week. In Pennsylvania Novus Ordo colleges and universities are routinely homes and platforms for the most radical dissident "theologians" and speakers sponsored by "religious" orders that you could imagine. All the while conservative elements are shut out and blackballed. Ohio in Cleveland there was hot tension between the chancery and lay people over the planned closure of dozens of Novus Ordo parishes, and the Vatican had to step in to settle that one. This is what happens when emphasis is taken off of God and placed in the community of hand-holding meal-sharing sissies. In Iowa, a Novus
Ordo school with the anti-bishop's permission was happy to allow the presentation of an award to one of its graduating seniors for a scholarship for his being sodomist. Indeed, it is cafeteria "Catholic" central, the world in which abominations are awarded and applauded.

I have also noticed SSPX and "traditonalist" clergy who run after and seek the approval of every person they can because… they need their feelings affirmed. So they spend their clerical lives always looking for compromise and consensus instead of being men and doing what men do which is to make a decision in truth and stick with it…





Subject: Comments on Increase of Suicides Article and New Video


Dear Brothers,


I read the article on the increase of suicides in America.(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2935326/posts) It is no surprise. Many people are giving into despair in these dark times, but the death of millions of people by abortion, suicide, euthanasia, false wars, etc. is exactly what the Illuminati want--so the people will not get any sympathy from the New World Order. Without God, life seems to be only a series of events that continue aimlessly on to no real purpose. Life, for the godless person, becomes an endless search for meaning that can never be fulfilled by the things of the earth, and yet, in his or her pride, he or she will not turn to the true eternal God. That yearning in a man's soul that seeks fulfillment beyond what the earth alone can give was placed there by God, and only God can fulfill it. As St. Augustine says,"Our hearts are restless until they rest in Thee, O Lord."


People need to understand that the Catholic faith is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY. If people would sincerely convert to the faith, pray the 15 decade Rosary everyday, and persevere in a state of sanctifying grace, they would find their true purpose, and they would be at peace even in the midst of persecution.


For as Christ said, Matthew 7:24: "Every one therefore that heareth these my words, and doth them, shall be likened to a wise man that built his house upon a rock, and the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they beat upon that house, and it fell not, for it was founded on a rock. And every one that heareth these my words, and doth them not, shall be like a foolish man that built his house upon the sand, and the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they beat upon that house, and it fell, and great was the fall thereof."


The people who are suicidal, or have committed suicide, are the ones who have built their house on sand. They built their lives on the flesh, the world, and the devil and that is why they live in misery. Many of these people believe the lie that death is the answer to their problems, when actually all death would do is lock them in their miserable state of mortal sin. In hell these people will cry out for death and death will fly from them. It is interesting that the enemies of Christ cry out for death, death, and more death, while God calls sinners to the Catholic faith, repentance, and amendment so that they may have eternal life with Him and death shall be no more.


Ezechiel (Ezeckiel) 33:11 "As I live, saith the Lord God, I desire not the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way, and live. Turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways: and why will you die, O house of Israel?"


Also, I wanted to mention that I very much appreciate your new video on the Catechism of the Council of Trent. I will be re-watching it many times in order to thoroughly soak up all the information you provided. The authority of this catechism came up recently in a debate between me and a B.O.D. B.O.B. Invincible Ignorance heretic. He kept saying, over and over again, that the catechism was infallible and that my saying that it was not infallible was basically an undermining of the Church's authority and teaching power. I told him that the language used in the catechism made it impossible for it to be infallible since it implied that God could command impossibilities and that there is such a thing as an "unforeseen accident". Providentially, a few days later your video came out. I suggested he watch it. I hope that he wakes up, gets his facts straight, and converts, or he will end up in hell with all the other liars.


God bless,

Jaclyn Tillinghast




Subject: Suicide Bomber


Dear Brothers,

A suicide bomber attacked a "Catholic" Church in Nigeria recently: "A suicide car bomber attacked a Catholic church conducting Mass in northern Nigeria on Sunday, killing two people and wounding another 45 in a region under assault by a radical Islamist sect, officials said."


(http://www.boston.com/news/world/africa/2012/09/23/suicide-bomber-hits-north-nigeria-catholic-church/nnGnAEeypquoflNRfmSHXM/story.html)  It is sadly ironic that many of the people in attendance at the "Mass" would have believed that it is possible to be saved in the very same diabolical religion as the suicide bomber: Islam. It shows that the denial of the salvation dogma has truly devastating consequences.

Ephesians 4:5 - "One Lord, one faith, one baptism."

God Bless,

Chris White


MHFM: Yes, many of the people attending that New Mass would have believed that people could be saved in the false religion of the bomber (Islam).  The same could be said of most attendees of traditional Masses.  In fact, they would not only believe that people can be saved in the religion of the suicide bomber, but that the suicide bomber himself might have been saved by “invincible ignorance” or “baptism of desire.”  If questioned about it, they would be forced to answer that they “don’t know” (and therefore it’s possible) since they “cannot judge.”




Subject: Comment on SSPX


Dear MHFM,


What is striking about the SSPX in retrospect is their almost complete lack of charity right from their start--early 1970s. They knew the new "mass" of Paul VI was invalid and yet they made no effort to inform people going to the Vatican II "mass." They just kept to themselves for literally decades never bothering to think that there might be some people growing up in the Vatican II "church" who could have benefitted from knowing that what they were experiencing was not Catholic. It is so striking because the SSPX offered the Tridentine form of the Liturgy; they obviously knew any other form of words for Consecration would fail to effect the Sacrament. Why didn't they try to get this point across to young people in the Vatican II schools?


It is clear now that they were never motivated by the need to teach and spread the true Faith--especially what is consistent with a Catholic recognizing true worship and the true Eucharist. Indeed, they were never motivated by this need even decades ago when they were not denouncing sedevacantism (and perhaps belief in the Salvation Dogma) from the pulpit. As MHFM has pointed out they were only concerned with externals and human respect. They were/are heretical and are now clearly schismatic.


It is no wonder that the SSPX did not engage in a campaign to warn Catholics not to attend Paul VI's new "mass." They promoted themselves (1970s) as breaking from Vatican II, but did not really break from the Vatican II sect! How can you break from Vatican II (stick to the Tridentine form) and fail to immediately tell Catholics to leave anything that is not using the Tridentine form?!???




MHFM: We think you make a good point.  However, we believe their inaction in that regard stems from their lack of faith (which is itself connected to their lack of charity, for true charity cannot exist without true faith).  Faith spurs action.  Since they did not really believe that the Novus Ordo is invalid and that adherence to the new religion leads one to Hell, they were not moved to aggressively and clearly tell people that they must not go to the New Mass, etc. under pain of grave sin. 




Dear Brothers,

Here's another mouthful of gobbledygook puke from the current anti-pope Rat-zinger during his recent speech to the newly appointed (false) Bishops.


[Speaking to the newly appointed bishops invited to Rome for a conference organised by the Congregation for Bishops… Ratzinger recalled that his predecessor, John XXIII saw the Second Vatican Council – which he had convened – as the chance to take "a leap forward toward a doctrinal penetration and a formation of consciences," so that the Church’s “certain and unchangeable doctrine” could be “deepened and presented in a way that meets the needs of our time."]


Here's another fine example of the Vatican-II sect twisting things around and then falsely accusing Traditional Catholics of twisting words and meanings. Taking an unchangeable doctrine and presenting it in a way to meet the needs of our times, is the same as saying, they planned to (try) and change the unchangeable Churches Doctrines to coincide with the modern times. In doing so, they only succeeded in revolting against God and his True Church while creating their own counter-church; the Bride of Satan, the Whore of Babylon, that will dwell in eternal hell fire.


This recent gobbledygook is right there on the Vatican's website for anyone of goodwill to recognize the deceptiveness of these counter-church leaders in these last days. Although as consistent with all "Rock-Stars" their audience isn't there to listen to the words, their attendance is strictly for the party, as in the days of Noe.


Also, I enjoyed your recent video on "The Trent Catechism and BOD."…


God Bless,

Tom Miles




Dear MHFM,

When conversing with a former atheist, he seemed to agree by nodding his head when I said the Catholic Church teaches that there is only One True
Religion and One True God. This is the substance of the things we discussed.

1. Do heresies and false religions have any rights as we understand that term? Answer: No, heresies and false religions don't have rights.

2. Should all "religions," as they call them, be treated equally irrespective of what they preach? Answer: God is not divided. He revealed only one religion. We either believe that religion, or do not believe it. There is no middle way, "He who is not with me is against me" (St. Mat. 12:30)…

4. Are all "religions" the same? Answer: No; for truth and error are not the same; faith and unbelief are not the same. As Our Savior taught but one religion, it must follow that all other religions are false religions, except one…

7. From a Catholic perspective, should social evils such as contraception, abortion, active sodomist unions etc., when preached by false "religions," be given government protection and support? Answer: No, enormous sins and abominations must never be protected or supported by governments. These human organizations clearly exceed their authority and rights when they do these things; and thus act unlawfully and against legitimate reason and authority. We are not bound to obey unjust and wicked laws. Laws contrary to Divine Law, opposed to the law of God, cannot be just.

9. Oh, I was taught in government school and T.V that "freedom of religion" was great? Answer: No, it is not great, but injurious to God and society as a whole. It is a step back in progress and actually, narrow minded. The "freedom of religion" heresy has been condemned by the Magisterium with Ex Cathedra Authority of the highest order and magnitude as an insanity (Quanta Cura, Pope Pius IX Dec. 8th 1864). Freedom of religion is fundamentally illogical, because if a person's "religious" views causes them to conclude that other people's freedoms should be infringed upon; then you would be limiting that person's freedom of religion, by guaranteeing freedom of religion for yourself. So it is a false (and impracticable) concept. However, close minded
people promote (this) insanity and daily increase it in society, in their riotousness against God and our Blessed Mother…



New Video Posted


The Trent Catechism and "Baptism of Desire" [video]


MHFM: This is an important video.  The video refutes the assertion that explicit “baptism of desire” should be believed because the concept is favored by the Catechism of the Council of Trent.  It proves that the Catechism, while having a great deal of tremendous teaching, is not infallible.  It proves that the Catechism has erroneous passages.  It demonstrates this by examining a number of passages in the Catechism, including one on the soul which many might find surprising. 


This video also gives a detailed analysis of the Catechism of Trent’s full teaching on the necessity of the Sacrament of Baptism, including the controversial passage that has been the subject of so much discussion and dispute.  It carefully considers what the proper translation of the Latin of that passage should be.  It also covers misconceptions on this matter.  The video proves that following the Catechism’s own teaching requires one to reject any notion of salvation without water baptism.  This video includes two very interesting new papal quotes which directly contradict the idea of “baptism of desire.”  It also contains a discussion of the language in the Council of Florence’s dogmatic definition on John 3:5.  A good deal of important new material is covered in this video – material that is useful for effectively refuting the enemies of the Church’s dogmas on salvation and water baptism.




Hello, I'm a Traditional Catholic and have many protestant friends; I sometimes get into debates with them on the sinless nature of Mary, what exactly could I tell them to make them see she was the Immaculate Conception? I know you're probably very busy, so many thanks if you see this and reply back.

In Christ, Jesse Fredericksen.


MHFM: We recommend this file: The Bible teaches Mary's Immaculate Conception, Perpetual Virginity, Bodily Assumption and more [PDF]


It’s from our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.




Hi. I really found your website helpful on my journey and am emailing you with the hope that you can help me find a valid latin mass where I may attend. I was baptized catholic as a 2 year old... I do not have confirmation or first communion and am in search to fufill these sacraments as well as enter into marriage... Please help. I live in Houston, Texas and the only Traditional Latin Mass I could find is a FSSP. Thanks in advance and may God bless us all.




MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  Before receiving sacraments, one must reach the point where one is committed never to attend the New Mass again, believes in Outside the Church There is No Salvation without exception (no “baptism of desire”), rejects NFP, won’t support any heretical priests, etc. That’s explained in this file: Where to go to Mass or confession today? People should also make the traditional profession of faith from the Council of Trent, which can be accessed from the aforementioned file. Once a person is convinced on all relevant matters, we can help that person with possible locations for receiving sacraments. We also recommend people to pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible.  One should not go to the FSSP, as they use "priests" ordained by "bishops" made "bishops" in the rite of Antipope Paul VI.




My name is Vernon bauer.

I am 64 years old and live outside Tucson AZ. I was born baptized and raised Catholic in St. Louis Mo. I attended Catholic School grade and High School After vatican II I did not recognize my church and the Mass anymore. I was an altar boy and felt a great loss in my church after Vatican II.

I never felt right in Church since then… My question is: where can I find my catholic Mass these days as it was then before Vatican II.??  I miss my old churches rituals. Can you steer me in the right direction out here in AZ??

Thanks for any help you can give me.
Vernon Bauer


MHFM: We responded to this person.  [The response to the e-mail above is applicable.]




Subject: Response to the Homosexual advocating "priest"


The clip showing the "priest" giving a "poetic" speech about what he thinks is "church teaching" on gays is disgusting. His speech is actually one deprived of mercy because he hides the truth of the Gospel and instead gives a mushy pathetic speech which has no basis in reality. His words are vain and empty, and they only appeal to the vanity and pride of men. Homosexuals are not victims, although the media loves to portray them as such. This novus ordo "priest" is another liar, and he is the one who is filled with hate for the truth. He is just helping to drag more souls to hell when he applies the heretical idea in jp2's new "catechism". It is the idea that a person can be a "chaste homosexual". There is no such thing as a "chaste homosexual". The reason being, is that as long as a person identifies himself or herself with perversion, he or she is still perverted. True chastity requires purity of heart and body in a state of grace while holding the Catholic faith whole and inviolate. No heart or body can be pure and in a state of grace as long as it sees God as the author of perversion. The Church does not teach that if you are "gay" you are called to chastity as a gay. NO! That is a lie from the pit of hell. The Church does not call homosexuals to anything except the truth so that they may quit their lies and be converted. The real problem with the people claiming to be homosexual, is that they are unwilling to accept the real fullness of God's truth and their own role in their perversion. What needs to be emphasized is the fact that God does not make people that way, it is sin that opens the door to that type of perversion.


Romans Chapter 1:22-28- “Because that, when they knew God, they have not glorified him as God, or given thanks; but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened. For professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. And they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of the image of a corruptible man, and of birds, and of fourfooted beasts, and of creeping things. Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonor their own bodies among themselves. Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error…”


God bless,


Jaclyn Tillinghast


God’s word


Subject: Benedictos' heresies


Dear MHFM, ...And then we wonder why, what is it-100 kiloton nuclear bombs pointed at every major city in the world, at the ready to conflagrate the world… [The] Antichurch in Rome (Benedictos crew) directed solely by satanists!...


Your presentation is irrefutably spot on regarding BOD…


the Vatican II sect, and previous infiltrated minons of satan, through guile, subterfuge, have violently undermined God's word and tradition in the Roman Catholic Church, resolving for all time, in defending the sacrament of baptism created for His members, the shield against such heretics. Like I always tell anyone who cares to debate-If Jesus Christ, God, demanded of a plain soul like St. John the Baptist to immerse God Himself into the waters, which was necessary, not for God, since Jesus was pure essence, God, how much more sinners to enter His Kingdom? God allows, always, His children, His members, to enter through the visible door of baptism, not the invisible door of desire. Peace be with you MHFM!






Subject: Rosie’s e-mail




I'd like to offer some advice to Rosie who e-mailed you about the Protestant view of Catholics "worshiping" idols because they venerate images of saints. Whenever I'm confronted with a heretic who accuses Catholics of worshiping idols, I ask them if they have pictures of their family members at home, to which they surely respond, "yes". Then I ask them if they worship their relatives. They cannot refute my point. I know some people who have pictures of presidents such as Bush or Clinton in their homes. They surely do not worship these people.




MHFM: It’s a good point.  We mentioned it in our saints section of The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church book.




Dear Brothers,


I could relate to Nathan's e-mail about Tim Tebow. There are Tim Tebow types in a lot of professional sports right now. These are athletes who think they believe in Jesus but are practicing a false religion. Tebow is praised worldwide for holding off on sex until marriage and remaining a virgin but yet he flaunts his body in magazines… He is getting additional money for doing this on top of his multiple millions. He is the epitome of a hypocrite.


Football "Christians" get most of the public eye because of the popularity of the sport. Golf not being as popular does not get the publicity. Golf being a so called gentleman’s game has a boatload of so called "Christians". They all take the time to give "God" the glory after a victory… They also find nothing wrong in taking the Lord’s name in vain… These athletes need to take a step back and re-examine their lives. I sent some of your materials out to Tebow a couple of years ago and did not receive a response back nor did I expect to.


God bless all that you do for Catholicism,

Bob Bohr




Subject: B16’s Latest Heresies


Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the article exposing Antipope Benedict XVI's latest heresies with Buddhists and the "Orthodox." Buddhism is completely Satanic - they don't even believe in God! Yet Ratzinger calls their leader "venerable" and invokes abundant "blessings." What an apostate!!!  He then lavishes praise on the schismatical "Orthodox" leaders, which is one of the most absurdly ridiculous things he could do since the "Orthodox" don't even recognize the position Antipope Benedict XVI claims to hold, i.e. the Papacy. His blind foolishness is astounding!!!

He constantly says the "Orthodox" are "the faithful," when they are not members of the Catholic Church. It shows that sedevacantism and the salvation dogma are intimately linked, since to deny EENS is simply to side with Antipope Benedict XVI. There can be no doubt that Benedict XVI is an Antichrist Antipope, just as there can be no doubt that the New "Mass" is totally invalid - the abomination of desolation.

God Bless,

Chris White


New Heresies of Benedict XVI


MHFM: This is a new article on recent heresies of Benedict XVI. 


NEW- Benedict XVI Declares the Supreme Buddhist Priest “Venerable” and his recent heresies on the “Orthodox”


It will be stored permanently in our Benedict XVI's Recent Heresies file.




Dear Brothers,


I recently attended an educational program on psychosocial rehabilitation which program was to teach parents on how to deal and help psychiatric patients. I must mention that this program took place at a Psychiatric “Catholic Mental Health Clinic” in Lisbon a very well known worldwide organization and a very prestigious one, at least this was years back then.  The organization is known as IIHSCJ – Clinica Psiquiátrica de S. José run by nuns, the founder of the clinic was Bento Menni who apparently was “canonized” by John Paul II. Its new buildings have absolutely nothing of what one could call traditional Catholic and the only traditional Catholic item I could see in there is a Crucifix very much traditional still hanging on a wall where the meeting was held, everything but everything is simply Novus Ordo even the few nuns there have nothing to do with true Roman Catholic… when looking around I could now distinguish all these things, they have this strange chapel where they celebrate their “Mass” for the sick of the clinic, oh… how sad this all is.


This program consisted of twelve sessions one session every week with a young psychologist and who once mentioned that he was a traditional Catholic, I met there some mothers who are going through very hard times with their sons who have mental problems and most of them as a result of drug consuming.


I told them that prayer and sacrifice for their young ones is a sure means for help and by avoiding sin, one mother in particular told us that her son who has serious psychiatric problems was completing a teachers course in yoga initiation and said that whenever he came from these classes he felt he was in another dimension and I asked how exactly did her son feel and she said he felt good, I told her that participating in yoga and other occult beliefs was very dangerous and went against the teachings of Christ and of the true Catholic Church, she did not agree with me, I then remembered the brothers and your site and told her that if she wanted spiritual help she could contact yourselves I could give her your site contact and to this she agreed, this conversation occurred in the presence of the said ‘traditional Catholic’ psychologist who sat there very passive and agreeing with such practice and her son`s wellbeing, so sad, he actually believes he is Catholic I really felt he had some good in him because whenever I refuted faith matters he never contradicted and just listened I do wish he also come to know of your site perhaps in time I just do not know.


…I wish to mention that my attendance here was mainly for health matters and nothing in common with their present views, I would always refute any discussion which would go contrary to the true Catholic Faith….




In J.M.J

M. Fernanda da Silva


MHFM: We believe the problems experienced by those people are spiritual in origin.  That is to say, if they converted to the true faith, broke from their sinful habits, and prayed (e.g., the Rosary) they would overcome them.  It’s not a surprise that the woman whose son is participating in Yoga (an evil activity) is having such problems.  It’s not only dangerous, but sinful.  Her rejection of your good advice on that point is an example of bad will.  The man who listened to what you said, and did not contradict it, is not necessarily exhibiting goodness.  It could just be that he’s not interested in disputing with or contradicting anyone. 


The only value we see in going to such an event is to meet people so that you can share the information with them. 




Ontario Catholic school to open Muslim prayer room: ‘One more nail in the coffin of Catholic’ ed


The irony of this is incredible. This false "Catholic" school is named for "Mother" Teresa who said she loved all religions -- which means she loved not only heretical "religions", but also pagan "religions" that deny Jesus Christ and the Holy Trinity. She loved the pagan religions whose gods are devils, and this was In fact her signature characteristic. If these blind people have no problem accepting as "Catholic" a school named after this apostate, then how can they object when the school does exactly what she did, and what she stood for? This really shows how dark is the mind of the Vatican 2 adherent. On page 408 of your absolutely necessary Truth book, there is a picture of Apostate Teresa kneeling in prayer before a statue of Buddha in a ceremony of thanksgiving for the 25th anniversary of the Missionaries of Charity! And on that same page is the following quote from this demonic woman who denied the true God while passing herself off as a Catholic nun: "I've always said we should help a Hindu become a better Hindu, a Muslim become a better Muslim, a Catholic become a better Catholic." In fact, "Mother" Teresa -- Recruiter for Hell -- would be all for this Muslim prayer room. I guess the lesson to us in this is that all the signs in the world won't wake a zombie from his self-induced trance, as long as he continues to love sin and refuses to embrace the doctrines or truths revealed by God. It's the blindness Sacred Scripture warns of and is epidemic in these last days.


Lee Ann




The keys to the kingdom of heaven


On John Paul ii being former Pope... Wouldn’t he have the Authority to change the mass or any other teachings even if the previous Popes rejected it? Seeing how Saint Paul went against what Saint Peter thought about circumcision and other Jewish laws/tradition... Maybe John Paul could have changed their minds in this new day and age? Who knows BUT God? Wouldnt the keys to the kingdom be passed down to the next Pope so he can decide what should be done?


Corey Balsano


MHFM: No, a pope would not have the authority to change the teachings of the Church.  That’s because divine revelation ended with the death of the last apostle, and the teachings of the Church are accurate proclamations of the truths Christ delivered once and for all time.  The idea that the teaching of the Church can be changed is heretical.  It’s clear that you need a better understanding of Catholic principles on this point.  We recommend this file:


The Glossary of Terms and Principles [PDF]


You should also consider these quotes.


Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 3, Chap. 4, Canon 3: "If anyone says that it is possible that at some time, given the advancement of knowledge, a sense may be assigned to the dogmas propounded by the church which is different from that which the Church has understood and understands: let him be anathema."


Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 3, Chap. 4, on the true progress of knowledge: "For, the doctrine of faith which God revealed has not been handed down as a philosophic invention to the human mind to be perfected, but has been entrusted as a divine deposit to the Spouse of Christ, to be faithfully guarded and infallibly interpreted."


Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 4, Chap. 4: "For, the Holy Ghost was not promised to the successors of Peter that by His revelation they might disclose new doctrine, but that by His help they might guard sacredly the revelation transmitted through the apostles and the deposit of faith, and might faithfully set it forth."


Pope St. Pius X, Pascendi (# 26), Sept. 8, 1907, explaining the false doctrine of the Modernists: "To the laws of evolution everything is subject - dogma, Church, worship, the Books we revere as sacred, even faith itself, and the penalty of disobedience is death. The enunciation of this principle will not astonish anybody who bears in mind what the Modernists have had to say about each of these subjects."




Hi there can you please give me your views & opinion on idolatry????


Ex 20:3-4 (NIV) "You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below."


God destroys idols; He is the great iconoclast. Even good things can become idols… The result is God's wrath, on you and the idol. God will not be eclipsed.  A lot of people argue that Catholics practice idolatry with our so called "statue worship" I don't agree ... I'm catholic and I only worship and adore God!


Just want to know how to respond to those who question me about it.


Thank you God Bless!



MHFM: Idolatry is evil.  Catholic practices are not idolatrous.  Iconoclasm is a heresy that condemns the use of icons/images.  It falsely associates Christian icons with idolatry.  Christian icons are not idolatrous, and God is not an iconoclast.  Our section in The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church refutes Protestant claims on that matter.  We recommend that you consult it.


False Christian


Dear Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond,

I wanted to thank you for calling out Tim Tebow about a month ago as a phony "Christian"… This guy is a totally sinful and prideful heretic who now just did a scandalous photo spread for Vogue magazine with his shirt off. There was also a picture he did for a magazine a couple of years ago where he had his shirt off and he proudly and blasphemously struck a pose of Christ on the Cross. This guy is wicked and a total heretical con-artist. Boy the deception really is profound these last days…

Nathan Barton




Subject: BOD/Trent Video


Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the brilliant video refuting the Catechism of the Council of Trent's teaching of the error of "baptism of desire." Your explanation of the heretical passage on BOD is amazing, and shows… that the BOD heretics have no idea what they are talking about. I thought your statements at 44:35 mins were worth transcribing:

44:35 - "I should probably add that even the Catechism of Trent itself, shortly after the false passage we've been discussing and refuting, says that if there's any necessity these adult prospective converts should be baptized right away. That proves that they did not have real confidence that the desire could grant one justification, because if there's an advantage in delaying the baptism, and desire can suffice for justification, there's no reason to baptize the person in a necessity. Why forego the advantage if the desire can suffice? The fact that they did baptize in a necessity, and even the Catechism of Trent recommended that, demonstrates that there wasn't any real belief, even in the case of the person who authored the false paragraph in the Catechism, that desire could really grant one the grace of justification. But the bottom line is that the Catechism of Trent's explanation for the delay directly contradicts the teaching of the popes and Catholic Tradition and the teaching of the Church as I'm showing here, and was simply wrong."

Of course, the whole video is a goldmine of gems of truth, and anyone of good will or who loves the truth, should immediately find solace and comfort in the defense of the dogmas, Outside the Catholic Church there is absolutely no salvation, and the absolute necessity of water baptism for salvation. Also, the part where you contrasted the Church's teaching on how it is impossible for a person to be saved without water baptism, with the Vatican II sect and Antipope Benedict XVI's statements on the impossibility of women being ordained, powerfully highlighted the truth of the dogmas, as well as the diabolical lies and heresies that emanate from the Vatican II sect and its antichrist apostasy. It shows that God does not command impossibilities because nothing is impossible for God (Matt. 19:26, Acts 8:6) and God cannot lie (Heb. 6:18). This video is really important - a must see for anyone who claims to be a Catholic today, or who is still in the process of converting.

God Bless,

Chris White




… I just came across your video on you tube.


I am Pentecostal Roman-Catholic, but I was first demonized by accident by a charismatic-Baptist girl (I believe she was false charismatic). She thought that she was trained to baptize in Holy Spirit. I think she had another spirit…


Can you explain what may take place if I tell you exactly what happened? (I just need confirmation what I think may took place).  I am originally from Bosnia, here in US.





