Summer-Fall 2010 E-Exchanges Archive

 

 

Results

 

Subject: Interesting video on polls and elections

 

Thanks for your latest thought-provoking video about polling and election results.  While you note some plausible reasons to be suspicious about the last two major elections, your passing reference to the fact that polling has already started on the 2012 race raises a point that is probably worthy of a video of its own.  I marvel at the fact that, in every election cycle, months before the first presidential primary, the major news media and their favorite pollsters have already decided who are the "serious candidates" for president -- generally no more than three or four from each major party, each with solid Establishment credentials.  (And, of course, almost never do they consider anyone from outside of those two parties.)  Then, in a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy, the voters are subtly conditioned on a daily basis by the mainstream media to believe that voting for anyone but one of those "anointed" by the media and the pollsters would be a "wasted vote", no matter how much they may believe that an announced candidate not on the pre-approved list would be a far better president. 

It's astounding how many voters have been programmed to think of casting their vote as being comparable to a trip to the racetrack or the stock market, where they, in effect, bet on a winner, and cash in only if their chosen candidate wins.  They become fixated on the media's tacit decree that Candidate X "has no chance of winning", so they fail to note that their one vote (even if it is counted honestly) will add only one to any candidate's vote total, whether that candidate is considered a front-runner or not, and, as a single vote, is very unlikely to make the difference in the election, no matter who the oddsmakers' favorite is.  And, as such, like sheep, they let the media and the pollsters herd them into choosing the perceived least objectionable Establishment puppet from a pre-set tiny list of candidates.  That's a profound manipulation of the civics-class concept of a free election even if there isn't subsequent deception in the count on election day, and you make a good case for the latter being a strong possibility as well.

If you look at the media/pollster pre-set list of early 2008 in light of my point here, I think the public's dissatisfaction with Establishment politics was reflected in the voters' choices of Obama and McCain as the major party nominees.  One could argue that neither Obama nor McCain was truly an anti-Establishment "principled man of the people", but, given the short list of media-approved "serious" candidates, those two at least presented the most anti-Establishment image, and, thus, got at least a half-hearted nod from voters who were fed up with Establishment politics in general.  (That's even assuming those primary elections themselves weren't blatantly rigged, which, as your material suggests, they may have been.)  Had the voters not been manipulated from the outset into believing that Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich "couldn't get nominated", who knows how many would have voted for them instead of the perceived least evil person on the unofficial "approved list"?  And, given the fact that there's nothing in the U.S. Constitution about a two-party system, how many people would vote for a third party candidate if they weren't distracted by daily media focus on the polls over and above the candidates' positions on the issues?

Your contention of massive election-rigging would also provide a rational explanation for some otherwise baffling election results at the state and local level.  In my home city of Phoenix, the current and previous mayors have implemented extremely unpopular "public-private partnerships" in which as much as $100 million in tax money has been given to rich developers to build hotels and shopping malls obviously not demanded by the marketplace; the city government then runs a massive deficit, and the citizens are sternly told that they must approve large tax increases or lay off large numbers of police and fire fighters.  Even the pollsters admit that the vast majority of the public is outraged by these shenanigans, yet the offending mayor(s) get "re-elected" by a wide margin every time.  Since, as you have noted, it's outlandishly easy for voting machines to be electronically rigged, when additional evidence exposes anomalies of this nature, this is one possible explanation for them that should be seriously investigated.

Thanks again for being a source of little-known information that deserves our attention.  I'll look forward to your ongoing insights.


                                                                    Lyndon Olson

Hoax

 

Subject: Hoax videos

 

After watching both of these, when they were posted; the one question that still comes to mind is, why didn't (or don't) they wait the proper amount of time (before announcing results) to make the whole "thing" look more realistic? Well, everyone knows patience is a virtue. And what's most apparent here is that we're not dealing with virtuous men. They're busted! 

 

RBS 

 

MHFM: They have a vested interest in announcing the results early.  It helps ratings; it programs the public to believe that the media is essentially all-knowing; and it enables them to wipe away most possible future opposition to their desired results by convincing the people early on that things have been decided and that further work for their desired candidate is therefore futile.  There is also the element of arrogance: they don’t believe people will realize and/or do anything about it.  

 

Wondering

 

Subject: could use some help

 

Hi brothers michael and peter,
 
I was wondering if you could help me find a legitimate priest to go to confession to and maybe receive the eucharist if possible. I'll give you some background. I was born and raised in the Novus Ordo sect all my life up until a couple of years ago i was going there. So I've never been to a real mass or a real priest. Thats when i discovered your website, wow the best thing that has ever happened to me. Can’t thank you brothers enough for the work that you are doing. If I remember correctly I think i was on catholic [forum] and someone was arguing in favor of your site saying you brothers hold the true position. I saw that and went over to your site. Have to admit i was pretty blown away by what i saw. I continued to attend the novus ordo church for a while, still looking more and more at your site everyday. Long story short I became convinced of all the things you were saying because it’s backed up by the truth and i finally saw it. On a different topic thought this was pretty telling too, I was trying to tell my mom about the salvation dogma and what it really means and that if the church were a remnant of people it would be the true church, (arguing the sedevacantist position) she kept arguing saying well where's the hierarchy, we have to have a pope, etc. The point I'm getting at is she even went on to say that she would go to a protestant church if she had to, if there were no so called "catholic" ones to go to. It made me sad, this is my mom. On the positive side though I have convinced my brother to check out your material and he seems to be really receptive to it. Hoping and praying to convince my mom and dad though because i have a lot of family members left that are still young like 11 or 12 that look up to them and there not providing any spiritual guidance for them right now. Sorry for the long winded email. If you brothers could help me find a priest I would really appreciate it… Thank you again for all that you do. 
 
God Bless you
 
Aaron

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  That’s an interesting story.  Your mom is arguing against the truth on the basis of her false understanding about the hierarchy, but she is willing to go to a Protestant church.  That’s quite revealing.  It demonstrates again that for most people who profess to be Catholic today, it’s not about the faith.  Their only concern is about a religious community feeling or following their local leader.  For them, it’s about showing up at a church.  As we’ve said before, as long as a man in Rome dresses up in robes and claims to be pope, they will accept him no matter what he believes. 

 

With regard to confession, if you contact us here we can help you with that issue.  But it is addressed specifically in this file: Where to go to Mass or confession today?  It discusses how, if there isn’t a better option, one may go to an old Novus Ordo priest for confession, if the priest says the proper words and has been ordained in the traditional rite.  That’s an important option to acknowledge today simply because there are so few priests and essentially all of them are heretics, including the “traditionalists.”

 

Whoever

 

Whoever is against the pope is against the catholic church and is heretic. if you don't want to fallow the pope is as martin luther the heretic. take good look and don't be heretic. have a nice day.

 

Richard

 

MHFM: You follow an antipope who has praised Luther and agrees with him on Justification.  See our heresies of Benedict XVI section.  Take a good look at what the Church teaches, stop being a liar, and begin to believe in Catholic teaching; for you do not at this time.  If you start to be honest, you will see that Benedict XVI is not a Catholic and therefore not a pope; and that by defending him you reject all the popes and attack the Church. 

 

Video

 

Subject: Election night video

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Great video on the election night hoax. It's beyond doubt that the major media corporations have secret information that enables them to make such amazingly accurate claims at such impossibly early times in the election. I think it may also be a trick to make people put more trust in those media stations than they deserve, because "if they can predict the elections so early, they're probably right about EVERYTHING!!!"… Thank you for exposing such a horrendous hoax!!!

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Calendar

 

Good evening Brother,

 

You used to put the calendar at this address : http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/calendar.html  I have notice that it is still the calendar of October 2010. Could you please tell me if there is a new link so that i could update my bookmark? …

 

Sincerely,

 

Philippe

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  It has been updated at that link.

 

Medjugorje

 

Subject: Mother, Medjugorje

 

Dear Brother Michael and Peter,

 

Hi. I was the person who emailed the other day about my mom who took the trip to Medjugorje last week. Well, I was talking to her last night and I asked if anyone else in her tour group had their rosaries turn to gold. Only one other person out of 60 in her group did it happen to. That tells me that the devil is working very hard to keep her in lockstep with Vatican II. He knows your information is of the truth and that I've been praying hard for her conversion to the true Catholic faith. But I won't give up, just like St. Augustine's mother didn't give up on her son, I won't give up on my mother. She was asking me over and over last night to watch her Medjugorje dvds she brought back from her trip. I tried to strike a deal with her. I said I'd watch her dvds if she would watch your dvds. She didn't agree, but she's strongly considering it. If she does agree to watch your material, then it could be my opening to get her to listen with an open heart about the true faith. Please keep my mother, Carol, in your prayers.

 

God Bless,

Josh

 

Statues

 

Subject: Weeping Statues

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Maybe I am wrong but it seems that statues of the Blessed Virgin began to weep tears and tears of blood since the introduction of the new mass. I don't recall any of this activity prior to 1969. It may also be a sign of the hand of God being ready to be released on this corrupt world in which we live and Mary is saddened by the fact that she can no longer hold back His wrath. But then again it could be another ploy from the devil. Just imagine if one of the statues somehow spoke and told the listeners that the Vatican II church is the true church and must be followed in all of it's teachings. The videos I watched were fascinating, especially the one that showed the Mother's eyes appear to open and close.

 

What is your take on this activity?

 

Your ardent supporter,

 

Bob

 

MHFM: It’s either a false sign and wonder from Satan (2 Thess. 2) to confirm people in the new religion or it represents the Virgin Mary weeping over the apostasy and manifold abominations of the Vatican II sect.

 

Bad will

 

Subject: Bad Will

 

Dear Mhfm,

Don't got alot of time to write this. But was having a quick look at your e-exchange section. Just wanted to say spot on Bill. The novus ordo always use that excuse. Certain "traditionalists" who attend masses they shouldn't attend use it too. So mhfm would love to see you publish something on this issue if you get a chance.

God Bless

Sean

 

Question

 

Subject: Question regarding the Luminous Mysteries of the Rosary

 

Hello Brother,

 

Is it true Pope John Paul II added the Luminous Mysteries to the Rosary? Seeing as he was an anti-Pope, should we recite this part of the Rosary? What is the reason he felt it was necessary to add this?

 

Thank you.

 

Sandy

 

MHFM: No, one should not recite the Luminous Mysteries.  They are not part of the true Rosary.  The reason Antipope John Paul II felt it was necessary to add them is that he was a non-Catholic revolutionary who wanted to change everything.

 

New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video.  It’s a follow-up to our recent video, Our Lady of Guadalupe overcomes the Mexican Serpent.

 

Cortes' Amazing Conquest of the Aztec Empire [video]

 

Bad Will

 

Subject: Bad Will

 

Dear Brothers: 

 

Can you publish something about one of the main things I run into with Novus Ordo people and that is various versions of: "It's OK for me to go there because if they are wrong it's not my fault and they may suffer but not me!"

THANK YOU!

GOD BLESS YOU!

Bill

 

Anglican false converts

 

Subject: Five Anglican Bishops join Catholic Church

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I thought you might be interested in this. Two items are of particular note, one is the statement by the Vatican that ”groups of Anglicans can join Catholicism, but maintain a distinct religious identity”. The other is in the analysis which tells of how the Church of England has had bishops for over 2,000 years.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11709148

 

Best Wishes,

Derek

 

MHFM: Yes, they are false converts.  They are not “converting” because they believe in Catholic teaching, but simply because the Anglican Sect has become too radical for them to maintain a warm community feeling within it.  If the Anglicans weren’t allowing homosexuality, women “priests,” etc. these people would almost certainly remain Anglicans.  To cement their place as false converts within the New Order Counter Church, the Vatican II sect and Antipope Benedict XVI are even allowing them to continue to use their heretical Anglican liturgical books.

 

Benedict XVI, Apostolic Constitution Anglicanorum Coetibus, #5, III, Nov. 4, 2009: “Without excluding liturgical celebrations according to the Roman Rite, the Ordinariate has the faculty to celebrate the Holy Eucharist and the other Sacraments, the Liturgy of the Hours and other liturgical celebrations according to the liturgical books proper to the Anglican tradition, which have been approved by the Holy See, so as to maintain the liturgical, spiritual and pastoral traditions of the Anglican Communion within the Catholic Church, as a precious gift nourishing the faith of the members of the Ordinariate and as a treasure to be shared.”

 

Attitude

 

Dear Brothers:

 

The email from Todd got me thinking again about the attitude of the SSPX.  They are very fond of quoting --again and again -- that Lefebvre "passed on what he received."  I think they even put this quote on his tombstone.  And when they say it, they say it in a breathless sort of way - like maybe people are supposed to have a moment of silence to venerate this "profound statement" from a man whose canonization they have taken upon themselves to pronounce.

 

But no one doubts that Lefebvre passed on what he received - that is the problem in a nutshell.  The question is:  from whom did he receive it?  Passing on what one receives is the way of all flesh;  generations of protestants have been doing it for centuries.

 

The Dimond Brothers do not pass on what they have received;  they pass on what Holy Mother Church has received.  That and only that is the Deposit of Faith.

 

The SSPX claims to oppose "false ecumenism" but, like their other claims, this is false - for this "ecumenism" is nothing more than baptism of desire a hundred years later, come to full fruition.  Passed on by Lefebvre and embraced by his followers who are more interested in proving him right than examining the truth.  The SSPX makes absurd claims to oppose the MHFM but will never address the issue at hand, which is the authentic teachings of the Popes…

 

The very reason the SSPX cannot see that the V-2 gang of thugs are false popes is because they and their followers have obstinately denied the teachings of the true popes. 

 

If the SSPX  were in good will - and actually believed the truth of their position - it would be a simple matter to say:  "I will read these MHFM materials with red pen in hand and indicate any errors I might find".  And then they would make an important discovery.    But I have never heard of any SSPX priest doing this or expressing a willingness to do this.  And that to me is most telling.  Perhaps they know what they will find.

 

Lee Ann

 

Can’t

 

I purchased a St. Pius X picture of the net and hung the picture on my wall in a picture frame. My mom, someone who prays the Rosary every night, asks me who that is. I tell her it’s Pope St. Pius X… She replies by saying that John Paul II is the greatest Pope ever. She's someone you just can't get through to. What’s also irritating is the only Saint she knows about is St. Anthony. But I bet she doesn't know a clue about St. Anthony.

 

Daniel

 

Authority

 

Thank you very much for your kind response. Please forgive me if I ask one brief follow-up question: If Vatican II HAD BEEN a legitimate Council (and I, as you, maintain that it was NOT) would it have had the authority to declare that Islam was NOT a pagan religion and that Pope Callixtus' declaration was overturned and that the Muslims' god Allah was the same Deity as our Holy Trinity? Thank you.

Ricardo Parks

 

MHFM: No, it would not be possible for a true ecumenical council to contradict the declaration that Islam is a diabolical and pagan religion.  That is an unchangeable truth; for it flows from what Christ revealed to the Apostles about the true faith, the true God and how people must consider non-Christian religions that reject the true God.  The very fact that Vatican II did contradict Catholic teaching on this matter proves that it was not a true council of the Catholic Church.

                                                                                               

V-2 Seminarian

 

Subject: V-2 seminarian

 

My friend a v 2 seminarian has accepted the catholic faith. Though he is still there in 4th year philosophy about to write his final exam. He hopes to infiltrate the place with catholic teachings until he is sent out. Is that a nice option ? What again must i tell him. Thanks for answering some of my questions….My parents are on my neck. Pls remember me in your prayers.

 

Ta…

 

MHFM: No, a Catholic can’t remain at a V-2 seminary.  It’s critical that you inform him that he will not save his soul unless he leaves the seminary and completely rejects the Vatican II sect and the New Mass.  He should also be informed about the website and the information that covers the Vatican II sect.

 

Comment

 

Dear Mhfm, 

 

Excellent historical description of the savages and their cultural and demonic practices nowadays endorsed as good by the Vatican II sect led by the head heresiarch Benedict 16.  10,000 to 1 and MHFM defends the faith against such odds.  Ave Maria, gratia plena...

 

Dea…

 

SSPX

 

Subject: Rebuked by the SSPX

 

Hi Brothers,

Well I was finally rebuked by Father Jordan Fahnestock at St. Anthony of Padua SSPX Church in Caldwell, New Jersey.  I arrived 15 mins. before the herd was to be let out and I was able to hand out a few of your books on, "Outside the Catholic Church there is Absolutely no Salvation".  I was pleasantly surprised by one father with little children, he said he was a fan of Brother Michael, I just don't know why he would be going to this church?  After that I went back to my car parked by the walkway so I could be ready to hand out your material, then all of a sudden one of the ushers threw open the door and was high stepping it toward me, he was such a good soldier and I told him just that, he asked me with attitude,  if I was distributing material at the church and I said yes, he told me that Father Fahnestock didn't want me to do that unless he saw the material first, I said ok I'll wait for Father and show him what I am distributing!  As he walked away I said,  such blind faith!  Well,  just before the people were to come out, all three ushers came out and stood right by my car as if to protect the people from me, can you imagine.  While still waiting for Father, an older couple came out, who I had breakfast with the week before, there was a group of them, they asked me to join them while I was trying to hand out material, while at breakfast last week a conversation came up about people who were not catholic who prayed to God and I said that their prayers are not pleasing to God because they don't have the faith, they all gasped at me.  So I sent her an email when I got home from breakfast last week citing Hebrews 11:6.  Getting back to this week, the older couple came out after the ushers and the lady who was at breakfast the week before walks over to me with an attitude and says, "don't email me anymore I don't need you for my spiritual advisor," she was offended because I gave her the proof against her error,  what Pride!   Then Father came out and walked over to me and shook my hand and the first thing he asked me was did I go to Mass this morning and I said no.  I showed him the book and I stated that the book contained dogmas, encyclicals, statements made by true popes and saints regarding the salvation dogma, one baptism, refuting invisible ignorance , etc. He looked at it very quickly and stated, wow, this is heavy stuff and I said it's not heavy at all, its simple stuff! He went on to say that the society is suspicious of the Dimond Brothers and the fact that they are off on they own and not part of the church, basically trying to make the connection, "you don't have jurisdiction for your mission!  He also stated there is an issue with the sedevacantist position that the brothers hold.  He also stated that you are somewhat prideful to say the least because you are off on your own!  Well needless to say,  I'm finished with this church!!!  Here is Father Fahnstock's email… I would love for you to sledgehammer him with the faith!                         

 

Todd

 

MHFM: Interesting story… It’s so true that so many supporters of those groups don’t think for themselves and they aren’t interested in the truth.  They just follow whatever their priest or local community says, to their own damnation. 

 

Islam

 

Subject: Islam

 

Dear Brothers Dimond: Citations on your website indicate clearly a strong condemnation of "the diabolical sect of Mahomet" by popoe Eugene IV and Callixtus III. I maintain that the "god" that they worship, Allah, is in fact, based on extensive historic archaeological research, el-Alilah, who is "the moon god" - in other words, Satan. I submitted this matter as a reader inquiry to "This Rock" Catholic apologetics magazine and my response, in no uncertain terms from Fr. Vincent Serpa, O.P., at This Rock was that I am wrong - Islam worships Allah and Allah is the same as our God. I believe that Fr. Serpa is wrong and have told him so, but I seem to be getting nowhere with my argument. Can you please tell me what the official teaching of the Church is and has been since the founding of Islam in the 7th Century, concerning who or what Allah really is? Thank you!

Ricardo L. Parks

 

MHFM: Certainly it’s not a surprise that you would receive such a response from an antichrist and apostate group that couldn’t care less about traditional Catholic teaching.  The traditional teaching of the popes on Islam is found in this video we did:

 

The Popes Against Islam

Part 2

 

It cites numerous popes who, while obviously desiring the conversion of Muslims, describe Islam and Muslims as “diabolical,” “abominable,” “faithless,” “sacrilegious,” and more.  It also covers an extremely important quote from Pope Callixtus III.  He officially classified the Muslims with the “pagans.”  That’s extremely significant and pertains directly the question you ask.  Since the Church officially classifies Muslims with the pagans, that proves that they do not worship the same God as Catholics, contrary to what Vatican II heretically teaches.  It destroys Vatican II’s teaching in that regard, and the many heretics who defend it.  Although, it’s true that papal citations shouldn’t be necessary to demonstrate that Muslims reject the Trinity and therefore don’t worship the same God as Catholics who believe in the Trinity.

 

Lying Sign

 

Subject: Medjugorje “Miracle”

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Hello, I hope you have been doing well. I want to tell you of my mother's recent trip to Medjugorje. First I will preface that she knows that I hold the sedevacantist position, and despite my numerous attempts over the past 4 years to get her to open her eyes to the imposter church, she remains staunchly Vatican 2. Before she went on the trip I tried expaining how the "Mary" of Medjugorje cannot be the same person as Our Lady because the real Mary woudn't praise other religions. Again, in one ear and out the other. So last week she took her trip to Medjugorje and got back yesterday. She was so excited because the metal crucifix of her rosary turned from silver to gold while she was there. This is so sad, she is so easily deceived all the more now. Yet it is my mother's love of the lies of Vatican 2 that makes her fall for lying signs and wonders of the devil. I can't tell you how sad and depressed and frustrated I get over family members, especially my own mother, who unless by the grace of God to shed light into their souls, will not be saved.

 

Sincerely,

Josh

 

MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail.  It’s a prime example of a lying sign and wonder that St. Paul predicted.  He prophesied that they will come in the final days to deceive those who receive not the love of the truth (i.e., the traditional Catholic faith).  The example you give from Medjugorje, deceiving a person who doesn’t want the truth, is exactly what is foretold.  It shows that we are living in those times.

 

2 Thessalonians 2:9-12: "Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying wonders, And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.  Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying.  That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity."

 

False Apparitions (Divine Mercy, Bayside, Medjugorje) [Link to Section]

 

Medal

 

Dear Brothers,


I just thought this was interesting.  Have you ever looked at the congressional medal of honor?  It is the upside down star.  The pentagram

 

Paul

 

Confession

 

Subject: Confession

 

Dear Brothers,
 
I am a recent "prodigal" catholic, who feels very much in danger of losing his soul… i firstly would like to thank you for your work and your direction, as well as your testament to the true church, and to live without fear, and to demand the changes most desperately needed in our house.  Having said that, my problem enters here. I want to make a good confession, but Novus Ordo is rampant through our area… [and] has become laughably drunk with the "do what you FEEL is right" mentality. Now, i haven’t confessed there for some time….
   Brothers, I want to make the right confession and sin no more… I have re-found my God, my mother, and the rest, and love it, feel it, but cannot partake in communion for my mortal sin.  Knowing i am walking in danger everyday is beyond un-settling. I desperately need to know what to do, Brothers. If you can help me in anyway…
 
In the Name Of The Father and Of The Son and Of The Holy Ghost
 
Thank You my friends.
Sincerely Yours…

 

MHFM: It’s great to hear about your interest.  First, you should pray the Rosary each day.  Second, you need to stop going to the invalid New Mass if you still go there.  Before receiving sacraments, it's necessary for a person to be convinced of all the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church.  That includes a complete rejection of the Vatican II Church.  It also includes holding the correct Catholic positions on the various issues that are relevant today.  Once a person is convinced, he or she needs to make the traditional profession of faith from the Council of Trent.  That’s found in the file below.  At that point, a person can go to confession to a priest ordained before 1968 or in the Eastern Rite.  We can help you with options in that regard.  Confessions made to “priests” ordained in the New Rite of Ordination are not valid. 

 

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

Where to go to Mass or confession today?

 

Machine

 

Subject: Documentary Spain

 

Dear MHFM, Wow! I just watched this program that showed how Christians of Spain persecuted the Muslim and the Jew. I'm not saying Spain was populated with one saint after another but the program was so pro Muslim and pro Jew it was sickening.  All the "scholars" were from US universities and they were very good at explaining the beauty and tolerance of the Muslim culture. The Jewish scholar was exceptional at explaining how the Europeans were barbarians and not really smart enough to govern themselves thus the need for the Jew.  Surprisingly, the Catholics were never defended for anything (except the broken treaty in Grenada) and Isabelle was a fanatic.  It was a good example for my kids to see the Anti-Christ propaganda machine in action, on prime time America.

 

Matthew

 

Belgian

 

Subject: Belgian V-2 Sect

 

Hello,

 

I've read on your website the section concerning mass sexual scandal in the V2 sect, and I think something can be added there.

 

It is quite illustrative that even at least one "bishop" is directly involved in the scandal.

 

"Belgian Catholic bishop admits molesting boy" 

 

"Belgian Catholic offices raided in sex abuse probe"

 

Best regards,

Patrick

 

Cortes Video

 

Subject: Cortes Video

 

What a superb video on Cortes---fascinating----but the part about the faces kind of grossed me out-----keep up the wonderful work for Our Lord and Our Lady!!... also I wanted to say a big THANK YOU  to MHFM for sending me the… audios… I think I know just the person to send them to...a 14 year old who claims he'll read any Catholic books I send him… Please pray for us!...

 

Anne

 

Wow

 

Subject: Queen of Heaven Parish Buffalo, NY

 

Bro Michael Dimond

Bro Peter Dimond

 

I was speaking… about Queen of Heaven Parish in West Seneca, Buffalo NY… I heard about a rock band giving a concert at this Parish gym this Saturday.  I found the website to the church and was not suprised to find that they have had previous carnivals with live rock music, magic acts and beer tents.  I have included the link to their page.  I think you will find this very interesting.

 

May our Lord Jesus Christ and our Holy Mother Mary protect us and save us in these last days of the world.

 

Kieran  

 

http://qofhchurch.org/pages/001Parish/Carnival%202010.php

 

MHFM: Wow, that’s really something.  “Magic” Shows, A Beer Tent, A Gambling Tent… it’s surprising even for the Novus Ordo.

 

Form

 

MHFM: For those it might interest, we have a new order form: Order Form (PDF).  We also have a new edition of our mp3: MP3 Disc (7th edition).

 

Ecumenical Council

 

Dear Brother Dimonds,

 

I was researching the word "Ecumenical" and came upon this: 

 

"Ecumenical Councils are those to which the bishops, and others entitled to vote, are convoked from the whole world (oikoumene) under the presidency of the pope or his legates, and the decrees of which, having received papal confirmation, bind all Christians. A council, Ecumenical in its convocation, may fail to secure the approbation of the whole Church or of the pope, and thus not rank in authority with Ecumenical councils. Such was the case with the Robber Synod of 449 (Latrocinium Ephesinum), the Synod of Pisa in 1409, and in part with the Councils of Constance and Basle."

 

… Could you please explain what the underlined bold statement above means? 

 

Thanks,

 

T.N. Le

 

MHFM: First, you are citing a definition of “ecumenical councils” given in the Catholic Encyclopedia.  It’s basically correct but is not infallibly precise (as a dogmatic definition would be).  The statement means that if a council is convoked in a manner that would be ecumenical, but is not confirmed by the pope after it sets forth its teaching, it does not have the force of a binding ecumenical council.  The confirmation must be given by the pope.  The statement that it needs the approbation of the “whole Church” might be confusing because if a pope confirms an ecumenical council in an authoritative fashion, it becomes the teaching of the Church and is binding on the whole Church.

 

This fact about ecumenical councils, by the way, shows that the position of those who reject parts of Vatican II, but accept Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI as valid but bad popes, is ridiculous and completely opposed to traditional Catholic teaching.  Paul VI authoritatively and solemnly confirmed Vatican II.  It was, therefore, in their sect, an “ecumenical council” which must be accepted.  If they can reject it, then one could reject past ecumenical councils. 

 

“Each and every one of the things set forth in this Decree has won the consent of the fathers.  We, too, by the Apostolic Authority conferred on us by Christ, join with the venerable fathers in approving, decreeing, and establishing these things in the Holy Spirit, and we direct that what has thus been enacted in synod [council] be published to God’s glory… I, Paul, Bishop of the Catholic Church.” (Paul VI, solemnly closing every document of Vatican II)

 

Since Vatican II was clearly heretical and must be rejected, this fact proves the sedevacantist position.

 

Conclusion

 

AP have you ever considered the scenario that you are wrong? It's amazing how bad-willed people will cleverly reason around the truth while being unable to be ignorant of the truth. Your only digg your grave deeper as you reject the truth.

Brothers, I've often wondered what happened to the elder family members during the inception of the Great Deception in the early 1960's as they slaved away to have their children attend Catholic Schools.  How they could be so deceived and turn away from the true faith. The conclusion is that they were never real Catholics, just going with the flow every Sunday, while chasing the American modern dream during the week as seen today.

While observing the senseless behaviors of parents this past Halloween, you can see the product of the last couple generations. It will be no-wonder, what this un-Godly generation of kids will be passing on to their children.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

Individual

 

This individual AP love's Mr. Corapi like someone loves a rock star, Mr. Corapi makes AP's life very easy for him.  I think Mr. Corapi is possessed by Aleister Crowley because they both say the same thing; it doesn't matter if you are muslim, protestant, jewish etc. just practice it, live it, do what thou wilt!  I would pay a 1000.00 dollars for a front row seat to see the Dimond Brothers debate "Mr". Corapi, it would be like taking candy away from a baby!!!!!!!!! 

 

Todd

 

MHFM: It is remarkable how devoted these people are to the heretic Corapi.  They obviously don’t care about the fact that he accepts false religions and renders Christ and the faith meaningless.  He’s a true false shepherd, one of the many leading people astray in this apostasy. 

 

False Law

 

Dear Brothers,

 

How does AP explain the fact that even in most Pagan cultures they know that murder, theft, lying, adultery, etc. is evil.  AP reminds me of the radical schismatics who try to multiply the things that are necessary for salvation, such as by making up their own false laws and dogmas. AP's false law, that one doesn't sin unless they know it is sinful, contradicts both the natural and Divine laws: 

 

Romans 2:14-16 - "For when the Gentiles, who have not the law, do by nature those things that are of the law; these having not the law are a law to themselves: Who shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness to them, and their thoughts between themselves accusing, or also defending one another, In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel."

 

Pope St. Pius X, Iucunda Sane - '36. And since, for our moral discipline, the Divine Redeemer proposes as our supreme model of perfection His heavenly Father (Matthew v. 48), that is, the Divine goodness itself, who can fail to see the mighty impulse thence accruing to the ever more perfect observance of the natural law inscribed in our hearts, and consequently to the greater welfare of the individual, the family, and universal society? The ferocity of the barbarians was thus transformed to gentleness, woman was freed from subjection, slavery was repressed, order was restored in the due and reciprocal independence upon one another of the various classes of society, justice was recognized, the true liberty of souls was proclaimed, and social and domestic peace assured."

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Soon

                                

MHFM: We hope to have some new videos posted soon.

 

Mortal Sin

 

[Note: this is a response from the person who e-mailed and argued that a mortal sin is not mortal unless a person knows it’s a mortal sin]

 

You offer a good argument. But here is another. Lets say a mentally retarded person beats to death another mentally retarded person, it has happened before. Would this be a mortal sin against this person?

Of course the average person knows this is a sin. But one of the requirements of a sin being mortal, for us Catholics, is the knowing and willful violation of God's law. It is much like telling a child you may not play in the street. He then has the ability to CHOOSE whether to break this law or not.

If the child was never told, "Don't play in the street", of course he never made the choice against his parent, he simply did not know it would be a grave danger, thus not having a willful violation of his parent.

CHECK OUT THIS LINK: EWTN IS LEGIT. It should clear up this matter…

 

AP

 

MHFM: By presenting this argument, you demonstrate that your understanding of this issue is false.  Describing someone as “mentally retarded” is somewhat vague.  Most mentally retarded people can distinguish basic right from wrong, but are simply mentally slow.  In that case, a mentally retarded person who beats to death another person knows the action is wrong and does commit a mortal sin, even if he doesn’t know about the concept of “mortal sin.”  He knows he shouldn’t beat his neighbor to death.  The action is gravely wrong in and of itself.  Thus, it’s another example of how a person can commit a mortal sin if he deliberately commits an action that is gravely wrong in itself, even if he doesn’t care about or understand the concept of “mortal sin.”

 

If you posit a “mentally retarded” person who doesn’t know right from wrong at all, then you make him equivalent to an infant.  Infants cannot commit actual sins.  Hence, the person you posit (if such a person existed) would not be guilty of mortal sin – not because the commission of an act by a reasoning person without specific knowledge of “mortal sin” renders it non-mortally sinful, as you and Corapi heretically maintain, but rather because infants and those lacking the use of reason cannot commit actual sins.  Therefore, your examples do not in any way contradict the Catholic truth that we expressed.  They serve only to demonstrate the specious and desperate nature of your avoidance of Catholic teaching.  People who deliberately commit acts that are inherently and gravely wrong, such as fornication, murder or contraception, commit mortal sin, even if they don’t know about the concept of “mortal sin.”  They know that what they are doing is gravely opposed to the right use of reason and the natural law and they deliberately decide to do it. 

 

Your second example also fails miserably.  You give the example of a child who was never told not to play in the street.  The fact that you would bring this up reveals that you completely lack an understanding of the points we’ve made.  Playing in the street is not inherently evil.  So, there would be no sin if the child played in the street.  On the other hand, using contraception – which is really what you are defending as possibly not mortal – is inherently evil.  One who deliberately uses it knows it’s opposed to the natural law and the right use of reason.  Therefore, that person always commits mortal sin when using it, as Pius XI teaches.  As we can see, your false theology, which you’ve adopted from the likes of EWTN and the apostate Corapi, is a house of cards.  EWTN is not Catholic, by the way, but utterly heretical and modernist: EWTN and the Charismatic Movement [link to section]

 

Flood

 

Subject: The Biblical Flood Explained - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X16SE-N-8ys

 

I find it highly immoral when people are spreading lies made up by individuals like the particular video about a global flood. This video does not represent what we know today…

I used to be a Christian but these things make me feel a deep disgust inside… Think about it.

 

Thinking…

 

MHFM: The video is true and it’s based in scientific facts.  You are very upset about it because it shakes your worldview.  If the flood occurred, which it did, then you have a major problem.  You have an obligation to God and to accept the true religion; otherwise you go to Hell.  That’s the only reason for your vitriol: deep down you are very scared.  By the way, the man who did the video is an accomplished scientist who has written a large book documenting his points in abundant detail.  As any careful and honest consideration of this issue shows, it is the evolutionists who are spreading lies and have convinced the gullible world of a massive fraud.  You should look more honestly into the presentations against evolution and those for creation science according to the biblical record.  We have a few of those, including the book which further proves the video you disliked so much: In the Beginning - Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood.  But God doesn’t force the hand of those who are liars at heart.

 

Kennedy

 

Subject: Kennedy

 

Thanks for O'Malley and your understanding. I was one of your First subscribers and still look every now and then. You guys seem to be busy and are not wanting to get to involved with me. Understandable. BUT

I was the right hand man of JFK and friend of Bobby. Neither of these men believed as their brother, so WHY would Teddy be so much different???

The men who killed both Jack and Bobby actually got to Teddy through Hypnotism without him Knowing(of course when you are Hypnotised you Never Know).  Its the populace that never found out. I tried to stop this but was unable to. There was NO reason to try and tell anybody about this(FBI;etc) for they would Not believe this. Just like you are having a hard time accepting that a person can be controlled this way.

Teddy NEVER believed this in his earlier career and NEVER came to understand why he believed it later. The AntiChrist that Ruleth the World right Now USED Teddy for ITS purpose and MANY have succomed.

I can Still identify the murderers and give their names UP But NO ONE Listens..

 

MHFM: That’s not an e-mail you get every day. 

 

Temperature

 

MHFM: Here’s an interesting fact about one of the many miraculous features of the Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe.

 

“The image even rejects insects and dust.  Fr. Mario Rojas has told me that according to LaValle, no matter what the surrounding temperature is, the Image itself remains at an even 36.5 degrees C, or 98.6 degrees F., the normal human body temperature.” (Janet Barber, “The Tilma and Its Miraculous Image,” A Handbook on Guadalupe, The Academy of the Immaculate, 1997, p. 62.)

 

Mercy

 

We were called to patiently persevere through all trials.  That our actions must be based on the fruit of love and not condemnation.  "What you desire is mercy, not sacrifice."  You should remember yourself that Paul changes his stance in view of the times ahead, first calling for patient endurance and then refusing to feed those that did not work.  The keys were given so that we might apply God's infinite mercy accordingly and not stuntingly in opposition to the true message that was to be given.  

   Yes, i know it is written, "All have fallen away, there is no one that does good" "Even our righteous acts are like filthy rags"  

   But there is good to those who can see it.  You are right in many ways and I can't argue with the truth.  But the law doesn't give way either...only mercy does.  I humbly accept your rebuke, but the time of testing will come with or without our help to separate those who are sincere from those who are not.  I'll look into your videos...  I don't have any, but i will leave a psalm.  116.

 

In faith,

Hugo

 

MHFM: We’re glad that you will look into the information.  But your understanding of mercy is not correct.  Strictly adhering to the apostolic faith and denouncing those who deviate from it or corrupt it is not incompatible with the charity or mercy of the Lord.  On the contrary, only those who fall into the category of the former can understand or truly display the latter.  The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Psalm 110:10).  The idea that mercy means being open to exceptions to God’s truth, or that there might be salvation or goodness where God has revealed there is none, is a corruption of mercy and a deception. 

 

In fact, the Scripture you cite – “I will have mercy, and not sacrifice” – comes from Matthew 9:13.  The context is not about considering as good people who are not, or accepting deviation from the faith.  Rather, it’s a rebuke to the Pharisees who criticized Jesus for how He communicated with publicans and sinners.  Jesus was of course trying to convert them to Himself.  He was not, as you imply, teaching that sinners are fine where they are, or that people should consider as saved those who are not converted.  He declares in that very context that those people are “ill,” meaning spiritually dead and in need of salvation.  That’s why He approached them.  Thus, your understanding of that passage is incorrect. 

 

“Orthodox”

 

Dear Sirs,

I found your "Debate on Papacy and the Bible" fascinating, but, being in the Eastern Orthodox church, found the constant divergence onto "reformed issues" (Sola Scriptura, visible church, etc.) somewhat disappointing. I would be very interested in hearing what you all would have to say against an Orthodox position on the Papacy (which would focus more on issues like the Filioque and the exact historical position of the Roman See among the patriarchates). I'm contacting you directly because I have been unable to find much on your sight even mentioning the Orthodox (though your mention of Meyendorff in the above debate greatly piqued my interest!) never mind systematically addressing their views on Catholicism. If you do have such content, please forgive my overlooking it and be so kind as to direct me to it, and if you do not have such content, I would like to urge you to consider making some!

Yours,
David Dietrich

 

MHFM: That debate you mention was a debate with a Protestant on the biblical merits of the Papacy; it therefore dealt with that topic and the related topics a Protestant would bring up.  As far as the evidence for the Papacy in the ancient Church goes – and specifically the information that refutes the claims of the Eastern “Orthodox” – that’s covered in a separate section of our website.  You will find numerous audios dealing with that topic in this section: The Bible teaches that Jesus made St. Peter the first pope [link to section].  This section, by the way, is found under our “Refuting Protestantism” section.

 

New Video Posted

 

MHFM: This is a new video:

 

Sean O'Malley, Counter Church "Bishop" [video]

 

Read

 

Subject: Comment on Watched

 

Good Day,

 

As I've read AP's comment I have concluded that he thought that ignorance can save someone of mortal sin which is basically no. The defense that the brothers gave is very detailed and informative and also I would also like to add that there is a saying in law (which my teacher drilled to our thick skulls) about ignorance I'm sure many of you are familiar with this: "Ignorance of the law excuses no one." Also AP's comment on the Catholic faith looking bad backs up his position of tolerating lies, a saying goes that truth really hurts.

 

TB

 

Regarding

 

Subject: Heretic

 

Hello… Brothers:

 

     Regarding "zema" - just another one who denounces the idea of exposing heretics or calling heretics out, who in the same breathe feels free to call you a heretic! Why do these totally evil fools not see the thorough self contradiction in their crass relativism. It is always the same with them - "nobody can be called evil, because that it against our inclusivism - by the way, you are evil for not being inclusive"! They say there are absolutely no absolutes/ it is morally wrong to say anything is wrong/ they dogmatically state that there are no dogmas/ It is absolutely true for them that there are no truths. It is a circus of mental tomfoolery from start to finish. Thank you again and again brothers for the good work and know that there is much good fruit from MHFM. God bless you all.

 

-Michael

 

Heretic

 

Subject: heretic

 

I've listened to a few of your videos and read a little on your home page.  But, I'm curious in your extreme convictions of heresy.  What would you do with the example of Paul?  If there were no mercy as in your logic, would we have the epistles?  You cry heresy! without any reservation, but you are the hateful heretic.  You are the roaming lion that accuses day and night.  How can you ever sit at peace with the diversity God willfully created?

 

Zema…

 

MHFM: No, you are mistaken.  As the quote of the day said:

 

Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, 1311-1312, Decree # 26: “… it is a grave offense not to work for the extermination of heresy when this monstrous infection requires action...”

 

A true Catholic must denounce heresy and heretics, and there is no shortage of either in our day.  Can you name one person whom we have labeled a heretic who is not?  If you tried to, you would be refuted.  It is charitable, just and necessary to denounce heretics who lead others astray.  It is uncharitable and evil to do nothing to combat such an evil.  You obviously don’t understand the doctrine of St. Paul and the Apostles.  In addition to imploring non-Catholics to enter the Church, they condemned all those who deviated from the true faith.  You heretically believe, and imply in your e-mail, that heresies are to be accepted as part of a “diversity” willed by God.  No, God does not will that people reject His truth and go to Hell.   

 

St. Paul, Galatians 1:8-9: “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.  As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be anathema.”

 

St. Paul, 2 Thessalonians 3:6: “And we charge you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you withdraw yourselves from every brother walking disorderly, and not according to the tradition which they have received of us.”

 

2 John 1:10: “If any man come to you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him, God speed you.”

 

Pray

 

Dear Brother Peter Dimond,

 

I am not a Catholic even though my heart has always felt that I was. I taught myself to pray the rosary because I understand the importance and feel it is the right thing to do. Is the Blessed Virgin Mary, our Mother, "insulted" to receive prayers from a non-Catholic? I would never, ever purposefully do or say anything to upset Her. I just love Her so much and want to pray for others…  Thank you for taking the time to listen.

 

God bless you.

Sandy

 

MHFM: The Blessed Virgin is not insulted to receive prayers from a non-Catholic.  If a person is sincere, he or she will be led by such prayers to accept the Catholic faith and to take the steps to join the Catholic Church.  That’s what you need to do: continue to pray the Rosary for the grace of the true faith and to immediately act upon your interest.  The Devil will labor hard to get people to stall, to put off the most important steps of their spiritual conversion.  You must act, and follow the steps to convert to the (traditional) Catholic faith.  It’s not clear what you mean by your statement that you feel you have always been Catholic.  You might mean that you were inclined to Catholicism; for everyone who is honest with himself realizes, deep down, that Jesus Christ is the center of history and that His original Church is the Catholic Church.  But you are not a Catholic until you are baptized, accept the Catholic faith, and take the steps to join the Church.  That’s necessary for salvation.

 

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

 

Pelagian

 

Hello brothers Peter and Michael. Grace and peace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.

I watched your video, "Why most pro-lifers are not truly pro-life,”… Contrary to public opinion, the aborted babies are not in a better place… Thanks for your video on this. I can see the connection with the Pelagian heresy more clearly now. I think you could categorize pro-lifers into pro-temporal-life and pro-eternal-life. Those who are pro-eternal-life are able to see that abortion is an even greater sin than the typical murder.

Thanks,
Daniel

 

Recently

 

Subject: canonization of Brother Andre

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for the CD and other reading material you have sent me last.  Really Most Holy Family monastery is very generous.  Thank you for helping us (who search) for knowing the truth and how to protect ourselves during these darkest of times.

 

Just wanted to share with others of the True Catholic Faith, how tired I am of the hypocrisy of the Vatican 2 Church. Other than my children, and in prayer , I have no one else to share this news  with since I have not encountered others of the Faith. It comforts me to share this with you. 

 

Recently Ben 16 has canonized Brother André a Saint.   I am sure you are aware of it by now.  How blind does Ben 16 think we are.  Brother André during his life on earth, did not share their false doctrines, since he passed away before the Vatican ll council.   Why are they masquarading in making him a Saint.  John Paul ll is more their type.   I can tell you that they are trying to make themselves look like the legitimate all time Catholic Church.  Brother André cured many people of health and faith.

 

What must Brother André think now.    Anyone can come in now into the Oratory.  Free for all, everyone of every false religion and false Christians are welcomed into his Oratory.  What a disgrace.  I used to go there at least once a year to honor Brother André and St. Joseph and to pray, etc.  I am sure now neither Brother André or St. Joseph , nothing Holy is present.  Brother André… offered sacrifices and hours of praying all that for the sake of saving souls from hell in the name of St. Joseph and Our Lord.  Surely he believed strongly in the dogma outside the church there is no salvation.

 

Brother André I am sure is already a Saint and weeping tears over the Oratory who worked hard to bring it up which started with a little Chapel.  I believe still stands with a beautiful altar as it was when it was built.  I have not returned since I left the false Vll church.  Your comments are always welcomed.

 

Pat.

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  Of course, Benedict XVI’s “canonizations” have no validity since he is an antipope.

 

Follow up

 

Subject: phony terror follow up

 

Following up on Todd’s point about the ease with which these silly terror plot stories are planted; I find it especially galling when some pundit or government guy talks about how “good” they have to be to keep foiling all of these clever plots.   They’ll say stuff like “the enemy only has to get lucky once, but we have to be perfect all of the time”.   I hear this and think to myself, how hard is it to fed-ex a package?   Or they’ll talk about where someone like the 19 year old so-called “underwear” bomber “trained”.  I’ll think how much training does it take to put on one’s underwear and buy a plane ticket?  And how would anybody detect such bombs if the bombers had any level of sophistication at all?  In other words if these plots were real, they would never be detected.   

 

Of course there are better, even easier ways to create massive carnage, but it doesn’t happen.  In an open society, it would be impossible to detect such plots if there were a truly determined “plotter”.   But then this is probably the point.  The only real logical reason for these transparent hoaxes is to condition people to accept more war and more draconian “security measures” targeted at themselves.   I think a couple of generations of dumbed down education, a corrupted public morality and a debased culture, all of which really accelerated after Vatican II (which people have to understand effected the world profoundly even beyond the real Church), have come together to make such transparent deceptions possible. 

 

Bill Mulligan

 

MHFM: Yes, and each fake scare is calculated to achieve a new end.  The underwear bomber was intended to bring in the most invasive searches possible.  This latest scare, concerning the supposed explosives that were supposedly intended for Chicago’s Jewish centers, involved cargo planes.  As even this Sky News clip mentions, that will lead to more stringent measures for searches of such planes.  Civilians and their baggage were already subject to outrageous security measures.  This hoax will give them greater liberty to go through all the cargo on the cargo planes.  It’s also interesting that in this clip, on a major news network, they mention that this occurred right when people in Europe were talking about getting rid of the burdensome airport security measures.  The newest fake terror alert aims to convince the public that the measures should remain in place and even be strengthened.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7tRRXusKZA&feature=player_embedded

 

O’Malley

 

Subject: Heretic O’Malley

 

… the utter evil that envelopes the likes of this pure filth, O'Malley, regurgitating adulation to the likes of further filth, Kennedy, in a false church is clearly beyond any human description.  Bless you Most Holy Family Monastery for the strength of truth which emanates from your persistent wisdom of God's truth in Jesus Christ Our Savior.

 

Dea…

 

Britain

 

Dear Brothers,

The news about "Mohammed" being the number one baby name in Britain is not surprising given that the author of the Anglican schism, King Henry VIII was a polygamist, just like Muslims. Also, he put to death his wives for the "honor" of the kingdom (as if any honor were left after his adulteries) as do Muslims in their so-called "honor-killings." England has been in schismatical "la-la-land" for the last 500 years or so it's a natural progression for it to become "Allah-allah-land." "Islam is here to stay," says the Muslim. What an outrageous disgrace!!!

The video on the computer programmer who used to work for NASA, and how he made a poll fixing program is astounding! To speak so matter of factly about such political crime shows how comfortable and protected the criminals are. Also, for only one person to be able to change the entire course of a nation’s history by a flick of a switch is really bad. What a shocking expose on the true status of American politics!!!

The story on babies being found in dumpsters is really heart-breaking. How can people be so callous and cruel is beyond me. It has to be demonic because everyone has the natural law written on their hearts, such as that killing is wrong. Mothers are abandoning their children in unprecedented numbers, and then they wonder why the Muslims are gaining ground in the west! What a foolish culture the west has created, and all because it has rejected the Catholic Church, and Catholic faith, outside of which there is ABSOLUTELY NO SALVATION!!!

God Bless,

Chris White

 

Fake terror garbage

 

Subject: false flag latest terror garbage

 

It’s getting to the point now that they don't even need to destroy anything or any buildings anymore, the people are so brainless, all the new world order cronies have to do is just announce their false flag in the news and it becomes real to the herd! 

 

Todd

 

MHFM: That’s right.  We could not agree more.  They don’t even need to pull more fake terror attacks (at least not as frequently), for they can accomplish their goal with fake news about supposed plots.  What a surprise that the supposed explosives were supposedly addressed to Jewish synagogues.  What a load of complete nonsense.  It might also be part of a build up to a fake terror attack for election time.

 

Contradicting

 

Subject: From the Jerusalem Post

 

I just read this article… A couple of excerpts are interesting:

1)  The title of the article is:  "Vatican Synod call for end to Israel's 'occupation'"

2) “The Holy Scriptures cannot be used to justify the return of Jews to Israel and the displacement of the Palestinians, to justify the occupation by Israel of Palestinian lands,” Monsignor Cyril Salim Bustros, Greek Melkite archbishop of Our Lady of the Annunciation in Boston, Massachusetts, and president of the “Commission for the Message,” said at Saturday’s Vatican press conference.

“We Christians cannot speak of the ‘promised land’ as an exclusive right for a privileged Jewish people. This promise was nullified by Christ. There is no longer a chosen people – all men and women of all countries have become the chosen people.


3)  Mordechay Lewy, Israel’s ambassador to the Holy See, told The Jerusalem Post that Bustros, in saying that Jesus nullified God’s covenant with the Jewish people, was “returning to successionist theology, contradicting Second Vatican Council teaching and Pope Benedict himself – who has welcomed the return of Jews to their ancient homeland.”

I bolded the print for emphasis.

Paul

 

Archbishop

 

Brothers:

Melkite Archbishop Cyrille Bustros, presumably a validly consecrated bishop, has recently restated authentic Catholic teaching regarding the fact that the Old Covenant was abrogated by Almighty God with the birth, death and resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ. The people of Israel are no longer the so called "chosen people," ergo have no rights related to that. The chosen people of God are now the true followers of Jesus Christ which is the true Catholic Church. Archbishop Bustros is to be supported for his remarks even as Ratzinger and his Vatican II nonchurch rush to distance themselves from him and Catholic teaching.

EJP, MD, DD

 

MHFM: The fact that a bishop under Benedict XVI says something correct on Catholic teaching is not a reason to applaud.  It’s to be expected that one who purports to be Catholic promotes authentic Catholic teaching.  The bishop you mention is still heretical.  He accepts Vatican II and the antipope. 

 

Letter

 

Hello, I just got a letter from the American Life League urging me to act against Obama's threat to unborn babies.  Obama, as you know, is a hard core baby killer advocate.  From this letter it seems as though this group will really try to do something.  The problem is that the President of this organization, Judie Brown, is a hard core John Paul II advocate also.  I really want to help the unborn with something more than just my prayers.  Do you think God would frown down on donating to this group? 

Jim

 

MHFM: Yes, God would frown on donating to such a heretical group.  The person who runs it is a darkened, wicked, disgusting apostate who is not really against abortion.  She professes communion with those who are pro-abortion, in addition to being a supporter of heinous Vatican II antichrist apostasy.  By professing communion with those who accept abortion, she shows that she’s not really against it.  She is the epitome of false conservatives whom God abominates.  We know first-hand that she’s not at all interested in the truth but loves the lie.

 

Comment

 

Interesting Video on the mark of the beast… Christ said my kingdom is not of this world… As St John states, "love not the world neither the things that are in the world. If any

man loves the world the love of the Father is not in him." Insightful video you have. Feel free to watch my series when you have the chance. Have a great day.

 

Ricky…

 

Watched

 

Hello,

I have watched many of your videos and have come to a conclusion. With some things you are right, and some things you are wrong. I am a practicing Catholic. I think you really need to talk to your local priests and bishop. It seems you come to your own conclusions based on nothing. The video "exposing" father Corapi is pretty horrible. The devil likes to pit brother against brother. Father Corapi is not a fluke. He simply does things to better get through to people. In that same video you give an example of Corapi stating what is a mortal sin. YES, a mortal sin is a mortal sin ONLY if the person knows it is. If he or she does not KNOW it is a mortal sin, it is not then a mortal sin. Many of your videos make the Catholic faith look bad. If you really are a Catholic, I suggest you removing them. Thanks

AP

 

MHFM: We have read your e-mail and come to the conclusion that you don’t know what you are talking about and that you are attracted to the lie.  What you say about mortal sin is heretical.  According to you, if a person goes out and commits murder, but knows nothing of “mortal sin,” he doesn’t commit a mortal sin.  Your false position forces you to come to that absurd conclusion.  You might respond, “no, a person who commits murder obviously knows it’s wrong.”  Exactly, that’s the point.  Certain actions constitute grave matter in and of themselves.  Among those actions are murder, fornication, using contraception, etc.  Therefore, a person who willingly commits such an action, even if he or she doesn’t know or believe or care about the concept of mortal sin, commits a mortal sin.  Corapi teaches heresy when he states that contraception is only a mortal sin if you know it’s a mortal sin.  That’s equivalent to saying that murder is only a mortal sin if you know it’s a mortal sin.  It also directly contradicts Pope Pius XI, who teaches that whoever perverts the use of matrimony in the way he describes are, by that very fact, branded with the guilt of a grave sin.

 

Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii (#’s 53-56), Dec. 31, 1930: “ “Since, therefore, openly departing from the uninterrupted Christian tradition some recently have judged it possible solemnly to declare another doctrine regarding this question, the Catholic Church, to whom God has entrusted the defense of the integrity and purity of morals, standing erect in the midst of the moral ruin which surrounds her, in order that she may preserve the chastity of the nuptial union from being defiled by this foul stain, raises her voice in token of her divine ambassadorship and through Our mouth proclaims anew: any use whatsoever of matrimony exercised in such a way that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural power to generate life is an offence against the law of God and of nature, and those who indulge in such are branded with the guilt of a grave sin.”

 

The Errors of Peter Abelard, Condemned by Innocent II, July 16, 1140, #10: “That they have not sinned who being ignorant have crucified Christ, and that whatever is done through ignorance must not be considered sin.” – Condemned (Denz. 377)

 

Corapi clearly denies this truth.  He says that people can use matrimony in such a way (e.g., contraception) but not be branded with the guilt of a grave sin, if they “don’t know it’s a mortal sin.”  Since you are attracted to falsehood, we wouldn’t expect you to care about any of these Catholic teachings which refute Corapi.  Corapi is also a false ecumenist.  What part of that don’t you understand?  He believes that souls can be saved in false religions.  He denies Catholic dogma on the necessity of the Church, heresy, Protestants being heretics, etc.  He’s not a Catholic, and neither are you. 

 

Picture

 

Subject: Wisdom

 

Brothers,

 

Interesting video on Sean O'Malley. The picture of O'Malley and all the other non-catholic Government officials sitting up front says quite a bit about the Vatican II Counter-Church.

Their leader, anti-pope Benedict XVI is being somewhat quiet about the upcoming devil night celebration, I'm sure Benedict XVI is busy touching up his costume for his father Satan's feast day...Halloween.

I thank God every day for the mercy he showed when he led me to the wisdom of your site. Knowing that I too was lost in this great dark deception for the same reasons those that remain outside the truth (Church) today.  Due to their prideful account of following this evil world and it's slavery agenda do they remain outside for all eternity.

 

Wisdom 7:24-30. For wisdom is more active than all active things: and reacheth everywhere by reason of her purity. For she is a vapour of the power of God, and a certain pure emanation of the glory of the almighty God: and therefore no defiled thing cometh into her.

 

For she is the brightness of eternal light, and the unspotted mirror of God's majesty, and the image of his goodness. And being but one, she can do all things: and remaining in herself the same, she reneweth all things, and through nations conveyeth herself into holy souls, she maketh the friends of God and prophets. For God loveth none but him that dwelleth with wisdom. For she is more beautiful than the sun, and above all the order of the stars: being compared with the light, she is found before it. For after this cometh night, but no evil can overcome wisdom.

 

God Bless,

Tom Miles

 

Snapshot

 

Subject: Snapshot

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Thanks for the video on O'Malley.  Not only is it loaded with food for thought, it is a most effective "snapshot" of the fake V2 church. 

 

I recommended this video to a relative who told me that he had heard that Kennedy "made his peace with God" before he died (along with the usual admonition about not judging).  Another happy, snappy slogan of liberalism like that given by O'Malley who told people "to comfort one another with assurances of faith."  Advice from hell.

 

When liberals say "don't judge" what they really mean is:  don't judge evil to be evil; judge evil to be good. No wonder most have no problem with Halloween:  it's their high holy day.  Their wearing of costumes is, however, superfluous since these individuals masquerade as Christians all year long.

 

A wonderful video - thanks for the good work as always.

 

Lee Ann

 

Kennedy

 

Subject: Kennedy

 

KENNEDY, IF HE WERE THE "AVERAGE JOE" WOULD STILL BE LOCKED UP FOR MURDER OF A YOUNG WOMAN AND FOR BEING A WEASEL COWARD . THE MURDER OF THE INNOCENTS WILL BE IN GOD'S HANDS AND ALL HIS WONDERFUL CONTIBUTIONS TO OUR SOCIETY, ONE THING IS FOR SURE ,ONLY WHEN THE USA GETS ITS MORAL PRIORITIES IN LINE IT WILL BE DOOMED. I AM NOT A WRITER AS YOU CAN TELL -THESE ARE MY THOUGHTS WE ARE NO BETTER THAN CHINA ,

 

CHARLES

 

Baptism

 

Hello Brothers,

 

I came across this quote from St. Augustine of Hippo entitled "On the Creed: A Sermon To Catechumens"… You probably have already seen this, but I thought it would be a good one to add to your section called IMPORTANT NEW QUOTES AND POINTS ON THE SALVATION DOGMA AND REFUTING “BAPTISM OF DESIRE”......

 

"16. In three ways then are sins remitted in the Church; by Baptism, by prayer, by the greater humility of penance; yet God does not remit sins but to the baptized. The very sins which He remits first, He remits not but to the baptized. When? When they are baptized. The sins which are after remitted upon prayer, upon penance, to whom He remits, it is to the baptized that He remits. For how can they say, Our Father, who are not yet born sons? The Catechumens, so long as they be such, have upon them all their sins. If Catechumens, how much more Pagans? How much more heretics? But to heretics we do not change their baptism. Why? Because they have baptism in the same way as a deserter has the soldier's mark: just so these also have Baptism; they have it, but to be condemned thereby, not crowned. And yet if the deserter himself, being amended, begin to do duty as a soldier, does any man dare to change his mark?"

 

St. Augustine of Hippo states empatically over and over that God will NOT remit sins to those who are not baptized and those who are baptised but are heretics he points out that they are like deserters form the Army who, even though they are baptised, will be condemned.

 

-Will W.

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s a good quote.  It’s one that we did cite in our book, Outside the Catholic Church There is Absolutely No Salvation, in the section on St. Augustine.  We cited this portion of it:

 

St Augustine, 395: “… God does not forgive sins except to the baptized.”

 

It’s another example of how the universal tradition of the fathers is that no one (including an unbaptized catechumen) can be saved without baptism.  Even though not all of the fathers were always perfectly consistent with their own writings on this or other topics, the universal tradition that no one can be saved without the Sacrament of Baptism is clear.  And most importantly, it’s backed up by the dogmatic teaching of the Church.  

 

Chemtrails

 

Subject: Chemtrails

 

Hi Brothers,

They are spraying like crazy in New Jersey, I noticed my first black beam along with the chemtrails that I have been reading about.  They are really implementing their commandments {guidestones}.  It makes me mad to see it right in front of your face! 

 

Todd 

 

Mystery

 

Just heard the Guadalupe and new hell videos great job.  For years and years I asked the Holy Ghost to reveal to my mind the meaning of Simeon's words to  Mary (4th Joyful Mystery though I always found it tinged with great sorrow) about the sword of sorrow piercing her own soul so that the thoughts of many would be revealed.  Maybe it refers to those who are privileged to share in the incomparable grace of sharing in Mary's sorrowful immaculate heart…. I do not know, however,  I've been pondering the meaning of Simeon's words a while now,  still wondering.  Another thing I just do not "get" still is how some seem to miss the opportunity to experience the truth even when it put right before their face.  I know it is the mystery if iniquity…

 

A

 

Listen

 

…as for halloween my mom won't listen to me that it is evil and she is going to celebrate it and drag my sister into hell by doing so this is urgent if you said something it would help…

 

E…T

 

MHFM: It sounds like you’ve already tried to convince her.  If you haven’t, you should tell her that a Catholic may not celebrate a pagan holiday.  That’s especially true with one that has its roots in pagan religions and involves dressing up like ghosts (evil spirits), goblins, etc. in order to scare (or horrify) people.  It should be obvious why a Catholic should have nothing to do with such a pagan celebration; but you can’t force a person to do the right thing.

 

New Video Posted

 

MHFM: This is a new video:

 

Why Hell Must Be Eternal [video]

 

Novus Ordo Halloween

 

Subject: How to have a Novus Ordo Halloween

 

This guy is a convert from Anglicanism to Novus Ordo. He gives hints on how to have a "Catholic" halloween. 

 

http://cantuar.blogspot.com/2010/10/top-ten-ways-to-have-catholic-halloween.html

 

Talk about playing with the devil...

 

CK

 

Fr. Damien

 

Subject: Father Damien of Molokai

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I just watched a movie about Fr. Damien who volunteered in to set up a mission in a leprosy colony in the late 1800's.   There were a couple of scenes which I wished they hadn't included because of immodest dress even though they were pertinent to the story line,  but other than that the movie seemed very good  from a purity standpoint and excellant as an example of Christian charity and humility. 

 

The real question that I had though involves about 3 or 4 instances where the Fr. Damien did or said some things that were not in line with Catholic teaching.  For instance, he gave a Catholic burial to a man who died as an avowed Anglican denying the Sacraments right up to his death and later in the movie, Fr. Damien was telling a new Priest who had arrived about the natives who were singing in the distance to their gods and he stated that he felt it gave them (the natives) peace, as though it were OK.   

 

I was wondering if you knew much about this mission Priest and if these were Hollywood fabrications or not.  I want to make note that had I not read your materials, I would have never caught the modernist ideology of those few moments in the movie.  

 

Thank you and God Bless

-Will Weigand

 

MHFM: We are familiar with the priest.  However, we would have to research whether the statements attributed to him in the movie are rooted in fact or whether they are editorial additions on the part of the movie’s creators.  If he did say or do the things you mention, it is problematic.  It would reveal that he didn’t have the true Catholic faith, but held heresies relating to the Church’s necessity.  That was a problem that unfortunately became common near the end of the 19th century, around the time he died.

 

Regarding

 

Subject: Temple/Johnson

 

Regarding the possible ignorance of the people (or followers) of the Aztec Empire. On finding that Cortes was still on his way to Mexico City, Montezuma was terrified and said starkly: "We will be judged and punished. And however it may be, and whenever it may be, we can do nothing but wait." These people knew exactly who they served and knew one day there would be an accounting and not by the serpent their master. Even the most simple of men as the bible says have no excuse. Infused in our nature is the ability to know God and right and wrong. The concept of evil,  judgement and punishment was not foreign to Montezuma or his followers. I think the concept of evolution has so corrupted peoples mindset they believe humans "way back then" were more like animals in their capacity to think and therefore are less culpable for their crimes (unless they were Christians).

 

Matthew

 

Contraceptive

 

Subject: New Contraceptive

 

Hello Brothers

Heard about this on the news about a new form of contraceptive today so thought I'd share it with you. What worries me is what evil will they come up with next?
Satan must be laughing hard at how far people have fallen away from God.

http://www.torontosun.com/life/healthandfitness/2010/10/26/15833666.html

 

Lil…

 

Personal

 

Subject: God’s Vindictive Justice

 

Dear Brothers,
 
In your video on why hell is forever I enjoyed your point about how God's justice is vindictive towards those who die in mortal or original sin. It's amazing how so many people think, "why is this happening to me?!" when in the throes of some calamity, as though there is no personal Almighty God who governs the universe by His Providence. No doubt such an attitude is a result of the freemasonic push to make eastern religions popular in the west, such as Buddhism, Hinduism, Tao, Zen, etc., because in those wicked eastern religions, there is no one true God, but either a myriad of false gods (Hinduism) or simply an impersonal nothingness - "ohm," "self," "nothing," "Nirvana," etc. In reality, that impersonal nothingness is Satan and his malice, pretending to be powerful when he's powerless and chained to hell. There is no middle ground/path, sitting-on-the-fence place that is neutral, because God is personal, and any sin is an offence directly against Him personally. Either one is for Jesus or against Him, like Sr. Lucia said about being either for God or for the Devil, there is no other way - Jesus is Justice! Also, when a person sins, it's not just against one Person, but against all three Divine Persons of the Holy Trinity, though One God. So it is easy to see how malicious sin is, especially in light of all the daily graces and miracles of existence, plus the superabundant provisions He provides in the Catholic Church (only) for salvation..

 
God Bless,
 
Chris White 

 

Voodoo

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I found this news item in France: http://www.20minutes.fr/article/611979/societe-yvelines-differents-scenarios-defenestration

 

The article describes the events has follows: A family, originally from Central Africa, held a Voodoo ceremony at 3 AM during the night. A man became possessed by a demon, the man's wife, began calling him the Devil, leading the others to jump from a second story window.  One of the men who jumped, was carrying an 4 month old baby girl, who died from the fall.  The others are all hospitalized!  Investigators have been assigned to determine the exact cause.

 

Richard Cardet

Bordeaux, France

 

MHFM: That’s Voodoo, a religion for which John Paul II, Benedict XVI and the Vatican II sect have great admiration.

 

Acts

 

…I do have one question if could help me understand what was meant in Acts 8:16, it seems just a little confusing and your help would be greatly appreciated. 

 

Amanda

 

MHFM: It refers to how the Holy Ghost would come upon those new converts in Confirmation.  That was a grace they had not received, having only been baptized.  The Holy Ghost is of course received at baptism, but it’s received in a special way in Confirmation.  Each sacrament has its own special grace attached to it.  The context of that passage concerns their reception of the unique strengthening of the Holy Ghost provided by that sacrament. 

 

Fatima

 

Subject: Fatima:

 

Dear People of God-

Why is it, with the exception of those in North America, that nobody in the Vatican wants to talk about Fatima?  You have a lot on your web site… They want all catholics to forget about it, including anything prior to 1960.  I am so fed up!!!  I pray to the seers, Francisco, Jacinta & (the real) Lucia to intercede for the remnant of catholics who are still holding on to what is right-- the Latin Mass.

Thanks & God Bless,
Jean Szumega

 

MHFM: Some people discuss Fatima.  However, one of the big problems is that many false Catholics provide incorrect and deceptive conclusions on the topic, especially concerning Sr. Lucia, the Third Secret, etc.  False analysis and wrong information on Fatima issues is a major reason why many are deceived.  That’s why our DVD on Fatima is so important.  It deals with what Catholics need to know about Fatima, in addition to covering the other main aspects of the Vatican II apostasy: The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and The End of the World

 

Mexico

 

Subject: Mexico is not immune to the Great Apostasy, here’s why

 

Dear MHFM,

That's very interesting about Jeanne's personal visit to the temple where they did their sacrifices.

I wanted to comment briefly why Mexico, once a very Catholic country (compare to USA), has also fallen in this Great Apostasy.

About a few months ago, I emailed a sedevacantist group (which is also in working communion with the CMRI) named "Sociedad Sacerdotal Trento" and I asked one of their priest 3 simple questions: 1) Did they [Sociedad Sacerdotal Trento] believe in "baptism of desire and of blod"; 2) Did they believe in "invincible ignorance"; and 3) What is their position on the dogma: Outside the Catholic Church There Is Absolutely No Salvation.

Here is how the priest, who claims to be "traditionalist" sedevacantist, answered these questions:

"Yes, we believe in the first two questions, based absolutely in the Catholic Church's position and in studied theology way before Vatican II.  We also believe in what's indicated on the third question, [enphasis is mine] BUT it should be noted that it is NOT A DOGMA and that is not believed in the absolute manner; there are exceptions to it somehow."

This is outright heresy!  I couldn't believe my eyes when I read this.  He says that the dogma Outside the Catholic Church There Is No Salvation which has been defined infallibly 7 times by the Catholic Church, IS NOT A DOGMA!!  This is what this priest, named Fr. Jiménez of the "Sociedad Sacerdotal Trento", holds as " the Catholic Church's position and in studied theology way before Vatican II"... No, I'm sorry, that is not the Catholic Church's position. 

But it’s just to show how even in Mexico, these sedevacantist priests (which have many different churches throughout Mexico) hold the same heresy which caused this Great Apostasy, that souls can be saved outside the Church.  If this is what a sedevacantist holds, how much worse will the Novus Ordo Church be in Mexico?

Thanks for your apostolate MHFM and God bless you.

Sincerely,
Bernardo

 

Temple

 

Dear Brothers Dimond:

 

Thank you for posting the video regarding the times before the Virgen de Guadalupe in Mexico. I grew up in Mexico City and visited the Tenochtitlan temple a few times as a family outing. My dad always bragged about his obsidian knife collection as these are/were found prolifically all along the roads within the temple grounds.

 

Growing up, the mantra everywhere was that the Aztecs were wrongly accused. And I will say that the alternative history of the Aztec Indians, called "Vision de los Vencidos" or "vision of the beaten", which narrated the conquest from their point of view, is very eye opening as well. I believe that although the Aztec high-priests did commit these atrocious crimes, the population as a whole was victim to these priests, not only literally, as objects of sacrifice, but figuratively and philosophically, by living in that society.

 

Having said this, however, I will tell you that there is a denial that the Aztec culture was this grotesque, or in fact, grotesque at all. I have visited the Templo Mayor, a temple in the southern part of Mexico City which was discoverd by a construction worker who was drilling through to build an extension of the underground Metro (subway). There are stone skulls everywhere, and you can see the actual masonry with skulls there for all to see.

 

How can that NOT be evidence of these death ritual sacrifices? We are told growing up that the accusations by Spaniards are not true, that they made up these stories or exaggerated things in order to justify their conquest and avaricious search for gold. But in the end, the Mexicanos cannot prove that they did NOT commit these horrendous acts.

 

I know that were it not for Franciscan monks at the time of the Conquest, who were brought over to prevent the genocide that the crusades caused on the islands first "discovered", the conquest itself would have been more horrendous than it was. Let's face it, greed runs rampant in every culture and the Spanish men on horseback prove to have been no exception. HOWEVER, the Franciscan monks did a tremendous job in converting the Aztec indians to Christianity and in assuring their survival during this tumultuous time. And for this I am personally grateful as I have seen the most humble and faithful Catholic people in Mexico, more so than in the USA. Perhaps it is because Protestantism did not take a strong foothold in Mexico, that the Catholic faith has been more intact than elsewhere even after V2. The Mexicans are a deeply faithful nation, who eschew attending Church as proof that they are faithful, understanding that faith is internal, real and not dependent on the actual church for its manifestation. I pray for all of us in these dark times.

 

Thank you for all the work you do and for unveiling the truth.

 

N. Jeanne Johnson

 

MHFM: Your personal visit to the temple is another interesting confirmation of what occurred during that period in Mexico.  There is no doubt that the Aztecs engaged in that activity.  It’s a well-documented fact of history.  You mention that you believe the people were victims of the Aztec priests.  We must say that the people cannot be excused, for they were immersed in the diabolical culture and the ritual.  Even if they were influenced by the priests, they were guilty for having condoned it or supported it.  They also fought vigorously to defend the demonic empire and its capital during the final battle.  Defeat in that encounter would have meant the end to the diabolical and bloody cult of their devil gods, but they fought with all their might to maintain it.  Soon we hope to soon discuss more about this very interesting period of history.

 

With regard to modern Mexico, it can’t be considered faithful.  The Great Apostasy has extended everywhere, leaving only a few true Catholics.  Mexico is not immune to the Vatican II apostasy.

 

People

 

Subject: hell video

 

Very interesting insight regarding the eternity of Hell.

People want to deny it, but your principle is implicit in many common expressions everywhere, such as "best friends forever", as well as numerous romantic songs and expressions, which is an implicit admission that even present happiness has no meaning unless it will continue forever.

By the same token, even complete pagans will express, for example when reading about some notorious criminal, that "even the death penalty would be too easy for him" because they (incorrectly) view death as an end even to the worst punishment, and any punishment which ends isn't enough for someone, so they admit, even with their heathen mentality.

-- Bruce

 

Scary

 

Subject: Scary website you have!

 

Greetings to you Bros Michael and Peter Dimond, I'm Margaret…

I recently came across your website. I have listened to many of your talks and debates regarding Vatican II, the new Mass and Sacraments. It gives voice to many of the changes I have seen in the church in the past 20 years.  I have some questions that I hope you can help with (surprised? LOL)

A brief intro *might* help you understand where I am coming from, but if it doesn't, feel free to bypass it :) I was raised Roman Catholic, moved away from the church to pursue several false religions… After realizing the Catholic church was really the one true church that Jesus Christ founded and ordained, I went back to the Catholic Church. I had more supernatural experiences which led to a fervent love for Jesus Christ that I did not know ever before… I have begun to pursue an annulment so that I can follow up in the idea of a religious vocation.

Two weeks ago, I was at a weekday Mass where the priest stated in his homily that we should emulate the Buddha and seek non attachment -  but never once mentioned Christ. I was horrified, and instantly wanted to flee the church in tears. It was perverse to advocate another religion on Christ's own altar and not mention Jesus! But this was coming from a priest who, although new to the parish, is usually outwardly devout - with the exception of his wearing a coconut bra on the altar at the teen Mass. (yeah, I know)… Many people understood my outrage - especially protestants, but quite a few… saw nothing wrong with it and started telling what the church teaches. I stopped short of calling it what it is - heresy - but it made me sick. It has made me wary of the Catholic Church - but I figured all the more reason to pray fervently to our blessed Lord Jesus for His church.  (I also had inadvertently exorcised my sister during a house blessing - and the monsignor at my parish screamed at me because he did not believe in demons or that Christ heals. Sigh. You guys are right - it is a very sad state in the church!)

Anyway, somehow I came across your website, and I've been listening to many of your talks and debates on Vatican II, the Mass and Sacraments.  I have some questions:

1) … my sins were recently 'forgiven' by the same priest who advocated buddhism rather than Christianity. It happened interestingly enough after I prayed to God that I would never be able to confess all my sins but that I would try anyway, and that I was in His hands. When I got there and started to confess something that happened 20 years ago, the priest told me to stop confessing my old sins, that they were all forgiven - every one of them. At the end he did the standard absolution, but I don't remember his specific words - whether it was 'absolve' or 'forgive' or 'cleanse', but it was done in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Q: Was this priest validly ordained to absolve me of sins even if he did say the proper 'verbiage'? Am I condemned to die in my sins because there are no priests who are validly ordained?  What on earth am I to do? I will surely perish if not absolved and can in no way remember every sin committed in 40 years!

2) My son… He is now going through RCIA because he has never made his first communion or confirmation…
Q: Should I continue to advocate his religious training in the RCC? Is there a better way to make his first communion and confirmation? Is the RCIA program valid in light of what you are saying in your talks?

3) The Mass. If it is true that if we eat the flesh and drink the blood of Christ we will have eternal life, then indeed, the Mass is very important. 
Q: Do all Latin Mass' use the extraordinary or tridentine form?...

4) In general, what do you propose that we do to train our children and participate in worship? Find only a church with EF Mass and pre-Vatican II priests? What if there aren't any in my area?

Thanks for any guidance you can provide…

Best Regards,
Margaret

 

MHFM: Margaret, you have many questions and they are answered in the material on our website and in our books and DVDs.  Regarding the priest, it depends upon when he was ordained.  All past mortal sins must be specifically confessed to a priest ordained in the traditional rite of ordination.  His statement that they are all taken care of, even if they have not been specifically confessed, is outrageous and false.  Priests who were ordained before 1968 were certainly ordained in the traditional rite of ordination.  However, there is some doubt about his ordination and what he said in giving absolution.  Thus, the confession of those sins should be made to a different and clearly valid priest.  That’s explained in this file. Where to go to Mass or confession today?  You are required to confess past mortal sins that you recall.  To your concern about having forgotten something, that’s why people should add at the end of their confession: “I also ask forgiveness for any sins I forgot and did not confess.”

 

Next, it’s critical that you realize the Vatican II Church is not Catholic.  The New Mass is invalid and must not be attended for any reason.  You must be convinced of that before even going to confession.  Obviously your son should not go to RCIA or have anything to do with the Novus Ordo parish.  They are instructing people in the false Vatican II religion, which Catholics must completely reject.  You and your family must be convinced that the Vatican II Church is not Catholic. 

 

Yes, the true Mass is important, but having the Catholic faith is more important.  One can’t be saved without the true Catholic faith, even if one attends a true Mass; and the New Mass is not a Mass at all.  The parishes to which you refer do not represent the true Catholic faith.  Our material gets into the options for traditional sacraments in this time, but one must first completely reject the Vatican II Church and the New Mass.  One must believe in all Catholic dogmas, including Outside the Church There Is No Salvation.  Your story about the priest who advocated Buddhism is not surprising when we consider the Vatican II Church, but it is nevertheless revealing and interesting.  Please look carefully at the material and we believe the answers to your many questions will become clear.  We should add that no Novus Ordo priest is “outwardly devout.”  They are all modernists and heretics.  Pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible.

 

Continue

 

AGBO
Dear brothers,


I got to know about you through a small catholic group in Nigeria and i also went to your web and have accepted the catholic faith against all odds in the family. i have the following question to ask. Can i continue to pray in the house with my family that are still in v 2?...

 

MHFM: You shouldn’t pray with them.  You could still pray in the house, but just pray by yourself or somewhere else.

 

Interest

 

Subject: A link of interest

 

Dear Brothers:

First, thank you for the video on Our Lady of Guadalupe and what the Spaniards found in Mexico.   Information and history I did not know. It is good to be reminded of Christ's victories.  The story of Our Lady of Guadalupe and Juan Diego are so very interesting and really beautiful.

I wanted to send you this link.  Brother Michael is on a masonic hitlist found here: http://www.masonicinfo.com/people.htm

This is very serious.  I do not know if you were aware of this.  This is a most evil Website.  I found the link through "The Occult Masonic Temple God ," an eBook which barely makes any sense to me.  It is a study compiled by Christopher Newcomb which I downloaded online.  There were some links in there which I followed.  I think this work is pro masonry, but I cannot tell, it is so badly written and confused…

God bless you always,
DH

 

Comment

 

Comment on "One thousand in Britain and Ireland are children of priests: Celibacy an issue for pope’s visit"

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter:

I think St Paul said it best in his epistle to the Philippians (chp. 3): "For many walk ... that are the enemies of the cross of Christ; whose end is destruction; whose god is their belly; and whose glory is in their shame."  I think any reasonable individual would agree that celibacy is not the problem.  But so what?  I suppose celibacy has no place in the Vatican 2 church anyway.

This approach to celibacy seems to be the approach to standards in general: "Well, no one can live up to these standards, so it is the standards that must change."

Incidently, that mug shot of Benedict shown in the article...he's frightening.

PC

 

Video

 

Subject: New video on Hell

 

Great video, I was smiling while listening to the clip, how a simple explanation {truth} with common sense blows away the most lofty lectures on some complex subject, it's amazing!!!    

 

Todd

 

Totally

 

Subject: Outrage - Vatican says Simpsons are Catholic

 

Dear MHFM,

… "I believe, the Vatican is indeed right, stating, that Simpsons are Catholic, because current "catholics" in current false "Catholic church" can indeed behave and believe these horrible things as Simpsons do, and still be fully "catholic" in "Catholic church"...


Thx for your interest, it does prove beyond any doubt, that Vatican is totally mad even in the eyes of all non-catholics....

God bless you!

Josef

Priest, NFP

 

Dear Brother Dimond,

 

Permit me to introduce myself to you. My name is Jennifer Barber and I am from Ireland… I am expecting my thirteenth child and I homeschool the children to make sure that they receive a traditional Roman Catholic education.  I was converted from the V2 anti-church in 2006 and went to the SSPX.  At that time I did not understand the sede-vacantist position as I had very little information on that subject (I did not have access to the internet.) but I was acutely aware of papal heresy.  I did not go there for long until I realised that there were major flaws in the SSPX thinking and  their bullying tactics towards  those who questioned the validity of the Novus Ordo sect was alarming. I was fortunate to make the acquaintance of an elderly gentleman who  was very vigilant.  We would regularly discuss the illogical Rosary crusades , the SSPX hostility to those who refused to pray for the modernists and the lifting of the so-called excommunications.

 

Gradually, I became educated in the sede-vacantist position which initially under the SSPX influence I hesitated but eventually knew that it was the only correct position to hold. I immediately left the society on Easter Sunday 2009 with a friend, Catherine, and we  both stayed at our respective homes without the Holy Sacraments until September 2009. Catherine is also sede-vacantist but cautions my reading of your site as she thinks you are extreme  since you refer to almost everyone as heretics to which I reply that everyone that you mention on your site are heretics.(I mean those whom you expose as heretics.)  So as not to labour you Brother Dimond,I shall jump on to September  2009 when Catherine made contact with the CMRI and two independent traditionalist Roman Catholic Priests in Germany under Bishop Pivarunas.  I agreed to have them come to stay at my home every two months to offer the Holy Sacrifice and provide us with the sacrament of Penance. This continued until a fortnight ago. I noticed that when the superior came that it seemed like he was trying to break down our resistance to certain worldly practices such as the wearing of feminine clothes (namely skirts) mixed summer camps which he would show us videos of on the laptop...

 

At this point I should not forget to mention that the elderly man whom I talked of earlier in this letter had met the priest in question, Fr Rissling, and decided that he would not be back but opted to stay with Bishop Williamson. He was angry at the bare-faced liberalism of Fr Rissling. There are many things which I can describe to you but it would take too long.  The final straw for me was on the last visit he discussed the use of NFP for no real apparent reason as I did not bring this topic up. As it turned out he was out of his depth, as he had wrongly surmised that I was uneducated in this field. I had studied and was qualified to teach NFP (sponsored by the local anti-bishop years ago when I was prominent in the pro-life movement and still in the anti-church) Thankfully and by the grace of GOD I never practiced nor taught this contraceptive method to anyone. I told him that I thought it was a vile, evil practice and the NFP movement was anti-catholic.  He did not show too much opposition and the visit passed without further episodes. However when I sent Catherine an e-mail to let her know that I was distraught at the recent visit (I didn't give any details on the mail) She lost control of herself and went into a fit of a rage. The reason I contact you is to ask you if you know of a priest of absolutely NO_COMPROMISE who would be willing to come to Ireland. I have children who need the sacrament of Confirmation as well.  Bishop Pivarunas also holds the same heresies as Fr. Rissling. Therefore it would not be an option for him to come to us… I will keep you
informed. 

 

Ave Maria, Jennifer Barber.

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  Unfortunately, basically all of the priests are heretics and have problems.  You are not going to find a priest in your area who is 100% Catholic and can be supported.  There are options to receive sacraments, if the priest falls within certain guidelines, but the priest should not be looked to for guidance or support.  That's explained in the file on our site.  The biggest problem with the CMRI, in addition to their support for NFP, is that they believe souls can be saved outside the Church.  They are not Catholic; in fact, they believe the same as the Counter Church on salvation.  One should not have those priests in his or her home.

 

Pilot

 

Hi Brothers,

While writing an e-mail to Michael Roberts, the pilot who refused to enter the body scanner and to be frisked, I was thinking about the simple causes of the present situation of the world just like the past 6000 yr. history of man, how every time man falls under slavery {satan's slavery} just like the jews before the exodus, the cause is man turning his back on God and disobeying HIS commands!  With the norvus ordo mass, man literally turned his back on Jesus in the tabernacle and now is following the command of Aleister Crowley {satan}, do thou what thou wilt, I don't think it can be made any more elementary than that!!!  

 

Todd

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s true.  Also, perhaps you already did, but please tell him to check out the website. 

 

Listened

 

… Recently I listened to your clips on interracial marriage, and although I agree with the basic result (that it is not forbidden or a sin as such), I would like to give a short statement on the issue. In these days we see nations being destroyed, wiped out within just a few generations. All European nations loose their identidies. The interesting thing about this is that race mixing plays a huge role in it. Anti-racist-laws put you in prison if you dare to feel like it is a good thing to stay among your own kind, i.e. to marry one of your people rather than an alien. The government makes not only propaganda for the acceptance of sodomy ("homosexuality") but especially for interracial marriage. We are forced to fallow the freemasonic American model that a mere document makes you belong to a people, and not the blood and the history. The One-World-Fanatics want all races to mix up (except for the ones who see themselves as the chosen master race...) and children have to read books that claim that in a globalized world it is the best thing to mix with other races, because that would make us more beautiful and more original to the first human beings. They hate white people (so parts of them hate their own origin), and I think they hate it because of its Christian past that shaped the whole world.  The more racially different a person is, the more problems it causes to marry him or her for the own children, because their identity is damaged "thanks" to the parents. Interracial marriage won't damage a people when it stays an exception (which it would be if there was no propaganda; for it is rather natural to marry one of the own kind.) Today the words of Daniel 2,43 are very fitting, which say that people mix up by marriage, but they won't stick together just as iron and clay won't mix.

All the best
Alexander

 

MHFM: It’s not an issue of preserving racial or even national identity.  It’s an issue of the Europeans losing their faith and departing from God into a general apostasy.  Catholics marrying people of a false religion has definitely contributed to the decline you lament.  But marriages between people of different countries or races are not a problem if the faith is left intact. 

 

New Video Posted

 

MHFM: This is a new video:

 

Our Lady of Guadalupe crushes the Mexican Serpent [video]

 

Unacceptable

 

Hello!

 

Is it unacceptable to God to attend a vatican II mass?  If so, what do I do (and my children) for Church?  Isn't it better to go to one of those masses than none at all?

Thank you for your time.

 

Karen 

 

MHFM: No, it’s a grave sin to go to such an invalid and non-Catholic service.  It is better to not go anywhere than to go to one of those invalid “Masses.”  Going there will send a person to Hell.  There are some options for receiving sacraments.  That’s explained in this file: Where to go to Mass or confession today?  However, one must be convinced on all issues of the faith first.   That includes never attending the New Mass again for any reason.

 

Interesting

 

Brothers,

Interesting is the article on how Clinton's aid wanted to let Saddam to shoot down one of U.S. planes to initiate an act of war. As conspiracy theories go, in 1945 the U.S. had the weapon of mass destruction with no one to test it on as the war with Germany was at an end. With advance knowledge, the Japanese were allowed to bomb Pearl Harbor in order to get the American people behind the invasion of Japan that eventually lead to the dropping of the atomic bomb. Now, the Muslim named, so-called christian president wants the recent ban on homosexuals in the military to be dropped again. In some circles, the acronym DADT is being generated to water down the Don't ask, Don't tell program, just like the acronym LGBT was generated. This end time Great Deception has not only infiltrated Rome at the top with its Jewish infiltrators, Muslims have infiltrated one of the greatest so-called christian nations and is injecting its immoral beliefs into the strength that protects this country. All part of God's will for the sins of this world.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

Interest

 

Wow. I'm blown away at the truth i have just heard in your videos. I am interested in learning more about what you talk about.  My parents are from Mexico and I was born in Chicago. I'm a Proud Catholic. But I'm so interested in what you say i like it and believe it.

Joaquin.

 

Urban

 

"O what a disgrace if such a despised and base race, which worships demons, should conquer a people which has the faith of omnipotent God and is made glorious with the name of Christ! With what reproaches will the Lord overwhelm us if you do not aid those who, with us, profess the Christian religion! " - Pope Urban II (On the muslim invasion).

 

Why?

 

Subject: I enjoyed watching your videos

 

i have been among (christian) people for a while. when i was a baby i was baptised as catholic and went to a Catholic church. but i dont really remember it. since you say there is no salvation outside the (traditional) Catholic faith, may i ask why? i would love to hear your argument of how it is more true than a fellowship christianity, that is the church i go. i am not acknowledging this for an arguement (fight) so to say, i am genuinely interested. i will check out this website you sent to me, and i hope to hear from you again soon.

thank you for your response.

Sarah

 

MHFM: Sarah, there is no salvation outside the Church because there is no salvation outside of Christ and following all of what He commanded.  He instituted Confession, the Eucharist, the Papacy, etc., all of which the non-Catholic denominations reject.  Simply put, one is not a true Christian unless one is a Catholic.  That's what the material and the book we have show.

 

Vatican II

 

Subject: Vatican II Exposed

 

The false council, Vatican II, should be identified for the real travesty that it was and re-named Reformation II. It sought to continue the traditions of destroying the Catholic Faith that were begun during the Protestant Reformation…

Thanks and God Bless.....

Ricardo Parks

 

Divide

 

My name is Joaquin, at first i feel didn't like you, but as i listened to you i did begin to like what you had say, i still do. Leave Father Corapi alone, why fight were a family. i relate to him. don't divide The Catholic Family with what you are saying please....

 

MHFM: Joaquin, Corapi is not part of the Catholic family.  He claims to be Catholic, yes, but he’s actually a modernist heretic.  He believes in salvation outside the Church, false ecumenism, and offers the invalid New Mass.  You need to look carefully at the material on our website to find out what the Church really teaches and how the Vatican II Church is not Catholic.

 

Rosary beads

 

Subject: Regarding the rosary and the “fake” rosary

 

Hello brothers, i have a few questions.  First, I would like to thank you for your videos, "Is the world about to End?"… My Question is, what are your thoughts on the explosion of people who wear the rosary, but more importantly, this new thing I am seeing, where obvious non-catholics are wearing something that mimicks the rosary in appearance, but is not. For a time, and even still now, I thought it might be the blessed mother or the holy spirit crying out in these dark days, to make the catholic faith visible, or possibly as a chance for conversion. But now I think that this is just another deception. That satan is attempting to make non-catholics look catholic to convince people that there is no difference as to what church you belong to. I would appreciate your thoughts. Your website has helped me greatly. I spent a good amount of time as a teenager and as a young adult feeling outcast, because I believed in the Catholic Church and faith, but never liked, or agreed with what the church or its popes. Your website has helped me validate a lot of questions in my life and faith. Thank you.
 
Patrick M

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  Perhaps you are referring to beads that people wear around their necks that look similar to rosary beads but are not.  We do believe that such items are a deception.  They detract from the true meaning of the Rosary.  Since they look similar, they turn the wearing of actual rosary beads into a fashion statement, and thus detract from the Rosary’s real purpose and spiritual value.  There are also people in popular culture who wear actual rosary beads because they like the way they look, not out of any devotion.  Certain gang members even wear them.  This is part of a diabolical deception to subtly turn the Rosary into an external item that doesn’t require any devotion, belief or change in one’s life.  In short, it renders it meaningless.  It further cements the false religiosity of our day: that God and the elements of His true faith are purely external and devoid of any real power, meaning or impact.  We also agree with your point: that the popular practice of non-Catholics wearing rosaries fosters religious indifferentism and false ecumenism.  It’s excellent, however, for true Catholics to wear rosaries.

 

Comment

 

Subject: Our Lady of Guadalupe crushes the Vatican II sect

 

Dear Brothers,
 
Thank you for the extremely interesting video, Our Lady of Guadalupe crushes the Mexican Serpent. According to the Vatican II sect and its 5 Antipopes, the Aztec human sacrificing "priests," because they were zealous for their religion, could possibly have been erring in good faith, invincibly ignorant, and thus saved, because there is no such thing as demons, the Devil, or hell in the V-2 religion. The sickening thing is that, like in the days of the Roman Coliseum, the common people would likely have become desensitized to the evils that were happening so that constant sacrificial murder to the "Sun god" became commonplace, even expected or enjoyed! Similarly today, the destruction of souls (not bodies - apart from abortion) in sacrifice to Lucifer the Devil, who is now reigning in the Vatican, is more commonplace and widespread than ever before, so much so that almost everyone has been numbed to the eternal consequences of their sins. How grateful that we have such a powerful and caring protectress in the Blessed Virgin Mary who can preserve her children in the state of grace while the Great Apostasy rages everywhere! Just as the conversion of the Mexicans to the Catholic faith was miraculous, so being truly Catholic today requires the constant supernatural help of grace, especially from praying the 15 decade Rosary each day. If Our Lady can preserve the paint on her picture from Guadalupe for centuries, then she can keep faithful Catholics safe from heresy and sin to the end, provided we cooperate with the grace she gives us. Our Lady of Guadalupe crushes the Vatican II sect!!!
 
God Bless,
 
Chris White
 

Outrage

 

Subject: Total Outrage: the Vatican says the Simpsons are Catholic

 

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/hottopics/detail?entry_id=74842

Dear MHFM,

i am sending you link to an artikle about newest statement of Vatican about that most ridiculous cartoons of Simpsons… That is most ridiculous heresy I have ever heard... Let me write down some reactions from mostly non-catholics to this topic:

"Why is the vatican proud the dumbest character (homer) is catholic while the smartest (lisa) is atheist?"

"Lisa's more of a skeptic than a hard line atheist."

"The Simpsons DID make Catholic heaven look a lot more fun that the Protestant one!"

"This is pretty ridiculous, considering that the Simpsons have specifically identified themselves as NOT Catholic.

Bart: "Mom, can we go Catholic? At least they get bread to eat during church."

Marge: "Nobody's going Catholic! Three kids is enough, thank you.""

"Actually, I think The Simpsons skewers Christianity pretty well, making fun of Flanders and his over-the-top Jesus love, and also Flanders' children, who are effeminate, wimpy saps."

"Good grief, the Vatican can't tell fantasy from reality. No wonder people eschew religion."

"Not sure the Catholic church could miss worse on this... It's like a bunch of the church seniors got together and, in trying to make Catholicism seem 'cool for the kids', decided to associate themselves to this show... incorrectly... and several years past the Simpsons prime..."

"Lol - my comment about Homer not being Catholic got deleted because I said he wasn't molesting Bart.
The Pope is on this like a cheap suit."

"Their creative interpretation of the show matches their creative interpretation of the bible."

God bless you!

Josef Svitak

 

Recently

 

Subject: Freemasonry Property

 

In response to Richard who asks about Freemasonry buying up property.  I recently went to visit the Pine Barrens in NJ.  They hold 17 trillion gallons of water underneath enough water to cover NJ in a 10 ft. lake.  It turns out a division of the UN has purchased property in the Pine Barrens under the name UNESCO.  Could this be a possible example?  

 

Kathleen

 

Watched

 

Subject: Rock and Roll Sorcerers of the New Age Revolution

 

Hi Brothers, 

 

I watched the video that you offer on rock and roll sorcerers of the new age revolution, very eye opening as to how many of the music performers or rather the shamans, truly are possessed by the devil.  Even though the man doing the presentation was protestant he brought out a lot of points on the music industry and how they follow Aleister  Crowley, who is a satanist, who wrote the book called The Book of the Law, one of his most famous quotes is "do thou what thou wilt.  In other words be disobedient to Gods laws, if it feels good do it!  God says thou shalt not do it!  My 10 yr. old daughter watched the video with me and she got the passage that the guy was quoting right away about Ephesians 6:12  For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but principalities and power, against the rulers of the world of this darkness; against the spirits of wickedness in the high places.  My daughter understood the tremendous advantage that satan would have if he could possess people in high places { people of great influence } like rock stars because they go all over the world on tour playing their satanic music, just like the pied piper!  I strongly recommend parents to buy this video and show it to their children, the only thing is you need to have a VHS tape player to see it, even if you had to spend 50 dollars to get a new player its worth doing it for your children, please!!!  

 

Todd

 

Mysteries

 

Brothers in Christ,

When saying the 15 Rosary, is there any specific way to recite them?  Can it be Sorrowful, Glorious, Joyful? Is it any preference?


John

 

MHFM: The normal method would be Joyful, then Sorrowful, then Glorious.

 

Souls

 

Dear Brothers 

 

Great video about Our Lady of Guadalupe and the Aztecs.  I, too, did not realize how satanic and evil they were!  Looking forward to Part 2 !  With the coming of the month of November and the Holy Souls in Purgatory… I love praying for the Holy Souls, since I was a little girl and we were told to say the 6 Hail Marys, 6 Our Fathers, and 6 Glory Be for them on Nov 2…

 

June

 

Clip

 

Subject: Our Lady of Guadalupe overcomes the Mexican Serpent

 

Hello,

 

The new clip about Our lady of Guadalupe was awesome; I hope it is to be continued.

All the best
lxnv…

 

Video

 

Brother Peter Dimond,

I enjoyed your last video on Our Lady of Guadalupe overcomes the Mexican serpent.

I think you chose a great topic and it is most interesting. You did a great job! Please continue with it.

Elijah…

 

SSPX

 

Dear Brother Michael & Brother Peter
 
Many thanks for your reply. As i have said before, i have read your website with great interest, and your expose on the heretics Pope John Paul II & Benedict XVI as teaching falsehoods and doctrines, was absolutely brilliant. Would like to ask you a few more questions.
 
1. Am a big supporter of the Sspx,and I attend Sspx traditional latin mass here in London, but you dont support them. Why?
 
2. Is sedevancantism a sin?
 
Many thanks Brother Michael & Brother Peter.  If only our church could have more men like you, and restoring all things tradition to God's church and to Our Lord Jesus Christ.
 
In Domine
Mr Gerald Purves

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  This file explains why the positions of the SSPX are not Catholic and why their group cannot be supported. 

 

The Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]

 

The sedevacantist position is definitely not a sinful one, but rather the only true Catholic position at this time.  That’s because the Vatican II antipopes are/were heretics, and the Church infallibly teaches that heretics are not true popes.  The Chair of Peter is therefore vacant.  To obstinately resist that position, and embrace the one held by the SSPX, is a sin.  All of the documentation for the sedevacantist position is covered on our website.  As covered in the file above, the SSPX also believes that souls can be saved in false religions, which is heretical.
 

Shocked

 

Subject: Comment: Guadalupe crushes Mexican Serpent

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,

I recently listened to your new video on the demonic Aztec empire.  I am so shocked by the information in this video.  I want to know more of what happened next with Our Lady's appearance to the takeover of the demonic empire, please do continue the series. I can't wait for any following parts.

… I was just so overwhelmed with the new video on Guadalupe that I actually didn't realize that 11 minutes had passed… It’s actually the first time I've ever heard something so detailed of what these evil Aztecs did.  It's very sickening and actually very hard to believe such civilization existed, but it really did.  Also, the reference to the snake connected with these pagan religions form the east, it's also interesting that Chinese cultures and other parts of Asia use that dragon which definitely has the looks of a snake.

Those conquistadores were very brave and those who persevered till the end in the grace of God are now happy that they have received eternal glory for believing in Christ, in His Church, and in practicing the True Catholic Faith.  These conquistadores weren't saying to the Aztecs, "We can't judge if what you're doing is evil" like how many people hold now-a-days with the whole We Can't Judge heresy.

You know, a while back I was talking with this Mexican Novus Ordite and we got talking about the Aztecs, and so he then brought up that the Europeans came and destroy the culture of Mexico.  He was arguing that the atmosphere and environment was cleaner and more peaceful before the Europeans came to the New World.  And then I told him that the Aztecs killed thousands and thousands of people, sacrificing them to demons, and that this was sending thousands of souls to damnation because they had not yet received the Light of Truth, Jesus Christ, and so it was actually profitable that God willed to put an end to this through the Catholic conquistadores.  But no..., this apostate person, who by the way when explained what a dogma is, and when cited and explained Eugene's dogmatic bull "Cantate Domino" and the Scriptural evidence of the necessity to believe in Jesus Christ to be saved, and finally when asked if a Jew who rejects Christ could be saved if he died in rejecting Christ, the man simply stated that he didn't know and would not judge because that's between God and the Christ rejecting Jew, basically throwing out the window all the time spent in trying to explain to him the necessity of the Catholic Faith, well, he argued that the Europeans only brought unrest, war, and sickness.  THIS WAS A PERSON WHO CLAIMED TO BE CATHOLIC!  He later said that pregnancy of Our Lady of Guadalupe represented the new raza [new race].  I have no idea what he meant by that but the impression I got, from what he was basically describing, was John Paul II's antichrist gospel: man as God.  Also, I was told that he liked to read different books of different beliefs (like at the time he was reading some stuff about buddhism) and so I told him that I could give him your material so he can read it and study the Catholic Faith... well you know what he said?  That he didn't have time and needed to spend time to work and support his family.  A true liar to heart, unfortunately.

Our Lady of Guadalupe is one of my most favorite apparitions.  Here you have a whole civilization in darkness, then the devil takes millions of souls with him through Luther and his rebellion.  So what does God do to get those 5 million back?  He sends His mother and converts almost double the amount by crushing the Mexican serpent.  And let's not forget the miraculous tilma of Our Lady of Guadalupe.  To know that San Juan Diego's tilma still remains colorful and beautiful, after more than 450 years have elapsed since the apparition, is in itself miracle!

God bless you MHFM for your dedicated work.

Sincerely,
Bernardo

 

Statue

 

… Always Appreciate your good work and new Aztec video.....how gruesome they were.  How Dare Christians come and Stop that (Says our… Dept. of Education.)  Also, just caught a TV documentary thing about some Sculptor in New Mexico/ Arizona (?) who the Indians were ANGRY with for daring to sculpt a beautiful Spanish conquistador statue on a horse.  So now he's going to sculpt a Big Indian statue for Them...  

 

Carol D.

 

Sr. Lucia

 

Dear Brother Michael & Brother Peter

Would like to know why you consider Sister Lucy an imposter and fraud?

In Domine
Mr Gerald Purves

 

MHFM: Of course, the original Sr. Lucia was not an impostor.  However, at a certain point the enemies of the Church definitely utilized an impostor.  All of that is covered in detail in these videos:

 

The Impostor Sr. Lucia – 1 of 3 - When and Why

 

The Impostor Sr. Lucia - 2 of 3 - The Proof and Her Contradictions

 

The Impostor Sr. Lucia - 3 of 3 - Her Heresies

 

Overthrew

 

Subject: Our Lady of Guadalupe Video

 

Dimond Brothers,

 

Thank you for the new video. Yes that is a wonderful book. A few hundred brave Catholics overthrew an entire civilization. The battles they won against the most incredible odds were purely supernatural. The Aztecs were horrible satanists and the Europeans were the best thing that ever happened to them. Only a fool or a dishonest person would doubt Mary came to clean house and institute Holy Baptism and the Catholic Faith. When Our Lady first introduced herself to Juan Diego she explained she was "the Serpent Crusher". The magnitude of that statement and all that it means to every living creature in the universe is sadly not understood. Ave Maria!

 

Matthew

 

Pagans

 

Subject: Pagans

 

Dear Mhfm, 

 

Excluding diseases, famines, the last century has to be the most violent against man-on-man in the history of A.D.  Just placing WWI, and WWII, in perspective, the multi-millions of human beings slaughtered, butchered, mangled, maimed-souls sent to hell-according to Our  Blessed Holy Mother at Fatima, boggles the mind in comparison to the savage world of paganistic death south of the border.  Now, in the early 21st century-Armageddon is at hand!  There is no way out accept the Rosary of the Blessed Mother.  Truck on, Mhfm!  I suppose satan seethes with envy at your task at hand.

 

Dea…

 

Freemasonry

 

Subject: Bernanke says U.S. on brink

 

In your video about exposing freemasonry, their goal is to replace religion, law,& property with masonic religion, masonic law, & masonic property. Well, the first two are most apparent, for those who have eyes to see; but how do you change property into masonic property?  What these CAFR's show is that "composite government investment funds" through association in reality own virtually everything. The media, for their part, has created a deliberate void in comprehension, to this fact. Remember, G. Edward Griffin's audio tape on the Fed says the first thing they did after starting the Fed was buy up the media. That's why Bernanke can say "whatever", to propagate the whole "budget" lie.

 

Richard

 

Comment

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

 

The Devil is obviously 'MAD as Hell, and he can't take it anymore', so all he can do is send out his 'dupes', like LF, to try and annoy and wear down the MHFM, with their ravings and ad hominem attacks, rather akin to pesky mosquitoes, who as soon as you brush them off, return with a few more of their fiends, in a vain attempt to undermine the operation of salvation...

 

God bless,

 

David

 

Rock

 

Dear Brothers,

 

We've had our comments about some of the British superstars of rock. There is always speculation about selling their souls. I thought this was a little creepy. When doing an interview for his new book: "Well, I'm not putting death on the agenda," he told the Times. "I don't want to see my old friend Lucifer just yet". 

 

The Beatles (Lennon), Led Zeppelin (purchased Alister Crowley’s castle) and many others had close ties with Darkness.

 

When Richards says "old friend" I assume he started the relationship a long time ago when these superstars were consorting with prominent satanists.  When he says "I don't want to see" him I assume he understands there is a debt he isn't looking forward to paying. What's sad is, even a man who signs a contract in his blood can have it revoked by our Dear Lady if only he pursued more important secrets.

 

Matthew

 

Sensed

 

Subject: Thank you

 

Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond

         

About a week or so ago I purchased a few books and DVD’s from you and I can say justly that I have been truly blessed and enlightened by them. For the longest time I sensed such a feeling of despair in our Holy Church and I could not figure it out. To that extent when I saw your website and a few of your videos on YouTube I began to do my own study and it led me into complete despair when I thought of how far astray our church has gone. In upholding Vatican II, the church has sacrificed itself to the secular world and betrayed Christ with its attempt to “fit in” with everyone else. The horrible time of the reformation was to me when the church was the strongest because in the face of heresy and apostasy it remained resolute and strong in the faith of Christ and in His Holy Church. Yet in this modern time, the church bows and recognizes schismatic’s and defilers as holy and followers of the faith.

