Winter 2010 E-Exchanges Archive




I have a question for the Dimond brothers that I need to know the answer to. Jesus said in the Bible explicitly that if a man marries a divorced woman he too commits adultery-
Matthew 5:31"It has been said, 'Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.'[f] 32But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery.
Now it is possible that a divorce can be annulled if it is over unfaithfulness- (ie cheating) but what if a man divorces a woman because he no longer wants to be with her. Can that woman (who was divorced seemingly for no fault of her own remarry?
I just have a little trouble getting my head around this exactly.  And the other issue that makes this even less clear to me- is that the Dimonds don't think that the current priests of Vatican 2 are even true priests- hence I wonder if there can even be valid marriages anymore?
Does that mean that no one is right to have sexual relationships anymore since there are no valid marriages?
Please help me understand what is going on in regards to marriage and divorce.


MHFM: The annulment of a marriage simply means that a marriage wasn’t valid to begin with.  If one spouse cheats on another, that does not annul the marriage.  They are still married, even though separation could be justified. 


If a man divorces a woman because he no longer wants to remain with her, the woman is not free to marry.  They are still married.  Again, the marriage is valid unless there was an impediment which existed from the beginning which rendered it invalid.  This topic is covered in this file.  Perhaps it will assist your understanding of this issue:


The Annulment Fiasco - The Vatican II sect's De Facto acceptance of Divorce and Remarriage [PDF File]


Concerning your other question, the “priests” of the Vatican II sect who were ordained in the New Rite of Paul VI are invalid.  But that does not mean that all of the marriages they witnessed were/are invalid.  For in marriage the priest serves as the official witness, while the sacrament is exchange between the two getting married.  Having a valid priest is not absolutely necessary.  That means that there are valid marriages occurring inside the Vatican II sect.




Dear Brothers Michael and Peter


I am writing this e-mail to ask your opinion of Marie Julie Jahenny.  She was a Breton stigmatist and described as one of the greatest mystics of the 20th century.  She also had the stigmata.  As far as I know she was declared Blessed by Vatican 1.  As you are probably aware she made many prophecies, one being the plan to invent the new mass. Our Lord told her that disciples who were not of his gospel were working hard to remake a mass that would contain words which would be odious in his sight.  She also prophesied all the false apparitions. I would really like to read her biography but have found it impossible to find a bookseller who stocks it… I find it strange that such a holy woman has been completely brushed aside.  


God Bless





Dear Brothers,

I just wanted to comment briefly on your most recent discussion: I listened to the first approximately 3 minutes, and that was enough…

Outside of the Church There is no Salvation

Benedict XVI. claims the Orthodox are in the Church

Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I, 1870, Sess. 4, Chap. 3, ex cathedra:
"… all the faithful of Christ must believe that the Apostolic See and the Roman Pontiff hold primacy over the whole world, and the Pontiff of Rome himself is the successor of the blessed Peter, the chief of the apostles, and is the true vicar of Christ and head of the whole Church... Furthermore We teach and declare that the Roman Church, by
the disposition of the Lord, holds the sovereignty of ordinary power over all others… This is the doctrine of Catholic truth from which no one can deviate and keep his faith and salvation."

Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra: “There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which nobody at all is saved, in which Jesus Christ is both priest and sacrifice.”

What a bunch of fools these guys are, it disgusts me. Also, your series on the Apocalypse is very good, though I'm struggling a bit with the beast of chapter 13 being more things, although that's probably not impossible, as Apocalypse 17 shows - 7 mountains and seven kings, whereas in chapter 13 we are, I believe, more or less supposed to figure things out ourselves, so I guess it's not incompatible at all.

Glod bless you,

Jakub Eisenbruk


MHFM: With regard to the beast, the Apocalypse describes it as having various heads and also attributes what happens to the head who is wounded to the beast.  Therefore, it fits precisely with what is said for the beast to be viewed from the standpoint of the entity (or empire) coming out of the sea with seven heads and from the standpoint of the head of the beast who is wounded.


Is the World about to End ? - Part 1

Is the World about to End ? - Part 2

Is the World about to End ? - Part 3

Is the World about to End ? - Part 4

Is the World about to End ? - Part 5

Is the World about to End ? - Part 6

Is the World about to End ? - Part 7

Is the World about to End ? - Part 8 - Mark of the Beast

Is the World about to End ? - Part 9 - Mark of the Beast

Is the World about to End ? - Part 10





Dear MHFM,

My name is Glenn, I am a Catholic. I just want to ask a question, Who are the "elect" in Matthew Chapter 24? Are they only Catholics? thank you for your time. God bless.



MHFM: The elect refers to the elect: those who will be saved.  Yes, it refers only to Catholics (or those who become Catholics).  Jesus says: “Then if any man shall say to you: Lo here is Christ, or there, do not believe him. For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect.” (Matthew 24:23-24)


It’s not possible for the elect to be deceived.  But what He is saying is that the deception will be so profound that it will touch upon areas implicating or surrounding the true faithful.  This fits precisely with a Counter Church.  The elect will see through the deception of the Counter Church, but the deception will occur in areas where the elect normally might be or normally might look.  We believe this passage refers, at least on some level, to the countless false apparitions of the past few decades, especially during the reign of Antipope John Paul II.  They were false appearances of Christ and Our Lady which were crucial in building up the antipope and the Counter Church and keeping people in it.




Subject: Why?




I came across this and thought I'd pass this on to you and your readers;


Why MHFM and all the faithful are right? Two of the many reasons: First, because what so many Sovereign Pontiffs had condemned as anathema, the Vatican II popes have contradicted and become the apostates that holy saints warned against. Secondly, because prior to Vatican II, the four indelible marks of the Church were intact and in full effect: One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic.  With so much dissension and veering from the Truths and Traditions of Holy Mother Church the conciliar church formed at Vatican II cannot be 'One'.


The barren fruits stemming from Vatican II along with the shocking scandals and lowering of the moral virtue bar give solid evidence the church of Vatican II cannot be 'Holy'.


Because, except in the True Church of the Catacombs, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass has been abandoned in favor of a Protestant service that seeks to de-mystify the Mystery of Faith…


Finally, because of the modernist, progressive agendas and the insidious infiltration of the satanic, Masonic and Communist operatives within the Church, the bishops have, by their refusal to uphold the Faith and place their flock as their top priority, abdicated their apostolic succession and made this well known with their assertion that it is not necessary to become Catholic anymore. Therefore, the church of Vatican II can never be 'Apostolic.'


Saint John Fisher said that "He who goes about to take the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass from the Church plots no less a calamity than if he tried to snatch the sun from the universe."  Pope St. Felix III stated clearly what we must do: "Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it; and indeed to neglect to confound evil men, when we can do it, is no less a sin than to encourage them."  


The "Apostle of Tradition" Saint Athanasius who, in the time of the Arian heresy which pales in comparison to the heresies abounding today, stated, "They can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true Faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the Faith dwells within you. Let us consider: what is more important, the place or the Faith? The true Faith, obviously. Who has lost and who has won in this struggle - the one who keeps the premises or the one who keeps the Faith? Even if Catholics who remain faithful to the Traditions are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ."


God Bless,

Tom Miles




Hello Brothers!
Yesterday on CBC, late in the evening after the hockey game, they did a segment on one of their shows about God and atheism. They had three guests and one was Richard Dawkins. They called him the Pope of atheism. When the host of the show introduced him, a lot of applause and cheer from a young audience came his way. The host talked about how Dawkins was raised in a religious family but Dawkins abandoned religion after he discoverd Charles Darwin. I laughed a bit when I heard that. I mean, isn't there anyone greater in this big scam then Charles Darwin? If I wanted to convert someone to the Catholic faith, I sure wouldn't instruct them to learn from Benedict XVI or John Paul II. There are a lot of flaws in Darwin’s theory.
Dawkins, throughout the show, continuously made statements how there is not a single doubt that evolution is true (I laughed again). He also stated how there are two different meanings to the term theory, basically trying to twist things to make the evolution theory seem like a reality. And my favourite of all, he said that you wouldn't deny evolution, just like you wouldn't deny the holocaust, because they are both historically true. In the end, the host asked him to tell us one thing to prove that evolution really is true. He said something regarding DNA. I can't remember it but I know I wasn't impressed.
Throughout the whole show I kept thinking about your video on Creation and Miracles, Past and Present. I wondered what Dawkins would say if someone asked him how big was the sun 100 million years ago?
I hope you make more videos on science and creationism, and exposure on the evolution hoax. The news articles on how more and more scientists are converting to creationism, and how creationism is growing is really pleasing to read. Although its pleasing to read that they are rejecting evolution, most of them, if not all, still reject the true faith, which is the most important thing of all.
Since I'm really interested in this subject, do you have any books or videos that you could recommend to me that deal with debunking evolution and support creationism? Perhaps your readers could suggest something as well.
All the best,
God Bless!
Danijel Filipovic


MHFM: Besides Creation and Miracles and the other videos we feature on our videos page, we would recommend the book we offer by Dr. Walt Brown: In the Beginning.  In our view, this is the best and most in-depth refutation of evolution.


Book: In the Beginning by Dr. Walt Brown




In reviewing new (Rossi) debate, it seems obvious that "the Whore" of the final days---- heretics,  enemies of Christ and of His Bride, the Holy Catholic Church---- have attempted [but failed miserably,  OF COURSE!]   to lay hands on the HOLY WORDS of consecration in the Mass,  and even on Jesus in the Most Blessed Sacrament, in a way only "the Whore" could our would ever dare to attempt to do!!.....we know all this was prophesied by Pope Leo XIII's Prayer to the Archangel St. Michael written around the turn of the last century (about 1900)...but God has once again proven that NOONE can lay unholy hands on holy things,  words and people consecrated by HIM---especially JESUS--and live to talk about it!  This reminds one of how God protected His Holy Ark in the Old Testament.  God is eternally HOLY and NOTHING unclean can touch Him!  Thanks to the historical testimony of the true Teaching Magisterium-----(which has not been wiped away despite the enemy's best attempts to do so during the prophesied end-times Eclipse of the Church per Our Lady of La Salette and Our Lady of Fatima)--- and thanks to several remaining true Catholics brave enough to reveal them to the world… ------ the Catholic Mass,  and Faithful Bride, still remains pure and inviolate---in spite of all modernism and Vatican doubts that even as much as 15 or 20 years ago this type of internet communication making all of this transfer of information possible could even have occurred to reach all of His scattered sheep..   




Dear Brothers Dimond   


Brother peter did an excellent series/ debates with the blind GREG ROSSI, he sounds like a martian from another planet.  He can’t grasp simple truths of the faith…




Parts 10-13 of New Debate Posted


This is a discussion/debate between Bro. Peter Dimond of Most Holy Family Monastery and Greg Thomas Rossi.  It concerns whether Benedict XVI is a valid pope and what the Catholic Church teaches on Outside the Church There is No Salvation.  It's a wide-ranging debate-conversation with a more flexible and informal style.  Rossi is an apologist for a Novus Ordo group. Mr. Rossi wrote in to Most Holy Family Monastery and challenged our beliefs.  He also asserted that we don't understand Catholic teaching, and thus a debate/conversation occurred.


Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 1

Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 2

Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 3

Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 4

Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 5


Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 6

Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 7

Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 8

Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 9


Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 10

Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 11

Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 12

Catholic Salvation-Sedevacantism Debate - 13





Subject: Debate


Dear Brothers:


We should not have been surprised to learn that Greg Rossi is an apologist for the Novus Ordo "religion". Whether they're writing newsletters, speaking to groups, etc. these blind leaders of the blind always belly-up to the front of the pack to preach their false gospels.  And whether their "apostolate" is large or small, they have delusions of grandeur and/or delusions of sanctity:  they're on a mission from God!


They are on a "mission", all right, but not from God.  Puffed up with pride and self-importance, these individuals cannot see that they are simply employing the double-think and communications strategies of hell.  And, sadly, their audiences are all too ready to accept their drivel.  And this may be due - at least in part - to the most sinister characteristic of novus-ordo speak.  The listener's mind is assaulted in rapid succession with so many bits and pieces of extraneous "information" - whether false or irrelevant - so that a kind of mental meltdown occurs. TV does the same thing - and it's not the way God designed our minds to work.  I think that's why it takes so long (and much grace is needed) for even a person of good will to dig his way out of the snare. 


The debate is an instuctional gem; thanks so much for posting it.  Although I am not the world's best typist, I am seriously thinking of transcribing it.  How useful it would be in demonstrating not only the deceptive techniques the false church uses, but also the layers of lies upon lies that are perpetrated by its devotees.  For example: It never dawns on these people that there is no Protestant sect that claims Jesus Christ as its Founder.  All Protestants know when and where their sect was founded and by whom - in other words, they all know that they are in a man-made "religion".  Often, the founder of the sect is considered a "hero".  Same for the schismatics.


Furthermore, if these individuals "sincerely" believed in Jesus and in the Bible as they claim, then one can presume they would actually read it - especially the New Testament.  If they actually read it, they would find the Catholic Faith.


The nonsense about the poor "invincibly ignorant" individual - whom nobody actually knows - is also something you hear all the time.    Things like:  "I just can't believe that the poor native in Africa can't be saved".  No, you just won't believe in the dogmas of the Church.  It never dawns on these individuals that Our Lord told His Apostles and disciples to teach all nations, and there is no reason to think that they did not.  Not all would accept the Gospel and others, having at first done so, would later apostatize.  Cyrene was in Africa.  The Council of Carthage was in Africa.  The Ethiopian baptized by Philip was from Africa (and went back to Africa).  And an epistle was sent from Rome to the African bishops in the year 418.  (Denzinger #109).  But these are facts and people who love the lie don't love facts.  Nor do they tell others the facts.


Nor will they admit that in an Apostasy, God does not abandon His people; His people abandon God.  To insist on Salvation outside the Church and thus to deny that God can and will give the grace of conversion to any man of good will - anywhere and anytime - is to deny God's mercy, justice, omniscience, omnipotence, and truth.  It is an attempt to make God in the image of man.


One last comment:  If anyone has not yet read Brother Peter's book on Outside the Catholic Church There is Absolutely No Salvation, they absolutely should.  This could easily be one of the most important - if not the most important books - one could ever read.  It can make all the difference.


Thanks to MHFM for all you do,





To expound a little more on what Sanjiv said, Brother Peter wrote a book called Outside the Catholic Church there is absolutely no salvation and in it he wrote about how St. Isaac Jogues suffered incredibly to save souls who were ignorant about God and unbaptized.  St. Isaac Jogues went to extremes to instruct and baptize those who were about to die or were going to be killed so that these souls wouldn't be damned.  Another example would be the corporal and spiritual works, in the spiritual works,  one of the practices of a Catholic is to instruct the ignorant.  St. Paul says to Timothy in 2 Timothy 4:3 , For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: 4:4 And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables.  Now on the other hand,  I attach to Brother Peter and Michael verses 2 and 5: Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, retreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine. 5 But be thou vigilant, labour in all things, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill thy ministry. Be sober.  5  "An evangelist"... a diligent preacher of the gospel.  If these vatican ll people would just research and search the true faith they would know what is going on but they don't care enough and they are lovers of this world!  These people live a life of contradiction!!!=


True Mass


Thanks for defending the True Catholic Mass in section 12 of the newly posted debate with heretic Rossi.  I am sure doing this debate was somewhat annoying for MHFM considering both Rossi's heresy and his diabolical obstinacy:  however I think this whole debate was very worthwhile to sort of "refresh" the memory of some sedevacantists as to exactly why it is they chose to LEAVE the V2 counter-church and the horrible,  EVIL V2 counter-mass.  It is my humble opinion that no honest individual could listen to part 12 of this debate and even attempt to "justify" the V2 counter-mass.  On the feast day of Pope Saint Pius V,  I certainly do thank God for sending us this truly HOLY pope who so VERY CLEARLY stated that if someone ever DARED to change the words of the consecration as to change their meaning,  this sacrament would fail to be validly confected.  I think this point ALONE ought to be enough for any HONEST seeker of the Truth about the Catholic mass..........however ALL the additional points Brother Peter Dimond sets forth here in part 12 of this debate, I think, are way more than enough to help anyone of good will understand the truth of what MHFM has been saying about why the V2 counter-mass is INVALID----PERIOD!  End of story!  Thanks for making this info all so clear--I certainly will recommend listening to this debate to anyone who I think has a chance of grasping the significance of what you have said on all of these absolutely crucial issues.




Gates of Hell




You can't prevail against the Catholic Church, because it is the Holy Spirit of God is dwelling in it. even your father of lies, Satan can't. you have no truth in yourself. why? because you're trying to explain the truth out of the context of it. And another thing, no body even Jesus knows the end of the world, only God the Father, and you have already starting to talk about it, are you claiming that you know more than Jesus the son of God?




MHFM: What a surprise that another Vatican II heretic misapplies/misquotes a Scripture or a Catholic teaching?  No man knows the day or the hour of the Second Coming (Mark 13:32); but people can know that we are in the final days.  Even Sr. Lucia of Fatima told Fr. Fuentes that we are in the final days.  You hold that the gates of hell (heretics) have prevailed against the Church.  You conflate the gates of Hell (Benedict XVI, Kasper, etc.) with the Church.  You are in communion with the gates of Hell (heretics), and you will end up forever with the gates of Hell (heretics) if you don’t wake up and convert. 


Pope Vigilius, Second Council of Constantinople, 553: “… we bear in mind what was promised about the holy Church and Him who said the gates of Hell will not prevail against it (by these we understand the death-dealing tongues of heretics)…”


Pope St. Leo IX, Sept. 2, 1053: “The holy Church built upon a rock, that is Christ, and upon Peter… because by the gates of Hell, that is, by the disputations of heretics which lead the vain to destruction, it would never be overcome.”


St. Thomas Aquinas (1262): “Wisdom may fill the hearts of the faithful, and put to silence the dread folly of heretics, fittingly referred to as the gates of Hell.” (Intro. To Catena Aurea.)




Dear Brothers Michael and Peter:


Arguably, the greatest heresy of Vatican II was the change from Catholic teaching that the "Church is the Catholic church...." to the "Church subsists in the Catholic church....".


The phrase "subsists in," is an implicit renunciation of the Catholic Church's traditional claim to be the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church founded by Christ. The "liberals" welcomed this supposed change, which they thought would lead to an increase in ecumenism and prospects for Christian unity; while the "conservatives" pointed out that true unity can only occur when everyone embraces the Truth, and they argued that this phrase was, at best, obfuscating the truth.


How remarkable is it that the Talmudic Communist Counterfeit church of Vatican II uses the same word "subsist" to dissolve the true teaching as the Arians did in the 4th century.  In St. Athansius day the Arians proposed the same wording "subsists" for the Creed.  Traditional and true teaching at that time was that the "son is consubstantial with the Father" and Arius and 97% of the "bishops" wanted it changed to "the son subsists in the father". The "Arians" truly didn't believe that Jesus Christ was God and that he was only a man.  Constantine exiled St. Athanasius because he wouldn't accept the wording "subsist".  It is my understanding that St. Athanasius didn't accept it predominately for the reason that the Arius followers would still think that Jesus was only a man.


Can you please comment on 1) whether I have a true understanding of what happened at the council with this wording and a true understanding of what St. Athanasius said and meant? 2) whether or not the change to "subsist" in Lumen Gentium is the greatest heresy of Vatican II? and 3) as so many of the documents from Vatican II are noteworthy for not only their errors but their obfuscations, omissions and outright heresies that one can only assume is was done because Vatican II and the last five antipopes were so intent and had already, through so many devious devices, laid the groundwork for already in place lay people and organizations, who were Catholic apostates and "liberals" to begin with, to promote this heresy since the 1960"s?


God speed to you and may God help you both in your work...


Paul R.


MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail.  We agree with you that the change from the Church of Christ “is” the Catholic Church, to “subsists in,” is another example of Vatican II’s heretical intentions and mindset.  However, we do not believe that it’s Vatican II’s worst or clearest heresy, and it’s probably not in the top twenty.  Nevertheless, it’s definitely something that offends Catholic teaching and provides further proof that Vatican II holds and teaches that heretics and heretical sects are part of the Church of Christ; for that’s clearly the reason they used “subsists” instead of “is.” 




Dear Brothers,


Your most recent debate with Gregory Thomas Rossi demonstrates the profound desperation Novus Ordites and heretics in general are in to avoid the truth. Every twisted and perverted tactic in the book is used by them to lie, distort, fabricate and generally create the illusion that they believe in Jesus Christ and His One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, without however having any faith whatsoever! It is not surprising at all that such evil-willed beasts, walking flames, meet their end with Hell. The only thing that would restrain me on this point is that we don't know what was said after the recording stopped or what he will do in the future. However, statistically speaking, he's lost forever. It's an infinite malice to reject God's Truth - Catholic Dogma - because He, in the form of a man, suffered more than anyone has, is, or will suffer for anything, so that we may know the Truth and be set free from sin. It is telling that Greg admitted, though reluctantly, that he had seen MHFM's material on the invalid New Mass, the Salvation dogma, etc. but still argued against all common sense on these issues. What does it take? Obviously nothing will budge the obstinate except a profound miracle of grace, which is only granted to very few …


Benedict XVI's blatant apostasy by writing to the Rabbi of Rome saying "The Lord... wished you to have... salvation," is insane. Nothing could be further from the truth. Obviously their lord is Satan, with whom there is no salvation whatsoever. When will they ever learn? (never) Also, "Cardinal" Walter Casper's honorary award form the American Jewish Community proves that he's a total apostate. The Vatican II sect's hierarchy just can't get enough of the Jews. Why don't they just come out of the closet and call the Vatican a synagogue?!! Added to that is "Archbishop" Dolan's encouragement to strengthen Catholic-Jewish relations, as though Heaven and Hell should dialogue! His statement that "to forget is heretical" is heretical itself! It's not a dogma of the Catholic faith that we must always remember things, especially not events that didn't even occur, such as the World War II "Holocaust." So they admit that it is an article of their Antichrist faith to "always remember the "Holocaust""...


God Bless,


Chris White




To whom it may concern,


I am not a sede (yet).  I came across your website a few weeks ago and have been checking it out.  I had fled from the Novus Ordo to the Byzantine Church… Still I avoid the NO, but my family is still heavily involved in it, so I have the misfortune of going once or twice a year.  Anyway, I thought that this hymn coincided with your understanding of John Paul II’s theology with regard to ‘dissolving Christ.’   This is in the 2010 Hymnal, and was sung yesterday at my niece’s First Communion.  Not sure how it avoids being heretical.  There were other questionable hymns, but they were merely ambiguous, this one was, I thought, blatantly heretical.  Have you ever looked at the new hymns?





Novus Ordo Hymn:


I myself am the bread of life.

You and I are the bread of life,

taken and blessed, broken and shared by Christ

that the world might live.


This bread is spirit,

gift of the Maker’s love,

and we who share it know that we can be one:

a living sign of God in Christ.


Here is God’s kingdom

given to us as food.

This is our body, this is our blood,

a living sign of God in Christ.


Lives broken open,

Stories shared aloud,

become a banquet, a shelter for the world:

a living sign of God in Christ.  (


MHFM: Wow, that hymn is really something.  It’s a prime example of how the Counter Church of the Antichrist has imbibed, on the local level, the doctrine that was taught by the Antichrist: the dissolving of Christ, that each man is Christ.  You need to get out of the invalid New Mass and recognize that Benedict XVI is not the pope!




Subject: Invincible Ignorance Debate


Please read the short conversation below. The setting is a parallel universe, in the outskirts of 1st century Rome, all fictional.

St. Peter: Lord, Lord where are you going.
Jesus: I’m going to Rome, to be crucified a second time.
St. Peter: Why my Lord?
Jesus: Because my faithful sheep are being crucified there.
St. Peter: No, please do not go there.
Jesus: Why not?
St. Peter: There are no Christians there. We did not preach in the capital. I visited Rome just to see the games.
Jesus: Then tell me, where are my sheep being persecuted? Athens? Antioch? Alexandria? I must tend to my Holy ones.
St. Peter: There are no Christians there too, my Lord.
Jesus: What? Didn’t my Father and I send you the Holy Spirit? Didn’t I convert the heart of St. Paul so that he can preach my Gospel to the whole world? Where did you preach? And where are my sheep? (Jesus is visibly upset)
St. Peter: We indeed received the Holy Spirit. But we had a better idea. By a new ecumenical council, we decided not to preach at all, even in Jerusalem. Paul and James had to obey the council so they did not preach to the multitude as well.
Jesus: What better idea are you talking about?
St. Peter: From Greg Rossi. He suggested that we can save more souls by “invincible ignorance“. That's less work for me too! Genius!

I hope the egos of confused modernists are disarmed for just a moment. Please look at the ignorance idea really closely and sincerely. What are the consequences of "invincible ignorance" as an exception for and as a quantifier to salvation? Greg Rossi's entire defense of the Vatican II sect is based on "invincible ignorance" (indifferentism and relativism are his real personal beliefs). Both of which are condemned (Syllabus of Errors, Oath against Modernism.) If the ignorance argument is true, the initiative is to keep everyone lost and in the dark for they can say: "You can't condemn me, I didn't know any better!"  This is clearly wrong. Its obviously one's duty to know what salvation requires and that is the Catholic faith held whole and inviolate. There is no excuse. And what was the initiative of the saints? To urgently spread the Gospel despite experiencing suffering or martyrdom. They died so that we may NOT live in ignorance anymore! And the Novus Ordo sect are spiritually killing them all over again. I pray the apostates get the picture. (And by the way, I'm just talking about the ignorant, what about the obstinate? That's even more obvious.)

Personally I think this "invincible ignorance" brouhaha is a joke, and so it should be treated like a joke. 

With prayers,





Subject: Core


Dear brothers in Christ,

Regarding your recent debate I can only say that I'm shocked by the bad (ugly to the core!) will and incompetence shown by the V2 heretic Greg (I think it is his
name). I can take listening this debate only as a harsh (and too much deserved) punishment for my too many sins I've done in my sinful life.  In essence these heretics and apostates are doing one and same thing all the time--they are repeating the words of their master, the father of all lies, spoken in Eden--"Surely, you will not die."

Let our Most Holy Mother Mary and St. Joseph pray for you, to keep your strength and patience in defending The Faith.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia




You cannot worship an "Unknown God" and expect Christ to say you have done well in honoring me. If you have not known Christ you cannot know the Father.

FYI "Father" Corapi was in town Saturday doing some all day event at a large arena. I decided to take my MHFM books and Fatima DVD's and hand them out to folks entering in the morning. When I walked up the sidewalk and picked a spot where I could hand out books and materials I put the Fatima DVD inside the books and said would you like a free Padre Pio book and Fatima DVD. I was out of books in about 5 minutes…





Subject: Comment about your recent debate


I just want to say I gotta hand it to you again, for dealing with these complete, utterly idiotic heretics that actually consider themselves Catholics and think they are defending the Church. What complete nonsense! I have only heard the first 2 parts and I just can't take it anymore. I can't keep hearing this nonsense. The level of ignorance, stupidity and bold heresy is just unimaginable and mind-boggling, these guys don't know a thing! I'm not saying that you're picking incompetents to debate them, not at all, but like you said, in truth they are all fools and incompetents and don't know a thing. What darkness! This truly is the Sect of Satan.

Good job, this debate just exposes - once again - the complete satanic, and heretical JOKE the Novus Ordo sect is and all of their unfortunate members. Like I said, it is just incredible how completely heretical they all are and how they don't know anything!






Hello Dimond Brothers - I have listened to all of your previous debates. Regarding this one all that I am able to say is - unbelievable, truly. Heresy is really a horrible terrible thing. That guy is the prime example -  the perfect spokesman for the VII false gospel - true universalism.  Not even slightly reasonable or coherent. It is horrid and very sad, and hard to listen to. Thanks for all your exemplary work and faith.


- Mike


MHFM: Thanks for the comment.  What we realized a long time ago – and we think that more are realizing it through such debates – is that, sadly, almost everyone out there is a liar.  That’s why very few are saved – almost no one is of good will and attracted to truth.  That includes almost all who claim to be Catholics.




Subject: Debate Part 7








Nice work on Rossi debate sections 6-9...Rossi has both verbal as well as mental diarrhea,  sounds like a mouse,  and has the theology of the same.   Rossi is bizarre, just another heretic..... Rossi has no Faith, period.  We are enjoying the Shroud of Turin video, it is fantastic.  Thank you for making this info. available.






The article ends, "In 2005 a baby boy in Manchester was born alive at 24 weeks after surviving three attempts to abort him. He is now a five-year-old school boy." Yes...,it occurs to me that there was a day when I was a "five-year-old school boy". Truly, there is nothing more torturous than the human heart; beyond all description. Who can even begin to explain it? Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us!






I agree with Tom Miles, very well said especially about asking 500 vatican ll members the same question and getting 1500 different answers.  One God, one faith, one baptism, I think it could be summed up with this:


2 Thess. 2: 10 And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: 10 "God shall send"... That is God shall suffer them to be deceived by lying wonders, and false miracles, in punishment of their not entertaining the love of truth. 11 That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity





The series on salvation and sedevacatism with Mr. Rossi reaffirms the teaching of Vatican II that, "man is God".  Mr. Rossi and his fellow sect members are loaded with bad-will, pride and lack the knowledge of the Catholic faith.  They have twisted the truth around so much, in their attempt to fool others that they are christian and that Vatican II is valid, that they have tied their brains in a knot. Their words are like a cesspool swirling around and round without clinging to anything, especially a valid thought.  If you'd ask 500 Vatican II sect members the same question, you'd end up with 1500 or more different answers.

God Bless your work,
Tom Miles


MHFM: Yes, they are loaded with bad will.  Something this debate really drives home (perhaps more than anything else) is what a complete liar he is, and the same is true of similar heretics.  One thing we didn’t mention in the description of the debate (which we have added) is that he is an apologist for a Novus Ordo group which specializes in attempting to refute sedevacantists, etc.