MHFM: The Charismatic movement is evil.  It’s clear that she did not have the Holy Ghost, but a wicked spirit.  Evils of the Charismatic Movement [PDF File]


What you need to do is convert to the traditional Catholic faith, and pray the full Rosary each day.  You must reject Vatican II, the New Mass, believe in Outside the Church There is No Salvation, etc.  That’s how you will free yourself from evil influences.  The information on our site covers what one must believe to convert to the true Catholic faith, and how to do so.


The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

How to Pray the Rosary [pdf]




MHFM: On Friday we hope to post a new video on an important topic.




For whatever it is worth.


I came across an audio file of Bishop Sheen from 1978. He did a presentation about Paul II after his death. Praising him hook line and sinker for his works as Pope and standing up for "human life."…


Joe Reilly


MHFM: That’s interesting.  John Paul II obviously wasn’t the “Pope,” but an antipope.  We discussed Sheen’s outrageous apostasy in our video Catholicism and America.




What Roman said about all the youth thinking the "new religion" is all about "peace": that sort of raised a thought that has been kicking around in my head lately about what it means in the Bible when it says: "When all are saying peace and security then the end will come" (my own paraphrase here)....I often wondered what that could mean as the world is perpetually at war including maybe especially now with WWIII planned poised and about to be introduced or so it seems presently.......so could it refer not to a political/military "peace" but rather to the kind of FALSE peace into'd by the V2 sect in terms of religious indifferentism? IDK but it seems like the scriptures may be referring to something like that...the false peace of religious indifferentism so preponderant today.


And as far as Roman's parents saying MHFM is "full of hate" I would beg to differ since in my view MHFM does the right thing by hating what God hates (religious indifferentism, a wholesale apostasy from the faith and denial of Christ which IS spitting in Our Lord's face and certainly mocking His Bride the only true church)------and loving what God loves------the Truth of the ancient apostolic catholic Faith.


I see what Roman sees in terms of the people who want to "party til the end"---I had that experience when giving your info to people I was trying to evangelize a few years ago when they said basically "it's going to be one [heck] of a party until the end"...... they really had that attitude! Scary!




Thank you Brother for the correction and the information…

Please pray for me.






Dear Brothers,

A quick question that was raised by a former Eastern Orthodox that I need some help in answering. the question is/was - Is it possible that the depiction of the Whore of Babylon describes the Roman Catholic church after the split with the Eastern Churches? As God is outside of time and the passage only states that Rome will become the whore (but not really when), and from an eastern perspective Rome has added doctrines that they say were not present in the first 1,000 years (Immaculate Conception, papal infallibility, purgatory). Is it possible that this is what it means when it refers to the Roman church becoming the whore of Babylon, because it was once the true church but broke from the true church in 1054 and will/has become the seat of the anti-christ (as recent events seem to confirm)?

Some help here in answering this question would be great.

Thank you,


MHFM: No, absolutely not.  The Catholic Church (the one true Church) cannot be the Whore of Babylon.  The idea that the Church is the Whore of Babylon means that it’s an evil sect.  Such an idea is heretical. 


Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 10), Jan. 6, 1928: “During the lapse of centuries, the mystical Spouse of Christ has never been contaminated, nor can she ever in the future be contaminated, as Cyprian bears witness: ‘The Bride of Christ cannot be made false to her Spouse: she is incorrupt and modest. She knows but one dwelling, she guards the sanctity of the nuptial chamber chastely and modestly.’”


Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas (# 22), Dec. 11, 1925: “Not least among the blessings which have resulted from the public and legitimate honor paid to the Blessed Virgin and the saints is the perfect and perpetual immunity of the Church from error and heresy.”


We are disappointed that you would even entertain the notion.  It seems like the “Orthodox” schismatic is having a detrimental effect on you.  The Vatican II sect – and specifically the apostasy from the Catholic faith led from the city (not the Church) of Rome in the last days (i.e., led by the invalidly elected leaders of the Vatican II sect in Rome) – is what the Whore of Babylon describes.  The evidence for that is covered in this article and video, as well as in our series Is the World about to End?


Is the Vatican II sect the Whore of Babylon prophesied in the Apocalypse? [article]

Why Rome is now the Whore of Babylon [video]


Moreover, the “Orthodox” left the communion of the universal Church by rejecting the Papacy.  The Catholics did not leave the Church.  “Orthodoxy” is false and unbiblical.  It rejects the clear teaching of Christ on the papal primacy of jurisdiction.




Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,


My name is Roman… I am 23 years old and I live in… California. I first came to your website in July of 2011. Before that I was living in… sins… my soul was very black. I hated myself. On YouTube I typed in “Real Biblical Events” and I came to the video of miracles [Creation and Miracles] of Padre Pio, the women born blind and can see, and other unexplained supernatural miracles which science can’t prove. This to me was real and supernatural and realized that the Catholic Church is supernatural; no other church comes close to Catholicism. Over the next year I rejected the Novus Ordo church, go to confession to a priest who was ordained before 1968 and I try my hardest to pray the Rosary every day, even if it’s very very hard. Some days are harder than other, but I want to clean my body spiritually and to be in a good state of grace.... You guys have helped me so much, but my parents went to your YouTube page and say that you guys are all hate and perverted the teachings of Christ. I try and explain to them what your videos are all about. The videos, with backed up details, try very very hard to prove all questions regarding faith and salvation, but they say that it’s all garbage and hate. They say God loves all and all Protestants are as good as Catholics, but your videos prove no. There is no salvation outside the church. It is sad that my parents whom I love with my heart don’t know their sinning mortally. I do not know if they will ever stop; probably not, because they’re in their late 50’s and think that they know enough, but the human brain never stops growing until people die. They also believe that a lot of people go to heaven, but only a minority does. Many go to hell and they can’t grasp the concept.


… I wish upon the whole world to look at your material… You have shown me the light. I would like to finish this e-mail about people who are my age, people 30 and younger. It is very very sad that they’re living in sin. Almost all of them think that religion is phony, yesterday’s news, and fake. They think and live all about sex. Sex is everywhere on T.V., drugs, extreme fornication, and living in lies and dishonesty. My generation is living in spiritual sloth. It will not get better over the next months because they will think oh, the world is going to end, let’s have sex and we die we die. They do not know the truth about heaven and hell. They look at other religions as good such as Islam, Jews, Buddhists, Shinto’s, they think that it is okay to pray to the dead and for peace to rule the world. In fact that that the new religion; both science and peace. They think peace on this world will equate to peace when they die. It is an epidemic that will take the grace of God to fix it. Thank you for all what you do.


Roman Garza




Subject: Thess-


Dear MHFM,


As you mention in 2-Thess, with Wendy, read MHFM material. In 2-10-Thess-"Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying." Most of the world… is impregnated with the operation of error presently. I hear in the media all the time, and people out in the street-"...Everything is a lie..." Many in the world are talking, daily, that the world is coming to an end. That's probably the only truth coming from mankind today. Yes, the world IS coming to an end… We, humans, don't know when, but the signs are most definitely there, aren't they? Are we in Noah's situation today? I think most, who are in the know, would say-yes, we are! The-operation of error-has been fulfilled… in this wicked world.






Subject: a question for brother M. Dimond


… I was listening to… the woman that called in, why would that CRIMINAL pope venerate MARY??... Why do you think that Criminal John paul would venerate Mary! As a kid, having zero interest, I remember seeing that pope paul and getting the creeps he… smirked like a cobra snake.  He did mention Mary a few times and I felt better about him even through I sensed pure evil coming from him.  I never venerated Mary, and I feel okay when shes mentioned


Think about it wendy hockeson


MHFM: Antipope John Paul II was a wicked manifest heretic.  He didn’t truly venerate Mary.  At times he would pretend to venerate her in order to deceive people, while he simultaneously attempted to trash the Catholic faith.  One should not be deceived by a few external gestures.  Rather, one should form an opinion about a person based on the substance of his or her teaching and actions.  You should consult the material more carefully, especially the sections relevant to why the Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church. 


It’s crucial to have devotion to Mary.  Perhaps you come from a Protestant background.  You really need to see our section refuting Protestantism, and our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.  It covers the biblical proof for the Catholic faith.  It also covers the necessity of praying to the Blessed Virgin, the Mother of God.  There is no salvation outside the Catholic faith, and the Vatican II sect does not represent Catholicism.









My name is Rafal and I have found your website http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/


I can see that you are traditional Catholics so I have a question.


Sometimes I can hear about protestant pastors who organize events (both Catholics and Protestants are invited) during which some get healed.  As a Catholic, what should I think about it? Is it possible that Jesus Christ can perform miraculous healings during such events organized by heretics?





MHFM: It sounds like those gatherings are either Charismatic events or ecumenical meetings.  Such meetings are not of God.  The “healings” that supposedly occur there are not miracles from God.  They are either fraudulent claims based on lies or false signs/lying wonders from Satan – consistent with those mentioned in 2 Thess. 2:9.


Evils of the Charismatic Movement [PDF File]




… In a book called St. Michael and the Angels, there is an interesting passage attributed to a Father Husslein, S. J. on page 50: "With the advent and death of the Savior the power of Satan was greatly limited. To this period the commentators generally ascribe those words of the Apocalypse: 'And I saw an angel coming down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit, and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, the old serpent, which is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years' (20:1,2). The text quoted does not mean that the temptations of the evil spirits were to cease during that time, but that Satan's power at all event was to be greatly limited. The thousand years, of course, are not to be taken literally, but as indicating a great period of time...When that long period should have passed, Satan was for a brief time to be allowed to exercise his activity again in an extraordinary manner here upon earth: "And after that he must be loosed a little time' (20:3). And then shall come the end."


Little wonder our world is as bad (or worse) than the ancient pagan world, as if it had never been Redeemed. But the world has been Redeemed, and Christ is not returning except as Judge -- a truth which is implicitly denied by all false Conservatives, all false Traditionalists, and all distorters of the message of Fatima like the Grunerites. In a way it makes sense that many of these people, in their wishful thinking, will falsely call Our Lady "Co-Redemptrix"…


Little wonder, too, that false, end-time scenarios are spread far and wide, as the heretics wrest Scripture to their own destruction. And little wonder, too, that our Dear Mother's Rosary is more powerful and more necessary than ever before. Just as the real Sister Lucy and St. Louis de Montfort said it would be.


Lee Ann


Base Jumper


Subject: Base Jumper

I wonder how many blind people would be mad at me for pointing out God's Justice in the death of this stupid, careless, selfish woman, who thumbs her nose at God by playing russian roulette with the precious gift of life that God gave her, that of her own life and that of the unborn child, it’s a hard saying but she got what she deserved. "Obviously her careless behavior in life was indicative of the condition of her soul", people don't realize that it is a great offense to God, to think little of God's gift, by taking life and death risks for the sake of fun. It’s one thing to take a risk and save one's own life by jumping out a window of a burning building or risk one's own life to save another but to do those crazy things for a so called thrill is outrageous. She was wanting in the fear of the Lord.

Wisdom 1:12 "Seek not death in the error of your life, neither procure ye destruction by the works of your hands."








Subject: Renata vs. her family

Dear Brothers:

Renata recently e-mailed you saying that:

… "the battles" that I am fighting lately with my family, who is on a "mission" to bring me back to post-Vatican- 2 Church. They truly believe that by rejecting it I put my, (and my children), spiritual/eternal life in jeopardy. They, like typical Novus O. are not willing to debate anything. They just call me a "heretic", accuse me of a "sin of negligence", of not being a good mother, and so on… our relationship , at this moment, is "on the rocks". Almost every phone call ends in an argument over this matter. My family considers themselves to be "very catholic". They are, obviously "Vatican 2 Catholics", and they despair that their daughter and sister "went the wrong way". They actually pray for my "conversion" back to the "V-2 Church", which they regard as the True and fully legitimate Church….

… If they condemn her for "rejecting" the "Catholic Church" (the V-2 "Church"), then they must be consistent and condemn everyone else who also does so - like Protestant, Orthodox, Jews, Moslems, Pagans, etc..


If they condemn those people, then they must also condemn those who do not condemn the rejection of the Catholic Church and actually accept those non-Catholics where they are. First and foremost, her family must reject Benedict XVI for his position:


"....we are in agreement that a Jew, and this is true for believers of other religions, does not need to know or acknowledge Christ as the Son of God in order to be saved…” (Benedict XVI, Zenit News story, Sept. 5, 2000)


“…their [the Jews'] "No" to Christ brings the Israelites into conflict with the subsequent acts of God, but at the same time we know that they are assured of the faithfulness of God. They are not excluded from salvation…” (Benedict XVI, God and the World, 2000, pages 150-151)


“Q. But could we not also accept that someone can be saved through a faith other than the Catholic?

A. That’s a different question altogether. It is definitely possible for someone to receive from his religion directives that help him become a pure person, which also, if we want to use the word, help him please God and reach salvation. This is not at all excluded by what I said; on the contrary, this undoubtedly happens on a large scale.” (Benedict XVI, Salt of the Earth, 1996, p. 24)


Renata needs to ask her family: "How could she be putting her spiritual/eternal life in jeopardy if Jews and other non-Catholics do not, as Benedict XVI explicitly says so." Their only way to escape this dilemma is to condemn Benedict XVI as a heretic and thus arrive exactly at Renata's position. They cannot have it both ways - condemn her for "rejecting" the Church, but accept Benedict XVI who does not condemn those who actually reject it. In other words, their "pope" does not reject (or exclude from salvation) those who reject the Catholic faith, so why do they?






Subject: Anglicans "defrocked" over abuse


Dear Brothers,

Some Anglican schismatical "priests" have been "defrocked" in Australia over abuse allegations: "Newcastle's Anglican Bishop has defrocked three priests over what he says are "disturbing" allegations of child abuse.  The alleged abuse occurred in the 1970s and 1980s. Another priest has been banned from the Ministry for five years." (http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2012/s3587031.htm) It has uncanny similarities to the Vatican II sect, and shows the bad fruits of false religion. It seems that the Last Days would be marked by a schismatical spirit, since as Jesus said, the charity of many will grow cold: Matthew 24:12 - "And because iniquity hath abounded, the charity of many shall grow cold." It shows that true charity is founded on faith whole and undefiled, not on some pretense of being "nice," and that at the core of such abuse is the denial of the dogma, outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and of the absolute necessity of water baptism.

God Bless,

Chris White




… "the battles" that I am fighting lately with my family, who is on a "mission" to bring me back to post-Vatican- 2 Church.  They truly believe that by rejecting it I put my, (and my children), spiritual/eternal life in jeopardy.  They, like typical Novus O. are not willing to debate anything. They just call me a "heretic", accuse me of a "sin of negligence", of not being a good mother, and so on… our relationship , at this moment, is "on the rocks".  Almost every phone call ends in an argument over this matter.  My family considers themselves to be "very catholic". They are, obviously  "Vatican 2 Catholics", and they despair that their daughter and sister "went the wrong way".  They actually pray for my "conversion" back to the "V-2 Church", which they regard as the True and fully legitimate Church….




MHFM: They just don’t want the truth.  A true Catholic should make it clear that the only conversion that might occur would be their conversion to the true faith, and that you would never accept the Vatican II sect.  The fact that they are still trying to persuade you suggests that you should articulate this point with even more clarity.   




Subject: Rosary beads banned


Dear Brothers,


A Colorado school has taken a Rosary away from a student because they consider it a gang symbol. We are surely seeing a world where good is bad and where bad is good. The way that God intended and wanted it to be has been reversed. We currently live in a world where the Creator has no pull in the eyes of the masses. There are only a few or a remnant who realize that all was made by God from nothing and man has got way too high an opinion of himself and his worth. The devil despises the Blessed Virgin as well and does not want any visible, holy objects to be seen in public. He has cleaned out the once holy Catholic Churches and now he wants to take Jesus and Mary out of the public eye. The battle lines are being drawn and time is short…


Bob Bohr




Well, benny the rat, has come out of his hole again, promoting spiritual suicide [religious freedom] and I'm sure, giving his approbation of the middle eastern human destruction and to further propagate more violence and WW lll. It was interesting that benedict condemned religious fundamentalism and called on all of his false religious leaders to do everything possible to uproot this threat [Catholics]. Is he calling on all the kings of the world, ringing the bell for WW lll?


The definition of fundamentalism: 1. A religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those principles [dogmas], and often by intolerance of other views [heresy] and opposition to secularism [the world].


An example of fundamentalism, in regard to the doctrines of the One True Catholic Church would be, Outside the Catholic Church there is Absolutely No Salvation, this dogma and all Catholic dogmas must be believed and followed to be a member [saved], and heresy is not to be tolerated. [strict adherence]

Psalms 65:5 Come and see the works of God; who is terrible in his counsels over the sons of men. [strict]

Deuteronomy 4:24 Because the Lord thy God is a consuming fire, a jealous God.


St. Robert Bellarmine, A Commentary on the Book of Psalms; 5 "The prophet again stirs up all mankind to adore and praise God in the sincerity of their hearts; and, to do so with greater affection, he exhorts them to reflect on God's work's, and how terrible he is in His dealings with mankind." pg. 155


I believe benedict is really saying, all True Catholics [strict adherents] are to be uprooted and destroyed because it is the Catholic Church that he [the rat] is threatened by, freemasonry is the arch enemy of the One True Catholic Church.


"Addressing an audience of government officials, foreign diplomats and religious leaders, he called for the "fundamental right" of religious freedom to be observed." [he calls for everyone to observe spiritual suicide, second death]

"Earlier in his visit, the [anti] Pope condemned religious fundamentalism and called on all religious leaders in the Middle East "to do everything possible to uproot this threat."







Even though for decades I attended the NO Mass, I have never, ever liked it or thought it could in any way compare to the "old" Latin Mass. Its casualness, informality, banality, shocking irreverence, smiley-faced bonhommie, and clap-happy atmosphere that typified the NO Mass was so markedly the diametric opposite of the sacrosanct old Mass (and so revolting to me personally) that I dreaded going to Mass, esp on Sundays, and was even grateful when I had a valid excuse for not going! (I came subsequently to see that the NO Mass had changed all our churches into auditoriums, and often ugly ones at that!) And I do not even refer to the watered-down, and sometimes bizarre but mostly vapid, passionless gospel that was preached. One example comes to mind:In the key passage of Matthew 16:18 in which Our Lord asks Peter who people say He is (just before informing Peter that He will build His Church upon him), the priest doesn't discuss the Petrine Primacy central to this passage but rather Jesus' psychological need for feedback on how he's coming across! Sort of like:"Hey, Jesus was only human, he needed reassurance too, just like the rest of us." But I think the clincher for me was when the bishops forbade people to kneel for Communion.  This is a very very strange mandate for worship in the Roman Church, a strong tell-tale sign that something was really rotten in Rome. --- It took a while for me to realize it but it seems that the whole theology of The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass has disappeared without a trace, a theology which the Roman Church to its very marrow steadfastly adhered to and died for by untold thousands of martyrs, a Holy Sacrifice which was also acknowledged, shared by, and respected in, the Holy Sacrifices offered in the Eastern Church, both Catholic and Orthodox, (both Duophysite and Monophysite Oriental Churches). But now the very idea, in the whole of the Roman Church: Gone! Completely gone without a trace! (apart from the very recent, mostly unwanted and mostly ignored permission to offer the "old" Mass, which so far is really barely a blip on the religious radar screen.) ---- Here is where I would hope you will see fit to comment: As I view the NO Mass, it is really "Luther's Mass" or even "Cranmer's Mass."…


In sum, the NO Mass is not Catholic; it is a Protestant concept created by Modernist Catholic and Protestant collaborators at Vat II. Even if it can somehow be shown by somebody to be valid, it does not seem to give much grace, since most Catholics have lost their Catholic sense and singular identity and the hierarchy can't even replace its own dying and defecting clergy without resorting to the importation of a lot of mercenary (not missionary), African priests, about 18% now of US clergy.




MHFM: You are correct that the Novus Ordo is definitely not Catholic.  It must be avoided under pain of grave sin.  However, you indicate that it might be valid.  It is not valid, as the material on our site shows.  Also, the Vatican II Church is not the “Roman Church.”  It is not the Catholic Church.  It is a Counter Church.  One must be clear on that point.


You also seem to refer to the sacrifices of the "Orthodox" in positive terms.  While it’s true that even their theology of the sacrifice contradicts the theology exemplified in the Protestantized Novus Ordo service, you unfortunately include the "Orthodox" schismatics and other heretics among Catholic individuals whose worship you seem to be praising (e.g., the martyrs).  One should not do such a thing, or at least you should more specifically articulate that you are not praising the heretics or their worship, only acknowledging the distinction between their theology of the Mass and that of the Novus Ordo.  The "Orthodox," as well as the monophysites, are heretical and schismatic.  We hope you have not imbibed the theology of the Vatican II sect on “the Church” and heretical sects.  Please consult the material on our site for information on these and other matters.




Your emailer wisely writes that Our Lady's Rosary sets a person free and I would only add that within that true statement, it is the CROSS which mystically sets us free from evil of every kind on every level...so above all I bless the cross...


You did a great job on refuting the JWs …




Subject: Evil


Dear MHFM,


In regard to the comments on, "Evil." I come from a rather large family, and because I'm a sede I'm pretty much an outcast to them. I happen to live in a small community and most know I'm a traditional Catholic because I'm not shy about saying who I am. I happen to be an older man, so solitude doesn't bother me much. As a matter of fact, it doesn't bother me at all, mainly 'cause I carry my Rosary, and pray the Ave Maria's when I feel I need to, which is often. As the brothers know satan and his minions never stop attacking, but true as their teaching is, the Holy Rosary works, and quells their insidious intrusions. It's a miraculous shield. Never let it go. The Three Holy Mysteries of Mother Mary truly set a person free, no matter what evil has in store.




Subject: quote


Dear Brothers,

That's an interesting quote of the day from St. Thomas Aquinas on how the Devil tried to be like God. It reminds me of Mormonism, where they teach that the Devil is the brother of Jesus. It is the same heresy, in that since Christ is God, and they believe Satan is Christ's brother, that therefore "Satan is also God". They also teach the antichrist notion that… men can become God. It is simply masonic kabbalism…

Ezechiel 28:14-19 - "Thou a cherub stretched out, and protecting, and I set thee in the holy mountain of God, thou hast walked in the midst of the stones of fire. Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day of thy creation, until iniquity was found in thee. By the multitude of thy merchandise, thy inner parts were filled with iniquity, and thou hast sinned: and I cast thee out from the mountain of God, and destroyed thee, O covering cherub, out of the midst of the stones of fire. And thy heart was lifted up with thy beauty: thou hast lost thy wisdom in thy beauty, I have cast thee to the ground: I have set thee before the face of kings, that they might behold thee. Thou hast defiled thy sanctuaries by the multitude of thy iniquities, and by the iniquity of thy traffic: therefore I will bring forth a fire from the midst of thee, to devour thee, and I will make thee as ashes upon the earth in the sight of all that see thee. All that shall see thee among the nations, shall be astonished at thee: thou art brought to nothing, and thou shalt never be any more."

God Bless,

Chris White




St. Thomas Aquinas (1265): “It is said, in the person of the devil (Isa. 14:13-14), I will ascend into heaven… I will be like the Most High. And Augustine (De Q. Vet. Test., cxiii.) says that being inflated with pride, he wished to be called God. I answer that, without doubt the angel sinned by seeking to be God. But this can be understood in two ways: first, by equality; secondly, by likeness. He could not seek to be as God in the first way; because by natural knowledge he knew that this was impossible… And even supposing it were possible, it would be against natural desire; because there exists in everything the natural desire of preserving its own nature; which would not be preserved were it to be changed into another nature… In another way one may desire to be like unto God in some respect which is not natural to one; as if one were to desire to create heaven and earth, which is proper to God; in which desire there would be sin. It was in this way that the devil desired to be as God.” (Summa Theologica, Pt. 1, Q. 63, A. 4.)




Dear MHFM,


I have been following your website for some time now and would firstly like to tell you that your work was instrumental in my conversion from atheism to the truth. I have been studying and learning the various truths of Catholic doctrine, as well as the issues with the Novus Ordo pretenders…



Christian E.




My parents’ hatred for the Catholic faith has reached fever pitch. Unlike my mother, however, my father's actions are viciously aggressive and relentless. Not a day goes by in which he does not verbally attack me or my sisters for practicing the faith. He is a very proud, evil man who will not let up. We avoid him as best we can, but oftentimes he seeks us out wherever we happen to be (even during our prayer of the rosary) in order to mock us, mock the Catholic faith and spew a torrent of satanic speech. During these episodes he becomes full of rage, shutting out lights on us, etc. Nevertheless, we have submitted ourselves to the will of God and our Lady. We have not let this discourage us from practicing the true faith.




Subject: Hell [sic], its Kaleb


I don't consider that Vatican II is a "heretic cult", they changed the Mass cause peps were to lazy… priests now face toward the Con., yes, BUT that still don't make the Popes and the Church "INVALID"! I'v talked to many Catholics… and they all agree that the Church TO THIS PRESENT DAY IS "VALID"! You believe what you want to believe, leave us "Vatican II Catholics" as you would say ALONE. We never done anything bad, ya the Church killed billions of peps, the Inquisition, the Reformation, Encounter (Catholic) Reformation, ect, ect ya We know, but so did Protestants, Calvinists in France piosed Catholic priests robes, Henry VIII w the Church of England (Anglican) hung, burnt, be-headed many peps, but so did the Catholic Church, I debat w a LOT of Eastern Orthodoxy Christians, and Protestant (Protestersants, what I call them, lol cause they protested against us:) ). So I don't mean to be rude, but please quit saying Vatican II Catholics, and even Orthodoxys, and Protestants are going to helll, as long as we belive Jesus died to Save us, and Redeem us through his most precious blood, we r good.


Sincerely Yours,

Kaleb L.


MHFM: So, you dismiss the overwhelming facts about the Vatican II sect and its heretical leaders.  Specifically, you ignore the proof of their heresies and the Catholic teaching that heretics cannot be valid popes: http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/heresy_of_antipopes_john_paul_ii_and_benedict_xvi.php


Instead, you form your conclusions based on what others say. 


Jeremiah 17:5- “Thus saith the Lord: Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord.”


You then repeat anti-Catholic myths about the Inquisition, etc. and express complete heresy against Catholic dogma.  You blatantly deny the necessity of the Church for salvation. 


When you unwittingly introduced yourself with the word “Hell,” we must say that was a startlingly accurate salutation.  It properly identifies whence your doctrine comes and where it leads you.




I was reading Co's email about "Extra ecclesiam nulla salus", if I could add another reason why [so many] people falsely think they are going to heaven, they say all you have to do is be good and nice to one another but they don't realize the only reason they are nice to one another is because they want to be accepted by other people. They would never defend Jesus Christ or the Blessed Virgin Mary because then they might possibly offend someone and expose themselves to ridicule, be laughed at or looked upon as "crazy"! The other big thing is the majority of people love the glory of the kingdoms of the world, instead of listening to Jesus and following His example by saying begone satan and his false kingdoms, and then adore and serve Jesus, your reward in Heaven will be a mansion in His Eternal Kingdom, happy forever. I had a laugh a couple of weeks ago, my sister was putting me down for always talking about religion to my kids, if I happen to see them, she said I need to have more of a balance and I interjected right away and said, "Oh yeah, like a balance of good and evil, right?"