 

When Christ ascended into heaven, he charged the apostle Peter with the care and leadership of the church. He was to be the new shepherd who commissioned by Christ would grow and expand the Gospel to all lands. Yet today we see our church in disarray, our traditions considered out of date and our teachings archaic. The role of the pope diminished to a figure of nothing more than a secular preacher, and the Holy Scriptures reduced to nothing more than fables and good stories. To me it was better when the common people were unable to read the scriptures themselves. Now to some this is a very strong statement to make but it is very true, because the Popes and priests all knew that if the common man would have the chance to read them the gospel would be destroyed by conflicting views, schismatic’s and free thought would been allowed to trample the teachings of Christ. There was a time in Holy Mother Church that we were in the ship of St. Peter and yet when the time of trial came many leaped out of the ship because the waves became too high and their testimonies shaken because of fear and polluted ideas. They relied on their own ideas to save them instead of remembering the gospel story of Christ calming the angry sea. In leaping out of the ship of St. Peter, they have allowed themselves to drown in the sea of heresy, thus as a result have torn asunder the seamless coat of Christ. Which stood as a symbol of unity and salvation.

 

Yet even in this darkness, there is light and it shines brightly from heaven in the figure of the Blessed Virgin. Christ calls to his lost sheep to come home, and yet they are too distracted by the notion of the grass being greener on the other side concept of earthly life and the hereafter.

 

I thank you both for the great work that you do for Christ and Holy Church, you will be blessed for your labors and your work will speak to many. I ask you to pray for me and for my family, as we will join you in prayer for the lost. We will always remember to say a rosary for you and I hope you will do the same for us. The fight continues and the banner of Christ will one day fly again over the Vatican and a true shepherd will step forward and lead the church back to Christ and salvation.

                                                                                                             

David Robertson

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  It’s important for people to recognize that the church which has engaged in all the things you mention is actually not the Catholic Church, but a counterfeit construct.  The true Church still exists, infallible and unblemished, but in a remnant.  The heretics to whom you make reference automatically ceased to be part of the Church and her representatives when they denied the faith.

 

Soon

 

MHFM: We have a new video that we hope to post very soon.

 

Rise

 

Subject: The rise of Islam

 

Hi Brothers,

 

You posted a news story a week ago about the Muslim praying in the streets of France. I found this really shocking, as I have been seeing a lot of this kind of thing where I live in CA. I was shocked the other day when I saw a man passing out Korans and other Islamic reading material on our college campus.  I have been doing a lot of research on this topic. It's really hard to find information on there faith that isn't twisted in their favor. I was wondering if you could do a video on this topic. It really is unbelievable, they are taking over the world!

 

This video has a lot of good information, but I want to know more: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pHK_2TvU94&feature=related

 

God Bless,

HW

 

Holy Days

 

Dear Bros. Dimond,

As the Vigil of All Saints Day approaches, I'm once again reminded of the horribly far-reaching grasp Lucifer has on the world.

In his hatred and cunning, Lucifer has successfully replaced all the Holy Days with "holidays". . . He has successfully turned people's attention away from the observation and celebration of God on these Holy Days (days entirely necessary to observe in order to obtain preservation from sin as well as honor the Good Creator) by replacing them with such horrible mockeries as "halloween", "xmas", and "easter" to name the most obvious ones.

How grotesquely displeasing it must be for God to see countless people annually celebrating death and Lucifer on "halloween" by dressing as demons (bearing in mind demons appear not only in their hideous forms (traditionally "scary" costumes) but in disguised forms of beauty too (princess, fairy, etc. costumes)…  Unfortunately, as a child I grew up watching horror movies and I can't think of a single horror movie that didn't blaspheme or mock God.

The Holy Day of Christmas when the Holy Father gave the ultimate gift of His only begotten Son who was born in blessed poverty. . .  has been replaced with not only the grotesque celebration of man (where people's only concerns are giving and receiving base material gifts, and leisurely spending time with "loved ones"), but with the added insult of removing Christ's title from Christmas to "xmas" while deranged people decorate a tree (the very thing on which our Lord Christ Jesus was crucified).

The Holy Day of Resurrection Sunday has been replaced too with the celebration of man. Lucifer has succeeded once again in turning people's attention away from God and their duty of reverent vigilance by eclipsing the celebration of Eternal Life (made possible by and through Jesus' resurrection) with the grotesque mockery of the celebration of temporal life as symbolized by the pagan depiction of the "easter bunny" and "easter eggs" (the celebration and veneration of creatures/reproduction/temporal life as opposed to the celebration and veneration of the Creator/resurrection/eternal life).

My grief and shame is only intensified by the fact that during these days of the great deception- where one does not have the convenience and comfort of going to a legitimate Catholic Church-   I don't even know the True Catholic way of properly observing these Holy Days. . . especially the Vigil of All Saints. So I'm writing to ask you if there is a book that I can read concerning the proper way of observing the Holy Days. . . or if there isn't, would you please instruct me on the matter?

Thanks be to God for blessing us with MHFM. . .  a most ardent preserver and propagator of the One True Holy Catholic Faith without which no one at all is saved.

Please pray for me…


Kristine

 

Regarding

 

Subject: Regarding: L F

Brothers Peter and Michael,

Well so much for "L F". He is not only spiritually blind, but he must be completely deaf.  I have a number of your DVD's. The good, the bad, the ugly that you discuss in the DVD's always has the name of the Encyclical,letters,news items,magazines, the dates ,who said it when it was said etc..etc..etc.. I know because I have looked up a lot of these articles to prove my point.

Not to mention, if one doesn't suffer from sloth, you can even purchase Encyclicals or use the inter-net to get the information. So, sorry, no excuse, no such thing as" justifiable ignorance." Oh yes, and one more thing: All of your books pertaining to the FALSE popes, FALSE mass, FALSE church-v2, my books have an "appendix" which means I can look up( for myself) the references used.   The references are also given after each chapter in the one book.

Thank you very much for all of your tedious work.  May God Bless you and our Most Holy Mother protect you always.

Jennifer

 

LF Responds

 

MHFM: LF wrote a short response to our recent response.  Not surprisingly, he ignored our request to discuss the matters in a recorded conversation. 

 

Bull.  You are a bunch of nut jobs who feel free to slander the legitimate authority of the Church.  If you don't like the popes, you can be Orthodox, or even Eastern Rite.  Instead, you spread BS all over the you tube.  I usually ignore it, but, b/c I was attracted by your deceptive techniques, I got sucked into your delusions, and I am angry about it.  Better stay behind your fenced in funny farm, there, in Fillmore. 

 

[From LF]

 

MHFM: By your first short statement, we suppose you are implying that our assertion that your antipopes praise false religions and heretical sects is nonsense.  No, it’s a fact and well-documented.  You are a liar at heart and a mortal sinner who doesn’t seek after truth, but runs from it when it is presented to you.  That’s why God blinds you and gives you the horrible punishment to believe you are right when you are so wrong.  You don’t like the popes.  You spit on them by defending an antipope who denies what they authoritatively taught. 

 

Clearly

 

Dear Brothers,

 

LF is clearly tormented by his own mortal sins and heresies, otherwise the truth wouldn't be so painful for him. LF calumniates the popes by saying the 5 Antipopes are Catholics, rather than the heretics, schismatics and apostates that they are. To say that the Antichrist Antipopes are Catholics is to calumniate the Lord Jesus Christ! He accuses you of deception, when the fact is that he himself is deceived - by the V-2 sect! LF wrote: "You repeat inflammatory words, but you give no evidence for it." It appears that LF is actually accusing you of what he himself is guilty of, because like so many bad-willed-lying-heretics today, he cites no authoritative Church teaching to prove his position, because he can't. Instead, like an immature fool, he attacks you personally, rather than debate the position! His own "POV" (point of view) is full of holes because he assumes that just because he witnessed something, that he could not have been deceived by it, and that "it's proof" of Our Lady's intervention, because "Totus Tuus" was formed from the JPII's satanic recovery. That means nothing - one may as well say that Protestantism is thus a legitimate form of Christianity, and not heresy, which it is, because it developed from the Arch-heretic Martin Luther. What pathetic nonsense and modernism! But one need only look at his comment about the salvation of souls to see the fruits of obstinately defending the Vatican II sect. Catholic saints and martyrs endured unimaginable tortures for the salvation of souls. Compare that reality with a "kook, zealot and malcontent" such as LF, and his comment: "It would be comical if the end result wasn't the loss of souls for people…" So, according to LF, the salvation of souls is "comical." That's one of the most evil things I've ever read. LF, in his satanic stupidity, defines his own method: "you pretend to be Catholic, and use many words that resemble it, then lead people subtly away from the heart of the Church and isolate them." And in daring desperation, he thinks he can contradict himself in the same paragraph, and that people will be so frightened of phrases like "Where Peter is, there is the Church.": "We fully expect an apostasy by the leadership of the Church during the reign of the antichrist.  Or, at least a false pope.  These things are speculation, of course, and we may be way off track." So LF fully expects things that are speculative! That really sums up how shakey his ground is - how uncertain his "faith" is. From there, the mental deterioration is evident in every sentence: "John Paul VI was physically unable to sanction contraception against his will.  That, to me, is proof of the Holy Spirit right there." Firstly, there was no "John Paul VI" - I assume he means Paul VI. And someone who is "physically unable to do something against their will," is physically able to do something for their will - the double negatives, "unable" and "against," cancel each other out to make the sentence positive. And if it is proof of the activity of the Holy Spirit that someone can physically do something for their will, then one may as well say that everyone is in the state of grace or that everyone will be saved, i.e. the heresy of Universal Salvation. I suppose LF picked up that heresy from his beloved "John Paul VI"!!! Lf is chasing pots of gold at the end of rainbows and listening to the "elves" he's possessed by. Then, with the "Dutch courage" of a drunken person, he boldly asserts: "Good grief, get some discernment gifts, if you are truly Catholic, as you say you are, which I am beginning to doubt," which contradicts his opening line of the paragraph where he says you're worse than people to lead souls to hell - "In any case, to me, you are worse than those..." The discernment is lacking in LF, not in MHFM. He follows up again by explaining his own method: "You use deception to lure them in, and mesmerizing repetition and half-truths to entice and hold interest, then, wham, you lower the hammer and attmept to smash the faith.  Right out of satan's playbook, I must say." That's what LF is doing: he repeats the methods he's using to criticize MHFM, to "hold interest," and than wham he tries to smash the Catholic faith by attacking MHFM. And again, imagining people will be too scared to see through his tactics, he writes: "It is the techniques, used by cultists the world over, that give you away." So, quoting Catholic dogmas in defense of the Catholic faith and against heresies, schisms and apostasies, even if it means the world will hate them, according to LF, are "techniques, used by cultists used the world over." No, cultists use flamboyant and inaccurate statements designed to incite intense emotion which will override the ordinary person's reasoning ability, so as to leave them a) confused, b) scared of the cult person, and c) desperate for any answer - which the cult member is equally desperate to supply. That's exactly how the Vatican II sect operates, and it works on people who are bad willed, because bad willed people are willing to compromise the "little things," which it is obvious LF is willing to do. And finally, the only one displaying evidence of irrational paranoia is LF, who thinks MHFM is deceptive. MHFM is the most uncompromising defender of the Catholic faith on the planet today - no heresies, no schisms, no apostasies ever from MHFM, and if one needs proof other than their work, just look at the bizarre, insane and deceptive reactions they receive in emails from apostates like LF. Perhaps if LF wasn't so worried about who his father thinks is a "paranoid schizophrenic," then he might be able to think more clearly. Though, even that might be a stretch! What a sad and frustrating road the path to hell must be!

 

Proverbs 10:14 - "Wise men lay up knowledge: but the mouth of the fool is next to confusion."

 

Proverbs 12:16 - "A fool immediately sheweth his anger: but he that dissembleth injuries is wise."

 

Proverbs 28:26 - "He that trusteth in his own heart, is a fool: but he that walketh wisely, he shall be saved."

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Idols

 

MHFM: This is an interesting quote from the life of Hernán Cortés, the famous explorer and conquistador who overthrew the Aztec Empire.  As his group came upon lands in the New World, they discovered the idols of the natives.

 

“Assisting their wounded, [and] bleeding, the Spaniards limped uphill to seek refuge in a cluster of low stone buildings that were prayer-houses.  But inside the houses they came upon idols of baked clay – hideous, monster-faced figures, some figures obviously female and some male figures in the act of sodomy.” (Richard Lee Marks, Cortes – The Great Adventurer and the Fate of Aztec Mexico, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1993, p. 26.)

 

This is another quote which demonstrates that homosexuality is connected with idolatry.  It is not natural, as many today would have people believe; but rather, as Romans 1 teaches, it is caused by a demonic takeover that results from apostasy and idolatry.  We also discussed this in the section of our book called:  The Idolatry of the Vatican II sect is connected with its rampant homosexuality [PDF File].  The culture which used these idols was thoroughly demonic and engaged in mass human sacrifice.

 

Respond

 

Subject: Your Book: The Truth about What Really Happened…

 

Most Holy Family Monastery,

I have just recently read your groundbreaking book, The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II. The facts you present are absolutely shocking! It's amazing, horrifying and deeply convicting of just how evil the Vatican II sect is. The information you provide is eye-opening and surely compels every true and honest Catholic to recognize this phony, counter-Church for what it is, have nothing whatsoever to do with its abominable apostasy, and flee into the wilderness where the one, true Church of Christ remains. In the final days we are told of the decisive battle between the elect and the reprobates. Your book successfully and abundantly proves how all the rise of the counterfeit church only further shows the authenticity of the true Church.

I would also like to respond to LF, whom you correctly recognized as being "a living example of why Jesus told us not to cast pearls before swine."

LF, you are so fully of bad will; so full of the sinful pride that blinds you from seeing the simple truth. It's in your desperate and futile attempts to undermine MHFM's witness to these truths that you demonstrate your utter contempt for the truth. You reveal yourself to be nothing more than the Devil's slave.

Thank you for your material.

Regards,

 

Sotto…

The words of Christ: "Blessed are ye when they revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake." Matthew 5:11

 

Since

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Since coming to your website approximately 3 years ago, I have learned what the Catholic Faith really is and that my past, in what I considered to be Catholicism, was simply founded in man-made religion.  I found a Byzantine priest for confession and made an initial general confession as well as others since then.  As I had not confessed for a long time and only sporadically over the timeframe from age 12-40 you can well believe there were a MOUNTAIN of sins that needed confessed.  My question is this:  If one makes a general confession and then is following a regular routine of confession but remembers something that he did not confess from the past (and I am remembering many now), should these then be confessed or would the general confession have remitted them?

 

The Monastery is truly a light in the darkness of this vile world… Without finding your website (through our Lord and Lady's grace), I would have been allotted to that heap of filth and condemned to Hell for all eternity.  I cannot thank you enough for your help and guidance over the years.  Perhaps one day I can truly thank you for all you have done for this poor soul.

 

God Bless you for your works......

 

Bruce

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  If one made a general confession, but then recalls a mortal sin that was not confessed, it would be necessary to mention that sin in a new confession when you can go.  However, it would not be necessary to repeat the general confession.

 

Swine

 

Member of the Most Holy Family Monastery,

 

     I was most intruigued with the video series you put out entitled, Is the World About to End?.   I was with you, of course, until you began to calumniate the popes.  You accused John Paul II of blasphemy and deception, yet, you began your series with deception.  Leading the viewer in by pretending to be legitimate, calling your self vaticancatholic, and starting with Fatima…

 

     You repeat inflammatory words, but you give no evidence for it.  For instance, you imply that JPII"s healing was not a miracle brought about by prayers to Our Lady, which it was.  In spite of the obvious signs, and his utter devotion to her, and the development of Totus Tuus, a family apostolate of the highest order, from it, you imply that satan had a hand in it.  Sorry, but I witnessed it.  Your POV is full of holes. 

 

    You accused the pope of blasphemies, but gave no example.  You gave your opinion of why you think what you think, but, it is too "out there" for any sane person to take seriously.  You realize that, don't you?  You appeal to kooks, zealots, and malcontents.  It would be comical if the end result wasn't the loss of souls for people…

 

In any case, to me, you are worse than those because you pretend to be Catholic, and use many words that resemble it, then lead people subtly away from the heart of the Church and isolate them.  The Church is not a bunch of Latin sayings.  Where Peter is, there is the Church.  We fully expect an apostasy by the leadership of the Church during the reign of the antichrist.  Or, at least a false pope.  These things are speculation, of course, and we may be way off track.  But, the gentlemen you described are not the culprits.  John Paul VI was physically unable to sanction contraception against his will.  That, to me, is proof of the Holy Spirit right there.  Good grief, get some discernment gifts, if you are truly Catholic, as you say you are, which I am beginning to doubt. 

 

     You use deception to lure them in, and mesmerizing repetition and half-truths to entice and hold interest, then, wham, you lower the hammer and attmept to smash the faith.  Right out of satan's playbook, I must say.  Had you been straightforward about your views from the get-go and just came out and said why, you may have been more convincing.  It is the techniques, used by cultists the world over, that give you away. 

 

     My father thinks you are just a colony of paranoid schizophrenics, or some other form of kook, but, this video shows too much cunning for that. I think you are, perhaps, enemies of the Church operating under the guise of well-meaning people.  

 

    I just wanted you to know that some of us are "on to you". 

 

Sincerely,

 

LF

 

MHFM: Allow us to respond to your e-mail.  First, your e-mail is filled with false accusations and it demonstrates your profound bad will.  There is no deception in our video series.  We are Catholic.  That requires us to reject things which are opposed to the Catholic faith.

 

To be Catholic means to accept all the teachings of the popes throughout history, which you do not.  You accept salvation outside the Church (which is heresy), and that Protestants are in the Church (heresy). You must accept all of that because it’s the official teaching of Vatican II, Benedict XVI and John Paul II; but it contradicts the infallible teaching of the Catholic Church.  You must also accept false ecumenism, prayer with pagans, the idea that Protestants and schismatics don't need conversion, the heresy of religious liberty, the teaching that non-Catholics may receive Communion, etc. – all of which are taught by Benedict XVI, John Paul II and Vatican II.

 

You say that the video series didn't give any proof of John Paul II's blasphemies and heresies.  It did, but it was not meant to be a comprehensive presentation on his doctrinal heresies.  That video series was about prophecy and how the Vatican II sect, John Paul II, etc. fit into it.  We wouldn’t expect a blind heretic like you to appreciate the points made on that front, for they are for those who possess the basic honesty to recognize the obvious: that the post-Vatican II sect is a departure from Catholic tradition.  For a strict doctrinal expose of his countless heresies, on everything from various pagan religions to all men are saved to Protestants don't need conversion, see the file below.  We would also love to debate you on the issue, and expose you for the fraud you are.  It would demonstrate that you are clueless about the Catholic faith, about John Paul II's actual teaching, and about how a Catholic must consider men who purport to be popes but teach heresy.  We could get into the matters you bring up in your e-mail.  Are you willing to have such a debate?  If not, you prove the falsity of your words.  Did you know that there have been over 40 antipopes in Catholic history?  Did you know that the doctors of the Church teach that a pope who would become a heretic would lose his office and cease to be pope?  Did you know that John Paul II signed joint declarations with the leading members of non-Catholic sects, in which he denounced trying to convert the non-Catholics (which is complete apostasy from the Catholic faith)?

 

The Heresies of John Paul II - a comprehensive presentation [PDF file]

 

You say that our material appeals to kooks.  That means nothing coming from someone like you.  Your nonsense only appeals to faithless losers who don't believe one bit in the necessity of Jesus Christ, and are too stupid and bad willed to figure out that Vatican II, John Paul II and Benedict XVI have contradicted what all the popes in history have taught and are, according to any Catholic assessment, not valid popes.  You are without a question a blind dupe of Satan, headed for Hell and the eternal fire you deserve.  You are too dumb to realize that your antipope praises non-Catholic religions every week, and that John Paul II preached a new gospel.  You are a living example of why Jesus told us not to cast pearls before swine, and not to give that which is holy to dogs (Matthew 7:6). 

 

Unecumenical

 

MHFM: We recently posted some quotes from a book called, Rodrigues the Interpreter – An Early Jesuit in Japan and China.  This book is about a Jesuit interpreter in Japan and China in the 16th and 17th centuries, and his experiences during the missionary work in those two countries.  It was written by a post-Vatican II “Jesuit” named Michael Cooper.  In the following quote, we see another interesting example of how ecumenism, as taught by Vatican II and implemented by Benedict XVI and the New Church, is a complete repudiation of Catholic teaching on heresy.  Keep in mind that the quote comes from a learned post-Vatican II “Jesuit”:

 

“But the annalist goes on to mention that this Jesuit met in Edo a group of half a dozen Dutch traders and an Englishman (who must have been Will Adams), and did his best to convert them to Catholicism.  The leading member of the party was the Englishman, and to him the Jesuit offered a safe-conduct from Bishop Cerqueira if he wished to travel down to Nagasaki and sail from Japan.  The Englishman, or ‘obstinate heretic’ as Girao unecumenically labels him, politely turned down the offer... both [the] Jesuit and Englishman began to cite Scripture in an effort to convince the other of his error and win him over.  Neither succeeded in this theological tussle.  Adams remained a good Protestant (but with many Catholic friends) to the end of his life, while Rodrigues (if the Jesuit in question was indeed Rodrigues) remained a good papist.” (Michael Cooper, Rodrigues the Interpreter – An Early Jesuit in Japan and China, Weatherhill, 1974, p. 206)

 

Notice that he says it’s unecumenical for Girao (a Catholic priest at the time) to describe the Protestant Englishman as an “obstinate heretic.”  It’s another example of how Catholic dogma on heresy, and the related Catholic teaching that Protestants are in fact heretics because they obstinately reject Catholic dogma, was indeed repudiated by Vatican II and by the Vatican II antipopes.  It is beyond dispute.  Protestants are now considered Christians and part of the Church, not heretics.  To reinforce his false opinion that the Protestant Englishman was not a heretic, Cooper also describes him as “good.”  Considering that Cooper embraces the teaching of Vatican II and false ecumenism, which renders the Catholic faith meaningless, it’s a mystery why he even wasted his time entering/remaining in religious life, and spending the time to do detailed research on the history of the Jesuits and the mission to Japan and China.

 

Videos

 

Subject: Videos

 

Just wanted to say that I found your 11-part series Is the World about to End very interesting. Thanks for sharing! Will be watching more of your videos.

~auntb…

 

Mentioned

 

I mentioned the revelation theory to plenty of people and apparently it's getting around. It really opened my eyes to see your video…

 

Parsley…

 

Encyclicals

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Do you know when Encyclicals become infallible? Where could I go to find this answer. 

 

God bless,

 

Tien Le

 

MHFM: One discovers the answer to that question by applying Church teaching on the magisterium and papal infallibility.  The answer is that it depends upon how a pope says something in an encyclical (the language he uses), as well as to whom it is addressed.

 

Resource

 

Dear Brothers,

 

You recently commented that the current Catechism is a bad resource to learn about the Catholic Faith. What would you recommend in order to learn what the Catholic Church really believes and teaches? For example, would you recommend the Baltimore Catechism? Thanks.

 

Steve

 

MHFM: For a basic catechism, we would recommend the Penny Catechism we offer.  To learn more about the Catholic faith and what one needs to know today, we would recommend our other books and materials.

 

Confession

 

Subject: Confession

 

I prayed to St Therese today to help me find a validly ordained catholic priest so that I can make a confession. Yes, I did find one… who was ordained before 1968. I confessed all my… sins. We were both in tears when I finished my confession because of the gravity of my sins. Before absolving all my sins he asked me what can I do to do penance. I told him that I pray the 15 decade Rosary everyday. He told me to pray the whole 15 decade Rosary at home (he knew that I was a traditional catholic because I told him before my confession) and he absolved my sins…

 

Disrespect

 

Subject: Hello

 

Now i know that true catholic fallow the pope. if you don't respect the pope  you  don't respect the  catholic church. so please comback home to true faith. catholic church is the true church so i beg you come home a accept the pope. thank you very much for understanding and i know you looking for the truth. your friend richard in christ. love.

 

MHFM: If you accept a heretic as pope, you disrespect the Catholic Church and follow an antipope.

 

St. Francis De Sales (17th century), Catholic Doctor of the Church, The Catholic Controversy, pp. 305-306: "Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church..."

 

Benedict XVI, Milestones, 1998, pages 53-54: “I have ever more come to the realization that Judaism… and the Christian faith described in the New Testament are two ways of appropriating Israel’s Scriptures, two ways that, in the end, are both determined by the position one assumes with regard to the figure of Jesus of Nazareth.  The Scripture we today call Old Testament is in itself open to both ways…”

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers:

 

The Evangelicals' opposition to the display of the Crucifix in Italy is yet another revelation of fake Christian religions of which the V2 sect is simply the ultimate.  I believe the fake Christian "church" is the deception of which Our Lord spoke.

 

Bill's review of the Masonic/communist assault on the world in the 20th century has reminded me of how clever Satan is (the greatest created genius ever).  The evil assaults on the Church and the world has yielded Satan an even greater victory than their direct hit on the Catholic Church.

 

With the enemies of Christ firmly situated in the Church, Satan's real victory seems to have been this:  that with these unspeakably horrible movements, the Catholics' love affair with Protestantism especially in the 20th century seems to have been bolstered.  While the real enemy of masonry etc. is the Catholic Church, these evil movements seemed to have caused in people's perception a realignment or shifting of sides, and confusion as to who "they" are and who "we" are.  Even when I was still in the NO and knew virtually nothing, it always seemed to me that the real problem was the man who called himself "Christian".  (I never guessed at the time how right I was.)  We see this same perception-shifting phenomenon with the pro-life movement today. The dissolving of the true Faith, the rejection of Truth and the embrace, instead, of a cause which on its surface is a good one.  Always is.

 

Having rejected the papacy and the true faith, the only principle of unity among fake Christians is their hatred for dogma.  That's why what passes for Christianity in the world today is no threat to Islam, communism, masonry or anything else (Glen Beck not withstanding).  There are some 25,000 (plus One) fake "religions" in the world calling themselves by the deceptive title of "Christian".  But they are not Christian;  they are Legion.  Will the real enemy please stand up?

 

Thanks for helping us understand all of this.

 

Lee Ann

 

Comment

 

You conclude that NFP is as evil as any other form of contraception.  Well, if you are to believe that then you would have to say any Catholic husband ans wife that do not have conjugal sex everyday would also have to be evil and if you take it a step further the married couple should perform the act several times a day or be in a state of mortal sin because marriage is for procreation and if a husband and wife are not trying to procreate daily then that would also be a form of contraception.  I have spent a lot of time reading your articles on your web site and for me they are not very convincing at all…

 

RW

 

MHFM: We wouldn’t expect the articles to be convincing for someone like you.  Your argument demonstrates that you fight against the truth and that you cannot, at this time, grasp basic logic.  Saying that NPF is sinful would not require one to hold that husband and wife must engage in marital relations each day.  NFP does not consist of a couple simply refraining from the use of marital rights.  Portraying it in that way shows how dishonest one must be to defend NFP.  Rather, NFP is an organized scheme to refrain on days when it is believed conception will occur but use marriage rights when it is believed conception will not occur.  It is thus a carefully constructed plan to use marriage rights while avoiding the primary purpose of marriage.  That is why it’s sinful.  The sin is in the intention. 

 

Turquoise

 

MHFM: The following quote is from Dr. Callahan.  He was a research biophysicist at the University of Florida, as well as a painter, photographer and scientific writer.  Analyzing the miraculous image of Our Lady of Guadalupe, which first appeared in 1531, the following quote briefly explains why the dark turquoise blue color on Our Lady’s mantle is just one of the image’s many miraculous features.

 

“The mantle is of a dark turquoise blue… This presents an inexplicable phenomenon because all such pigments are known to be subject to considerable fading with time, especially in hot climates.  The Indian Mayan blue wall paintings are already badly faded.  The blue mantle [on the Tilma of Guadalupe], however, is bright enough to have been laid last week.” (Philip S. Callahan, “The Tilma under Infra-Red Radiation,” CARA Studies on Popular Devotion, Volume II: Guadalupan Studies, No. 3, Washington, 1981, pp. 14-15.)

 

Horror

 

Thank you for your website. I thought my gradual lapse toward my religion was due to growing older and more worldly wise etc. My earliest childhood was spent
during the Pontificate of Pius XII... I felt trust for and strength from my religion every day.


I went to a Papal Audience, the General type, when I was eighteen and was very excited, of course. When Paul VI was carried by he fixed his gaze on me for a
good seven to ten seconds. My reaction was one of instant revulsion and almost horror. I surely didn't expect that. It was one of the creepiest experiences I can call to mind to this day.  

Thank you for waking me up. I didn't even know I was sleeping.

Sincerest thanks and God bless.

Greg Green

 

New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video and article on Benedict XVI’s astounding recent heresies.  It discusses one of the most heretical speeches he has given.

 

Benedict XVI's most heretical speech? [video]

 

Benedict XVI's most heretical speech and other recent heresies [article]

 

Catechism

 

Brothers,

 

What is your view of the current Catechism of the Catholic Church? Thank you for your time.

 

In Christ,

 

Frank

 

MHFM: The new catechism of the Vatican II Church teaches all of the primary heresies of Vatican II.  This file covers The Heresies in Vatican II [PDF File].  The catechism repeats and teaches the major Vatican II heresies, including: religious liberty; non-Catholics may receive Communion; Protestants and schismatics are united to the Church; Jews are not rejected by God; salvation outside the Church; the Church has a bond with non-Christian religions; all men are united to Christ; and Muslims worship the one true God, just to name a few.  It’s a large catechism, so it of course contains some Catholic truth.  But it’s the heretical catechism of the New Church.  Moreover, even in certain parts where it doesn’t necessarily teach heresy, you can see a weakness, an anthropocentrism, and a spirit of man that is repulsive.  

 

It was also solemnly promulgated by Antipope John Paul II.  That means that if he was the pope, the new catechism represents the authoritative and magisterial teaching of the Catholic Church.  That is impossible, and thus it’s another proof that he was an antipope.

 

Discovered

 

Hello,

I discovered your website and youtube channel this week and have been listening to your videos and studying scripture. I was once a Muslim convert who left Islam due to discovering truths about the Bible, but have been involved with a variety of Evangelical Protestant Churches over the past 6 years. I was hoping you could please help me with further discovering Biblical truth, and truth about the Catholic Church.

I do not believe that the current Catholic Church being lead by the Vatican can be the earthly Church authority of our Lord Jesus Christ. I see that you believe the same thing, yet retain your Catholic identity and allegiance - can you help me to understand this? How can Catholics still participate in the Catholic body of believers (Church) yet the leadership and so many are corrupt; is it still possible to find a Catholic Church that adheres to the traditions and beliefs of the true Church that the Apostles founded?

Your help is GREATLY needed in this time!

Kind Regards,
Brian

 

MHFM: It’s tremendous to hear about your discovery of the website and your interest in the Catholic faith.  We are Catholic.  It’s the one true faith.  It’s necessary to convert to it.  As explained on our website, the post-Vatican II structure, which purports to be Catholic, is not the Catholic Church.  That’s why we are traditional Catholics who reject the post-Vatican II sect.  All the information for how to convert is on our website.  As is explained in our file on where to go to Mass, there are some places to receive sacraments but the priests are heretical and cannot be supported.  The Church still exists in a remnant of traditional Catholics.  We would also recommend our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church, for the information on why only Catholicism is authentic Christianity.

 

Comment

 

I very much liked Joey’s take on the current situation in which there are no violent persecutions of “Catholics” today (that is real Catholics).   Even Communist China sanctions a state controlled version of the Vatican II sect which operates openly.   There is no need for violent suppression, because the Vatican II sect is so compliant; and when obligingly positioning itself against a few moral outrages, (albeit timidly), it undermines that position with its own hypocritical scandals.  To the worldly it is a pathetic joke.  It is a sea of contradiction in both its public prescriptions and its public behavior.  Joey’s  take on world history is true enough.  But the case can be made, that if the United States had been founded for the purpose of destroying the remnants of Christendom (and perhaps it was) it could not have done a better job than it has.   

 

To reinforce his point, all of the major wars of the US (and this case can even be made about the so-called Civil War, but it is more complicated)  going back to the 19th Century served to undermine Catholic societies.  The US supported the forces that overthrew Maximillian, the last Catholic Monarch to rule Mexico.  However for the time, Mexico remained nominally Catholic. So in the Mexican War, totally contrived, the US stole her territories.   Then in the Spanish American War, also totally contrived, practically fomented by one man (William R. Hurst), the US stole Catholic Spain’s Empire including the Philippines (now largely protestantized, Muslimized, liberalized) and Cuba (now Marxist).   The US then entered WWI in time to save the “Allies” and destroy the last great Catholic Monarchy in Europe, the Austro-Hungarian Empire.  This demilitarized and impoverished the center of Europe and allowed communism to succeed in Russia and for a time Spain, while communist revolutions nearly succeeded in Germany, Poland, Italy, etc.  Counter Revolutionary forces temporarily succeeded in reversing leftist gains in these countries, so a second world war was necessary to finish the job.  At the end of WWII communism claimed the entire center of Europe from the Baltic to the Mediterranean and nearly succeeded in Greece.  With out US military intervention, the Axis powers (which despite contemporary misconceptions were predominately Catholic) would have destroyed soviet communism.  Of course it took Vatican II to finish off the Church in Spain (which Franco, with the assistance of the German Luftwaffe, had restored) because Franco had the wisdom to stay “neutral” in the war (though he sent soldiers to fight with Germany on the Russian Front, the Spanish Blue Brigades). 

 

And these are just the major wars.  How many people know about the massacre of the Cristeros in Mexico in the 20th century by another US supported Masonic Mexican government?  The facts of history, recent history, are astounding when viewed through a Catholic lens. The apparent rollback of communism in the last couple of decades is illusory, as is the peace, because there is no real “church” anymore.  These nations are just as decadent (as is ours) and the communist ideals still animate them only under different names.

 

So the job is so thoroughly done now, that the nation’s “enemies” have to be contrived, hence 9/11, while the Vatican II sect just plays along like some kind of circus clown.

 

I think just as the real Christ, did not come to give the Jews the military leader, the temporal Earthly kingdom they desired, neither is anti-Christ a violent destroyer of bodies.  Rather he is the wolf in sheep’s clothing that destroys souls, what really matters.  The Protestants get this wrong because they see everything carnally.  If you understand that the warfare is spiritual you see that anti-Christ is already here, consolidating his reign. 

 

Bill Mulligan     

  

Creat

 

Subject: Creat, Divine Mercy, Justification

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Clearly it is "Creat," who wrote in asking whether you have a problem with a voice that has authority, that has a problem with a voice of authority, because not everyone who sounds authoritative, confident or strong truly is. As you mentioned in your video on Fr. Corapi, his whole image is a theatrical act designed to seduce and manipulate unsuspecting minds. If a loud and confident-sounding voice were all that is required to be a Catholic, then Adolf Hitler would be a saint, which is ridiculous! Obviously Fr. Corapi's get-up is designed for one thing: to intimidate a person into fearing man more than God. That's the whole essence of the Vatican II sect's apostasy, i.e. to replace God with man and the Creator with creatures. The "peace" that the world gives is no such thing but rather a paralyzing fear of creatures. Also, Creat says, "the people of the world need a voice of authority." So, the authority of Catholic dogmas evidently doesn't convince Creat. What would he do if he met a beggar who turned out to be St. Francis of Assisi. Or what if Creat met a crying woman who turned out to be the Blessed Virgin Mary. Or what if he met a man who was condemned to be crucified, as was the Creator of the universe, Jesus Christ. Authority consists not in the voice but in the truth and meaning of the words themselves. However, someone who is so pumped up by their own bad will is not going to be enthralled by the Eternal King or His Kingdom of peace, humility and meekness. Those who are in communion with abortionists, homosexuals and heretics, even though they themselves might not say they support those things, are in fact supporters, because of the principle of the Church's unity of faith, which is the Papacy. Those who want an adrenaline rush won't be happy with Jesus Christ and the Catholic faith. Fr. Corapi is an antichrist apostate…

 

"DivineMercy" who wrote in saying you need God's forgiveness for your "lies and blasphemy against the Church" actually needs God's true mercy and forgiveness! How is it that one comes to the point where they call light, darkness, and good, evil?!! It's by sin, heresy and bad will. There is absolutely no mercy in Sister Faustina's "Divine Mercy" false apparitions because they make a complete mockery of Jesus Christ's Passion and sufferings and the Catholic Church, i.e. Jesus did not suffer and die to justify sin… 

 

Council of Trent, On Justification - "CANON VIII.-If any one saith, that the fear of hell,-whereby, by grieving for our sins, we flee unto the mercy of God, or refrain from sinning,-is a sin, or makes sinners worse; let him be anathema."

 

Council of Trent, On Justification - "CANON XII.-If any one saith, that justifying faith is nothing else but confidence in the divine mercy which remits sins for Christ's sake; or, that this confidence alone is that whereby we are justified; let him be anathema."…

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Church

 

Subject: Forgiveness

 

May Our Merciful Lord Jesus grant his Mercy upon you for your lies and blasphemy against the Church. Your channel is nothing more than slander and gossip under a veil of truth.

TRUE believers in Christ will pray for you.

 

DivineMercy…

 

MHFM: No, it’s rooted in facts and irrefutable Catholic truth.  That’s why you can’t point to anything specific, but rather you can only make empty and unsupported accusations.  You don’t care about the truth or the facts.

 

Problem

 

Subject: Corapi

 

Dear Brother,

Do you have a problem with a voice that has authority? The people of the world need a voice of authority. Do you think God is going to have a 'flowery' tone in the last days?You haven't seen nothing yet. I believe Father Corapi has been placed in the programming of EWTN to give warning to the masses, especially the Catholics. I would also like to say that there is no "Change" in the doctrine of the faith and never will be. Every single part of Catholicism matters. All that was given 2000 years ago is to stay.

God Bless and may God give you true wisdom.

 

Creat….

 

MHFM: We have a problem with a voice that speaks heresy, denies the Catholic dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation, accepts Protestantism and false ecumenism, and celebrates the invalid New Mass, as Corapi does.  It’s pretty obvious that the facts presented in that video, concerning what he believes and how it contradicts Catholic truth, simply bounce off most of you as irrelevant. 

 

False Peace

 

Subject: False Peace – the Last Scourge of God

 

Dear MHFM Brothers,

 

Being updated in your website on a regular basis on matters of faith, morals and current events affecting Faith has sharpened my mind.  I’ve enjoyed very much your input on historical events affecting our Catholic Faith like your video on demonic French Revolution, articles on the Great Western Schism, Fatima Apparition that has something to do with World War I and II and the End Days … People who are correctly familiar with the World and Church History will agree with me that there seems to be an apparent PEACE nowadays reigning over us after the Vatican II Church successfully implemented the heretical ecumenism of all faiths. The entire Catholic world prior to the birth of abominable Vatican II Church has suffered an endless persecution from the start Christ established His Kingdom on Earth (Catholic Church).  We saw the persecution and mass murder of the first Christians and their followers, century after century Catholics who profess union with Christ and the Catholic Church suffer all sorts of persecutions and martyrdom like the murder of all Apostles of Christ and almost all the early Popes, persecution of early Christian during the Roman Empire, the Diocletian Persecution and during the Middle Ages, the rise of thousand heretical ideologies especially Islam and Reformation, the de-Christianization of France during French Revolution, Bolshevik Russian Revolution, Vietnam War, Philippine War, Mexican and Spanish War, the World War I and II that sent million Catholics to the grave, Communist State Empire in China that slaughtered millions of Catholics … almost all of these wars if one is truly aware is the war against God and His Church on earth – The Catholic Church.  No other religion suffers endless persecution except the Catholic Church and now that the Freemasons has penetrated the Vatican and now posing as the “Catholic Church” before the entire world … the most cunning and final deception Satan can employ against Christ’s Church on earth was done through Vatican II Church under the venomous veil of “ecumenism – union of all faiths”.   When this evil and heretical ideology of the Whore of Babylon has been announced to the world and accepted by millions of deceived Catholics – the use of force is no longer necessary.  The main objective of the use of violence and death for those following Christ thru His Church, the Roman Catholic Church, is for these Catholics to renounce their Faith and live in peace with the wicked world … this paved the way for continuous wars and revolutions for more than 2000 years.  And now that deceived Catholics unconsciously renounce their Catholic Faith, the use of arms is futile and we now see a very “peaceful world”.  However, this false peace is the greatest deception and last means of Satan in boasting against God that he could crush God’s Church on earth.  I am of the opinion that we won’t be seeing any violent war in the future against the paranoia of nuclear war … and this situation would persist until the Second Coming of Christ.  The Second Coming of Christ is preceded by almost NO faith among inhabitants on planet earth and I don’t think that there would be worse punishment than Vatican Council II Church and abominable New Mass …

 

Brothers Michael and Peter, I want to know your input on the above ideas of mine.  Now, I wonder not why there are no more true persecutions of the Catholics since most of the Catholics are no longer Catholics as they are ipso separated from the Mystical Body of Christ with their embracing heresy, schism and apostasy.

 

In Jesus and Mary,

Joey from the Philippines

 

MHFM: We think you make good points, and we agree with you in general about how we are currently living through a false peace.  That is definitely part of the deception of the Great Apostasy.  What’s most important has been taken away from people.  The world and what people think is the Church are being spiritually transformed while people are oblivious to it.  Events happen and the world takes notice, but only for a short time.  After a bit, they return to their godlessness as if nothing has occurred.  This coincides with the two realities: 1) that signs and events will happen in fulfillment of biblical prophecy; and 2) somehow most of the world will fail to recognize what’s happening.  The true faith and salvation are the only things that really matter in the end.  Hence, everything must be measured by them.  For that reason, what’s occurring in Rome, which has affected the spiritual makeup of the rest of the world, is the biggest indication of where we are.  If Satan removes the true faith from nations and church buildings, and if he organizes the fall of most into moral depravity and mortal sins of the flesh, he has what he desires and physical persecutions become unnecessary. 

 

Shocked

 

MHFM

 

… great job on the Heresy of the Week.  I was shocked as well on how heretical this antichrist has lately been speaking.  I thought last week's HOW on praising Jewish feast days was bad enough, but nooo... he had to follow up and mention it on another speech.  WHAT MORE COULD PEOPLE WANT?!?  Is right there in your face!!  Maybe he should
just tell the whole world that he is Jewish since he recognizes and believes it’s okay to celebrate Jewish feast days.

Also that quote on the missionaries to Japan, my comments are: We truly are in need of more laborers, all the time, as Our Lord taught us.  If these holy missionaries who went to Japan to convert the pagan Japan were  in so much need of more laborers to help out with the Evangelization... how much more are we in need today when people have now apostasized from the Faith?  We need Catholics to start spreading the Catholic Faith amongst the modern-day pagans, heretics, and all non-Catholics…

Thank you MHFM for you time.  God bless you and Mary protect you.

Let us Catholics (for those who have the time) pray an extra Rosary for the Feast of the Most Holy Rosary.  Through this powerful weapon we will conquer our enemies and convert non-Catholics.  Let us take advantage of the increased efficacy and graces which God has granted us Catholics for these end of times, so that we may glorify God the more, save our souls and convert non-Catholics so they can also save their souls.  This is it!  We are at war with the Antichrist!  Let's go into battle with our most powerful weapons, the Saving Crucifix on the right hand and the Most Holy Rosary on our left.

Holy Mary, Mother of God and Queen of the Holy Rosary, pray for us.

Sincerely,
Bernardo

 

Quote

 

Dear Brothers,

I recently read a TAN book called "St. Michael and the Angels" and, in it, I found a very interesting quote from St. Charles Borromeo regarding the Catholic Church and salvation. In a prayer entitled "Recommendation to One's Guardian Angel for a Happy Hour of Death," St. Charles says: "...In the full freedom of my will today, I come to charge you to speak for me at that fearful moment. You will say to Him, then, O my good angel: That *I wish to die in the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church in which all the saints since Jesus Christ have died, and out of which there is no salvation*..."" I think it's safe to say that St. Charles Borromeo /did not/ believe in universal salvation. Thank you.

Michael Dougherty

 

MHFM: He certainly didn’t believe in the heresy of universal salvation.  But he also didn’t believe that souls could be saved in false religions, which is what most “traditionalists,” including those who would claim to reject universal salvation, hold.

 

Harvest

 

MHFM: In Matthew chapter 9, Jesus Christ tells us that the harvest is great but the laborers are few.

 

Matthew 9:36-37- “Then he saith to his disciples, The harvest indeed is great, but the labourers are few.  Pray ye therefore the Lord of the harvest, that he send forth labourers into his harvest.”

 

We find an example of this in the 16th century mission to Japan.  At the time, Japan was a pagan nation and the Jesuit missionaries were having some success making converts in the pagan land.  However, there weren’t enough missionaries to fill the needs.

 

“There were scarcely enough priests to tend to the needs of the baptized Christians, let alone concentrate on the work of converting non-Christians, and Valignano himself observed: ‘It will never be possible to send as many laborers to Japan as are needed.’  Vice-Provincial Coelho substantiated this statement with concrete figures.  Writing in 1581 he noted that there were some sixty thousand Christians in Omura alone, but only four priests could be spared to work among them, although five times as many men would hardly be sufficient to administer to their needs adequately.  The missionaries were so few that they could not hear the confessions of even one-sixth of the Christian population in the fief every year, and consequently many of the faithful died without the consolation of receiving this sacrament.  The shortage of manpower also meant that the missionaries could not visit the Christian communities regularly, and some of the converts were not so well instructed in their religion as might be desired.” (Michael Cooper, Rodrigues the Interpreter – An Early Jesuit in Japan and China, Weatherhill, 1974, pp. 120-121)

 

Incredible

 

Subject: Benney and his apostates

 

It's simply incredible how openly the Vatican II sect, through apostate Benney openly declares the morals and dogmas not of the Roman Catholic Church, but the morals and dogmas of masonry.  "...Ever since the Second Vatican Council ..." Benney states.  That clearly means that the previous 20 councils spoke a different language.  Which means sacred tradition is out the window, folks.  It really doesn't take much insight to see what's happening here, does it?  Jesus Christ in present Rome dialoguing with Belial.  Present day Rome is not of Jesus Christ.  All true Roman Catholics have to know is that for 1900+years dialogue meant CONVERSION to the ONE true faith and His Roman Catholic Church.  Period! The language of Benney leads to Armageddon, folks.  Bless you Mhfm for opening our minds to the truth of Jesus Christ and His Church. 

 

Dea…

 

Obliteration

 

Subject: Obliteration

 

Thank you for all of your recent video posts and especially the one on that agent of Satan, B16 and his Church of the Obliteration of Jesus Christ.  As you have demonstrated time and time again, the adherents of the V2 sect need not be mental giants or theologians to figure it all out.  Said members of the Church of the Obliteration who recognize these Satanists as "popes" are totally without excuse.

 

Lee Ann 

 

What way?

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I visit your website everyday since you alerted me to the fact that Vatican 2 is fake of which I am very grateful.  It is not easy to discover that most of your life has been a lie and is also very upsetting.  I think this is why most people resist the truth and no matter how much evidence you present they will still reject what you say. 

 

I watched your video 'Is this the end of the world' which I enjoyed a lot.  You mentioned the attempted assassination of John Paul 2 and said that the meeting between JP2 and his assassin was part of the deception.  In what way?...

  

God bless

Christie

 

MHFM: Our video Is the World about to End? explains in detail how the assassination attempt was part of the deception.  The meeting after the fact with Ali Agca, the one who attempted to assassinate John Paul II, was also part of the deception.  That’s because the footage showed an up close, apparently heart to heart meeting between the two.  The story was that John Paul II forgave his attempted killer.  Hence, members of the Vatican II sect became further convinced that John Paul II is a “saint” and is “holy”; for, they said, “look at how he forgave the one who attempted to kill him.”  “Look at how John Paul II persuaded that man to change or reconsider.”  It enhanced the false reputation of the beast, and confirmed (in the minds of the deceived) what the false apparitions were telling them: that is, that John Paul II is “Mary’s pope” – a story which those with the true faith know is a lie beyond comprehension.

 

New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video about the CNN host who was just fired for saying that Jews run CNN and the other news networks:

 

Analysis of CNN's firing of Rick Sanchez for saying Jews control CNN [video]

 

How

 

Subject: How

 

Brothers,

 

How discouraging to read some of the E-Exchanges on your site of those that slander the true word of God. Accusing you of actually going out of your way to make all this up. How very true the fact that these lost souls are merely following a figure-head (anti-pope) of a false religion orchestrated by Freemasons.  How these two-faced anti-popes are ultimately responsible for the condition of the world today as they sit on their hands and do nothing except praise all the other false religions in order to please their father Satan, and then try to act Catholic by some false means. How deceived and brainwashed they all have become in these modern (last) times as they fail to recognize the times we are in. How convenient your material is available in print, audio and video for ease of understanding, though the bad-willed have closed off all means of understanding, due to their pride (sin).

How Noe ever got the ark built at the age of 600, after having to deal with all the daily visits from all the slanderers is a miracle in itself.  A shame that when the rain came it was to late for the non-believers that missed the boat.

God Bless your work,

 

Tom Miles

 

Wrote

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Richard who wrote in about the Jews obviously has no idea that it is the Jews who have tricked him into believing that the Jews are still special in God's eyes, i.e. by still having a covenant with God - No, the covenant with the Jews was ended when Jesus Christ - the Messiah, God made flesh - died on the Cross. It's another example of the profound and dark influence the Jews with power control. Of course, a person of bad will will be inclined to believe lies too.

 

JJG who wrote in needs to listen to Fr. Corapi (Fr. Crappy) and realize that the lies and heresies that he (Fr. Corapi) declares are from Satan. JJG is obviously a member of Fr. Corapi's cult since he resorts to insults and intimidation to "pursuade" people, rather than the facts and truth. Surely MHFM is Catholic, as is easily proven by simply a momentary glance at only their website's Home-page, but followers of Fr. Corapi's crap wouldn't bother using their eyes or brain since they are members of a pedophile's sect (V-2 sect). JJG is truly weak and pathetic. What a shame and embarrassment.

 

Thank you for posting the videos on how the Jews control the media and on the phony art students who are actually Iraeli spies. It's more proof of Jewish control issues that honest people love to see exposed, but that liars hate and want to hide. It's also shocking to see the burka being enforced in English schools - not surprising when their "Archbishop" Rowan Williams says Shariah (Islamic) law is "unavoidable":   http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7232661.stm (BBC, 2008)

 

God Bless,

 

Chris  

 

Corapi

 

The bullcrap you posted about Father Corapi on you tube sounds like it came from the mouth of satan...........are you people some kind of a cult?  Surely you people are not Catholic, or do not understand what it means to be Catholic.  I think you are actually protestants posing as Catholics on a bogus website.   How pathetic.
 

JJG

 

MHFM: It’s interesting that you can’t bring up anything specific from our videos on Corapi which you think is false.  That is cowardly and dishonest.  If you tried to bring up something specific, it would be demonstrated that what we said is true and that you are completely wrong.  You are actually a Protestant posing as a Catholic.  You accept Vatican II, Corapi and Antipope Benedict XVI who all profess communion with Protestants.  They all believe that Protestants have salvation (contrary to Catholic teaching) and that Protestants are not in heresy.  If you were not so spiritually blind and of bad will, you would realize that Corapi denies Catholic teaching just like the Protestants do. Speaking about the conflict between Protestants and professing Catholics in Ireland, “Fr.” John Corapi declared: “I don’t care if you’re Baptist or Catholic; you are Christian.  Just practice it.”  That is blatantly heretical. 

 

You are a complete disgrace and an enemy of God headed right for Hell.  You should carefully consider the facts we bring up, learn Catholic teaching and convert.

 

Comment

 

Subject: Another response to “Don’t”

 

Oinky...


If you want your opinion heard then call Most Holy Family Monastery and challenge them to a debate that can be placed on youtube.  I am sure that your challenge, of your opinion versus the truth, will be accepted.  Then thousands of people will be able to hear your opinion, as well as the truth.

Paul

 

Package

 

MHFM,

 

I just want to say THANK YOU!!! I just got my package in today and I am just amazed at how much my eyes are open to the TRUE Church now! I went to the Traditional Latin Mass for the first time ever this past Sunday and wow how different the true Mass is... Bella Dodd was absolutely right when she said "you will not recognize the Catholic Church". I use to think my grandfather was so harsh when he use to say "if you aren't Catholic you're going to hell" Well I couldn't agree more now and now I know why because that is what the true church has always taught. Thank you so much, my God bless you in all your research and spread of the TRUTH!!

 

Amanda

 

Deceptive

 

Subject: Deceptive V-2 “priest” comments on ‘Outside the Church’… dogma

 

MHFM,

 

We are truly living in the time of the Great Apostasy.  I recently had a short conversation with a “priest” in the Novus Ordo in which I had pointed out to him the dogma “Outside the Church there is no salvation.” I demonstrated (thanks to your material) how Vatican II flatly rejects this dogma and, therefore, cannot possibly be Catholic. He responded with the following:

 

“Unfortunately, you have gotten ahold of literature which seeks to cast doubts on the legitimacy of Vatican II, by sowing the seeds of confusion concerning the doctrine of "outside the Church there is no salvation."

The teaching of Florence was addressed to those who obstinately hold fast to error regarding the true nature of Christ and that of the one, true Church. Those who are obstinate and refuse to embrace the truth will not be saved.

However, please remember that most Jews and most Muslims are not obstinately holding fast to error. Rather, their conscience tells them that their doctrines are true, and they sincerely hold fast to the dictate of their conscience.

The Catholic Church preaches the true Faith with the understanding that we must convince people in their conscience they must understand the faith. If you look up all the traditional teachings about conscience, you will read quite clearly that the Catholic Church does not want people to violate their conscience.”

His response is truly evil.

 

By the way, I have noticed how common it’s become for followers of the Vatican II sect, when presented with Catholic dogma which clearly contradicts the many heresies of Vatican II sect, the antipopes, etc., they excuse these heresies by bringing up so-called “doctrinal development.” They say “our understanding of doctrine develops” and no longer means what it used to mean. How utterly deceptive and diabolical!

 

Thank you for opening our eyes to the Truth and exposing the phony church for what it is.

 

Sincerely,

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  What he says about the Church’s teaching and the dogmatic definitions on that issue couldn’t be more untrue.

 

Understand

 

i don't understand why are you against jew.they are chosen people and god said thourgh jew people everyone  will be blessed . true catholics love jews. have a nice day.

 

Richard

 

MHFM: First, we don’t hate Jews.  We desire the conversion and eternal happiness of all the Jews.  When we discuss Jews or Muslims or members of any other religion, we deal with facts and reality.  If we discuss the influence of a particular group, it’s because it’s rooted in fact and it should be known. 

 

Second, you err when you say that Jews are the chosen people and that through them God will bless everyone.  That’s not the case since Christ has come.  Those who don’t accept Christ are no longer the chosen people.  Regarding the “blessing,” you are obviously referring to God’s promise to Abraham.  As Galatians 3 teaches, only those who accept Christ (not Jews) are heirs to the promise. 

 

Galatians 3:14- "That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Christ Jesus: that we may receive the promise of the spirit by faith.”

 

Pope St. Gregory the Great (c. 590): “… if you be Christ’s then you are the seed of Abraham (Gal. 3:29).  If we because of our faith in Christ are deemed children of Abraham, the Jews therefore because of their perfidy have ceased to be His seed.”

 

Pope St. Leo the Great, Dogmatic Letter to Flavian (449), read at Council of Chalcedon (451): “The promises were spoken to Abraham and his seed.  He does not say “to his seeds” – as if referring to multiplicity – but to a single one, ‘and to thy seed,’ which is Christ (Gal. 3:16).”

 

Respond

 

I would like to respond to Jose regarding babies who die without baptism, my wife and I also lost a baby due to miscarriage but yes that is the teaching of the church because all things are always before God, past, present and future God knows you before you are born, he knows how you will turn out before you are born.  Obviously God saw that this baby would not be saved anyway if He allowed the baby to be born, he or she would have suffered hell with fire but instead the soul of the baby suffers hell without fire, one can see God’s mercy in that!!!  I understand how you feel Jose but you are looking at it from an emotional level and not the reality of Jesus' teaching on baptism.  If you also look at what Jesus says about how many are saved {few} then you can have a better understanding about how things really are, especially in these endtimes.   Please spend a lot of time studying the Brothers website because there you will find the teachings of the church before the evil vatican ll council.   

 

Todd


Outside

 

Subject: Outside the Church There is No Salvation

 

Hi, my name is Jose and I'm 29 years old. I attened an SSPX chapel. I have a concern about what I've heard you teach on outside the church there is no salvation. I'm not writting to argue with you for I Agree with you in almost all topics. I still have some concerns obviously. we are living in a time of great confusion. I have always had doubts about the validity of the modernist pope(s). In watching your videos there is no question in my mind that these modern popes are teaching and commiting heresies, thus resulting in the chair of Peter to be vacant. I do not believe and hold as the SSPX that the popes are heretics and still hold the chair. A heretic cannot be pope period. thus comes my next concern, why are we not electing a true pope. couldn't we gather all the traditional bishops of the world that reject Vatican II into a (mini) council and discuss the differences and try to come to some kind of an agreement and then elect a pope who would guide the true Catholic Church?
    Back to my original question.It seems to me that your point of "outside the church there is no salvation" a little bit radical. Don't get me wrong, this is a doctrine that i Firmly believe. I am married to a non-catholic and I tell her that she will not be saved if she is to die outside the church. But in the matter of infants that are not baptized are they condemned? I haven't heard you say directly that they will go to hell. but if you do believe that what about Limbo? I ask because there are always exeptions with what scripture says like for instance, an scripture says all have sinned there is not one just, yet we believe that our Lady was an exeption to this. We had a misscarriage and I wonder about the soul of my unborn child, is it condemed to hell? There was nothing that child could do and the same for me. Even if I wanted to baptize my child it was imposible for me to do that. if the child would have been born it would have baptized. I don't think that if the child would be in danger of damnation God would make it imposible to save him with the waters of baptism and beliebe me this was an imposible situation. So there has to be exeptions on this teaching as well. I don't think they go to the kingdom of heaven but neighther do I think they go to hell. isn't this where Limbo comes in?...

 

MHFM: First, we are allowed to recognize that there is no pope, but we aren’t able to elect a new pope.  That’s because the pope is the bishop of Rome, and only the college of cardinals or the clergy and people of Rome can elect a true bishop of Rome.  Therefore, the “election” of someone in the U.S. by people in the U.S. would have no validity, even if that person were fully Catholic and a bishop.  Moreover, the independent “traditionalist” bishops you refer to are not fully Catholic.  They believe the same as the Novus Ordo: that souls can be saved in any religion and even while worshipping any false god one can imagine.

 

You obviously have a problem with faith.  Contrary to what you say, there are no exceptions to dogmatic definitions.  If there were, papal infallibility would be false and God would be a liar (which is a blasphemous assertion).  Scripture tells us that it’s impossible for God to lie (Heb. 6:18).  Your argument that the Bible teaches that all men have sinned misses the mark.  It’s something we’ve addressed before.  In Romans, St. Paul is speaking in the context of all the nations.  Thus, he is not saying that all men without exception have sinned, but rather that all the nations (both Jews and Gentiles) are under sin.  In addition, the analogy fails because dogmatic definitions and magisterial teachings (not Scripture passages) are our proximate rule of faith.  That means that while Scripture and dogmatic definitions are both infallible, dogmatic definitions set forth what we must believe about Scripture in precise and literal formulas of faith.  These admit of no deviation or departure from their declared meaning (Vatican I).

 

You also reject the notion that unbaptized babies can’t be saved.  You need to read our salvation book.  The idea that they can be saved has been condemned by numerous dogmatic councils (Florence and Trent).  Limbo is a part of Hell where there is no fire.  It’s a blatant heresy to believe what you believe, and you can’t be saved holding it.  At this time, one must say that you really doubt God’s revelation and His protection over the infallible teaching of the Church.  That’s very serious, and going to the Latin Mass will not be of any benefit until you have the faith.

 

Series

 

Your video series in "Is the world about to End?" is really well done. It's really amazing that you were able to connect the biblical prophecies with the past and current events. I just want to know your opinion if the recent wildfires that occurred in different places simultaneously such as portugal, and others are mention in the Apocalypse. I watched it all over the news, some of them I already forgot what places did the wildfires and "heat waves" occur.

And in Siberia and known cold region is having a heat waves, and high-temp climates that the ice starts to melt. I think these events is the fulfillment of the prophecy that "the sun will be given power to scorch people with fire" in the book of Apocalypse. They say that these events never happened before. It is amazing that it happened right after or before the gulf of Mexico oil spill.

I am looking forward for your next videos. God Bless.

Glenn

 

Response

 

Subject: Response to “Don’t”  

 

MHFM youtube videos bring extremely important commentaries out in the open, commentaries which you will find nowhere else in the world. These commentaries are instrumental in leading souls to a knowledge of the one, true faith. They get people interested in what that have to do right now in these times in order to hold the traditional Catholic faith.

   MHFM wants youtube viewers to focus on the videos and not the outside opinions that would otherwise accompany them. MHFM does not want anything to distract people from watching and listening to their videos. It is critical to get as many people as possible to see these videos.

   MHFM is trying to get the word out about what is really going on with the Church today. Since it is such a unique situation certain measures should be taken to ensure that nothing gets in the way. The truth of Jesus Christ and His one, true Church is what matters. Saving one's soul is what matters. Opinions can be set aside for the moment. The traditional Catholic faith is of a higher priority.

TD

 

New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video:

 

Benedict XVI's Role in the Sex Abuse Crisis [video]

 

 

Read

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

It's great to read some of your readers happier experiences, amid the confusion and blindness of the times....people who are not afraid to stand up for what they truly believe in, when everyone else is 'losing their heads'. 

And so, to people like , Christina, thank you for sharing your moment...you are an inspiration and an encouragement for other parents out there,  in the raising of their children in the Cathoilc faith at a very early age...

As the Jesuit motto has it, " give me the child before he is seven, and I will show you the man”…

God bless,

David 

 

Don’t

 

Hello,

You seem to think you know everything that there is to know about the World. But you do not!

You dont let people have an opinion on your Youtube channel means to me you're no better than a Hitler

 

Oinky…

 

Comment

 

Brothers:

I want to reply to the reader who posted the account of her daughter singing the words to the Our Father. I offer a similar incident. My son James is 4. Recently we were watching the Third Secret DVD from MHFM and when Brother Michael made the point that anti-pope John Paul II believed that "every man is God," James immediately piped up with a bit of indignation, saying, "Every man is NOT God! There is only ONE God!" It was great. What an apostle!

Take care and God bless you all.

Joseph Ramirez

 

EENS

 

Brothers,

 

I was recently discussing EENS with a Novus Ordo "conservative" who believes that at the moment of death, Jesus can give anyone that one last chance to convert.   I pointed out to him that that makes the idea of missionary work meaningless since there would be no reason to go to pagan lands to convert them.   His reply still has my head spinning.

 

He said, "No authentic missionary thinks about converting a person.  Conversion is the work of the Holy Spirit...."

 

There was a quote you gave from a Pope around the time that the New World was being settled that expressed the  absolute necessity that missionary work was being done to spread the Gospel in the Americas thereby saving souls.   I can't remember where I saw it in your material so could you possibly send me that quote or post it with this email on your webpage. 

 

Thank you

-W. J. W.

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  It’s true that a person could convert just before death, but that would require an actual conversion: a real reception of the faith and baptism, combined with a repudiation of that person’s previous false religion.  What he probably meant is that anyone at the moment of death (even without proof of conversion) might be counted as possibly having been converted; for “we can’t plumb the mysteries of what occurs in the human conscience” or some kind of similar nonsense.  His statement that no missionary thinks about converting a person is astounding and of course quite heretical.  It reveals that once the salvation dogma is denied, it’s over.  Everyone who believes in “baptism of desire” denies that dogma and, in the process, the entire Catholic faith.  Perhaps the quote below is the one you had in mind.  It’s also cited in our book, Outside the Catholic Church There is Absolutely No Salvation.

 

In his Bull Sublimus Dei, Pope Paul III addresses the question of the Indians in the “recently discovered” New World.  Speaking in the context of those above the age of reason, Pope Paul III declares that they are capable of receiving the Faith, and he reiterates the teaching of tradition that not one of them can be saved without faith in Jesus Christ.

 

Pope Paul III, Sublimus Dei, May 29, 1537: “The sublime God so loved the human race that He created man in such wise that he might participate, not only in the good that other creatures enjoy, but endowed him with capacity to attain to the inaccessible and invisible Supreme Good and behold it face to face; and since man, according to the testimony of the sacred scriptures, has been created to enjoy eternal life and happiness, which none may obtain save through faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, it is necessary that he should possess the nature and faculties enabling him to receive that faith; and that whoever is thus endowed should be capable of receiving that same faith. Nor is it credible that any one should possess so little understanding as to desire the faith and yet be destitute of the most necessary faculty to enable him to receive it. Hence Christ, who is the Truth itself, that has never failed and can never fail, said to the preachers of the faith whom He chose for that office 'Go ye and teach all nations.' He said all, without exception, for all are capable of receiving the doctrines of the faith…By virtue of Our apostolic authority We define and declare by these present letters… that the said Indians and other peoples should be converted to the faith of Jesus Christ by preaching the word of God and by the example of good and holy living.”

 

These quotes are also relevant.

 

Pope Leo XIII (1902): “By his (Christopher Columbus’) toil another world emerged from the unsearched bosom of the ocean: hundreds of thousands of mortals have, from a state of blindness been raised to the common level of the human race, reclaimed from savagery to gentleness and humanity; and, greatest of all, by the acquisition of those blessings of which Jesus Christ is the author, they have been recalled from destruction to eternal life.” (Encyclical, Quarto Abrupto)

 

Pope Gregory XVI, Probe Nostis (#6), Sept. 18, 1840: “We are thankful for the success of apostolic missions in America, the Indies, and other faithless lands…They search out those who sit in darkness and the shadow of death to summon them to the light and life of the Catholic religion… At length they snatch them from the devil’s rule, by the bath of regeneration and promote them to the freedom of God’s adopted sons.”

 

Watched

 

Subject: Catholic faith versus others

 

I just watched all 11 parts of Is the world about to end, This was very well done, But I have some questions,I am not trying to put you or anyone elses down just want to know the truth in Christ. Now you say that the Catholic Church is the true Church. And You put down what the Pope has said. Do you not have to follow him? or any other Catholic Church. I just want to understand, I dont go to any Church at this time, But I do belive in Jesus and his word through faith, I just want to get to the church that teaches christ. I just want the true Jesus, The father of Abraham, Issaac,Jacob.The true God, That is the journey that I am on at this time before we see the end. Sorry for a long e-mail just need some answers and for you to pray for me,

 

Thanks Mike C.

 

MHFM: Mike, according to the teaching of the Catholic Church, Benedict XVI is proven to be an antipope, not a true pope.  That's why we don't follow him.  Also, it's not enough for salvation to claim to believe in Jesus.  Jesus founded a Church, and taught many things.  Those things are only kept in the traditional Catholic faith.  To be saved it’s necessary to accept that faith and become a Catholic.  We would recommend our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.

 

Revelation

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Consideration of the Feast of St. Michael should really drive home to Catholics (and others of good will) why there can be no salvation outside of the true Catholic Church, as the true Popes have always assured us.  And as St. John also makes clear, it's simply a question of free will.  In John I, in speaking of the Word of God, he says of Him:  "That was the true light, which enlighteneth every man that cometh into this world".  Notice, he says "every" man.

 

And who imagines that he is like unto God?  All those men do who, imitating Lucifer, reject God's Revelation to creatures, and make themselves - or other men - the Source of Revelation.  Lucifer was the first Protestant, and the founder of all man-made/creature-made "religions".

 

That's why the degree of rejection doesn't matter: one obstinate denial of one dogma is enough.  Either you hold that Revelation is from God, or it's not - and, practically speaking, adherence to one heresy always leads to the embrace of others.  Either God reveals or the creature reveals (often by "editing"  or "explaining away" the Revelation of God, as we have seen so many try to do).  And the creature "revealing" could be oneself, Martin Luther, Jacob Amman, or any one of a thousand others.

 

Even Archbishop Lefebvre.  See how false "traditionalists" keep digging themselves in deeper and deeper - denying more and more of Church teaching - simply because they will not admit that Archbishop Lefebvre was wrong.  Wrong about his holding of the dogma-denying and man-made "doctrine" of BOD, and wrong about his failure to apply authentic Church teaching (as you have) to declare the V2 gang of thieves to be heretics and antipopes.  No doubt, the Lefebvrites will now call upon their people to pray for the "pope" whom (they will say) is being attacked by the media, while Gruner assures people that this B-16 is the "suffering pope" who, along with the abuse of children by "priests", was foretold in the secret of Fatima!  Sickening.

 

God bless you for teaching us the true Catholic Faith.

 

Lee Ann

 

Distortions

 

Subject: The liar John Salza

 

Thank you, Brother Peter, for unmasking the distortions of John Salza, as well as explaining (almost by a reverse engineering method) the way he acts.

Too bad he was careful enough to avoid a confrontation, since it would have been tremendous to see him and his falsehoods falling down in a live talk. 

 

I don´t think I can say much, aside from what you and your readers have said so far. The only relevant fact that comes to my mind is the realization that the contortionist Salza uses in fact a method similar to the Salvation heretics. The denial of the Salvation dogma is indeed the grand-mother of all modern heresies. Once you can explain "Outside the Church there is NO SALVATION" as meaning that people outside the Church can be saved, there´s salvation for them (emanating from the Church), in essence, that there is in fact Salvation outside the Church (the complete opposite of the misleading title), then you can get away with just about anything. Just like he did, and you exposed.

 

It´s only because people were able to digest the Salvation Fraud (or at least in large part thanks to it) that John Salza manages to be effective in deceiving people

 

In one of your old radio shows, Brother Peter explained how the Faithful  (on their own) anathematized the heretical Bishop Nestorious (realizing that he in fact had anathematized himself) after he gave clear and unmistakable signs of deviation from the True Faith.

 

According to the Catholic authorities, the people at the time acted in legitimate Catholic manner, gave the True Catholic Response to the situation. But for the amazingly dishonest contortionist Salza, the people acted very wrongly. They should have waited, otherwise they would be "lunching the dinner".  Again, according to Salza, even if Nestorious (or Benedict XVI) decided to spit on a picture of Our Lady, or a Crucifix, or the Gospel, of the Eucharist, and after that teared off his clothes and started to run around in circles with fingers pointing up like horns in his head while screaming "I´m the Devil´s Son!!!!!" he would still retain jurisdiction (not to mention his office intact) and people would have to wait for an official declaration regarding his status before jumping to any conclusions. 

 

Give me a break. What a sick joke...

 

CK

 

MP3

 

Dear MHFM,

 
… Also I used to have a CD of yours with hours of audio including debates and talks on the important topics regarding Catholicism…
 
Also on this topic I wanted to say that I enjoyed the audio CD greatly and even more than the DVDs. I would listen to that all time and it really helped me memorize the arguments and facts regarding the important issues. I deeply hope that you compile another CD that is very long like the first one- with new material and deep discussions regarding all your issues.
 
Thanks most sincerely,
 
Ed O Donnell

 

Comment

 

TO MOST HOLY FAMILY MONASTERY:

 

     All of the SSPX Chapels this Saturday, October 2nd, are having a Mass (the local chapel here a procession, picnic, etc.) for the intention of the "Consecration of Russia" to Her Immaculate Heart.  In the book "What Happened to the Catholic Church Since Vatican II", the chapter on Fatima is brilliantly explained… how the Consecration already took place on July 7, 1952, by Pope Pius XII.

 

     When explaining this to a friend, he said, "Oh yes, I remember the nuns of Charity taught us the same thing, that the Consecration was made, by Pope Pius XII".  This man went to grade school in the 1950's.

 

     Yet, one of the many false slanders against Most Holy Family Monastery is "they're making their own rules up".

 

     Well it seems as some of these major "traditional" groups, who hurl the same calumny toward them, as the SSPX, are actually the ones making up their own rules, going against what the True Catholic Church teaches, and manifesting this on Saturday.

 

     May God continue to bless your work at Most Holy Family Monastery.

 

-  Nancy

 

Part 5 Posted

 

MHFM: Part 5 of this discussion has been posted.  There are only a few more parts to go.  Part 5 gets into more of his massive contradictions.

 

John Salza's Errors on Sedevacantism - Part 5 [video]

John Salza's Errors on Sedevacantism - Part 4 [video]

 

John Salza's Errors on Sedevacantism - Part 1 [video]

John Salza's Errors on Sedevacantism - Part 2 [video]

John Salza's Errors on Sedevacantism - Part 3 [video]

 

Share

 

Subject: Joy

 

I just wanted to share my joy from two nights ago. I was putting laundry away in my daughters room while she happily played with her toys. I was in the mood to sing some prayers and received a great surprise. After I finished the Our Father, she sang it back at me. So beautiful! She will be 3 this Saturday and I feel very blessed that Our Lord let me find the truth about what happened to the Catholic Church before I had her baptized by a counterfeit priest in the counterfeit church of Satan, and that i will be able to raise my daughter right! Soon I think she will be saying other prayers from memory and am excited to see what will be next. Sadly, of all the people I know directly, I'm the only person teaching their child to pray at a young age. I know many who are choosing to "not push religion on my child". Even more disgusting, many are teaching their children to be flirty and "check out" the opposite sex at this tender age! These kids have no chance! It is horrible and I don't care if they're so called "good people" or family members - I can't expose my daughter to them or their children….

 

Also, picking up where the letter from "convert" left off, I have to also testify to the power of the Holy Rosary. This prayer can absolutely work miracles... Thank You MHFM, for defending the One True Faith!

 

Christina Kalix

 

How far

 

Brothers,

The YouTube video series on "What the Pope Knew" goes to show how far people without any knowledge of the faith or backbone will go to protect and support these anti-popes. What justice is being provided by the 'Vatican-II Protector of Justice', other than to protect the criminal anti-popes? No concern at all for the victims or the fact the anti-pope has done nothing to correct the problem. Any good-willed person should be hearing bells and whistles going off that something is wrong. The "Sheep's Clothing" (the human skin) that protects these beasts from being recognized for what they really are, will one day disappear when Jesus Christ reveals their wicked souls and sends them back to their Hellish Father Satan.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

Ship

 

MHFM: This is a somewhat interesting story about the 16th century sea voyages from Portugal to Asia.  Missionaries, as well as others looking for prosperity in distant lands, would make the extremely long, difficult and hazardous trip.  The conditions on board these ships were excruciating for a variety of reasons.  This is a somewhat interesting (and humorous) quote about one such voyage:

 

“It would be a mistake, however, to assume that every voyage to Asia was a nightmare of storms, disease, and starvation, and there are not a few contemporary accounts reporting a fair and prosperous passage to India.  During the voyage of Sebastiao Gonclaves in 1562, only two men died of illness and two others fell overboard and were drowned; apart from the standard overcrowding, plus a storm and a fire on board, the Jesuit had little to complain about what he termed ‘one of the best voyages to India so far.’  In fact, some welcome relief to the general tedium on board was afforded by a zealous missionary who threw into the sea a worldly book belonging to one of the passengers; on being attacked by the irate owner, he defended himself by biting the man in the arm, but then happily effected a reconciliation by compensating the passenger with three spiritual books in exchange.” (Michael Cooper, Rodrigues the Interpreter – An Early Jesuit in Japan and China, Weatherhill, 1974, p. 32)

 

Spain

 

Hail Mary Dimond Brothers

First of all thanks for the very good work of your monastery in spreading the Faith and unmasking these "wolves in sheep´s clothing" so called "traditionalists" like John Salza.

I would like to share with you my own witnessing of the end signals that everyday assault our former Catholic world.

In my country Spain which was in ages past one of the most catholic countries, we witness as the Socialist Government, not content with corrupting the young with a signature which promotes homosexual lifestile, religious indifferentism, etc, is going to slowly demolish the Basilica where the martyrs of the spanish civil war remain buried!!

You can check the images on this site, but it’s in spanish: http://www.elvalledeloscaidos.es/ (scroll down a bit to see the images of Our Lady being prepared to be demolished)

Not only that, but they also pretend to will kick off the (novus ordo of course) 'beneditine monks' of the monastery annexed to the Basilica.  Altough the faith has long departed from these lands (as a result of the V-2 apostasy), nevertheless the symbolism of the tearing down of this gigantic cross-monument and the violation of the dead people who gave their lives in the past to prevent the Christian faith to be erased by marxism is very significative!!

It´s as if it is a clear sign that we are in the end times, and the powers of hell will be set loose upon the face of the earth (permitted by God as a punishment of sin) until the Second Coming of Christ!!

In front of scenarios like these, and the total immorality and indifference of GOd in the lifestyle of the people, it´s no wonder it the Apocalypse it is written that the martyrs "...cried out a loud voice, saying: How long, O lord dos thou not judge and revenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?"  much of people who enjoy the pace times they had thanks to the sacrifice of the Cristians of the past, but instead of being grateful, they swear, get drunk, fornicate, and live a life like nothing matters!!

Blessings brothers, I will keep you in my prayers, which is the most powerful weapon all we catholics have in these times!

Marco

Study

 

Brothers,

 

According to this AP news story I found on Yahoo, "Forty-five percent of Roman Catholics who participated in the study didn't know that, according to church teaching, the bread and wine used in Holy Communion is not just a symbol, but becomes the body and blood of Christ."

 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_rel_religious_literacy_poll

 

Sadly, in the Novus Ordo Church, it's the other 55% that actually got it wrong.  Of course, either way you look at it, it's a MESS.

 

-Will

 

Comment

 

Subject: St. Alphonsus, Salza heretic

 

Dear Brothers,
 
That's a great new section with quotes from St. Alphonsus Liguori's book, The History of Heresies and their Refutation. Thank you. It shows all those liberal heretcs, schismatics and apostates who believe in the heresies of "baptism of desire/blood" and "invincible ignorance" out there that true Catholics judge and denounce heresies - and St. Alphonsus Liguori did so well before he was made a saint - he wrote books refuting heresies!!! He doesn't pull any punches when it comes to condemning Mohammed and the Muslims, and neither should he. Anyone can see how satanically aggressive Islamists are, as well as their sympathizers. Islam is a carnal and murderous religion which believes that suicide is "noble" when in the cause of Jihad ("holy war"). So Muslims are like Judas, though Muslims have never even believed that Jesus is God. It proves that Antipope John Paul II's act of heresy, kissing the Koran, was the kiss of Judas - and that the Vatican II sect is the religion of Judas, Judaism, which accepts any religion that's not Catholic.
 
Thank you also for the videos refuting the heretic John Salza. To say that the heresies of the 5 Vatican II Antipopes are not public would probably even offend the Antipopes themselves because they go out of their way to show the world that "the Catholic Church no longer condemns Non-Catholics," and that "Finally! There is salvation outside the Catholic Church!" John Salza’s argumentation is specifically designed to pull the reader into a jungle of Canon laws to trick the average reader into missing the whole point of the Gospel, that God Incarnate (Jesus Christ) died for our sins and that one must be a member of His Church (the Catholic Church) in order to be saved from hell. Also, Salza'a blatant contradictions are so bold that the average reader would not pick them up - but they're there! It's like 9/11 where the evidence that it was a controlled demolition is everywhere, but most people don't care. To say a pope who excommunicates himself still keeps the Papal jurisdiction might intimidate the average person into thinking, "Wow! This guy really understands the finer points of canon law because what appears to be a blatant contradiction is actually a legitimate fact." - WRONG! It's John Salza who's an undeclared contradiction because he prints lies faster than the Devil flies! It appears that John Salza wants glory and fame in this life now, but at the expense of soul. Very sad, Salza.
 
Matthew 22:11-14 - "And the king went in to see the guests: and he saw there a man who had not on a wedding garment. And he saith to him: Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? But he was silent. Then the king said to the waiters: Bind his hands and feet, and cast him into the exterior darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. For many are called, but few are chosen."
 
God Bless,
 
Chris White

 

Story

 

Subject: Story about a V2 priest

 

Hi Brothers,

My friends are getting their baby baptized in the V2 anti-church, and I have explained to them that I will have nothing to do with the event and have declined to be the Godfather.  But that's not the interesting part, so the mother is going to nursing school and she learned there that anyone can validly baptize because the nurses used to do it to
the babies who they thought weren't going to make it.  It turns out that the "priest" who is going to be baptizing their baby argued with the mother about this point - he's fresh out of seminary - and he thought that only priests could baptize.  Furthermore, he then proceeded to argue that Lutherans are in the same church as Catholics.  And then he argued that the only person who was born without original sin was the Virgin Mary, according to this guy   "Christ had to be baptized to get rid of his original sin" - this is what a newly minted v2 "priest" sounds like.   Just thought I'd share.


Patrick

 

MHFM: That’s very interesting.  Thanks for the e-mail.

 

Comment

 

Brothers,

Thank-you for the sending the latest audio edition #7.  I was surprised to see the new audio compact disk contains 343 audio segments along with two versions of the contents list in both word and excel formats.  Great things come in small packages.

I'd also like to comment on the wickedness of this world. Ex-Pres. and NWO Bush once said that, "If you’re not with us you’re against us!" This seems to be the theme of this wicked world as both secular and false religions (including the VII sect) place themselves on the same level playing field.  We are beginning to see more and more groups of people being added to their terrorist lists for ridiculous reasons.  Eventually, (The Faithful Remnant) who stand firm in God's protection and do not give into the ways of the world, will be the few that are once again the so-called terrorists as seen in history. Without the mark of the beast on their heads (the secular wicked way of thinking), they will not, nor want not, to make a living along side these wicked beasts.

John 3:17-21.  "For God sent not his Son into the world, to judge the world, but that the world may be saved by him.  He that believeth in him is not judged. But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God.  And this is the judgment: because the light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than the light: for their works were evil.  For every one that doth evil hateth the light, and cometh not to the light, that his works may not be reproved.  But he that doth truth, cometh to the light, that his works may be made manifest, because they are done in God."

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

“Franciscans”

 

Subject: “Franciscans”

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery: 

 

In contemplating the mocking of Christ of the Third Sorrowful Mystery—Jesus is Crowned with Thorns—here is what Fr. von Cochem has to say in his Life of Christ:

 

“Each insult was received with shouts of laugher.  Every clumsy joke made at His expense and every piece of coarse buffoonery played upon Him excited still more their rude hilarity, and their cruel desire to plague and ridicule Him…HIS EYES WERE FILLED WITH BLOOD, HIS FACE PALE WITH THE INTENSE AGONY OF THE THORNY CROWN, HIS WHOLE BODY SEAMED AND TORN WITH THE THONGS OF THE SCOURGES; yet in spite of this, they ceased not to add to His sufferings and to insult Him with vile words and vulgar jests till they wearied of their sport.”

 

Now go look at the Franciscans on You Tube.  Go see these modern-day Roman soldiers mocking Christ 2,000 years later.  See it.  See how the soldiers danced.  See them.  Do not mistake it.  This is the dancing that Christ saw done before Him 2,000 years ago.  It is IDENTICAL.  It is the identical movements done in the mocking of Christ. 

 

And this evil was performed in front of the Basilica of Santa Maria degli Angeli e dei Martiri.  That’s right, St. Mary of the Angels and the Martyrs.  Holy Mary, our Blessed Mother, whom, by the way, saw how the soldiers danced in front of her Son.  Our Blessed Mother witnessed it as Ven. Mary of Agreda has written.

 

These Franciscans have gone off the deep end.  That performance was rehearsed too; it wasn’t spontaneous.  Apparently, they want to spend eternity in the company of Salome.

 

Brothers, thank you for your continued work in bringing about the reign of Christ the King.  Your analysis of the writings and speeches perpetrated by masons (B16 and Salza)teaches people to think clearly, thereby enabling God the Holy Ghost to work more easily among us.

 

Ad Jesum per Mariam,

Deidre Howard 

 

Question

 

Subject: Hello

 

MHFM,

 

My name is Amanda and I have a quick question. I don't know if I am wrong to do this but sometimes I feel compelled to email or blog to Protestant Church Pastors in my area and question their church teachings/beliefs. Am I wrong in doing this? I guess because their "churches" lead so many sheep to damnation I have a right to question it. Please email me back and give me your opinion, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you and God Bless,

 

Amanda

 

MHFM: It depends on why you are writing to them.  If you are writing to them in order to find out more about their beliefs so that you can refute them, then it could be acceptable.  In a similar way, if you are writing to them with the goal of giving the person who will answer the chance to see the falsity of his or her position, then it could be acceptable.  However, if you are writing to them because you actually entertain some internal doubt about whether their Protestant beliefs are false – and you are therefore curious to see their responses – then it’s not acceptable.  It would reveal a problem with faith.

 

Frustrated

 

Subject: Disgusting

 

Good afternoon brothers!
 
Not sure if you have seen this article or not. Just reading it gets me so frustrated. These people are just so evil and ridiculous. They aren't even remotely catholic. They don't bother to seek the truth. Always just trying to push there human agenda, whether or not it contradicts Catholic teaching. Anyways here is where i found the article. God Bless and keep up the great work.
 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20100927/us_time/08599202151900
 
Aaron

 

Basel

 

What's this I'm hearing that the Council of Basel was not all approved? That only the first 25 sessions are considered ecumenical/approved?

 

JAG

 

MHFM: That’s correct.  Not all of its sessions were approved.  Therefore, those sessions are/were not binding.  That council occurred during a period in which the heresy of Conciliarism was somewhat widespread.  That heretical idea, which gave rise to schismatic tendencies, held that councils are superior to popes.

 

Mark

 

Subject: Is the World about to End?

 

Hi

I was re-watching your video series, "Is the World About to End" and thought some more about the mark of the beast.  Could it be that the mark refers to the wafer or blessing given out at V-II masses?  The wafer is distributed in the hand, and I seem to recall that persons who are not receiving can stand in line and receive a blessing - which I have seen being given on their head.  Just thought this was interesting.

Ann

 

MHFM: We believe the evidence is very strong that the mark of the beast is a spiritual mark or character, received in the hand or forehand, which is meant to be the antithesis to the spiritual mark or character given in Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Orders.  There is overwhelming biblical evidence that the mark of the beast is spiritual.  The parallel to the true spiritual mark or character given in those sacraments indicates, in our view, that the beast holds a position in an ecclesiastical structure that apes the true Church and the true sacraments (i.e., the Counter Church).  To your point, we do believe that the abomination of the New Mass and its invalid host would be lumped in with the false ecclesiastical structure to which those verses point.

 

Mark of the Beast - Spiritual Mark

 

St. Alphonsus on Mahomet

 

MHFM: This is an interesting new quote from St. Alphonsus on Mahomet (Muhammad), the founder of the false religion of Islam.  We’ve added this quote to a small section called: Interesting quotes in St. Alphonsus’ book, The History of Heresies

 

ST. ALPHONSUS CONDEMNS ISLAM AND THE KORAN, AND HE SAYS THAT MAHOMET (MUHAMMAD) IS IN HELL

 

The following quote is particularly interesting because in it St. Alphonsus says that Mahomet is in Hell.

 

St. Alphonsus, The History of Heresies & Their Refutation, Chap. 7, Article I, On Mahometanism (Islam): “The impious sect of Mahometanism sprung up in this century [the 7th]… Mahomet, the founder of this destroying sect… was born in Arabia, in 586… He [Mahomet] pretended to have long conversations with the Archangel Gabriel, in the cave of Hera… In the year 608, being then forty years of age, he began to give out that he was a Prophet, inspired by God, and he persuaded his relatives and domestics of this first, and then began to publicly preach in Mecca, and attack idolatry.  At first, the people did not very willingly listen to him, and asked him to prove his mission by a miracle; but he told them that God sent him to preach the truth, and not to work miracles.  The impostor, however, boasts of having wrought one, though ridiculous in the extreme: a piece, he says, fell off from the moon into his sleeve, and he fixed it on again; and it is said that this is the reason for the Mahometans adopting the half moon as the device of their Empire…

     “He composed the Koran… It is a collection of precepts, taken from the Mosaic and Christian Law, together with many of his own, and interspersed with fables and ridiculous revelations…. He professes that there is but one God; but in his Alcoran [the Koran] he relates many trivialities unworthy of the Supreme Being, and the whole work is, in fact, filled with contradictions, as I have shown in my book on the ‘Truth of the Faith.’… The Mahometan Paradise, however, is only fit for beasts; for filthy sensual pleasure is all the believer has to expect there… The Mahometans shave the head, and leave only a lock of hair on the crown, by which they hope Mahomet will take them up to Heaven, even out of Hell itself.”

 

This is another good quote to refute the “you can’t judge” heresy.  According to those who espouse the “you can’t judge” heresy, we cannot say that people who die outside the faith are lost because “we can’t judge.”  The truth is that God has already judged.  God has revealed that those who are saved must fall within a certain category: they must be baptized and have the Catholic faith.  Hence, those who have the faith (i.e., true Catholics) believe and can profess that people who have died outside the Church are lost.  As we see, St. Alphonsus did not subscribe to the “you can’t judge” heresy.  Also notice how vigorously he condemns Islam and the Koran; he speaks of them with no respect whatsoever.  This is a stark contrast to the apostate manner in which Benedict XVI and his sect members speak of Islam, the Koran, etc.

 

New Video and Heresy on Benedict XVI

 

MHFM: This new video and short article concern a recent significant heresy from Benedict XVI.

 

Benedict XVI expresses gratitude for the Synagogue, and uses the Jewish Calendar [video]

 

Benedict XVI's expresses gratitude for the Synagogue, and uses the Jewish Calendar [Article]

 

Imploding

 

Dear MHFM,

It’s truly amazing, the amount of subterfuge and trickery going on with each passing day.  Thank you for your grinding article which leaves Salza’s supposed refutation of Sedevacantism in a heap on the floor.

Every day the prideful IllumMasonic Counter Church and her heretical, apostate, false popes with her, moves closer to spiritually imploding in the sight of all, and the evil False Traditionalists would defend it with a pickaxe laden with venom, while those who hold the true Faith of Jesus come to the fight with Canons.  Afraid of losing whatever grip they suppose they have, they must fight from a distance hence Salza.  On the one hand they attempt to maintain their catch by lying, hypocrisy, and defense of false doctrines and on the other hand they ensnare the weak and thereby widen their net with their intellectual magic as you call it.  The legs they use to support their argument is rotted and crumbles with each new day that Benedict XVI thumbs his nose at God.  They lack the faith, courage and humility needed to face the unvarnished truth.  They make 2 Timothy 3:5 glaringly obvious. 

True to the pride of their rebellious father, Satan, these heretics defend antipopes who say that man is God and refuse the see or hear the truth.  Since they are true to these “popes,” at the cost of their soul, they don’t realize they have indeed adopted their twisted thinking and have made of themselves gods.  They bend and twist the truth every which way in order to make the wrong pieces fit their puzzle which is still full of holes.  And they are puzzled; their reaction to you, the Sedevacantist position one must hold in these dangerous times in order to save our souls, and the state of the world with its outrageous denial, and/or attack of Jesus Christ on every front shows it.  They imagine they stand secure but have created for themselves a false cocoon in which they mentally and spiritually retreat.

When confronted they switch back and forth between a myriad of predictable processes such as intellectual hocus pocus, hanging up the phone on you, they become irate and try to intimidate, or resort to bribery, emotional blackmail, or run and hide, any and all methods are used, anything but the truth, to get you to come to the same wrong, illogical, deformed conclusion they hold. They say there are enough problems in the Church already why add to it? They don’t want anymore problems; they want it smooth and easy, they want peace.  It seems that they want to be safely nested, with their false idea of truth, peace and security (1 Thes. 5:3).  Like children they close their eyes and put their hands over their ears, when it suits them (Matt. 13:15).  Misguided, they insulate themselves to their own spiritual destruction and become intoxicated. They refuse to do the necessary work of reforming themselves spiritually as Sr. Lucia said we need to do. They forget that Our Lord said that he came not to bring peace but a sword (Matt. 10:34).

It’s sad that they just cannot accept the truth, really, really sad.

Thank you for doing the immense amount of research you have done in defense of the truth which the true Church of Jesus Christ has carefully and lovingly laid out for our salvation. Thank you, for teaching us how to debate and keep them on point.   May you and the entire monastery continue to be richly blessed as only Our Lord and Lady know best how to.

 

Comment

 

Subject: Salza= Sir Dupe of Vatican II

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

What is clear, and so true in this wicked world is that Vatican II is the council of all councils, and the previous dogmatic and magisterial councils preceding Vatican II, 20 of them, spanning 1900+ years were a period of total fruitlessness and are absolutely null and void.  The Modernist machine-false pontiffs, crooked cardinals, and their rag, Observatore Romano, and ancillary rags spread throughout the civilized world has spent billions of Catholic donations to foster this belief relentlessly.  As a logical consequence truth of Vatican II is now before us mortals, and because of this Great council the Christian world is seeing the wonderful, and grand results.  The world is truly at peace in Christ and Mary because of Vatican II.  Great work MHFM. 

 

Dea…

 

Errors

 

Dear Brothers,

What an excellent article against the diabolical errors of one John Salza. Thank you very much… I have always been interested in any information against the SV position and in looking at such information, have only ever been more confirmed in its truth.

God bless.

 

Ido…

 

Books

 

Dear MHFM:

I am confused. What is the best deal to get the material back in my hands? I loaned the two big books to people and they have never returned them. Also I am very interested in learning about the truth of Padre Pio and UFOs. God bless you. My name and address is as follows:

Scott Metz

 

MHFM: We have two versions of the special offer package.  For what you have described, we would recommend the larger special package.  You will find the options at our online store.

 

Whore

 

Do you realize that the Catholic Church is the whore and Beast of Revelation?

 

Slobadan…

 

MHFM: No, it’s not.  The post-Vatican II Counter Church is the Whore of Babylon.  The Catholic Church is the one true Church.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sbnpyOWbv0

 

Comment

 

Subject: Comment on Sedevacantism Debate – Dimond vs. Albrecht

 

This Albrecht guy is one of the worst debaters I have ever heard. Simply awful.

 

Joeah…

 

Convert

 

I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for your work. I was at a point in my life not a month ago where I did know what I was going to do. I had fallen into some deeply wrong mortal sins to pile on top of the habitual ones I already committed. About that time I received in the mail free of charge Bro. Peter's book "The Bibles proves the Teachings of the Catholic church." At one time I had been somewhat interested in the catholic church and in your work but I fell away from it.  After going over the book some, especially concerning the Matthew 16 and the Papacy, i began to acknowledge that the Roman Catholic Church was truly the church founded by Jesus Christ himself. After realizing that I went on your website and inquired about baptism and following your instructions I ordered a copy of the penny catechism and began praying the rosary everyday.
 

After that a miracle happened!  My interest in those mortal sins diminished significantly and I’ve found I’ve cut out a particular sin of the flesh almost completely. I never thought i could do that and i know still that i can't it was not my power…

It was the power of God with the intercession of Mary that caused me to end those vial mortal sins. Upon receiving the penny catechism and studying it reading it through a few times I felt I was ready to be baptized and so finally I have been! After I made the profession of faith and rejected my heretical Mormon background I could and I can rightly call myself a Catholic!... This email is primarily a thank you and I cannot thank you enough. I promise to continue to pray all 15 decades of the Rosary every day and try my best to be as good a catholic as I can!

 

MHFM: It’s great to hear about your interest.  We must emphasize, however, that to be saved or profit from the sacraments it’s of course necessary to cut out all mortal sins completely.  Once a person does so, we can help him or her with where to receive sacraments.

 

New Article Posted

 

MHFM: This is a link to a new article.  We hope that all those who are interested in this matter will print it out and read it.  This new article examines and refutes an attack on the sedevacantist position that recently appeared in a false traditionalist publication.  This attack apparently convinced some people that the sedevacantist position is not the true position.  By carefully examining the arguments, one can see which position is true. 

 

John Salza's Arguments Against Sedevacantism Crushed [article]

 

This and our other recent feature articles will be found permanently at the link called “Recent Feature Articles” which is found in our “Traditional Catholic Issues” section.

 

Fixed

 

Subject: No Fixed Morality

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for all your hard work in educating people all over the world on the one true faith. I had always known there was something wrong but couldn't figure out what and it led me for some time along false ........ but having read almost everything you have put on your website my eyes have been opened, so much so at times that it has brought tears to my eyes.

 

However, one subject I don't think you have written about is the whole nonsensical argument that some propose of there being  "no fixed morality", which in my opinion, in itself proves the necessity of A God, if not even in fact the truth that Jesus Christ is God. I would love to read your considered thoughts/arguments on the matter.

 

I work at my computer everyday and the first thing I do everyday is to check out your website, to know most of all that there are others who share my beliefs as there are few living or working near me who do.

 

You are always in my prayers. 

 

God bless

 

Niall Walshe

Ireland

 

New

 

Subject: “New Franciscans”

 

Dear Brothers,

 

It looks like the Village People of the 1980's have been replaced by the New Franciscans. They too dress up in "costumes" that have nothing to do with their music. I could not believe my eyes when I saw them prancing around and the crowd loving every minute of it having no clue that it is a total abomination in the eyes of God. Was this Monastery out in California? Most Vatican II Catholics would probably enjoy this and think it is a healthy way of getting people to participate. This video may take the cake for the most outrageous behavior for so called " religious."

 

Your ardent supporter,

 

Bob

 

Think

 

Hello Brothers:

I applaud your trouncing of John Salza's arguments against sedevecantism. He makes me think of all those Protestant heretics who are so obstinate and hard-hearted whenever I have had the good fortune to speak to them on the Catholic faith. Their premise always seems to be, "The Roman Catholic faith is, and must necessarily be, wrong--period." They then go to very, very great lengths to debunk the truth with endless misapplied Scripture quotes, twisted reasoning, and flights from reality. John Salza appears to embrace the same kind of principle: "MHFM is and must necessarily be wrong--period." And then he went to absurd lengths in the Remnant piece to show sedevecatism to be wrong, only to make himself look deplorably foolish in his contradictions and twisted thinking. He does show, however, a certain consistency with his fellow false-traditionalists: when challenged to debate they run, hide, or remain silent. Scared is a very appropriate word.

Thanks for the great work.

Joseph Ramirez

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  We should probably mention that the article and videos are not dedicated to refuting this individual for the reason that he is overly significant.  Rather, by carefully refuting and exposing his attempted refutation of sedevacantism, it serves to illuminate the truth and refute all of the non-sedevacantists together. 

 

Comment

 

Subject: Salza buried

 

Your case against Salza is so complete, so total, you buried him.  Paul IVth could not have been more clear.  I mean there is no other possible meaning, and because it is a teaching of the Chair, no other argument or refutation is necessary.  Nevertheless, because Salza so junked up an issue that should be so straightforward, with almost sophomoric misapplications of principle, you did a great service by patiently unraveling it and refuting it point by point.  The contradiction you caught (within the same article!) is a real stunner. It is also hard to believe that he could not see that the notion that a Catholic might licitly receive sacraments from an excommunicate (because of few alternatives), but not one who had been formally judged (except in danger of death), actually worked against his argument that a formal judgment is required.

 

Unlike some of the others who actually debated you, this guy pretends to take on the fundamental sedevacantist case head on.  He knows what the case is, and sets out to construct an argument against it.  And this is hard work; I think only a lawyer, and a prideful one, would attempt it.  Because to any honest person, the correctness of the sedevacantist case is obvious. 

 

I don’t believe that this guy is in good faith at all.  He is lying to himself.  He is too well educated, and too skilled in argument, not to realize that he was defending a false proposition.  He probably enjoys the challenge, without regard for any notion as trite as “truth”.

 

It is interesting that a fairly major publication would give publicity to the question.  Perhaps it is evidence of your growing influence?  But understand he will never take you on in public (when you are allowed to talk back).  I think his article is about damage control.  They seek to dissuade those who are perhaps beginning to ask questions along the sedevacantist path.  But they will not get into a fight that 1) they know they will lose and 2) would serve to elevate your status.

 

Bill Mulligan        

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  It should probably be pointed out that our website is significantly more active than both the publication that carried the article and the individual who wrote it.  According to Alexa, our website is currently ranked more than 550,000 spots higher than the false traditionalist publication, and more than 700,000 spots higher than the author of the article.  According to ranking.com, our website is ranked 23,396 in the world.  There were 234 million websites in the world as of December 2009: http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/22/internet-2009-in-numbers/  These facts are worth mentioning because the false traditionalist publication recently referred to us pejoratively as a tiny little group (implying little influence), when the fact is that our website is much more active than theirs. 

 

Eusebius

 

Subject: Eusebius

 

Thank you, Brother Peter, for your article refuting John Salza's "arguments" against sedevacantism. Your article is a gem, not only because it refutes the content of the claims used by Salza, but it also exposes the stratagem which you have very aptly described as black magic.  It's the same diabolical sleight of hand used by the various false traditional groups to first seem to be admitting - and then end up denying - an important truth.  Yes, Pius XII consecrated Russia; but no, Pius XII did not consecrate Russia.  No, there's no salvation outside of the Church, but yes, there is salvation outside of the Church.  And so on.

 

This is the same technique used by the Scribes and Pharisees to deny Our Lord Jesus Christ.  And we know what Our Lord had to say about them.

 

In Volume 4 of the Liturgical Year, page 379 we read the following:

 

"It was then that Satan produced Nestorious, crowned with a fictitious halo of sanctity and knowledge". 

 

On Christmas Day 428, Nestorious preached that "Mary did not bring forth God; her Son was only a man, the instrument of the Divinity.  The multitude shuddered with horror.  Eusebius, a simple layman, rose to give expression to the general indignation and protested against this impiety.  Soon a more explicit protest was drawn up and disseminated in the name of the members of this grief-stricken Church, launching an anathema against anyone who should dare to say: "The Only-begotten Son of the Father and the Son of Mary are different persons.'  This generous attitude was the safeguard of Byzantium and won the praise of Popes and Councils.  When the shepherd become a wolf, the first duty of the flock is to defend itself.  It is usual and regular, no doubt, for doctrine to descend from the bishops to the faithful and those who are subject to the faith are not to judge their superiors.   But in the treasure of revelation there are essential doctrines which all Christians, by the very fact of their title as such, are bound to know and defend.  The principle is the same whether it be a question of belief, or conduct, dogma or morals.  Treachery like that of Nestorious is rare in the Church, but it may happen that some pastors keep silence for one reason or another in circumstances when religion itself is at stake.  The true children of Holy Church at such times are those who walk by the light of their baptism, not the cowardly soul who, under the specious pretext of submission to the powers that be, delay their opposition to the enemy in the hope of receiving instructions which are neither necessary nor desirable."

 

Today, treachery is the norm and the true Children of Holy Church are rare.  And they won't be found amongst the false traditionalists like Salza who, had they lived in the time of Nestorious, would undoubtedly have attacked Eusebius!

 

Thanks for all you do.

 

Lee Ann

 

Arguments

 

Subject: Salza Arguments

 

This was by far, better than watching a boxing match or watching the yankees win the world series, John Salza got put through a paper shredder and then set on fire.  I absolutely had fun reading the entire article, I can see John cringing and squirming in his seat as he reads Brother Peter’s response to his arguments, talk about being stripped naked, wow!   For me the fight was over in the first paragraph, "tell it to the church"!   

 

Todd

 

Refutation

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Your refutation of Salza's attack is very thorough, complete and effective!  His silence, would indicate that he accepts your arguments!...

 

Thank you once again for defending the one, true faith!  In these trying times, your work is greatly appreciated!

 

Richard Cardet

Bordeaux, France

 

Critique

 

Subject: Critique

 

So, if a building(s) (i.e. NO "church") is engulfed in flames (from Hell) the people should wait for the "alarm" (from the heretics who started the fire) to sound before exiting? John Salza probably wouldn't debate you because his advice is so ludicrous, he knew he couldn't control himself from laughing. He has, in effect, tried to twist this tragedy (The Great Apostasy) into a comedy.

 

Rick

 

Apostate

 

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the great article against the modernist heretic and false traditionalist, John Salza. It really is a crushing defeat to the entire anti-sedevacantist movement because Satan clearly enrolled one of his highest devotees in choosing John Salza to attack us, and he has some legal credentials. However, the humble simplicity of the Truth of the Catholic faith always shines through in the end, regardless of how much time such heretics waste. His key magic trick, as Bro. Peter explained, was to set up an apparent contradiction in Canon Law (where there is none), in that #1: He stated that heretics lose their office without a declaration, and #2: That Catholics can recognize such heretics as excommunicated, even when no declaration has been made, but only when the Church declares such to be heretics! He tried to, by use of his freemasonic magic, make it seem as though the words, “without a declaration,” mean “with a declaration,” in that Catholics can only recognize an undeclared heretic once a declaration has been made by the Church. An “undeclared declaration” - it’s outrageously absurd, but the lying heretics love it! John Salza needs to stop declaring heresies. It’s memory-replacement-mind-control whereby what you have seen and heard from the Church, apparently becomes something that it is not: an illusion. For the modernist heretic, John Salza, it’s all just a big long process of figuring it all out, rather than a simple belief in what Christ revealed. He probably thinks that the collective whole of humanity, if they magnified their concentration intensely enough, could remove Original Sin simply by desiring it – like a massive “baptism of desire.” That’s what Antipope John Paul II’s Antichrist heresies of Universal salvation and “Universal Incarnation” erroneously declare, and that’s the (diabolical) essence of concelebration, i.e. that the faithful confect the Eucharist along with the Priest, and not the Priest only. Heresy is merely controversy for Mr. Salza! His article is in reality, “The Errors of John Salza.” Speaking of illusions, Mr. Salza tries to trick us from the very start: “The Errors of...Ecclesiastical Law.” There are no errors in Ecclesiatical Law. His goal, like Antipope Benedict XVI, is to make a mockery of the Catholic Church by attacking its foundations, but he’s only securing his own eternal destruction!

 

His second key error was that: a heretic who is apparently “elected” pope (apparently but not really) loses his office (the Papacy) but does not lose jurisdiction… It boils down to the infallible authority that Jesus Christ instituted in the Office of the Papacy – once a man walks out of that Office, whether by death or heresy, then he loses the authority to govern – he loses jurisdiction. It’s as though John thinks the Papacy is a sacrament, not like Holy Orders that is conferred once, but like confession or communion that a Catholic keeps receiving, because he seems to think that a heretic can exercise the function of a Pope (like receiving a sacrament repeatedly) but without holding the office, i.e. without having the authority of the Papacy (or the authority to administer the “papal sacrament”). The authority of the Papacy stems directly from Jesus Christ Himself, not any man, which is why no matter how hard V-2 “Catholics” may try to “mind-meld” or imagine a heretic to be a pope (as Mr. Salza seems to think he and others are capable of doing), the truth doesn’t change, and a heretic cannot be a pope, ever!... The Vatican II sect is like a cheaply made toy – good for nothing, has no true value, and is made with toxic chemicals (heresies) – and thus leads souls to hell - a Protestant can see it, a child can tell you it, but the obstinate defenders of the Vatican II sect will write books to prevent you from acknowledging it. The Vatican II sect and its 5 Antipopes main heresies revolve around the clear and manifest rejection, by word and deed, of Jesus Christ and the Trinity. Antipope Benedict XVI is a warlock and a heresiarch!!! John Salza dances around the Catholic dogmas like a voodoo witchdoctor, but continuously trips over his own feet… John Salza is a schismatical modernist, a Pharisee, and an Antichrist apostate!!!..