Vatican II


Laudetur Iesus et Maria
To whom it may concern,
In your 38th PDF, you said the following:

Yet, I am unable to find these statements on the Documents on Vatican II:
Please explain. Thank you for your time.
In Corde Iesu,
Enrique M


MHFM: If you click on the Latin version of the Vatican II documents, you will find the ending there.  For instance, if you click on the link, scroll to Dignitatis Humanae (Vatican II’s heretical document on Religious Liberty).  Near the end you will find those words in Latin:


“Haec omnia et singula quae in hac Declaratione edicta sunt, placuerunt Sacrosancti Concilii Patribus. Et Nos, Apostolica a Christo Nobis tradita potestate, illa, una cum Venerabilibus Patribus, in Spiritu Sancto approbamus, decernimus ac statuimus et quae ita synodaliter statuta sunt ad Dei gloriam promulgari iubemus… Ego PAULUS Catholicae Ecclesiae Episcopus.”


“Each and every one of the things set forth in this decree has won the consent of the Fathers.  WE, TOO, BY THE APOSTOLIC AUTHORITY CONFERRED ON US BY CHRIST, JOIN WITH THE VENERABLE FATHERS IN APPROVING, DECREEING, AND ESTABLISHING THESE THINGS IN THE HOLY SPIRIT, and we direct that what has thus been enacted in synod be published to God’s glory… I, Paul, Bishop of the Catholic Church.”


It’s also in some English translations.  For example, see the version by Walter M. Abbott: The Documents of Vatican II.  Perhaps the reason the ending is not found in the Vatican’s English version is because they figured it’s essentially a stock ending which comes after all the documents and didn’t need to be added.


New Mass


Dear Brothers  Dimond.  


I believe the introduction of the new mass was the final countdown to the end of the world and the second coming, but I am not sure exactly when the countdown began exactly.  Was it advent NOV, 30 1969, or advent DEC, 1 1974 when it was made mandatory in its final form?  What is your opinion about this?  Possibly 40 years from these dates or maybe a little over would be a generation to the jews.  The desolation would last a generation.                     






Good Evening Brothers,


It is very saddening after listening to your last debate that basic Catholic teaching is no longer believed in the world today. It is a very simple thing, as you know, one must be in a state of sanctifying grace to see God when they die… This is the reason for such strong language from the Church in regards to salvation. It is IMPOSSIBLE to find salvation outside of the Catholic Church… I believe this because I believe JESUS, my God, who says “You can do no good without me”, and “ I know mine, and mine know me”. Let us continue to pray the angel of Fatima prayer to God, and God will do as he has promised and add to the church daily.


Gary Craft




Brother Dimond,

You really should watch this 1973 movie which is called "The Conflict" and it also went by the title "Catholics". This movie is almost prophetic in depicting just how far the Novus Ordo sect changed true Catholic teachings.






Subject: Greg bad-will


Dear Brothers,


That desolate landscape picture in the sedevacantism/Catholic salvation debate is very appropriate. Greg is really asking for damnation, sadly. He simply refuses to accept the dogmas of the Catholic faith and the necessity of having the Catholic faith for salvation. What a sad case. You’re doing a great job in trying to help him out, Bro. Peter. I'll be interested to know whether he turns the full 180 degrees though.


God Bless,


Chris White


Cardinal John Henry Newman Examined


MHFM: This is a discussion of the positive points, and the significant doctrinal errors, found in the work of the famous 19th century cardinal, John Henry Newman.  For a variety of reasons Newman is an important figure to consider.  It also discusses his ideas on “the development of Christian doctrine.” 


Cardinal John Henry Newman Examined - 1


Cardinal John Henry Newman Examined - 2


More parts will be posted…




Subject: the most ridiculous thing I ever heard


Me: Do child murdering satanists go to hell

"Seminarian": I can't judge.


way later the same one said to me

"Seminarian": I am worried about your salvation (because I’m a sede)


I was talking to another kid, not a false seminarian. He said he couldn't judge.


Me: Can you judge that I’m wrong when I say 2 + 2 = 5 

Him: No






Thank you!

I just want to thank you for posting your videos; they reminded me why I am Catholic. Your videos make me strong in the true faith and they reminded me the words of Christ in Matthew 5.20

For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.

We all need to meditate on those words, again thank you and God Bless!




Santa Clara


There was a pro-gay pro-cross dressing hedonistic drag show at my college Santa Clara University last night, and I am editing the photos and videos I took of this vulgar display. I hope exposing this will do some good…








I find your views of Catholic Doctrine to be completely skewed and otherwise wrong. By refusing to accept the teachings of Vatican II, you are yourself a heretic(s).
You have said that sin is a sin no matter what, even if the sinner has no knowledge of the sin. This make no sense. Why would God damn someone for doing something they didn't even know was wrong?




MHFM: You don’t have any idea what you are talking about.  You are just another clueless Vatican II apostate, who lacks the good will and humility to carefully assess the true arguments.  If you are referring to pagans who are damned for not having heard the Gospel, they are damned for the sins they commit.  They of course have knowledge of the natural law and the things they are doing against it.  That’s why God keeps them in ignorance of the true faith.  If you are talking about heretics, they also are familiar with the teachings they reject and pervert.  So your statement is false, ignorant, dishonest and misleading; but it clearly springs from a heart which rebels against the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation.  You are not Catholic.  Vatican II is filled with blasphemies and rejections of Catholic teaching.  It’s clearly a false council.  Get some humility and look at the material.  Perhaps then you will learn something about the real Catholic faith. 




You are imperfect in many points...


About this video, you are imperfect in many points:

Benedict XVI says that Protestantism is not heresy !

ECUMENISM IS NOT RELATIVISM... And the new protestants are "material" herectics (in moral theologic view)... you forgot to proclaim the true Gospel...  YOU ARE NOT INTERPRETER OF CATHOLIC DOCTRINE... DON'T PRESUME ANY INTERPRETATION BY YOURSELF...

Sorry for your imperfection...! ECUMENISM IS NOT RELATIVISM... SORRY FOR YOU...!




MHFM: Wow, that’s quite a response to Benedict XVI’s clear and outrageous heresy that Protestantism isn’t even heresy.  You people will swallow anything.  You will accept anything and try to justify anything.  Those who reject Catholic dogma are not “material heretics,” but true (or formal) heretics.  If they are not heretics, then no one is!  By accepting his heresy, you prove that ecumenism is relativism.  You have no response to the heretical quote except to agree with it.  You people are just pure liars and total apostates.




I heard someone say online that there was a great metaphor to the Noah's Ark discovery IF it is true and that is that IF we are in the last days the revealing of the Ark would be very much a sign and wonder that implies what the Bible says about the last days that it would be like in the days of Noah.






I would like to thank you guys for exposing the truth about what's going on within the church. I thought it doesn't really matter what church you go to as long as it was bible based. Unfortunately most don't realize their church isn't really bible based nor does it have any authority. But especially your book and your radio program about UFO's Demonic Activity, really helped me get over the notion that aliens are real when they are not. It was a major stumbling block that you helped me overcome.

I have a quick question, is it necessary for a traditionalist priest to have been given the priesthood by another priest or bishop that link back to before Vatican 2? I presume there is a process that one has to go through to get the priesthood validly. Or is it something you get automatically because there is no non heretical or apostate priest available? Because I have a couple of independent traditionalist churches here in the Pheonix area but I don't know if they have to somehow have ties to a pre vatican 2 bishop to be a valid priest. Thanks Again. –Gilbert


MHFM: It’s necessary for a priest to have been ordained in the traditional rite by a bishop who was consecrated in the traditional rite.





Your video on Benedict XVI and Protestantism is true testimony to the limited Catholic knowledge these anti-popes real have. Reading of St. Cyril, he being the Patron of Unity among Christians, and understand that early on in the history of the Church, Catholics were the only Christians. You were either a Christian (Catholic), an off shoot of the true Catholicism (Heretic), or a pagan. Pope Pius XI (1931) and Pope Pius XII (1944) praised St. Cyril for upholding the authority of St. Peter and his successors. In 1931 Pope Pius XI gave to the Universal Church the Feast of the Divine Maternity of Mary on October 11th. It was this day in 1962 that the anti-pope John XXIII chose this feast day as the opening day of the second vatican council as to promote Christian Unity. Though his idea of Christian unity was that all false Christians faiths that developed through the years were equal and better than the True Catholic faith.

A shame that people are like sheep and walk around in herds. A recent TV special showcased how people are so prone to be one of the group rather than speak out.  A room of potential job applicants (actors) hired by the TV program and one unknowing job applicant are sitting in a room filling out their paperwork.  As part of the study, the room begins to fill with smoke from under a door. The hired actors continue to ignore the smoke as it completely fills the room.  The unsuspecting applicant, continues to look around with amazement that no one else is getting up to leave the room. The unsuspecting applicant stays in the potential threat thinking that if no one else is worried than they too will stay and finish the job application.

Although there are many reasons, unbeknown only by God, why are families, friends, and those we meet do not believe the truth, mostly they are comfortable in their lies, not their lives. They do not follow Matthew 7:7, "Ask, and it shall be given you: seek, and you shall find: knock, and it shall be opened to you."

The Bible explains in John 10:25:30 that non-believers are deaf to the truth and are not sheep of God.  "...I speak to you, and you believe not: the works that I do in the name of my Father, they give testimony of me.  But you do not believe, because you are not of my sheep.  My sheep hear my voice: and I know them, and they follow me.  And I give them life everlasting; and they shall not perish for ever, and no man shall pluck them out of my hand.  That which my Father hath given me, is greater than all: and no one can snatch them out of the hand of my Father.  I and the Father are one"

God Bless,
Tom Miles




On placing my next order for the "Fatima" DVD, I would like to thank the Brothers for this highly anticipated treasure. "Fatima" is an extraordinary, landmark documentary - A critical addition to their significant body of work. "Fatima" is a welcome gift for anyone alienated by a crass, hostile cinema that venerates all things profane, deviant and destructive.

For anyone unfamiliar with their earlier DVDs, may I suggest first viewing "Fatima's" eminent predecessor: "Death and the Journey to Hell". The inspired union of stark, breathtaking visuals with an eloquent, provocative narrative becomes a relentless force driving you, daring you to wake-up and comprehend the immensity of the stakes. And, by its conclusion, you should be ready for the next existential challenge: "Fatima - The feature presentation".

If you have found this website and are in possession of the "Fatima" DVD, it is no accident. Like many, it is likely you arrived here simply in search of coherence, facts and evidence. If you have not given up on trying to understand Fatima, but reject the "official" interpretations marginalizing Fatima as an isolated historical phenomenon with no immediate relevance. If the enterprising Vatican inventions, revisions and reversals have not escaped your notice. If you are certain that nothing specifically described or requested by the Mother of God should be treated as an optional, ambiguous metaphor. If you completely reject the Vatican's analysis of the third secret as a kind of renowned "mystery, wrapped in a riddle, inside an enigma". And if you've always known the who-what-where and when of Fatima...Just not the "Why"?! Then your perseverance has been rewarded.

Unparalleled researchers, patient and focused guides, the Brothers make it easy for you. They establish a time-line, identify the principle characters, reveal their underlying motives and show the dynamics linking cause and effect. All questions and objections are addressed and answered. No leap of faith is required. Just the ability to see the visual indictments, to hear the unchangeable, infallible dogmatic evidence and to summon the courage to acknowledge the obvious. Any retreat into comforting rationalizations or obstinate denial is a regrettable failure of will and reason.

So be prepared. It is a turbulent journey. "Fatima" exposes a moral sewer with rapidly expanding boundaries of horror. It illuminates the 50 year, festering nightmare of calculated evil, instigated by human agents freely and knowingly exercising choice. And they have chosen, with malice: Blatant apostasy, idolatry, blasphemy, fakery, flagrant lies, escalating corruption...All directed to the intentional ruination and obliteration of the Catholic Church.

But at the end of the "Fatima" journey, to have gained information, insight and comprehension without the power of change would be a useless exercise in futility and despair. So horror is not the intended destination. Granted, the once familiar, accessible landmarks have been decimated: The traditional Mass, valid sacraments and clergy, the traditional Catholic community... All were targeted and became early casualties of the Vatican's ruthless assault. Going forward, nothing about your practice of the true Faith will ever be easy, convenient or taken for granted.

However, the Mother of God, blessed bearer of the Word Incarnate has not abandoned her children to chaos… Ultimately, it's simple. If you believe her, remain devoted to her, the remedies are sufficient. If you don't, may I again suggest a thoughtful viewing of Fatima's predecessor "Death and the Journey to Hell".

To my sisters and brothers in Christ,



Dear Brothers,


H. Vorsict the heretic seems really confused, though in reality is just bad willed. I don't recall you ever accusing Martin Luther of being a freemason. Also, freemasonry is from Judaism (hence "templars") and is totally Anticatholic and Antichrist. Also, the statement that Luther was against everything which is "unnaturel" is not true. Martin Luther was a total pervert! Also, the last bastion of protestants - sola scriptura. When will they actually start reading their bibles and realize that Catholics wrote the New Testament!!!  


… The Vatican II sect doesn't enforce any ecclesiastical laws, only civil laws. It's the Harlot on top of the Beast. So if it's good for the Beast, the Harlot just has to ride along with it. Since European law forbids discriminating on the grounds of religion, the V-2 sect just hooks up with any old false religion it can find. Far from Antipope Benedict XVI being deposed for visiting and praying with Jews or heretics - he's praised for it by the world and the V-2 sect itself - which indicates who they're siding with (hint: not God). In fact probably the only thing Benedict XVI, etc. explicitly reject is Catholic dogma. They would need to start declaring that baptism of desire is a heresy for anything to change for the better, but that will never happen, of course, since they are not the foggiest bit Catholic!


That's one creepy picture for the recruitment campaign for new V-2 "priests." I suppose it will attract more perverts.


The "Cardinal" Castrillon Hoyos was president of the Vatican II sect's Ecclesia Dei, which Antipope John Paul II established to immediately counteract Archbishop Lefebvre’s consecration of 4 Bishops. His guilt in the latest pedophilia scandal indirectly throws the Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP) into the limelight since Ecclesia Dei is the authority over the FSSP. Also, it is Hoyos who gave the Society of St. Pius X the 5 point ultimatum for returning to full communion with Babylon the Great (the V-2 sect). From DICI: CONCERNING THE ULTIMATUM of Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos - Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos’ document expressed five demands: besides a positive answer requested before the end of June, the Society of St. Pius X, in the person of its General Superior, had to commit itself (1) “to give a response proportionate to the pope’s generosity”; (2) “to avoid any public comment which would not respect the person of the Holy Father and would have a negative impact upon ecclesial charity;” (3) “to avoid claiming a magisterium superior to the Holy Father’s and not to set the Society in opposition to the Church;” (4) “to demonstrate its will to act in all honesty and ecclesial charity, and in the respect of the authority of the Vicar of Christ.” [end quote]


So the SSPX must 1. Believe that the "pope" is being generous and not in fact callous, 2. Not criticize the "pope" publicly, since that would reveal the fact that He (Benedict XVI) is not actually a pope, 3. Only accept the apostate  Vatican II council, and not any true Catholic council before that, such as Vatican I, and 4. Be lobotomized puppets for Benedict XVI. False Traditionalism really leads to eternal loss!


God Bless,


Chris White




Dear MHFM,


If I'm not mistaken, it seems like one of the favorite tools in the modernists arsenal is to condemn anyone who would dare rebuke another person for warning them that they're on the road to hell for their sins. The modernists decry, "Don't judge!!! You can't judge! Only God can judge!" So I was wondering if you could clarify what exactly Jesus meant when He said 'do not judge, lest you be judged' so that I may refute these heretics when they (mis)quote that verse. For if we truly love our neighbor we care about their salvation first and foremost.


MHFM: The context of that passage (Matthew 7) demonstrates that what Jesus is condemning is hypocritical judgments: i.e., denouncing someone for doing something which you yourself do.  For, just a few verses after the verse the liberals love to quote, it says:  “Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam in thy own eye, and then shalt thou see to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.” (Mt. 7:5)


As we see, He is not condemning all judgments or denunciations, but hypocritical ones.  There are other passages which show that Christians must judge. 




Dear Brother Peter and Brother Michael,

I didn't know if you had heard about the recent tornado that touched down in central Mississippi - but someone took a picture of it on their cell phone and I thought I would share it with you...  We were not involved, being about 50 miles south of it. 

It does give one pause to think about the magnitude of force in such events that we are not in control of and how swift and deadly God can strike when and wherever He wants. 

Thank you for continuing to help us to see and believe in the Truths of our Holy Faith!



Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\tornado.JPG

Girl Scouts


Dear Dimond Brothers,


I have been reading your e-exchanges concerning the Boy Scouts.  What about the Girl Scouts?  What do you know about them?  Every year my husband must buy like 5 boxes of their cookies and we argue about it.  I don't think he should buy cookies from them.  Don't they support abortion or at the very least feminism?  He is pro-life but he says he doesn't care because he likes eating the cookies.  Wouldn't it be wrong to buy cookies from them if they promote such evils?


Thank you for your advice,



MHFM: Perhaps our readers know more about the Girl Scouts.  If there is a direct and notorious connection with things you mention, then it would be our position that one should avoid buying cookies from them. 




Subject: End of the World


Dear Brothers:


… if people don't believe in biblical signals, then they should recognize all the others secular signs God Almighty is so merciful to have given to them.


… the unity of EU is shaking right now with the financial crisis they are facing with the PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greek and Spain). They are still lying through their teeth that they are strong, unbreakable, and untouchable. Look now?


Just imagine how the children of this world repeat the same mistakes over and over. No one learns from the past what their ancestors did… Babel Tower repeated just as you say in your video.


Since you already have done 10 parts, please finish the whole REVELATION to help waking up the people. God bless you for your great work. Fantastic work and explanation…


Glory to God,


Kim-Lan Vu




A 25 foot statue of Anubis arrived in NYC harbor on March 23rd, 2010 - the very same day that Obama signed the health care bill into law. 

This is NO coincidence. In ancient Egypt, Anubis was the most important god of the Dead.  He was considered the conductor of the dead to the underworld and funeral processions would not be held without Anubis marching at the head.  In June of 2009, Obama was officially named the "New King Tut of the World" in Cairo, Egypt. King 
Tut had a guardian and that guardian was ANUBIS.

This statue drifted on a barge back and forth in front of the statue of liberty - while Obama was signing the health care bill. Is the illuminati signifying the death of liberty in our country or something more? This statue had also made visits to London and Indianapolis but has only carried a suitcase to NYC.

Some have speculated that this could be the third horseman of the apocalypse. I am no biblical scholar but I would certainly like to get your opinion on this.

thank you and God bless,



Benedict XVI and Protestantism






Dear Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,


You may be interested in the following on Newman: -


Q.  What is it about John Henry Newman, English convert and Cardinal, that Catholics chiefly remember?

A.   His mastery of English prose.


Q.  What is it about John Henry Newman that Catholics of our day generally forget?

A.  They forget, or never have been told of, his Jewish descent.


Q. If we catholics were to bear in mind Newman's real ancestry when we are appraising his literary ability, could we not the boast that we have had in our fold the greatest Jewish writer in the Engish language?

A.  We could - except for the fact that there have been in the English language other Jewish writers, like Robert Browning, Max Beerbohm, and Philip Guedalla, who never once thought of joining the Catholic Church.


Q.  Apart from his literay abilities, did not Newman make a good conversion to the Catholic Church?

A.  He made a nostalgic conversion.


Q.  What sort of a conversion is that?

A.  It is a conversion effected in a typical Old Testament manner, in which one is always sighing after the "fleshpots" of things one has abandoned, and which in Newman's case required an Apologia Pro Vita Sua, an apology for his own life, to justify.


Q.  After his conversion, and his ordination to the priesthood, is it really true that Newman used often to forego theological studies and pastoral pursuits in order to devote more time to reading from the pagan Greeks?

A.  Biographers disagree.  Newman's only comment in the matter was his repeated remark, "I shall never be a saint, for I love the pagan classics too intensely."


Q. Did not the blood which he inherited, from the Jewish moneylender, who was his father, allow Newman to bring to the Faith some of those same racial qualities possessed by the very earliest Christians, by Our Lord's own Apostles and disciples?

A.  The Jewish qualities which Newman brought to the Faith have been very tidily set in order by Canon William Barry, S.T.D., the eminent English authority on Newman.   Canon Barry reports that to Newman's "Hebrew affinities" the following qualities are attributed:  " ... his cast of features, his remarkable skill in music and mathematics, his dislike of metaphysical speculations, his gasp of concrete, and his nervous temperament."


Q.  What was it that Newman called those fellow Catholics of his who, at the time of the Vatican Council, were in favor of having the Pope's personal infallibility defined?

A.  Newman nervously called them, "an aggressive and insolent faction."


Q.  Was this attitude toward the definition of Papal infallibility the reason why Pope Pius IX so totally mistrusted Newman?

A.  It was one of the reasons.


Q.  If Pope Pus IX so frowned upon him, why was Newman made a Cardinal?

A.  Newman was made a Cardinal after Pope Pius IX died, when the Catholic Duke of Norfolk prevailed upon the newly installed Leo XIII to brighten the aged Newman's final years with a red hat.


Q.  Is it in England that Cardinal Newman's spirit best survives today?

A.  It is not.   Modern Catholic Englishmen, without analyzing it, sense that Cardinal Newman was, religiously, the kind of interloper in their midst that Prime Minister Disraeli was politically.


Q.  Where then have Newman's name and fame been most perpetuated?

A.  In America, in the form of clubs.  Newman Clubs, they are called.


Q.  What is a Newman Club?

A.  It is an organized excuse for the presence, the sinful presence, of Catholic students at secular universities founded and fostered by Masons and, lately, indoctrinated by Jews.


[- extract from Fr. Feeney - The Point, December, 1954 ]


God bless,






Subject: [Benedict XVI Protestantism is not heresy video]


Dear MHFM-


Your latest video shows an interesting contrast between Benedict XVI's evolutionary religion and the Catholic religion.  This is especially evident in his use of the words “gradually develop” (“Something that was once rightly condemned as a heresy cannot simply become true but it can ‘gradually develop’ its own positive ecclesial nature.”  So the very falsehood that was explictly condemned doesn’t “simply” become true but can become true in some complex way and over time? Of course any real Catholic knows that a condemned falsehood doesn’t become true suddenly, doesn’t become true gradually, doesn’t become true – ever.




BOD & Kingship


Subject: BOD & Kingship


Dear Brothers:


Thanks for the BOD series and the piece on Benedict's embrace of Protestantism.  I find these so valuable to listen to (even multiple times) not only for the lights they impart, but because they help an individual to acquire a certain "fluency" in Catholicism - and this helps so much in clarifying one's own thoughts as well as in trying to speak to others.  A comment about Traditionalists:  It seems impossible for a person to truly uphold the Kingship of Christ Doctrine while adhering to BOD - although many groups claim to.


If I understand the doctrine correctly:  Because Christ is King of all creation, He is King of both individuals and societies, including nations.  And all must acknowledge Him as King.


Now, it is the Catholic nation - and only the Catholic nation - that will acknowledge the Kingship of Christ.  And it is only through the true Catholic Church that the rights of Christ the King can be exercised in a nation.  When these things happen:  you have Christendom.  This is why actual conversion must come first.  Christendom is the fruit of conversion.  No actual conversion of a nation - no Christendom.


To claim to uphold the Kingship doctrine while failing to insist on the necessity of mankind's actual, flesh and blood membership in the Church is to render the Kingship doctrine as imaginary as BOD.


Said traditionalists reduce "Christendom" to something like a virtual reality (which, sad to say, is what it is in these times of the Great Apostasy.)   But sadder still is the fact that BODer's - like others - are essentially admitting that they are content that it be so.  No wonder so many people (even traditionalists) today think that democracy is the "savior" of the world.


St. Louis de Montfort knew very well that he was living in the last times when he saw the train of Protestantism - the dogma-less "church" - leaving Rome to bring wrack and ruin on the Faith and the Church wherever Christendom existed. It also explains why the protestant "missionaries" (Mennonites, etc.) still always target (and always have targeted) Catholic or once-Catholic countries.  It's what Protestantism does!


And as your research proves beyond any shadow of a doubt, the train of Protestantism (now carrying all heresies) has returned to Rome with a vengeance.


With gratitude, Lee




May be like three years ago, I went to St Cecilia Catholic Community with a friend to see the mass of OL of Guadalupe at the end of the mass many people that had brought such images came looking for the deacon to bless them, as it’s the Tradition in Mexico.


The Deacon did bless the Images but he also he started blessing the Tattoos of the Guadalupe, is this allowed in the Catholic church? Because he didn’t bless just one he blessed many, I didn’t have a camera but I saw it as my computer is in front of me...


How is this seen in a catholic Perspective?




MHFM: We assume you mean that he was blessing tattoos of Our Lady of Guadalupe that people had on their arms or other parts of their body.  If that’s what he was doing, that’s not Catholic.  Tattoos are condemned in the Bible.  By blessing tattoo images of Our Lady of Guadalupe, he is endorsing a gravely sinful practice.  It’s another example of how the Vatican II sect and its heretical ministers endorse that which is not Catholic and sinful. 


Leviticus 19:28- “You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh, for the dead, neither shall you make in yourselves any figures or marks: I am the Lord.”


Also, a Catholic must not go to the New Mass.




Subject: counter-flock


re: new video on B16/Protestantism:  only a counter-flock could entertain the heretical gobbledy-gook spouted by B16… we are witnessing an anti-flock that loves its respective anti-popes as they appear on the world scene one after the other in succession-----it strikes me that the anti-flock/the counter-flock are at this point at least as culpable as the "leadership" of this totally demonic false "Catholic" counter-church------they all deserve each other for if they love not the truth, they're in love with the LIE.  Which makes them all liars, and bound for hell-----"together"---as they so often love to be.


MHFM: Yes, they love the lie.


Part 10 posted


MHFM: We have posted part 10 of the new video, Is the World about to End?  We recommend that people watch parts in order (starting with 1, etc).


Is the World about to End ? - Part 10


Is the World about to End ? - Part 7

Is the World about to End ? - Part 8 - Mark of the Beast

Is the World about to End ? - Part 9 - Mark of the Beast


This new video covers how the Antichrist, the beast of revelation, the mark of the beast, 666, the great harlot, the great red dragon, etc. might have already been fulfilled.


Is the World about to End ? - Part 1

Is the World about to End ? - Part 2

Is the World about to End ? - Part 3

Is the World about to End ? - Part 4

Is the World about to End ? - Part 5

Is the World about to End ? - Part 6




Dear Brothers,


My mom will be traveling… to attend the Novus Ordo "First Communion" of her grandson, my nephew.  She is putting pressure on me to at least give a gift.  I have no intention of going and I can't afford to travel anyway.  Today she asked me what I'm going to do for my nephew's "First Communion".  What she means to ask me is if I'm going to at least give a present.  I replied that I'm not going to answer that question.  She knows what my position is on V2, the antipopes, etc.  She replied and said "ok suit yourself.  Your brother's children are the only people you will have in the future".  She's right because I have no children myself, nor am I married and I don't have too many friends neither.  I'm pretty much a loner.  Right now I'm in a bad mood as I'm writing to you because of all this.  I always have disagreements with her over the antipopes, etc.  She says that the Dimond brothers are extremists, etc.....


Of course I don't agree.  You guys are just telling it like it is.  She just comes up with excuses all the time.  The only real problem she has with you brothers is that you hold the sedevacantist position.  It seems impossible for me to make her see the light.  A few weeks ago, one of her false traditionalist friends attended an Old Catholic Church and she expressed disagreement over this.  I told her she is not much different because she thinks it's ok to attend Novus Ordo "First Communions".  I've pretty much given up on her.  No matter what I tell her she just won't face the truth on a few issues. 


MHFM: Perhaps you mean that she already knows that you would never give a present.  If not, you should tell her that you will not give a present because that would be sinful. 


If many


Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,


I would like to thank both of you for exposing the heresies of the vatican 2 sect and the anti-popes Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, etc... I emailed all my friends and loved-ones in my address book and asked them to go visit your website so that they, too, will be enlightened.  There is something I would like to ask you, if many people including us will pray for these anti-popes, heretics, atheists and people who are outside the Catholic Faith and ask God through Jesus Christ, together with the Holy Spirit and through the intercessions of the Blessed Virgin Mary, our Mother, all the saints and angels in heaven, that they be converted and return to the One and Only True Faith, the Catholic Faith, will they have a change of heart and professed that the Catholic Faith is the One and Only True Church established by Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior through St. Peter? or must all these things and prophecies come to pass?


… May God continue to bless you both…


From the Philippines,




MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail.  Concerning the antipopes, our position on your question is no, they would not be converted.  We believe that you are dealing with thoroughly wicked men – some of the darkest in history – who were chosen to play a specific role for the Devil in the final spiritual deception. 






Subject: YEAH OK








MHFM: You are so easily deceived.  Do you not realize that Satan transforms himself into an angel of light?


2 Corinthians 11:14- “And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light.”


The Bayside Message is false; we know that for sure.  It contains heresies and lies.  It teaches salvation outside the Church; it tells people to accept a heretical antipope; and it tells people to stay at the invalid New Mass.  You obviously have no faith if you can see the evidence we’ve presented, that Bayside contradicts Catholic dogma, and still believe that it comes from God!  That is blasphemy.  You are believing that God and Our Lady lie to people and lead them into heresy.  Of course Satan is going to tell people some true things in a false message which is meant to deceive people who pray the Rosary.  The message is intended for conservative-minded people, to keep them in the Counter Church.  The fact that it praises the Rosary proves nothing.  Wake up!