Proverbs 28:21 He that hath respect to a person in judgment, doth not well: such a man even for a morsel of bread forsaketh the truth.


Matthew 4:8-10 Again the devil took him [Jesus] up into a very high mountain, and shewed him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them, And said to him: All these will I give thee, if falling down thou wilt adore me. Then Jesus saith to him: Begone, Satan: for it is written, The Lord thy God shalt thou adore, and him only shalt thou serve.


John 14:2 In my Father's house there are many mansions. If not, I would have told you: because I go to prepare a place for you.




Antipope Paul VI


Subject: Populorum Progressio of Antipope Paul VI


P.P. is basically whitewashed… [V-2] “catholic” version of the Communist Manifesto, combined with global, nwo agenda, full of masonic worn out cliches and catchwords.  This "encyclical" [shows that] Vatican 2- and- what- happened- after-that was a plot to destroy the True Catholic Church and blind people with its "universal" a la French revolution messages of fraternity, freedom, peace, liberty, equality and so on….

Toward an Effective World Authority


78. Such international collaboration among the nations of the world certainly calls for institutions that will promote, coordinate and direct it, until a new juridical order is firmly established and fully ratified…




…. I think that many of these people that reject the Dogma "there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church" do so precisely because they have already previously chosen to reject the words of Christ:

"Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat. How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth to life: and few there are that find it!" Mat 7:13

Choosing to believe the opposite of what Christ teaches here is probably the root cause of a lot of the modern heresies.

This is what I imagine to be the process of thought going on within many people:
1) Most people cannot be going to Hell
2) Most people are not Catholic
3) Therefore Non Catholics are going to Heaven

I think that many people have already internally chosen to not believe that most people are going to go to Hell. No matter what. No matter the evidence.  Obviously a Catholic thinks:

1) The Ex Cathedra decrees are the proximate rule of faith, and the correct interpretation of Scripture.
2) The Church teaches from Ex Cathedra decrees that "there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church"
3) Therefore there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church






Subject: The Greatest Generation?


After hearing stories about 60, 70 and 80 year old "Catholics", who, actually reject the faith and listening to my own father who as a boy, used to be MC at Mass and currently says he's Catholic, but, believes in nothing...how can this generation of apostates be called great? They are the ones that went right along with everything. Every decade was a new revolution of some sort and they fought every war except the most important one. It seems to me every revolution the past 500 years was a war on our God. God bless the men and women who actually fought for the faith.






Dear Brothers,


If I might add to Bill's comment that polygamy and incest are already being propagandized to a very subtle level that even school children are being indoctrinated and exposed to via these so called television shows called 'anime' and manga (comic books)… Lastly those booms were somewhat due to the public's acceptance that pornography is not morally wrong.


God speed,





Dear Brothers:


Because we have to deal with indifference so often, I was glad to see MHFM's post about the indifferent woman with whom MHFM recently conversed. We are sure that you tried everything possible to wake her up, but to no avail. She and the millions like her are zombies. (Maybe they are what Satan is parodying in the zombie movement which is now in vogue.) These lukewarm people have such spiritual sloth that their minds don't even seem to register what you are saying to them, and they remain totally undisturbed by the horrors around them. The world may be spiraling down the toilet (including the false Catholic world which they accept), but they are too blind to see it. The denial of Christ and the true Catholic faith is not a problem for these people, because they (like all false Christians) no longer believe in Him. If they did, they would believe in all that He taught. Nor do they believe in hell -- although they might claim, as O'Reilly claimed in his discussion with the other atheist, that it exists for guys like Hitler. For these false Christians, the road to hell is narrow, but the road to heaven is wide. Perhaps that is one reason why, according to St. Alphonsus, most people won't believe in hell until they get there. Yet, what Our Lord tells us is the most frightening of all -- that these indifferent people are the vomit of God. They put man in the place of God by imagining that God must accept man's preferences, man's opinions and man's sinfulness.


I also want to thank you for the videos on the Jehovah's Witnesses and the one on The Seat of Satan. I never understood anything about the 7 letters to the churches until I saw that video (just as I never understood anything else about the Book of Revelation before seeing your analysis of it in your Is the World about to End? video.) MHFM's work is always characterized by great scholarship and great insight.


Lee Ann




MHFM: This is a somewhat interesting quote about the “blessing” of a Novus Ordo “priest.”


“‘Two days after Katie’s experience with the drawers, Tricia was forced to accept that it was true.  ‘I was in her bedroom tidying up when I heard the strange sawing sound, exactly the way Katie described it.  I turned round and couldn’t believe my eyes – the four drawers were being pulled out and in, all by themselves.  I nearly fainted.  I knew then that I’d have to call on the parish priest.’

     Father Frank McMenahan, a personable young man, new to the parish and the county, came to bless the house the following evening.  He assured Tricia that a blessing would put things right…

     The moment I went into Katie’s room,’ Father Frank tells us, ‘the hairs rose on the nape of my neck.  A feeling of icy coldness cut right through me.  I almost lost my balance with the force of it.  There really was no logical explanation for it.’…

     The priest blessed the room, sprinkling – if anything – even more holy water than he had used elsewhere.  He left the Downey home, confident that whatever had ‘visited’ the family had been expelled.  He could not have been more wrong. 

     ‘After he blessed the house, it went crazy,’ Tricia Downey says with a shudder.  ‘It was growling and banging, not only during the night, but in the daytime as well – upstairs and downstairs.’”  (David M. Kiely and Christina McKenna, Dark Sacrament – True Stories of Modern-Day Demon Possession and Exorcism, pp. 231-232.)




Subject: No Salvation


People need to realize the importance of, "No salvation outside the Catholic Church". It is the current test, the lines have been drawn. The heretics would like to put a fog over the situation. They want people to think that most traditionalists are pretty 'conservative' on this dogma. They make the illusion that there are all sorts of little groups condemning each other over this dogmas 'interpretation'. The unspoken lie is that some groups believe only babies get an exception, others only catechumens, others believe invincible ignorance this way others look at it that way... But the Truth is that there are two sides, one says ANYONE could get into heaven, the other side says you must be Catholic. No one (anymore) believes just catechumens get an exception or just these people or just those people they always extend it to everyone. People need to focus in on this dogma and make sure they know which side that they are on.


MHFM: Yes, the ‘No Salvation’ issue is the most important issue.  The denial of that truth is certainly the biggest problem today.  Yesterday one of us spoke with a Novus Ordo woman in her seventies.  She was a follower of EWTN.  She considered herself a practicing, and perhaps even a ‘conservative,’ Catholic.  What she said about salvation was appalling.  She indicated that Christ and the Catholic faith are of no necessity.  She said that whatever you are raised with, if you are ‘good’ (whatever that means), then you can get to Heaven.  When she was informed that such a position is opposed to the teaching of the Gospel and Catholic dogma, she wasn’t aggressively defensive.  She just didn’t care.  It was obvious that citations from traditional Church teaching or from the words of Christ didn’t matter to her.  She wasn’t bothered by the fact that Catholic dogma and the New Testament teach the opposite of what she believes.  To her, being “Catholic” isn’t about accepting the infallible truths of faith.  It’s about something else: showing up at church and thinking she’s in communion with Rome (despite the fact that she rejects what Catholic Rome infallibly taught).  It was another striking example of how when true belief in the salvation dogma and its real meaning was lost in the minds and hearts of so many, as it was with the adoption of BOD, invincible ignorance, etc., the entire Christian faith was necessarily lost with it, leaving only a foul, empty and unbelieving apostasy in its place. 


The staggering truth is that there are millions of people out there just like her.  They also claim to be Catholic.  Many of them even think they are conservative, traditional, and loyal to the Church.  They populate the Novus Ordo churches (as well as traditional ones), and they presume to receive “Communion.”  They think they have the Catholic faith.  In their blindness they cannot see that unbelief has rendered them anathema to God.


Outside the Church There is No Salvation (book and section)




Subject: Co-Redemptrix


Dear Brothers,

That's a great quote on how the Blessed Virgin Mary is not Co-Redemptrix. It seems to be a false traditionalist fashion to adhere to this heresy, since they seem to think that by their… false devotion to Mary, and by saying she is also Redeemer rather than the Lord Jesus Christ alone, that they will win some kind of special favors from heaven. In reality, they offend God and cut themselves off from the Mystical Body of Christ - the Catholic Church…

God Bless,

Chris White




Subject: sodom and gomorrah


Hollywood, having succeeded in virtually normalizing, if not aggrandizing homosexuality in the popular culture over the past couple of decades, is apparently getting ready to begin propagandizing for incest and polygamy…:


[News: Notebook Director says if we back gay “marriage,” why not incest]


It occurred to me a couple of years ago, while watching Bill O'Reilly arguing with someone over Gay marriage from the perspective of "if this, what's next, why not polygamy?", that this argument would be lost, because the bulk of society, including "conservatives" and "Christians" long ago ceded the essential ONLY moral premise on which any logical argument can stand.  That premise, as defined by the True Church, is that the purpose of marriage is the "rearing and education of children" (Pius XI, Casti Cunnubi, 1930). That premise, and the morality that underlined it, is that sex (formerly known as the "marriage act") was to be restricted to marriage. This understanding of sex and marriage was pretty much universally understood and accepted by the entire civilized world, even the protestants, EVEN THE PAGANS… society was not adverse to setting rationale standards of civility, and these standards were based on the natural law, the law of God.


So I remember thinking to my self when watching O'Reilly that I would have liked to have asked him: "Hey Bill, if polygamy is bad, are you saying that we should reinstate the civil laws against adultery, fornication, sodomy, etc.? It wasn't that long ago that these things were illegal in many states." I think Bill would answer (in a self righteous tone), "No, I don't want to regulate people in their bedrooms."…


I mean the liberals will be absolutely correct, they win the logical argument, if we say that sex is just a private affair, its nobody's business what two "consenting adults" agree to do. If we concede that, then eventually there is no rational case to be made against Tom marrying his daughter, Dick marrying Harry, or Joe having three wives. This totally confused logic will lead (has led) to a totally chaotic world. The logical confusion stems from moral confusion, and it is the FRUIT of the false doctrine that we Americans were reared to worship, "religious liberty", also condemned by the 19th Century Popes who saw all of this coming. Then Vatican II surrendered to the world, contradicted irreformable dogma, and enshrined religious liberty as a good. How's that working out?


Bill Mulligan


Interesting quote


MHFM: This is a very interesting quote from the Catechism of the Council of Trent.  It’s relevant to the position, held by some, that Mary is Co-Redemptrix and that such a title should be given to Mary.  As we pointed out in this video and in a corresponding article on the topic, the title of Co-Redemptrix is false and inconsistent with infallible Catholic teaching.  Mary is not Co-Redemptrix, as Christ alone redeemed us and He alone is the Redeemer.


The quote below from the Catechism of the Council of Trent repeats the truth that Christ “alone” redeemed us and that Christ “alone” is the Redeemer.  While the teaching of the catechism is definitely not infallible (and we will have more comments on this point soon), the following teaching is completely consistent with the infallible definitions of the Councils of Florence and Trent on this matter.  Notice the use of the word “alone,” exactly as we see in the dogmatic definitions on this point.


Catechism of the Council of Trent, Part III: The Decalogue – First Commandment – Thou Shalt not Have Strange Gods, etc. – Objections Answered: “True, there is but one Mediator, Christ the Lord, who alone has reconciled us to the heavenly Father through His blood, and who, having obtained eternal redemption, and having entered once into the holies, ceases not to intercede for us.”


We have added this interesting quote to our article on this topic.  (Below are the dogmatic definitions we have cited numerous times before). 


Pope Pius IV, Council of Trent, Sess. 25, On Invocation, Veneration and Relics of Saints, and on Sacred Images, ex cathedra: “… the saints, who reign with Christ, offer up their prayers to God for men; and that it is good and useful to invoke them suppliantly and, in order to obtain favors from God through His Son JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD, WHO ALONE IS OUR REDEEMER and Savior… And they must also teach that images of Christ, the virgin mother of God and the other saints should be set up and kept… But if anyone should teach or maintain anything contrary to these decrees, let him be anathema.” (Denz. 984)


Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino” 1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes, and teaches that no one conceived of man and woman was ever freed of the domination of the Devil, except through the merit of the mediator between God and men, our Lord Jesus Christ; He who was conceived without sin, was born and died, THROUGH HIS DEATH ALONE LAID LOW THE ENEMY OF THE HUMAN RACE BY DESTROYING OUR SINS, and opened the entrance to the kingdom of heaven, which the first man by his own sin had lost…” (Denz. 711)




Hello Brothers,


… that same year in Malaysia the hindus were celebrating some kind of celebration day to one of their many false deities with a procession, i could hear them chanting and signing from down the street as the procession approached the house, i decided to see what abomination this was. As i stepped outside my gated garage. i could see that lots of people were following closely behind the float. This electrical float with a hindu shaman accepting gifts to their false gods, as soon as it was no closer than 50 feet from me, i started to pray the Hail Mary. As soon as I began to pray the Hail Mary Full of Grace the whole thing the (electrical float) shut off and was unmovable, and the whole procession stopped for about two hours right in front of the house. I was amazed. I have the video and you can hear that as soon as i started to pray it shut down, the people from the procession got frantic and in the video you can see them all looking at me i got scared and went inside.


God Bless You





… That is what Benedict 16 and the post-Vatican 2 modernised "edition" of the neo-"catholicism" is trying to tell people of other , false faiths and religions.


Benedict 16 and his cohort instead of telling them: " either you convert to The Only True, holy catholic faith and Church or you 'll burn your sorry behinds in the eternal fire, for ever and ever, and ever" , sends them best wishes to end Ramadan and talks some fuzzy -wuzzy -masonic talk about "solidarity and fraternal love ,about becoming one, single family" and yada, yada , ya…


He should have said: "yes, God created us all, but God demands worshiping only Him, the only One, True God in Three Persons.  Worshipping Buddha… Allah, Great Thumb, etc., will not secure your salvation, but will bring eternal damnation to all of you…

Sending those "interfaith", "friendly messages" for the end of ramadan, or similar occasions, reminds me of practices that communistic leaders from different nations used to do. They sent "messages" on the occasion of May 1st, anniversary of birth of Lenin etc., using the same empty slogans (e.g. workers of the world unite) and pathetic rhetoric (we'll build a new , better order) deprived of all the truth and deeper meaning.





Dear Brothers,


In regard to the inquiry on "study friend" I wish this person the best… [but] it is impossible for any good intended Catholic to get through to any Jehovah Witness and make them see the truth because they turn their backs the moment they feel the other side is perseverant in the Catholic truth other times they stick like glue, all they are interested in is in the recruitment of lukewarm souls for their sect, Oh how I tried, I once spent an afternoon with two of them and by the end of the afternoon I just simply had to force myself to get away I was so exhausted I could not take any more and almost came to the point of fainting, with no doubt I can say that they are a most evil sect I have lost all inspiration in discussing faith matters with them.


When I come across them now I simply ask them if they know what “Jehovah Witnesses” means, some of them say “God´s Witnesses” I tell them that their sect and doctrines is a complete lie and are further lying when using the name “Jehovah Witnesses” because none has ever seen God the Father but the Son, God the Son, yes, witnesses of Jesus Christ yes, but since they refuse to believe in God the Son our Lord Jesus Christ it would be a waste of precious time discussing further with them.


Exodus 33:20 ….. “But He (God) said, “You cannot see My Face, for no man can see Me and live”


John 1:18 ….. “No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.”


John 6:46 ….. “Not that anyone has seen the Father, except the One who is from God; He has seen the Father.”


In the Sacred Heart of Jesus,

M. Fernanda da Silva


MHFM: Your point that adherents of heretical sects are often extremely resistant to sound argumentation is certainly correct; but it would not be correct to say that it’s absolutely impossible to get through to any person of that sect.  It’s possible to reach some of them, even if it’s rare and requires a special grace.  With many, however, the resistance of their own will makes it in essence impossible to reach those people in particular.




… I want you to know about a soul you've influenced. I've been 'catholic' for the past year. I'd been unwittingly led astray to believe in a false Catholicism. A friend of mine sent me Pius X's encyclical against modernism. I later that week was listening to Fr. Mitch Pacwa, speaking about… Jews… how we can learn from their reading of scripture and so forth.... It made no sense. So, I read through the documents he was referencing and a couple other VII documents and realized, the modernism warned about by previous pontiffs was all around us. I've come to the realization of the sedevacantist position about 2 weeks ago. Since then, I've delved into your material. Excellent by the way! I've I heard you say on one of your videos that some sedevacantists accept the heresy of salvation outside the Church. I've listened to many of your videos and I agree with everything you hold as it is authentic and faithful Catholicism in no uncertain terms. After listening to your material, I'd research your references and what not, and found it to be anything but 'out of context' as many falsely assert. Unfortunately, many accept that, dismiss your material out of hand, and remain in the VII mindset… God bless you for being faithful to the traditions passed on to us… Thank you for your time and dedication. I will be sending away for your package. You will remain in my prayers…




New Video Posted


MHFM: This is a new video.


Quick Refutation of Jehovah's Witnesses [video]




Subject: Council of Elvira


Dear Bros. Peter and Michael Dimond,

I was just doing a little reading through vol. 1 of Faith of the Early Fathers and I came upon the Council of Elvira. It was very edifying to read the statutes and of Canon law. I just wanted to know were any of those binding and is this a dogmatic council?... Also, I wanted to point out the horrible irony of our day in which the fact is that there is more complete information ready at your fingertips for basically everyone about the true faith and yet humanity as a whole is more irreligious than ever before in history. It just defies logic doesn't it? It especially does so when you think people would be scared by what they see happening around them and might want to think about eternity for a little while. The majority of the earth are so ungrateful and unappreciative…

Nathan Barton


MHFM: The Council of Elvira was a regional council.  Its statements and canons were not infallible, but many of them were certainly reflective of the true apostolic faith.  In our book, The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II, we cited this interesting statement from Elvira.  We brought it up in the discussion of John Paul II’s attendance at a pagan temple and his apostate meeting at Assisi II, in which he turned Catholic rooms into pagan temples so that the pagans could worship their false gods.  He even removed crucifixes and other items to facilitate the transformation.


The Council of Elvira, A.D. 305: “It has been decreed that those who in adult age after receiving Baptism shall go into the pagan temples to worship idols, which is a deadly crime and the height of wickedness, shall not be admitted to communion even at death.”


As we see from this regional council, in the early Church going into a pagan temple (which John Paul II did in Thailand) to worship idols was considered the height of wickedness.  It represented such apostasy from the Faith that those who even repented of it were only admitted to confession (not Communion).  If going into the pagan temple was considered such severe apostasy, what would they say about a purported leader of the Church who turns the Catholic churches themselves into pagan temples (e.g., Assisi II) so that the pagans can worship false gods in them?  They would undoubtedly consider it the height of apostasy.




Dear Brothers,


The "Orthodox" schismatic who said the Holy Ghost doesn't proceed from the Son doesn't know what he's talking about. He evidently ignores the Gospel of John: John 15:26 - "But when the Paraclete cometh, whom I will send you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceedeth from the Father, he shall give testimony of me." John 16:7 - "But I tell you the truth: it is expedient to you that I go: for if I go not, the Paraclete will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you." The heresy of Photius (the denial of the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Son) is Satanic: Mark 3:29 - "But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, shall never have forgiveness, but shall be guilty of an everlasting sin." The "Orthodox" are full of pride….

God Bless,

Chris White


MHFM: Yes, we have to agree.  A distinguishing characteristic of the Eastern schismatics we’ve conversed with is intellectual pride.  They really consider themselves to be theologically sophisticated, when sadly they are not even true Christians. 




Subject: The heretic Peter


Dear Brothers:


That guy Peter who denies that Jesus Christ and the true faith are necessary for salvation is a first class idiot. To justify his error, he cites people who lived prior to the Resurrection of Christ and, thus, prior to the requirement of baptism. How could a man calling himself "Catholic" not know this or not even bother to find out? In order to avoid the humility it takes to accept the teachings of Christ, these proud heretics work feverishly to come up with any kind of absurd rationale that appeals to them and, after they have done so, they bask in the shadow of their blindness which they mistake for the glow of brilliance. These proud fools don't realize how pathetic they are. Nor do they realize that while they are claiming to extol the power of God, these heretics are actually denying it!


The Bible tells us that the god of the pagans is the devil and -- in case anyone were foolish enough to doubt the word of God -- the experiences of the true Catholic missionaries prove this to be so beyond any shadow of a doubt. Now, isn't it interesting how, according to these heretics, Satan and his legions can travel the world finding people of bad will and fill them with lies -- but somehow God is not powerful enough to find souls of good will and provide for these individuals. That is what all promoters of the heresy of "baptism of desire" are actually claiming: that Satan is more powerful than the God of Creation. Utter blasphemy reflecting a complete "vacuum of faith", as MHFM explained to another emailer.


Lee Ann




Dear Brothers,


I enjoyed your response to Peter. Peter comes from a long line of willfully possessed NO Catholics. They become this way when they refuse to accept faith facts that are based on scripture, dogma and tradition. Their egos are much bigger than their desire to accept God and his teachings 100% and not a percentage less. When are these people going to realize that God is an all or nothing God. Good - Evil, Heaven - hell, truth - lies and so on and so forth. We live in an age of smorgasbord ‘Catholicism.’ People feel they can pick and choose what to accept and what not to accept.


God wants all of us. He wants full commitment and vomits out the lukewarm as scripture tells us. The anti-Christ theme of man as God is not going away. People like Peter enjoy being noticed for their bravado in defending a defenseless church. They need to wake up and smell the coffee before it is too late. God's mercy is coming to an end for most of these "heroes" of the VII masonic sect…


Bob Bohr




Dear MHFM,


In addition to Lee Ann's piece on, "Peace-God's unconditional love and universal salvation..." promotion by V2 false, heretical teaching. What about St. Paul, as one tiny, important teaching of many in Holy Scripture, "Work out your salvation with fear and trembling..." The incredible plethora of heretical teachings of V2, and mankind follows such drivel! The history of mankind remains unchanging in their ability of offend God. The 21st century in no different. Simply unbelievable!...





I was watching the Monastery’s YouTube channel and was amazed at the care and the comprehensive work that has been done to expose the heresies… I am Orthodox and we have some of the same issues, the Patriarchs chumming up with non-Christians and in some cases outright insulting to the Sanctimony of the Holy Orthodox Church. Anyway I wanted to thank you for documenting Truth! It is sad to see all these innovations as I was born and raised Catholic (Roman), went to seminary. For me the last straw was the Seminary. I am an Old Calender Orthodox Christian and with us it is the same issue the Patriarch starts to make concessions, befroe you know it Divine Liturgy is simply a protestant ceremony with Sacraments--the Novus Ordo.

Well I suppose we simply must pray unceasingly as St. Paul taught. I wanted to ask you, I saw a video that was saying "how the Bible proves the truth of the church" or something like that I suppose that it is an apologetic work but in reality the Church wrote the Bible. To me it is placing the cart before the horse? The bible is the Apostolic tradition written but a part of Tradition--never could understand it seems like Webster trying to defend the existence of words by use of the Webster Dictionary, does that kind of make sense??? I hope I don't come across wrong.

Well, I wish you well despite 1054--The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone not the Father and the Son, the chief sacraments of the Church are Baptism, Chrismation and Eucharist which should be given at once. Confirmation to me is a very protestant idea? Not to be insulting but it is vital that the Holy Spirit descend upon the Newly Baptized. As you well know that there are forces out there to destroy and pull children out of the arms of our Lord and into their diabolic plans--this I suspect would be even more important for someone who's theology is strongly influenced by Bl. Augustine.

In my opinion, Protestamts are simply children of Rome that have went astray and rebelled against their parent and have dishonored the Saints especially the Theotokos! The disdain some of the prods have towards the Blessed Mother--denying her perpetual virginity… When I was in seminary I was going to write a term paper titled: "Protestantism the Genesis of Modern Day Atheism." It was considered to be too controversial…


Well take care and be well,


In Christ our Lord,

Collin Patrick Bentley


MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but "Orthodoxy" is not true Christianity.  It rejects the clear proof for the Papacy in Scripture and the early Church.  Please see this file:




“Orthodoxy” embraces other heresies as well, such as a denial of the filioque.  "Orthodoxy" is also utterly illogical, as proven by its inconsistent position on ecumenical councils.  It's a false sect.  We hope you come out of it and convert to the true Catholic faith.




Subject: The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World


… the reason I'm writing to you is regarding the video you posted in the subject heading. Just shocking. I was fooled. Thank you so much for exposing this. You are truly a sniper for Jesus in the way you expose the truth about a lot of things that are crucial for people to know… May Jesus bless you and protect you brother. GOD bless you.



More from Novus Ordo heretic, Peter


[Note: this individual has written to us a number of times recently.  We responded and provided him with dogmatic teaching which contradicts his false positions.  We also asked if he was interested in an audio discussion of these matters.  He was not.  He has repeatedly and obstinately expressed support for the position that non-Catholics can be saved.  He also obstinately clings to the Novus Ordo Church.] 


… So, no Hebrew can be saved?


Did Jesus attend Synagogue? Did He practice the Jewish faith? Did He follow the fast days? Did he follow the dietary laws of the Old Testament (Covenant) even though He told Peter later on to get up and eat because nothing God has created is unclean? Were the dietary laws of the O.T. natural laws to be kept for health reasons? Will Abraham, the Father of Faith, be saved? What about King David, Solomon, etc? Will they not have the chance to know Jesus and be saved? What type of Baptism will they have? Does not the desire for Baptism bring about the fruits of Baptism? God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but He Himself is not bound by HIS sacraments. True? Is it not true that every man who is ignorant of the Gospel of Christ and of His Church, but seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it, can be saved? Can it not be supposed that such persons would have desired Baptism explicitly if they had known its necessity?


I am also stating right now as God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit is my witness, that Jesus Christ is Lord and God Forever. I do not nor will I ever reject Jesus the Christ, the Word made flesh… I've just been re-reading every word I wrote and you wrote. I am definitely NOT a proponent of Modernism. I receive Holy Communion on the tongue and not in the hand. I genuflect before I receive Him. I wish we still went to the altar rail to receive communion as we did when I was in High School. My daughters were never "altar boys." So, I'm definitely NOT a modernist!!


No, I said I wasn't being nasty period meaning I was speaking with you out of LOVE. I am a sinner that's for sure and have been hypocritical at times. In fact I can remember a time when I was telling someone what they shouldn't be doing and at that moment realized that I, too, had done the same thing. What a realization that was!! Confession was next. But, I am NOT a hypocrite as you have stated that I am. I wasn't defensive at all… I haven't rejected any dogmatic statements. It's in the interpretation of those statements that there may be a misunderstanding on our part….