 

Pascendi, On the Doctrine of Modernists, Pope St. Pius X – “They are ready to admit, nay, to proclaim that Christ Himself manifestly erred in determining the time when the coming of the Kingdom of God was to take place; and they tell us that we must not be surprised at this since even He Himself was subject to the laws of life! After this what is to become of the dogmas of the Church? The dogmas bristle with flagrant contradictions, but what does it matter since, apart from the fact that vital logic accepts them, they are not repugnant to symbolical truth.”

 
Matthew 5:13 – “You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt lose its savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is good for nothing any more but to be cast out, and to be trodden on by men.”
 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Message

 

While driving on a rural end of the roadway on Thursday morning, I saw an infant carseat on the side of the road with a blanket draped over it. For whatever reason, I did not stop, even though I had all kinds of thoughts running through my head. But when I got to my destination, I called the PD and they were going to check it out. But, this is what the Police advised even before they went out there to check....

 "There are several things to be aware of ... gangs and thieves are now plotting different ways to get people (mostly women) to stop their vehicle and get out of the car.

"There is a gang initiation reported by the local Police Department where gangs are placing a carseat by the road...with a fake baby in it...waiting for a woman, of course, to stop and check on the abandoned baby.  "Note that the location of this carseat is usually beside a wooded or grassy area and the person --woman-- will be dragged into the woods, beaten and raped, and usually left for dead. If it's a man, they're usually beaten and robbed and maybe left for dead, too.
 

 DO NOT STOP FOR ANY REASON!!!

… REPORT WHAT YOU SAW, BUT DON'T EVEN SLOW DOWN.
 
"IF YOU ARE DRIVING AT NIGHT AND EGGS ARE THROWN AT YOUR WINDSHIELD, DO NOT STOP TO CHECK THE CAR , DO NOT OPERATE THE WIPER AND DO NOT SPRAY ANY WATER BECAUSE EGGS MIXED WITH WATER BECOME MILKY AND BLOCK YOUR VISION UP TO 92.5%, AND YOU ARE THEN FORCED TO STOP BESIDE THE ROAD AND BECOME A VICTIM OF THESE CRIMINALS. THIS IS A NEW TECHNIQUE USED BY GANGS, SO PLEASE INFORM YOUR FRIENDS AND RELATIVES.  THESE ARE DESPERATE TIMES AND THESE ARE UNSAVORY INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL TAKE DESPERATE MEASURES TO GET WHAT THEY WANT." Please talk to your loved ones about this. This is a new tactic used. Please be safe.  Get started NOW -- SEND THIS MESSAGE TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS AND LOVED ONES TO BE CAREFUL AND AWARE OF EVERYTHING AROUND THEM SO AS NOT TO BECOME A VICTIM.

 

Altar girl

 

MHFM: During Benedict XVI’s “Mass” for the “Beatification” of John Henry Newman, there was at least one altar girl.

 

Pope Benedict XIV, Allatae Sunt, July 26, 1755: “Pope Gelasius in his ninth letter to the bishops of Lucania condemned the evil practice which had been introduced of women serving the priest at the celebration of Mass.  Since this abuse had spread to the Greeks, Innocent IV strictly forbade it in his letter to the bishop of Tusculum: ‘Women should not dare to serve at the altar; they should be altogether refused this ministry.’  We too have forbidden this practice in the same words in Our oft-repeated constitution...”

 

Trip

 

… all the crazy books that those two wrote, Catholicism for Dummies, Catholicism Answer book, (which has NO answers!) how can they get away with such garbage?  And YOU had a problem with You-Tube when a lot of the stuff on You-tube is horrible!  (I got an email from a Traditional Family Values list I am on and they are always fighting for morality, and one of the things they wanted was to email You-Tube to take off the desecration of host-and it looked like it was a black mass)   And again, You tube had a problem with YOU???

 

Re:  Muslim article

 

U.S. kids bow to "Allah" on Mosque school field trip

 

They want everyone to be a Muslim! How can they indoctrinate our children with such garbage?  What will they be like when they are adults with absolutely NO values whatsoever?  I feel that we are going to die defending our true Catholic Faith. And that man being arrested for burning the koran!  How many people got arrested for burning our Bible!?

 

RE: Benedict’s trip to England:  On the Today show this morning, Benedict celebrated "mass" in the Anglican Cathedral and the journalist did mention that England killed countless Catholics, but acted like it was no big deal!

 

I cannot understand all this acceptance for the gays!  Why didn't they just stay in the closet???  Why are WE wrong when we say it is a sin?  What part of Sodom and Gomorrah don't they understand?  If everyone accepts this immorality, aren't we in worse shape than Sodom and Gomorrah?

 

God bless you for all of your good work!

 

June

 

New Video & Article, You Tube

 

Latest Update: You Tube removed our first version of the video, that had many more views.  Now it only allows the second version.

 

MHFM: These are links to a new video and a new article.  Note: our new You Tube video (which is below) on The Catholicism Answer Book was being deliberately delayed by You Tube.  For that reason, we had to re-upload the video and we decided to slightly modify the title.  That didn’t work.  You Tube is still deliberately messing with our video, so we are just linking to the original.  If you fight through the first five or so stalls in the first thirty seconds, it seems to play smoothly.  It seems that You Tube will allow people to listen to our video from that point on.   

 

The Catholicism Answer Book Exposed [video]

 

Article: The Catholicism Answer Book Exposed [article]

 

Comment

 

Not only should the Koran be burned, but so should the Talmud and all Protestant versions of the Bible, for the translators are putting lies in the mouth of God, which is Blasphemy.  Speaking of this topic reminded me of something my son told me not long ago.  This event happened while we were living in California.  He rode his bicycle near a V2 church that was next to our house and he saw something that drew his attention.  It was a bonfire.  My son went over out of curiosity and asked one person what was going on.  Apparently, the church was holding a burning to "get rid of the old to make room for the new".  He saw people throw Bibles, missals, rosaries etc into this fire.  

 

The truth becomes more obvious with every horrifying tale that emerges.  Keep up the great work!

 

Brenda Roy

 

Mess

 

Subject: Novus Mess priest blesses Koran

 

I may not always agree with the stances of the mhfm but as you can see in the article things are getting out of control and something must be done.  The state of affairs in the church make me want vomit.

Peace Brother.

 

Calif…

 

MHFM: Perhaps that should tell you that we are correct.

 

Today

 

MHFM: Note: There’s a chance that an important new article will be posted today.

 

JP2 Musical

 

Subject: JP2 the Musical

 

A bit of funny/weird news:

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/vaticancityandholysee/7803727/John-Paul-II-the-Musical-to-open-next-week.html

The rock-star "pope" lives on... On the reign of the Antichrist, his reign. 

 

As one could expect, it features a lot of rock music. I don´t know about the presentation, but at least during the rehearsals it´s possible to see a man with his chest naked, and women with revealing clothes. It´s appropriate when one considers the subject matter, the AntiMoral AntiChrist AntiPope Wojtyla.

 

Now that´s what I call a truly tragic symphony...

 

Lunacy

 

Subject: Shocking

 

This past week has been pretty shocking regarding the garbage being said in the media and by the apostate Mccarrick and the Rat, I have such a hatred for benedict arnold XVl.  How is it the more blatant the lies, the more blind the people get, I truly don't have any words to describe what is going on it’s pure lunacy .       

 

 Todd

 

MHFM: Yes, his current trip to England is a veritable course on how to mock the English martyrs and deny the necessity of the papal office.

 

Satan

 

http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/139422.html

I just read this entire article and was so upset, I called my mother.  I related to her what the article was about. I had remembered something from the mid-sixties that was told to my father by a priest who was a very good friend of our family. I did not know at that time the substance of the information related by the priest to my father.  When I read this to my mom, today, there was a dead silence on the phone. She then said to me, "Jennifer, don't you remember what Father S....... told your dad about this supposed
fishing trip that he went on up in Michigan. The things he told your dad were horrible.  Father....S   said he was so shocked, he'd never go anywhere with those people ever again."

I remember something being very wrong,BUT, I never knew what it was.  What I did know was, this was a fishing trip with fellow priest and a few laymen. I was 12 or 13 at the time. I'm now 59. That article struck a nerve with my mom. She said and I quote.." That's exactly what Father S.... told to your dad."

"The smoke of satan"

Please keep this between us. The Priest is now deceased and so is my father.

This just re-confirms to me the truth and goodness of Most Holy Family Monastery.

May God Bless and Keep you safe. We need you two more than ever.

Jennifer

 

Cathedral

 

Subject: Koran blessed at Cathedral 

 

Dear Bros. Apostasy! The V2 church lifts up man and the human condition "of can't we all just get along". Catholics in this false church refuse to read about the lives of the saints who dealt with the pagans. They refuse Christ’s own call to Baptize and Preach the gospel of Christ to these pagans!  Bro's what do you see coming for Catholics in this country concerning these Muslims that are living here and building mosque's. Do you foresee a holy war coming one day? May God embolden us all with the Holy Spirit to preach the gospel everywhere!  Holy Mary Pray for us! 

 

Debra Ames

 

Koran

 

Subject: E-Exchanges on Burning the Quran

 

Dear Dimond Brothers,

 

About four days ago I sent out an e-mail to all my contacts concerning the Florida "pastor's" intention on burning the Quran.  I got one reply back from someone who demonstrates such an astounding level of bad will that I thought it worthy to send to you.  I don't know if you will consider it good enough to post in your e-exchanges, but just in case here it is.  I copied and pasted it in my e-mail to you in chronological order to make it easier to follow because had I just forwarded it the last reply would appear at the top and the original at the bottom.

 

Sylvestre

 

MY E-MAIL:

 

As most of us know, Benedict XVI and the Vatican II sect have condemned a Florida pastor's intention on burning Qurans to mark the ninth anniversary of the September 11th attacks.  On Wednesday, September 8th, the Vatican issued a statement denouncing the Florida pastor's plan as "outrageous and a grave gesture".

 

Well here's something to ponder.  The following represents the Church's true position on book burning.  It was issued from a true pope long before the Vatican II apostasy :

 

Pope Pius VII, Diu Satis (# 15), May 15, 1800:  “Books which openly oppose the teaching of Christ are to be burned.  Even more importantly, the eyes and minds of all must be kept from books, which do so more steathily and deceitfully… So the sheep of Christ should consider safe and eat cheerfully the food to which Peter’s voice and authority directs them; but despite any beauty and charm, they should shun as harmful and plague-ridden, what this voice forbids them.  Those who do not comply are certainly not to be counted among the sheep of Christ.”

 

HIS RESPONSE:

 

… Wow, I respect you for voicing your beliefs, but couldn't possibly agree with you less. I will always side with any man who seeks God in his own way without regard to the "rites" or "icons". The average truly devout Muslim is no more a servant of the devil than the average truly devout Jew or Christian. As with so many who seek to be the "better" example, you quote from selections that are contrary to the whole body of scripture. Just as radical Muslims can find a phrase or two in their Holy Book to justify horrific actions, so can radical Christians. God makes the same demand on all of us. We either serve him or we will be cast away from him. That is all I need to know. He will deal with us justly and we have no right to pass judgement on His behalf.

May you find peace in your search for the truth,
Eddie

 

ME:

 
It's obvious that you know hardly anything about God.  It's ridiculous and defies common sense that God could approve of just any religion, all of which profess different beliefs.  Most christians believe that Christ IS God.  If you truly loved God then you would reject those religions which deny Christ.  Protestantism rejects Christ also because although they claim to believe in Him, they only accept His teachings which are likable to them and reject all others.  This is an abomination before God and they will all have to answer to it on Judgment Day.  You are so blinded by the Devil that the truth is right in front of you so plainly and you cannot see it.  You are one of countless souls that God allows to remain in the dark because of your pride and bad will.  Unless you wake up and become a TRUE Catholic you will find yourself being cast into the everlasting fiery pits of Hell when you stand before the Judgment seat.

 

HIS LAST RESPONSE (Which I don't find necessary to reply to):

 

I will stand beside you on Judgement Day and God will tell us who was wrong. I respect that you believe in your way and am saddened that you don't have that same respect for me. Time and God will tell. Until then, please refrain from personal attacks or write me off for a loss.

Eddie

 

V-2

 

Subject: Vatican II ratbags

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

All I can say in regards to your recent videos, "Catholicism of Dummies" and "The Catholicism Answer Book" - you are doing a Trojan job in exposing these Vatican II Ratbags!

God bless,

David

 

Excommunication

 

Subject: Catholicism Answer Book Revealed

 

Dear Brothers,

Great work exposing the "Catholicism Answer Book." The book is full of heresies! The sufferings of Jesus Christ are treated as completely valueless by such apostates. It is a total rejection of the necessity of the Catholic faith for salvation, and an embracing of every false religion that ever existed. To say that Jews and Muslims who have died during war or for their false "faith" are martyrs is outrageous to the extreme! Martyrs are Catholics only, who have died for the faith because they are witnesses to the Truth: to Jesus Christ. To say that a person who continually commits mortal sin is not in state of mortal sin and that people rarely become possessed because of their own actions is ridiculous and atrocious. To say that there are graces in Non-Catholic religions is outrageous too. The book is one huge summary of Vatican II apostasy. I thought it was interesting that they call Fr. Feeney's "excommunication" famous, when almost no one knows about it, let alone what the real facts are. Also, why would they cite such an "excommunication," but not cite truly famous excommunications such as of the Protestant heretics, Martin Luther and King Henry VIII?! They were pivotal excommunications because of the immense destruction that such heretics were causing!... Thank you again for showing so clearly what an evil and outrageous book it is.

God Bless,

Chris White

 

Corapi

 

Subject: listend [sic] most of one of your youtube videos

 

Peter Diamond.

 

And I have easily come to the conclusion that you are in a state of ignorant grandeur when it comes to Father Corapi.

 

…You are not doing the Lords work under the seemingling holy named website.. Seems more like satan in sheeps clothing.

 

Remember whose toes you tred on....  and that the gates of hell will not prevail against the church the Lord built. You church and teaching will fail, but sadly you will take many with you.  You are a brother to know one.

 

Rose…

 

MHFM: We are certainly not ignorant of what “Fr.” Corapi believes.  On the contrary, you are the one who is blind to the truth and wilfully ignorant of what he stands for.  We even played his words and quoted him in the video you saw.  The problem is that you don’t care about the facts.  It doesn’t bother you that he accepts false ecumenism and salvation outside the Church.  His denial of Catholic dogma is not a concern to you because unfortunately you are not a Catholic.  Below is a quote from “Fr.” Corapi which should dispel your ignorance on the matter of what he really believes.  Unfortunately, it probably won’t because you are not inclined to hear the truth. 

 

Speaking about the conflict between Protestants and professing Catholics in Ireland, “Fr.” John Corapi declared: “I don’t care if you’re Baptist or Catholic; you are Christian.  Just practice it.”  That is blatantly heretical.  It’s just a small example of why he is not a Catholic, but rather a modernist phony who deceives people who don’t care about the Catholic faith.  If you were of good will, you would figure out that you and he hold the Catholic faith to be meaningless. 

 

Shriner

 

Subject: You Tube video Shriner worships Lucifer

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2OXuXTkBNQ   Also, I wanted to add a related comment.  Please pray that I convert my wife to the true Catholic faith.  Except for me, she is completely surrounded and influenced by the "we all worship the same god", "we have the right to think what we want" , "we can't judge" nonsense.  This type of thinking is exactly what the Masons-Shriners promote.  If we take that nonsense to the extreme, we have to support whatever anyone thinks and then does.  e.g.  If you believe in the "official" 9-11 story and take the indifferent thoughts to its conclusion, you have to support 19 Muslims killing 3000-12000 people and be happy about it.  If you believe in the conspiracy theory of 9-11, you have to support a government killing its citizens.  Something is right or wrong; it is not both at the same time.  Christ laid out clearly right and wrong; it is simple to follow His rules.  God bless you and thank you.  Also, please have another radio program if you can make the time. 

 

Comment on a Sedevacantism Debate

 

Subject: Comment on Sedevacantism Debate

 

Well the Bro Dimond guy clearly won. There was a lot more substance to his side of the debate, and it was disappointing that gnrhead didn't seem at all concerned by the things Bro Dimond brought up, but instead suffered from the most severe case of tunnel-vision sola scriptura I think I've ever witnessed. He also wasted time arguing over greek grammar, which I always find to be a manipulative tactic in debates.  This would've been better had both sides kept the personal attacks to a minimum.

 

Nym…

 

Swallowed

 

Hi Brothers,

 

I am deeply concerned about my father because he has been swallowed up by Luisa Picaretti and her supposed revelations of Jesus explaining Divine Will.  Could you please explain why she is a false seer or heretic because someone recently wrote that her writings were put on the Forbidden Books list in 1938.  

 

John T.

 

Talk

 

In regard to all this talk out there about God esteeming everyone as on the same level, and the Lord hates the sin but loves the sinner, well those people thinking that need to consider these verses…

 

(Psalm 5:6) "the Lord hates the bloody and deceitful man."

 

(Proverbs 6 : 16 & 19) "The Lord hates... a false witness..."

 

(Wisdom 14:9) “But to God the wicked and his wickedness are hateful alike.”

 

(Proverbs 1: 26)  I also will laugh at your disaster. I will mock when calamity overtakes you.

 

Steve

 

Imagine

 

Subject: Koran burner Derek Fenton booted from his job at NJ transit

 

Can you imagine being detained by the police for burning the koran and also being fired from job, but the jews in Israel can burn bibles, outrageous!  

 

Todd

 

Latest

 

Subject: Latest Video

 

How on earth do these people who write such books even sleep at night???  What a load of rubbish!  Thank you Brother Dimond for being an island of sanity in an ocean filled with evil and corruption unimaginable outside of hell.  

 

One of the "suggested" videos listed beside yours on YouTube was someone named "Marywasnotavirgin" and the title of her video was "Catholicism is the same religion as Islam". I sometimes wonder if you wouldn't be better producing your videos privately, putting them on your website rather than YouTube so that weak and curious souls won't be exposed to someone else's antiCatholic ravings. 

 

Great job, as usual.  God bless you always,

Brenda Roy

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail, but it is definitely better to have them in such a forum because the goal is to make the truth available to those searching in those areas.  The people who already have access to the truth should be mature and strong enough to not delve into, or be swayed by, heretical sources and productions. 

 

Note

 

Latest Update: You Tube removed our first version of the video, The Catholicism Answer Book Exposed, that had many more views.  Now it only allows the second version (link is below).

 

Beyond Insane

 

Subject: Beyond Insane

 

The Catholicism Answer Book, Page 383: “… the Catholic Church does not mean that Catholics are somehow better than anyone else, since they’re not.  All men and women are equal in terms of their human dignity, worth, and value in the eyes of God and the Church.”

 

Great, so, if I'm standing on top of a Aztec pyramid with some guy’s heart in my hand, I have, in God's eyes, the same value as St. Teresa of Avila or St. Benedict.

 

Thanks for your work MHFM,

 

Matthew

 

MHFM: Yes, the article also covers the quote in which they state that those who are faithful to their religion (whatever it may be), according to their held beliefs, can be saved.  So, if they are dedicated to their practice of ripping hearts out, and follow it meticulously according to the rites of their religion, they will be dear to God and will get to Heaven.  These are the “priests” and individuals who are featured on EWTN and fully approved by what most people (wrongly) think is the Catholic Church.

 

Answer Book

 

Subject: Answer Book

 

Brothers,

Thank you for taking the time to read, review and expose the heretical, "The Catholic Answer Book."  All part of the great deception, by means of packaging and labeling their lies with the false pretense of having answers and also being Catholic. I suppose that at the end of the wide road that the multitude follow, the sign at the Gates of Hell will also have some mention of their heretical false beliefs.

1 Machabees 7:42, "Even so destroy this army in our sight today, and let the rest know that he hath spoken ill against thy sanctuary: and judge thou him according to his wickedness."

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

Paused

 

I paused the video, waited until it fully loaded and then it played all the way through with no problem.

 

WJ

 

Catholic Answers

 

Subject: Catholic Answers

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

St. Pius X said it best.  "Modernism is the synthesis of all heresies..."  This cancer of modernism has enveloped the world, for sure.  The operation of error permitted by Our Lord clearly points to end times.  Your monastery elicits sacred historical  and present day truths toward that finality.  The stench of modernism has to end much like Sidon, Sodom, etc., etc.  Thanks!  Holy Mother of God, pray for us.

 

Utopia

 

Subject: Utopia

 

Dear Brothers:

 

The number of bizarre actions and speeches by V2 "Bishops" is big enough to choke a dinosaur.  Someone gave us a gift subscription to [a newspaper] and in their latest issue, they talk about a "bishop" who is praising the effort/desire to build houses in space!!  It all boils down to this: does one place one's hopes in a utopia here on earth (space!!) and ignore the fact that we are destined to leave this earth eventually or do we place our hopes on heaven with God.  Too many people are placing their hopes on a utopia on earth; the repugnance of suffering and doing penance for one's sins are proof of this.  This may be the reason there is so much bad will among people, even traditional Catholics.  Nicholas Gruner would have his readers believe in a "paradise" of sorts after the "consecration", but it is evident that he is just another utopian.  

 

Brenda Roy

 

Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video:

 

The Vatican II Sect encourages Muslims to Celebrate Ramadan [Video]

 

Recent Significant Vatican II Counter Church Heresy [Short Article]

 

Tauran

 

Dear Brothers,

 

That's a great new section of your website: The Most Recent Significant Vatican II Counter Church Heresy. Thank you for the short video too. The heretic and apostate, "Cardinal" Jean-Louis Tauran appears to be a seasoned Freemason given that he is espousing Freemasonry's highest "ideals": fraternity, equality, reconciliation, etc. Apart from the heresies you outlined, one line I thought was particularly sickening was this: "There are important recommendations also given in the above mentioned text: to open our hearts to mutual forgiveness and reconciliation." In other words, he calls on Catholics to "forgive" the Koran for its blasphemies against the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation of Jesus Christ, and to reconcile Christ with Mohammed. What an outrage! Another abomination is this: "Teaching by religious leaders, as well as school books which present religions in an objective way, have, along with teaching in general, a decisive impact on the education and formation of younger generations." So he thinks that the rejection of God Incarnate is "objective." To say that one should have no bias based on religious affiliation is Antichrist and satanic. "Cardinal" Jean-Louis Tauran is a demon in human form!!!

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Bible

 

Hello

In your youtube video "Chosen People, Mary and updates" you brought up the quote from Daniel 9:26. In the video it is written "And after sixty two weeks Christ shall be slain: and the people that shall deny him shall not be his." I looked up the passage in different versions of the Bible and I could not find this part "(...) and the people that shall deny him shall not be his."

Can you please write a fast reply and say from what version of the Bible the quote from your video is?

Thank you very much. God bless

 

Eduard

 

MHFM: It’s found in the Catholic Bible, the Douay-Rheims and the Vulgate.  You won’t find it in Protestant versions.

 

Connecting

 

Subject: Connecting the dots

 

From your video Abortion, Rock Music, & Freemasonry Exposed: During the initiation ceremonies of The Shriners (the 'cream of the crop' from both the Scottish & York Rites) they, "seal their solemn oath in the name of Allah, the god of our fathers." A little later on in the ritual they acknowledge, "Islam as the one true faith."

 

R

 

Fundamental

 

Subject: “Fundamental Christians”

 

Hey Brother Peter,

 

I recently got into a debate with one of these people that refers to them self as a fundamental Christian. This person went on to tell me that Catholicism is heresy, claiming that we pray to false gods (saints), and that we do not follow the true teachings of Jesus Christ.  Was wondering if you could shed some light on this.  Who are these people, and how could they possibly think praying to saints is an occult practice? We've been doing it for almost 2000 years!

 

God Bless

Hillary Waddell

 

MHFM: There are countless Protestants out there who hold similar false views.  Misunderstanding and perverting the Scriptures, they believe that praying to saints is idolatrous.  We recommend our section called “The Bible on Praying to and Venerating Saints” in our book The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.

 

Not a place

 

Dear Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Sorry if I ask many questions from you, I am a bit worried because I can't find any traditional mass celebrated by a priest ordained in the Old Rite, I want to confess, and I can't find a valid priest that can hear my confessions, what should I do? I am maintaining devotions to the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Rosary.

I quit attending the new mass a few months ago, because I finally realize their heresies, I didn't even hear priest saying sermons about hell, I do hear one but he says that hell is not actual place! it is when you are in a state of loneliness, sadness and poverty that is hell he says, I was shock to hear this. Your website is full of information that's really worth reading, and I am sharing your information to my friends.

I am a Catholic from the Philippines, thank you for your time, God Bless.

Sincerly,
Glenn

 

MHFM: That’s very interesting that the “priest” repeated the heresy that Hell is not a place.  It’s an example of how the false teaching of the antipopes filters down to their subjects.  There should be a priest ordained before 1968 somewhere in your area to whom you could go to confession.  Even if it requires driving some distance once in a while, it’s important to get to confession.  If someone is in mortal sin (which hopefully is not the case), then obviously it’s even more necessary to get to confession; but if there is definitely no option, then a person must focus on prayers and having contrition for his or her sins.  Perfect contrition and the desire to confess the sin can restore a person to justification before the Sacrament of Penance is received.  Our guidelines on Where to Go to Mass contain some principles that concern those who are leaving the Novus Ordo. 

 

Remind

 

Subject: “Cardinal” McCarrick

 

The apostate "Cardinal" McCarrick (who refuses to criticize the Koran) can´t even claim the he accepted the Gospel. Someone should remind this heretical coward that Saint Paul, under the Direction of the Holy Ghost, wrote in Ephesians 5. 11: "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them."

 

This is true even for the lowest layman. How can a man be considered Catholic, hold a title of "Cardinal" or even "Pope" and yet call evil good, have fellowship with false religions created by the devil and say it´s not up to him to criticize and condemn Islam?

 

They clearly teach those heretics worship God in a pleasing manner, when the Church has already defined that It´s impossible to worship God except INSIDE Her, that Islam ins an abominable infidel and faithless pagan sect, that all of it´s members are lost in their current state (as well as any member of a false religion or anyone who´s not Catholic) and that those who reject the Son also end up rejecting the Father.

 

That book Brother Michael reviewed and utterly destroyed, "Catholicism for Dummies" is simply shocking in it´s declaration that Synagogues, Protestant and Orthodox "Churches" and even Mosques are (true, one can presume by the reading) Houses of Worship. 

 

These fools even help to gather funds for the building of more mosques. More places in which souls are lost, God is denied, Christ is rejected and people are taught to hate Christians and rejoice in killing them. 

 

Frankly, to defend this thing, this Apostate Vatican II sect after witnessing all this garbage, and to voluntarily sell one´s own soul to the Devil are essentially the same thing. There can´t be much difference. 

 

Thank you, for teaching me so much. 

 

Please, keep up the fine work. 

 

1 John 5

 

MHFM: This is an important verse that was incorporated into our recent video, Do You Believe ?  It’s especially important in this age of apostasy.  That’s because no adherent of Vatican II and the theology of the Counter Church could really say that he (or she) believes this verse.  With their “respect” for various false religions – and their position that one can’t “judge” all the members of such religions to be excluded from salvation – 1 John 5:19 is foreign to their belief system.  Nor could those who believe in the “invincible ignorance” heresy honestly say they believe and internally understand the verse; for they hold that many people outside of Christ can be justified (if they are innocent “through no fault of their own”) and therefore are not necessarily in wickedness (or darkness).

 

1 John 5:19- “We know that we are of God, and the whole world is seated in wickedness.”

 

What?

 

MHFM,

 

What do you think of Atila Sinke Guimaraes and his book “In the Murky Waters of Vatican II”?... I’d like to know what are your thoughts on his position and also what you think of this book. 

 

Thanks so much for your work.  GREAT JOB on the conversation with that annoying chatter box from Wales.  I couldn’t believe this guy’s mouth how it just would close!  I honestly didn’t hear half of what he was saying, and when he did speak only LIES blurted out.  He sounds so much worse than the “apologist” from Chicago whom you talked with a few years ago.  May God bless your braveness to defend His Church.

 

Sincerely,

Bernardo

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  With reference to the book you mention, we think it’s a massive waste of time.  He examines theologians who promote the “new theology,” yet he believes the representatives of this new heretical theology are Catholic (e.g., Benedict XVI and his “bishops”).  It’s actually the epitome of stupidity.  It’s also not to the point because the horror of the Counter Church is most effectively exposed by analyzing its leaders and their writings (Benedict XVI, JP2, etc.), rather than the wacko theologians who are far less significant.  In short, the individual you mention is a seared heretic who unfortunately and amazingly still regards the Counter Church (with all of its filthy apostasy) to be the Catholic Church.

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I totally understand you and your positions.  How exhausting to go as long as you did with Robert from Wales.  You did a great job defending the true Faith.  Can you help me I am looking for any background on the author Fr. Pierre Loret a one time author of the book "The Story of the Mass"  All I know is that he died in 1983 and was a French Redemptorist.  I can not find one thing on who he actually was.

I am trying to refute this book.  

 

Kathleen

 

Conversation

 

Subject: Reference “The Conversation”

You are a wonderful example of "PATIENCE"........ I just listened to the "conversation" between you and Robert from Wales… By the end of the first part I was ready to pull my hair out.

May God Bless you and keep you safe…

Jennifer

 

“Cardinal”

 

Subject: anti-Cardinal Tauran

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

You must be kidding?  What a masonic infiltrator to think this trash is actually believed by Roman Catholics who are wedded to sacred tradition. The sainted popes in Heaven have to be puking their guts out if they do so there.  This is simply outrageous!  The end of the world has to be around the corner, as they say.  God Bless MHFM for that miniscule island of truth left in this twisted, and sick world.

 

Dea…

 

Counter Church

 

Hi Brothers,

 

I didn't know if you saw this yet or not.  More Horror regarding the "Counterfeit Church of Conciliarism" -  

 

http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/139422.html

 

If you haven't seen it yet - go to www.lifeofluisa.com - looks like the false seer of "Divine Will" is up for Beatification.  Her books were put on on the Forbidden Books list in 1938. 

 

Respectfully,

Kathy Carson

 

McCarrick

 

Reverend Brothers:

The article about McCarrick the heretical "cardinal archbishop emiritus" of Washington was disgusting. This man must be filled with hate for he promotes the acceptability of people accepting the Koran, ergo condemning themselves to hell for eternity.

EJP, M.D., D.D.

 

MHFM: It’s another good example of how the Vatican II sect and its hierarchy are a sick joke, and the same is true of those who obstinately defend such ridiculous apostates.  Come on, the guy claims to be a Catholic bishop while saying that he can’t say “Don’t embrace the Koran” – and all those who accept Benedict XVI must accept this guy as a Catholic!

 

Ramadan

 

Subject: Ramadan

 

Brothers,

 

While attempting to find a suitable show to watch on television, I no sooner started watching the Thursday night football game, when the announcers started boasting of one of the Minnesota Viking players religious beliefs.  It seemed almost planned ahead of time and the announcers were waiting for the player to make some sort of great play in the game. The player has evidently changed his name to reflect his new belief in the false Islamic faith. The announcers couldn't praise the player enough for having fasted through Ramadan during the pre-season training, while going without food and water. Remarking how strong he was both as an athlete and in his Islamic beliefs. The whole scenario stunk of the Jewish liberal media thinking to use their "trusted" personalities for appeasing the muslims over the FL Quran burning and NY Islamic Mosque incidents. This whole Muslim situation reminds me of the motto, "If you don't stand for something (truth), you'll fall for anything."

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

Gruner

 

Dear Brothers:

 

When I began to learn the truth about Fatima, I thought that Gruner was simply a useful idiot.  But you were right; the man is an out-and-out deceiver whose mission is to keep people locked in the false V2 sect while swearing allegiance to its antipopes.

 

In the autumn issue of his "Crusader" magazine, the first article is his and is entitled "Is the Antichrist Coming Next?"  In this article Gruner states:  "So, in this time of the worst apostasy the Church has ever seen, which is just apparently before the coming of the Antichrist, when even the elect would be deceived if that were possible, Our Lord says we must inform ourselves." - something Gruner is doing everything in his power to prevent.

 

Gruner is well aware that the Scriptural prophesy runs thus:  The Great Apostasy opens the door to the Man of Perdition, and this is what precedes the Second Coming of Christ.  There are no predictions of the conversion of Russia or any other nations to the Catholic Faith during the Apostasy - despite the insistence of John Salza and the other stars of Gruner Propaganda, Inc.

 

And just in case any of his donors are alert to this fact (of no conversions), Gruner adds what seems to be a somewhat useful and new twist.  As a result of this yet to be made Consecration of Russia, Gruner says: "It would not be paradise on earth such as Adam and Eve had before they sinned, but if would be hundreds, if not thousands, of times better than what this world is groaning under today.  The Message of Fatima also says:  If you don't obey, if My requests are NOT granted, then the whole world - every country in the world, with no exception - would be enslaved; not in a benign slavery, but under the rule of the Antichrist."

 

Now where did that come from?  Sounds like another way of saying "send cash fast" - and of getting people to start wondering which political leader might be Antichrist.

 

Another thing that annoys me is their use of Our Lady of Guadalupe to try to prove that the conversion of Russia must happen.  No doubt, Our Lady assists and answers prayers but, recall, the Spanish missionaries had been in Mexico for some years trying to do what Our Lord commanded the Church to do: teach all nations. There is virtually no effort of (or desire for) Catholic evangelization in Russia or anywhere else in the world; in fact, Catholic evangelization is outlawed by the V2 sect.  Furthermore, the Catholic world in the 1600's was not in Apostasy.  Many heretics did leave the Church via Protestanism, but the true popes made it clear that Protestantism was a revolt against God and that the heretics were out, not in. There are big differences between the situation that existed at the start of the Revolt, and now at its culmination. 

 

Funny how, according to Gruner, a "certain period of peace" has now become not quite paradise - but almost.

 

Lee Ann

 

1.    MHFM: Yes, it’s also interesting to note that Gruner, Vennari, Ferrara and Salza recently fielded questions about the meaning of the “conversion” of Russia.  It might have been in response to the information we’ve circulated on the true meaning of “conversion” in the precise context of Our Lady’s July 13 message at Fatima.  They gave their response to why it must, according to them, refer to the conversion of the entire nation of Russia to the Catholic faith.  Needless to say, they had no evidence to prove their position.  Rather, their argument essentially boils down to this: it must mean conversion to the Catholic faith because, well, it must.  On the contrary, all of the evidence from the context of Our Lady’s words on July 13, as well as Sr. Lucia’s statements concerning the matter (not to mention how Scripture uses the word “convert” in a similar way), supports our position on the issue.  That evidence is covered in this article: The Whole Truth about the Consecration and Conversion of Russia.  By the way, we also have an article coming that crushes John Salza’s recent attack on Sedevacantism.   

 

“Invincible Ignorance,” Exorcism

 

Dear MHFM,

I gladly study your material as often as I can.

Recently I came to the topic "baptism of desire". I'd like to shortly mention a story/saga of an unwilling Frisian who lived around 700 anno domini, i.e. when Bishop Willibrord and soon later St. Boniface missionized his land. He was about to receive baptism when he asked what happened to his pagan ancestors. The missionaries' answer was: All heathen souls went to hell. So obviously it was no subject of discussion whether those pagans lived a life as honest and good as they could; as nonchristians they just cannot come to God. This may be an indicator against the theory of baptism of desire, at least the version that says people can desire baptism even "unconsciously".

I'm writing this letter because of another topic: exorcism, or rather: the origin of the fruits of any work. When Christ freed demonically possessed people, the scribes claimed He did it with the help of Beelzebub and the highest demon. Christ, however, responded: "How can Satan cast out Satan?" and "If Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end."

Now, these statements seem to tell that good deeds always come from a good source. They surely do if considered merely abstract, but factually the source can be diverse, for instance if heretics do the exorcisms (I have no doubt that there are competent and "eastern orthodox" exorcists. Yet sometimes American sectarians show in their strange modern "religious service shows", in which there are allegedly blind, crippled, possessed etc. people who get healed by the "priest" during the show; but to me this always looks like fake) - can one really say the source was good, even if these exorcists error in relevant matters of faith? Also there are pagan "exorcists", even though their "exorcisms" work in a different way (satisfy "Gods"/ghosts/demons to receive help, otherwise being additionally cursed by them). The last mentioned issue is what makes me the biggest problem regarding the aforementioned words of Christ. Can't a stronger demon "cast out" a weaker one? I always thought yes, he can, and in my understanding this is why occult practice may "help" people, for example in African voodoo garbage which is becoming more and more popular in my country. This is also what a former astrologer and esoteric said who converted to catholicism. But when reading e.g. Mark 3,23 it really sounds like if everything that "helps" is good. Which would mean that the satanic voodoo man gets his power from a good source when he "helps" a person to become free from a demon. And those who are into esoteric "medicine" would be right saying "He who heals is right!", to which I used to reply: "So he who casts out a demon with Satan is right?".  Maybe you could tell your opinion on this, I would appreciate it very much.

Thanks for your time and attention.

All the best
Alexander

 

MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail.  The story you bring up is another example that “invincible ignorance” (i.e., the idea that souls can be saved without the essential mysteries of Catholic faith) is an untraditional, anti-Christian heresy. 

 

With regard to exorcism, your question is discussed in our two-part discussion of The True Story Behind the Exorcism of Anneliese Michel.  You will find that on Our You Tube Channel.  In it, we discuss how there’s an interesting two-fold dynamic in exorcism.  In one way, exorcism is effective by the power of the priesthood or by the power of the name of Christ.  In other words, it’s independent of the faith or the merit of the minister.  We learn that in Matthew 7:22 ff., where it is made clear that people can cast out devils even though Christ never knew them.  This is also demonstrated by the many heretics who are able to cast out certain demons by the power of the priesthood or by the name of Christ.  In this way, exorcism can be (but not always is) similar to the principle at work in the sacraments, ex opere operato (by the work that has been worked) – in the sense that it can be effective independently of the merit of the minister. 

 

On the other hand, we also learn from Scripture that with some demons, the merit and faith of the exorcist are required for exorcism to be successful.  We see that in Matthew 17:18, where Jesus rebukes the Apostles for failing to cast out demons as a result of their unbelief.  In Matthew 17:20 & Mark 9:28, we also see that the dedication and faith of the exorcist play a role in whether an exorcism is successful. 

 

Hence, it is clear that there is a two-fold dynamic at work in exorcisms: some of them can be successful simply by virtue of the invocation of the name of Christ or by the power of the priesthood (probably exorcisms of weaker demons); but others require faith, good will and devotion on the part of the exorcist to be successful.

 

You also say that you thought a stronger demon could cast out a weaker one.  That’s a false idea directly contradicted by Our Lord (Matthew 12:26).  He condemns the idea that Satan could cast out Satan.  It’s an idea one must reject.  You also mention the man who practices Voodoo and tries to cast out demons in that way.  Since he does not utilize the name of Christ or the valid priesthood, but rather the practices of a non-Christian demonic religion, such an individual could not truly cast out a demon.  If a wicked heretic using the name of Christ or the priesthood does apparently cast out a demon, it is not by virtue of his merit, but rather by the name of Christ and/or the power of the priesthood.

 

San Francisco

 

“This world is reaching a new low, and San Francisco has to be one of the most evil places on Earth:"

Dear MHFM,

   This commentary is SO appropriately placed, SO correct, and so necessary for everyone to see. When people start to think about how laws are changing in ways which reflect increasing immorality, how brazen thefts go unpunished, and how accommodations are being made for people with sinful intentions, a general idea of the end times described by St. Paul can be more easily formed:

   "Know also this, that in the last days shall come dangerous times. Men shall be lovers of themselves, covetous, ... , ungrateful, wicked, without affection, without peace, ... , incontinent, unmerciful, without kindness, stubborn, puffed up, and lovers of pleasures more than of God: ... these ... resist the truth, men corrupted in mind, reprobate concerning the faith. ... evil men and seducers shall grow worse and worse: erring, and driving into error." (2 Timothy 3:1-13)

   San Francisco used to be known as a Catholic city.

   How sad it is to know that today San Francisco has to be labeled as "one of the most evil places on Earth." How sad for people who live in San Francisco to realize this about their city and its leadership. How sad I feel, having grown up in the San Francisco area, and yet how relieved I am to have my worst suspicions confirmed by a true Catholic source.

   God bless the work of Most Holy Family Monastery.

Sincerely,
TD

 

Concerned

 

I am concerned about the salvation of my family and friends who profess faith in the Post Vatican II church.  They believe  that the Vatican II church is the same Church that they were born into through Baptism and the sacraments;especially the Eucharist.  My question is If they are sincere in their belief that Vatican II church  is guided by the Holy Spirit; and that they firmly profess the Triune Godhead in the working out of mankind's salvation can they realize this salvation through the Great Mercy of God  Whether they are deceived or merely obstinate in their blind faith that Vatican II is still the true Church; they point to the establishment of the Church in scripture  They point out to scripture these arguments:: I know that the scriptures state that God can neither deceive or be deceived   Jesus told Peter that he who hears you hears Me and He who rejects you rejects me and Him Who sent Me Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.  I realize that they are shallow in their understanding of scripture This is their fault. They need to study their Faith as taught through the CATHOLIC CHURCH MAGESTERIUM AND TRADITION  of the ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH ON EARTH Then can we judge that they condemn themselves because of their obtuse spirit to seek the truth in sincerity and truth PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS CONCERN  I know what mhfm monastery teaches but how do I help them SEE THE TRUTH.

 

Anthony

 

MHFM: It’s not clear what your concern is.  From what you have said, it seems that they obstinately reject the information which demonstrates that Vatican II was not Catholic, and that the sect which emanated from it is not the Catholic Church.  By rejecting that information, they demonstrate bad will and place themselves on the path to damnation.  A Catholic cannot consider them to have the faith or to be true Catholics.  You can present the truth to them, and encourage them to pray the Rosary for the grace to see the truth, but many people are simply of bad will.  There’s nothing that will convince them.  That’s why St. Paul tells us to avoid the heretic after the second rebuke. 

 

Vatican II

 

Subject: Summary of Vatican II

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

I think your comment to Rachel, is an excellent summary in the attempt to explain the confusion that resulted in the wake of Vatican II, to people who have not woken up at this late stage of the Great Apostasy

It would not do any harm to copy it out, carry with you, as a ready reference, hand it out, when the opportunity presents itself for people to do further research, adding the MHFM link , of course.

God bless,

David

 

Don’t Understand

 

My name is Rachel am catholic but i dont understand you dont believe in the 2nd vatican .. whats going on .. sorry but this kind of confusing cause i did not know that in our church would be any kind of separation.

thank you can you explain

God bless you

 

MHFM: Rachel, we don’t believe in Vatican II because it directly contradicts defined Catholic dogmas and the teaching of the past popes.  It was clearly a false council, predicted in Catholic prophecy and Scripture, that brought in the Great Apostasy.  The men who called it and confirmed it were manifest heretics.  It can be demonstrated that they were antipopes.  To follow Vatican II is to reject all the past popes and past councils.  In fact, it is to accept Judaism.  See:  The Most Specific Heresy in Vatican II.  Also, please consult our full section on Vatican II.

 

St. Joseph

 

I really like the quote from Amos someone wrote in today about "the remnant of Joseph":  wow!  That is SO timely!  Just today as I finally had a day off from work I was both reading and listening to the Gospel of Luke and it is so interesting how Jesus asks about who is the good and faithful servant who is found feeding his flock when the master returns?   then he talks about Joseph and this reminds me so much of Joseph of the OT who we of course know prefigures the NT-----and I have been thinking a lot lately about Saint Joseph and how in a very silent and mysterious and mystical way he is TODAY feeding Christ's flock, during this Great Apostasy, of how GOD really truly highlighted Saint Joseph's role when the latter appeared with the Child Jesus at Fatima…

 

A

 

New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video:

 

The Pakistan Floods and the 9/11 Ground Zero Mosque Controversy [video]

 

Novus Ordo

 

Video on ground zero mosque- A good presentation and a good angle on the inside job discussion.  I would add that it is good that people are waking up a little to find out the abomination that the Muslim religion is.  Assuming that one belives that Muslims did it line, this is certainly not the first time that they have built a "victory", "in your face" mosque and it is good becuase of this controversy, that people are starting to understand how radical the Muslim faith is to do such a thing.

 

My NO brother came for a visit with the family for Labor Day.  He is the only member of my family with even a whiff of good will to listen to the issues, a. Benedict is not the pope, NO priests arent priests, etc., to have any interest in the Latin Mass.  He came to Mass with me and we had a good talk.  I pray that I may convert him to the true Catholic faith.  We got to talking about the rite of ordination.

I told him the defects with it.  He responded, "Jesus is not a (paraphrasing,) "rule freak").  I told about the DE DEFECTIBUS bull of St. Pius V.  I asked him if he said Mass and used the right words of concentration, would he confect the sacrament?  No, of course not.  So words mean things, like the butchered right of Ordination and these men are nothing more than ministers with fancy uniforms.

 

Also, as far as valid Holy COmmunion, of course, they stand in his NO church and take communion in the hand.  I asked him if he believed in the Real Presence.  He said yes.  I said if Jesus appeared to you in a vision, would you stand or kneel?  He said kneel of course.  Then I said why would you do anything other than kneel before Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament?  He got it. I hope he gets all of it.

 

Heretics

 

Dear Brothers,

Greg who wrote in is a hypocrite. He says your website is "hate-filled and bilious," says to "turn from your sin-filled ways," and then quotes Matthew chapter 7 which is about not judging (hypocritically). So, if we cannot judge anything at all, because according to Greg that is to disobey Jesus, then how does Greg judge that your website is "hate-filled and bilious" and that you are walking in "sin-filled ways"?!! How does Greg even determine what sin is, if one cannot judge? How does he even read the Bible, since that it to judge between the black of the letters and the white of the spaces in between, as well as judging the meaning of the words and phrases themselves. And how does Greg judge which websites are good or bad, according to him?!!  Perhaps Greg is unemployed because having a job requires judging prudently what the best decisions are in relation to one's field of work. I hope Greg is not starving to death because he can't judge where his mouth is so as to put the food there. No, in reality, Greg is "hate-filled and bilious" and walking in "sin-filled ways," because he hates the Truth of the Catholic faith, like so many bad-willed liars out there today. Like so many of your critics, Brothers, he cites not one single thing that you've written to prove that you're wrong - because he can't, since you're right. Greg has put his foot in his mouth, and it's probably not the first time. Perhaps Greg should think about Amos 5:15 and sincerely weep over his own sins.

Amos 5:15 - Hate evil, and love good, and establish judgment in the gate: it may be the Lord the God of hosts may have mercy on the remnant of Joseph.

Glenn Dickerson, like Greg, cites no authoritative Church teaching to prove you are in error. Instead he says "according to the Catechism," etc. I would be surprised if the Vatican II Catechism even has the words heresy or heretic in it! Most V-2 "Catholics" don't even know what a heretic is. From MHFM's Recent Heresies of Benedict XVI section: "A Heretic is a baptized person who rejects an authoritative teaching of the Roman Catholic Church." Heretics are not Catholics and Catholics are not heretics - never have been, never will be.


Second Council of Constantinople, Pope Vigilius - "...we bear in mind what was promised about the holy church and him who said that the gates of hell will not prevail against it (by these we understand the death-dealing tongues of heretics)."

The bad-willed liars and heretics can't quote anything that the Church teaches authoritatively to refute MHFM, because all of MHFM's teachings are based on the same infallible teachings of the Catholic Church. In reality, Glenn is not in communion with the true Catholic Church because he rejects her infallible teachings, as do the Vatican II sect's Apostate Antipopes, such as Benedict XVI, as well as her members!...


God Bless,

Chris White

 

Quake

 

[A friend from New Zealand wrote in about the recent Earthquake]

 

Dear Brother Michael and Peter Dimond,

Thought you might be interested in these pictures of a big 'quake which woke us up at 4.30a.m… Saturday 4th September, 2010

One of the biggest to hit N.Z. for many many years, and the strongest I have ever felt....a lot of structural damage in the centre of Christchurch, as pictures show...no loss of life so far...

We O.K. here, power is back on....no water....but neighbor has a artesian well next door, so we are alright for drinking water, as the city supply is expected to be out for a number of days..

We have some structural damage to house, mainly doors jamming and windows out of alignment; conservatory has moved northward about 3/4 inch!.....

God bless,

David

 

Interesting

 

On the ninth anniversary of the 9/11 World Trade Center terrorist attack hoax, protestant "Pastor" Terry Jones of Florida will burn Korans, the blasphemous Holy Books the false, evil religion of Islam.  General David Petraeus has condemned this imminent act, saying it will result in the deaths of many American troops stationed in Afghanistan (a Jew/ Warmongering Neo con war we shouldn't be fighting).  However, the skunk  Petraeus had nothing to say about the incident when an art museum in NY featured a disgusting, diabolical "artwork" of our Lord a few years back.  No matter how heinous and despicable the affronts to Christ are in the media and elsewhere in this country, nobody has a word to say about it.  But when this protestant wants to express his 1st Amendment right to burn the evil Koran (rather than kiss it like JPJew did), the whole country is up in arms ready to destroy this man.  On Fox News, that light in the loafers heretic "priest" with his girly voice, "Fr." Jonathan Morris, has the audacity to say this act "offends" God and is an act of "sacrilege".  Sacrilege?!  It is not offensive to God to burn the blasphemous Koran!  Shame on these phonies!  How practically the whole world could be so blind...

 

-Michael Rudnicki

 

MHFM: That’s very interesting that another Novus Ordo “priest” went on TV to say that burning a Koran is “sacrilegious.”  They are not remotely Catholic.  It’s another clear example of the apostasy of the Counter Church on the local level, and why the teaching of Vatican II (which this “priest” has clearly imbibed) cannot represent the teaching of the Catholic Church.  Here’s a devastating quote to refute the heretical “priest,” Benedict XVI and the Vatican II sect. 

 

Pope Pius VII, Diu Satis (# 15), May 15, 1800:  “Books which openly oppose the teaching of Christ are to be burned.  Even more importantly, the eyes and minds of all must be kept from books, which do so more steathily and deceitfully… So the sheep of Christ should consider safe and eat cheerfully the food to which Peter’s voice and authority directs them; but despite any beauty and charm, they should shun as harmful and plague-ridden, what this voice forbids them.  Those who do not comply are certainly not to be counted among the sheep of Christ.”

 

Actualize

 

I live in San Antonio Tx. Where might I be able to go to a church that meets all of the requirements you set forth on your website? It's really great reading with an impressive array of data presented, however, if one cannot actualize the information and make a practical application of it in their own life, the only benefit I see to it can only be had on a merely intellectual level. While this may be an indespensable start, it is not enough to bring one all the way to salvation. I imagine, among other things, one has to come into regular contact with the valid Mysteries of the True Church. If you know of how this can specifically be done outside your monastery, please let me know. Moving to New York is not an option at this time.

 

I'm Catholic (1975). Never Confirmed.

 

Thank you

 

Eric

 

MHFM: Before receiving the sacraments, one must be in full agreement on all issues pertaining to the traditional Catholic faith.  That includes a firm commitment never to attend the New Mass again for any reason.  You seem to have the misconception that the faith is defined by, or only practiced during, attendance at church on Sunday.  On the contrary, the faith is lived each day.  Catholics in various periods of Church history were in situations that precluded them from attending church.  Therefore, one doesn’t always have to attend church to have his faith “actualized.”  Moreover, without the faith whole and undefiled, attendance at church will not be of any benefit.  If you are in agreement on all core issues, please consult this file and the principles discussed. Where to go to Mass or confession today?. After that, a person can contact us and we can help him with where to possibly receive sacraments.

 

Comment

 

Re:  Our Lady Did Predict a Sedevacante Period

 

Our Lady in her appearances to Mother Marianna in Quito, Eucador in the 16th century (a Church approved apparition/message)  did in fact predict a period in the twentieth century where the Church would go through a "dark night for lack of a Prelate and Father....).   She mentioned again at LaSalette (again, an approved apparition) that "Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the antichrist....)  How is it possible for John Salza not to be aware of these messages??

 

 

Glenn Dickerson, catechisms are NOT infallible documents!!  They are guidelines only.  If you don't bother to investigate questionable topics and just use the catechism for your information, then you are guilty of spiritual sloth, which is a most dangerous sin.  How many people are in hell today because they couldn't be bothered to learn and study their faith!!  Papal encyclicals are a better source of information for people who are interested.

 

Your video "Do You Believe" is excellent; please keep putting out these most interesting videos.  

 

God bless,

Brenda Roy

 

Matthew 7

 

Greg,

 

MHFM is dedicated to delivering the truth of Catholicism as it was once told. You imply that the Dimond brothers are judging. That is incorrect in that they are explaining "The Church’s" position, which as you know is infallible. If I had to guess you don't like judgment at all. If God was so tolerant he wouldn't have created the ten commandments etc. Since you believe so firmly in Matthew 7v3 you must also believe in Matthew 7v14 that few are saved which of course means most people go to hell.

 

Matthew

 

Mother Teresa

 

Dear Bros. I came across this article of Mother Teresa saying she had asked a rich man in a muslim country to build another mosque for the people there. This proves beyond a shadow that she is exactly like you said she was. How very sad for the souls that were lost to hell under her care! 

 

Sincerely,

 

Debra Ames

 

Comment

 

Yours is by far the most hate-filled, bilious website I have ever encountered in 15 years of surfing the Web! 

 

Read Matthew 7:1 AND OBEY JESUS, or Matthew 7:2 will surely befall you. 

 

Read Matthew 7:3 - 7:5, take it to heart, and forsake your sinful ways! 

 

.... Excuse me, I must withdraw and cry for you now. 

 

Love,

Greg. 

 

According

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,


According to the Catechism you are not in communion with the Pope and the Catholic Church.

Regards,

Glenn Dickerson

 

MHFM: No, according to the teaching of the Church, they are not true popes and they don’t represent the Catholic Church.  They don’t even believe in the concept of a pope.

 

St. Francis De Sales (17th century), Doctor of the Church: "Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church..." (The Catholic Controversy, pp. 305-306)

 

Process

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,

Thank you for your efforts.  I particularly appreciate the free book I received recently, which I hope to pass on to an Anglican friend.  I am myself in the process of converting to the Faith…

 

Thanks again,
Curtis

 

Conceived

 

Subject: Arian Trinity Issue

 

Dear Brothers,

 

There is a section in the Bible Proves booklet that talks about some of the issues the Arian apostates had with the Church. I believe one had to do with Jesus being an original part of the Holy Trinity. In the Apostles Creed it says when talking about Jesus says "who was conceived by the Holy Ghost." Does this mean was conceived as in a thought or conceived in some way to how Jesus was conceived or brought about in a Godly way by the Holy Spirit in the Blessed Virgin? God knowing all was aware that man would sin and have need of a Savior from the beginning so this would point to the second type of conceived listed above. Could you give me your thoughts on this?

 

Your ardent supporter,

 

Bob

 

MHFM: It means that when the Son of God assumed human nature and became man, He was not conceived in the same manner as other men, from the seed of man; but rather it occurred in a way that surpasses the natural order, that is, by the Holy Ghost.

 

John Salza

 

In 1917 our lady came to fatima to warn the church of the crisis of faith we are now experiecing she also revealed that the holy father would have much to suffer in none of her reported communications did she say the pope would lose his office for heresy  just wondering why she didnt and john salza an apolgist and lawyer had a debate on his website with a sedevacantis it seems he refuted every thing the other person defended just wonder have you seen his website thank you a.l.

 

MHFM: Allow us to address your points.  Your objections are without merit.

 

First, even if Our Lady didn't specifically warn people about antipopes at Fatima, that wouldn’t preclude the possibility of a line of antipopes in the Great Apostasy.  Our Lady of La Salette did say that Rome will lose the faith and become the Seat of the Antichrist.   

 

Second, we don't have all of what Our Lady said at Fatima because the Third Secret wasn't revealed to the whole world.  However, the information that can be gathered about the real Third Secret points us directly to the conclusion that it does in fact predict antipopes and the Vatican II Apostasy.  See: The Real Third Secret of Fatima.

 

Third, John Salza has refuted nothing.  His arguments are false.  They are filled with distortions, errors and perversions of Catholic principles.  On August 23, 2010, we wrote to John Salza and challenged/invited him to a telephone debate on the topic.  We sent him the e-mail that you will find below, and we followed it up with a certified letter.  He did not respond to either one.  We believe that he is avoiding us because he's afraid to engage us in such a debate.  Considering that John Salza says sedevacantists should be called “empty heads,” he should have no problem doing such a debate; but he’s obviously afraid to do it.  He probably realizes that such an encounter would not go well for him, and that it’s better to continue to promote his false arguments and distortions of Catholic principles to a captive false traditionalist audience that’s not really interested in the truth.  In a debate, his arguments would be shown to be false, and of course (like the rest of his fellow Vatican II heretics) he would have no response whatsoever to the mountain of heresies in Vatican II and in the writings of the antipopes. 

 

Here’s the e-mail that was sent to John Salza on August 23, 2010.  The same e-mail was sent to him a few days later by certified letter.  It was received and signed for at his address on Aug. 30, 2010.  To this date, we have received no response to the e-mail we sent on August 23 or to the letter that followed a few days later. 

 

Hi John,

 

My name is Brother Peter Dimond.  I'm a member of Most Holy Family Monastery.  You're probably familiar with us or with some of our material.  I was wondering if you would be interested in a recorded telephone conversation/debate on the issue of sedevacantism, i.e., whether Benedict XVI is the pope?  I realize that you consider Benedict XVI to be a valid pope, and that you believe the sedevacantists are quite wrong.  I think a conversation on this matter would be very valuable and interesting for people.  Please let me know if you are interested.

 

Thanks,

Bro. Peter Dimond

 

We will have more to say on this topic.

 

Pervades

 

Subject: “Pervades”

 

Chris White has commented on his experience with SSPX Holy Cross Seminary rector Vicente Griego. In his commentary Chris states that it requires humility rather than theology to be a Catholic.

I ask whether it is at all possible to find many graduates of the SSPX seminary at Winona (Griego's stable) who have humility? Or for that matter, simple good manners?

 

Francis…

 

MHFM: The first problem is that they don’t have faith; they don’t believe.  In fact, it’s a mystery that they even bothered to enter any kind of seminary, considering that they all believe that souls can be saved in any religion.

 

Beast

 
Hi, you sent me a video recently about the end times. European Union as the beast and, I admit that those are excellent points and so was the mark of the beast which I thought was definitely a microchip, which still could be but I doubt it now.
 
… anyways great video brother dimond. It was truly a work of God’s grace and wisdom and helped me a lot with understanding about these times.
 
Matthew.
 
God bless you brothers.

 

New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video:

 

DO YOU BELIEVE ? [VIDEO]

 

“Lord’s Supper”

 

Subject: Pot Luck

 

Dear Brothers:

 

I want to mention that I really like the new look of the website.  Thank you for that update and for all of your recent videos.  In addition, I appreciate the emails sent to you by your readers;  they are very informative.  I have recently been reviewing the "Discovered the Exodus" video which you offer and have been thinking much about the true worship and sacrifices ordered by God, all of which prefigured Christ and the Holy Mass.  Only a liar could deny it.  I've also spent some time with Chapter 11 of First Corinthians and the accompanying footnotes (Haydock Bible).  Chapter 11 really drives home the horror of the false worship of Protestantism and of the V-2 sect, both of which have been referred to as "the Lord's Supper".  Chapter 11 is also a great example of how heretics wrest St. Paul's writing (and also the other Scriptures) to their own perdition -- just as St. Peter warned.

 

When many Catholics hear the term "Lord's Supper" their minds automatically turn to the "Last Supper" and its significance.  It was at that particular Passover supper (or strictly speaking, immediately after it) that Our Lord instituted the Priesthood and the Mass.  The term "Lord's Supper" apparently confuses a lot of people (especially V2'ers) but they would not be confused if they were willing to hear the Church.  In Chapter 11 of Paul's letter, St. Paul is quickly referring to (rather than treating in-depth) a problem which apparently was becoming serious and which he intended to fix when he would visit the Corinthians in person.  Two entirely separate events were going on at the ancient church of Corinth:  the celebration of the Eucharist and the practice of what appears to have been, in modern terminology, the custom of pot luck suppers. 

 

Now, having heard about the abuses, St. Paul apparently didn't like what was going on and asks:  don't you have homes in which to eat?  St. Paul was always cautious not to scare off new converts who were not fully formed in the Faith.  So he didn't condemn the practice outright since these pot luck suppers or Agape were not sinful in themselves (at the time), and were ostensibly done in imitation of the meal Christ had shared with the Apostles prior to His implementation of the Mass and Priesthood.  These dinners (around which abuses were creeping in) were "extracurricular" -- that is, they were not part of the celebration of the Divine Mysteries.  And St. Paul is clearly trying to refocus the Corinthians' attention on what was truly important:  the celebration of the Divine Mysteries and the proper disposition for receiving the Eucharist.   

 

If a person were to read Chapter 11 without the direction of the Church, it would be very confusing and dangerous (just as St. Peter notes).  But listen to what the representatives of the true Church have pointed out to us (as found in the Haydock footnotes):

 

* The charity feasts [pot luck suppers] were called Agape and were practiced in some places in the infant Church as a token of peoples' friendship and union.  These suppers took place prior to the celebration of the Holy Mysteries.

 

*  It is the common belief (although St. Augustine thought otherwise) that when Paul used the term "Lord's Supper" he was referring to these charity feasts or pot luck suppers.  St. Paul "reprehends the abuses of the Corinthians on these occasions: which were the more criminal because these feasts were accompanied by the Eucharist sacrifice and sacrament".

 

*  In Chapter 11:23 etc., Paul reminds the Corinthians of the true Divine Mysteries.  He repeats the words of Consecration verbatim - as Our Lord had spoken them 24 years earlier - fully and clearly expressing a true and real presence of Christ's Body in the Eucharist - without one word to signify that this was to be taken in a metaphysical or figurative sense as the Protestants would later claim.

 

*  The Sacrament of the Lord's Body and Blood had been called the Eucharist even from the first ages of the Christian religion, as evident from the epistle of St. Ignatius, St. Irenaeus and Tertullian.  "The late pretended reformers found it called by this name in the Catholic Church.   Why then do they who pretend to nothing but Scripture, affect to give it the name The Lord's Supper when these words in Scripture signify a different supper?"

 

*  "We find these Agape forbidden to be made in the Churches, in the 28th canon of the Council of Laodicea, a little before the General Council of Nice."

 

In the Novus Ordo sect, one of their favorite words is "Agape", the meaning of which nobody really seems to know.  However, for them it does seem to connote something where a good time can be had by all - except for those who have a problem with heresy and irreverence with what they believe is supposed to be the Mass.  And V-2 "churches" teach ad nauseum about V-2's alleged return to the pure and unadulterated practices of the early Church - which no doubt was the same line used to lure (or at least assuage the consciences of) the first Protestants.  What a sham.

 

 "The Lord's Supper" is not only not worship (and was never the worship of Christians), it isn't even a true commemoration of the real Last Supper - because it has been shorn of its true significance. "The Lord's Supper" seems, rather, to be a parody of the true Last Supper. 

 

And a commemoration of the Church-outlawed pot luck suppers!  Little wonder why at these V2 ceremonies people behave like they are worshipping the golden calf.  They are!

 

Many thanks to you for always keeping the Light before our eyes in the wilderness of these last days.

 

Lee Ann

 

Women “priests”

 

I have two questions:


1. What is all the written proof that the Roman Catholic Church cannot have married priests?


2. What is all the written proof that the Roman Catholic Church cannot have female priests?

Thank You,
Dick Gray

 

MHFM: 1. The Church doesn’t absolutely forbid married priests.  Celibacy is the discipline in the Roman Rite, and it’s rooted in Christ’s teaching that celibacy is superior to marriage.  However, the Church has allowed married men to be ordained in the Eastern Rites.

 

2.  Sacred Scripture makes it quite clear that women are excluded from such ministry (1 Tim. 2:12; 1 Cor. 14:34).  Jesus also instituted His priesthood in His Apostles and He did not include women.  Moreover, priests act in the person of Christ.  Women are thus excluded from acting in that capacity.  The fathers of the Church also condemned the concept.  The idea was so foreign to the traditional Christian faith that it didn’t have to be elaborately or repeatedly condemned.  Nevertheless, when the practice of altar girls cropped up in certain places, numerous popes specifically condemned it.  By extension, the condemnation constituted a condemnation of the idea of women “priests.”

 

Pope Benedict XIV, Allatae Sunt, July 26, 1755: “Pope Gelasius in his ninth letter to the bishops of Lucania condemned the evil practice which had been introduced of women serving the priest at the celebration of Mass.  Since this abuse had spread to the Greeks, Innocent IV strictly forbade it in his letter to the bishop of Tusculum: ‘Women should not dare to serve at the altar; they should be altogether refused this ministry.’  We too have forbidden this practice in the same words in Our oft-repeated constitution...”

 

Mass

 

Dear  Bro. Peter & Michael Dimond

Hi, I just want to ask if I need to learn Latin in order attend the Latin mass? I recently downloaded a video of the Latin mass and I can't understand a thing they are saying I can only understand our own language and english. I am a Catholic from the Philippines and I don't attend the new mass now, sadly there are no traditional masses here, so just in case I will have an opportunity to attend traditional mass somewhere I know what to expect. And one more thing, do I need to confess before receiving the Eucharist? Thank you for your time and God bless.

Sincerely,
Glenn

 

MHFM: If a person is in mortal sin, it is necessary for him or her to confess before receiving the Eucharist.  Also, one doesn’t need to know Latin in order to attend the Latin Mass.  Moreover, since basically all the priests in our day are heretical, if one finds an option for receiving the Eucharist, one wouldn’t be going to attend Mass but only to receive the sacraments.  That’s explained in our file on Where to go to Mass. 

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

What can I say but EXCELLENT video on Pakistan and 911 Mosque! I thought about that too, that Pakistan is all Muslim and it was no surprise to me that the floods happened. Sad that so many souls are lost, but people will not listen to the truth, how evil Islam really is and their history of trying to destroy Christan as in Fez Moracco,  Or how Our Lady helped the Christians at the Battle of Lepanto!  And I do believe that they are making the Mosque on NYC a 'distraction' from the truth that they are hiding, as you stated in the video (and the video about Kurt Sonnenfeld the FEMA cameraman saying 911 was an inside job).  Also not allowing the Greek Orthodox church to just REBUILD their church on the site where it was destroyed is most suspicious.  Also, on the front page of Aug 31 Wall Street Journal was a story about how Col Gadhafi is converting Italian women to muslims!  God bless you!

 

June

 

Malachias

 

Dear Brothers Dimond,

 

Thank you again for the important work you are doing... crying out the truth in the wilderness! I pray for you both every night when I say my rosary which is doing amazing things in my life... one of which was to be led to your website which has explained everything I have gone through with the Norvus Ordo church in the last 5 years.

 

I have taken to reading scripture... and this morning reading was Malachi 1 and it jumped off the page:

 

"A son honors his father, and a servant his master. If I am a father, where is the honor due me? If I am a master, where is the respect due me?" says the LORD Almighty. "It is you, O priests, who show contempt for my name. ...    7 "You place defiled food on my altar. 
      

11 My name will be great among the nations, from the rising to the setting of the sun. In every place incense and pure offerings will be brought to my name, because my name will be great among the nations," says the LORD Almighty.

 

 12 "But you profane it by saying of the Lord's table, 'It is defiled,' and of its food, 'It is contemptible.' 13 And you say, 'What a burden!' and you sniff at it contemptuously," says the LORD Almighty.

 

Yes! Not only relevant to the day of Malachi but to our counterfeit Catholic Mass as well!

 

Keep up the great work!

 

Colleen Urban


Found

 

Subject: Rosary and Mass

 

Good afternoon Brother,

First i would like to say thank you for your great site.

I am catholic and i used to go to the v2 church until i found your video about the invalid new mass. It aroused my curiosity and i went to your web site to read all your material. Thank you for you helped me a lot. There are only V2 "mass" where i live (the Netherlands)  and as i do not want to go there any more i would like you to tell me what to do on Sunday.

Also as you suggested, I try to pray the full rosary every days at three different times following your guide. My question is, should i pray the creed, our father and the three hail Mary before I start a new set of mysteries?

… thank you very much brother.

God Bless you.

 

Philip

 

MHFM: We’re really glad to hear about your interest.  This section covers those questions about receiving sacraments: Where to go to Mass or confession today? [link to section].  With regard to the Rosary, one does not need to pray the Creed and the three Hail Marys before each new set of mysteries, if one is praying all 15 or more than one set of mysteries in a day. 

 

B-16

 

Subject: B-16 + Gay “Marriage”

 

Brothers, did you see the news?

AntiPope B16 just granted the highest order a layman can receive in the Church to the President of Portugal, even though this devil just allowed gay "marriage" in his once blessed country. 

 

I don´t know if this is suitable material for a Heresy of the Week, because it´s more of moral scandal than a Faith issue. But nevertheless, like so many scandals, it´s connected to the bad faith the V2 sect professes, if one can connect the dots. Just like when Ratzinger gave (novus ordo) "communion" to Protestants, Abortists and his sect commemorated Ted Kennedy. 

 

After this incident, you can safely and reasonably state that the V2 not only is pro-abortion (since it allows its members to held this position), but also pro-gay civil unions, since one can legalize gay "marriage" and yet receive the highest commendations. That´s actually the second time they praise a pro-gay politician, since the U.S. Senator Kennedy was also in favor of this aberration. 

 

It will be really funny (if not tragic) to see the Portuguese President being celebrated both by the Novus Ordo Sect and another gay group, the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence (who mock the Catholic Faith). They often "canonize" persons who in the public sphere fight for gay rights, or politicians who pass on laws giving them additional rights or protections. 

 

CK

 

Not sure

 

I’m a new Catholic, Did Catholicism last year. I thought I was in a God fearing Church but from what your books say I’m now not so sure.  If the Church is wrong how do we make it right? I’m working on getting my health up so I can go to the Philippines and help. I’m retired Army and on disability.  The Leadership of the Church makes those calls so how do I as a member know if I’m right or wrong...

 

Dan Martin

 

MHFM: The local churches which have the “Mass” in English are not authentically Catholic.  Please consult the material and you will find the proof that the Vatican II “Church,” which most people think is the Catholic Church, is not the real Catholic Church.  Please look at the information which explains why one must avoid the invalid New Mass.  The Catholic Church is not wrong.  The people you think are representatives of the Catholic Church are in fact not even Catholic.  You need to consider what the Church has taught throughout history, and that’s what our material covers.

 

Ramadan

 

Dear Brothers,

 

For Antichrist Antipope Benedict XVI to say that God will reward Muslims for their Ramadan fasting is beyond outrageous. Unless a person is water baptized, has the full Catholic faith, and is in the state of grace, then their sacrifices are extremely offensive to God:

 

Proverbs 21:27 - “The sacrifices of the wicked are abominable, because they are offered of wickedness.”

 

The Vatican II sect and its 5 Antipopes have literally made a meal of (destroyed) the notion of acceptable sacrifices to God by installing the invalid New Mass, where Jesus Christ's Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity has never been present and never will be because, a) they're ususally not even a validly ordained priest doing the “ceremony” to begin with, and b) the words of consecration have been changed so as to render the entire “sacrament” invalid, i.e. the “sacrament” no longer signifies what it effects – the union of the Catholic faithful with Christ. The New Mass is a Protestant meal, not the Holy Eucharist! Yet the V-2 Antipopes always go completely out of their way to show honor, respect, devotion, veneration and worship for any Non-Catholic religion and the sacrifices they make. The importance of making acceptable sacrifices to God is made crystal clear at Genesis 4:3-5:

 

Genesis 4:3-5 - “And it came to pass after many days, that Cain offered, of the fruits of the earth, gifts to the Lord. Abel also offered of the firstlings of his flock, and of their fat: and the Lord had respect to Abel, and to his offerings. But to Cain and his offerings he had no respect: and Cain was exceedingly angry, and his countenance fell.”

 

A Catholic never respects Non-Catholic sacrifices, such as Muslim fasting during Ramadan. Muslims fast in order to destroy all non-Islamic religions and their adherents, such as the Catholic Church! Muslims fast for their Jihad, or “holy-war” against all non-Muslims!! Muslims are like Cain who, as a result of his anger, killed his brother - the first murder of the human race. Antipope Benedict XVI (and the other 4 Antipopes), the Vatican II sect, and anyone else who obstinately respects or follows them are murderers of Jesus Christ and of the Mystical Body of Christ, the true Catholic Church. By the Vatican II sect's apostasies with Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Protestantism, schismatics, etc. they commit murder in their hearts and minds!! Benedict XVI's latest praise of Muslims with their Ramadan fasting is the latest case in point. Islam blasphemes God, the Holy Trinity. Islam kills God's Son, Jesus Christ, by their rejection of Him. Islam constantly seeks the destruction of the only true Church of Christ, the Holy Roman Catholic Church. Benedict XVI kills anew all the Holy Catholic martyrs that Muslims have put to death over the centuries:

 

Apocalypse 6:9, 10 - “And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held. And they cried with a loud voice, saying: How long, O Lord (holy and true) dost thou not judge and revenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?”

 

The Vatican II sect (Whore of Babylon) and its Antipopes (Beast) are completely drunk on the blood of the martyrs of Jesus, and of the saints of Jesus:

 

Apocalypse 17:6 - “And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.”…

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Videos

 

Dear Br. Dimond:

 

I must also sing the praises of "Incredible Creatures", and I wonder how many people realize that Darwin himself admitted that the evidence for evolution simply doesn't exist.  

Most, if not all mutations are detrimental to the survival of the individual, and that fact alone would  make evolution impossible.  It's sad that people would rather believe a fairy tale than the truth.

 

Another set of videos that we bought some years ago (produced by Questar) is "Wonders of God's Creation" and this series of videos describes not only the animal kingdom, but other things as well, such as storms, heavenly bodies (outer space) and I think it is a good supplement to any homeschool science program.

 

God bless you always, 

Brenda Roy

 

Creatures

 

Subject: Incredible Creatures

 

Greetings Brothers!
 
I too would like to add a comment to the video series Incredible Creatures that Defy Evolution.
 
I watched two of three so far and it’s tremendous. There is quite a lot I would have never thought these animals were capable of. If I'm not mistaken, the series is great in explaining that all these great unique features could not have simply evolved because it would all have to have evolved at once. Basically the animal would have to have been like this, like today, from the beginning. If some of these features from the beginning began to evolve, they would serve no purpose until they evolved to their present state.
 
A lot of it is dependent on other features of the animals uniqueness. So if you had one of these parts evolve without the other one(s), it would be useless and the animal wouldn't be able to perform what it needs and requires to survive. And some of these animals are born with this knowledge, with these features that they need right from the start to survive. If they did not have these features from the beginning they could not survive. That means an animal like this could never evolve. I'm not the best at explaining it but I recommend that people get it. I enjoy watching videos on evolution and creationism and this series certainly satisfies me.
 
Part one of the series begins with the professors explanation of evolution. In a sense it's quite humorous. The professor openly states that our school text books still contain a lot of the evolutionary lies that have been proven of being false, yet they're still in the text books.
 
I also wanna say thank you for all the free stuff that you always send me with my orders. It is very gracious of you and I thank you.
 
God Bless you!
 
Danijel Filipovic

 

Comment

 

Greetings!

I just wanted to compliment you on your website!  SUPER FANTASTIC!...

 

Thank you so very much for the hard work you do.  It is really helping me in these dark times.

God Bless

mark thimesch

 

Vatican-Moscow

 

Good morning,

In your most humble opinion, how much has the Vatican Moscow Treaty hurt the voice of the church and how much does this treaty interfere with her teaching?

Mrs. A

 

MHFM: It was something that had significance back at the time of Vatican II.  However, at this time, it’s not really relevant when compared to the widespread acceptance of false ecumenism, indifferentism, salvation outside the Church, and other heresies.  The heretical teaching of Vatican II (and the Vatican II antipopes) is what directs the heretical voice of the Counter Church.

 

New conversation posted

 

MHFM: This is a new conversation with Robert from Wales. He called in to attack our beliefs and defend Antipope Benedict XVI and Vatican II.

 

Conversation with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 1/3

Conversation with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 2/3

Conversation with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 3/3

 

Altar

 

Subject: “Beatification Altar”

 

Dear brothers:

 

The vatican just finished posting pictures of the "altar" where Cardinal John Henry Newman will be "beatified."

 

http://www.thepapalvisit.org.uk/News-and-Media/Latest-News/Images-of-the-Beatification-Altar

 

Is there anything about this weird "sanctuary" (other than the crucifix) that looks even remotely Catholic?

 

-RDS

 

Incredible

 

Subject: Incredible Creatures that Defy Evolution

 

Awesome videos!!!  I finished part two of three and I found the part where they talk about the incredible engineering it took to design a fighter jet and the things that it can do in flight but when it comes to the evolutionist the birds evolved, I find that simply astounding…

 

Todd

 

Beck

 

Glenn Beck stands on the platform at the "Restore Honor Rally" in Washington DC, with some leaders of all religions.  With Imam's and Rabbi's and a priest...and Protestant ministers....just as did John Paul II...at Assisi....

 

Nothing but lies...deceit and trickery....just wondering what your take on Mr. Beck is?

 

Sincerely

CD

  

EU

 

… I have re-watched your video End of the World.  And in that you show the paper from Pravda Russia Nov 3, 2009 (I think) where they say that the EU is Another form of communism.  I have tried to look it up on the Pravda website but cannot find it.  I would like to send it to everyone because I believe it is important that people know how evil the EU is.  So you have a link to this? Thank you and God bless you for all of your good work.

 

June

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  This is one of a number of links one could consult: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4157

 

Feel

 

I feel the same way Brenda Roy feels regarding the conversation between brother peter and robert or anyone else like him for that fact, forget all the torture techniques that one could apply to a human being, just lock a true catholic in a room with a person like Robert and make the catholic person debate this obstinate lunatic for a short period of time, it will drive you crazy.  It’s like watching someone try to put a square block in a round hole and he just doesn't see that it won't work.  

 

Todd

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Thank you for sending the new 4-in-1 DVD with "Is the World About to End?" and the book, "The Bible Proves the Teaching of the Catholic Church."  So very generous of you to send them to me, and they arrived on the feast of St. Monica!  Bro. Peter's book is well written and very easy to understand.  The sequence of logic he uses is superb.  I have been unable to correspond for several weeks, though I have been reading the Website, and I am so glad to see you've been doing your usual marvelous work.  I am thinking especially of Joseph Ramirez, a man who has admirably lived up to the responsibility of bearing the name "Joseph," by confronting the dangerous and spiteful Bp. Williamson.  I would ask Mr. Mulligan if the person he is corresponding with is truly Bp. Williamson and not one of his lackeys or factotums.  If Williamson has forgotten, then he needs to be reminded: "The floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops."  —St. Athanasius

 

It is wonderful to hear Bro. Michael again in his new video discussing the latest heresies of the masonic usurper of St. Peter's Chair.  When B16 writes, "In these days when we remember the return to the *Father* of dear Brother Roger," people assume B16 is referring to our Father in Heaven.  We must not be fooled by this verbal manipulation.  If Ratzie meant God, then he should have used the proper designation: GOD.  But he did not.  There is another father, the father of lies.  So what B16 actually wrote is: "In these days when we remember the return to Lucifer of dear Brother Roger..."  And for these people, there is great joy in that.  They cannot wait to join lucifer!  They adore satan and serve him.  Really, these masons are becoming so obvious.

 

Thanks to Bro. Peter for the discussion with Robert from "Wales".  Bob's arguments were so absurd that I did laugh out loud; the way Bob changed topics constantly was comical.  Of course, being invincibly ignorant, Bob jumped right into the invincible ignorance song-and-dance yet again!  Robert must be pals with Mr. Windy from the Archdiocese of Chicago.

 

This quote from the invincibly ignorant Robert found on Audio 3 at 05:51 is typical of his babble: "Well, I believe in Heaven everyone is a Catholic, wherever they were in this life.  So if someone has got to Heaven under invincible ignorance, they will be Catholic in Heaven.  So Heaven, in that sense, is full of all Catholics!"  Robert continued to chatter and natter on nonstop like a pot full of bubble-and-squeak while Bro. Peter tried to speak!  As it turns out, Robert's rudeness is actually the least of his problems.

 

It is obvious Bob is spiritually lost.  But he also physically lost.  Literally.  He does not know where on earth he is located.  When he said, "It's getting late here in Great Britain," he gave himself away.  Fie-fi-fo-fum.  I have been friends with actual Welshmen born and bred.  From Cardiff.  No true Welshman says, "Here in Great Britain."  Great Britain?  Only an Englishman says that.  "Jolly good, old chap!" In any case, Bobby's accent is decidedly Brit; he sounds like he just left a meeting with Queen Lizzie Rothschild at BP:  Buckingham Palace, of course. (Bet you thought I meant BP as in British Petroleum.  Why, what a peculiar coincidence!  How odd.) 

 

Bob a Cymry?  Doubtful.  The only connection Bob has to Wales is that he tells lies the size of a school of whales.

 

Robert cares not one whit, not a farthing, not one pence for the ultimate destination of his soul.  Mired in the bog of Novus Ordo muck, what remains of his brains numbed by the fluoride of Vatican2, missing his beloved JP2, and living in the land of QE2, there is no room for logic in poor Bob's head.  It is sad to listen to someone like Robert.  Though he does not sound it—because he uses a soft, somewhat quivering, and sibilant voice—Bob is actually terribly arrogant.  As he proved when he said, a tad peckishly, to Bro. Peter, "I don't like your tone of voice."

 

Robert needs to understand that if he continues on this path, he will neither be allowed to meet nor stand beside the Recusants in eternity for he has thrown his lot on the side of that stinking Cromwell and fat Henry…

 

God bless you always,

Deidre Howard

 

DVDs

 

Dear Br. Peter and Michael,


A heartfelt thank you for all you have done and continue to do for souls…. Have you done any research on any of the apparitions of Our Blessed Mother, other than Fatima, i.e. La Sallete, Lourdes, Garabandal... We just finished watching the video on the "end of the world" and enjoyed the format (no music) Sometimes it is hard to hear the message with the background music, something to consider if you re-do any of the DVD's/CD's, especially for us "older folks" Our heads are full, our hearts sad, but we persevere knowing that the Church established by Jesus Christ will prevail, even if it is only a remnant! 

You remain in our prayers.
In His Will,
Jim & Linda  

 

Williamson

 

…  Bp. Williamson is indeed a most intelligent but foolish man to deny EENS.  Instead, he analyzes the dogma, which he no doubt was forced or influenced to do by the blind, foolish evil organization, the SSPX.  He does not have the faith of a child.  Children will blindly believe anything their parents tells them, and not try to analyze it.  The dogma of EENS is supposed to be accepted and not in the slightest way questioned or analyzed to render it meaningless.  That could be done to make any dogma worthless, but it cannot be done, for it is heretical.  If a child is told uncompromisingly the truth from age 5 on up, the simple sentence: "All non-Catholics go to Hell.", they will never question it.  It's just that simple.  A short sentence that Williamson should have been taught without compromise, the immutable truth: All non-Catholics go to Hell.  It can be more thoroughly explained to Catholic youth by their parents as they get a little older, such as dying a Catholic with no unconfessed mortal sins is the only way to ever hope to go to Heaven and a more thorough explanation of the Latin "Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus" (Such as it contradicts infallible bulls to say that it is possible for a man to be saved if he is not a member of the physical Church on Earth.) It could have saved the hell-bound fool, Williamson… But his faith just isn't strong enough to accept something so simple as what all toddlers should be told: "All non-Catholics go to Hell."  And there is no "however" or "but" at the end of that sentence.

 

-Michael Rudnicki

 

Gruner

 

Fr. Gruner… has an article about the 3rd Secret of Fatima in which it is declared that the secret revealed on June 26, 2000 was a perfidious hoax.  Yet it was revealed by the Vatican with under Pope JP II.  Well, how could any Pope et al in good standing deliver a perfidious hoax upon the entire world?  Why does Fr. Gruner still deny the whole sedavaticanism or whatever it's called?  Perhaps I'm overly simplistic, but if someone lies to my face I don't trust him anymore, and I'm sure not going to send him any money.  It was either the real message or it wasn't.  If it isn't, then whatever is sitting is the vatican is a dreadful liar.

 

Karl

 

MHFM: Gruner is, one must say, a most wicked heretic and a false prophet.  His soul is far darker than most people could ever imagine.  He spent his life misleading those who consider themselves conservative Catholics with dishonest defenses of the Vatican II sect and a promotion of the most wicked heretics in the world (JP2, etc.).  He led them right back to the Vatican II Counter Church and its Antichrist leaders whom Our Lady wanted them to reject.  He still frequently quotes Antipope John Paul II in a positive light!  The fact that anyone would even consider supporting such a despicable phony heretic, once that person is familiar with the facts about what’s happening, reveals the profound spiritual fog in which people remain.  He’s a complete heretic headed for Hell and he’s leading others there as well.  The notion of “two third secrets” or two texts of the third secret was all part of their compromised position to not accept the official version but at the same time not really condemn it.  It’s a microcosm of their larger compromise on the Vatican II sect.

 

Gruner, "Fr." Nicholas – Why would you say that he is a schismatic?

 

Heretic, Baptism

 

Brothers,

 

Bro. Peter's debate with Robert!!! from Wales brought a question to my mind. I thought I was familiar with all the materials MHFM has put forth regarding the Church's teaching on baptism. But Bro. Peter was asked if a non-Catholic was baptised, is he a Christian and Bro. Peter said "no." I think I know the proper context of what Bro. Peter meant, but I was hoping you could expound on this point in greater detail, mainly so I do not fall into error.

 

Regarding the "heavy-metal monk," I thought this guy was retiring, at least according to the last article posted on your website? Did the Vatican cut his retirement benefits or did the "monk's demons miss the music?

 

God bless you all there,

 

Howard

 

MHFM:  A heretic who is validly baptized does not become a member of the Church.  This also touches upon a finer theological point.  The Church teaches that a heretic can be validly baptized if he is baptized with water in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost.  But if a person is baptized as a heretic – for instance, if he rejects the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation – then his baptism, though valid, would confer no grace and would not unite him with the Church.  His heresy is an impediment to his reception of the grace of baptism.  He receives the character or the mark of baptism validly, but he does not receive the grace of baptism.  He doesn’t have his sins remitted and he is not justified, since he is outside the church.  Outside the Church there is no remission of sins.   

 

Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra:

“With Faith urging us we are forced to believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic Church and that, apostolic, and we firmly believe and simply confess this Church outside of which there is no salvation nor remission of sin… Furthermore, we declare, say, define, and proclaim to every human creature that they by absolute necessity for salvation are entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff.

 

This is the express teaching of Pope St. Gregory the Great.

 

Pope St. Gregory the Great, Quia charitati, June 22, 601: “From the ancient institution of the Fathers we have learned that those who are baptized in the name of the Trinity, although amid heresy, whenever they return to holy Church, may be recalled to the bosom of their mother the Church either with the anointing of chrism, or the imposition of hands, or with a profession of faith alone…because the holy baptism, which they received among the heretics, at that time restores the power of cleansing in them when they have been united to the holy faith and the heart of the universal Church.” (Denz. 249)

 

Here we see Pope Gregory the Great explaining that those baptized as heretics are not cleansed, i.e., their sins are not remitted.  They are not cleansed by the baptism they received among the heretics until they remove the heresy and are united to the true faith.  The baptism they received is valid; they don’t need to be rebaptized, but it’s not efficacious for them until they remove the heresy.  At that point, they become justified by the power of the baptism they already received.  We also see this principle illustrated in Sess. 7 of the Council of Trent on the Sacraments in General:

 

Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Sess. 7 on the Sacraments in General, Can. 6.: “If anyone shall say that the sacraments of the New Law do not contain the grace which they signify, or that they do not confer that grace on those who do not place an obstacle in the way, as though they were only outward signs of grace and justice… let him be anathema.” (Denz. 849)

 

Here we see that the sacraments do not confer the grace which they signify on those who place an obstacle in the way, such as heresy.  The above is also the teaching of Doctors of the Church.  This teaching does not contradict any of the other definitions of Trent, of course, such as Sess. 5 on Original Sin:

Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Session 5:
"If anyone denies that by the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is conferred in baptism, the guilt of original sin is remitted, or even asserts that the whole of that which has the true and proper nature of sin is not taken away, but says that it is only touched in person or is not imputed, let him be anathema." (Denz. 792)

Notice that this anathematizes anyone who says that original sin is not remitted “by the grace” conferred in baptism.  Whenever grace is conferred in baptism, original sin is infallibly remitted, as in the cases of the baptism of infants and others who don’t place an obstacle in the way.  However, in the case described above (i.e., the baptism of a heretic) no grace is conferred at all.  As a result, original sin is not remitted.  Hence, we can see that the clause “by the grace” is very important.  It’s an example of the infallibility of dogmatic definitions and the protection the Holy Ghost gives to the teaching of the Church.

 

Empty Solutions

 

As I saw the Glenn Beck "take back America" rally this past Saturday, I couldn't help but think how SAD that there were about 100,000 people at this rally (and although Beck is a Mormon and it seemed that the rally was more of a 'protestant ' rally).  Wouldn't it have been better to have those 100,000 people saying the ROSARY and REALLY praying for a solution to this problem, to the one person Our Lady, who could help us, just has she helped at the Battle of Lepanto!   People just do not understand the trouble we are really in, and are always reaching for 'empty' solutions, that will not help. 

 

Hum…

 

MHFM: Yes, and while he says some true things, he’s very ecumenical and totally pro-Israel.  Getting his view on Israel is like listening to an Israeli cabinet member.  He realizes who’s in charge and the line he must take on that issue to remain in the mainstream.

 

Truth

 

Subject: Robert from Wales

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Robert is just another person among all the billions of souls since the time of Our Lord that are not willing to live up to something that the Church teaches.  The rejection of truth always comes down to the fact that there is something that the man or woman does not want to accept or is not willing to submit their will to.  Because such a person cannot either give up something sinful or does not want to think that someone they love within their family or friends may be lost to Hell forever, they will go anywhere to avoid the truth of it all.  Robert and all the others who reject truth, will talk endlessly without meaning... they will go anywhere to keep the race of running from truth going...so they don't have to really do anything or change anything… It is only bad will and ego that will ramble on as Robert does, going nowhere and making no sense whatsoever.  Anything to keep the illusion alive that everything is ok.  So very sad.

 

CD 

 

Videos

 

Subject: Is the World about to End?

 

Thank you for all of your work and effort in putting these videos together. I feel like I have learned a lot with a fresh new perspective on the book of revelation. Like other Christians wanting further understanding of the book of Revelation/Apocalypse, I have heard a few different explanations of the beast, trumpet judgements etc and yours seemed to make a lot of sense. Anyway, I believe your work should not go unrecognized and you should know you're not unappreciated. God bless.

 

Rigotto

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  We hope you look into the material we have which demonstrates that the Catholic Church alone is Christ’s true Church; for it’s necessary for salvation to be a part of the one Church He established.

 

Search

 

Brother Peter Dimond, I am writing to you in my search for Truth.

God has been calling me to Him over the past 5 years (all my life actually, but significantly in these past five years). He has called me out of the world, and into holiness. However, although the call is strong, I am still not entirely sure to what place in Christianity He is calling me too.

I am currently fellowshipping with three Protestant churches of different denominations and I am working closely beside Anglicans, Presbyterians, and Catholics at a local Drop-in Centre.

I am in search of the One True Catholic Church, but I can not find Her!

I would appreciate any and all information you can give me.

And although I have NO INTENTION to settle for lukewarm mediocre Christianity, I would appreciate if you could share with me, what is the FOUNDATIONS of the Catholic Faith? That is to say, what is the absolute minimum required to receive Salvation, according to the Catholic Faith? Again I do NOT INTEND TO SETTLE at this level, God is calling me to holiness, and demanding 100% of myself to Him. But I would like to know what is the basic fundamental beliefs needed to be part of the One True Catholic Church.

May the Blessed God and Father of Our Lord Jesus Christ Bless you and Keep you and yours!

 

…Manasseh

 

MHFM: You will find the information about the true Catholic faith, and how one would convert to it, on our website and in the materials we have available.  You must get out of Protestantism or any affiliation with similar denominations.  There's only one true Church, and that's the Catholic Church.  The traditional faith is covered and explained on our site and in our materials.  You really need to look at them, and begin to pray the Rosary.  Please consult our section on how to convert.

 

Vatican II

 

Subject: … and we will not serve Lucifer

 

I understand if JPII was a madman, and all his 'teaching ' is nothing but open insults to God and Church, this Benedict is more dangerous and cunning; he uses ambiguous statements always leaving room for manipulating the truth. Any TRUE CATHOLIC POPE, if he claims to be a real Catholic, should PUBLICLY declare Vatican II VOID and NULL, invite a new Vatican II council banning all new theological 'editing' of Holy RCC dogma and traditional teaching, restoring the Gregorian Mass with High altars, restoring all Liturgical text of pre-Vatican II, reestablishing a NEW Inquisition for reevaluating all priests, clergy from bottom to top, excommunicating all who are NOT CATHOLIC. Unless pope does this- he is a heretic, he is an ENEMY to Christ, and we DEMAND the resignation of Benedict! No dialogue with this hateful people, who have a poison of snake in their hearts and sugar on their mouth, who kill Christ with 'washing of hands'- who are BLOODY and responsible for this universal paganism, sin, catastrophe and perpetual troubles mankind goes through in our modern time.  We ,'the spotless dove' of Christ, will NOT SERVE LUCIFER, wherever he is- even in the pretended RCC. In fact Holy Roman Catholic Church is there intact and all-powerful, as it is, as long as people like you are there...

 

Woody…

 

New Video & Article

 

MHFM: We have a new video and article on Benedict XVI’s recent heresies. 

 

Benedict XVI's Recent Heresies, Late August 2010 [video]

Benedict XVI's recent Heresies, Late August 2010 [article]

 

Heavy Metal

 

Subject: Heavy Metal Monk

 

Brothers in Christ,

 

I think it was amazing & quite telling that in the beginning it shows him flashing the satanic sign.

 

John

 

Christian

 

Subject: Alex Jones Non-Christian Video

 

I agree with you about alex Jones. Also he is buddies with David Icke who has called himself the son of God. You can find David making these statements if you look it up youtube. I followed Alex's channel and agree with his political views but if he is best buddies with a man that into reptilians and who calls himself the messiah I no that Alex is a non believer. I love the Lord and I am a Christian myself but I do take offense that you say the one true religion is Catholic. Honestly, I know it is a powerful religion but separating christians based on doctrinal belief and religion is not what we need today. We need to all go back to what Jesus wanted us to be. Christ Like hense Christian. I don't see any religion mentioned in the Bible and I don't believe I need a priest to intervene for me to be forgiven of my sins...

 

…Dezzy…

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but your views on Christianity are not correct.  Christ founded one Church upon Peter (Mt. 16:18-20), and said you must hear it to be saved (Mt. 18:17).  He also taught baptismal regeneration (John 3:5), His real presence in the Eucharist (John 6), confession (John 20:23) and many other things that non-Catholics and Protestants reject.  By doing so, they reject the Gospel.  We have a book called The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church which demonstrates that the Catholic Church alone is the biblical faith.  You really should consult the sections on our website that are dedicated to refuting Protestantism.  You cannot unite with people who have different and contradictory beliefs on core issues of the Gospel.  To say that everyone should unite, despite such differences, is to render what Christ revealed on those matters meaningless.  One must say in charity that you can't be saved believing what you do.

 

With

 

Subject: Exchange with Robert

 

Dear brothers:

 

I found this section of your exchange with Robert quite extraordinary:

---

MHFM: "Since we can't judge and we don't know how God works, is it possible that God incarnated himself in one of the figures of a different religion without our knowledge?"

Robert: "Absolutely not."

MHFM: "On what basis do you exclude that possibility?"

Robert: "Because of the promises to St. Peter."

---

You had helped to lift him out of the darkness and muck and for those few seconds he seemed to stand upright on the dry ground where the sun was shining, but sadly (and almost certainly due to bad will) he slid back in and then went under.

 

-RDS

 

Revealing

 

Subject: Comment on your new conversation with Robert.  And 9/11

 

How is Robert going to say that he knows what the Catholic Church teaches when he doesn't even believe in the most basic laws of physics regarding 9/11?  People who are confronted with the laws of physics regarding the scientific impossibility of a "pancake" collapse choose not to believe the truth because of the reality it reveals to you. The individual lies to himself to believe in a reality based off of what he/she finds comfortable to believe in. The same case goes with people who are confronted with basic dogma because they know it contradicts what they have been programmed to believe, so they choose to lie to themselves.  You can definitely call these people out as liars.
 
It was revealing that Robert Chose to attack what you believe about 9/11 "theories" because he couldn't attack you at the clear definitions of Catholic dogma.
 
I also have a suggestion. I think you should make a video series about what really happened on 9/11 and the spiritual warfare connection. If people can't believe something so massively a lie on the secular level such as 9/11, what makes them think they will not fall for a greater spiritual deception such as Vatican II? Also I believe if you make a youtube series on 9/11, it can be pushed to reach alot more people to bring them into the knowledge of the One True Faith.
 
Keep up the great fight!
-Isaac

 

Read

 

Bro. Michael and Bro. Peter

 

The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church is the best book I have ever read.  It made a lot clear that I did not know.

 

Mary Ciaccio

 

Conversation

 

Robert’s conversation was a clear demonstration of an unwillingness to listen to the truth. As a modernist, Robert regurgitates the same puke over and over with a severe case of diarrhea of the mouth that spews the lies that were force fed to him by the Vatican II abomination during these last days. Robert is clueless of what the Church teaches, while unable to take a stand in his beliefs, he jumps around in the conversation like a Mexican jumping bean. Amazing the bad-will amongst Robert and his fellow Vatican II sect members, while playing the Saint and refusing to judge anything except going against the truth. God has already laid down the future consequences and judgment of those outside the True Faith through the Bible, the Popes and the Saints. I think the main point that Robert and other modernists fail to recognize is the seriousness of the end times we are currently in (that have been predicted throughout Catholic Church history) and the role that the Vatican II unusual suspects play in these last days.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

Shocking

 

Subject: Guy from Wales Shocking!

 

Dear Mhfm,

You ask the guy "Do you believe jewish rabbis who reject Christ could be in a state of Grace?" His answer "I'll leave that to God". What kind of an answer is that. First off he questions your salvation somewhere in that conversation/debate because you’re a traditionalist but a Jewish Rabbi he can't judge. But he has no problem judging you Bro Dimond. He didn't answer your point on Abortion. I can't understand it how people could be that stupid that’s what it is along with bad will. Truly drunk with the wine of the whore of babylon. Let’s hope the Mother Of God converts him to the Catholic Faith. But when he says things he knows "great Christian people" who don't believe the Catholic faith his conversion is slim.

God Bless

Sean

 

Meaningless

 

Subject: Wales V-2 man and radio show

 

This man was horrible with his bad will.  He knows that there is no salvation outside the Church and knows that Benedict-Ratzinger does not teach it.  As Bishop Dolan did (in his sermon you dissected about 3 years ago), he reduces the dogma to a meaningless formula.  The man is smart enough to understand the truth.  But his bad will gets in the way.  I cannot blame you, Brother Peter, for getting so irritable with the man.

 

Also, I really enjoyed listening to your archived radio shows.  I encourage you to have more and ask you to please make time to do them around your other activities.  Thank you.

 

“I.I.”

 

Re:  Robert

 

You are not only a heretic and apostate, you are an idiot.  There is no such thing as invincible ignorance.  If people are sincerely interested in God, it is extremely easy for them to have access to information to save their souls in this age of internet.  If people die in ignorance of the Faith, it is because they were not interested in God, which is why God sends such people to hell.  What you and others like you are saying is this:  God is not powerful enough to lead people of good will to the Faith.  This is not only blasphemy, it is a complete lack of faith.  This heresy is worse than a cancer devouring one's body; this heresy is a cancer devouring peoples' souls.  Wake up!

 

Brenda Roy

 

MHFM: The conversation was another example of how “baptism of desire” and “invincible ignorance” are, at this time, the foundation and attempted justification for all heresies and every rejection of Christ and His necessity.  We see again that even the most liberal and unbelieving heretic, such as Robert, invokes them in a futile attempt to put a “Catholic” face on religious indifferentism and apostasy.

 

Comment

 

Subject: B16 & his heresies

 

Please, do a follow-up DVD on him. Some very deluded people try to convince themselves (and even more sadly, others) that Ratzinger´s heresies are from a long forgotten (and forgiven) past. It´s always good to have at hand a new pack of recent heresies, in order to show that he did not change for the better at all. In fact, he seems to be getting worse. This new incident involving Brother Roger is really a card in the sleeve I´m going to use several times in future discussions. It´s as if B16 sent the heresy of the week as a gift package to you.

I am aware that your Fatima DVD covers him and some of his most recent heresies, but the man really deserves personal treatment. JP2 needed almost 30 years of Anti-Papacy to award him the dubious honor of having his heresies denounced on 2 DVDs, but B16 is managing to do what seemed impossible: To outrun JP2 in terms of heresies and apostasy... in half a decade! The guy is factory of heresies. And at the same time, creating the illusion that he´s a staunch defender of Catholic Doctrine, Moral and Discipline. What a deception.

 

I´m really starting to think he uses some form of Black Magic in order to deceive people. How can anyone with eyes to see not realize he´s a heretic? Or worse, to even believe he´s going to promote "the big restoration"? He could not care less about the necessity of the Catholic Faith. 

 

Brother Michael´s reasoning is just perfect. Ratzinger does not believe that the Faith of Rome is to be held. To him, a person can be outside the Church, found his Own Church/Community, lead them astray from the True Faith, and yet be a role model, die in the state of grace and be a Saint in Heaven. - Pause for throwing up - One does not have to read between the lines to find a deeper hidden meaning at all! This is just scandalous heresy, as manifest as one can get. A "pope" who believes that Protestants (as well as the Orthodox) are free to reject the Papacy and yet can achieve Salvation and Sainthood. 

 

To me, that was the most explicit denial of the Catholic Faith and demonstration of religious indifference EVER. And the bad will from the false trads and the defenders of V2 is beyond comprehension. Over the past months I´ve been trying to convince people. Most of the times, it´s a big frustration. One can see by their attitude how a Merciful, Loving and Caring God would still send them to Hell. They don´t really care about Jesus (despite what they may claim), so in similar fashion Jesus won´t care about them at Final Judgment. They will reap what they sow. They don´t give the slightest importance to the Truth and dismiss the facts without any concern. 

 

What´s worse is that they constantly try to scare me by saying that I am going to Hell (as if Hell was reserved only for sedevacantists, and in some cases, traditionalists). I had to borrow your argumentation. I always state something like: "Well, so what? According to your so called Popes, every religion creates Saints and Martyrs, I could be a Sedevacantist Saint, for all you know. You should also never try to convert a Protestant, by your logic, since he could be well on his way to sainthood, perhaps being even more saintly than you and I. Even if you were right, and don´t get me wrong, you AREN´T, I still accept all the dogmas about the papacy, unlike the protestants, who deny the papacy as a whole and yet can be saved and become Saints, according to your "popes". To say that Sedevacantists are going to Hell for being "out of the church" or "against the papacy" (when they only question the validity of the last FALSE claimants) and yet call Protestant Brothers, attend their services and believe they can be saved is just astonishing pharisaical hypocrisy." 

 

Conversation

 

Dear MHFM,

 

I recently downloaded audio clips of the recitation of the rosary so that i could listen to it while travelling, since I spend a lot of time traveling to college.  Is this ok? Is it equivalent to praying the rosary provided I meditate on the mysteries when they are being recited?

With Best Regards

Sam

 

MHFM: Thanks for the question.  No, listening to the Rosary being recited by others is not equivalent to praying it.  It’s necessary for you to recite the Rosary yourself.  Also, we do not recommend that people pray the Rosary while listening to a recording of others who are praying it.  It’s important for people to foster individual interior lives, and that comes with individual prayer to God and solitary time.  We would recommend that you pray the Rosary yourself while you are traveling. 

 

New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video.

 

Bishop Richard Williamson Exposed - 1/2

Bishop Richard Williamson Exposed - 2/2

 

Conversation

 

Dear MHFM,  

   A few weeks ago I had a conversation with my mother and my sister (both Novus Ordo) about my decision to not attend a reception being given for a deceased friend of the family, the same individual from the e-exchange "Tea." I explained to them that I had no evidence that this individual had died holding the traditional Catholic faith. I said it would be uncharitable for me, a Catholic, to attend.

   My mother then asked, "Does this mean you would not attend the funerals of your own mother and sister?" I said, "Yes." My mother persisted, "Not even your own mother and sister?!" I tried to explain to her that the Novus Ordo service is not Catholic and the Church teaches that Catholics must not attend non Catholic services under pain of mortal sin. She expressed her unwillingness to believe that the Church had taught (and still does teach) this.

   My sister gave her own reply: "That just does not look good." I did not respond to this. My sister had already displayed negative sentiments toward the Salvation dogma when I presented it to her as a true Church teaching about two years ago (my mother also does not believe this core dogma). I probably should have tried to explain to my sister that not compromising the faith is of a higher priority than what looks good. It seems pointless to try to talk to her about this, however, if she's not going to believe that the Church teaches absolutely no salvation without baptism in water and the Spirit.

Sincerely,
TD

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  Yes, one should explain to her that what “looks good” is not what determines how a Catholic must act.  Moreover, those who form their decisions upon “what looks good” will not get to Heaven.

 

Comment

 

Subject: A Gulf Coast Article

 

Brothers,

 

I don't know if this has any interest or if it relates to the Apocalypse at all, so here is the headline:

 

Portions of the Gulf are So Toxic that Dolphins, Fish, Crabs, Stingrays and Other Animals are "Trying to Crawl Out of the Water"

 

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20744

 

Take care and God bless you all there at MHFM,

 

Howard

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Notorious heretic Bp. Williamson's attack on sedevacantists and “Feeneyites” is outrageous but is easily refuted. He wrote to Bill Mulligan: “One's all too frequent experience with sedevacantists and with Feeneyites is that the mind has shut down, and emotion, blocked emotion, has taken over.”