The False Apparitions at Bayside, NY [PDF File]




Dear MHFM,


Was the latest video in your Is the World about to end? series also the last one or are you planning to make additional videos ?  Btw. what you have done is just HUGE! It's like almost everyone is looking in a completely wrong direction (Satan's deception or diversion) while you hit the nail right on the head. Reading the Apocalypse in the light of the information you provided us with has been really revelatory. Superbly done! Two passages from the New Testament (which you have emphasized many times) that are unfortunately overlooked far too often have never been more true or timely, namely:


1 Thessalonians 5:2- For yourselves know perfectly, that the day of the Lord shall so come, as a thief in the night.


Luke 18:8... But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?


Thank you and God bless,


V. from Croatia


MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  We plan on doing some more on that issue.


Boy Scouts


Dear MHFM,


I too was a Cub Scout at the impressionable age of 7 or 8. I was only in it for a year or two. One of the Scout leaders I believe was of indian heritage and when we earned so many badges this person had us partake in some weird ritual where we were brought into a dark room and there were candles lit and we were asked to read some spiritual "prayers" from a script out loud. Unfortunately, at the time, I didn't quite have the reasoning capacity to differentiate between spiritual matters and secular matters and I went along with it but felt very weird afterwards. It was definitely a way to get innocent kids to partake in anti-Christian, occultic garbage.




Dear Brothers,

I just wanted to thank you for leading me to the truth the more I read your materials and pray the Rosary the clearer the truth becomes. I had a couple of questions first I need to get baptized. I am going to ask my husband again to do it. I have asked some of my family members who belong to the V2 sect and they say they don't have the authority to do so.  I explained that the Council of Trent allows for anyone to baptize in cases of emergency, but they do not consider my situation an emergency, since they hold to the Vatican two religion.

I have given them your materials including the Fatima dvd I don't know if they have watched it yet I have also spoke with them about what I believe and why, and one of them gave me a sarcastic response said that I was going to be the only one in heaven with Jesus everyone else is going to hell this really hurt my feelings. I felt like I was being made fun of… Thanks and may God bless you keep up the good work.



MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  One shouldn’t be troubled by family members who would say such things.  They obviously don’t care about the truth.  The only concern they have is that what you are telling them is incompatible with their liberal outlook and would entail the condemnation of many people.  That’s what bothers them, not that what you are saying is backed up by the truth of Jesus Christ.  No, they don’t care about that at all.




Dear Brothers:


I have to wonder:  was the Father Feeney event the formal "grand opening" of the Apostasy - with Satan being given the green light to proceed?


Here's an interesting "coincidence":  If my 'nfo is correct, TELEVISION appeared on the scene around '49/'50 (same time as BOD was being used to kill off Father Feeney's Catholic evangelizing effort.)  Television was very crude at the beginning with only one snowy channel - used by saloons as a novelty attraction.


But the technology advanced quickly over the next ten years - just in time for V2.   And just in time for all the world to be propagandized by the counterfeit church?


Interesting, no?


God Bless You, Lee


MHFM: There’s no doubt that the condemnation of the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation in the minds of the public, which occurred with the alleged condemnation of Fr. Feeney, was a huge victory for Satan and a signal of the end.  What’s most outrageous is that many “traditionalists” fight side by side with Satan (because they are of Satan) when they rejoice over that condemnation, and work against the necessity of water baptism.




… Comment on your new You Tube Videos: Excellent!!!!

Comment on your latest videos, the area where you mention they were drunk on the wine of the wrath of her fornication.  You may want to add this to your info:
1. When i speak to Novus ordo (practicing) "catholics" there is no way to reason with them it’s almost literal that you’re speaking to a drunk person one cannot reason with drunk people…


May God Bless your work through JMJ.....




If we have disagreements within the Church, we must use dialogue within the Church. Otherwise, we become Protestants and, according to you, loose all hope of salvation. You are disregarding the most basic doctrine of the Church on earth: It is guided by the Holy Spirit and thus is infallible. Men are fallible. God is not. The Vicar of Christ cannot then be the antichrist. The Holy Spirit will do the work of the Father and the Son. The gates of hell will not prevail. Don't loose sight of the example of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. He is compassionate, kind, meek and humble. I will pray that you rekindle these qualities in expressing your concerns but be careful, you have an obligation to respect and obey the authority of the Church on earth. The peace of Jesus be with you and keep you.




MHFM: He’s not the Vicar of Christ.  He doesn’t even believe in Christ.  It’s not hard to understand: The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope [PDF file].




What do you know about this practice on the Vatican II Church?  How appropriate is to a Christian to do the Seder Meal on Easter? Can this be consider a Heretical practice among Roman Catholics?




MHFM: It’s a completely inappropriate practice.  It’s a mortal sin against the faith and an expression of apostasy.  It’s something done by Vatican II false “Catholics,” not by true Catholics.




Dear Mhfm,

I have been watching your new video series, can only say one word AMAZING. Everything you say makes sense. I’m simply shocked, took a look at a two euro coin today it’s clearly there. The Holy Ghost guided you in your work without a doubt. I am also now 100% convinced that John Paul II is the antichrist. But I did not imagine that the EU was the beast. However here in the EU everything answers to it. Our Car number plates must have the EU flag on it.  They control everything and it is Godless. I don't know if you know this but I find it interesting.

"The anthem of the EU “Ode to Joy” also contains religious symbolism.  “Ode to Joy” is the prelude to the last movement of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, which has religious implications.  EU publications state that the anthem really is an “ode to freedom, community, and peace”, however the lyrics, by Friedrich von Schiller, are actually about the entering of the shrine of a pagan goddess and the uniting of all men in brotherhood, by the power of magic."

Thanks for the great work.

God Bless





Dear Brothers,


Don't you think it is more than a coincidence that the "Catholic" country of Poland's president was reluctant to sign the Lisbon Treaty because of objections to the Fundamental Rights Charter, among other reasons; then, not many months later, after being pressed politcally and having signed the treaty, he along with other Polish politicians and their wives -- 96 -- are killed together in a plane crash?  Could the appearance of JPII in flames have been more than a "miracle" from Benedict XVI?  Could it also have been a portend or warning?


Also, looking at Comcast's Web Newspage at the arial photos of the volcano in Iceland, it is concentrating on weird lightning.  However, while looking at two of the photos of the Iceland volcano, I clearly saw a huge demonic head with eyes, nose and a mouth lying on its side in one photo, then rising up and looking down and hovering in another.  Wasn't there also a reference to the keys of the abyss being opened and demons being unleashed in the Apocalypse also?


In Christ,





Luther was not a mason! He was against Catholik Church... That Church wich bring the masons into the world with the Templer...


You Know, i am german, and i have the scripts of him (of 1545)... Three books... And i know, that he was absolutely against everything wich was unnaturel...

Sola Scripura!!!

Did you Know this?

Greetings from germany


H. Vorsict


MHFM: Luther was an unbiblical and demonic heretic.  Please look at these links:


What you don't know about Luther

Luther, the Devil and Denominations


The Bible proves the Catholic Church




Subject: John Corapi


Do not insult that man. He is 100 times the man you are.




MHFM: He’s not even Catholic, but you don’t care about that.  All you care about is following a person.




I was a  Boyscout and we (Boyscouts) had strange handshakes that looked like the handshake on your Freemason video ( God help me, I think I was indoctrinated in to Freemasonary as a 5 year old child). My fraternal uncle was a freemason and so were other family members. Also when I was a bear and weeblow scout the den I belonged to was in an Elks club hall which is allegedly a Freemason cohort organzation. How can I prove a connection between boyscouts and Freemasonry and warn Christian and Catholic parents that this so called conservative group is maybe satanic.




False light


The saints in the past clearly taught that many were already living in the false light, prodigiously, St. Catherine or Sienne, and more recent, Padre Pio, who in time, if there is any left, will become a legit' saint in the Catholic Church. The saints could clearly sense the distinction between the Light of God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and the false light imparting from satan and his minions inhabiting the earth.  This living hell we sense today was abundant then and Jesus expressed it on the cross by suffering for our salvation, and today few, sadly, are sensing the superabundance of this false light throughout the world, and the horror approaching thanks to modern technology.   What's changed from the past is clearly that evil is more pervasive and noted with the speed of technology for those who are attached to Jesus Christ and His Holy Mother.  Our only defense is Our Blessed Mother in Her Rosary, and those who embrace Her and Her Rosary are protected from this end-times horror about us.  God Bless MHFM.






Since our Blessed Mother needed Baptism & Salvation, along with St. John the Baptist (plus the rest of us), plus the fact that nothing impure can enter Heaven causes me to consider John 3/5, as spoken by Our Lord, as ABSOLUTE!  The Commies started the "interfaith" movement last century leading to the pseudo excommunication of Fr. Feeney & the V2 Apostasy.


Do these BOD advocates really think they, in their fallible human creature condition, can perform a PERFECT act of contrition & love of God (without the Grace of properly receiving the Sacraments)?  These heretics, like their ancestors, better humble themselves & accept the truth or there's no way for them to avoid eternal burning. Our Blessed Lord commanded His Apostles to teach ALL He commanded to all nations; Baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son & Holy Ghost. 


Why do that if BOD/BOB is applicable?... The Apostles didn't teach their OPINIONS like heretical prots., who reject the true Bible, as they reject the one historical Christian faith.  The Apostles dumped their "prideful opinions" & kept the faith to their death.  It's terrifying what we creatures will do (under the influence of Satan) to squirm out of absolute truth, seeking to justify, with our own supposed wisdom, a way out.  Are they really willing to risk that upon their death?  They go with Luther & the pervert King James. 


How can this attitude be anything but damning?  Spitting in God's face by placing themselves above God!  Who is God's counselor???    Who are these non-believers to correct, clarify, & explain what Jesus meant?  Our Lord doesn't need an interpreter in such a clear statement similar to His saying that without consuming His body & blood there is no life in us!  Heretics have NO fear of, reverence of, or love for God!  They are unable to thank God for His will & humbly accept it. 


Pride is truly the mother of all sin & Heretics are truly the Gates of Hell.


Thanks for all you do,






“Let any clergyman or layman who enters a synagogue of Jews, or of heretics, to pray be both deposed and excommunicated.” [Apostolic Canon 65.]


Why isn’t this enforced and have b-16 thrown out when he visits mosques/synagogues?


MHFM: The quote is simply a reflection of the consistent teaching against taking part in the worship of non-Catholics. 


Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 10), Jan. 6, 1928: “… this Apostolic See has never allowed its subjects to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics…”


This teaching is rejected by the Vatican II sect, which holds that it’s fine to take part in the worship of non-Catholics.  Since their leaders reject this teaching, why would they enforce it?


“Baptism of Desire” Debate


MHFM: This is a debate on “Baptism of Desire” which has been on our website.  Many of our readers have already heard this debate.  We have posted it in video form because it’s an interesting debate which covers some very important issues.  Here are the videos:


"Baptism of Desire" Debate - Part 1

"Baptism of Desire" Debate- Part 2

"Baptism of Desire" Debate - Part 3

"Baptism of Desire" Debate - Part 4

"Baptism of Desire" Debate - Part 5

"Baptism of Desire" Debate - Part 6

"Baptism of Desire" Debate  - Part 7

"Baptism of Desire" Debate - Part 8

"Baptism of Desire" Debate - Part 9

"Baptism of Desire" Debate - Part 10




Dear Brothers,


In part 9 of your End of the World video, it's quite obvious that Antipope Benedict XVI baptizes invalidly because he pours the water on the back of the person's head where there is hair.  In order to be valid the water must make initial contact with the bare skin.  That is why the true Catholic Church's rite of baptism requires pouring the water on the forehead.  It's quite astonishing to see how many people don't understand what's necessary to have a valid sacrament.




MHFM: It is a doubtful way of doing it.




Hello, I was recently reading your e-exchanges and came upon something you wrote about Alex Jones… The link then broke and I spent more than an hour looking for it.  It was not about him saying that he's a fake Christian.  It was not about the anti-catholic film he did. Can you help me?




MHFM: This must be what you are asking about:

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 1

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 2

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 3

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 4

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 5


This is a related discussion of a new anti-Catholic film, A Lamp in the Dark, one of the most anti-Catholic films ever produced:


A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 1

A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 2

A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 3





I thought your video 10 on the recent volcano was right on. I had just read Apocalypse 9:1-12 and thought this too was appropriate, with the recent meteor (star) that fell across the sky, the volcano ash that darkened the sky and will most likely cause health issues to those breathing the ash, and your video on God's Seal. "Then the fifth angel blew his trumpet, and I saw a star that had fallen from heaven on to the earth, and he was given the key to the shaft leading down to the Abyss. When he unlocked the shaft of the Abyss, smoke poured up out of the Abyss like the smoke from a huge furnace so that the sun and the sky were darkened by it, and out of the smoke dropped locusts which were given the powers that scorpions have on the earth: they were forbidden to harm any fields or crops or trees and told only to attack any men who were without God’s seal on their foreheads. They were not to kill them, but to give them pain for five months, and the pain was to be the pain of a scorpion’s sting. When this happens, men will long for death and not find it anywhere; they will want to die and death will evade them.

  To look at, these locusts were like horses armoured for battle; they had things that looked like gold crowns on their heads, and faces that seemed human, and hair like women’s hair, and teeth like lions’ teeth. They had body-armour like iron breastplates, and the noise of their wings sounded like a great charge of horses and chariots into battle. Their tails were like scorpions’, with stings, and it was with them that they were able to injure people for five months. As their leader they had their emperor, the angel of the Abyss, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, or Apollyon in Greek.  That was the first of the troubles; there are still two more to come."

God Bless,
Tom Miles




Is it EVER possible for a person to be baptized into the Faith via, "Baptism of Desire"?  Thank you!



MHFM: No. 


New Age


That's really creepy,  what David wrote in about "was JPII's body 'reincarnated'" after the "deadly bullet" that probably actually killed JPII on that May recalls from the "New Age" circles people used to talk a lot about something they called "walk-ins"---it is a phenomena the New Age-ers firmly believed in,  the idea that at some point in time,  a "walk-in" demon/entity/spirit ENTERS the body of a human SO COMPLETELY,  that the original human who occupied that same body is GONE,  while this "entity" is LIVING in that human's body---is David saying this is kind of what happened with JPII?  It would explain the anti-Christ JP II's total demonic possession....and his un-Godly malice toward Christ's Church....

    At any rate David's is an astute observation viz the connection with the Lady of LaSalette prophecy...about some "dead" being raised......and helps explain it.  Ironically,  it is similar to what St. Paul and so many other saints experienced in their increasing sanctification while still living in their mortal body here on Earth,  that "it is not I but Christ who lives in me":  with the complete and absolute mortification of the soul [I guess as much as is humanly possible] in one way,  the mere mortal sort of dies,  while Christ lives,  rules and reigns in that individual,  more completely. 

    That moment when JPII was shot with the "deadly bullet" and then when he claimed the Blessed Virgin had "saved" him:  well the devil had most of us fooled,  it was truly the eclipse of the Church…






I want to thank you for making such an excellent series with true insight in the true Catholic meaning of the passages. It was really amazing to see how well all these things fit with Antipope John Paul II as the Antichrist, and with Benedict XVI as the false prophet, and the European Union as the beast.

Another amazing point, not yet covered in your video, was in the e-exchanges, on the conversion of the Jews and St. Vincent Ferrer. And that Apocalypse chapter 9 was about the protestant reformation. It would be amazing if you could cover these things as well in detail for the blind protestants so that they may come to the truth. Do you think there are passages as well referring to the Orthodox schismatics split from the Church?

Truly we do live in the last days, may the Lord have mercy on us.

God be with you Dimond brothers.







Dear Brothers:


I would like to thank you for all the works you produce;  they are all masterpieces.  The video on the end of the world is so good it leaves me speechless.  You have taught us true history, Sacred Scriptures, the true Catholic Faith, and how to make sense of the times in which we are living.  Above all, you help us to escape from the satanic maze of lies that is the V-2 "church".  I must say it again: studying your materials is like having reconstructive surgery on the mind!  Now I understand what is meant by "the truth will make you free". 


And the truth is simple (although the mindknot of liberalism prevents people from seeing it): God is Truth; man is not.


A Catholic dogma is a TRUTH or FACT revealed by God.  God wills to reveal this truth to mankind through the true popes of the Catholic Church, teaching either alone or in conjunction with a true Council.  God wills that men obey His truth and assures us that Truth will set us free from the domain of Satan.  The founding of a Church was an essential component of Our Lord's Sacrifice on the Cross.  Truth is offered to men as a complete package - not a smorgasbord!


A heresy is a LIE concocted in hell.  Its purpose is to rob men of the gift of Redemption which God in His mercy offers to all mankind.  A heretic is outside the Church because he has rejected the Church and has said "no" to God's offer of redemption.  When the Church teaches that there is no salvation outside of the Church, She is not putting someone out; She is simply stating a fact.  And whether or not an individual realizes it, a proponent of heresy is an agent of Satan.  A heretic imagines that he (or some other man) is the source of truth, thus putting man in the place of God.  And when he prays the "Our  Father" he is a hypocrite, because he himself has no intention of doing the will of God.


A Protestant may claim he won't pray to Our Lady because he "goes direct to Jesus", but he is deceiving himself because the "Jesus" he goes to is not the true Jesus of Scripture, the Founder of the Catholic Church.


The search for truth begins with a desire for it, a pondering in the heart.  That may be why the changes were introduced into the Church by Paul 6 with such rapidity -- to create utter confusion and make it difficult if not impossible for people to really think about what was going on.


I'm thinking now and with gratitude to you,


         De Profundis




Dear Brothers,


The Iceland volcano, under the Eyjafjallajökull glacier is 1666 meters high! It seems to symbolize the polluted spiritual atmosphere that Europe as a whole (of course, there are true Catholics still there, though few) has created over the last 100 years or more. The signs are all around us that God is justly angry, but how many will change and convert to the true Catholic faith? Time is running out. May Jesus and Mary have mercy on us…


Chris White




Outstanding and insightful work, "Is the World About to End",  on the Apocalypse.  I would echo the previous individuals in making this available via a DVD and MP3 when the series is completed.  The "Mark" being Spiritual is VERY compelling and Brother Peter does a miraculous job showing how this ties in with not only Scripture but the Catholic Church's own interpretations (Trent).  Could the Mark also pertain to receiving the host in the hand in the Novus Ordo Mass?  This would then signify the "giving in" to the abomination of the false faith that VII signifies.  It seems to tie-in to the entire acceptance of VII. 


There can be little doubt that Our Lady has provided you with the answer to your prayers on deciphering the end times.  This is one of your most compelling works to date.......

God Bless you for your works.....


Bruce Knapp




In a sense, he already "canonized" him.

I was reading about JP2´s  funeral, and it appears to be the most watched event in History. The whole world watched it. There were both political and religious delegations and leaders present. Ratzinger presided over the event, and during the Homily, he assured everyone present that John Paul II was already in Heaven and asked to be blessed by him and that he blessed everyone.


It was clear that JP2 was a friend of the world. And an enemy of God. It´s no wonder. After all, he preached permissive tolerance and indifference.  And the people never ceased screaming SANTO SUBITO!




Subject: World about to End video


I watched all 9 parts of the End Times Video you posted about fell out of my chair here at the office once it got into Exodus 13:16 & Deut 11:18 about the spiritual mark!!    You both should go on Coast to Coast AM at the same time and cover the New Fatima Disk and Is world about to End vid as well…






Dear Brother and Sisters in Christ,


Your work has helped me find the Truth of Christ.  I thank you for your work and efforts.  Receiving your materials, verifying your citations, and taking positive steps to bring my actions in accordance with God's will has absolutely changed my life.  May God bless you with unfailing faith.  May you see His face in Heaven.








Dear Brother Michael,


I wish to finally thank you for the complimentary DVD you sent me years ago.  I can't tell you how many times my husband and I watched it...


Sincerely yours,


Mary Hamernik




Subject: Mark of the Beast



Your newest addition to the end times and mark of the beast series is incredible.  Just as the false church (Vatican II) continues to literally rot over time, your work and material continues to bear better fruit through the years. The timing of your latest work is truly God's timing; allowing those who will listen, the opportunity to recognize the present season that we are living. Without the recent past-existence of JPII (anti-Christ) and the present existence of B16 (False Prophet) would all this information come together and make total sense.  The "Great Deception" continues to unravel as the liberal media (Jews) would have us all fall prey to their version of the end times and the mark of the beast as being the micro-chip in the hand and/or a national money system, while the real truth would have consumed us.  With the world and movie industries special effects portraying beasts as something from another world and non-human, it's no wonder there is so much difficulty identifying with the true beasts that are mentioned in the bible.

God Bless your work,
Tom Miles


As if it were slain


Dear Bros, Michael and Peter Dimond,


 Since we discussing the APOCALYPSE and its application for us all today, the comments on the attempted assassination of Antipope John Paul II and the reference to the sword as opposed to the gunshot wounds received by him,( one of the heads of the beast,or kings,referring to the sixth king) on May 13 1981, and how all this ties in with Apocalypse 13. are interesting.


We are all familiar with the metaphorical expression, "he who lives by the sword, dies by the sword".  Of course, this derives from the account in St. Matthew 26:51-52, and also St. Mark's Gospel...


...where we read about St. Peter, being of a somewhat hasty and quick nature, cuts off one of the guards or soldiers ears who come to arrest Jesus, "and behold, one of them that were with Jesus, stretching forth his hand, drew out his sword: and striking the servant of the high priest, cut off his ear.  Then Jesus saith to him: Put up again thy sword into its's place: for all that take the sword shall perish with the sword." Matthew 26: 51 -52 (Douay Rheims version)


Consider, again how the sword has always been represented as a form of retribution or threat to individuals or mankind throughout history  viz St Michael,the Archangel , the sword of Damacles, it was the weapon of the Old Testament, and St. John would have been familiar with it, in contrast to our modern day weapons as the MHFM point out.


So, it is quite easy to see how St. John would see one of the heads of the beast receiving a death wound, the sword being symbolic of a weapon of destruction, in this case of the sixth head or king, antipope John Paul II.


Notice, the reference to a "death's wound" and a " deadly wound", both these terms imply a fatal wound, caused by the gunshots, inflicted by a trained marksman, Mehmet Ali Agca, (who incidently has just been recently released from prison, and calls himself " Christ eternal", and is considering offers on writing a book, films and T.V. documentaries on the events, and who also plans to visit The Vatican and meet with Antipope Benedict XVI.....that should be interesting, if it ever occurs!) ...medical reports by doctors who treated John Paul II, were amazed at his seemingly miraculous survival, as he had suffered massive wounds, including the loss of most of his blood, after at least one bullet went right through him, penetrating his intestine, of which 22 inches had to be removed and a colostomy performed...


Now, all this is interesting, and there is a reference in the Apparition of the Blessed Virgin on the Mountain of La Salette relating " on occasions the dead and righteous will be brought back to life."  Are we looking at a reincarnated body after this fatal, death dealing wound of the sixth head of the beast?? The Apocalypse tells us that he receives a death dealing wound and is slain to death, and the death's wound was healed!   That's pretty striking... he died and was resurrected!  Think about that!


Another interesting thing to come out of this, is that antipope John Paul II actually admits that the gunshots were fatal, confirming further, Apocalypse 13, , " Could I forget that the event ( Ali Agca's assassination attempt) in St. Peter's Square took place on the day and at the hour when the first appearance of the Mother of Christ to the poor little peasants has been remembered for over sixty years at Fatima, Portugal?  For, in everything that happened to me on that very day, I felt that extraordinary motherly protection and care, which turned out to be stronger than the deadly bullet." - "Pope" John Paul II - Memory and Identity, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 2005, P. 184


....Deadly bullet, Deadly Bullet! .....the bullet that kills!


God bless,






Dear Brothers,


It's obvious that everything you produce is the result of a lot of hard work.  But the amount of work you put into the book The Truth About What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II and the DVD The Third Secret of Fatima is mind-boggling.  They are certainly worth more than your asking prices…


God Bless you for the work you do,


Verna Pechulis






Fr. Kramer, in his "Book of Destiny" states that Apocalypse XVI: 21, refers to a shower of comets or meteorites. If this is the means of chastisement utilized, it may look something like what is seen in this video.


The sight is spectacular.







Bravisimo work on your YouTube videos on the Apocalypse.  When I was about 14 years of age, I remember reading those chapters in the book of Apocalypse and I always wondered what did the writer mean with such language and figures like the Beast, 7 heads and kings, etc. and ever since I've always wondered what they meant until your great videos came along.  I really started to get tired of how the Protestants misunderstood so many passages and not understanding that the Vatican II is not the Catholic Church.  So, I am glad you brought to light this topic and I appreciate and thank you for your time to do this great work, because finally we have a true Catholic perspective on the Apocalypse.  I believe your prayers have been answered and this is, from my own thinking, an insight God had allowed us to see through your work. You know Brothers, when I first watched this, say the first 2 parts, I had a lot of questions but they are slowly getting answered as I watched later parts and you are most certainly correct, one must watch it from Part 1 to understand it more thoroughly.

May the Most Holy Trinity, through the intercession of the Blessed Mother of God, protect and bless your charitable work for the greater glory of God and the salvation of souls.

Bernardo Torres




New Video: Parts 7-9


Dear Dimond Brothers,


Your new video series about the world ending is amazing especially parts 7-9.  I haven't seen any Euro coins until your video.  It is right there ... the "mark" and "number" (666) of the beast!!!  Why aren't more people seeing these signs??!!!  Your interpretation of the "mark" being spiritual and not physical is also astounding.  Other have said it would a visible mark like a microchip or something similar.  Now I think of all these false Sacraments of Confirmation and Ordinations.  What if one has received such a "mark" from being confirmed in the Novus Ordo years ago?  


Thank you,



MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  If one rejects the New Church and holds the fullness of the Catholic faith, and has taken the appropriate steps to obtain forgiveness (confession, etc.), he or she will suffer no ill effects from a past involvement with the Novus Ordo and its invalid rites.




Subject: Rebuked an atheist


Hello Brothers!
I recently had a short evolution/creation debate with a Jewish atheist from the Netherlands. The debate started after I said some things about evolution and then he replied to me criticizing me that I'm immature, a religious fanatic, etc. I used the information from your video Creation and Miracles, Past and Present to rebuke him. I told him about all the flaws of evolution, how its just a theory, a theory that really makes no sense. After I sent him the message he never wrote back. In fact, I never even saw him again on the website. I think there might be a possibility that the information struck him really hard. Sort of like when I first saw your material on the Vatican II and their "popes".
God bless you!






Subject: 666


Dear MHFM, 


I'm sure you've heard antipope Benedict-aka-Ratzinger, say or read him say that his pontificate will be a short one.  I have, and it fits in with your knowlege of the Apocalypsis Ioannis.  Thank you, and again, may Jesus and Mary Bless you with many graces from above.




St. Joan


Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,


I am currently reading the E-Exchange Archive 2 and I was stunned at your exemplary treatise on Galileo Controversy mentioned in your well-discussed study - Examining the Theological Status of Geocentrism and Heliocentrism and the Devastating Problems this creates for Baptism of Desire Arguments.  You have well-documented the arguments leading to errors committed by the Inquisitional Court to accuse the ever mind-blowing martyr, St. Joan of Arc of heresy and burned her alive.  God knows that I have never doubted even once in my life that the Catholic Church had erred, err or would err at any point in time in the future since She is the Mystical Bride of Christ .. that She cannot be with a stain (even the slightest degree) on faith and morals.  St. Joan of Arc is one of the most fascinating heroic Saints of the Catholic Church … whenever I reflect her last days on earth … devoid of all human consolation, no friends – treated as if she was one of the most execrable human being on earth … my heart and soul is elevated at worshipping God!  We could very well label her to have been crucified with Christ on her last days – so admirable and I envy her so much.  Some people ridiculed me by saying the Church (allegedly) burned her and then canonized her 500 years later as absurd.  However, to answer unbelievers that the Church did not err in burning her; and that to refute that St. Joan of Arc did not sin by disobeying the ecclesiastical authorities who urged her deny the voices she heard; and to defend that she was ‘faithful to the Church’ on the issues thrown to her when faced with question if she complied with “submitting to the decision of the Church” … Your arguments on what constitute “Fidelity to the Church” has helped me answered that specific doubt.  I totally agree with you that the cases of Galileo and St, Joan of Arc have paved the way for us to understand better what really constitute “Fidelity to the Church” … this is very much applicable to our time … this Great Apostasy and the reign of the Anti-Christ on earth … Fidelity to the Church matters so much when we face the Jurisdiction Controversy … Your analysis on why God preferred one catholic army (France) over another (British) … due to Protestantism Revolt a century later after Joan’s death is really stunning!!!


In my teenage years I almost devoured reading Books on Lives of the Saints but I have not read an account of St. Joan of Arc.  In fact, I’ve only known her when I watched the movie, The Messenger, The Story of St. Joan of Arc played by actress Milla Jovovich.  Have you watched this film? Are there some heretical views or un-catholic input on the movie?  I ask this because I love this film and I keep this DVD with me until now.  I don’t grow tired watching it all over again and again …


The current videos on the End of the World that you masterminded are truly stunning, words are mute to express how grateful I am to be gifted of having watched them … these recent videos cement my plan of dedicating my life to the service of the Catholic Church in the Philippines .. God has been pleased to MHFM for keeping the Faith alive in these final days.  A million thanks for all the hard work Dimond Brothers.

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey, EENS-Sedevacantist (Philippines)




Dear Dimond Brothers:

.. I was reading… that Jesus Christ, while appearing to Sister Faustina told her to blindly follow her superior. Well, if his statement is true, then it goes totally contrary to the notions of serving God rather than men  and that if a different gospel were to be preached, even if by an Apostle or an Angel, it was to be reject.