In HIS Mercy and Love I will be praying for your return the Church,




MHFM: The problem is that you don't believe in Jesus Christ or in papal infallibility.  That's the truth.  That's the root cause of all your problems.  You absolutely reject the defined dogma that belief in Jesus Christ and the Catholic faith are necessary for salvation.  If you claim otherwise, while you admittedly believe members of false religions can be saved, you commit mortal sin and bear false witness.  Don't say you believe faith in Christ is necessary when you don't!  You are a liar.  You believe Jews and Muslims can be saved, and you advance the most ridiculous arguments for that position.  You reject the Catholic faith, period.  You reject Jesus, by spitting on His word that one must believe in Him to be saved.  You are sadly of bad will, a liar, and an unbeliever and headed for Hell, as sure as there is a God in Heaven. 


You deceive yourself by thinking that you receive "Communion" on the tongue.  You are not even receiving Communion.  The Mass you go to is invalid and Protestant.  But you could attend the most reverent traditional Masses in the world and it wouldn't matter at all because you don't believe in Jesus.


You don't follow the Catholic Church.  You follow a man who teaches a multitude of heresies, including a rejection of the accuracy of the Bible.  He also teaches that Protestants and schismatics are inside the Church, that pagan religions are good, that pro-abortionists are Catholic, and much more.  You also show your pathetic self-deception by focusing on how nice you think you've been.  That's both untrue and irrelevant.  You threw out insults, but in your dishonesty you deny that you did.  Furthermore, it makes no difference.  For even if you did not throw out insults, you are still a heretic and a Catholic must inform you of that fact.  You are an abomination, and there is nothing more to say to you.




Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,


This is an interesting quote from the life of Fr. Henry Morse. It recounts some of the more frightening things he experienced while ministering to the plague victims of England in the 17th century.


"Often it fell to Morse to dress their sores, to support in bed dying women in danger of strangling or choking, and hear their faintly spoken confessions as their infectious breath fell across his face. Frequently he would sit with them while they passed into their delirium and death agony...In their last hours many would break out in extravagant rage and strike in madness at their friends until death ended their ravings. Others shivered and trembled hideously. In their dreams men were known to cry out that they were all on fire...Cuthbert Holland's household was one frequently visited by Morse...Morse watched while six of them died of the plague." (Philip Caraman, Henry Morse: Priest of the Plague, p. 108-109)


God Bless,

Mario Chavez




Brothers of the Most Holy Family Monastery,


I, like many others, have been "blown away" by the information provided in your plethora of resources… I believe your order is conducting the works of God and defending the true Catholic Church of Christ… I am Catholic and had been away from the Church for a LONG TIME… And although I had returned to the Church… where I had my First Communion and Confirmation) thinking it was a true Church; but God eventually and rather quickly (since my renewed faith) led me to your information. I don't know why but I believe in my heart that this is not a coincidence… I am reciting the Rosary every day and have faith… From what I have learned, I have been using invalid confession and communion to nurture my journey and feel betrayed somehow because my heart has been truly seeking God (it may be the reason the He has led me to your web videos…).


… Thanks for your help and attention to my issues and may God Bless You and keep you strong and safe Soldiers of Christ!



Oliva Herrera




Subject: Iron Men


Dear Brothers,


I was watching a TV series called "Iron Men" on the weather channel that depicts the men that work high above the city, building iron skyscrapers. The recent episodes include the iron workers involved with rebuilding world trade center #4 (72 stories) on the original 16 acres in Lower Manhattan. The show starts out showing Larry Silverstein, President and CEO of Silverstein Properties, INC., who owns 4 of the 5 new skyscrapers, praising the iron workers as they renew his destroyed properties after 9/11. Silverstein suggests his property will be "transformed, the beauty of it, the majesty of it, the quality of it" as, "none of this would be happening, the rebuilding wouldn't and couldn't happen without the local iron workers, as he's looking forward to getting it done." Silverstein looks over the building site, saying he "is amazed to see everything coming together, everything coming to fruition in front of his eyes."


This must be the fruition of the evil plan to "pull it" and bring down his old asbestos infested buildings on 9/11. No mention of the double indemnity insurance policy taken out only a few months prior to 9/11 and the billions of dollars of blood money he received from an "accident" that caused the first-ever iron structure to collapse from fire damage. The first part of the reconstruction was to build a memorial of the lost workers on 9/11. Two-huge square water fountains now outline the footprints where the former towers one and two used to sit.


The TV show made me think back recently of the Olympics as the world waited to see if the elite would play their evil hand of destruction by destroying the arena or even the city as part of a 9/11 part II. The destructive "events" that take place are part of "the game" the elite play with each successful event gaining "evil points and praise" from their opponents. The recent Olympic "event" that never came to "fruition" was due mainly to all the non-mainstream media attention that was seen around the world, as MHFM points out in their video. Lost "evil points" and onto the next "event" as the evil-elite continue their games, being so blind to the fact that their every move is being documented by God himself for the day of final judgment that no man shall escape.


God Bless,

Tom Miles




Dear Brothers:


I was thinking of the very many (even seemingly innocuous) ways that Satan mocks God throughout the so-called Novus Ordo mass (which I don't think any good willed person can doubt is the Abomination of Desolation). In particular, I was thinking of when the "priest" (at every single "mass") tells the audience to give one another the sign of peace, and each turns to the other and says: "the peace of Christ be with you". Judging from the accompanying fervor (hugging and kissing) with which they do this, one gets the impression that these individuals certainly believe what they are saying. It never dawns on these misguided people that God specifically told us, that those who deny Him and His truth will be condemned for all eternity, and will never enjoy His peace. These people conveniently forget that it is not "peace to all men." It's peace to all men of good will. And that means God's will.


Consideration of this makes me recall something else. The Whore of Babylon and its anti-popes elevated man to the place of God, calling man the measure and center of all things -- a false notion which even the "Catholic" world was all too happy to embrace. After Vatican II, in the corporate arena and in all segments of secular society, there was an explosion of "motivational" books and programs which were all designed to convince man that he really didn't know how good and wonderful he truly was and all that he was capable of achieving. This thinking was all the rage -- including among Vatican 2 "Catholics". Add that to the fact that the demon Paul 6th removed from the new "missal" all references to sin, judgement, and hell -- and there's little wonder that the V2 church has little use for things like "Confession", or that they embrace the lies of God's unconditional love and universal salvation. Satan is the Prince of this world, and the Apostate church is his crowning glory.


Lee Ann




Subject: Debate: Busting Myths about Vatican II's "Infallibility"


Dear Brothers,


… I am listening now. It has given me an insight into WHY people deny the true faith: they are prideful, or they have some cherished idea they don't want to give up, or they have some secret sin that they cling to. We live in an era where "personal freedom" is king and people think because they have an opinion that they value that it must mean it is true. This young man refuses to see the truth, saying you are "giving an opinion," when you are quoting dogma. This is prideful….



Colleen Urban




Subject: Another VII Scandal


Dear Brothers,


The area in which I live is continuing to discredit the so called Catholic Church as another "Minister" as they called him on the news, got in trouble. This time a supposed holy man took advantage of a 15 year old girl for an extended period of time. The members of the NO church with every passing day get into deeper and deeper trouble. They are in a false church and have been for many years. They have become numb to any and all sex scandals. They blindly follow each other thinking that a whole parish cannot be wrong. What they fail to realize is that God expects each man or woman to think things through or to work out their salvation with the many gifts God has bestowed upon them. They unfortunately are a bunch of sheeple who are headed for eternal punishment. Pride is at the foundation of their problems. A true devotion to our Blessed Mother could save all these people a whole lot of "needless aggravation" in the hereafter. What is really sad is that your web page has all the answers and they refuse to accept them.


God bless your efforts,

Bob Bohr.




Subject: Yangtze River Turns Red and Turns Up a Mystery | ABC News Blogs - Yahoo!


If only people cared, believed and then had understanding of the knowledge received, they would see what is happening {warnings} and then take further action in changing their lives, like prayer {rosary}... It was interesting to read verse [14], how it speaks of one of the torments of hell, the extreme of being thrown into cold water and back into the hellfire.


Exodus 7:19-21 The Lord also said to Moses: Say to Aaron, Take thy rod, and stretch forth thy hand upon the waters of Egypt, and upon their rivers, and streams and pools, and all the ponds of waters, that they may be turned into blood: and let blood be in all the land of Egypt, both in vessels of wood and of stone. And Moses and Aaron did as the Lord had commanded: and lifting up the rod he struck the water of the river before Pharao and his servants: and it was turned into blood. And the fishes that were in the river died: and the river corrupted, and the Egyptians could not drink the water of the river, and there was blood in all the land of Egypt.


Apocalypse 16:3-6 And the second angel poured out his vial upon the sea, and there came blood as it were of a dead man; and every living soul died in the sea. And the third poured out his vial upon the rivers and the fountains of waters; and there was made blood. And I heard the angel of the waters saying: Thou art just, O Lord, who art, and who wast, the Holy One, because thou hast judged these things: For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy.






Subject: Mary, the Rosary and JP II


Your MHFM Web encourages devotion to BVM and the Holy Rosary for salvation.  What about JPII and Totus Tuis. Is JPII totally lost? Did he have devotion to Mary or was this just another Satanic deception used by JPII?  I have read his Apostolic letter Virginis Rosarium and the Luminous Mysteries Am I deceived? I can not see any heresy with the devotion of Rosary…Can you upload on your MHFM You Tube channel an examination of this issue





MHFM: No, he did not have a devotion to Mary.  It was a satanic deception, as we demonstrate in our material and specifically discuss in the video on the Apocalypse: Is the World about to End?


The facts prove without any doubt that John Paul II was an apostate antipope and an antichrist, who taught a variety of outrageous heresies.  To believe that a man who blasphemed and denied Jesus as he did was devoted to Our Lady is a grave insult to God and to Our Lady.  It reveals a vacuum of faith.  Consult the overwhelming evidence of his heresies:




He also taught that every man is God.  You are deceived, but it’s not too late for you to wake up and convert.  Please consult the information, the videos and the articles on these matters. The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World  We also suggest that you pray the full Rosary each day (excluding the ‘Luminous Mysteries’) for the grace of faith.




Subject: Video


Dear Brothers,


Could you please inform me of the title of your video where you talked about man's concern is only for the present?


God speed,



MHFM: Why Hell must be Eternal




Dear Brothers,

It never ceases to amaze me at the number and audacity of false traditionalists who claim to believe in the salvation dogma, but actually hold to some version of "baptism of desire." It is noticeable particularly in their attachment to externals and to man, since BOD originates in man and appeals to the world: James 4:4 - "Adulterers, know you not that the friendship of this world is the enemy of God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of this world, becometh an enemy of God."… BOD plays directly on man's evil inclination… It is outrageous, and it is not hard to see why hell is the only Just punishment for such sinners and heretics, since BOD as it's believed today is a total denial of Jesus Christ and His suffering and Crucifixion. The BOD heretics of our day are like the Lapsi, children of the Whore of Babylon…

God Bless,

Chris White




Subject: Busting Myths about Vatican II's "Infallibility"


Dear Brother Peter,


You did a very good job in exposing the lies and confusion of that man. Such astounding arrogance and resistance to the truth can only mean that he is on the side of the devil, as you said. Too bad he did not have the good will to actually listen to what you had to say. Your suggestion that he pray the 15 decades of the Rosary each day must have really bothered him. I notice he brought it up again later on in the debate when he protested "you don't know if I pray the Rosary." It is certain that he would not be the heretic he is if he were praying the Rosary faithfully each day.

Thanks for posting these debates. They're always edifying.

Sincerely in Christ,



Study friend


… Is it wrong to have a Jehovah's Witness lady as a friend to "study" with, but I have ulterior motives to convert her? Should I ask questions to get her to think and to assess the facts with dialogue? The Witnesses are not allowed to read non-Witness literature. Sometimes I feel like I'm deceiving her because she always asks me to go Kingdom Hall and stuff but I say I'm not allowed to, which is true, but I feel like I'm giving her the wrong impression like I want to convert to their religion. How should I handle this? I don't want to scare her away because I want to witness to her…


MHFM: The answer to your question depends upon the circumstances.  If your friend were open to conversion, then we think you could study with her, at least for a certain period of time.  However, you would need to make it clear that it’s not just that you are forbidden to go to a Jehovah’s Witnesses’ hall; but you would never in your life want to do so because their group represents a false religion.  If she’s determined to “convert” you, rather than being open to conversion to Catholicism, then you should not study with her.  There would have to be some movement on her part toward Catholicism, some demonstration of real interest; otherwise you are wasting your time.


They reject the Trinity, the true deity of Jesus Christ and all the biblical proof for it.  They believe Jesus is St. Michael the Archangel.  You need to charitably explain to her that her beliefs are unbiblical, untraditional and absurd.  Some of the facts in this file are relevant.  Their religion denies the true God, the incarnation of God the Son, and the fullness of God’s truth as revealed by Jesus Christ.




Subject: Saint Augustine


Your quote of Saint Augustine on confession to a priest is especially interesting considering that he probably wrote it in the late 300s, or almost 1,200 years before the "reformation" and the abandonment of this sacrament by the Protestants. It is also interesting that somehow these same Protestants still claim to admire Saint Augustine. I guess they pick and choose what they like.


I read Saint Augustine's Confessions when on vacation this summer. I was a bit concerned that it would be tough to digest, but I found it a very easy and enjoyable read. Many of his observations on life are easily applicable to today. I thought how little things, I mean even everyday things, really change.


Bill Mulligan




Cardinal says Catholic Church '200 years out of date' - Yahoo! News


It seems that men such as "Cardinal" Montini played an important role for the devil in the Great Apostasy, as do all radical priests and nuns who make it their business to loudly broadcast their radical views. Many years ago, when I was in the Vatican 2 church and was slowly beginning to see things going on which did not make sense, I used to ask people about them. I remember that I always received essentially the same answer: that the popes were good guys, but were simply surrounded by evil men. If I remember correctly, that was also what that demonic character Martin Malachi tried to convey -- that Peter was in chains. After a while, of course, I came to realize that that explanation was a crock of bull -- as I began to realize that these "popes" were doing, voluntarily and with glee, what the martyrs would refuse to do even though their refusal meant certain death for them -- and often cruel death at that. The publicly known radicals give the false Catholics someone to blame and focus their attention on. They love to falsely contrast such persons against their "conservative" antipopes (although they quickly change the subject when pressed to explain why none of their false popes ever excommunicated any of these radicals). I can remember one woman telling me, years ago, that Ratzinger was fighting all of these evil guys; she called him a "Rat-zinger". Even at the time her blindness seemed to me incomprehensible, but now I understand that it resulted directly from her rejection of the No Salvation dogma, and other Catholic dogmas as well. For such people, the Christ-despising Antichrist and the False Prophet are heroes whom these people adore -- a realization that almost takes one's breath away.


Lee Ann




MHFM: This is a pretty good quote from St. Augustine on confession to priests in the early Church.


St. Augustine, on confession to priests: “Let no man say within himself: ‘I repent in secret to the Lord.  God, who has power to pardon me, knows the inmost sentiments of my heart.’  Was there, then, no reason for saying ‘whatsoever you loose on earth, shall be loosed in heaven.’ [Mt. 18:18] no reason why the keys were given to the Church of God?” (Lib. 1 Hom. 49.)




Subject: cremation vs. conventional burial


I listened to your video on the subject of HELL that mentions our souls will be joined with our bodies. How does this affect my decision to be buried or cremated? Thanks




MHFM: The traditional law of the Catholic Church forbids cremation under pain of mortal sin.  The Church has taught that those who request it cannot receive Christian burial.  So, in your case, if you choose to get cremated you will not be saved.  The following quotes reflect Catholic tradition on this point.


1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 1203 § 1-2: “The bodies of the faithful departed shall be buried, their cremation being reprobated. 2. If anyone by any manner orders that his body be cremated, it is illicit to execute that desire; and if this was added to any contract or testament or any other act.”


1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 1240 § 1-5: “Unless they gave before death a sign of repentance, the following are deprived of ecclesiastical burialThose who ordered that their body be handed over for cremation; 6. Other public and manifest sinners.”




Subject: Check out ‘Pope’ suggests it’s best to be ‘honest’ and leave the Church if you


Pope suggests it’s best to be ‘honest’ and leave the Church if you don’t believe


These remarks of the lying False Prophet must be another weekly installment of Hell's Comedy Hour. B16 is, yet again, mocking the rank and file "believers" who believe in him and Antichrist JP2. He is mocking all those persons who, in their spiritual sloth and love of the lie, never bother to even inquire how it could be possible (when it is impossible) for a supposed council and popes to destroy everything which every one in the world once recognized as Catholic. Even newcomers to the false Church -- if they are of good will like your emailer Andrew and so many others -- question why everything has changed and why, like the great Secret of the Rosary, all has been rendered obsolete by the Vatican 2 sect.


Notice how "Msgr." Barrero, director of HLI, holds a "doctorate in dogmatic theology". A doctorate from the Counterfeit Church. One can just imaging the garbage that constituted instruction in whatever institute of lower learning this guy went to (just like all the rest of the so called "Catholic" universities which, Barrero obviously chooses to forget, promote abortion, homosexuality and every other degeneracy). This man doesn't know -- because he doesn't care to know -- that B16 and his V2 cohorts deny just about every single dogma which the true Catholic Church has always taught, and embrace every heresy that the true Catholic Church has always condemned. But Barrero holds a title and a position, and that's enough for him; he can impress others who, like himself, receive not the love of the truth. How can these people imagine that their Rosaries for Life can be pleasing to Our Lady, when such individuals deny her Son? Perhaps, like St. Alphonus says, they speak, but they do not pray. All the while the False Prophet is laughing up his sleeve at all those who will die without the true Catholic faith which is necessary for salvation.


Lee Ann




Dear MHFM,


I find it almost astounding that your website is the only website in the world that teaches Catholic truth. But it makes sense in this present moment in salvation history…


Mother Mary's Rosary… [is] the conduit to supernatural life… which the modern world has disdained thoroughly. She will lead us to heaven and Jesus, her Son….






Subject: Milan Cardinal Carlo Maria Montini


Is this man a relative of Pope Montini? (P6, as I call him, also of Milan). But the story here is: Elect a Modernist pope, get a Modernist cardinal, bishop, etc. (in spades, actually). This 'new Catholicism' bears so little resemblance to the old, I think the only reason Catholics continue to support it is that the alternatives, with the exception of Eastern Orthodoxy, are even worse. Catholics keep hoping that if they just "stay loyal to the Pope" everything will work out all right in the end, because Our Lord placed Peter in charge of His church until He returns (which can't be far off!) Thanks for sharing this news of Cardinal Montini that: the Church should apologize for its doctrines, drop them altogether, and get much more "with it", meaning, in effect, adopt the pagan spirit of the world. Who are these guys working for, anyway




MHFM: Well, they are modernist antipopes, and people who obstinately support them or their heresies are not Catholics. 


Philip Bartlett – “Pope Boniface”


MHFM: A few of our readers may have heard of a man in the traditional movement who sends out e-mails and posts on websites purporting to be “Pope Augustine” or “Pope Boniface.”  Well, his name is actually Philip Bartlett and he claims to be a lawyer.  And while Philip Bartlett repeatedly claims that he is the pope (an utterly ridiculous and false claim), just a matter of weeks or days later he will switch his position and present himself as an anti-Catholic Protestant who believes in faith alone and the doctrines of John Calvin.  Philip Bartlett, his posts and his activity are patently absurd.  However, since he continues to contact and bother us, despite our repeated and kind requests that he not do so, we feel it’s necessary to inform the general public of this man’s real name (Philip Bartlett) and his disgraceful activity. 


This man came to the traditional positions about nine years ago, after seeing material published by MHFM.  But then he fell into a variety of heresies, including on salvation and the Counter Church.  He would literally switch his religion from “Catholic” to Protestant, from traditionalist to Novus Ordo, etc. with a frequency that truly boggles the mind.  It was so absurd that we even wrote an article detailing his incredible alterations.  We removed that article because, at one point, he told us he agreed and he also said he would not contact us anymore.  However, that did not last and he continues to attempt to bother us and contact us.  As a result, we decided to post this note. 


New Article Posted


MHFM: This is a new article about the individual against whom we recently prevailed in a lawsuit.  His name is Eric Hoyle.  (For those who aren’t familiar with the lawsuit we recently won, consult this video.)  This new article covers many facts about that case, as well as some interesting theological considerations.  The article also contains revealing quotes from deposition testimony, including the aforementioned individual’s staggering contradictions on financial matters.  For those who might be interested in this issue, this article is worth printing.  One of the reasons we deemed this article necessary is that winning the lawsuit against him was not sufficient to shed proper light on what transpired in this four-year case.  His apostasy and disgraceful activity needed to be exposed.


The Astounding and Epic Apostasy of Eric Hoyle [pdf file]




Dear Bros. Michael and Peter,


I recently heard the whole story on Most Holy Family Monastery's website regarding that Greg Heretic and the righteous indignation of all real Catholics and it made me feel like I should tell you a story of my own… When I came into the Novus Ordo Church I noticed after several months that something was wrong.  I didn't see any incense or hear any Latin or any of the stuff I had heard of or what it was I thought when I thought of the Catholic Church. So one day after several months of sitting right next to this old man (I learned later that he was a Dominican…) I just looked over at him and struck up a conversation with him about his Rosary and began to ask some questions about it to make sure I was doing it right.


I also thought I would ask him about the Church because I thought he would know seeing as how he was about 76 at the time. So I asked him "What happened to the incense?" He told me "Oh you're a new Catholic and you don't know about Vatican 2 do you?" I told him "No I don't what's that?"  I had heard about Vatican II during the RCIA classes and assumed that I had to follow it because it was just another in a line of valid councils of the Church, of course I know better now. He went on to tell me that after Vatican 2 the Church changed a lot and to look up about the Church before Vatican 2.  I did and the first place I came to was Most Holy Family Monastery and I've visited the site several times a day, every day since then.  I can't tell you how many dozens of times I've listened to your audios and watched your videos.  Anyway, we occasionally run across each other from time to time in town and while I have a chance to talk to him, while he's around, I usually ask him questions about the faith…


So you can imagine my horror whenever I caught this friend out and asked him some questions about the Church.  So I asked him about the Eastern Orthodox as well as about baptism of blood, baptism of desire and invincible ignorance… Needless to say I was rather shocked by his response to all of my questions and we had a 45 minute talk… Before it began he made it perfectly clear to me that he believed in baptism of blood as well as baptism of desire and invincible ignorance. As if that wasn't enough he stated that Benedict XVI ONLY gives communion on the tongue and kneeling. I told him that that wasn't true because I've seen pictures of him giving communion to people in the hand standing. I told him I don't believe that because unless he's been doing it recently like in the last 3 months... Anyway here is some absolute ghastly denial of the faith that he spoke that so infuriated me I physically begin to shake.  When it comes down to it [he said] that in essence nobody is going to hell and that the church does not know who is going to hell and who isn't, that the church isn't sure if anyone is in Hell, so merciful is God that he makes a way for all to be with him… When I said that the popes of the past have said that it is necessary for salvation to be entirely subjected to the Roman pontiff and what Pope Eugene IV said at the Council of Florence, he replied that "That's not what he meant and that's not what the church teaches the church has to tell you which statements are infallible and the church has never taught about who was going to hell and who wasn't."


So according to him just because a Pope says "We proclaim, say, define and pronounce..." means nothing the Bishops have to declare that what he said was ex-cathedra, (basically collegiality) what blasphemy.  Over the course of the conversation he in essence told me (and sometimes straight out told me) that when it comes down to it that if someone was a Satanist and flat out straight up worshipped Satan as their god, that they can go to heaven because it's not their fault they were raised that way and were prejudiced against the truth.  He also went to on to tell me that the only way someone can go to Hell is if they are told about the Catholic faith and then they reject it. I told him that "If what you say is true about the people who just don't know that the Catholic faith is the one true faith why evangelize them because if you tell them the Catholic Faith is the ONE and ONLY ark of salvation and they don't accept it and they go to hell you have put them in a place where they weren't going to go to before.


… How godless and sick of mind, not to mention spiritually deranged, are the Vatican II protestants? If anyone thinks there is no problem… and that the Great Apostasy is still coming some far off day they need their heads examined.


God Help Us All,



Pomp in Marriages


MHFM: This is a quote about the ridiculous extravagance, pomp and waste involved in marriage celebrations near the end of the 15th century.  It demonstrates that this was a problem in previous centuries, and it’s obviously a problem today.  In fact, it’s outrageous to consider how worthless and wasteful almost all marriage celebrations are.


“Within a year the Infante D. Juan, heir to Ferdinand and Isabella, married the Archduchess Margarita of Austria, whose brother the Archduke Philip of Hapsburg married Dona Juana, one of the Catholic Sovereigns’ younger daughters; and their eldest daughter, Dona Isabel, married D. Manuel, king of Portugal.  All this, and the Naples question, occupied the Sovereigns’ attention, cost immense sums of money, and (what affected Columbus most) required plenty of ships.  A fleet of one hundred and thirty vessels, splendidly equipped, escorted Dona Juana to Flanders for her marriage to the Emperor’s son, and brought back his sister Margarita to marry the heir apparent of the Spanish thrones.  Ironically enough it was Columbus’s slight service in connection with this pompous cortege, his successful prediction of the date when the Hapsburg princess would arrive at Laredo, that gave him the necessary credit with the crown to obtain maritime equipment for discovering the South American continent.” (Samuel Eliot Morison, Admiral of the Ocean Sea – A Life of Christopher Columbus, pp. 508-509.)




Subject: Why Hell must be Eternal


Dear Brothers,


Another excellent video. Years ago in my first apartment here I had decorated my bedroom with a darker comforter.  Wanting something lighter and brighter i found a great quilt which uplifted the room.  At the time I thought "I wish I had done this 2 years ago... 2 years I have lived without this brightness in my room."  But only after a few weeks I realized that it seemed as if I always had the "lighter" quilt.  At the time I was amazed at this discovery that truly the present is all that matters.


Thanks again for all your wisdom,



Colleen Urban




Dear Brothers,

The radical schismatic who wrote in falsely accusing you of being wrong about Columbus' landing spot shows the deluded mentality that God allows such individuals to fall into. He was so convinced that he was right, when he was totally wrong, and he will probably continue to be wrong about things because he is wrong about MHFM and the true positions. God is the Truth, and so to pervert the truth about God will result in errors in many other ways, since all things were created by God. I must confess that I couldn't help laughing at him because of your excellent rebuke and refutation. Then to top it off, he says he is available for hire to do "accurate research" on an hourly basis. Maybe he should spend his time simply reading things properly before shooting lies and false accusations.

2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 - "[The Antichrist] Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying wonders, And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity."

God Bless,

Chris White


MHFM: It was truly a staggering example of what spiritual blindness – which springs from pride, a lack of charity and bad will – can do to people.  In his case it was so profound that he could not even read a paragraph correctly.  Perhaps God allowed the radical schismatic to write that amazing e-mail on that day in particular because we had just posted an article that discusses, among other things, the disastrous effects of spiritual blindness.  His e-mail thus served as an additional, tremendous illustration of the potential of spiritual blindness – radical schismatic style.


Knowledge of self (i.e., being able to truly see oneself and one’s own conduct) is very important; it’s what evil people lack.  That’s why, in explaining his true devotion to Mary, St. Louis de Montfort recommends that the first week of the consecration should be dedicated to self-knowledge.  