 

Three weak points are worth exposing in this sentence. 1) He cites his experience, rather than dogmas as his nexus. 2) He assumes mental relaxation is mental dysfunction (or "shut down" - it also could be reverse speech for "mouth: shut up"). 3) He talks of blocked emotion like a New Age psychoanalyst, i.e. that negative emotions, if suppressed, cause psychosomatic disorders. Each of these points are refuted very easily:

 

1) Pope St. Pius X, Pascendi - “For the Modernist believer, on the contrary, it is an established and certain fact that the reality of the divine does really exist in itself and quite independently of the person who believes in it. If you ask on what foundation this assertion of the believer rests, he answers: In the personal experience of the individual.”

 

2) Catechism of the Council of Trent, Article I, Faith excludes Curiosity: “For when God commands us to believe He does not propose for us to search into His divine judgments, or inquire into their reason and cause, but demands an unchangeable faith by which the mind rests content in the knowledge of eternal truth.”

 

3) Pope Leo XIII, Exeunte Iam Anno - “...even the philosophy of the ancients taught that every man should restrain his evil desires, and still more and with greater care those who from daily contact with the world have the greater temptations...For man has been born under this law, that the mind should rule the body, that the appetites should be restrained by sound sense and reason; and hence it follows that putting a curb upon our masterful passions is the noblest and greatest freedom.'

 

Pope Pius XI, Ad Salutem - “Here indeed is an ideal protrait of a Christian sovereign, nor will you find anywhere a nobler or more perfect one. But it cannot be reproduced by the man who trusts the guidance of human wisdom, which often is slowwitted, oftener blinded by the emotions.”

 

He then quotes Confucius, as though he were some kind of Church authority, and not in fact a pagan! It's a typical invincible ignorance heretics' tactic to cite some famous non-Catholic philosopher as though their natural wisdom is proof of their attaining the state of grace without having received the sacrament of baptism! Also, his reference to “Gordian knots” is mysterious. He seems to be implying that the Catholic faith is a Gordian knot (an extremely complicated problem that needs solving) rather than an extremely simple set of dogmatic truths that require a peaceful acceptance and belief. Also, the legendary Gordian knot was actually “solved “ by being cut by Alexander the Great, so that's how Catholics are to deal with occasions of sin such as heresies – cut them off! By implying that the Catholic faith is a Gordian knot, Bp. Williamson is saying that a) the Catholic faith is a problem, and b) it can only be “solved” by being cut off – such is what Vatican II tried to do – cut out the heart of the Catholic faith by dissecting and removing the dogmas. In reality, being the heretic and schismatic that he is, Bp. Williamson is cut off from the Body of Christ. Bp. Williamson is a Gordian knot of heresies! The sedevacantist "feneeyite" mind simply rests confidently and peacefully upon that rock which is Christ: the Truth. There is no need for a Catholic to be constantly wound up like a cockoo clock, trying to unblock emotions and untie Gordian knots!!! Both scripture and Tradition make it clear that there is no rest for the wicked, but there is abundant peace for the good…

 

Wisdom 3:9 - “They that trust in him, shall understand the truth: and they that are faithful in love shall rest in him: for grace and peace is to his elect.”

 

Isaias 57:2 - “Let peace come, let him rest in his bed that hath walked in his uprightness.”

 

Luke 10:6 - “And if the son of peace be there, your peace shall rest upon him; but if not, it shall return to you.”

There is no rest or peace for heretics, schismatics and apostates such as Bp. Williamson.

God Bless,

Chris White

 

Share

 

Subject: Mind Control

 

Hi MHFM,

If I may share a thought or two. Bishop Williamson is, hypothetically, learned in the ways of manipulating thoughts and feelings of people, by the use of his own words and actions. This is proven by his discussions with Joseph and Bill.

First, the discussion with Joseph Ramirez. The bishop referred to him as "my dear boy", even though he clearly is not a young child. Why? Other heretical clergymen have done this before. They do this in order to revert grown men back to a child like docility and sense of comfort. (Let us recall 1 Corinthians 13:11) The more docile the flock, the easier for them to be controlled. Heretics are not backed by the Lord's dogmas, so they need other means to keep their heretic trained flock in line: erroneous obedience.

Second, the letters to Bill Mulligan. The bishop discussed "emotions", a quote from Confucius, closed mindedness, and the Gordian knot. That is lot of things to talk about, if taken seriously. I may have to get my copy of the Analects (Confucius), and perhaps a biography of Alexander the Great (Gordian Knot). There are no dogmas to be found in those documents. If another manipulative man would say similar things, one would argue that he is speaking stylistically in order to sound smart, while avoiding the dogmatic definitions. Keep them busy, look under my left sleeve, then under my right sleeve, until they forget the dogma that is in question to begin with. This trick is similar to a performer's trick in a magic act, but has the same effect: intellectual diversion.

The Lord wants us to discuss His dogmas. The devil wants to keep us busy with something else, such as useless trivialities. True Catholics use dogmatic definitions to teach. Wicked heretics use the people's own thoughts and feelings to manipulate them. The question is, putting aside whatever good the Bishop has done, is he being manipulative intentionally, by training or by chance? We must equip ourselves against these tricks nonetheless. I hope he converts too. If not, at least it would do some good for SSPX and other like minded groups if he confronts the dogmas head on in a debate with one of the Dimond Brothers. Assuming he wins, it would be another feather on his cap, If he loses, he can find the true faith not only for himself but for others like him. What does he have to lose?

Finally, to control another person's mind one must first analyze it. Psychoanalysis therefore is a basis of mind control.

Ave Maria.

Sanjiv

 

Protestant

 

Subject: Protestant near death worship of man

 

A sad story

 

A networking acquaintance of mine posted on her facebook page that her friend was dying.  I said is she catholic and would she like a priest.

 

Answer was "No thank you, she has made peace with her minister" Not interested in making peace with God, but with the Protestant minister.  And these Protestants believe in universal salvation like v-2 Catholics.  "God is ready to take her to heaven" Very sad.

 

MHFM: Yes, the bad will remains to the end.  It’s at those moments that the seriousness of these issues comes into focus. 


Discussions

 

Brothers:

Thank you for the video exposing Bishop Williamson. I thought the use of the word "charade" was absolutely right on, but unfortunately, too many people are playing along with their game. Over this past weekend, I came to a decision: I'm no longer attending their Armada chapel and watch their heretical priests play this game of deception.

As I related in my last email, several discussions at the Armada, MI parish recently landed me a call from the prior, the now notorious heretic Steven McDonald. He called me about my promotion of the true dogmas on salvation and Holy Water Baptism at "his" parish, and my warning to one 17-year-old boy, who I knew was considering the priesthood with the SSPX, to put his possible vocation in God's hands and to NOT vow yourself to this heretical Society. The lad cried to his mama, Mama called Steven, and Steven was "rather disturbed" by this activity on my part. After a long phone conversation with Bishop Williamson the Second, he attempted to offer me a deal: Steven would read my (i.e. Bro Peter's Salvation book), and I would read a book of his chosing, and then we would talk. In exchange for this agreement, I would promise to refrain from telling "his" flock the truth about what is required to save their souls. He agreed that he would not formally impose his heresy on me by making some announcement or denying me Holy Communion. At first I agreed but the next day cancelled the agreement since it's wrong to obey men, rather than God, and his book would be dangerous to my faith. No deal, Father.

Please know, I have challenged this man to debate me publicly on three seperate occasions, which he refused. He doesn't want to "draw attention" to the issue. Translate: He wants to keep the Charade going. I've challenged two other men to debate me, both long-term false traditionalists, one of whom is a veteran lawyer. Decline, decline. I've offered these folks, including their "pastor" to play fair and debate me like gentlemen before the eye of the public, and they run and hide! All except for Steven--he chose at yesterday's Sunday Mass to play dirty, cowardly, and notoriously heretical from the pulpit.

The Gospel spoke of the ten lepers, and Steve remarked that Jesus wanted to teach us about "hierarchy and order." Great, no problem. But Father went on and on about how much confidence the people should have in him as their prior and the Society priests and bishops in general. He was almost claiming to be infallible, not even a hint that he could fall into error, or that we should always judge everything in light of Catholic dogma. The people, he seemed to be saying, don't need dogma, since they have the great SSPX priests such as himself. Have perfect confidence, Fr. Steve will bring you safely to glory. This "little messiah" complex of his then got stepped up as he lavished praise on Marcel Lefebve as the Great Hero who saved the true Mass AND Catholic tradition--where would we be without him?--as if God cannot raise up thousands of Champions of the Catholic faith at any time. But this was the last straw. Marcel Lefebvre was a manifest heretic,
McDonald loudly-praised this heretic as the Saviour of Catholic Tradition. Conclusion: Fr. McDonald is a manifest heretic. Goodbye SSPX, I'll pray for your conversion to Jesus Christ and the Roman Catholic Faith. He also quoted St. Bernard as saying something like, "the man who will not be led or guided is a fool."  I saw that as a weak, cowardly shot at me and you. What a gutless heretic.

Joseph Ramirez

 

Materials

 

… Your web site and WRITTEN materials and audio/visual resources are excellent media to provide the TRUTH about the ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC, and APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF JESUS CHRISTJESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO THE FATHER THE ONLY WAY, TRUTH AND LIFE   No one comes to the FATHER EXCEPT THROUGH THE SON.  No one knows the Father except the son and he to whom he reveals Him.  Your web site provides the magisterial teaching of the church through the true popes; THE  WRITTEN WORD OF GOD THROUGH THE BIBLE and APOSTOLIC TEACHING which hands down the teaching of JESUS CHRIST.  YOUR WEB PRESENTS THE POPES TEACHING THROUGH PAPAL ENCYCLICALS AND DOGMATIC TEACHINGS, EX-CATHEDRA AND PAPAL BULLS.  ALL TRUE CATHOLICS NEED TO KNOW THESE TEACHINGS DIVINELY INSPIRED THROUGH THE HOLY SPIRIT AS CHRIST PROMISED THAT THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST THE CHURCH WHICH CHRIST ESTABLISHED THROUGH PETER.  PLEASE CONTINUE TO PRESENT MORE OF THESE PAPAL DOCUMENTS SO THAT CATHOLICS WILL HAVE THE TRUTH.  YOUR YOU TUBE CHANNEL IS EXCELLENT SOURCE OF INSTRUCTION

 

Anthony

 

Perhaps

 

Subject: Open Letter to Confused Catholics

 

Brothers,

 

Perhaps the SSPX should change the name of that document, "An Open Letter To Confused Catholics".   It should actually be called  "An Open Letter -   To Confuse Catholics"

 

Wj…

 

Comment

 

I was very pleased to see you´re taking a more active role in exposing the false traditionalists. It was about time for you to place Richard Williamson in his proper place and expose him (in all his absurdity) for what he truly is. You did an article on him years ago, but it was "buried" among other articles in one of the sections. A person had to deeply explore your material to find it. I hope someday you do something similar about Fellay.  If I may be so bold, and since you´re reformulating your main page, why not place a link to the BEWARE section in a window too, like you did to the youtube channel? That section is a must read, and I don´t think it gets the attention it deserves. 

 

The FFSPX, like so many other groups, realize there´s a real problem. However, they not fully perceive it for what it is, and end up offering false solutions and hope. The devil probably knew that at one point the Apostasy was going to be so manifest that he would have to establish a controlled opposition of his own. When I was a "traditionalist" (non-sedevacantist) I always knew the Tradition was going to be only a temporary home, a spiritual hotel shall we say, before I could study the matters more deeply and sort things out before finally deciding what to do with my life, and where to entrust my soul. After all, they had reverence and a good approach to the moral life (ok, aside from NFP, as I later found out through you) 

 

While I would not say the FSSPX was bad from day one, nowadays the people there are heterogeneous. It´s really a grey field. There are tares, but also potential wheat. Some are of good will, seeking refuge from the V-2 and searching for answers. Others are just accommodated. While others are moved just by thrill about the group promoting the Old Mass, opposing ecumenism and denouncing the Jews. At least that´s what they used to do. When Hell broke loose with Williamson and the Holocaust, they quickly removed most (if not all) of their online material exposing the Jewish Zionist propaganda. How blessed I was to discover your works and finally be instructed on the real problem and how a Catholic should deal with it.

 

While Bishop Williamson advocates for many true causes, he´s indeed a hypocrite of ridiculous proportions, plus a coward in some areas. I guess the reason so many people follow him is because they see pure evil around them, so they settle for someone who´s offering 25% or 50% of the Truth and they don´t know (of) any better. Williamson is learned, and all his knowledge was for nothing at the end of the day. It only served to feed his pride and typical FSSPX´s elitism (another reason why I could not stand them for very long). 

 

In your video Death and the Journey to Hell, there´s a part (among others) I can never forget. When you talk about the reality of many people going to Hell not because they were totally evil in an almost cartoonish caricature manner, but more of the case that they were not sufficiently good. Like the people in Hell saying "forever, and ever, and ever..." when I examine my conscience and reflect on my sins and faults I always repeat to myself (as a way of correction and warning) "not good enough, not enough, not enough...". I used to think that Williamson and his Society were good, but not good enough. But he reached such a low point, that a sincere Catholic must reject him as a bad and evil person, like he disgustingly fails to do in regards to JP2 and now B16.

 

A failure to reprove them, after seeing what they did, is indeed theological vomit. But to actually go in their DEFENSE as if they were GOOD is nothing less than a severe case of mental diarrhea. The false Resistance is really the devil´s assist plan. 

 

All in all, another fine audio file. Keep up the good work.  One last thing. There´s a gossip circulating that RW is suffering from a neurodegenerative disease. I don´t know for how long (in case the rumor is true), or how advanced it may be (he can still say Masses, that´s for sure). I don´t know if he was always a bad willed person (he certainly is for a few years), but this clinic condition could help explain his absurd and aberrational declarations. 

 

CK

 

Videos

 

Subject: Williamson videos

 

Very nice job with your Williamson videos.  I think you nail the essential problem of Williamson; that is intellectual pride, very well.

 

Not to bore you but I had some follow-up with him since I shared the recent line about “Gordian Knots” with you.  I pointed out to him that his line, that SdV and ENS “cut Gordian knots”, while “theology only unties them as best they can be” represented a concession to SdV and ENS.  His answer to me was basically to tell me that I don’t know what theology is.  That I don’t know what I don’t know, and that I have a slow mind but a quick tongue.   

 

Well I paraphrase; the actual words of the bishop are below.  While I am no “theologian”, his entire “argument”, all he has written against Sedevacantism can be reduced to a psychological prescription, that is: “these Romans are insane”.  However their insanity shields them from their otherwise manifest heresies, because they are not obstinate (they can’t be obstinate because they are insane, essentially innocent but crazy).   If you point out to him their high level of education, he will say that indeed that is precisely what made them insane; (presumably therefore they are less guilty than an otherwise ignorant person would be).  As far as I can discern, this is his entire case.  He will not touch “Feeneyism” other than the comments he made to Mr. Ramirez.   And he will not counter any dogmatic citations with argument.  He will gently tell you that it is cute that you are trying to tackle such weighty issues, you know, because you can’t possibly understand these matters, and then he’ll go back to psychoanalyzing the Roman offenders, and never answer your argument.  It is truly amazing that the shell can be that empty.  But sadly it appears to be.

 

Bill Mulligan

 

Valid

 

Dear MHFM,

Hi, I just want to ask if the 4th mystery of the Rosary is valid? as far as I know it was promulgated by anti-pope JP II right? thanks

Glenn

 

MHFM: No, the “Luminous Mysteries” are not part of the real Rosary and shouldn’t be included with it.

 

Questions

 

Subject: Comment - Stephen’s Questions

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

 

I would like to thank you for the straightforward reply and charitable act you made on Stephen's questions … Your answers [assist] him that is confused, wary and scared on the presented affairs of his soul, should he apply the remedies you recommended.  I find his email and questions very interesting and may prove helpful to others who are in similar situation.  I would like to comment and forward some of my insight, if I may:

1 - "Am I damned for all eternity because of the actions of the church leaders"    C - First, you have to clear the air by defining who these church leaders you refer to, if you refer to the Vatican II Sect and if you follow their actions – the answer is categorically yes, the reasons for this had been well explained by MHFM Brothers;

2- "… Is this the plan of God?"   C - To indicate God to plan evil situations is blasphemous and tantamount to ignorance of God's attributes … evil (absence of good) situations as mentioned by Stephen (invalid Mass, worthless adoration hours & devotion etc) are allowed by God to satisfy the just Justice of Almighty God that has been disrespected by unacceptable prayers and sacrifices to Him;

3- "Why would the Lord and through him the Holy Spirit, allow for entire populations to be duped and worship in an invalid way"   C – Since you refer to this worship done in Vatican II Church arena, this worship is in no way acceptable to God, hence God does not allow Himself to be worshipped in an invalid way as all abominable acts or worship and prayer go straight to him that asked for it – the devil.  God could never stand the slightest imperfection (the main reason why Purgatory was created) how much more invalid and sinful prayers?;

4- "… I just don’t think that God would allow so many of us who try to be devout to be duped or intentionally depraved of our worship and devotion"    C – "To be devout", this phrase in the Catholic sense should be understood as a soul following the Commandments of God through His established church on earth – the Catholic Church (not the Vatican II), hence if the soul deviates in the path by jumping out of the safe haven of the Catholic Church through apostasy, heresy or schism – that "to be devout" claim loses its dignity before God! … that soul regardless how sincere his devotions he thought he had … can never be considered devout at all.

 

Stephen, Brothers Michael and Peter have given you the best advice you can ever solicit on this planet earth and make sure that you remember this resounding command from Heaven through them – "Regarding the effort you’ve employed, that’s surely why you’ve come across this information.  God is giving you the grace and the opportunity to see the full truth.  It’s up to you to accept it.  If you don’t, one must say in charity that you will go to Hell."  And I concur that you will go to Hell if you do the opposite.

 

If a sincere Catholic dissects this email, the questions presented stem from the fact that Stephen indeed has very little knowledge on the attributes of God, the history of the Catholic Faith and the Catholic Church … should he be familiar with the history of many ancient heresies, apostasies and schisms of the past – somehow his questions would be narrowed to just a few and not be complicated.  In these most turbulent times of the world, the End of Days, I should say … one must not only content himself in various devotions and prayers he practices, but one MUST also feed his soul that is terribly hungry by spending enough time to study Catholic Faith.  I can safely say that if Stephen is familiar with the accounts surrounding the Catholic Church like preceding historic moments that paved the way for the birth of a number of heresies, apostasies and schisms he won't be surprised with the present situation of the Church.  The abominable bishop Arius was "holy", intelligent and very ascetic that's why numerous souls marched with him to wage war (with their heresies) to the death against St. Athanasius and the very few that hold the Catholic Faith; the founder of Islam in the 6th century did observe 40 days strict fasting and prayers in the desert before he claimed to have received visions from God to establish a new religion; how the great Christian Constantinople country fell and became the Islam Turkey;  the great Western Schism that paved the way for the three antipopes who ruled the Catholic Church for more than 40 years; the deChristianization of France with the evil French Revolution in the 18th century; the founder of Protestantism was a former monk; the persecutions of Catholics around the world that hold the traditional Catholic Faith … in the 20th century, thousands of our Catholic brethren where slain in Russia, Spain and Mexico by not complying with the Communist ruling states in fact the then Pope Pius XI cried against these atrocities and condemned the "Conspiracy of Silence" of the Western and European world for not joining the Catholic Church in condemning these evil acts in persecuting and murdering the Catholics - these are just a few of them …

 

God was pleased to wake me up on the Sedevacantism position and from that moment on I never turn my eyes again to Novus Ordo Sect and I had nothing to do with them; I came across with lots of "traditional catholic" sites until I discovered MHFM.  After that, I did not check other sites except one time… I was just reading a few lines of the works of [a] heretic… my head ached so hard that I could not continue reading it…

 

Yours in Jesus and Mary,

Joey from the Philippines

 

Heretic

 

Thanks for great job exposing this noxious pestilent heretic and arch-enemy of Christ the Lord… Sure he believes antichrist JPII and False Prophet B16 are "good [puuuuuuuuuke!] men"  [gag] because isn't that the freemasons' motto:  "making good men better men"? or some other garbage..........?  This nefarious evil-doer has got to be right up there with the likes of JPII whose body was probably possessed by some super high-powered DEMON........you know,  the same game of deception-------and how about those "vessels" I think it was of the Catholic religion he so enjoys filling with:  THE NEW POISONOUS FUMES OF EVERY MODERNIST HERESY?... that is what the battle is all about-------all about poisoning the would-be Catholic faithful to make sure they go to hell..........what a crying shame it seems to be working on so many people.  It's unbelievable today and completely OUTSIDE THE PALE that anyone who has even the tiniest modicum of rationality still falls for this after it's been SO THOROUGHLY EXPOSED.  There ARE no excuses:  period.

 

A.

 

Padre Pio

 

[On a recent] morning… while preparing to pay some bills, the check book couldn't be found… Thus, the hunt for the check book went into serious mode, lasting several hours, superseding all other plans on the "to do list" for the day.

   

While searching for the checkbook, I came across Padre Pio's booklet depicting his religious and miraculous life.  I asked him to please help me locate my missing item.  To my amazement, my prayer was answered almost immediately, within 20 minutes of my request, and the checkbook found exactly at the same place in my desk I had previously searched.  I am amazed and humbly grateful, as never before has my prayer been answered sooner.  I wish to acknowledge my thanks to God and Padre Pio, along with Brother Michael Dimond for writing the booklet...

 

Sincerely,

 

Kathleen Ryan

 

EENS

 

Dear Brothers,
                    

     Just to let you know that I told a 'traditional priest' that baptism of desire/blood was a heresy, as I thought he was an advocate of it. I gave him little by little some of your arguments in your excellent book 'Outside the church there is absolutely no salvation' (I actually translated those parts). The first time he was like shocked and said how scandalous and anti-traditional that idea was. So you see he didn't appreciate already your work. I convinced him to read it (the translated parts) by saying that I would like to have his opinion; and hoping that he would convert.
    I gave him 3 parts, given separately every week ; and what was astounding to see was that his arguments given to me each of these weeks refuting our position, was a different "objection/response" which you cover up in your book.
      It didn't help a bit as he still remains obstinate and says that I am a heretic and that you are totally wrong and making this up. He tried to convince me and debate by saying that all the theological teachings are for baptism of desire… that all of the catechisms were perfect. He said that all the saints were right..... (he contradicted himself many times)…

Thank you for what you do.
         

Sincerely

 

Austin…

 

Heretic

 

Subject: Heretic Williamson

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

How profound the truth, and how well and simple you explain the double-talking St. Pius X group, especially Bishop Richard Williamson and his bountiful, gibberish liberalism.  How he and his group embrace the sheer lies of heretical antipopes of Vatican II.  What does it matter to this bunch of heretics what a real pope, Boniface VIII proclaimed in Unam Sanctam in early 14th century upon the whole world-past, present, and future 'til the Son of Man cometh at the end?  What hypocrites of the cloth!  Keep up the militancy… God Bless You!...

 

Dea…

 

Hindrance

 

Subject: Hindrance

 

Dear MHFM, thank you for the new DVD. Today’s quote by St Thomas Aquinas and the story of St Francis converting the Sultan, they both use the exact term "provided there is no hindrance" the grace of God will come to those seeking the truth of God. What a gift this grace is! How many people are alive today that have no hindrance? What mercy God has shown me! I think this grace to pursue the truth was gifted to me by Our Lady after you encouraged me so strongly to pray the Rosary everyday. I try to pray as much of the Rosary everyday and each day I feel more and more like an alien.  Remember when we were kids, you used to hear the term "Oh he or she is such a saint"?

 

Now you would hear "oh that poor guy is crazy or some fanatic". I'm sure you know what compounding is. It's like a snowball going downhill. This is how fast the hearts of men are turning away from anything saintly.  I think it's this evil momentum Our Lady has been warning us about and why it's Our Lady that we must constantly turn to, for we have been commanded to have recourse to her…

 

God bless you MHFM,

 

Matthew

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thanks for the book and the DVD with the 4 features! The one about the end of the world, I can't put into words; I tell people, you just have to see it…

 

Also, I was wondering, the St. Jude prayer that someone sent into your web-site, about 1 or 2 months ago, wouldn't that be in the category of "chain" prayers, the way the man wrote in, about answer to prayer must be posted (something to that effect).   Thanks

 

Sincerely,

 

Nancy

 

St. Francis, Baptism

 

Brothers,

This is an excerpt from one of the famous books on St Francis of Assisi. If having the desire alone could save, St Francis need not send his friars, isn't it?

God bless,
Jerome

 

CHAPTER XXIV (from Little Flowers of St Francis)

 

HOW ST FRANCIS CONVERTED TO THE FAITH THE SULTAN OF BABYLON

 

St Francis, urged by zeal for the faith of Christ and by a wish to suffer martyrdom, took with him one day twelve of his most holy brethren, and went beyond the sea with the intention of going straight to the Sultan of Babylon. They arrived in a province belonging to the Saracens, where all the passes were guarded by men so cruel, that no Christian who passed that way could escape being put to death. Now it pleased God that St Francis and his companions should not meet with the same fate; but they were taken prisoners, and after being bound and ill-treated, were led before the Sultan. Then St Francis standing before him, inspired by the Holy Spirit, preached most divinely the faith of Christ; and to prove the truth of what he said, professed himself ready to enter into the fire. Now the Sultan began to feel a great devotion towards him, both because of the constancy of his faith, and because he despised the things of this world (for he had refused to accept any of the presents which he had offered to him), and also because of his ardent wish to suffer martyrdom. From that moment he listened to him willingly, and begged him to come back often, giving both him and his companions leave to preach wheresoever they pleased; he likewise gave them a token of his protection, which would preserve them from all molestation.

 

At length St Francis, seeing he could do no more good in those parts, was warned by God to return with his brethren to the land of the faithful. Having assembled his companions, they went together to the Sultan to take leave of him. The Sultan said to him: "Brother Francis, most willingly would I be converted to the faith of Christ; but I fear to do so now, for if the people knew it, they would kill both me and thee and all thy companions. As thou mayest still do much good, and I have certain affairs of great importance to conclude, I will not at present be the cause of thy death and of mine. But teach me how I can be saved, and I am ready to do as thou shalt order." On this St Francis made answer: "My lord, I will take leave of thee for the present; but after I have returned to my own country, when I shall be dead and gone to heaven, by the grace of God, I will send thee two of my friars, who will administer to thee the holy baptism of Christ, and thou shalt be saved, as the Lord Jesus has revealed to me; and thou in the meantime shalt free thyself from every hindrance, so that, when the grace of God arrives, thou mayest be found well disposed to faith and devotion." The Sultan promised so to do; and did as he had promised. Then St Francis returned with his company of venerable and saintly brethren, and after a few years ending his mortal life, he gave up his soul to God. The Sultan, having fallen ill, awaited the fulfillment of the promise of St Francis, and placed guards in all the passes, ordering them if they met two brothers in the habit of St Francis to conduct them immediately to him. At the same time St Francis appeared to two of his friars, and ordered them without delay to go to the Sultan and save his soul, according to the promise he had made him. The two set out, and having crossed the sea, were conducted to the Sultan by the guards he had sent out to meet them. The Sultan, when he saw them arrive, rejoiced greatly, and exclaimed: "Now I know of a truth that God has sent his servants to save my soul, according to the promise which St Francis made me through divine revelation." Having received the faith of Christ and holy baptism from the said friars, he was regenerated in the Lord Jesus Christ; and having died of his disease, his soul was saved, through the merits and prayers of St Francis.

 

Received

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I Just received your Book and DVD you sent me, what a Nice Surprise !    I'm especially excited about seeing the whole Fatima one…

 

This Book is just Amazingly Filled with more information than I could have possibly guessed by just its size…. I'm constantly shocked by what passes as Christianity with most people these days...and the level of hate towards the Catholic Church.   This is Most Appreciated, can't wait to read it!...

  

Carol Delger  

 

Questions

 

Dear Brother Michael:
 
I have visited your site and have reviewed many of your articles.  First, I appreciate your efforts to educate and found most of your material very illuminating but I must confess, I also found some of it most disconcerting. Let me explain by way of questions for your review and comment if possible:
 
1.  I live in Rhode Island, the most Catholic State in the USA - per capita of our residents; and there are many churches but only one church in the whole State that offers a Latin Mass on Sunday.   I go to daily mass at my local Parish and of course the Vatican II mass is celebrated.  You claim the mass is invalid, if that is true, then why would the Lord permit that every single mass said throughout my State every morning is invalid? Does the Lord not want my salvation?  If there is no daily Latin Mass offerred throughout the entire State, what is a Catholic to do?  This is the case in most States in the USA.  Am I damned for all eternity because of the actions of the church leaders. How does obedience play into the equation.  Do I just stop going to mass every day?  Forgo all the hours of eucharistic adoration, with the invalid consecrated host? 
 
2.  Is every confession I go to invalid, every mass, every adoration?,   If the answer to these questions is yes because a Vatican II priest consecrated the host or performs the sarament, then most of the sacraments that are offerred are invalid thereby making my devout worship and dedication worthless.  Is this the plan of God?
 
3.  Why would the Lord and through him the Holy Spirit, allow for entire populations to be duped and worship in an invalid way when most of us are just trying to be obedient to the church and its' leaders?
 
4. Are you also suggesting that the Holy Spirit has permitted or ordained that the last 50 years of Popes would all be invalid? Is it becuase of end times?  When would a valid Pope be elected?  Benedict has been very supportive of allowing the Latin Mass to come back and he refuses to distribute communion in the hand, etc....What is a lay person to do? If everything you propose is correct then 99% of all Catholics in the world are worshipping incorrectly under the guise of obedience.  I just dont think that God would allow so many of us who try to be devout to be duped or intentionally depraved of our worship and devotion.
 
5.  Regarding the imposter  Sister Lucia.  I agree that the person pretending to be her is clearly someone different.  How was the conspiracy played out? How could the real Sister Lucia die or be killed and that information be kept a secret?  There are those who claim that Paul VI also had an imposter. When you look at the pictures of the early Paul VI and the later years Paul VI they are also clearly different people.   What does all this mean with all these antipopes, invalid mass, imposters?
 
I personally was a very bad sinner.  Over the last year or so, I have truly changed my life made amendments.  I say the rosary everyday, volunteer, go to daily mass, go to confession weekly, sometimes twice a week. I have spent literally hundreds of hours before the Blessed Sacrament.  I have consecrated myself to the Blessed Mother. I observe First Fridays, First Saturdays, I pray about 2-3 hours every day, read scripture, etc....  I can say that I feel the change in myself.  I have read the Imitation of Christ by Thomas Kempis, the Dark Night of the Soul, etc... I have experienced some form of purgation. I believe that I am or try to be in a state of grace.  How would this be possible if I am worshipping under false masses, etc?...  I am just trying to reconcile what is going on in the church and how I proceed.
 
Thank you and God Bless,
 
Stephen

 

MHFM: To your questions… 1. The Lord permits the invalid Masses as a punishment for people’s sins and for their bad will.  He sees that very few care about the faith itself; for that reason, He has allowed the real priests, Masses, etc. to disappear.  To give an example, we had to go out recently.  One of us got into a conversation about the faith with a person, which we sometimes do.  This individual claimed to be Catholic.  In giving her a DVD and discussing what’s been happening, the issue of false ecumenism and John Paul II’s prayer with idolaters and pagans came up.  The woman flatly denied that John Paul II could have possibly engaged in such an action.  In response, one of us explained that it’s a fact.  We also said that we have the proof on the DVD we just gave her.  All she needs to do is watch it.  She was obstinate, and she refused to believe that John Paul II did anything like that.  It wasn’t even clear if she would watch the DVD to see the proof.  The point is that, if this encounter had not occurred, she might not have heard about the Vatican II apostasy or what is really going on.  Through this encounter, she received a special opportunity to hear the truth.  However, whose fault is it that she hadn’t found out?  It’s obvious that God left her in the dark because He saw that she didn’t care about the truth and that she is of bad will.  For upon hearing the truth, she was not receptive; but rather she fought against it vigorously.  She even tried to deny an indisputable fact, and balked at looking at the visual proof.  That’s why God leaves countless people in the dark of the Novus Ordo.  They may seem nice on the outside; they might attend “Mass,” but inwardly their hearts strenuously rebel against His truth.  God sees all of it, and He sees that they are not of the truth.  Hence, there’s no need for Him to give them a special message concerning the full extent of what’s happening; for almost all of them would reject it anyway.  Everyone who is of the truth hears His voice (John 18:37).  Those who really care and have interest will be brought to the knowledge of the truth.  This is not to suggest that people shouldn’t try to aggressively evangelize or spread the truth to these individuals.  It is merely to point out that few of them will be inclined to search for the truth on their own, and thus it is often only through the special efforts and encouragement of others that they might investigate what’s happening. 

 

2.  Every mass you go to (assuming it’s the New Mass) is definitely invalid.  The same is true for every “adoration” session.  The confessions are invalid if they were made to priests ordained in Paul VI’s invalid new rite of ordination.  You ask if this is the plan of God.  We ask, do you believe in Outside the Church There is No Salvation, as the Church has taught?  Do you believe that people who engage in false ecumenism, such as Benedict XVI and his bishops, deny the faith?  Do you believe that all pagans, Jews, Muslims, heretics, etc. are lost?  If not, then you reject His faith.  Perhaps then you can see why God would allow you and many others to be deceived.

 

3.  The answer is that almost all of them are of bad will.  In addition, we are living through the Great Apostasy and the great spiritual deception.  Jesus said that the deception would be so profound that even the elect would be deceived, if that were possible (Matthew 24).  It’s clearly predicted in Scripture that the Mass will be taken away, and that there will be a profound deception.  So how can you think that it’s not possible?  This is covered in our material.  The Great Apostasy and a Counterfeit Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy.  You need to look at it.

 

4.  These questions are addressed in our articles, DVDs, book and debates.  Please look at them.  You need to realize that few are saved even in Catholic times, and extremely few are saved today.  Here’s what Jacinta said about the time of World War II, which is nothing compared to the darkness of today:

 

“Lucia found Jacinta sitting alone, still and very pensive, gazing at nothing.  ‘What are you thinking of, Jacinta?’  ‘Of the war that is going to come.  So many people are going to die.  And almost all of them are going to Hell.’” (Our Lady of Fatima, p. 94; p. 92 in some versions)

 

5.  Our video on Fatima and the Impostor Sr. Lucia addresses your questions on this topic.  Regarding the effort you’ve employed, that’s surely why you’ve come across this information.  God is giving you the grace and the opportunity to see the full truth.  It’s up to you to accept it.  If you don’t, one must say in charity that you will go to Hell.  You must never go to the invalid New Mass again.  You must also keep in mind that spiritual works or time spent without a pure intention or a submission to His faith lose all merit.  God wants obedience, rather than sacrifice.  In other words, if you accept heretics or reject His dogmas, your spiritual works will be worthless in His sight.

 

1 Kings 15:22-23: “And Samuel said: Doth the Lord desire holocausts and victims, and not rather that the voice of the Lord should be obeyed?  For obedience is better than sacrifices: and to hearken rather than to offer the fat of rams.  Because it is like the sin of witchcraft to rebel: and like the crime of idolatry, to refuse to obey.  Forasmuch as thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, the Lord hath also rejected thee from being king.”

 

If one rejects God’s truth, he cannot please Him.  To accept the Vatican II sect, in light of all the facts, is to deny God.

 

Effect

 

Hi, I just want to share something of interest.  My family was in the v2 until I became aware of the heretical teachings of the nun leading the religious ed. I removed my kids from the class and tried to teach the faith at home.  It was not easy.   Sadly they were already in their teens.    I am still very angry that my kids were exposed to the false teachings.   They are in their mid twenties now.   The effects of the v2 teachings apparent.    I have been sharing information from your web site and other sources  with them,  when possible .  Hoping they will do some research of the faith on their own. One of them called me a couple of weeks ago.  He said he was on his way to work and said a short prayer for discernment.  He was researching something and by chance (?) he was led   to articles on freemason, among others . He said he had read these types of  articles before , but that day the information all of a sudden started to fall in place and he got  a deeper understanding of the Catholic church  and other things that he had questions about , concerning his faith.  He was very excited, and said he wanted to talk to me in person about some other things that were revealed to him .I told him that the Lord answers prayers but sometimes in a way we don't expect. Discernment on his faith was not on his mind when he said his short prayer.  I am looking forward to his visit. I am  hopeful and thankful for this turn of events.  What books or dvds do you have that would be good for me to get for him. ( Errors of v2,  freemasons,  evolution. )  Thank you for your website and the information that you share.

 

Bw…

 

MHFM: That’s good news.  We would recommend the DVDs and books in our special package.  Death and the Journey into Hell is especially important for him to see, so that he seriously considers the necessity of getting his soul in order.  Lives of the saints are also important, in addition to of course encouraging him to pray the Rosary.  The life of St. Francis Paola (which we offer) is quite good for people who are new or coming into the faith.  His life is filled with extraordinary miracles and can get people excited about the power of the Catholic faith.

 

Response

 

Response to Stepup

   If you think an MHFM video was some sort of a joke you really need to back away from your own self confidence, consider that you may not know everything God wants you to know, and pray that God will give you the grace to convert to the one, true faith. You need to start taking an interest in the Rosary and the idea of reciting the Rosary.

   Do you care about saying the Hail Mary prayer? "Listen to what Our Lady revealed to Blessed Alan de la Roche, as he has recorded in his book on the dignity of the Rosary: 'Know, my son, and make all others know, that it is a probable and proximate sign of eternal damnation to have an aversion, a lukewarmness, or a negligence in saying the Angelical Salutation [Hail Mary prayer], which has repaired the whole world.'"
(St. Louis de Montfort, True Devotion to Mary, Trans. Fr. Frederick Faber, Rockford, Illinois, Tan Books and Publishers, Inc., 1941, 157.)

 
   If you attend the Novus Ordo "mass" ask yourself if this "mass" makes you care about saying the Hail Mary prayer.

TD

 

9/11 Mosque

 

Dimond brothers,
 
  Did you see ABC Nightline yesterday ? There was a Vatican II Priest pushing for that Muslim Mosque to get built at Ground Zero.
The name of the Priest is Father Kevin Madigan. You might want to put that on your latest news section on your website.
 
                                                                                                             God bless

H

 

MHFM: Wow, what a scandal… What apostasy.

 

Pervades

 

Dear Brothers,

That's a very interesting story from Joseph Ramirez on the heretic Bishop Williamson. It reveals the intellectual pride that pervades their whole organization. I remember when I was kicked out of the SSPX for distributing two small EENS flyers. The Rector of the Seminary (Holy Cross, Australia), imposing heretic Fr. Vincente Griego, said that the information on the flyer was "all twisted," or "taken out of context" - something to that effect. It doesn't require a theology degree to be a Catholic, but it certainly does require humility! Catholic dogmas are to believed as they are written.

Mark 10:15 - Amen I say to you, whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, shall not enter into it.


Proverbs 15:33 - The fear of the Lord is the lesson of wisdom: and humility goeth before glory.

John 12:40 - He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart, that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.


God Bless,

Chris White

 

Damage

 

Hello I have been watching your videos on YouTube I am a Conservative Catholic. I had no idea what damage Vatican II has done until I watched your videos of the Heresies of Popes abominations of the new mass etc. Could not believe my eyes when I saw the Mass video I have never seen anything like that in my life…
 
But my question to you is what am I meant to do, where am I meant to go and Worship and where to go for Confession? I live in the England.
 
Also this a problem for me as I have believe that I am called to the Priesthood and have been considering joining the Priesthood and going to seminary but after watching these videos you have shown I am like so kind of confused of what to do now.
 
I have been telling people about this in my Church they too had no idea of these heresies and abominations taking place.
 
Looking forward for hearing from you.
 
Regards
 
Ste

 

MHFM: We’re glad to hear about your interest.  The first thing is to get out of the invalid New Mass and become convinced on all the issues.  A Catholic must never go to the New Mass again for any reason.  Pray the Rosary each day, and please continue to review the material.  You will see clearly that the Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church.  Once convinced, a person can apply the guidelines on where to receive sacraments to the available options in their area (only considering certain priests ordained in a traditional way, of course).  A profession of faith, a good confession, etc. are all important.  But the first thing is to continue to familiarize yourself with the traditional Catholic faith and what a Catholic must know and believe about what is happening. 

 

Saw

 

Subject: Hello

 

Hi there. I saw your video on BP oil spill and tried to thumbs up it, and as you know, I couldn't. I then visited your channel and watched some more videos, (all of which I found extremely interesting). I really like your channel and the way you present the information. While I’m not Catholic, I believe the only way to salvation is through Jesus Christ, too. I'm really looking forward to watching your series, Is the World about to End?. Thanks in advance for the information you're putting out there.

 

Thepart…

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  We hope you continue to look at the material.  We must emphasize that it's critical to embrace the one true faith of Christ.  Jesus taught that one must hear His Church and accept all of His teachings for salvation.  We have a book called The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.  It demonstrates that the Catholic faith is the only true Christian faith.

 

Question

 

I have a question about your videos you have for sale (like the ones on JPII, Paul VI, The New Mass, JPII preaching antichrist, Council of apostasy, and benedict XVI).  Are the videos the newest versions (like 2nd edition and final edition. Like the ones you can watch for free on your website)?  I'd like to know before ordering (I hope they are the newest versions).  Thank you.

Sincerely, Ryan

 

MHFM: Yes, the videos/DVDs we offer are the newest versions.

 

Williamson vs.

 

Subject: Williamson vs. Ramirez

 

I had written you in the past, and shared some exchanges I had with Bp Williamson.  As was Joe Ramirez’s experience; I found in argument the Bishop skirts core issues and goes adhominum whenever a concrete Truth is cited.

 

However I think Mr. Ramirez touched a nerve in the Bishop.  It had been nearly a month since I heard from the Bishop, then out of the blue, yesterday morning, I got this:

 

Dear Bill,

 

Arguing is fine, as long as the mind is not being governed by emotions. One's all too frequent experience with sedevacantists and with Feeneyites is that the mind has shut down, and emotion, blocked emotion, has taken over. With such, argument is a waste of time.

 

Confucius he say, "He who speaks to a fool, wastes his words. He who does not speak to a wise man, wastes his man. The wise man wastes neither his words nor his man."

 

I don't know why minds shut down on sedevacantism or Feeneyism, but I know that they easily do.  Both cut Gordian knots. Theology unties them as best hey can be untied.

                                      God bless,             Bishop W.

 

The timing of the note, I mean after so much time, and sort of disconnected from the chain of our most recent dialogues, probably wasn’t a coincidence.   Maybe his conscience was tweaked?  Maybe he is arguing more to himself than to me.

 

Anyway, thought it was interesting.   I think such as Bp. Williamson are worthy of your prayers (as I suspect your prayers have great efficacy).  Prayer for his total conversion of course…

 

Bill Mulligan

 

Revealing

 

Dear brothers in Christ,


The letter from the reader Joseph Ramirez, about bishop Williamson, is quite revealing. The bishop's very phrase "to understand dogma correctly" is provocative enough to accuse bishop for heresy and mocking God. For how would it be possible to have a true Faith and at the same time suggest that God has spoken His Eternal Truth in a way that it is logically possible to understand it incorrectly?  If it would be possible, there would be no sin at all, for then every sinner could rightly say that he/she acted upon his/her own understanding of The Truth, and didn't break The Law according to this understanding. This would constitute modernism in extreme, and this is what bishop Williamson is promoting. In that respect he is indeed more dangerous than Novus Ordo heretics who openly accept modernism.

Bishop Williamson obviously is very fond of with playing with words. I would like to ask him what is the correct meaning of the word "correct"? If it is possible to understand the statement "no pagans, or heretics, or Jews would be saved unless..." incorrectly, to the point that it has the meaning "it is possible for pagans, heretics and Jews to be saved even if they die outside the Church", then it is obviously possible to understand the word "correctly" incorrectly.  So the bishop Williamson is pushing his flock to "deeper understanding". Well, I suppose I am allowed to think that "the deeper" has its extreme, that there is "the deepest". If the bishop Williamson has the true charity, why then he doesn't say this "deepest understanding" of the dogma, and thus make the end of discussion. Let him just translate each and every dogma to its "deepest understanding", and order each and every member of his flock to forget altogether the "shallow understanding" of the dogmas. For, what would be the use of "shallow understanding" at all? We don't need "shallow understanding", do we?

For example, I firmly believe the dogma that there is ONE God, and THREE Divine Persons, and each and every of the THREE Persons is The ONE and same God. I never pretended that I UNDERSTAND this dogma in a way as I understand many truths of the natural world. So, I suppose that bishop Williamson would like to give me the deepest understanding of this dogma, and other dogmas as well, and thus make an end to my quest of understanding.

To summarize: Bishop Williamson is just one of the countless Novus Ordarians wannabe traditionalist. He is representing the masonic doctrine of salvation, just like his fellow co-workers in Vatican. For, it is the masons who have the "circles of understanding", the "degrees", and all such satanic mumbo-jumbo doctrine, in order to confuse the people who long for The Truth, which is God. The truth is that the dogmas will always mean what they say. And according to the dogmas, the bishop Williamson is on the road to Hell.  Unless he embraces the dogmas as they are, he would perish eternally.

God bless MHFM

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

1 Timothy 4

 

Subject: 1 Timothy 4

 

Hello brothers,            
 
I had a quick question, I was trying to convince this protestant woman… I was using the bible proves the teachings of the Catholic Church. She was more interested in convincing me of her scripture alone view. She pointed out first timothy chapter 4 where it talks about the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods God created.  She says Paul is talking about priests. I think she took this scripture out of context but wanted to know what it meant could you please explain it to me. I have been giving out your dvds and I hope the people that i gave them to will listen. I find protestants very hard to convince. I got baptized and am working on living the full true faith... Thanks for all you do for us.

Veronica.

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  There’s a lot of bad will out there.  The woman is completely wrong about the passage she brings up.  We should quote the passage, so that your question is clear to our readers.

 

1 Timothy 4:1-5 “Now the Spirit manifestly saith, that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error, and doctrines of devils, Speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their conscience seared, Forbidding to marry, commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful, and by them that have known the truth.  For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be rejected that is received with thanksgiving: For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.”

 

There is a very definite meaning to this passage.  The passage speaks of the various dualist sects throughout Christian history.  Examples of these were the Gnostics, the Manicheans, the Cathars, etc.  These people believed in two gods: one evil and one good.  They held that the evil god was the god of matter, and the good god the god of the spirit.  These groups developed a theology which was destructive to any use of material things, to a greater or lesser degree depending upon the sect and their zeal for it.  Hence, they forbade marriage, abstained from meats, and preached poverty (for they believed that to own material things was evil).  The most devoted would even kill themselves to put an end to their material existence. 

 

There is no doubt that this is what the passage is referring to, as a careful study of Christian history will show.  These types of dualist heretics popped up again and again.  They became such a problem in the Middle Ages that the war against Cathar-dualist heretics in 1208 was called a crusade by Pope Innocent III (Carroll, A History of Christendom, Vol. 3, p. 175.)  So the passage is not remotely forbidding celibacy, which the Bible clearly teaches is superior to marriage.  See this file:

 

Refuting the Protestant rejection of the Catholic and Biblical teaching on celibacy

 

Some ask, why does the Church prohibit priests from marrying?  Catholic priests in the Roman Rite are forbidden to marry because the Bible teaches that the celibate state is superior to the marital state.  But it’s important to recognize that in the Eastern Rite married men can be ordained to the priesthood, but once ordained a man can’t be married.  So a celibate clergy is a disciplinary law, but one which is rooted in doctrine and biblical truth.  This discipline began to be enforced in the early Church.

 

Book, DVD

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery:

Thank you for the book and resources that you sent me.  "The Bible proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church" is an excellent resource - it is well-written and easy to understand - exactly what I've come to expect of MHFM.  The DVD is also very good especially "Is the World About to End" and "The Third Secret of Fatima"…

Thank you for all your hard work.

Sincerely

PC

 

E-mail

 

I watched one of your videos. I really hope it was some sort of joke. If not, you are undoubtedly insane to the point of no return...

 

Stepup…

 

New YouTube Design

 

MHFM: For those it might interest, we have a new design for Our You Tube Channel.

 

Williamson

 

Brothers:

Greetings. I met Bishop Williamson of the SSPX today at their priory in Armada, MI. My family and I came to the 7:15 am Mass and to my surprise he was the celebrant. I didn't think I would get a chance to talk to him, but after Mass he was calmly strolling the grounds, so I thought I would just go up and introduce myself, and let God lead from there. We exchanged small talk for a few minutes, and then I asked him bluntly, "Bishop, do you believe in salvation by invincible ignorance?" I asked him this question because I had heard that he "privately" holds the Church's dogma that outside the Church there is no salvation. His answer was a literal crash course in heresy, sophistry, and ad hominem attack. First, he clearly and forcefully DOES NOT hold the Church's dogmatic teaching that only water baptized believing Catholics can enter heaven. He took no time at all to reply to my question in the affirmative, and that, to him, the Catholic Church has always taught this idea. I then asked him to explain to me how invincible ignorance squares with Pope Eugene IV's dogmatic definition in Cantate Domino concerning Jews, pagans, heretics, and schismatics departing into everlasting fire unless they first reconcile with the Catholic Church before death, and that even shedding blood for the name of Christ cannot save them. His response can be summarized as the classic "you have to understand dogmas correctly," which, after his long-winded explanation, contained little if any understanding or correctness. I politely, with all respect, told him that he was wrong. The Bishop then became noticeably agitated and told me that "just reading the Dimond Brothers" does not make me some sort of expert, or some such thing. When I asked how he knew that I read your material, he said, "Oh, it's quite obvious!" He went on to condemn you as dangerous and wrong. "But Bishop" I said, "the Dimond Brothers simply point people back to the Church's infallible dogmas..." He cut me off, and tried to give some types of analogous commentary to support his position which made no sense to me.

He also felt the need not only to bash you for doing what he as a Bishop should have been doing all along, namely, holding, proclaiming, and defending Catholic dogma, but he went after me (in so many words) by emphasizing that since he and his priests are so well-trained and educated, I must be a dummy. (I almost stated that Catholicism is For Dummies like me, but I refrained for fear that he might think I was endorsing the heretical Novus Ordo book you recently exposed). He also referred to me as "my dear boy, as in "My dear boy, you really must be careful to not tell a Bishop that he is wrong!" Since I'm 52, I took it as a compliment, thanked him for his time, and left.

Brothers, these men are for real! Do we not have in the SSPX the "traditional" counterpart to the Vatican II sect? They claim to be the Catholic Church, just like the Vatican II sect, and even resemble the true Catholic Church more realistically with the Latin Mass, cassocks, devotions, and so on, but if they and their supporters die embracing their heresies, what will it all be worth? Pope Eugene IV specifically included heretics among those who will be consigned to eternal fire unless they reconcile with the Church. What a diabolical deception! So many generous people having lots of children so that they can be placed in the hands of false-traditionalist priests at SSPX schools and parishes, seminaries and novitiates, just to be raised up in heresy and fit for hell! This is truly atrocious!

I thank you again for your defense of holy Dogma, and I am honored to be so "obviously" associated with you.

Joseph Ramirez

 

MHFM: That’s a very interesting e-mail and story.  Thanks for sending it.  Perhaps the most revealing part of the exchange is when you made reference to the Bull Cantate Domino.  You asked him how his view could possibly conform to that dogmatic definition.  He responded by arguing essentially that one must “understand” the dogma if one is to conform it to his (heretical) position.  It is classic modernism, and it’s precisely what Vatican I condemns: departing from the definition once declared by the Church under the specious name of a “deeper understanding.”  His “understanding,” of course, clearly contradicts the actual words of the text.  All of this serves to expose their heretical unbelief; it demonstrates, once again, that they reject the dogma as it has been taught by the Church. 

 

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Sess. 3, Chap. 2 on Revelation, 1870, ex cathedra: “Hence, also, that understanding of its sacred dogmas must be perpetually retained, which Holy Mother Church has once declared; and there must never be a recession from that meaning under the specious name of a deeper understanding.”

 

2 Tim. 3:5

 

Subject: 2 Tim. 3:5

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Might not the scripture to which you referred, (paraphrasing) "In the last days there will be the appearance of religion, but the power thereof will be denied," also indicate the appearance of the Catholic religion via the Novus Ordo, which denies the true efficacy of the sacraments?  For example, to the world, the Catholic Church still appears to be the Church; the buildings are the same, there is still a "pope", cardinals, bishops, gregorian chant, pseudo sacraments, etc., however, all the sacraments, including the Mass, and even the doctrines have been changed just enough to be merely empty ceremonies posing as the real ones -- fooling, if possible, even the "elect?"

 

God Bless,

Perry

 

MHFM: We think that it probably has a number of applications.  However, we definitely think it applies to public figures, celebrities, etc. who say they are “blessed” or thank God yet live in a manner that’s completely incompatible with His most basic morality.  For example, they talk about how they are “blessed” yet go to immoral clubs or live lascivious lifestyles or participate in the production of impurity, etc.  They have the appearance of godliness, i.e., they mention His name, but deny His power or influence over the actions and lives of people and how they should conduct themselves. 

 

Bible references

 

Your teachings, showing with Bible references, the validity of Mary, Peter, and the Eucharist is beyond price.

 

Respectfully, Michael Holbrook

 

Comment

 

To the Drummer's comment:

Promise given made to St. Benedict regarding the destiny of his enemies:

"3) Everyone who persecutes his order and does not repent will see his days shortened or meet with an unfortunate end."

Let's pray that Drummer repent before it's too late because desiring the death of the Truth (the Catholic Faith) spread by Most Holy Family Monastery is a very evil thought.

I thought the person Seesyou who called you an "antichrist" was bad enough but considering this fool's comment, I might reconsider and say that this might have superceded it.  Why? Well because he/she not only hates the Truth, who is Christ (which in a sense would make him/her an antichrist), but also desires the death of… sound doctrine (the true Catholic Faith given by Christ) which is taught and spread by MHFM.  Drummer and all those who hate MHFM's wonderful work are fools and have nor fear nor love for God.

2 Timothy 4:3 "For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires..."


Proverbs 1:7 "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. Fools despise wisdom and instruction."

Galatians 6:7 "God is NOT mocked."


Sincerely,
Bernardo

Comment

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond,

Subject :"you need to die''

...and you will need tomorrow, "Drummer," to eat those words with regret - is it because you 'march to the beat' of a different drum, than the rest of us Catholics who belong to the one true Church of Jesus Christ [ Outside of which There is No Salvation] - that you make such a flippant comment ?

...they say 'what goes round, comes round'  - so be careful, drummer, your wish doesn't come true - cf.,  to those who persecute the Benedictine Order and do not repent, will see their days shortened or meet with an unfortunate end!   8 - [

God bless,

David

 

Die

 

Subject: you need to die

 

Seriously…

 

Drummer…

 

USA

 

I see you never considered that USA might be the beast of hell? That is fine. I listened to most of your speeches, very intelligent and interesting. I used to be a believer. I think that USA has more points to win the place of, foretold by Bible, beast of doom. First nuclear attacks were made by US, the oil spill -USA, North American continent also comes out of the Sea; even more so than European.


Regards!

 

Esaul…

 

MHFM: We believe Europe is the beast out of the sea.  That’s because the Apocalypse connects the beast out of the sea with the fourth beast predicted by Daniel and its ten horns.  We discuss that in the video.  Daniel’s fourth beast was the Roman Empire.  It arose out of the Mediterranean Sea.  The new beast (which is a new form of the previous beast) is therefore the new Roman Empire (the European Union).  It also arises out of the Mediterranean Sea.  Moreover, as the video shows, many other things fit with the European Union.  You need to become a believer in God’s one true faith.  Salvation is the most important thing, and unless you embrace the true Catholic faith you can’t be saved.

 

B-16

 

Hello.

I saw this at euronews channel. "Pope" Benedict XVi celebrates a "mass" for the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in St Thomas of Villanova in Italy where he spends his summer. The novus ordo priests that were handing out "communion" were giving it in the hand of the people. It didn't show benedict xvi doing this, but he was there too so it means he allows this. Grotesque show. Here is the link: http://www.euronews.net/nocomment/2010/08/16/pope-celebrates-assumption-mass/

God bless

 

I forgot to mention. Watch also the novus ordo "nun" in the background.  She also receives ""communion" in the hand

 

Eduard

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  There are numerous pictures of Antipope Benedict XVI giving “Communion” in the hand as well.

 

Comment

 

Dear brothers in Christ,

The image player on the top of your website is a good idea. It is very useful for reminding the readers of the many excellent videos you've produced, which uphold and nourish the Catholic Faith.

In response to a reader who wrote about ex-governor "Catholic" funeral, you wrote:"Could they indicate any more clearly that they hold the Catholic faith to be completely meaningless and unnecessary?"

To answer your rhetorical question-- I'm 100% sure they can. I have no idea what will it be, but I'm sure they'll think of something. The V2 sect is an inexhaustible fountain of wickedness. A believer in God is incapable to imagine the innumerable ways of mocking God coming from the pit of Hell.

May The Queen of Heaven protect the true Catholics.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

Share

 

Hello Brothers Dimond,

Regarding the article: The day Metallica came to "church"

I want to share the following video of a motorcycle "catholic" mass in Schweinfurt/Germany, which featured even a metallica song for communion, to show it's not a distinct "feature" of non-catholic sects.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hWnayzMzSI starting at 5:15 (but the rest is also pretty abominable)

Greetings from Germany

Stefan

 

MHFM: That’s incredible.  Thanks for the e-mail.

 

Ex-Governor, “Mass

 

Subject: Ex-Governor dies & receives “Catholic” funeral “Mass”

 

Dear Brothers,

A few weeks ago there was a televised Novus Ordo (New Order) funeral service full of ceremony for what looks to be a high ranking Freemason.  Ex Nevada Governor Kenny Guinn was a “Catholic” and served the state of Nevada for many years.  The N.O. church was packed and the “Mass” was presided over by the effeminate sounding “Bishop” Pepe, who never once said that Guinn went to heaven, but rather said that Guinn was, “a man who had no denomination per say but like Abraham was a man of faith and belief.”  The service/ceremony was full of symbolic meaning, including the display of Military with the Honor Guard, Flags, the 21 Gun Salute and Scottish Bagpipes whenever the body was in “procession”.  All this was a tribute to their man who did his Freemasonic duty in spite of his “Catholic” façade.  He died keeping the secrets of the “Craft”.  His official burial was to take place in California!  Despite being a native Californian he ended up with a lot of fingers in the pies of Nevadans.  He was a past Superintendent of Schools; he was CEO of the Gas Company, and CEO of a bank among many other things.  From the varied sources, reference was made to the fact there was even still more work that lay ahead for him even though he was 72 years old!
 
As press reports of his death came in it was speculated that he was on the roof of his house (he has two in Nevada) possibly fixing the air conditioning or brushing leaves off during the record breaking high temperatures in July and may have suffered a stroke or heart attack while up there and fell off.  What in the world would a wealthy old man be doing fixing his own air conditioning or sweeping leaves off his sharply angled roof?  There wasn't wind, it was heat and the aerial photos of the house in question clearly showed a sloping rooftop with no wind or leaves.  The official autopsy which eventually came out stated: “The Clark County Coroner’s Office has released the autopsy results on former Nevada Governor Guinn.  The coroner says Guinn died from blunt force trauma to the chest and head after he fell from the roof of his home July 22.  The report also says the fall caused his heart to stop, and he was pronounced dead at University Medical Center at 11:07 am.  The cause of his death was ruled accidental.”

The links from Part I and part II of the disgusting display of a “Mass” along with the comments by the "Bishop" (and many other press releases) are here if you are interested in taking a look:  http://www.ktnv.com/Global/searchresults.asp?vendor=ez&qu=guinn

Reference to the bagpipes are here: http://www.mynews3.com/story.php?id=23900 and a brief video reference to them and the gun salute are here:  http://www.8newsnow.com/global/story.asp?s=12876475

By this very public and abominable display it would appear that he was indeed a Scottish rite 33rd degree Freemason and that his "Catholic" name was a ruse for the benefit of his wife and family and to keep up pretenses for covert activities as instructed by his fellow comrades.  His associates tell on themselves by publicly paying their respects and so doing, the “high ranking dignitaries” ally themselves to him and to Freemasonry. (Will they be wearing full insignia including their Aprons at the other service in California?)

These Freemasons and their incessant in our face slight of hand, out and out lying and fixation on symbols and numerology (note the publication of date and time of death) make me more furious and sickened by the day.  Grown men keeping secrets and playing with numbers and symbols, how stupid and ignorant can “smart men” be?  If they die in this atrocity they fully deserve what the Lord Jesus Christ gives them for their betrayal of Him and their true duty to their families and true countrymen. Poor Novus Ordo family, if they stay where they're at, they will not fare much better.

Anon.

 

MHFM: That’s very interesting.  It’s especially interesting that the Novus Ordo “bishop” explicitly identified him as a man of no denomination (i.e., he wasn’t Catholic), yet gave him a “Catholic” funeral anyway.  It’s another example of the almost never-ending stream of apostate actions by the Vatican II sect.  What a complete mockery of the faith.  Could they indicate any more clearly that they hold the Catholic faith to be completely meaningless and unnecessary?

 

Interest

 

Respected Brothers,


Greetings!


I think some of us are missing important youtube videos. I go to Internet parlour once a month to download MHFM pages and any new audio files I find. I tried to install youtube downloader in the parlour computer, didn’t succeed, maybe because of some restrictions. It would be kind of you to provide also the audio files for the videos you post. Also, right now I cannot order the books you sell… but I’ve downloaded the PDF files. I think you’ve provided most of the chapters of the book “The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II” in PDF. I read them, print them and share photocopies of them with at least one uncle in our village, who is serious about the Faith, may be more serious than me, I guess. I share what I read with my younger brother, also with my Godmother, who spontaneously speaks out many of the things I’ve read and which I’ve not told her before. I guess it is intelligence face to face with Faith. Example: I was talking about the invalidity of the new sacrament of ordination, she just said, “that’s why there is no grace in the sacrament of confession, and people fall again into the same mortal sins which they confess.” Also what Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said about the salvation of pagans, she said something like, “when Catholics will have such difficulties in saving their souls, how much more difficult it will be for pagans… it was just wrong for him to say that.”

Brothers, we pray for you.  May many souls be saved through you and through everyone who is with you in the Apostolate.

With kind regards,
Sanjay.
From Orissa, India.

 

Interview

 

Subject: “Fr.” Breen interview – you tube [regarding item in News & Commentary]

 

NOXIOUX VILE TOXIC HERETIC for explaining to "all of us where we can go"..........well, it is straight to hell, according to these people, with their un-Godly beliefs they are spouting!  How sad that so late in the day of human history they are still so seemingly HOPELESSLY LOST!!!  It's obvious they could not care ONE FIG about souls, the Truth, The Catholic Faith:  this "Breen" is an ABSOLUTE POSTER CHILD for someone who has so thoroughly intoxicated himself on the wine of the fornication of the "new [counter] mass" of Vatican 2 and all its evil heresies......well, there really is NO EXCUSE AT ALL for people like this:  talk about wolves in sheep's clothing!  MHFM has made the truth abundantly available… and yet these blind guides still lead their hapless "flocks" STRAIGHT into the pits of hell, with NO MERCY AT ALL!  I guess severe, profound spiritual blindness and deception has punishments all its own:  like a further increase in that blindness... Saint Jude pray for us

 

MHFM: Since his story got a lot of attention, he will probably receive some very mild and insignificant discipline only as part of a public relations ploy to appease people who are upset by what he said.  However, he won’t be excommunicated, even though he supports contraception and all the rest.  Thus, it’s another example of how the Vatican II sect is not Catholic. 

 

Note

 

MHFM: Readers of our website probably noticed the new image screen/player near the top of our website.  We will begin to update it with new content hopefully toward the middle or end of next week.  The News & Commentary and E-Exchanges will continue to be updated as usual. 

 

Troubled

 

Dear Brothers:

 

I am very troubled by the fact that my local grocery store sells immoral products such as contraceptives and very perverse novels. It’s troubling too because I am a cashier at this store. As a Catholic I feel morally obligated to find another job rather than continue selling these things. Please advise me on this matter.

 

Sincerely,

Anonymous

 

MHFM: A Catholic must not sell those things.

 

Comment

 

Hi Brothers,

 

I just received your book “The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.”  This is the best thing I’ve ever seen!  I’ve seen other books like it, but nothing this complete and convincing and backed up with facts.  All your stuff is good, but you really take the cake with this book.  This ought to show all the Protestants and other religions that they’re in the wrong boat.  I’m going to need to order a few hundred because we want to start handing these out to people.  I still like the Padre Pio book, but this is the best thing even for fallen away Catholics.  Thank you Brothers and MHFM.  God bless you! 

 

Don Primi

 

Austrians

 

Subject: 100,000 Austrians

 

The news article you published about 100,000 Austrians leaving the V-2 church is very revealing. Even though most of these people probably cannot identify all of the multiple issues about which the conciliar church has entered into heresy and apostasy, they know something is wrong. Besides, the conciliar church teaches that one may obtain salvation even if one is not a member of the Catholic Church. The same thing is happening in Latin America and in the United States and Canada where millions are leaving the conciliar church only to end up in false evangelical, pentecostal or other protestant sects or cults.

The V-2 church and its leaders, especially Roncalli, Montini, Wojtyla and Ratzinger have proven to be a disaster for the world.

EJP, M.D., D.D.

 

New Video and Article

 

MHFM: Bro. Michael Dimond checks in with a new video and article on the best-selling book, Catholicism for Dummies.  This video and article expose the heresies in Catholicism for Dummies.  Catholicism for Dummies was authored by “Fr.” John Trigilio, a featured speaker on EWTN.  It has also been promoted by Novus Ordo “apologist” Jimmy Akin and “Catholic Answers.”  For those reasons, the outrageous heresies in the book are all the more revealing about the apostate Vatican II sect.

 

Catholicism for Dummies Exposed [video]

 

 

Catholicism for Dummies Exposed [article]

 

SSPV

 

I was listening to Father Jenkins of the St. Pius V Society… [someone] asked him… whether or not it was correct to say that no one could be either in heaven or purgatory without sanctifying grace.  Father Jenkins responded that that was correct, that no one could be saved and be in either purgatory or heaven without having been in the state of sanctifying grace.  Then the [person] asked if the means of obtaining sanctifying grace was through the sacraments only.  Father Jenkins first said yes, then hesitated and changed his mind and said, "That would be denying the baptism of the blood and of desire, though.  God can save a person through any means."  I got so disgusted that I… did not listen further.  It is so upsetting because Father Jenkins, in most all other instances appears to be so orthodox in his beliefs.  He speaks of modesty, family, against indifferentism and the new ecumenism, having a prayer life, the sacraments, sanctity, etc...  It occurred to me that it could be that this caller was merely trying to get Father Jenkins to see the incongruity of his beliefs.  They are vehemently against what they call the heresy of "feeneyism."

 

I, too, used to be an attendee of their masses until I read their publication and saw their endorsement of the heresy of BOD.  Also, I was shocked to discover they did not even object to sending Catholics to public school.  When I confronted them about the two of you, [a supporter of theirs] Wes Steele warned me off of you, saying your monastery was illegitimate and that the two of you "appeared" out of nowhere and had gotten your degrees from secular universities in California.

 

I mention all this because this society rejects John Paul II and Benedict XVI, and all the other antipopes; and rightly calls the Novus Ordo a sect, not the Catholic Church.  Their followers really believe they have found a safe-haven, and feel secure and happy because they receive the sacraments regularly.  It is just like a family.  They have a bishop, priests, monastery, schools, nuns, picnics, pancake breakfasts, prayer support -- all the things the Church used to provide for everyone…. In a sacrament-starved environment, it appears as an oasis in the desert…. And yet, the poison of this BOD and BOB heresy undermines the entire faith and they are all oblivious to the fact that this heresy, particularly BOD, is the foundation for Vatican II and the basis for the very ecumenism they say they reject.  It is like sitting in someone's parlor and having tea and cakes with a huge, wild, "white elephant" standing next to the white wall. 

 

Perry

 

MHFM: Misinformation and lies are standard when such heretics mention us.  With regard to the question he answered, that’s mild compared to what they really believe.  If the questions got into specific religions and members of those religions, the wholesale apostasy would become apparent.  They believe that souls can be saved in any religion.  They also accept NFP.  It’s true to say that they essentially believe in universal salvation.  They couldn’t say that any person, or any number of people in any spiritual situation, is definitively in the state of damnation or lost.  Except for the Latin Mass, they are almost the same as the Novus Ordo.  It’s a massive façade, like Protestant false Christianity, with the darkness lurking within their false salvation message.  It springs up to rip apart true faith in Christ and His dogmas, rendering the entire Gospel and faith meaningless and empty.

 

Follow-up

 

Subject: Shark follow-up

 

Your points on the situation regarding the Baptism on the Beach story are valid.  However I think that prima fascia, the story is so extraordinary, that the boy was probably saved.  Having reached 18 years of age in 1959, in the US, it is almost certain that the boy was aware of the Incarnation and the Trinity.  In fact the Trinity is implicit in the form of Baptism.  So his consent to Baptism and his Act of Contrition seem evidence of cooperation and acceptance.

 

There are other facts of the case to which the story as printed in TIME don’t really do justice.  O’Neill’s courage (the girl rescuer) was almost supernatural.  The Shark, estimated from the bite radius was a great white some 18 feet long.  It was literally chomping him when she approached.  If you have ever seen video footage of these sharks attacking a seal or feeding on a dead whale, you’ll have some idea of what she confronted.  She pulled him away as the shark was repositioning for a better grip.  And then the shark, which never showed any interest in her, left.

 

It took her several minutes to drag him to shore through two foot swells.  Though there were other people, presumably men, on the beach, no one entered the water to help her. 

 

The other fact is that his wounds were massive and gruesome.   One leg was completely gone, one in shreds, and half his torso bitten through, shoulder to hip.  O’Neill’s courage and fortitude aside, it seems miraculous that he was alive long enough, and conscious, to consent to the baptism.   I think it speaks to election.  “I know mine and mine know me”.  Some souls, through the mystery of Grace, God just loves.  Perhaps it was some aspect of Kogler’s (the victim) interior disposition?  Anyway, I think it is OK to win one once in a while.  Maybe this was a win for God.  I know we can’t know anything with certitude about a particular soul (unless the real Church speaks through canonization), but I also think that some cases lead to probably conclusions.  Hard to imagine this happening today, 50 years and 45 years into Vatican II.

 

Bill Mulligan

 

MHFM: Yes, it makes sense that the article wouldn’t give all the details.  It also makes sense that, at that time, he was aware of the core truths of the Trinity and the Incarnation.  In the lives of the missionaries, there are many refreshing and amazing examples of how people were preserved just long enough to receive water baptism.  They serve to further contradict the lie of salvation without actual incorporation into the Church through baptism.  This shark story might very well have been another example.

 

Abomination

 

Subject: “Catholicism for Dummies” – abomination!

 

Dear Brothers,

 

That's a great video and article on the diabolical and outrageous book, “Catholicism for Dummies.” Thank you. It's one of the biggest selling books on the subject of “Catholicism,” and combined with the brand name, “...for Dummies,” its circulation is massive… Even a simple glance at the cover picture speaks volumes: 1. An old lady's hands – with arthritic joints, and 2. Holding Rosary beads – the hidden message is that Catholicism is a dying tradition, and that the Rosary is only for old women! It's like a catechism of Vatican II apostasy. Page 100 gets in the heresies of invincible ignorance (i.e. ”anonymous christians”) and baptism of desire in one hit, while page 94 says that all baptized, even heretics, are in the Catholic Church - heresy and schism! Page 9 opens a heretical can of ambiguous worms by stating that “all people are basically good.” Even though we are made in God's image, and man's fallen nature is not fundamentally or irredeemably evil (as Protestants believe), i.e. we still have free will, original sin has weakened our nature and will so that we are constantly inclined toward evil, and so most people will be lost to hell. Jesus said only “One is good, God.” (Matt. 19:17) It's the V-2 heresy of, “all 'good' people go to heaven” - it's universal salvation, religious indifferentism, apostasy! The book says “it's nice” to go to the gates of hell, i.e. Protestant services. That Judaism and Islam are “great religions,” when they are more guilty for spilling Catholic blood than any other religions. That NFP is sophisticated, when it's actually another New World Order population reduction tactic (viz. genocide). And that homosexuals are treated equally to heterosexuals by the Church, when God ionized Sodom and Gomorrah for their [homosexual] sins… 1+1=2, ask any 1st grader. If people can't see that the teachings in such trash as the book, “Catholicism for Dummies” are the same teachings that have produced unprecedented numbers of child molesting pedophile “priests,” then they'll enjoy being called dummies too! The End of the World has arrived – hold on to the true Catholic faith above everything else! Outside the true Catholic Church there is absolutely no salvation!!!

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

NOPOPE

 

Brothers, I was watching a documentary on the Titanic called "Titanic: Secrets Revealed." There is talk of all the omens associated with the ship, with the biggest omen mocking God by saying the ship was unsinkable. At the 12:30 minute point in the film it talks about how in the Irish shipyard during construction, the Catholic workers saw in dismay the identity number (406063) on the massive ship hull reflecting in the water. The upside down reflection in the water looked like the word "NOPOPE". The workers wondered if the ship was unholy as well.

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\titanic_nopope.jpg

I find this an amazing coincidence that after 75 years the Titanic was discovered and photographed in 1985. That this photo and message of "NOPOPE" would be discovered during the reign of the Anti-Christ Anti-Pope John Paul II.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

Athanasius

 

MHFM: We thought this was a somewhat interesting quote.

 

“Besides, he [St. Athanasius] did not study what in itself constitutes the divine Persons, nor how they are distinct and how differentiated, one from another, nor how we can, by means of remote analogies, represent to ourselves the mysterious operations which give them their being.  A polemicist always in the heat of battle, Athanasius had neither the leisure nor, probably, the taste to treat these questions of profound religious philosophy.” (Tixeront, History of Dogmas, Vol. 2, p. 75.)

 

The point is that, in the opinion of this author, Athanasius didn’t necessarily get bogged down by deeper philosophical considerations or reasoning about secondary issues.   He focused on the core truths and the primary arguments to refute the heretics.  The wisdom in such an approach is that the best arguments are always, in the end, simple.  It’s certainly true that, in refuting the multi-faceted objections and distortions of heretics, deeper understanding and deeper analysis are often required and extremely effective.  In the end, however, the refutation returns to the simple point and the core divine truth.  Countless heretics deceive themselves by a vain dedication to their own thoughts and analysis – not in order to further expound the simple divine truths – but instead to consume their focus and move them away from the simple facts.  In this way, countless people are deceived.  The quote is not meant to suggest that Athanasius didn’t believe in or understand the distinction between the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, which of course he did; nor, of course, is it in any way to suggest that deeper study and analysis are incompatible with true wisdom – not at all.  Rather, it is to comment on a mindset that must prevail in a defender of truth, even when he acquires a deeper understanding of a topic or deals with issues which some deem to be more involved.  

 

Flooded

 

Subject: Brenda’s comment

 

THIS IS WHY IN 1966 PAUL VI ABOLISHED THE INDEX OF FORBIDDEN BOOKS, SO THE WORLD COULD BE FLOODED WITH THESE HERETICAL PUTRID BOOKS LIKE CATHOLICISM FOR DUMMIES.  IT ANGERS ME SO MUCH THAT PEOPLE JUST THROW AWAY THEIR GOD GIVEN COMMON SENSE TO BECOME PARROTS FOR THESE EVIL SNAKES!  

 

TODD

 

Salvation issue

 

Dear Brother Dimond,

 

I have visited your web page because my friend, Juan… showed me the text you kindly sent him related to the salvation dogma. I recognize to have fallen into this error - thinking that some "special cases" of "which baptism "might occur - because of being ignorant myself. Thanks to Our Lady now I have learned the truth, always taught by the Holy Church and now shown in your web page. Thanks God. 

 

Please subscribe me to your newsletter…

 

In Jesu et Mariae

 

Jorge Zamora

 

Tea

 

Subject: Tea

 

Dear Brother Dimond,

   About two years ago I visited the home of an elderly couple with my mother and my sister. The husband was the son of someone who was a friend to my mother's relatives.

   Somehow, while I was speaking with the wife, she happened to mention that she had attended some sort of "Christian" school as a youth. I asked her if she had ever learned the Hail Mary prayer. She revealed to me that she had attended a protestant school but had still learned to say the Hail Mary. I asked her if she used to recite it often. She said that her teacher taught it to her class, and she would say it along with the class; but this was the only time she said it. She indicated that after a certain grade she stopped saying it, and she stopped saying it because her later teachers would no longer have the class recite this prayer.

   About a year later I again visited this same couple at their home. This time I asked the wife if she would like to receive some literature about the Bible and the Catholic Church in the mail. She said yes to that, gave me her address, and indicated that she would take a look at the material. I mailed her The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church along with my own note informing her that this book proves its main thesis in many areas using the King James Version of the Bible, a Protestant translation.  

   Just last month I learned that she had passed away due to an illness. I had not heard from her since I mailed the book to her. I never got the chance to ask whether she had read the book or what she thought of it. I do not know if this book caused her to convert to the traditional Catholic faith.

   The husband has invited my mother and myself to a tea in his wife's honor. As far as I am aware the husband is not a Catholic. Considering the fact that I do not know if this lady died as a Catholic, I believe I should not go. I believe this tea (reception), even though not immediately following a non Catholic funeral, is something that a Catholic should not attend.  Brother Dimond, any comments you might have on this matter would be appreciated.


Sincerely,
TD

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  No, you should not attend.  Since there is no evidence that she embraced the Catholic faith, one cannot consider her to have died as a Catholic.  In responding to the invitation, we would recommend telling the husband exactly what your thoughts are in a charitable way.  In other words, as a Catholic, you cannot have tea in honor of someone who did not die in the true faith; and you invite him to embrace the true faith to obtain his own salvation. 

 

BOD


Subject: Shark Story

 

With it being “Shark Week” on DSC Channel, I remembered as a kid reading about the fatal attack of a great white in San Francisco Bay in the 1950s.  I remember the victim was a guy named Kogler, and his girlfriend, named Shirley O’Neill had pulled him away from the shark and onto the beach.  Because it was witnessed by a soldier, the girl was given a medal by President Kennedy.    So these general details I remembered, so I thought I’d google the name Kogler to refresh my childhood memory of reading this story.  However this part of the story I did not read in the Time Life book article.   However this story appeared in TIME, the Magazine in 1959.

 

Miss O’Neill, in addition to possessing tremendous physical courage, apparently did not suffer from Baptism of Desire, or the “Soul of the Church” heresies:

 

Baptism on the Beach

Monday, May. 18, 1959

It was a sunny afternoon in San Francisco. Shirley O'Neill and Albert Kogler, 18-year-old freshmen at San Francisco State College, went for a swim off Baker's Beach, near the Golden Gate Bridge.

They were treading water about 50 yds. offshore when Al Kogler cried out. "I turned around," Shirley said later, "and saw this big grey thing flap up into the air. I don't know if it was a fin or a tail. I knew it was some kind of fish. There was thrashing in the water. He screamed again. He said, 'It's a shark! Get out of here!'"

Looking down on the ocean from the Presidio, San Francisco's history-encrusted Army post, Master Sergeant Leo P. Day saw what happened next. "I could see the boy in the foaming red water, shouting and signaling someone to 'go back, go back.' Then I saw the girl, swimming toward him, completely ignoring his warning. It was the greatest exhibition of courage I have ever seen."

Shirley reached Albert and seized his hand, "but when I pulled, I could see that his arm was just hanging by a thread." She slipped her arm around him and began to swim for the beach. When she was near enough, a fisherman threw her a line. After they were on the sand, Shirley, a Roman Catholic, scooped up some sea water and let it run over the head of her friend (who had never been baptized and belonged to no specific faith). "I baptize thee in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost,"* said Shirley, making the sign of the Cross, and whispered to Albert, "Is that all right?"

"O.K.," he gasped.

She told him to repeat after her the act of contrition: "0 my God, I am heartily sorry for having offended thee. I detest all my sins because I dread the loss of Heaven and the pains of Hell, but most of all because they offend thee, my God, who art all good and deserving of all my love."

Just before Albert Kogler lapsed into unconsciousness, he whispered: "I love God, and I love my mother and I love my father. Oh God, help me." Two hours later, in the Presidio's Letterman General Hospital, he died.

 

Bill Mulligan

 

MHFM: That’s a very interesting story.  There are only two comments we would make.  First, public swimming (almost certainly in immodest attire) in front of others is not an appropriate activity for people.  Second, in addition to having willingly received baptism, it would have been necessary for him to have accepted belief in the core mysteries of the Catholic faith (e.g., the Trinity and the Incarnation).  Since the young man seemed to have willingly and enthusiastically embraced baptism, as well as the act of contrition, it’s likely that he accepted core belief in the essential Catholic mysteries.  Therefore, he could have been saved by dying after baptism.

 

Comment

 

Subject: Brother Michael Dimond’s review/expose of the stupid book “Catholicism for Dummies”

 

It seems that this book is indeed aptly named:  for anyone would have to be a REAL DUMB-DUMB to actually fall for the stupid heresies in this book, and even BEGIN think they are Catholic!  My goodness!  It's as if the authors/publishers/promoters of this book are, by this horrendous outrage against THE FAITH, are literally BEGGING God Almighty to strike and decimate theml  Wow!  Truly satan is bold as he stalks the earth looking for his ill-fated prey, today, most of whom just tumble so easily into his grasp......

    I've heard of "Father Trigilio"--(gag)---of EWTN "fame"---or infamy---did you realize he has notoriously supported one of the very many FAKE V2 'Fatima' organizations, "Tradition,  Family,  Property" … Thankfully,  I have never even heard of the other "priest" involved in authoring this "book" and I thank God too I have never-ever even heard of this "Chris Brown" creep ---- must be some hideous vile "pop-culture" freak-- However I am praying for that poor girl who emailed MHFM about her pathetic addiction to him (whoever he is)---it is truly awful to witness the extremely dark evil the "youth culture" of today involves itself in!!  It makes you think that satan sure has it easy--------for now.  

 

A.

 

Papal Infallibility

 

Subject: Papal Infallibility

 

Dear Brothers:

If the modernist heretics only accept dogmas defined the Vatican Council in 1870, they would be denying the dogma of the Immaculate Conception that was defined in 1854 by Pope Pius IX, well before the Vatican Council.

EJP, M.D., D.D.

 

MHFM: Yes, their position doesn’t make any sense.

 

To do?

 

… I am not even Catholic. I am a seeker from Sweden, raised much like you in a "non-religious family" as you defined it some video I watched "the belief that God *probably* exists (and usually some holistic version) but no one cares and what matters is living a good life and only that." I am sure you can imagine and perhaps identify with the confusion of first realizing the truth of a higher being and beginning the search for truth, going through buddhism, sufism, Islam, Christianity, eastern Orthodoxy (which I halted for a good while) and then finally understand that the Catholic Church is the one true Church - and when delving deeper into that I find the Second Vatican Council, the catastrophic state of the Church and mass, the Tradionalists, which I immediately identified with, and then later the sedevacantists... Sigh, well, it's most confusing. I feel as if I am walking on a web of small lines hanging over the Abyss - blindfolded. And there's practically no Catholic (or Second Vatican Council sect if you wish) presence except for some Polish immigrants, and that's all lukewarm such and there's not a hint of traditionalism...

I don't really know why I am writing this... I just, what should I do?

 

MHFM: You should obtain a rosary and start to pray it.  The file on how to pray it is on our website.  We would also recommend reading some lives of the saints, to see the miraculous power of the one true faith (the Catholic faith).  We offer some of those books.  Jesus Christ was true God and true man.  That’s indisputable.  He founded one true Church; that’s indisputable.  There’s nothing more to think about.  You need to become Catholic.  Start to pray and familiarize yourself with the basic Catechism.  When convinced, take the steps to convert that are on our website.  But if you don’t start praying the Rosary each day and doing spiritual reading, you won’t have the grace to follow through with your conversion or be convinced of the faith.  We hope you take the steps.  Today is the day to act.

 

Anti-Catholic

 

Greetings!

 

Your expose on "Catholicism For Dummies" was right on the mark.  We had bought and briefly looked at an abridged copy; and promptly threw it away.  We might as well have been looking at an antiCatholic tract.  Another set of books you may want to warn people about is "Radio Replies"; it is a written account of a radio program run by three priests back before Vatican II.  They are set up in a question and answer mode; and yes, they do promote baptism of desire and universal salvation, even way back then.  They also mentioned that Noah's flood was a locallized event !!!  These books are very old, and they do have some valuable insights in them, but I cannot recommend that anyone buy them because they are heretical.

 

Brenda Roy

 

Read

 

Subject: Catholicism for Dummies

 

mhfm,
 
I read your article exposing the Catholicism for Dummies fraud and you did a very good job.  When you mentioned the fact that they taught there are only two ex cathedra pronouncements it shows how misinformed they are.  The idea that there are only two ex cathedra's is actually very common (at least in the state of Illinois).  That was taught in my RCIA back about two years ago, I was taught that at another parish and out of a book called The Complete Idiot's Guide to Catholicism when I was still Lutheran at the age of 14.  From what it seems the (flawed) rationale for this teaching is that ex cathedra was formally defined in 1870.  There were only two ex cathedra pronouncements after this date so those two are the only ones that count (so they say).  Every V-2 person I talk to doesn't see the illogic of having two infallible definitions on the Blessed Virgin but having no infallible definitions on such things as the Trinity, the incarnation, etc.  (The two infallible Novus Ordo definitions are Immaculate Conception and the Assumption, they are extremely important of course since they belong to the Deposit of Faith, however it would be strange if there were no other dogmatic definitions, especially on such things as the nature of God himself.)
 
Kenneth Connelly

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  In our experience with people in the Novus Ordo, we’ve also noticed that this is a common misconception.  However, we thought it was remarkable that the egregious error was promoted by one of EWTN’s “most respected” theological teachers.  The misconception betrays a completely modernist view of divine revelation.  Since they only believe that dogmas become true after they are proclaimed – for example, according to them, the definition on ex cathedra pronouncements only became true after it was proclaimed in 1870 – they only apply them to times after the definition in 1870.  A Catholic, however, understands that a dogmatic definition sets forth a truth of revelation that was given to the Church by Jesus Christ.  Thus, when a pope proclaims a dogma in 1870, or in 1441 (e.g., Outside the Church There is No Salvation), he is declaring that it was true without exception since the promulgation of the Gospel and the founding of the Church.  In other words, it was true throughout all of Church history. 

 

That means that every time in Church history before 1870, when the criteria for an ex cathedra pronouncement were met, the pope spoke infallibly from the Chair of Peter.  The divine protection did not come into existence in or after 1870.  In the same way, these modernists don’t believe the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation was true before its definition.  They actually don’t believe in it at all, but they will say things like: that statement at the Council of Florence was before they discovered this country, etc.  By such arguments they reveal their completely modernist understanding of dogma.  The dogma is a truth of revelation.  It was true before the first definition; the definition simply told us in a clear and authoritative fashion what Christ had already revealed about reality.  We also recognize that some of the modernists conclude that there have only been two ex cathedra pronouncements based on an arbitrary view of what words must be said for something to be infallible.  They believe that since the wording of the definitions of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption were very similar and, in their view, more formal, only they fulfill the requirements.  This view is held by some in the traditionalist movement, including SSPX supporters, and it is not supported by the teaching of Vatican I.  

 

Finally, we will point out that the modernist position on this issue entails a further inconsistency.  If there were only two ex cathedra pronouncements in Church history (the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption) – and they are basing that on the language set forth at Vatican I in 1870 – they must exclude the very definition of Vatican I from what constitutes an ex cathedra pronouncement!  Otherwise, they would have three: 1) The Immaculate Conception, 2) Vatican I on papal infallibility and ex cathedra pronouncements, and 3) the Assumption.  Since they exclude the text in Vatican I, on what basis do they declare that the other two are indeed ex cathedra pronouncements, since Vatican I was the place where the criteria for what is ex cathedra were set forth?  It’s a mass of contradictions and illogical nonsense. 

 

Outrageous

 

Subject: Outrageous

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

To say that both John Paul II and Benedict XVI, are, and have been, ' very holy men' and 'staunch defenders of the teachings of the Catholic faith' is simply ridiculous and outrageous!

Has Christine never read the… Heresies of both John Paul II and Benedict XVI?... -  She needs to, before she starts hopping onto her novus ordo 'high horse'- and attempting to preach to and correct  the converted, the few true Catholics who remain in the world today, who remain faithful to Christ and His Church, and are more than capable of rebuffing mindless, unsubstantiated accusations of "blasphemy"...

And, once having acquainted herself with the numerous heresies of her "popes", AND she refuses to budge - she becomes the blasphemer!

 ...having just put her foot in her mouth - the boot now appears to be on the other foot!

A 'sister in Christ' to me, she most definitely is not - as long as she remains stubbornly with the church of the Apostasy, and its Antipopes, which lacks ALL four marks of the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation, and whose prayers God does not heed!

God bless,

David

 

Latest

 

Subject: Latest review of Catholicism for Dummies

 

Dear Brothers,


Good job on exposing a largely distributed book that is probably hurting already countless souls.  They don't even care!  I think they just want to sell books.  All of the heresies were terrible! But, the one that got me the most was the one on Hell and purgatory, not being real places!  How could they in right conscience put out such obvious lies.  The Dogma of hell is what saves so many sinners right at the beginning of their conversion.  Because they're not pure enough yet to avoid sin simply for the love of God but the fear of Hell keeps most of them from committing sins.  Now, take away the reality of hell and what do they have to fear?  This book is so dangerous it's ridiculous.  It’s simply a religion of the world it’s spelling out, where everyone is of God no matter what they do and whatever you do, don't offend anyone.

Nathan

 

How can?

 

Subject: Catholicism for dummies

 

Excellent video!

Their book should be called PROTESTANT Catholicism for dummies!!  How can they get away with such heresy!!  Saying jews and muslims are the same etc!!

And the GAYS!!! and now it is legal practically everywhere!  What happened to Sodom and Gomorrah??...

 

Hum….

 

Abominable

 

Subject: B-16 and Anti-Semitism

 

My compliments to Brother Michael Dimond for his recent article/audio. The "apologists" from Catholic Answers are simply clowns able to digest the most abominable heresies. 

The V-2 sect´s respect for the false and apostate Jewish religion is really sickening. I don´t know if you are aware of Father Dehon´s case. Simply put, Ratzinger put his canonization process on hold (not that the rat had any power to canonize him anyway) because some of his writings were discovered, in which he demonstrated "anti-semitic" ideas. 

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/15/AR2005061502305.html

 

CK

 

Comment

 

Subject: Christine

 

I think your answer to the shocked Christine was a slam-dunk.  However as she claimed that she could “go on and on for a very longtime”, I would like to invite her to do so.

 

People such as she seem to prefer unity, or consensus, or harmony, no matter how contrived or artificial to either truth or justice.   They are often quite disturbed by conflict, but they can rarely (never) cite a single fact (article of truth) or even a coherent idea in support of their position.   So Dear Christine do tell us something, and it doesn’t even have to be a very longtime, of why say John Paul II is good and holy.

 

In addition to His prayer for unity, Jesus also warned, “think ye not that I came to bring Peace on Earth, but rather the sword, to divide father against son etc…”  In isolation this verse, and Christine’s favorite verse seem contradictions.  In context they are perfectly harmonious.  

 

Bill Mulligan

 

John 17

 

Response to Christine Pineault

Christine you stated that Jesus said "That we may all be one." This is a misrepresentation of Jesus' words.  Even John Paul II and Benedict XVI misuse these words of Jesus.

Let's take a look at what is going on in Chapter 17 of St John's Gospel.  First off this is about Jesus' prayer to His Father in Heaven.  He was praying for for His Apostles as stated in John 17:6-11:
 
(6)"I have manifested thy name to the men whom thou hast given me out of the world.  Thine they were, and to me thou gavest them; and they have kept thy word. (7) Now they have known , that all things which thou hast given me, are from thee:  (8) Because the words which thou gavest me, I have given them,; and they have received them, and have known in very deed that I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me.  (9) I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them whom thou hast given me:  because they are thine: (10) And all my thifs are thine, and thine are mine; and I am glorified in them.  (11) And now I am not in the world, and these are in the world , and I come to thee, Holy Father, keep them in thy name whom thou hast given me; that they may be one as we also are one".

As you can see Jesus was not praying that His Apostles and the world were to be one but that the apostles were to be one.  You can even see that Jesus is speaking strictly about those who believe. 

The prayer of Jesus in the 17th Chapter of St John is nothing like the prayer of JPII and Benedict XVI, who are praying a diabolical and twisted version of Jesus' prayer. 

So you see the, "they" in Jesus' prayer is for His Apostles, NOT for unity for His Church and the world.

Paul Smith

 

Comment

 

Subject: pride, predestination, free will

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I was thinking that one of the main sources of pride today is an unfounded confidence in one's own salvation. For example, the Novus Ordites are taught that there is no hell, that those outside the Catholic Church can be saved, that all men are saved, etc. and so they have no fear of God punishing them for their sins. Radical schismatics seem to believe that, since the number of the elect is few, and there are only a few radical schismatics, then they must be of the elect, which makes them believe like many of the heretical sects, that all Catholics are of the elect. As a result they have no fear of God since they imagne they know for sure who is saved. The Church simply tells us how to judge things by the external forum, which helps to determine who definitely cannot be saved, such as Non-Catholics, but it cannot tell who is saved for sure, except for the saints. If anyone knew they were saved with 100% surety, unless by a special revelation from God, then they would lose all fear of God, be overcome by pride, and end up in hell! Since we all have free will which can resist grace or concupiscence at any time, and which can go from bad will to good will or vice versa whenever the person wants it to, then it's hard to tell who will be lost or saved amongst Catholics, unless they have some outstanding qualities, whether they be good or bad, but even then it may not be possible to judge whether such a one is saved or lost (I think this is how the Church views predestination, etc.).

 

Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON IV.-If any one saith, that man's free will moved and excited by God, by assenting to God exciting and calling, nowise co-operates towards disposing and preparing itself for obtaining the grace of Justification; that it cannot refuse its consent, if it would, but that, as something inanimate, it does nothing whatever and is merely passive; let him be anathema.

 

Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON XV.-If any one saith, that a man, who is born again and justified, is bound of faith to believe that he is assuredly in the number of the predestinate; let him be anathema.

 

Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON XVI.-If any one saith, that he will for certain, of an absolute and infallible certainty, have that great gift of perseverance unto the end,-unless he have learned this by special revelation; let him be anathema.

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Heard

 

Dear Dimond Brothers:

It´s been almost 4 years since your now classic debate against the novus ordo apologist William Golle. To tell you the truth, at the time I first heard the debate, I was cheering up FOR HIM, since I described myself as a Traditionalist (even though I still regarded the crippled Liturgy as valid and somewhat acceptable, and the conciliar leaders as legitimate Popes). This was the second material from you guys that I saw, the first being your video on the New Mass, which shocked me deeply. I was hoping that someone could stand up and prove you wrong, that the situation was not so dire, and that even if you´re not wrong, there was a great deal of exaggeration. 

 

What I saw during the next 3 hours was just astonishing. He felt right into your traps, proving his position to be simply a tower of sand that you gladly kicked. At the say time, all of his objections against the sedevacantist thesis and reality were quickly and effectively disproved with clear examples and in total conformity with the Church´s Teaching and the Promises of Christ.  

 

That debate was crucial in changing the tide of my life and position. I´m sure there are many people with similar stories. After that, I´ve immersed myself deeply in the study of Sedevacantism, and of your material in particular.

 

To this day, I´m in debt to the 2 of you. And in a certain way, to Mr. Golle as well for his inept defense of the indefensible V2 AntiPopes and their sect´s heresies and apostasy. As GnrHead´s defeat played a major role in some people´s conversions, I know that the debate against Golle was pivotal in my case.

 

Don´t you think it´s about time he gets the rematch he´s been asking for? After all, nobody seems to be interested anymore in stepping in a debate with you. Even when they seen to be giving the green light, for some reason they all give up, probably very much afraid of being exposed as the inconsistent liars they deep down know they are.  

 

If he´s still willing, why not give him a chance? What´s to lose? A fair amount of people had their shots at you, and none of them performed any better. 

 

Frankly, at this point, aside from a highly, extreme, clinical case of bad-will, the only reasonable motive for a person who have listened to your debates to not be convinced would be the supposition of the possibility that all of the V2 apologists you´ve face so far were somehow unaware of what V2 really teaches and misrepresented it´s true position. That´s why I´ve urged you to try to find a recognized authority inside the Novus Ordo structure (like that Franciscan) willing to debate.

 

But since it´s highly unlikely any of them will accept, why don´t you bring Mr. Golle back (and down) again?

 

Apologia

 

Dear Bros;

 

I read Archbishop Lefebvre’s book ‘Apologia Pro’ earlier this year.  Anyone who reads this will not be surprised of the current state and attitude of a large number of SSPX supporters.  Despite the bishop’s fight to keep the true mass and sacraments, his lax attitude towards new church and its members who want to destroy the true faith have become the foundation upon which the SSPX is built.  I have a good friend who doesn’t even like to use the term ‘SSPX’ since of course St. Pius X was a true saint.  ‘Lefebvreists’ is a more fitting term for SSPX members.

 

MG

 

Debate


I'd just like to clarify: Is your debate with "P…W…" just delayed? I look forward to your next debate because your past debates are gems of Catholic training and are very useful reminders. Debate is preferred over posting videos back and forth between the two parties… It clears away the fog, once and for all. Facts can no longer be buried under so many lies, and the Truth, from whomever it comes from, becomes obvious just as the day is separate from the night. We will eventually all learn from it.

On your recent discussion with a SSPX supporter: A reasonable and concerned person would think as follows: "Is there a possibility that he is making a point and I am in error? I should investigate his answers to all my questions." He probably did not think of that. Not one bit of concern from him at all. He was so sure of himself, he even said that he'd pray for you to join SSPX! What would have been decades of difficult prayer and investigation, you just summarized in minutes. You already made it so easy for him, but still he does not want to dig in deeper. Maybe, SSPX and other similar groups are traps for traditionalists?

On your last conversation with Greg, may we know how it ended? Has he changed his mind after your explanation? Did good will prevail? Even Saint Paul, a persecutor of the early Church, was converted by Jesus Christ. Let us all pray then: may the Lord bless Greg so that he may complete his journey to finding the Truth, as many of us who were once deceived have also done. Amen.

… have you considered writing Catholic children's books? There are lots of children's stories out there that are not spiritually helpful for them. Have you also heard about the theory that "Santa Claus" does not really refer to a saint but could be an anagram for "Satan Lucas" (for the English speaking world). This was an old trap to deceive children so that they would commit idolatry on the feast day of the nativity. Do you think this is true?

May God continue to bless MHFM,

Sanjiv

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  After originally agreeing to have the debate-conversation, he backed out.  He stopped responding to our e-mails.  Just recently he admitted that he is no longer interested.  He is clearly afraid of having his heretical position exposed.  After we refuted his false assertion on Dominus Iesus, he obviously concluded that a debate wouldn’t be a good idea.  He had declared that Dominus Iesus makes it clear that Benedict XVI holds that the Eastern “Orthodox” are not part of the true Church, and that Protestant religions are not means of salvation.  We refuted that from the very document itself.  It teaches the opposite: it says the schismatics are part of the Church and that the Protestant religions are means of salvation.  At that point, he decided that he didn’t want to do the debate.  What’s most disgraceful is that he was still posturing as if he was willing to do it when in fact he had backed out. 

 

Regarding the SSPX conversation, there were a few things that struck us.  One of the interesting things was the fact that he was extremely unfamiliar with solid Catholic principles, yet had memorized some of the responses which are commonly (and wrongly) used to deny the true positions.  For instance, he didn’t know what schism is; yet, when confronted with Catholic principles which lead to the conclusion that the SSPX’s position is wrong, he immediately replied with all the common (and false) objections: St. Athanasius (misunderstood); era of peace (misunderstood); consecration of Russia (misunderstood); Padre Pio (misunderstood); etc.  This reveals that they are not interested in solid Catholic truth, but only those things which keep them comforted in their false positions.  They have those memorized (even though they lack a detailed understanding of them), but they couldn’t care less about Catholic principles or dogmas.  For that reason, when it is demonstrated that their arguments on those matters aren’t correct, they don’t care.  The conversation was another example of a so-called traditionalist who is not remotely Christian.  There is no other way to put it: he rejects core faith in Christ, His necessity for salvation and a true belief in His dogmas.  All they care about is community, going to a church, externals, and the Latin Mass.

 

On the matter of the conversation with Greg, he did communicate with us afterward.  He continued to send us e-mails which demonstrated outrageous obstinacy in his false positions.  It was one distortion and misunderstood argument after another.  It was truly appalling.  Anything these heretics think they can use to deny Catholic teaching is brought up.  That’s why the conversation with him was valuable; it brings those distortions to light.  So, he is unfortunately as hardened in his heresy as he was before the conversation.  That’s why we described him, in post-debate posts, as a complete liar. 

 

Is the World about to End? – Part 11

 

MHFM: We have posted part 11 of the video, Is the World about to End?

 

Is the World about to End ? - Part 11

 

Is the World about to End ? - Part 1

Is the World about to End ? - Part 2

Is the World about to End ? - Part 3

Is the World about to End ? - Part 4

Is the World about to End ? - Part 5

Is the World about to End ? - Part 6

Is the World about to End ? - Part 7

Is the World about to End ? - Part 8 - Mark of the Beast

Is the World about to End ? - Part 9 - Mark of the Beast

Is the World about to End ? - Part 10

 

RCIA

 

Subject: RCIA

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Your video on JP2's teaching the gospel of Antichrist brought many things to mind, one of which follows.

 

Years ago my spouse and I attended an RCIA program.  Soon after, I began reading some pre-Vatican II books and wondered why the points in those books were never mentioned during the so-called RCIA program.  At the time, I concluded that the RCIA had been a great waste of time. 

 

Of course, I was wrong:  the RCIA was no waste of time -  the RCIA was one of the counterfeit church's many shuttle trains to hell.  RCIA should be called RIDD:  Rite of Indoctrination into the Diabolical Disorientation.

 

By the time the program finishes, their victims are indeed diabolically disoriented:  they don't know up from down, or in from out.  And this - as your video makes clear - is precisely the gospel and goal of Antichrist, as the real Sister Lucy warned.  Satanic doctrine and a counterfeit church with people all the while thinking they are holding God's Revelation and are in the Catholic Church.  Diabolical disorientation indeed!

 

RCIA creates the monstrous and difficult-to-dislodge belief in people's minds that to be a Catholic depends on what you call yourself, what your friends think you are, where you park yourself on Sunday, or what your grandmother was.  Nowhere in the false church (understandably) is it ever taught that to be a Catholic depends first and foremost on holding the true Faith and being baptized. 

 

It's amazing how you've made all of the pieces of the puzzle fit together.

 

Thanks for all you do,

Lee

 

Duty

 

I had a quick question about the Easter duty required of Catholics.  I had thought that (under normal conditions) a Catholic must worthily receive Holy Communion once during the Easter Season (which ends on Pentecost).  Someone told me one must also go to confession once per year as well, but I was thinking if one commits only venial sins, they are not required to go to confession - the worthy reception of the Eucharist implies being in the state of grace, and the Church does not require that venial sins be confessed.  I realize the usual disclaimers - if one is not near a valid mass, one need not worry, and frequent (valid) confession is a very good practice.  I just wanted to make sure I understood this correctly.

 

God bless you,

 

John

 

MHFM: Even though it’s an excellent idea to go frequently, there is no strict obligation to confess venial sins alone.  Yet, there is an obligation to go to confession once a year (canon 906, 1917 Code).  Therefore, in normal times, to fulfill that obligation, the Catholic in the state of grace would confess the venial sins alone.  

 

Moreover, there is also an obligation to receive Communion at least once during Resurrection time (canon 859).  However, in this situation, when basically all the priests are heretics, there is no obligation to go and fulfill that duty.  It’s a church law which does not bind in this situation.  The same is true of the normal obligation to go to confession.  However, we believe there are options for confession and Communion for many people, and those are explained in our Where to go to Mass file.  The point is that there is no strict obligation to go in this situation. 

 

Excommunication

 

Subject: Excommunicated persons

 

Dear Brother Peter Dimond,


I am studying your paper "The Heresies of Fr. James Wathen". I am pleased with your opinions. I see that you implied that excommunicated persons are outside the Church. The actual statement was an implication that excommunicated "heretics" are outside the Church. I believe that the Church teaches that heretics are outside the Church by their own act: their heresy puts them out of the Church. Excommunicated persons, on the contrary, are still members of the Church, but are under punishment, called remedial, or some such term (I remember this from Pietro Parente's Dictionary of Dogmatic Theology, 1951).  They are still members of the Church, but are under sanctions. If such an excommunicate happened to be a heretic, he would no longer be excommunicated, he would become a heretic and would not in any way be a member of the Church. It is splitting hairs, but I submit to the Church and what the Church teaches without judging it.  It is quite true that the Modernists are heretics, and know that they are in contradiction to the teachings of the Church. They know; and I suspect that many of the Modernist leadership, if not most of them, are directly linked to the Freethinkers.  I am not trying to deflate you, I just wanted to make a comment on your paper.

 

Robert Gregory

 

MHFM: First, you are completely wrong.  You say that “excommunicated persons… are still members of the Church.”  You also say that if an excommunicated person happened to be a heretic, he would no longer be excommunicated.  According to you, heretics are not excommunicated persons.  That is wrong.  Second, you imply that we said that all excommunicated persons are outside the Church.  No, we did not.  We very clearly explained that those who are excommunicated for heresy, schism or apostasy are outside the Church.  However, one could receive a minor excommunication for something else and still remain a member of the Church.  Your principal error, which demonstrates your lack of understanding of the issue, is that heretics are not excommunicated.  It is contradicted by the following things, among others.  All heretics are automatically excommunicated.

 

Pope Benedict XIV, Ex Quo Primum (# 23), March 1, 1756: "Moreover heretics and schismatics are subject to the censure of major excommunication by the law of Can. de Ligu. 23, quest. 5, and Can. Nulli, 5, dist. 19. But the sacred canons of the Church forbid public prayer for the excommunicated as can be seen in chap. A nobis, 2, and chap. Sacris on the sentence of excommunication. Though this does not forbid prayer for their conversion, still such prayer must not take the form of proclaiming their names in the solemn prayer during the sacrifice of the Mass."