What´s even more odd is: Why would "Jesus" give such an instruction just prior to the Great Apostasy, when in a very short period of time virtually all of the authorities would in some level or another succumb to heresy?  Added to the info you provided in your page and audios, I believe her Divine Mercy should not only be avoided, but rejected altogether as a clear false message not from God. 




Parts 5 & 6 posted


MHFM: We have posted parts 5 & 6 of the new video, Is the World about to End?  More parts are coming soon.  If they haven’t already seen the parts, we recommend that people watch these parts in order (starting with 1, etc).


Is the World about to End ? - Part 5


Is the World about to End ? - Part 6


This new video covers how the Antichrist, the beast of revelation, the mark of the beast, 666, the great harlot, the great red dragon, etc. might have already been fulfilled.


Is the World about to End ? - Part 1


Is the World about to End ? - Part 2


Is the World about to End ? - Part 3


Is the World about to End ? - Part 4


Will Convert


Dear Brothers,


Another point I have to make:  One of the final signs of the End Times is that "the Jews will convert" and many wonder exactly how this might occur, especially seeing the stubborn nature of so many liberal Jews in our day and the unlikelihood that those "converts" would be able to recognize the True Church as opposed to the false Church, etc (not to mention that fact that the Ashkenazi Jews, at any rate, are seemingly descendants of the ancient Kazars and not the ancient Hebrews of the Old Testament)....


Well, maybe the Jews who are to convert is in reference to Novus Ordo Catholics who are essentially part of a Judaized faith as evidenced by the ephod of Paul VI, the mitre with Jewish stars worn by Benedict XVI, and the many visits of Benedict and JPII to Jewish temples and synagogues.  Many Jews have described JPII as the "first Jewish pope" due to his affinity for Judaism, and indeed he did come from Jewish parentage.  One of the main reasons for my departure from the Novus Ordo religion to the True Catholic Faith was my understanding that JPII is more a pope of the Jews (and Mohammadens, and Hindus, and Buddhists, and Protestants, etc.) than of Catholics.


So, considering that there are many more like me who have converted from Novus Ordoism to the True Catholic Faith (as evidenced by the many readers of your website who have done the same), perhaps that prophecy of Scripture that "the Jews will convert" in the End Times, fresh upon the Great Apostasy, has already occurred.  Even the ordering of these two events--the conversion of the Judaized Novus Ordoites upon the Great Apostasy of New Church--makes a lot of sense.....


With Prayers,

Francis Herrmann


MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  We believe that St. Vincent Ferrer’s conversion of Jews, in addition to other Jewish conversions of the period, fulfilled that prophecy.  We discussed some of the evidence for this in our Jurisdiction article [PDF], but it is copied below (references are in the article):


St. Vincent was canonized by Pope Calixtus III in 1455…. It is also estimated that he converted hundreds of thousands by his preaching. “In a work entitled Juehasin, it is related that in the year 1412, a Friar named Brother Vincent [meaning Vincent Ferrer], having preached to the Jews, the latter renounced their law to a number of more than two hundred thousand.”  Some say that the number of Jews converted was closer to 100,000. Whole synagogues were converted and turned into churches.


St. Vincent converted so many Jews that he seemed to consider his success the fulfillment of the prophecies about the Jews being converted before the end of the world.


St. Vincent Ferrer: “The End of the World cannot be far distant, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Has not our Lord Himself said that the bearing of the fig-tree foreshadows the coming summer?... Nor is the Jewish fig-tree any longer barren, for we see it daily producing its abundant and choicest fruits in every city in Spain.”


He also called himself the Angel of Apocalypse 14:6. He raised a woman from the dead to prove it. “At Salamanca he raised a woman to life, to prove to his audience that he was himself the Angel Precursor of the Judgment, announced in the Apocalypse [Apoc. 14:6].”


… We do believe that St. Vincent Ferrer was, in fact, the one described in Apocalypse 14:6. Some say St. Vincent was exaggerating or that he didn’t really mean it or that he was simply wrong. The fact is that not all of the events described in the Apocalypse foretell things which will only occur a few years before the Second Coming of Christ. They describe crucial moments in Church history which bear apocalyptic import because they change the world in a way that will shape it for the rest of its history and especially in the final days. An example of this would be the Protestant revolt of Luther. This was an event which unleashed devils all over the Earth in the forms of hellish perversions of the Gospel which would ensnare millions of souls. Fr. Herman Kramer, who studied the Apocalypse for many years and wrote a well known book about it, held the opinion (with many others) that the Protestant revolt is described in chapter 9 of the Apocalypse.


It’s interesting that St. Vincent lived only 100 years before this apocalyptic event. So, just as some of these events, which have been predicted to occur before the end, don’t necessarily happen in the few generations or the few years prior to the end, I likewise believe that some have erred thinking that just prior to the end of the world there must be a massive conversion of Jews. Our Lord Himself implies there will hardly be any faith (Luke 18:8). The truth, in my opinion, is that St. Vincent was right that his massive conversion of Jews – in addition to the many Jews converted by others in the Middle Ages – constituted the fulfillment of that commonly talked about prophecy about Jewish conversion prior to the end of the world.




Good Evening sir,

I have 3 questions:

I read… that infants who die without baptism go to hell. Is this really Church teaching?

Secondly, why do traditionalists consider the new form for priestly ordination to be invalid simply because it changed two little words? Have not many different forms been used throughout Church history?

And thirdly, is not the whole issue of salvation outside the Church just a theological oddity? After all, if God choses to have his angels baptize someone mystically at the moment of their death, then that is God's prerogative. And He may chose to give them grace in proportion to the natural good they did in their lives (the parable of Jesus about the
landowner who gives more to a newcomer than to the laborer comes to mind.  God doesn't have to be fair). This fits nicely with Pius XII's teaching, in his encyclical on the Mystical Body, that non-Catholics in good faith are related to the soul of the Church. At that point, the debate over salvation outside the Church becomes a petty debate over WHEN sanctifying grace is given (during life or at the moment of death) and is unrelated to Glory, Heaven, and Hell. So why so much ink and sweat spilt over this issue?? I don't understand??



MHFM: 1. Unbaptized infants go to Hell, but to a part of Hell where there is no fire. That’s the teaching of the Church, and it’s covered in our book and in this video.


2. We assume you are asking about the New Rite of Ordination, as opposed to the New Rite of Episcopal Consecration.  The New Rite of Ordination is definitely invalid because of its systematic deletions of references to the true sacrificing priesthood.  This pattern of deletions paralleled what the Anglicans did, and the Anglican rite was declared invalid by Pope Leo XIII as a result of those deletions.  See: Why the New Rite of Ordination is Invalid [PDF File]


3. No, it’s not a matter of God does whatever He wants.  God does what He says.  He does not lie (Heb. 6:18).  If He contradicted in reality what He has commanded us to believe as infallibly true, it would be incompatible with Himself as “the truth” (John 14:6).  He has declared that He will only save people who are brought into His Church through faith and baptism, and that’s what He does.  Also, Pius XII did not teach that non-Catholics are related to the “soul of the Church.”  That’s covered in our book.  The notion that non-Catholics can be united to the soul of the Church is heretical.  You act like this issue isn’t a big deal.  No, it’s tied in with true faith in Christ Himself.  If one cannot believe His revelation, one doesn’t believe in Him. 




Interesting to see that Antipope Benedict XVI constantly wears the Star of David mitre. Obviously he is trying to tell everyone that he's Jewish! What an Antichrist apostate!!! I was a bit startled by Melissa's confusion. She says that the Bible is the only authority, which is not true at all:


Matthew 18:15-17: But if thy brother shall offend against thee, go, and rebuke him between thee and him alone. If he shall hear thee, thou shalt gain thy brother. And if he will not hear thee, take with thee one or two more: that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may stand. And if he will not hear them: tell the church. And if he will not hear the church, let him be to thee as the heathen and publican.


1 Timothy 3:15 - But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.


Also, the Council of Trent makes it clear that Sacred Catholic Tradition is also the Word of God, not just Holy Scripture... Melissa has probably been infected with the heresy of modernism via the V-2 sect, which she said she came from (M - "I came out of Catholicism myself" - the V-2 sect is not Catholicism at all). It's no wonder she has problems with the Rosary: AUGUSTISSIMAE VIRGINIS MARIAE, POPE LEO XIII, ON THE CONFRATERNITY OF THE HOLY ROSARY … Prayer," says St. Thomas, "is offered to a person in two ways - one as though to be granted by himself; another, as to be obtained through him. In the first way we pray to God alone, because all our prayers ought to be directed to obtaining grace and glory, which God alone gives, according to those words of Psalm Ixxxiii., 12, "The Lord will give grace and glory." But in the second way we pray to holy angels and men, not that God may learn our petition through them, but that by their prayers and merits our prayers may be efficacious. Wherefore, it is said in the Apocalypse (viii., 4): "The smoke of the incense of the prayers of the Saints ascended up before God from the hand of the angel" (Summa Theol. 2a 2ae, q. Ixxxiii. a. iv.). Now, of all the blessed in heaven, who can compare with the august Mother of God in obtaining grace?... We do not pray to the Blessed in the same way as to God; for we ask the Holy Trinity to have mercy on us, but we ask all the Saints to pray for us (Ibid.). Yet our manner of praying to the Blessed Virgin has something in common with our worship of God, so that the Church even addresses to her the words with which we pray to God: "Have mercy on sinners."


[Regarding EU]… It's interesting that the European flag has twelve stars, and the designer of the flag, Arsene Heitz, claims to have been inspired by the twelve stars of the woman of the Apocalypse. This actually supports the fact that the European Union is the Beast of the Apocalypse, because the twelve stars on their flag is absent the Blessed Virgin Mary. In other words, the Whore of Babylon, is, as you've proven before, the counter - Church to the Immaculate Bride of Christ, the Catholic Church, which is usually symbolized by the Blessed Virgin Mary. What's really interesting is that the poster with the tower of Babel shows the twelve stars inverted...


God Bless,

Chris White




Just two quick thoughts on Francis Harmann’s recent inquiry:


1)      I think the word sword, or phrase “by the sword” is / has been used at least in English idiom to mean any violence or the use thereof.  Christ’s warning which begins “He who lives by the sword…” did not become obsolete with the advent of gunpowder; and I heard the phrase “the state has the power of the sword” used during a TV political debate just a couple of weeks ago.  So I don’t think that the use of a gun compromises your interpretation.


2)      I think his comment regarding Apoc 18:21’s use of the term “millstone” is very interesting.


Bill Mulligan




Dear Diamond Bros.


First of all thank you for your website. I am learning so much and things are making more sense.


My mom used to tell me stories of how church was before when she grew up in Mexico and the deep reverence there was in mass. People would dress appropriately,

women would cover their heads, the mass in Latin etc.  I would always wonder why things were not like that now, but now I do.


Well, I wish things were like that again, except for the language of Latin. It is a beautiful language, but how can anyone understand what the priest is saying if it is in Latin? I am sure that the Latin liturgy is meaningful, but I do not think I can comprehend it. Can you please tell me why Latin should be used and its importance or significance? All I know, is that it is one of the oldest languages and the Latin Vulgata bible is one the closest translations of the Greek and Hebrew scriptures. I just don't see any advantage of still using

Latin to communicate the Gospel or the mass, but I do see an advantage of having a full traditional, trinity, complete mass in a native tongue, such as English.


Thank you,

Please keep up the good work,

God bless,



MHFM: Even if a person can’t understand what is being said, that is not the main issue.  Latin is more conducive to the sacredness of the event, and reverence for the mysteries.  (Again, we are speaking generally about normal times, when there were many valid Latin masses to attend.)




Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,


Here is another news on the V2 Church scandal - AP IMPACT: Predator priests shuffled around globe--- link:


God bless us all.


In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey, EENS-Sedevacantist (Philippines)


B-16 Star of David

Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\Benedict_XV_with_Jews\b_star.jpgDescription: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\Benedict_XV_with_Jews\good_2.JPG

MHFM: Here are three pictures of Benedict XVI wearing the Jewish Star of David on his mitre during the Easter Vigil service on Holy Saturday.  He also wore it during the Good Friday service.  He wears it quite a bit, and apparently for the most important events.  Is he trying to tell us something?  We think so.  Paul VI wore the breastplate of the ephod, John Paul II had the upside-down cross, and Benedict XVI has the Star of David mitre. 

Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\Benedict_XV_with_Jews\good_3.JPG



Subject: V-2 “popes” and the UN


It would be an interesting analysis to see the long list of Anti Catholic Laws of the UN & EU, contrast that  with the Catholic Faith and the fact that the V2 "Popes" support the UN and its power over the people. In the early 1900's millions of Catholics were criminally abused and oppressed only then they didn't have the full support of the Vatican.






I have a question regarding the usage of the Brown Carmelite Scapular.  I know it needs to be Blessed by a valid-ordained Priest, and then (the first time a person wears it) a ceremonial Investiture takes place. When I started wearing mine, I was aided by a priest with ties to the FFSPX. 


So my question is, for the sake of other individuals:  If someone does not have the benefit of a valid ordained priest, what should this person do?


Refrain from using it?  Wear it and ask Our Lady for protection, and ask the help of a Priest as soon as one becomes available?


Wear the Scapular without worries hoping that epikea is applicable to this situation?...


MHFM: One should just wear it, even if it hasn’t been blessed.


Sr. Lucia Impostor Video


Subject: Sr. Lucia Impostor Video


Dear MHFM,

This is so sad. You are probably right that the roman catholic church is the whore of babylon, but you are still missing the big picture. I came out of catholicism myself, because God showed me the truth through his holy word. Scripture is the only authority and it tells us that Jesus is the way , the truth, and the light. From your video quote "it is through praying the Rosary that we will save ourselves". We cannot save ourselves- it's impossible. That is the very reason Jesus Christ died for our sins. If we could save ourselves via praying the Rosary "do not pray like the heathens do, with vain repetitions" then Jesus would not have needed to die on the cross. These apparitions claiming to be Mary are NOT the mercy seat- they are a deception. Jesus is the Mercy Seat….


Love in Christ, Melissa


MHFM: You are very confused and very wrong.  If the post-Vatican II “Church” is the Whore of Babylon, that means that the pre-Vatican II Church is the Bride of Christ: the true Church.  For the great harlot is only the great harlot if it represents an abandonment of the true faith.  Only God’s people can become a harlot.  If it’s a false pagan religion, as some Protestants assert, then it couldn’t qualify as the Whore of Babylon.


You also say that one cannot save himself.   


1 Timothy 4:16- “Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.”


Here we see that one must continue in the faith to be saved.  One could lose the faith, therefore.  We also read that it is in doing things that one is saved!


This verse is quite important because some Protestants – who preach the false doctrine of justification by faith alone – like to contrast the Catholic and Protestant views in these terms: The Protestant view [they say] is all about Jesus saving man and doing all the work; but the Catholic view is about man doing the work and saving himself.  Obviously the Catholic view is not about man saving himself, but that Jesus saves man by making salvation possible.  Without Jesus, man cannot do anything.  However, a man must cooperate with God’s grace.  If he cooperates and takes advantage of the salvation which Jesus has made available, and does the things which God requires, then he will save himself.


In the verse above, we see that the Bible teaches the Catholic view; it’s not all Jesus without man’s cooperation.  Rather, man’s works and deeds (i.e., what man does) clearly determine whether he – and others – will have salvation.  Faith-alone Protestants such as yourself would have to condemn the above verse as heretical. 


Catholicism is the only biblical faith.  Please listen to our Papacy and Justification debates, and get our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.  You are definitely wrong and deceived!





I can only say that I hope you will put this "Is the World about to End?" series into DVD format. This is amazing. It needs to be in the hands of all who care at all about the Second Coming.

Also, what meat is not allowed on Fridays? Is it anything that walks on land, excluding anything in the sea? Is it anything that walks on four feet, excluding birds? Is it everything, excluding only fish? I wish I had asked this a long time ago.  I appreciate your time.

God Bless,


MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  The Catholic Encyclopedia explains: “Meat diet comprises the flesh, blood, or marrow of such animals and birds as constitute flesh meat according to the appreciation of intelligent and law-abiding Christians. For this reason the use of fish, vegetables, mollusks, crabs, turtles, frogs, and such-like cold-blooded creatures is not at variance with the law of abstinence. Amphibians are relegated to the category whereunto they bear most striking resemblance.” (Abstinence)




Hi Brother Michael Diamond,

I one time saw some excellent videos that you presented, but I don't remember where I saw them… However, I did watch some amazing videos ("Is The World About To End?" in 6 parts.)…

I really respect your research and thoroughness.

Thanks you so much, David Nardone




I agree very much with Maria Juanita, you should make these end of the world videos into dvd's, I think they will help open the eyes of people.   Hopefully!!!=






Dear Brothers,


In your video series "Is the World About To End?" you quote the passage in the Apocalypse that the Beast would be wounded by a sword, while Mehmet Ali Agca shot JPII with a gun, not a sword.  Could it be that this passage then refers to the fact that Agca was a Muslim which is symbolized by the sword? 


Furthermore, is it not true that the Vatican read JPII into the Third Secret of Fatima as the martyred "pope in white" in order to--whether consciously or unconsciously--divert us from the fact that he might instead be the exact opposite, i.e., The Beast of the Apocalypse?  And if it was Benedict who was responsible or primarily responsible for this misreading, then is this not another way he is giving aid and support to the worship of the Beast, a la Apoc 13?  What a great diversionary tactic it would be to present an episode that points to JPII as the Beast (his being wounded in an assassination attempt) as instead being the fulfillment of the Third Secret Fatima with JPII as martyr instead (which you already seem to have alluded to in your video)!


Finally, perhaps you will be covering this in later videos on the topic, but I was struck by how in Apoc 18:21 "And a mighty angel took up a stone, as it were a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying: With such violence as this, shall Babylon, that great city, be thrown down and shall be found no more at all"--which seems to have direct reference to the worldwide pedophilia scandal in the modern church and its cover up by the modern hierarchy on a universal scale, and Our Lord's words in Mat 18:6 that "But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea"--only now these words as they are found in the Apocalypse are applied to the church as a whole centered in Rome rather than to this or that individual.


With Prayers,

Francis Herrmann


MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  Concerning the sword, you raise an interesting point.  Additionally, since guns didn’t exist when St. John lived, if he saw someone pull out a handgun which caused injury and blood, then to him that instrument would truly be a sword. 


With regard to the Vatican’s false version of the Third Secret, we definitely believe it was tied in with the admiration of the beast.  It was Satan’s total inversion of the truth: portraying the Antichrist and the beast who is wounded instead as the hero of the message of Fatima.  We also believe that’s why he was wounded on May 13, 1981. 


With regard


Dear Brothers,


With regard to mr/Mrs P on “outrageous” We see how difficult it is for many Catholics and others to grasp and see clear on the true Catholic faith at this time in history because the faith preached today has been reduced to nothing but good feelings. People have turned out to be not only of bad will but because almost everybody’s lives are lived very superficial they now hate the truth about God and His Church and are unable to accept the narrow path.


If one considers and accepts this simple fact of truth that the Holy Catholic Apostolic Church came to exist two thousand years ago long before the implementation of Vatican II false Council it is not difficult for a person to conclude that all the evil in the Vatican and in the Church in general is a result of this false anti-dogmatic council and its non-Catholic preachers who successfully infiltrated the Church.


I myself who participated whole heartedly in the apostate Vatican II Church, asked myself many questions, and one in particular crossed my mind… if it was at all possible that God would be in favour of all these drastic changes such as opening the doors to non-Catholic sects, paedophiles etc.etc... how could it be possible that once things were done and taught in one manner, revealed by the Holy Spirit for so many years and in a few years everything is dismantled and now considered outdated. While in intensive search for the truth through prayer and the word of God, the light lit, yes, one morning just before or just after I had discovered MHFM I cannot precise, I was woken up by a sweet heavenly voice, clearly a woman, with these words “Thank you father.”


I wondered what these words and the sweetness of the voice meant, then understood this to be the voice of Our Blessed Mother whose intercession for me had been answered and giving me the grace of hearing her thanksgiving to the Father, so as I went through Most Holy Family Monastery material on the teachings of the Holy Popes with all the Divine Revealed Dogmas taught before this horrible Vatican II council took place, everything made sense.


Only a very evil person after being presented with the facts and by reading the teachings of the Catholic Church through MHFM site will continue to deny the undeniable.  These shameful people have treated the true Church of Christ the Catholic Church as they treat their political affairs, in the same lines, shame on them.  I do believe, with all my heart that if a still doubtful Catholic or non-Catholic stops to think and by the sincere prayer of the Rosary he will be given the grace and God will not leave him in the spiritual darkness of the true faith.  I thank the Lord’s providence through MHFM and the powerful intercession of the Queen of the Heavenly Hosts Amen. 


M.Fernanda da Silva




Dear MHFM,


Your series on the Apocalypse is getting more interesting by each video that you post. It seems that your prayers for insight have been abundantly answered. I will wait until you have posted the last video to share with you some pieces of information that I found interesting while looking into this whole issue (inspired by your investigation). So far, your view and take on this issue has been stunning, to say the least. Keep it up.


I have a question. In the fourth video you correctly analyze the relationship between the harlot and the beast---‘’And the ten horns which thou sawest in the beast: these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her with fire.’’  In your opinion, what is the meaning or interpretation of the last portion of this verse (the desolation and nakedness is pretty clear): ‘’… and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her with fire. ’’  ?  To me it sounds as if this verse is prophesying the physical destruction of apostate Rome (like in a nuclear fire or something similar—just my opinion) because in another place the Bible also says : ‘’... Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine, and she shall be burnt with the fire; because God is strong, who shall judge her. 9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication, and lived in delicacies with her, shall weep, and bewail themselves over her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning: 10 Standing afar off for fear of her torments, saying: Alas! alas! that great city Babylon, that mighty city: for in one hour is thy judgment come…’’


Thank you and God bless.


V. from Croatia


MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  Yes, it might very well indicate that Rome will be physically destroyed. 


Came Across


To whom it may concern,


As if by "chance" I come across your site, at a point in my life where I feel the urgency to join the legion of mary and work on my spiritual life. Please pray for me, I truly want to be the saint I am called to be. To defend the true church and the catholic faith and to think of God constantly so that even in breathing I pray.


Thank you.





Dear Bro Peter and Michael.

We cannot thank you enough for this new video ( Is the world about to end?). In watching it, it was just so simple and easy to understand though i had never for once thought it to be the way you explained it until now. May Our Lady continue to give you people the wisdom to continue in this noble course. Amen.

I however wanted to plead with you people that if its not going to be out of context with what you have in mind in the remaining parts, you could also clear up some misconceptions on Matt. 24 and also the so called "Rapture". A lot of people misunderstand these especially in V II and protestantism. I was also a victim of this in V II till i joined the true faith and saw how deceived i was.




No idea


Hello Dear sir,

I simply want to point out a mistake you made in your thesis against salvation outside the visible Catholic Church. You quoted Pope Innocent that one cannot optain abosolution without belief in basics of Christian Dogma. However, I think it is quite obvious that it was referring to confession, thus it mentions abosolution and says nothing about baptism of
desire or receiving santifying grace for the first time. Since you didn't provide any background on this decree or its history, I assume you haven't research it yet perhaps you should. Also, it is a fact that the Church condemned the Jansenist (sp?) position that grace is not given outside the Church.


Now lets clarify this: it is certainly referring to santify grace because the Church also condemned the Janenists for saying that all natural good acts of kindness, ect, whatsoever must be the work of God's actual grace. It is clear that the Janenist did not believe that no actual grace was given to non-Catholics, otherwise they would never convert; and this contradicts there Augustinian beliefs on grace. So the Church defined that santifying grace is given outside the Church. Or more correctly, it condemned the Janenist opposition to it, but did not thereby adopt their terminology of what "outside the Church" was to mean in Catholic thought.

For you insist that your interpretation is the correct one of that doctrine, despite the fact that logically it IS possible to interpret it the way the mind of the Church is interpreting it now, is to set yourself up as a Magisterium. You are not all extremely well read on these issues, and you are deluding yourself with error. I know you won't respond to this
email because there is no response you can give. Your silence will prove your error.  Let us pray for one another

Your Friend,


MHFM: You don’t have any idea what you are talking about.  We quote Pope Innocent III for many things, but recently we quoted his decree in the Fourth Lateran Council which defined that there is no salvation outside the Church.  We did not quote him on absolution (not: “abosolution,” as you say).  Second, the Church did condemn the error that no grace is given outside the Church.  Of course, non-Catholics can get certain graces even though they are outside the Church.  Those graces are called predisposing or prevenient graces.  Without such graces, no one could turn to God or begin the conversion process. But that does not mean that non-Catholics can receive sanctifying grace outside the Church.  The Church never taught such a thing. 


To further illustrate your bad will, let’s look at two of the errors on this matter which were condemned by Pope Clement XI:


#29. Outside the Church, no grace is granted. – Condemned by Pope Clement XI, Unigenitus, Denz. 1379


As we see, it’s condemning the notion that no grace at all is given outside the Church, not that SANCTIFYING grace is not given outside the Church.  You are dishonest.  The error right before it, #28, also sheds light on the point.


#28. The first grace which God gives to the sinner is the remission of sin. – Condemned, Denz. 1378


We see that it condemned the notion that the first grace a sinner receives is remission of sins.  It follows, therefore, that the graces given to the sinners and those outside the Church are predisposing graces which bring them to conversion, not sanctifying grace.  In fact, the idea that non-Catholics can receive sanctifying grace is contrary to infallible Catholic teaching. 


Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra: “There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which nobody at all is saved, in which Jesus Christ is both priest and sacrifice.”


Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra: “With Faith urging us we are forced to believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic Church and that, apostolic, and we firmly believe and simply confess this Church outside of which there is NO SALVATION NOR REMISSION OF SIN…”


As we see here, there is no remission of sin outside the Church.  One cannot have sanctifying grace (justification) without remission of sins.  So, you have no idea what you are talking about and your position is heretical.   What’s astounding is that you are a heretic, completely wrong and you don’t even know us; yet you try to insult us off the bat when you are the one who is wrong.  The level of blindness, dishonesty and bad will is truly staggering. 




Subject: Apocalypse Video


Dear Brothers…


I was able to listen to all four parts of your new video and have been thinking about it since.  Just like your recent video on "The Third Secret of Fatima," it is filled with information. There are so many fearful aspects of this now revealed, true history of the 20th century, so many things to contemplate about what has been done to Jesus' Church.  Animus dilendi has always been satan and his children's primary motivation.


Only a Roman Catholic who had studied Fatima thoroughly, who knew the Bible thoroughly, who understood Catholic dogma, and had the blessings of God the Holy Ghost would be capable of correctly interpreting the Book of the Apocalypse.  There has been no one who had the requisite knowledge as well as the essential blessing from God.  Until now.  Most Holy Family Monastery has been given a signal blessing from God…


So many years of misinterpretations of the Book of the Apocalypse by boisterous heretics which they call Revelations.  Meanwhile, nothing has been revealed to them; revelations indeed.  Their interpretations are now seen as gibberish; pure nonsense with their asinine rapture.  Since they reject our Blessed Mother, so her Son has rejected them.  Since they know not the Apparitions of Fatima, they will be incapable of understanding the Bible's final Book…


No wonder Leo XIII collapsed when he was shown what would happen to the Bride of Christ in the 20th century and what is about to beset this generation in the 21st.  May we hold firm to Christ and stand brave for Him.


God have mercy on us.






Thank you for your most excellent series on the End.  I always thought that the beast that was wounded but recovered was communism as a whole.

Great series.  Also, I had never seen the upside down cross on the "popes" or in other places, I stopped looking at these guys when I was a boy.






You accuse Fr. Corapi of blasphemy and false teaching on a number of things, one being that salvation is possible outside of the Catholic Church... Christ himself teaches the same to his apostles: Mark 9:38 "Teacher," said John, "We saw someone driving out demons in your name and we forbad him, because he followeth not us." Christ answererd, "Hinder him not, for he that is not against you, is for you." Also you say that Jews are not saved, I have read in the New Testament that God has not abandoned His chosen beloved people, the Jews.

Our Lord has instructed us to love one another. I am a Catholic and my prayer to our Father in Heaven is this: "Father have mercy on me and the whole world, for your Son has asked you to "forgive them as they do not know what they do." Please forgive me as I forgive others and have forgiveness and mercy on all of us so that all may enter your Kingdom."

Our Father knows what is in our heart and in my heart is the desire for all to enter the Kingdom of God. For Christ came for the likes of me, the sick.




MHFM: It’s just amazing how you people don’t care one bit about what the Church teaches.  As soon as you encounter a dogma you don’t like, you simply concoct heretical misunderstandings of Scripture and pit them against defined Catholic dogma.  It’s a defined dogma that there is no salvation outside the Church, and that the Jews, the Muslims, etc. are not saved unless they convert.  You must be reading some other Bible to come away with the belief that Jews can be saved without baptism and conversion to the true faith; for the Bible is quite clear that Jews must accept Christ to be saved. 


In the passage you bring up, Jesus is not endorsing the ministry of those who reject His truth.  That individual was one with their truth, even though he did not travel with Jesus in a special manner like the Apostles did.  That event also occurred prior to the Resurrection.  To say that Jesus is saying that people can reject His dogmas (the Church’s official teachings) and be saved is totally heretical and ridiculous. 


Pope Leo XII, Ubi Primum (# 14), May 5, 1824: “It is impossible for the most true God, who is Truth itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and the Rewarder of good men, to approve all sects who profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their membersby divine faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and that no other name under heaven is given to men except the name of Jesus Christ in which we must be saved.  This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church.”


Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos (# 13), Aug. 15, 1832:  “With the admonition of the apostle, that ‘there is one God, one faith, one baptism’ (Eph. 4:5), may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever.  They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that ‘those who are not with Christ are against Him,’ (Lk. 11:23) and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him.  Therefore, ‘without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate (Athanasian Creed).”





I'm enjoying your new series on the end of the world. Thank-you for the work you've done to clear up my questions over the years on the mystery of the beasts and of Babel. It was my misunderstanding that modern day Babylon was Babel. Not surprising, the beast with which the woman sits has the devilish (Texan) long horns, and the EU Parliament poster depicts the Tower of Babel having a modern day crane. This indicates the prophesy, that the tower of Babel would be rebuilt again (present time). During my past tour of Iraq (formally know as the garden of Eden), I was amazed to see the rebuilding of modern day Babylon to include two or more large mounds of earth that represented the foundation of a large structure (tower). This construction was begun by Iraq's previous leader Hussein and continues to be rebuilt by American taxpayers dollars. This is just a decoy to those without eyes to see the truth and the real babel that is worldwide communism. Before finding your site over two years ago, I thought that there was quite a bit of time before Babylon was completed and before the end of the world.  You've clearly shown how the EU (Babel) is in full force and the beast depicted in the bible. I'm quite sure that all those souls that have perished into Hell, all thought they had more time.  Whereas, all the saints seemed to never had enough time to complete their work in Christ Jesus.

Also, the Vatican II continues to defend their sinister leader of their false sect against those they consider hate groups for over fifty years.  Not the fact that the act of pedophilia is a hate crime, and that the VII pedophile priests think they should not be blamed, but remain unpunished. As with all the corrupt world leaders and the VII sect; if you’re not with them, you’re the enemy. I am accused of hate when I try to point out to VII sect members they are accessories to the anti-popes love for pedophilia, abortion, gays, etc., every time they turn a blind eye and toss money into the VII collection basket to pay for all the court trials.  The "Bad Will Mystery" continues, as the VII sect continues to believe the VII church is the church Christ founded while here on earth. Sadly, the sinister joke is on them.

The recent agreement on nukes between Obama (not the U.S.) and Russia's
Medvedev, makes you wonder why they even need nukes anyways, when they plan to take over the world with the silent Communist Socialist One World Order, with the aid of the Vatican II anti-popes. With all the recent destruction around the world from earth quacks, volcanoes, etc., I believe God is just warming up, before coming to the plate at the bottom of the ninth inning.

God Bless,
Tom Miles




Dear Holy Brothers,

I would like to suggest if you could sell on dvd the end of world tapes.  These tapes when distributed will be a powerful tool for conversion.  Thanks for all the good things you do.  What do we need to do to avoid the mark of the beast? What do we need to do to assure salvation   Thanks and GOD bless in the Precious Blood of JESUS,

Maria Juanita




My children who are teens, don't agree with much of what I have to say about the truth of the Catholic church, although I do always remind them that when the time comes of judgment, they cannot say I didn't warn them, or instruct them. Yes their mother is remarried (in the eyes of the state) but not in the eyes of God, and there is a lot of protestantism that reeks in that home.


This is why it is SO important for young people to become focused on what the church teaches on marriage, and what our Lord expects, and praying for the proper partner in marriage.  My focus is saying the rosary everyday, and even though it is hard living in accordance to God will, another reason I ask to be remembered in your prayers.


I do want to say, that had I not found your website years ago, I would be very confused in many different areas.  So brothers keep up the good fight, and remember you have a friend in Christ here in AZ.







I don't know if anyone noticed that with all the bad press about the sex abuse in the vatican ll counter church, benedict has been using a more conservative crucifix, you don't see him with the bent cross.  He makes me sick. =






How could this man say that if you are not a catholic, you are lost for eternity? That is to judge all other Christians to go to hell!




MHFM: It’s not hard to understand, and it should not be hard to believe.  There is no salvation outside of Christ; and there is no other way to be in Christ than to accept all of His truth and His Church.  Only Catholics do that.


Acts 2:47- “And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.”


Matthew 18:17- “And if he will not hear them: tell the church. And if he will not hear the church, let him be to thee as the heathen and publican.”





Some I have shared this excellent exegesis with have formed the opinion that because they are referred to as "Kings" this means these False "Popes" are legitimate and therefore B-16 will be the last "Pope".  I hope you will clarify that in other segments.


Bill Hoyt


MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  They obviously ignored the point, which is that the statement indicates that these seven have a temporal kingship.  It does not mean that all of them have legitimate spiritual authority over the Catholic Church.  They are all called “kings” because they all truly were kings.  They all had/have temporal authority as kings of the Vatican City State.  Those individuals who conclude that since they have a kingship they must have true authority in the Church clearly have trouble grasping the distinction between temporal authority and true spiritual authority.  But more of these issues will be expanded upon in remaining parts.



… The new series of videos on the Apocalypse by brother Peter are really revealing, and shows at what point we have come and people yet remain so blind and obstinate against the faith.

An interesting point is that in the Gospel of St. Luke, chap 21, v.24 states something very interesting "
...and Jerusalem shall be trodden down by the Gentiles till the times of the nations be fulfilled."  It´s interesting that now that the Jewish people returned to Jerusalem, we see the phenomenom of "globalisation", which means in practice the death of nations (they time ended), as they become inter-dependant and in the end give up all their autonomy or even power to rule (E.U. as a start), and the whole world for the future as they plan.

Regarding the recent floodings that took place at Rio de Janeiro, i´d like to share my opinion: I live in Brazil, and I believe this is clearly God´s punishment, and I´ll explain the reason: the floods started immediately after Holy Week passed.

Well the people are so godless, so evil, that during all holy week I witnessed most places sponsoring parties, dance clubs, "funk parties" (which is the utmost in promiscuity and immorality), carnival, barbecues the whole week (even friday), etc. Well, as monday after came, the rains started, and didn´t stop without leaving God´s punishment on all these outrages. Here where I live is 400 km to Rio de Janeiro, and I can assure, that it looked like the biblical Flood, I mean, the rain didn´t stop, most of the cities around got flooded with water, and Rio de Janeiro, being the "capital" of sinful lusts… was one of the cities that suffered the most.

Anyways, i´d like to say that I wait anxious for the continuation of the Apocalypse video series, and wish many blessings upon your monastery.





I have recently become a father.


Because of the molestation that has taken place in the Catholic church over the past 90 years... I've decided to leave the Catholic church for a nice Methodist ministry in my area.  The only reason is the Catholic church's continued ignorance of this issue.


Why would Pope Benedict in the 1980's approve the transfer of a German priest and sex offender for therapy and then allowed him to return to the church and molest more children???  Why would Pope Benedict in the 1990's fail to defrock an American priest who molested 200 deaf boys in Wisconsin???




MHFM: Benedict XVI is not Catholic.  He is not a true pope, but a heretical antipope.  Please look at the material on our website.  The Vatican II “Church” is not the true Catholic Church.  Moreover, even though Benedict XVI is not Catholic, it’s not logical to reject Catholicism over the sins of one who claims to be Catholic.  The Catholic Church is the only biblical Church, the one true Church.  Please look at our “Refuting Protestantism” section and obtain our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.




Brothers Michael & Peter:


The situation is past a full state of alarm in the church.  The rosary and quiet solitude and praying are all that can help I believe.  Every time you talk to someone about the Talmudic Communist Counterfeit Catholic Church of Vatican II they look at you like you are a madman. Just like the Pharisees used to say that Jesus had beelzebub.  Almost all "Catholics" refuse to learn the teachings and encyclicals before 1958. Praying that these apostates (Ratzinger and the "College of Heretical & Apostate Bishops) become Catholics seems futile.  We must pray that people would leave the illegal and invalid novus ordo "mess".  May God have mercy on our souls.  Since we live in a protestant masonic country I can only say "If it is anti American to have first allegiance to a valid and true pontiff, then it is anti catholic to be an American." What irony that in this supposed (not) Christian country, if you want to be president and you’re Catholic the people would say your first allegiance is to Rome, which is true, but we have so many in government of the Talmudic persuasion who hold duel American and Israeli citizenship (a-okay with the Protestants), yet the Protestants who put Israel on the level of a God ordained state don't see that Israel is anti christian, but demand they be protected.  How bad willed they are and what an affront to the savior. Ever since I was a child I have heard the anti Catholic bilge spilling out from Protestants.  It is time for Catholics to avoid any familiarity with family members who have become Protestants or who say they are Catholic yet: adhere to the Vatican II teachings and seek spiritual teachings from satan’s little helpers like Ratzinger, every bishop I know and almost every priest I know. I ask my dear sisters about some new heresy or apostasy emanating from Rome or American bishops (literally happens on a daily basis now) and they say they need to go talk to their parish priest.  I say "why don't you read pre 1958 encyclicals, or the teaching of the fathers of the Church, or just read the Vatican II documents or JP II or Rat zingers books as they condemn themselves by their own writings.  No one has time. "Indeed this great mass of calamities had its inception in the heretical societies and sects in which all that is sacrilegious, infamous, and blasphemous has gathered as bilge water in a ship's hold, a congealed mass of all filth". (Mirari Vos- Gregory XVI).


Thank you for everything you do and providing your materials at basically no cost.  God Speed To You.  


Paul R.


Concerning EWTN


To the "pray for me a sinner" I know exactly what they are doing. I go to Saint Thomas and am surrounded by V2ers. They are promoting the you cannot judge heresy. Because if you say pray for us sinners you are condemning others as sinners, which is unacceptable for them. You can only judge yourself is what the message is. 




New Video


MHFM: This new video covers how the Antichrist, the beast of revelation, the mark of the beast, 666, the great harlot, the great red dragon, etc. might have already been fulfilled.


Is the World about to End ? - Part 1


Is the World about to End ? - Part 2


Is the World about to End ? - Part 3


Is the World about to End ? - Part 4


There are more parts than four, and they will be added soon.  We recommend watching these parts in order. 




Subject: P?


I know it is just more of the same, but P’s letter has to be about the worst I’ve ever seen.  What a combination of arrogance and ignorance!  Hopefully the “ignorance” is predominate, and P will take the time to consider your response, complete with your usual, devastating, citations, and rethink his (perhaps her more likely) positions.   Maybe, let’s hope P’s passion and zeal are good signs (better than indifference).  It is quite possible today for someone (perhaps anyone under say 45) who considers himself “Catholic”, and studies the Novus Ordo Catechism, to never have been exposed to a shred of real Catholic truth.  Well now “P” has been exposed.  I hope there is a follow-up.     


Bill Mulligan




Dear Brothers,


P's email is outrageous and displays a diabolical insolence. It is also a classic study in heretical ambiguity. P's main weakness, apart from bad will, is a misunderstanding of "the infallibility of the popes," because he/she accuses you, ridiculously, of denying the infallibility of the popes. This is most likely a result of P's faith in man, rather than in Jesus Christ. The ambiguity lays in the fact that a true pope is not infallible in every situation, i.e. always; a true pope only speaks or teaches infallibly in a very limited and specific situation:


First Vatican Council, SESSION 4, Chapter 4. On the infallible teaching authority of the Roman pontiff, 9, 10 - Therefore, faithfully adhering to the tradition received from the beginning of the christian faith, to the glory of God our saviour, for the exaltation of the catholic religion and for the salvation of the christian people, with the approval of the sacred council, we teach and define as a divinely revealed dogma that when the Roman pontiff speaks EX CATHEDRA, that is, when, 1. in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, 2. in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, 3. he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole church, he possesses, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed his church to enjoy in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals. Therefore, such definitions of the Roman pontiff are of themselves, and not by the consent of the church, irreformable. So then, should anyone, which God forbid, have the temerity to reject this definition of ours: let him be anathema.


… Also, the papacy is not a sacrament like baptism, confirmation or holy orders, all of which imprint an indelible mark on the soul. The Papacy can be lost by someone who was a true pope, but the indelible mark imprinted on the soul by those three sacraments stays there forever. So a good question for V-2 "Catholics to ask themselves is, what's more important, the Papacy itself or the man who occupies the Papacy? It should be obvious to anyone who can read that it is the Papacy, not the pope, since popes come and go, but the Papacy remains unchanged and unchangeable. The Papacy, the Chair of Peter, does not move, though his successors do. Popes can sin, but the Papacy cannot, since the Papacy is an office, not a man…


Chris White




Subject: Fr. Corapi video


I think you need to study the catechism cause everything you spoke of are inflamed very much with an ignorant view of these subjects. How dare you deny the infallibility of the popes. No one especially you have no right to objet to the teaching of the Pope is the earthly figure of Christ. Also Christ says "no one can get to the father EXCEPT through me" therefore as long as you accept Christ as your true and sovern savior and you sincerely believe and love him you can get to the Father. Therefore a protestant minister can be saved despite them not being Catholic. In our catechism we teach that all faiths have inspired truths given by Christ himself, so we are to accept these truths and be aware of them and try to bring those people who believe these truths to the ENTIRE truth which is taught infallibly by the Catholic Church both orthodox and roman through the Pope and Patriarchs. YOUR views are heretical and contrary to a millenia of teachings by our ONE HOLY CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC church and im ashamed of you that you feel you can talk bad about an ordained Priest who is a follower and preacher of Christ and worker of the apostles. Shame on you for your ignorance. May Christ illuminate your heart and mind so that you see the errors of your ways and I hope you turn your life around because from this point you are on your way to live with satan and his fallen angels in HELL where as of right now YOU BELONG!

and maybe he can bring you to the LIGHT OF TRUTH




MHFM: You know nothing about the Catholic faith.  You boldly express your belief that people can be saved outside the Catholic Church.  That is heresy.  You therefore reject a defined Catholic dogma.  You prove that you are not Catholic and are in fact ipso facto excommunicated.  You probably don’t know what ipso facto excommunication is, but nevertheless it applies to you and the heretic Corapi.


Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra: “There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which nobody at all is saved, in which Jesus Christ is both priest and sacrifice.”


Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino,” 1441, ex cathedra:

“The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives; that the unity of this ecclesiastical body is of such importance that only for those who abide in it do the Church’s sacraments contribute to salvation and do fasts, almsgiving and other works of piety and practices of the Christian militia produce eternal rewards; and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”


These are dogmatic definitions.  You clearly reject what these popes infallibly taught.  You thus reject the Papacy and Jesus Christ.  You are outside the Church. 


Speaking about the conflict between Protestants and professing Catholics in Ireland, “Fr.” John Corapi declared: “I don’t care if you’re Baptist or Catholic; you are Christian.  Just practice it.”  That is blatantly heretical.  It’s just a small example of why he is not a Catholic, but rather a modernist phony who deceives bad-willed apostates like you.  If you had any clue what you were talking about or doing spiritually, you would figure out that you and he hold the Catholic faith to be meaningless.  But you don’t because God leaves you in blindness for your unspeakable bad will.




Subject: LA closing liturgy video




I just watched that video and I noticed at about the 5 minute mark, the narrator indicates that the Deacons were entering with their wives, "getting ready to offer PRAISE and WORSHIP TO God's gathered people" .... Similar to the slip up by Alex Jones, this narrator wittingly or unwittingly admits that this definitely is the worship of man.


-Will Weigand




I have read and admire the actions taken by the men to separate from their wives. On my part, i am not married but live with heretical parents who are also obstinate. The man i.e my father believes so much in pagan things and still calls himself a "catholic" .My problem is that at times, they fight themselves to the point of inflicting injuries on themselves such that if one is not there, the consequences would be disastrous. He also accuses the wife of being the cause of his misfortune. To be honest, at times i do feel that God is punishing them for their obstinacy but not intervening when they do violence against themselves could also be bad. What can one do in such case. I am not working and have no means of being on my own.

Pls i need an advice 



MHFM: You should continue to live the Catholic faith where you are, and avoid getting involved in your parents’ problems.  As long as you have tried to show them the truth and convert them, you need not bother with them anymore or even worry about their fights.  It’s up to them to accept the truth, and you should focus on what you have to do.  The fact that you are living there is not your problem.




Dear Brothers, I recently tuned into the EWTN television network and saw something that I thought wasn't the norm.  The network showed the rosary being recited by groups of people in a large field.  What I noticed was that a young girl was spotlighted and she alone was reciting the rosary.  But when the "hail mary" was recited the girl in question said "pray for me a sinner" instead of "pray for us sinners......." . Could you please comment on this. Are we not supposed to pray for all sinners?  Thank you.  






Dear Brothers:


Greeting in Jesus Christ resurrection.


Great works, this is what most people are waiting to heard. Even if they are pagans, everybody senses in their own hearts and minds that something big is about to explode. Yes, indeed I agreed with you 100%, the end of the world is at hand. God will burnt all of their pride "man-made" into dust, just as St. Peter said, everything man proud of will be burnt to ashes.


Thank you for faithfully defend the truth church and THE TRUE GOD. May God bless you and your work. Please remember me in your daily prayers…


Glory to God,


Kim-Lan Vu


Fr. D


I like a lot of the writings of Fr. Denis Fahey, but I'm curious: did he believe anything heretical?  What was his stand on EENS?


-M Rudnicki


MHFM: In his book, The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation, he denies the salvation dogma.  In fact, he denies the core message of the Gospel.  But his outrageous heresy is also held by almost every sedevacantist priest today:

Fr. Denis Fahey, The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation, p. 52: “The Jews, as a nation, are objectively aiming at giving society a direction which is in complete opposition to the order God wants.  It is possible that a member of the Jewish Nation, who rejects Our Lord, may have the supernatural life which God wishes to see in every soul, and so be good with the goodness God wants, but objectively, the direction he is seeking to give to the world is opposed to God and to that life, and therefore is not good. If a Jew who rejects our Lord is good in the way God demands, it is in spite of the movement in which he and his nation are engaged.”

Here we see the famous Irish priest Fr. Denis Fahey, whose writings are praised by many who call themselves “traditional Catholics,” teaching that Jews who reject Our Lord Jesus Christ may “have the supernatural life which God wants to see in every soul” (i.e., the state of grace) and therefore can be saved.  This is truly an abomination.  Notice how Fr. Fahey’s statement directly contradicts the word of God.


1 John 5:11-12: “And this is the testimony, that God hath given to us eternal life.  And this life is in his Son.  He that hath the Son, hath life.  He that hath not the Son, hath not life.


The word of God tells us that he that hath not the Son hath not life.  Fr. Denis Fahey tells us that a Jew who rejects the Son hath life: “a member of the Jewish Nation, who rejects Our Lord, may have the supernatural life…”  By making such a statement, Fr. Fahey reveals (unfortunately) that he wasn’t a Catholic, but a blatant heretic.  Perhaps if Fr. Fahey had spent more time getting to know the truth of Jesus Christ, His Gospel and His dogmas, rather than writing large volumes on “the forces of organized naturalism,” he would have discovered that the core focus of the entire Gospel – and the very central truth of the universe along with the dogma of the Trinity – is that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and that you must believe in Him to have eternal life. 


“For God so loved the world, as to give His only begotten Son: that whosoever believeth in Him, may not perish, but may have life everlasting.” (John 3:16)


“He that believeth in the Son hath life everlasting: but he that believeth not the Son, shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him.” (John 3:36)


To assert that one can attain salvation while rejecting Jesus Christ is to say that one can attain salvation while rejecting salvation itself.  It is one of the worst heresies that one could utter. 


“Now this is life everlasting, that they may know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.” (John 17:3)


“And he said to them [the Jews]: You are from beneath, I am from above.  You are of this world, I am not of this world.  Therefore, I said to you, that you shall die in your sins: for if you believe not that I am he, you shall die in your sin.” (John 8:23-24)


“Amen, Amen, I say to you: he that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up another way, the same is a thief and a robber… I am the door.” (John 10:1, 9)


“Jesus saith to them: I am the way, and the truth, and the life.  No man cometh to the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6)


“And when he [the Paraclete] is come, he will convince the world of sin, and of justice, and of judgment.  Of sin indeed: because they have not believed in me.” (John 15:8-9)


“For this was I born, and for this came I into the world, that I should give testimony to the truth: every one who is of the truth, heareth my voice.” (John 18:37)


 Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439, ex cathedra: “Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.– But the Catholic faith is this, that we worship one God in the Trinity, and the Trinity in unity... Therefore let him who wishes to be saved, think thus concerning the Trinity.

     But it is necessary for eternal salvation that he faithfully believe also in the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ...the Son of God is God and man...– This is the Catholic faith; unless each one believes this faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.”




Dear Brothers:

I´ve been living in Rio de Janeiro city for almost 30 years (my entire life) and I never saw such horror. I don´t disregard the distinct possibility it´s connected with other cataclysmic events like the one in Haiti. One interesting fact is that just a few days before, I actually saw chemtrails in the sky. I wonder if it´s God punishing the world, or if somehow men has achieved control over the environment.

So far, over 130 people are confirmed dead, and the city looked more like Venice. and now is filled with mud.

I entrust myself to your prayers. God may be punishing us for our depravity. This city is marked with all sorts of immorality. It´s truly a spiritual sewage of sins overflowing with sins. It´s of fitting dignity that we are now reduced to a physical sewage as well. Too bad that most people here won´t recognize this signal from Heaven about what awaits them if they do not change their ways of perdition. Please, pray for us.

Concerning your most recent videos. i´m very curious to see the remaining chapters. So far I agree with everything… I´ve always wondered how Jesus would return by surprise "like a night thief" when everyone knows he comes after the Anti-Christ is empowered. It should be obvious to anyone. Unless of course there was a deception so big that even the Anti-Christ is not perceived by what he truly was until it´s too late…

God Bless You.






Hello Brothers,


I recently watched the 4 part series you have just posted, and want to say that this is a must see for all… The Fatima CD was sent to my mother back east and she stated this was very good, and gave some to my brothers and sisters, hoping they come around from their spiritual death.


Again thank you for all the hard work, as you our included in my Rosary everyday.  If I can ask you to please remember me in your Rosary as well it is much appreciated.


God bless you and your work





Subject: Sheeple


Dear MHFM, 


Now we know why the world is coming to an end when sheeple, in the thousands, gather at an apostates tomb, a wolf in sheeps clothing,  placed in a holy place, amongst true pontiffs, and venerate this unholy Modernist, JP2, condemned by the "Greatest" pontiff of the twentieth century, St. Pope Pius X.  Truly mindboggling!






… Pius XI 1928 Mortalium Animos blows away any concept of a Catholic accepting any other "Christian" faith and the contemptible idea of ecumenism. The V2 position and promotion of it is outrageous heresy.  If they believed in the faith and the primacy of the papacy this would not be another indisputable example of their total embrace of apostasy and hatred for Jesus Christ. How long will the blood of the saints have to wait?





Absolutely wonderful, and thought provoking videos on the end of the world.  I do not follow a lot of the EU news, so most of it was new to me - I had to rewind a lot to take in all of the information.

Like everyone else, I am looking forward to the next.

Thank you for these!

Teri Thurman




Dear Bros.  Michael and Peter Dimond,


… I have managed to watch all four of the blockbuster videos… there is much information in them, and a lot of it new, which needs to be sifted through to be fully appreciated and understood. 


… There is so much one could comment on, (the EU and its inception at the Maastricht Treaty, the four beasts, the seven kings, and especially the reference to the seventh king and the shortness of his reign, which must be of some concern and should act as a wake up call for many! ) and most have done so already, and judging by what a masterful job you have done so far, we can only wait… for the sequel...


God bless,






Subject: The new video on the Apocalypse


Dear Brother Peter and Brother Michael

I just wanted to congratulate you on such a fantastic video which provides the most powerful insight into the prophecies contained in the Apocalypse and how they are describing the times we live in.  Brother Peter's analysis is clear and compelling. The material presented explaining the harlot riding the beast, and the pagan imagery of Europa riding a beast really made me sit up and consider just what evil times we are living in and how knowingly or unknowingly the architects of the EU empire are working for AntiChrist. I just wanted to ask what you consider Catholics should do who live in the EU but do not want to be complicit with this evil institution in any way?

Is even voting in European elections sinful as this legitimises this institution? It is near impossible not to be controlled or interact with the EU or other New World Order governments which are powerful and control more and more of our lives, but some advice on avoiding being morally complicit in the acts of such evil imperial bodies would
be welcome.

God Bless your very important work in saving souls and bearing witness to the Catholic Faith.

Best wishes



MHFM: Thanks for the comments and the interest.  Some of those questions will be addressed in the remaining parts, but the answer to your main question is no.  We do not believe that voting for the best option – a person you think might have a chance to make some kind of positive difference – would be wrong. 




Comment: Is the World about to End?


Brother Peter has done an outstanding job on the 4 part series.  I can’t wait for part 5.






Subject: Chronological happening in the Apocalypse


Hello Bro. Peter Dimond,

thanks for your believeable apocalypse interpretation from a catholic perspective. I agree with the godless EU will become really communist sooner or later (EUCCP resp. EUSSR, EUdSSR in german) and I will have the "fun" to be in the middle of it…

Greetings from Germany





Subject: Children Clueless on Christ


Hello Brothers!
Yesterday here in Canada, CBC showed the documentary "Supersize me". I'm sure you heard of it, the one about how McDonalds is fattening the American population. There was one part of this documentary that astonished me. At one point, the creator of the documentary is interviewing about 6-7 young kids and is showing them pictures of historical figures. The first picture was of George Washington and only one child knew about him. As he showed them the second picture, hiding it from the camera, all the kids were clueless who the person was. Then he showed the picture to the camera and it was our Lord Jesus Christ. These kids, our future, had no idea who Christ was. One of the kids took a guess with George W. Bush. I know American kids aren't very bright at some subjects, like geography, but not knowing who Christ is is really pathetic. It’s the masonic education system and the failure of the parents.






Subject: Revelation


Just wanted to express my thanks for the four-part revelation series which I watched on Easter.  I was hoping that you would study revelation. I have been going to a study of Revelation hosted by the 7th day Adventists and I appreciate your info on them. I showed it to a Baptist and he quit and I am only going tonight to pass out some of your Bible proves the Catholic faith booklets as I am hoping your great study can make it clear to them.  Thanks so much,


Rick McMahon






Thank you… for yet another brilliant take on an extremely important and timely issue. Waiting in anticipation for the rest of your presentation.


V. from Croatia 




Subject: Is the World about to End?


What a great new video. You made it so clear to understand and it all makes perfect sense i can’t wait for part 5!  I also wanted to thank you for the debates that you do. As i never have thanked you for them.






Your analysis of Saint John’s prophesy is stunning!  The EU stamp and the sculptures so revealing.  I think this will make some hardcore skeptics take notice.  Let’s hope. I anxiously await more installments.  Thank you.


Bill Mulligan




Excellent interpretation of the Apocalypse, !!    I will never forget the words of our tour guide in Hungary about 8 years ago. She grew up in communist Hungary as a girl-her father was a freedom fighter, which she didn't know till she was an adult.  She said the the 'EU was just another form of communism'!!!  She saw that they were taking over all the nations.  She said how  they had control-even over the tomatoes that you buy-for instance, one country had an excellent tomato but could not export it because the EU had control to sell the bad tomatoes to the other EU countries!  And that was just about a tomato!! At first, Hungary was not going to be part of the EU but now they are because of the pressure put upon them!   Look at the Catholic countries of Spain and Portugal-how they have caved!!!
God help us all!! God bless you and looking forward to Part 5!



The World


Dear Brothers,


What a brilliant video series on the fact that the world is about to end. That is the only accurate explanation of what and who the Beast of Apocalypse chapter 13 is - the European Union. What a great job, Bro. Peter. Thank you. You have woven the facts from the Bible, history, and the present day to prove that the EU is the Beast which the Whore of Babylon, the Vatican II sect, rides upon. Your thorough research shows, and you've distilled it into a format that is interesting, persuasive and informative on the essential details. What a breath of fresh air when compared with all the confusing Protestant interpretations on the same scriptures. It proves again that the Catholic faith is the only true religion, because it enables a Catholic to see through the lies and get to the point, so as to understand what's really important - the truth! Also, it is very fear inspiring - we really, truly are living in the last days. We mustn't hesitate to do all within our power to spread the word on the Catholic faith and how MHFM is the only true source of light for Catholics today. What a God-send. Your prayers have been answered!. The clarity, simplicity and power of the truth shines through. Thank you for bearing witness to the truth so well!!


God Bless,


Chris White




Dear Brothers,


Finally someone had put out a believable as well as fascinating account of the book of Apocalypse. I have been waiting for this for many years. Leave it to the MHFM to do it and do it right. It all adds up when you look at your presentation. The EU has basically replaced the old scenario around the sea. The harlot on the beast statues and the design of the new EU headquarters, to resemble the tower of Babel make it hard not to believe your take on this long, misunderstood book. Wow, have the heretical faiths ever got it mixed up. They are not even close. Great job! I am awaiting the completion of the series.


Your ardent supporter,


Bob Bohr




Superb work on the new "Apocalypse" videos---I think you are RIGHT on the money---most stunning truly revelatory was the comparison of the image of the not-yet-completed Towel of Babel with the EU building in France---WOW!  The Holy Ghost is guiding you and Our Lady is surely pleased by all MHFM's fine work… VERY timely for Easter.  Sincerely,




John Paul II


Dear MHFM, 


Reading about the early Church and the Nicolaitans, and how they were condemned by St. John for making sacrifices to idols, and committing fornications.  It strikes me how Satan reveals himself through antipope John Paul II and his multitudinous heresies.  In mocking St. John, Wojtyla took on St. John's holy name as John Paul II, and through his pontificate performing sacrilege, after sacrilege with identical ardor of the Nicolaitans.  How John Paul II spoke often of the early Churches and their leaders, and praising them.  What John Paul II was underhandedly referring to was the practice of heresies of the Nicolaitans, and their ilk, and how Vatican II had adopted this manner of controlling the Catholic contemporary anti-Catholic Church, and leading them right into the hands of Lucifer.  Truly diabolical and from the bowels of Hell! 