Dear Brothers,

The article on the man who tried to mail himself to his girlfriend demonstrates the seriousness of mortal sin. He almost died, and it could have been due to a prolonged courtship, which resulted in sins of the flesh being committed. Almost no one cares about the reality of spiritual death these days. Most people simply care about themselves, and do whatever they want regardless of the consequences. Gone are the times when it was frowned upon to have an abortion, or to live together without being married. Instead, the Vatican II apostasy is in full flight…

James 4:7 - "Be subject therefore to God, but resist the devil, and he will fly from you."

God Bless,

Chris White






I saw your ad on television and so visited your website…


Reading through the first e-exchange on this page: http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/E-Exchanges.php you correctly state that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. However, there are people that are Catholic in action and belief who don't know they are. It is also taught that as long as one is honestly searching for the TRUTH and desires to follow the TRUTH then that person can be saved…


I could go on.





MHFM: Actually, what you said about salvation is not the Church’s teaching.  It’s contrary to it.  The Church teaches that one must believe in Jesus Christ, the Holy Trinity, and the Catholic faith to be saved.  It has also been defined that baptism is the only way into the Church and is necessary for salvation.  The Church’s teaching states that all who die as non-Catholics are not saved, specifically excluding all who die as pagans, Jews, heretics and schismatics.  Consult our section on the dogma, and you will see abundant documentation from Catholic teaching on these points. 






Subject: Eric Hoyle's astounding and epic apostasy


Dear Brother Peter,

The theological considerations concerning Eric Hoyle's "astounding and epic apostasy" are well worth reading, as is your entire article. Wow! How despicable of him to have willingly denied Christ in his wicked attempt to destroy MHFM.

Sincerely in Christ,





Subject: Comment on article.


Dear Brothers Michael and Peter:


I just finished reading your article on Eric Hoyle ("The Astounding and Epic Apostasy of Eric Hoyle"). It was so refreshing to read some of the many details and facts behind his fraudulent lawsuit. It is very clear that Hoyle has no faith or conviction at all and is willing to lie in order to win a lawsuit. He is definitely a tool of the devil and deserves what is coming to him.


It is also very clear that Hoyle has a real issue with pride. This became evident with his sudden conversion to the radical schismatic position and his subsequent rejection of the Catholic position allowing the faithful to receive sacraments from certain undeclared heretics under certain circumstances. Things pretty much spiraled out of control for Hoyle after that, much like they did with Martin Luther.


Hoyle also has no common sense. If he did, he would avoid such people as the “prophet” R.I. who believes that St. Thomas Aquinas is in Hell and should be “pulled out of Hell” and tortured. That should have raised a big red flag for anyone claiming to be Catholic or having any common sense.


The most astounding conclusion of your article is the fact that Hoyle ended up falling into the same position he once condemned as a radical schismatic. That is, communion with the counter-church. What poetic justice. God allowed Hoyle to fall into the radical schismatic position and then file a lawsuit which put him in a position to profess that Benedict XVI and its “Benedictine” Order is legitimate. That was definitely no coincidence.






… My second question involves reaching out to my local Vatican II attendees. We homeschool and live across from the VII grade school and church. I was thinking of setting up a small table with the correct handout materials on my lawn across from this church. I would sit there when their service lets out on Sunday mornings at 8 am and 11 am. I would have a banner attracting attention to my free information. I'm pretty sure after some time I will draw some interest. Any pointers / tips?


Thanks for sharing the truth.


Tom Pardee


MHFM: That sounds like a good idea.




Subject: Hoyle


That was a great compilation of the many contradictions of eric hoyle's lawsuit against you and as you said there is much more extremely revealing information about eric hoyle that could be said. It is truly outrageous that eric could basically dare to use the heresy of separation of Church and state, thinking that he could claim unity with something that is a complete contradiction, the fact that US law recognizes the vatican ll {public} benedictine orders, and at the same time, he can stand with the Catholic Church {True members} denying the public orders of benedictines and that it was not a denial of Jesus Christ, to have a duel stance, all for the purpose of winning his case against MHFM.


Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei (# 34-36), Nov. 1, 1885:
“Thus,Gregory XVI in his encyclical letter Mirari Vos, dated August 15, 1832, inveighed with weighty words against the sophisms which even at his time were being publicly inculcated – namely, that no preference should be shown for any particular form of worship; that it is right for individuals to form their own personal judgments about religion; that each man’s conscience is his sole and all-sufficing guide; and that it is lawful for every man to publish his own views, whatever they may be, and even to conspire against the state... IT IS NOT LAWFUL FOR THE STATE, ANY MORE THAN FOR THE INDIVIDUAL, EITHER TO DISREGARD ALL RELIGIOUS DUTIES OR TO HOLD IN EQUAL FAVOR DIFFERENT KINDS OF RELIGION…THIS THEN IS THE TEACHING OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE.”


1 Corinthians 10:21 You cannot drink the chalice of the Lord, and the chalice of devils: you cannot be partakers of the table of the Lord, and of the table of devils.


As you pointed out, in one day eric's faith was destroyed because of a false prophet made me think of vatican ll antipopes {false prophets}:


Apocalypse 18:10 Standing afar off for fear of her torments, saying: Alas! alas! that great city Babylon, that mighty city: for in "one hour" is thy judgment come.






Hi Brothers,


I finished reading the new PDF you posted and listened to the audios. Thanks to your work! My eyes have been open to See and Understand the Truth That is the Catholic Church and all her teachings….


Peace be with you,



Busting Myths Debate


Subject: Debate: Busting Myths about Vatican 2's "Infallibility"


Hi Brothers Dimond

RE: Debate: Busting Myths about Vatican 2's "Infallibility"

Your latest debate is filled with so much logic that it made my day. Anyhow, I'd like to add a comment or two on the nature of those who go by the name "Catholic" and yet remain with the Counter-Church.

The logic is very simple to understand, for those who want to understand. The Catholic traditionalists who recognise the Antipopes know there is a big problem - otherwise they wouldn't consider themselves 'traditionalists' - but they fail to accept the proper conclusion. In one part of the debate, you concisely addressed the -whole- issue by asking (paraphrase): "Can the Catholic Church teach heresy ? No. Does the church of Benedict 16 teach heresy ? Yes." (One cannot even begin to be Catholic unless one holds that the Church cannot teach heresy.) Therefore, the church of Benedict 16 cannot be the Catholic Church. That would be the logical conclusion, essentially as simple as 2 + 2 = 4. I don't think that people "can't" see this; it is more like they don't want to see it.

Part of the reason is, as you told the caller, that he sees the Church in a very "naturalistic" way. He does not see her supernatural character as he ought. Indefectibility does not mean that the Church or a Pope can teach heresy and still (somehow) be true; and yet many 'traditionalists' are confused on this point. Again, part of it is seeing the Church too much in a "naturalistic" way; for instance, they think that a public declaration of some kind is necessary to excommunicate someone for heresy - that would be "visible"; but the things of Faith are not visible. They're supernatural, because they are beyond the material order.

Another part of the problem is fear. Many are afraid to accept the truth that the Roman Counter-Church is not Catholic, and that it has been ruled by Antipopes since 1958, because of what it all might mean. It's easier to stay with the crowd, and easier, too, to harbour suspicion towards little groups who "say such things" about Rome. In that case, human respect takes precedence, for them, over Love of Truth which would allow 'traditionalists' to see the contradictions between their Antipopes and all the True Popes, *and* to accept all the conclusions which necessarily follow.

Or perhaps some 'traditionalists' are afraid that leaving today's Rome means leaving the Church. The caller seemed to think that because you reject today's Rome, you've somehow "left the Church". I know people who speak the same way.

But leaving today's Rome is not leaving the Church, it's actually keeping the Faith, which Rome today does not keep. If one keeps the Faith, one is supernaturally in the Church, which does not depend on the physical buildings… These kinds of things can be stated in a hundred different ways, but as the saying goes, "you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink it".

-Michael D.S.




Subject: Conversation with a Novus Ordo priest…




Today I had a revealing and shocking telephone conversation with a Novus Ordo priest whom I knew in the past. Well I asked him if he believes that Vatican II is contrast with the Catholic teaching, he responded that Vatican II is the Catholic teaching. When I demonstrated to him that Vatican II denies the dogmatic definition "Extra Ecclesiam nulla Salus" and quoted the infallible definition of the Council of Florence, he began to get nervous. He said also that baptism is "important" but not absolutely necessary to be saved. I responded quoting John 3:5 and mentioning the canons on baptism of the Council of Trent. At this point he said: "OK, I am a heretic, are you happy ?". I responded: "I am not happy, it is a tragedy. You are a heretic because you deny Catholic teaching. And heretics are headed for hell." He responded: "Let me go to hell, I feel OK in hell."  And hung up the phone.






Subject: Hoyle’s Epic Apostasy


Dear Brothers,

Thank you for posting the fascinating summary of Eric Hoyle's Epic Apostasy. He really is a tool of the Devil. His answers under oath show a typical "vagueness" of liars who don't want to be nailed down to any particular fact, just in case they "need" to change their story later. The word, "con artist" comes to mind with Eric Hoyle. He will spin any lie and falsehood, even going so far as to try to bend the law to meet his fanciful whims, and all merely to satisfy his own insecurity and faithlessness. Needless to say, Eric Hoyle shares no similarities whatsoever with Jesus Christ, who is Himself the Way, the Truth and the Life. Eric is not someone who was simply mistaken in good faith, but is rather a demonic deceiver, betrayer and plotter of iniquity…

God Bless,

Chris White




Dear MHFM,


First I'd like to thank you for all of your information on what really has happened to the Church. I came upon your material in January this year, whilst looking for information on John XXIII and Paul VI (whilst I still thought of them as popes (bad popes) but popes nonetheless). I'm from a Caribbean island called St. Lucia and for a long time I thought that there was no way that sedevacantism would even exist elsewhere, but to my surprise I saw an e-response on your site from a lady named Melina from Trinidad which is relatively close to my own island…


Once again I thank you for everything that you've done for God and his Holy Church- please keep up the good work.


Dean Nestor

St. Lucia, West Indies




… I think the Catholic objection to this revelation about Groeschel is not the "popular one", which is that 12 or 14 year olds can be culpable, for anyone above the age of reason can be. But it betrays an attitude of mind on Groeschel's part that 1) the homo-sexual impulse is not intrinsically disordered or sinful and 2) that to give into temptation (if the priest is seduced) is not so sinful either…This attitude infests the Novus Ordo. Just another data point.


Bill Mulligan




Dear Brothers,


I am reading your expose on Eric Hoyle and am just about finished. What a thorough explanation of what transpired with this wicked man who turned to Satan to promote an evil agenda. You have definitely dotted your "I's" and crossed your "t's" in your presentation which any lawyer or writer in the world would be proud to call his or her own. You have been given a lemon and turned it into lemonade…


Your patience and prayers to Jesus and Mary have paid huge dividends. I congratulate you both on another job well done. You truly are doing the work that should have been done by many who came before you. I hope those who follow you continue to support truth no matter what the costs, for we are truly fortunate to have you working for God's glory.  May God and Mary continue to bless your hard work,


Bob Bohr


Wow – another totally blind radical schismatic liar


Dear Dimonds,

I read your post about Christopher Columbus 2nd voyage landing in "almost the exact spot" as his 1st voyage.

Your ignorance and inaccuracy is astounding.

If you consider "almost the exact spot" to be within 300 miles you might have a point. But as usual your shoddy research has shown, once again, your slothful attention to details.

The first land Columbus sighted during his 1st voyage was the island that he named, San Salvador, which is located in the Bahamas.

During the second voyage Columbus sighted the island which he would name the Dominica, WHICH IS WELL SOUTH of the first island he sighted in the 1st voyage.

… If you are interested I am available to be hired on a hourly basis to perform accurate research.




MHFM: [Note: this person is a radical schismatic who writes to us on occasion with outrageously false assertions.  However, he will never give his actual name to back up those false assertions.  In considering this e-mail, we can see why.]


First of all, you are an idiot.  You obviously cannot read.  We did not say that Columbus’ landing spot on the second voyage was almost exactly the same as his landing spot on his first voyage.  We didn’t say anything of the sort.  What we said and posted, you illiterate man, is that ON HIS SECOND VOYAGE, his landing spot IN THE LEEWARD ISLANDS was almost the exact spot that sailors of later years (who possessed more information than Columbus) considered to be ideal for landing in the Leeward Islands.  Thus, you are NOT EVEN CLOSE to accurately representing what we said.  (We know Columbus landed in the Bahamas on his first voyage and we were not talking about his first voyage, you dope.) 


And to prove our point on the ideal landing spot, in the Leeward Islands on the second voyage, we cited Pulitzer Prize winning author and master sailor, Samuel Eliot Morison.  (Morison, by the way, in doing research for his book, which won the Pulitzer Prize, sailed much of Columbus’ path so that he could more accurately describe the details.)  So, what we posted was a completely accurate and well-researched point.  And in your astounding blindness you call it astoundingly ignorant and inaccurate!!!  Wow.  You are filled with such pride that blinds, such evil lies, and such hatred of us.  But given your inability to read, follow points, comprehend details, and honestly represent what people say, we can see why you think our material (which specializes in accurate attention to detail) is inaccurate.  Evil men call darkness light, and light darkness (Isaiah 5:20), so it is to be expected that some demonic characters such as yourself will identify totally accurate details as astoundingly inaccurate. 


(Incidentally, this radical schismatic probably wrote to us today, with his ridiculous and totally inaccurate attack on our Columbus post, because he was demonically enraged by our new article.  The article, linked to above, completely exposes one of his fellow radical schismatics.  It frequently happens that when we expose and refute the dishonesty and evil behind their movement, the Devil stirs them up to lash out at us.  However, they do so with their characteristically false and inaccurate assertions.)


We can see why you are a radical schismatic, and why you don’t ever give your real name when you write to us.  You are unable to back up your false assertions.  Perhaps this refutation of your nonsense might bring you some badly needed light, and serve as the first step toward your conversion.  By the way, for your education, here’s more of Morison’s expert explanation of why Columbus’ landing spot at Desirade in the Leeward Islands was considered ideal:


“… Desirade… Deseada… as the Spaniards named it, was the goal of the great colonial flotas of merchant vessels bound from Spain to Vera Cruz, Porto Bello, Puerto Rico, Santo Domingo and Cuba; of French fleets bound for the Iles sous le Vent and Saint-Dominque, of Englishmen destined for the Caribee Islands, Jamaica and Virginia.  For, if you try to sail north of the Leeward Islands, you are apt to miss the strong trades; and if you try to hit one of the passages between Antiqua and Sombrero, the dangerous reefs around Barbuda and Anguilla may pick you up.  But the passages on either side of Desirade, one of which Columbus hit right in the middle, lead safely to protected waters; and they are so placed with reference to the prevailing winds that one can scud free to any point of the Caribbean, the Gulf of Mexico, or Florida.  So on his Second Voyage Columbus discovered the shortest and best route from Europe to the West Indies.  Put it down to luck, seamanship or the finger of God, as you will; it was marvelous.” (Samuel Eliot Morison, Admiral of the Ocean Sea – A Life of Christopher Columbus, pp. 404-405.)


Almost the exact spot


MHFM: Below is an interesting quote about Christopher Columbus’ second voyage.  Even though Columbus lacked the information that would make sailing more precise in subsequent centuries, he made landfall at almost the very spot in the Leeward Islands (in the Caribbean) that was later considered to be ideal.


The marvelous thing about this landfall is that Columbus made it at almost the exact spot in the Leeward Islands recommended by writers of sailing directions during the next four hundred years.  Vessels bound for any part of the West Indies north of Barbados were advised to make for Desirade, the small high island that rides out to windward of Guadeloupe.” (Samuel Eliot Morison, Admiral of the Ocean Sea – A Life of Christopher Columbus, p. 404.)


This descriptive account of Columbus’ smooth sailing across the deep blue ocean is also somewhat interesting.


“… Columbus profited by the full force of the trades.  Any fleet of modern yachts would feel proud to cross that stretch of ocean today in twenty-one days.  This second outward passage must have been very near to the mariner’s dream of perfect sailing.  Running before the trades is a glorious sensation even when you are alone on the ocean; and on this voyage the beauty of the deep blue water, flashing flying fish, curling wave crests and changing cloud formations, was enhanced by sixteen other white-winged ships spread out over the face of the sea.” (Samuel Eliot Morison, Admiral of the Ocean Sea – A Life of Christopher Columbus, p. 402.)




Hello. I would like to know if the main objective reason you believe in the primacy of the papacy is because of the status St Peter was given in scripture.





MHFM: We believe it because it’s the teaching of Scripture, Tradition and the one Church Christ established.




I am a Catholic convert of five years, and I have just finished watching one of your videos. You have me both interested and concerned.


Is there a "traditional Catholic church" (is that the correct term?) in the greater Seattle area that you could point me to? I would like to attend and learn more.


Thank you very much.


Christine McMillan


MHFM: Thanks for the interest, Christine.  We really hope you continue to look at the material, especially the videos on our YouTube Channel and the sections on our website.  We have a number of videos and articles that are very important to consult.  However, if you have not seen these videos, we recommend that you watch them:


The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World

Why the New Mass and New Rite of Ordination are Invalid (full length)


We also recommend that you read this file: The Glossary of Terms and Principles


You asked about a church.  Before receiving sacraments, one must reach the point where one is committed never to attend the New Mass again, believes in Outside the Church There is No Salvation without exception (no “baptism of desire”), rejects NFP, won’t support any heretical priests, etc. That’s explained in this file: Where to go to Mass or confession today? People should also make the traditional profession of faith from the Council of Trent, which can be accessed from the aforementioned file. Once a person is convinced on all relevant matters, we can help that person with possible locations for receiving sacraments. We also recommend people to pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible.




Subject: John Paul 2


With talking to people and just a general feeling, I think that when John Paul 2 gets "canonized" it will be like a frenzy. I feel like people are ready to freak out over this heretic. It is difficult to describe but it is like a huge force is powering these people. It is kinda like people think, "When he gets cannonized people will see...things will be different." It is like the calm before the storm right now.






Subject: Response to Margaret


Hello, it sounds like the adherents of the SSPX are speaking of the prophecies of St. Malachy which lists all the popes from the 12 century to the end of time. According to them John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI are on the list (which is correct) so they must be true popes. Well, there is one big problem with this argument, THE LIST INCLUDES ANTIPOPES ALSO! Here are just 2 examples: Flagellum Solis was Alexander V an antipope who (falsely) ruled from 1409 - 1410, and Cervus Sirene was John XXIII an antipope who (falsely) ruled from 1410 - 1415 (The Prophecies of St. Malachy, TAN P. 52).







Subject: The fewness of the saved


By this we understand the death dealing tongues of heretics, who try to widen what the Lord has said is a straight and narrow path, that they are the gates of hell. If the attainment of salvation is rare among Catholics, try to imagine what it will be like for others who reject His words.

St. Anselm:"If thou wouldst be certain of being in the number of the elect, strive to be one of the few, not of the many. And if thou wouldst be quite sure of thy salvation, strive to be among the fewest of the few...Do not follow the great majority of mankind, but follow those who enter upon the narrow way, who renounce the world, who give themselves to prayer, and who never relax their efforts by day or by night, that they may attain everlasting blessedness."(Fr. Martin Von Cochem, The Four Last Things,p.221)

Erick Vega




MHFM: On Friday we hope to post a new article which some might find interesting.


New Debate


MHFM: This is a new debate. 


Debate: Busting Myths about Vatican II's "Infallibility" [video]




Subject: God’s Unconditional Love


That made me think of: "Esau I have hated".  Romans chapter 9 totally refutes the false concept of "unconditional love" (Douay -Rheims).






Dear Brothers,

… I've always known even before I became a true Catholic that there was something wrong with the v2 facade and the antipopes never really impressed me… I've just been growing in more intense realization of how EVIL these men are and it is soberingly horrifying… heresy especially being spread by the most educated men in the world is unspeakable offense of unimaginable magnitude… there's official heresy and apostasy that kills the souls of the whole world… Like the bible says His ways are not ours…. I just can't believe the power of the rosary…. the Secret of the Rosary is an unbelievably holy instruction on how to truly efficaciously pray the rosary and spread it to others. He is truly a great saint and teacher yet I know little about him. It would be great to know more about one of the saints who had the most profound impact on my life…

God Bless,
Nathan Barton




Atheist to give opening prayer at Tulsa City Council meeting | NewsOK.com


It's interesting how the false Vatican 2 "Catholic" by the name of Bynum (who heads this council) accepts this atheist's prayer to man. He refers to atheism as a "religious perspective" that people (including false Catholics) can learn from. This is yet another proof that the Counterfeit Catholic religion is a total blasphemy and inversion of the true Catholic faith. It also seems to be yet one more proof that we are at the end of time. All of the perverse man-in-the-place-of-God doctrines of Antichrist JP2 and the False Prophet B16 have been thoroughly embraced by the V2 rank and file who, without their recognizing it, have become antichrists themselves. But what can they expect? They have rejected the teachings of the true Catholic popes, and are in union with Antichrist. Jesus Christ and the Holy Trinity have been completely obliterated from the little that is left of their minds.


Lee Ann




Subject: No Way Jose


Is it really that bad now among Novus Ordites? These people purport to be devout Catholics who are well-studied about the issues, yet they blurt out blatant heresies with no weight on their consciences. If they know oh so much, then they'd know about the facts that heretics cannot be popes because one can't be the head of a body of which it is severed from, heretics have been identified as the gates of Hell by popes, Jews are not in the least fit to participate in eternal life, religious liberty is evil, schismatics like the "Orthodox" can't be "particular churches", Muslims are "the abominable/diabolical sect of Mahomet (Muhammad) etc., etc., etc., ETC!!! Jose said he doesn't believe Jews etc could be saved, but then he touts invincible ignorance. WHAT! He doesn't even know what he believes! It's only when you (Bro. Peter) allowed him to spew his filth and then held it up to scrutiny is when maybe he realized what he said and then he spews more filth to like, divert from the issue. In so doing, he shows himself to be a liar of bad will and an empty shell. Makes me shake my head in righteous indignation. Then he starts asking about your monastery as if to say "ah y'all ain't no Benedictines 'cause y'all ain't with Rome." (note that when he says Rome, he doesn't mean the Magisterium or true popes and holding fast to ex cathedra teachings, Rome to him is only a place where some guy in robes reside and claim a pontificate) How shallow can one be???...



To hear


Subject: Debate with Jose


Thank you for defending the Catholic Faith again, another win for the True Catholics, it is the saddest thing, over and over to hear the mystery of iniquity in these vatican ll adherents, time and time again, they are exposed to have little or no knowledge, as to the Catholic Faith! The other thing that is always exposed, is the total apathy towards the True Catholic Faith, as Brother Peter has said in the video…


Osee (Hosea) 4:6 My people have been silent [destroyed], because they had no knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will reject thee, that thou shalt not do the office of priesthood to me

Josue 23:11 This only "take care" of with all diligence, that you love the Lord your God.


Ecclesiasticus 21:21 As a house that is destroyed, so is wisdom to a fool: and the knowledge of the unwise is as words without sense.

Apocalypse 3:17 Because thou sayest: I am rich, and made wealthy, and have need of nothing: and knowest not, that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked. {Vatican ll adherents falsely think they are rich in the faith}






Subject: Jose


Dear Brothers:


One might have thought that after he had made the first 10 or 20 false statements, and had to be corrected each time by Brother Peter, Jose might begin to feel embarrassed for having called to attack MHFM in the first place. One might have thought that Jose might begin to realize he had no clue as to what he was talking about, recognize that his claims were based on nothing but his own opinions, and admit the need to do some research. But no, he just kept going, continuing to make more false claims and continuing to contradict himself. Such is the power of bad will. Jose has no idea what the Catholic faith is and -- what is worse -- he did not seem to have much interest in finding out. One point did seem to catch his attention, though. That was Brother Peter's warning that Jose's ignorant and false claims constituted idle speech, every word of which he would one day be called to account for. What a great point! How many people in the Counterfeit Catholic Church make themselves spokesmen or writers on matters of "religion" -- when all the while they have no idea what they are talking about and are promoting beliefs that have been condemned by the Magisterium. All idle speech that will have to be accounted for.


Lee Ann




I watched your ad and it could not have possibly been better produced. It was short but concise and the message of its importance should get across to the viewers...


God bless,






Dear Brothers,

Thank you for posting that comment about whether God's love is unconditional or conditional. I have seriously pondered this myself many times and came to the same conclusion. God's love is conditional.

I have been so tired of hearing this error of God's unconditional love promulgated everywhere and am glad it has been addressed. This error becomes an excuse in so many people to commit sin and discourages people from making the effort to perfect their lives. I think it is very tied to the Justification by Faith Only heresy… in Jesus and Mary,





Most of the diocesan priests & deacons are suggesting that God's love is unconditional. My response is that if this is true, why did God create hell & where is this mentioned in scripture? Can you give me your comment. Do they jeopardize their own salvation with what I believe not to be true? Thanks




MHFM: The truth is that God’s love is not unconditional.  His mercy is only for those who fear Him (Luke 1:50) and do what He says (John 15:14).




Dear Brothers,

Thank you for posting the debate with the heretic Jose. He showed a typical false traditionalist disinterest and resistance to the facts, and more of a concern for the opinions of other people (including himself). He doesn't even pray the full Rosary everyday - an almost certain sign of reprobation. Instead of going by dogmatic pronouncements, he accused Bro. Peter of "interpreting" them, when the dogma is the interpretation and explanation. Dogma is not like scripture where one can interpret various passages in different ways. Dogmas are precise and clear statements of faith that one cannot be scandalized by, so long as one holds to the sense in which the Church holds to them. Jose appears to have swallowed the Vatican II's false gospel - that man is special, rather than a sinner in need of redemption. He reminds me of a Protestant who pretends to believe in Jesus Christ, but denies the true power, value and substance of Christ… since the truth apparently has no real effect on Jose's life - for Jose, it is more about appearances and externals, rather than cultivating the internal Kingdom of God: Luke 17:21 - "Neither shall they say: Behold here, or behold there. For lo, the kingdom of God is within you."


Jose is also very arrogant, pretending to know what he was talking about, while accusing MHFM of being wrong, while he was totally ignorant of basic things, such as sacramental theology. Jose is a typical weak-willed and cowardly apostate of the Vatican II sect… His incredulity demonstrates again why there is a hell, and why it is forever. Bro. Peter refuted him… yet Jose still wouldn't budge, while diabolically falsely accusing Bro. Peter and lying his way through… It shows again that once a person denies the dogma, outside the Catholic Church there is not salvation, and the absolute necessity of water baptism, that they lose all sense of the Catholic faith and truth.

Apocalypse 21:8 - "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, they shall have their portion in the pool burning with fire and brimstone, which is the second death."

God Bless,

Chris White




Subject: Post Vatican 2 brain dead


Dear MHFM, Great audio… I applaud your historical, binding truth of Catholicism against brain dead NO Catholics…






Poor Jose has no idea about the Truth, He is blinded and misled by heretics who are not Catholic. He really was not listening or understanding what you were telling him. Plus he is a liar when he mentioned that you were twisting things what a lie, you asked him to prove it and he couldn't. This world is full of people like him and worst! Brother Peter i still don't understand how you keep calm and control yourself with such liars. I always lose it and yell at them.