 

Canon 2314, 1917 Code of Canon Law: “All apostates from the Christian faith and each and every heretic or schismatic: 1) Incur ipso facto [by that very fact] excommunication…”

 

Interest

 

Dear Peter and Michael,

 

I am a Easter Orthodox Christian, living in Toronto Canada. Over the last two months I have spent a considerable amount of time watching your videos, and reading your articles. I am very impressed!  I was wondering what non-VaticanII Catholic churches you would recommend I attend in my area, as I have tried looking via internet. It seems there are very few, in fact I don't really know, should I go to a Byzantine rite Catholic church? Your help would be very appreciated.

 

Thank you so much,

 

Goran Petkovski

 

Exploring

 

Dear Brothers,
 
I have recently been exploring the Traditional Catholic faith.  I have come across a church in my area which offers the Tridentine mass.  It is given by a priest with the letters FSSP after his name.  I have done some research but was wondering what your thoughts were on this type of ordination.  Would this be a mass option for me??  I realize that I would not be able to support the priest financially due to his support of the current antipope.
 
Thank you for your time, God Bless,
 
Amanda

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  No, the FSSP would not be an option.  Most of their priests are ordained by bishops who were made bishops in the invalid New Rite of Episcopal Consecration.  That's mentioned in the articles on our site dealing with the new rites.  Therefore, they wouldn't be an option for confession or Communion or anything.  Our file on “Where to Go to Mass” deals with those issues.

 

Posting

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Thank you for posting your conversation with the man from the SSPX.  It made me tremble, and made me thank God yet again for finding the MHFM.

 

The things the SSPX supporter said are repeated ad nauseum in the cult calling itself "Tradition".  In cult-like fashion, the spirit of inquiry and investigation (i.e., the search for truth) is beaten down to the point of death. We have been warned of this by St. Paul who tells us to test all things and keep what is good.

 

Thus, they keep their subjects imprisoned in the whore of Babylon, swearing allegiance to Antichrist John Paul 2 and his blaspheming cohorts who have put the worship of the true God on the same level as the worship of Satan.

 

In the Sept. '09 issue of the SSPX's Angelus Magazine, there is recorded an interview with Bishop Fellay.  At the end of that interview Fellay is asked;  "What do you think of Benedict XVI?"

 

Fellay responds:  "He is an upright man, who regards the situation and the life of the Church most seriously."

 

Enough said…

 

I wanted to also thank you for the video on JP2 teaching the Gospel of Antichrist.  If anyone has not seen it they should; make a nice complement to the end of the world series.  And the wrap-up that you make at the end of that video is absolutely superb. 

 

Thanks again. Lee

 

Conversation

 

Subject: Conversation with SSPX supporter

 

Dear Br. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Regarding your "Conversation with SSPX supporter" when you asked him if he had the same faith as Ratzinger. He could not answer that question.  For a moment the truth dawned in his mind but of course he refused to accept it. He could not refute a single thing you said and totally amazing after such a poor display of understanding the Catholic Faith he wanted you to join the SSPX. Hard to believe there are such foolish and deluded people. I am sure he will be happy if Fellay joins the SSPX to the Seat of the Anti-Christ.

You are right in the early days the SSPX would be okay but as time went on and it became obvious what was going on and the heresy very clear then they were responsible to act as a Catholic. The SSPX leaders will be held accountable by Our Lord.

God Bless,
Maria

 

Incomprehensible

 

Dear Brothers,

 

It is so incomprehensible how the anti-popes, who have willingly led to the destruction of so many souls, could possibly not fear God's wrath. Perhaps there is a special place in hell just for them.

 

Alpha…

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

If Benedict is the "beast" of the Apocalypse in the form of a "rat" that comes out of the earth, is this story an indication that Obama, with his leftist, pro-abort, New World Order agenda is fully in league with him?

 

http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/rat-scurries-past-obama-during-rose-garden-speech/19485782

 

FH

 

Names

 

Subject: Names, Games

 

Dear Brothers,

 

That's a very interesting Part 11 to your End of the World series. You prove very clearly the connection between a Biblical person's name and their role, characteristic or qualities. Antipope Benedict XVI is the Devil's rat - a betrayer of Christ. He's a rodent scuttling about in the sewers of the world (synagoges, mosques, Protestant Churches, etc.) hissing and screeching blasphemies against God and His One Catholic Church. Rats are sneaky, deceptive and carry disease. What an appropriate description of Benedict XVI! Also, Antipope John Paul II's real name, Karol is derived from Charles, which means "man" and his last name Wojtyla is connected with war (also sounds like woe...), which is interesting that he spread the Antichrist gospel that "man is God" in a war-like, i.e. extremely aggressive manner - like a Beast - more than anyone ever before or since! 

 

The news article on how Israel plays war games is very revealing. It shows how blood-thirsty they are. If Iran made a big public show of playing a war-game like that can you imagine the uproar that would ensue?!! It's all part of the process to condition the public mind into accepting lies, such as that Iran has nuclear weapons, which it doesn't. Yet no one worries about Israel having nuclear weapons, as though the fact that they are Jews justifies the imbalance. Also, it's a common tactic of those who are corrupt and in power to antagonize their enemies, wait for a reaction, and then use the enemies’ reaction to justify going to war with them. It's called "flushing them out," in police jargon. So Israel is trying to "flush out" Iran by mocking them and teasing them, so that after Iran says something (even one little thing against Israel), then Israel will turn around, stones in their hands, crying "See!!! We told you they have nuclear weapons. Now we have to attack before they do! Don't think! Just do what we say now before it's too late!!!!!" Israel thinks war is a game, that's how dangerous they are!

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Rats

 

Subject: About Rats

 

Once again, a brilliant presentation! Nicely done! I don´t know if you´re going to remain on the "rat" issue during the next videos, but there are a lot of things that could be said:

 

For instance, it´s widely (if not universally) accepted that some animals have a symbolic value. Many theologians and philosophers even believe this was intended by God. This is even in the Holy Bible. Many Air Forces use the Hawk, because it symbolizes boldness and courage. The pig, uncleanness. The dove, peace. The lion, majesty (many monarchies through history used it as symbol). The scorpion, treachery. The snakes, the devil and evil in general. 

 

As for the rat, at least in idioms derived from Latin (like French, Portuguese, Spanish) you can find expressions identical to "are you a man or a rat?". I know that at least in Chinese zodiac the rat is considered good, but in most cultures it appears to be widespread the notion that rats or mice are representatives of COWARDICE.

 

What better way to describe Joseph Ratzinger?... He assumed the old Holy Office, even though during Vatican II he was the writer of the controversial text (read by his master) demanding the very end of the Holy Office. And in a sense, that´s what he did, by reducing its effectiveness to nearly zero, like a rodent destroying wood. This is pretty much like inviting some PETA eco-terrorist to be the head of a slaughterhouse, some pacifist hippie as the country´s Minister of Defense, or the little Red Wood hiring the hungry wolf as grandmama´s nurse. I guess everything is possible in a sect which allows a Rosicrucian to screen candidates to the priesthood.

 

"Pope" Paul VI stated (in his typical cynical fashion) that by SOME FISSURE the smoke of Satan entered the Church. In a sense, this could be attributed to Antipope Paul VI himself or the modernism in general present at Vatican II. But I don´t think it´s too much of an extrapolation to suppose that the fissure from which the beast emerges is a mouse-hole.

 

… Heretics are the sons of the devil. True Catholics are the lineage of the woman. These two spiritual races are natural enemies… Since there´s no Pope to safeguard the Church, the rats are now celebrating and spreading a spiritual Black Plague. By the way, rats were the main vector of the Plague that afflicted Europe in the Middle Ages. It´s fitting that a rat plays such a large role now.

 

… His sect is marked with his cowardice. He does nothing to extirpate liturgical abuses on the new mass. He once made a remark about Islam that backfired on him. So he retracted the statement and said it was only something he was quoting, not necessarily his own view on the matter. It´s ok to him to be pro-abortion. Since his sect would make far too obvious that they´re not the catholic church if they endorsed abortions, his solution is to remain silent and sin by omission instead of excommunicate everyone who supports it in any sense. 

 

Parents afraid of their children. Priests afraid of the faithful. Bishops afraid of the priests. And now "popes" scared of Bishops. But in reality, instead of a frail old man, he´s a fearsome beast, perhaps the deadliest enemy of the Church and mankind ever. Rats are so small, so fragile, so easy to kill. Any domestic cat can hunt them down. And yet, they can be a plague, can cause immense destruction. They can fool people led by appearances that they´re harmless. Just like Ratzinger does, while he promotes an enormous destruction by his action, and perhaps even more by his coward inactions…

 

Keep up the good work. It´s really great news that you will be releasing this series on DVD. I personally believe you´re uncovering the greatest lie in the entire History of human civilization. This Vatican II apostate sect is such a major fraud…  This series is not only an excellent warning to wake up the Neo-Conservative and "Traditionalists", but I suspect it could be great to use as an instrument of apologetics and proselytism with Protestants who wrongfully regard the Catholic Church as the Whore. Once again, thank you for defending the Faith and Spreading the Light of Truth.

 

CK

 

After

 

Dear Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,

 

After listening to that SSPX apologist, my only reaction was to say, "What a complete 'no hoper', an 'ignoramus 'and a totally dishonest person!!"

 

God bless,

 

David

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  It's an interesting example of how they are all programmed with the same responses, which they regurgitate on call to dismiss infallible Catholic truth: e.g., “pastoral council”; “era of peace”; consecration of Russia; etc.  All of their misconceptions on these matters can be and have been refuted, but it's an interesting illustration of their bad will.  They really don’t care about Catholic teaching and the truth.  His heresy on salvation is also quite revealing – another example of how for them “baptism of desire” = salvation in any religion. 

 

Appears

 

Subject: rat in the White House

 

Talking about rats...guess they are leaving the sinking ship

 

Rodent scurries by as Obama lauds Wall Street vote

 

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hqGxY_MkXAPzC5gh7_SDZd8qB9oAD9FQQR400?index=0


WASHINGTON — '' In his battle with the titans of Wall Street, President Barack Obama almost got upstaged by a rat. But he didn't even seem to notice. Assuming that's what it was, scurrying in front of his podium Thursday in a sun-drenched Rose Garden...''

 

V.

--

Subject: rat appears at White House conference

 

I thought this was interesting considering your latest video content.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100520/ap_on_re_us/us_obama_rodent

 

Ms…

 

Lucia

 

Thank you for your postings, especially about the Lucia imposter.

Ad Jesum Per Mariam

Dan

 

UFO

 

Subject: Comments on the UFO book

 

Hi there,

Just want to say the UFO book you have written is great.

I suggest in the 2nd edition of the book you include an expose of the film called The Fourth Kind.

It is a Hollywood film and supposedly based upon a true life story. Though it is biased it supposedly contains real life footage and it shows people going under hypnosis to relive their "alien abduction" experiences.

The people who under hypnosis in some scenes levitate and demonic voices come out the people speaking ancient Sumerian.

The messages the "aliens" bring are summarised:
1. Pray no Help
2. I am God

If the real life scenes in the film are true it’s the best expose on the "aliens" for whom they really are ......Demons!

regards,

Ivan

EENS

 

Hello,

 

You have a wonderful site!  I love your writings on EENS…

 

Blessings,

 

Don

 

Saying

 

I like how you put into perspective the information in the latest series, concerning the "Rat" and the false Prophet B-16 and bring it to an undeniable conclusion . One saying comes to my mind as well, "Rat Fink" concerning the beatification of the anti-Christ JPII.  To think of all the miracles, hard work, and suffering that Padre Pio had performed over 50 years, and no real mention of his accomplishments or beatification. A lot of Vatican II Sect members know nothing of Padre Pio, nor anything else of the true Chruch prior to Vatican II.  A complete brainwashing as we see also today with the actions of world governments.

The (2007) childrens Pixar cartoon movie "Ratatouille" about Remy the young RAT in Paris who is portrayed as such a sweet lovable almost human character who loves cooking came into view at a seemingly appropriate time. The movie was produced only a couple years after Ratzinger came into the public eye.  Interesting in comparing the two, that the food dish Ratatouille (Ratzinger), from which the movie name comes, is usually served as a side dish (along JPII), but also may be served as a meal on its own (B-16 False Prophet).

These last days will ultimately show God allowing the serpent snake Lucifer who also lives in a hole in the ground (Hell), to attack and swallow the rodent (RATzinger) that plagues this world.  I look forward to the release of this new series "Is the World about to End" onto DVD.  What a package should it contain the other three movies; The Third Secret of Fatima, Death and the Journey to Hell, and Creation & Miracles.  As fishers of Men, your bound to fill your nets with a big catch!!

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

Comment

 

I wanted to thank you for posting that creation past and present video. That was one of the best videos I have ever watched in my life. Praise Jesus and please put more of those videos up!

 

Jo…

 

Writing

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I´m writing you from Brasília, Brazil. I really enjoy reading your website, listening to your audio debates, videos and programs. It´s the first time i ever heard about the theory councerning the phony sister Lucia, and as a coincidence, some weeks ago, a good known brazilian philosofer Olavo de Carvalho metioned your theory and website in his online radio program…

 

But i have a question on an other issue: we actually know that Pope Benedict XVI (i´m not a sedevacantist, so i don´t call him an anti-pope) ordered everyone to shift the New Mass "for all" consecration words to "pro multis" one. Therefore i ask you: if every parish attend this order on the Novos Ordo consecration form, isn´t your main argument against the validity of the New Mass going to loose it´s significance?

 

Although the new mass isn´t catholic at all , it´s really possible that using the "pro multis" form, turns the consecration valid. Isn´t it?...

  

Thank you for all your great work on catholic teaching,

 

With best regards,

 

Claudio Chad

 

MHFM: Regarding some Novus Ordo “priests” returning to pro multis (“for many”), it wouldn’t make the New Mass valid.  That’s because almost all the priests who are offering it were ordained in the invalid New Rite of Ordination.  They aren’t priests, so they can’t say a valid Mass.  Further, the consecration is still missing mysterium fidei.  When words that were used by Christ – which were part of the Roman Rite form since apostolic times – are deliberately removed, that demonstrates an intention contrary to that of the Church.  For that reason, the deliberate removal of mysterium fidei from the Roman Rite by itself renders the New Mass doubtful.  Nevertheless, the absolutely invalid “for you and for all” form is still widely used.  

 

At this stage of the Great Apostasy, it was a calculated move by the Devil to allow the Latin Mass and to make minor liturgical concessions to conservative-minded people.  He knew that it wouldn’t make a real difference because almost all the priests are invalid and the apostasy is so firmly entrenched.  Therefore, he had his False Prophet make these rather insignificant concessions in order to deceive the people who love not the truth but only the externals.  They were insignificant in terms of their real practical effect, but extremely significant in terms of the impression and the psychological impact: to keep people inside the Counter Church.  You really need to become convinced that he’s not the pope.  How much proof do you need to see that he’s a heretic and outside the Church?  Come on, now. 

 

DVD

 

Gentlemen -

 

Very captivating videos...  I am truly astonished with your way of connecting the dots, thanks for all the hard work you have put into the series.

 

I would love to get these videos out to my family, unfortunately not all of them have access to the Internet.  Are you considering, or would you consider compiling the series on to a DVD? 

 

Thank you for your work and dedication to the truth,

 

Andrew

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  The Is the World about to End? video is in the process of being put on to DVD.  It should be available for order very soon.

 

Video

 

AND PEOPLE SAY GOD DOESN'T HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOR, HE LOOKS LIKE A RAT!!!  GREAT JOB BROTHERS, FITS JUST LIKE A GLOVE.  KEEP THE VIDEOS COMING AND PLEASE MAKE THESE INTO DVD'S.=

 

NK

 

Makes sense

 

Great job on the new video about the rat-man B16---very observant!  Makes sense too that St. John would also describe this rat-beast as speaking like a dragon, like the "great RED dragon" of Apocalypse 12------because arguably,  B16 is the most vociferous and powerful mouthpiece for communism in the world today

 

A.

 

Interesting

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Interesting, as I have been calling him Rat-Zinger ever since the first minute I laid eyes on him.  I remember Running down my stairs as they were announcing the New Pope on TV....and coming face to face with what I thought was about the most horrific demonic man I'd ever seen!  Those sunken demonic dark eyes are just chilling. 

 

Yet, when I went to Mass (in my past life) I was Shocked to hear a couple of women go on and on about how Beautiful his Eyes were ????   This was about the Last straw for me, I left Vatican II shortly afterwards.  We don't know from what vantage point John was shown this 'Beast'; perhaps Jesus made him look bigger and more terrible than just a mere rat?  In my book it's insulting to rats to compare them to Rat-Zinger.

 

The Last point is well taken, this pushing of John Paul II towards sainthood certainly matches with the old Roman emperors.  I just can't get over how Subtle this all is, in contrast to the Big Show we have all been programmed to expect.  Without all your hard work and insight from God, we would never be aware of all this.

 

Thank you so much,

 

Carol D.

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  Lots of people have insulted him by referring to him as the Rat.  Their goal was to draw attention to his shady character.  However, we believe that the real significance of his name is not just that he has a shady character, but that it connects him again directly with the second beast coming out of the earth.

 

Reminded

 

Dear Brothers:

 

My mother just reminded me that rats are disastrous plague carriers that brought death to great numbers of people - a threat to entire communities and nations in Europe.   Likewise, in the plague of Apostasy the "Rat" has a very important role to play.

 

Section 11 provides much food for thought.

 

Thanks, Lee

 

Smell

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Your last observation about antipope B16 is quite interesting. Some people might find it funny that you make a connection between his last name and a rat but just think about some idioms used in English...off the top of my head: ''to smell a rat''...now isn't that an appropriate expression to describe the Vatican 2 sect and the man presently leading it? Hopefully, in the time that is left, more people will smell a rat and come to the knowledge of the real truth.

 

God bless,

 

V. from Croatia

 

Note

 

MHFM: A new video will be posted probably tomorrow.

 

Came Across

 

Thank you for protecting the truth.  I just came across your website, my name is Louise from Ireland, i have been led astray for so long, i knew something  was wrong but i didn’t have the words to explain it. May God enlighten me more,

 

Louise.

 

Padre Pio

 

I need to bring your attention to a matter, you obviously over-looked? I will not mention the many other lies you perpetrate on you site.

 

In your mag "A Voice Crying In The Wilderness", you state that Padre Pio only used the traditional missal? You must know that this is a complete lie? Have you never scene the videos of him celebrating THE NEW MASS?? That man said the new mass until his dying day! What liars!

 

You better confess your mortal sins of lying & slander!

 

Uk

 

MHFM: No, you lie and you are wrong.  Padre Pio died in 1968.  The New Mass wasn’t promulgated until April of 1969.  In the 1960s, there were priests who were implementing a table which faced the people as part of the initial stages of the liturgical revolution.  There were also priests who were using the vernacular to celebrate the traditional Mass.  Padre Pio, however, always said the traditional Mass in Latin.  In your comments, you are referring to his final Masses and you don’t know what you are talking about.  In the last few years of his life, Padre Pio was in extremely poor health and his vision was failing.  He had to be helped to the altar to even say Mass.  During that period, they assisted him to a table which was facing the people; and from there he celebrated the traditional Mass, not the New Mass.  As a result of Padre Pio having been brought out to a table, many have wrongly concluded (like you) that he said the New Mass; but he did not. 

 

So, your comments were not only arrogant and completely wrong, but in them you falsely accused us of lying when in fact we stated the truth.  That’s very bad.  That’s surely not the first time that has happened to us, however.  We address many of the points people bring up concerning Padre Pio in this audio: Answering Objections Against Padre Pio [42 min. audio discussion] We discuss and respond to the claims that Padre Pio endorsed the heresies of Vatican II, Humanae Vitae and salvation outside the Church.

 

Russia and EU

 

Subject: Russia and the EU

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thought you might find this interesting as it shows a connection between Russia and the EU:

 

http://www.city-journal.org/2010/20_2_soviet-archives.html

 

Thanks for all your excellent works,

LM

 

E-Mail

 

Dear Brother


in the name of god and peace i will start

My name is anas 26 years old male , syrian citizen but i life in saudi arabia
i am not Christian but i study Christian religion in lebanon , and i like what i read i am searshing for true , i need some help to study religion and get in touch with , or even go to anyware and study it , i cant change my religion in my country because i will kill , i already leave my country and familly because my faith
and i reall wana advice from you , i need some help… is it what religon tell to do ???!!!
please can you help me or advice me what to do

God bless you

A.H

MHFM: You need to make sure you believe in Jesus Christ, the Trinity and the Incarnation and all the teachings of the Catholic Church.  You also need to reject all other religions, including Islam, Judaism and Protestantism.

 

You need to make sure you are baptized in water in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost.  You need to pray, especially the Rosary each day.  You will find out how to do that on our website.  Please continue to look at it.

 

End Times Purgatory

 

I´ve just read Joey´s letter about the End of Times, and I think he makes total sense.  In many prophecies, the level of horror is described in such a way that the living would actually envy the dead. 

 

Isn´t it already happening? Wouldn´t you say that Padre Pio was fortunate of being spared by God of witnessing the Great Apostasy as it later developed? He cared so much for the Mass, he loved so intensely the Holy Sacrifice. If someone could use a time machine, travel back in time and show him a copy of your video on the New Mass, he would certainly burst into tears and indignation. He would probably die on the spot during the first 4 or 5 minutes, taking into account what those devils did with their infernal Reforms, reducing the Most Holy and Sublime event into an ineffective and empty Protestant Abomination. 

 

In the last days, life will be like (is?) a Hell on Earth. And Purgatory is very much like Hell (even though it shares similarities with both Heaven and Earth). The torments are similar, the fire is the same as Hell´s. The difference is: In Purgatory, you have real hope. Because sooner of later, your torment will cease. Someday, your Salvation will be fully accomplished, when you pay all your remaining debts.

 

Purgatory is like Earth in the sense that our trials and sufferings shall finish one day. In fact, even on Earth whenever we face hardships or obtain indulgences we pay a bit of our temporal debts due to confessed and forgiven sins, if we manage to avoid Hell. In Purgatory, the souls can get a small taste of Heaven, during a few breaks when they have relief. They benefit from our prayers, they receive visits from the Saints and Angels. According to (some) Saints, it seems that some of the Purgatory souls (when they are close to being fully cleansed) can also intercede towards others and cooperate in their Salvation. 

 

On Earth, we also get small glimpses and tastes of Heaven. Whenever we pray, or assist Mass, receive Sacraments, or study the Divine Revelation.  Joey´s idea seems to be in conformity with everything the Church has taught. Since the last days (at least by the Just´s standards) will be Hell on Earth (while the wicked will enjoy it as if it was their distorted paradise). Most of the things that connect us to Heaven will be cut off (like Masses, the reigning Papacy, good catechisms, theology manuals, dedicated priests). Maintaining the faith and avoiding sin will be harder than ever. Life will mostly resemble Hell for those who sincerely love Truth.

 

… Not even the children are spared. In fact, they seem to be the biggest target. And nowadays they can´t even take refuge in the "Church" thanks to all those perverts whose crimes cry out to the Heavens to wreak revenge.  What kind of women are these kids going to be like? Today´s women "wear" clothes that even prostitutes in Europe not so many decades or centuries ago would consider too revealing. Can it really get any worse? It´s everywhere. Pornography, sensuality, arrogance, fornication, adultery, no respect for authority, intemperance, vanity, greed, dishonesty, acceptance of homosexuality, abortion, heresies, indifference, bad will, profanations...

 

Several months ago, a letter I sent to you was posted in the e-exchanges. In it, I described the city I live in as a Hell. As the months passed, we had the worst carnival in Rio´s history, this time with the full approval of the Novus Ordo church. The "cardinal" personally blessed it, and a pop-star "priest" even composed the theme song ("samba enredo") of one of the clubs. There was something really ominous in the air, a tragedy waiting to happen, as if we were begging for a chastisement. And I believe that´s exactly what we got.  But all that water that flooded Rio was not sufficient to wash away the sins of this modern-day Sodom. We were reduced to mud. It´s altogether appropriated, because God allowed us to see materially that the souls on this city (most of them) are not just in a fog, but a sewage of immoralities. 

 

Even the Blessed country of Portugal has now approved abortions and gay "marriages". All sorts of profanations take place on the very spot the Dearest Mother of God appeared. And it will escalate. One after another, all countries accepting unnatural laws. With each passing day, the faith becomes weaker, and the Devil grows stronger.  For the people living in the very last days (and they don´t seem too far away) this outrage will be totally revolting. I´m pretty sure you understand me. Because I know that´s the way you felt when you saw the Anti-Christ´s Church create the Assisi meetings, or treat a pro-abortion and pro-gay dead Senator as if he were a Saint of sorts, or when you had to deal with the irrational bad-willed behavior of Father Corapi´s fans.

 

In the days to come, keeping the Faith will be so hard, and living surrounded by so much mess and perdition so unspeakably disgusting, that each day will be like a small living martyrdom, and a good chance to pay fully in life for all sins. This could explain the lack of a Purgatory for the last generation.

 

CK

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Nancy Pelosi is a monster and a demon. How else could one describe such an evil individual who is doing so much harm?!... Any Catholic who procures an abortion, or aids such actions, is to be excommunicated. The Church's teachings are unambiguous. Nancy Pelosi is a prime example of a person with a heart as hard as a rock - charity will never impregnate it without it shattering! She's like the quintessential product of the Vatican II sect - power hungry, demonized, and influential. What an apostate.

 

The devil is really whipping up support for the two Beasts recently, Antipopes Benedict XVI and John Paul II. It is utterly astounding that so many people support Benedict XVI, when he is to blame for so much inactivity, apathy, and indifference to evil. It's simple, stop the apostasy, schism and heresies. But Benedict XVI wants to destroy the Catholic Church. He thinks it's an impediment to the advancement and progress of mankind - to the "evolution" of man. It's no wonder he's so giddily happy about the abuse scandals because he's in the perfect position to draw down even more Anti-Catholic sentiment than ever. He tells the world that it's just another sin. No, there is a pattern, it is chronic. The cause is not just human weakness, it is Antichrist Apostasy that is the root of their perversion. But the world goes on cheering their Antipope. Cheering for the pedophile hiders. The truth is a rare commodity these days!

 

The movie The Messenger, though obviously a big budget film, with good actors, does seem to have a modernist and even gnostic undercurrent. The modernism is revealed when St. Joan tells her helper that God uses her own voice to speak to her and that he could hear God's voice too, if he tried. This mocks the fact that God really did send St. Joan to lead the defense of France against the English. Also, the gnosticism shows itself in the ambiguous character in her visions - a boy, Jesus, and the older man in a black hood. He is portrayed as being both good and evil. The first voice she hears is one example - it sounds diabolical, not the comforting voice of God. I suppose it's not surprising given that the people who fund such blockbusters have Antichrist agendas, most of them being Jewish and/or Illuminati.

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

All Eternity

 

A sign of the wicked times: Comedy Central is soon to air a new blasphemous animated series with Jesus as the main character, who moved to NY to get away from his Father.  Can you believe... why does God even allow these [people] to get away with this?!  It is interesting to note that a few weeks ago, comedy central censored the image and then the very audible mention of the name Mahomet from the 200 and 201st episodes of South Park (the first time in American history a non-obscene word was censored out in American history) ... AND YEY THEY PERMIT AN ENTIRE BLASPHEMOUS SERIES… ABOUT OUR LORD!  THINK OF ALL THE MILLIONS OF SAINTS AND MARYRS WHO DIED FOR CHRIST'S NAME!  It is also worth pointing out one would never see such horrific abominations on radio or television before the abominable clearly heretical, robber 2nd Vatican Council.  It really boggles the mind as to why there are not more sedevacantists!   

 

-Michael Rudnicki

 

MHFM: He lets them get away with it because He has all eternity to punish them. 

 

Deuteronomy 32:35- “Revenge is mine, and I will repay them in due time...”

 

Interesting

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I must tell you something you may find extremely interesting.  Over eleven years ago, I read your magazine, A Voce Crying In The Wilderness…  I read it many times; it changed my life.  Recently, I was trying to remember where I got it from.  Now I remember!  When I believed in the Vatican II church, I was watching Mother Angelica on EWTN.  She was interviewing Joey Lamaengelo.  I am sure you know this is the man who is mentioned in the demonic Garabandal apparitions.  At the end of the interview, he mentioned if  anyone wanted information (a medial, magazine, etc.) write to his ministry.  When the information arrived, the magazine that they sent was yours!  So someone there knows the truth and is sending it out.  Maybe you are aware of this already, but if not, I think you should know. 

 

Serv…

 

Confession

 

Hi Brothers,

I had a question for you, could you tell me what the Church teaches regarding confession: Does true contrition and genuine tears in the confessional remove forgotten mortal sins of the past?  That is true contrition for having offended Jesus throughout ones life, knowing the ingratitude one has showed through his mortal sins all his life toward Jesus and Mary!  I hope you can help.

 

MHFM: Tears are irrelevant.  Sorrow is demonstrated by the determination to stop sinning.  As St. Ambrose said, “True repentance is to cease to sin.”  Many people who show emotion as if they are sorry don’t have the firm commitment to change; whereas others who don’t show emotion sometimes do change.  (That can also apply to issues of charity, by the way.  Some who appear very friendly and soft do not have true charity.  Not infrequently they are phonies who will abandon their friends when the going gets tough or when they receive criticism.  On the other hand, others who might appear more serious sometimes are more truly charitable, forthright and enduring when difficult situations arise.  We’re not saying this is always the case, but it’s not uncommon.)

 

For a mortal sin to be forgiven, confession and absolution are required.  The only exception is if one has perfect contrition and the desire to confess.  In that case, a person can be forgiven before confession.  We assume you are asking about a person who is in mortal sin.  When a person confesses all mortal sins of which he or she is aware, that person should add: “I also ask forgiveness for any sins which I forgot and did not confess.”  If a person makes that confession and sincerely tries to confess all un-confessed mortal sins, that person is restored to justification.  If later on that person remembers a mortal sin that was not confessed, he/she needs to confess it at that point.  That person would only sin mortally if he or she failed to confess it at the first reasonable opportunity.

 

Purgatory

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

 

Ave Maria!

 

I would like to ask your opinion regarding Purgatory on the Last Days.  It’s written in the Holy Scriptures that on the Second Coming of Christ, He will judge both the living and the dead.  On the Last Judgment Day, the dead (both the elect and the damned) would inhabit their human bodies and render an account of their lives to God to be witnessed by all (e.g. God, the Blessed Mother, Angels, Devils and Men).  In this scary moment, the Almighty God would show how just His judgments are for everyone.  I am of the opinion that at this point, I think the Church Suffering would finally be released and be admitted to Heaven.  In the last Days, the Holy Scriptures also expresses ‘woe to the inhabitants of the earth’ (of course with the exemption of the remnant Elect) my question now is … will there be Purgatory after the Final Judgment? … I don’t know if I sound correct, I think in the Last Days, men who are living on earth would face the toughest and last trials of the Faith which will serve as their purgatory  [the most vigorous revival of all execrable heresies especially of Arianism and Modernism, the abolition of the Holy Sacrifice to God, the Great Apostasy of Faith, the abolition of sacerdotal sacrament, the invalidation of some sacraments, the denial of Kingship of Christ on Earth, the insurrection of the worst version of Sodom and Gomorrah, the apparent unstoppable appearance of false Marian apparitions, the birth of false prophets and seers bearing the name of 'catholics', the worst kind of pagan and hedonistic lifestyle known to men, the highest form of immoralities abound left and right, just to name a few of these punishment reserved to our generation] … - the Saints (the Elect) of the Latter Days would come face to face with the Anti-Christ and would wage toughest final wars (spiritual) reserved prior to the End of the World … and the Saints of the Latter Days would no longer be acknowledged on earth since there would be no Pope, no structured building occupied by the Remnant Elect, no more canonization, no more miracles to bear witness to their holiness, no more Catholics to admire them, and why? … because it would be Christ Himself who would vindicate His Remnant Elect and with both body and soul enter the eternal bliss given to them that loved followed the Will of the Father … is there any sound basis to give credence to these thoughts?

 

 … Is there a basis to conclude that Purgatory would no longer exist after the Final Judgment? … Is there a basis to support the idea that the Elect would indeed experience purgatory on earth (on the last days) to expiate remaining punishment due to forgiven sins? Brothers, your opinion on these would be highly appreciated as usual

 

By the way… I just finished reading the entire E-Exchange Archives A and B … and I learned a ton of traditional catholic knowledge and many of my questions have been answered.  A million thanks for archiving relevant email exchanges that occurred in the past - they are of tremendous help to anyone seeking the truth like me.

 

May Our Lady of Fatima guide and bless MHFM in these final days. 

 

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey from the Philippines

 

MHFM: We believe those are valid points. 

 

Church

 

Subject: “Church” of Hypocrisy

 

Dear Brothers:

 

There's a chilling and undeniable parallel between the Church of the Old Testament that existed at the time of Our Lord's first coming, and the "church" that exists today.

 

The Scribes and Pharisees were the Hierarchy of that church which professed to be the Church of the true God and His Christ, i.e., the Church of the Christians-in-Expectation.  As such, that hierarchy was the official Custodian of the many unmistakable Scriptural prophecies that would enable mankind to recognize its Redeemer.

 

Yet, despite all of those prophesies - and despite all of His miracles - the Hierarchy of that church rejected Christ, as did most of their followers.  They knew who He was, but this kind of Messiah and the Religion He preached was not to their liking.

 

Our Lord told them many things, and in no uncertain terms.  First, that they were hypocrites pretending to be what they were not, and to believe what they did not.  He told them that they were following in the footsteps of their forebears who had killed the prophets.   He told them that they despised Moses and had rejected the Revelations of God.  He accused them of having substituted man-made doctrines for these revelations and foisting them on the people. 

 

He further told them that they brought people into this church only to ultimately rob said people of the Faith and salvation, making them children of hell.  In addition, Our Lord said that their sacrifices were not pleasing or acceptable to God, and that their Father was Satan.

 

What a description of the Christ-rejecting, Faith-rejecting counterfeit church we have today!  Strictly speaking, those who openly deny Christ today are not "hypocrites" in the strict sense of the word;  they despise Christ and make no bones about it.  It's the one calling himself "Christian" and, especially, "Catholic" that is the true hypocrite today.  The counterfeit church (like all protestantism) is the Church of Hypocrisy.

 

And to think that then as now (now, with the denial of EENS and the demise of Christendom) both Christ-rejecting churches officially began with the cry:  We will have no king but Caesar!

 

Thanks so much for the End of the World series - along with your instruction on hypocrisy and bad will.  Really helps to put everything in perspective.

 

Lee

 

Afar

 

JPII came "from afar", alright: like, the pits of hell!

 

A

 

Earrings

 

… I would say I do not see how wearing earrings has ever helped me gain any merit nor virtue whatsoever indeed it has probably only led me on the wrong path, since it wreaks of vanity… 

 

Still

 

I just saw that Benedict XVI is still condemning abortion & homosexuality. If he was going the other way on these issues then I might believe you have some points.

 

Uk…

 

MHFM: That’s ridiculous.  It’s the same thing that one “apologist” for the Vatican II Church said to one of us once.  There are Muslims, Jews and many Protestants who oppose homosexuality and abortion.  Benedict XVI is totally antichrist and an antipope because he denies the Gospel and the Catholic faith.  Antichrist is that which opposes and denies the truth of Christ, even if it might oppose the unnatural evil of homosexuality and abortion.  Your attitude, one must say, is heretical and faithless.  As long he says something on some moral evils, he can deny the rest of the Gospel and the Catholic faith.  You have fallen for the trap.  The faith is what is necessary for salvation, not just making a few weak statements against obvious moral evils.

 

Additionally, he doesn’t truly condemn abortion.  In fact, he accepts it and celebrates it.  That’s because he obstinately and knowingly keeps within his communion the most wicked and notorious supporters of abortion in the world (pro-abortion “Catholic” politicians).  His sect even commemorated Ted Kennedy as “the servant of Christ.”  He doesn’t oppose abortion, but only makes a few mild and inconsequential statements against it to deceive faithless people like you.  See our video:

 

Benedict XVI is pro-abortion video [10 min. video]

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers:

 

In response to that writer who was confused about the so called Jewish messiah, I want to mention something I remember from the time shortly after the death of John Paul II.   This was the headline in the Jerusalem Post "John Paul II: The best pope the Jews ever had".  One doesn't have to bow down in adoration in order to "worship" someone or something.  I believe as you do, that JPII fulfilled the part of the Apocalypse which mentions the messiah that the jews will accept.

 

Brenda Roy

 

MP3

 

MHFM: The mp3 of our recent debate discussion with Greg Rossi on salvation-sedevacantism has been posted

 

MP3 of Sedevacantism-Salvation Debate [2 hrs. 8 min.]

 

This will be found permanently under Traditional Catholic Audios.

 

Good Thief

 

The thief on the cross must have been bummed. Obviously he went to hell because he wasn't baptised.  Oh wait,there must be a "teaching" from tradition of rome that explains that situation.  Baptism is what the bible says it is: symbolic of true faith,not of pagan Rome, but of Jesus! Throw away heretical traditions and keep what is true: The Bible. Repent and turn to Christ!!    

 

Dg

 

MHFM: It’s interesting to see that even Protestant heretics such as yourself, in addition to heretical false traditionalists, wrongly use the Good Thief to attack the necessity of water baptism.  The following refutes your misunderstanding from the Bible itself (since you don’t accept Catholic teaching).  You are also not a Christian and you don’t believe in the Bible; for the Bible clearly proves the Catholic Church.

 

The Good Thief cannot be used as an example of baptism of blood (or salvation without baptism) primarily because the Good Thief died under the Old Law, not the New Law; he died before the Law of Baptism was instituted by Jesus Christ after the Resurrection.  For that reason, the Good Thief, like the Holy Innocents, constitutes no argument against the necessity of receiving the Sacrament of Baptism for salvation.

 

Catechism of the Council of Trent, Baptism made obligatory after Christ’s Resurrection, p. 171: “Holy writers are unanimous in saying that after the Resurrection of our Lord, when He gave His Apostles the command to go and teach all nations: baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, the law of Baptism became obligatory on all who were to be saved.”

 

    In fact, when Our Lord said to the Good Thief, “This day you will be with Me in paradise,” Jesus was not referring to heaven, but actually to Hell.  As Catholics know, no one entered heaven until after Our Lord did, after His Resurrection.  On the day of the Crucifixion, Christ descended into hell, as the Apostles’ Creed says.  He did not descend to the Hell of the damned, but to the place in Hell called the Limbo of the Fathers, the waiting place of the Just of the Old Testament, who could not enter Heaven until after the Savior came.

 

1 Peter 3:18-19 “Christ also died once for our sins… In which also coming he preached to those spirits that were in prison…”

 

     To further prove the point that the Good Thief did not go to Heaven on the Day of the Crucifixion, there is the fact that on Easter Sunday, when Mary Magdalene met the Risen Lord, He told her, “Do not touch Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father.” 

 

John 20:17- “[On the Day of the Resurrection] Jesus saith to her; Mary.  She turning, saith to him; Rabboni, (that is to say, Master).  Jesus saith to her; Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to my Father…”

 

     Our Lord hadn’t even yet ascended to Heaven on the Sunday of the Resurrection.  It is therefore a fact that Our Lord and the Good Thief were not in Heaven together on Good Friday; they were in the Limbo of the Fathers, the prison described in 1 Peter 3:18-19.  Jesus called this place Paradise because He would be there with the just of the Old Testament. 

 

Receive

 

I've just finished watching your 3 new videos.  I feel MUCH calmer now, knowing that (#8 ) the "Mark" has little to do with buying and selling.  I didn't realize how much stress I had over that until you released us from that notion.  All that you're saying sounds amazingly logical and free from the Terrible images many of us have had for a long time, through popular media etc.

 

My only frustration is with the fact that Jesus told the Pharisee Jews he would send THEM someone they Would call the Messiah and worship.   I don't see how ANY of this fits with a Jewish leader.  I know that both these antipopes are Jews, but they are not anybody all of Israel would call Their Messiah.   Instead, it seems Jesus has sent wayward Catholics someone They would follow ??   What does All This have to do with the Jews?

 

You have managed to answer all my little questions up till now, so I trust you will explain that as well.  I'll just sit here impatiently and wait.  ; )

 

Thank you for ALL this work you have done!  Just showing us the many sites where the Mark is talked about has been a great help to me, trying to explain this to others.  I realize you have to be thorough, so everyone will understand.   Is it possible that the Expectation of all this, is More than the Actual thing?   

 

You're Much Appreciated!

 

Carol D.

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  The passage that you are probably referring to (John 5:43), where Our Lord says to the Jews “if another will come in his own name him you will receive” may refer to the Antichrist, but it is not certain.  If it does, all it necessarily means is that the Jews will embrace him or receive him.  And, in fact, if this passage refers to the Antichrist, then Antipope John Paul II has fulfilled it, because Antipope John Paul II was literally “received” by the Jews in the Synagogue in 1986.  He was the first claimant to the Papacy to go there; he was received cordially; he prayed with them for the coming of their “Messiah”; and the event was filled with significance. 

 

To do

 

I watched one of your videos and you talked about what one must do to prepare for judgment. You mentioned wearing a brown scapular. From what I know, the first scapular must be blessed. My question, given the modern incarnation of the church as novus ordo, how does one receive the most valid blessing? Who does one turn to?

Thank you Brothers

 

Cquinn…

 

MHFM: Pray the full rosary each day.  Read and then make the True Devotion to Mary as explained by St. Louis De Montfort.  Get out of the New Mass and the Vatican II “Church,” if  you are in it.  Be convinced of all traditional Catholic dogmas.  Practice, spread and hold the faith whole and undefiled.  Make the profession of faith which is given on our website for those leaving the Novus Ordo or converting.  Do spiritual reading and make sure that, once the other things are done, you have confessed all un-confessed mortal sins.

 

Article

 

MHFM: We have posted the beginning of a new article on the modernist errors of Cardinal John Henry Newman.  The article will be added to as time permits.  We have also done two videos on that issue, with more to come.  The first installment covers one of Newman’s main modernist errors:

 

The Modernist Errors of Cardinal John Henry Newman [first installment of article]

 

This will be found in our “Traditional Catholic Issues and Groups” Section.

 

Kings

 

Dear brothers in Christ,

Thank you for the very revealing videos about the end of the world. There is one thing that bothered me; namely, amongst seven kings there are two true popes--Pius XI and Pius XII. Somehow they are mixed with the five antipopes leading the satanic counterfeit church. But, as I thought about the Old Testament, where the lines of God fearing kings were frequently interrupted with the line of "antikings", the fact that the line of two true king (i.e. popes) is succeeded with the line of five false kings (antipopes) shouldn't be
a problem for your interpretation of the Book of the Revelation.  I like the idea that the mark of the beast is predominantly a spiritual mark, thus putting all the stuff about RFID and similar devices, so popular amongst the innumerable false, secular, prophets on the level where it belongs, and that level is the level of seduction by the scientific-materialistic mumbo-jumbo. In short--the Book of Life, mentioned in the Revelation (and in other places in the Bible) is a spiritual thing, not material. 

I want to add one more comment. It is very interesting that the Europe [was] covered with (volcanic) ashes. I am compelled to believe that this is a sign from God--Europe, the beast, is inhabited by hundreds of millions extremely sinful, spiritually dead, people who should make the atonement by covering themselves with the ashes. But, they are not willing to do the right  thing, the most important thing. So, they should taste some of the ashes from
the bowels of hell.

God bless you and your holy works.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  We have some additional thoughts on the kings, which concern some of those points.  We hope to share them soon.

 

St. Joan

 

Dear Bros, Michael and Peter Dimond,

 

In response to Joey, I have not seen the St. Joan of Arc movie version "The Messenger" that he is referring to, but I have seen and have the version made in 1999, starring Leelee Sobieski as Joan, with supporting cast including Peter O'Toole and Shirley Maclaine, entitled "Joan of Arc", a pretty moving story and movie by all accounts.

 

 From what I have read of comments, so far, many prefer this latter version, starring Leelee Sobieski....

 

You can actually watch this movie on the Youtube channel, and if you spot it in the bargain bin, snap it up....it is well worth the watch!   I think I paid only nine dollars ( $9. 00 ) for my copy!

 

Now, back to the Apocalypse videos, which seem to be having an ever growing captive audience, which is no surprise !

 

God bless,

 

David

 

Wonder

 

I know that you warn about false apparitions, and that we should beware.  I wonder why the Blessed Mother Herself never warned about false apparitions ?

 

That some other entity would have the audacity to impersonate Her?  In other words, no apparition ever refuted or condemned any other apparition as false or heretical, even though they had every opportunity to do so.

 

So, people fall for this jazz hook, line and sinker. And Hell is filling up daily as a result of this.  I say this because all the writings and messages of "legitimate" visitations are circulated widely.

 

Yet, there is not one "legitimate" message that warns that there are "illegitimate" appearances of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Imposters.

 

Imposter Mary's that take poor souls to Hell.

 

What can we do ?

 

Alan

 

MHFM: Sacred Scripture clearly warns about false apparitions.  Other prophecies do as well.

 

2 Thessalonians 2:9-12: "Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying wonders, And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.  Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying.  That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity."

 

Prophecy of Marie Julie Jahenny, Briton Stigmatist (1891): "During the time of the approach of the punishments announced at La Salette, an unlimited amount of false revelations will arise from Hell like a swarm of flies; a last attempt of Satan to choke and destroy the belief in the true revelations by false ones."

 

Matthew 24:24-25: "Then if any man shall say to you: Lo here is Christ, or there, do not believe him.  For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect.  Behold I have told it to you, before hand.  If therefore they shall say to you: Behold He is in the desert, go ye not out: Behold He is in the closets, believe it not."

 

But even without any warnings, a true believer can recognize an apparition to be false if it contradicts Catholic truth.  The problem with so many is that they refuse or hesitate to believe something unless it is specifically confirmed by Our Lady in an apparition, even if the conclusion flows from Catholic truth.  That is not a faithful way of considering the issue.  It is actually a faithless way of looking at it.  Perhaps the reason there aren’t more prominent warnings about false apparitions in the well-known apparitions of Our Lady is that God specifically wants to test people to see if they will be guided by the light of faith or by the light of signs and wonders. 

 

Intense?

 

What happened to B16's intense message at Fatima, Portugal??

 

Karl

 

MHFM: During his trip to Fatima he talked about the importance of the assassination attempt on John Paul II.  That fits with our Is the World about to End? series.  If John Paul II is the Antichrist, and Benedict XVI is the false prophet who will cause people to worship him, and the assassination attempt on May 13, 1981 is a crucial part of the final deception, it makes sense that Benedict XVI (the false prophet) would again emphasize it.  See the aforementioned video, specifically part 5.

 

Is the World about to End ? - Part 5

Is the World about to End ? - Part 6

 

SSPX

 

Subject:  SSFX Priests Protesting Fellay

On April 5, 2010 yet another SSFX priest has left that order in protest.  Fr. Juan Jose Turco in Bogota, Columbia, has released publicly his letter to Bishop Bernard Fellay, stating that the SSPX has not only betrayed the principles of Archbishop Lefebvre, but that the late Archbishop's statements have been misrepresented. In particular, following up on a series of complaints dating from October of 2009, Turco claims that Fellay is trying to "present a false image of Benedict XVI as if he would be regularly favoring Tradition."  Turco tells Bishop Fellay he is abusing his authority by threatening priests who refuse to keep silent.  He quotes Fellay as writing: "A renewal of the Church has started. It is very difficult, but authentic."  Turco, as others before him, cannot agree to the Modernism of Benedict XVI.

Personally, I feel it is unfortunate that priests like Turco did not recognize the problems with SSPX years ago, but at least now their eyes are becoming open to the many heresies being accepted in mainstream Catholicism today. At MHFM, there are excellent articles about the deceptions undertaken by the leaders of SSPX, from the very beginning of their organization…

Cheryl Helena Thomson

 

MHFM: That priest’s eyes might be opening to the modernism/apostasy of Benedict XVI.  However, he thinks that the principles of Lefebvre should be followed.  That includes the belief that souls can be saved in any religion.  Therefore, even though the priest rejects Benedict XVI, he’s still not a true Catholic because he rejects the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation.

 

The Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]

 

False apparitions

 

Subject: Signs and Wonders – to deceive if possible even the elect

 

Dear Bros. Michael  and Peter Dimond,

 

In response to 'Flo' and her query about the popes and Garabandal, also confirmed by the MHFM - let it be known that some of the things the four girls at Garabandal, Spain claimed the Virgin Mary told them, have proven to be false and as a consequence cannot possibly have emanated from her, but from the Father of Lies, Satan himself, so as to even deceive the elect - if it were possible....

 

One of the girls, Conchita, claimed, in 1962 , 'Mary' said there would be only THREE more 'popes' after the death of John XXIII, and then the end of time .....WRONG !  We are up to 'pope' number four, unless of course, they reckon Benedict XVI is an antipope - I don't think so!.... And, my clock is still ticking!

 

Russia will be converted as a result of the miracle ( yet to come ) .....WRONG!   Russia was consecrated by Pope Pius XII in 1952, and as a result, as we know ,was 'converted' ( end of persecutions)

 

The Council would be a GREAT Council ( Vatican II) according to 'Our Lady' ....WRONG!  For the true Catholics it was bad news and a sign of the beginning of the End Times in line with Fatima -Great news however for the anti - Catholic element already inside the Church at that time -  and so for Satan,and the enemies of the Catholic Church, it truly was a Great Council!

 

Both Paul VI and John Paul II, met with the seers and praised Garabandal, and said that "the Church blesses them."... enough said!

 

Mari Loli died in 2009, aged 60 years of age....three 'seers' left ...all of whom adhere to the 'whore of Babylon' and attend the "Abomination of Desolation" - the new mass.

 

Conchita will announce the date of the "promised miracle''  8 days in advance  -  so she is the one to be watching out for - of course, it will never happen!

 

Joey Lomangino to receive new eyes at the miracle to occur in Spain - Joey will be 80 years old this year, and a sick man apparently.....again, as above!

 

Followers of the false apparitions of Garabandal tend to be of the "conservative" Novus Ordo type, who are generally concerned about abuses that are rampart in the Vatican II Church, but in reality know little about the teachings of the Catholic Church, because of bad will on their part in general!

 

God bless,

 

David

 

Why bother?

 

I just listened to your debate with Greg Thomas Rossi - to me, he sounded like he was so desperate to be in the right that he was grasping for anything.  As an aside, I teach mathematics and I see this frequently, that is, students who write down anything even though they obviously have no idea how to solve the problem.

It seems to me that the whole "debate" about salvation can be summed up in the following question: "If the Catholic Church is not necessary for salvation, then why bother?"  Even when faced with the most bizarre scenarios, I think this question would still show up.  For example, the individual on the isolated island who has never heard of Our Lord, the Faith, etc - can this individual be saved?  If the answer is yes, then why bother?

PC

 

B-16

 

Hello Brothers:

 

I thought you might find this interesting: Benedict XVI says -

 

" "For a society made up mainly of Catholics, and whose culture has been profoundly marked by Christianity, the search for truth apart from Christ proves dramatic", he added. "For Christians, Truth is divine; it is the eternal 'Logos' which found human expression in Jesus Christ. ... The Church, in her adherence to the eternal character of truth, is in the process of learning how to live with respect for other 'truths' and for the truth of others. Through this respect, open to dialogue, new doors can be opened to the transmission of truth".

 

  "The Church must enter into dialogue with the world in which she lives", said Pope Benedict quoting Pope Paul VI. "Dialogue, without ambiguity and marked by respect for those taking part, is a priority in today's world, and the Church does not intend to withdraw from it. ... Given the reality of cultural diversity, people need not only to accept the existence of the culture of others, but also to aspire to be enriched by it and to offer to it whatever they possess that is good, true and beautiful".

 

He is an antichrist - this is certain. His speech does not even make sense.

 

-Thanks always for the good work,

Mike

 

Stand

 

Subject: how traditional Catholics stand on these two popes

 

Hello Father my name is Florencia and I am from Argentina, what you said regarding John Paul II and Benedict XVI really scares me. I am not a traditional catholic, in fact, not long ago I was a liberal one (if that exist) but my father is in accordance with Lefebvre and he says that we are in our most darkest moments and that the devil entered the Vatican after the SVC. This obviously scared me and because of that I came closer to the Church and her VALUES of life and how to live it But nowadays within the catholic church one can get so confused because everyone has a different opinion… If you can guide me here I would be in you debt. , I am really devoted to Garabandal and Padre Pio, and they speak of apostacy in the Church, of a warning a miracle and of a punishment. The girls also speak of the popes but I do not really grasp the meaning of that. i wanted to know if you knew anything on this and if possible enlighten me!! I know that there are terrible priests, bishops and cardinals..but some how i can not think that the holy fathers are also diabolical!! If you have information I can read so that I might know more I would appreciate it. And also...what about San Malachias??? And also Father Malachy Martin...I love the latter… Thank you very much

God bless

 

Flor…

 

MHFM: The Message of Garabandal contains predictions which did not come to pass.  It also recognizes Paul VI as a valid pope, and he was not.  It is a false message.  The children of Garabandal also recognize the apostate Vatican II “Church” as authentic.  Once you see the evidence of what John Paul II and Benedict XVI did, it should not be hard to believe that they are evil.  It’s so obvious!  You need to become convinced of Catholic dogmas, and judge things by that standard.  Then everything will become more clear to you.  That’s why looking at our material is important.  As a Vatican insider, Malachi Martin had some interesting information; however, he was sadly heretical.  He believed in salvation outside the Catholic Church and recognized the heretical antipopes. 

 

Problem

 

… I disagree with you that only Catholics can go to Heaven.  I never did believe that. I disagree with the new Liberation Theology.  I disagree with Padre Pio. If Jesus died for my sins and diseases, why should I have to suffer?  I'm not a masochist.  I see nothing good about suffering and I think it is a bit narcissistic for someone to be into suffering, knowing who Jesus was.  Besides, I suffered more than Jesus anyway.  It has to be about Whom He was.  Who'd want to be beaten up by devils.  We've enough problems already.  The church should have put a stop to that. And how can you talk about the infallibility of the Pope when you admit that 42 of them were Apostates, which I am now…

  

Anyway, that's what I have to say.  I hope you get my e-mail and that I've made myself understood.

 

Blessings,

 

Clare

 

MHFM: Your problem is pride.  That is demonstrated by your false statement that you have suffered more than Jesus.  Pride is why people like you unfortunately don’t receive the grace to come to the knowledge of the truth. 

 

Unity

 

Sadly, I do understand. Are you really concerned about those who are, according to you, being misled by Vat II or are you concerned about being part of an exclusive club. Jesus came for all. Though our non-catholic brethren are missing out on the fullness afforded us by the True Church and all its graces toward salvation, who but God himself can determine worthiness? If indeed you are concerned for these misled souls, how can bashing the earthly authority help them? You have to trust Jesus' words that "the gates of hell will not prevail" (Mt 16:18) and "there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God" (Rom 13:1). I fear that you have fallen into your own trap. I pray you will ask humbly for guidance in this matter. It seems you have been overcome by the letter of the law and have lost the essence, which is mercy, kindness, compassion, patience....and love.

 

Vsheff…

 

MHFM: First, there is no love without truth.  If truth is not present (i.e., the full truth of Christ) a false hope and a false charity replace true charity.  Love then becomes hate: a hatred for God and a hatred for the only way man is to obtain real happiness.  Second, the Church of Jesus Christ is an exclusive club.  It excludes all who do not accept all of Christ’s truth.  Your problem is that your notion of Jesus Christ is a misguided one.  Your notion of Jesus is incompatible with the true Jesus Christ of the Gospel and the Catholic Church.  Jesus and His Church exclude all who don’t accept all of His truth.

 

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9): "The Church, founded on these principles and mindful of her office, has done nothing with greater zeal and endeavor than she has displayed in guarding the integrity of the faith. Hence she regarded as rebels and expelled from the ranks of her children all who held beliefs on any point of doctrine different from her own. The Arians, the Montanists, the Novatians, the Quartodecimans, the Eutychians, did not certainly reject all Catholic doctrine: they abandoned only a certain portion of it. Still who does not know that they were declared heretics and banished from the bosom of the Church? In like manner were condemned all authors of heretical tenets who followed them in subsequent ages."

 

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, "Cantate Domino," 1441:
"Therefore the Holy Roman Church condemns, reproves, anathematizes and declares to be outside the Body of Christ, which is the Church, whoever holds opposing or contrary views."

 

Pope Pelagius II, epistle (1) Quod ad dilectionem, 585: “If anyone, however, either suggests or believes or presumes to teach contrary to this faith, let him know that he is condemned and also anathematized according to the opinion of the same Fathers.” (Denz. 246)

 

To accept the modernist ideas you promote, and identify them with the Catholic faith, is to hold that the gates of Hell have prevailed against the Church.  See our material on that topic. 

 

Revelation

 

Subject: Contradiction, Newman, Watchtower Society

 

Dear Brothers,

 

That's a really keen observation of TD in regard to the Vatican's tolerance of the "Orthodox" schism, but intolerance of the SSPX's schism. Sadly, the Vatican's bad will is so extreme that such a fact, if presented to them, wouldn't faze them even one little bit.

 

Thank you for the article on the modernist errors of Cardinal John Henry Newman. Cardinal Newman's assertion that we can't find a fixed point in time at which Revelation stopped growing is really quite outrageous. One need only think of all the Protestant cults that have arisen around some charismatic leader based on the idea that they have been given some new revelation which then constitutes an article of their heretical faith. For example, the Watchtower Society teaches that in 1914 Jesus Christ returned to earth invisibly because He was enthroned at that time in Heaven. That teaching contradicts scripture and Catholic dogma which states that angels said Jesus would return in the same way He ascended into Heaven, i.e. visibly (Acts 1:11); and that Jesus immediately was enthroned in Heaven after he ascended there (Mark 16:19, Apostles Creed). The Watchtower's teaching on 1914 is absolutely fundamental to their other teachings (heresies) such as that only 144,000 go to heaven, that all religions except their own make up Babylon the Great (which leads into their rejection of the Trinity, Incarnation, Immortality of the soul, Hell, Grace, Merits, Papacy, etc.). The 1914 date is based on a false interpretation and confusion of the 1260 days/3 1/2 times from the book of Apocalypse (verses 11:3, 12:6, 12:14) with the 7 times in the book of Daniel (verse 4:13). They hold the dishonest position that Jerusalem fell to the Babylonians in 607 B.C, rather than the 586 B.C. which the Catholic Encyclopedia states. They teach that the 607 B.C. date is absolutely certain, a "fixed date' which no one of any merit calls into question, which is totally absurd. They do so because without that date being true (which indeed it is not), their whole watchtower falls like Babylon the Great! Even if for arguments sake it were true, their conclusions about it are false. For one, the 7 times refers specifically to the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar. They calculate the 7 times (Dan. 4:13) by 360 (days per year; see Apoc. 11:3, 12:6, 12:14) to arrive at 2520 days. They then apply the "day for a year" prophecy principle from Ezechiel 4:6 to get the 2520 years. If one counts 2520 years from 607 B.C. they will arrive at 1914 A.D. if allowing one year for the year "0" between B.C. and A.D. They hold that the "anointed class," the 144,000, received special insight into the Scriptures from 1914, especially in regard to the times they were living in. They teach that between the Apostles and 1914 there were only a few true believers (such as the Arch-heretic Arius, millenialists, etc.) but that even most of them were lacking the whole truth. Ultimately they place absolute importance on the use of the Divine Name, Jehovah. They teach that the Divine Name must be used, especially vocally/audibly in order to worship God acceptably and that all that is really necessary for salvation is to "call on the name of Jehovah" (i.e. by praying to Him, worshipping Him, etc.). This heresy is taken from a misinterpretation of Acts 2:21 and Joel 2:32, by substituting interpreting it to mean that the Lord means Jehovah but not Jesus Christ! The Watchtower Society has put the name Jehovah into the Old Testament about 200 times where the meaning of the original Greek word is actually "Lord." They claim their doing so to be a "correction." Along with countless other changes to their version of the Bible, the New World Translation). What's interesting is that Christ means "anointed one" - The Watchtower Society explicitly teaches that the 144,000, their "anointed class," are other Christs, which is Antichrist - 1 John 4:3!!! So a rejection of just one Catholic dogma, such as that revelation was completed with the death of the last apostle, is a rejection of Jesus Christ, thus leading to countless heresies, errors and loss of salvation to those who are obstinate in such errors. I'm looking forward to the next part of the article. Thanks again.

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Dreams

 

My questions are not on the basics of catholic dogma(by catholic i mean non vat 2 catholic dogma) anyway, not sure the best way to do this or ask this, but is there someone who can take a look at 3  dreams i had.. I’m not trying to delve into "heresies" and so forth, but i had a most perplexing dream that really stands out- sort of like a cat at a mouse convention. and I don’t trust the doctrinal integrity of those in my neck of the woods enough to seek help from...  again, before God i promise I’m not claiming or trying or seeking to be anything… nor am i trying to venture into heretical areas, etc etc..  I guess I’m sort of looking for a modern joseph.-- I believe strongly enough that perhaps God was trying to speak to me, that i should seek some input from appropriate sources, as of yet God has not provided much in the way of an answer.

there are 3 dreams (2 very short ones, one medium), if you would be willing to look them over, ill send them..

 

 

God bless you and keep up the good work!

             ~Jeff

 

MHFM: Thanks for the question.  One should focus on accepting the true Catholic faith, praying the Rosary, and getting into or maintaining the state of grace.  One shouldn’t put much focus on interpreting dreams, for people can be sidetracked or deceived that way.  If God has delivered a clear message in a supernatural way, it would be so powerful that there would be no question.  To speculate about one’s dreams is not what one should do.

 

Video

 

 

 

Church

 

I don't know you, but as a Catholic who used to be an anti-Catholic Jack Chick Tract promoter, YOU SOUND JUST LIKE THE ENEMIES OF THE CHURCH.
YOU SAY THE SAME THINGS THEY DO-- ROME IS THE WHORE OF BABYLON. Hmmm ARE YOU OF THE SAME SPIRIT AS THE FUNDAMENTALIST ANTI-CATHOLIC SECTS???????

 

dfincher

 

MHFM: You understand and believe as little about the Catholic faith now as you did then.  You are in communion with Protestants and the defenders of Protestants.  Heretics cannot be popes.  Learn Catholic teaching.

 

Why Rome is now The Whore of Babylon

 

Gospel

 

Hello Brothers

Have you ever said anything about the modern 'Q' Gospel? I was talking to a fellow about the validity of Islam and I tried to explain to him what you said about Islam having illogic at the heart of its teaching. When I said Christ said he was God, he retorted that Jesus said no such things, and that NT authors did. He said the speaker of 'Q' does not.
He seems to be a staunch defender of 'Q'.  Does the Church endorse this 'Q' source?

Regards, Neil

 

MHFM: The idea of a “Q Gospel” is a false modernist notion that attempts to undermine the authenticity of the four gospels.  There is overwhelming evidence in the early Church and from the earliest fathers that there are four authentic gospels and that Jesus Christ claimed to be God.  There is no evidence for the “Q Gospel.”  Those who hold that Jesus did not claim to be God, and that the passages in the Bible which declare that He did are fraudulent, pit themselves against the early Church, the early Church fathers and the indisputable record of history.  For example, in about 108 A.D., St. Ignatius of Antioch (one of the apostolic fathers) made it clear that Jesus Christ is God and that He claimed to be God.

 

Where does the Bible teach that Jesus is God?

 

Baptism

 

… Is it possible for you to clarify the following: is a baptism performed by a pre-Vatican II ordained priest using the Vatican II rite of baptism valid?... Thank you for your assistance in these matters.

 

Thomas Hudec

 

MHFM: It can be valid if water is poured correctly and the proper words (“I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”) are said.  One issue is whether the water properly strikes the forehead and skin.  That seems to be a problem with some baptisms in the Vatican II sect, including those performed by Antipope Benedict XVI.

 

Contradiction

 

Dear Dimond Brothers,

   There appears to be a striking contradiction between the Vatican's efforts to bring the SSPX under antipope Benedict XVI and the Vatican's lack of effort to do the same with the eastern "Orthodox" schismatics.  Antipope Benedict XVI tells the eastern "Orthodox" schismatics that they are "pastors in the Church" and then turns around and tells the SSPX schismatics that "[their] clergy will not be recognised as Catholic priests" unless they are doing things the way Benedict XVI wants them done:

   "Without an accord, the group [SSPX] will have no official status and its clergy will not be recognised as Catholic priests or allowed to exercise their ministry."
(http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-48261220100505?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=true)

   According to Benedict XVI, if you are a schismatic because you reject Benedict XVI's "primacy,"  you are in the Church. If, however, you are a schismatic because you accept Benedict XVI's "primacy" while publicly rejecting the Vatican II changes, you are not in the Church.

TD

 

Visible

 

MHFM,

 

… I have been checking different things out on your site.  The biggest obstacle for me might be the visibility issue, but on the other hand is what we have seen publically demonstrated for us at Assisi etc., really the Church visible?   I suppose that if Our Lord wondered when He returned if He could find the faith, it isn’t unreasonable to assume that it might be difficult for us to find now.  I will continue researching.  One thing that I appreciate is your desire for truth, that is the biggest thing that is missing from the discussion.  In the meantime, I thought you might be interested in the following article concerning the talks between the Vatican and the SSPX.  Cardinal Kasper apparently thinks it is funny that they think he is a heretic, and I believe that he purposefully obfuscates on why they are opposed to Ecumenical dialogue.

 

http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-48261220100505?sp=true

 

Rob…

 

MHFM: The Church is visible in her members, in the remnant of traditional Catholics.  It’s visible in the same way it was during the Arian crisis.  Furthermore, the Vatican II sect officially denies that the Church is visible.  It does so by teaching that the Church’s visible unity is damaged.  In fact, Vatican II specifically teaches that the one truly visible and universal Church of Christ does not yet exist!  We pointed this out in our book, article and video on Vatican II’s heresies: The Heresies in Vatican II [PDF File]

 

Vatican II document, Unitatis Redintegratio # 1:

“Yet almost all, though in different ways, long for the one visible Church of God, that truly universal Church whose mission is to convert the whole world to the gospel, so that the world may be saved, to the glory of God.”

 

At the very beginning of its Decree on Ecumenism, Vatican II teaches that almost everyone longs for a truly universal Church, whose mission is to convert the world to the Gospel.  What is the truly universal Church whose mission is to convert the world to the Gospel?  It’s the Catholic Church, of course, which alone is the one true Church of Christ.  So what is Vatican II talking about, then?  Why is Vatican II teaching that almost everyone longs for the truly universal Church of Christ when we already have it?  The answer is that Vatican II teaches that people must long for the true Catholic Church because it teaches that it does not yet exist!  For those who doubt that Vatican II was here denying that the Catholic Church exists, we will quote John Paul II’s own interpretation of this passage.

 

John Paul II, Homily, Dec. 5, 1996, speaking of prayer with non-Catholics: “When we pray together, we do so with the longing ‘that there may be one visible Church of God, a Church truly universal and sent forth to the whole world that the world may be converted to the Gospel and so be saved, to the glory of God’ (Unitatis Redintegratio, 1.).”

 

Here we see that John Paul II himself confirmed that the longing for the one visible Church of Christ is a longing on both sides – Catholic and non-Catholic, which means that in its Decree on Ecumenism (from which John Paul II was quoting), Vatican II was indeed longing for the one universal Church of Christ.  Vatican II was therefore denying that the Catholic Church is the one universal Church of Christ. 

 

Whatever dogma one brings up, that dogma is used to prove that Benedict XVI is not the pope and that the Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church.

 

Follow-up

 

Thank you for the generous reply but I am a little confused as to how this is consistent with what jesus said in scripture about divorce:
 
Matthew 5:32
 
"But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery."
 
I am confused as to what he means. He says "except" for martial unfaithfulness. Please help me understand what he is saying.
 
Sincerely and God bless,
 
Ed 

 

MHFM: He is saying that a divorce, in the sense of a separation or a split, can be justified for that reason.  However, He is not saying that a second marriage is justified.  There can be a divorce, but not a divorce and remarriage.

 

Mark 10:9-12- “What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.  And in the house again his disciples asked him concerning the same thing.  And he saith to them: Whosoever shall put away his wife and marry another, committeth adultery against her.  And if the wife shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery.”

 

Meant

 

Dear Brothers,

 

My brother asked me to find out about this.  Can you tell us what is meant by our blessed Lord's words?

 

21 Jesus saith to her: Woman, believe me, that the hour cometh, when you shall neither on this mountain, not in Jerusalem, adore the Father. 22 You adore that which you know not: we adore that which we know; for salvation is of the Jews. 23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and in truth. For the Father also seeketh such to adore him. 24 God is a spirit; and they that adore him, must adore him in spirit and in truth. 25 The woman saith to him: I know that the Messias cometh (who is called Christ). Therefore, when he is come, he will tell us all things.

                                                                        

Thanks for all that you do.

                                                                 Tom

 

MHFM: He is saying that with His coming, the establishment of the Church and the New Covenant, the Old Law will cease.  He is also prophesying the destruction of Jerusalem as part of the end of the Old Law.  Additionally, He is indicating that, with His coming, the worship of the true God will become universal.  With the incorporation of the gentiles into His true faith, the worship of the true God will not be confined to one place, temple or people; but will be spread all over the earth.

 

Isaac

 

Subject: Ref. Letter from Isaac

 

If these vatican ll people would just research and search the true faith they would know what is going on but they don't care enough and they are lovers of this world!  These people live a life of contradiction!!!=

I'm afraid doing thousands of pages of research for many will amount to little as the truth doesn't fit what they want, therefore they cannot see or hear. The first deadly sin is pride and being unwilling to humble oneself, God doesn't give one the grace to see. If one expects to find when they seek I think they have to bring themselves very low…


Matthew

 

Two new videos

 

MHFM: The first is a video response to a person who e-mailed us and argued that it’s ridiculous to claim that John Paul II taught that man is God.  The second is a related new video.

 

John Paul II did preach that man is God [video]

John Paul II's Anti-Catholic Mission [video]

 

Punishment?

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Over three months ago I sent you an e-mail on the subject of my mom attending my nephew's "First Communion" in the NO.  Around the same time my brother, whose son is the one receiving "First Communion" was seeing a doctor about some discomfort in his stomach.  It was finally determined that he has stomach cancer.  He has since had a gastrectomy.  He has been depressed for a long time and I had gone to visit him for a week.  During my stay he and I had a short conversation which he initiated about why this had to happen to him since it is rare for someone his age to have stomach cancer.  I will not state his age here but he is rather young.  He asked me if I think God is punishing him.  I was not sure how to answer his question.  I told him that it is possible.  I've tried in vain in the past to get him to be a traditional Catholic and to renounce worldly things.  Also this event in his life coincides with his son's "First Communion".  That leaves me to wonder whether God may in fact be punishing him for being bad-willed.  Additionally, the doctors say his prognosis is good if he takes care of himself.  So I wonder if God is allowing a good prognosis so he lives long enough to have plenty of time to ponder about his state in life. 

 

I'd appreciate your take on the matter.

 

Sylvestre

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  As you indicate, your brother has rejected the truth for some time.  He also lives in a fashion that’s incompatible with the state of grace.  It’s certain that God is displeased with him.  It’s probable that it’s a punishment.  At the same time, however, it’s a special blessing.  For we can see that the cancer is causing him to re-assess his spiritual situation.  When people are struck with calamities, it’s not uncommon that they are humbled and forced to evaluate themselves.  That’s when we hear that most people turn to God.  More often than not, however, they don’t fulfill what God wants.

 

If your brother had not been struck with this cancer, it seems that he would have continued merrily on his heretical path and ended up in Hell.  But now he’s getting a serious warning, and at the same time a chance to convert.  So, what would be the answer to give him if he poses that question again?  We would recommend saying: Yes, it’s probable that you are being specifically punished by God, and it’s certain that He is displeased with you.  At the same time, He’s giving you a special chance to wake up, to start being honest, and to convert.  It should be emphasized that it’s an outrage not only to reject the true faith, as he currently does, but to arrange for his child to receive the invalid host at the abominable New Mass.

 

Civil War

 

Subject: Civil War?

 

Hello, I don't know if I missed it, but I didn't see this article on your news page and I thought that it might interest you.

 

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/120/796/First_Signs_of_Civil_War_begin_in_the_US:_Sheriff_Tony_DeMeo_Threatens_Force_Against_Federal_Agents.html

 

- DC

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s an interesting video.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoYtnoFn09Y&feature=player_embedded

 

Shocked

 

Peace be with you,

I just took a look at your website, and am very saddened and shocked by your teachings.  The prayer of Jesus before He died was "That we may all be one."  Everything your organization says and does is divisive, contrary to the prayer of Jesus.  Pope John-Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI were and are very holy men, staunch defenders of the teachings of the Catholic faith.  For you to call them anti-popes is blasphemous.  I could go on for a very long time, but I will simply say:  I will be praying for you.  God bless you.

Your sister in Christ,
Christine Pineault

 

MHFM: We can’t say that we are shocked or saddened by your bad will.  Of course we wish you were not as you are, and that you cared about truth.  However, when confronted by someone like you who displays no concern whatsoever for the facts and information presented, it stirs a Catholic more to righteous indignation than sympathetic pity.  The blasphemous thing is not a Catholic’s rejection of Antipopes John Paul II and Benedict XVI.  No, what is blasphemous is their endorsement of false religions that reject Jesus Christ.  Your blind acceptance of such apostasy, without the least consideration for the Catholic teachings backing up our position that they are antipopes who must be rejected, is also very blasphemous.  We would tell you to wake up, but you may be beyond that point.  

 

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/heresy_of_antipopes_john_paul_ii_and_benedict_xvi.php

 

Typical of modernists, you also quote John 17 with the usual false signification, that Catholics should have communion with heretics to truly fulfill the Church’s unity.

 

Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 7), condemning false ecumenism, Jan. 6, 1928: “For the authors who favor this view are accustomed, times almost without number, to bring forward these words of Christ: ‘That they all may be one… And there shall be one fold and one shepherd,’ (Jn. 17:21; 10:16) with this signification however: that Christ Jesus merely expressed a desire and prayer, which still lacks its fulfillment.  For they are of the opinion that the unity of faith and government, which is a note of the one true Church of Christ, has hardly up to the present time existed, and does not today exist.”

 

Why?

 

Hello. I'm noticing that I have some questions as I am listening to your very informative clips. I am going to write them all down as I go along here, and hope you'll be able to come back to me and have patience with me. Some may be answered later, and some may not, some I may remember to change, others not, as said, I hope you can have patience with me. Thank you very much…

 

… Who are the 40 plus anti-popes in Church history and what did they do?
… Why, really, would God create this ruse and condemn "believers" to hell when they could be a great counterbalance for the very evil in the world he wishes to punish it for? I mean, if anyone is standing up against the European suicide, war, abortion, gay marriage and so on, it is the Catholic Church... I don't get it. And don't give me something like "It's God, you're not supposed to get it….

 

Hampus…

 

MHFM: You will find the names of the antipopes in our Antipopes Section.  We recommend that you take a look at it.  We assume you are asking why God would create the deception of the Vatican II “Church.”  He didn’t create it; He allowed it.  He saw the bad will of men, their denial of the faith and His dogmas, and how they didn’t care about His truth or His commands.  So, He allowed it to be almost completely taken away in a massive deception; but He made sure the Church remained in a remnant.  When you consider the almost universal bad will out there, it makes perfect sense why He has allowed this situation to occur.  The dearth of good will is simply remarkable.  With regard to your claim that the “Catholic Church” stands up to abortion and gay “marriage,” you are obviously referring to the Vatican II sect and you are mistaken.  They facilitate abortion by enabling pro-abortionists to remain within their ranks.  If years ago they had excommunicated in a vigorous fashion every public supporter of abortion, it never would have been passed into law.  The Vatican II sect is responsible for it.  They also facilitate the homosexual abomination, by perverting the truth about the evil orientation.  They only mildly criticize the homosexual act.  They also allow homosexual perverts to run rampant in their perverted seminaries, and they give the supporters of the abomination a prominent place in their churches and universities.  Most importantly, however, even if they were thoroughly Catholic on these issues, it wouldn’t matter.  They deny Christ and embrace false religions.  Once you do that, nothing else matters.  That’s what you need to realize. 

 

Community

 

How does one overcome pride?

Also, I'd like to share something I've noticed, the V2 "Catholic" Churches around here are replacing all of their signs, they no longer say "St. X's Catholic Church", they now say "St. X's Catholic Community".  I suppose the official line will soon be "there are Catholic communities, Lutheran communities, etc, but only one Church".

 

Patrick

 

MHFM: Have a true devotion to Mary and regularly say three Hail Marys for the specific intention of true humility.  St. Louis De Montfort’s renewal of true devotion to Mary also has a week dedicated to self-knowledge.  Pride blinds people, especially by rendering them unable to see themselves.  Grace, on the other hand, gives one the ability to see things (including himself) as they are.  That’s why St. Louis’ first week of preparation for true devotion to Mary (the second period) deals with the issue of self-knowledge.  Accurate self-knowledge is crucial.  It enables one to see his faults, shortcomings, limitations, etc.  While it’s true that nothing good can be done without grace, a person who is interiorly humble almost instinctively refers good things to God.  It’s immediate and fluid.  He is not consumed with or focused on himself, even if he maturely recognizes his involvement in something good; whereas the prideful person is weighed down by himself.  It becomes his focus and burden, consuming his outlook, operation and thoughts.  He has trouble doing things without both the right and left hands knowing what he is doing (Matthew 6:3).  Certainly, spiritual reading can assist people in this area; however, if a person seriously struggles with this he really needs to reorient his spiritual focus and prayer life, with a special emphasis on the full Rosary.  Even though most don’t realize it, pride is the biggest problem today, including in countless heretics who might exteriorly be considered meek or patient or humble.  Their interior pride (a misguided view of their own spirituality or holiness or intellect) keeps them falsely confident in their dark spiritual plight; whereas if they possessed humility, they would accurately assess themselves, what they believe, how they compromise God’s truth for friends, etc.  We can’t tell you how many members of the Novus Ordo have called our monastery over the years.  The number of them that think they are extremely knowledgeable (experts) and dedicated Catholics, while in reality they know almost nothing about the real Catholic faith, is staggering.  Pride is their problem and it keeps them deceived.  That’s why the Fourth Lateran Council said that all heretics are tied together by pride.  Everyone who commits clear mortal sins is weighed down by pride, not primarily weakness.  They lack the first degree of humility, which causes a person to fear God enough to avoid what He forbids.

 

That’s very interesting about the Community signs. 

 

Changes

 

Subject: Latin vs. English

 

Quote from article,

 

“You can call it whatever you like, but it's not English,” said Father David Cooper, president of the Milwaukee Archdiocese Priests Alliance. “The language of prayer is supposed to be evocative, graceful, uplifting. This reads like clunk-clunk-clunk-bang-boom.” “Anytime there are changes, people...angry and sad,”

 

Brothers, if he doesn’t like changes, then how come he didnt speak up during the 2nd Vat council when changes were taking place??   But what do you expect from a member of a religion where everyone just joins hands and sings a happy happy joy joy song and everyone can be saved regardless of where they are..

 

http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=7115

 

Steve

 

New

 

Note: Very soon (perhaps within the next week or so) we hope to have a special new addition to our website.  We also have a new article and video that should be posted very soon.

 

If

 

I have been seen your webpage a several times and sometimes I visit your youtube channel.  If you have the truth and Catholic Church is full of heresy that mean that there is no any other Church, there is no Church any more... Where I and another believers, have to go now? I do not want join protestants or pentacostians clowns. Where can I go if I want see the Sunday Mass?? Where I can get the Eucharistia, if there is no Church???

Maybe I can join the Old Catholic Church (Staroktolicka Cirkev), they refuse the First Vatican Council in 1868 and they possibly keep rules as been before the Vatican I., so they're maybe original untouched Church. Or can I join the Orthodox Catholic Church? They are practise the same (unchanged) rituals for 2000 years, as is their affirmation. They had in history a many miracles too.
 
So WHAT NEXT? Where Can I follow the Lord Jesus Christ if his Church is no longer on Earth?
 
I am Roman Catholic and I should be respect the Pope without any questions, he's got "the key of heaven" and what he change on Earth will be changed in Heaven too. If he (the Pope) bring a new rules to Earth will be this rules accepted in Heaven too......?  I hope that your answers come soon.
 
Yours Faithfully
Peter Zmajkovic

 

MHFM: We must say that your question is indicative of a larger problem among alleged “Catholics” today.  You seem overwhelmingly and almost exclusively concerned with where you can go to church on Sunday.  That’s not what it means to be Catholic: just showing up at a church.  Your outlook displays a misguided focus: one that’s more concerned with fellowship with others than on God and His faith.  The Catholic faith is much more significant than where one goes on Sunday.  The faith is something that must be lived every day.  It’s not defined by a trip on Sunday.  First and foremost, you must accept the Catholic faith and all of its dogmas whole and undefiled.  Without the full Catholic faith, receiving the sacraments will not lead you to Heaven or to please God (Hebrews 11:6).

 

Your willingness to join the schismatic Old Catholic sect reveals that, at this time, you don’t have a firm belief in the Catholic faith.  Why would you do that if you believe, as the Catholic Church teaches, that there is no salvation outside the Church?  The Old Catholic sect is a non-Catholic sect that leads people to damnation.  Its followers have been excommunicated by the Church.  And if you dissent from the Catholic dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation, while claiming in some way to adhere to Catholic truth, what makes you think that showing up at any church will please God, since you reject a dogma He has revealed? 

 

Not even a valid pope can change a Catholic dogma.  Matthew 16 does not grant a pope the power to overturn a truth of revelation.  The revelation of Jesus Christ cannot be changed.  You need to convert to the Catholic faith (i.e., come to a firm faith in all Catholic dogmas, so that you would never even consider leaving the Catholic Church) and completely reject the Vatican II sect.  That involves never going to the New Mass again, for any reason.  Once you are convinced, then we can assist you with where to receive sacraments; but one should not receive them until he has the proper faith and has made the profession of faith.  Please see our section on those converting or leaving the Novus Ordo.  Also, we recommend that you review the The Glossary of Terms and Principles [PDF], in addition to our other material.  It will assist you with key principles that contradict your current mindset; they demonstrate that your current ideas are incompatible with the Catholic faith of Christ.  Finally, we are not saying that the Catholic Church is full of heresy, but that the Vatican II “Church” is not the Catholic Church.  Our material makes that very clear.

 

Cannot

 

Dear Mr. Dimond,

Your lesson about the thief and where he went after his death also cannot be true and here is why. Paradise is where the tree of life is and that's in heaven with God.  How do I know?  Because of Rev. 2: 7 - it reads as follows:

"Revelation 2:7 (New American Standard Bible)

 7'(A)He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches (B)To him who overcomes, I will grant to eat of (C)the tree of life which is in the (D)Paradise of God.'"(NASB)

 

The Lord Jesus Christ said this to the thief:

 

"Luke 23:43 (New American Standard Bible)

 43And He said to him, "Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in (A)Paradise."(NASB)

 

Blessings!

 

Anita Hiltz

 

MHFM: No, you are not correct.  Your points are addressed and refuted in this video: The Good Thief, the Old Testament Saints, and the Necessity of Baptism [video]

 

Never

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I have never understood this story and some others like it in the Bible.  It appears to me that the Church is talking out of Both sides of its mouth when it comes to Communism vs. Capitalism ?   On one hand we are told to give up EVERYTHING and follow God.......and on the other hand we are told that would be stupid to not be able to support ourselves and fall into poverty, where we could never be Able to give to Charity? 

 

I'm sure there Must be More to the story than we see on the surface here, but we Never get the Details.

If it was Their (God given)  land, why did God kill   him, and yet,  tells us Private Property rights is a good thing ?? 

 

Thanks for any light you could shine on this,

 

Carol D.

 

“Ananias, with Saphira his wife, sold a piece of land, And by fraud kept back part of the price of the land… But Peter said: Ananias, why hath Satan tempted thy heart, that thou shouldst lie to the Holy Ghost, and by fraud keep part of the price of the land?... Thou has not lied to men, but to God. And Ananias hearing these words, fell down, and gave up the ghost.  And there came great fear upon all that heard it.” (Acts 5:1-5)

 

MHFM: We think you’re overreacting.  People should not come to such conclusions when presented with a verse they don’t immediately understand.  It’s not an endorsement of Communism.  Rather, the fathers believe that the Christians of that period had agreed to share their possessions and give all to the community.  The Haydock commentary explains it well.  It is believed that “the resolution which the faithful made of selling their property, and laying the price at the feet of the apostles, implied a vow of reserving nothing for themselves, but giving all to the community; and that the crime of Ananias and Saphira consisted in the violation of this vow; on which account they regarded them as sacrilegious, and plunderers of sacred things.”

   ---“Ananias, and his wife Saphira, had made a promise or vow, to put into the common stock the price of what they had to sell.  When they had sold the field, they resolved by mutual consent to keep for their private use part of the money, and to bring in the rest, as if they had received no more.  The whole price being promised, and by that means consecrated to God, St. Augustine calls it a sacrilegious fraud, and St. Chrysostom a theft of what was already made sacred to God.”

 

Found

 

Hello my name is René Pelchat… I am 47 years old single convert to what I thought was the catholic faith when I was 30. After reading a lot of catholic books, lives of saints, books on freemasonry and their infiltration into the church, etc, I felt that there was something wrong with the vatican II catholic church (I believed during many years in Medjugorje, marian movement of Priests, etc,).

 

In the last couple of years, I didn't understand why there was so much chaos in that church and so few people attending masses (most of them old people).  For instance, I was wondering why the catholic vatican II church was not talking and promoting the unbelievable miracles we have in our history (Our Lady of Guadalupe, the Saint Shroud of Turin -we know now by science that this is the Shroud of Jesus Christ, numerous Eucharistic miracles, etc.).  I was asking Jesus and the Virgin Mary in my prayers where is the Real Truth.  Well, thanks for your site and your discoveries I am beginning to be at peace now.

 

I would like to congratulate you and thank you for the immense effort you did by creating your site.

 

(Rene)

 

Comment

 

After listening once again to your talks with Greg Rossi and Will Golle, one sad thought stroke me: Both the radical schismatics (who cast down Saints, depose real pre-vatican II Popes and misread Church Law) and the radical defenders of the V2 apostasy suffer from the same problem that blinds them in similar fashion, even though they are on 2 extreme opposite sides: Pride. 

The radical schismatics pride themselves on their knowledge and make a fool of themselves. While most of the V2 defenders (aside from [Albrecht] and the pseudo-intellectual with the pipe) actually pride themselves on their IGNORANCE. This problem plagues the (fake?) V2 defender from Chicago, Lewis, Golle and Rossi. They can´t even tell who goes to Hell, or who is and who isn´t a Catholic, or when a Catholic ceases to be Catholic. 

 

I know it´s hard to find good help nowadays. But for you, it seems even harder to find worthy opponents. 

 

Question one

 

Question one:

 

Are you supposed to be afraid of God?

 

Ow…

 

MHFM: Yes, the most common theme in the Bible is that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Psalm 110:10), and that His mercy is only upon those who fear Him (Psalm 102:17; Lk. 1:50; 2 Cor. 5:11; etc.).  Therefore, those who don’t have a sufficient fear of God to obey His commandments and avoid gravely offending Him will not receive His mercy or forgiveness.  The fear of God is what causes sinners to turn from the broad road and begin to live a life of grace.  After people become more advanced in the spiritual life, their actions become motivated by the love of God, though a salutary fear of the Lord remains. 

 

Interesting

 

Thought this was an interesting article.  Even though they imbibe the V2 apostasy and are totally ignorant of the true faith they have correctly stated that, "Islam is of the devil".  This has been taught throughout the history of the Catholic Church.  They however seem to be doing this more in retaliation for what they falsely believe about 9/11 being an Islamic attack.  What is even more diabolical is the CNN reporter, "Rick Sanchez" and how he defends not only Islam but man in general and how we must respect all people.

 

-Bruce

 

“Christians To Burn Quran”

 

This is an outrageous story - but true. And it can only lead to the sort of narrow-minded anger and violence that peaceful people (of any religion) want no part of.



A CNN interview reveals that a US church has sparked off a huge controversy by mulling an ‘International Burn a Quran Day’ to observe the anniversary of the 9/11 terror attack. The Dove World Outreach Centre in Gainesville, Florida, will be hosting the event to remember the victims of the Sep 9, 2001 attack and has extended an invitation to all Christians to burn the Muslim holy book at its premises from 6 pm to 9 pm.  “We believe that Islam is of the devil, that it’s causing billions of people to go to hell, it is a deceptive religion, it is a violent religion and that is proven many, many times,” church pastor Terry Jones told CNN.

 

Youtube interview here.

 

MHFM: Yes, the complete apostate Rick Sanchez actually claims to be a Vatican II “Catholic.”  What a sick joke.

 

Talking

 

Dear Mhfm,

I know you got a recent e-mail from someone about Chris Brown.  I found this video about him.  It shows how one of his songs is talking about Lucifer.  [“Fallen Angel”]

God Bless

Sean

 

Note

 

MHFM: Our combo DVDs containing the new video, Is the World about to End?, are now available to ship from the monastery.  Orders for them will be shipped starting tomorrow.  We had previously made them available for order.

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\shot_of_mhfm.jpgDescription: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\shot_of_mhfm_2.jpg

A few pictures of the Monastery

 

Question

 

Since you have done a good job of showing how recent popes are anti-popes, I was wondering, does your movement have an alternate pope?

Do you have a list of anti-popes? Also the black popes (Jesuits) and your view of these?

Since people's salvation depends on much of this and adhering to the truth of scripture, are you trying to reform the Catholic Church or are splitting from it?

I would appreciate your reply.

Thank you.

 

Courag…

 

MHFM: We are Catholics and we adhere to the traditional faith that the Church has always taught.  The true Catholic Church still exists, but in a remnant of traditional Catholics.  The Church doesn’t need to be reformed, but rather a massive apostasy has occurred in which almost all who claim to be Catholic are in fact non-Catholic.  They have left the Catholic Church.  What most people regard as the Catholic Church (the Vatican II sect) is in fact a counterfeit sect.  Our view of the Jesuits is that non-Catholics are deceived when they think that modern “Jesuits” run a world conspiracy.  That’s nonsense.  The modern so-called “Jesuits” are in fact heretics and apostates because they adhere to Vatican II and false ecumenism.  Traditionally, however, the Jesuit Order produced some of the greatest saints and missionaries.  They did an invaluable service in spreading the true faith and bringing the Gospel all over the world. 

 

People’s salvation depends on hearing, accepting, and following all of what Christ commanded.  You can’t do that as a non-Catholic.   That’s why it’s necessary for salvation to become a traditional Catholic.

 

JP2

 

Brothers,

 

The recent video on JPII is a clear message to those willing to listen.  The only problem is that there are not too many people willing or able to listen in this evil world today with all the modern technological distracting noise.  By externals, their worlds are conceived by many false signals and a spirit of "Jumping on the Band Wagon".  JPII's "New Truth" is just one of those false signals that is accepted in the V-2 Sect's "New Mass".  The "New Truth" is but "Another Lie" that adds fuel to the fire that has engulfed the Vatican II sect.  "Learn not the way of the heathen," Jeremiah 10:2…

 

When JPII died, he was first placed into a cedar coffin.  His face was covered with a white silk; this was the first time this was done...  Next the cedar coffin was sealed in an 800-pound coffin...then finally it was placed in another wooden coffin before being buried beneath St. Peter's Basilica. "...bearing a skull and crossbones.." Los Angeles Times.  Interesting to note is that JPII was buried in a trapezoidal-shaped coffin, the same seen in many vampire movies.

"The trapezoid has long been regarded in by occultists as the most satanic of shapes, especially adapted to enhance demonic manifestation.  This type of coffin is built to draw in and preserve evil, dark energy.  The idea was to attract enough vampire dark demonic energy, to draw sufficient quantities of energy, and to store that evil energy, so that, at a right moment, the dead man can come out of the coffin, as demonic resurrection," former satanist, Bill Schnoebelen…

 

God bless,

Tom Miles

 

Videos

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

Thanks for the prompt shipment of the Incredible Animals that Defy Evolution and other videos we received today-----WOW!!  these are ABSOLUTELY RIVETING!!  Our puppy Jesse was similarly glued to the TV screen,  particularly enjoying the baby chick peeping as it emerged from its awesome shell---(he kept barking and moving his head around at all kinds of angles and listening carefully with his little ears perked up!) ---personally I enjoyed the section on the hummingbirds the most as they are --- like all these animals---totally MIRACULOUS creatures of God! 

 

Great new videos on arch-evil JPII---great point in that yes he very carefully, methodically, made certain all his extreme-hell-inspired-antichrist-anticatholic program was explicitly put ON THE RECORD!!  [kind of like a serial killer].  He did this again and again as MHFM has so correctly pointed out.  Hindsight is 20/20----could what he was really up to (pure evil) possibly be any MORE OBVIOUS!...

 

Comment

 

Very nice clips you posted about on the 'God of Wonders' video… The verse that hits home in it was:

 

"For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse."   Romans 1:20

 

What a slap in the face it is to God who shares his creation with us, and hear some say there still isn’t a God.  Those people don’t want there to be a God, so that way they can attempt to dupe themselves to live immorally without following God’s law along with trying to find some cheap way to cover their guilty consciences…

 

On the flip side, it’s nice for me to hear things during astronomy star gazing sessions while viewing the heavens, when someone says something like, 'How can there not be a God?'   Also Astronomy magazines cover story about 2-3 months ago had an article about our Sun, on how science and astronomers are struggling to find another star unique like our own sun. Out of the billions upon billions of stars out there, our sun is unique...Try to explain that one Darwin ??

 

Steve

 

Wonders

 

Subject: Wonders of God

 

Great videos, although I never believed in evolution, watching these videos really made me feel small.  St. Alphonsus Liguori uses the word, "worm" a lot in his writings to describe our nothingness in comparison to the Blessed Trinity.  The other thing that comes to my mind is His love and care for all of us, all these creations that God made were out of love for us.  The next and final reality to consider is our salvation, God closed the gates of heaven by his word, He could have done the same to open them but to show us His indescribable love for us, Jesus chose to suffer the most ignominious death possible… Can you imagine, Jesus does all this for Love of us and we slap Him in the face and run from Him, such ingratitude…

 

Todd

 

God of Wonders

 

MHFM: This is a link to an excellent video called God of Wonders.  It was our intention to carry this video.  However, the end contains heresy: the false salvation message of Protestantism.  So, we have linked to the first seven parts.  They deal with refuting evolution and demonstrating God’s power.  The footage is tremendous.

 

1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWH7uVc0S4Y&feature=related

2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7D4QD7lS9o&feature=related

3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73QQ3XJWmmw&feature=related

4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQH26-lDW3s&feature=related

5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J5MygZiRcM&feature=related

6) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIJMC8CAKKs&feature=related

7) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYRwpTEvVfc&feature=related

                   

Posting

 

Subject: God of Wonders video – amazing !

 

Dear Brothers,

 

What an amazing video, God of Wonders. Thank you for posting it. God's creation is such an endless source of natural miracles that it's no wonder St. Paul said people have no excuse for not believing in God (Romans 1:20). The series destroys the idea that the universe came about by chance because every single thing that exists is built in an organized way – that doesn't happen by accident! The footage is superb and if there is so much beauty coupled with practicality in nature, then one cannot even begin to imagine what heaven is like:

 

1 Corinthians 2:9 - But, as it is written: That eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart of man, what things God hath prepared for them that love him.

I particularly enjoyed the section on snow flakes in video 3. It reminded me of how many servants of the Blessed Virgin Mary, when given the grace of seeing her up close, remarked that she glittered with a snow-like light. It also reminded me of the vision of hell that the children of Fatima were given and about how so many souls would fall into hell “like snow flakes.” It is remarkable that Protestants can see such glories in creation, but cling obstinately to their heresies, as though God, who so clearly demonstrates His love in nature, would abandon His creatures to a man-made system of salvation, such as is protestantism, and not build a permanent structure of salvation – the Catholic Church only. If we want to make it to heaven these days during the Antichrist Antipope Vatican II Great Apostasy, then we really need to put the Catholic faith first by holding uncompromisingly to Catholic dogmas, and to have a strong and consistent devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Rosary. May Jesus and Mary help all Catholics to love God wholeheartedly, to be humble, and to walk the narrow path to life all the way to the end.

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

     

Convert

 

I was looking into your site. I have been looking to convert from protestantism to the Holy Catholic Church in order that my soul might be saved. First is that possible? If it’s possible what would you recommend.  I live in Florida and there are no traditionalist organizations that teach extra ecclesiam nulla salus… please advise.

Thanks,

F...M….

 

MHFM: That’s great to hear.  What a person in your situation would do is follow these steps to convert: The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts.  Begin to pray the Rosary each day, do spiritual reading, and familiarize yourself with the basic catechism.  When one is fully convinced and prepared for a profession of faith, we can help you further with where to make a confession.

 

New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video about the Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell.

 

The Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell - 1/4

The Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell - 2/4

The Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell - 3/4

The Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell - 4/4

 

Soul

 

Dear MHFM,

 

I was reading St. Gertrude's current bulletin (July 25, 2010) just now and read in a reprint of St. Anthony's Messenger from October 1936 that someone with a sincerely held non-Catholic belief is really a member of the soul of the Catholic Church and will be saved. I was surprised to find this… Any comments?

 

Valerie Duffy

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s blatantly heretical. They deny Outside the Church There is No Salvation, just as we’ve pointed out all along.  Those who support, accept or agree with such heretical priests are not true Catholics.  The heresy was also being spread by priests in fallible sources prior to Vatican II.  See our book for a full discussion of these issues.

 

BOD

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

Council of Elvira completely debunks baptism of desire.  "Canon 4-Flamens who have been catechumens for three years and who have abstained from sacrifices may be baptized.  Canon 42-Those with a good reputation who seek to become Christians shall remain as catechumens for two years before being baptized.  Should they become seriously ill, they may request and receive baptism earlier."  Baptism, early 4th century Roman Catholicism was never an issue of desire saving those outside the Church unless baptized prior, properly, in the Church.  That would have been ludicrous thinking and totally insane. Furthermore, the idea of salvation outside the Church could save you somehow, equally as ludicrous and outrageous.  Thank you MHFM.  May your ministry bear great fruit.

 

Pop star

 

Subject: Pop star made a “Saint”

 

Hello Brothers!
 
Reading the e-exchange about that one female who loves Chris Brown so much, I decided to share another story with you. A student in Serbia decided to paint a religious icon, or picture, of the turbo-folk star Ceca Raznatovic, widow of the hypocrite Zeljko Raznatovic Arkan. It’s sad to see who the young people consider to be Saints these days. Words suchs as whore, prostitute, Turk, demon, sinner are all words that can be used to describe her. Not much different from the female pop stars in North America (Lady Gaga, etc.) I have attached the picture of the icon.
 
God Bless!

 

Daniel

 

New Church

 

I wanted to comment on Carlos' conversation with his fellow new church catholic regarding his understanding of americanism, the problem is these people don't use common sense and logic.  They also apply this so called blind faith to what Vatican ll teaches instead of applying critical thinking to the matter at hand.  Once the True Catholic Church solemnly declares a Truth {dogma} it can't be changed and it can't be changed because they are the teachings of Jesus Christ.  Could you imagine saying to Jesus, "you need to get with the times"!  The Church solemnly declares these truths so that the faithful become bound by these truths.  They have to hold these truths whole and inviolate to be a member of the catholic church.  This is the function of the Teaching Magisterium!   These people have a misunderstanding on what Jesus said to Peter regarding, "what you bind on earth will be bound in heaven and what you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven", this teaching doesn't apply to a divine truth, you can't change a truth because the truth is not subject to anything, it’s a rock!   

 

Todd

 

Repeating

 

Subject: Catholic Inquisition Myths Busted

 

… This is such a hot topic for so many protestants, to throw that at your face when the person knows so little about it – and is just repeating what that person’s minister or false opinion is about that time in the Church’s history.  In William Thomas Walsh’s book about Isabella, Queen of Spain, He details the problems that the Spaniards had to deal with regarding Muslim invasions and Jewish “false” converts once that rule was enacted (that all non-Catholics had to leave…)

 

Thanks…

 

Melanie and Bill

 

Regarding

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Regarding canon 16 of Council of Elvira, "...they are to be given neither to Jews nor to heretics, because there can be no companionship between faithful and infidel..." By this holy synod of holy early times antipope Benedict 16 stands condemned as obstinate heretic in 2010 of salvation history by visibly and openly kowtowing to the Jews in their condemned faith… As a Roman Catholic I condemn antipope Benedict 16, HERETIC!  St. Michael the Archangel, avenge us we pray most fervently.

 

Dea…

 

Schism

 

Could you please also make a video about The Great Schism of 1054? It would help a lot of people here from Eastern Europe.

Thank you and God Bless!

 

Eduard

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  In our Papacy section, there are audios that deal with the primary issue involved in the schism, the rejection of the Roman Pontiff’s primacy of jurisdiction.  The Bible teaches that Jesus made St. Peter the first pope [link to section].  The audios cover how the ancient Church, and the East, recognized the pope’s primacy of jurisdiction.

 

Impression

 

Your latest videos are spectacular, as always.  The Western Schism has left me with the distinct impression that God, in his infinite wisdom and careful planning,  allowed this disgrace to happen exactly in order to prove that what would come to pass in the Great Apostasy that we are living through is plausible. 

 

The coincidences are so striking, it´s even scary.  Just like in Siri´s election and later conspiracy by the college of cardinals…

 

CK

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  Yes, the coincidences are striking.  It seems that God arranged it so that there would be a precedent during the Middle Ages for what would happen during the Great Apostasy.  

 

Mythology

 

Dear brothers in Christ,


I'd like to add some comments about anti-Catholic mythology of these last days of the world. First, the Inquisition. One reader, obviously a brain-washed protestant, wrote about millions of so-called victims of the Inquisition. I have nothing to add to your answer to this accusation (i.e. about the number of the real victims of judicial errors of the Inquisition); I would like just to ask the protestants promoting the lies about the Inquisition the question: If the number of victims, and "victims", counts in millions, how so that your "saint", Martin Luther, did not mention this "slaughter" not only once in his 95 (ninety five) theses? I repeat--there are 95 theses that Martin Luther brought up against the Catholic Church, and did not mention the Inquisition in none of those almost hundred theses. Why is that, if the alleged crimes of the Inquisition were so brutal and widely spread as you claim it was?

For example, Sir Isaac Newton, the founder of physics as an exact science, was, as far as it is known today, an adherent of arianism, but he kept his views in secret. Publicly, he was an adherent of anglicanism, and as such a violent enemy of the Catholic Church. What do you think would have happened to him if he had publicly doubted the Trinity within the anglican church?

Second, the mentioned reader wrote: "The catholic church from its inception and enforcement by the Roman government under Constantine has been illegitimate and false."

The inception of The Catholic Church is in Christ's words: "Thou art Peter...". So the reader blatantly say that Our Lord Jesus Christ is an "illegitimate" and a liar. No wonder that the "fellow protestants" so much love the antipopes ruling from the Rome for the last 52 years. Perhaps the satanic antipope would "canonize" Luther together with countless "martyrs" from every other damned false religion of the world. I agree--Martin Luther, Henry VIII., Calvin, and other protestants are indeed of the same kind as muslims, buddhists, hinduists, animists, etc.

It is true--the "huggy-huggy christianity" of these last days cannot withstand the satanic lies. These "huggy-huggy" followers of Satan would love to put God on the international judicial trial for the many genocides, atrocities and other "illegal" killings of the human beings we find described throughout The Old Testament, and confirmed by Jesus in The New Testament (" For amen I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot, or one  tittle shall not pass of the law, till all be fulfilled.").

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

Conciliarism

 

Subject: new videos 

 

Thank you MHFM for your new videos on Great Western Schism/Gates of Hell.  "Conciliarism"--thanks for teaching me a new word with its meaning being SO very highly significant for our day!  "Conciliarism"--it reminds one of a chronic disease --- which basically the whole post Vatican 2 (false council of heretics) Catholic-in-name-only "church" has contracted!  It reminds one of a spiritual disorder which makes humans abandon God,  His True Church, His Truly Catholic teachings........(as clearly defined by DOGMA).  This "conciliarism" falls in right along with the other sicknesses of the modern era---DarwinISM, MarxISM, feminISM, etc etc however, it is even more toxic, and worse!!

   

 "Indefectibility"--that God will NEVER abandon His bride the True Church (and in turn she, never having contracted "conciliarism", or,  "modernism”… so that the Gates of Hell (lying mouths of heretics, like at vatican 2 and in the V2 sect) will NOT prevail against God's True Church------this is beautiful.  Yes, some things STILL remain unchanged, untouched and perfect---like our ancient Catholics dogmas…  

 

Inquisition

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

"BloodTa" is a pathetic joke!!  .. .and here's why, and why he needs, in future, to 'engage his brain before he opens his mouth' ...

The BBC produced a documentary entitled "The Myth of the Spanish Inquisition," in the 1990's, which puts to rest the lies perpetrated and spread by anti-Catholic forces, particularly after the Protestant Reformation/ Revolution....the Spanish Inquisition was set up under Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand to oppose and uncover the Jews who had infiltrated the Church and State by 1492, false Marrano Jews as they were called, whose main object was to destroy Christianity and society as a whole.

The trials were fair and no torture was used, and the numbers of incalcitrants accused and eventually burned was very small in number. For instance between 3000 and 5000 were killed in the 350 years of the Inquisition (that's about 10 every year ).  Meanwhile in that same period, the BBC documentary reveals that between 1450 and 1750, in Protestant Europe, 150,000 persons were persecuted for crimes of witchcraft and perhaps half that number were condemned and executed.

In one year alone, (1692 ), The Protestant Salem Witch Trials executed 20 "witches"...

.In Spain and Spanish America, 40 - 50 were executed during the 350 years of the Spanish Inquisition, while in comparison, during the reign of Mary and Elizabeth, (1553 -1603), during the Protestant English Inquisition, 400 were executed, and in the general anti - Catholic persecutions, 72,000 souls.

The Papal Inquisition was set up in the 13th century, basically in response to the Albigensians who were teaching heresy and were a threat to both the Church and society in general, and was directed at Catholics and lapsed Catholics only.  They too, were fair and most accepted the penances imposed by the ecclesiatical courts.... Only incalcitrants were handed over to the State for trial, which considered heresy a crime of treason, undermining the State.