Subject: Finding Catholicism


Dear Brother Dimond,

In my recent search for truth I came across you video's condemning the Vatican II Catholic Church, I was astonished to hear a Catholic so talk about the Pope.

As I was raised as a Protestant I had always had a distrust of the Catholic Church, and I saw many things (now exposed in your videos) that I thought to be heretical. This always kept me from investigating the Catholic Tradition. However now that I have discovered the SSPX and your videos etc. I am curious to find out what the Catholic Church REALLY is, that is, before the heresies of Vatican II…

I also plan to search your website and make a list of the heresies so I can differentiate between true Catholicism and the Vatican II heretical church.

God Bless you Brother Dimond.


MHFM: We’re glad that you came across the information, and we hope that you continue to look at the website.  It’s critical to embrace the Catholic faith, the traditional authentic Catholic faith.  We recommend our “Refuting Protestantism” section.  Also, the SSPX is not fully Catholic, as our file on them explains. 


Outside the Church


Subject: Outside the Church



I heard in one of your videos that salvation outside of the Church is impossible by any means possible. But what happens with a person who never heard of Christ? Let's say an Indian living in American before it was discovered by the Europeans...

What happens to his soul? If there was no possible way for him to convert to the catholic faith, how is it possible to be sure that he is damned for all eternal life?

Why would God create a human being for eternal damnation?

Thank you very much



MHFM: This is addressed in our book: Outside the Catholic Church There is No Salvation.  The answer is that a person who dies without hearing of Christ goes to Hell.  This is the teaching of Scripture, Catholic Tradition and solemn dogmatic teaching.  The person is not damned for not having heard of Christ, but for his or her other mortal sins.  If that person had been of the truth, God would have made sure that he or she came into contact with the true faith and was baptized.  The quotes below explain it (references are in the book).


Fr. Francisco de Vitoria, O.P., a famous 16th century Dominican theologian, summed up the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church on this topic very well.  Here is how he put it:


When we postulate invincible ignorance on the subject of baptism or of the Christian faith, it does not follow that a person can be saved without baptism or the Christian faith.  For the aborigines to whom no preaching of the faith or Christian religion has come will be damned for mortal sins or for idolatry, but not for the sin of unbelief.  As St. Thomas says, however, if they do what in them lies [in their power], accompanied by a good life according to the law of nature, it is consistent with God’s providence that he will illuminate them regarding the name of Christ.


St. Augustine (428): “… God foreknew that if they had lived and the gospel had been preached to them, they would have heard it without belief.”


St. Augustine (426): “Consequently both those who have not heard the gospel and those who, having heard it, and having been changed for the better, did not receive perseverancenone of these are separated from that lump which is known to be damned, as all are going… into condemnation.”


In the Summa Theologica, St. Thomas further taught the truth that all men above reason are bound to know the principal mysteries of Christ for salvation with no exceptions for ignorance.  With regard to people who have never heard of Christ, he explains that they could not be saved; and that if one of them were of good will he would be brought into the faith:


St. Thomas Aquinas, De Veritate, 14, A. 11, ad 1: Objection- “It is possible that someone may be brought up in the forest, or among wolves; such a man cannot explicitly know anything about the faith.  St. Thomas replies- It is the characteristic of Divine Providence to provide every man with what is necessary for salvation… provided on his part there is no hindrance.  In the case of a man who seeks good and shuns evil, by the leading of natural reason, God would either reveal to him through internal inspiration what had to be believed, or would send some preacher of the faith to him…”


St. Thomas, Summa Theologica:  After grace had been revealed, both the learned and simple folk are bound to explicit faith in the mysteries of Christ, chiefly as regards those which are observed throughout the Church, and publicly proclaimed, such as the articles which refer to the Incarnation, of which we have spoken above.”


Also, the distant lands were evangelized and reached with the Gospel far earlier and faster than most people believe.  That’s covered in the book.




Subject: Lutheran/Vatican signing


I was watching this video with interest, but as I began watching I felt the need to rebut some of your comments, however, you disabled comments and so I did not bother watching the rest. If you can't clarify a question I have, what's the use? Too much work to be emailing my thoughts, so this will be the only time I write you…. Good luck figuring out your 'own' truths.




MHFM: You offer a lame excuse for being unable to specify your problem with the video.  You think that what was stated was false, yet you are unable to give an example.  You could just write in and mention what it is, but you don’t.  That’s because it would be refuted.  Your e-mail demonstrates bad will.


St. Jude

Dear Brothers Dimond,


I decided to look up St. Jude in the Liturgical Year books.   There are some interesting thoughts there we thought you might be interested in looking at.  In volume 14 page 447 The first paragraph on that page tells us why the Church exists.  "Such is the condition of her existence on earth, that she can remain here only as long as she continues to give children to our Lord; and therefore, in the Mass of Oct. 27 she makes us read the passage of the Gospel where it said: 'I am the true vine, and My Father is the husbandman.  Every branch in Me, that bearth not fruit, He will purge it, that it may bring forth more fruit.'


On page 449 "Ecclesiastical history informs us that, towards the end of his reign, and when the persecution he had raised was at its height, Domitian caused to be brought to him from the east two grandsons of the apostle St. Jude.  He had some misgivings with the regard to these descendants of David's royal line; for they represented the family of Christ Himself, whom His disciples declared to be king of the whole world. Domitain was able to reassure himself that these two humble Jews could in no way endanger the empire; and that if they attributed to Christ sovereign power, it was a power not to be visibly exercised till the end of the world.  The simple and courageous language of these two men made such an impression on the emperor, that according to the historian Hegesippus from whom Eusebius borrowed the narrative, he gave orders for the persecussion to be suspended."


It ends with a prayer on page 451. " All thanks be to you, O holy apostles, who in labor and suffering procured us this blessing; maintain in us the title and the rights of this precious adoption.  Great Evils surround us; is there any hope left to the world? The confidence of thy devout clients proclaim thee O Jude, the patron of desperate cases; and for thee O Simon, this is surely the time to prove thyself Zelotes, full of zeal.  Deign, both of you, to hear the Church's prayers; and aid her, with all your apostolic might, to reanimate faith, to rekindle charity, and to save the world."


When one realizes that there is no missionary activity in the novus ordo since all are saved and all religions are good, she already has no reason to be on earth.   And the fearful thing to think on is that the Traditional priests and people have only a little missionary zeal ...because they too believe souls do not have to be a member of the Church in order to be saved.   How many of these Traditional orders risk having no reason to exist?  Is that the reason, perhaps, that the SSPX is falling from the Traditional Faith so quickly and the poor people in her pews are struggling to choose to keep their faith or follow along to embrace the novus ordo heresies and invalid sacraments?  I myself am looking at St. Jude's patron of desperate cases in a whole new light.  His statue is now front and center in my living room along with the Holy Family because after all he is a member of that family by not only adoption but by blood.   


May God protect the Most Holy Family Monastery in its missionary zeal to bring adoptive sons to God.


Mary Ann Davis




Brother Dimond,


I am ordering 75 of your new DVDs and lots of the others, too, because I want to show people how wrong they are to think John Paul II is a saint.  Your bluntness really helped me to re-think everything.  Jesus was also very blunt when He told the people “You will die in your sin.”... I know what you are saying is correct and I pray you will continue.


Virgilia Newman




I am a Catholic, but it’s so hard to find the truth.  Your monastery has helped me so much, thank you!  I hope you continue with your work because your books really explain the truth.  God bless you!


Sherwin Contaoi


Communion of Saints and BOD


Subject: The Communion of Saints and BOD


Dear Rev. Brothers,


In the Creed we express our belief in the Communion of Saints. There is now a situation in several countries of the world where Christians are in a minority, that the majority routinely hate the Christian community and tend to blame it for all the ills of the nation.


I live in one such country where the majority non-Christian population blames us for everything from the garbage, to corruption to bad driving. Some of the people who hold such prejudices are (supposedly) God-fearing and seem to be living in a state of justification.  The Vatican II Church and the false Traditionalists will say that these people have the BOD. But how can this be? Their so-called well- meaning hatred towards Christians flatly contradicts belief in the Communion of Saints (as well as the teaching of the Mystical Body of Christ ).


I'd appreciate your comments. Thanks.




MHFM: Since they are non-Christians, certainly the people you mention don’t have the state of justification.  That’s something a Catholic must believe.  With regard to the Vatican II sect and false traditionalists holding that such individuals could have “baptism of desire,” they do hold that false (and heretical) idea.  Once they admit that they believe a certain member of a false religion could have “baptism of desire,” they must leave the door open for anyone and everyone, including people who hate Christians (Catholics).


Your point about how this contradicts the communion of saints is true, but we think it most precisely contradicts the unity of faith.  Their heretical idea destroys any notion of a true unity of faith; for the “baptism of desire” heretics must argue, when correctly cornered, that a man who rejects and even hates Jesus Christ and His followers can have the ONE FAITH AND THE ONE LORD that those who accept Jesus Christ have.  They must argue that someone who hates the Lord (the person you describe) has THE SAME FAITH as the person who believes in the Lord (the Catholic).   That is of course absurd and false, and it mocks the Church’s dogma: that all in the Church have one faith.  




Subject: domestic problems


Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,


The recent e-exchanges regarding the troublesome wife, problems with making their children truly catholic… the separation, divorce not due to infidelity but due to conflict in keeping the Catholic Faith against joining the heretical beliefs, not only limited to V2 Church.  I am most inspired how TM takes his situation with his 8-yr old son ... Joe, Bill, David, tm and the rest who share the same domestic troubles keeping the Faith.  Some of you are the type of parents, we traditional catholic children would dream of having ... In view of this struggle it comes to my mind St. Rita of Cascia's plight getting married with her pagan husband. 


We read in the Life of St. Rita of Cascia that the saint’s great desire was to become a nun, but, in obedience to the will of her parents, she, at the age of twelve, married a man extremely cruel, ill-tempered and an immoral man.  St. Rita endured his insults, abuse, and infidelities for 18 years, and bore two sons. Although she tried to raise them with Catholic values, her sons were unholy for most of their lives. Toward the end of her husband's life, St. Rita helped convert him to live in a more pious manner. Although Mancini became more congenial, his allies betrayed him, and he was violently stabbed to death. Before his death, he repented to St. Rita and the Church, and she forgave him for his transgression against her. After Mancini's murder, her sons wished to exact revenge on their father's murderers. Knowing murder was wrong, she tried to persuade them from retaliating, but to no avail. She, instead, prayed to God for Him to take away the lives of her sons instead of seeing them commit such a terrible sin. God heard St. Rita's words and her sons died of natural causes (disease) a year later. On account of the many miracles reported to have been wrought at her intercession she received in Spain the title of La Santa de los impossibiles (Patron Saint of the Impossible).


The most unfortunate scenario is St. Rita lived in the age of faith while all of us are now living in the most dreaded last days, the age of apostasy of faith leading to the Second Coming of Christ on earth.  We have to do our utmost best in keeping and propagating the Faith even if we resort to the means employed by St. Rita (that is asking God to take away the life of our love ones than see them commit crimes most abominable in the eyes of God - heresy) ... yes, St. Rita showed us the way should all our efforts failed us


May the Passion of Christ live in our hearts day in day out.    

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey, EENS-Sedevacantist (Philippines)


Novus Ordo


Dear Brothers     


… about the novus ordo abomination clip from your website.   Why are they so, so , so, so, PROTESTANT!,  PENTECOSTAL   HAPPY CLAPPYS?  Give me a some asperin, or pepto  LOL.  Fake novus ordo presbyters, fake bishops.   This is a totally freemasonic sect from hell.  Great job in posting this video.  Have a happy and blessed easter and triduum.  The lord willing.                     


 mark v


MHFM: Yes, it’s a prime example of how the Novus Ordo represents the abomination of desolation in the temple of God. 




Subject: Dinner


It's too bad I ate dinner just prior to viewing the "novus order abomination" on your site---well I almost lost my dinner!  really.  And the "kiss" to the fake altar---reminds one of the "kiss of Judas"---total betrayal. The whole episode was entirely wicked, satanic evil-----kind of reminds one of well-orchestrated Jehovahs Witnesses events,  "with a cast of thousands".  How mournful to see our Lord and Savior mocked this way.  Thank you for exposing this:  hopefully some souls will be saved during this Holy Week by MHFM exposing this evil abomination---the V2 sect---for what it really is....



Like to




To Joe and all those with a troublesome spouse, I'd like to say, stay on the narrow path.  I too, after being led back into the VII sect by my so-called spouse of eight-plus agonizing years, separated and divorced.  I gave up custody of my 8 year old son, knowing God's Will would triumph in the end. My son and I share more quality time without having to worry about walking on egg shells and I have the opportunity to present the true traditional faith and explain the dangers of the Vatican II New Mass.  I have him wearing the brown scapula and I'm showing him that it's O.K. not to be "one of the boys," and to avoid the dangers of this world.

My son was placed in the local swim team by his mom and eventually went to state competition this past year.  After being called the worst dad in the world for avoiding the events and continuing to profess the dangers of the sins of the flesh, my son is now asking me to suggest another sport for next year in hopes I'll attend.  My son will also be going through the false-VII First communion ceremony this Easter season with his mom and my folks from out of town.  I will not be attending the ceremony, nor do I have much to do with my folks anymore as well.  My son understands why I won't be attending and wishes he too were afforded the opportunity not to go. God willing, in a couple years, God will make it strong in my son's heart, which parent he wants to live with. 

With True Devotion to Mary and the Holy Rosary, the Blessed Mother Mary will clean up your life of all that is not pleasing to her.

God Bless,


In the works


MHFM: Note: we have a multi-part item that we hope to post very soon.  We think people might find it interesting, so please keep an eye out for it.




Subject: Encouragement


I’m writing to encourage Joe.   I’ve been sedevacantist for about five years now, and it has been, especially in the beginning, a struggle at home.   I stopped going to the Novus Ordo with my family and of course I have tried to convince them, to no avail… Originally my wife was nearly hysterical and accused me of betraying our marriage by “changing religions”. She tried to get mutual friends to “talk sense to me”, etc.  But she has gotten used to it and while I literally can’t even discuss it rationally with her, she absolutely breaks into tears and leaves the room, she gave me a traditional Missal for Christmas last year.  So in a way she is starting to cooperate.


So I pray for her and my four children (all in their early twenties and beyond my practical direct influence) to convert.  I don’t know how it will ultimately turn out.  But I would leave and try to enter a monastery if I had to before I’d ever give in.   I feel it is my duty to try to be leader I’m supposed to be.  I don’t think I compromise on anything essential, but you have to always be on guard about it. I wish I had the understanding at 25 that it took until 45 to discover.  (Understand that we were very involved in the Novus Ordo, “Catholic” Schools, CYO, etc).


I saw the truth of the traditional and sedevacantist positions when I first was exposed to it almost instantly.  It was like someone turned on a light switch and everything made sense all at once.  But it makes my wife cry and rant.  It is really extraordinary to see and hard to understand. 


But anyway, if you pray and persevere, trust in Mary, say the rosary everyday, things work out.  I think they will for me and I think they will for you.  BTW, there are others too I know of who have this problem.    You are not unique.


Bill Mulligan


Benedict XVI’s Recent Heresies


MHFM: We’ve updated our Benedict XVI's recent heresies file with new heresies from Benedict XVI’s recent trip to the Lutheran church.


Debating with Day


Subject: Debating with Dad


Any suggestions for surviving a debate with my father?  He is a Eucharistic minister...  This position is new to him.  This is the first Easter I am not hosting my parents and sister's family because I am traveling to an independent Latin Mass. My family is upset with me. My father believes I am being led away from the church.  I have all your literature.  He wants to spend 2 hours with me.  I want very much more than to survive 2 hours with him.  I appreciate any help…




MHFM: A good way to start is by pulling out the quotes from the popes and councils which defined the dogma, Outside the Church There is No Salvation.  Show him the solemn definitions from Pope Eugene IV, Innocent III, etc. which are found in our books (see the first section of our salvation book), and have him read them.  At that point, he is faced with the clear choice of whether to accept what the Catholic Church has officially taught or to reject it.  Then explain to him how the Vatican II sect and its antipopes completely reject that dogma.  At that point you usually you begin to see the rejection of the truth, but hopefully you won’t.  After that, you could get into the evidence against the validity of the New Mass.




After reading "Troublesome" and Joe's problems with his rebellious wife, I am reminded of what Pope Pius XI had to say about the duty of wives towards their husbands... and I think it is symptomatic of the times we are living in as prophesized by St. Matthew regarding the last days; we have seen the "empowering" of women, ever increasing since the 1960's, when the feminist movement reared its ugly head at the expense of males in society, ih general. The result of which is the rejection of the natural order designed by God for the harmonious ordering of human society...which are witnessing today in ever increasing numbers it seems!


...Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubi, Dec 31, 1930: "This order includes both the primacy of the husband with regard to the wife and children, the ready subjection of the wife and her willing obedience, which the Apostle commends in these words: 'Let women be subject to their husbands as to the Lord, because the husband is the head of the wife, and Christ is the head of the Church.' "


The advice given so far to Joe, is well have demonstrated your duty to love your wife, by your concern for her spiritual welfare, as the Gospel must leave the invalid "mass" of the Vatican II sect, immediately, and start saying the full fifteen decades of the Rosary daily… as the MHFM advise...


Leave the rest in God's hands and the hands of His Blessed will be tough, but God will not test you beyond your strenghth, and in the end, you will have saved your soul! 


God bless,




MHFM: The only thing we would add is that today almost all the husbands are either heretics, pagans or very lax about the true faith.  Therefore, an interested wife must take the initiative not only in the case of her own salvation, but for the rest of the house, if possible, rather than being led by the faithless or heretical direction (or lack thereof) of the husband.




Subject: Troublesome wife


I read the e-mail from a gentleman named Joe, I can perfectly understand what he is going through, I am currently separated from my wife and family because of my strong faith which mhfm helped me with and wanting no part with the Vatican ll counter church.  I was also criticized by my wife and kids for being on mhfm's website a lot. And yes I also was called crazy!  This past halloween I took a stand and said no to this pagan celebration, although I knew it was wrong in the past I didn't have the courage to take a stand, knowing the backlash it would bring.  That was probably one of the last straws that caused my wife to want a divorce.  I also have a strong sense of being responsible for my wife and children's salvation being the head of the family but everyone also has free will to  choose or reject God!  God is trying to do many things in my life and I feel one of them is the detachment of family, don't misunderstand me I love my wife and children very much but I'm not going to give up God and my faith to have my family back.  They don't want to live life the way that I see it and that is the rejection of this world and all of its lures, they run head long right after them.

As the brothers always say pray the whole rosary: joyful, sorrowful, glorious mysteries everyday our lady won't let you down.  I read a sobering small black book called: The Four Last Things; DEATH JUDGEMENT HELL HEAVEN,  once you understand the endgame and the times we are living in you will want to be on the right side and not on the left on that Judgement Day.  Hang in there Joe! 




Dear Brothers,


I finally got a chance to watch the 3rd Secret of Fatima DVD… It is brilliant, sums up everything and is easy to understand.  My sister and I watched it, and she usually being indifferent, seemed interested and convinced of the truth of the fake Sister Lucia and everything. 


Thanks for the DVD and all the work behind it. 


- Nancy


The Faith


Subject: Traitors to the faith


Dear MHFM, 


It's good to see how… Catholics have found your site, and it seems by having this inner hunger for the faith.  That's what lead me you your site-this hunger for Christ and His Most Beloved Mother-The Blessed Virgin Mary… many of these so-called Catholics would doubt at first the sede' position, after the massive betrayal from the bowels of Vatican II, and their multi-billion dollar empire, with a propaganda machine rolling 24/7, having the exterior of Catholicity vested in fine linen and gold.  However, Jesus is on your side, and money, of course, and fine linen is sand, and mold for Jesus Christ and his court in Heaven.  We, as Catholics have Him from above, and we have our treasure here on earth-Sacred Tradition.  Just delving into these sacred histories we clearly see from early on that the church suffered periods of The Chair of Peter being vacant.  For example, in the early fourth Century, from 304-308, during the horrible persecutions by Diocletian, from Pope St. Marcellinus to Pope St. Marcellus I, the Chair of Peter remained vacante, but the Catholic Church still held together in the faithful.  Then, in the early 20th century Pope Leo XIII, St.Pius X, Pius XI, Pius XII constantly reminding us of the dangers from within the Church with the modernists infiltrated-Rahner, De Chardin, Lubac, Wojtyla, Ratzinger, etc., etc...-bent on bringing in destructive theology to our traditions-why shouldn't we believe that present day Rome is infested with these pestilent traitors-modernists?  God Bless MHFM.






Subject: marriage


Recently i have been very serious about leaving the V2 mass.  I have spoken with my wife about it and she said she will absolutely not come with me to a real Catholic Mass...which is extremely hard to find. She has not been supportive and she is even getting to the point to where i can't even listen to music pertaining to God. I thought i was being too over the top so i backed off.... but recently she noticed i was on the internet with the mhfm website and she called me crazy!!... she is saying i am changing too much. In Genesis, Eve ate from the tree because Adam was not there to protect her from evil.  I feel it is my job to protect her no matter how mad she gets at me.  But i have a feeling she might leave me if i keep this up.  If you have any suggestions or readings i could go to for help i would appreciate it.




MHFM: We are glad to hear about the interest.  However, we would say that you must not decrease your practice of, or interest in, the faith just because your wife is getting upset.  You must focus first on saving your soul, and if she leaves you that’s her problem.  The way it’s going, you might have to consider leaving her.  We would recommend the books Preparation for Death and True Devotion to Mary.  You need to leave the V-2 invalid Mass.  A Catholic may not attend such an invalid service under pain of grave sin.  Perhaps you haven’t left the New Mass for the reason that it would offend her.  You must leave, and if she doesn’t also stop going it’s her mortal sin.  To allow her to have such influence over your decisions – for example, to stay at the New Mass simply because she goes there or because she would be upset – is something that will cause the loss of one’s soul.  Based on your description, she sounds like a complete pagan who is seriously bogged down by dark spiritual forces.




I reject the Novus Ordo – and the invalid mass. I am looking for the true pure catholic church. Every since they changed it I felt empty and the mass didn’t feel the same as when I attended back in the early 60’s.  I have always felt that. Now I know why. I was reading your home page and I was amazed. When I saw the pope on tv back a few years I saw the cross up side down on his chair. That was a sign to me from God not to trust him. I would like to receive communion and go to mass but I don’t know where a true priest and a true mass is near me. Please help me find one…


Thank you,


Chantal Poggi


Lutheran Agreement






Dear Brothers,

I haven't seen this mentioned but I have never seen a crucifix until John Paul's that had Our Lord's legs spread open.  I purposely looked up crucifixes before emailing this and John Paul's was the only one with the knees far apart.    Any decent artist portrays Our Lord with His knees together out of modesty's sake.  Anyone doubting should search it and compare.



MHFM: It makes sense that the broken or bent cross is the symbol of Antichrist.  That’s because by having the edges of the cross point down, it essentially becomes an inverted cross.  One could argue that it is an inverted cross, and therefore that the cross they consistently carried was an inverted cross.  With the edges distorted and broken and bending down, it almost becomes a peace symbol, which is an inverted cross (a satanic symbol).  It represents that they were trying to crush and destroy the cross.




Dear MHFM,

Thank you for your help.  I have a few questions that have been bothering me.

1.Why are people born with disabilities.  Does God have a purpose behind this or is it because of some other reason?..

Thank You,
Yours Sincerely Sampath.


MHFM: Of course God has His reasons, but one reason could be that if they were without that disability, and fully healthy of body, they would get involved in things which would make it more difficult to save their souls.  This is not to suggest that by simply having the disability they will be saved.  




Brothers in Christ,


Is it necessary for a priest to wear a stole when hearing confession?




MHFM: Not for the validity of the confession, no.




I think that you analysis of AJ was a little exagerrated. no one in their right mind would think that he is a religious authority, which is why he doesn't really talk religion. secondly, your analysis of linsday was off as well. he never said mccain was a shoe in, he said that mccain was the favored one. he did predict the cost of oil from 150 to 50 per barrel. that is enough proof for anyone.


frankly, there is no talk show host that comes close. there are no catholics that stepping up to the plate either, which is mind boggling, considering the amount of anti masonic literature written by catholics in the past.


the false prophet label is misleading. he never claims to be a prophet. however, he is extremely accurate on political issues.




MHFM: It was not exaggerated.  He does sometimes talk religion, and he attacks the true religion.  He also mixes false religion and a false salvation message with his views.  He has claimed to be a prophet repeatedly, and he even attributed this verse to himself: “And Jesus said to them: A prophet is not without honor, but in his own country, and in his own house, and among his own kindred” (Mark 6:4).  He did so when speaking about how he sometimes is more well-known or received in other states or other countries than near his home.   Again, we are not discounting the good information he has on news issues, but what we did was necessary and accurate.   The analysis of Lindsey was not off.  The fact that he got a few things correct doesn’t prove he’s talking to an insider, especially when the insider told him that Obama would never get elected.  You are partial to Alex and defending his evils, probably because you don’t have the true faith and have been deceived about what’s most important: having the true faith and saving your soul.




Dear brothers, 


I have been saying a novena for a ittle under a month now to saint joseph for many important intentions. this is because i am 8 months pregnant and my husband and i live in his mother’s house here… as many people know this town is the 3rd worst crime town in america. i miss living in my small town, and so does my husband. we are very devout to him and have been trying to pray for him to move us out of here before our son is born in may. not only do we want our own home so we can dedicate a special section of it to the holy family, but we have no room here. in order to move we need for him to have a new job closer to our desired small town, but also we need a car for when  the baby arrives. a 2door truck doesn’t work with carseats. i have my hopes and trust placed in saint joseph and saint gerard to release us from this mini-prison. i dont know if u recall but we also recently wrote about my mother in law who thought we worshiped the devil because we had a douay rheims bible. anyways. to make this short  i was hoping you too could pray for us to saint joseph for our intentions so we might be able to live a holy life alone with our son, away from all the people in this house and town who blaspheme god and think we’re outsiders because our beliefs. if it’s all God’s will  i ask that you will pray for us too.  Thank you sooo much!    -emily


MHFM: We would recommend praying the full Rosary each day, if you don’t do so. 




I am writing for more information about where to find a validly ordained priest… I have come to know much about the evils of Vatican II and have learned a great deal more about it on your web site. Suffice it to say, I am disheartened and feel very alone. I wish to practice the True Faith as it has been for centuries but I, of course, am not sure where to turn… Thank you in advance.

God Bless You.
Kathy Green




I watched many of your videos where you are making the claim that the Popes chair has been empty since Vatican II. This is quit a serious charge!

Most faithful Catholic agree with you that there are wolves in the church and they need to be removed. The bible even says that wolves will enter the church and its seems that the past 40 years have proven it to be very true; especially with passage of the health care bill…

I do have a problem with the arguments that you are making about Vatican II. If the Popes seat is now empty and everything being taught is now an apostasy, then you are also claiming that Jesus lied to us when he said that he would be with us always and the holy spirit will guide the church and the church has the authority and the keys to heaven.  The Mormons make the same claim and that is why the Later Today Saints exist.

I am not saying I disagree with what your research, I am disagreeing that Jesus lied to us. I do not know the details of what you speak but I would be careful what you are saying because what I hear you saying is that Jesus lied and that the Catholic church has gone underground. Who knows where the Catholic church now resides?




MHFM: You are starting with a false premise, that what we are saying contradicts Jesus’ promises to the Church.  It does not.  The Church has had antipopes, crises and periods where the faith was reduced to a remnant (e.g., the Arian crisis).  There have been vacancies of the papal chair, even extended ones, as well as times when antipopes reigned in Rome.  It is also predicted that there will be a great apostasy which will reduce the Church to a remnant.  Your concerns are addressed in this file: 


Responses to the Most Common Objections Against Sedevacantism [PDF file]


The fact is that by adhering to a heretical antipope and a sect which officially denies Catholic teaching, you are contradicting Christ, papal teaching and Christ’s promises to His Church.


Bent Cross


Subject: bent cross


How do you know if the crucification cross that they used on Jesus was not bent? You are playing with fire with your acquisations. You will be held accountable as you are trying to split the church with conflict. I don't think you have the facts to back up your statements.

Pray for the Bishops, Cardianls, Priests...that would be more appropiate than lashing out at them.

Good Day.




MHFM: Besides its history in the occult, it’s obviously a sinister symbol.  Nevertheless, you don’t seem to recognize that Benedict XVI, his “cardinals” and his “priests” are utterly heretical and apostate.  They accept false religions, deny Catholic dogma, believe in salvation outside the Church, etc.  You really need to look at the information.




Subject: lamp in the dark (Lamp in the Dark Exposed - 1)


I wrote to the people who made this, expressing my disappointment with this documentary. they purport to show an unbroken chain of belief, go over a little 1st and 2nd century politics, then ship to the 12th century or thereabout. they call the group the "albigensians" as opposed to cathars because they realize anyone who knows any amount of history will recognize the cathars as clearly heretical, yet they try to make it seems as if there was universal consensus that St Dominic lost all the debates....but the worst was the spurious quotes...they sounded so over the top they were unbelievable...they might as well have said "Pope X said to decapitate babies and drink their blood" they are on that level of ridiculous.






Subject: Great videos about Alex Jones, but listening to Alex Jones for religious direction


is like going to your accountant and asking about having your car fixed. AJ fights the NWO and he(AJ) is just another miserable sinner full of pride.  Granted where my/your soul is going is more important than your car.  Lindsey Jones is a strange sort of fraud , I agree. Again another sinner full of pride, (like me).  I'm still confused about how only Catholics will get into Heaven.  Please send videos/info. about this.  So Jesus is not in Heaven? He was/is a Jew.  Mary was not catholic. The thief on the cross was not Catholic.