Good Bless





Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,

I read your letter exchanges with John Salza a while back. That man is a snake… twisting everything to appear in his favor. He is so evil…

I have a couple thoughts about those who refuse to debate you, like Salza, Fr. Cekada, Greg, and all the rest:

1) They do not have charity. If you were truly wrong, as they maintain, then not only your own souls would be in jeopardy, but those of your audience. Charity would compel them to publicly admonish you that they may pull at least some of these souls off of the road to hell. And yet, they seem completely indifferent as to whether these souls go to hell or not, since they are overwhelmingly silent.

2) The Holy Ghost is not present in them. These men are highly reluctant - I would say afraid - to debate you. But if they held the Faith and were in the state of grace, the Holy Ghost would dwell within them. The Holy Ghost's presence, as Our Lord tells us, would be manifested in His assistance, particularly in matters of debate (Mark 13:11): "And when they shall lead you and deliver you up, be not thoughtful beforehand what you shall speak; but whatsoever shall be given to you in that hour, that speak ye. For it is not you that speak, but the Holy Ghost."

Their refusal to debate you manifests their lack of charity, the absence of the Holy Ghost - and what I hope is clear - their lack of the Faith.

In Mary,




A few days ago a declaration was signed in Poland between the Polish Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Church's Patriarch, Cyryl Kirill. [There] is an interesting website which shows what kind of disgusting, greedy, deceitful persona (as well as ex- KGB agent), and arch-heretic this "Patriarch Kirill/Cyryl" is.

"Traditional" and neo-Church Polish website are praising the move claiming that "two lungs" of the "same" Church need to cooperate and fight against the "evil of the world". When I wrote that Eastern Orthodox ARE heretics and schismatics, I was immediately accused by so called " lefebvrists" of spreading hate, false info, and a very negative, non-christian attitude. Go figure…






Dear Brothers,


You definitely had a nice laundry list showing very clearly that Mr. Salza is of complete bad will. I have a couple of cousins and multiple NO ex-buddies that are not a whole lot different. Puffed up pride and the failure to accept correction when correction is due probably ranks second to sins of the flesh in condemning a man or a woman. People simply need to read the book of Proverbs and recite the 15 decade Rosary to remedy their pride issues. The spirit of the anti-Christ runs deep in these people. Devils released in 1864 per our Lady of La Salette's prophecies have possessed millions it seems when it comes to selfish, irrational pride… It is like a modern version of the three stooges only sadly there are millions of them…


Bob Bohr




Dear Brothers,


Thank-you for posting the finer points of ignorance in your recent response to a modern day false-prophet, John Salza. The heresy of baptism of desire carries into all aspects of the modern day heresy. The heretic "desires" anything under the Sun and that becomes his reality, not that it's of the truth. I turned on the TV today and there was the false-prophet, Joel Osteen with his "desire" to turn his ability of motivational speaking into his own modern religion. Convincing the thousands of attendees at his mega-church (previous football stadium) that giving ($$) is the means to pleasing God. All the while cracking jokes, to include one joke ending in the suicide of two individuals, followed by his followers praise and laughter. All the while these blind "followers" can't understand that they are the people spoken of in the bible that will be deceived in the last days. Just as Salza being blind to the truth, leads his fellow sect members blindly down the slippery path to destruction.


God Bless your work,


Tom Miles




… I didn't go to a funeral for my friend of over 50 years… Most of my friends are gone and those Traditionalists out there need to know that the road to God is straight and the gate narrow and few find it. Many of the people that I talk to don't care if they go to Hell.


Jerry K.




Subject: Greg’s shameless claims


My Brothers:

Some thoughts about Greg's cowardly little tantrum. He claims that you are the "nutjob" when he is in the heights of a sort of spiritual schizophrenia or addiction. His V2 religion works for him. He won't face the facts of the Catholic faith courageously. Instead, he medicates himself with his belief that he attends Mass (which he doesn't--it's totally invalid) and adoration (right--a piece of bread, the deceptive fruit of the invalid Novus Ordo). Nutjobs don't painstakingly research and strive after the facts of the Catholic faith (which MHFM does), in order to show them for the beauty, clarity and reasonableness they contain. Nutjobs get all starstruck with charismatic figures who trotted all over the world looking like great apostles (like the antipope John Paul II), but all the while were manifestly distorting and denying the facts of the Catholic faith. High on the glitz and buzz of externals, Greg can't stand a manly challenge to face reality, to face the facts. The false traditionalists are the same way. For that matter, the Protestants are the same way. How quickly they shuck, jive and run when simply handed a copy of The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church. Of course Greg won't talk--you threatened to take his drug away, and his dependence on fantasy just couldn't handle it.

Joseph Ramirez


New Video


MHFM: This is a 30-second ad we are currently promoting nationally on television.  Within the first few days of this project, we have received hundreds of orders.  How widely and how long we are able to do this will be determined by the amount of financial support/donations we receive. 


MHFM Television Ad [video]


A heretic refuted


Subject: Most Holy Family Monastery Web Site


Dear Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond:


I just wanted to thank you for the help that coming across your web site just 3 months ago has given me in my Catholic Faith. I am from a large family, but I am the only Traditional Catholic in it. I credit a special grace from God, possibly from my baptism, for seeking the truth, and always knowing something was wrong in the Vatican II sect growing up. I was born in the 1960's, so I never knew of the Traditional Mass, but I knew something was wrong seeing the likes of "Communion in the Hand" (which I have NEVER taken) and the "sign of peace", and countless other abuses in "Mass" growing up. My family just tolerated the abuses, and still do, and I've been continually seeking the truth of the true Catholic Faith. Nobody ever told me the way that the Mass used to be, or even what pre-VII, VII, and post-VII were. The first step for me was refusing to go to a Sunday evening "Folk Mass" 26 years ago, that so many parishioners enthusiastically attended. I have had to find my way to Traditional Catholicism, basically on my own. I haven't attended the Nervous Ordo for over a decade, and certainly never will again under ANY circumstances based on all of the information that I have found on your web site. Your videos and audios and archived radio programs are invaluable to me, and I listen to them over and over, especially the audio of the former pastoral administrator from the New Ulm, MN parish. Perhaps you can do radio programs again because they are so informative. I now pray the 15 decade rosary, and am very informed about "Baptism of desire" and NFP, and manifest heretics. "Journey Into Hell" and all of the videos dealing with the post Vatican II sect and "Sister Lucy" contain information not found anywhere else.


I love your video and print report on John Salza as well. You handled him extremely well in the published email exchanges. I think that you were quite reasonable, and that he was just putting up unreasonable obstacles to ensure that a debate between you two would probably never take place, although maybe it will in the future if he becomes a bit more reasonable. Maybe he's just being a lawyer too. I wonder what Mr. Salza's advice to you now is, since Judge Curtin has thrown out the case against you. He was blabbering in the emails about all of the tough questions that you were going to have to face in court, and how he was going to question you in the same manner as you would face in a court of law, about other unrelated topics, like the lawsuit and your end times possibilities. I can't wait for part II of your video about him, and for your response to him about the lawsuit being thrown out. I loved how you told him that you came from no faith and alienated a wealthy father in the process, while he was a freemason who claimed to be Catholic at the time of his masonry. I don't care whether he will debate you or not. He even got that great articulator William Albrecht to email you and offer to debate the two of you with him. Please, don't ever debate William Albrecht again. What an inarticulate fool. I can't believe that this man debates anyone, protestant or Catholic. Salza often shows up at conferences where a bunch of Sisyphuses continually roll the rock up the hill in hope that one day they'll get the full Fatima third secret from the Vatican II sect. This secret has most likely been destroyed in my opinion. I don't think that we'll ever get the third Fatima secret, except maybe from Heaven and Our Lady herself giving it to us. I would love to know the true contents of it though, in conjunction with the first 2 parts that we already know, because I know that it would vindicate true Traditional Catholics. I am sure that we have been living through it since the Father Fuentes interview and VII, and I hope that Heaven will give the secret to us somehow.


Also, I just heard Brother Michael on "Coast To Coast", and I concur that the number of people that follow your website is growing. I myself can attest to that because I am a new follower. And it is great to hear that your YouTube channel gets more hits than the Vatican II sect's channel in all of its different languages. Thanks for all of your great work.


Bill Sample


MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  Regarding Salza, any honest person who reads the e-mail exchanges we had with him, as well as our article refuting his false arguments, will see very clearly that he is a complete heretic, deceiver and a liar.  He even promotes the heresy that the papacy-rejecting “Orthodox” are inside the Church (see below).  After saying he would debate us, he then refused – putting up an additional obstacle to get out of it.  He even had the audacity to lie about having refused the debate.  His arguments were simply crushed in our articles.  Of particular note is our most recent article, John Salza Has No Idea What He's Talking About [article], which goes through every single page of Salza’s second article and proves that there is a lie, an error, a half-truth, a distortion or a significant contradiction on every single page (no joke).  It’s as if his article was written by Satan.  For more proof that this is true, see the rapid-fire summary below.  Here are just a few examples of the “quality” of his arguments (and there is much more where this came from).




John Salza, Second Article, p. 30: “God did not promise that He would prevent the pope from using his authority in confusing or even destructive ways. That a pope harms the Church by engaging in false ecumenism or common worship does not mean he is no longer the pope. The example of St. Peter is clear: he denied our Lord by swearing an oath and cursing and yet he did not lose his privileged office.”


Salza is quite wrong. When St. Peter denied our Lord, he wasn’t the pope. St. Peter was not given the office of the Papacy until after the Resurrection. That is defined Catholic dogma. Considering that we’ve refuted this objection numerous times, I’m surprised Salza hasn’t figured this out yet.


Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I, Session 4, Chap. 1: “And upon Simon Peter alone Jesus after His resurrection conferred the jurisdiction of the highest pastor and rector over his entire fold, saying: "Feed my lambs," "Feed my sheep" [John 21:15 ff.].” (Denz. 1822)


The words that Our Lord spoke to St. Peter in Matthew 16:18-19 were a promise that He would build the Church upon Peter, and that He would give him the keys to the kingdom, but these words did not give Peter the keys. When St. Peter finally became the pope, he was a Catholic who denied nothing. If he had been the pope and denied Christ, he would have lost his office.




That’s just one error.  The many contradictions, distortions, and lies are much more significant.  Salza not only contradicts himself many times within his article, but his second article contradicts his first article.  What’s particularly revealing and actually appalling is that some false traditionalists, who lack the good will to even read our exposé of him, will promote his arguments, wrongly believing they are sound.  They probably don’t even understand what Salza is really saying.  Since his arguments reference canon laws and attack people they don’t like, they sound good to them.  However, by promoting his deeply flawed article/arguments they reveal how ignorant and blind they are; for if they carefully read our exposé (or even understood what Salza is asserting) they would discover that Salza’s arguments are actually a joke: e.g., his primary argument (that a pope would have to be condemned for heresy in a canonical trial), which he repeats throughout his article, is one that directly contradicts divine and canon law.  For instance:




John Salza, Second Article, p. 21: “If the pre-election excommunication was for something other than “public and notorious” heresy, then the elected pope would be subject to the ecclesiastical procedures that Dimond says don’t apply (investigations, trials, declaratory sentences). Once again, Dimond’s false premise that the conciliar popes are “notorious” heretics poisons his entire analysis of ecclesiastical law, which he either dismisses as not relevant or manipulates in an effort to support his thesis.”


Salza simply has no idea what he’s talking about, as we’ve shown throughout this article. In fact, in this particular paragraph, notice the precision with which he contradicts Catholic teaching. He explicitly states that a pope would be subject to trials, investigations, declaratory sentences, etc. Catholic teaching is exactly the opposite.


Canon 1556, 1917 Code of Canon Law, On trials in general: “The First See is judged by no one.”


Pope St. Nicholas, epistle (8), Proposueramus quidem, 865: “… Neither by Augustus, nor by all the clergy, nor by religious, not by the people will the judge be judged‘The first seat will not be judged by anyone.’”


Salza, in composing his nonsense, probably had no idea of what he was falling into. 


John Salza, Second Article, p. 7: “Second, even if the pope were subject to canon 2200 and thus his formal heresy were presumed (which is not true), the pope would still be entitled to rebut the presumption in a canonical trial…”


His position directly contradicts Catholic teaching.  By recommending the false arguments he advances – mainly because those specious arguments attack us and the sedevacantist position – those false traditionalists actually make complete fools out of themselves.


Moreover, while we can and do refute every single one of his arguments in excruciating detail, Salza ignores almost every argument sedevacantists advance from the heresies of the Vatican II antipopes.  On the rare occasion when he attempts to address a heresy of the antipopes, here’s the pathetic “quality” of argument he advances. 




On the rare occasion when non-sedevacantists such as Salza do discuss specific examples of Benedict XVI’s heresies, the inadequacy of their response is obvious to any fair-minded person. For example, after 29 pages of nonsense, Salza finally gets around to addressing Benedict XVI’s heresy that Eastern schismatic leaders are “pastors in the Church of Christ.” This heresy by itself ends the debate about Benedict XVI.


John Salza, Second Article, p. 30: “While some of the words and actions of the concililar popes seem indefensible on their face, we cannot prove that they were acting with malice. Even if the sedevacantist wrongly presumes malice, ecclesiastical offices are not lost on presumptions, and due process allows any accused to defend himself. For example, did Pope Benedict XVI call Eastern schismatics “pastors in the Church” because he maliciously denies the dogmas of the First Vatican Council, or because he caved in to the peer pressure of the Modernist ecumaniacs that surround him? (Does Pope Benedict even write his own speeches and addresses? Remember, the pope has admitted he doesn’t believe everything he says.) Is caving in to peer pressure enough to lose the office of the papacy?”


This response is truly pathetic.  He admits that many of their statements seem indefensible. Yes, they are indefensible, John. You should wake up and convert from your diabolical stupor.  He then attempts to make it seem like Benedict XVI’s statement was an isolated incident!  He implies that it was an act that doesn’t reflect Benedict XVI’s true beliefs.  How does that hold up?  It has already been totally refuted.  I’ve proven that Benedict XVI’s outrageous statement is the consistent teaching of the Vatican II sect.  It’s in Vatican II, Dominus Iesus and even on Salza’s own website, as I’ve shown!


John Salza’s Website, “Catholicism & Orthodoxy: A Comparison,” by Dave Armstrong: “Catholics must believe that Orthodoxy is a part of the universal Church (commensurate with the Second Vatican Council and many recent papal encyclicals on ecumenism in general or Orthodoxy in particular). That fact alone precludes the justification of any condescension, animosity, or hostility, which is especially sinful amongst Christians (Galatians 6:10).”


Need one say more? Salza then argues that Benedict XVI doesn’t believe in what he says, or that he might have said it for reasons of “peer pressure.” That is ridiculous on its face; and, as I’ve shown, it makes no difference. The lapsi didn’t believe in the false gods to whom they sacrificed out of fear, but they were still apostates.  As we can see, Salza and those of his camp have no response to the heresies of Benedict XVI.  His heresies are indefensible, as all of our debates prove.  That’s why they almost never even attempt to address them.


Here’s another example:




John Salza, Second Article, p. 16: “Of course, the conciliar popes have never said they know they are departing from Catholic teaching. Expulsion from the Church must be based on malice, not speculation.”


Salza is wrong again. To give just one example that refutes Salza’s claim, in his book Principles of Catholic Theology, Antipope Benedict XVI admits that Vatican II’s teaching on religious liberty (to which Benedict XVI adheres) contradicts the magisterial teaching of Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (1864). That the two contradict each other is obvious to any honest person who studies the issue.


Benedict XVI, Principles of Catholic Theology, 1982, p. 381: "If it is desirable to offer a diagnosis of the text [of the Vatican II document, Gaudium et Spes] as a whole, we might say that (in conjunction with the texts on religious liberty and world religions) it is a revision of the Syllabus of Pius IX, a kind of counter syllabus… As a result, the one-sidedness of the position adopted by the Church under Pius IX and Pius X in response to the situation created by the new phase of history inaugurated by the French Revolution, was, to a large extent, corrected..."


Benedict XVI admits here that Vatican II’s teaching (to which he adheres) is directly contrary to the teaching of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. In other words, he admits that Vatican II’s teaching is contrary to the teaching of the Catholic Magisterium. One could hardly ask for more of a confirmation that the teaching of Vatican II is heretical. In his book, Benedict XVI repeats this again and again, calling the teaching of Vatican II “the countersyllabus,” and saying that there can be no return to the Syllabus of Errors!


Benedict XVI, Principles of Catholic Theology, 1982, p. 385: "By a kind of inner necessity, therefore, the optimism of the countersyllabus gave way to a new cry that was far more intense and more dramatic than the former one."


Benedict XVI, Principles of Catholic Theology, 1982, p. 391: " The task is not, therefore, to suppress the Council but to discover the real Council and to deepen its true intention in the light of present experience. That means that there can be no return to the Syllabus, which may have marked the first stage in the confrontation with liberalism and a newly conceived Marxism but cannot be the last stage."


Here’s another example:




John Salza, Second Article, p. 26: “Well, then, the same logic can and does apply to the post-conciliar teachings that Dimond believes are heresies, since they too are not from the Extraordinary or Ordinary and Universal Magisterium. None of the heterodox statements or novel practices of Popes John Paul II or Benedict XVI, for example, have come from the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium.”


Salza is so wrong.  I could spend quite a bit of time discussing numerous examples that refute Salza’s contention, but I will only focus on one. Consider the heresy that the schismatic “Orthodox,” who reject the Papacy, Papal Infallibility, and Vatican I, are part of the universal Church.  That horrible heresy rejects dozens of magisterial pronouncements which declare that those who reject the Papacy are outside the Church.  Benedict XVI teaches this heresy and he admits that it’s the binding and magisterial teaching of Vatican II.


Benedict XVI, Light of the World, 2010, p. 89: “… what I defended was the heritage of the Second Vatican Council and of the entire history of the Church. The passage [from Dominus Iesus] means that the Eastern Churches [i.e., the “Orthodox”] are genuine particular churches, although they are not in communion with the Pope. In this sense, unity with the Pope is not constitutive for the particular church.”


Benedict XVI, Light of the World, 2010, pp. 94-96: “And not even a Pope can offer an alternative definition of a Church? A. No. He has no authority over that. The Second Vatican Council is binding on him.”


Benedict XVI clearly teaches that Vatican II’s teaching on “the Church” (which includes the massive heresy on the “Orthodox”) is magisterially binding. Even if Benedict XVI never bound anyone to this outrageous heresy, his adherence to it would still prove that he is not the pope.  But as we can see, he does bind people to it.  It’s the official teaching of Salza’s sect. In fact, Salza’s own website teaches this heresy and confirms that it is the binding teaching of his “Church”!


John Salza’s Website, “Catholicism & Orthodoxy: A Comparison,” by Dave Armstrong: “Catholics must believe that Orthodoxy is a part of the universal Church (commensurate with the Second Vatican Council and many recent papal encyclicals on ecumenism in general or Orthodoxy in particular). That fact alone precludes the justification of any condescension, animosity, or hostility, which is especially sinful amongst Christians (Galatians 6:10).”


Hence, Salza himself teaches that Catholics “must” believe in this horrible heresy.  So while Salza is saying that he’s not bound to any of the false doctrines, his own material proves him wrong!  And there’s so much more. 


Below is a rapid-fire summary of the main points we proved in the article: John Salza Has No Idea What He's Talking About [article].  All of the assertions below about Salza’s mind-boggling contradictions, errors, distortions, heresies and lies are proven in detail in the aforementioned article.


RAPID-FIRE SUMMARY (of points proven in this article about Salza’s heretical article)


-Salza fundamentally changes his position on recognizing someone as a heretic without a declaration, and lies about his old position.


-He now says that you can recognize a heretic without a declaration, unless it’s a pope. But this leads him into the condemned heresy that popes can be declared against or subjected to trials.


-He teaches the condemned heresy that popes are subject to trials more than ten different times in his article, thus demonstrating that he has no understanding of the issue he presumes to discuss at length.


-He blatantly lies and says that I avoided a debate with him! The truth is just the opposite, of course. He thought he might get away with his lie because he didn’t know I would publish our actual e-mail exchanges which expose it and reveal his dishonesty.


-He blatantly lies about my debate with another person. His outrageous lie is reckless and defamatory, and he makes it because he was enraged by my refutation of him.


-He directly contradicts himself on one’s ability to judge the intentions of others. He judges our intentions as bad-willed, and then on the very next page says we cannot judge his motives.


-He misleads people by saying that there have been five opinions on a heretical pope, when there has only been one opinion of saints and doctors on whether a manifest heretic would remain pope (he would not); and this position is dogmatically certain.


-He quotes canon 2223.4 on no fewer than ten pages of his article, in an attempt to prove that a declaratory sentence is required in the case of a pope’s heresy; when the fact is that the canon has nothing to do with the issue (for the various reasons I discussed) and it cannot apply to a pope because no one can issue a declaration against a reigning pope. His stunning misapplication of this canon poisons his article from start to finish.


-He makes significant errors on presuming heresy.


-In a desperate attempt to argue that Benedict XVI is not guilty of heresy, Salza argues that Benedict XVI is either ignorant or insane or drunk or under physical threats when he commits his countless heresies. Salza advances these as possible excuses despite the fact that there is no evidence that Benedict XVI is any of the above. Moreover, canon law presumes malice anyway, and none of those excuses would save Benedict XVI’s “papacy” even if they applied.


-He argues that Benedict XVI could be saved from heresy because he “desires” to please the world. He is refuted by the lapsi controversy. It proved that those who commit apostasy even out of fear for their lives are still considered apostates. By justifying apostasy on the basis of a desire to please the world, Salza mocks the saints and martyrs. He proves himself to be a demonic defender and justifier of Christ-denial.


-He incompetently calls our position, that there are certain mysteries of faith which everyone must know to be saved, and the fact that one can be ignorant in good faith of other deeper dogmas, a “double standard,” when it is not only perfectly consistent but in fact the teaching of the Church.


-The anti-Catholic nature of his position is perhaps best shown by the section, “If Salza Had Lived During the Lapsi Controversy.”


-He makes the pathetic argument that Benedict XVI doesn’t believe in what he says. That’s because he has no response to the many heresies Benedict XVI teaches.


-He directly contradicts himself on whether a declaration is required against a heretical “pope.” These are fresh contradictions, new and independent from the many in his previous article. He says that a declaration is “always” required in the case of a papal claimant, but then says that if the heresy is notorious, no declaration is required.


-He again contradicts himself on whether a declaration is required against a heretical “pope.” He says a declaration is “always” required, and especially to ensure the certainty of papal governance. He then says that it’s required only if the heresy “has not been proven to be morally imputable,” which means that it’s not always required.


-He again calls for schismatic decrees against the occupant of the papal throne, thus trashing Catholic teaching against judging the First See.


-He directly contradicts himself on whether a heretic vacates his office before a warning. He says yes and no. Note: this is in addition to his contradictions on that point in the last article.


-He falsely claims that on every heretical topic, there are more true statements from the conciliar “popes” than heretical ones. This is false and irrelevant. The example we examined (the heresy on the “Orthodox”) pounds Salza’s claim into the ground.


-He contradicts his first article on whether a heretic could govern. He also subtly admits I refuted him.


-He again repeats his massive change of position on whether a Catholic can recognize a heretic without a declaration (thus contradicting his first article again). He also lies again about having ever taken a different position on this point.


-He admits that if John Paul II did certain things, he could have been considered a heretic and non-pope without a declaration. This undercuts basically every argument he makes in his article, and directly contradicts his numerous assertions that a declaration would “always” be required for the “certainty” of papal governance and “the common good.”


-He utters a fresh contradiction on what heresy must be. He says it must be “public and notorious” and then says it must be “notorious or pertinacious.”


-He declares that the conciliar “popes” have never said they know they are departing from Catholic teaching. He is refuted by the example I give from Benedict XVI, among others that could be discussed.


-He contradicts himself on whether a cardinal or papal claimant can be considered a heretic without a declaration. He wrongly cites canons 1557-1558 to argue that a pope must declare a cardinal a heretic. He then contradicts that by declaring that “Cardinal” Wojtyla (John Paul II) could have been a heretic without a declaration if he did certain things.


-He again calls for schismatic judgments against a papal claimant. He even says that canon law requires such judgments, when canon and divine law condemn trials or judgments of the First See.


-He changes his position on canon 2264 after I refuted him.


-He repeats the already completely refuted and demolished argument on the Pius XII conclave legislation.


-He outrageously calls an argument I made “for the sake of argument” a contradiction and reveals his dishonesty in the process.


-He again calls for condemned trials and declaratory sentences against a pope. He even says that a pope “would be subject” to such trials and declarations, directly contradicting Catholic teaching.


-He contradicts himself again on whether a pope can be considered a heretic without a declaration.


-He falls into a major pit on the Pope Liberius argument. He actually argues that the declaration of the Roman clergy would remove Catholics’ obedience from a reigning pope. He thus teaches the heretical position that lower clergy can judge and de facto depose a pope.


-He again calls for a schismatic (and condemned) trial of a pope, wrongly declaring that the pope could “rebut” the evidence “in a canonical trial.”


-He actually argues that none of the heretical statements of the antipopes come from what would be considered “magisterial” teachings. He is refuted by his very own website, and numerous facts I adduce!


-He teaches the heresy that there is salvation outside the Church, and that God leaves some of the elect in ignorance of His faith, even though he incongruously believes that God unconditionally elects and predestines His chosen few.


-He contradicts himself on Pius IX and “invincible ignorance.” He cites Pius IX to wrongly teach that there can be salvation “outside of the Church,” and then he says that our position on Pius IX is plausible – according to which Pius IX taught that all good-willed souls in ignorance will be led to the divine light of Christ.


-He makes a completely specious argument in an attempt to prove “baptism of desire” from the Council of Trent.


-He lies and says we are guilty of crimes [in reference to the now-dismissed lawsuit]. He is desperate to defame us because we refuted and humiliated him.


-He makes an illogical comparison between our lawsuit and Benedict XVI’s heresies, when the laws and principles governing a determination of guilt in the former case are quite different from the latter.


-He completely changes his position on whether sedevacantists are schismatics after I refuted and exposed it.


-He directly contradicts Catholic teaching and St. Robert Bellarmine on reading minds and hearts and its application to judging heresy.


-He outrageously lies about our view on the end of the world.


-He displays his ignorance of Catholic history and facts on the Antichrist.


-After 29 pages, he finally attempts to address one heresy of Benedict XVI on “the Orthodox” and he is refuted by his own material. He cannot convincingly address any of our arguments, while we can refute all of his in excruciating and nauseating detail.


-He makes a massive blunder on St. Peter’s denial of Christ as it relates to the Papacy.


-He errs and misrepresents the facts on the impostor “Sr. Lucia” and displays illogic and inconsistency on Fatima.


-He compares Benedict XVI’s massive heresies to the pre-Vatican II popes’ failure to consecrate Russia, even though Heaven treats the two differently.