William T. Walsh, as well, has written an interesting treatise on the Inquisition, in his "Characters of the Inquisition," which "BloodTa" would do well to consult, before committing 'pen to paper!'

God bless,

David

 

When

 

Subject: Inquisition

 

Dear Brothers:

 

When I was thirteen, one of my so called friends said to me "You're a Catholic?  How nice!  How would you like to be a Christian?"  She went on to accuse the Church of murdering millions in the inquisition, basically the same sort of accusation in the one letter you just received.  At the time, I was novus ordo, and didn't know how to respond except to say that Christ didn't found any Protestant sect, He founded the Catholic Church so that was the Church I wanted to belong to.  After doing some research on  the subject I came to several conclusions:  Spreading heresy is a far worse crime than murder, since the guilty party is killing souls which is more serious than killing someone's body, so the Church and state were perfectly justified in executing notorious, unrepentant heretics who were spreading their filth and leading souls out of the Church.  Secondly, the entire population of Europe could not have been more than a few million people, so the number of executed was greatly exaggerated.  The protestants take some abuses by a minority of Catholics and exaggerate their number and importance and use these things to justify their rebellion against Rome.  Of course, when protestants commit crimes, they ignore or downplay those sins like the hypocritical nitwits that they are.  It started with Martin Luther and still hasn't stopped.  Some things never change.  I did view your video on the subject some time ago after finding it on YouTube; I'd like to see a full one hour DVD video on the subject, perhaps combining it with the Crusades, which is another area vastly misunderstood by most people.  Keep up the good work.  God bless you all,

 

Brenda Roy

 

Isabella

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Bloodta, what is that short for? Brothers, I guess you respond to things like that for the benefit of others. I just read Isabella of Spain the Last Crusader by WT Walsh… 1930. What a wonderful book!  I also scanned a book by Benjamin Netanyahu's father (Benzion) "The Origins of the Inquisition in Fifteenth Century Spain",  Netanyahu's father is a very influencial professor in the N.E. and very popular also in Israel. He would also be considered "right wing" and obviously has no love for the Holy Roman Catholic Church. I would go so far as to say he has a deep hatred of the Holy Roman Catholic Church and his writings are just a repeat of the same lies (plain and simple) we've seen throughout church history. I'm glad Isabelle started the inquisition and I'm glad I actually know why.  Queen Isabelle of Spain...I'm not sure why she isn't a saint.

 

Matthew

 

Promise

 

Subject: Western Schism video

 

Dear Brothers,

 

That's a truly brilliant explanation of the Great Western Schism and how it does not contradict Jesus' promise that the gates of hell will not prevail against the Church. In fact, it proves that Christ's promises are absolutely unalterable, because only satan himself could conjure such a ridiculously confusing situation where there are 3 claimants to the papacy, but only one true pope, and for the Church to stay her course throughout 3 successive elections. The fact that one of the true popes, Gregory XII, had the least support proves that it was of the devil because otherwise God would have given him more support, as He did eventually. The parallels between the two Antipopes named John XXIII are not to be taken lightly either, i.e. one reigning during the Western Schism, and the other reigning during the current Vatican II apostasy. It demonstrates how saints and theologians are not infallible, and can be horribly wrong even about who the true pope is! Probably most importantly is the great jurist of the time, Baldus, who remarked that a pope who is openly and persistently heretical is (self-)deposed. It shows that the hierarchy of the Church is not infallible – infallibility was only promised to St. Peter and his successors, not to the body of cardinals or to any other Catholic. It proves that it is patently absurd to reject the notion that such a situation cannot be the case today, especially when even Protestants can recognise the apostasy of antipopes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. So what if there has been a papal interregnum for over 50 years?! Do non-sedevacantists even think about how impossible it is for planet earth to sustain life in the midst of such a huge cosmic garbage dump? Impossible for man, but not for God. Such dogma doubting heretics imagine that the world will never end, and especially not in our time. What a severe surprise when they see Jesus coming on the clouds of heaven in glory to judge the living and the dead. What a horrible reality to know that one has rejected Him who is life itself. What a sad fact that the heavens and earth will be dissolved by fire but that only a few will be saved. Thank you for the encouraging video.

 

Luke 18:14 - “...because every one that exalteth himself, shall be humbled: and he that humbleth himself, shall be exalted.”

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Convenient

 

Subject: How Convenient

 

In your video "Why Rome is now the Whore of Babylon", I noticed that among your list of martyrs that you conveniently left out the 500 years of Inquisitions in which the Catholic church still under your precious pre-Vatican II, killed in upwards of millions of non-catholics according to historians. Is there some reason you didn't add these martyrs? I'm sure there was and I'm sure we both know why, don't we? The reason you did not add these martyred millions is because it does not fit into your paradigm of having to believe that the pre-Vatican II Catholic church is Christs "true church" and so you will continually attempt to justify or cover up/ignore any history that does not show your church in the light that you wish to view it in.

I'm sure you daily suffer from cognitive dissonance due to history that you have chose to ignore. You need to wake up. The catholic church from its inception and enforcement by the Roman government under Constantine has been illigitimate and false, and it is this false church that you are protecting and promulgating. You need to look at history with a non-biased point of view. Your videos show that you are biased and with an agenda and are not actually looking at what is but rather what you want to believe is…

Take your blinders off and start looking for truth rather than what you have been told and believe is truth.


- BloodTa…

 

MHFM: No, you don’t have any idea what you are talking about.  You really need to watch our video on that issue.  It specifically addresses and refutes the very lies you are promoting about the Inquisition.  Do you even know what the Inquisition was?  The idea that millions were killed is pure nonsense: anti-Catholic mythology.  Among other things, the video examines the work of a renowned Jewish historian.  He’s certainly not partial to the Catholic Church, but rather quite critical of it.  He’s an expert on the Inquistion and puts the many myths about it to rest, including the ridiculous lies about the number of people killed.  See our video: Catholic Inquisition Myths Busted.  The evidence shows that a few thousand were killed by the Inquisition over its whole history; and the reason for those deaths should be understood after one has a better grasp of the period and the intention behind the Inquisition.

 

You need to wake up and realize that there’s only one biblical faith, and that’s the Catholic faith.  Obviously you have been brainwashed by the propaganda you’ve seen against the Catholic Church. 

 

Redemptoris Missio

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I'm not sure if you ever emphasized this, but while looking this morning at John Paul II's encyclical "Redemptoris Missio" # 10, one thing struck me:

 

"The universality of salvation means that it is granted not only to those who explicitly believe in Christ and have entered the Church."

 

In other words, Antipope John Paul II is saying, without the slightest doubt, that salvation is available outside the Church! No matter what version of the salvation dogma you adhere to, John Paul II is denying here, in the most explicit fashion, its very simplest expression!

 

Of course, in the same paragraph, he goes on to say that those who have not entered the Church have already been united to it in a "certain way". What a waste of time.

 

God bless you,

 

Jakub Eisenbruk

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s covered in our file on The Heresies of John Paul II - a comprehensive presentation [PDF file].  There are a number of outrageous heresies in that encyclical, including universal salvation and others dealing with false religions.

 

E-mail

 

Subject: Brian’s e-mail

 

As for Brian's email…: it seems that the whole matter simply boils right down to this:  does one choose Faith in GOD, as HE has so clearly revealed through DEFINED Catholic DOGMA, over the past 2,000 years?  Or does one choose faith in puny tiny fallible measly man---that is, to believe whatever anyone "feels like" believing?...

 

Freemasonry

 

Subject: Freemasonry

 

Really Good videos on Freemasonry but the same way you can trace freemasonry being an occultist religion you can also see the Roman Catholicism practice such occultist things and why the bible contradicts the Roman Catholicism practices

 

Adrian…

 

MHFM: No, the Catholic Church doesn’t practice anything occultic.  If you tried to give an example (which you didn’t), your misconception could be refuted.  See our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church for the biblical evidence for Catholicism.

 

New video on Baptism

 

MHFM: This video covers some important new points and angles to this issue.

 

The Good Thief, the Old Testament Saints, and the Necessity of Baptism [new video]

 

This video discusses how water baptism can be absolutely necessary in light of the Good Thief.  It also covers the Old Testament saints and the necessity of water baptism. There will probably be a part 2.

 

Prayer

 

Dear Brothers:

 

What is the best way to recite Rosary? I wonder how the Saints said their Rosary? Did they say Rosary after a working day, or they say it before go to work?

 

And if they forgot, or were distracted, did they begin anew, restart it again or did they just keep continuing their Rosary until the finish.

 

I have a lot of problems of distraction, distress, and being forgetful.  I keep restarting again and again, sometimes it takes me a whole morning or afternoon or night just to try to finish the 3 decades.  I’m afraid my praying is not worthy at all.  Maybe God wants me to work, get the job done first, then, whatever time is left then pray. I am not sure this is the best way or not, I wonder how the Saints conducted their works and their prayers.

 

… God bless.

 

Kim

 

MHFM: In regard to when one should pray, that depends upon the person and what works for him or her.  There’s no set time.  Concerning distractions that can arise when one is trying to pray, the saints tell us to simply continue praying.  By continually stopping and starting, you can actually give more attention to the distraction and interrupt your prayer more significantly.  One saint basically said: when dealing with a distraction, it’s not recommended to make a violent move of the mind away from the distraction, for in such a violent move away from it, the distraction can receive more focus and be increased.  Rather, one should simply and calmly continue to pray while moving the focus back to the prayer.  In this vein, one should not fret if his or her prayer is not perfect or less than 100% recollected.  St. Louis De Montfort also says that continuing to pray while dealing with involuntary distractions can increase the merit of prayer.  Continue to try to pray the full Rosary each day.  An easier way to get that done is one set of mysteries at three different times.

 

Comment

 

Subject: bad-willed heretics

 

Dear Brothers,

The bad-willed heretics sure are on fire recently with all their attacks against Catholic dogmas! I went to a priest that was saying that when Jesus walked on water and Peter got out of the boat and started walking on water to Jesus, that the reason Peter started sinking was because, "he left his friends - he tried to do it alone - he should have stayed in the boat." So it doesn't matter to such pathetic heretics that Peter has SUPREME JURISDICTION in the church, or that he was walking to Jesus but started to doubt! He then went on to say that it doesn't matter if you start doubting the faith, but to just keep going. Well, that's exactly what such V-2 apostates are trained to do - doubt dogma. At least he said that one needs to stay inside the boat, i.e. the Church. It's so pathetic how bad willed people are today. The martyrs didn't flinch when it came to defending Jesus Christ against the idol worshiping emperors of Rome - in fact they were happy to suffer for Christ. Nowadays, the local "bishop" would back out of any confrontation with a true Catholic like lightening. By rejecting the EENS salvation dogma, they are saying to Jesus, "yeah, thanks for dying for us, but you didn't really have to." It's shocking!!! It's all about love of man rather than love of God for the heretics. It's the Antichrist Apostasy with their… "baptism of desire."

God Bless,

Chris White

 

Luther

 

Subject: Martin Luther, the Devil and Denominations video

 

Finally, it’s like for 100 protestants that attack the catholic church, 1 catholic decides to defend himself. Good video

 

Chiv….

 

Sedevacantists

 

The one thing I have always wondered about Sedevacantists is this: why debate… some other apologist about what Benedict XVI said or meant? Benedict XVI is still alive. When will sedevacantists develop a definitive list of concerns/ charges of heresy for Ben XVI to respond to directly?  Supporters of Ben XVI say that a Pope must be confronted directly

 

Sulkow…

 

MHFM: There’s no question about what Benedict XVI is saying.  His writings, actions and promotion of Vatican II make it quite clear.  People have written to him about his false ecumenism, how it contradicts Tradition, and the general apostasy of Vatican II.  Stop making excuses for the public heretic, demonstrate some good will, and accept the obvious.

 

Regarding

 

Greetings; and hoping all goes well for you.

Regarding the sacrament of Baptism: Those who are Traditional Orthodox Catholic, Like myself, know that baptism is the required sacrament for gaining church membership after accepting what the church teaches for salvation.  Seems to me this issue of desired baptism should be considered the Exception to the rule for Extreme circumstances. This should not be accepted as being normal or regular principle since it contradicts what Christ taught. Hope this makes sense to you.

 

John Moyna

 

MHFM: No, it doesn’t make any sense and in fact it’s totally contradictory.  You begin by saying that baptism is required for membership in the Church, as if you believe that no one is saved without it.  However, you then contradict yourself and declare that people can be in the Church and saved without baptism by way of exception.  You are speaking out of both sides of your mouth.  At this time, you do not accept the Church’s teaching on the necessity of the Sacrament of Baptism.  The contradiction articulated in your e-mail is typical of those who depart from Catholic truth on the salvation and baptism dogmas.  They have no problem saying one thing, and then declaring exactly the opposite.  The comfort you display while speaking two contradictory things is problematic and perhaps illustrative of why you haven’t yet seen the full truth on this issue.

 

SBC

 

It appears that the St. Benedict Center/Brother Andre Marie have reached rapprochement with the Vatican II church and the Diocese of Manchester….

 

Bill

 

MHFM: They are truly disgraceful apostates who couldn’t care less about any Catholic dogma.  Despite their claims to the contrary, they definitely do not believe Outside the Church There is No Salvation is a dogma one must accept to be inside the Church.  That can be easily proven.  They also accept pro-abortionists as inside the Church, as they must to hold communion with the Vatican II sect.  To accept Antipope Benedict XVI and his apostate bishops at this point, with all the evidence they’ve seen, shows that they truly serve Satan.  As long as a man in Rome dresses up in papal robes and claims to be pope, they would accept him no matter what he did, including “canonizing” Luther, John Paul II and probably even Satan himself (there’s not much difference between the second and third on that list, by the way).  We are dealing with dark spiritual zombies who claim to be dedicated Catholics – complete and utter phonies.  This is the dark spiritual plight of our age.  What a disgraceful example of bad will.  They talk about Our Lady and Our Lord, as if they care about them.  They don’t care one bit about them, which is why they profess communion with a man who trashes them and denies the whole faith.  Barring a miraculous conversion, they will find their spot alongside their father Lucifer in the fires of Hell.  Perhaps you can ask one of the heretics from their group if they’d want to have a phone debate with us, in which they’d have to address the many heresies of their spiritual leaders that they constantly ignore.  Only in such an encounter would the full depths of their unbelieving, satanic, heretical malice be shown to the world, as it was in the encounter with Vin Lewis.  During that exchange, it was clearly demonstrated that all of those who obstinately cling to the Counter Church are forced to believe in nothing.

 

Update

 

Dear MHFM,

Well I suppose this day was coming. Last Sunday Fr. Talcott sent an individual (Eric Hoffman) to "talk" to me after Mass concerning me staying outside of Mass. I was sitting in our van… when he approached me. He was at first courteous (we had met before), but grew rather disturbed when I told him Fr. Talcott is a heretic. In any case he told me that he was giving me a warning from Father, that if I don't come in to Mass, Father has the right to kick me out. I argued with this heretic for awhile, he ended up "tuck tail and running...or walking rather fast" because I think I caught him off guard with my blunt responses. There is more to the argument, but as you have heard it all before I won't go into great detail. One thing that was amazing, and sad, was his level of spiritual blindness.  He told me, in a very strong and confident manner, that "NO pope has ever said anything infallible!!!...none of the last 268 popes have ever done such a thing!" I said, "oh really, how about the Immaculate Conception?" He responded, "Oh, well yeah that was an infallible statement."  And yet he still stuck to his original claim!! He could not even see such a stark contradiction himself. It was unbelievable!

Anyways, I got a call from Fr. Talcott on Tuesday that "You are to be in mass the entire time. You must all stand when I walk down the aisle, stay the entire time until the last song is sung." I told him that it wasn't going to happen, that he is a heretic for what he believes, his adherence to Benedict, etc. He had nothing to say. He acted like an immature person. This was his response, "Oh yeah, okay Robby, I'm a heretic, okay you got the word in!"  I said he was correct! Then he said if we think he is a heretic, and we won't listen to him, we are not to come anymore.

So unfortunately we have run out of "Traditional" priests in the area to go to. Fr. Zapp kicked us out for adhering to water baptism. Fr. Morrison...well I slapped my hand down in disgust when he was preaching heresy from the pulpit, and declared he was preaching heresy and walk out. And now Fr. Talcott kicked us out.

Please pray for us brothers. This was obviously God's Will, and we understand that (which actually is always comforting to know God is protecting us from people like Fr. Talcott), and I know there is a lot of people out there in the same situation, but it is always hard to make the transition from mass every Sunday, to no mass at all.

There are still some options for confession, so we should be okay for awhile in that regard. Take care.


Robby Hansen

 

MHFM: Thanks for the information about your experiences defending the faith and dealing with certain “traditionalist” priests who impose their heresies and thus must be avoided.

 

Heretics

 

Hello,

I was wondering why you call some Priests "heretics" for allowing the possibility of baptism of desire and not refer to St. Alphonsus Ligouri as a heretic? Why the double standard? And be honest... If I were to tell you that I knew of a Priest who said baptism of desire is de fide you would call him a heretic - yet St. Alphonsus said this very thing.

Thank you,

Brian

 

MHFM: We’ve already addressed that in our book, debates, etc.  The real question is why you heretics don’t bother to check our responses to these issues before writing in your bad-willed questions.  Perhaps the answer is that you don’t care about truth but only about looking for ways to continue to believe your heresies.  There’s a separate section on that issue in the book, in fact.  The truth is that you couldn’t care less about what St. Alphonsus said except in so far as he defends “baptism of desire”; for you almost certainly reject his position on the damnation of all pagans, Muslims, etc.  In short, the priests you regard as Catholics (who are actually antichrist apostates) believe in salvation for members of any religion.  St. Alphonsus did not. 

 

As wrong as he was on “baptism of desire,” St. Alphonsus only believed in explicit “baptism of desire” for people who believe in the essential mysteries of Catholicism: the Trinity and the Incarnation.  Second, we have said that people could be mistaken in good faith on explicit “baptism of desire,” as St. Alphonsus believed, until they have seen all of the arguments; but to persist in that position, once they’ve seen the array of dogmatic arguments against it, is definitely heretical and shows extreme bad will.  At that point, a person runs inescapably into heresy and a denial of various dogmatic principles.  St. Alphonsus’ statements on the so-called “baptism of desire” – the false theory which, once expanded, became the heresy of all heresies for our age, because it justifies every antichrist form of apostasy – are filled with errors.  Among other things, he misquotes Trent, teaches that one can be born again but not receive the remission of the temporal punishment due to sin (directly contrary to Trent), and cites as infallible a letter attributed to Innocent II or Innocent III (they’re not even sure), which we know, from Vatican I, is certainly not infallible.  That’s why we don’t go by saints, but by the popes and the Magisterium.  However, we recognize that for heretics who don’t believe in papal infallibility but only in man, that’s incomprehensible.  Perhaps if you consider St. Gregory Nazianzen, another man (saint, doctor of the Church) who explicitly rejected “baptism of desire,” your “faith” in man will be shaken a bit. 

 

Americanism

 

Subject: Americanism

 

Hello Brothers Dimond,

I am a Catholic who is beginning to understand the importance of Dogma in relation to the Catholic Church. Your websites and you tube channel have been very effective in teaching these items of importance. However, this past week, I was engaged in a conversation with a fellow "new church" catholic and told him of the topics and evidence presented by your website. When debating the validity of Vatican II with modernizing the church, he referenced a papal bull, I believe was written by Pope Leo XIII named Americanism. To his understanding, he thought this bull gave the Church the authority to change doctrine in order to "get with the times". I read this bull and believe it was misunderstood on his end. I believe your insightful clarification on this matter would be greatly appreciated by those who will misunderstand this papal bull. In addition, it would be great if you give on your website, any recommended readings for example, a source page with all books you reference in your works.

Thanks,

Carlos

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail and the interest.  Your acquaintance has completely misrepresented the letter of Pope Leo XIII on Americanism.  Pope Leo XIII teaches exactly the opposite of what your acquaintance said.  In the letter, Leo XIII expressly condemns modifying doctrine or its presentation to fit with the times.  In the following very interesting and important passage, we find a striking condemnation of what the entire Vatican II sect represents.

 

Pope Leo XIII, Testem Benevolentiae, Jan. 22, 1899: “The underlying principle of these new opinions is that, in order to more easily attract those who differ from her, the Church should shape her teachings more in accord with the spirit of the age and relax some of her ancient severity and make some concessions to new opinions. Many think that these concessions should be made not only in regard to ways of living, but even in regard to doctrines which belong to the deposit of the faith. They contend that it would be opportune, in order to gain those who differ from us, to omit certain points of her teaching which are of lesser importance, and to tone down the meaning which the Church has always attached to them. It does not need many words, beloved son, to prove the falsity of these ideas if the nature and origin of the doctrine which the Church proposes are recalled to mind. The Vatican Council says concerning this point: "For the doctrine of faith which God has revealed has not been proposed, like a philosophical invention to be perfected by human ingenuity, but has been delivered as a divine deposit to the Spouse of Christ to be faithfully kept and infallibly declared. Hence that meaning of the sacred dogmas is perpetually to be retained which our Holy Mother, the Church, has once declared, nor is that meaning ever to be departed from under the pretense or pretext of a deeper comprehension of them." —Constitutio de Fide Catholica, Chapter iv.

 

It’s also interesting that he reiterates the teaching of Vatican I on how dogmas are to be understood as they were once declared, condemning any departure from that understanding under the false name of a deeper one.

 

The V-2 homosexual problem

 

Subject: The homosexual problem in the seminaries and news that V-2 "priest" scandal as reporter films them at gay clubs

 

Dear MHFM,

When we used to go to the Vatican II church we met a very nice family who had befriended us.  They had a son who was very sincere in his calling to become a priest.  We had chosen this young man to become the Godfather to our baby boy who is now 19 years old.  There was much joy in the parish when he graduated high school because it was known that he would soon be attending a seminary in the U.S.  We were afraid for him having heard stories of the homosexual troubles in the seminaries and based on our experience with our liberal parish "priest" since he was the one who made the arrangements for which seminary the young man would be sent to.  We questioned the parents and tried to alert them but they were totally trusting of the "priest" and ended up in spiritual disaster. Before our son's Godfather was finished with his one year novitiate he was back home with his parents and was in seclusion and an emotional basket case.  He would not speak to his parents why he would not become a priest and what had happened to him at the seminary.  His family was heartbroken and worried for their son, especially because they received no explanations.  We left this parish soon afterwards and never found out what happened to him.  The family became distant and if we ever ran into them in public they wouldn't talk about him.  We eventually lost all touch with them. 

We also were friends with a woman who had a calling to become a Carmelite nun and lived a cloistered life in the U.S. for several years.  In the correspondence I enjoyed with her she would send us newsletters which carried photos of events of the lives of the nuns and it could clearly be seen that Mother Superior wore lipstick!  Later, it was said that Mother would leave the convent far too often.  My friend is now in the health care field somewhere and we have heard nothing from her or her family since shortly after she left the convent.

The face of our world could be literally changed by the faithful, prayerful observance of these loving servants of Christ, but the world as it is now will have none of it. My dear friends were not only spiritually starved but abused by those whom they trusted in this false church, the Novus Ordo Vatican II religion of the Antichrist.  The terrible scandal that the world sees of a church that pretends to be the Catholic Church is not only abusing children but takes… adults as well.

You did mention (in your astounding video series, the 3-in-1 DVD Second Edition of Why John Paul II Was Not the Pope) in the Final Edition segment on The Amazing Heresies of Paul VI that there was a mass exodus of religious and in Holland the seminaries were completely closed down and this was, I believe in the 60's and through the 70's. What horrors and abuse must be going on in the places that are operating today!  Perhaps the "new order" seminarian has to be brought low and through "sensitivity training" and to become better at "understanding" he ends up becoming effeminate and a homosexual.  Maybe this false church thinks that it would be better if the "new order" nun becomes "knowledgeable" in the ways of the world through the constant barrage of confusing, evil and terribly anti-christian books she is required to read in order to become "enlightened".

Our friends gave up their lives to receive Light from God and pray for the sins of the world, but rather, received error and "a song and a fiesta" as Dr. James Wardner so aptly puts it in his talk on your DVD -The Communist and Freemasonic Infiltration of the Catholic Church.  The devil tried to tear down the Church and has rebuilt his evil version of it in his own Satanic image, hating real men and real women, religious and lay persons because we are heirs to what he has lost. Catholic religious give the very best of themselves to God and this of course has received his wrath on so many levels, so much so that it is really hard for the ordinary person on the side-lines to comprehend. Any God-fearing person would have to take this into account with an honest look at the vast evidence you have presented us with, especially regarding Freemasonry and their utter hatred for the Catholic Church specifically…

You have laid it all on the line for the Honor of Christ and His Blessed Mother and for Christ's Church.  If anyone can't see that then they are the dishonest, "mean-spirited" foolish ones who will be like the unwise virgins (Matthew 25, 1-13) who didn't bring enough oil in their lamps and soon they will find themselves in an outer eternal darkness, totally unprepared for the reality that will be their lot for all eternity.   

Much Peace and Blessings,

Marie

 

MHFM: Those are very interesting stories.  Thank you for the e-mail.  This file pertains to some of your comments: The Seminaries of the Vatican II sect are unspeakable cesspools of homosexuality and heresy [PDF File]

 

Vatican

 

http://www.cleveland.com/religion/index.ssf/2010/07/vatican_sets_off_controversy_w.html

The vatican puts women priest controversy in same category as pedophile priests.  Why doesn't the vatican just say OK to women priests as they are so protestant anyway and loves the Angelicans and Episcopalians who have women ministers?  What is the difference?  Is this there way of staying "conservative'??  like we believe that one!

I am looking forward to part 2 on the Good Thief etc.  Excellent video!  God bless you.!

 

MHFM: Yes, as long as they reject women “priests,” the false conservatives don’t care if they deny the rest of the Catholic faith.

 

Columbus

 

Subject: Comment on the Knights of Columbus

 

Brothers,

 

I just looked through a picture book of the history of the Knights of Columbus. In this book the "knights" are attending the unveiling and dedication on Aug. 21, 1920 in France of a statue of Lafayette, which they also funded.

 

I found two brief comments regarding Lafayette:

 

There is no question that Lafayette was a freemason, for the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania received him with distinguished honours during his last visit to the USA, and the Grand Lodge of Tennessee made him an honorary member when Andrew Jackson, seventh USA president (1829-1836), introduced him to that Grand Lodge in 1825. Where he was made a freemason though, remains an unanswered question.

 

General Lafayette and General Washington shared not only a close friendship but membership in the Craft, a commonly used name for Freemasonry. On two occasions General Lafayette presented Masonic aprons to Washington (see Figure 4). One of these aprons, embroidered in colored silks by Madame Lafayette, bore the emblems of the Holy Royal Arch degree. The fact that this apron was especially made for George Washington has led to much speculation that he was raised to that degree. This may be of considerable importance, for the "Royal Arch degree is the salient, spiritual degree of Freemasonry, not excepting the degree of Master Mason" (Steinmetz, 1946, 67).

 

It seems almost incredible that the K of C back in 1918-1920 could not or did not know that Lafayette was a freemason. Or perhaps they did not care that he was a mason.

 

Sincerely,

 

Howard 

 

Circular

 

I have viewed your videos for about a year now, and first allow me to thank you for your efforts to educate the public. I only wish I had the time and skills to do the same. But I enjoyed much of your work and have sent links to your videos to friends.  However I do see a problem with your logic. You no doubt have heard of cyclical logic. It is present in the argument for evolution where they date a fossil by the surrounding layer, and they date the layer by the fossils contained within.

I feel you are using this kind of logic in your argument against the current Pope. If you claim the current pope is fallible by the infallibility of another pope, then you undermined the whole Church. For if the current pope is fallible, then so can the previous ones.

Now, we all know that they were some bad popes, ie Pope John XII.  I also know that the outcome of Vatican II was truly tragic in our history.  But, we are still here, and Benedict seems to be on the right tract.  Though we have been sick, we did not die.  Jesus said the gates of hell will not prevail" By claiming the current pope is anti pope, you call Jesus a liar and again, undermined the whole Church.  I welcome your arguments as I always want the truth.

 

Gdost…

 

MHFM: No, you are quite mistaken.  Your argument is actually circular and completely illogical.  Your argument assumes to be true (i.e., that Benedict XVI is a valid pope) exactly what you need to prove.  That’s called begging the question, a logical fallacy.  You can’t argue that he is the pope by assuming it’s true to begin with.  The argument that he is not the pope is not circular and it’s not illogical.  It’s completely logical.

 

Let’s begin from a point on which we can both agree.  The popes who presided over the Councils of Florence, Trent and Vatican I were true popes.  All professing Catholics agree with that position.  Therefore, operating from that basis and applying the teaching of those valid popes and the popes in between (such as Pope Paul IV), we are forced to conclude that a man who demonstrates public apostasy is not a legitimate successor of St. Peter.  That’s the teaching of the past popes we all claim to accept.  The rule, the teaching, the standard that was already laid down by popes whom we all agree were indisputably valid force us to conclude that Benedict XVI is not and could not have been elected a true pope.  It’s not a circular argument, but one that flows directly and inescapably from a premise that all professing Catholics accept.

 

The other part of your e-mail that’s extremely problematic is your (frankly) outrageous statement that Benedict XVI is on the right track.  Are you serious?  Have you watched this video or carefully consulted the material available on our website?  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z7qqqtXktQ  By obstinately asserting that Benedict XVI is the pope, you actually call Jesus a liar and deny the whole Catholic faith.

 

Solemn

 

Is there a solemn Magisterium pronouncement that today's independent Priests are in obedience to the Church (thus obedient to God) in today's crisis?   I'm aware of Quo Primum & St. Paul's clear instruction.   I'm asking for someone who has doubts & wants more.

Also; what Scripture can I refer a Prot. to showing that the old testament saints had to wait in Limbo till our Lord's Ascension?

Thanks,

jd

 

MHFM: Basically all of the independent priests deny Catholic dogma, especially Outside the Church There is No Salvation.  For that reason, they are not in obedience to the Church.  As far as how an independent priest can have jurisdiction to hear confessions and administer sacraments in this situation, please consult our article and audios on that issue.  Your question about the Old Testament saints is covered in our recent video: The Good Thief, the Old Testament Saints, and the Necessity of Baptism [new video]

 

Chris Brown

 

[MHFM: We post this as an example of the astounding idolatry of popular culture figures, and how they lead people to Hell.  We know very little about Chris Brown, but we do know that he is a pagan musical performer who is said to have demonic messages in his music.]

 

Hi I'm Lisa I need your help a singer name Chris Brown got arrested last year for beating up his girlfriend it was a singer name Rihanna and I need to know that what's an excellent prayer that you can say to the singer Chris Brown to make sure that he does not beat on the singer Rihanna again and that he becomes a better person,a changed man,to calm down his anger problems,that he treats women with respect,so they can go back to constantly playing his music and to also say that violence is not the answer to solve problems because I really care about the singer Chris Brown and I also need the singer Chris Brown to be safe at all times please help me.

 

LisaluvsChris…

 

MHFM: Chris Brown is a wicked pagan and you shouldn't want him to sing anymore.  You shouldn't say you love him.  You need to convert to the Catholic faith.  It's necessary to avoid hell.

 

[HER RESPONSE]:

 

excuse me no you didn't just say to me that I shouldn't love him how dare you say that to me I'm allowed to love Chris Brown and listen to his music when ever I want and you can't tell when I can listen to his music you are not the boss of me I'm allowed to love Chris Brown and listen to his music whenever I want and you can't stop and when he comes back out again I'm going to listen to his music forever and ever and ever you should apologize to me because that wasn't very nice to me you hurt my feelings I love Chris Brown alot he's a handsome man and he's an excellent singer and no Chris Brown is not a wicked pagan  he was just angry that's all.

 

MHFM: Yes, it appears that you will be listening to Chris Brown’s music forever and ever in the pits of Hell.

 

Re-uploaded - explanation

 

MHFM: About two days ago, we posted our video discussion of the DVDs Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution.  However, the video was not playing smoothly for people.  It was stalling throughout making listening to it very difficult.  We thought it might be a problem on our end, so we decided to re-upload the video after it had been up for about 5 hours.  We also deleted the first version.  However, the same problem occurred.  We then suspected that Youtube might be automatically or deliberately slowing the video because it had an anti-evolution title.  So, we re-uploaded it again and decided to remove the anti-evolution title.  We called it “Astounding Creatures,” and now it’s playing smoothly!!!  Here’s the video for those who tried to listen but couldn’t:

 

Our recent video was not playing for people - it was re-uploaded with a different title and now it's playing smoothly [video]

Click here to play it

 

Here’s the previous video, with the anti-evolution title, that stalls repeatedly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB__MD9iAI8

 

Here are just a few clips from the actual DVDs:

 

Birds

Beetle

Woodpecker

Dragonfly

Giraffe

Chicken

Bee

 

Absurd

 

Dear MHFM,

Great work on those new points on the Good Thief.  I believe you when you said that you receive this Good Thief objection perhaps more than any other objection because I, and probably all true Catholics who have dealt with people on this topic, have encounter this same objection.  The illogical sense of these people is very disturbing.  It's also interesting that about a year ago, I was talking with this Protestant and he didn't believe in that necessity of water baptism, so he brought up the argument of the Good Thief.  Lucky for me, I remember that I had studied that topic about a few weeks prior before meeting this Protestant.  Well... if this is a Protestant who doesn't believe water baptism is necessary for salvation, wouldn't that make, in some way, Baptism of Desire/Blood advocates also Protestants since they are protesting against the dogmatically defined dogma that WATER BAPTISM is absolutely necessary for salvation (de fide, John 3:5, Council of Trent "AS IT IS WRITTEN [John 3:5]" and its Canons on Baptism, Pope Eugene's bull "Exultate Deo", etc.)?  In a sense, it could be said that, but obviously in a different degree.  All in all, they're all heretics who reject the absolutely necessity of water baptism for salvation.  It's very interesting that when it comes to this topic, Protestants, false "Traditionalists", and Novus Ordites alike AGREE ON THE SAME ABSURD ARGUMENT: "The Good Thief wasn't baptized and he went to paradise."…


As always, thank you very much for your work.  If it wasn't for your material, I wouldn't have known what it meant to be a Traditional Catholic.

Jesus and Mary always protect your Monastery.

Sincerely,

 

Bernardo

 

Information

 

Dear Brothers:

 

I truly do appreciate the wonderful information you post on your vast informational website and also think it is great that you are doing your information in Spanish as well.  However, I would REALLY appreciate if you could give "options" on your numerous videos and make them available to the hearing impaired population via closed captioning or even to give an option to "read" what the video is about.  I get SO disappointed when you make videos and leave us no options to catch the "news" you are reporting about.  The vast number of deaf and hard of hearing population in the US today would certainly appreciate the gesture as well, I'm sure! 

 

God Bless You MHFM!

 

Sincerely,

JC

 

Baptism

 

Wonderful work on the new baptism video, looking forward to part 2… and thanks for explaining more fully the meaning of the Old Testament Just arising from their graves upon the huge earthquake as Christ died and the curtain in the temple was rent----always wondered what that meant I think your explanation makes a lot of sense.

 

Knights

 

Dear Brother Michael and Brother Peter,

 

I'm no defender of the Knights of Columbus, especially with this push to canonize their founder Michael J. McGiveney. However, I need to ask why you didn't comment on the part of that recent e-mail where the writer stated that their pledge of allegiance included a part for abortion. I was a member of a Right to Life group and we always inserted that part "born and unborn", in our "Pledge of Allegiance" recital, (at every meeting), as a rememberance against abortion,(not for abortion). You should have taken issue with that comment. Thanks for all your efforts. God Bless you in all your work.

 

                                                                    C. Peyton

 

MHFM: We didn’t comment, and had no obligation to do so, because it wasn’t clear to us what he meant by that particular statement or what went on at the particular meeting he was referring to.  If we knew he was misrepresenting something, then we would have commented.  Whatever he meant by that statement, it was not the focus of his larger e-mail, which primarily concerned the secretive nature of the group and the skull & bones on the table.  We obviously post many e-mails which promote discussion, and we do not necessarily agree with everything in a reader’s comments. 

 

Facts

 

I just saw the new video on The good thief, the old testament saints and the necessity of baptism, simply amazing, the divine insight that the Triune God gives you is astounding!  Putting aside the glaring facts that are brought up before the atomic coma, it’s just incredible how a little coma can obliterate these obstinate people.  This should prove to people that the simplest truths and insights of God are infinitely powerful!  

 

Todd

 

Hail Mary, interesting

 

Subject: possible power of Hail Mary

 

MHFM,

 

I wanted to share a story with you about what happened to me at work today. I am a police officer and today something very different happened to me.  I was going to a radio call for a naked man on the street bothering people.  I saw the man that was naked and noticed he had an evil look in his eye and was extremely confused. 

 

After he was apprehended by myself we were driving to my HQ to do the arrest paperwork.  He started cursing at me and cursing my family, which he has never met before.  He did this for about 5 minutes straight and me being foolish bought into his comments and starting saying bad things back to him.

 

This enraged him and made him even more intrusive in his words. At one point i looked back in my rear view mirror and his face was 1 inch from the glass that protects me from him and his eyes were as wide as they could go, and one word popped in my head "DEMONIC". At this point i decided to change my approach.  I decided to make satan angry and started saying two Hail Mary's out loud and told him to join me.  Needless to say he did not join me, but a complete calmness came over him and he just sat back and actually looked like he was at peace. Right then and there i felt something different happen and i really can’t explain it, but it was nice.

 

As soon as i stopped the Hail Marys he started right back up again. I felt that him doing that was proof that the Hail Mary helped intervene in that car ride. If i never read the secret of the rosary, i never would have done that.

 

Thank You for helping me save my soul

Joe 

 

Vatican II

 

Hello, Brothers,


I was listening to your debate with the Vatican II zealot… As you said he confuses it in a fog. Having a spirit of the devil, these apostate Catholics will play with words, confuse all in their ambiguous formulas, because they are 'flavorless salt.'… In 1990 I was invited to France for Vatican II document courses (I used to be a Christian program redactor in State TV , Armenia, USSR), and during retreats they taught us OPENLY and CLEARLY- that all which is connected to pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic Church is wrong- dogma, doctrine, ritual, that the real Catholic Church is started from Vatican II. To my question why then all these great saints could reach perfection, if they were in erroneous church, they did not have an answer. I was stunned seeing these 'Catholics' who were bitter, fake, without essence...

 

JPII has a book 'Crossing the Threshold of hope'- where he clearly exposes his teaching, that he is not a Vicar, all bishops are equals, same way all Christians are Christ. And when he for pure formality indicates something dogmatic, like penance and redemption- every time he says 'Church says...'   That is the Devil.
Absolutely… by God we will remain faithful to Christ to the end.

 

Woodya…

 

Clear

 

Subject: it isn’t just NO ‘Catholics’

 

It is clear that the N.O. religious, etc., are heretics & apostates, and they have brought more Protestants into the stew, as well.  Since JP2's ecu-mania, a former friend of mine from Protestant days, who always longed for the Mass, the Rosary & other Catholic essentials, has found the perfect solution.  She continues to be a Protestant minister & preaches to her congregations, but goes to the Benedictines in Twin Falls, ID for her "Catholic fix" [if you will].  

 

I have told her it was sacrilege for a Protestant to receive the Eucharist [which the NOs don't have, but the action of the two parties involved - are sacriligeous by INTENT].  I've shown her relevant documents.  Eventually, a friendship of 30+ years was dissolved.  I could not be party to this, even to being associated with her.

She is also an adulteress who doesn't have the Holy Sacrament of Confession.  Nothing to ease her conscience... no way to feel peace.  I am not defaming her, either, for she lived in public concubinage before her "marriage" to the man who has recently died.  All the while, she continued as pastor of 2 churches.  Her former husband, a Prot pastor, as well, was on his 2nd marriage when he married her &, upon their divorce, married again.  He, too, is actively ministering to his congregation.

When he decided to remarry, I who was in error in my adherence to protestant teaching, at the time, still dug up Catholic dogma & documents to show him that you cannot marry three times w/ your spouse still living, but that it was a form of serial polygamy.  He didn't speak to me for 30 yrs. & that has not been a problem for me, at all! 
There's more & it's worse for it affects their adopted children, etc.  Error breeds error.  I have seen this pattern become more & more prevalent in 'mainline protestant churches' & that is exactly where the NO is going.  They set everyone up with their homosexual "clergy" & will "solve" the problem w/ married clergy and with women priests & with husband & wife clergy teams.  It's all been done before & that is the road which the putative 'Catholic' church is treading. 

 

Jennifer Hill

 

Modernists

 

Subject: Benedict XVI - antipope

 

St. Pius X said it best, "No venerable brethen...the city of the world shall not be built otherwise than as God has built it.  Society shall not be set up unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work...It has only to be set up and restored continually against the unremitting attacks of insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants..."  The insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants clearly point to antipope Benedict and his Modernist/end of time thugs in Rome under the aegis of a false Vatican II council whose rotten walls are crumbling before them.  St. Michael, Most Powerful Angel of the Lord, avenge us, we pray most fervently!

 

Dea…

 

Heresy Spill

 

Subject: Benedict XVI’s Massive Heresy Spill Disaster

 

Regarding your excellent article on Benedict XVI's recent Heresies against the Catholic Church and the Benedict XVI’s Massive Heresy Spill Disaster.

Unfortunately Benedict XVI is just following the edict of JPII's Decologue of Assisi, the "ten commandments" of the antichrist.  When you read and actually see something like this, what comes out of Benedict's mouth and it is accepted, it hurts to see that this is the exact same spirit that pervades even the so-called traditional Catholics who still hold that he is the pope.  Why can't they see this?  What will it take for them to remove the scales from their eyes?  When John Paul II is finally "beatified" and they accept this, it will be a huge slap in the face of Our Lord.  When this happens we will know exactly where anyone who claims to be Catholic stands and there will be no turning back for them. The battle lines will be clearly marked. God knows how to defend His own and punish His enemies. For our part, as you so often have reminded us, we need to hold tightly to this Holy Faith we profess, show charity by helping those we can to see the truth as you have done and pray our Rosary during this and other coming manifestations of Our Lord's plan.

A

 

Evilution

 

Subject: Evilution

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for the video detailing some examples from the DVDs of amazing animals in God's creation which destroy evolution. The truth is that evolution contains the seeds of its own destruction. It is a peculiar characteristic of information that facts are self-sustaining, whereas lies are self-destructive. Evolution is a lie. At its core, the motivating principle of evolution is survival (of the fittest). If an evolutionist were asked to explain why people lie, then he would reply that it is a survival instinct. So, according to evolutionists, lying is necessary, and so, it doesn't really matter to them whether evolution itself is true or false – so long as it “survives” then it has value (in the evolutionist's mind). But therein lies the contradiction. Once an evolutionist has embraced the principle of survival at all costs, then he is trapped in an unending quest to perpetuate that very myth (survival at all costs), and in doing so, according to the same myth, it is necessary to lie and dodge the truth. A creationist on the other hand, knows that God is the beginning and source of all truth and creation, and so knows that everything begins and ends with God. The fact is that, for an evolutionist, the truth of the “theory” is not so important as how long the theory can “survive.” However, the theory of evolution must constantly mutate or “evolve,” in order to survive, which proves that evolution is already dead. Modernism, the synthesis of all heresies, is founded on the false theory of evolution:

 

Pascendi, Pope St. Pius X - “In this way they pass to what is practically their principal doctrine, namely, evolution. To the laws of evolution everything is subject under penalty of death -- dogma, Church, worship, the Books we revere as sacred, even faith itself.”

 

Evolution is Antichrist, and was the first step towards the denial of the dogma, outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and of the absolute necessity of water baptism and the Catholic faith for salvation. Thus, evolution created the Antichrist Vatican II Great Apostasy, which will eventually destroy itself too.

 

1 Corinthians 10:12 - Wherefore he that thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall.

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Comment

 

Subject: “Sai Baba”

 

This whole "Sai Baba" thing is nauseating---it is amazing HOW MANY stupid Westerners FALL for this gargage-amungo --just because it is (supposedly) from "the East!"  I think this may in part happen because the V2 sect has nothing to offer and particularly young people can sense the emptiness of it and look elsewhere for God then again when you had the anti-christ anti-pope JPII aka "Mr.  Katz" sporting around Assisi and the whole world with every imaginable religious abominationist…

 

 I went through this as a youth, when I was doing my Jr. Year abroad at U. Edinburgh,  Scotland studying history.  I was a radical liberal at the time, an animal-rights activist,  ardent "vegan" vegetarian,  the whole nine.  A "nun" from one "Throssel Hole Priory" a "zen" Buddhist monastery in Northumberland England came to speak to our University Buddhist society (to which I belonged).  I ended up spending lots of time there and even planned to stay there permanently and become a "nun" there -- I had moved in (my family FREAKED!!) and the thing I like there was the absolute SILENCE at all times (and the vegetarian food!)-----but one day they had me reading/studying their "sutras" and then kept telling me "all else is heresy, all else is heresy" which I guess the tiny flicker of the Holy Spirit still remaining in my darkened soul reacted to cause I just KNEW this was wrong,  it was NOT TRUE,   they were definitely wrong (course at the time, 1985 I had NO IDEA who was "right") anyway I ran away immediately and GOT OUT OF THERE!  People fall for this stuff maybe because they are already in a grave state of mortal sin and the truth is NOT easy to find, at least, it was not, for me.  We still know people like this.  I give them your literature/DVDs.  Please pray for me.

 

Videos

 

Dear Brothers:

 

This weekend I viewed all six of the new videos you offer; I highly recommend them.  I always knew there were no proofs for the fake science of evolution, but I did not realize how many specific empirical proofs there are for Creation - including the scientific proof that the universe had a beginning.  These videos really help to demonstrate the enormity of the lie that has been foisted on mankind in the name of science and education.

 

As the Creation Scientists (true scientists) point out, nature (from the lowest cell on up) is characterized by a complexity of interrelated parts and procedures -- and that the removal of just one of these parts would make the organism nonexistent.  These scientists have named this all-or-nothing principle "irreducible complexity."

 

It occurred to me that as God reveals indirectly through nature, so He reveals directly in what we call Divine Revelation or the Deposit of Faith.  The Catholic Church has been teaching the principle of irreducible complexity since She was founded.  Only instead of calling it irreducible complexity, Holy Mother Church has simply termed it "whole and inviolate."

 

Wonderful videos.  Thank you for making them available.

 

Lee Ann

 

Questions

 

Dear Brothers,
                  

I have been told that concerning baptism of desire:
 

If someone really desires to be baptised, yet dies before receiving the sacrement of baptism, as he is part of the Soul of the Church (not its Body), he can be saved.  Is this heretic ?
 
Also, If a martyr dies for Christ but didn't received the baptism of water, can he be saved ?

 

Austin…

 

MHFM: What you have been told is wrong.  Those issues are specifically addressed (separate sections are even dedicated to them) in: Outside the Catholic Church There is No Salvation [link to section and book].  A man can’t be saved without water baptism, even if he claims to die in the name of Christ.  If someone of good will intended to die for Christ, he would be brought to water baptism prior to death.  The idea that one can be saved who is part of the “soul” of the Church, but not part of the body (which only comes with water baptism), is definitely contrary to Catholic teaching.  It has been dogmatically defined that one must belong to the body of the Church to be saved, and that the Church itself is a body.  Moreover, the idea that one can be part of the “soul” of the Church without belonging to her body has been specifically condemned.  There is much more information on both of your questions in the section that is linked to above.  We strongly encourage you to obtain an actual copy of the book.  It’s included in our larger special package and it can be obtained separately.

 

Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 10), Jan. 6, 1928: “For since the mystical body of Christ, in the same manner as His physical body, is one, compacted and fitly joined together, it were foolish and out of place to say that the mystical body is made up of members which are disunited and scattered abroad: whosoever therefore is not united with the body is no member of it, neither is he in communion with Christ its head.”

 

Prayer

 

May the sacred Heart of Jesus be adored, glorified, loved: preserved throughout the world now and forever. Sacred heart of Jesus have mercy on us. St. Jude worker of miracles pray for us. St. Jude help of the hopeless pray for us. Say this prayer 9 times a day; by the eighth day your prayer will be answered. Say it for 9 days. It has never been known to fail. Publication must be promised.

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Can you post this prayer, I said it and my prayer came true on the 8th day… 

 

Thanks –Steve

 

India

 

Subject: India

 

Dear MHFM,

   Last week I met a person who just returned from India this year. He had spent about a year living at a guru's ashram--in this case, the living quarters of a guru named Sri Sathya Sai Baba. This person indicated that he would have much to say about his experience with Sai Baba. This false prophet is teaching that with love man is God, God has many different names, and all religions are true. This reminded me of John Paul II preaching the doctrine of antichrist and religious indifferentism.

   I gave this individual The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church and explained the Essential Mysteries of the Catholic religion, the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation. I told him he must believe those Mysteries and accept all the teachings of the Catholic Church. I explained the absolute necessity of water baptism in the name of the Holy Trinity. I told him he needed baptism because it is the only way one gets the Catholic faith, and one must hold the Catholic faith and be in a state of grace in order to be saved when one dies. I told him he would have to have the desire for the Catholic faith, specifically ask for baptism, and actually receive it in order to have a chance at being saved. I also told him anyone could validly baptize as long as moving water strikes the forehead and the name of the Holy Trinity is invoked.

   I said I would be willing to baptize him if he would reject the Sai Baba organization (and all other false religions), express his desire for the Catholic faith, express his desire to not compromise the Catholic faith, and ask for the Sacrament. I met him again yesterday, and he showed me a book he had: A Catholic Priest Meets Sai Baba by Mario Mazzoleni. I went through the book with him pointing out passages which proved that the author was not Catholic and did not know what the Church teaches.

   He asked me who Sai Baba really was and what he was really doing. I told him Sai Baba was an agent of the devil, someone the devil was using to spread false doctrines and ideas about religion. I recounted the Genesis narrative of the fall of Adam and Eve emphasizing how the serpent (the devil) had lied to Eve when he told her she would become like God if she ate the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. I made it clear that Sai Baba was trying to deceive people (bad willed people) into thinking they can become like God if they follow Sai Baba. These people are being lured away from investigating the one true faith of Jesus Christ and His one, true Church on earth.

   This person does not have easy access to the internet and has not yet seen vaticancatholic.com although I did inform him of it. He said he would try to get to the library to see the site.  God bless the work of Most Holy Family Monastery.

Sincerely,
TD

 

On Mars

 

I read the e-exchange of S about Mars and did a search… and found three places where it talks about a blood moon {red}, Joel 2:31, Acts of Apostles 2:20 and Apocalypse 6:12… Mars would explain a blood moon being it is red in color. 

 

Todd

 

Evolution

 

Brothers,

 

What a shame it is to read about all those that visit your site (Mr. Anderson) and not recognize the truth of the Catholic Faith. The following bible verses remind me of all those that have come to your site and have reognized the truth, the true faith, Jesus Christ.  Genesis 18:1-5.  "And the Lord appeared to him in the vale of Mambre as he was sitting at the door of his tent, in the very heat of the day. And when he had lifted up his eyes, there appeared to him three men standing near him: and as soon as he saw them he ran to meet them from the door of his tent, and adored down to the ground. And he said: Lord, if I have found favour in thy sight, pass not away from thy servant: But I will fetch a little water, and wash ye your feet, and rest ye under the tree. And I will set a morsel of bread, and strengthen ye your heart, afterwards you shall pass on: for therefore are you come aside to your servant. And they said: Do as thou hast spoken.

Also, I'm enjoying the series of DVD's on refuting Evolution. It's Clear that the "Devil was in the details" when Darwin, with his limited biological machines tied to refute God. Amazing, is how after some 600 modern scientists and professors have signed an affidavit renouncing Darwin's Theory, and thanks to the mainstream media, his theories are still in the school's textbooks and being taught today.  Darwin's tree of life is ridiculous, to think that over time, all the little intricate parts of a cell gradually formed into the workings of a cell. His theory refutes itself, as without the entire parts of the cell, the cell would die off and be non-existent to begin with.  His theory, more than anything shows how certain life-forms were destroyed, not how life is created.

God Bless You,
Tom Miles

 

E-mail

 

Subject: Reddy’s e-mail

 

Dear Mhfm

Just wanted to add a few quick points to Reddy.

"I also dont see how a small campfire that only looks like a photo of JP II can be associted with calling fire down from heaven."

People have said the same thing to me. Or they say it didn't fall from Heaven. But I think you got to look at it the way the Novus Ordo does for a spilt second. Some sedevacantists use the picture to say it shows John Paul II is in hell. But novus ordo "catholics" say it was John Paul II giving a blessing from HEAVEN. Therefore they look at it as if it was fire coming down from Heaven in their sight.

As far as Antipope John Paul II being antichrist the work the Dimonds have done makes it quite clear. Another point to consider would be if an antipope is somebody who claims to be pope but is not. A true pope is Christ's vicar on earth. So if an antipope is someone who claims to be pope but is not, then antichrist will claim to be christ or put man in place of Christ. What better way for antichrist to fool people then claim to be Christ's vicar on earth. I think it makes perfect sense that it would be an antipope. The work the Dimonds have done is the final nail in the coffin… If there was a true pope this apostasy would not be as bad as he would lead people the right way the only way which is the Catholic way and therefore Christ's way. However you had the Antichrist JP2 teach that every way leads to God doesn't matter what you are Hindu, Muslim, protestants every religion under the sun was true in some way according to him.

"BY THEIR FRUITS YOU SHALL KNOW THEM"

I ask what are the fruits of Vatican II?

Here’s the horrible answer: http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/29_Figures.pdf

God Bless

Sean

 

Former Knight

 

Dear Brothers,

I just read the letter from the lady whose husband quit the Knights of Columbus. First off thank you MHFM for showing us light in this world of darkness.  Congratulations for leaving the KoC.  I will expose why the meetings are secret.  There are 4 degrees before you can become a full fledged Member of KoC.  After the member has received the first 3 degrees the 4th Degree is the Big One.  Mine was done in a “Catholic” church where I was a member.  It was done in a secret Room hidden way in the back of the church.  There were no Services and the church was empty and locked. I had been researching the KoC before I would make that life long commitment. The Holy Spirit I believed had shown me via the internet that there were Masons in the Executive leaders and members. I knew something was wrong.

Then they wanted us to change the words of the Pledge of Allegiance. At the end of reciting it ,With liberty and justice for all, "born or unborn" I was not going to praise abortion with them.  As a Veteran this also bothered me.  Something was wrong.  So the big day comes and we all quickly walk through the passage ways and halls and enter the room.
There were many men there in KoC costumes or uniforms and a few others wearing nice suits and ties.  We enter this dark room and in the center of the table there is a human sized, "Skull and Bones" The 2 bones were crossed in a X.I asked what is this? They said that what was going to happen today in this meeting must remain Secret for the rest of my life.  I could never tell anybody.  Well no thank you.  Me and my Guardian Angel, Ralphie boy left and never went back.  Praise GOD from whom all blessings flow.  As far as the other problem of them never stopping the mail to you.  Insurance is one of their largest money makers. And you know they offered it to you.  Just put on the envelopes that their computer will send you these few words: “REFUSED and also RETURN TO SENDER.”  The computer will stop when they are losing money through the postage they are spending.

GOD Bless

X knight

 

MHFM: Wow, that’s a very interesting e-mail – a skull and bones on the table.  Combined with the secretive nature of the group, those facts demonstrate that it’s semi-Freemasonic.  Obviously, no Catholic should have anything to do with it.

 

Mars

 

Dear bros.   

 

Read recently there's something big happening with the planet Mars in august, it's being drawn really close to earth by Jupiters gravitational pull. It says it will be as big as the moon to the naked eye. It says that they don't know if it's ever happened before or will again.

 

Question is; with everything that's been going on, that is with the Church, earth quakes, flooding, etc, is there anything biblical about this??

 

S

 

Abstinence

 

Your page on the rules of fasting and abstinence says that it is forbidden to eat meat on a Friday only on days of complete abstinence, that you can eat only 1 meal with meat on days of partial abstinence.

So when is it a day of complete abstinence, and when is it partial? Your calendar doesn't specify that. All Fridays only say "Abstinence", they don´t say whether it's complete or partial

 

MHFM: “Abstinence” always means complete abstinence.  Days of fast are always days of at least partial abstinence.  Therefore, if it’s listed as a day of fast, but not of abstinence, it’s still a day of partial abstinence.

 

Reviewing

 

I've been reviewing the information on your site about the Latin rite Mass comparison to the Novus Ordo.

I was told by a priest that one is to believe the Novus Ordo is valid, promulgated and approved by the Holy See.  He was a priest who also celebrated the Latin Mass.

In all your writings, have you any information concerning the Fraternity of Saint Peter order of priests?

 

Id…

 

MHFM: The fact that a priest celebrates the Latin Mass doesn’t mean he’s a true Catholic or that he will give you sound advice.  The priest who said that the New Mass is valid is completely wrong.  Please consult our material on that issue.  The Fraternity of St. Peter is a heretical order of “priests” in full union with the Vatican II sect.  They accept the heresies of Vatican II, the New Mass, false ecumenism, salvation outside the Church, etc.  They are also ordained by “bishops” who were themselves ordained in Paul VI’s new doubtful rite of Episcopal Consecration.  That means that the “priests” of the Fraternity of St. Peter, who were ordained by such bishops, cannot be considered valid priests.  See our section on the Vatican II Counter Church for the article on the new invalid liturgical rites of Paul VI.  See our section on Vatican II and Benedict XVI’s heresies for all the heresies that the FSSP swallows while falsely claiming to hold the Catholic faith. 

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

In regards to the person who called you the antichrist I would just like to say that those who attack your work obviously can't stand the truth. I believe their troubled conscience eats away at them like a gnawing worm. For if they loved the truth, which is found only within the true Catholic religion, they would be… thanking God for what your monastery has done to witness to the truth. They can't stand the fact that few are saved, that other religions and "Christian" denominations are demonic. They can't stand the fact that they would have to put in some effort to save their souls, therefore, these pitiful heretics attack you and what you stand for.

 

Proverbs 17:15: He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous, Both of them alike are an abomination to the LORD.

 

Alpha…

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.

 

World End? series

 

Hello

I am finding your "Is the world about to end?" series interesting and informative but when it came to part 5.. I started getting confused. I have a few questions and I hope you can help me better understand so I can continue viewing your series without confusion.

I understand clearly the EU being the beast and that which is which was not. I understand the kings or emperors being the popes since Vatican City became its own little kingdom.. but.. If the Vatican is separate from or not a part of the EU than how can it's emperors/kings/popes be interchangeable with the beast if they are not physically part of the beast? Also.. How can Pope Jon Paul II 1981 wounding by gunshots be the wounded head of the beast? The beast did not form until 1993, so the beasts' head could not be wounded at the time because it didnt emerge yet, a beast would have to already been emerged to be struck. Going back to my first question I still dont see how JP II can be the head of the beast when the Vatican is separate from the beast. It seems the creator or head of the EU would be the head of the beast.

I also dont see how a small campfire that only looks like a photo of JP II can be associted with calling fire down from heaven.

I do see the grave mistake should there be a canonizing of JP II because I believe he was very worldly and far too liberal of a pope and that many things he did were going against Christs' church, I also agree as do many that he twisted the 3rd Fatima secret.

I understand the damage caused by the liberal Vatican II and it is paramount in my life to remain in the true Catholic Church: Christ's church. I try to educate myself on the true faith as much as possible realizing that no one person has all the answers but I do want to understand any valuable points they are making.

Thank you for your videos. It is refreshing to hear a presentation on the Apocalypse from a Catholic perspective.

God Bless,
Reddy

 

MHFM: The first part of your question is addressed in detail in Part 7 of Is the World about to End?  Perhaps you didn’t get to that part?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3YCnraGes0 St. John is not only describing the political entity, but Europe (Europa) as one big ecclesiastical whore.  Thus, the spiritual center of Europe (Rome) is inextricably bound up with the beast; for the beast is not merely a political organization but apostate Europe as a whole.  That’s why Apocalypse 17 says that the city of seven hills is riding on the beast, and it specifically connects the seven kings affiliated with Rome to that dominion.  The spiritual entity and the political organization flow together.  In fact, the spiritual reality of the new godless Europe is the most important thing to God and to St. John.  That’s why the kings in Rome, the antipopes who become the active heads of the beast (kings 6 & 7), are truly said to be heads of the beast.  They were/are the guiding forces of the new godless Europe, which simultaneously possesses a political formation in the European Union (Empire). 

 

With regard to how John Paul II’s wounding could be a wounding of a head of the beast since the EU didn’t come into existence until 1993, there are a few points to consider.  First, the Bible says that St. John saw one of the heads of the beast wounded and he recovered.  If, at any point, John Paul II became a head of the beast, as we believe, then this indeed happened.  He (a head of the beast) was wounded and recovered.  It doesn’t say when that wounding occurred.  Moreover, St. John describes the wounding, the recovery and the subsequent adoration at the behest of the second beast in one stream.  He is describing the entire period.  Thus, if all of these things are predicated of the man who eventually becomes the head of the beast, it is true to say that all of it happened to the head of the beast.  You are, in our view, inaccurately and unnecessarily splitting hairs. 

 

For example, in Apocalypse 18:4, God says to those who are in the great harlot: “And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues.”  If the harlot is a false Church, as the evidence indicates, then why is God describing its members as “my people”?  He isn’t necessarily saying that, but rather could be referring to those who were His people but who are entrapped in the false Church.  He could also be referring to people who are entrapped in the false Church but who will become His people.  He could be referring to them as “my people” from the eternal present point of view, that they will eventually be His people by coming out of the harlot.  In the same way, in John 2, Jesus turned water into wine; yet it is said: “And when the chief steward had tasted the water made wine, and knew not whence it was, but the waiters knew who had drawn the water; the chief steward calleth the bridegroom.”  It is called “water” by the sacred word, even though it is no longer water.  One could, as you are trying to do, split hairs and say: that’s not accurate: it should say wine that was formerly water because it’s no longer water…

 

Obviously people can hold different opinions on the Antichrist; but if you don’t see how John Paul II could be significant enough to be the antichrist, then you misunderstand what is important to God.  The rest of the non-Catholic world is already on the path to Hell.  What matters is God’s Church and those who claim to be part of it.  John Paul II was the culmination of evil and apostasy.  He overthrew the entire Gospel and every Catholic dogma with calculation and completeness.  His “canonization” will be the ultimate insult to God.  It makes complete sense that he was the guy.  This is especially true when we consider what he was preaching, how it fits with the other prophecies, and how the false conservatives in the Vatican II Church would come to worship him by virtue of their attachment to Antipope Benedict XVI.

 

Thoughts

 

I was just wondering what your thoughts were about Our Lady of the Roses in Bayside New York. I've seen many of your videos on youtube. You have very interesting beliefs. I have no wish to debate on any matters, I just want to know if you believe in these apparitions or not. Thank you for your time.
 
Matthew

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  We do not believe in them.  We have a section on Bayside which demonstrates that the apparitions are definitely false: The False Apparitions at Bayside, NY [PDF File].

 

Brainwashing

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Boy, the devil has sure 'dupped' these clueless N.O. Vatican II apostates ... there is so much one could say about people like '"catholic" Karl' .. the brainwashing has been so successful that his comments only want one to, for a better expression ... 'papa uniform kilo echo'

I had a similar experience with one of these people, a few brief years back, he having denied the Church's teaching on salvation; this supposedly conservative, pious individual, as his parting shot, said, " I will pray for you." - meaning that his prayers were for my return to the vomit of the novus ordo sect.   I replied, " Don't bother, it won't work, I can assure you of that!".

 

God bless,

 

David

 

Papacy

 

Subject: Papacy

 

Dear Brothers,

The man who wrote in telling you to repent, Karl Anderson, needs to realize that, "The Church in respect of its unity belongs to the category of things indivisible by nature, though heretics try to divide it into many parts...” (Satis Cognitum, Pope Leo XIII), and that we should, “bear in mind what was promised about the holy church and him who said that the gates of hell will not prevail against it (by these we understand the death-dealing tongues of heretics)” (Second Council of Constantinople, Pope Vigilius), because, “not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy,” (Mystici Coporis Christi, Pope Pius XII), and that, “In this way, by unity with the Roman pontiff in communion and in profession of the same faith , the church of Christ becomes one flock under one supreme shepherd” (Vatican I, Pope Pius IX). So, Benedict XVI is not a pope because he wants a Church without a supreme head – a pope – which is why he believes and teaches that schismatics, such as the “Orthodox” and the Anglicans, who reject the uniting principle of the Church, i.e. the Papacy, are actually members of the Church, when they are not. Benedict XVI is a schismatic and works feverishly to scatter Christ's sheep (Matt. 12:30). 

Vatican I, Pope Pius IX - “So, then, if anyone says that the Roman pontiff has merely an office of supervision and guidance, and not the full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the whole church, and this not only in matters of faith and morals, but also in those which concern the discipline and government of the church dispersed throughout the whole world; or that he has only the principal part, but not the absolute fullness, of this supreme power; or that this power of his is not ordinary and immediate both over all and each of the churches and over all and each of the pastors and faithful: let him be anathema.”

Karl Anderson's sorrow arises from him being in a state of mortal sin because he's outside the Catholic Church and thus separated from Her Unity of faith. It's the pain of loss – the pain of separation from Jesus Christ. It should come as no surprise to such heretics that they are confused since they believe the Church has more than one head: “Nor against this may one argue that the primacy of jurisdiction established in the Church gives such a Mystical Body two heads. For Peter in virtue of his primacy is only Christ's Vicar; so that there is only one chief Head of this Body, namely Christ, who never ceases Himself to guide the Church invisible, though at the same time He rules it visibly, through him who is His representative on earth” (Mystici Corporis Christi, Pope Pius XII).

So, even though there is no visible head of the Catholic Church today (nor for the last 50+ years), Jesus Christ never ceases to be its invisible head.

God Bless,

Chris White

 

Union

 

Subject: Union

 

Dear Brothers:

 

I would like to ask Karl Anderson - and all the other "must be in union with the pope" people:  1)  Do you know what it means to be "in union with the pope"?  2)  Do you think men claiming to be popes must be in union with all other popes beginning with St. Peter?  3)  Do you know what an Antipope is, and how many there have been in the history of the Catholic Church?  4)  Are Catholics supposed to be in union with Anti-popes?  Above all, do you understand that the Papacy was founded to preserve the deposit of Faith?

 

And since Karl mentioned Our Lady, I would remind him that the only words of Our Lady recorded in Scripture (other than the Magnificat) that I am aware of are:  do whatever He tells you.  Therefore, I would also ask Karl:  can a man be a pope if he contradicts or distorts the words of Our Lord (or the teachings of His Apostles), or otherwise renders their teachings meaningless?  Can a man be a pope if he denies the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture?

 

The most bizarre and frightening characteristic of all false versions of Christianity (whether Protestant, Schismatic, or V-2 Catholic) is that words have no meaning.  How many "Catholics" will readily nod their heads in agreement when you mention "dogma" or "heresy" - but actually embrace heresy and refuse to consider anyone a heretic!  The loss of the horror of heresy among Catholics (or the love of the lie) is the essence of the Great Apostasy…

 

Lee Ann

 

New Items

 

MHFM: We are offering some extremely important new DVDs for sale at our online store.  These are some of the best DVDs we have seen, and they are definitely worth obtaining.  Click on the links for descriptions and pricing information.

 

Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution - 1 - $15.00

Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution - 2 – $15.00

Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution - 3 - $15.00

The Privileged Planet - $3.00

The Case for a Creator - $3.00

Intelligent Design - Unlocking the Mystery of Life - $3.00
 

Our video, Is the World about to End?, is also now on DVD and available for order.  Note: it’s available for order, but it will not be available for shipment until late July.  There are two combo DVDs we offer which contain Is the World about to End?  The two DVD options are:
Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: http://ep.yimg.com/ca/Img/trans_1x1.gif
4 in 1 DVD: Creation and Miracles; The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia and the End of the World; Death and the Journey into Hell; Is the World about to End? - $2.00 (see bulk pricing info)

2 in 1 DVD: Is the World about to End?; The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World - $2.00 (see bulk pricing info)

 

New Videos

 

MHFM: Below are two new videos.  They deal with certain errors against the Catholic faith that were recently promoted.  From time to time, we will be focusing in on the arguments and errors made by various heretics.  The second video is a somewhat related video.

 

Errors in "Rejecting Sedevacantism" [video]

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUru8Y2QP_A [video]

 

Listened

 

Dear sir;

 

I have listened to your youtube commentary with a troubled and sorrowful heart.  Pease ask Our Lady, your Mother and mine to form you into the likeness of Christ, bringing you into the true fold, under the true shepard divenly chosen.  Please do not cause further division in the Church, but please see us as a family; as such, resolving its problems within the structure of the family.  Please be obedient to the Holy Father.  Why do you speak so terribly against him?  Please pray! Please repent!  Be my true brother, and please do not grieve our Heavenly Father by your disobedience.

 

Sincerely yours in Christ with our Mother Mary,

 

Karl Anderson

 

MHFM: It’s amazing that you don’t care one bit about what Benedict XVI believes or what the Catholic Church teaches.  He denies the necessity of any obedience to Catholic teaching, Catholic dogma or the papal office; and that’s why he’s an antipope.

 

Grave sins

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I'm a bit confused about this. I found this in your archives:

 

"As far as eating meat on Fridays, it’s forbidden under pain of mortal sin. But if one was not aware that this is the law of the Church then it’s not necessarily a mortal sin, unless one was sinfully negligent in acquiring this information. But once one knows that this is the law, it’s forbidden under pain of mortal sin."

 

At the same time, this seems to contradict the Catholic teaching on what constitutes mortal sin, because knowledge is not required, only the grave matter counts. Or is my logic flawed, because this deals only with a disciplinary law?

 

God bless you,

 

Jakub Eisenbruk

 

MHFM: Your understanding of the issue is not correct.  Certain actions are inherently evil because they are directly opposed to the right use of reason and nature.  Eating meat on Friday is not one of those actions.  People do not know from nature that they must not eat meat on Fridays, and in fact there are exceptions to the prohibition of eating meat on Fridays.  If someone is starving, he may eat meat on Friday.  If a solemn holy day falls on Friday, such as Christmas, one is not required to abstain from meat.  As we can see, eating meat on Friday is not inherently evil.  The grave matter in doing it – what constitutes the mortal sin – is actually the direct violation of the Church’s law on a matter that binds under pain of mortal sin.  In other words, it is for directly violating the Church’s law that one commits mortal sin when eating meat on Friday. 

 

But in the case of actions such as fornication, drunkenness or artificial contraception, for example, they necessarily entail activity that is known to be gravely disordered and opposed to the right use of reason and nature.  If people use artificial contraception, they know that they are thwarting the natural purpose of the activity and thus it is gravely and inherently disordered.  Such actions cannot be performed without knowledge that they are wrong.  The very commission of such actions necessarily entails grave matter and thus they are always mortally sinful, even though the people committing them might not care about the meaning of mortal sin or believe in it.   

 

Protestants

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I recently read somewhere that Protestants are in good faith.  If they were in good faith they would not : 1) Reject Jesus Christ in the Eucharist, 2) Reject the teaching of the Catholic Church instead of relying on sola scriptura, 3) Reject the teaching that you have to persevere and die in a state of grace while at the same time they all believe they are saints and living in a state of grace without confession to a true priest (No humility or truth and ridiculous) 5) Reject a true pope and apostolic succession and one faith, one Lord, one baptism 5) Reject the fires of purgatory as outlined in Machabees 6) Reject our Lady when there is overwhelming proof that she was always in a state of grace 7) Reject asking saints to intervene for us as they reject the communion of saints.  They are completely without true discernment as to the faith as they believe they are all saints here, but they at the same time reject the saints in heaven (they won't ask them to intervene on their behalf), thus they are truly of double mind.  How could a person believe that there is no communion of saints, while thinking they and all their Protestant "brethren" are saints now?  Isn't that a communion of saints?? 8) Many are rejecting baptism as necessary 9) Reject five sacraments 10) Reject that only priest can teach in the church as many women are now Protestant "ministers" 11) Reject the teaching that you can only marry once and cannot marry again if you are divorced (Vatican II has blurred the lines on this in such a disgusting way that annulments, which MHFM has clearly shown are not valid and that there is no such thing save nullities for very few reasons).  There are I am sure many more.  

 

As Vatican II has dissolved the faith in most of these areas Protestants can so easily seem to retain or proselytize as they also call Vatican II teaching on not converting the Jews apostasy, which it is obviously.   (Vatican II makes it so easy to enable Protestants to make Catholicism look like apostasy especially with this teaching). The problem is that when the source of truth has been taken over by the wolves the sheep are scattered and then the sweet talkers and vain deceivers tear up the pieces left by the wolves. 

 

Finally, we should ask Protestants if they believe our Lady was a saint.  Who could not?  If she is a saint -are dead saints in heaven?  Since dead saints are alive in heaven and they have proven their love for Jesus Christ wouldn't it be more efficacious to ask them to intervene for us rather than a living person who isn't in heaven and hasn't shown final perseverance?  Then ask them if they are saints and living in a state of grace of which they will all readily agree which may seem like a joke to most Catholics however I have spoken to enough of them and many truly believe they do not sin at all .  If they don't believe she is a saint-they are ridiculous.  If they don't believe saints are alive in heaven they don't really believe.  If they think that one of their living persons is a saint, which they do believe that they are all saints, then they prove the point that saints are to be asked for prayer, (what is the difference if they are living or in heaven, really what is the difference if Protestants think they are saints now), and thus prove that the Catholic teaching is and always has been correct.  

 

Paul R.

 

Hell

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Hell's been on my mind lately. I recently viewed your video on "Death and the path to Hell" and frankly, it scared the hell out of me. A couple of nights ago, the syndicated radio show "Coast to Coast" had a gentleman on who claims that in 1998  he had an out of body experience where our Lord gave him a vision of hell. I listened to him carefully and couldn't find anything he said that contradicts catholic dogma. The only problem I have is that this man isn't catholic. Although, he did admit on the air that all people who deny Jesus as the Christ are automatically condemned.

 

I have two questions. First, did you listen to "Coast to Coast" to hear this man and if so, please comment on it. Secondly, have you ever read "The Letter From Beyond"? A fascinating story of a german catholic nun who had a dream about a friend of hers who died earlier that morning and conveyed to her (in a letter) her condemnation and the reasons why she was condemned to hell.

 

I've been reading and studying your materials for quite some time now… God Bless.

 

Steve

 

MHFM: We did not listen to it.  The experience is not necessarily false because, based on what you said, there’s nothing in the story that contradicts the Catholic faith.  God might grant non-Catholics special graces so that they more aggressively search out His spiritual truths and evaluate their eternal salvation.  If they respond to it with good will, they will be led to the Catholic faith.  But the “experience” could also be a deception.

 

Sufferings

 

I just thought of something Brothers,

 

Do you believe that one can suffer for sinners and that one's tribulations, if offered up for poor sinners by a soul in the state of grace (ie Padre Pio) can help to save those people? Would they (the poor sinners) all necessarily have to convert to Catholicism in order for the sufferings of those Saints to help save them? So in other words, do the great sufferings of the saints only bring about converts or can non-catholics be admitted into heaven based on their sins being atoned for by great suffering of someone else? I'm not sure what Catholic Dogma says on this matter so if you could shed some light that be very helpful!

 

Go with God,

 

Alex,

 

MHFM: A Catholic should already know the answer to that question.  No one can be saved outside the Church.  That’s a dogma.  Therefore, the sinners who would truly benefit from such sufferings would have to convert to the Catholic faith.

 

Knights

 

Dear Brothers:

 

I read the email regarding the Rotary Club and I'd like to know what your feelings are, whether they are another form of freemasonry.  Same with the Knights of Columbus.  My husband was a member of the Knights for a long time before we converted; he has sent multiple letters to the head office renouncing his membership.  He has not paid dues to them for a number of years now, yet they still send him their literature.  My husband has told me that the initiation rites are secret(!!!) which is stupid if they are in accord with Catholic teaching.  

 

To the protestant who thinks praying to Mary is unchristian, I have a question:  Do you really think you're pleasing Jesus by ignoring, hating, and despising the assistance and prayers she offers on our behalf??  Doesn't one of the ten commandments include "Honor your father and mother"?  Mary is our spiritual Mother, and Jesus is a very good Son, and He will not leave unpunished those of you who insult her in any way.  

 

Brenda

 

The Virgin

 

Hi… I was wondering and I know how your videos say otherwise but I was thinking are you a Christian or do you pray to the virgin mary? Please answer if you have the time thanks.

 

Global…

 

MHFM: Yes, we pray to the Blessed Virgin.  She is the new Ark, and we invoke her just like the Israelites utilized the Ark of the Old Testament to defeat the enemies of God (Joshua 6), for miracles (Joshua 3 & 4), for protection (Numbers 10), etc.  You need to see our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.

 

Joshua 6:13-20."… and they went before the ark of the Lord walking and sounding the trumpets: and the armed men went before them, and the rest of the common people followed the ark, and they blew the trumpets... So all the people making a shout, and the trumpets sounding, when the voice and the sound thundered in the ears of the multitude, the walls forthwith fell down: and every man went up by the place that was over against him: and they took the city..."

 

Numbers 10:33-35- "So they marched from the mount of the Lord three days' journey, and the ark of the covenant of the Lord went before them, for three days providing a place for the camp.  The cloud also of the Lord was over them by day when they marched.  And when the ark was lifted up, Moses said: Arise, O Lord, and let thy enemies be scattered, and let them that hate thee, flee from before thy face.”

 

1 Samuel 5:10- “And when the ark of God was come into Accaron, the Accaronites cried out, saying: They have brought the ark of the God of Israel to us, to kill us and our people.”

 

Curious

 

Brother Dimond,

After I posed my first question to you a week or more ago, I became curious if indeed Revelation 8:7 (yes, I am protestant) had potentially occurred and we, as Americans, being so involved in our own "little corner of the world," failed to see it happen.

Here is what I found:

Article from 10/8/03 from the Food and Agriculture Organization "Fires are Increasingly Damaging the World's Forests," http://www.fao.org/english/newsroom/news/2003/21962-en.html And this is old data. When I searched for information I found the numbers of forest fires worldwide, which are damaging entire forests, to be staggering! Here are more references (I could post reference after reference, after reference). My point is, I do believe 1) the oil DISASTER is, indeed the second trumpet and 2) the first trumpet was blown while Americans, and others worldwide, focused only on their little part of the world, forgetting there is much more to prophecy fulfillment than what will blatantly and obviously occur before our eyes.

Thank you for all of your videos. Once I start watching, I can barely stop!

K.

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest and the e-mail.  You really need to become Catholic.

 

Message

 

Subject: Message

 

Dear brothers,


Excellent way in which you nailed the heretic William Gollie. It was great. I especially enjoyed your after comments. Also great video on the heretic Paleocrat. This guy never had the catholic faith. It is the problem you constantly point out… Great work as always.


Thanks
Mrs. Stewart

 

Comment

 

You are the antichrist.

 

Seesyou…

 

Abjuration post

 

Subject: Abjuration Post

 

I just read the recent post on your e-exchanges from "PM" regarding abjuration, and I just wanted to add:

You say that the Trent Profession of Faith (which is in itself also an abjuration), plus Confession/act of perfect contrition is enough to get back into the Church if you were a Novus Ordinarian or if you belonged to another sect (and also specifically mentioning whatever other heresies one held), so my question is: is it enough to make the Profession by yourself? Or do you need the 2 witnesses and their signature? Who do you make this Profession with? Doing it by yourself is enough?

<<They turn the ecclesiastical law about abjuration into a necessity of means for salvation, as necessary as belief in the Trinity.>>

That's exactly right, that's what they do.

 

Iug…

 

MHFM: Yes, it would be.  The law for normal times not only requires that it be done in the presence of two witnesses, but also in front of the ordinary.  Since there is no ordinary, obviously one can’t adhere to the letter of that law.  Thus, making it by yourself would be sufficient in this situation.  The core of the issue is that the individual has the Catholic faith, makes the profession, and rejects the heresies.  It’s not that he conforms to every particular requirement of a Church law intended for a normal situation. 

 

Falsity

 

Subject: Comment

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Thank you for informing us about Paleocrat.  This is yet another proof of the falsity of the V-2 "church".  Instead of producing the Church Militant, it produces the Church Effete.

 

All the works you post (and offer) are always so valuable -- Faith-affirming as well as practical in helping us to fight the Good Fight.  Thank you for all of them.

 

Lee Ann

 

Dutch

 

Subject: Dutch Church Goes Orange for WC Final

 

Dear Mhfm,

Watching that video I realised orange is the perfect color for the Vatican 2 "church". The reason is because here in Ireland the protestants up north who hate Catholics or anyone who has the name Catholic their "trademark" color is orange, they are known as the "orange men" who are actually affiliated with the freemasons. These "orange men" originally came from Holland. So since Protestants use the color orange I think it’s a perfect fit that the Novus Ordo would use orange after all they are no better than protestants.

God Bless

Sean

 

Debate

 

Brothers, 

 

Your debate with William Golle is once again a clear demonstration of kicking the can down the street.  William starts off with his only truth when he states "he has an issue". William then tries to divert the debate with a bunch of irrelevant mumbo-jumbo.  The "issue" that William is referring to, is what a  spiritually blind liar he is, as he shows up to the debate without knowing the question at hand while trying to pass off irrelevant information.

William, proselytizing is the act of attempting to convert people to another opinion and, particularly, another religion. Therefore Proselytizing=Evangelism! Knowing the truth is like a math problem...there's only one right answer.

Brother Peter, great job of providing valuable information concerning the debate, while you sum up the debate with your strong remark, "...the Devil's Dupes will always do his dirty work, he will use them and spin them around like a top, arguing one thing then the other, as long as that which is false and evil, namely Vatican II and its anti-popes is defended".

I look forward to receiving your new selection of DVD's.

God Bless Your Work,
Tom Miles

 

Watched

 

Watched your oil spill video and i was just wondering why you refer to Revelation as apocalypse? Isn't the book called revelation? i do agree with everything stated in the video and I believe we are living in the last days. The oil rig could be the "mountain" described in the Revelation...

 

MHFM: Apocalypse (apokalypsis) is the Greek word for “revelation” or “lifting of the veil.”  It’s the original title of the Bible’s final book, and what the Catholic Church calls it.

 

Beasts

 

Great work MHFM.  The beasts are without a doubt the Vatican II antipopes and the cave they dwell in is the temple of God in Rome at the present time.

 

Dea…

 

Listened

 

I just listened to your conversation on the oil spill and how it may relate to the Book of Revelations. I thank you for it.  Perhaps the most important message that is lost out there is that this is America's oil that we are watching. It feels as though God is saying, "You choose to buy oil from dictators that use the money to propagate the message of a False Prophet; yet you refuse to use the oil I have freely given you. Therefore, even what you think you have will be taken from you and be as a curse to your land and sea.."

While I don't subscribe to many Catholic teachings (and left Catholicism when I was young because of them), I find it remarkable how Jesus is drawing all of his followers into deeper fellowship in these last days.

One such experience of deep spiritual intimacy occurred for me in Bangkok. I was at St. Louis Hospital undergoing surgery at a time of great sorrow and faithlessness. Catholic sisters came by my room and I felt compelled to ask them what they did when God was nowhere to be found. The next day, and totally unexpected, a sister came by and gave me When the Well Runs Dry by Father Green. I hardly want to speak about the moment because its beauty would be tainted by imperfect words; but there it was: a time when God came near. Perhaps we could be friends too? I wish you ever deepening insight and revelation of the Lord's presence in this troubled world.

Fight the good fight!

In His Grip,
Duane

 

MHFM: The Catholic faith is the only true Christian faith.  Jesus makes it clear that one must accept all of His teaching to be saved.  Please consult the material in our refuting Protestantism section.  It demonstrates that, as a non-Catholic, you do not accept all of His teaching and in fact reject His original and only faith.  Without the true faith, moments that you consider to be of great spiritual importance prove rather to be deceptions.  They are deceptions that keep a person comforted and confident in a life devoid of Christ’s full truth and the knowledge of God’s will that comes with adherence to it. 

 

Mel

 

Brothers in Christ,

 

What is your assessment of Mel Gibson's behavior?  It seems like he is in the grip of Satan & is in total ruination.  He left his wife of many years, after fornication with this Russian girl now has a baby out of his marriage, is caught on tape ranting like a lunatic etc.      

 

John

 

MHFM: It’s obviously outrageous, but unfortunately not surprising when we consider that he wholeheartedly believes in the “baptism of desire,” salvation-for-members-of-any-religion apostasy that countless “Catholics” and supposed “traditional Catholics” hold.  We do have some more comments, and we will probably share them soon.

 

Non-denominational

 

First of all, I FULLY enjoy your videos. VERY good. May God bless you for all days to come.
 
I have a question though: while watching your video titled, "Like Martin Luther, the Devil and Denominations" you talk about denominations and then end with, "And if you are Catholic. . ."  I consider myself non-denominational. Although, it seems that today, that has become a denomination in and of itself. I go to a Calvary Chapel…
 
What are you thoughts and/or views on non-denominational churches? What do you think about people who say, "It's not about a religion, it's a relationship?"  And. . . and this may be a BIGGIE (maybe not). . . What do you think about aliens being fallen angels (and the subject of aliens in general)?
 
Thank you very much,
 
Dan

 

MHFM: We are glad that you came across the information.  However, Christ only founded one Church. You really should get our book on that issue: Refuting Protestantism from the Bible and Eastern "Orthodoxy" (audios and articles).  That means that you can’t have a relationship with Him unless you accept His entire faith and the one Church He established.  You can’t be saved remaining “non-denominational” or going to such a church.  You need to come into the traditional Catholic faith, the only true faith of Christ.

 

Rotary Clubs

 

Brothers:

Do you know if the Rotary Clubs are affiliated with the Masons? I have seen things from my own research that would indicate a connection. Would you recommend any materials for further research on my part? I have watched your DVD's on the masonic influence of America and don't recall any mention of the Rotarians. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Joseph Ramirez

 

Debate

 

Debate: Does Vatican II teach that non-Catholics may receive Communion - 1/4

Debate: Does Vatican II teach that non-Catholics may receive Communion - 2/4

Debate: Does Vatican II teach that non-Catholics may receive Communion - 3/4

Debate: Does Vatican II teach that non-Catholics may receive Communion - 4/4

 

Abjuration

 

Do you have any information on the necessity of abjuration?  Some of these cults insist that unless we sign an abjuration (that they have written) from the Vatican II heresy, in front of two witnesses, we will go to Hell, and that the Profession of Faith and perfect Act of Contrition is not enough.

 

PM

 

MHFM: The profession of faith from the Council of Trent, which is given to converts from heresy, is also an abjuration.  They are completely wrong.  The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

 

It includes a formal renunciation of heretical beliefs that are opposed to the Catholic faith.  If one held a specific heresy, he should mention that heresy when making the profession of faith from Trent.  The radical schismatics misunderstand the Catholic faith.  They turn the ecclesiastical law about abjuration into a necessity of means for salvation, as necessary as belief in the Trinity.  They are very deceived.  No one can be saved without rejecting a heresy that he once held obstinately.  However, suppose someone converted to the true faith on his deathbed.  If he rejected the false belief/heresy he previously held, and had time to make a confession for the sin against the faith he committed, he could be restored to justification.  He could be saved if he did not have time to sign or make a formal abjuration.  He rejected the heresy internally, and confessed the sin.  The specific form in which the rejection of the heresy is manifested, in an abjuration in front of two witnesses and the ordinary (normally speaking), is an ecclesiastical law intended for normal situations.  Other schismatic errors that those non-Catholics hold are refuted in detail in our sub-section to E-Exchanges, under “Traditional Catholic Issues and Groups.”

 

Religions

 

Subject: JP’s Exchange

 

I read JP's e-exchange and went to the video on sedevacantist priests deny catholic salvation dogma and found it amazing that all these priests don't see the glaring and obvious problem with how the world accepted and loved and worshiped these five anti-popes especially JPll and Benedict XVl.  The world {jews} killed Jesus, they rejected HIM and the saints and martyrs also!  Why?  Because of the rock solid and unwavering TRUTH and what is this truth: JOHN 15:18 If the world hate you, know ye, that it hath hated me before you.  19 If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.  20 Remember my word that I said to you: The servant is not greater than his master.  If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you:  If the priests just understood or cared about these truth's of Jesus they would have to ask why does the world love these men who sit in the Chair of St. Peter.  If these evil men were true popes, all of the false religions in the world would have hated, attacked and persecuted these men but what we have with these men is just the OPPOSITE, they were and are loved and excepted by all these false religions.  This is spiritual fornication on behalf of these anti-popes because they esteem, respect and actively participate in these false, despicable and demonic man-made religions!!!...

 

 Todd        

 

BOD

 

Hello again Dimond Brothers,

 

I know you are not proponents of the Baptism of Desire belief, but I just discovered a definition of it in the back of my Bible which is copyrighted 1954, 1953, 1952, 1950 by The Catholic Press, Inc. It has an Imprimatur from Samuel Cardinal Stritch June 4th, 1953, then Archbishop of Chicago. It is: The Family Rosary Commemorative Edition of the Catholic Bible issued to celebrate the Marian Year. It goes along with the announcement made by Pope Pius XII on September 26, 1953, that the year 1954 would be a Marian Year to mark the 100th anniversary of the proclamation of the Immaculate Conception as a dogma of the Church.

 

In the back of this Bible, under Catholic Encyclopedia it lists Baptism of Desire and defines it as follows:

 

One of the two possible substitutes for Baptism of water (the other being Baptism of Blood). When it is not possible thus to be baptized, an act of perfect contrition or pure love of God will supply the omission. Such acts are a perfect and ultimate disposition calling for the infusion of sanctifying grace, and at least implicitly include a desire and intention to receive Baptism of water should occasion offer. Infants are not capable of Baptism of desire. A heathen, believing even though in a confused way, in a God whose will should be done and desiring it to do that will whatever it may be, probably has Baptism of desire. It may reasonably be assumed that vast numbers of persons unbaptized by water have thus been rendered capable of enjoying the Beatific Vision.

 

If you could shed some light on the subject, that would be great. You're arguments against Baptism of Desire seemed legit, but this seems to contradict your stance. I checked out Samuel Cardinal Stritch, and as far as I can tell, he was a true Catholic Archbishop. Ordained around 1910 and died in 1958, so before the Counter-Church was instituted. I am at odds as to what to believe now, so please, I know you are busy, but if you could look into this matter and tell me what you think I would be most grateful!

 

God Bless you Brothers!

 

Alex, a concerned Catholic

 

MHFM: You really need to read our book.  You seem to be under the impression that a book with an imprimatur is somehow infallible.  That’s quite wrong.  You also seem to think that anything published before Vatican II was orthodox.  That is also quite wrong.  The heresies were being taught in fallible books, such as the one you reference, prior to Vatican II.  The book you cite is blatantly heretical.  The clerics who read and agreed with it were heretical.  It teaches “baptism of desire” and that heathens can be saved.  It even says that “vast numbers” of such heathens are saved!  That contradicts infallible Catholic dogma.  It’s a prime example of evil pre-Vatican II heresy.  It was precisely heresies like that which led to the Great Apostasy after Vatican II. 

 

Infallible

 

Hi Brothers,

 

Sorry, disregard the last e-mail on BOD. I see your answer on your website.

 

My… question is: How does one determine if a document is dogmatic, and/or infallible?  I am surprised that the council of Trent is not dogmatic because I always thought it was.

 

-C

 

MHFM: It depends on the language used by a pope in promulgating it, and the form in which it is promulgated. 

 

Counter Church

 

Hello Dimond Brothers,

 

My name is Alex, and I'm a Traditional Catholic in Ohio. I have an important question: For the last week, I have been having very strong urges to share information about the Vatican II Counter-Church with my "catholic" friends, and I have passed it on to some. I just wanted to know, if there are any tips or words of advice you may have to help me successfully convert my friends? I know that most of them will not believe, because they simply will not be able to rationalize or admit that the Church has been infiltrated, but I may be able to convert some. Any strategies you recommend? I have known about the false Vatican II for several years now, but have not said anything to my friends out of fear of offending them, sloth, and just plain forgetfulness. Your website has helped to awaken me from a sleep, I have always been Traditional Catholic, but I had become lax in my prayers and would not stand up and bear witness to the Truth. But now I feel compelled by God to proudly proclaim my Catholic heritage and to undeniably say that Catholicism is the one true faith, instituted by Christ. I want to thank you for the great work you do, you have the courage to speak the truth when no one else will. God is working through you, and working well. I just purchased several books and writings from your website, and I am about to begin reading your book, The Truth About What Really Happened to the Catholic Church After Vatican II, which was given to me by my grandmother. Over the last 4 days, I have immersed myself in your videos online, and your writings, and in my heart I know them to be true. We truly are in the last days, as the Chair of St. Peter sits vacant.

 

One final point, I stumbled upon this verse when I opened to Bible to this exact page (funny how frequently that happens) and it was Matthew 10:34 "Do not think that I have come to send peace upon the earth; I have come to bring a sword, not peace." Yet Anti-Pope John Paul II and his "meeting of religious figures" prayed for world peace amongst religions. Yet another fact proving the Novus Ordo to be utterly false and not of God, but of Satan.

 

Thank you so much for your time Brothers, and may God Bless you!!

 

Sincerely,

 

Alex

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  We would recommend having them watch the entire DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia and the End of the World.  Additionally, one should familiarize himself with the main heresies of Vatican II and the Vatican II antipopes.  Since you are looking at the videos and The Truth about What Really Happened after Vatican II book, you will see those covered.  A good way to cover them quickly would be to read out loud for them the section headings or bullet points covered in the detailed Table of Contents of the aforementioned book.  After explaining some of those heresies to them, you should explain the primary dogmatic principles which demonstrate that heretics cannot be popes. 

 

Apostate Debate

 

Subject: Golle Apostate Debate

 

Dear Brothers,

 

In listening to the debate with the V-2 apostate, William Golle, on whether Vatican II teaches that non-Catholics may receive Communion (which it does), it is clear that he uses three main tactics: The first is to speak with conviction – it makes no difference what he says (to him). The second is to lie – particularly by avoiding any acceptance of the obvious facts. The third is to repeat himself constantly - which gives him more confidence. The Vatican II apostates think that to say things with heartfelt conviction makes them speak the truth, when in fact they are just passionate liars. Listening to Golle dance around the facts makes it obvious why the Vatican II sect mass produces production line pedophiles – his dishonesty and avoidance of the truth is obese!!! William Golle doesn't understand what “properly disposed” means because he himself is in a state of mortal sin – he's blinded by his own guilt! John Paul II's quote devastates Golle's position, by stating (falsely) that non-Catholics may receive communion, but Golle just uses the V-2, “I-don–know” if it's true, to avoid it. Q - Where's the Church, William? A - “I-don-know.” An interesting moment occurred after Bro. Peter called Golle a liar (vid. 3, 5:15 mins.) because William then says, “Ok then, fine! I'm not gonna, you know, call you a liar – I don't know; I can't read your heart.” The Vatican II apostates believe in nothing and know nothing as well. A liar is someone who doesn't tell the truth. A person only needs the ability to understand words in order figure out if someone's a liar or not – one doesn't need to read hearts to see that someone is lying! It's amazing that he admitted he was wrong in the debate but now flip-flops over to the Vatican II teaching even more. That's obstinacy and bad-will for you!!! Gee golly gosh, William's a white-wash! William Golle is properly disposed towards hell!!! There is no peace for the wicked.

 

ARCANUM, ON CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE, Pope Leo XIII - “But these are extreme cases; and they would seldom exist if men and women entered into the married state with proper dispositions, not influenced by passion, but entertaining right ideas of the duties of marriage and of its noble purpose; neither would they anticipate their marriage by a series of sins drawing down upon them the wrath of God.”…

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail.  Yes, it’s so true that it makes no difference to him (and to many similar heretics) what he says.  Moreover, it’s equally true and even more common to find that the supporters of the Novus Ordo Church, when listening to such an exchange, don’t care at all about what is actually said by the Vatican II “apologist.”  As long as it defends the antipope and contradicts the sedevacantist, no matter how illogical, unfounded, distorting or wrong it might be, they don’t care.  This is not an exaggeration: someone could literally do a lecture or produce a Youtube video against sedevacantism and say anything.  As long as it purports to refute the sedevacantist position, people will find it persuasive and even praise it.  We are truly in dark times. 

 

To give an example of what we’re talking about: one of us recalls hearing one exchange between a defender of the Vatican II Church and a sedevacantist.  The two were arguing about the New Mass.  The defender of the Vatican II Church (not the sedevacantist) quoted Pope Benedict XIV on the many vs. all distinction and the form of consecration.  He cited the same passage that we quote.  This passage doesn’t help his position.  It actually refutes it.  The passage is below.  It demonstrates that “ALL” is not acceptable in the form of consecration, as anyone can see.  It does so by teaching that the form is expressing the efficacy aspect of Christ’s blood.  Since it’s expressing efficacy, Jesus specifically said “for you and for many” (not all) when giving us the form.  The passage also agrees with St. Thomas, who taught the same on many vs. all. 

 

Pope Benedict XIV, De Sacrosancto Missae Sacrificio: “And so, having agreed with the same Angelic doctor, we explain those words “for many” accordingly, though it is granted that (sometimes) the word "many", after a manner of speaking in the Holy Scriptures, may signify "all".' 'Therefore we say that the blood of Christ was shed for all, shed for all however as regards sufficiency (Benedict's emphasis: quoad sufficientiam) and for the elect only as regards efficacy (Benedict's emphasis: quoad efficaciam) as the Doctor Thomas explains correctly: "The blood of Christ's passion has its efficacy not merely in the elect among the Jews, ... but also in the Gentiles ... and therefore He says expressly, for you the Jews, and for many, namely the Gentiles”.”

 

So, in the exchange we’re talking about, the defender of Vatican II read the above words.  He read them with special emphasis and voice tone as if they prove his point (when the words actually completely disprove his point).  He read the words and he didn’t make a comment about them.  He then moved on to talk about other things.  Later in the conversation, however, he argued (with words to this effect): “You did not respond to my refutation of your position from Pope Benedict XIV.  You obviously have no response to what I proved.”  So, he was acting as if the passage from Pope Benedict XIV, and what he covered about it, proved his position on “all” in the consecration and refuted the argument of the sedevacantist!  All he did was quote something (without commenting, but with special emphasis) that completely refutes his own position; and minutes later he acted as if what he covered on that point completely refuted the sedevacantist and proved that “all” is acceptable in the consecration!  It’s really something.  This kind of distortion happens all the time in the presentations of heretics.  What’s most outrageous, however, is that the bad-willed heretics who abound in the Counter Church are persuaded by such lies and distortions. 

 

After hearing this exchange, the dumbed-down (through bad will) and blind adherent of the Vatican II sect (who yearns in his heart for the lie) probably said: “Yeah, he refuted the sedevacantist.  He completely refuted him on Benedict XIV.”  We know this is true because people even praised the defender of Vatican II for his performance in the aforementioned exchange.  Their self-imposed spiritual fog is such that they cannot follow the points carefully or they simply refuse to; for the truth is that he didn’t even comment about Benedict XIV’s passage or make any argument about it.  He simply quoted it with special emphasis and PRETENDED like it proved his position, when the truth is that it does not.  That’s why we say frequently, and IT’S 100% TRUE: we are battling with liars all over the place – complete and total liars.  Pretending like they’ve made an argument is all they need to do to reinforce the false faith and confidence of those who love the Vatican II lie.  

 

Confirmed

 

Hello Brothers:

 

     I just wanted to alert you, in case nobody has picked it up, that William Golle had clearly stated in part one of your debate (at 8:08) that it would be a "clear heresy" on the part of the Vatican II church "if it was saying that non-catholics could indeed receive Holy Communion". This is very, very important, as you have him admitting to the heresy of the Vatican II church which he is now, of necessity, defending. He is then an admitted heretic, and is also admitting that the Vatican II antipopes are heretics!

 

When he contacted you to say that he was "wrong" did he admit to you that, if according to his church, it is a dogmatic conciliar statement that non-catholics may receive communion, then he argued for a personal heresy vehemently for almost an hour? Does he care at all? No, of course not. And further, just listen to that discussion again. No matter how plain the Vatican II church makes it, he argues against you and the facts. Does he apologize to you and say "yes, I must humble myself, I acted very wickedly. I clearly lied."? It is doubtful that he said such a thing to you.

 

At 1 minute 22 sec. of part one he is "amazed" that you would have the VII quack on instead of him - as if you hadn't already had him on for approximately 5-6 hours of previous intolerable tomfoolery (on his part) - as if you were afraid of him. It is more demonstration of how infatuated with their own voices these VII defenders are.

 

Every heretic is a complete and absolute confirmed liar, for God robs no man of His Grace!

 

-Thanks for the debates, the research, and all of the work. Good fruit and possibly the last of the Benedictine exercise on the face of the earth –

 

Mike

 

Heretic

 

Subject: Bad “Will”

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

I just couldn't resist this ....so please forgive me!

The guy's a joke...referring to Bad "Will," of course - he has no shame or any pride, meaning self respect as opposed to the sin of pride - what an embarrassment he must be to his family! ... And I thought he had been 'dealt with' long ago!... I guess some people are just plain 'tigers for punishment!'


8 - D

God bless,

David

 

Listened

 

Dear brothers in Christ,

I've listened to the debate about V2 "holy" communion, i.e. whether V2 NO "catholics" could receive communion from "orthodox" schismatic priests and "orthodox" schismatics from V2 NO "priests". Your opponent, as blind liar as he is, is stating that this inter-communion is, as a rule, forbidden, and is allowable only in cases of emergency and necessity. The teaching of V2 satanic documents regarding this problem is as clear as any satanic lie could be clear. They invented so called partial communion, in full opposition with the basics of Creed--The True Church of Christ is ONE, is WHOLE, is HOLY etc. One is either a member of The Church, or is outside of Her. So, when the antipope B16 calls some schismatic "bishop" a pastor in The Church of Christ, this could only mean that that "pastor" has full jurisdiction in The Church, and therefore he is allowed to minister the communion to anyone who is a member of his church. By "partial communion" invention--who isn't a member of the "pastor's" church?

Of course, the answer to this rhetorical question is simple--the true Catholics are not members of their satanic churches. The true Catholics are the only people in ZERO "partial communion" with the Devil and his legions now occupying V2, "orthodox", Anglican, and innumerable other "Christian" churches.  Your opponent's lie--that the V2 teachings forbid mutual "exchange" of "sacraments"--is of the same kind as the lie that the false V2 council was "only-pastoral-non-dogmatic" council.

If there is some hope for the people like that your opponent, let them try to ask themselves, as honestly as they can, some basic questions: what is the meaning and the purpose of 'emergency and necessity' if anyone could be saved, even those who received not only one sacrament in their whole life? what is the meaning and purpose of any kind of Creed (whatever it would be) if anyone, who opposes that Creed, could be accepted as an adherent of the Creed?

Partial communion is a contradiction in terms. The Teaching of The Catholic Church says that anyone, ordinary layman or a pope, could eternally perish if he/she commits just one mortal sin and dies in the state of condemnation. This is a statement of a fact. There is no "partial pleasing of God", there is no "partial salvation", there is no "partial condemnation by God", there is no "partial Heaven", "partial Hell", etc. etc…

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

Disposed

 

Subject: Properly Disposed

 

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/archbishop_burke_public_figures_must_receive_holy_communion_worthily/

 

The above link from a Novus Ordo source, quotes a Novus Ordo bishop on the reception of Communion.  In the article the “bishop” defines “proper disposition” (that exact phrase) for Communion as being free of unrepentant mortal sin.   So you see even real Catholics must be “properly disposed”.

 

William’s argument was pathetic.  He might have been the worst yet.  I think you should take him on regarding Paul IVth and Sedevactantism though.  He seems so eager. 

 

Bill Mulligan   

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s also interesting how the false conservatives of the Vatican II sect only focus on the fewer than one percent of Novus Ordo “bishops” who think that pro-abortion public figures should not receive “Communion.”  99 percent of the apostate “bishops” allow pro-abortionists to receive “Communion.”  That apostate position is also backed up by Benedict XVI and the Vatican.  The handful of “bishops” (well under one percent) who oppose it still do not excommunicate the pro-abortion public figures.  Thus, all the Novus Ordo “bishops” without exception regard as Catholics, and hold within their communion, people who are pro-abortion.  See: One can be pro-abortion and part of the Vatican II sect at the same time [PDF File]

 

Truths

 

Dear Brothers,

When you gave the update at the end of the debate I began getting overjoyed that Mr. Golle saw the truth of what the Vatican II church was saying until you mentioned that now he is defending what he was condemning.

 

It is unpopular to take the positions that a lot of us Catholics take, i.e., sedevacantism, no salvation outside the church with no exceptions, only one Baptism, etc. but once the decision is made to hold to these TRUTHS there is a peace which only God can give and that no one can take away.  We will keep Mr. Golle in our prayers.  

Theresa

 

Bad will

 

Subject: Bad will

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Thanks for posting the debate with William Golle.  People (especially newcomers to your website) should be sure to listen to the entire debate; parts 3 and 4 are especially important, as are Bother Peter's afterthoughts at the end. Golle's remarks are one of the best examples yet of outright dishonesty and bad will; a good snapshot of the typical novus ordo defender.  And don't these people love to hear themselves talk!

 

Thanks, Lee Ann

 

Comment

 

Subject: new debate

 

I feel very strongly that William at this point is just debating out of amusement and is enjoying his notoriety on the… brothers website and gets a fuzzy warm feeling out of reading the comments made by everyone.  While these are great opportunities to expose the heretics and to educate and convert people I think William has grown to like the attention.  I really think he doesn't believe the garbage he is spewing but just an opportunity to justify his existence.  I would bet if no one responded to his gibberish that would be more crushing than even the negative attention he would normally get from everyone, any kind of attention is better than none at all!   May the Queen of Heaven, grant William the light to see!!! 

 

Todd

 

Priest

 

Subject: SSPV

 

I spoke today with a priest from Oyster Cove Bay who claimed that Baptism by Blood and Desire was declared at the Council of Trent. How do you respond to that?

 

Having read your position to NFP my wife and I agreed to practice abstinence.  What happens after she passes through change of life? Are we still under the obligation to abstain?

 

I find my self choosing btwn traditionalist camps which appear on the wrong side of several issues. I tend to favor the SSPV over the SSPX because they reject the New Code of Canon Law. I expect the Society's untenable position of accepting the New Code will continue to lead to problems. But the SSPV will refuse me communion. Is it a sin to simply say nothing and accept communion anyway?