Where in the Bible is Catholicism the only way.  Faith thru Jesus is the only way.  I go to your website all the time.




MHFM: You should go to our “Refuting Protestantism” section and obtain our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.  They deal with the issue you bring up.




Subject: the Video [Sexual Sins made the wise King Solomon most wicked, and 666 in the OT]



I saw a video you have about King Solomon and 666. Exposing Solomon as the beast that was is what God is calling his saints to do "now"...




MHFM: We are not saying he was the beast, but rather that the number 666, as it appears in his life, gives us an indication of what it signifies.




Heya I have never been one to throw dirt, but isn't it more of a concern that here in the EU we are now seeing all day everyday, new sex abuse claims coming out about the whole of the Catholic World.  I don't know if you know this or you merely choose to discuss issues that have no real bearing. What is happening to the CC on a worldwide scale tells me that it is information that has been out there for yrs and just now it is coming to light and I mean, everyday new claims are made. Not just that but priests in many churches are openly asking for forgiveness, see the vids about this.

I feel someone is attacking the CC, WHY, why was the Pope Attcked in public just 2 mos ago, it seems there is worry about his posistion on the NWO banking takeover, it is on the news here every week, there is a new plan or meeting for the new currancy, there is talk about a week long bank closer.  I feel you are talking jazz, so as to not dig deeper into the issues of these open attacks on the CC, The Pope and the fact that it seems to be inline with the major moves the banks are making. Just so you know.




MHFM: As we’ve discussed before, as part of her punishment, God is allowing the evil public and the media to expose the Vatican II sect (the Counter Church) and to make a mockery of her.


Fr. J.C.


Subject: John Corapi


Subject: Hey [Expletive deleted]


Get your facts straight......You know nothing of Jesus christ. Fr.JC is doing the work of the lord...not idealistic american christianity....we are not muslims to hate other false religions.

[expletive deleted] with grace!




MHFM: Considering that you speak like a devil, it’s not surprising that you feel inclined to defend the apostasy of John Corapi.  He’s clearly not a Catholic.  He accepts false ecumenism, salvation outside the Church and false religions.  In fact, speaking about the conflict between Protestants and professing Catholics in Ireland, he declared: “I don’t care if you’re Baptist or Catholic; you are Christian.  Just practice it.”  That is a total denial of the Catholic faith.  You know nothing about Jesus Christ or Catholicism.




Dear Brothers,


That's a great video explaining the horrendously heretical Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans (the gates of Hell) that the Vatican II sect signed, and both John Paul II and Benedict XVI approved. The document is a shocking insight into the heretical mindset, because heretics usually state the positive and true form of the Catholic teaching, but then retract their statement in some way in the same context. The JD, as you mentioned, states Catholic teaching, but also states Lutheran teaching, and then it denies Catholic teaching by saying that nothing in the JD is condemned by the Council of Trent. The Council of Trent is Catholic teaching and is all about fighting off and condemning the Protestant heresies, especially the heresies of Martin Luther and the Lutherans! But, as usual, nothing is heresy to the Antipopes, except for true Catholic teachings. Benedict XVI doesn't even think Protestantism is heresy!:


Pope Pius XI, Rerum omnium perturbationem (#4), Jan. 26, 1923: “The saint was no less a person that Francis de Sales, Bishop of Geneva and Doctor of the Universal Church.  Like those brilliant examples of Christian perfection and wisdom to whom We have just referred, he seemed to have been sent especially by God to contend against the heresies begotten by the [Protestant] Reformation.  It is in these heresies that we discover the beginnings of that apostasy of mankind from the Church, the sad and disastrous effects of which are deplored, even to the present hour, by every fair mind.”


Heresy means to choose, and Protestantism means to protest against the authority of the Catholic Church, so even the name Protestant proves that they are heretics because they choose to reject the authority of the Catholic Church - an authority invested in the Catholic Church by Jesus Christ Himself!!! Protestantism is a means of remaining in sin but retaining a false Christian veneer, which fact is even admitted by the Lutheran heretical contradictory term of the "justified sinner." (It's like saying "Physical spirit," or a "Catholic heretic") Also, the idea that Christ's justice is imputed to the sinner, and not the justified person having their own justice, is borderline Antichrist, since it confuses the justified soul of Christ with the unjustified soul of the sinner! This is why many Protestants commit sins of drunkenness, gluttony and fornication, because they read in the Bible that Jesus ate and drank with sinners, and they imagine that Jesus permits, allows or encourages sin! It's horrifying - they are basically saying that one can only be justified by sinning, as though sin is a sacrament!!! Finally the idea that we cannot cooperate with our salvation is so ridiculous as to be laughable. Obviously Martin Luther was not very familiar with the Canons of the Second Council of Orange (529 A.D.):


CANON 6. If anyone says that God has mercy upon us when, apart from his grace, we believe, will, desire, strive, labor, pray, watch, study, seek, ask, or knock, but does not confess that it is by the infusion and inspiration of the Holy Spirit within us that we have the faith, the will, or the strength to do all these things as we ought; or if anyone makes the assistance of grace depend on the humility or obedience of man and does not agree that it is a gift of grace itself that we are obedient and humble, he contradicts the Apostle who says, "What have you that you did not receive?" (1 Cor. 4:7), and, "But by the grace of God I am what I am" (1 Cor. 15:10).


CANON 9. Concerning the succor of God. It is a mark of divine favor when we are of a right purpose and keep our feet from hypocrisy and unrighteousness; for as often as we do good, God is at work in us and with us, in order that we may do so…


CANON 18. That grace is not preceded by merit. Recompense is due to good works if they are performed; but grace, to which we have no claim, precedes them, to enable them to be done…


CANON 23. Concerning the will of God and of man. Men do their own will and not the will of God when they do what displeases him; but when they follow their own will and comply with the will of God, however willingly they do so, yet it is his will by which what their will is both prepared and instructed.


According to the catholic faith we also believe that after grace has been received through baptism, all baptized persons have the ability and responsibility, if they desire to labor faithfully, to perform with the aid and cooperation of Christ what is of essential importance in regard to the salvation of their soul. [end of quote]


The Council of Orange constantly emphasizes the permanent interior change brought about by water baptism (sanctifying grace), i.e. from being a sinner to being justified, and then that person's cooperation with God's grace to maintain and increase his own justice, grace, and merit. I don't think it's a coincidence that the Second Council of Orange was held in 529 A.D., which totally contradicts Martin Luther's heresies on justification, and which was held exactly 1000 years before Martin Luther's Large and Small heretical Catechisms were published in 1529 A.D. (Catholic Encyclopedia)! Protestants hate the Catholic Church because the Catholic faith has all the checks and balances in place that, if followed correctly, do not permit a person to sin, but Protestantism attempts to justify the unjustifiable, namely, sin!!! The JD really is the AntiTrent!


Thank you and God Bless,


Chris White


Blood Type


Subject: Our Lord’s Blood Type


It seems we have ample evidence that our Lord’s blood type was AB.  It is evidenced from the Shroud, from the cloth which covered His head, from various Eucharistic miracles.   I have pondered this fact for Theological significance.  It would seem, from a superficial, let’s call it a “Protestant” perspective, that Christ’s blood-type should be type O; for O is considered the “universal donor”.  Anyone, regardless of his own blood type, can use type O blood.  Therefore it seemed to me that if Christ shed His blood for “all” men, then His being the universal donor would seem to be more elegant symbolically harmonious.


So being of the firm belief that Heaven doesn’t do anything of significance randomly, I thought there has to be a reason, a message in the type of Christ’s blood.     Then I learned that type AB blood is the “universal recipient”.   A type AB person can use any other type of blood.   Suddenly the type of Christ’s blood seemed perfectly consistent with the Catholic understanding of the Redemption.  It seems to validate the Catholic notion that while Christ is open to all, we too must “pick up our cross”.  We must be willing to participate, to join our sufferings to His.   I think it argues against the Faith Alone concept.  I think it also symbolizes the way Christ takes on all of our sins, since Christ’s blood could be mixed with any of ours.  And in this way, through our willing participation, is Christ’s sacrifice effective for us.   If “all” were saved merely by Christ’s shedding of blood, as the Protestant’s believe and the new mass implies, then I think He would have been an “O”.     


Maybe you think I’m reaching too far here, and maybe I am, but I think that it has to “mean” something. 


Bill Mulligan




Dear MHFM:


I received your book on Padre Pio from a man I met at the March for Life.  He told me he converted because of reading your book.  I, too, was impressed, so much so that I want to hand them out.  I’ll take 3 boxes.  Thank you and God bless you.


Mark Hall




Subject: Fastened


Dear Brothers,


Really Appreciate your bringing THIS to the public's attention.  V2 people Need to Know that God forsaw all This and gave directions on what to do.  I think the Overwhelming feeling of Abandoment is where a lot of V2 people are.  This V2 'church' has made a Great Effort to see to it that most Catholics don't Know What the Church taught previously, as you well know. As always, you're filling a Great Need.  The Vatican is their Christmas Tree....hanging one rotten thing on it after another, the same way Hillary Clinton and Co. decorated the White House Tree with filthy items… etc…


Carol D.




I heard second hand that b16 might resign? your thoughts?




MHFM: We don’t think so.  In fact, we would expect him to come back strong in the eyes of the world or in the eyes of New Church.  For example, we wouldn’t be surprised if there were a false miracle to move forward the “beatification” and “canonization” of John Paul II, or some kind of conservative action on his part to regain some of his lost credibility.  That seems to be how God allows things to happen.  God gives people the chance to see the heretics in all of their heresy, filth, ugliness and depravity, before he allows a semi-deception to occur.  People then have the choice to cling to the truth about these heretics or be deceived by the lies and the deception.  No, we don’t think he will resign. 




Dear Dimond Brothers and MHFM,


I hope more people access your wonderful website.  You have guts… You explain to us how we’ve been bamboozled.  You are giving away all your hard work and knowledge for free on your website!  You have done all the work for us. 


Susan Clary


MHFM: Thanks for the comment and the interest.




MHFM: Speaking of The Whore of Babylon, Apocalypse 18:4-5 says: “And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues.  For her sins have reached unto heaven, and the Lord hath remembered her iniquities.”


In his book, The Book of Destiny, Fr. Herman Kramer makes a very interesting point about this verse (“her sins have reached unto Heaven”):


“According to the Greek text, the sins of Babylon have been ‘fastened’ on to Heaven.  Heaven is the Church, and the clause may mean that the wicked inhabitants of the city have imputed their own sins to the Church and have accused her of every perversity of which they are guilty themselves or have blamed her for the punishment received…” (Fr. Herman Kramer, The Book of Destiny, Tan Books, p. 409)


With his point about how the precise meaning of the verse is that her sins have been “fastened” on to Heaven, we believe that Fr. Kramer is tending to the correct point.  He obviously did not have the Vatican II sect and apostate Rome in mind, but consider how precisely this clause applies to her.  The sins, the sex scandals, the abuse, etc. of apostate Rome and the Vatican II sect have been FASTENED on to the Church.  Even though she is strictly speaking not part of the true Church, in the eyes of the world she represents the Catholic Church.  Therefore, when the media covers how “Catholic” priests and the “Catholic Church” are mired in a sex abuse scandal that almost defies comprehension, it all gets attributed to (fastened on to) the true traditional Catholics who abhor all of it and have no part with it.  It is fastened on to the true priesthood, the true faith, etc. even though the Vatican II harlot and its heretics are not representative of the true faith or the true priesthood.  



Greetings to you and your community!!!


May the peace and love of our Lord Jesus Christ cover you always.  I am Sherwin. I am a Roman Catholic… I agree with Bro Michael Dimond's findings about what has happened in vatican council II. I can see the result from the news how the false pope and other priests are destroying our Catholic faith. It's alarming 'coz even if i know the invalidity of the new order mass, i don't know where else can i attend the valid old mass.


I want to find the true Catholic faith.  Thank you for the enlightening documents and videos you have posted in your website. May the Holy Spirit of the Lord Jesus Christ be with you always.




MHFM: We have a project we are working on which some of our readers might find interesting.  We are trying to get it done soon.


Joint Declaration


Hello Brothers:


Thank you once again for the brief touching upon the Joint Declaration with the Lutherans (video). This must not be disregarded, as the J.D. is one of the worst offenses against God that there has ever been - probably second only to the Assisi prayer meetings (and like acts of idolatry). My experience during my time as a former protestant was such that when speaking on matters of justification, almost nobody in that false religion had even a modicum of care for what the bible plainly says regarding justification. It is akin to being a Catholic Sedevacantist attempting to discuss the issues with the Novus Ordos. Besides not caring about the clear teaching of scripture, the poor protestants truly believe that they actually must enjoy their sin out to the full in order to glorify God. And what sin one would see them commit! Beside the shameful sins, which they would hide, they would usually boast gleefully about sinning in various ways - as if it glorified God. Of course, if someone was caught red handed in mortal sins of the flesh - such as adultery, etc., - they would say that he was "out of fellowship" with God, but thank God for his "justification". There are very few Catholics who realize how horribly wicked Protestantism is. The Tridentine Popes loathed it immensely - and we must thank God for these good Popes. Protestantism is every bit as bad as paganism and this can be known with certainty. It is an occult form of idolatry, and the epitome of the worship of false, man made doctrines.  


- That short video in itself is a good fruit,

Thanks, Mike




I had a question regarding this quote.


Martin Luther, Letter to Melanchthon, August 1, 1521: “If you are a preacher of grace, then preach a true and not a fictitious grace; if grace is true, you must bear a true and not a fictitious sin.  God does not save people who are only fictitious sinners.  Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly, for he is victorious over sin, death, and the world.  As long as we are here [in this world] we have to sin.  This life is not the dwelling place of righteousness, but, as Peter says, we look for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells.  It is enough that by the riches of God’s glory we have come to know the Lamb that takes away the sin of the world.  No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day.  Do you think that the purchase price that was paid for the redemption of our sins by so great a Lamb is too small?  Pray boldly—you too are a mighty sinner.” 


I hate Luther and his terrible heresies he gave to the world but is this quote technically wrong.  When he says No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day. Isn't that correct because can't only heresy separate us from the Lamb, not mortal sins. Please respond I debate people a lot and this has been bothering me.




MHFM: It is certainly heretical because by it he meant that they are not separated from a life-giving relationship with the Lamb (from justification).  According to him, they would still go to Heaven and be united to the Lamb, which is of course outrageously heretical and false.  The truth is that they are removed from the state of justification and they are therefore spiritually dead to the Lamb, even though they remain (dead) members of the Church who could regain the lost justification.


Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Session 6, Chap. 15: "... the doctrine of divine law which excludes from the kingdom of God not only the unbelievers, but also the faithful who are fornicators, adulterers, effeminate, liers with mankind, thieves, covetous, drunkards, railers, extortioners (1 Cor. 6:9), and all others who commit deadly sins, from which with the assistance of divine grace they can refrain and for which they are separated from the grace of God."








Subject: Health Care


I can't believe that congress passed the health care bill despite the clear fact most Americans don't want it.  I think it is a horrible bill regardless and I liked your video, but I did see a news article that made me wonder, does the bill in fact pay for abortions?  According to a news report the bill was supposed to restrict abortion funding, and President Obama (amazingly) kept his promise to sign an executive order that says abortion has to be paid out of pocket.  Is abortion indeed divorced from the healthcare bill or did I miss something?  (Please note I don't think the bill is good, even if abortion is out of the bill, I think it is the road to socialism).
Also people are threatening, causing property damage in some states over the legislation.  I'm worried that if it were to grow severe in my state I would get called up to battle riots as I'm a military policeman for the state's national guard unit.
(If you decide to publish this please do not show my name on the e-exchanges).






All my family members help me out whenever I need it, including my older brother who has 5 kids who works for [a Novus Ordo Diocese], he also does my taxes every year..,---They respect the information I give them but they won’t  apply it, they even asked for the new Fatima Dvd, but doubt they even watched it yet...Anyways, over here at my job, I can email people a code that allows them to buy electronic, computers, appliances etc at a good discounted rate though my company..The company allows us to give the code to our friends, family etc....My older bros washer/dryer broke and needs a new one & asked me to give him the code...Would this be ok?   Could I give him the code but let them know they need to get on board, watch Fatiima, and that I’m not happy that they are not making any progress toward conversion...Or should I just tell them all that I wont be able to help them in matters such as these anymore since I don’t want to give them the impression that im accepting them in their false faith?  If I go this route, will this dampen the chances of them accepting future information from the Monastery, or should I just assume they are not going to change and close book on em....Where is the line drawn for helping out heretics




MHFM: No, you should not give them the code.  They are obstinate.  You have been trying to convert them for years, and to give them special assistance at this point would be the wrong thing to do. 






God of Nature


Dear Brothers,


We are hearing a lot about the God of our Constitution now.  Knowing there were a Lot of Masons involved in the creating or our Constitution we hear a lot of conversation about whether this Country was based on the Real God, or the God of the Masons. 


When they say "Nature's God", are they talking about worshipping Nature in any way.....or is that the acceptable description of the Catholic Church? 


If our Constitution IS all based in Masonic language, then we are NOT founded on Christian principles at all ?  


This is extremely confusing and is the constant subject of discussion.  Will you please clear it up for us.


Thank you,


Carol D.


MHFM: It would really depend upon what one meant by that description.  Certainly the true God is the God of nature, but a true believer (i.e., a Catholic) would almost never find himself referring to “Nature’s God.”  Those who would choose that description would usually be heretics or liberals who are doing so euphemistically, i.e.., to avoid a more specific reference to Jesus Christ or the Trinity or the God of the Bible or the God of the Catholic Church; for these references are more likely to offend others. 




Hi, Brothers.  Just a quick question.  Is the rapture a protestant idea?  What is the Catholic explanation?


Carol Walker


MHFM: Yes, it’s a Protestant and false idea.  To find support for it they take verses which refer only to the Second Coming of Christ and falsely apply them to some kind of removal of the just before the end of the world.  For instance, the verse below refers to the Second Coming of Christ.  It speaks of those who are alive when Christ returns.  It simply says that those good people, who are alive when Christ comes, will be caught up with Him in the air. 


1 Thess. 4: 14-16- “For this we say unto you in the word of the Lord, that we who are alive, who remain unto the coming of the Lord, shall not prevent them who have slept.  For the Lord himself shall come down from heaven with commandment, and with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God: and the dead who are in Christ, shall rise first.  Then we who are alive, who are left, shall be taken up together with them in the clouds to meet Christ, into the air, and so shall we be always with the Lord.”


It of course says nothing about a removal of the just during the tribulation of the final days well before Christ finally comes to judge the living and the dead.  Yet, this is one of their “best” verses.  Needless to say, it’s not a biblical idea. 




Dear MHFM,


Your videos are excellent, especially the new one.  Thank you for your tireless research ... and for valiantly casting human respect to the wind!  Keep up the good work….






Brothers Dimond:


Assuming that the correct matter and form are used during a protestant or other heretical Baptism, does the erroneous and heretical theology of the minister concerning Baptism affect its validity? Most do not believe that baptism absolves original sin.


EJP, M.D., D.D.


MHFM: The intention required in conferring the Sacrament of Baptism is extremely minimal.  It’s simply to pour the water and say the correct words and not to interiorly fail to intend to perform the outward action.  Therefore, even false ideas about original sin, baptism and other matters of theology do not vitiate the intention to do what the Church does.  This was confirmed by Pope St. Pius V, as shown in the very interesting quote below.  Pope Pius V decided in favor of the validity of baptisms performed by Calvinists, even though they denied baptismal regeneration.


According to Calvin baptism had not the power of taking away original sin, and the French preachers, in consequence, made it clear that in baptizing they had no intention of doing what the Roman Church understood by baptism.  The Council [of Trent] had declared that the baptism of heretics was only valid if they intended to do what was intended by the Church of Christ, and the French Catholics therefore felt serious doubts as to the validity of Calvinist baptisms.  The Congregation of the Council decided in favor of their validity, on the ground that, in spite of their errors as to the effects of baptism and the true Church of Christ, the preachers steadily maintained their intention of administering true Christian baptism, and of doing what the Christian Church had always done in conferring it.  This decision was confirmed by [Pope St.] Pius V.” (Dr. Ludwig Pastor, History of the Popes, Vol. 17, p. 205) 






Dear Brothers

I wanted to let you know what good work you do for all of us. I have finally awoke to the truth thanks to you guys, and your valuable information. I wanted to share my story with you in hopes of helping others that have been in my shoes.  To start out I didn't have much of a religious upbringing, so I have spent my life searching for answers but not taking my journey that seriously until now. Before I knew about your information, I took religious classes though the V2 sect but sensed something wasn't right so I went back to the protestant religion still sensing something was missing there to, and feeling like a fish out of water when I attended their services. I never felt I belonged there. I learned of your web site about a year and a half ago and ordered your material and read  it but was not completely convinced, and I still was going to the protestant church thinking God was love surely he wouldn't send me hell or would he I started to ask myself. So I decided to be honest to myself and told the pastor of the church I believed the  teachings of the catholic church to be the most true. He told me that I needed to make a decision and he was very matter a fact about it. So I took his advice and made a decision to become catholic, and raise my children catholic. I wrote him a letter to inform him of my decision and to refer him to your web site so that he may know the truth.
He wrote me back and I wanted to share the letter with you, so here it is.

Dear Veronica

Thank you for writing. But I was distressed over what you wrote. We love you and your family and have tried to help you spiritually. I hope if you change your thinking you will feel free to contact us and come back to the chapel.  You have apparently decided to become Roman Catholic. Their teaching is that they believe in Christ and the cross but that faith in him is not enough.  One must also be baptized and keep the church sacraments, live a good life, and then go to purgatory to atone for ones sins.  One can never know he is going to heaven as long as he is alive because his works may not be good enough.

The scripture emphasizes that Christ is enough to save us, his death atones for our sins.  Time and time again it is emphasized that  salvation is by grace through faith (EPH.2:8-9)  This truth is emphasized in Romans 1-5, the book of Galatians and many other scriptures.  Put aside R.C. teachings and simply read the scriptures and ask God to show you the truth.  I am quite familiar with R.C. teaching and am convinced that it is wrong. It will not bring salvation to you or to your family.  And the end of false teaching is eternal destruction. Do not be deceived.

That was the letter the pastor wrote me and that is how they lure people into their false teachings hope this can help others see how they do it. Because that is how they did it to me. But not no more.

Thanks God Bless





Hi, I was reading your new book, "The Bible proves the teachings of the Catholic Church" and while I was on the chapter of Mary as the second Eve, An idea popped into my head on the similarities between Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit and the Eucharist.  Eve tells the serpent in Gen 3:1-6 that God has said to her, "Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die"  So when Adam and Eve did eat the fruit we know that they sinned mortally and their souls died.  This is the same as the Eucharist except in reverse. You must eat the Eucharist and when you do (if you are in the state of grace) you will have life in you.


Also, Eve believes from the mouth of the serpent that if she eats the fruit, her eyes shall be opened and she will know good and evil.

So if one in the state of grace eats the Flesh and drinks the Blood of Christ, their eyes will be opened to truth and it will be easy to distinguish between good and evil.


This is a great book not only for those who do not yet believe in Catholic truth but also for those who are seeking to have a greater knowledge of Catholic apologetics.

I thank you for this book, it will save many souls. God Bless






Subject: Baptism of Desire – Gnostic


Hello Brothers -


I was very glad to see the e-mail from Chris White quoting Irenaeus. Baptism of Desire is absolutely Gnostic, in its implications, expression, and in every way in its definition. Let us call it what it is! The Gnostic Heresy, ( the Gnostic Heresy has dressed itself up in various garbs since its demonic inception.) The Baptism of Desire advocates are each and every one "invincible ignorance" heretics as well. This is Gnosticism pure and simple.


Thanks for the tireless work,





Excellent video on the US Bishops being responsible for health care passing.  I agree completely.  The other reason they are responsible is because they have connected government health care with social justice.  On the Catholic Bishop website it states they have been supportive of universal healthcare for decades.  They state that health care is a basic human right.  They have abandoned the concept of Catholics volunteering freely to the poor and sick to an imposed government right that will come with a loss of privacy and steep price tag.     






Hello Brother Dimond-

First of all I'd like to tell you how much I enjoyed your books, videos, audios & website.  It is in my favorites & I check it regularly.  I am looking for a real vatican 1 church a driveable distance from my home… I was born & raised Catholic but fell away from it in my teens after questioning some things in grade school.  I went to St. Francis of Assisi for grade school & Notre Dame high school.  I was suspicious of the sexual abuse cases that kept coming up in the news & smelt a rat.  It was then that I somewhat suspected infiltration of the church but I didn't, at the time, know there was such a thing as vatican 1.  I am so glad that I found it & your site.  Anyway, I need to go to Confession- by a real priest.  I won't walk into a vatican 2 church anymore at all. My kids have been baptised by the vatican 2 church (before I knew there was a difference) so they need to be re-baptised… Thank you so much for your wonderful site.                                                            




Lisa Moore




How would a penitent confess the sin of receiving the true Eucharist unworthily if the only validly ordained priest available to him was a novus ordo priest (who does not try to justify mortal sins)? How would that penitent put this sin into words so that he does not cause the priest to bring up his own heretical beliefs about the Eucharist? Should the penitent even consider this priest to be an acceptable option for Penance in this case?



MHFM: If he is validly ordained and uses the essential form, the Novus Ordo priest would be an option for such a confession.  The penitent would say: I ask forgiveness for having sacrilegiously received Holy Communion, by receiving it in mortal sin.  Specify the number of times. 




Thank you to MHFM and Brother Peter Dimond for the comments on the video re: US "Healthcare"   -- "vote"---if you could call it that.  How SICKENING, NAUSEATING the whole thing is, what an abomination and what a ultimate HUMILIATION for any American!  I think Brother Peter's comments accurately depict this scenario as merely a reflection of and part of the due punishment for the most HEINOUS CRIMES we in "America" accept and even throw roses at those who promote----"Vatican 2 Catholics" who are TOTALLY PRO-ABORTION such as Pelosi,  the abomination Chaput,  Biden-----oozing,  bleeding sores and wounds on the body of this nation....yes,  hell awaits them all:  let us pray ever more ardently and fervently not to be caught up in the evil web of the demon which is dragging SO MANY souls into fiery gehenna!  Jesus, Mary,  help us!






Hi Bros, Michael and Peter Dimond,


That's a great breakdown of the Obama "health care" bill....excellent...


God bless






Dear Brothers in Christ,

Your book "The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church" is the best book dealing with the errors of protestantism I've ever read. It's a clear-cut proof that protestants don't care about the Bible at all, and that the protestantism, besides the V2 evil teachings, is probably the largest collection of self-contradictory statements on the planet Earth. For example, the protestant teaching about the 'one and only mediator between man and God' is mind-bogglingly illogical teaching, simply because the preaching about it is a form of mediation between man and (as the protestants erroneously think) God. Every protestant, who thinks that a man is an idolater if he seeks for an intercession from a saintly person, should ponder about basic questions: why have a church at all? why listen to the preaching of the pastor at all? why read the Bible at all?

All of these activities are a form of mediation, for God certainly can reveal Himself to a man without the church, without the pastor, without the Bible, without anything and anyone at all in between man and  Himself, as He has done so with Abraham, Noah, Moses and many other prophets.

It brings me much joy every time when I read a letter, on your website, from a reader who converts from protestantism to the True Faith.

St. Joseph, the protector of The Church, pray for us.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia




Dear Brothers,


I found this interesting quote on the necessity of Baptism from St. Irenaeus', Against Heretics.

Against Heretics, St. Irenaeus, Book I, Chapter XXI.-The Views of Redemption Entertained by These Heretics [the Gnostics]: "1. It happens that their [the Gnostics'] tradition respecting redemption is invisible and incomprehensible, as being the mother of things which are incomprehensible and invisible; and on this account, since it is fluctuating, it is impossible simply and all at once to make known its nature, for every one of them hands it down just as his own inclination prompts. Thus there are as many schemes of "redemption" as there are teachers of these mystical opinions. And when we come to refute them, we shall show in its fitting-place, that this class of men have been instigated by Satan to a denial of that baptism which is regeneration to God, and thus to a renunciation of the whole [Christian] faith."


St. Irenaeus equates the denial of water baptism ("that baptism which is regeneration to God") to a total rejection of the Christian faith, i.e. Apostasy ("a renunciation of the whole [Christian] faith.")!!! Apart from proving the fact that St. Irenaeus believed in the absolute necessity of water baptism, it shows how the Gnostics had a type of "tradition respecting redemption" that sounds similar to Baptism of Desire because it "is impossible simply and all at once to make known its nature, for every one of them hands it down just as his own inclination prompts. Thus there are as many schemes of "redemption" as there are teachers of these mystical opinions." Vatican II only references Books 3 and 4, not 1,2, or 5 of St. Irenaeus' Against Heretics, but it still draws attention to the title under which all 5 books are named. So the very seed of the Vatican II Apostasy, i.e. the denial of the Absolute necessity of water baptism for salvation and entrance into the Catholic Church, is buried in the Vatican II documents! Also, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia, St. Irenaeus was born between 115 A.D. and 125 A.D., which shows again how dishonest it is to assert that Baptism of Desire was Church Tradition from the beginning - the very opposite is in fact the case, as is shown by St. Irenaeus' book, Against Heretics!


God Bless,


Chris White




Subject: Your refutation of “A Lamp in the Dark”




I am hoping that you decide to produce a video refuting the horrible new movie, "A 'Lamp' in the 'Dark'."