Dear Brothers,

That's an interesting video on what has happened to Australia after guns have been banned. Thank you for posting it. The ban was the result of a false flag attack at Port Arthur on the 28th of April, 1996. They blamed it on a mentally retarded man, Martin Bryant, yet claimed he shot 19 out of 20 people in the head, while shooting from the hip and without a laser sight, and 12 of those people in only 15 seconds while using merely 17 rounds. Such is impossible for a person with an IQ of 66. Here is what Joe Vialls wrote in THE PORT ARTHUR MASSACRE CONSPIRACY: "What does matter is that at this precise juncture the gunman had killed twelve victims and wounded a further ten in 15 seconds flat, using only 17 rounds fired from the right hip. Such a staggering performance is on a par with the best combat shooters in the world, and two retired counter-terrorist marksmen ruefully admitted they would be hard pressed to equal such awesome speed and accuracy. Both agreed that attributing such a performance to an intellectually-impaired invalid with an IQ of 66 and severely limited cognitive functions, amounts to nothing less than certifiable insanity on the part of Bryant's accusers." It shows the distortions that the media is capable of. All they need do is cut up the true facts, then attribute a slightly different meaning to them, and the public swallows the story without question. It is outrageous, yet God clearly allowed it to happen as punishment for the sins of most Australians, such as the separation of Church and State. Tragic.

Luke 22:35-38 - "When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, did you want anything? But they said: Nothing. Then said he unto them: But now he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise a scrip; and he that hath not, let him sell his coat, and buy a sword. For I say to you, that this that is written must yet be fulfilled in me: And with the wicked was he reckoned. For the things concerning me have an end. But they said: Lord, behold here are two swords. And he said to them, It is enough."

God Bless,

Chris White




Subject: False Traditionalists and their False Charity


Dear MHFM, the longer I am a Catholic, the more I come to appreciate the information you provide. What is unfortunate is that so many people of bad-will despise the truth of the Church and are content to live in a lie. Though I know many are of bad-will, it never ceases to amaze me how many "traditionalists" claim to love the faith, but in reality, actually hate the very faith they claim to love since they refuse to accept the fullness of Church teaching…


God bless you all at MHFM. Keep fighting the good fight!






Subject: GREG - his arrogance is typical of Novus Ordites


Hey Brothers,

Just a quick thought about Greg. He is OF EXTREEEEEEEEEEEEEEME BAD WILL. (Yes the extra E's are necessary) He is so evil… that he just automatically decided you were wrong even without letting you articulate the well-researched facts. Just because you are Brother Dimond and you're not Greg or you at least don't share his views, it's like based on that, you are wrong immediately. He is so rude that he didn't even let you speak, you had to say "are you aware" several times before you finished the sentence, makes me shake my head in righteous indignation. He is arrogant and moronic…





I just saw your add on TV and thought I would take a peek at your website.

I am not a catholic. I am a Lutheran turned LDS (Mormon).

… While I have never considered the Catholic church to be anything particularly exciting from a "true church" standpoint, I know many really good Catholics, and I really admired Pope John Paul the Second. As Far as Benedict the XVI goes, I have always thought highly of the guy as a person, as a human being.

What really is it about the Catholic Church that you don't like? Or do like?

What do you think of Pope John Paul II? Was he also a heretic? Everything I saw on the website talked about Benedict XVI.

Is all this heresy talk really the "great apostasy" spoken of in the Bible?

What are your feelings regarding, oh, maybe Constantine?

If you can get back to me on this, I would appreciate it.


Kermit Kittleson

MHFM: First, the Mormon religion is false and rejects the true God (the Holy Trinity).  You need to see our section on the biblical proof for Catholicism.  Second, we are Catholics and we promote the Catholic faith.  We point out that the post-Vatican II Church is not the Catholic Church, though many think it is.  That’s covered in the material on the site.  We hope you look it over.  John Paul II was a non-Catholic heretic and apostate who promoted paganism, and falsely posed as a pope.  According to Catholic teaching, he was an antipope.  This situation is predicted in Catholic prophecy, as the information on the website shows.  Your other questions are covered in the material, and we think you would greatly benefit by looking at the videos on our YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/mhfm1



The Great Apostasy and a Counterfeit Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy




That's sad about the deacon--he like most people is right where the devil wants them: totally brainwashed. They will defend anything that is not real, sealing their fate for exclusion from eternal life in paradise with their creator. It must really take an extraordinary grace to snap someone out of their V2, fake catholic delusion, practically, a miracle. Please pray for me, thanks,






Dear Brothers,


I listened to the rosary on EWTN, they used the luminous mysteries, I felt very uneasy about that rosary, as its mysteries are not part of the original and have nothing to do with the promises associated with the rosary. It the luminous mysteries seemed man made and fake. Please advise.


Thanks Ken


MHFM: One should not listen to the Rosary on EWTN, or pray it with them.  They are modernists who accept Vatican II, salvation outside the Church, etc.  We recommend that you pray the 15 decades of the Rosary (Joyful, Sorrowful, Glorious – NOT THE LUMINOUS) by yourself. 




… can you clarify why SSPX is in error?


I like your clarity when discussing issues, it is SO HELPFUL. However, SSPX people are saying that approved apparitions before V2 have discussed all the popes until Peter the Roman shows up to save the Church and therefore, heretics or not they are valid popes.


I have been going through all your information but do not feel even a little bit qualified to discuss the issue with them.


God bless,




MHFM: With regard to the SSPX, the reasons they are in error and heresy are covered in this file. You really should read it: The Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section].


However, to quickly summarize the points, the reasons are: 1) They believe souls can be saved in false religions and therefore without the Catholic faith.  That is condemned, mortally sinful heresy. 2) They obstinately regard manifest heretics as members of the Catholic Church (e.g., the manifestly heretical Novus Ordo “bishops” and the apostate Antipope Benedict XVI).  That is a horrible sin and a denial of the Catholic faith. 3) They obstinately operate independently of the hierarchy they claim to regard as the Catholic hierarchy (i.e., Benedict XVI and his apostate “bishops”).  Since they are pertinacious in their determination to regard Antipope Benedict XVI’s apostate hierarchy as authoritative while operating outside of its authority, their position is definitely schismatic.  They also accept the sinful birth control method of NFP.




Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond,

I am currently a "Catholic" seeking the true Traditionalist Faith but am frustrated about where to go for Mass and fear complete disownment by my family should I go this route of true conversion. Where can a resident of North Georgia go? The Atlanta Archdiocese has everbody here locked into the Vatican II false doctrine and I have nowhere else to go. Do you know of anyone near here who may be of help to those seeking the truth labeled "sedevacantism"? Your help is truly appreciated.


Matthew Graham


MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  Before receiving sacraments, one must reach the point where one is committed never to attend the New Mass again, believes in Outside the Church There is No Salvation without exception (no “baptism of desire”), rejects NFP, won’t support any heretical priests, etc.  That’s explained in this file: Where to go to Mass or confession today?  People should also make the traditional profession of faith from the Council of Trent, which can be accessed from the aforementioned file.  Once a person is convinced on all relevant matters, we can help that person with possible locations for receiving sacraments.  We also recommend people to pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible.


New Video Posted


MHFM: This is a new video, for those it might interest.


Man condemns the information, but can't back up his claims [video]




Subject: greeting


Dear Brother,

I have many times questioned the ecumenism documents of VII. I have always been under the impression growing up that you must be a Roman Catholic to have everlasting life. There is no salvation outside the Roman Catholic Church. I still tell it like it is.  I am wondering how do you bring people back to the fold with so much negativity? Do we just let them die without conversion. Everyone is damned except you and your followers, and that includes me.

The Mass of the New Order was a heresy. Pope Benedict the XVI has accepted an English interpretation this past Advent that brought back some of the beauty that was removed from the ancient Rite. America and the other English speaking nations had a real abobination interpretation. This doesn't solve any problems but it does give us a glimmer of returning to tradition.

I find a joy in the fact that the catholic church of the east and the Roman Catholic Church of the west are making strides to speak and reconcile. This is good news. They have along way to go. The eastern orthodox need to do one thing and that is to recognize the Pope as the supreme Pontiff, but according to you we don't have a true pope, therefore, there can't be a true reconciliation.

I agree with you on our relationship with the Jewish and Muslim people they must convert. The Jewih leaders of our Lord's time did have Jesus Crusified. The Muslims are in fact the driving force of our worlds problems. The protestant are right up there with them.  Every priest that has been ordained, every saint that has been declaired, every church that has been concercrated, every miracle that has been authenticated since VII are lies according to you. What a sad day it is for so many who believe they are following the truth.

I find it very disheartening at times when I read that Luthern or Anglican, even Methodist ministers that come to the faith are allowed to be Roman Catholic Priests. When I and so many others would love to be a priest. You probably won't recognize my ordination to the Permanent Diaconate, even though the history of the diaconate originated with the apostles. VII brought us back.

My dear Brother, I don't know who your authority is, but I do know mine and I know that God made me from an early age to be His faithful servant for all ages.  I don't rebuke you! We are but two pilgrams within the same faith heading the sme direction following the path that was laid out for us.

My God Bless You.

Pax et Bonum
Deacon Edward Wendt


MHFM: First, you claim to believe the Catholic faith is necessary for salvation.  You don’t.  You support the Vatican II antipopes who teach that there is salvation outside the Church.  Here are just three quotes from Antipope Benedict XVI (there are others) which prove that he believes in salvation outside the Church.  


Benedict XVI, Zenit News story, Sept. 5, 2000: “[W]e are in agreement that a Jew, and this is true for believers of other religions, does not need to know or acknowledge Christ as the Son of God in order to be saved…”


Benedict XVI, God and the World, 2000, pages 150-151: “…their [the Jews] No to Christ brings the Israelites into conflict with the subsequent acts of God, but at the same time we know that they are assured of the faithfulness of God.  They are not excluded from salvation…”




“Cardinal” Joseph Ratzinger, Pilgrim Fellowship of Faith, 2002, p. 251: “The fact that the burdensome question of [apostolic] succession does not detract from the spiritual dignity of Evangelical Christianity, or from the saving power of the Lord at work within it, has been very nicely elucidated in the Decree on Ecumenism, especially in number 23, so it seems to me.”


So, you cannot defend the Catholic faith and simultaneously accept Antipope Benedict XVI and the Vatican II sect.  You also say that you believe the “Orthodox” need to accept the Papacy.  That’s outrageous because the Vatican II Counter Church, which you defend, does not teach that the “Orthodox” need to accept the Papacy.  Antipope Benedict XVI and Vatican II teach that the “Orthodox” are already part of the Church, that they can be saved, and that they don’t need to accept the Papacy.  There are many quotes which prove this point.  Please look at the documentation on the website, wake up and convert.


Benedict XVI, Principles of Catholic Theology, 1982, pp. 197-198: “Against this background we can now weigh the possibilities that are open to Christian ecumenism.  The maximum demands on which the search for unity must certainly founder are immediately clear.  On the part of the West, the maximum demand would be that the East recognize the primacy of the bishop of Rome in the full scope of the definition of 1870 and in so doing submit in practice, to a primacy such as has been accepted by the Uniate churches.  On the part of the East, the maximum demand would be that the West declare the 1870 doctrine of primacy erroneous and in so doing submit, in practice, to a primacy such as has been accepted with the removal of the Filioque from the Creed and including the Marian dogmas of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.  As regards Protestantism, the maximum demand of the Catholic Church would be that the Protestant ecclesiological ministers be regarded as totally invalid and that Protestants be converted to Catholicism; the maximum demand of Protestants, on the other hand, would be that the Catholic Church accept, along with the unconditional acknowledgement of all Protestant ministries, the Protestant concept of ministry and their understanding of the Church and thus, in practice, renounce the apostolic and sacramental structure of the Church, which would mean, in practice, the conversion of Catholics to Protestantism and their acceptance of a multiplicity of distinct community structures as the historical form of the Church.  While the first three maximum demands are today rather unanimously rejected by Christian consciousness, the fourth exercises a kind of fascination for it – as it were, a certain conclusiveness that makes it appear to be the real solution to the problem.  This is all the more true since there is joined to it the expectation that a Parliament of Churches, a ‘truly ecumenical council’, could then harmonize this pluralism and promote a Christian unity of action.  That no real union would result from this, but that its very impossibility would become a single common dogma, should convince anyone who examines the suggestion closely that such a way would not bring Church unity but only a final renunciation of it.  As a result, none of the maximum solutions offers any real hope of unity.”


The New Mass is Protestant, invalid and must be avoided.  The ordination rites of the Vatican II sect are also invalid.  The information is available to you.  If you are a man of truth, you will see that this information is correct, reject Antipope Benedict XVI and the Vatican II sect, and convert.  However, at this point it seems that for you the allure of an “external structure,” and a man in Rome you can follow, is more appealing than adherence to the true teachings of Christ as defined by the valid popes.  But, if you remain a member of the Vatican II Church, you will not be saved. 


You also misrepresent our position.  That’s typical of adherents of heresy.  We do not say “everyone is damned…”  We say that to be saved a person must have the true Catholic faith and die in the state of grace.  You also mention negativity.  In a period of almost universal heresy and apostasy – when evil men, false teachers and liars abound – the duties of a Catholic to spread the truth, defend the faith, and combat error necessarily involve activities a liberal would characterize as “negative.”  A Catholic, however, would describe them as propagating the faith, refuting heretics, and denouncing evil. 




Subject: spiritual blindness


Dear MHFM,


I, also, have met people like Greg… including… [a] priest of the CMRI. He had the same reaction as Greg when I presented him with your books. I was shocked at his attitude. He threw the first set of books in the garbage, and later when I gave him more, he returned them to me, wanting nothing to do with them. They are irate that their reputation is being tarnished. They can't reconcile this information with the stand that they have taken towards baptism of desire and salvation outside the Church. Rather than humbly admitting they have been wrong all this time, they become extremely defensive and emotionally upset, even resorting to name-calling, just like a child would do whose ego has been crushed. But the priests feel like they have to obey their bishop, adopting his attitude and directives. They don't have the courage to think for themselves, at least not yet. If only they would study the literature with an open mind, think and pray about it, stew over it, give it some time, but they don't give it a chance.




To hear


Subject: Debate


I would have liked to hear you debate someone about Saint Alphonsus'. I know very little about Saint Alphonsus'. I have had that argument used against me in the past, "Saint Alphonsus believed in baptism of desire". I have not done a study of Saint Alphonsus, I am currently studying Saint Thomas. My comeback is usually just, "well he was in error". I know you probably want to destroy someone in a debate, but the world could literally end before any heretic gathers up the courage to debate you. So I think many less learned Catholics would like if you just, debate yourself. Show the typical arguments from the heretics and show the counter arguments you would use. Thanks for all the great work.






Dear Brothers:


I am truly grateful that you posted your attempted conversation with Greg, because it reminded me so much of people whom I used to consider "friends" while I was still in the Novus Ordo. Even before I had moved to tradition in search of the true mass (an action they condemned), I used to be very bewildered by these people and could never figure them out. Not anymore. Not since I have learned about bad will… As Greg proves, it is absolutely impossible to tell these people anything. This type of person is an inverted Catholic. Such persons pounce on any truth they hear, the way true Catholics pounce on heresy, and they do everything in their power to prevent truth from reaching their little circle of acquaintances at whose apex they are pleased to sit. They have no knowledge, no wisdom, no humility --and you will almost always find these people writing "newsletters" or otherwise serving as mouthpieces or organizers in the counterfeit church. And, oh yes, they have great pretensions to holiness -- which is really at the heart of their pride. Notice how this guy, while attacking the truth, had nothing specific to say but that he goes to "mass" and "adoration" all the time. That's a necessary part of their self-image and the reputation that they attempt to build for themselves among their little circle of equally ignorant and easy-to-deceive people. In their utter blindness cause by pride, the Greg types believe (and attempt to get others to believe) that they are superior and holy. Thus, they are delighted to adore and defend the Antichrist and his false church because, by doing so, such individuals are able to garner some admiration for themselves. They think they are important people, and in once sense they are. Of all false Catholics, they are the most dangerous.


Lee Ann




Subject: The world according to Greg




Greg's "non-response" is just another day in the life of a V-II heretic. Proverbs 23:7 interpretation; "A man is as he thinketh". Greg's "own" (V-II) "conclusion" is that the truth is "sad, twisted, sick, off-base, garbage". Words from someone who claims to go to Adoration and receive the Eucharist everyday. Sounds more like the words of a demonically possessed "Rock Star". Greg's thoughts and words condemn him, along with all the other V-II "Rock Stars". Greg admits he hasn't researched anything as you have, though still insults your knowledge and integrity as would the thoughts and words of a demon.


I thought this bible verse from Proverbs 26:17 rebukes all the bad-willed individuals trolling the internet looking for a fight against blocking comments on your YouTube page; "As he that taketh a dog by the ears, so is he that passeth by in anger, and meddleth with another man's quarrel." Demons will vanish through the aid of prayer, though bad-willed people tend to linger around forever it seems.


Proverbs 23:6-9. Eat not with an envious man, and desire not his meats: Because like a soothsayer, and diviner, he thinketh that which he knoweth not. Eat and drink, will he say to thee: and his mind is not with thee. The meats which thou hadst eaten, thou shalt vomit up: and shalt loose thy beautiful words. Speak not in the ears of fools: because they will despise the instruction of thy speech.


Ecclesiastius 27:12. A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon.


God Bless your works,


Tom Miles




Bro. Dimond,


Your thoughtful and detailed reply was very much appreciated. Since I first wrote, I have listened to many more of your recorded debates and informal discussions/arguments with callers. First, the work you are doing combating these heretics is amazing and something I have not seen anywhere else; but second, the debates themselves (as a listener) I found to be very edifying and instructive. After listening to so many of them, one can definitely see recurring themes in how the heretics attempt to deceive, and in how they attempt to evade the truth. One can almost hear the devil himself behind the voices of these callers, but I am sure you are well aware of the battle you are waging… Listening to these calls was not only instructive to me as a Catholic in how to combat heresy through reasoned argument, but also very energizing spiritually. I have not been this fired up about battling error in years, and my devotion to prayer has also been considerably increased.


I am sure you know, you are the only true Catholics I know who are actually evangelizing and publicly battling error. The other traditional groups I am aware of seem content to live in their own bubbles and don't seem to have any missionary spirit. I was honestly not truly aware of the baptism of desire heresy. It had only come up indirectly and briefly once or twice in my experience, so I didn't really hold any opinion on it. But, after listening to several of your arguments on this, I am convinced you are correct. In fact, in reflecting on it a little, I think you may have come across the root of the problem with the Church Militant. The holding of that erroneous position could likely be what has completely sapped the missionary zeal out of all the other 'traditional' groups - because even if they won't admit it directly, allowing for baptism of desire places a pernicious seed in the back of the mind that conversion (and therefore evangelizing) is not really necessary. Truly evil.


I just can't seem to effectively put into words what coming across your material has done for me. My mother, sister, and I sat down this past Sunday and watched your video on the 3rd secret of Fatima, the imposter Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. In 2 hours, you were able to accomplish what I have not in 12 years: getting through to them, and there is now sincere hope for their conversions. I can't thank you enough…


God Bless you!



MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  We think you should read the book, Outside the Catholic Church There is Absolutely No Salvation.  It covers the “baptism of desire” issue in detail.




Subject: Greg


Dear Brother Peter,


Greg is an arrogant… heretic. He's open and unashamed about his errors. He even suggests that he knows how to "offer help" to true Catholics--"You need a psychologist… You must be obsessive compulsive." It's infuriating to listen to him… Indeed, his attitude triggers righteous indignation in someone who loves God.






Dear Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,


As Catholics:-


We all know from his writings, that Br. Peter, of the MHFM, as a traditional Catholic, is a defender of the Catholic Faith.


We also now know, that Greg, who claims to be a member of that same Church, viciously attacks Bro. Peter for those same writings.


We can now conclude, (by logic), that Greg, does not belong to the same Church as Bro. Peter.


He is a heretic, and ipso facto automatically excommunicated, as are all heretics.


God bless





Hi Brothers Peter and Michael Dimond,

I just listened to your latest video, about your attempted conversation with "Greg". He is obviously a full devotee of the "NewCatholic"/Antichurch religion. His views are a perfect example of the 100%, complete rupture with Tradition in the Antichurch; or, to put it another way, the total *substitution* of the True Faith with Vatican "2". The amazing thing is, this has been done while retaining the name "Catholic"; there are two completely different religions with the same name, and yet, many cannot see the difference…

Then there is his attitude. He won't even listen. When you, Bro. Peter, engage in a debate (and I've listened to many of those), you take the time to listen to a point, then you present the rebuttal. "Greg", on the other hand, engages in what may be termed as "theatrical indignation, with added vagueness"; or perhaps it is like this: "You're wrong, because you are!"

I fail to understand how JP2 is more "charismatic" or "appealing" than the glorious -authentic- Catholic past. Yet so many are charmed by that one. They'd choose him over the defined Catholic Faith; and that's what they end up doing, if they do not see the contradiction. And they will not, unless they see that the Dogmas of the Faith came before the Antipopes, who contradict them, though the Antipopes claim continuity with the True Popes who defined them…

-Michael D.S.


No takers?


MHFM: We recently posted an invitation for a debate about St. Alphonsus’ opinion on “baptism of desire.”  We extended that offer to Larry L, who wrote in on the topic, and others out there who might be interested.  Apparently no one is willing to defend St. Alphonsus’ opinion on that issue.  It appears that people who claim to think so highly of that BOD opinion (at least in internet postings and in e-mails) are not so enthusiastic about actually defending it. 




… What you state and document is Catholic Teaching.  It has been apparent for many years that heresies are rampant by means of Vatican II, JPII speaking, what has been said or written, and Benedict XVI. It is impossible to pick up or read any books after Vatican II without some scare of heresy to be found there. Millions of lay people are being lost or led astray….


God bless--In Christ, His Holy Mother,





God bless you, Bro. Peter. That guy Greg was truly a disgusting and heretical fool. Thanks for defending the Faith against abominations like that and in the way you do it. People like him are an example of why those in the Novus Ordo make a mockery of the Catholic faith, for they think that they are knowledgeable and dedicated to Catholic teaching, yet, they don't even care when those teachings are being trampled upon all around them. They only know about those dogmas which the Novus Ordo sect still claims to believe in - i.e. those relating to the Eucharist, the Papacy, and Mary. However, the problem is that these heretics will act like they know more than you brothers do about Catholic teaching and that you are the ones who are ignorant! Yes, such dishonesty does and should cause righteous anger.



Mario Chavez


MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  If they were willing to accept (or listen to an explanation of) the Church’s dogmatic proclamations on the Papacy, they would see that Vatican II and the post-Vatican II antipopes are anti-Catholic and anti-papal.  For it is the Church’s proclamations on the papal office (and on the consequences of not accepting the papal office) that slice through the heresies of the post-Vatican II Church the fastest.  But they don’t believe in or care about the dogmas on the Papacy.  They only care about supporting a man who dresses up in robes in Rome, irrespective of his actual statements or actions.




Subject: The foolish man who condemns the information


Dear Brother Peter,


This man is outrageously arrogant. Greg's diatribe reflects so clearly his hatred not only of the truth but of MHFM who works so hard to bring the truth to others. He's so blinded by his own bad will that he spurns the opportunity given him by God in finding your material. And he calls himself a Catholic! Such despicable behavior absolutely merits righteous indignation. Hell is filled with people like him.

St. Teresa of Avila wrote the following, "...Our prayer for those who give us light should be unceasing. In the midst of tempests so fierce as those the Church now endures, what would we be without them? May it please the Lord to keep them in His hands and help them so that they might help us, Amen."

… God has used your monastery as His chosen instrument to awaken so many who were asleep in sin, myself included, and to expose the Great Apostasy in these final days. MHFM is a light shining in the midst of the darkness of this world.

Sincerely in Christ,





Subject: Greg


The only thing that greg knows about jp ll {antichrist} is what all the other birds {parrots} around him say and I'm sure greg has seen the antichrist on TV and notices how all the people, at these antichrist gatherings, act and behave, so greg says "well he must be good", this is his experience of jp ll, he doesn't know, nor does he care about what jp ll has taught, which his teachings are in complete opposition to what the True Catholic Church has taught for 2000 yrs. consistently! Birds of a feather flock together! I HATE THAT PHRASE, "TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT"!


2 Thessalonians 2:4 Who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God.




St. Peter's Square
Sunday, 22 October 1978

#2 ... All of you who are still seeking God, all of you who already have the inestimable good fortune to believe, and also you who are tormented by doubt: please listen once again, today in this sacred place, to the words uttered by Simon Peter. In those words is the faith of the Church. In those same words is the new truth, indeed, "the ultimate and definitive truth about man": the son of the living God—"You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." ...


Antipope John Paul II, Redemptor Hominis #13, March 4, 1979: “… by his Incarnation, he, the Son of God, in a certain way united himself with EACH MAN.”[5]


Pope St. Leo the Great, Dogmatic Letter to Flavian, 449: “Let Nestorius, therefore, be anathematized… he made one person of the flesh, and another of the Godhead, AND DID NOT PERCEIVE THAT THERE WAS BUT ONE CHRIST…”[9]

Pope Vigilius, Second Council of Constantinople, 553: “The holy synod of Ephesus… has pronounced sentence against the heresy of Nestorius… and all those who might later… adopt the same opinions as he held… They express these falsehoods against the true dogmas of the Church, OFFERING WORSHIP TO TWO SONS, trying to divide that which cannot be divided, AND INTRODUCING TO BOTH HEAVEN AND EARTH THE OFFENCE OF THE WORSHIP OF MAN. But the sacred band of heavenly spirits worship along with us only one Lord Jesus Christ.”[10]

1 John 2:22 – “Who is a liar, but he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, who denieth the Father, and the Son.”

1 John 4:2-3 – “Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, is of God: And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus is not of God: and this is Antichrist, of whom you have heard that he cometh...”


Genesis 3:5 For God doth know that in what day soever you shall eat thereof, your eyes shall be opened: and you shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil.






You are clearly being used by Satan to attack Holy Mother Church.   I pray God's justice upon you.    You are a total nutjob, gone wild.   Your writings are garbage and full of nothing but mis-interpretations and mis-representations.    Shame on you…




MHFM: Our response to this e-mail is in this video.


Man condemns the information, but can't back up his claims


Nostra Aetate Debate


Subject: Nostra Aetate #3


Bro. Dimond,


I recently listened to your phone debate with Robert Sungenis that was posted on youtube regarding Nostra Aetate #3. First, what a refreshing and surprising thing to find! This is the first real debate and attempt at a genuine defense of Vatican II from a Novus Ordo person that I think I have ever seen or heard. As you know, 99% of the time they are incapable of producing a real argument of any kind. Incidentally, you won the debate in my opinion, but I wanted to ask - regarding Sungenis's point that the document esteems Islam since muslims "worship God" (his point, I believe, was that it is the same God and therefore worthy of esteem since this is supposedly in common with Catholic belief, etc etc..) Couldn't you simply refute that they are actually worshipping the same god since they specifically deny the divinity of Christ and therefore, do not worship the triune God? Is a positive denial and rejection of the Trinity grounds to conclude they are not worshipping the same god at all? I have made this point before to others about Jews also, but I would love to hear your take on it. I've listened to several other of your calls to Novus Ordites, such as the Chicago diocese rep, and I have to say - you are my hero!! I used to take these people on myself back in my heyday, but I just don't have it in me anymore for a frontal assault - but you're slaying them left and right. Keep up the good work! You are absolutely brilliant!