 

Respectfully,

JP

 

MHFM: We respond by saying that it’s simply not true.  All of that is addressed in great detail in our book on the topic, as well as our section dealing with the salvation dogma, our debates, etc.  That’s why people need to look at that information; they should obtain and read the book from us.  Trent teaches that the Sacrament of Baptism is necessary for salvation and that John 3:5 is to be understood as it is written (i.e., no room for salvation without water baptism). 

 

Pope Paul III, The Council of Trent, Sess. 7, Can. 5 on the Sacrament of Baptism: “If anyone says that baptism [the Sacrament] is optional, that is, not necessary for salvation (cf. Jn. 3:5): let him be anathema.”

 

Pope Paul III, The Council of Trent, Can. 2 on the Sacrament of Baptism, Sess. 7, 1547:  “If anyone shall say that real and natural water is not necessary for baptism, and on that account those words of Our Lord Jesus Christ: ‘Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit’ [John 3:5], are distorted into some sort of metaphor: let him be anathema.”

 

Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439:  “Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church.  And since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5].  The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water.”

 

Consult our material for the one passage of Trent they misunderstand.

 

With regard to your question on NFP, the answer is no.  The sin of NFP involves taking positive steps to avoid conception, namely, deliberately restricting marital relations to times believed to be infertile.  When conception does not occur as a result of NATURAL defects of time or of age, that’s not attributable to the action of the married couple.  They didn’t do anything to positively prevent conception.  Therefore, it’s not a sin.  People can still use marital rights at those times, and Pope Pius XI makes this point clear in his encyclical, Casti Connubii (see below).  And this is not at all comparable to NFP, which is an organized scheme to deliberately restrict marital relations to infertile periods. 

 

It should be emphasized that post-Vatican II heretics love to MISUNDERSTAND the following passage from Pope Pius XI’s encyclical on marriage.  They quote it and wrongly apply it to NFP, when it’s not teaching NFP at all!  Rather, it’s simply making the point we just explained.  For all of the passages in Pius XI’s encyclical that demonstrate that NFP is condemned – for it subordinates the primary purpose of the marriage act to secondary ends – see our article: Why Natural Family Planning is Sinful Birth Control [PDF File]

 

Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii (#59), Dec. 31, 1930: “Nor are those considered as acting against nature who in the married state use their right in the proper manner although on account of natural reasons either of time or of certain defects, new life cannot be brought forth. For in matrimony as well as in the use of the matrimonial rights there are also secondary ends, such as mutual aid, the cultivating of mutual love, and the quieting of concupiscence which husband and wife are not forbidden to consider so long as they are subordinated to the primary end and so long as the intrinsic nature of the act is preserved.”

 

Moreover, women can and have become pregnant at times and at ages when it is generally believed pregnancy will not occur (e.g., see Elizabeth and Luke 1). 

 

With regard to the SSPV, our material clearly proves that they are heretics.  They not only reject the aforementioned teaching on water baptism, but they hold that souls can be saved in any religion.  They are not Catholic.  They are completely faithless, wicked apostates who totally reject the Lord Jesus Christ.  They don’t even believe in God.  They do not believe in Outside the Church There is No Salvation.  They believe that a Hindu, Christ-hating idolater can be in the state of grace.  They believe that one can be of Christ and at the same time antichrist.  They also obstinately promote sinful NFP.  To support them would be a grave sin.  Since they are imposing heretics, one must also not receive Communion from them.  In fact, you shouldn’t even receive sacraments from anyone until you are clear on this and completely reject such heretics and the false doctrines of “baptism of desire,” salvation outside the Church, NFP, etc.  You should watch this video.  Perhaps you are also not yet convinced of the sedevacantist position?  If so, you need to become convinced before receiving sacraments.  The SSPX priests are heretical on salvation in the same way the SSPV is, and they also accept Antipope Benedict XVI.

 

Video

 

MHFM: This video discusses The French Revolution.

 

The Demonic French Revolution [video]

 

Story

 

Bill's story about having dinner with friends and the conversation at dinner reminded me right away of Pope Leo Xlll's vision, hearing the devil ask Jesus for added power over the people who would give service to the devil.  This is exactly the power that the devil asked for, to confound, blind, confuse the people with a sprinkling of indifference on the top as the cherry!!! 

 

Todd

 

Comment

 

Subject: song

 

… I think Matthew's comments on "Led  Zeppelin"'s "song"  "Stairway to Heaven" are astute, very accurate......in this case, Satan USED peoples' perceptions of Our Lady to drag possibly countless souls into hell......forever......never to escape......but then again, God's adversary has USED everything about the Catholic Church, God, all the Saints, etc, to achieve this goal, for at least the last 50 years now, seemingly quite effectively-----he has USED… everything holy and pure to his own ends.......deceit and treachery can't get any worse!  (one hopes.....)

 

A.

 

Videos

 

Subject: Jews exposed videos

 

Dear Brothers,

Those two videos, one on the student painting swastikas and the other of the former Israeli minister saying they Jews use "holocaust" and "Anti-Semitic" as a trick to avoid criticism and "justify everything they do to the Palestinians" are incredible and outrageous.  It adds further proof to the insane influence of the Jews and Israel have in the world. Sadly, such clips would never be aired on mainstream TV. Thank you for posting them.

God Bless,

Chris

 

MHFM: Yes, they are very interesting.  It’s not an accident that they are shown only or primarily on local programs or affiliates, and not on the mainstream national programs. 

 

Very interesting

 

Jewish Student caught painting Swastikas on her door and then claiming Anti-Semitic attack [video]

 

MHFM: Consider two things: 1) If she hadn’t been caught by the hidden camera, people would probably have never known; 2) They didn’t even decide to charge her with a crime, but just let her go!  What an outrage.

 

Always

 

 

Israeli Minister: "We always use the Anti-Semitism trick or bring up the Holocaust" [video]

 

Indifferentism

 

Subject: Indifferentism

 

Lee Ann’s comments on Jamie Worn are right on.  I like her comparison to thievery.  But Worn is accurately reflecting the teaching of the Novus Ordo religion.  I was at dinner a couple of months ago with an old friend, the best man at my wedding 25 years ago, and our wives.  These are “good” people by modern standards, who wouldn’t dream of missing the Novus Ordo Mass on Sunday, have several children in their schools, and have “conservative” (again by modern standards) views.

 

Yet in discussing religion, after I had laid out an overview of the problems with Vatican II, the new mass, and the invalid priesthood,  my friend’s wife says “in the end I don’t think Jesus is going to care what church you went to”.   I asked her if ever she were to commit a mortal sin did she think she’d have to seek absolution from a priest.  The answer was yes.  So I followed up with: “well what about the protestant, or say even a Jew?”  “How are they restored to Grace?  Indeed what if one isn’t even baptized, you baptized your children didn’t you? “

 

Blank stares, and my “friend” was silent.  It is the same all of the time.   You don’t have to be a trained philosopher to see the contradiction, but it is like they can’t even think.  So unfortunately Jamie Worn is a typical Novus Ordite.  Atheists are probably more honest, they don’t pretend to believe something they don’t.

 

Bill Mulligan       

 

Dylan

 

Subject: Dylan Part 2 of Mess

 

Dear Brothers, I explained my history with rock n roll earlier.

 

When I saw the Dylan clip I thought of Led Zeplin who obviously sold their souls to the devil and they admit it. Their music was unbelievable.  It was amazing when you first heard a new album. I remember thinking, how could any human think this stuff up? Tonight I looked at the lyrics of the most popular song ever "Stairway to Heaven". I'm sure you have checked these lyrics but tonight I almost cried as the hair went up on my arms. Could it be the devil wrote a song about his greatest adversary? Think of the untold millions of horrible sins committed during the playing of that song. While pulling millions of souls straight to hell with sweet sounds, he seems to have acknowledged her greatness.

Hasn't it been written that Mary is the stairway to heaven?  Is she not the "May Queen"... "A Lady we all know who shines White Light"...

 

Ave Maria!

 

Matthew

 

MHFM: The satanic lyrics in the song you mention are exposed in our video, Abortion, Rock Music and Freemasonry Exposed. 

 

Theology of Body

 

Hi

 

Have you touched on JP2's extensive writings of theology of the body?  My aunt sent me a link to the Theology of the Body.  It is described as a theological timebomb yet to go off in the church.

 

George Weigel, author of Witness to Hope: The Biography of Pope John Paul II, calls this papal study of human sexuality “one of the boldest reconfigurations of Catholic theology in centuries” – a “theological time-bomb set to go off with dramatic consequences ...perhaps in the twenty-first century.” At this point the Pope’s vision of sexual love “has barely begun to shape the Church’s theology, preaching, and religious education.” But when it does, Weigel predicts, “it will compel a dramatic development of thinking about virtually every major theme in the Creed” (pp. 336, 343, 853).

 

I would be interested in your comments on his extensive writings on this subject that is considered a timebomb yet to go off.    Please keep up the great work.  I watch all your videos.  Your zeal for the truth is so needed.

 

Kathleen

 

MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail.  Perhaps we will have some more comments on it at some point, but we feel the evil and perversion behind it are self-evident. 

 

Admitting

 

Subject: Bob Dylan admitting to pact with the Devil

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Here is a video clip from the show 60 Minutes where Bob Dylan, being interviewed, blatantly admitting he made a pact with the devil. Thought you'd find it interesting.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqvvOD4bdRs

 

Keep up the good work.

 

Alp…

 

MHFM: That’s very interesting.  Thank you.  John Paul II invited Bob Dylan to perform at one of his events. 

 

Agree

 

Hello all,

 

I have just returned to roman Catholicism after many years away, I have discovered your website and would tend to agree that there is something missing, I live in (Glasgow) Scotland...

 

Your brother in Jesus

 

Arthur jennings.  

 

Reading

 

Dear Brothers:

 

In reading the comments sent to you by Jamie Worn, I was reminded once again that liberalism is darkness trying to pass itself off as light, and that the liberal is always a thief -- giving away what is not his to give.

 

The false V-2 religion is the "religion of luv" whose only virtue is "being nice";  its adherents enjoy basking in the glow of their own imagined goodness and generosity.  But, despising Truth, they love only themselves.  These thieves attempt to rob God of His right to be God;  they deny Christ's instruction to believe all things that He has taught;  and they rob their hapless victims of eternal life by destroying faith -- and hope.  Always speaking of love, kindness and charity, they are the very antithesis of charity.  It never dawns on these people that it's not "nice" to lead others to hell.

 

I believe it was Pope Pius IX who said the liberal Catholic was the worst enemy of the Church.  Who can doubt it?

 

Thanks for all you do,

 

Lee Ann

 

Cement

 

Dear Brother Michael and Peter Dimond,

The comment from the N.O. heretic regarding the atheist Christopher Hitchens, helps to cement and reinforce the fact that the N.O. crowd are likened to people on a rudderless boat in their sea of confusion and blindness - just fancy saying that an atheist should be allowed to 'tell his "truth" as he sees it' - whereby acknowledging that truth is relative, and in this case the LIE has now become the TRUTH !

That is all Satanic, and that such tripe comes mindlessly out of the mouths of these N.O. ( Nervous order ) people, who have no firm or secure beliefs...is not surprising, and I would guarantee that would be the response of most of them.   About 3 years ago, I did a random survey,which was not specifically aimed at Catholics, but did include a small number of them - on their understanding and acceptance of the Catholic Church's position on E.E.N.S.   Of course, most of the non - Catholics were unaware of any such teaching, BUT the half a dozen or so of people claiming to be Catholic, I questioned, ABSOLUTELY denied the doctrine that OUTSIDE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION!

If you are happy to swim in this N.O. muck, when the signs are everywhere -  then God will abandon you.

This is no time for the lukewarm - and that is what they are, and so God aptly rewards them accordingly...

- rubbish in - rubbish out!

God bless,

David

 

“Correction”

 

Subject: Correction

 

[To Most Holy Family Monastery]

 

There are those in Catholicism who say that love and kindness will overcome anything. This Catholic however has some Old Testament in him too, that says love and kindness have known boundaries.

 

There is no other way to speak to people like you than the following way:

Re: http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/christian_brotherhood.html

 

Peter when Jesus returns he will not be pre-occupied with the finer ecclesiastical divisions regarding Reformation and Catholicism, he will be pre-occupied in severely punishing ridiculous little men who make themselves believe these issues are more important than just preaching the good news, just tending to the sick and poor, just humbly turning the other cheek, just worshipping Him with contrition and just carrying His cross. This issue is for Jesus to resolve, not you. If both sides are basically acknowledging the Creeds, the rest is just hatred.

 

You are the true enemy of the church.

 

Jamie Worn

 

MHFM: You obviously claim to be Catholic and to believe in St. Peter’s authority.  Yet, you say that the “ecclesiastical divisions” are of no consequence.  You also argue that it’s outrageous to have a problem with Benedict XVI’s outrageous heresy: that Protestantism is NOT HERESY.  You are truly an astounding apostate who doesn’t believe one bit in Catholic teaching.  If you understood or believed in anything the Church teaches, you would realize that what you hold has been condemned by many popes.  To reject the Papacy, or any dogma of the Church, is to put oneself outside the unity of Christ and in a state of damnation.  What you argue is also condemned by Christ; He says that one must “hear the Church” (Mt. 18:17).  Yet, you argue that this of no consequence. 

 

What’s so astounding is not that you are such a faithless heretic – for there’s a multitude of them out there – but rather that you simultaneously seem to think you are a devoted Catholic.  We suppose it’s part of the unique blindness of this age: the most unbelieving apostates contend that they are the most faithful believers. 

 

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9), June 29, 1896: "The Church, founded on these principles and mindful of her office, has done nothing with greater zeal and endeavor than she has displayed in guarding the integrity of the faith. Hence she regarded as rebels and expelled from the ranks of her children all who held beliefs on any point of doctrine different from her own. The Arians, the Montanists, the Novatians, the Quartodecimans, the Eutychians, did not certainly reject all Catholic doctrine: they abandoned only a certain portion of it. Still who does not know that they were declared heretics and banished from the bosom of the Church? In like manner were condemned all authors of heretical tenets who followed them in subsequent ages."

 

Private Revelation

 

Subject: Private Revelation

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

 

Ave Maria!

 

I would like to comment on Ed’s email on his reading Ven. Anne Catherine Emmerich visions of Purgatory that mentions presence of PROTESTANTS … If I may add, the book also mentions JEWS as saved in Purgatory … I agree 100% with you Brothers on your opinion of her visions … I too had same conclusions since the book mentions that she simply dictated her visions and the messages were therefore transcribed by the trusted soul … she may have had the correct visions from God but when the messages were being written down there must have been mistakes hence, the wrong written messages (regardless if the original messages were true as granted ) must be treated as heretical as written … and again should the messages really sound heretical – there’s no other way to treat them but as coming from the Devil! ….. innocent (or ignorant) souls who are not familiar with basic traditional catholic catechism [much more with finer points] will definitely be led astray in their beliefs reading her book … so how would one know if he can read a revelation book (from approved sources)?? … You should answer a few qualifying questions e.g. Do you believe in baptism of desire or blood? Do you consider the Vatican II church as the Catholic Church? Do you believe the V2 “popes” to be true popes? Do you believe in the New Mass? Do you believe that Transubstantiation is effected in the New Mass? Do you consider the New Rite of Ordination valid? Can souls who die as non-Catholics be saved? Can non-Catholics be saved without the Catholic Faith? Do you consider Fr. Leonard Feeney's invalid "excommunication" valid? Do you not believe in the error (in good faith) of Fr. Feeney on Justification issues? Are sacraments performed by heretics and wicked men invalid though they do as the Church does? Do you consider the Catholic Church can restore to its former beauty and resurrect itself in the future? Do you consider the Catholic Church to have erred in any part of the history of the Catholic Church? Do you believe that some of the canonized Catholic Saints are possible to be heretics and are not in Heaven? Do you consider he Holy Scripture errs in some ways? Do you believe in the separation of Church and State? … just to name a few of significant Catholic beliefs … should your answer be YES to any of these questions then YOU ARE IN NO WAY QUALIFIED to read books that depict private revelation regardless if the said apparition is approved by pre-Vatican II Church authorities or not …. Should you do otherwise, not only you are putting your faith to peril but you are also wanting in humility … lacking in faith.  If your answer is yes, you don’t know your Catholic Faith, you don’t know how to read the "Mind of the Church", much more will you comprehend and know your God … pray hard and do some penance to align your orthodoxy to the correct one and yet still - do not read books of private revelations. 

 

Of course no private revelations in the post Vatican II counter church is real … we don’t need a genius to decipher their lies; a single heresy is enough to consider the entire revelation as coming from Hell … but how would you detect a heresy when you don't know your Faith? … study your faith very hard, pray the 15 decades of the rosary daily and always start and end your spiritual readings with prayers and Hail Mary's … and yet you still should not be reading private revelation books … these Catholics who insist reading these books are putting their faith in peril... in view of the inconsistencies and some heretical accounts no one should endorse her book nor recommend it …

 

The Mother Church teaches us that God's Public Revelation to man ended with the death of the last apostle … hence all revelations are labeled private regardless of the urgency and significance of the messages (Lourdes, Fatima etc) … because belief in Church approved private revelations IS NOT necessary for salvation.  Approved private revelations (e.g. Lourdes, Fatima, Carmel) are sent to us by God to show mankind of the Infinite Mercy God has on a human soul … He is never content with His Passion, Death and Resurrection but has sent His Mother from time to time on earth to warn us, guide us, strengthen us and save us from the tyranny of the Devil while false apparitions would definitely do exactly the opposite.  You nailed your argument by saying:  "That’s why Catholics (real Catholics) don’t go by visions, but by Catholic dogma."

 

May the good Lord and Our Lady continue to bless MHFM!!!

 

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey from the Philippines 

 

Atheist

 

Christopher Hitchens has cancer of the oesophagus

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/jul/01/christopher-hitchens-cancer

 

'''Christopher Hitchens, the iconoclastic writer, is to undergo chemotherapy after being diagnosed with cancer of the oesophagus...I regret having had to cancel so many engagements at such short notice...Hitchens, 61, and a renowned heavy smoker until giving up several years ago, made the announcement after cutting short a US tour promoting his latest book, Hitch 22...In his 2008 book God Is Not Great, Hitchens put himself on a collision course with major religions with his trenchant atheist views...''

 

If one scrolls down to the comments section of that same page there is one Novus ordo ''gem'' : from alltalk--'''As a practising Catholic, very much on the other side of the fence from Mr Hitchens, I wish him a complete and speedy recovery and may he soon return to telling the truth as he sees it.'''

 

One should of course hope and pray for his conversion to the One True Catholic Faith no matter how impossible that may seem.

 

V. from Croatia

 

MHFM: That’s a very interesting comment from the Novus Ordo heretic.

 

French Revolution

 

Dear Brothers,

 

That is an extremely powerful video exposing the demonic and Antichrist French Revolution… The outlawing of Christianity there during that period reminds me of the outlawing of Christmas in Schismatical England around 1650. The Freemasons and Illuminati were certainly given temporal power to bring about the overthrow of Catholic France. Their catch-cry, "Liberty, Fraternity, Equality," has become a world-wide (false) dogma today as we see homosexuals made "equal" to heterosexuals, and abortion abattoirs more common than McDonalds!!! It is the replacement of Almighty God with puny man - Antichrist - and the design is the same today as it was in 1789 - revolution by blood. Of course, the Vatican II sect either says nothing or actually promotes the New World Murder. The schismatical oath imposed by King Louis XVI seems to parallel the abolition of the oath against modernism by Antipope Paul VI. The V-2 Antipopes would probably call the revolutionaries who died, "martyrs for the progress of humanity," by applying the heresy of baptism of blood. Today, the Freemasons have arrested control of all available vehicles of information (T.V., radio, newspaper, etc.) and then flood the public with naturalistic propaganda to deliberately create chaos or anarchy - "liberty." Then they persecute those who don't go along with their lies - "fraternity." Finally they impose unjust laws to destroy the family and by consequence all of society - "equality." The French Revolution was a genocide of France, and if the New World Ordites get their way, it will be a global genocide… It proves how essential it is to have an active Catholic faith by spreading and defending it, staying out of mortal sin and in the state of grace, a strong devotion to Mary, the Rosary and spiritual reading… Otherwise, when the tipping point comes, we'll find ourselves too weak and cowardly to save our souls, and lose God forever, like the pathetic coward and schismatic King Louis XVI!!! May Jesus and Mary help all Catholics to remain in the state of grace at all times.

 

I listened to your debate/conversation with the radical schismatic, heretic, and liar, Aaron, on the issues of Baptism, Heresy and Schism (Part 1 - Part 2). His unwillingness to accept the clear truths of the Catholic faith is incredible and outrageous! The radical schismatics' position is Antichrist because they put the Papacy (occupied by man) in the place of God by saying that the essential mysteries which must be positively known in order to be Catholic (along with being water baptized), are not only the Trinity and the Incarnation, but also the Papacy. The Church doesn't teach that, as Bro. Peter kept pointing out. Due to the schismatic's pride, they are tools of the devil, and so fall into an idolatry of the Papacy, because the essential mysteries which must be known and believed in order to be Catholic and saved pertain to God only (Trinity and Incarnation), not to man (Papacy). Obviously their error and schism is another manifestation of the spirit of Antichrist - even though they reject Antichrist Antipope John Paul II, for instance, they put a pope in the place of God by basically declaring (falsely) that a pope must be known in order to be saved. His heresy is manifested by his misunderstanding of the term "subject to the Roman Pontiff," because baptism automatically makes a person subject to the Roman Pontiff, whether they are an infant or an adult, but the radical schismatics think that subjection to the Roman Pontiff is a separate action (especially of the will) to being baptized. For example, a person who becomes an American citizen, when they do so, i.e. they complete the procedure required (the parallel to baptism), then they are automatically made subject to the President of the U.S. - the person chooses to be subject to the President by becoming a citizen of the U.S. - the subjection to the President and the becoming a U.S. citizen are one and the same action, not two distinct actions. However the radical schismatics appear to think that a person subjects himself to the pope by a separate and conscious act (a choice) of submission to, i.e. subjection to, the pope, before, during or after baptism - but the Church teaches that baptism automatically subjects the person to the Pope at the very moment of baptism, not by the individual's choice at any time. It is no coincidence that the word heresy is derived from the word "to choose," and that it is the heretical and radical schismatics who think that subjection to the Roman Pontiff is a matter of choice and not a matter of water baptism. Aaron's position appears to be an inversed version of baptism of desire because he separates water baptism from membership in the Church (i.e. subjection to the Roman Pontiff), by making a distinction between baptism and subjection to the Pope, when there is none. On all other matters aside from the Trinity and the Incarnation, obstinacy is necessary for a baptized person to become a heretic. Aaron was (and presumably still is) obstinate and is therefore a heretic. Well done… for exposing his lies, hypocrisy and heresies…

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White  

 

Convinced

 

Dear Brothers Dimond:

 

Thank you for the work you are doing on a daily basis...

 

As a result of the videos, audios and articles, I am convinced that Catholicism holds the answers to all my questions, and that it is the true faith - I wish to convert.

 

I was already aware of the Masonic influence on our culture and government… I grew up in Mexico. However, my parents were foreigners, and thus I was baptized Methodist. But I grew up among Catholics and I always longed to know more about it but I always felt somehow left out, that there was nothing I could do. Now, at 44, I am finally understanding better. I was under the impression that protestants believed in faith and works, and that catholics did not!! No wonder I have not sought to convert until now. I now know I was sadly mistaken but I rejoice that I have learned about this during my lifetime, and to the benefit of my children, whom I would like to baptize in the faith as well…

  

I look forward to answers to my questions, and again, thank you for finally explaining to me personally the difference between Catholicism and Protestantism. I see your points so clearly, and they can be summed up as the workship of man vs. the worship of God…

 

Sincerely,

 

Jeanne-Marie Johnson Bryan

 

Talk

 

Subject: French Revolution…

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for your Video!... We have had a lot of talk about the origin and meaning of the Statue of Liberty, especially since Rush explained it last week.  But, of course, Rush did not get to the Real Masonic meaning of it either, but was better than Glenn Beck and others trying to make it into the Statue of Immigration.  There is an urge to Bull Doze it after reading the Masonic meaning, but as Catholics, aren't we suppose to take the good and discount the bad as our fore fathers had to do going into Roman society?   I passed your Video on to friends as a wake up...

 

Thanks again for all you do,

 

Carol D.

 

France

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery:

 

Most Holy Family Monastery is… casting light into the darkness, illuminating evil and dispelling it, helping others see the narrow path more clearly…

 

So glad you are continuing with the videos and so apropos for the 4th of July to discuss France.  When that young fellow of 24 wrote you to say he never heard of V2, you are absolutely correct about continuing to post historical discussions from the Catholic point of view; which is the truth!  People are very poorly educated today and unless a parent tells their child important knowledge, Catholic history is forgotten within one generation.

 

Monsieur Descartes had a pivotal role in laying the foundation for the Reign of Terror.  Because his, "Je pense donc je suis," (cogito ergo sum) really means:  I think therefore I AM.  Very clever use of the first person I AM, which is God's Name.  Rene was saying he was God, "I am God because I think."  It is a very easy matter to show that Rene Descartes was not thinking, though he thought he was!  (I am avoiding the obvious comparison of Descartes to Galileo Galilei who also wrote in the vernacular.)…

 

Please continue with these marvelous videos; they are informative and thought-provoking.

 

Ad Jesum per Mariam,

Deidre Howard

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers:

 

I was so delighted to read Mike's rave reviews on your book Absolutely No Salvation; this book could very well be the most important book I've ever read. As I had not previously known this dogma (having been taught just the opposite), by the time I finished reading the book I felt as though I had been shot from a cannon.  It was shocking for me to learn this dogma.   Every day for about a week I said to myself:   If this is what the Church teaches, then I must and will believe it - and I prayed for help.  (That's when I started the three Rosaries each day.)  It was almost like having a St. Paul conversion - although mine wasn't immediate but took about a week.  It's not possible for me to tell you how grateful I am for this book.

 

… I would like to second Mike's recommendation that this book is must reading for everyone.

 

Thanks, too, for the video on the French Revolution.  Real food for thought amidst all the sounds of fireworks.

 

With gratitude,

Lee Ann

 

Latest

 

Subject: Great French Revolution video

 

Thank you for all of the wonderful videos you have been posting...they are not only very educational, but they do so much for my morale and perseverance. 

The latest video on the French Revolution was very good - it relates so much to the times we are living in right now.  I think that demonic is a perfect adjective for the French Revolution.  (I was taught that King Louis XIV and XVI were very good Catholic Kings).

May God reward you for your diligence,

Teri Thurman

 

Dogma

 

Hello Brother Peter:

 

I am again reading your book "Outside the Catholic Church there is Absolutely No Salvation". It is true that upon second and third readings, etc., one gleans more and more from a particular work. I must say that this document is amazing, truly. I have read hundreds of books, studied philosophy and Theology, and have written a great deal as well. The scope of this book is not only good - comprehensive, but that it propounds the absolute truth of Our Lord Jesus Christ on this issue, it has an air of true blessedness to it (as sure Dogmas always do). It may well be the very best manuscript I have ever read on any topic. This is the work that every single true Catholic needs to read and learn. Even if one believes the Dogma on the face of it, to read and learn this book is greatly edifying. One cannot be a "traditional Catholic" and not believe and assent to the truth contained in this book. The Novus Ordos should, of course, read this work as well. Just the first few pages - containing the Magisterial Declarations of the Dogma - prove how absolutely, utterly dishonest any man is who even questions the Dogma. I have read all your books and listened to all of your debates, and it is my personal conclusion that this particular book is probably the single most important of all. Sad to say (and this is true for likely the majority of Novus Ordos) that most of the Novus Ordo laypeople have never, ever heard the truth on this matter (Nevertheless, they should be at the very least questioning the crass relativism of the Novus Ordo - but they don't care at all!), but have been brainwashed by the anti-christ antipopes and their "bishops". (The Vatican II "bishops" and "priests" are purely vile and wicked through and through) What good popes we have had in defining this Dogma in past centuries. This is the gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, pure and simple. Good work and many thanks.

 

-Always, Mike

 

Book

 

Hi Brothers,

I'm reading the book, Preparation for Death the abridgement, what a book it helps a lot. 

 

Todd

 

MHFM: It’s a tremendous book.

 

Faith

 

Dear Bros.,

 

Often lately, I have been searching for the examples of orthodox christians that claim to hold catholic tradition… Knowing that the issue here regards the highest intellectual pursuit of truth, via, the Catholic Faith, one must wonder why these groups seem not to be so objective in their concept of tradition and truth. That being said, the visual and practical evidence of change, circa 1970, but more accurately 1958, now with hindsight, should awaken any honest man to the dire circumstances we face as catholics today.

 

Most members I have come across in these groups seem to, "make people feel good, without these people actually being very good". The money people who work at anti-catholic jobs are favored amongst the priests without any rebuke or correction of employment. Still, nothing is really done or accomplished at all. The only thing foremost in their minds is

going to the latin mass. What about The Faith that leads to the mass? In all truth and honesty, it should and must, be the Mass of St. Pius V.!!!

 

St. Paul tells us that the household of the faith is the priority!!! Then, our faithless neighbors!!! Why are some groups so concerned about their neighbor before their own flock? BOD is a non issue! i.e.nonsense…

 

The time is near when we all might just resemble holy Job. Who in this material world will be blessing God when their worldly "paradise" is lost in an instant?

 

Bros., it is a shame that you are having to do what you do seemingly, almost alone!!! But I am thankful for your charity!... I thank you for your catholic frankness!...

 

Sincerely, J R

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  Even though the salvation dogma deniers might pretend to have a concern for their fellow man, they don’t.  By rejecting what God has said about salvation, they run from the truth concerning their neighbor.  Without the true knowledge of how to assist their neighbor, which only comes with belief in the dogmas of faith, they cannot possess true charity.  As a result, they wind up hating their neighbor either by lying to him or by failing to work for his salvation in the way that a person with the true faith would. 

 

Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (#9), Jan. 6, 1928: “… the foundation of charity is faith pure and inviolate…”

 

Hebrews 11:6- “Without Faith it is impossible to please God.”

 

Video

 

MHFM: This is a brief video discussion of Benedict XVI’s recent heresies:

 

On Benedict XVI’s recent heresies, June 2010 [video]

 

Connection

 

“My people are destroyed from the lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I also reject you as my priests; because you have ignored the law of God…” – Hosea 4:5-6

 

Hmmm. I wonder if there is a connection in this verse to the scores of invalid priests of the end times we're living in.

 

Alpha…

 

Heretics

 

Dear brothers in Christ,

I've listened to first 30 minutes of the debate "Is Benedict XVI the Pope?", and all I can say is that I feel tormented by the legion of demons coming out of the mouth of your opponent. Of course I deserve all the torment befalling me, so much so I can experience infinite God's Mercy in being able to stop that for some time.

You've pointed out to him numerous times that a heretic is not a member of the Church, that believing otherwise is equal to deny the Unity of the Faith etc., and what was his answer? As is usual with the heretics, he spews out a bunch of contradictions; he is pathetically trying to get away with the apostasy of V2-antipopes by saying that some translations are incorrect, that those antichrists were not aware what they were doing, etc. etc.  Of course, your opponent, being a heretic himself, is not trying to meditate upon a simple question: Should I follow a man who is constantly not aware what he is doing, who constantly on an hourly (not daily) basis blasphemes Our Lord Jesus Christ? What about the words of Our Lord Jesus Christs, and Teachings of the Church:
   
Matthew 15:14- Let them alone: they are blind, and leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into the pit?

No, these words, and all the infallible words of all true popes mean nothing to the obstinate heretics and apostates. They are constantly mumbling the phrases whose sole meaning is "true is false, false is true". They are denying even the possibility of the existence of good and evil, "yes" and "no", true and false, faithful and unfaithful, etc.

Dearest and Most Holy Mother of God, thank you for your protection of True Faith amongst the remnant of True Catholics.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

Regarding

 

Hello: I came across a few of your videos regarding the end of times and your websites articles regarding the Catholic church. I have been a Catholic all my adult life, mind you not a very practicing one but I was baptized in the Catholic church. Are you or the people on your website saying that the Catholic church as I knew it does not exist anymore? I have not had a chance to listen to all of your videos and tapes on the subject yet, but I did want to ask you the question before I go any further. It would not surprise me if this was the case with all the bad things that have been going on with the church. If this is true, who are you and your website? Where does a Catholic like myself go to worship?

 

Thank you,
Deric

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  No, we are not saying that the Catholic Church doesn’t exist.  It still exists, but in a remnant of traditional Catholics.  We are pointing out and proving, from Catholic teaching, that the mainstream “Catholic Church” (the organization under Benedict XVI) is not the Catholic Church, but a false Counter Church.  This situation was predicted to occur in Catholic prophecy, and the fact that we are in it is proven by the teaching of the past popes.  The Church teaches that heretics cannot be valid office holders in the Church, and we can demonstrate that the men who brought in all of these changes were heretics and thus antipopes.  We hope you continue to look at the information, and especially our DVD on the Third Secret of Fatima.  It really explains a lot to those who are new.  It’s also crucial to pray the Rosary each day.  Once a person is in full agreement, we can help him or her with where to receive sacraments.  One must never go to the New Mass, of course.

 

The Great Apostasy and a Counterfeit Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy

 

The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope [PDF file]

 

Re-Christianize

 

Hello Brothers

I've just came across this information on the Vatican, and I'm not sure if you've seen it yet. Benedict XVI will be attempting to rechristianize Europe apparently.

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/pope-creates-office-to-promote-a-renewed-evangelisation-in-europe-123755.html

Another thing that caught my attention was when my mother was attending a novena, the Priest there revealed that prayers in the mass would be changing, and that it was ordered by Rome. Have you heard anything about this?


Sincerely, Neil

 

MHFM: Yes, that’s the kind of stuff he says frequently, as he simultaneously spreads complete religious indifferentism and apostasy.  A few bland words with no practical effect, as he cuts the heart of the Gospel out from Europe by promoting false religions and non-Catholic sects.  They have spoken for years about “correcting” egregious abuses and mistranslations in the New Mass.  It’s almost always a lot of talk without almost any practical effect.  They win in the media, while nothing really changes.  And even if they did correct certain things, it would not matter because the entire “Mass” itself is invalid and non-Catholic.  Hence, the effort is a sideshow, a distraction, and a deception for those gullible enough to obstinately believe that there is genuine Catholicism in the Vatican II sect. 

 

When

 

MHFM,

 

Yes, of course, I also am sure that the Church cannot break, I expressed myself wrongly, what I meant to say was: "JPII had perhaps the intention to break the Church.

 

I have since a longtime a question that bothers me a lot: When I still went to the Novus Ordo Mass, I had a Trentain said for a very close family member. The thirty Masses were said in Latin, but it were Paul 6 masses in latin (with the canon that resembles the most to the Pius V Mass) Now, do you think this Trentain has been absolute useless?

I would appreciate your opinion,

 

C.Christiaanse

 

MHFM: The deliberate removal of “mysterium fidei,” from the consecration form of Paul VI’s Latin version of the New Mass, causes a grave doubt.  It cannot be considered valid.  For that reason, those Masses cannot be considered to have been effective.

 

Presbyterian Wedding

 

Subject: Presbyterian Wedding

 

Dear MHFM,

 

My cousin recently got engaged to a Presbyterian. Unfortunately he and his fiance are going to have the wedding at a Presbyterian church.  He has asked me to be in the wedding, but i would never walk in a not Catholic… building for a mass, let alone a wedding!! 

 

My cousin and i are only two weeks apart in age and have done almost everything together since birth.  I know what the answer your going to give me...but my real question is how can i talk him out of getting married at a Presbo church.

 

This decision will make a pretty big impact on my family and friends but since i have starting praying the rosary and reading the bible, i am petrified to commit a MORTAL sin again. I have been working EXTREMELY hard in staying on the right course and this will only make satan smile.

 

With this being said, he is also going to get a Vatican II priest to preside in the mass which I thought was ridiculous to begin with.  I know you are extremely busy and i don’t know how you do everything you do, but if you have an answer for me please lt me know.

 

Thank You and God Bless You,

Joe

 

MHFM: First, a Catholic may not attend such a wedding – not the service, and not the reception.  There are many reasons for this.  The most obvious is that your cousin is not a Catholic, even though it sounds like he claims to be.  Second, even if he were getting married in a traditional Catholic setting, you still couldn’t attend.  That’s because he’s obviously a heretic.  That’s demonstrated by his willingness to be married in a non-Catholic church.  Third, since we assume he claims to be Catholic, he can’t even marry the Presbyterian.  Mixed marriages are normally forbidden, and they were only allowed in exceptional circumstances with a dispensation and agreement that the children would be raised Catholic.  The marriage would also have to observe a Catholic form, and not be done in a Protestant church.  As you can see, a “marriage” to her in a Presbyterian church won’t even be valid.  For these reasons, this whole “marriage” is fraught with problems that touch upon a denial of the true faith. 

 

You shouldn’t tell him that he shouldn’t get married at a Presbyterian church.  Rather, you should charitably inform him that he’s not a Catholic and shouldn’t be marrying this woman at all.  It would be a sin to attend, or to send him a gift, a card or anything.  Of course, this response will be criticized by those who don’t care about the faith; but it will be completely understood by those who do. 

 

Can one passively attend non-Catholic funerals, weddings?  No.

 

Fourth Mystery

 

MHFM,

 

By praying the whole Rosary, one says 153 times "Ave Maria", number which represents the Church (The miraculous fishing , so adding a "Fourth" mystery really makes no sense.  (St.John Ch. 21-11  Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land, full of great fishes, one hundred and fifty-three. And although there were so many, the net was not broken.) Perhaps the "Fourth mystery "breaks the the net??!! which is the Church.

 

En union de prières,

C.Christiaanse

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  It attempts to break it, but cannot completely succeed, as the Church exists in a remnant.

 

Cartoon

 

Subject: Cartoon

 

Some company is producing a new cartoon called Neighbors from Hell, in which an oil company invented a drill so powerful it will penetrate into the depths of hell, thus exposing it to people.  Thus, the devil send demons to live in suburbia, work for the company, and sabotage the drill.  The cartoon is profane in the extreme, and a few years ago would have received an X rating.  Ironic it went on the air just after the drill disaster down south.

 

Karl

 

Vatican II

 

I appreciate your channel and the good work you do. I'm a 24 year old roman catholic born and raised and i never even heard of Vatican 2 so this is very interesting stuff!. God bless you.

 

Frank…

 

Most will not

 

Brother Michael: Your web site states that most of us "Catholics" will not obtain eternal life ( Heaven). It is frightening to consider that both of my parents, wife, relatives, etc. will suffer eternal damnation. I am seventy two years old and have lost all of the above, not counting many acquaintances. Most of the above people I spoke of, were nominal Catholics and some never went to Mass, never mind confession or received the sacraments. Even the most pious person would have this "sword" hanging over there head. As a man of my age we get set in our ways and can not see our own faults and I know I have many. Could you offer some insight into this dilemma…

 

 John

 

MHFM: Well, Scripture and Tradition teach us that few are saved: Few are Saved- Most Adult Catholics are damned.  Just look at the Old Testament; look at how many of God’s people fell into idolatry, betrayed Him and denied Him repeatedly.  Consider even the more Catholic ages of the Church.  King Louis XIV is just one example we discussed recently.  Most of the Catholics at that time didn’t have the attitude, the honesty, the intention or the interest that’s necessary to be saved.  If they held a public position, again and again they fell into working against the Church if their interests dictated it; those of other states of life did not engage their faith actively, but were Catholics primarily in name or only when they showed up at church. 

 

It’s not that it’s that difficult to be saved.  It’s that most people, in every age, don’t have the interior honesty, the interest or the detachment from creatures to follow God.  To have more security, make sure you are free from any taint of heresy; and that you are praying the full Rosary each day, doing spiritual reading, and engaging your faith.  This is demonstrated by a strong prayer life, learning more about God and your faith and – this is crucial – working to spread the true faith and convert others in the way that you can.  That demonstrates an active faith.  A truly pious person will not be damned; however, false piety is frequently mistaken for true piety.

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

 

Good day, the two of you are to be commended for the outstanding research and your persistent effort in spreading the true faith of Holy Mother Church, many thanks on behalf of all your readers.  I've been searching around the internet a bit and following the oil spill disaster in the gulf, a friend sent a link to me and I found one myself as well I'm sending them to the two of you and would like to know your opinion on them if you can find the time to view and listen to them.  We all hear many different scenarios as to what is truly happening in the gulf through main stream media, so without a doubt none outside of the ones in charge specifically the US government and BP really knows the truth...Jesus, Mary, Joseph, please pray for us...

 

Doyle Maser

 

B-16

 

I am sorry but I have one more comment to make about the excellent recent heresies of B16 update you just posted:  the words coming our of this chief heresiarch's mouth and indeed ALL the V2 worst-nightmare-scenario mouths are SO SPIRITUALLY TOXIC SO LETHAL SO DEADLY----it is literally so physically nauseating as to be way beyond words but I may have to spend a lot of time puking today--------and the seemingly endless pit of oil/benzene/toxic fumes now spilling out of the Gulf of Mexico just seems to mirror or reflect this V2 deadly spiritual apostasy----------it never ends,  it will never end,  until God puts all these into the pits of hell!!--------may He come soon with His holy Angels!  Oh Mary Mother of God pray for us! 

 

A.

 

“Life”

 

Subject: “Life”

 

Dear Brothers:

 

A question has been bothering me for some time and I wondered if you had some thoughts on it:  Jesus said, "Unless you eat My Flesh and drink My Blood, you will NOT have life in you.  If you eat My Flesh and drink My Blood you WILL have life, and I will RAISE YOU UP on the Last Day."  In these dangerous times when one can hardly, if not at all find a validly ordained priest or a true Mass, how is one supposed to obey this?  Also, does this not mean that, in order to be fair to the "elect" Jesus MUST return almost immediately, or no one will have "life"?  Is this what He meant when He said, "For the sake of the elect, the days will be shortened?"  I believe it is also mentioned in the scriptures that, "Unless those days are shortened, no one will be saved."  What happens if we cannot receive "life"?  Will those of us who have made a choice to follow Him in truth be able to be raised up on the Last Day?  Does this mean we are not actually a part of the "elect" if the Lord does not provide an opportunity to receive the Blessed Sacrament?  I would very much appreciate your thoughts on this…

 

In Christ,

 

Perry

 

MHFM: At various times we’ve discussed how the necessity of the Eucharist is different from the necessity of water baptism.  The necessity of water baptism is absolute, for every man, and without exception.  The necessity of the Eucharist is for those who hear the command and can fulfill it.  It’s obviously a very serious necessity, but there can be exceptions.  In addition to the teaching of the Church, that’s demonstrated by the language of the two key biblical passages (John 3:5 and John 6:54). 

 

If one absolutely cannot receive the Eucharist, then he could be saved without it, if he maintains the true faith and the state of grace, although presumably it would be more difficult.  Nevertheless, Jesus says that one must receive Him to have life.  That’s serious.  That’s why we’ve been of the opinion that if there is a priest who might constitute an acceptable option, we believe one may go, especially in this crisis where essentially every priest is heretical in some way.  That’s as long as one doesn’t agree with or support the priest or his heretical positions.  The priest would also have to fall within certain guidelines, as our file on that covers.  Yet, many today have nowhere to go because all the options are priests who should not be approached, either because they are notorious or imposing heretics or they are of questionable validity.  In those cases, people could be saved if they have the true faith, a strong prayer life and devotion to Our Lady, and if they maintain the state of grace.  However, we do believe that there should be options for confession for almost everyone, as the aforementioned file covers. 

 

Luminous Mysteries, 666

 

Subject: 666 concerning the so-called Luminous Mysteries

 

About the new set JP2 created, there are some interesting considerations to be made.

 

1-Bugnini tried to do a similar thing while under Paul VI. Even AntiPope Montini considered it too radical of a change and said it was to remain untouched; It took decades of satanic innovations, liturgical vandalisms and all kinds of aberrations in order for the V-2 sect to feel sure enough that people, now accustomed to changes and the notion that nothing is free of reform, would gladly embrace the new set.

 

2-One can see, however, the new plan devised by the AntiChurch. They no longer try to impose the reforms. They just offer it as a suggestion. People are free not to use it, as long as they recognize its validity. They now do the same when it comes to the Mass. And it´s all together appropriate to a time of perdition when people started to hate dogmatic truths and rigid rules, but are open to ideas, opinions and friendly suggestions. Or at least done in a way that appears to be friendly. (the biggest the smile, the sharpest the knife).

 

3-There´s nothing wrong in itself if a person wants to pray more than 15 decades. Some people with a strong prayer life enjoy praying the full 3 sets of Mysteries, and then dedicate an extra set just for the souls suffering in Purgatory. Saint Maria Goretti used to pray it 2 times. One with her family, another one specifically for her deceased dad.

 

4-The problem with the new set id that it takes away the attention from Our Lady, and try to focus more on Our Lord. Once again, they try to please Protestants. It´s one more point of the wave of innovations, just like Saint Joseph being introduced in the Canon of the Mass. 

 

5-Each of the 150 Ave Marias has a correspondent Psalm. When you pray 200, the connection is lost. 

 

6-There´s another very interesting thing regarding the fourth set. I think you´re going to enjoy this one because it´s more evidence .that JP2 was total Anti-Christ. Perhaps even THE Anti-Christ, as you´ve been saying for quite some time. When this information came to my attention, I still regarded JP2 as a valid Pope. What you are about to read gave me the creeps, scared me to death because it´s too much to be a coincidence.  

 

In some countries, like Portugal and Brazil, the Rosary is popularly know as "O Terço". This would translate into English as "The Third part". It´s because each Mystery is 1/3 of the full rosary. When someone prays all 3 sets, we say that person prayed "all of the third".

 

When Jp2, crazy by the wine of the fornication of his Apostate Sect, tried to create (even though not imposing) a new set of Mysteries, what he tried to do was to establish a 4/3. This is as insane as a third-half.

 

Also, when you sum the 150 Hail Maries and divide it by THE THIRD (3), you get 50. But if you add the 200, as proposed by JP2, and divide it not by 4, but as usual by 3, guess what, Dimond Brothers? You get 66,6!!! 

 

Total Anti-Christ indeed. Even when he and B16 try to do something that appears to be reverent, devoted or conservative, it´s all an orchestrated ploy.

 

CK

 

Heresies

 

Subject: Benedict XVI’s Heresies and Oil Spill and Rosary

 

MHFM,

Great videos on exposing that heretical evil man.  I was recently finished re-reading "Answers to Most Common Objections against Sedevacantism" and now with your recent video on Benedict XVI's recent heresies, it just made it all a complete short study on the heretical Vatican II sect.  I have learned a lot more and, of course, everyday I learn something new, whether it's from the simple Quote of the Day or Heresy of the Week, or better yet, your short clip video updates on the outstanding heresies of the Vatican II sect.  Thank once again.

… By the way, I noticed how you titled HOW: "Benedict XVI's Massive Heresy Spill Disaster" [No pun intended! Right? :)]

Thanks for changing my life through your charitable and beautiful work.

May Our Lord and Mother Mary always protect you.

Sincerely,
Bernardo T

 

Exposing

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for the video exposing Antipope Benedict XVI's latest heresies (June 29, 2010). The picture of him shaking Anglican "Archbishop" of Canterbury's hand appears to be a concealed freemasonic handshake. So, in Benedict XVI's mind, he is a "brother" with all the other freemasons - according to him, one doesn't need to have the Catholic faith to be his brother - what an Apostate! It's amazing how the Vatican II sect and its Antipopes do actually understand that in order for them to (try to) destroy the Catholic Church it is crucial for them to undermine the Catholic faith and dogmas by promoting heresy, schism and apostasy, i.e. they know how powerful the Catholic faith is and they are desperate to stamp it out, especially by promoting religious indifferentism. By their promotion of a New World Order, it's clear that their highest priority is the salvation of the world, not the salvation of souls. By means of ecumenism he (Benedict XVI) praises and prays with schismatics and Protestants (such as Lutherans), calls their leaders "brothers" and "Archbishops," and says they have the Apostolic faith - in doing so he totally rejects the Papacy and Christ. It's absolutely outrageous! He condemns intolerance but does not even tolerate the simple, humble truths (dogmas) of the Catholic faith! He promotes freedom of conscience and religion, which is in reality "freedom" of evil. Benedict XVI is a slave to the Devil - the Devil's pet Antichrist Beast!! Antipope Benedict XVI is a deceiver and deceived - his is so proud of his heresies that if anyone tried to stop them gushing out of his mouth he'd probably explode in a ball of poisonous gases! What a foolish apostate.

 

The V-2 Pittsburgh "Bishop," Apostate David Zubik being awarded the synagogue's "pursuer of peace" award shows how the V-2 sect is at peace with the Devil, i.e. by not condemning Judaism and other false religions or fighting for the purity of the Catholic faith. Also, the fact that NYC's "Archbishop" Dolan allows his parishioners to participate in a gay pride march without excommunicating or stopping them shows how extreme the Vatican II sect is with its apostasy. Likewise, the Apostate Portuguese "Bishop" who thinks the Church's teachings against contraception and homosexuality are a "little inflexible" shows how far he's willing to compromise - probably just to keep his job, but at the expense of his soul! 

 

The Vatican II hierarchy almost never, if ever, condemns the unjust treatment of those who are trying to spread the Christian/Catholic faith. Though not a Catholic (or Christian) the youth minister who was arrested for preaching (though he wasn't preaching the true Christian faith) in the mall is shocking, but the V-2 sect says nothing and in effect endorses such outrages. Another example is the article on the homosexual books that are very popular. The V-2 "bishops" could easily condemn such hideous perversion, but they just carry on as if God's judgment on Sodom and Gomorrah were a myth!!! The Vatican II sect's sins reach clear up to heaven. It's total Antichrist Apostasy!

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Removing

 

Dear Brothers,

 

May the good Lord be with you,

 

About removing Holy Catholic names from universities etc, here in Portugal there are also rumours that the ungodly forces  are working on to eradicate all Holy names from the Hospitals and other places.

 

They, the government are also seriously working to change or even take away from the calendar all Catholic Holy days of obligation with the exception of Christmas at this point, in the name of the world crises.

I have heard  the Current Vatican II Sect of disgrace on the news that they are willing to compromise with this horrible government.

 

May Our Lord protect us from these monstrous evil people.

 

M. Fernanda Silva  

 

Fourth

 

Dear MHFM,


I came across this on some websites on 'How to pray the Rosary'.  They specify a fourth set of mysteries called 'Luminous Mysteries'.  I know your website only asks us to pray 15 decades(3 mysteries).  What are Luminous Mysteries then?

Thank You.

 

Sam…

 

MHFM: The Luminous Mysteries were added by Antipope John Paul II.  They are not part of the Rosary.  The Rosary has 15 mysteries.  The Luminous Mysteries should not be prayed when praying the Rosary.

 

Oil Spill

 

Subject: Very informative regarding Gulf Oil Spill… Thank You!

 

When I first saw the images coming in of the "red" oil in the Gulf, I immediately thought of this passage. Thank you for sharing this video and explaining the scripture. I do believe that this may very well be what the scripture is referring to, and I believe that we haven't even begun to experience the repercussions of this devastation.

Oh, and I agree that there are those who have certain greedy agendas that include keeping us dependent on foreign governments, and also keeping us dependent on government, in general. It is their desire to condition us to depend upon government. . . for reasons that I shudder to think about!
"The LOVE of money is the root of all evil. . ." I say that this disaster, as bad as I hate it for the fishermen and people who depend on the ocean for their livelihood, is what BP gets for being so greedy! GOD is always in control. He just lets people THINK they are, sometimes. . .

Thanks. Great video.
Carol

 

Posting

 

Subject: Oil Spill!!!

 

Dude!!!! Me and my folks came to the same conclusion man!!! Totally cool! Man, scary but at the same time exciting!!! Very good video man, like it a lot!!! Awesome! Thanks for posting that.

Kindest Regards,
GBlues…

 

Last Rites

 

Subject: Last Rites

 

Dear Brothers,

 

May God continue to bless you in your work.

 

My parents and family are all in the Novus Ordo.  I have shown them your videos and books, but to no avail. Recently, my mother had a hip replcement.  It was considered a very simple surgery.  Yet, she went to the Novus Ordo presidor, and received the "Last Rites."  Unbelievable!!!  Another example that the Novus Ordo is definetly not Catholic.

 

Wayne C. Lang

 

Facts, Truth

 

Dear Br. Michael,

 

Your section reguarding Fr. Wathen and other "trad priests" is, to me, the crucial topic of the human element as regards holy orders today.  These men claim to be faithful priests of the One,Holy,Catholic,and Apostolic Church, but if you start  to show any signs of anti-lemming mentality, you no longer are important as members of the particular mass center. Obviously, due to the last 50yrs, normal parish life has been destroyed.

 

People are so lost in themselves, from what I have seen and know myself, that they forget the Divine element in the whole picture of what Catholicism really is. Therefore, they are only satisfied with an external, thin veneer of the real faith.

 

Doctrine is the key to any real doors opening for all in this fight. If we refuse to Know truth, and settle for our own comfortable little "trad" pieces of tradition, we will continue to see  non-unity amongst our so-called, "traditionalists"!

 

It really is beyond belief that these priests cannot instruct themselves and lead their sheep from this human foolishness we have lived through since Pope Pius XII.

 

Thank you for calling things as they are and reminding people that the Facts matter! Quality over quantity!

 

Sincerely, J R


P.S. What part of Daniel do they not understand?

 

Consecrate

 

Greetings in Jesus Christ,

 

I don't believe a priest who is gay even though he ordained before 1968, consecrate a Tridentine Mass, and the mass and the host is valid to be attended. Because if he is gay, that means he is under Satan's possession. He is unclean and outside of the church, cut off from the tree of life, Jesus Christ.

 

Then his duties or conduct acting as a priest to perform the sacraments are null. Am I right or this is wrong to the Catholic teachings?

 

May God bless your work for the Church.

 

Kim-Lan Vu

 

MHFM: You are not correct that such a priest could not validly consecrate.  You are right that such a priest is in mortal sin and under demonic possession.  However, even evil priests can consecrate if they intend to do what the Church does and observe the traditional rite of the Church.  That’s not to say that one should go to such a priest, but merely to analyze the theological question of whether such a priest could validly consecrate.  Even though you are not correct on that point, we of course agree with your general sentiments opposing and condemning homosexuality.

 

Video

 

For those it might interest, this is a brief new video on King Louis XIV:

 

King Louis XIV, the "Sun King" Disgrace

 

Regarding

 

Subject: Regarding New Haven CT High School removing “Our Lord” from diplomas

 

Dear Brothers,

    In the article, it mentioned that "This year, a Muslim student at Trinity University in San Antonio petitioned to have the words removed from diplomas." 

    If one were really offended by the words, "our Lord" would they not stop there?  What about "Trinity University" or "San Antonio"?  Will people one day 'realize' they are so offended that they will want to rename the university?  or maybe even rename San Antonio (and the many places with saints names across our country)?  Will I be expected to change my own name from Michael to something more modern or meaningless?

    In all honesty, if it were simply a matter of not offending anyone, I would assume a simple answer would be to change the words to "in the year of Jesus Christ" (that would be accurate -- yet not imply that the institution necessarily considers Him our Lord -- just an historical reference to the date).

    But, what about the offended Catholics -- that are "apparently" offending the world by our very thoughts and hopes: believing that God is Our Lord, believing that God created everyone to be with Him if only they will respond to His Will, praying that every man will allow God to soften his heart in this world so that he may enjoy His reward in the next world, praising the Lord for becoming one of us Himself to bring us to Him, and welcoming the Holy Ghost in our hearts.

    It's not okay to be passionate about God in our culture, but passion about everything that isn't holy is held 'holy'.  The true Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ is being constantly offended by these public actions to remove every possible trace of Him from society -- and to replace Him with the importance of His creations :(

    I pray God to keep me from offending Him any more than I already have by my own sins.

-Michael O.

 

Reading

 

Dear Brothers Dimond,

 

I was reading about Venerable Anne Katherine Emmerich, In one of her vision she said that the PROTESTANTS in purgatory are there the longest because there is no one to pray for them. After reading your book I thought Protestants were outside the true Church. Am I missing something?  Of course at my age [82] I miss alot. God bless you for opening my eyes. I have stopped going to the Novus Ordo Mess.

 

Ed.

 

MHFM: The statement is heretical.  It’s not a vision from God.  Either she never said it or it was misunderstood or it’s a message from Satan.  Perhaps that’s why she hasn’t been canonized.  Perhaps she never even said it.  Her messages were edited; she didn’t read and write.  It could also have been misunderstood.  For example, if she’s talking about people who are in Purgatory yet have Protestant family members, she could have been referring to converts to the Catholic faith from Protestantism.  Such Catholic converts (former Protestants), who died in the state of grace, might be in Purgatory but would lack Catholic family members to pray for them.  In the process of transmitting such a message, it’s possible that it was confused; and that the Protestant converts to Catholicism in Purgatory were simply summed up haphazardly as Protestants, since the emphasis was on the Protestant family members who aren’t praying for them.  Regardless, it’s definitely 1) a false message from Satan or 2) a misunderstood one or 3) one that was fabricated by her editor.  It conflicts with Catholic teaching.  That’s why Catholics (real Catholics) don’t go by visions, but by Catholic dogma.  Those who dismiss Catholic dogma, and instead follow what they think is a vision from God, are very deceived (see Galatians 1:8-9).    

 

BOD

 

Subject: BOD

 

Dear Brothers:

 

In this Octave of St. John Baptist, I am reminded once again that the Jews of the Old Testament apparently believed in the importance of water baptism far more than do the modern BOD'ers.

 

In St. John 1:25 we read:  "And they asked him, and said to him:  Why then dost thou baptize, if thou be not Christ, nor Elias, nor the prophet?"  Although I may be mistaken about this, I don't recall baptism being spoken of in the Old Testament.  Yet, the Jews apparently knew about baptism and its connection to the Messiah.  Perhaps they were taught about the future baptism by Moses after their passage through the Red Sea?

 

Thanks for all your work.  Your website is like having a university at one's fingertips.  Only your university teaches truth!!

 

Gratefully yours, Lee

 

Popes

 

Subject: Popes

 

Brothers,


I find your new series on the Popes Against Islam quite fascinating. You’re able to distinguish as day is to night between the True Faith and real Popes and the false sect of Vatican II and their false Popes.  As if someone switched off the light in 1959 and left everyone in the dark, when Anti-Pope John XXIII came about to implement the Great Deception. Clearly the work of the Masons to unite the world religions for a one-world government. Thank-you for shedding the light by which to see the truth in these final days of darkness.

Also, messages of Anti-Pope's Paul VI and JPII include:

Paul VI Message to President of a U.N. Conference in May 1976; "...this new international economic order that has to be ceaselessly built up."

Paul VI Sept. 8th, 1977; "Stress is legitimately laid nowadays on the necessity of constructing a new world order."

Paul VI May 24th, 1978 to the United Nations; "...we are aware that the path which must lead to the coming of a new international order..."

JPII on November 27 1983 issued the Papal Bull which legalized secret society membership for Roman Catholics.

JPII in December 1996, the Grand Orient Lodge of Italian Freemasonry offered John Paul II its greatest honor, "the order of Galilee" as an expression of thanks for the efforts he made in support of freemasonic ideals.

JPII, Los Angeles Times, December 12th, 1984; Quoted JPII as saying, "Don't go to God for forgiveness of sins, come to me."

God Bless your work,
Tom Miles

 

Response

 

Subject: Response to article on women choosing not to have children

 

Dear MHFM,

 

In response to the article of Women not having children, I believe for many women its not a choice.  I personally know, several women who are trying to have kids but cannot have a successful pregnancy.  (I don't know anyone who choose not to have any). Fertility clinics are full of women who can't conceive.  I must say, it is a desolation many wives and husbands feel.   It's unspoken in society because the couple thinks their is something "wrong", with them.  It's embarrassing to talk about and its terribly painful to admit in public.  I know for the average stranger it is easier to say,'we choose not to have any' then to say "I don't ovulate, or my uterus is toxic".   It is a known fact fertility rates are decreasing around the world due to many reasons, including plastic linings contaminating our foods to GMO's.

 

Thanks,

C 

 

MHFM: In posting the article, of course there was no suggestion that every woman who doesn’t have children has chosen not to.  However, your assertion that almost every woman wants a child is simply wrong.  As godless lifestyles become mainstream, fewer and fewer women are having children.  Certainly they are not having the number of children they normally would have.  This is also directly connected with the proliferation of contraceptives and birth prevention methods, and the facility with which modern people obtain and use them.  In fact, with the exception of perhaps a few traditional Catholics, Mormons, fundamentalists, etc., almost every married couple in the world is probably using artificial contraception or sinful family planning methods to avoid children. 

 

You bring up the stigmas that are attached to married couples that can’t have children.  Of course, it would be incorrect to conclude that in each case there is something wrong with those who can’t have children.  However, it might be a sign of God’s displeasure.  Children are a biblical blessing.  God might leave a couple childless if the marriage is not pleasing in His sight or if it wasn’t His will (e.g., if one of them had a vocation but pursued marriage instead).  At the same time, He might do so for another reason that’s not attributable to the married couple at all.

 

Part 2 Added

 

The Popes Against Islam [video]

 

The Popes Against Islam - Part 2 [video]

 

MHFM: We have added Part 2 of this video.  Part 2 gets into the astounding heresies of the post-Vatican II antipopes on Islam. 

 

Impression

 

I get the impression that your site is aware of the present day corruption of the catholic church, and you are possibly trying to restructure it to its former glory (correct me if I'm wrong).  Your interpretation of what John wrote about the BP oil spill is correct, as opposed to the history channel's misinterpretation of a volcano falling into the sea.  This tells me that you have received an enlightenment, and are not a victim of the pressures of darkness prevalent in this world.

… From where do you think John gets his visions?

Regards,

Just a "regular joe".

 

MHFM: St. John got his revelation from God.  You need to realize that the Vatican II sect, which we expose, is not the Catholic Church.  It’s the prophesied Counter Church of the last days.  The Catholic Church is the only Church of Christ, the one true Church.  It’s the original, historical and biblical Church.  You must belong to it to be saved.  We hope you consult our section refuting Protestantism, and our book: The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.

 

Sins

 

Subject: Habitual Sins

 

How does one overcome habitual sins…?

FS

 

MHFM: Avoid the occasions of sin, pray the full 15-decade Rosary each day, do spiritual reading, and add 3 Hail Marys for the specific issue you are dealing with.  Moreover, acquire some fear of God, for that’s what a habitual sinner is missing.  Most chalk up falling into habitual mortal sin to weakness.  The truth is that it’s pride.  If the person had more humility, he would fear God enough to abstain from what God forbids.  If he had more humility, he wouldn’t treat God like He’s something that isn’t to be taken seriously.  If he had more humility, he would see himself and the sorry state of his soul as he sins habitually.

 

Expose

 

… Novus Ordo "Catholics" are willfully disobedient to the teachings of the Catholic Church, are promoters of Catholic disunity, care more for human approval than God's approval and they have truly become enemies of Catholicism and Catholic unity and teaching.  Protestants select the scriptures they like-and toss any verse that allows for their pernicious private opinions to be bested. 

 

Paul R.

 

P.S.  While Vatican II has almost completely dissolved everything of Jesus Christ, arguably, the promotion of "annulments" has done more to destroy the family and the Faith than anything else they've done.  "Novus Ordo Catholics" think they can remarry after divorcing, but in actuality, they are in a perpetual state of mortal sin if they do. Millions of souls are going to hell by the granting of annulments and the family structure so compromised by the fact that those married or contemplating marriage think they can divorce and then remarry.  

 

We expose as heretics, the anti-popes, anti-bishops and anti-priests by name. The time is now for us to expose in charity our own family members by name.

 

Fatima

 

Dear Dimond Brothers,

 

… This is what Fatima is first of all: the most urgent reminder ever that the true religion that pleases God and saves souls, is indeed this traditional religion, still faithfully lived in the beginning of the century in many regions, where Christendom remained very much alive".  For me this is comforting in that I try to practice the traditional faith but not so comforting when looking for the beauty and happiness of Christendom here on earth.

 

May God bless MHFM,

 

Matthew

 

Louis

 

Subject: King Louis XIV of France

 

The very fact that he was called and is remembered as "The Sun King" reeks of:  idolatry.   Everything you describe and we learn about his life reeks of:  idolatry.  I visited Versailles back in the 1990s (via bicycle!) and everything about it was SO excessive in its extreme luxuriousness that it was/is truly nauseating.  Just goes to show how all selfishness is so empty and meaningless----all the Saints of course knew this, turned their backs on the world, and walked away.

 

Videos

 

Subject: Videos

 

Dear Brother Dimond,

Just a quick thank you for the videos that you post here and also for your web site. They truly hold a wealth of information.

Thank you, Joe

 

Found

 

I have found your website several weeks ago by accident.  I have been looking for some validation of my catholic views for years.  I have argued for years much of what you espouse.  Especially, outside the church there is no salvation.  I have felt for years that this faith (Roman Catholic) my faith has been uninspired.  Thank you for your work it has meant so much to me… I am a practicing catholic.  I am married with 5 children.  What am I to do ? 

Thank you,

Francis Lally

 

MHFM: Thank you for the interest.  You need to make sure you don't go to the New Mass, and that you pray the Rosary each day.  You also need to be convinced of all Catholic dogmas (e.g., no salvation outside the Church or without baptism, etc.), and that you completely reject the Vatican II sect and its antipopes.  Also, this file contains a profession of faith from the Council of Trent that those who have been involved with the New Church should make.  After that, we can help you with where to receive sacraments.  We would also recommend our special package.  Our file on where to receive sacraments also covers that issue.

 

Earthquake

 

Subject: Earthquake and G8 Summit in Toronto

 

ISN'T IT INTERESTING THAT THERE IS AN EARTHQUAKE IN THE SAME CITY WHERE THESE EVIL MEN WHO GATHER TOGETHER TO PLAN FOR THEIR NEXT WAR!!!

 

NK

 

Eucharist

 

Subject: Eucharist

 

Hi Brothers,

I was wondering if you could tell me whether or not you are supposed to chew the Host when you receive it or if you are to let it sit in your mouth until it is dissolved enough to swallow. I had read in a validly ordained priest's Family Catechism that you are not supposed to chew but I had never heard that before. Thank you for clarifying this issue. God bless you both.

Jodi P.

 

MHFM: One should try to avoid chewing the Eucharist if one can, and let it sit until you can swallow it. 

 

Annulment

 

… On the annulment issue, I was married in the V2 sect in 1983, divorced in 2002 and received an annulment from the V2 sect in 2003. I re-married in 2004 in the V2 sect. I returned to tradition in May 2009, and learned about your work in January 2010. I have read the salvation book and The Truth About V2 book both twice, watched several of your videos several times over, and check your website daily. In short, I agree with all your positions that I know of: sedevacantism, the V2 antipopes, etc, etc, etc.
Anyway, enough background. I have discussed the annulment fiasco with my wife and have told her that I believe the best and safest course of action is to live as brother and sister, since I have SERIOUS DOUBTS about the decision/competence of the V2 tribunal in my case, and I am totally unwilling to use the decision of the apostate counter-church as a justification for offending God. We also have three children together….


Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Joseph

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  An annulment is a declaration that a marriage was never valid to begin with.  That means that an invalidating impediment to the marital union must have been present at the beginning.  As explained in the file, that’s very rare.  To form an opinion on a particular case, one would have to know the precise reason the “annulment” was granted. 

 

The Annulment Fiasco - The Vatican II sect's De Facto acceptance of Divorce and Remarriage [PDF File]

 

Fatima

 

Subject: Fatima

 

Dear Brothers:

I just stopped at a Korean religious goods store near my house. I had left them the Fatima DVD about a month ago… Today, I was going to leave them some more and they said that they had taken the DVD and were having it translated into Korean! They said it would be done in about 3-4 weeks and promised me a copy. I'm just praying it will be an accurate translation.

Your sister in Christ,
Gloria Howard

 

Realm

 

Subject: Debate

 

Dear MHFM,

 

I have only listened to the 1st segment so far. When a man begins a sentence with "I believe" or "in my opinion" or "I feel" in the context of this debate on the faith, he immediately leaves the realm of dogma and straight to the church of Vin Lewis….

 

Matthew

 

Comment

 

Subject: …Is Benedict XVI the Pope?


'Is Benedict XVI the Pope?' Fabulous debate on Youtube! Fantastic!

Scarlett Miller

 

Sunday

 

Greetings Dimond Brothers,

 

 I wanted to know the traditional Catholic view of Sunday. Is Sunday (the Lord's Day) the same as the Sabbath Day or is it something different? Also, do all the Sabbath laws of resting and no work, such as buying and selling, still apply or did this end with the fulfillment of the Old Law? Thank you.

 

-DC

 

MHFM: That’s a good question.  Strictly speaking, the word Sabbath still refers to Saturday.  Saturday is still referred to as the Sabbath in liturgical books.  However, in the New Covenant, the prerogatives of the Sabbath have been transferred to Sunday.  In the Old Testament servile works were forbidden on the Sabbath, and now they are forbidden on Sunday.  Unnecessary commerce (buying and selling) should be avoided on Sunday.  Since the prerogatives of the Sabbath have been moved to Sunday, it’s also correct to say that the Sabbath was changed to Sunday.

 

Islam

 

Dear Brothers,

 

What a shocking group of Antichrist Apostates the Vatican II Antipopes are, showing respect for the diabolical religion of Islam! They couldn't make it clearer how evil they are, because the Catholic Church has made it so obvious that Islam is totally evil. For Antipope Benedict XVI to express respect for Islam is to trample on all the blood of the martyrs and saints who died at the hands of the Islamic infidels, and is another expression of the heresy of baptism of desire!  For Antipope John Paul II to encourage Muslims to live their faith is to encourage the same false beliefs that killed countless Catholic martyrs and saints by Muslims, and is another expression of the heresies of "universal salvation" and "invincible ignorance"! For Antipope Paul VI to show high respect for "Muslim martyrs" is to show the lowest disrespect for Catholic martyrs and saints slain by Muslims, and is another expression of the heresy of "baptism of blood"! All of the Antipopes totally reject Jesus Christ and the Holy Trinity in showing any respect for Islam or Muslims, and so He rejects them! The Antipopes keep adding to their vault of freemasonic sins - they imagine that they are eternally secure, and that their evil works will have no consequences!!! How wrong they are - to Hell they will go! The Catholic Church teaches that outside the Catholic Church there is absolutely no salvation, but look at how the Vatican II Antichrist Antipopes try to kill that dogma by their apostasies!!!...

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Interest

 

Hello, my name is Mark.i would really like to know more about the most holy family monastery and about sedevacantism…

 

Deo Gratias,

 

Mark

 

MHFM: We hope you continue to look at the information.  We would also recommend our introductory DVDs and books.

 

Word

 

Dear MHFM,

 

You are probably aware of the following historical fact but I just wanted to remind you since I saw it mentioned on your website. The word wormwood in Russian/Ukrainian is Chernobyl or Chornobyl… The city is named after the Ukrainian word for mugwort or wormwood (Artemisia vulgaris), which is "chornobyl". The word is a combination of the words chornyi (чорний, black) and byllia (билля, grass blades or stalks), hence it literally means black grass or black stalks. That may signify burnt grass, perhaps prior to cultivation). 

 

The Chernobyl nuclear fallout disaster that happened in April of 1986 is considered to be the worst such disaster ever. Besides killing many people on the site and causing an entire town to be permanently evacuated it also produced a dangerous, deadly, poisonous radioactive cloud that spread above almost the entire European continent at that time. I remember that incident (although I was a little kid back then) because we were camping somewhere in the woods when it started raining and there was a warning issued on the radio and TV to avoid going outside or to use some kind of cover because of the dangerous radioactive cloud from the fallout that could produce acid rain. People were very scared and many people around Europe died and were sick (developed cancer) due to the radiation.

 

In my opinion this incident could very well be the fulfillment of Apocalypse 8: 10 And the third angel sounded the trumpet, and a great star fell from heaven, burning as it were a torch, and it fell on the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters: 11 And the name of the star is called Wormwood. And the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter.

 

There is much information on the Internet about the aforementioned disaster and many people have made the apocalyptic connection (just type in Chernobyl wormwood). 

Besides that terrible event that was one of the final nails in the coffin of the Soviet Union a.k.a. the Red Dragon, 1986 seems to have been a pretty dark year. One of the most notorious (if not the most) apostasies in history happened in October of the same year, namely, the Assisi ‘’peace’’ gathering lead by Antipope/Antichrist John Paul 2. In 1986 the European Community (precursor of the EU a.k.a. the Beast from the sea) officially accepted the flag that we now know as the EU flag (http://europa.eu/abc/symbols/emblem/index_en.htm)...etc.

 

P.S.  Your recent videos are great as usual, and it's also great to see that you have a website in Spanish... good work.

 

Thank you and God bless,

 

V. from Croatia

 

Why?

 

Thank you for your honest (such a rarity today) response to Margaret Breene about the very fact that all unbaptized babies including aborted unbaptized babies will NOT GO INTO HEAVEN.  Why is it that people feel that their "pain" justifies their making up just any old beliefs and then labeling those beliefs as "Catholic"?  I think that is a sin… Do they think their "emotional pain" over the fallout of the mortal sin of committing the murder of abortion is bad, right now?  Think of how much worse will be the eternal pains of hell........and repent, while one lives...........and the mercy of God is still offered, to every living soul who fears Him........  

 

Inquiry

 

Hello Brothers Michael and Peter,

 

Thank you very much for publishing your website in Spanish language.  It will benefit those faithful who are in the far corners of the world and don’t know English at all, or well enough to understand the unchanging teaching of the Catholic Church!

 

I have an unrelated question.  Not being brought up in this culture I simply don’t understand why is it that some ‘religious’ males in this part of the world have name of Mary as part of their vocation name?  Is this a new N.O. invention, or that’s been practice in the Church beforehand?  I was under impression that males would pick only a male figure name and females would stick with females.  You sometimes see, ex. Sister Joseph Agnes.

 

If you don’t see it trivial enough, would you please explain.

 

Thank you,

 

Renata.

 

MHFM: Thank you for your question.  It’s an issue to which we have given some thought.  Our opinion is that a male religious should not use Mary or any other female name as part of his name (whether it’s for his religious name or any other name).  In the same way, we do not believe that a female should use a distinctly male name.  However, it’s something that has been done in the history of the Church.  It’s not a Novus Ordo invention.  In fact, numerous male saints had Mary as part of their names out of devotion to the Mother of God.  Prominent examples of this would be St. Louis De Montfort and St. Alphonsus Liguori.  Nevertheless, in our opinion, we don’t agree with it.  We believe that males should not use female names. 

 

We would add that when those saints did have Mary as part of their names, this was done in past ages which were much more Catholic.  The people generally would have had a better understanding of why this was done.  Additionally, in those days there was almost no question about the masculinity of the priesthood or the male religious life.  Suffice it to say, that’s not the case in our day.  Using a female name can add to the confusion and the misconceptions which abound in our day.  But we don’t like it for any period of Church history, even though we understand that it was done out of devotion to the Blessed Virgin. 

 

Hello

 

Hello, my name is Lukasz i live in denmark, i recently had confirmation in the vatican II sect church, but i have not worshipped the anti popes since i woke up to how they’re false teachings are, but pls can you explain to me how to be a true catholic, i have never been preached by a true preacher

 

MHFM: It’s great to hear about your interest.  First, be convinced on all the core issues and wholeheartedly accept all Catholic dogmas.  We assume you are familiar with the basic catechism.  Don't support any heresies, reject the New Mass, and reject Vatican II.  Follow the steps in the Steps to Convert file.  Reject baptism of desire, salvation outside the Church, etc.  Practice and live the faith each day, and try to spread it to others.  Pray the Rosary each day, at least five decades but preferably all fifteen.  After you’ve made the profession of faith, consult the steps on where to receive sacraments to find options for a good confession. 

 

Comment

 

Why do people continually utilize the term "hardship" to describe home-schooling?  I've known several mothers who have home-schooled,  since they as a family were SO unhappy about ANY other "education" (read:  freemasonic brainwashing)  options available-------and yet these mothers and may I add fathers who also helped in this process all considered it a great and wonderful JOY!  Did the non-home-schooling parent have to have two jobs or something like that just to pay the bills?  Look at Padre Pio's father who had to leave his HOME COUNTRY ITALY and come over to a very difficult manual-labor job in a FOREIGN country (U.S.) in order to provide......well I would consider THAT a real hardship for the ENTIRE family maybe especially for the mother but also for the kids------yet look at the fruit THAT family's sacrifice bore for the glory of God! 

 

I do NOT mean to belittle the sacrifices involved in home-schooling because obviously it is not "free"---nor do I wish to insult any of your readers---- it is just that on balance it would seem that to a serious traditional Catholic/sedevacantist, home-schooling would be a very joyful "sacrifice"-----and a great blessing for all!  I have taught in Catholic schools and can vouch for their intolerance for anyone with the true Faith.   

 

A.

 

Abortion

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I have just been on your website and am living in the UK.  I am a practising Roman Catholic married but separated from my husband… I am also the mother of 5 children all of them raised Roman Catholic.

 

Please allow me to tell you of my story of Abortion.  I see that you still claim all unbaptized children will never enter Heaven.  As we all know Abortion is from Satan himself.  You claim Satan would not be behind this horrendous sin if these children unbaptised, went to Heaven.  To me this is wrong, and now on with my personal story of Abortion.

 

Three months after I left my husband and when all my children were over 18 had University places and all settled, education complete, my 21 year old daughter had a fast track abortion at 8 weeks of her pregnancy.  She was in London UK I was in Cardiff South Wales UK.  I had no idea she was pregnant or of her abortion.  Six months later whilst with my grandchildren in Ireland and daughters, my daughter broke down crying, and told me of what had happened.  Her words were .. I refused counselling.  On the Monday I was told I was pregnant, 2 days later on the Wednesday the baby was gone.  She was fastracked. On her way to the Hospital for the abortion she told me she kept thinking .. I am going to Hell for this.  On the bed whilst having this horrendous procedure that took my infant Grandchild, she still kept thinking I am going to Hell for this.  Why she didn't stop the procedure there and then I dont know.  All I know is she was devastated and repentant.

 

I have always been staunchly Pro-Life.  I walked the first anti-abortion march in this City during 1967 at the age of 15.  When my children were older I was in Mass one Sunday and saw some pictures at the back of the Church of aborted babies.  I brought them home left them on the kitchen table and told my children what they were leaving them the option to view these pictures or not.  Whether my daughter viewed them or not I dont know.  I also told me . if any pregnancy should happen .... come to me I will support you 100 per cent but never ever please ... choose the option of Abortion.  Dont kill your baby and dont break your Mothers heart.  Satan still did his work .... and took my Grandchild.  Now .... the aftermath of the abortion.  When my daughter told me . my initial reaction was to strike my daughter, my older daughter restrained me.  After a nights sleep my daughter came to me and said . Mammy you must hate me for this !! I told her I loved her unconditionally which I do.  I love my daughter dearly and always will no matter what.

 

Satan had tried to destroy the love in our family .. he failed.  Praise the Lord.   I despise Satan and all his sins all his acts all his temptations I abhor him despise him and his Minnions.  So you see once again through Gods love . he was overruled put down.  Satan maybe behind this sin . I truly acknowledge the act of Abortion as Satanic.  But Gods love protected my family.  Sadly not my little infant Grandchild

 

Since that Abortion I have had depression and anxiety 2 very nasty episodes of this.  One of which I am going through now, but with Our Lord standing beside me, holding me gently, I am recovering.  But when I read your website on Abortion, I broke down.   You preach a hard God an unloving Jesus, Holy Spirt and Father.  This was the way I was raised,  I remember being in Mass and our priest telling us of this vengeful God.  Being terrified.  This is not the way.  The Holy Spirit is continually revealing to us.  We are simply Man and very often . all to often unable to hear what The Holy Spirit/Ghost is telling us.  We dont have the intelligence .... we are very often to simple.

 

I know that my aborted grandchild is in Heaven.  I feel that this darling infact was a little Girl so I  named her Kate, after her Mother.  I hear The Lord telling me she is well and safe in his arms, and that one day I shall be reunited with her.

 

Open your hearts Brothers, see his love fully.  How can you love him fully if you dont feel his love ?  Im sorry for this email but I felt compelled to write it.

 

Godbless you all

 

Margaret Breen

 

MHFM: You are simply not Catholic.  You say that we teach aborted infants don’t go to Heaven.  You ignore that this is the infallible teaching of the Catholic Church.  You reject that dogma, and original sin.  You are a modern-day Pelagian heretic.  You act as if your story, and the sadness you’ve experienced, somehow proves your (false) belief that your aborted grandchild is in Heaven.  This only reveals how blind you are, and how little you care about what God has revealed.  You have no faith; the dogmas mean nothing to you.  You only care about emotions and making yourself feel comforted.  You need to be converted, for you don’t know God or believe in Him at all.  You think that you are a devout member of the Catholic Church, when in fact you are not remotely Catholic.  It’s obvious that many of your comments concern justifying the act of your daughter.  Your heretical belief that the aborted child is saved helps you try to do that.  However, you only deceive yourself. 

 

Infants cannot be saved without baptism

 

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Session 11, Feb. 4, 1442, ex cathedra: “Regarding children, indeed, because of danger of death, which can often take place, when no help can be brought to them by another remedy than through the sacrament of baptism, through which they are snatched from the domination of the Devil [original sin] and adopted among the sons of God, it advises that holy baptism ought not be deferred for forty or eighty days, or any time according to the observance of certain people…”

 

Pope Martin V, Council of Constance, Session 15, July 6, 1415 - Condemning the articles of John Wyclif  - Proposition 6: “Those who claim that the children of the faithful dying without sacramental baptism will not be saved, are stupid and presumptuous in saying this.”- Condemned

 

Pope St. Zosimus, The Council of Carthage, Canon on Sin and Grace, 417 A.D.- “It has been decided likewise that if anyone says that for this reason the Lord said: ‘In my Father’s house there are many mansions’ [John 14:2]: that it might be understood that in the kingdom of heaven there will be some middle place or some place anywhere where the blessed infants live who departed from this life without baptism, without which they cannot enter into the kingdom of heaven, which is life eternal, let him be anathema.”

 

Pope Paul III, The Council of Trent, On Original Sin, Session V, ex cathedra:  “If anyone says that recently born babies should not be baptized even if they have been born to baptized parents; or says that they are indeed baptized for the remission of sins, but incur no trace of the original sin of Adam needing to be cleansed by the laver of rebirth for them to obtain eternal life, with the necessary consequence that in their case there is being understood a form of baptism for the remission of sins which is not true, but false: let him be anathema.”

 

Mass

 

Dear Brothers,


Not being able to support any priests these days what does a catholic do if he wants a mass said for someone.

 

Thank You

 

Ken

 

MHFM: There are certain options for receiving sacraments, but one shouldn’t have a Mass said by a heretical priest for someone else.  One would have to go without a Mass being said. 

 

Another

 

Subject: Debate…

 

Brothers,

Vin Lewis is just another "All Day Sucker" that starts his debate with a stupid lie and then lies all the way through.  His initial statement shows the caliber of person your dealing with; someone who slithers on his belly as he states, "how numbers mean nothing and how he wants to concede that it is "his opinion" that MHFM holds the minority view and that most of the people of the world would say your wrong. And, the fact that "he thinks" he is on the majority side means nothing, so he's not going to use that at all."  (Didn't he just use it??) "He's also heard your position, not from you but from others (hearsay), and have not found it convincing." He's a double-tongued snake who is definitely in the dark from the beginning as he's so afraid to even look at the truth of your material on your website and make his own conclusion over everyone else's conclusions. What a coward.

After all the years that the Masons boasted of how they would infiltrate the Church and try to cause it's ruin, why is it so hard for the modern Vatican II sect to believe even-now they succeeded? It's clear that God has allowed the Anti-Pope Mason John XXIII to be the first of the last anti-Popes to rule over what is now empty real estate.  Once John XXIII forced his way in the door, all his successors were brought in after-wards to continue the Great Apostasy…

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

“Catholic” School

 

Subject: Catholic School

 

Dear Brothers:

 

After reading the post from Kathleen about being forced to homeschool because her "Catholic" school informed her that her children would not be welcomed back next year, it struck me as strange that it took the rejection of the school for her to decide to home-school.  Clearly, from her email, she could see the dangers of exposing her children to the ideology of the Novus Order "Catholic" school; yet she was willing to subject her children to other children and teachers who obviously would influence her children to believe in harmful religious/worldly pratices.  I simply do not understand her reasoning.  It's as if she were willing to accept some amount of indoctrination in order to keep her children in school, rather than having to do the hard thing of home-schooling.

 

I only say this, because when I first clearly saw the adverse consequences of Novus Order policies while I was a CCD teacher at our local Catholic parish --  our newly appointed "priest" refused to have a special day for "penance" before Easter for the children as the former priest had done because he didn't believe children committed grave sins -- I immediately realized there was a serious problem regarding the salvation of those children.  For most of the children, this was the only time during the year in which they received the sacrament of penance.  This new liberal "priest" was specifically appointed after parishoners complained that one of the parish priests had dared express in a homily his opposition during a national presidential election to the pro-abortion beliefs of one of the presidential candidates. They were outraged by his stance against abortion and birth control and that he dared to make it a "Catholic" issue.  They were already angry because another of the "priests" held Corpus Christi processions, sang the "Kyrie" in Greek instead of English, and encouraged Ambrosian hymns because the parish Church and school were named after that saint. 

 

You see, they absolutely "hated" all Catholic traditions, and even Greek and Latin.  They hated incense, and wanted the altar boys to be altar girls.  They wanted the homilies to be done by women.  These were mostly women who complained, although there were men as well.  These women were already giving out "holy communion" in their jeans and tennis shoes as extraordinary eucharistic ministers.  So letters were written, the former conservative "priest" was ousted, and a liberal "Novus Ordo" priest was appointed who advocated joint prayers with the local Protestant Church with the female minister.  We in the choir were also told we would now begin to serve in the local soup kitchen as part of our ministry (a forced sense of charity - just like socialism) and we began to sing the chants of "Taize." Our hymns for Holy Thursday changed from the Latin prayer of the petition of the saints to a pop style with guitar music.  We also sang hymns in which WE were the "body of Christ broken and shared by all."  It seemed so blasphemous to me that I simply did not sing.  Immediately, the CCD classes took on a different emphasis.  I quickly got my child out of that environment, stopped teaching in that CCD program, and began to home-schoo.  First, however, I gave a priest who had served with the previous ousted priest the articles written by John Paul II in the Vatican newspaper which clearly expressed indifferentism, along with a picture of him kissing the Koran.  He got extremely angry with me, and refused to believe what was right in front of his face.  He preached a public homily in which he used veiled accusations against all who surfed evil, unreputable websites which attacked the "Holy Father."

 

There comes a time when one simply can take no more, and it becomes clear that the church one is attending is simply no longer Catholic.  So we got out of there, studied the traditional Latin Mass and Catholic teaching, and became Traditional Catholics… In other words, with all Kathleen's having to complain about the practices at her school, it should have become clear that she was no longer dealing with the Catholic Church and that she was instead dealing with a false religion; and it should equally have become clear that she could not keep her children in it. One should not wait until one is rejected by the false religion.

 

That's all I had to say, and I do not mean to be judgmental, but it just seems that there are probably many more Catholic mothers who have not been rejected by the false religion's "Catholic" schools who will simply continue to subject their children to them in order to not have to make the huge sacrifice of home-schooling.  They simply do not see the harm they are causing, or the fact that they will have to give an account to God for how they trained up their children.  I hope I am not being too harsh, and I do apologize if I am.  I just feel our children would have more outlets and friends, and we mothers would have more company if more of them recognized the truth and took a definite stand.  We should stand together and help one another in these very difficult times to keep the faith.

 

Perry, a concerned mom

 

MHFM: We also believe it’s very important to homeschool, but we think she has made the right decision and is on the right track in that regard.  We encourage others to do the same.

 

Adhere

 

Subject: debate

 

Regarding this poor soul Vin Lewis, I think this is an example… of the trashing of the Papacy and the misunderstanding of the office of the Papacy and of the antipopes.  We as christians {catholics}, are to adhere to the teaching Magisterium of the True Church for one reason and that is because Jesus promised the Holy Spirit as protection to the true pope and office regarding FAITH AND MORALS {THE POPE CANNOT ERR ON THESE TWO THINGS}.  Here we have a man like Vin Lewis in this debate constantly saying, "in my opinion", we don't get to give our opinion, who are we to supersede God's truths for our own oh! I forgot the new teachings of JP ll, that man is God.  In order to have ONE FAITH we must mirror the teachings of the Magisterium exactly and not add one word or take away one word because these are the words of Christ, SUCH ARROGANCE!

 

NK

 

MHFM: It’s a prime example of how he and those who obstinately accept the antipopes believe in nothing.  Their heretical position requires them to accept anyone as a Catholic, and blatantly reject dogmas concerning the unity of the Church, the loss of membership through heresy, etc.

 

Rejecting

 

MHFM,

 

Vin Lewis was caught many times in just the first 6 installments.  It was clear that he is rejecting the teaching of the Church for some reason or other, as is always the case with unbelievers - heretics - protestants...something is too costly or something they don't want to give up or human respect....or too much fame...many reasons....

 

his claim that the "popes" have had their writings - tampered with and possibly changed...was of no impact whatsoever because we see these same "popes" doing exactly what they have written - with our own eyes ---Assisi....going into synagogues and so on…

  

thanks

CD

 

“Catholic” School- Homeschool

 

Dear Brothers

 

This year I had to say no to sex education at my catholic school for my 5th grader and take my children out of school for an African spiritual dancer assembly.  I had to point out the socialism and liberation theology in the religion curriculum and say no to centered prayer that was modeled after a trappist monk.  I had to point out that John Lennon hated Jesus and his songs should not be played in music class.  So why am I shocked, humiliated and upset that I have received a letter from the school principal that my children are not allowed to return because I do not support the curriculum.  I know this must be Mary's guidance as I pray the rosary to her faithfully.  Please pray for me and the courage to home school my beautiful three children.  I will someday rejoice in this rejection.  But right now I am sad that there is no room for a traditional catholic mother. 

 

Kathleen

 

Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope?

 

Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 1

Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 2

Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 3

Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 4

Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 5

Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 6

Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 7

Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 8

Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 9

 Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 10

 Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 11

 Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 12

 

Material “Heretic”

 

Dear MHFM,

   Suppose a person who was water baptized (in the name of the Holy Trinity) as an infant dies as a "material heretic." Could he be considered to have died as a Catholic?

TD

                                                                            

MHFM: There is no such thing as a material heretic.  It’s just another name for an erring Catholic who doesn’t obstinately reject a Catholic teaching.  Therefore, a person who was baptized as an infant and dies as what people call a material heretic (an erring Catholic) would be Catholic.

 

Guy

 

That guy that you were debating is like Clinton, "that depends on the meaning of what is is".

 

Charles

 

Few

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond,

 

I think that is a good move in making the website available in Spanish for various reasons, the more obvious one having been discussed - a lesser obvious reason or spin off with this move, could be the downfall and demise of the false apparitions (and the movement as a whole), said to have occurred at San Sebastian de Garabandal, in the 1960's - and a chance for the Spanish speaking peoples of that region who were exposed and so deeply involved with this hoax for many years, to be finally told the truth about the Vatican II sect.

 

Your response to Paula on the fewness of the saved, and Bible references using Psalms is a good example of how the mercy of God is given only to those who fear the Lord - who try not to offend God but please Him at all times, by obeying His Commandments - sadly most do not keep His Commandments and so do not save their souls.

 

See what some of the Saints, have to say about the fewness of the saved, which should cause those who think that because God is all forgiving, His justice will not also prevail ...and should be cause for serious reflection.

 

St. Augustine tells us that it is certain that few are saved, while St. Thomas Aquinas states there are a select few who are saved.

 

St Alphonsus says that the greatest opinion is that the greater part of adults is lost, and St. Leonard of Port Maurice tells us a great number of Christians are lost.

 

More on the adults who won't make it - St. Regimus - Among adults there are few saved because of sins of the flesh with the exception of those who die in childhood, most men will be damned.

 

The saints are so few, but we must live with the few if we would be saved with the few. O God, too few indeed they are , yet among those few I wish to be - St Alphonsus Maria Ligouri

 

And a good story to finish off - and think about!

 

One day, St. Macarius found a skull, and asked it whose head it had been. "A pagans!" it replied "And where is your soul?" he asked.

 

"In Hell!" came the reply. 

 

Macarius then asked the skull if its place was very deep in Hell.  "As far down as the earth is from Heaven!"  "And are there any other souls lodged even lower?"  "Yes! the souls of the Jews!"  "And even lower than the Jews?"  "Yes! the souls of bad Christians ( Catholics) who were redeemed with the Blood of Christ and held their privilege so cheaply!" - Blessed James of Voragine

 

God bless

 

David

 

Benedict XVI’s Recent Heresies

 

MHFM: We’ve updated our Benedict XVI's recent heresies file with some new heresies from Benedict XVI.

 

Main

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Perhaps I have overlooked it, but would it be possible for you to include a link on the main webpage (in English) to the Spanish site.  Your material directs to the English site and for someone receiving this who only spoke Spanish they would not know of the other site.  I recently had a woman, who only spoke Spanish, ask if your material was available in Spanish (I understand a very small amount of Spanish).  Thank you for the consideration.

God Bless you for your works.

 

Bruce

 

MHFM: There is a link to it on the mainpage.

 

Listened

 

Hi Vin,

Just listened to the debate you had with Bro. Dimond. I was disappointed because I thought you would have had better arguments.

Not that I doubted that Bro. was going to win, but you could not even refute one point of his, not one. All you had going for you was your 'opinion', while he is rooted simply yet firmly in clearly defined Dogmas, and Magisterial teachings.

This is your problem and many others for that matter, that instead of submitting to clear and sound doctrine, it somehow has to resonate with your own 'inner voice', which is tainted and has been clouded by these heretical teachings for so many years.

I call it heretical mumbo jumbo they have down to a science and have fooled the masses with.  That was how I got through it anyway, just thought I'd point that out.

Please don't wish me dead for your sake. :)

God Bless!

Michael

 

Release

 

Brothers

I just wanted to thank you, and show my most joyful gratitude for the release of your website in spanish. For a long time I´ve been explaining catholic doctrine and other issues to my wife, but her lack of knowledge in english always was a problem. I for instance, came to the point of making subtitles and translating them for two of your DVDs (Vatican II and John Paul II antipope), but now I feel a greater happiness, for your apostolate is truly blessed!

And it will be something priceless for all the spanish people, from Spain and all hispanic countries, which were always strongly catholic countries, but now are like blind sheep following the apostate Vatican II sect and its antipopes along with all their heresies. One needs only to see the immoral and anti-catholic laws that each day are passed on (Spain mostly), without any or in some cases very little protest from them people.

I see the articles of the website are being one by one translated, so I wanted to ask, are you going to release your books or DVD in spanish too?  If so, I´d right away purchase again all of them, and even in larger quantities, for your books and DVDs are the most precious material on catholic issues that I´ve come across in this time of great apostasy that we live in, and they clearly are a great help for those of good will and love of god who need to get out of the abomination of the novus ordo.

So my wishes of greater success in this new phase, and many blessings upon your monastery.

Viva Cristo Rey!

Marco

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  A Spanish Youtube channel with some videos has recently been created.  It is here: Spanish Youtube.

 

Material

 

Hi MHFM,

Thank God, your material is now more accessible to the millions of people of South and Central America, as well as Spain. This is a major, major milestone for MHFM. If I may add some info, the novus ordo tailor different errors in different parts of the world so that their heresies can be accepted by the local population. I think in the English speaking world it is their ecumenism; but in the Spanish speaking world (South America), I think it is a veiled communism that is actually materialism. The politically active novus ordo priests far south are actually "struggling" to "liberate" their peoples from "injustice". Sound familar? To some of them, "sin" is associated to the governing authority, the more affluent classes, the capitalist West, and even correct orthodoxy. I mean, there are real serious secular problems that have to be solved, but because of their unique approach to solving it, simple orthodoxy is often forgotten, or worse, thrown out the window. Their priests are effective in spreading these ideas among the people since many are vulnerable to this kind of thinking due to their difficult worldly experiences. I hope MHFM will change this.

An official congratulations to you for getting your new Spanish language web site up online.

Cheers

Sanjiv

 

Comment

 

Subject: Comment on your recent poster AP

 

Tell AP to go and learn spanish, and that his way of thinking is one-dimensional and ignorant, just like so many americans today. It's always better to know more than only 1 language. Plus all the spanish-speaking people who come here learn english, they have to one way or the other. It's not like they "refuse to learn it". If you don't speak the language here you will be lost and probably starve, unless you go to spanish-speaking areas of course. Of course bilinguals will have better offers at certain jobs because it's obviously better than simply knowing english and it's probably part of the job in the first place, what does he think.

 

Wear

 

I have been seeing people wear the Rosary on their neck, is this okay?  Some show it & others beneath their shirt.  Even celebrities have begun this practice.                                                             

 

John

 

MHFM: It’s an excellent idea to wear a Rosary, in addition to having one with you.  Of course, those who might do it for superficial reasons or because they think it represents jewelry of some kind don’t have the proper intention; but even in those cases, wearing such a powerful sacramental with a crucifix might give them certain special graces to re-assess their improper lives and consider what’s important.  

 

Reading

 

Subject: Why B-16 was left out

 

I was reading your article at

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/Machabees_NewMass_abomination.html

 

and at first I though it was strange to be only four high priests when we know that the V2 sect will have at least 5 of 6 anti-popes. This seemed like a fundamental flaw in your logic, even though your parallels fit precisely. Then I realized, I overlooked something. Holy Scripture could be warning us about the invalidation of some of the Sacraments, 

 

The first 4 anti-popes indeed had something that Ratzinger (and likely any possible successor of him) did not possess. Even though they all betrayed the Church, their souls had the mark of the fullness of the priesthood, they were apostate VALID CONSECRATED bishops. Ratzinger was not, since he was "consecrated" using the revised Anglican-like formula.

 

This could be why God decided to foretell this event by listing four HIGH Priests, in opposition to LOW priests. As Bishops, those men, in a Judas Iscariot like fashion, were indeed Princes of the Church, although they did not profess the true faith.

 

At times like this, it´s good to remember the notion that some sacraments (Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Orders) do leave a definitive mark on the soul of the recipient once validly received. The same does not goes for the Papacy, which can be lost, or any other office. 

 

CK

 

Available

 

Dear Brothers,

 

You can do whatever you want with your website but I don't like the fact that you make it available in Spanish.  By doing so you are discouraging these Spanish-speaking immigrants from learning English.  It's bad enough that so many of them come to our country and refuse to learn our language.  They demand that the government makes everything available to them in Spanish.  It has even gone so far that there are some jobs that only English-Spanish speaking people can get.  What about all of us millions of Americans who were born and raised in this land and speak English?  It's not fair to us that the government pampers to all of their needs.  I'm strongly in favor of promoting the English language in this country.  It is an essential characteristic of what the people of a nation have in common.  I live in a part of the country that has a very high Hispanic population and it annoys me when they come up to me and speak Spanish.  I have to repeat the same thing all the time : "I don't speak Spanish".  It happens almost everyday.  I look Spanish but I'm not!  I feel like a stranger in my own country.  I wish they could all go back to their homeland unless they speak English.  I could have a better job if this evil government didn't have any "diversity" promoting nonsense.

 

AP

 

MHFM: We must say that we completely disagree with your e-mail.  Making our website available in Spanish really has nothing to do with the issue of whether people who reside in America should be encouraged to learn English.  People look at our website all over the world.  It’s for those people, whether in America or in another country, who know Spanish but do not know or struggle with English.  It’s obviously critical for them to see the information.  The Church is universal.  Having the true faith and the information people need to be saved is what’s important, not necessarily what language they speak or where they live.  We also believe this country should retain English as its language of use, but again that’s a separate issue.  We would add that we believe that many Spanish-speaking people in the U.S. would like to understand English if they could.  It would obviously make their lives easier.

 

Defending Pope Leo XIII

 

 

 

For those it might interest, this video refutes certain false accusations made against Pope Leo XIII and discusses Church teaching on Church-State relations.

 

Heresiarch

 

Thanks for updating the recent heresies of B16 file----well, there the chief heresiarch goes again, spouting the "religion of freemasonry", again:  what else could one expect from the false prophet?  But this rat is really THE WORST!  He can talk about "brotherhood" amongst all heretics since they are most likely all freemason brothers anyway, all conspiring to do their utmost to hoodwink the gullible,  under-educated masses of the planet into their global "one world order" under the "religion of freemasonry", and above ALL,  attempting to obfuscate the truths of the authentic Catholic religion----their only real and actual enemy.

 

A.

 

Defense

 

Dear Brother Peter: 

 

A strong and necessary defense of Real Pope Leo XIII.  I stumbled across… these radical schismatics recently and their vicious and inaccurate attack of a good and strong Pope… it is good that you put the issue to rest.  You strongly showed the Church's "middle" ground.  The Church does not have to worry about secular matters such as how many police officers to fund or where to put parking meters.  But they have to be involved in moral issues such as abortion, etc.  "social issues".  These radicals think that the Church has to be involved in everything versus many Novus Ordo laity and clergy who support pro-abort and pro-gay candidates and say the Church should stay out of politics.  Leo XIII was a realist as far as the US Constitution.  While it is not a perfect document for the faith, it was good that the Church was allowed to flourish from Washington until Vatican II.  I hope you do one on St. Pius X as well. 

 

Bill

 

Comment

 

Your website is one of the most astounding and honest of all catholic websites.  Please keep up the good work for the salvation of all poor souls out there.

 

Michael Mello

 

BOD

 

Dear Brother Dimond:

 

Your latest commentary on the oil spill leaves me wondering about something, not that it matters.  I'm not a geologist and I assume you are not either, but is it just possible that this massive oil leakage could initiate geologic events in places, oh like Yellowstone??

 

To you stubborn people who still cling to baptism of desire:  Your time is running out; don't delay your conversion.  BOD is a one way ticket to hell, abandon your heresies while there is still time.  Thank you very much for doing such a fantastic job of bringing people back to the Faith..

 

Brenda Roy

 

Lightning

 

MHFM,

 

Thought you might find this interesting.  An apostate "church" that is close to me..... God is certainly telling people that he is NOT there and showing them with this example. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_lightning_strikes_jesus_statue

 

Bruce

 

Forgiven

 

I recently I have talked to many who believe, they will be forgiven at the end because we have a forgiving God, what could I respond to those with those beliefs?

Paula

 

MHFM: You could respond by pointing out that the Bible says few are saved (Matthew 7:13).  Obviously, therefore, God doesn’t just let anyone into Heaven or forgive things unconditionally.  You could also mention that the most common theme in the Bible is that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Psalm 110:10), and that His mercy is only upon those who fear Him (Psalm 102:17; Lk. 1:50; etc.).  Therefore, those who don’t have a sufficient fear of God to obey His commandments and avoid gravely offending Him will not receive His mercy or forgiveness. 

 

Plan

 

Dear brothers in Christ,


Thank you for defending the true popes from the attacks of some radical schismatics. In these attacks every true Catholic can see the Devil's plan, and that is to try to compromise the True Teaching by making unsubstantiated attacks on true popes, as if they were antipopes who denied some dogmas of The Catholic Church. Since we undoubtedly have (had) five demoniacal antipopes in the last five decades, these schismatics have engaged themselves in a kind of sport activity to hunt for the "antipopes" reigning before the antipope Angelo Roncalli. The Devil's plan therefore is--if you can't make people to accept the true antipopes as true popes, then try to make them to accept true popes as true antipopes. This tactics is also visible in the realm of true prophecies---try to deny true prophecies by producing numerous false
prophecies.

So, these radical schismatics are really Devil's servants.  I can add nothing new to your words about the *true* pope Leon XIII. In essence the claims of the radical schismatics are indeed ridiculous. However, your reaction to these false claims is as it should be.

Most Holy Mother Mary, thank you for helping MHFM through your powerful intercession.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia.

 

Comment

 

Brothers:

 

… I just found this article which appeared online June 11th about absinthe. I find the timing of this story extremely odd because it mentions the ingredient: wormwood.  I cannot entirely explain why I find this story so peculiar and disturbing, except that the second and third angels, their punishments deal with water, and wormwood is imbibed in the liquid absinthe, which has a green color; chartreuse…  You have to read about halfway down to get to the mention of the bitter herb. 

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/7821341/Absinthe-could-be-legalised-in-France-after-100-year-ban.html

 

Many thanks always for your work,

 

Deidre Howard

 

Spanish

 

MHFM:  This is our website in Spanish (for those who only speak Spanish).  It’s updated frequently.

 

http://www.vaticanocatolico.com/

 

Traditional

 

I am so very impressed with your interview with the Chicago Archdiocesan "Apologist" in the Youtube archives! Absolutely fascinating! I am a traditional Catholic and have learned so much from the MHFM website. Thank you… for all you do!

Yours very sincerely,
Scarlett Miller

 

Infant Baptism

 

Now a question: have you ever had anyone whom you were debating infant baptism with come back a day later and say "I looked up the definition of households and in biblical days infants weren't considered part of the household." Only a protestant could come up with this! And how they hate the truth - that they're denying original sin. How in an uproar that made this protestant. How can anyone think that God would give infants a door to Him in His old covenant (circumcision) yet not in His more perfected new covenant??

 

Thanks for all the work!... The end of the world series is phenomenal! The latest debates are hard to listen to but have much to offer. If only people could cast aside their pride you would be able to reach so many more. I find that a majority of people I try to introduce to your work only take a brief look and have an attitude like "why should I listen to a bunch of monks" (in a negative way). It's so sad. Anyhow, thanks again!

 

Christina Kalix

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  That’s an interesting claim by the Protestant.  If not substantiated with any evidence, his claim is worthless, especially when we consider that the Bible links households with children.

 

Gen. 18:19- “… he will command his children and his household after him…”

 

Gen. 36:6- “And Esau took his wives, and his sons, and his daughters, and all the persons of his house.”

 

Since households generally include children – and the Bible repeatedly mentions that whole households were baptized – these passages by themselves make the case against infant baptism extremely unlikely.  In fact, if a Protestant who rejects infant baptism believes in Scripture alone, he would have to find an explicit teaching in the Bible that infants should not be baptized.  But there’s nothing like that.  Furthermore, we know that infants should be baptized from Jesus’ teaching in John 3:5, the parallel with Circumcision, the witness of the early Church, etc.