I especially would like to see a thorough refutation of the lie about the Society of Jesus assassinating President Lincoln. Mary Surratt, a Catholic, was tried, convicted and executed by a kangaroo military tribunal for the "aiding and abetting" of the assassins. Her story is typical of the totalitarian state that was constructed during the War of Northern Aggression. Freemason President Johnson refused to intervene for this poor woman, and nowhere in the book detailing the travesty of justice was the Society of Jesus even remotely mentioned as accomplices or planners. The name of the book is, "The American Bastille Vol. 2." This 2-volume set serves as a ready guide to the coming communist state apparatus to which we will be exposed.


Please permit me to pre-order 1000 copies of this work, should you choose to produce it.








Good job exposing the "bishops" participation in the health care bill.  Knowing politics and the mentality of "you scratch my back I'll scratch yours,"  I bet that as a thank you to the Bishops, the powers that be printed this.
It seems more than a coincidence that this comes out only a day later. 
Please withhold name



Just something I wrote last night that I wanted to share with you. Hope you like it:


A snuffed lamp


A lamp in the dark

has missed the mark

by trying to wreck

Saint Peter's Barque.


A web of lies

dark minds devise,

but it's their hour,

there's no surprise.


There was no outrage

but for voices two,

who from Monastry Holy

us the Truth shew.


The bullets of Truth

simple beads of wood,

pierced through the lies of

darkened minds.


Through night and wind

on sailed the Barque,

and the only thing snuffed

was a lamp in the dark.


Job 18:5 Shall not the light of the wicked be extinguished, and the flame of his fire not shine?


God bless,


V. from Croatia


MHFM: Thanks, that was amusing.




Bro. Michael Dimond,


Your website has really opened my eyes to what is happening in the world.  The more I learn from what you have to say, the more it’s changing my life and putting me on the right path and keeping me praying, especially the rosary… I’m sending your materials to all my family back home in Ireland so they can know they’ve been deceived.  There are so many people who just don’t know.  Thank you for your work.  I can’t say enough for how much you’ve helped me.


Kieran Stainsby



Hail Mary brothers Michael and Peter Dimond

I am really thankful for your exposure of the false prophet Alex Jones and the diabolical movie which he endorses.

Like you said, many good things are revealed by him, but always in a very materialistic point of view, that leaves the impression that all that matters is to guarantee our liberties and nothing else matters.

Another point that gets proven is how "...those who are not with Christ (His Church) are against Him", so no matter what 'good' this Alex Jones does in exposing the evil New World Order, he neverthless sponsors a truly diabolical film against the True Church of Christ, and in the end, is another 'agent' even if not aware of the NWO that is satanic.

By the way, today was shown here in Brazil the History Channel documentary on the 3rd Secret of Fatima with the participation of Brother Michael. I have to say that for a secular and somehow 'biased' tv channel, the program itself was neverthlees quite good, although Brother Michael´s lines were definitely cut off, and there were some other very important points missing or taken out of context.





Padre Pio




Dear Br. Dimond,


What about this letter referred in several biographies of Fr. Pio ?  Also, several of his biographies have him predicting on two different occasions that Archbishop Montini would be the next pope after John 23 ?  Thanks, Fred Nesbitt 


Letter to Paul VI on Humanae Vitae


MHFM: We addressed that in an audio we did sometime back: Answering Objections Against Padre Pio [42 min. audio discussion].  We discuss and respond to the claims that Padre Pio endorsed the heresies of Vatican II, Humanae Vitae and salvation outside the Church.




To contrast the teachings of the Modernist Vatican II council on false ecumenism, completely fostered by head heresiarch Dr. Ratzingzer, aka, antipope Benedict XVI and his fervent heretical belief of following and worshiping false religions to attain eternal life in Christ's Kingdom-Heaven.  Let's read of St. Benedict-sixth century Catholicism-.  "...Upon the crest of Monte Cassino "there was an ancient chapel in which the foolish and simple country people, according to the custom of the old gentiles, worshiped the god Apollo.  Round about it likewise upon all sides there were woods for the service of devils, in which, even to that very time, the mad multitude of infidels did offer most wicked sacrifice.  The man of God, coming hither, feat in pieces the idol, overthrew the altar, set fire on the woods and in the temple of Apollo built the oratory of St. Martin, and where the altar of the same Apollo was, he made an oratory of St. John: and by his continual preaching he brought the people dwelling in those parts to embrace the faith of Christ."  According to heretic, antipope Benedict XVI, St. Benedict of Nursia was wrong in preaching Christ to infidels, and destroying devil worship.  Who's right?  He who has eyes to see...




MHFM: Yes, it’s a quote we cite in our file on Benedict XVI.


Pope Pius XII, Fulgens Radiatur (# 11), March 21, 1947: “… he [St. Benedict] went south and arrived at a fort ‘called Cassino situated on the side of a high mountain; on this stood an old temple where Apollo was worshipped by the foolish country people, according to the custom of the ancient heathens.  Around it likewise grew groves, in which even till that time the mad multitude of infidels used to offer their idolatrous sacrifices.  The man of God coming to that place broke the idol, overthrew the altar, burned the groves, and of the temple of Apollo made a chapel of St. Martin.  Where the profane altar had stood he built a chapel of St. John; and by continual preaching he converted many of the people thereabout.’”


For many


Subject: for many versus for all


Hello Bro. Dimond


While reading through Denzinger I found this passage that seems to indicate that the New Mass words of consecration do confect and produce a valid sacrament.:  Denzinger 715: 


…there can be no doubt but that after aforesaid words of the consecration of the body have been uttered with the intention of effecting, it will be changed immediately into the substance of the true body of Christ.


What do you think of this?




MHFM: No, it doesn’t indicate that at all.  In order to confect a sacrament, one must have matter, form, minister and INTENTION.  The Church teaches that intention is determined by intending to do what the Church does, that is, intending to use the FORM that the Church uses.  So, using the proper form determines whether one has the proper INTENTION.  In the traditional Mass, since one intends to use the WHOLE FORM, one has the proper INTENTION to do what the Church does. 


Therefore, when a priest who is using the traditional form, and therefore has the proper INTENTION, says: “This is my body,” the substance is immediately changed.  That’s because he intends to do what the Church does.  He intends to go on to use the rest of the Church’s form.  That's what the Council of Florence is discussing, someone with proper "intention."  However, when a “priest” uses the new mutilated Novus Ordo form, he does not intend to use the form prescribed by the Catholic Church but a mutilated and heretical form.  Therefore, he has a defect of intention from the start.  This defect of intention is present at the very moment the Novus Ordo "priest" says “This is my body,” and thus nothing happens.  So, the defect of form in the wine portion of the New Mass gives rise to a defect of intention which takes effect at the very moment he says the words for the consecration of the bread: “This is my body.” 




Dear Brothers

My query is this, as it has been bugging me for a while now. One of the arguments you use against John Paul II was his use of the upside cross. Surely it makes sense to use the cross of St. Peter as we all recognise him as the first Pope. This is something your detractors would bring up to try and discredit you.   I haven't yet came across you address this as regards to it being the cross of St. Peter. If you could shine a bit of light on your view of this that would be most appreciated.

P.S. There is a lot of interesting reading on your website and your videos are always food for thought. Your discussion on the film, 'A lamp in the dark', was informative and also entertaining, particularly the bit about the Cardinals hat. Anyway, as a lapsed Catholic trying to revitalise my faith I find that your material and information is very helpful so I thank you for that.

Yours sincerely




MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  First of all, we have addressed this before.  John Paul II had the huge upside-down cross over his head when he was in Israel on March 24, 2000.  When he did that, it was not in commemoration of St. Peter.  There was no commemoration of St. Peter at all, and it wasn’t done on any of St. Peter’s feast days.  The upside-down cross is one of the biggest symbols in Satanism.  That’s why the satanic antipope used it.  The people who argue that it was for St. Peter are simply outrageous, desperate and without anything to back them up.  In fact, John Paul II even used it on his vestment before he was antipope, when he was a “cardinal,” which further destroys their argument. That is shown in this video.


Additionally, it’s not a main argument (or even a necessary one) that we bring forward to prove he was not the pope.  The heresies prove that by themselves.  It’s an additional point, for those with eyes to see, which serves to reveal the kind of evil he represented.




Dear Brothers,


Is Nancy Pelosi a possessed witch?  What an ABOMINATION!  Everybody needs to oppose this OBAMACARE conspiracy. I predict we are going to become a communist police state. Also I wondered if you would like to make some youtube videos about what you think is the MARK OF THE BEAST 666, THE ANTICHRIST, THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST AND THE END OF THE WORLD, THE GREAT TRIBULATION, etc. I think these subjects might be interesting from a true catholic perspective.  I wish you a blessed ST BENEDICT feast day!   ST BENEDICT pray for us!  In the holy family…                  MARK V


MHFM: The passing of this bill will mean the end of America as we have known it.  It might not be recognized immediately, but it’s the first major step to socialism or communism.  We have some videos on the topics you mention, but there are other important points that will hopefully be discussed very soon.




Hello Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,


… I discovered your site a few months ago. Let me tell you with complete honesty that I credit the material in there with my conversion from Protestant/ Evangelical conviction to Catholicism. I am for a first time completely sure of what I believe in and why. The true Catholic faith is a true representation of the contents of the Bible and the will of God. I had never encountered such complete teaching of the scriptures. It is unfortunate that many of my friends who were searching for the truth got taken in by the JWs, Mormons, and other heretical sects and religion. If they had this material available at the time, or knew of it, who knows how many of them would have taken the right path… Most catholic clergy, it seems, do everything in their power to make the Faith sound as ridiculous as possible. I have had debates with a few that were not even up on some basic Biblical doctrine.


I do, however, deem myself lucky enough to stumble upon your website and find the material there. Once I familiarized myself with its contents, heard the audios, and the debates, I felt an overwhelming rush of happiness. It was like coming home after a long and arduous journey from strange and unpleasant places. Your work, dear brothers, is not done in vain. You have succeeded in putting me, or at least pointing me, to the right path. I wish you could multiply and be supernaturally transported to every household, school, church, city and given the authority to preach and teach. I am sure the harvest would be plentiful, as many thirst, but few are quenched. May God be with you always, and may the powerful intercession of Our Blessed Lady Holy Mother of God never waver in supporting the sacred work you are performing.


Edmund Dallakian


MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  It’s great to hear about the interest.  For those who intend to convert to the Catholic faith, it important for them to follow the steps in our “steps to convert” file.




Subject: Amorth


Dear MHFM,


I have a hard time trying to understand how someone like the "chief" exorcist of the Vatican, Fr. Amorth, can NOT see or refuses to see the vatican 2 church for the imposter Catholic religion that it is. How this man who was validly ordained and has cast out countless demons from the possessed, who knows firsthand the trickery, deception, and cunning of the devil cannot or does not see the truth about vatican 2 is beyond my comprehension. How can this man be so spiritually blind?? If this priest does not convert and adhere to traditional Catholicism, will he be one to say to Jesus, "In thy name have I not cast of demons" only to hear our Lord rebuke and condemn him that He never knew him?




MHFM: Yes, he will be one of those people.  He believes in the activity of the Devil on some level, but obviously not in traditional Catholic doctrine.  He thinks that John Paul II, with all of his apostasy and false ecumenism, was “holy” and even “saintly.”  That’s outrageous.  It’s somewhat similar to how people who claim to be traditional Catholics, who might even put out a lot of effort traveling to Latin Masses, also believe that Muslims, Buddhists and Jews can be saved without the Catholic faith.  It’s doesn’t even bother them that their view is heretical and was condemned infallibly by the Catholic Church.  They just explain it away.  It’s the mystery of bad will. 


Alex Jones and “Lamp” Discussion


MHFM: This is our discussion of Alex Jones:


Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 1


Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 2


Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 3


Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 4


Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 5


This is a related discussion of a new anti-Catholic film, A Lamp in the Dark, one of the most anti-Catholic films ever produced:


A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 1


A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 2


A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 3




Dear Brother Michael and Brother Peter,                                                


We have discovered your website!  Your research and study is prodigious, and we encourage you to continue the efforts to find and reveal the truth about Vatican II and the deplorable apostasy in the world today.  I, myself, am at present reading the article concerning the further, more current, heresies of Benedict XVI.  After only a quarter of the way through the page, I noticed a feeling of sickness in my stomach and head.  At the halfway point, I feel overwhelmed by the stench!  This anti-pope is definitely a cosmic one-worlder, totally devoid of faith in the Truth – Jesus Christ, and is NOT in the least bit a protective and nurturing shepherd of the flock, being totally humanistic, materialistic and not interested in the true salvation of souls.  On one hand he suggests religious freedom and on the other he says that expressing one’s differing beliefs is not to be allowed – that is if you are truly Catholic.  The “Progress of Humanity” is not attained by the efforts of man.  The antipopes have perpetrated the sacrilegious use of major Catholic shrines as well as invalidating the Mass, sacraments, and the priesthood, depriving the true faithful access to pure devotion, the saving grace of Jesus.


My husband, Dennis, and I, Chris, were brought up in the pre-Vatican II Church and have been in great pain ever since the Novus Ordo came along.  Although we realized that it seemed more Protestant than Catholic and that things were not right, and some “celebrations” were an abomination, we didn’t put it all together till now – we were dealing with heresy on a huge scale!  All these years we have been continuing to go to the new mass thinking that we were going to “stay Roman Catholic no matter what”.  Now we know that continuing to attend them put us in the same category as a heretic!  All these years we have not been to a real Catholic Mass or received the real Body and Blood of Jesus, or the real Sacrament of Confession, except on rare occasions.  Up until yesterday I used to make the sign of the Cross when going by a “Catholic Church”.  Today, I didn’t…


We pray for the peace of our Lord Jesus, the wisdom of the Holy Spirit and the aide of our Blessed Mother Mary for the Remnant and for the conversion of souls to the glory of the Most Holy Trinity One God.


Dennis White & Christine Andre




Dear MHFM,


When you first broke the story about Alex Jones (mainline fake Christian) a few days ago, I wrote a letter with my views on the whole matter (I used to frequently listen to the AJ show). I decided to wait until you made a full expose before sending that letter. After I have seen and heard what you had to say in those videos I decided not to send the letter because you have addressed almost every point that I mentioned in it. Long story short, your expose of AJ and that idiotic ''documentary'' is simply brilliant. 


Besides AJ's constant promotion of extremely anti-Catholic and pagan individuals (such as Jordan Maxwell, Michael Tsarion, David Icke...), the notorious incident with J. Bermas from 2009 was too much at that time… and I stopped listening to his show. Only recently I again started to tune in occasionally (listened to some guests) until this new fiasco. This time I can say with certainty that I will never be going back. The whole show in my opinion is mostly a waste of time. Instead of listening to him, people should visit and get their life and soul saving information there. It is BY FAR THE BEST PLACE for those who seek first the Kingdom of God (Matthew 6:33).


God bless,


V. from Croatia




I listened to the interview you linked between James Traficant and Alex Jones.  I really had never paid attention to him (Jones) before, never heard his show, only an occasional you-tube clip.   I assumed the Brother Nathaniel guy to be reliable in this sphere of politics.   But I have to agree with you, it is a stunning interview, and it is hard to imagine a shill for the Jews making it.


It is also refreshing to hear Traficant tell the truth about some basic economics.  It is just a simple fact that the only reason to impose and collect taxes is social engineering.  This is because the burden on any economy comes from what the government spends, not the amount of fiat currency in private hands.  For example, if the government took half of everyone’s “money” and burned it, didn’t spend it, the economy is not taxed at all.  Price levels would adjust (downward) and everyone would have the same spending power with fewer dollars.  One the other hand if the government didn’t take any money from anybody, but spent like crazy, printing money or borrowing it, then the society is “taxed”, as production is diverted to whatever the government wants to buy and the price of everything left over goes up.  More dollars chasing the same or fewer goods.  Inflation therefore is a form of tax.   High interest rates (the “crowding out” effect) is also a form of tax. 


Another scam is the notion of the “corporate income tax”.  A corporation is an abstract entity, not some fat rich guy with a cigar as oft portrayed in the popular imagination. Any cost it incurs to produce its product (be it food, or heating oil, or other stuff people need) must be borne by either its customers or its employees, or its shareholders (like old ladies who own pensions).   But because there is a corporate income tax, incredible talent and resources are diverted from productive work into tax avoidance schemes.  It is so wicked evil, a stupid notion borne of misguided envy.  But does the New Church have a clue and oppose notions such as the corporate income tax?   No, in fact usually the opposite in the name of equally misguided “social justice”.   When you don’t understand the Faith, you don’t understand anything.  It really seems to work that way often.  


Yes the Traficant interview was quite good.  I have never heard a politician discuss this stuff honestly before.  It is not a coincidence that the federal income tax and the federal reserve were both born at the same time (1913?).  Soon then the US was off fighting the last great Catholic Monarchy in WWI.


Bill Mulligan




MHFM: In The Book of Destiny (a book on the Apocalypse) by Fr. Herman Kramer, there are some interesting quotes about how the apocalyptic Babylon refers to Rome.  This coincides with what we’ve believed and pointed out: Why Rome is now The Whore of Babylon.  We don’t agree with everything in the book, but these quotes are very interesting:


“A harlot is given to fornication.  Ezechiel (XXIII.) calls Israel and Juda harlots, because they practiced the idolatry of the pagan nations bordering on Israel.  Fornication and adultery in prophetical language mean apostasy from the true faith and from God.  Hence this GREAT harlot is a city whose apostasy from the true faith is a monstrous thing.  This may point to Rome.  Rome is the Holy City of Christ, the center of His eternal Kingdom, as Jerusalem was the center of the theocracy.  And the apostasy of this city, and her becoming the head of an empire that would lead all possible nations and peoples into antichrist-worship would merit for her the title of THE GREAT HARLOT.  The apostles called ancient Rome ‘Babylon’ (1 Peter 5:13).  So the conclusion is near that the great harlot of the future shall be Rome.” (The Book of Destiny, Tan Books, p. 383.)


“The title of the harlot city, BABYLON THE GREAT, leads us to the conclusion that it shall be Rome.” (The Book of Destiny, p. 389)


“In St. John’s description of Babylon, the conspicuous traits of ancient pagan Rome appear as the most prominent features.  Babylon is not ancient Rome, but a new Rome that has a resemblance to the ancient center of idolatry and Godlessness.  This Rome is entirely cut off from God, is in a spiritual desert.” (The Book of Destiny, p. 388)




Dear Brothers,


That is a great expose of the evil "documentary" - "A Lamp shining in the Darkness." Thank you. "The Lamp" appears to be a collection of every single Anti-Catholic myth, lie and distortion that has ever been dreamed up by the Devil's minions. Do they ever consider that Satan appears as an angel of light? 2 Corinthians 11:13, 14 - "For such false apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light." In fact, it sounds very similar to what the Watchtower Society ("Jehovah's Witnesses") teaches. As usual, the Jesuits are portrayed as the most evil people ever, and if anything bad happens it's always the Catholic Church's fault, so they think. It's another weapon in the heretics’ arsenal for arguing that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church. What gets me is how Alex Jones can endorse things that pretend to expose the Antichrist, such as "The Lamp", but then he is a big fan of the heavy metal rock group "Megadeath"!  Also he allows his websites to be a vehicle for promoting marijuana use, homosexuality, abortion, etc.! It is similar to modernism, where there is no objective truth when it comes to religion, "it's all in your mind" they say:


Pascendi, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, Pope St. Pius X, 10 - "It is thus that the religious sense, which through the agency of vital immanence emerges from the lurking places of the sub-consciousness, is the germ of all religion, and the explanation of everything that has been or ever will be in any religion."


Also interesting was that you exposed the Gnostic dualism lurking beneath their promotion of the Waldensian and Albigensian heretics. The Albigensian heretics were thwarted not only by St. Dominic's books being miraculously preserved from the flames, but also by the Most Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin Mary:


Fausto Appetente Die, On St. Dominic, Encyclical of Pope Benedict XV promulgated on June 29, 1921 - "God Himself was ever at hand to aid him in his battle for the Faith. Thus, having accepted the challenge of the heretics that each should consign his book to the flames, his book alone remained untouched by the fire. Thus by the valor of Dominic Europe was freed from the danger of the Albigensian heresy." 


On the Rosary, Octobri Mense, Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII promulgated on September 22, 1891 - "8. The heresy of the Albigenses had in effect, one while covertly, another while openly, overrun many countries, and this most vile offspring of the Manicheans, whose deadly errors it reproduced, were the cause in stirring up against the Church the most bitter animosity and a virulent persecution. There seemed to be no human hope of opposing this fanatical and most pernicious sect when timely succor came from on high through the instrument of Mary's Rosary. Thus under the favor of the powerful Virgin, the glorious vanquisher of all heresies, the forces of the wicked were destroyed and dispersed, and faith issued forth unharmed and more shining than before."...


Chris White


MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  It’s also interesting to note that in the video, they of course (falsely) claim that St. Dominic lost his debate with the Albigensians, and for that reason had to resort to killing them.




I was willing to check out your website in case i've been led astray in following the post vatican ii church.  i was not convinced of any of the "heresies."  far too many of your quotes are taken out of context.  some of your arguments have faulty logic, and the conclusions you jump to are far-reaching and unfounded.  you need to spend some serious time in front of the eucharist asking Jesus to enlighten you…


also, i watched your father corapi video on youtube (again-faulty conclusions) and was unconvinced.  the mocking tone of voice you used detracts from your credibility as a christian witness to the Truth.  i believe you are well-intentioned (except for the mean, mocking tone of voice), but i am afraid you are not leading people to the Truth.  i will pray for you. i always wondered why people broke away from the church after vatican ii.  if it is only due to supposed heresies i will need some solid evidence (that considers the totality of the pope's actions and writings-taking into account whether some statements or actions may be misunderstood, misinterpreted, or taken out of context). 


if i scrutinized your writings, took them out of context, and used the catholic dictionary as a rock solid point of truth (which it isn't-it does not constitute "church teaching" in and of itself.) i could accuse you of heresy as well…


i apologize if this seems aggressive, but i am greatly worried when i see the truth misconstrued or misapplied.  i worry about the souls that may be led astray.  i'm sure you can understand this, considering it is the only reason you reach out to others in the holy name of Jesus as well.  let us pray for one another to be led to the Truth, which is Jesus Christ himself.  fortunately God brings good from all evil and sees the heart of man.


your sister in Christ,




may God bless you!


MHFM: You are nothing more than a liar.  “Out of context,” “false,” etc. is what they all claim.  You don’t give even one example because, if you did, it would be completely refuted.  General statements and charges, without specific examples to back up those charges, are WORTHLESS.  Your e-mail is worthless.  You are simply dishonest and of bad will.  Barring a stunning conversion, you will be saying in Hell, for all eternity, that the proof provided (which will convict you on Judgment Day) was “out of context.”  Corapi accepts false ecumenism.  That’s a fact.  He holds that Protestants, Jews and others can be saved without the Catholic faith.  That’s a fact.  His position is heretical.  He holds that rabbis have a “mission,” and thus that Jews can be saved without belief in Christ.  That’s a fact.  He is not a Catholic, and neither are you.


The Vatican II antipopes hold that heretics and schismatics are in the Church.  That’s a fact.  They hold that they don’t need to be converted.  That’s a fact.  They accept, promote and engage in condemned false ecumenism.  That’s a fact.  They are not Catholic and they cannot be popes.


Bible Proves Booklet Usage


Subject: Bible proves booklet usage


Dear MHFM,


Based on the research and the accuracy of this book based on the Bible, it would be great if it was used in Catholic schools. Has there been any effort on your behalf to get this book into schools? Do you recommend this being done at a local level? I would imagine based on the V2 infiltration of our schools that there would be resistance to this.

I would be interested if this has been done by you or any of the readers of your web page.


Your ardent supporter,




MHFM: We are not aware of anyone who has tried to have it used in schools themselves.  If they allowed it, it would be a minor miracle.




Dear Brothers,

Your recent series of videos on Alex Jones and A lamp in the dark exposed are excellent. The problem with Alex, like some politicians, he has identified the problem, though doesn't have the solution to the problem. The solution being God and his Commandments.  If you’re not part of the solution, then you’re part of the problem. He does a nice job of bringing to light the masonic plan to destroy the world, though the path he's on has no means of salvation for those following him…


For the true believers, it's no "news flash" that the world is evil and will end one day. As you've stated on your site, the Masons are behind the evil of this world and the Vatican II Great Apostasy. The masons evilness is responsible for the removal of women through Feminism and also responsible for immodest dress in our society. Both cause the destruction of the family and moral decay of society. The following is from a masonic Letter of Vindice to Nubius; [pen-names of 2 leaders of the Italian ‘Alta Vendita’] dated the 9th August 1838. This letter was drafted eight years prior to the message from Our Lady of La Salette.

“Catholicism does not fear a very sharp sword any more than the monarchies feared it. But, these two foundations of Social Order can collapse under corruption; let us never tire to corrupt them. Tertullian was right in saying that from the blood of martyrs Christians are born; let us not make martyrs; but, let us popularize vice among the multitudes; may they breathe it through their five senses; may they drink it and be saturated. Make vicious hearts and there will be no more Catholics.  It is corruption on a big scale that we have undertaken…a corruption that should one day enable us to lead the Church to its grave. Lately, I heard one of our friends laughing philosophically at our projects saying: ‘To destroy Catholicism, we should do away with women’. The idea is good in a certain way, but since we cannot get rid of women, let us corrupt them with the Church. ‘Corruptio optimi, pessima’. The best dagger to strike the Church is corruption.”

A follow-up letter below is from the (International Review of Freemasonry, 1928)

“Religion does not fear the dagger’s point; but it can vanish under corruption… It is necessary to corrupt, that our boys and girls practice nudism in dress. To avoid too much reaction, one would have to progress in a methodical manner: first, undress up to the elbow; then up to the knees; then arms and legs completely uncovered; later, the upper part of the chest, the shoulders, etc. etc.”

God Bless the Faithful,
Tom Miles




This guy (“Brother Nathaniel”) has done a couple of features exposing Jones’s ties to Zionism.  He too thinks he is controlled opposition and criticizes his protestant views.


Though he is “Orthodox”, as a Jewish convert he sometimes has interesting information and cites everything pretty well.  I sometimes can’t believe this guy is walking around alive with the enemies he must have.  You guys too for that matter.




MHFM: We’re familiar with the schismatic “Orthodox” individual you mention, and we believe that his claims (at least on this point) are totally unpersuasive and unsubstantiated.  There is no evidence at all.  In fact, one of the “best” pieces of evidence people try to bring forward to show that Jones is a Jew, or that he works for the Jews, is that he allegedly said his wife is Jewish.  But actually, when people listen to the clip, they can see that he didn’t say that.  He said that his wife is a “Christian” who has Jewish blood somewhere back in her family tree.  He probably mentioned that she has Jewish blood somewhere in her family tree in order to shoot down any lies that he might be “anti-Semitic” or against people solely because of blood lines.  That’s quite different from saying that she is Jewish, as if she’s a practicing Jew or was born to a Jew, which is not the case.  We’re not saying that you are making that claim, but the others who spread that idea (such as the individual you mention) don’t even have their facts correct or they aren’t capable of any careful analysis whatsoever.  Starting with this distortion and error, they then falsely conclude that Jones must be a Jew.  This is taken and spread around (falsely) as a fact, and then anyone who doesn’t agree with this utterly false conclusion (because they are more careful, accurate and charitable) must be Jewish as well.  It’s beyond outrageous. 


Here’s an interview that Jones did with James Traficant.  This utterly refutes the lie that he’s a Jewish shill.  Jones is exactly what we said in our discussion of him.  This interview is very interesting, by the way, and it is worth listening to.  No one in the tank for the Jews would do such an interview.  In the interview, Jones even mentions that he has sometimes been “mild” on Jewish control issues because he’s trying to bring everyone together to fight the New World Order.  Translation: whether you agree with him or not, he believes that he can be most effective fighting the New World Order by not being cast to the fringe as an “anti-Semite” and by trying to remain as big and mainstream as possible, rather than risking the elimination of his operation if he too aggressively exposes Israeli influence.  The relevant portions begin at about the 6-minute mark of this part:


James Traficant Interview - Part 2


Of course, as we covered in our discussion, we condemn Jones for the evil false prophet that he is, despite the good he does.  However, since we love truth, we feel that we must speak up to refute lies that are being spread, such as the false notion that he is some kind of agent.




Subject: Verified



To my best efforts I could not hear Jones say the word "not". He clearly said "mainline fake Christian" whatever that means. How divinely providential. And thank you again for your tireless efforts in exposing not only the lies, but also the half-truths (Alex Jones) and the baseless wicked imaginations (A Lamp in the Dark) of the disinformation experts. Half-truths are like rat poison (90% water, 10% chemicals). The rats drink for the benefit of the water (new knowledge), but die from the poison (evil insinuations and conclusions). That is what half-truths do to people, and for the imaginative fake stories, it's so clearly false, it borders on the ridiculous. It's not good if people fall for it because they do not investigate further.

Let us pray that more people will follow the Lord's command: To seek ye first the Kingdom of God. He did not command us to seek ye first the worldly kingdom. When we seek God's Kingdom, we learn eventually the necessary knowledge of the worldly kingdom.

With prayers,





Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,


Thanks for alerting us re A Lamp in the Dark DVD as advertised on Alex's webpage....truly shocking and you have done a great job in exposing it! 


I have not viewed it, but the description, brief as it is given on the webpage, is enough!  It is a vicious attack based on lies and distorted history which will not go well with Alex, to be sure!


The rest of your coverage is well researched and very interesting, and long overdue, I feel.  There are a lot of questions to be satisfactorily answered by someone over all this, for I feel it will simply just not fade away, as easy as that!


God bless




No doubt


Dear Brothers,


In regard to Alex Jones speech, first of all there is no doubt that the words pronounced by him were definitely  “I am a mainline fake Christian”, and if one looks carefully at his face in that fraction of a second it gives a clear impression of hesitation and shock he got from his own words.  In a normal situation no one would ever say such a thing about himself.