Best Regards,

Keith Elflein


MHFM: Thank you for the words of support.  We think it’s a valuable debate because it focuses on just one passage in Vatican II.  A more careful examination of singular passages brings out the full malice entailed in each and every one of the heresies.  As we mentioned in a radio program, the only reason Sungenis agreed to the debate was because it was limited to one passage which he knew about in advance.  (He also said that if we insulted him he would hang up).  Even so, he could not defend the heresy in Vatican II (not surprisingly).  It was demonstrated that his own authorities (the Vatican II antipopes) agree with exactly what we are saying about the passage.  He was thus forced to absurdly dismiss what his own “popes” have proclaimed (in statement after statement) about the very passage in question.  It was also demonstrated that their statements about the meaning of Vatican II, which prove what we are saying, would, if they were true popes, be binding and actually exceed what true popes said in binding statements about true ecumenical councils of the past.  


Sungenis got so confused, in fact, that when we pointed out that Nostra Aetate #3 does mention “the Islamic faith,” in the context of esteeming the false religion, he confidently denied that Islam is mentioned in the text.  He said that only “the Muslims” are.  When it was pointed out again exactly what it says in the original (“fides Islamica” – the Islamic faith), Sungenis then quietly acknowledged his error.  However, it was a mistake so significant that we could have blasted him and said that if you don’t even know that the text mentions the Islamic faith (even after we pointed that out), why should anyone listen to your far-fetched (and absurd) attempts to explain the passage away – attempts which contradict what your own antipopes say about the passage?  However, he might have hung up if we blasted him in that way.  Instead, we just pointed out the errors in his arguments, that his own antipopes prove our point, and numerous other facts which disprove his position.  Furthermore, his original protestation that the text does not mention “the Islamic faith” was a reaction to the realization that if it did mention “the Islamic faith” in that context, it would prove our point – namely, that Vatican II esteems a false religion.  Hence, when he finally admitted that we were correct (i.e., that Nostra Aetate #3 does mention “the Islamic faith” in that context), he should have changed his position and acknowledged the truth: that the passage is indefensible because it showers praise upon a false and condemned non-Christian religion.  But of course he didn’t acknowledge the truth; instead he continued, with other false arguments, to attempt to defend the indefensible. 


To your question, one thing we mentioned in the debate is that Sungenis (believe it or not) does not claim to believe Muslims worship the true God.  He actually holds that they worship a false god.  To prove that point, we had the following quote at the ready if needed (but we didn’t need it).  We were also prepared to refute the argument from the often-misused quote from Pope Gregory VII (but we didn’t need to). 


Sungenis: “… either one worships the Triune God of Christianity or he is worshiping a false god.”


So, believe it or not, Sungenis was actually not arguing that Muslims worship the one true God.  He also claims that it’s wrong to esteem a false religion.  What he was asserting in the debate was that Vatican II only esteemed the Muslims’ monotheism (i.e., the fact that they profess belief in one God rather than in many), but not the Islamic religion or any of its practices.  As we pointed out in response, that is patently false because Nostra Aetate #3 explicitly mentions the Muslims’ religious practices (including their “prayer, fasts,” etc.) in this very context.  It also explicitly mentions “the Islamic faith” in the context of this praise and esteem!  Moreover, the debate on this point ends when we consider how his own “popes,” who promulgated and implemented the very text under discussion (Nostra Aetate #3), understood the passage (which is the way anyone reading it honestly should).  Notice that they admit Nostra Aetate #3 expresses esteem/respect for the Islamic religion, exactly as we said.  This directly refutes what he claimed:


Benedict XVI, Address, Dec. 22, 2006: “My visit to Turkey afforded me the opportunity to show also publicly my respect for the Islamic Religion, a respect, moreover, which the Second Vatican Council (declaration Nostra Aetate #3) pointed out to us as an attitude that is only right.”


Benedict XVI, Catechesis, August 24, 2005: “This year is also the 40th anniversary of the conciliar Declaration Nostra Aetate, which has ushered in a new season of dialogue and spiritual solidarity between Jews and Christians, as well as esteem for the other great religious traditions.  Islam occupies a special place among them.”


So, the debate demonstrated that there are at least two blatantly heretical aspects of Nostra Aetate #3 on the Muslims.  First, the passage clearly esteems a false, non-Christian religion which the true Catholic Church officially calls an abomination.  That is heresy.  We also refuted Sungenis’ claim that Nostra Aetate’s assertion does not deny a dogma of the faith.  We quoted the dogma of Pope Leo XII to prove the point that it is a denial of Catholic dogma to esteem a false sect.  (Interestingly, Islam, which Vatican II approves and esteems, is even described as an abominable and diabolical “sect” in Catholic teaching).  Second, the passage is heretical because it asserts that Muslims truly worship God.  That contradicts the dogma proclaimed by Pope Gregory XVI. 


Sungenis’ response to the first point (as described above) was absurd and was refuted by the facts above.  Sungenis attempted to respond to the second point by providing a further nuance to his false position: he contended that the passage was not asserting that Muslims truly worship God, but rather that they can have some form of worship of God which is not true worship.  In other words, his contention was that Nostra Aetate, even though it explicitly says the Muslims adore and worship God, was not in any way teaching that they truly worship God.  That is absurd.  We refuted it by pointing out that Nostra Aetate #3 teaches that Muslims truly worship God because it explicitly states that the Muslims adore God “who has spoken to humanity.”  The God “who has spoken to humanity” is the TRUE God.  Nostra Aetate’s statement therefore means that the false god of the Koran (the “god” the Muslims worship) has “spoken to humanity” and is therefore the true God.  Moreover, Nostra Aetate #3 says all of the Muslims adore God in the very context of looking upon their religious practices and their faith (including their prayers) “with esteem”!  It is thus praising their worship.  It is therefore absurd to contend, as he does, that Vatican II meant that all the Muslims have false worship while it is simultaneously “esteeming” Islam corporately in view of its worship, religious practices and beliefs.  The passage is an obvious abomination, as his own antipopes’ statements about it prove, and we believe that was clearly demonstrated for any honest person who is capable of following points.  


So, with regard to your question, yes, a denial of the Trinity is sufficient grounds to conclude someone is not worshipping God.  It is a dogma that the true worship of God is unique to the Catholic religion. 


Vatican II Debate on Nostra Aetate #3 and the Muslims [video]




MHFM: These are some photographs of a nice sunset, which we took on the monastery’s grounds.


Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Article_pictures\web1_30.jpg



Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Article_pictures\web2_30.jpg

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Article_pictures\web3_30.jpg




Subject: Question about Exorcism



I am turning to you, who are doing such a great job for the catholic religious faith, like nobody else in the whole world.

I'm looking for an exorcist in Europe (Germany and around). I am afraid, my son is possessed by at least one evil spirit. Nobody believes me, but I know I am right. Actually, I am afraid many people in this world are possessed and they don't know it. They go to doctors to treat their problems, but curing physical and psychological illnesses cannot remove the spiritual disease. That - in the meantime - goes unrecognized and does a lot of harm to those who suffer from it and to their surroundings.

Can you recommend someone? I already wrote to the Archdiocese in Prague, but they never bothered to reply.

Your answer will be greatly appreciated,

Jane Kollar


MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  Most people can overcome such problems without an exorcism, if they wholeheartedly do the things we are about to specify.  We have made this point before.  There are a number of things your son needs to do right away.  If he doesn’t do them, his problem almost certainly will get worse; and if he’s not willing to do them then the efforts of others on his behalf will be fruitless.  


First, he needs to pray the Rosary each day.  This is very important.  How to do so is on our website.  He should also say the prayer to St. Michael the Archangel each day.  Second, he needs to familiarize him with the basic Catholic catechism, and hold all the correct theological positions on the Catholic faith in our times (specified on the website).  When convinced, he should make the traditional profession of faith from the Council of Trent (in the “Steps to Convert” section).  Those who obstinately adhere to a heretical position or support a heretical group remain under Satan’s power.  Third, perhaps he goes to the New Mass or supports a heretical church he should not be supporting?  If so, that activity needs to stop.  Fourth, he needs to stop committing any clear mortal sins he might be committing.  Unfortunately, most people are committing mortal sins of the flesh.


Fifth, you and he need to refrain from giving attention to dreams or events you believe are the result of demonic activity.  Ignore them.  Do not think about them.  Focus on moving toward God, converting to the Catholic faith, and fulfilling God’s will.  The more attention one gives to signs or events one perceives to be the result of demonic activity, the more influence they are often enabled to have in one’s life.  We do quote things about instances of demonic influence to show people the reality of the spiritual war.  In that way, they can be instructive and they can inspire people to pray, etc.  However, if such things happen in his life, he should ignore them.  If he does the things mentioned above, his problem should be solved; and, most importantly, he will move toward eternal salvation.


The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

How to Pray the Rosary [pdf]


New Video


MHFM: For those it might interest, this is a new video.


Questions from a man who "Committed Suicide" [video]




1929 to 1969 is 40 years, those dates seem like markers of some kind on the Great Apostasy, the renewed pagan Roman Empire of Apocalypse with the 7 kings including the 5 antipopes beginning in 1929...in 1969 the abomination of desolation being set up in the counter-mass of the V2 sect....isn't 1929 the year Our Lady came to Sister Lucia in Tuy asking for the Immaculate Heart devotion in order to stop all the horrors she described would descend upon the world if Russia were not consecrated to her immaculate heart? In Wisdom it talks about the 5 Cities that are utterly destroyed (Sodhom, Gomoarh etc) and this reminds me of the 5 anti-popes who go off into destruction along with the whole renewed pagan Roman empire (Apoc.).... and 1929 was the year of the Wall Street crash and the beginning of the Great Depression. Now it seems like we are going into the "Greater Depression". It seems like we are all living on borrowed time but God is mercifully giving us time to help us convert… we must do penance to try to save ourselves and others too from hell.


The C2C radio show was most excellent, great job Brother Michael Dimond. It is very nice of MHFM to help people like the C2C listeners and the guy "Jimmy", these people are all receiving inestimable graces in order to convert to the only true religion, the catholic faith.




Subject: Jimmy


Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the excellent video of the conversation with Jimmy the Novus Ordite. The bad-will of such individuals who, after having seen the facts, obstinately cling to the Vatican II sect, is astounding. He even admitted that the New "Mass" is from the Devil, but then was unsure about whether to go or not. It shows that he is not oriented towards God, but rather towards man. Also the fact that despite spending a lot of his time in bed, he claims he cannot pray the 15 decade Rosary everyday speaks volumes. It appears that God does not even give him the grace to pray the full Rosary because he obstinately clings to the New "Mass," as if Jesus Christ were present in it, when He is not. Hopefully he will convert to the Catholic faith by fully believing in the salvation dogma, and rejecting the Vatican II sect, its Antipopes and "baptism of desire," since it appears that many people who compromise the Catholic faith today are compromised in those areas first.

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino,” 1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives.”

St. Louis De Montfort (1710): “Blessed Alan de la Roche who was so deeply devoted to the Blessed Virgin had many revelations from her and we know that he confirmed the truth of these revelations by a solemn oath. Three of them stand out with special emphasis: the first, that if people fail to say the Hail Mary (the Angelic Salutation which has saved the world) out of carelessness, or because they are lukewarm, or because they hate it, this is a sign that they will probably and indeed shortly be condemned to eternal punishment.” (Secret of the Rosary, p. 45)

God Bless,

Chris White




Subject: Luther Video Comment


Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,

I appreciate your response to the person who refuses to watch your videos because you disable comments. Contrary to that person's position, I actually prefer watching videos that have comments disabled. Most comments are distracting, rude, vulgar, or just plain obtuse. With a few exceptions, I also prefer going to websites that do not have comments.  Your e-exchanges section is one of those exceptions, since I frequently learn or am inspired by the many fine letters on your site.

In Mary,




Subject: Check out Russian activists sue Madonna for $10m in ‘moral damages’ — RT


Russian activists sue Madonna for $10m in ‘moral damages’ — RT


More bad news for the Grunerites and others of his ilk who, distorting the message of Fatima, not only give people false hope -- but worse -- keep them locked in the Counterfeit Catholic Church and in union with the Antichrist and the False Prophet. God bless MHFM for giving us the truth about Fatima because, even though all persons have enough information to see that there are serious problems with the prevalent stories about Fatima (with the imposter Sister Lucy contradicting herself and denying the Catholic faith), it was MHFM's research and analysis that helped us to actually piece the deceptive puzzle together -- and really understand the breath, gravity and significance of Our Lady of Fatima who is the Woman Clothed with the Sun. Gruner and the other false preachers of Fatima who pass themselves off as "authorities" and "scholars" on Fatima are, in fact, anything but since they refuse to honestly examine the facts, they hide the facts, and they perpetrate lies. They would have us believe that Our Lady of Fatima approves the rejection of her Son and His true Church. What blasphemy.


Lee Ann




Subject: Baptism of desire & St. Paul


I just watched your bill o'reilly segment. There is no doubt b.o.d. is a satanic doctrine. I was just talking about this with a friend of mine, and he didn't believe God would send good people to hell. So, I asked him, what then is your motive for evangelizing? He's a man of few words, so he just looked at the ground, then looked at me and said, 'you’re right'.

Imagine if St. Paul believed in baptism of desire? Christianity may not be here today and we'd all be damned. This demonstrates the subversive anti-christ belief of baptism of desire.

On a side note, I've been Catholic almost one year. I won't go into the details of how God brought me to this point, but it's been an interesting journey. I love the Catholic faith. So I read some books by saints, then I delved into past encyclicals of some Popes at random. I just happen to read Pascendi Gregis by Pope St Pius X. Then I read Mortalium Animos by Pope Pius XI… I then stumbled upon nostra aetate and realized, almost immediately, something was very very wrong. You had these Popes writing against modernism, then you check the date on nostra aetate and you can visibly see... "ok, this is what they were talking about.... It's here!" The parts that exceedingly made my face go numb with shock were the parts on muslims worshiping the same god as Catholics... I had previously read some of the quran and as you know it states that the Trinity is 'father,son&mary'. Islam is from the pits of hell to strike fear in the weak against the very notion of a Creator. Also, the views N.A. promoted on the Jews! Totally anti-biblical, illogical, heretical and anti-christ.

So anyway, I've been going through your channel and agree with the position. It's obvious 'popes' who would stand by these blood curtling breaks from Catholic teaching, are not only not-popes, not only not-Catholic, but they're evil on-purpose and have damned souls on account of their actions and decrees. I cannot fathom, souls who have chosen to align themselves with the organization the Savior of the world has lovingly established upon Peter, only to draw out plans to pervert it out of existence even though it's absolutely impossible. Are they crazy? Do they not fear the Lord? I do not know, but the evidence points to them having absolutely no faith, no fear of hell, and no concern for the salvation of souls. Some Catholic acquaintances I've presented these ideas to have admitted these errors, but insist on 'sticking with the pope.' These people are no dummies, but sticking with the assassins of the Catholic faith, nothing could be more dangerous. I think people are swayed by the idea of "it looks like a duck, it walks like a duck, it must be a duck!" But, it doesn't quack like a duck, so, it's not a duck, therefore in Catholic terms, it's an abomination. "Embraced or rejected as a whole" People see this as uncharitable, but it is uncharitable not to tell them the Good News, in no uncertain terms, people deserve that. It is uncharitable not to tell them and let them go to hell. It's almost as if Martin Luther has become ‘pope’ since '59. The devil doesn't announce to the world, "Hey, I'm changing things to damn souls," no, he works as a serpent. He's cloaked in his workings and moves slow as to go by unnoticed... So, thanks for your material.




MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  We do know why the antipopes do what they do: it’s because they are heretical and evil.




Subject: Coast to Coast


Dear Brothers:


I was going to listen to the Coast to Coast recording tomorrow, but after reading CM's email, I couldn't wait and had to listen this evening. Am I glad I did. Brother Michael did a wonderful job conveying a large amount of information very clearly. And, just in case he needed more evidence that we are in the apostasy from the true faith, that woman caller named Teresa called up and provided it: she referred to both JP2 and Ratzinger as "saints"! To these apostates every person that denies Jesus Christ and all things Catholic is a saint!... Brother Michael presented a wonderful gift to Jesus and Mary on the feast of Our Lady's Assumption.


Lee Ann




Subject: Coast to Coast AM


Dear MHFM,


All the first caller, Theresa, could do was emote. She could not bring herself to consider the facts Brother Michael was giving. She relied on verbal assault tactics (to make her feel justified in her positions). You could hear them in the way she intoned her voice, getting all worked up almost into a frenzy. So many heretics seem to live by emotion and for the sake of emotion alone.




MHFM: She is actually a prime example of the deception of the final days and the Antichrist: she’s totally convinced that the two most evil men of the period (John Paul II and Benedict XVI) are the holiest.  She has imbibed the same worship of the Antipope and Antichrist exhibited by the adherents of false apparitions and the “John Paul II, we love you” crowd.  In other words, if people wonder how the deception of the antichrist plays out, and who its victims are, just consider her as one small example. 




Subject: “Suicide Video”


Dear Brothers,


I just finished watching the twenty minute video about the NO Catholic who called in to the monastery. What a powerful video in that it shows the thinking patterns of a lot of NO Catholics and how far off base they are in their thinking. Brother Peter continually "painted this man into a corner" with "Jimmy's" own words in an effort to get him to admit his shortcomings with the Rosary and the attendance of the new mass. It shows that true love is the pointing out to these people the error of their ways in a desperate attempt to get them back on the track they need to be on to be saved.. it shows how to confront people coming from the NO church…


Bob Bohr




What you don't know about Martin Luther


You ruined a perfectly interesting video, by disabling comments.

I have a personal rule. If you disable comments, I won't watch.

The reason is if you do so, you are scamming us.




MHFM: That's your loss if you won't watch.  The pearls of truth are not for swine like you.  Only a fool would believe that it's a scam to disable comments.  A more discerning, honest, and good-willed person would consider why one disables comments: e.g., to stop people from spreading lies and profanity; to stop people from spreading libel; to stop people from spreading heretical nonsense and garbage links/info which distract from the true and researched points covered in the video.  If one takes the time to put together a presentation, why should he turn his video into a forum or advertisement for those who hate the truth?


Your comment reveals that you are searching for what other people think (i.e., opinions of man), rather than what God has taught or what the facts and the truth of history indisputably show.  Hence, you are deceived because you savor the things of man and not those of God. 


Another revealing part of your e-mail is your self-assured statement that "I won't watch" - as if the world is suffering a major setback because you won't grace it with your undivided attention.  Your pride begets your blindness.  You cannot see that the truth doesn’t need to find you.  You need to find the truth.  You fail to see that if you won't look into this information, then you are the one who will suffer the ultimate loss, in Hell.




Dear MHFM thank you brother michael dimond for your… years of service to our lord Jesus Christ. you are a brave man who speaks the truth to a very wicked and perverse world that does not want to hear the truth. also I would add that if the vatican 2 church is the catholic church and benedict 16 is a true pope. then the catholic church defected on dec 8 1965. it was never the true church. the gates of hell have prevailed over her. there is no more catholic church. lets just give up and surrender to the world. that is how i see it. but of course that is not true or possible. i would say that to a vatican 2 follower… the lord is giving I believe the world a little bit more time to save souls. people! please repent and come into the church and catholic faith before it is too late.! also I believe that fatima was a countdown to the end of the world. possibly the last 100 years before the end of the world . 1917 - 2017?. the miracle of the sun on oct 13, 1917 was an fulfillment of apocalyse 12. fatima was a great sign. thank you and god bless in st benedict , st joseph, in her Immaculate heart. ps people should continue to pray, offer sacrifices, and penances to save souls as our lady requested at fatima, and as the children of fatima practiced. there is no expiration date to this request. from mark vasquez CA




Subject: “committed suicide”


Your videos of talking to people are very helpful. It is hard having a conversation with people today. I use your tactics to help me out…




Was on


MHFM: Bro. Michael Dimond was on Coast to Coast AM with George Noory (Aug. 15th)




Subject: What is Truth


I listened to the latest coast to coast radio program {Aug. 15} and was disturbed at hearing the relativism from the caller, James, saying there are two sides to a coin, as if to falsely infer, that truth is nothing but opinion… They are saying the truth can never be found, without even understanding what they are spewing from their mouths. The world is getting harder and harder to bear!


John 18:37-38 ...For this was I born, and for this came I into the world; that I should give testimony to the truth. Every one that is of the truth, heareth my voice. Pilate saith to him: What is truth?...

2 Timothy 3:7 Ever learning, and never attaining to the knowledge of the truth.


Psalms 5:10 For there is no truth in their mouth; their heart is vain.






… I listened to Brother Dimond on Coast to coast am and I am concerned and wondering if my pastor is validly ordained and able to give the sacraments authentically.Can you help me? Thank you.

P.S. This is not a traditional parish




MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  The parish you mention offers the New Mass, which is invalid and must be avoided.  Before receiving sacraments, one must reach the point where one is committed never to attend the New Mass again, believes in Outside the Church There is No Salvation without exception (no “baptism of desire”), rejects NFP, won’t support any heretical priests, etc.  That’s explained in this file: Where to go to Mass or confession today?  People should also make the traditional profession of faith from the Council of Trent, which can be accessed from the aforementioned file.  Once a person is convinced on all relevant matters, we can help that person with possible locations for receiving sacraments.  We also recommend people to pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible.




Subject: Coast TO Coast interview


Dear Brother Dimond,


I listened to you on CoastToCoast with great interest. You are a very learned, articulate, and brave man. You certainly ruffled a few feathers and “kicked up the dust,” as George Noory said afterwards. I also checked out your website and read some excellent articles. But I must tell you that I chuckled when I saw the reference to Orthodox Christians as “schismatics,” because that is exactly how some of us of the Orthodox persuasion refer to the Catholic and Protestant Churches. Many of the traditional Catholic practices that were wiped out in the 20th century, much to your chagrin, are still the norm in Orthodox services, such as the priest facing the altar, not the congregation, during mass, among many others. Is Orthodoxy (which officially calls itself “Catholic”) not closer to the original church of Christ than contemporary Catholicism or Protestantism? Is not this why the great Catholic theologian, Jaroslav Pelikan, converted to Orthodoxy late in life? I would understand if you could not provide a detailed answer, but a link to some relevant reading from the Catholic perspective would be greatly appreciated.


With respect,


Victor Barac


Toronto, Canada


MHFM: Thank you for the interest.  This section of our website, http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/papacy_mainpage.php, contains audios and other items that show why Eastern “Orthodoxy” is not true Christianity.  The audios examine the evidence for the Papacy in the ancient Church, as well as the inconsistency of the Eastern “Orthodox” position on ecumenical councils.  Hence, that’s the section we think you should consult, in addition to our section on the biblical proof for the Papacy; for the “Orthodox” reject the clear scriptural teaching on the full authority entrusted to St. Peter. 


Not going


Subject: not going to “wedding”…


Someone I know recently told me she thinks I act like someone "from another planet" because I am "too naive" and she basically dumped me as a friend probably the fact that I am not going to attend her non-catholic (second-time-around) wedding didn't help....


But I see how God is taking people OUT of my life......


Seems like one of the most special added helps God gave to Mary's Rosary in these final days is the efficacy for those who pray it to be able to see through the deceptions of the Great Apostasy…The world is on such an edge...how can people "not notice" the times we are in now? Hope all are well at MHFM,








Thank you again for all the great information provided.


Joseph Gelfuso




[Subject: Coast to Coast show]


Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,


Brother Michael, thank you for shaking the "faith" of the Pagans. You shook the Pagan world and sent their Heathen beliefs trembling. I also like it that you are sure to let the Pagans know what the One True Religion is. You also exposed the conciliabula or conventicula or latrocinia ("robber synod") nature of the apostate synod held in 1962, called Vatican II. You also connected Daniel and his prophecies of the Roman empire and the land it comprises as ten horns, to St. John's Apocalypse and phased it in greatly to the Apocalyptic and dreadful figure of the Scarlet Woman, the Mystery Babylon: the robber synod sect of the second Vatican council. In contrast, Anti-Christ John Paul II said (Address to Polish Bishops' Conference, Feb. 2, 1998) "The person of Jesus Christ releases enormous spiritual energy in the world" and he connected this to the idea that man is God, by saying man is the way. He also said (Angelus Address, Oct. 25, 1987) "The sanctuary of Pompeii, with its vast impact on the international level, with the multitudes of pilgrims converging there, with the great complex of works that surround it, witnesses to the powerful energies that the cult of Mary is capable of awakening, energies which, in the last analysis, are embodied in a burning love for man, for the whole man, in his spiritual and in his social and temporal dimensions." Thus, the Anti-Christ promoted a pantheistic system (divinizing man) through his book sized encyclicals. He excites in his adherents a fascination and awe outlook on man. You also connected in the Communist conspiracy being the dragon of the Apocalypse and Our Lady of Fatima being the woman with stars in the Apocalypse.


… the Vatican II religionist apostate lady (Theresa of Arizona) [spewed] her paganism (she is such a pagan that she didn't even know enough of the minimal basics of Christianity to even engage in a coherent discussion or be a member of the Church)… The apostate religionist of Vatican II failed to realize that it is in fact the 'infiltration of the deception' of the Vatican II orientation that is… diabolical… Vatican II sect forums fear you, and also what you say. I remember evangelizing on phone to a novus ordo organization that purports to teach on Catholic matters, and I mentioned your name, website, and also the position called sedevacantism, and the person just dreaded answering the questions, he was losing words from his mouth panicking and saying he had to go. He later emailed me ridiculous lies about Fr. Feeney. I guess he felt he had to give lip service to the Vatican II sect for his daily bread. You shined through the radio show…






Dear MHFM,


… you see how bad willed people walk around in this wicked world thinking they have life. All they have is the seed of satan coursing through their being. These bad willed people need to pray the Three Mysteries of Mother Mary on a daily basis-period! God Bless MHFM for providing Catholic truth in these end times.






Bro. Dimond,


I was on your site the other day and heard a radio program with an atheist and Dr. David White. I was so disappointed that he did not defend the Faith. Perhaps he thought if he really expressed his opinion about atheist having no salvation outside the Church, it could damage his rep. Maybe he believes in BOB, BOD and BAI, but I am not sure.


He could have said so much and used Scriptural evidence to support his position as a traditional Catholic. Anyway, I was still disappointed in him. He did not say anything to defend Christ and his Church!


I have known Dr. White for years. He even came to my wedding and had a scolar put together sung by a few of the Alumni from Annapolis. We really appreciated that he was so kind to do this as a wedding gift… God bless…




MHFM: “Maybe he believes in BOD” and salvation outside the Church?  What planet are you on?  Actually, you are on Earth but human respect has hampered your willingness to accept the truth that’s right in front of you: i.e., he definitely believes in salvation outside the Church.  He confirmed that quite clearly in the discussion.  White isn’t someone who just failed to defend the faith, as you say.  No, he doesn’t have the faith – not at all.  He’s not a Catholic, but a complete heretic.  He do