 

SSPX

 

The SSPX are heretics because they differentiate Catholics according to the color of the skin. All their unwanted priests from the West, whom they are reluctant either to defrock or expel, are sent to the Asia zone of their Society, where they are actually given positions of authority!. The local Asian priests have been playing second fiddle to an array of misfits these past 20 years, and can only murmur under their breath as they have made great sacrifices to become priests of a Society shunned by their very own family, relatives and friends. Where can they go and to whom can they turn?

 

RA

 

MHFM: We can’t comment on that claim because we haven’t seen any proof in that regard.  However, it’s a fact that they are heretical in various ways.  A priest who is unhappy in the SSPX needs to focus on accepting the true faith and rejecting their false positions on salvation and the Vatican II Church.  Once the priest becomes a true believer and seeks the will of God in sincerity (which of course would mean leaving the SSPX), all things would be added onto him.  God would direct Him concerning what he is supposed to do and where he should go (Matthew 6:33).  But as long as he persists in their heretical positions, he will not discover what God wants him to do.

 

Video: The Fall of Constantinople

 

 

 

MHFM: For those it might interest, this is a discussion of one of the more dramatic moments in Church history.

 

Inquisition

 

Dear Brothers,

 

In defending the Church with conviction, they, not only the Protestants, immediately throw to our face the Inquisition affair, how can one defend this situation? They take pleasure in attacking this issue to denigrate the Catholic faith. Have you any material in this respect in your site or elsewhere that I may clarify? 

 

In JMJ

M. Fernanda da Silva

 

MHFM: Yes, we did a video on it.

 

Catholic Inquisition Myths Busted

 

 

Two

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for the video defending Pope Leo XIII against the false accusations of radical schismatics, i.e. that he taught the heresy of separation of Church and State. The correct Church and State Union is probably best illustrated by the relationship of Matrimony, the Church representing the Husband, the State the Wife. The two are said to become one, as Christ indicated. That doesn't mean that the husband becomes the wife or that the wife becomes the husband, but merely that their two separate and distinct wills unite toward the same purpose: child bearing. In a similar way, Christ has two wills because He has two natures (human and divine) but the human nature and will submitted to the divine nature and Will, toward the same purpose: the salvation of mankind. The radical schismatics propose a Church-State relationship that is like a hermaphrodite, i.e. that both powers are not distinct but the very same power, rather than the correct position that the two powers are distinct, but work for the same purpose: the welfare of the region. It's similar to the Nestorian heretics who confused Christ's two natures by cancelling out either the divine nature or the human nature and thus tried to divide Christ into two persons. Christ is one person with two natures and thus two wills. The Church and State have one physical area, but are two separate powers and two "wills". Their heresy, i.e. that the Pope is [and must be] both temporal and spiritual ruler reminds me of the Arian heretics of our day (the Watchtower Society) who claim that the soul is the body - that we do not have an immortal soul. Also, the union of the faithful with Christ in the Eucharist does not make the Catholics Christ Himself, but unites them spiritually with Christ. God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost are three distinct persons with no confusion between them, but they are all three of the same divine substance: One God. In refusing submission to the mind of the Church, the radical schismatics have lost their own minds, not that the Church and its members have the very same mind as the Church, but that the members minds' are united toward the same purpose as the Church's mind: the salvation of souls.  

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Flag

 

Subject: On the don’t tread on me flag

 

Dear MHFM,

 

One of your readers wondered about the ''Don't tread on me'' flag. The picture... is the cover of the so called ''Black'' album from the group Metallica-- the album features the song ''Don't tread on me'' and the cover has the snake from that flag...I just rotated the picture so that it looks like a mirror image. The symbolism that comes out is pretty obvious in my opinion.

 

Thank you and God bless,

 

V. from Croatia   

 

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\dtom.jpg

Comment

 

Subject: The Fall of Constantinople

 

Thank you for your video.  I like to learn about the history of the Church so I think you did a great job!  I enjoyed it and I agree with you 100% regarding this video.

… I know some about the Orthodox Church… but could you do a video explaining more about the Orthodox Faith I think it would be very informative for those Catholics who are not well versed on it.

Thank you.

Elijah…

 

Arkansas

 

Subject: Albert Pike Rec Area Deaths

 

It's terrible what happened to those people in Arkansas. I wouldn't go camping there just because the place is named after a satanist.

 

It's interesting to see how much the leadership of our country loves this satanist. “… Albert Pike (December 29, 1809–April 2, 1891) was an attorney, soldier, writer, and Freemason. Pike is the only Confederate military officer or figure to be honored with an outdoor statue in Washington, D.C..... Pike died in Washington, D.C., aged 81, and was buried at Oak Hill Cemetery (against his wishes—he had left instructions for his body to be cremated).[3] In 1944, his remains were moved to the House of the Temple, headquarters of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite.”

 

Matthew

 

Benedict XIII

 

Subject: Benedict XIII Antipope

 

Hello Brothers

I write to you today to ask just why was Benedict XIII from the 14th-15th century an Antipope. There is an anti-Catholic that I'm chatting with and he's telling me it was simply because he didn't reside in Rome during the Western Schism... He also said it was just to not look like complete fools that lost most of their power. I assume it was not because of that, as I believe he is talking with a total bias against the Catholic Church.  Anyway I hope you're all doing well there at MHFM, and well done on the Fall of Constantinople video as well. It was clear, concise and very interesting. I have also come across your file on the western schism so I'm going to give that a read now.

Sincerely, Neil

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  Benedict XIII was an antipope because Pope Urban VI was validly elected by the cardinals in 1378.  After the election of Urban VI, the cardinals convinced themselves that his election was invalid.  They withdrew to Avignon and proceeded to elect Clement VII.  Clement therefore became the first of the Avignon antipopes, as the validly elected pope was already reigning in Rome.  Following Antipope Clement VII’s death, the cardinals of the Avignon line elected Benedict XIII as his successor.  So, in short, Benedict XIII was an antipope because Urban VI was the true pope, his cardinals elected Boniface IX as his successor, and Pope Boniface IX was reigning when the Avignon cardinals elected Antipope Benedict XIII. 

 

Honeybee

 

"Colony Collapse Disorder"  - Maybe the "mysterious causes" he mentions is coming from the chemtrails!  It was really bad in 2006 and now, four years later it's affecting 1/3 the world’s food supply. They abandon their hives and fly off to die.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHRgdzwEPGA&NR=1

 

V-2 Church

 

I first heard bro. Michael Dimond on coast to coast am with George Noory. At that time I thought that your organization was anti catholic but when I checked your web site and got your books and videos I saw the truth.  I am trying to help awaken my family and friends but they are so closed minded  that they refuse to see the truth and reality.  I am deeply concerned about their salvation if they don't get out of this apostate Vatican II church and its false mass and teaching

They don't have the true body and blood of Jesus Christ in their communion because they follow the anti-popes who reject the apostolic tradition and dogmatic teaching of the True Popes who followed the guidance of Holy Spirit to establish the True Mystical Body of Christ.  PLEASE KEEP ME AND MY FAMILY IN YOUR PRAYERS THAT THEIR MINDS AND HEARTS MAY AWAKEN TO THE TRUE CHURCH AND SALVATION.

 

Anthony

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers, 

 

Isn't it a strange coincidence… Back in the 1980's, both JP II and Ronald Reagan were highly charismatic leaders, both suffered gun shot wounds that should have killed them around the same time and both were highly popular with "conservatives".  Another thing: I am Canadian and I don't understand the "Do not tread on me" snake flag that seems to be very popular with conservatives.  Doesn't anybody see the connection with the book of Genesis and God telling the serpent "I will put enmities between thee and the woman, between her offspring and yours.  She shall crush thy head, and thou shall lie in wait for her heel".  Why on earth would supposedly Christian "conservatives" embrace a flag that is clearly an act of defiance against God and His Holy Mother?

 

Very interesting video on the Fall of Constantinople.  Please keep putting out these videos; I find them very interesting and informative.

 

God bless you always.

 

Brenda Roy

 

Haven’t

 

I really appreciated and was enlightened by your series about the end of the world. I am a confirmed Catholic - confirmed in 1982. But how can I become confirmed in the true church? I haven't practiced Catholicism since the '80s. I believe in Jesus Christ, but have never been attracted to or worshipped any of the Catholic tenets, popes, etc. I have stayed clear of most churches and religions, but have tried to stay true to my Christian heart. Could you please offer me some advice as to how this post-Lateran Treaty, post-Second Vatican Council Catholic, whose mother was a nun, by the way, back into the proper fold of the flock?

Very sincerely yours,
John S.

 

MHFM: We’re glad to hear that you are interested.  One of the most important things you can do is begin to pray the Rosary each day.  It’s critical that one cultivates a prayer life and devotion to the Rosary.  Spiritual reading is also important.  Without these things, one won’t receive the graces to prepare himself for the state of grace or remain in it.  Next, you should follow: The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts.  Before doing so, however, one must believe in all Catholic dogmas, including Outside the Church There is No Salvation.  You also need to recognize that, in departing from belief in and practice of the Catholic faith, you ceased to be Catholic.

 

Also, Confirmation is a sacrament.  It’s not valid in the Novus Ordo Church, but receiving it is not your chief concern.  Believing firmly in all Catholic dogmas, praying, and making sure you are prepared to make a good confession is what you need to focus on.  Once you are on convinced on all issues, we can help you further with where to make that confession. 

 

Ordination

 

Dear Br. Dimond,

Background; I came over from the NOM around 10 yrs back to the SSPX. Around 3 yrs back left the SSPX when their contradictions became apparent and today hold the sedevacantist position.  Even when I was attending Masses of the SSPX and receiving Holy Communion, many a times I would also go in between to… Priests who I was told were ordained before 1969.  Now here in Bombay (India) there are no Sedevacantist Priests and I continue to go the NOM Priest(s) for confessions (only). 

Problem;

There was one Priest (Fr. Benjiman S.J.) who I would go almost always, as a Lady, also a sedevacantist told me that he was a valid Priest i.e. ordained validly before 1969. However a few weeks back, on enquiring was confirmed that this Priest (FR. Benjiman) was indeed ordained in March 1970!

My questions are; what becomes of the confessions I made to this Priest for almost 10 years in good faith? are they valid? Do I have to confess again whatever I remember?
Whom do I go to to as there are no sedevacantist Priests?  In future I will confirm and only then go to Priests… ordained before 1969.  There are few of us sedevacantist who would go to this Priest, and many more of the SSPX adherents who would go and maybe still do.  I would appreciate an elaborate answer which I would also convey to others.

Thanking you!

Yours sincerely in JMJ!!!

 

Gilbert

 

MHFM: The New Rite of Ordination was promulgated in 1968, but it wasn’t necessarily implemented everywhere right away.  In some places, the traditional rite might have stayed in use for a few years, but maybe not.  That’s why, when considering those borderline cases (1969-1972 approx.), it can become a thorny issue.  It really comes down to how much you know about the priest’s ordination, and whether you trust what he says about it.  Sadly, we’ve seen that most people (including heretical priests) are not honest, and that includes when discussing details about their ordinations.  They will often give themselves the benefit of the doubt, or even convince themselves that their “ordination” was much more traditional than it in fact was.  They don’t want their whole priestly identity called into question.  So, if there is some doubt, as there seems to be, about what rite he was ordained in, then a person who confessed mortal sins to such a priest should re-confess those he remembers to another priest who was definitely ordained in the traditional rite. 

 

V-2 Sect

 

Blessings Brothers! That is how I feel, you two Brothers Dimond should receive an Award of Excellence, exposing the Vatican II sect for exactly what it is, diabolically wicked, heretical and apostate not to mention abominable as well.

That being said, a heartfelt Thank You for being very instrumental in my reawakening…

God Bless!

 

Michael

 

Intrigued

 

Subject: numbers and years

 

I was intrigued by your video on the fall of Constantinople by the length of time between the initial events of the Eastern Schism in 1054 and the final fall of the schismatic empire in 1453.  I thought to myself that is 399 years.  I wonder what happened of significance 399 years prior to 1958 when we lost our last real Pope.  The arithmetic took me to the year 1559.  I googled “1559 the year” and discover that on January 15th, 1559, Elizabeth I was crowned Queen of England.  Also the Scottish Reformation was begun under John Knox. 

 

The trouble of course began with Henry’s divorce of the Saintly Katherine some 25 years earlier.  But the Church was briefly restored to England under Katherine’s daughter Mary.  The protestant victory was not cemented until Elizabeth became Queen, defected from the faith, and began the incredible persecution of Catholics.  Hence the fall of the West began.   

 

Bill Mulligan

 

Comment

 

Subject: video

 

Brother Peter,

Great video, right to the point, basically if you step outside the church God withdraws His protection.  How long before you put the end of the world series on a dvd, I can't wait for that one!

 

Blast

 

Dear Brothers,

 

That is an excellent video on the fall of Constantinople. It reminds me of how the enemies of the Catholic Church (freemasons and heretics in particular) attempted to blast a hole in the Catholic faith by persecuting Fr. Feeney and his stance on outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation, so they could implement Vatican II. Obviously the Catholic Church is indefectible and no one can destroy the Catholic Church or faith, but in the eyes of many that is what happened. It also shows what will happen to schismatics if they continue to reject the Papacy – like lifeless, fruitless branches they will be thrown into the fire (John 15:6). It also shows how evil Antipope Benedict XVI is when he praises the schismatics, and how he went to the Mosque and prayed like the Muslims. I suppose if he is a freemason then it should come as no surprise, since freemasonry is based in Judaism but uses Islam to persecute the Church. Both Benedict XVI and freemasonry teach that all dogmas are true!! What apostasy!!!...

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Video: Oil Spill in the Apocalypse?

 

Oil Spill in the Apocalypse ?

 

BOD

 

Hi, baptism of desire, why does this always come up when our Lord never gave any indication of it. Had it been so it would sure have saved time for the missionaries. One could have gone into the villages, preached, seen the desire in the people and left. Then on to the next - a much faster way to cover the vast areas they had to get to. And since they were instructed to teach all nations, BOD would have been the preferred means of baptism. How many examples of missionaries have we seen that stayed many at the cost of their lives, to complete our Lord’s instructions of Baptism - BY WATER...                                    

 

W Smith

 

Vatican II

 

Subject: Vatican II

 

I just wanted to let you know that I love your youtube videos.  I was a devoted Vatican 2 Catholic when I was younger, I went to church all the time and I was an altar boy for years, I was confirmed in 1996 and thought about becoming a priest.  My mom and the older Catholics at our parish were discussing the traditional Latin mass one day and I asked father dave about it and he said that Vatican 2 had changed the mass. My mom gave me a Latin missal dated 1958. After reviewing it for 10 minutes I realized that the church I was attending was not Catholic and was not teaching the true faith.  I did a lot of research on Vatican 2 and other councils, so I question father dave and he was not happy that I was looking into Vatican 2, I told him that I wasn't interested in being a priest anymore because I believed the church had been dismantled after Vatican 2. He had trouble answering any of my questions about Vatican 2. It seems there is no consistency in the church every Catholic believes something different and priests seem more like Protestant ministers, very sad. I am happy there are still Catholics out there. I hope the best for your monastery.

 

Sri…

 

Homosexuality

 

Subject: Homosexuality

 

Hello Brothers of the Most Holy Family Monastery,

 

I was reading one section in your website on FAQ, more specifically your answer to the question about homosexuality. I agree with almost everything you had to say about except for one thing. I quote from your website:  

 

"Vatican “Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith” on Homosexual Unions: “Sacred Scripture condemns homosexual acts “as a serious depravity... (cf. Rom 1:24-27; 1 Cor 6:10; 1 Tim 1:10). This judgment of Scripture does not of course permit us to conclude that all those who suffer from this anomaly are personally responsible for it, but it does attest to the fact that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered”.  This same moral judgment is found in many Christian writers of the first centuries and is unanimously accepted by Catholic Tradition.” (Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons, approved by John Paul II March 28, 2003)

 

Here we see an official Vatican document asserting that homosexual acts are wrong, but that the homosexual orientation is not necessarily a result of grave sin.  This is evil, uncharitable and false."

 

I believe that the official Vatican document is correct on this one. When a demon enters someone by reason of mortal sin, it is not always the person possessed by the demon who committed the mortal sin.  You must be aware, for example, that demons may enter a child immediately after one of his parents has cursed him. There are well known cases of this. You cannot say that the child possessed is personally responsible for the possession and by his own fault he has become possessed by a demon, although the reason of the possession was a mortal sin (committed by the parent in this case). I believe that you cannot rule out that some homosexuals may have become demon obsessed or possessed by a similar situation. Also, if the child was sodomized by an adult, it seems possible that they can become demon possessed by this mortal sin being committed in their bodies. Again, not all demonic possession occur by reason of the person being personally guilty of mortal sin. But you seem to hold as true that in every single case, someone who is afflicted by homosexuality has become demon possessed entirely through his own fault. 

 

Jll…

 

MHFM: No, Romans 1 is very clear that people are given over to such an unnatural orientation as a result of idolatry (“For this cause…”). 

 

Romans 1- “Because that, when they knew God, they have not glorified him as God, or given thanks; but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened... who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error... they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.”

 

The Vatican’s document is not correct.   It contradicts Scripture, and it’s evil because it opens the door to the justification of the perverse orientation.  After all, the acceptance of homosexuality is exactly what we see in the Counter Church.  It’s rampant there precisely as a result of the aforementioned false teaching: that only the homosexual act, not the orientation, is connected with sin. 

 

Your attempt to compare this issue to people getting possessed by demonic curses misses the mark.  It diverts from the incontrovertible truth, that Romans 1 identifies the precise cause of homosexuality.  There’s also no proof that a person who’s in the state of grace can be affected by a curse from another.  However, those who are in mortal or original sin are vulnerable to such demonic influences.    

 

The Idolatry of the Vatican II sect is connected with its rampant homosexuality [PDF File]

 

Sermon

 

Dear Brothers,


I just read a e-mail about Father Eugene Berry from Aurora Colorado. I have been going to his church for a long time and I have never heard him mention BOD or any other heresy that involves salvation. Just two weeks ago his sermon was on how you had to belong to the catholic church to be saved. I also know that he accepts the fact there is no pope right now.

 

Thank You

 

Ken

 

MHFM: The fact that you might not have heard him mention it from the pulpit is irrelevant.  It’s an undeniable fact that he believes in the “baptism of desire”/invincible ignorance heresy.  That of course means that he believes souls can be saved in any religion.  EWTN or FSSP “priests” might only occasionally mention their heretical belief on salvation in a sermon.  That doesn’t mean they don’t believe that souls can be saved in false religions.  People need to start caring about the faith, and not just about where they show up on Sunday. 

 

We’re not trying to single this priest out among all the countless heretics.  He’s unfortunately a heretic, but he’s just one of countless priests who hold similar heresies.  He should not be supported; and, since he imposes support for his heresies on those who approach him for the sacraments, he should also be avoided.  Those who obstinately support him will go to Hell, as will those who obstinately support other priests who accept “baptism of desire”/invincible ignorance.  That includes basically all of them.  Almost all of those priests also accept NFP. 

 

Frankly, we’ve also seen from experience that most people have no clue what their priests believe.  This usually arises from a lack of interest in the issues of faith.  We cannot tell you how many times we’ve encountered people who say with “100% certainty”: “my priest doesn’t believe that.”  They will vehemently argue and fight with us on this point.  And then, to prove our claim, we cite the publication or writing which their priest or his group produced.  When that happens, they sometimes switch to justifying the heretical position of the priest – THUS PROVING THAT THEY ARE COMPLETE LIARS FOR DENYING THAT THEIR PRIEST COULD POSSIBLY HOLD WHAT THEY THEMSELVES BELIEVE – or they continue to deny it, as you are.  So, he might have mentioned it from the pulpit; but since people are often oblivious to those things, most probably missed it.  Regardless, it doesn’t matter because it’s definitely what he believes.

 

In addition, since we’ve been prominently exposing heresies of this nature, more and more priests have probably become reluctant to reveal their true views on this matter in a sermon.  Nevertheless, it’s what they believe, promote and uphold in various ways.  You really should obtain and read our salvation book. 

 

Refuse

 

Subject: SSPX

 

Thanks once again, this time for your debate with the SSPX supporter. When I first realised that the institutional church was no longer the Catholic Church, I started out with SSPX, but I soon enough realised that JPII and his three predecessors were not Popes…


I am always dumbfounded when people, like the man you were talking to in the debate, simply refuse to acknowledge the Truth as God has clearly revealed it… It's really scary how readily so many people continue to adhere to their own ideas after receiving that grace. Of course, everyone, including myself is reluctant to leave their own particular comfort zones in whatever sphere, but one would imagine that our duty towards our Creator and Redeemer would always take precedence.

Nuff said! That's the reason the world is in the mess it's in.

 

Pddb…

 

Hello

 

Subject: Hello

 

Thank you for your (End of the world ) series, and the Gulf oil spill in prophecy. I found both very educational and enlightening . But as far as calling protestants heretics well will just have to disagree.  Know I take the Holy Bible very much as being the very mind of God.  So I'll never call anyone father but God.

Or will I ever pray to anyone but. To father God, Or call anyone God But God the father, Jehovah,YAHWEH. God the son, Jesus,YESHUA. And God the Holy Ghost.  The Comforter that the Lord Jesus Christ said he would seed to us.  He is God and God alone The Great I'AM That I'AM.  I will die before I would bow to or worship any other.  Now please note that I would never say that a catholic brother or sister in Christ is a heretic.  Christ tells us to love and pray for all and I do and I will till my dieing day or his return.  His word is clear many in the church that do great things in his name. He will say depart, I never know you.

A servant of Christ Jesus,

 

MrMark…

 

MHFM: Mark, the Bible itself repeatedly calls people who are not God “father.”  Here are just two examples of many:

 

Acts 7:2- “[Stephen] Who said: Ye men, brethren, and fathers, hear. The God of glory appeared to our father Abraham, when he was in Mesopotamia, before he dwelt in Charan.”

 

Philippians 2:22- "Now know ye the proof of him, that as a son with the father, so hath he served with me in the gospel.”

 

The Protestants are unfortunately heretics because they reject the clear teaching of the Bible.  Their rejection of the office of the papacy (Mt. 16:18-20; Jn. 21:15-17; etc.) is one obvious example.  See our Refuting Protestantism Section.  The Bible says that those who don’t hear the Church Christ founded upon St. Peter are to be considered as the heathen and the publican (Mt. 18:17).  Your other misconceptions are addressed in the aforementioned section of our website, and in our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.  Your position is also illogical, for you say that you would not call a Catholic a heretic.  But Catholics and Protestants differ on matters that are central to the Gospel message.  If both are acceptable, you are saying that 1) either the truth can’t be found or 2) what Jesus taught in those crucial areas of salvation doesn’t matter.  But Jesus Himself commanded the Apostles to teach all the things He delivered to them (Mt. 28:20).  That should be another signal for you that your beliefs aren’t correct, but please look at the information. 

 

Question

 

Dear MHFM,


Your video series 'Is the world about to end?' was amazing.  Great work, God bless you.  I also recently watched your video related to oil spill in the gulf of Mexico.  It was great as always.  I wanted to ask you… What is the difference between the Catholic Bible and the Bible the protestants use besides some inaccurate translations?...

On a lighter note, it seems you are getting a lot of e-mails related to lotteries.  I also would like to request you to pray for me so that I do well in my exams which start on June 14th (13th in US).

Glory be to God

Yours Sincerely,
Sampath

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  In addition to certain inaccurate translations, the Protestant bible is missing seven books.  It’s also frequently accompanied by heretical commentary.

 

Video, Vatican II

 

Dear Brother Michael,

I wanted to thank you for your valuable video on Catholic miracles.  I can't begin to tell you how many Catholics and non-Catholics I sent it to... I wish the whole world could see that video.  Anyone who denies the truth of our faith after seeing that video... simply needs prayer and only prayer will do.  I have a hard time understanding how people
can learn about the truths about our faith that you addressed in that clip, and still doubt our faith.

I want you to know that I support your work, and I thank God for it.

I do have a question about your views on Vatican II, as you are far more knowledgeable than I.  Between you and I, one faithful Catholic to another: We both know the Holy Spirit guides our Church, and only our Church, thus, can we safely assume and trust that Vatican II is a result of the Holy Spirit, whether we agree with it or not?

Personally, up until recently, I had a very hard time with the fact that our former Holy Father, Pope John Paul II, was as open as he was to those who practice other faiths.  I worried that it might undermine the truth of our faith, and mislead others into thinking "anyone can get to heaven" outside the Catholic Church.  I gave it more thought, and I realized that if we believe the Holy Spirit is guiding our faith, then Vatican II can't logical run contrary to that, ever – for that matter, our faith would be a lie. Christ promised us that Satan wouldn't prevail against his Church.  If Vatican II was influenced by Satan -- how could this be true, I wondered.

I think that Christ wants us to be more of an example than anything else.  If we are more open to other people, and show them that we are open and we aren't judging them, they will see something in us (Christ) that they don't recognize in their religion.  All religions claim to be true, but no other religion except for ours has been responsible for creating saints.  I think that if we should them love that appears supernatural at all times (utter patience (obviously, that is, the highest level possible considering our human (sinful) condition)), and explain why we are the truth by working with our Church, and never against it, I think that would be the most effective way to change those around us who don't accept the truth…

I will narrow my question down: How do we reconcile the Holy Spirit's guidance with opposing Vatican II, in a nutshell?

Your friend in Christ,
Justina

 

MHFM: Justina, we’re glad that you liked the Creation and Miracles video.  Perhaps you haven’t yet consulted the other information on our website.  It shows that Vatican II teaches many clear heresies against the Catholic faith.  That’s also covered in our debates and videos.

 

The Heresies in Vatican II [PDF File]

 

The Most Specific Heresy in Vatican II [10 min. video]

 

We know that Vatican II doesn’t come from the Holy Ghost because its teachings are blatantly heretical.  They render Christ and the Catholic Church’s dogmas meaningless.  John Paul II wasn’t merely “open” to non-Catholics, as if he received them with a friendly disposition whenever they had questions about Catholicism.  No, he endorsed their false religions, committed innumerable acts of heresy, apostasy and blasphemy, mocked the very saints you make reference to, and trashed the Gospel before the world by endorsing false gods.

 

John Paul II (manifest heretic who claimed to be pope 1978-2005) [link to section]

 

It seems that you might not be convinced of the truth of the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation.  Those who aren’t have an accompanying weakness in denouncing individuals who deny the truth of God, as well as in recognizing the evil such a denial entails.  Please consult the material we have on those issues. 

 

It’s inconsistent to say that since Christ promised to be with His Church, Vatican II must be true.  Christ’s promise doesn’t rule out a Great Apostasy, false councils and antipopes posing as true popes.  In fact, we’ve seen those very things in the past.  We know that Vatican II isn’t of the Holy Ghost not only from the truly diabolical fruits that emanated from it – wholesale spiritual desolation and destruction – but because it was promoted and confirmed by heretics in addition to containing many heresies in its documents.  For all of those reasons, a true believer should immediately recognize that Vatican II was a false council, evil, orchestrated by Satan, and a mark of the Great Apostasy.  Our file covering the many heresies in Vatican II proves it. 

 

Evil Cross

 

Subject: Evil Cross

 

Greetings, Brothers!   I was just browsing on E-bay and came across this listing:  "inverted crucifix necklace Satan upside down evil cross -- top rated seller".    Indeed, it is a crucifix turned upside down on a necklace.  Why am I still shocked when I see something like this?  Such outrageous times we live in.    

 

God bless you.

 

Margaret Moore

 

MHFM: According to the foolish defenders of Antipope John Paul II, they must be devoted to St. Peter.

 

Priest

 

Dear Brother Peter and Michael Dimond:

 

This is to let you know about my email exchange with Father Berry here in Denver.  He sent me a note reminding us of our obligation to "tithe" and to support the Church with financial donations.  Well, I replied to him that we would be glad to support him if he would give up his heresies (BOD and invincible ignorance).  Otherwise we could not in good conscience give him any financial support whatsoever.  He replied that we are no longer welcome at his chapel.  This is "Our Lady Of Victory" in Aurora, Colorado, just east of Denver.  For those readers of yours who live in this area or who will be visiting Colorado, that chapel should be avoided.   The priest in question is Father Eugene Berry.

 

Brenda Roy

 

Common

 

Hi Brothers,


I think that "The Pope cannot say heresy ex cathedra" is the most common rebuttal I get from V2ers, how would you respond if you only had about 2 minutes?

Thanks for your work you've changed my life.

Patrick

 

MHFM: The first thing to say is that the argument is illogical because they are asserting exactly what they need to prove (i.e., that he is the pope).  That he is the pope is precisely the point they would need to prove in the debate, and they are assuming it to be true in their argument.  That’s illogical; it’s called begging the question.  The second thing to say is that we agree that a true pope can’t teach heresy ex cathedra.  The fact that the Vatican II antipopes have taught things that are heretical in documents that would be ex cathedra if they were legitimate (e.g., Vatican II) serves to prove that they are not true popes.  Hence, it again gets back to whether Vatican II is heretical or not, which of course it is. 

 

Finally, you could add that popes teaching ex cathedra have told us that heretics can’t be accepted as popes.  They did so long before the post-Vatican II heretics ever claimed to be popes.  If the people with whom you are conversing really believe in what popes teach ex cathedra, they must conclude that these obvious post-Vatican II heretics aren’t true popes.  Since they weren’t true popes to begin with, their false teaching was not protected by papal infallibility.   

 

Obvious

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Greeting in Jesus Christ.

 

It was so obvious that whoever wrote that email to you is afraid to sign their name, he says loud and clear that he has no good intention nor the will of finding out the true faith. Don't even bother to waste your precious time on those people.

 

God calls you to serve his people, his church, his children, not otherwise. Don't even waste one word on those for they are not seeking debate to learn about the truth. Everything on the website is enough for anyone who wants to learn about the true church to come to know at least all the fundamentals of the Catholic religion…

  

Glory to God,

 

Kim-Lan Vu

 

MHFM: We frequently post such e-mails because it’s valuable to point out their errors and expose their unwillingness/inability to defend their false positions in an open forum. 

 

Mortal sin

 

Hello Brothers,

 

I've read statements by saints stating that when a person is in mortal sins there is nothing that person can do to please God.  With that being said, would it still profit someone to say fast or pray a rosary while they are in mortal sin.   Thank you and God bless      

 

Josh           

 

MHFM: A person can’t gain any supernatural merit while in the state of mortal sin.  However, by praying and other works of mortification, a person in mortal sin can receive certain graces to break free from it.  The Rosary, his other prayers and spiritual exercises are crucial if he is going to receive the graces to change his life, avoid the occasions of sin and make a good confession. 

 

Dialogue

 

Subject: Anon

 

Anon does not even follow the practices of his conciliar sect, one of which is "dialogue." They do not follow the great commission of Christ which is to teach the Faith and baptize non-Catholics. Instead they prefer this thing called "dialogue." They dialogue with every heretic, schismatic, pagan, heathen and other devil they can find. But they fear dialogue with Catholics such as your self.

EJP, M.D., D.D.

 

Whenever

 

Brothers..

 

Whenever the lottery gets real high into the $250 Million dollar range or higher in our state, I run a lottery pool here at work in which I have a sign up sheet at my desk in which about 40 people here in the office pay me $5.00 each to increase our chances or winning....Thus we would all go in on it together if we were ever to win the jackpot,...--..If we did win, each person would probably net about around $4 to $8 million after taxes ...Is this morally wrong for me to run the pool ??

 

Steve

 

MHFM: There’s nothing wrong with it.

 

Recent

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,

 

I found it very interesting among others, your video on “Oil Spill in the Apocalypse?”  All these recent world disasters, numerous wars, disaccords between nations, public relations and within family circles, religious organizations, governments and societies in general, within the younger generation and the older we can only see disaccord and unhappiness. It becomes clearer and almost palpable or rather actually palpable according to my spirit, that as the days go by our human race is being evermore oppressed by the works of existing evil forces at this particular time in human history which is very much as you say, in accordance with Biblical and Catholic revelations. 

 

Even the faithful who fight to avoid this world’s false morality, fight to live holy lives according to God’s will and who cry out the dangers of the world, are also being put to test and the bar is getting heavy, but as Our Lady reminded us that we must never lose sight of Jesus our Saviour and His true teachings.

 

Sincerely

M. Fernanda da Silva

 

Lottery

 

Subject: Lottery

 

Brothers in Christ,

 

Is it God's will when people hit the lottery for huge amounts of money?  My 73 yo aunt who's dying of lung cancer just hit the lottery for $64 million.  i was just curious is it just luck or is He the reason she won.  Is it a test how they will react to this life changing event?     

 

John 

 

MHFM: It could be a blessing, it could be a punishment or it could be a test.  It could be a blessing: e.g., in the case of a person of the true faith who is thus given an opportunity to use that event for the glory of God, the spread of the true faith, and the salvation of souls.  It could be a punishment: e.g., in the case of a person outside the true faith who, by winning it, will be more inclined to pursue an already godless lifestyle and spurn considerations of eternity.  It could be a test because each person’s obligation, after satisfying his or her state in life, is to use such a blessing for the purpose of God’s will (Matthew 19:24). 

 

If your aunt is a non-Catholic who is uninterested in the truth (we assume you’ve tried to convert her), punishment is the most likely answer to why she won.  She is close to death and winning the lottery is likely to cause her to continue to put off considerations of what is most important (salvation) or waste the money on unimportant or heretical causes.

 

Rosary

 

Brothers,

 

I apologise if this question has been covered before.

 

Does a rosary need to be blessed by a validly ordained priest before it can be used? (also other items such as scapulars, religious pictures etc) If so, is there anywhere in europe where they can be bought online?

 

Thanks, Jim

 

MHFM: They do not need to be blessed before being used.

 

Mentioned

 

I mentioned what MHFM discussed about oil spill/Apoc. 8--8 and 9 to a couple gals I saw this a.m. at a shop and one used the term "plague"… in re-listening to your Fatima DVD in the section on Sr. Lucia's 1957 interview with the priest from Mexico Father Fuentes, Sr. Lucia does mention that while it is her mission to warn against the loss of our eternal souls if we do NOT obey Our Lord and Our Lady's requests (at Fatima and of the true Catholic Faith overall)  then there would ALSO no doubt be some kind of physical chastisements----again she emphasizes that those are NOT her mission to warn against, because Sr. Lucia was focused on the spiritual not the physical message re: chastisement-----but does say those physical chastisements are not ruled out (in so many words,  I think it is sort of implied).  This sort of reminds one of the Apoc. verses MHFM pointed out, on the physical level,  what may be a chastisement allowed by God in the final days, the waters turning red like blood.  Could it reflect the blood of all the innocent babies murdered by abortion in our day as well as the blood of the martyrs trampled on and mocked by the Vatican 2 sect?  A reflection of innocent blood poured out on the altars of greed and lust and every kind of treachery.

 

A.

 

Want to?

 

Dear sirs,

 

    Your website makes so many false claims, that I cannot refrain from addressing a few. First of all, you insist that "no salvation outside the Church" means that only formal Catholics are saved. Yet you haven't proved that "outside" is the best translation of "extra", or at least best expresses the meaning intended by the Church of the Middle Ages; nor have you provided insight into how the word "joined to" [the Church] was understood back in those days. The only theologian I have heard you quote to support your meaning of that dogma lived way after Boniface VIII and the other decrees you quote. Also, wouldn't the Church Fathers and Doctors of the Church be the best interpreters of the language of Catholicism? Well, if we turn to Jesus's life, we see that He says "unless a man is born again of water...". Now the meaning that more likely comes to us upon its first reading is: water baptism is necessary as a means for eternal salvation. However, as many authors have proven, many Church Fathers and Doctors of the Church believed in baptism by desires. These Church authorities knew about Jesus's word in the Gospel of John, yet understood that Jesus was speaking about his Jewish generation, who were not invincibly ignorant since God Himself was among them. Therefore, Jesus's words about baptism can be interpreted by the same principles as John 6; namely, he was preaching about objective necessity, which is not interchangeable with "a necessity of means". These sames principles can be applied to the dogma's about "no salvation outside the Church", the Church Fathers themselves providing the tools of interpretation, not the MHFM.

 

         You have also argued that if water baptism was not absolutely necessary as a means to salvation, then we would have three baptisms (water, blood, desire), instead of "one baptism". This is not true however, since only water baptism provides the sacramental imprint on the soul, which cannot be remove; the other 2 take the place of the sacrament when the other is not available, but baptism is objectively obligatory even after baptism by desire. Whether the stain of original sin returns if one commits a mortal sin after baptism by desire (but before baptism by water) is an open question. You also quote Church teaching which states that baptism and God's lifegiving grace are "inseparable", but you overapply the principle. Grace is given by baptism, baptism is objectively necessary, and baptism by desire\blood only takes the place of baptism in exceptional circumstances. Therefore there is no separation of baptism and grace, but the providing of grace, through the mercy of God, for those who don't have access to water. 

 

Therefore the Diamond brothers are in error, and have yet to find the Pearl of truth...

 

Anonymous

 

MHFM: Want to debate?

 

[HIS RESPONSE]:

 

Since you ask everybody and their gramma's cat to debate, you seem to have the some complex as Protestant apologist James White. Besides, since you use so many "debate tricks" (with phrasing, vocal emphasis, diversion, and unnecessary namecalling), it is unwise for people to engage in recorded debates with you; and if you were wise you would deeply consider what I and others have written to you.        Anon

 

MHFM: No, it's that you don't have a clue what you are talking about and that would be shown in a debate.  You are a heretic, clueless and a coward on top of it...  You are afraid to debate.  That's what we thought. 

 

Your ridiculous comment that extra doesn’t mean outside (consult any Latin dictionary or any translation of the texts which define the salvation dogma) is sufficient to demonstrate the emptiness of your argument.  It’s also irrelevant, by the way, because the accompanying language and the other definitions declare that one must positively have the Catholic faith for salvation.  That’s what you deny.  One could address every one of your sentences, but since you ran from the concept of backing up your claims in a debate, it’s unnecessary.  It’s revealing that despite your arrogance, you won’t engage in a debate.  It’s amazing how the arrogance of heretics like you so frequently and so quickly vanishes once the debate offer is extended.  The same thing occurred with someone else who wrote in a few days ago.  We see it frequently.  

 

We will, however, take the time to quickly refute a few of your errors.  They are addressed in our debates and in our book.  You say that John 3:5 is to be understood the same as John 6 – wrong.  Their language is not the same, and the Church’s dogmatic definitions don’t understand them in the same way.  So, you are completely wrong.  You would have learned that if you had read our book and listened to our debates.

 

You say that it is not true that the “baptisms of desire and blood” (the “three baptisms”) contradict the truth of one baptism.  In trying to explain it, however, you only prove our point.  You say: “Whether the stain of original sin returns if one commits a mortal sin after baptism by desire (but before baptism by water) is an open question.”  According to you, one can receive “the first baptism” (“baptism of desire”) and have his original sin removed, and then come to baptism of water.  Thus, according to your belief, the same person can receive baptism twice.  You have therefore proven our point: your false belief forces you to accept multiple “baptisms” for the same person. 

 

Expanding upon this point, you assert that one can be forgiven of original sin by “baptism of desire,” but that this original sin might return if that person sins prior to receiving the baptism of water.  (Where is any of this taught by the Magisterium, by the way?  Nowhere.)  Therefore, according to you, the person has two baptisms (the first of desire, and the second of water) – both in the same person – and they both remove original sin.  You have the same person being freed from original sin (in other words, receiving the effect of baptism) possibly two different times by two different “baptisms.”  That clearly denies the truth of one baptism for the remission of sins.  To deny that is simply to be a liar, but that’s what you are.  All of this serves to illustrate the falsity of your doctrine, the falsity of “baptism of desire.”  By the way, it’s not only a dogma that there is only one baptism, but that the one baptism is of WATER and that it’s the same for everyone. 

 

Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, 1311-1312:  “Besides, one baptism which regenerates all who are baptized in Christ must be faithfully confessed by all just as ‘one God and one faith’ [Eph. 4:5], which celebrated in water in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit we believe to be commonly the perfect remedy for salvation for adults as for children.”

 

St. Jerome (386): “The Lord is one and God is one… Moreover the faith is said to be one… And there is one baptism, for it is in one and the same way that we are baptized in the Father and in the Son and in the Holy Spirit.”

 

Melbourne

 

Subject: Melbourne, Pelosi

 

Dear Brothers,

The article on the Melbourne V-2 abuse case shows to what great lengths the V-2 Church will go to cover their tracks, i.e. by hiring a private investigator. Only it didn't work for them because the police could still gather enough evidence to lay 8 charges of indecent assault!! It's yet another proof of the fact that the V-2 sect is desperate to keep perverts among their ranks in order to further destroy the image of the Catholic Church (though they are not the Catholic Church!). The real Catholic Church would kick out such cranks the first they got word of it, but the V-2 sect just keeps hiding them away.

For Nancy Pelosi to say that her policies are determined by Jesus is so outrageous as to be almost beyond words!!! She talks about "the Word," as though Jesus is just any old word that someone can say, and that therefore her words (or anyone else's), even if they contradict Jesus' own words, are justified - simply because they are words. It's the height of stupidity! The clearest expression of this heresy of hers is in her statement: "The Word. Isn’t it a beautiful word when you think of it? It just covers everything. The Word. Fill it in with anything you want. But, of course, we know it means: ‘The Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us.’ And that’s the great mystery of our faith." So Nancy Pelosi thinks that God the Word "covers...anything you want." That's the Satanic dogma, "do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law"!!! So, according to Nancy, heresies, because they are expressed in words, are part of "the  great mystery of our faith." It's yet another example of the corruption that results from unrestrained freedom of thought (conscience) and speech so rampant in western societies today, and by extension, a further expression of the Antichrist spirit - man in the place of God!!! Nancy Pelosi will do anything to get her say, even if it means abortionists can get their way. What a gross and ugly abortion apostate!!!

God Bless,

Chris White

 

Comment

 

Subject: Video

 

Brothers,

 

Great video, it makes perfect sense, the people don't see it as anything other than an accident just like in the past with other oil catastrophes.  St. Matthew tells us that in Noe's day the people were living their evil lives as if nothing was going on around them, but I'm sure there were signs happening all around them before that terrible day happened.37 And as in the days of Noe, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.38 For as in the days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, even till that day in which Noe entered into the ark, 39 And they knew not till the flood came, and took them all away; so also shall the coming of the Son of man be. 

 

NK

 

Apoc.

 

Subject: Apoc. 8:8

 

Again, excellent work. I really enjoyed your video and respect your gift of discernment. Why are so many people still blinded to the truth as to what happened on 911?  Keep up the good work.

 

Rick

 

Spill

 

Subject: Spill

 

Brothers,

I liked your latest video on the oil spill in relation to the Apocalypse. So true are the current signs of the times hidden from those that are waiting the physical fulfillment over the spiritual fulfillment. The blind modernists whom believe themselves so worthy of Heaven, can not entertain the idea that they are living in the end times and would expect God to highlight the events on the evening news, should those times be near. They did not listen to Noe nor any of the other prophets over the history of this world and were overtaken by the past chastisements. The rug is being pulled from under their feet in these last days and they will descend into the depths.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

Every

 

Subject: Attack on every Catholic leader

 

In the beginning I used to watch your video clips and felt as if you had a good message, however the more I watch your work the more I begin to doubt your intentions. You have attacked all the latest popes from Paul VI to Benedict XVI as antipopes or heretics and you do not stop there you still go on to promulgate an antiCatholic view on charity and humility. I believe as a practicing Catholic (if you truly are) you need to pray more and attack others less. It is God's duty to judge His people not 'your duty'. You need to stop spreading this confusion to the faithful, stop attacking the church's shepherds. As every Catholic knows, we do not judge and condemn God's priests, should we feel that they are in error, we need to pray for them…

 

Muz…

 

MHFM: According to you, the burning issue is not whether they do in fact reject Catholic dogma; but rather it is that our message isn’t tolerant enough for you.  You need to learn Catholic teaching on the obligation to reject heretics and heresies:

 

Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215, Constitution 3, On Heretics:

“We excommunicate and anathematize every heresy raising itself up against this holy, orthodox and Catholic faith which we have expounded above.  We condemn all heretics, whatever names they may go under.  They have different faces indeed but their tails are tied together in as much as they are alike in their pride.”

 

Pope Pelagius II, epistle (1) Quod ad dilectionem, 585:

“If anyone, however, either suggests or believes or presumes to teach contrary to this faith, let him know that he is condemned and also anathematized according to the opinion of the same Fathers.”

 

First Council of Constantinople, 381, Can. 1:

“Every heresy is to be anathematized and in particular that of the Eunomians or Anomoeans, that of the Arians or Eudoxians, that of the Semi-Arians or Pneumatomachi, that of the Sabellians, that of the Marcellians, that of the Photinians and that of the Apollinarians.”

 

Paul VI, Benedict XVI, etc. are clearly heretics and antipopes.  Please consult our files on them.  In addition, the Church teaches that a priest or bishop or one who claims to be the pope must be rejected and considered outside the Church if he shows himself to be manifestly heretical.  The fact of the matter is that you are a modernist.  You don’t believe in Catholic dogmas, and you don’t care when they are denied. 

 

Angel

 

Thanks very much for the information. Very interesting indeed...

I remember reading somewhere that according to St. Aquinas, if a "bushman" was trying to follow the natural law, then God could send him an angel to teach him the basics of the faith. So following from this, would it be possible to say that all non-Catholics who are invincibly ignorant are mystically (perhaps in another location through bi-location) baptized and taught the faith by angels from their death beds?? For all things are possible with God, and again, He could give them all the graces he chooses to based on the natural efforts they made in life. At that point, the only difference between your position of so-called "conservative Catholics" would be WHEN they receive sanctifying grace and the removal or original sin, and of course whether implicit faith is sufficient and water not absolutely necessary... All of which are IMPORTANT theological questions, but who will be saved vs. who will be damned would not be affected regardless of the position one held. The End would be the same, and the question is simply a theological one about the means God will use to save people. People will be saved either way, so this question really doesn't seem to have a lot of importance. Perhaps I am talking gibberish however.
Again, thank you.

 

Thomas

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  However, we do not agree with your description of this issue.  You belittle the importance of this dogma (the most important issue in our day), as well as the significance of the many heresies against it.  A man (not an angel) must baptize a person.  The reason is that the sacrament is necessary, and in order for a sacrament to be confected there must be a person who administers it (Council of Florence).  So, the true position is not at all comparable to the nebulous, open-ended confusion of apostates who deny the baptism and salvation dogmas. 

 

Your attempt to find common ground between the pure re-statement of defined dogma and the meaningless formula of unbelievers is wrong.  The ignorant native you envision must also have real faith in the mysteries of Christ, in addition to actually being baptized.  The heretics, on the other hand, hold that those who even reject Christ and don’t believe in Him are in the state of grace.  That disproves what you have argued.  They also leave open the possibility that anyone, no matter what his beliefs, can be counted as inside the Church somehow.  It’s certainly true that an angel could miraculously instruct an ignorant native.  He could then direct him concerning what he must do; but someone would have to baptize him. 

 

The quote from St. Thomas to which you refer is referenced in our salvation book.  In it, he refutes the false idea of “invincible ignorance.”  He teaches that faith in the Trinity and Incarnation is absolutely necessary for salvation; and that, if a good-willed person were ignorant of those truths, an angel would be sent to teach him.

 

Comment

I just watched your new video on B16 wearing Star of David mitre....words simply really do not express the perverse extremity of this absolute DENIAL of any and all Faith in Christ currently exhibited to all the world by the goblins in the "vatican"---only one image keeps coming into mind, and that is of Christ bloody, beaten, and tortured almost beyond  recognition as He lays dying on that terrible crucifix dangling between earth and sky---for US. His mother is at the foot of the Cross, weeping, praying… The enemies of Christ cannot change this reality of Christ's Sacrifice---though they certainly are TRYING to.  Thus the salient importance of the continual fervent and ever-more loving prayer from our hearts of the Rosary-----we will fight with this WEAPON------and WIN!!  This is a battle to the death, and beyond---thankfully, we have our weapons.......with humility and prayer and chastity we will simply crush our enemy-------with overwhelming force. 

 

A

 

Rosary

 

Brothers,
 

With regards to the question on how the Holy Rosary can save us, please inform the questioner Melissa that during the Apparition in Fatima, Portugal, the Blessed Virgin Mary said to Francisco that he needs to pray a lot of rosaries to make it to Heaven. For a young child to be told that it only means that we, adults, have a lot of praying the Holy
Rosary to do.  Keep up the good works,


Maria Juanita

 

Follow-up

 

Subject: Concerning Transubstantiation Question

 

Thank you MHFM. I knew about form and matter, but this was the first I heard of minister and INTENT. It makes more sense to me now. I will continue to study and to pray about the present situation.

God bless you,
Daniel

 

Found

 

Brother Michael:

 

I found your website strictly by chance and find it very compelling. I am a cradle Catholic and have more than a few years under my belt. Your web site states that the two past Popes are not, and were not the true Popes, and your do prove it to my satisfaction.  No Pope would go into a Mosque and pray with Muslims who deny the divinity of our Lord. My question to you is how do I convince anyone that the Catholic Church is the true and only way to salvation and then tell him or her that the last two Popes were not genuine? I will be waiting for your response.

 

John

 

MHFM: We’re glad that you came across the information.  There are two main points to stress when explaining it to them: 1) According to the teaching of the past popes, the Vatican II “popes” cannot be true popes.  That means that they are not legitimate on the basis of Catholic teaching which existed long before their “elections.”  Therefore, there is no inconsistency in Catholic teaching at all.  When applied, it eliminates them from consideration.  2) It is predicted in the Bible and in Catholic prophecy that there will be a Great Apostasy and a massive falling away from the true faith in the final days.  This apostasy will also feature an apostasy in Rome.  The fact that Rome figures so prominently in the apocalyptic saga demonstrates that Rome was historically the seat of God’s Church, and that the Catholic Church is the true Church.  This video is very relevant:

 

Why Rome is now the Whore of Babylon

 

The Great Apostasy and a Counterfeit Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy

 

 

Afflicted

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Your work has been going on for many years and the world is still afflicted with the Vatican II Whore.  Will this whore be with us until Jesus Christ comes back?  Is there any way to remove the false Vatican anti-popes, anti-bishops and anti-priest or are we stuck with them?...

 

As regards the false pope (Rat Zinger) making images of the beast JPII, it seems to me after reading a book, the name escapes me, where JPII (surely he fits the description of the antichrist in the following scripture verse "...so that he sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself as though he were God" (2nd Thess. 2:4) -by preaching that all men are Christ and by the authority as a pope, even though he really doesn't possess that office because he is an anti-pope, he in the same words makes himself a God and at one and the same time deals lethal blows to the truth of: 1. that the only way to salvation for men is to believe that by Jesus Christ's death on the cross and his resurrection He made satisfaction for our sins, that we need to be baptized and born of the Holy Spirit to even have the possibility of eternal bliss, and 2. that faithfulness to the dogmas and doctrines of the Catholic Church are required for salvation) gave two retreats in 1962 and 1972 where he develops the thesis that all men were united with Christ at his incarnation whether they know it or not which in effect says there is no original sin, (universal salvation), God reveals man to himself instead of the true revelation that God reveals to man Himself, in other words, all men are Gods. 

 

… Basically that… Vatican II was the realization of this new truth: that all men are united with Christ even though they don't know it, and that this reciprocates back to Adam and Eve.  Seems to me that Rat Zinger is following up with JPII's anti-christ message with the constant references he makes about the need for men to have "memory" or to remember who they are which ties in with all men are united to Christ whether they know it or not…

 

St. Jerome said, "To put it briefly, I have never spared heretics, and have always striven to regard the church' enemies as my own" and as Pope Pius XI said to lukewarm Catholics, "The two opposing camps are now clearly marked; each man should choose his own. Men of good will and men of evil will face one another. The uninterested and the cowards face their fearsome responsibility. They will have their names changed if they do not change their behavior: they will be called traitors." 

 

Paul R.

 

Interesting

 

MHFM: This is an interesting interview concerning Israel’s recent raid on the Gaza flotilla.  It provides perspective and information one won’t hear in the controlled press.  For those who are interested in this issue which has been in the news recently, it’s worth watching.

 

Discussion of Israel's raid on Gaza flotilla

 

Question

 

Subject: Question about Transubstantiation?

 

Hello brother Dimond. I'm a Novus Ordo Catholic that agrees with you about the erroneous words of consecration over the wine. I have a question on transubstantiation. As you know, the Novus Ordo priest speaks accurate words to consecrate the bread. Does transubstantiation occur at that second? If so, then what happens a few seconds later when he speaks the erroneous words over the wine? Does reverse transubstantiation occur on the previously consecrated bread?

I have my own thoughts about this, but I was curious about what the sedevacantist position is on it.

Thanks,
Daniel

 

MHFM: Before answering your question, we must say: how are you not yet convinced that Benedict XVI is a heretic and therefore not the pope?  You need to get out of the invalid New Mass.  With regard to your question, we have discussed it in the past:

 

In order to confect a sacrament, one must have matter, form, minister and INTENTION.  The Church teaches that intention is determined by intending to do what the Church does, that is, intending to use the FORM that the Church uses.  So, using the proper form determines whether one has the proper INTENTION.  In the traditional Mass, since one intends to use the WHOLE FORM, one has the proper INTENTION to do what the Church does. 

 

Therefore, when a priest who is using the traditional form, and therefore has the proper INTENTION, says: “This is my body,” the substance is immediately changed.  That’s because he intends to do what the Church does.  He intends to go on to use the rest of the Church’s form.  That's what the Council of Florence is discussing, someone with proper "intention."  However, when a “priest” uses the new mutilated Novus Ordo form, he does not intend to use the form prescribed by the Catholic Church but a mutilated and heretical form.  Therefore, he has a defect of intention from the start.  This defect of intention is present at the very moment the Novus Ordo "priest" says “This is my body,” and thus nothing happens.  So, the defect of form in the wine portion of the New Mass gives rise to a defect of intention which takes effect at the very moment he says the words for the consecration of the bread: “This is my body.” 

 

We hope you continue to look at the information and become convinced.

 

Notice

 

You Brothers have done and are doing a tremendous amount of work for the glory of God and of the True Faith. Be sure that it is appreciated.

I notice that you have been excommunicated! From what, I wonder? It's interesting to note that in the days that Our Lord walked the earth, His followers were 'excommunicated' from the Synagogue (Jn 9:22).

May Our Blessed Mother carry you in Her arms and protect you with Her mantle.

 

pd

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  We’re not sure exactly what you are referring to, but the Vatican II sect would have no authority to excommunicate anyone anyway.

 

Baptized

 

Hello Brother Michael and Brother Peter,

You'll be pleased to know that after looking at all your information and listening to your audios, I have been baptized in the Conditional Form by my younger sister. She did this for me last week. I had, beforehand, made absolutely certain I believed in all traditional Dogmas, most especially "No Salvation Outside the Church."

So...I just wanted to say thank you for all your help and information and may God and His Most Blessed Mother keep and protect you.

 

T…S….

 

Consecration

 

It's been said that Pius XII consecrated Russia, so that it's been done but without the cooperation of his bishops in a formal way.  The message clearly states that it must be done with the bishops, for a general marches at the head of his army - but not without them.  An example from the world:  when the papers reported that Gen. Omar Bradley crossed the Rhein, it was understood that he didn't go alone, but with his army.
 

If the consecration had been done and accepted by Heaven then the age of peace would have begun and it would last centuries.  Am I wrong?

 

Karl

 

MHFM: You are wrong.  We covered this in detail in our videos on the topic and in the article.  Our Lady requested that the consecration be done with all the bishops, but only promised that the pope would do it.  She also indicated that it would be “late” and not in total conformity with her original request.  The meaning of the certain period of peace (which was fulfilled) is addressed in these videos and article:

 

The Consecration and Conversion of Russia - Part 1

The Consecration and Conversion of Russia - Part 2

Fatima (the sign, the miracle, the Consecration of Russia, the False Sr. Lucy) [Link to Section]

 

Debate

 

Debate about Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist - Part 1

Debate about Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist - Part 2

Debate about Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist - Part 3

Debate about Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist - Part 4

Debate about Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist - Part 5

 

Preparation

 

MHFM:

 

Cannot thank you enough for the End of World videos! At last I understand it all clearly.  Will there be any more after #11?

 

In preparation for the coming chastisement, I have been looking for truly blessed bee's wax candles and holy water.  Are these available from you, or can you provide info about a reliable source?...

  

Dominus vobiscum...

 

John

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  Holy Water, in normal times, is of course a good thing to have.  However, one doesn’t need special candles to make it through a chastisement.  That’s a misconception that some have.  We believe that we are in the great chastisement, which is the current Great Apostasy. 

 

Had to

 

Dear MHFM,

I had to write in concerning so many people who have commented on E-Exchanges (Paul R., Deidre Howard, Vladimir, and others).  This winter, you had responded to one person very accurately,

 

i've been listening to some of your debates, i'm sorry but all of your opponents come off really stupid, can you please get someone a bit more intelligent? these guys arguments are some of the dumbest things i've ever heard

 

mp…

 

MHFM: They are not stupid.  It’s that the arguments and positions, when confronted with strong truth, look stupid; and, in the process, their bad will and inconsistency become apparent.   We’ve debated a variety of individuals and we are trying to set up more debates.

 

I think more people need to keep this point in mind. It seems in their responses that they are lacking Catholic Charity when they insult the person, i.e. "he is stupid", rather than strictly assessing the person's argument. As you said above, "They are not stupid.  It’s that the arguments and positions, when confronted with strong truth, look stupid; and, in the process, their bad will and inconsistency become apparent." 

You always give a good example and I haven't ever seen you simply reply to a "stupid person" and say, "wow, you are stupid." 

Another person people may want to take a good example from is Chris White. He frequently writes in and from what I have read, displays the Catholic Charity that you display. He never calls the person stupid, he simply points out the errors, the lies, etc.  This email is really in response to Michael Rudnicki. Even though he had interesting points, I was very much bothered by his email. It seriously lacked Catholic Charity, which you (in effect) accurately pointed out. I think this is a very important point because you have touched many people with your works. Many people are taking what you say to heart and trying to apply it to their own situation. I think the thing people should remember is that when you (MHFM) have a debate, or when you denounce an individual, they frequently have already insulted you, told you that you know nothing, etc.

 

So if a person comes across a N.O. individual they should, as you commented, take time to explain some things to them. Very frequently they have no idea about what went on in the 1960’s. They simply grew up in the N.O., and that’s all they know. Thinking back, when I was N.O., had someone asked me the same question, is the Catholic Church the one true religion, I also would have hesitated and stumbled. People just don’t speak like that in the N.O. I mean they are basically Protestants.

 

As an example, this past Sunday… I was staying out of church as usual and an Asian woman approached me. She had stepped out of church with her young children and she started asking me questions about church etc. I could tell she had never been there before, and later she told me she was a born and raised N.O. She decided to come because the Latin Mass seemed more reverent. After she said why she decided to come I jumped right in and told her why we were there. I explained that the new mass is invalid and why. I also explained that Benedict isn’t the pope etc. She was receptive to the information and in the end she took my phone number and email, and she told me she would definitely check out your website!

 

I just wonder if the person Michael had confronted would have responded the same way had he used a little more Catholic Charity and sense!

 

Sincerely,

 

Robby

 

MHFM: We have a few thoughts about your e-mail.  First, in terms of people insulting others strictly on the basis of what they consider to be a lack of intelligence, we agree with your comments.  As you have quoted above, we disagreed with a reader who wrote in and expressed his opinions in that regard.  We believe that God gives every person the intelligence he or she needs to see the truth and fulfill His will.  Generally speaking, people should not criticize others in that way, and it does display a lack of charity.  It can also display a pseudo-intellectual pride, which always begets spiritual blindness.  In fact, it’s quite often the case that those who consider themselves the most intelligent are in fact the most foolish and bad-willed.  Moreover, such individuals frequently savor the unimportant wisdom of man and look down upon the simple truths of God.

 

However, we do not believe that the readers’ e-mails to which you referred were necessarily directing their insults purely at the Chicago “apologist’s” intelligence or lack thereof.  They were commenting on his general stupidity, which arises not from an innate defect of reasoning capability, but rather from the perversity of his will.  Heretics like him do become stupid by their dishonesty, their hatred of the truth, and their obstinate rejection of Catholic teaching.  In addition, in their demonic pride, they consider themselves learned while they simultaneously trash Catholic teaching and fail to even consult pure sources of it.  With all of that considered and on display in a heretic who is willing to debate against Catholic truth – he also called us “loons” before the conversation, after seeing our website – we do not have a problem with those who labeled such a despicable and obstinate apostate as stupid and idiotic and ignorant, even if personally we would usually stick to calling him evil, a liar, bad-willed, etc.  That is to say, we do not have a problem with their comments when made in the context of what such a person has become through bad will.  The same words could be applied to many other heretics we have debated with.  Those heretics also spare no words in throwing out their false insults against those who defend Catholic truth.  Scripture likewise insults evil men:

 

Romans 1:22- “For professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.”

 

Isaias 56:10: “His watchmen are all blind, they are all ignorant: dumb dogs not able to bark, seeing vain things, sleeping and loving dreams.”

 

Ecclesiasticus 22:12- “For the wicked life of a wicked fool is worse than death.”

 

Psalm 13:1- “Unto the end, a psalm for David. The fool hath said in his heart: There is no God.”

 

With regard to your comment about staying with people and communicating in a friendly manner until they have a chance to hear the truth, we of course completely agree.  That’s the whole point and it should go without saying for a true Catholic.  A Catholic’s goal is to try to convert them.  Those who would walk out and condemn them without even giving them the information to hear the truth, or a chance to respond, have a serious problem.  They miss the whole point. 

 

Finally, we would add that we need more people who hate evil today. 

 

Psalm 96:10- “You that love the Lord, hate evil…”

 

That’s why we do not find it offensive, but refreshing, when we receive e-mails from individuals who say things which attack and insult obstinate heretics and evildoers.  When it comes from a true motive of rejecting or exposing the evil they represent or defend, it demonstrates a zeal for truth, a lively faith, a freedom from human respect, and the hatred of evil which one must have if the Lord is to use him. 

 

Listened

 

I've just listened twice to the recent "debate" with Rob, the phony "Catholic" apologist.  Had to add my two cents worth because it makes my blood boil!  The Catholic Church uses language which is simple, concise, and unfailingly clear, leaving no wiggle room for weasels who will "interpret" dogma away.  He offered not one solid proof for any of his diabolical musings.  Apparently, the 2000 years of the Church previous to the Vatican II era are meaningless to him.  But of course, once again, the truth shone brightly over the shifting sands of the lies and deceits of this diabolical counterfeit Church.  Brother Peter, you were unmistakably speaking with a demon.  God be with you and Brother Michael.  You are always in my prayers.

 

Sincerely in Christ,

Margaret Moore

 

Brief

 

Dear Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,

 

Just a brief comment for Deidre:

 

"Good on you for giving that 'windbag' from Chicago a 'blast of hot air' - which if he doesn't 'smarten up' soon - will have to endure for all eternity!"

 

God bless,

 

David

 

Fatima Video

 

Subject: Fatima Video

 

I was watching the fatima video again and the part where the brothers talk about the description of the sun where it was fiery and then suddenly it descended to the earth towards the people, I was thinking it was like our lady was playing charades with the world.  I think Mary chose this example to tell us the world is going to end and that the second coming of Jesus is near.  Everyone knows that an asteroid that big would destroy the entire earth.  Our lady also  appeared in the miracle as Our Lady of Mt. Carmel {scapular}, she was telling us to wear the scapular.  Our lady also told Lucia that the rosary was the last remedy or weapon to be used during this last time.  Great video guys!=

 

Nk

 

Novus Ordo

 

Maybe something more sinister is going on, with the Vatican II apologist (apostates), as one of your readers (Vladimir from Zagreb) suggests when he says: “...their stupidity  (read: “drunk” in the verse below) is of supernatural origin” and it could tie in with your article: “Is the Vatican II sect the Whore of Babylon prophesied in the Apocalypse?” and specifically where you point out the scripture verse:   Apocalypse 17:1-2- "Come, I will show thee the condemnation of the great harlot, who sitteth upon many waters, With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication; and they who inhabit the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her whoredom."  In that article you go on to say “In one and the same verse, therefore, God is revealing that the whore is conducting massive spiritual fornication in areas which regard the Catholic Mass and the Catholic Church as a whole. It is a startling description of the Vatican II sect: the end-time Counter-Church”.  

 

Maybe these novus ordo “Catholics” are “drunk” with this wine (novus ordo mass) of her whoredom… doesn’t the whore try and mimic the true church?  Maybe the following scripture verses are prophetic in some way when, in Acts 2:12 some of the Jews “...marveled” on the day of Pentecost and seemingly in opposition others said: Acts 2:13: “But others deriding said, That these are full of new wine.” And then St. Peter saying, Acts 2:15: “For these are not drunk.” The exact opposite outcome, (the truly good one is the fruit of the Last Supper (Roman Rite) which leads to eternal life and the other one the evil and death dealing fruit of the novus ordo mass which leads to eternal damnation), of this demonic “mimickry” is then either quite ironic (I don’t think so) or is foretold in a way when tying together the scripture verses in The Apocalypse and Acts.  

 

“And I hear another voice from heaven, saying, Go out from her my people: that you be not partakers of her sins, and receive not of her plagues.” (Apocalypse of St. John 18:4.)

 

A chilling reminder that a Catholic can in absolutely no way, and in no uncertain terms, be associated with the Vatican II whore.

 

Paul R.

 

Audio

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery:

 

Thank you for posting the audio debate—which was actually an attack—from the Windy One of Chicago.  I found him amusing and laughed at him— at first, until I was scandalized by him.  Here is yet another man who cares nothing for his soul, and attempts to drag others down into the pit with him; he compounds his sins by scandalizing others.  No coincidence, here is the reading for Saturday, May 29 from the Epistle of St. Jude 17-21:

 

“But you, my dearly beloved, be mindful of the words which have been spoken before by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ, who told you that in the last time there should come mockers, walking according to their own desires in ungodlinesses.  These are they who separate themselves, sensual men, having not the Spirit.  But you, my beloved, building yourselves upon your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost, keep yourselves in the love of God, waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ, unto life everlasting.”

 

If I could write a letter to Mr. Windy, this is what I would say:

 

Dear Mr. Windy of the Windy City,

 

I neither know who you are, nor do I care.  As I am no one, my jeers at you will not bruise in any way your overinflated sense of self for you are one of the hoi-polloi with the diocese of Chicago.  You sure are somebody.  Gosh.  Thanks so much for sharing your astonishing stupidity with the world… you are filled with bad will.  Br. Peter was extremely patient with you, which I and others witnessed…

 

I am appalled by your ignorance which, as you so generously demonstrated, is invincible.  You are a novus ordor superhero; your ignorance is like a force-field.  Everything bounces right off.  No amount of logic, no quotes, no words from the saints God sent to His Church makes a dent in your arrogance.  Indeed, you are Invincibly Ignorant!  You are another tiresome example of the rotten fruit of V2.  However, just so you know, God will not accept your ignorance, as insurmountable as it is, as an excuse for your scandalizing me and others, Mr. Windy.

 

Mr. Windy, I will tell you how I know you are evil and the way in which you scandalized me: you equated Jesus to “the deity”.  You did it more than once; you did this several times.  The word “deity” is commonly used to refer to the demons worshipped by infidels and satanists throughout history.  You have given yourself away and revealed yourself for what you are.  How dare you conflate Jesus Christ with lucifer!  You are an evil man.  Your attempt to foist that evil upon me and others is scandalous and a mortal sin.

 

No wonder you did not give your name and wished to remain anonymous.  However, the true God, the Blessed Trinity, knows who you are.  And your deity, too, Mr. Windy.  It knows who you are and is waiting for you… No more chatter from you, Mr. Windy.

 

I will give my name for all to see, unlike you, Mr. Windy.

 

Deidre Howard

 

Comment

 

A couple of thoughts occurred to me upon reflection on the debate with the Chicago guy:

 

1)   At least twice, in trying to answer the question about the fate of hypothetical persons (unbaptized infant, a rabbi) dying outside of the Church, he used the expression “that would be up to the deity”.  Maybe it is not a big deal, but I think that people who use this term for God, at least when otherwise speaking in colloquial English, view God as an abstraction, and not as a Catholic would view Him.  Its use is like a warning bell to me about intentions or belief.

 

2)    In claiming that he cannot judge these circumstances, because as he says “if a person has not been taught…”, what he is really denying, which is even more basic than EENS, is Original Sin.  If you think about it, this is what all of Vatican II’s blather about the “dignity of man” is really about.  It undermines the doctrine of Original Sin.  Denying EENS and every other related heresy is just a natural development of denying (unconsciously, or stealthily, because they never say it) this most basic fact of our nature…

 

 Bill Mulligan

 

Interest

 

Dear Brother Michael and Brother Peter Dimond,

Thank you for your amazing website.  It is the best website that I know of.  A great torrent of truth.  I am an English Sedevacantist.  One of the very important things that you have said is that Benedict in Greek is Benediktos and it equals 666.   This will really help to convince people…

 

Michael

 

Reminder

 

I very much appreciate the posting of Brother Peter's attempted debate with the "Apologist" from Chicago.  While it was painful to listen to this, I'm sure it was much more painful for Brother Peter to have undertaken it.  It must have been like trying to converse with a parrot. 

 

And though painful, I may listen again - because it's worthwhile and sobering.  Our minds were made to know God and His truth.   Brother's conversation with the parrot is a stark reminder that only the Enemy could have done this, and that the false church (with its false religion) is the work of Satan and the worst possible punishment of mankind. 

 

During this past week of Pentecost, I was reminded that obstinacy in heresy is the sin against the Holy Ghost.  Our Lord said that with repentance and true contrition all sins can be forgiven - except the sin against the Holy Ghost.

 

Every "heresiarch" usurps the role of the Holy Ghost by trying to replace God's truth with his own "doctrine" and, thus, he assumes the position - The Satanic Stance.  And every follower of these heretics assumes the stance of the fallen angels. 

 

It seems that as it all began, thus will it end.  Many thanks for being an instrument in our conversion to the true Faith and the true Church.

 

Lee

 

Dom

 

Subject: Dom Gueranger

 

Brothers:

Thank you for everything that you do on behalf of the truth of Roman Catholic Dogma.

Were you aware that Dom Gueranger favors baptism of desire?... Thanks again, and God bless you.

Joseph Ramirez

 

MHFM: Yes, we were aware.  He was simply wrong, dead wrong.  The false doctrine became widespread in that period, without an infallible leg to stand on. 

 

Considered

 

Dear Brothers,

 

If a Novus Ordo "Catholic" on their death bed, when explained everything to them of the real Catholic Church, and they agreed and did want a priest to come for Confession and Last Rites, and the person died before the priest came, is that person presumed to have died as a Catholic?

 

Or, being that it is a sin against the Holy Ghost, is unforgiveable unless the Sacrament of Confession is received?

 

Also, speaking of "rats", a friend once told me, rats are from Europe, and they got to America via boats entering New York.

 

Thank you, and God bless

 

- Nancy

 

MHFM: One thing that people should have such individuals make is the profession of faith for converts from the Council of Trent.  It’s on our website.  They should add to it a rejection of the main heresies they held.  Since the person you describe would have been baptized and agreed with all the true positions, and presumably rejected the heretical ones he or she previously held, then that person could be considered to have died a Catholic.  That of course assumes that the agreement was sincere and not simply out of a desire to pacify the family member or friend who was present.  It also assumes that the person ceased all previous heretical activity.  We would add that if there is some doubt that a person will live until a priest can give absolution, he/she should be counseled to pray for the grace of perfect contrition, and of course the Hail Mary and the Rosary, in case the priest doesn’t make it. 

 

Perfect contrition, it should be noted, is sorrow for sin which arises primarily out of love for God and for having offended Him.  Imperfect contrition is sorrow for sin which arises primarily out of the fear of Hell, God’s punishments, the loss of Heaven.  Though inferior to perfect contrition, imperfect contrition is salutary and good.  As Trent teaches, imperfect contrition arises from an impulse of the Holy Ghost, even though it cannot restore one to justification without the Sacrament of Penance. 

 

There is no type of sin that is unforgivable.  After baptism any sin can be forgiven in (a sincere and complete) confession or through perfect contrition and the desire for confession.

 

VII Apologist

 

Subject: VII Apologist

 

Hello Dimond Brothers:

 

     I just listened to your debate with the Vatican II so-called "Apologist" for the second time. All I can say is unbelievable, despicable, demonic. But that is just what these people are - and it is really unthinkable how deep the antichrist heresy goes until one hears it in the debate format. It is really shocking how intent somebody like him is against Our Lord. He really does not want to see Christ reign, but instead plainly shows how he wishes for men to be exalted, to the extent that a Christ-rejecting Rabbi is saved is saved in his mind and in his false religion. He believes that all men are "worthy" of salvation - probably due to their "human dignity". When he says "through no fault of their own" he basically means that all men have such a dignity that they are beyond any fault that God could have a right to judge them on. This is not an anomaly - sadly, pretty much all of the Vatican II churchgoers believe this precisely, though most have not the bold malice to admit it in such an explicit fashion as he. This is what the antipopes have done, the fruit that Vatican II has produced, and especially the Arch-heretic John Paul II. I, along with many others, thank you for exercising the patience to tolerate these debates. The debates are, to a great degree, countering the bad fruit of the VII church for those of good will.

 

-Thanks, Mike

 

Listening

 

Subject: Debate about Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist

Listening to the person in your "Debate about Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist" debate was very frustrating. The apologist seemed to be an illogical idiot who argued against basic truth. The fact he could not even understand what DOGMA means was simply amazing. The fact he said "unbaptised infants could be saved" and then you pointed out Trent on that very issue then he tried to get out of what he said. He said he was against you being an arbiter but does not understand that the arbiter is the Catholic Church and Dogmatic teaching. You were only stating the Catholic dogma and not being an arbiter. The guy simply does not know his Catholic Faith and his statements were often illogical.

God Bless,
Maria

 

Total

 

Subject: comment

 

Dear brothers in Christ,

I've just finished the listening of the debate you've had with an "apologist".  The "apologist" wasn't able to say not even one coherent statement. It is just incredible how much these V-2 people are stupid and ignorant. Complete liars as they are, they so much love their lies that they are not capable to grasp the meaning of contradictions. I mean, every human being, even those who can be called retarded for their lack of natural intelligence, are capable to realize that "yes" is just the opposite of "no". But, V-2 adherents are so stupid that they question even that--that "yes" is the opposite of "no". And that proves that their stupidity is of supernatural origin.

The "apologist" would probably say:"well, it depends what the OPPOSITE means", not realizing, due to his unshakable love for satanic lies, that the OPPOSITE has no meaning without "yes" and "no" at all.  Total darkness, total destruction of faith, total destruction of natural intelligence given by God to every human being---these are some of the expressions describing most fittingly the present state of V2 sect. Things are going from bad to worse every second.  I admire your patience with these people. Most definitely this patience is a gift from God.

Most Holy Heavenly Mother and St. Joseph, pray for us.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

Just found

 

Dear Brother Michael,

 

I just found your website and haven't been able to stop reading it. WOW! Where have I been all these years!  What I'm wondering is, what mass can I attend now? 

 

In other words: How do I know which mass I can attend?  What if there are none in my area (or close enough for driving distance)?

 

Thanks, God bless,

 

Camila

 

MHFM: It's great to hear about your interest.  In that case, there wouldn't be an obligation to go.  You should try to find a priest who was validly ordained to whom you could go to confession.  That's explained in our file on Where to go to Mass, under traditional Catholic issues.  If you contact us, we can also help you with potential locations for receiving valid sacraments.  Again, it's great to hear that you found the site.

 

Remember

 

Subject: Corapi

 

I remember a few years back I was watching Corapi, and I heard him say, "I have read the documents of the 2nd Vatican Council, and I'm not against it, I'm for it."  And he went on to bring up what he said to a priest who was wondering why so many in Latin American are leaving the true faith for Evangelical Protestantism.  The reason he gave was "They still believe that there is a Ten Commandments, and they still believe you gotta follow them." as opposed to the V2 sect, which does not.

 

-M. Rudnicki 

 

Pope Gregory vs. Vatican II

 

MHFM: This is a new discussion of the most interesting parts of Pope Gregory XVI's 1832 encyclical, Mirari Vos. This video shows how this encyclical contradicts various heresies in Vatican II, and other heresies which are prevalent today.

 

Pope Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos) Destroys Vatican II - part 1

 

Pope Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos) Destroys Vatican II - part 2

 

Debate

 

Dear Brothers,

The debate with the anonymous Vatican II apologist is absolutely smashing!!! The ending is just classic! He couldn't refute you so, like a rat, he just hung up… He couldn't even name the first Church Council… I think such heretics are employed (by the Devil) to confuse people into staying in Babylon the Great (the Vatican II sect) by mocking true Catholic teaching. Such modernists don't even believe in the visible Catholic Church (i.e. One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic) so logically the teachings of the Church are rejected by them as meaningless. Modernism, based on the false philosophy of agnosticism (i.e. that is impossible to know if God exists), essentially proclaims that it is impossible to know if anything is absolutely true, since God is the Absolute Truth. He denies that dogma is dogma! He thinks Catholic dogma is arbitrary and not based on Divine law. What a modernist. To deny dogma is to deny Christ. All Jewish Rabbis knowingly reject Christ because the Talmud calls Jesus a heretic and a sorcerer! Muslim Muftis knowingly reject Christ because the Koran blasphemes the Trinity and Jesus! Yet the V-2 Antipopes (JP2, B-16, etc.) honor such evil people and their false religions. He thinks one can honor devils and please God!!! I get the feeling that he doesn't even believe that dogmas can be written down. He thinks "to loose" means a dogma can be contradicted by a later pope! He criticized you for understanding the teachings of the Catholic Church "too literally," when there is no other way they are to be understood:

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Sess. 3, Chap. 2 on Revelation, 1870, ex cathedra: “Hence, also, that understanding of its sacred dogmas must be perpetually retained, which Holy Mother Church has once declared; and there must never be a recession from that meaning under the specious name of a deeper understanding.”

The debate is a very accurate snapshot of the Antichrist Apostate mindset of the Vatican II Church in contrast to the true Catholic Church - clouds blocking the sunlight. The main point that struck me is his demand to know the definition of a dogma. Vatican I dogmatically defined the definition of a dogma. There are three specific criteria for a teaching to be dogmatic/infallible, i.e. a Pope teaching the Church, invoking authority (e.g. Church, solemn, apostolic, etc.), on faith & morals:

Vatican I: "we teach and define as a divinely revealed dogma that when the Roman pontiff speaks EX CATHEDRA, that is, when, 1. in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, 2. in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, 3. he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole church, he possesses, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed his church to enjoy in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals.

 

The bull Cantate Domino is dogmatic because it contains all three requirements:

 

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino,” 1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches [1,2] that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives. [3]"

 

Mr. Hang-up is just a total liar, bad-willed and a heretic who is on the path to hell. Clearly he just didn't want to hear the truth, which is why he kept interrupting you and eventually admitted defeat in the most cowardly way possible - by hanging up the phone without saying goodbye. Words are meaningless for such wicked and evil men - it's impossible to reason with a liar. He accuses the Catholic Church, the Immaculate Bride of Christ, of sin. It's outrageous!!! Heretics fight with dirty tactics as can be heard in the debate…

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Concerned

 

Subject: You have me concerned

 

I was never confirmed catholic when i was younger but i was baptized catholic... recently i wanted to have my confirmation done now being 29 i thought it was good to chase it up and did so at easter!  but if what you say about the pope is real pope then i have taken a mark of the beast !!! so what then is to happen to me,,,, and what is your thoughts on brown scapular?

where do i stand i am from Australia and they say our pope Ben16th ..... so what if you are saying is true can i be at a valid mass if he is not the real pope at all and they say he is our pope what should i do then pray the rosary and not go to mass, go to mass an keep praying to rosary

if i was at a invalid mass the rosary would be the only thing that saves me!... and i do feel the great storm is coming very soon ww3 kind

 

Ekultec…

 

MHFM: You need to pray the full Rosary each day.  You need to stop going to the New Mass.  You need to become convinced of the traditional Catholic faith, and all of its teaching.  Once that has occurred, follow the steps on our site for a profession of faith, confession, etc.  One should wear the Scapular.

 

Watched

 

I watched some of your videos on paul 6.0 and I feel really bad for you guys. I can tell you love Christ more than a church-good for you. I think it's over though… I think that modern catholics cannot because they are so apostate.

Always Christ
Always Scripture
God's love be with you,
Thomas S.

 

MHFM: You seem like a Protestant. Our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church, is important for you to see.  Christ founded a Church, the Catholic Church.  It’s necessary to belong to it to be saved.  Our other material also explains why those you call the modern “Catholics” aren’t Catholic at all.

 

Message

 

MY MESSAGE TO YOU IS YOU MAY FOOL SOME OF THE PEOPLE BUT… WHAT YOU SAY IS JUDGEMENT ON OTHERS AND IT IS SO WRONG ON fATHER cORAPI AND WHAT hE SAYS ABOUT THE THIRD SECRET AND SISTER LUCY / YOU NEED SOMEONE TO PRAY FOR YOU TO STOP JUDGING OTHERS, DO YOU HAVE A BLAMELESS LIFE?

 

Neet…

 

MHFM: Corapi denies Catholic dogma.  How hard is it to understand?  It’s evil to defend heretics, but that’s what you are doing.  Every e-mail we receive like yours is another example of why God leaves so many in the Novus Ordo without a clue about what’s really going on.  It’s because, like you, they don’t want to grasp the truth. 

 

Wanted

 

Dear, Sir,

I wanted to take a moment to comment on your presentation regarding Father Corapi.

I believe that your taking his comments out of context, that is easy to do since anyones words can be taking out of context. People even take the words from the bible out of contexts, if this wasn't so then there wouldn't so many denominations. Just because he isn't what he would do doesn't mean anything, priest this day in age can't deny communion to anyone, it is the partakers choice. You should spend more time bringing people to christ not attacking other people.

Snakes…

 

MHFM: What’s out of context?  (Hint: nothing.)  The truth is that you don’t have any evidence that anything has been taken out of context.  It’s just a cheap response when you have nothing else to say.  Stop lying.  You talk about bringing people to Christ.  You can’t bring people to Christ if you don’t have the true faith, if you don’t denounce heresies and heretics. 

 

Romans 16:17- “Now I beseech you, brethren, to mark them who make dissensions and offences contrary to the doctrine which you have learned, and avoid them.”

 

Baptism

 

Hello bro. Michael and members of the MHFM community! Peace be to all of you!


I am Sherwin… I am a Filipino and baptized when infant in the Catholic Church. I am more comfortable writing to you than calling. I believe that the 2nd Vatican Council is not the True Catholic Church. I knew there is something wrong with the teachings but i just couldn't figure out due to lack of resources, until i found your videos and documents in the net. I ordered dvds and books from you and i believed those are true.  After being informed by you, i realized that the priests in our Parish Church in the Philippines are ordained by the Vatican II Council. DOES THIS REALITY MAKES MY BAPTISM IN 1978 VOID?

Baptism concerns me a lot because i believe and i have been convincing my protestant friends, with the use of Bible verses, that we need Baptism from the True Church of Jesus which is the Catholic. And i have a baby born April 27, 2010 who needs to be Baptised. Paul wrote in Ephesians 4:5 "One Lord, one Faith, one Baptism." and Jesus said in John 3:3 "...unless one is born again he shall not see the Kingdom of God." There is no other Baptism and Faith other than what Jesus handed down to the disciples, apostles and early Church leaders.   But the problem we have now is that Our Church leader, who claims to be the Pope is already a heretic. This includes the bishops and priests who follow the Vatican II Council.  HOW CAN I HAVE MY CHILD BE BAPTISED? CAN I HAVE HER BAPTISED BY ANY CATHOLIC PRIEST… Please help with this problem because i believe this is very important.

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  The Church teaches that anyone can validly baptize.  So, the fact that your Novus Ordo “priest” was not validly ordained doesn’t mean that your baptism was void.  As long as he said the proper words and intended to do what the Church does in properly performing it, it was valid.  The form is on our website.  You can baptize your own child, and we hope you are convinced and committed to never attending the New Mass again. 

 

One true religion

 

Subject: One true religion

 

At the public library, I asked an N.O. attendee who sings in the choir if he believed that the Catholic Church was the One True Religion.  He paused, and said "Umm..." for a moment, as he was having to think about it!  Can you imagine that?!  The stupid heretic is not even remotely Catholic.  And this can be known JUST BY THAT ONE SIMPLE QUESTION made evident by the fact he had to think about it!  I did not even let him finish.  I just told him, "You are not a true Catholic.  You are worse than Protestants for you claim to belong to the True Faith!"  and left.  I don't know what he was planning to say, no doubt that nonsense that there are "elements of truths in other religions."  Even if it were true, which it isn't, in the minds of these young V2 little apostates, that means the Catholic Church is not the One True Religion.  If a true Catholic were asked that question, he would not have to think about the answer for a fraction of a second.  He would give a quick, audible, affirmative "Yes!"  But that is the ambiance the world over the Vatican II sect has created, where these phony apostate fake "Catholics" will not even say their religion is the one true one!  If that alone does not prove the apostasy of the VII sect, nothing ever will!!  Someone told me that he went to the reception after the "Mass" of a man who was celebrating his 50th anniversary as a priest that year.  Serving him cake, the guy said, "Thank you for a half a century of service to God and the one true religion.   Some liberal "Catholic" lady overheard this and laughed!  She laughed!!!  And the priest said, "Whoah, you can get into a lot of trouble talking like that."… Heretics!  How dare they claim to be Catholics!!! 

 

-Michael Rudnicki

 

MHFM: That’s interesting.  However, one thing we would say is that you should have stayed a bit, talked to him, and tried to convert him.  One should find out if he has any interest and try to direct him to the website and the material.  If he still demonstrates obstinacy or a lack of interest at that point, then you should leave.

 

Rosary

 

Subject: Rosary Prayer Style

 

Hello Brothers!
 
If I'm not wrong, I remember reading on your e-exchange a while back that you said it’s better to pray the Rosary silently, rather then out loud. I have recently started to pray silently, in my head, and I also close my eyes as that helps me to meditate on and think of the mysteries I'm praying. Is there anything wrong with this style of prayer? When I pray like this, it looks like I'm asleep.
 
Thank you and God Bless!

 

D

 

MHFM: There is nothing wrong with mentally praying the Rosary.

 

About

 

Subject: About the coming end of the world

 

You are so right brothers.  I just saw a report on the web news that a flood of frogs is blocking a major highway in Greece.  Our good Lord is giving every warning that he can because he is merciful to save as many as possible.

In Christ,
Nathan

 

Encounter

 

Subject: Encounter with St. Michael

 

Hello MHFM,

 

Just read the article "Encounter with St.Michael".  Amazing story.  What I really liked was the prayer.  The prayer is so full of innocence of a child.  We all know Jesus said that people should accept the kingdom of heaven like a child.  Knowing that, it was not surprising that help came so easily.

 

Yours Sincerely

Sam.

 

Diocese

 

For some reason I went to the website of the Diocese of Galveston -Houston.  At times I like to see what the impostors are doing.  What is written below are excerpts straight from the link on that site under "About our faith".  At the end of this article I will make a few points...

 

"We participate in activities of social justice, support the good works of persons in other countries, prepare our children and young people to be responsible members of the community and we do all this in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ."

 

"But just who are we?  Catholics are the largest single denomination among religions in the United States."  “Many of our beliefs can be found in other Christian religions but some are distinctively Catholic.”

 

"Besides being people of the Bible we are also a people of tradition.  Tradition, for Catholics is more than a long history; we base our teachings also on the faith experiences of the many people who have made up the Catholic Church over the past twenty centuries."

 

The following are excerpts from their description of the 7 Sacraments: Baptism: This is an initiation rite which begins our journey by connecting us to a community of faith.  It is a ritual which includes pouring on of water, lighting a candle for life and the presence of sponsors who promise to guide the person on their journey of faith.

 

Eucharist:   We celebrate a ritual enactment of Jesus’ Last Supper.  The priest repeats the words of Jesus and the bread and wine are changed into the actual body and blood of  Christ.  This sacrament is sometimes referred to as Holy Communion.

 

Confirmation:    “…It brings additional strength for the journey and strengthens the connection with the faith community.  The candidate is anointed with oil as a sign of strength as a Christian.

 

Penance:   The sacrament is also called Confession or reconciliation.  Catholics are able to bring themselves back into full grace through the forgiveness of their sins.  A process of self-reflection to identify some patterns of behavior which “miss the mark” leads Catholics to confess their sins to a priest.  Then the priest, in Christ’s name, offers forgiveness for those sins.

 

Marriage:   Marriage is a lasting relationship between a woman and a man which is seen as an extension of the covenant relationship between God and his people.  In Catholic marriages there are three persons involved: husband, wife and Jesus Christ.  Catholic teaching is that marriage is for life.

 

Just a few observations, of the many that could be made. 1.  They prepare "children and young people to be responsible members of the community", no mention of preparing them to be saints.

 

They state the Catholic Church is the largest single denomination.  The problem is that the Catholic Church is not a denomination.  All “Christian” sects are denominations. The admission that there is more than ONE Christian religion.  This is a denial that there is ONE FAITH.  As we all know.  Regarding the explanation of Tradition they say, "we base our teachings also on the faith experiences of the many people who made up the Catholic Church..."  I believe the use of the term "faith experience" is used here to give credence to the modern idea that faith is based on the faith experience of the "believer", rather than the written account of the teachings of Jesus Sacred Scripture and the oral account of the teachings of Jesus and the apostles, which is Sacred Tradition.  Regarding Baptism:  They say, "This is an initiation rite which begins our journey by connecting us to a community of faith."  Nowhere do they state that baptism connects one to God or erases original sin.  But we will see in # 7 that they can't use the word sin.

Regarding "Eucharist":  They admit it is an "enactment of Jesus’ Last Supper."  No mention that it is a true and unbloody sacrifice, or that it is a re-presentation of the crucifixion on Calvary.  Regarding Confession:  Here they refer to someone coming “back into full grace” rather than returning to the state of grace.

Regarding Marriage:  Notice they say that marriage is between "a woman and a man".  This may seem trivial but it shows the contempt for the order God has designed for the family.  The man is first, under Jesus, and then the woman.  This is equivalent to the scriptures mentioning Peter last in the naming of the Apostles.  As we all know Peter is named first for a reason.  By mentioning the "woman" first, it emphasizes that woman is higher in the hierarchy of the family and creation.  This is a complete rejection of the Order of God.

Paul

M V

 

That is really an excellent video on Pope Gregory XVI's encyclical, Mirari Vos, condemning liberalism and religious indifferentism. Thank you. I am looking forward very much to the series you plan to make on the encyclicals of true popes… Pope Gregory XVI's explanation that dogma is to be understood as it is written is so fundamental to Catholic faith and principles. Without such a simple and clear understanding of dogma, the dogmas are rendered invalid, just as the Pharisees rendered the scriptures invalid by their human traditions, and just like Protestants render the scriptures invalid (though from the New Testament), by their human traditions and systems of heresies. Heresy and heretics divide. Catholics and their faith unite. 

 

It's interesting that Gregory XVI says that freedom of speech can never be sufficiently denounced, because many western countries take great pride in such "freedoms", when in fact it is probably the number one cause of the moral and religious corruption (ruin) of the west (obviously no freedom of speech, such as in totalitarian regimes, is worse). Such false freedoms are the seedbed of indifferentism because it puts all opinions, good and evil, true and false alike, on an equal plane. Catholics need to denounce heresy and heretics again and again, especially today!!! The Vatican II sect and its Antipopes believe and teach that denouncing heretics and asserting Catholic dogmas is divisive - nothing could be further from the truth. It is Catholic dogma that unites the Church making Her One. It is the denunciation of heresy and heretics, the guns of hell, that keep Her Holy. If Christ is the rock, in which is laid the second foundation, the Papacy, then it is the heretic who chooses to depart from that stable foundation of the Church….

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Rev.

 

Subject: Revelation 16

 

Dear Mhfm,

"And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon that great river Euphrates; and dried up the water thereof, that a way might be prepared for the kings from the rising of the sun." Revelation 16:12

The river Euphrates has being drying up.  Check out these links.

http://www.1913intel.com/2009/07/14/the-euphrates-river-is-drying-up/

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601104&sid=abirKaZF0Wpc

Just thought it was quite interesting.

God Bless

Sean

 

B-16, Portugal

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Re: Benedict XVI’s visit to Portugal,

 

The little I heard of Benedict XVI speeches which were all read out, were words without life and tiring to listen to.  You are quite right about him confirming the importance of the assassination attempt on John Paul II because I managed to hear this on the news through a journalist who also stated that when Benedict XVI was interviewed and asked about the 3rd Secret he also replied that the third secret was not only limited to John Paul II, but also to the Magisterium of the Church, how about that? Amazing don’t you think?

 

Many representatives of the Vatican II Sect… charismatic pastors appeared on many programs throughout Benedict’s stay, well you should have seen them and heard them, pathetic, they all loved him and praised him so much, I know for a fact that these same people have always refused openly to obey their beloved “Popes”.  I had never seen them dressed in Catholic canonical vestments before, and suddenly out they come, posing as true Catholics, what a laugh, what hypocrisy, their looked so promo, as if they were wearing it for the first time.

 

There was a particular program, to discuss the difference between John Paul II and Benedict XVI, guess who the guests were, a woman representative of the Jewish community of Lisbon, the head of the Islamic Mosque and a Vatican II pastor.  The Vatican pastor who was dressed as a Catholic had only praises for Benedict XVI and made it quite clear that this “Pope” was a more conservative “Pope”, but the head of the Islamic Mosque and the Representative of the Jewish community quickly contradicted this, pointing out that this was not at all the case because from what they understood of him he was as open to other religions as John Paul II was, he just kept quiet for the rest of the program.

 

At one point the commentator who is well known to have close links with the Vatican II Church asked the Jewish representative if she also agreed that the attacks made against the “Catholic Church” on recent pedophile events were similar to the Jewish persecution.  What a question, of course she skipped the answer and condemned the situation in a vigorous manner as unacceptable, boy how low can they go. In her comments she also criticized some Jews who have been celebrating their Sabbath on a Sunday.

 

May the good Lord give us the grace of the love of truth and protect MHFM.

 

M. Fernanda da Silva

 

Antichrist debate

 

Subject: Antichrist debate

 

Brothers Michael & Peter:

 

There is a recent "debate" that was captured on video and this is how some of the press reported it:

 

“There are few experiences more pleasing than watching Christopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry utterly demolish their opponents in debate. Last night, in the Methodist Central Hall, Westminster, they squared up to MP Ann Widdecombe and Nigerian Archbishop Onaiyekan, who were tasked to defend the motion that: The Catholic Church is a force for good in the world.”

 

I only saw the portion, where Stephen Fry speaks. In Fry's (an anti-christ) speech he commits  every sacrilege and blasphemy against the church a reprobate is capable (so intellectually  dishonest and morally bankrupt an eight year catholic would have no problem refuting) of.  I don't know what was more blasphemous though, the infamous rantings of an antichrist or the Novus ordo bishop and a nun clapping (scandalous) for him when he was done.  This is standard fare now in all types of media except yours.  In the pretend debate they bring in a total apostate and heretic novus ordo "catholic bishop", have them supposedly represent the catholic church, and since they aren't catholic anyway, Jesus Christ and the church are incessantly portrayed in the worst possible light both by the attacker and the "defender".  Mr. Fry happens to be an extreme anti christ figure so his portion is as vile an attack as I have ever seen.

 

Paul R.

 

B-16, Dalai Lama

 

Subject: Benedict XVI – A New Dalai Lama

 

Hello Brothers:

  

I do not know if you saw this -

 

Benedict XVI May 22, 2010:

 

 "Today more than ever", he said, "the human family can grow as a free society of free peoples so long as globalisation is guided by solidarity and the common good, and by social justice...  In a global society made up of many different peoples and religions, the common good and integral development must be achieved with everyone's contribution. Religions have a crucial role to play in this, especially when they teach fraternity and peace. The exclusion of religion from public life - and, at the other extreme, religious fundamentalism - hinders an encounter between persons and their collaboration for the progress of humanity"

 

He is manifestly a complete fraud - a "spiritual advisor" to the peoples of the world. There is not one thing Christian about his approach, which is to have a "human family" working for "peace" and "social justice" without fidelity to Christ and His gospel. He plows on and on - day after day - attempting to persuade the world to build a "human community" where morality, in a completely secularized sense, and "religions" play a crucial role in man's solidarity. This is itself a humanistic, relativistic form of communism, where man "becomes" united based on "human rights" communing apart from The One True and Living God. And of course such a thing is totally impossible and there will be no peace! I also note with him that he uses the same buzz words and catch phrases all the time in his speeches, just like a manipulative journalist. It's always a "profound" human experience he promotes, or a unity that is "intrinsic" to men, etc. He is excessively transparent with his program, and the heretics who support him have to be obscene liars to say that BXVI does not do and say the things which he constantly does and says. Further, they have to be excessively diabolically driven to fight so furiously in defending him and saying that he is a Christian. He basically admits himself, and openly, that he is not. I admire your endurance in dealing with these heretics in debate. Liars are very difficult to tolerate and you consistently expose them. Good work all around and spiritually discerned on every level.

 

Thanks,

Mike

 

SSPX

 

Conversation with SSPX supporter - 1/3

Conversation with SSPX supporter - 2/3

Conversation with SSPX supporter - 3/3

 

Love and Hate

 

Subject: love and hate

 

Hi,

I recently visited your website too see your photos of pope John Paul II. with your commentaries. There is one thing I cannot understand - being Christians, how can you be so full of hate.

"God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him” (1 Jn 4:16)  -this is the key to the Kingdom, yet I did not manage to find an ounce of love on your website

“If I give away all I have, and if I deliver my body to be burned, but do not have love, I gain nothing” - the key to the heaven is not fear but love and every further command is tied to the command of love

I am a Christian and believe our faith to be the true one, but if someone wants to help other people understand it, he should not be doing so by means of a fear from hell and damnation but by love

John Paul II. knew this and never preached anything that would be in conflict with God's word, he also loved others(no matter if they were Christians or not) and always treated them with respect. It is blasphemic to say that he took part on worshiping other gods,  the only thing the photos show is his respect and love for other people...when let's say your brother takes your toy and you say: "I'll kill you!", it's quite obvious you do not have any intentions of killing him, when someone lets a shaman write something on his forehead but takes it only as an act of respect toward the beloved person he doesn't take part on the ritual in any way. John Paul was an apostle of love and faithful servant of God. May you love as strongly as he did

God Bless you,

Your Martin Kubena

 

MHFM: You are quite wrong, on every front.  John Paul II did engage in the worship of false religions, as our file shows.  He also taught that false religions are a product of the Holy Spirit, which is apostasy and blasphemy.  He also taught that souls can be saved in those false religions.  He also facilitated the worship of idols and demons at Assisi, which is apostasy.  He did much more.  You are not being honest, and you do not have true charity; for its foundation is the true faith which you don’t care about. 

 

John Paul II (manifest heretic who claimed to be pope 1978-2005) [link to section]

 

Cards

 

Brothers in Christ,

 

Where can I purchase valid Mass cards? Also, I would like to leave instructions about my burial wishes, can I tell my family to give me a burial mass in the Byzantine rite or Melkite Greek Catholic rite?                                                                                   

 

John

 

MHFM: Since basically all the priests are heretics, you shouldn’t give them Mass stipends.  As far as funerals go, one shouldn’t use them for that either.  Since the priests are heretics, you could arrange to be buried without the Mass, etc.  People should focus on dying in the state of grace.  We believe some of those priests might be an option for confession or Communion, but one should not use them for requiem Masses.

 

“Monastery”

 

Here's a recent article on the Sacred Heart "monastery" in Hales Corners, WI. 

 

Sacred Heart congregation, fired executive trade claims in lawsuits

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/94639624.html

 

This is the place where the "diocese" sends its seminarians for its "theology" classes - it also appeared in the book Goodbye, Good Men, where they would take field trips to the gay bars, and more recently… where among other things, the first day of seminary, they hold a native american prayer service and sing the Mickey Mouse song with the words changed to spell 'Sacred Heart' instead of 'Mickey Mouse' [this is all presented by the author who finds nothing wrong with anything.  I read the book while in the bookstore so as not to pay money for it].

 

D 

 

Creation

 

Dear Neighbors,

 

I have watched many of your YouTube videos. They are packed with much information that would be helpful.  Say, would you have any similar teaching about "Creationism"  and Catholics ?  Mp3's are best, but whatever you have will do.

 

You see, my sister is a staunch Catholic. But she is way too liberal as far as not believing the Bible and holding to the theory of evolution.

 

The Lord Jesus holds the High Office of Creator as much as Savior.

I think that this is important.

 

Thank you.

 

Alan

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  If your sister doesn’t believe in the Bible and holds to evolution, she is not a Catholic.  That’s something you must believe.  We have our video, Creation and Miracles and the book we sell, In the Beginning.  We would recommend those in addition to some of the other videos in our “Watch Our Videos” page. 

 

UFO

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

 

In reply to Ivan's message on UFO referring to The Fourth Kind movie, I agree with him for saying that this documentary film is the best expose on "aliens" for their true nature ... Demons.  I have not yet read your UFO Book but I have read pdf file UFO Hoaxes Meant to deceive Mankind ... the UFO Book of MHFM has elucidly reflected its veracity and truthfulness on this docu-film ... I have watched one evening and literary I was not able to sleep until 4am ... the real life camcoder accounts of people who were asked to recount what transpired to their unusual experiences thru hypnosis were hair-raising! ... the moment they fell into hypnosis the wacky events immediately occured uncontrollaby leaving irrefutable proofs on the what really happened ... the instance of the man who was scared to death even to fall asleep was foolishly advised by Dr. Emily to fall into hypnosis hoping to provide solution to the problem ... he immediately levitated above his bed changing his physical appearance to demon-like vomiting curses .. and the videocam recording the event has encountered electrical static problems causing the video output to be blurred similar to what was described in the UFO Book .. of course since the high energy emitted from hell visitor could not withstand the power of the videocam! ... this man levitated so high that immediately after the hypnosis he fell back to his bed with broken spinal column that led to his death as recounted by the angry police ... the main character of the film named as Dr. Abigail Emily Tyler was the first victim of UFO abduction when his psychiatrist husband took his life to stop his suffering from his alleged same "visitors" ... Dr. Emily, a psychiatrist by profession too, had a burning passion who dedicated her life to find answers why her husband killed himself and in the process she participated in the death of her patients and the UFO abduction of her own daughter ... the movie has no special effects, it simply tried to re-enact the series of events backed up by actual video and audio records available ... i must say that this movie is the most scary real life story i have ever watched in my entire life ... the movie's scariest account was when the Dr. Emily herself willfully went to hypnosis to find answers to all her question .. stupid as she was she hoped to regain her daughter back .. and the camcoder was set ... As soon as she fell into hypnosis she levitated above the sofa scaring all people present during the recording ... it was here where the Devil (who possessed Dr. Emily) that says "I am God!" ... that no more daughter to be returned, "Pray no help" as recounted by Ivan ... and again the recording was blurred due to electric static then the camcoder fell to the ground as all present were abducted ... fortunately they were returned back on earth that made the movie possible to produce.  In the last part of the movie you will see the unforgettable interview of Dr. Abigail Emily Tyler ...

 

Brothers you are perfectly correct in all facets of your explanation about UFO! People do not understand that God allows these kind of phenomenon as punishment to people who violate the First Commandment - Thou shall not have other gods before Me! .. These people who resort to perverted science like Psychiatry where they explain hearing demons whispering as "olfactory hallucinations" ... Psychology where pagan professionals explains perverted pursuit to paranormal things as laudable and honorable as intelligent pursuit .. yes so many people are putting themselves to the edge of diabolic possession thru the practice of astral travel, yoga, spirit of the glass, fortune-telling in crystal ball, producing horror films depicting demons etc .. yes most of these people are diabolically possessed on a lesser degree unlike people who suffered in UFO abduction…

 

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey from the Philippines

 

Resent

 

[NOTE: this is a response to the excommunicated post below, and our response.  This individual wrote in and told us that we are wrong on excommunication.  We responded by pointing out that he is wrong.  He responded again by calling us evil for pointing out that he was wrong.]

 

I resent your hostile attitude. It is uncalled for, and indicates some kind of flaw in your soul. I said that heretics are not excommunicated persons, maybe, but the point was that they are far beyond the penalty stage. They are severed from the body of the Church. I do not like your attitude at all. You are hateful, proud, and evil. Go away.

 

Robert Gregory

 

MHFM: No, you are evil and proud.  If you had any humility, you would have checked out the issue before arrogantly asserting that we are wrong.  You should re-read your original e-mail.  You don't have any idea what you are talking about, yet you act as if we don't.  You even said that you are “not trying to deflate us,” as if you were simply compelled to point out “an egregious error.”

 

In response, all we did was write that you are completely wrong, and you are.  What's wrong with that?  It's the same thing you did in your e-mail to us.  You said we are wrong, and we responded by simply saying the same thing: you are wrong and you don’t understand the issue.  The only difference is that you are indeed wrong and we are correct.  So that proves that YOU are the problem.  You like to dish it out (when you are not correct, and when you try to correct others); but when others correctly point out your error you not only don’t like it but call them evil.  You have a big problem with pride.  The fact that you conclude that we are evil for simply responding to you by correcting your error proves that you are actually evil.  You pride is demonic, in fact, and we are sick of it being exhibited by bad-willed people like you, especially false traditionalists.  It’s one of the reasons this world is in the sorry state it finds itself.  It’s one of the reasons that God doesn’t give graces to people like you to see the truth and fulfill His will.

 

Discussing

 

At last the truth about the Catholic Church that people are scared to put into words.

 

At last someone who tells people just what sins are mortal.

 

At last someone who talks about feast days as though they mean something.

 

So much of Catholic dogma has been brushed aside by liberals and worse in the church that there is hardly anything left to believe in.

 

When discussing a vocation to the priesthood he found out that as an act of piety I kissed the crucifix above my bed before sleeping. He thought this was idolatrous. If a catholic cannot be reverent to our most precious symbol then I am afraid we are all doomed.

 

I decided not to go ahead with the vocation as I feared I'd die a protestant.

 

Keep up your remarkable work

 

Yours in Christ

 

Mark

 

 

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Winter 2010 Archive)

 

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (A)

 

Next Archive for E-Exchanges is Here (B)

 

www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com